Slashdot Mirror


Three Headed Frog

An anonymous reader writes "Children in a nursery were shocked when they spotted a three-headed frog hopping in their garden."

37 of 135 comments (clear)

  1. Obligatory by spood · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did they name it Blinky?

    --
    ---- Just another spud server.
    1. Re:Obligatory by Numeric · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Hoppy" would be more appropriate.

      --
      -- ladies and gentlemen we are floating in space!
    2. Re:Obligatory by spood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, since the original Blinky had three eyes, and this frog has three heads, something referencing its three heads would be more appropriate. Something like Noddy. But that really wouldn't be very funny.

      --
      ---- Just another spud server.
    3. Re:Obligatory by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 3, Funny

      Like... "Amphiberus".

      On second thought, maybe not.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  2. Kermit and Piggy's Babies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ....so this is what happens when a pig and a frog do the nasty?

  3. If you listen closely... by NickDngr · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...you can hear them say "Bud-," "-weis-," "-er.'

    --
    Yoda of Borg am I! Assimilated shall you be! Futile resistance is, hmm?
  4. I wonder.... by SuDZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does it have three brains, the sets of other inards? Lets cut thtat froggy open and find out.

    SuDZ

    1. Re:I wonder.... by Muhammar · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am afraid the children in the nursery actualy did try the separation surgery and now they have to resort to excuses like:

      "The mystery amphibian is currently the subject of a frog-hunt after it hopped away and disappeared as staff at the nursery showed it to curious parents."

      --
      I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
  5. Frogs Three by Undefined+Parameter · · Score: 4, Funny

    Relax, everyone, it's just the beta for Frogger 3.0.

    ~UP

    --
    Eat the Path.
  6. OK, that's freaky by dacarr · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm not exactly the squeamish type, but that kinda made me a bit queasy. Please be warned - this appears to be an odd fusion of three frogs.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  7. Democracy meets Biology by stuffduff · · Score: 2, Funny
    I wonder how it decides where to go next? Each head has it's own tongue, so which fly to catch is not an issue, but:

    Where do you want to go today?

    Is a whole other question!

    --
    "Can there be a Klein bottle that is an efficient and effective beer pitcher?"
    1. Re:Democracy meets Biology by Cy+Guy · · Score: 4, Funny
      I wonder how it decides where to go next?

      Obligatory Holy Grail quote:
      ALL HEADS:
      You're a Knight of the Round Table?
      ROBIN:
      I am.
      LEFT HEAD:
      In that case, I shall have to kill you.
      MIDDLE HEAD:
      Shall I?
      RIGHT HEAD:
      Oh, I don't think so.
      MIDDLE HEAD:
      Well, what do I think?
      LEFT HEAD:
      I think kill him.
      RIGHT HEAD:
      Oh, let's be nice to him.
      LEFT HEAD:
      Oh, shut up.
      ROBIN:
      Perhaps I could--
      LEFT HEAD:
      And you. Oh, quick! Get the sword out. I want to cut his head off!
      RIGHT HEAD:
      Oh, cut your own head off!
      MIDDLE HEAD:
      Yes, do us all a favour!
      LEFT HEAD:
      What?
      RIGHT HEAD:
      Yapping on all the time.
      MIDDLE HEAD:
      You're lucky. You're not next to him.
      LEFT HEAD:
      What do you mean?
      MIDDLE HEAD:
      You snore!
      LEFT HEAD:
      Oh, I don't. Anyway, you've got bad breath.
      MIDDLE HEAD:
      Well, it's only because you don't brush my teeth.
      RIGHT HEAD:
      Oh, stop bitching and let's go have tea.
      LEFT HEAD:
      Oh, all right. All right. All right. We'll kill him first and then have tea and biscuits.
      MIDDLE HEAD:
      Yes.
      RIGHT HEAD:
      Oh, not biscuits.
      LEFT HEAD:
      All right. All right, not biscuits, but let's kill him anyway.
      ALL HEADS:
      Right!
      MIDDLE HEAD:
      He buggered off.
      RIGHT HEAD:
      So he has. He's scarpered.


  8. really freaky... by advocate_one · · Score: 4, Informative
    watching on tv last night on the local section of the news...

    It's not a hoax, there really are three heads and most of three bodies merged on that animal... but only two forelegs but I was unable to determine exactly how many rear legs there were... but then again frog's bums don't exactly appeal to me either...

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  9. Re:Sad. by RCO · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't know, it's seems to be doing pretty well as it is... Don't assume it's a terrible existence just because it's different from the norm.

    I'm sure that if you or I were thrown into an existence like that it might be unbearable, but things would become easier as we learned to cope, these frogs, as well as some humans, have never known another existence, therefore it isn't so unbearable to them.

    --
    'And all the monkeys aren't in the zoo Every day you meet quite a few...'
  10. it's still alive... by runswithd6s · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If this isn't a hoax (it's not April 1st yet), it's quite amazing that the frog has lived as long as it has. That frog is lucky, I tell ya.

    --
    assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */
  11. Mythological Typographical Error by roberto0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is this the frog that guards the gates of Hades? No, that's three-headed dog.

    Maybe this is the guy who guards the gates of Froggy-Hell!!!

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, simulate.
    1. Re:Mythological Typographical Error by Mr+Beano · · Score: 3, Funny

      Kermberus!

      --
      this sig left intentionally blank
  12. And I will call you Cerberus... by Big+Sean+O · · Score: 4, Funny

    Obviously we're very close to the entry of Amphibian Hell.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cerberus.

    Be on the lookout for a Newt called Heracles!

    --
    My father is a blogger.
  13. Canaries in the coal mine baby! by Inexile2002 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Frogs are more sensitive to environmental pollutants and toxins because they're able to absorb many of them directly through their skin. They're developmentally simple animals so mutations show up more easily in their external morphology. Interestingly, since frogs eggs are separate cells and the membrane (which also absorbs toxins) would probably prevent three developmental frogs from sticking, this is one frog that has developed three frogs - not some sort of conjoined twin thing. (Although the difference there is a matter of degree, not kind.)

    This is the most dramatic example of what I've seen yet but frog mutations are extremely common. Check out this, or this (warning more gross pics). Does anyone but me wonder why we tolerate this level of contamination in our environment? I'm not a Green but I do object to being poisoned for some companies bottom line.

    1. Re:Canaries in the coal mine baby! by Hadean · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So when do we stop? When snakes start to grow heads at both ends? When deer start getting extra legs? Pollution is a cumulative thing - if there's enough now to cause mutations in frogs to this degree, pretty soon it WILL start affecting mammals such as ourselves (if it hasn't already).

      I never understood why people just don't care about this type of thing, even though there's horrible proof right in their faces.

      It's like a friend driving his Hummer down the smog-filled street (and not capable of seeing the tops of the skyscrapers) but telling me that pollution is just a big scare by all the environmentalists and that there's nothing wrong - HE'S HEALTHY. Although I'm not Green either (like the grandparent post), I can't understand the reasoning. What will it take to change their minds?

      Whoa. /rant off.

    2. Re:Canaries in the coal mine baby! by Hadean · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, the environment is indeed self-purifying, I never said it wasn't, but just not fast enough to account for the amount of toxins that released. Actually, I should have been more specific - there are two kinds of toxins, some cumulative, some not.

      A simple Google search came up with a ton of pages supporting this, like this one should that shows the accumulation of toxins in marine biology ("Non-cumulative toxins do not increase in concentration in the body, even if the organism is chronically exposed to the toxin. Conversely, cumulative toxins, tend to increase in concentration, and are often associated with a specific tissue, e.g., cadmium tends to increase over time in the digestive gland of blue crabs."). this link, this link and this one also talk about the cumulative nature of pollution. etc.etc.

      So where are your links?

      I agree that a single mutated frog isn't PROOF that pollution is involved, that mutations will occur to surrounding mammals, whatever, BUT it should at least make you stop and think for a second, asks questions, etc., instead of just shrug and ignore it completely - which is what I was getting at.

      Sadly, you're just as bad as those environmentalists you attack... ignoring everybody else.

  14. sensationalism... bleh... by Free_Meson · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The creature - which has six legs - has stunned BBC wildlife experts who warned it could be an early warning of environmental problems.


    When there are a few hundred documented cases of this it's time to be alarmed. Here, it looks like a few eggs failed to adequately separate. I doubt the frogs even have the same DNA. The fact that their pond was 2-3 Kelvin warmer than it would have been 50 years ago has nothing to do with this freak occurance.
    1. Re:sensationalism... bleh... by Guy+Harris · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The fact that their pond was 2-3 Kelvin warmer than it would have been 50 years ago has nothing to do with this freak occurance.

      The comment to which you're responding said "environmental problems", not "global warming".

  15. The next thing you know... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2, Funny

    You'll see these suckers in tanks in French restaurants like seafood places have lobsters. Oo-la-la! Ze Seks leg'ed frog!

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  16. bicycle pumps by SkunkPussy · · Score: 2, Funny

    does that mean you need 3 bicycle pumps to inflate it then?..

    --
    SURELY NOT!!!!!
  17. The real question is by doconnor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What did it look like when it was a tadpole?

  18. Green in a nutshell by ghostlibrary · · Score: 4, Interesting

    >I'm not a Green but I do object to being poisoned for some companies bottom line.

    Err, I think you summarized the entire Green platform with that last bit. Beware, due to pollution and toxins, you might mutate into a Green, oh no!

    Myself, I'm not a libertarian, I just want less government. I'm not a republican, I just want lower taxes. I'm not a democrat, I just want a lower debt. And I'm not an anarchist, I just post to slashdot occassionally :)

    --
    A.
  19. Is this even real? by jpsowin · · Score: 2, Informative

    The photo is fake. The news article says that some people saw it but it got away. So they are merely going on what a few people said and now they are showing a fake frog picture to "prove" it. They're currently "looking" for the frog that was spoken of.

    Fishy?

  20. Frog Just Doing What Comes Naturally by cmjensen · · Score: 3, Informative
    That's not a mutant frog. That's frog porn.

    Doesn't anybody remember this hoax which turned out to be pretty much the same thing? Here is a good discussion of the issue

  21. Re:Partially discredited by Inexile2002 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Can you supply some references? Because who it's been discredited by and who paid for the studies (assuming you're siting studies) matters in these things. Frankly, I don't buy it. There are frog mutations all over (not just in England or MN) and dramatic increases in them that coincide with the rise of toxins in the environment. I'm going to go dig up the article I read about it and post a link in a bit. Got to get back to work now though.

  22. Re:ugh by TwistedGreen · · Score: 4, Funny

    curious happening. hardly stuff that matters though.

    What do you mean? It does matter! If anything, it's damn cool-looking. Mutants are neat.

    Think of it as a biological memory leak. ;)

  23. 3 big mouths by oever · · Score: 4, Funny

    I bet Steve Balmer is jealous: 3 big mouths and good legs for jumping around.

    --
    DNA is the ultimate spaghetti code.
  24. More Pictures! by dnahelix · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is truly freaky!

    More Pictures Here.

    --
    Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
    They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
    I Hate \.
  25. Re:Lake District by Captain+Pedantic · · Score: 2, Informative

    No, it is in the south west, 10 miles away from Hinkley Point (A nuclear power plant).

    --

    None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.
  26. Zaphod? by WTFmonkey · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is that you?

  27. Re:Sad. by ag0ny · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't forget we're talking about a frog. Something like this might be a real tragedy for a human being, because or our own social behaviour. But, from the social standpoint of a frog (if there's such a thing), I don't thing this is going to be a problem.

    I guess the definition of "happiness" for a frog would be something like "being healthy and well-fed". This one looks quite happy to me.

  28. Re:ugh by Crazy+Eight · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, you've hit a strange subject that touches nether regions of the psyche there. To me, Siamese twins aren't nearly as "disgusting" as this creature, though one lower body with two torsos might come close. There's something about nature's mistakes when they happen at this level of sophistication -- between plant and mammal -- that hit me right in the creepy zone. As soon as I clicked the tab on the BBC story I clicked away before I could really grasp what this abomination looks like. There's a chthonic, nauseating, freakazation about it I don't want to sleep on. Yikes.