Slashdot Mirror


New HP Drive Lets You Burn Your Own Label

way2trivial writes "Wow -- remember Yamaha's DiscT@2? now HP has a invention to use the DVD laser to etch the flip side of CDs and DVDs. I own a nice Epson to print on CD-R/DVD-Rs, it does full color -- but this looks impressive as hell, even if it is in monochrome"

55 of 257 comments (clear)

  1. Cool !! by varunrebel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cool idea...

    Only downside it seems is that you cannot use normal CDs. You have to use CDs which can actually are designed to allow this 'burning' on the flipside...

    --
    "Programming is like sex. Make one mistake and support it for the rest of your life !!"
    1. Re:Cool !! by Kent+Simon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I pretty much figured that would be the case. The data on a CD is stored very close to the label. If you have a CDR you don't mind wasting you could scratch part of the label and see that it goes straight to the plastic protective layer. I imagine the special CD's have an extra layer between the top and the data layer that does not exist on a normal CDR.

      --
      Kent Simon Multitheft Auto
    2. Re:Cool !! by superhoe · · Score: 5, Insightful
      And this makes me wonder:

      If the burners with this new technology are just $10 more expensive - and the media required to burn to the flipside is just a 'dime more expensive'.. Where's the added value to the sales?

      My guess is that we end users are going to pay much more than just a dime xtra for those CD medias.. :(

      --

      -el

    3. Re:Cool !! by Threni · · Score: 4, Interesting

      > Only downside it seems is that you cannot use normal CDs. You have to use CDs
      > which can actually are designed to allow this 'burning' on the flipside...

      Why don't they sell blank labels you can stick onto normal CDs and then etch them with a laser? Or is that too obvious?

    4. Re:Cool !! by no+longer+myself · · Score: 5, Informative
      My guess is probably not. It's got a little extra nift value, but it's really all in the software. They're using the exact same laser, so the hardware isn't any different except for maybe an extra bit of firmware to prevent knock-off CD-Rs from entering the scene. Everything else is handled by software, so the extra $10 on top of a DVD burner is the only hope they have of getting people to consider it. Much more and who would bother?

      For the other end, the consumable disc, an extra $0.10 has a huge fudge factor. Prices vary greatly so they're probably basing it upon the highest priced premium brand of DVD/CD-R (which isn't necessarily any better than the low cost cheepy-brand) so yes, you'll end up spending $10 for about 25 discs, while someone else is going to be paying $15 for a spindle of 100.

      My biggest gripe (and you know I'll get flamed for saying this...): Since (I'm only guessing) it's all based in software, it will probably not be a feature availble to Linux users.

      Looks like Sharpie isn't going to lose any of my business anytime soon. ;-)

    5. Re:Cool !! by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Funny

      Only downside it seems is that you cannot use normal CDs

      Perhaps glueing 2 regular CDs back to back would work?

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    6. Re:Cool !! by GORby_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let's see:
      1. it would probably be more expensive, since it would need a layer of plastic and glue in addition to the special etchable layer
      2. it's easier when the layer is already on the disc
      3. no problems with balance... labels that aren't positioned exactly in the middle will cause unbalance and lots vibration.

      Good enough?

    7. Re:Cool !! by Chalybeous · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My guess is that we end users are going to pay much more than just a dime xtra for those CD medias.. :(

      My guess is that the only people who'll pay are the ones who the RIAA decides to get mean with. For example, when I buy an album, I burn a copy to use in the car (basically so my expensive CD doesn't get damaged, and it's no great loss if the car is stolen - it's fair use IMHO, since it's not passed to anyone and I'm not ripping the manufacturers off), and scan the cover and track list to make an insert. With this technology I'd be tempted to either pop the track listing *on* the face of the CD (my handwriting is near illegible, worse if I'm using a marker), or to replicate the on-disc logo or art.
      CD pirates will have a field day making use of this device. And so will the lawyers...

      --

      "It is dark. You are likely to be eaten by a grue." -- Zork

    8. Re:Cool !! by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Presumably if you're selling media burners and blank discs, you'd like people to chose your products over the competition's. That may well be the "added value to the sales"...

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  2. piracy is fun by hellmarch · · Score: 4, Funny

    maybe it can copy the do not copy label while you're copying the data

  3. That Rocks by paganizer · · Score: 4, Funny

    I actually read the article, and THAT ROCKS.
    The porn applications alone are mind-boggling.

    --
    Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    1. Re:That Rocks by FrostedWheat · · Score: 4, Funny

      You can have porn on the CD, and porn *on* the CD.

    2. Re:That Rocks by Blue+Stone · · Score: 4, Funny
      "The porn applications alone are mind-boggling."

      The hole in the middle of the CD.

      Goatse man.

      Oh the horrorr.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
  4. Other uses by CleverNickedName · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll bet it makes perfect toast too.

    --


    Unfortunately, I am not Wil Wheaton
  5. Is it more than cosmetic? by __aatgod8309 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Have to wonder if this process will shorten the life of the cd the way adhesive labels are rumoured to do...

  6. Use a computer? No thanks by ObviousGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The real leap forward will occur when this is built into camcorders and other media recording devices. The whole idea behind connecting the camera to a computer just so you can save the data on a disc that won't be played on a computer anyway, not to mention printing labels for the disc, is crazy and redundant. Though it is a necessary stopgap until we get these technologies into the cameras, the computer is just another barrier to the development of user-created media.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
  7. Good idea! by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is a great idea - granted, it takes special media (which sounds like it's just basically double-sided), but if it gets popular enough, it should be cheap and easy to find.

    Although I like colour inkjet printable CDs/DVDs that the new epsons can produce at low cost, this is a great way to label something that doesn't need to be in colour with the associated ink costs, etc.

    Wonder what the resolution of the printing is, and how long it takes...

    Maybe the top side could be used for additional data storage as well if you don't need a label?

    N.

    --
    "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
  8. 10$ = Rs 500 approx by varunrebel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A CD Drive costs about Rs. 1200-1500 in India.

    An increase of 10$ (=Rs. 500 approx) is a bit too steep. Obviously the good old felt-tip pen is much cheaper !!

    But the basic idea/concept is very user friendly and cool. Wish they can make it a bit cheaper... :)

    --
    "Programming is like sex. Make one mistake and support it for the rest of your life !!"
  9. This is old stuff by pieterh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's just thermal printing with another twist. The good news is that there are no ink cartridges to replace. The bad news is that the paper is _really_ expensive.

  10. Tell you the truth by SyKOStarchild · · Score: 5, Insightful
    As potentially useful as it would be to use one of these things for CD/DVD Labeling, I am awful fond of saving money and will continue just using a sharpie or an adhesive.

    I don't need new tech and new burnable media to keep doing that.

    1. Re:Tell you the truth by ajs318 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Absolutely. CDs are for listening to {or at any rate, perceiving stored content through some kind of electronic reading device with sensory stimulators}, not looking at. I'll stick with an indelible marker pen. As for DVDs, I don't ever write anything on them anyway; I just write on the card in the box, because -- at four quid a pop for DVD+RW media -- sooner rather than later, they're going to get recorded over.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  11. Small business use.... by MagicDude · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This will help small software businesses lower their costs of production. My family has a business where we sell software, but where it's not practical for us to use mass production because we have to make 1000 copies minimum, since our market is so small. It's easier and cheaper for us to simply burn DVD's everytime an order comes in and print the labels ourselves, and then shrink wrap it. So this will be a real benefit to us and potentially other small business too.

    1. Re:Small business use.... by Kent+Simon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree. I think many labels you print off with the "CD labelling software" tend to look rather amateur. I would definitely consider buying something like this if I wanted to showcase software I had written to friends or potential employers.

      --
      Kent Simon Multitheft Auto
    2. Re:Small business use.... by notestein · · Score: 4, Funny

      A word of advice... Don't label the pirated software your "family" sells.

      You will get caught.

  12. its brilliant by katalyst · · Score: 5, Insightful

    because they are giving a new lease of life to an already saturated market; i'm happy with my 32x burner and would not have thought of investing in another cd-burner... and would have upgraded to a dvd-burner whenever i could afford one... but now.. I'll HAVE to consider this...
    we'll have happy cd-writer manufacturers, happy cd-manufacturers, happy geeks and very happy software pirates :D
    I missed this detail, but what speed does it burn the label at? :p how long would it take to burn a full gfx rich label?

    --
    |/________
    |\A|ALYS|
  13. i love mum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    as soon as the printing department hear about this we'll shortly have do it yourself home tatoo kits.. now that'd be cool.

  14. Excellent for musicians by nmoog · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I would LOVE something like that for the CD-R's of my music I sell, and send out as demos. Stick-on labels look like stick-on labels, and are barely better than magic markers.

    The most impressive result I have gotten so far is by laying the cd's on the ground and spray painting them all white. Then when that layer dries, lay a stencil of an image over each disk and spray black. Leaves a cool ghosty image that looks like it was pressed. The disks play fine, and it doesn't look like your music is sponsored by TDK.

    1. Re:Excellent for musicians by Hungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You can of course buy printable CDs and DVDs and use a printer like the one I use which is an ezcd4200 it costs me about 12 extra per cd or dvd but I do get full colour with it. Oh and if you are going to do any volume remeber to buy a continuous flow system for your pritner. In fact here is a tutorial I found on hacking your own CFS System

      --
      Bad Panda! No Bamboo for you! In matters of importance ACs will not be responded to. Want to say something critical,OK
    2. Re:Excellent for musicians by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 3, Informative

      Another one to look at is the new Epson Photo R800 - it can print both regular media as well as CD/DVD, and has seperate ink tanks for each colour. Prints with glossy ink, but has the capability to insert a "flat black" cart, or a "glossy" cart to modify how the output looks. Interesting...

      I've got a slightly older Epson model at work which handles CD/DVD media, and it does a beautiful job. About 3 min per disc to print.

      I also still recommend people use a CFS system for high-volume colour printing, but it's not as much of an issue if you're just doing disc labels.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
  15. Hmmm by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anyone remember the CD bomb from the days when the Anarchists Cookbook circulated?

    Take a CD, cover with gunpowder or phosphor scraped from match heads. Varnish. Insert into CD rom drive.

    Now immagine how well that would work with a laser set to a power high enough to carve images into plastic.

    Kaaaaaaboooom.

    --
    Beep beep.
  16. I wonder... by CliffH · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... what the reality of pricing is going to be on these things as opposed to the probable $10 premium quoted in the article. If they really stick to that, these things are going to take off liek crazy. The one big problem with the Yamaha was the price (at least here in NZ). If this thing truly has a negligible (???) price increase, I can see them selling like mad and being put into every branded system and whitebox known to man. Can you think of an easier way of labeling small DVD backups of your data than to write it directly to the DVD through a script. No more forgetting labeling of important data.

    The flipside of this is, how long will the drive actually last with the extra etching duties of the laser? Will these have a shorter warranty period than their non-ethcing counterparts? Through the first run, will we see unusually high failure rates? I haven't heard of anything like that with the Yamaha's but, then again, I haven't looked. I haven't had to. I haven't sold one yet and I think that's mainly because I haven't bought one (if you don't know the product or the brand intimately, or are unwilling to learn it, don't sell it).

    Anyways, I'm done with my rant now. You can get back to reading truly thoughtful comments. :)

    CliffH

    --
    sigs are like a box of chocolates, they all suck remove the underscores to email me
  17. not glued on by KalvinB · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the problem with regular CDRs is that if you bang them around enough the silver stuff (what the data is burned to) flakes off because it's not encased in the plastic. Those glue on labels help to weaken it. If you try to take a label off, chances are the data goes with it.

    Presumably this new method has the label part manufactured on and not attached to the part of the CD the data is written to. Or it's a second layer that more painted on than glued on. However it's done, it's probably much more sound manufacturing than putting a sticker on a CD.

    Ben

  18. Hmmm ... by the+bluebrain · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now if it were holograms, I'd be impressed.

    :-)

    / I mean, what we got freakin' LASERs in these things for anyway?

    --
    yes, we have no bananas
  19. Resolution by Inda · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know what a 600dpi image looks like printed out on paper. I know that 300dpi gives a reasonable quality image too.

    What sort of resolution can we expect from this?

    Have many pits per inch are burned into the data side of a disk at the moment?

    Can we expect the same?

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    1. Re:Resolution by Rakishi · · Score: 3, Informative

      Rough caculations put it at over ten thousand for me. You can either convert 700mb to bits, dividing by a cd-rom's area and taking the root (gace around 18k for me) or by looking at actual dot size: 300 dpi => 84.67 m 4000 dpi => 6.35 m (Wikipedia) cd-rom: pit size seems to be around 1~2 m which gives a dpi of 10 to 20 thousand.

  20. Re:burning images onto normal cdrs by _Shorty-dammit · · Score: 5, Informative

    To do so requires special writing capability in the drive itself, you not only need to be able to control the regular user data, you also need to be able to control all the bits that get generated in addition to regular user data. All the bits that are involved with the error correction, etc. This is why you don't see Yamaha type 'tattoos' with just any old drive, because Yamaha so far is the only manufacturer that gave you that much control over the drive. Without such deep control, I don't know how easy it would be to get your desired image, considering you normally have control over much less than half of how many bits are actually contained on a CD. I vaguely recall doing the math one day to see how many raw bits are on a CD, and I think it adds up to around 2GB of raw data to store your 700MB of user data. Very vaguely. Figures may be off, but it is in that ridiculous ballpark. And I'm not in the mood to go digging through specs. Basically, 2048 bytes of your data first goes to 2352 bytes, maybe another step here, and then every 8 bits gets translated to 14 bits encoded on the disc. Even just the 2048->2352 and 8->14 steps gives you almost 1407MB raw data for 700MB of user data.

  21. Seems brilliant... by odano · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can't imagine any better way to produce a professional looking CD than with technology like this. Sure it is no better than a sharpie for home users, but for people who burn demo CDs or sell software online and want to make it look professional, this is about as good as it gets.

  22. Chicken or Egg situation by varunrebel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    An with a number of things in the real world CR-Writers with LightScribe technology and the special CDs are obviously prone to the chicken or egg syndrome

    The special CDs won't become popular until the special CD Writers become common and the CD Writers won't become common until the special CDs become common enough...

    --
    "Programming is like sex. Make one mistake and support it for the rest of your life !!"
  23. Cool by barfarf · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now we can get our AOL discs with even MORE style!

  24. http://www.lightscribe.com/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The official website has more info and photos of labled disks.

  25. Cool by Underholdning · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a great little feature. Not that I plan to burn great images on the disk. Rather, I plan to burn the contents of the disk - maybe just do an ls -lR | burnlabel. I don't use jewelcases for my CD's or DVD's. They take up too much space. I just keep them in sheets in a binder. The downside is, that the small slip of paper telling me what's on the disk has a limited life span (i.e. I lose it somewhere). This little gimmick will rid me of that problem by fixing the contents to the disk.

  26. Holograms by tonywestonuk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Are DVD lasers sharp enough to produce diffraction patterns, insead of a standard image?.... Could this tech be used to create you own hologram, from a 3D File?

    1. Re:Holograms by Mr.Mysteriosity · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, the special disks have an ink impregnated on the label side, and when the drive burns the label side, it uses a laser powerful enough to cause a chemical change in the ink that turns it a darker color.

  27. All your image ... by elronxenu · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now the RIAA will get all concerned about pirated album covers ...

  28. Here is a PDF from HP all about it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
  29. here ya go. by Niacin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://www.lightscribe.com/user/labelTips.aspx

    Closeups of different labels using this thing.

  30. It's only a matter of time by trveler · · Score: 4, Interesting

    until they manufacture a drive that doesn't require you to flip the disc in order to burn the label. Eliminating that annoying step would be worth extra $$.

    --
    ... is whot bwings os tugevza tsuzay.
  31. Re:burning images onto normal cdrs by smellystudent · · Score: 5, Informative

    The reason for the 8 -> 14 bit encoding is to make sure that long runs of 0's do not exist. If they did, the laser would be unable to follow the track accurately.

    --
    Predictive text is shiv!
  32. I want one! by p_millipede · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I like to label my disks, but hesitate to do so with the normal stick on labels after a couple of bad experiences. When I used such a labeled disk in my laptop once (which can get rather hot) I smelt burned, popped the disk and found the edge of the label smouldering slightly. I also know people who've had the labels peel off slightly and gum up the drive. This sounds like an ideal solution to the problem.

  33. ink and burn = cd tatoos. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I mess around as a artist time to time with different media.

    This is very similar to etching print plates.

    After you burn the CDROm and etch the flip side, guess what?!

    You take various colored inks, fill in the etching and then wipe off the excess.

    I bet you could make some realy neat looking designes with it.

  34. Your CDRs are not cheap enough! by John+Harrison · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have a stack of 100 CDRs that I bought from CompUSA for cheap. They have nothing on top of the aluminium. If you rub it vigorously your finger turns silver. If you scratch it you get flakes of metal under your fingernail and you can see right through the resulting hole.

  35. Re:burning images onto normal cdrs by lxs · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are simpler methods to ensure that a long string of 0's doesn't occur, without 40% redundancy.

    The real reason for the encoding is FEC or Forward Error Correction. It ensures that if you lose a bit here and there, there is enough redundant information spread around the damaged part to reconstruct the original data stream.

  36. Re:HP is looking for the next ink cartridge cash c by static+int · · Score: 3, Informative

    Permanent markers are always best, unless you need to write more information than a few simple words. Which is what I suspect most people need. Labels are much easier, when you want to list multiple items that are on the cd. The problem, however is that the labels can cause lots of problems. Causing the media to wobble and reduce read times, or worse coming loose while spinning in the drive. This "new" printing tech, sounds like it can fix these problems quite well. I'm sure drives (and media) for this will become much cheaper over time as the ever increasing drive speeds warrant using it.

    Just FYI, to anyone who has newer cd roms/writers: #1 use all 4 screws #2 don't use labels unless absolutely necessary

  37. Speed by Tomato3 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The FAQ at: http://www.lightscribe.com/ says it can take 1-15 min to burn a label depending on how detailed the image is.

    --
    Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master. -Commissioner Lal
  38. steganography... by GuruHal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You have to wonder with the imaging application for doing graphics and the nature of CD data - tis this could lead to some steganography applications. The laser will be able to output data in such a way as to create graphics while the CD is rotating, so it can probably be programmed to read that same data and you get some pretty cool steganography applications....
    I would think it would be easy to hide data in a picture made of 1s and 0s.

    --
    "Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati" -- Red Green