Slashdot Mirror


Build a Robot out of a Car?

SomeRobotGuy writes "A researcher in the U.K. is in the process of building an autonomous biped robot out of a Mini Cooper r50. Its functions are controlled by six computers running RTLinux and it's powered by an internal combustion engine. And the thing's not tiny, at over 10 feet tall! The site includes videos showing some impressive results."

76 of 264 comments (clear)

  1. Standard Bending Unit? by mod_critical · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now it just needs a loudspeaker and a recording of "BITE MY SHINY METAL ASS!"

    1. Re:Standard Bending Unit? by nomadic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know, after all these years you'd think slashdot would have tried to come up with something that wouldn't cripple the web sites they link to, and cost poor unsuspecting people hugely increased bandwidth fees. For a website that always tries to position itself as siding with the independent, pre-commercial spirit of the internet, the Slashdot editors have a really lousy sense of ethics.

    2. Re:Standard Bending Unit? by BLAG-blast · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You know, after all these years you'd think slashdot would have tried to come up with something that wouldn't cripple the web sites they link to, and cost poor unsuspecting people hugely increased bandwidth fees. For a website that always tries to position itself as siding with the independent, pre-commercial spirit of the internet, the Slashdot editors have a really lousy sense of ethics.

      Right on!

      What makes it even worse is that they have a busines model around fukcing over unsuspecting people. You pay them to see the site before it gets completely crippled (I notice that some times people take down movies and won't put them back up after a slashdotting). Now if it wasn't for the slashdot effect, would so many people pay for slashdot accounts?

      --
      M0571y H@rml355.
    3. Re:Standard Bending Unit? by jwriney · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Gosh, asking for permission is so hard! It's clearly better to crush their site and potentially make them pay thousands of dollars in bandwidth overages instead.

      --riney

    4. Re:Standard Bending Unit? by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think so. If they honor the robots.txt, they should be fine. Google and archive.org do basically the same thing.

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
  2. Huh? by TapTapTheChisler · · Score: 5, Funny

    They could have picked any transformer and they pick BUMBLEBEE?

    1. Re:Huh? by noidentity · · Score: 4, Funny

      Transformer Refuses To Change Back Into Volkswagen

      CYBERTRON -- Following an intense battle with Megatron and his evil Decepticons Monday, former robot-in-disguise Bumblebee refused to revert to his natural state as a yellow Volkswagen Beetle. "I hid my existence in this world by taking the form of a vehicle! I revealed my true nature when I was called upon to protect earth!" said Bumblebee, a member of Optimus Prime's heroic Autobots force. "I refuse to change back into a humiliating bubble-shaped compact car!" Bumblebee added that Megatron arrived on earth with one goal: Destruction!

      (from The Onion)

  3. Next up by bartyboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    They should use a red tractor trailer to build Optimus Prime.

  4. wow by AssProphet · · Score: 5, Funny

    The things you can do with photoshop...

  5. Bubblegum Crisis by RadicalBender · · Score: 3, Funny

    Holy crap! It's a Motoslave!

    --
    RadicalBender.com
  6. I just love photoshop... by Richard+N.+Bush · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... and After Effects.

    1. Re:I just love photoshop... by ruprechtjones · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, to avoid a robot-car gap, I have to turned to my driveway to see what I can do. Mini Cooper r50, prepare to meet '82 Dodge Colt RS! And mine has a sun-roof...

      we meet at dawn.

      --
      Kip Hawley is an idiot.
  7. It's a nice bit of CG, it might be from MINI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The site is well camouflaged to make it seem real. The CG work is well done. It wouldn't suprise me if this is a site created by MINI. They have a long history of non-traditional advertising. They have put a MINI in the stands at a Giants Baseball game. They put them into Malls on a platform with coin slots saying $16,995 in quaters for a ride.
    There best known one was putting the MINI on the roof of a Chevy Suburban and driving it arround San Francisco.

    It was also recently revealed that the Weekly World News article with BatBoy Stealing a MINI was a planted article by MINI USA.

    1. Re:It's a nice bit of CG, it might be from MINI by MrBlue+VT · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, I mean I guess they are trying out of the box advertising, but stuff like this isn't so good. It suckers people who don't know what the state of the art is in robotics and don't know that what is displayed here is all fake. Now I'll have to see how many of my less technically adept (or frankly just gullible) friends send this link to me.

    2. Re:It's a nice bit of CG, it might be from MINI by RajivSLK · · Score: 5, Informative

      It seems that it is advertising.

      A whois lookup on r50rd.co.uk returns the address:

      6 darblay street
      london
      W1V 8DM
      GB

      A quick search for this address on Google reveals:

      Martyn Gould Productions, 6 D'Arblay St, London, W1F 8DN, UK

      On a page titled: "Film and Television - Post Production, Commercials"

    3. Re:It's a nice bit of CG, it might be from MINI by sydsavage · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And a quick search on Google for Colin Mayhew reveals that's an alias for prison escapee Allan Johnson. Looks like he's continuing his string of frauds.

  8. Re:More than meets the eye... by Gary+Yogurt · · Score: 4, Funny

    Actually he's Bumblebee's British cousin, Nigel. (He visited Cybertron during the short-lived Transformers sitcom.)

  9. Sigh by srcosmo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Fifteen comments and the server appears to have bit the dust.
    Slashdot should come up with some automatic link-cacheing system or something...

    --
    free speach
    Did you mean: free speech
  10. Poor publicity... by Akki · · Score: 4, Funny

    For something claiming to be "the fastest Web server ever". It certainly doesn't seem to be standing up to a slashdotting very well.

    1. Re:Poor publicity... by Alien54 · · Score: 5, Funny
      For something claiming to be "the fastest Web server ever" [zeus.com]. It certainly doesn't seem to be standing up to a slashdotting very well.

      Of course they are the fastest. They ran away.

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    2. Re:Poor publicity... by Myco · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh, I don't know... it went down pretty fast.

  11. Geez. by Azureflare · · Score: 2, Funny
    That's great. Link to a small site with a bunch of medium mpeg files. Give them no warning. Has slashdot no shame???

    Seems like it's become a custom around here to destroy small hobbyist sites. *sigh*

    From what I got to see of it, it is truly awesome! The amount of work this guy has put into this project is just amazing. Makes me realize even more how much I want to get into the field of robotics.

    1. Re:Geez. by introverted · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Seems like it's become a custom around here to destroy small hobbyist sites.

      I wonder if perhaps that's a sign that the small hobbyist sites are the only ones doing "cool" stuff anymore.

    2. Re:Geez. by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >Seems like it's become a custom around here to destroy small hobbyist sites.

      In this case 'small hobbyist' turns out to be guerrilla/deceptive marketers and the /. effect is great weapon to use on these assholes.

  12. HOLA! by GoMMiX · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now THAT is a toy!!

    I'll take a dozen!

  13. They should have run the by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 3, Funny

    server on the cooper engine.
    MORE HORSEPOWER!!

  14. And the winner is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would hate to be the other robot when this thing makes it to battle bots.

  15. Site is Farked... by d0st03vsky · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...er, I mean /.-ed...

  16. Decepticon Millennium Copyright Act by SunPin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Clearly, this is an unacceptable use of an automobile.

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
  17. Strange things indeed.. by brain1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This thing looks like a cross between a Gundam and Robocop. I think that Jesse James should have built this on Monster Garage. OK. Now what does it REALLY do?

  18. DARPA?? by pvt_medic · · Score: 2, Funny

    i wonder if it would qualify for the Darpa competition. I think it would be an interesting twist if it did.

    --
    30% Troll, 50% Underrated, 10% Interesting
    Score:5, Troll
  19. FAKE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Watch the "Battery Test" video, if that isn't CGI then I'm a monkey's uncle.

    1. Re:FAKE! by sakusha · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're right, it's a dead giveaway. Notice the guy holding the clipboard, the lighting is camera left since the clipboard casts a shadow on his chest. But the fake CG shadows from the "robot" indicate the model was lit from the camera upper right. And none of the background objects (i.e. the cart) casts shadows anywhere near as distinct as the "robot."
      Come on fakers, don't you know that your lighting has to be consistent between composited layers?

    2. Re:FAKE! by vectra14 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Also listen to the interview- especially the "leg is a pendulum, so we used a fly-wheel" crap. I have some (limited) experience with humanoid-type robotics, but this guy straight BS'es through both interviews. its pretty amusing through.

    3. Re:FAKE! by vectra14 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      bad form to reply to self, etc etc, but just wanted to put the final nail into this coffin (err....):

      "The gyros are polled at 100Hz, which is overkill considering the height of the robot's CG. With six gyros churning at 100hz, a lot of mission-critical bandwidth is required, so I placed the gyros on their own token-ring controller that is accessible only to the balance and watchdog CPUs. "

      100hz is SLOW for low-level feedback control. we run 4-wheel omni-dir robots and they go at 300 hz... i would think that you need an even higher control frequency (and lots of sensors/fast actuators!) when you're balancing a humanoid.

      the robots center of gravity has nothing to do with this. also you would probably have more than 6 gyros for this many limbs... and you'd also have accelerometers, etc. a token ring has NOTHING to do we gyro/accel-type sensors. in fact all a gyro/acc requires for output is usually a single wire connection (analog or duty cycle output)

      also, humanoids are REALLY difficult to keep balanced, not even speaking of through doing some actions (stopping cars?????). oh yeah, and motors with torque high enough to actually support that thing either a) don't exist or b) are too slow or c) REALLY expensive. take a look at the sony SDR-4X robot ( i think it got renamed recently) and its joints. compare to Honda's ASIMO thats a few years older. etc etc...

    4. Re:FAKE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Linguistic analysis backup: the author states that he is 'originally from Oxford', and then proceeds to talk about 'autos' with 'hoods'. In proper English these are, of course, cars with bonnets.

  20. The real scoop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Redundant

    The site is well camouflaged to make it seem real. The CG work is well done. It wouldn't suprise me if this is a site created by MINI. They have a long history of non-traditional advertising. They have put a MINI in the stands at a Giants Baseball game. They put them into Malls on a platform with coin slots saying $16,995 in quaters for a ride.
    There best known one was putting the MINI on the roof of a Chevy Suburban and driving it arround San Francisco.

    It was also recently revealed that the Weekly World News article with BatBoy Stealing a MINI was a planted article by MINI USA

  21. Next Project by Catnapster · · Score: 5, Funny

    Take an F-15 and turn it into Starscream.

    Or, optionally, find a thirty-foot-long alien ray gun and turn it into Shockwave.

    Don't forget Unicron!

    --
    The world can be wrong today for once.
  22. It's Not Real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There is nothing but fluff on that site. The "sketches" have the stink of marketing all over them. Now, whenever I see a Mini Cooper, I'll be reminded of their pathetic "me too" attempt to get some attention. At least Honda's Cog ad actually entailed some technological brilliance and real work to make happen. All this does is raise the question of where the line should be drawn when it comes to making false claims of research and development in order to get free advertising. Isn't that illegal? What's the difference between what Mini is doing and what we'd think of a drug company that fabricated a bunch of bogus "technology" to imply that it had a cure for cancer for the purpose of getting free advertising?

    Yeah, I guess I don't like the feeling of being duped by a marketing department.

    1. Re:It's Not Real by laddhebert · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Comeo on, lighten up dude. It carries a way-cool factor is really fun to look at. They aren't trying to sell you a transformer...

      -L

      --
      Don't Panic.
  23. Yeah. by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Note to self: If I ever make a web server, don't put advertisements for it on "Error 503: Server Broke" page.

  24. Mini? by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 2, Funny

    Six computers in a Cooper Mini? Hell, they'd never fit. This must be fake.

  25. Red Green by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 4, Funny

    Red Green already did this with a K-Car. And a few rolls of duct tape.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  26. I liked it better by aexandria1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    when they called it KITT. All they need now is a couple of LEDs on the front of the car and William Daniels in the trunk.

  27. Something like this? by mrdaveb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The /. effect got to the page before I did... But I wonder if the robot looks something like this:

    http://home.comcast.net/~themichaelsmith/VWHiRes.m pg

    --
    Homme petit d'homme petit, s'attend, n'avale
  28. Slashdotted already! by xandroid · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's the image on the one page I could access. Below it was the text:

    "Here is r50r without the protective bonnet plate. I was a bit hesitant to post this because you can see some of the details of my mechanics. But I don't think it gives away too many secrets."

    --
    $ echo "ceci n'est pas une pipe" | sed -Ee 's/(eci n|pas )//g'
    1. Re:Slashdotted already! by xandroid · · Score: 3, Informative

      I was lucky enough to get the actual article a second later, too -- link

      --
      $ echo "ceci n'est pas une pipe" | sed -Ee 's/(eci n|pas )//g'
  29. Transformer? Please. Battlemechs Rule! by craXORjack · · Score: 2, Funny

    No way man! A BattleMech is way cooler than any fruity ass robot that transforms into a refridgerator. Put a .50 cal on it, some recoilless rockets, maybe a laser or two and send it out looking for Osama bin laden.

    --
    Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
  30. This would be cooler if... by rasafras · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...it were real. This is basically a less cool version of the VW bug transformer video, which can be found here (sorry about the format). The creator of the video has an interview here, though the original site is down.

    I'm surprised this slipped through, editors.

  31. OT:Geez. by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 4, Insightful
    That's great. Link to a small site with a bunch of medium mpeg files. Give them no warning. Has slashdot no shame??? Seems like it's become a custom around here to destroy small hobbyist sites. *sigh*
    I agree that this might inconvenience many small sites, and in the case of those who (for whatever awful reason) have bandwidth overage charges instead of an auto-cutoff it might even put them in the poor house. However the current /. system works pretty well, especially when a subscriber takes it upon themselves (throwing caution and probably several legalities to the wind) to mirror the content or Google caches the site so we can at least read the text. And for quite some time on the Internet the reality is that any site, on any subject, anywhere geographically, can be /.'ed by MANY different news/aggregator sites if they link to it. And with the high content value on small sites that concentrate on a single subject (esp if it's the original author/design team/etc's site) there is a much higher probablility that it will be selected to be /.'ed by the world at large. Of course hardly anyone at these small sites actually considers that they might get blasted by a "friendly DDOS", and even the ones who think/pray for the attention of a giant like /. probably don't go the extra bit and make sure their sites can either withstand it or fail gracefully (without the aforementioned bandwidth overage charges). Seems to me some of these "build a basic website" primers need to add a section on ALL the various things that can happen to even hobby websites; not only /.'ing but also defacement, etc.

    Of course I agree it's a problem, just giving my thoughts on the situation...

    Jonah Hex
  32. Reply From Builder (Colin Mayhew) by nherc · · Score: 2, Informative

    I just came across a reply from the creator regarding its authenicty on Google Groups:

    From: Chris S. (123@123.com)
    Subject: Re: Robot built from a Mini Cooper?
    View: Complete Thread (9 articles)
    Original Format
    Newsgroups: comp.robotics.misc
    Date: 2004-03-11 13:08:35 PST

    I'm not so sure. I really want to believe this thing's for real, but I
    have some serious doubts. Here's the response I got from Colin Mayhew,
    the robot's inventor:

    Colin Mayhew wrote:

    >I can assure you that the Cooper project is a real and
    >very tangible one. Your suspicion is perhaps
    >understandable because the leaps we've made are rather
    >significant compared to the current state of
    >commercial AI. As Mr. Clarke wrote in Technology and
    >the Future, "Any sufficiently advanced technology is
    >indistinguishable from magic." What's important to
    >remember in this famous quotation is not that the
    >technology becomes magic, but rather that technology
    >seems magical only to those who don't understand the
    >details or are not knowledgeable of the history of a
    >technology's development. It's for that reason that
    >I've placed notes online and have included videos from
    >different stages of the project. Have you seen videos
    >of people interacting with the Kismet robot? That
    >robot uses a fairly simple emotional model, yet people
    >bond to it and treat it as a 'living' creature! It has
    >become something magical from bits of aluminum and
    >electrons whizzing inside silicon. Your experiences in
    >the research sector I'm sure have shown you how
    >disconnected the public can be from the realities of
    >technology. There are autonomous machines (be they in
    >medicine or oil well drilling) so removed from our
    >daily lives that when we finally learn of them, we are
    >shocked and amazed---far more so than had we followed
    >the gradual steps and wrong turns the engineers made
    >developing and finessing the technology. This project
    >is real, and it, and the systems I've developed for it
    >are going to change the way we live our lives. The
    >most recent software revision I've tested on the robot
    >has some powerful reasoning capabilities, a large step
    >more powerful and versatile than that employed on the
    >robot when I recorded the videos you may have seen
    >online. They are perhaps powerful enough to seem like
    >magic, but both devil and the angel of creativity are
    >in the details. Soon enough, these little creatures
    >will be animating the robots all around us and making
    >our lives safer and more fulfilling.
    >
    >Regards,
    >Colin
    >
    >
    > --- "Chris S." wrote: > Is your
    >Mini Cooper powered robotic biped a real
    >
    >>project? Your site
    >>seems detailed enough, but the videos look
    >>suspiciously like computer
    >>generations. Either way, it's an entertaining feat.
    >>
    >>Sincerely,
    >>Chris S.

    Take it for what you will. I just can't believe someone built something like that essentially alone in just a few years. It just does too much and it moves too fluidily. For instance watch the video where it stops a run-away Car.

    --
    'He was a dreamer, a thinker, a speculative philosopher... or, as his wife would have it, an idiot.' - Douglas Adams
    1. Re:Reply From Builder (Colin Mayhew) by Doches · · Score: 2, Funny

      He Quoted Arthur C. Clarke! I Love Him!

    2. Re:Reply From Builder (Colin Mayhew) by sakusha · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yep, remember your conservation of momentum, the bot doesn't move when it grabs the car, it should at least absorb part of the kinetic energy and have to push back, or be pulled along with the car a tiny bit. Consider a similar collision on a smaller scale, what would happen if you tried to halt a guy on a bicycle?
      And notice the bot casts a shadow but the car doesn't. Totally fake. Also notice all these "tests" are done with a locked-down camera, that's a giveaway of a bad CG producer, anyone with real skills would have used a handheld camera and used move matching.

    3. Re:Reply From Builder (Colin Mayhew) by EnormousTooth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One thing I just noticed--the robot's shadow is directly opposite to that of the cones/car.

      --
      I don't use Emacs; it uses me.
    4. Re:Reply From Builder (Colin Mayhew) by juhaz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Where's the Star Trek fans?? Haven't you learned anything from Spock? "An ancestor of mine maintained, that if you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."

      For those of us that live in the this world, not on Enterprise few hundred years into the future, that's first used by Conan Doyles Sherlock Holmes (maybe Spock considers all other fictional characters his ancestors) and is more or less based on Occam's Razor.

    5. Re:Reply From Builder (Colin Mayhew) by rbilli · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree, you can see the robot being dragged for a short distance after it 'grabs' the car. However, you can also see the front of the car dip, prior to being grabbed, as the driver applies the brakes sharply to bring the car to rest.

  33. If you're going to steal a post by KalvinB · · Score: 2, Funny

    at least have the sense to attach it as a reply to a lame attempt at first post at the top.

    Ben

  34. Re:CG totally by ruprechtjones · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yup, this is advertising. Genius, but still just a Mini plug. Check the whois then google the parent company.

    --
    Kip Hawley is an idiot.
  35. r50rd.COM ... by nherc · · Score: 2, Informative

    Interestingly, r50rd.COM was also registered this time at NetSol in Jan. '04 by the same David Mayhew who registered the UK domain.

    Just thought I'd share. I must say if it is a hoax... that's some pretty darn nice CG. If real, WOW... give me MY 10ft robot slave already!

    --
    'He was a dreamer, a thinker, a speculative philosopher... or, as his wife would have it, an idiot.' - Douglas Adams
  36. Inventors Actual WebSite by nherc · · Score: 2, Informative
    Here is what Colin Mayhew's Personal Yahoo! freebie website (in case it goes away again) says, since when I first looked it was out of bandwidth.

    Welcome to the homepage
    of Colin Mayhew
    [picture of our good doctor]
    Welcome. My name is Dr. Colin Mayhew, and you are visitor number

    I'm hoping to make this web site a place where I can share information about myself, my family and my interests.

    I hold a doctorate degree in engineering and worked for 30 years in the UK. Since my retirement, I have spent much of my free time in my laboratory. My other interests include reading, miniature locomotives and applied physics. To see my collection of miniature locomotives, click here. For engineering and applied physics links and downloads, click here.

    Thanks for your interest.

    This site was last updated 01/02/99

    Email: colinMayhewphd@yahoo.co.uk

    [The 2 linked pages are below]
    [Locomotive link, each description has a black and white photo]

    Pictures back to home

    Scene at Greywood North terminal (circa. 1951) before the departure of the 3.10pm 'special' (locomotive on left of picture). This is a K5 (2-6-0) class loco. On right is an 'Immingham' class (4-6-0) loco owned by a drummer in a local pop group at the time.

    My father (wearing his Canadian Pacific Railway hat) is sitting on the edge of the turntable pit in front of the purpose built engine shed. The engine on the far left is a 'Sterling' class single (2-2-2), Dad's hand is resting on the Immingham loco as shown in pic. 1.

    This is me driving my own loco 'Eureka' which is a Pacific class (4-6-2) over the mere bridge viaduct. Riding in the train behind is my sister Jane and school buddy Charles. Noral were the company which supplied all the 'Dural' aluminium alloy railway track for the GCR.

    A K5 loco on the turntable in steam and ready to go.

    A friend with my loco Eureka on the turntable.

    This is me (age about 8) steaming up my own engine. I dont know who the little enthusiast is on the left - he is probably Chairman of a London bank by now!

    My father is sitting on Eureka on the turntable ready to go. In the background is another engine owner, 'Woody' who was a veterinary surgeon; he is leaning over his own locomotive - another Pacific class 4-6-2.

    This is the skeleton tunnel or flyover with Eureka on the top level. The railway was sold in 1962 after my father's death and was reconstructed on a nearby farm estate.
    Underneath the flyover is the Royal Scot class (4-6-2) driven.

    This site was last updated 01/02/99
    Email: colinMayhewphd@yahoo.co.uk

    [Physics and downloads link]

    Links back to home

    History of quantum mechanics. Nicely details Kirchoff's theorem of blackbody radiation.

    Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR).

    Institute of Nanotechnology. Excellent venue to keep up on current events.

    I highly recommend this abstact to anyone working on computing the area and centroid of multiple intensity-coded objects. Click here to download.
    [links from above]
    http://www-gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/H istTopic s/The_Quantum_age_begins.html
    http://www.cs.washi ngton.edu/research/jair/home.ht ml
    http://www.nano.org.uk/
    http://uk.geocities.c om/colinmayhewphd/brajovic_vl adimir_2001_1.pdf
    This site was last updated 01/02/99
    Email: colinMayhewphd@yahoo.co.uk

    Someone spent a decent amount of time on this if fake.

    IMPORTANT NOTE: The last update of this site is in 1999 if that is to be believed. I suppose it's either the real last modified date along with a real Doc Mayhew or it is another part of the hoax. Thoughts?
    --
    'He was a dreamer, a thinker, a speculative philosopher... or, as his wife would have it, an idiot.' - Douglas Adams
  37. Re:And the final proof by VikingBrad · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Mini are about to introduce the Mini Convertible so can you guess what the ad campaign is going to be?

    Free advertising here on Slashdot.

    Cheers
    VikingBrad

  38. Updated version by cgenman · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, the personal website of the author has a cleaned up, and significantly larger, version available here.

  39. Actually, the old ones were even more godlike. by Chrontius · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Gah, you gotta be kidding me. Back when I was playing MW2: Mercenaries, the most godlike mech I ever used was a DC Urbanmech named Lucifer. (yes, the beer-keg on legs)

    It had maxed out jump-jets, twelve medium lasers, and maxed heat sinks. Its only other weapon was a machinegun in the head with one ton of ammo, for taking out Elementals and such.

    All the lasers were in either the left or right torso, where those arms would shield all of the hits. All the beams would fire at the same time, and hit the same place.

    There is nothing like oneshotting an Atlas. Period. Especially when you horizontal-jet in a la Gundam to do so with a glorified beam-saber.

    And being in an UrbanMech, I was always ignored until big things started dying.

    Don't tell me that it was cheap, I know it was.

    (12*6=72 damage, way more than any PPC)

  40. Obviously... by Whelzorn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Think about this: It took Honda years, and millions of dollars to create the ASIMO robot, which does nothing compared to what this one did stopping the car, and unscrewing the bolt from the wheel (robot arm dexterity test). ASIMO was also created by a huge team of mechanics, scientists, and programmers. This guy actually wants us to believe that he 1. built the thing, 2. programmed all the fast, complex motions, and 3. built it out of a cooper? bullshit. I dont even think that with the weight of the car applied to the motors the thing was using, that they could have as much torque and speed as they did. This may have been more believable if he made a more official looking website, and faked some press activity. I mean if it were real, this would have been all over the news by now, doing demonstrations and everything.

  41. mirror by xWh3lPx · · Score: 5, Informative

    managed to mirror it here.

  42. Stealth Marketing directed at Slashdot by tekrat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Have you guys heard of "Stealth Marketing"? 60 Minutes covered it a few months back, but basically, imagine this scenario.

    You're walking down times square, and a pretty couple with exotic accents, who look and act like tourists asks you to take their photo. They hand you their digital camera. You notice it's one you've never seen or heard of before, so you snap the photo, and then ask about it, and they proceed to tell you how cool this camera is.

    You've just been 'Stealth Marketed' -- the tourists are fake, actors hired to stand in Times Square asking people to take their photo.

    You're sitting in Starbucks and you see a guy playing a cool game on his laptop. Pretty soon, he's letting you try the game and you're hooked. Turns out he's also an actor hired to sit in the coffee shop and get people to try the game.

    This looks to me like a Stealth Marketing campaign diliberately directed at the Slashdot crowd. Note the post came from "SomeRobotGuy", who, I'll bet, is also in on this gag.

    The server was supposed to get slashdotted to hell and not work properly, as that lends an air of credibility to the hack.

    You're all part of a campaign directed at people like us who read Slashdot, ArsTechnica, HardOCP, and Wired. Chances are this site will make the rounds on all the hardcore tech sites, and if it makes a few people consider buying a Mini-Cooper, then the Stealth Marketing guys have done their job.

    Believe me, this won't be the last time you're "hacked" by Marketing types who are getting more clever about how to direct an advertising campaign at you without you even realising you're being advertised to.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  43. Isn't it amazing? by mark-t · · Score: 2, Interesting
    You hear all kinds of noises in those videos, but none at all from its footsteps.

    A 1500 lb anything is not going to be particularly quiet when it's moving... heck, I have a cat that makes more noise than that thing does.

    This is about as real as a 9 dollar bill.

    1. Re:Isn't it amazing? by vivin · · Score: 2, Funny

      What?! Are you telling me my 9 dollar bill is not real?

      --
      Vivin Suresh Paliath
      http://vivin.net

      I like
  44. ...this smells like a fake to me... by omarin · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I love robots, but after looking at the site & the videos my "bullshit" meter went off:
    1. The 2nd line of the page says "User logged in, proceed." This seems out of place on a technical guy's webpage, as if it were put there for the nontechnical/credulous to think "oh, computerese, must be technical and real"...
    2. The robot makes me think of CG in several scenes.
    3. If this robot is so fabulous, why haven't we heard anything before now? (Where are the drooling reporters to report on this neat news story?)
    4. I find it hard to believe that one guy and his ball-and-chain could do work of the caliber (and cost) comparable to MIT or Honda's Asimo bipedal robot...
    5. Occam's Internet bullshit razor: if it's too good to be true, and it's on the internet, it's probably bullshit

    Of course, I'd love to be wrong (I hope I am, I'd love to see such a robot out and about working), but until we get some independent, trustworthy verification I'll take this cum grano salis (...with a grain of salt.)
  45. Nail in the coffin of it... by Vthornheart · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Okay, check this one out: http://www.r50rd.co.uk/research/internal/v2i/engin /videos/light_test.htm


    The difference in shadow casting between the two objects, when they are both at roughly the same location, is so dramatic that it could not possibly be anything but a hoax.


    I had a really long post that I was going to type about disproving the "robot stopping the jeep" through some ideal physics calculations, but my computer locked up on me (and I was lacking an initial velocity value for the Jeep). However, if anyone's a Physics guru and wants to give it a go, I compiled some initial data for it:


    Weight of Jeep: ~1800kg.


    Weight of Robot (assuming it's still about the same weight as the car it was made from): ~1483kg.


    Coefficient of Friction for Car on pavement: .8


    Coefficient of Friction for robot on pavement: ???
    (Anyone know the M
    Time before stop: ~1.5sec


    So what we'd really need is the coeff. of Kinetic Friction for metal on pavement, the initial velocity of the Jeep, and... can't think of anything else. We could then figure out the force, under ideal conditions, that the robot must have been under. My wager is that the force would be significant. But the light difference, as shown in the video linked to above, is proof enough I think. I'll believe the Robot story when I physically touch the thing.

    --
    -Vendal Thornheart
    1. Re:Nail in the coffin of it... by Vthornheart · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Ah, excellent! Lemme do some calculating... We'll estimate that it was on the average of the two values you gave, so let's say that the velocity was 35kph, or 9.7m/s.

      (Walks downstairs to get his Physics textbook)

      Okay... What we have here is an interaction between two rigid bodies. (Hmm, I went back to watch the video one more time before doing the calculations... seems the page doesn't exist any more... fascinating...) Anyways, from the point of impact the car seemed to move about a car length (about 4.7 meters) in about 1.5 seconds.

      4.7m = 9.7m/s*1.5s + 1/2(a)(1.5s^2)

      That gives us, after some brief calculation, a net acceleration of -8.75m/s^2 for the length of the impact.

      Let's examine the forces at work on the Jeep at the time of impact: -mg (gravity) and mg (the normal force) in the vertical direction; F(robot) and F(kinetic) in the horizontal direction.

      Each of these can be used to determine the F(robot). First, we must find the force of gravity so that we can find the Normal Force. F(g) = mg = 1818kg * (-9.8m/s^2) = -17816N. Utilizing that, we can determine the normal force: F(N) = 17816N.

      Excellent, now we can get the F(kin). F(kin) = -Mu * F(N) = .015 * 17816N = -268N... Note that I'm using .015 as the coefficient now, because I just realized that I should be using the "rolling friction" and not simple dragging "kinetic friction".

      Now, let's find out what the Fnet should be for the X direction. Fnet = ma = 1818kg * -8.75m/s^2 = -15908N. Now, Fnet in the X direction also equals F(robot) + F(kin).

      -15908N = F(robot) - 268N. Therefore F(robot) = 15640N.

      Okay, so the force of the Robot on the Car is -15640N, and Netwon's laws dictate that an equal but opposite force must be on the robot by the car. Therefore the force on the Robot's hand as he attempts to stop the car is 15640N.

      Now let us examine, as a comparative force, if the car was instead dropped on the robot from directly above. Fnet then = ma = 1818 * -9.8m/s^2 = -17816.4N, relatively close in force to the force being applied on the robot's hand.

      I'm fairly new to utilizing physics (I'm taking a class right now =) ), and as such I don't know how to calculate things like the bending or breaking of metal and such, so I'm using a thought experiment now. It's reasonable to believe that if the car was dropped on the robot, the robot would likely be (at least partially) crushed. Since almost the same amount of force occurs against the robot trying to stop the car, some sort of deformation should be taking place.

      Anyone who does know the calculations that I don't can feel free to step in here and give us a more accurate value for this stuff... I also feel that the friction of the robot on the pavement plays some part in it, but I'm having a hard time seeing it any further, so I'm going to leave it at this thought experiment until someone with a greater knowledge of Physics can run with the problem from here.

      --
      -Vendal Thornheart
  46. Scaling laws by Bender_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Simple scaling laws that should be known by any engineer tell why bipeds of that size are not a good idea to begin with.

    With increasing size the time constant of motion changes (froude number) making larger robots inherently slower. Also other laws indicate that the influence of gravition grows larger, make the robot difficult to control and prone to damage.

    There are reasons why nature has not created bipeds of that size.

  47. Mirror by cgenman · · Score: 5, Informative

    Another poster has put up a mirror, though nobody seems to have noticed the original comment.

    The mirror is available here.

    The page doesn't load animations properly in Opera, and relies upon Quicktime to display the Mpegs. It might work in Mozilla, but it might not.

    And again, adulations aplenty to xWh3lPx for the mirror.

  48. Re:Must be French! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes. Because if it was American it would've shot all it's allies...

  49. Fake Server overload by FromWithin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's a bit bizarre that you can't see any webpages, but you can still download the movie files using direct links.

  50. Linus's Law by Rhodnius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm surprised how fast all the flaws with the video were exposed by readers here. How did Linus's Law go again... "With enough eyeballs, all fakery is shallow"...?