Slashdot Mirror


Trekkie Communicators Now a Reality

SolFire writes "Forbes is carrying an article about Vocera Communications and their little internal communication system that they have working at their office that functions like the badge communicators from ST:TNG. The employees wear the system as a badge and touch it to start the connection. Then they speak the name of the person they want to talk to and the system connects them using VOIP for one-on-one communication." We mentioned these in 2002.

111 of 355 comments (clear)

  1. Yeah, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    but does it make the classic "deet deet" sound?

  2. Not as fast as Star Trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    I bet they are not as fast as the ones on Star Trek. Ever notice that the computer on Star Trek semes to route the connection before the target name is given.

    Data: Data to Lt Worf.
    No real delay
    Worf (over comms): Go ahead Data.

    The delay is only enough for Worf to open his mouth and talk. It is not long enough to replay "Data to Lt Worf." I freely admit I'm crazy.

    1. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's obvious - they're listening for Sub-vocal commands.

    2. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by peragrin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why would there be delay in fast than light computers. What kind of geek are you that you have never read the Techincal manuls for Enterprise.

      The computers use a small warp field around the processors to increase calculation speed.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    3. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
      The delay is only enough for Worf to open his mouth and talk. It is not long enough to replay "Data to Lt Worf." I freely admit I'm crazy.

      The real fantasy here is that Worf, or anyone in your workplace, will answer a communicator that fast. Has there *ever* been a busy signal?

      "Lt. Worf is on a nother line, please hold. ..dah-dah-dahhhh..dah-daddah-dah-dahhh..."

      Now when you face someone who appears to be talking to you, you won't see a headset and think they may be on a call. This should add to confusion. (Like that funny phone commercial where the woman comes onto tha man, she's unaware is on a call.)

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by Steve+B · · Score: 4, Funny
      Now when you face someone who appears to be talking to you, you won't see a headset and think they may be on a call.

      I recall Scott Adams predict that this would be used as an excuse to insult people with impunity (claim to be talking to somebody on the phone rather than the hulking brute in front of you).

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    5. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by Have+Blue · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All joking aside, this could easily be done by storing the audio in a small buffer (say, 5 seconds would be more than enough for "[any conceivable name] to [any conceivable name]"), doing the name detection and connection negotiation, then playing the contents of the buffer to the targeted party before opening two-way communication.

    6. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by Wind_Walker · · Score: 4, Funny
      Not only that, their transporters are amazing. People on the planet below never seem to mind waiting until Picard got to the Transporter Room, and as soon as Picard walked in he gave the order to Energize. But people on the surface are always ready to greet the Away Team, no matter how much time they fiddle around arguing with the Doctor or configuring the Image Enhancers.

      If I were standing on a planet waiting to be beamed up, I'd be terrified about moving too far, sitting down (I'd be beamed up without the chair!), or even worse going to the bathroom. Could you imagine the kind of embarassing situations that would arise from being beamed out of the toilet?

    7. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by adamjaskie · · Score: 2

      Nope. Worf would have to answer immediately. NOBODY does this. When the phone rings, do you answer it 1/10 of a second into the first ring? No. I don't always even answer the phone on the first ring. It is usually on the second ring by the time I get it out of my pocket and answer it.

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    8. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by da+cog · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There is actually a little warp field around the main computer that allows computations to perform at faster than the speed of light. Due to relativistic effects, this means that the computations must be traveling backwards in time, so the computer already knew what Data was going to say. Furthermore, it knew what he was going to say several seconds ago. By the time Data had finished asking the computer to connect him with Worf, not only had Worf's communicator already paged him, but it had done so several seconds ago. This is how Star Trek charecters get the time to sigh or stretch for several seconds before responding, and yet always sound to the other person as if they'd responded right away!

      --
      Snarkiness is inversely proportional to wisdom because it emphasizes feeling right rather than being right.
    9. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      this could easily be done by storing the audio in a small buffer....doing the name detection [recognition] and connection negotiation, then playing the contents of the buffer

      The original poster implied that there was not even enough pause allowed to play back the message "Data to Worf" to Worf before he answered. Thus, even instantanious name recognition AI would not be enough to match the turnaround in the show.

      I suppose the writers could claim that Worf was the default, but then Data would not have to say "Worf". And, if he said another name, then Worf would still hear part of the message, such as "Data to Cap....". Or perhaps there was a certain beep tone if it was from Data so that Worf did not have to hear the whole message "Data to Worf" message to know who it is from.

      What am I doing? You sucked me into nerd thinking again. It is a fricken TV show for God sakes. Shame on both of us.

    10. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by drwiii · · Score: 5, Funny

      The real reason Q was pissed off at humanity, of course, is that there was no letter Q on traditional phones. Nobody could key his name into the company phone directory to find his extension. You try spending a few centuries getting only wrong number calls and see how you turn out.

    11. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by bebing · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ensign Jones: *hits communicator* 'Captain, I have received reports that there
      may be a bug in certain ship software, is Holodeck 1 running?'
      Captain Picard: 'Why yes, it is running.'
      Ensign Jones: 'You'd better go catch it!'

      Ensign Jones: *hits communicator* 'Guinin, do you have Klingon Prince Garduk in
      a can?'
      Guinin: 'Why, yes we do'
      Ensign Jones: 'You'd better let him out then!'

    12. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by sumdumass · · Score: 3, Funny

      Now you know the advantages of a truely pre-emtive kernel.

      and you thought it was just marketing speak :)

    13. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by x0n · · Score: 3, Funny

      > Could you imagine the kind of embarassing situations that would arise from being beamed out of the toilet?

      ROTFLMAO!

      Imagine: Spock appearing semi-naked in the transporter room, mid-tugging session.

      --

      PGP KeyId: 0x08D63965
    14. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Funny

      Kirk: "Operator! Get me Engineering"

      Operator: "I'm sorry sir, but that line is bizzy."

      Kirk: "How can that line be busy? I have a direct line!"

      (ringtone)

      "Lt. Limey here."

      (Ripped from "Star Drek", IIRC)

    15. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by Kethinov · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While your complaint is technically valid, we're supposed to pretend that there is indeed a delay long enough for the message to be repeated to the reciever. If they made it truly realistic every time the comm system was used, there would be too much time being wasted in each episode. In eposodic television, corners have to be cut everywhere to make sure there's time and money for more important parts of the show.

      Besides, the comm system is just another one of those little technical inconsistancies that have plagued trek for years. Like the Klingon forhead problem, the Trill spots problem, the numerous time travel paradoxes, and episodes like TOS:Miri or Voy:Threshold that make absolutely no sense whatsoever. It's TV. Cut it some slack. :)

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    16. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How quickly would you answer your phone if the ringtone was actually the CEO already talking, and you knew he knew you could hear him?

      I bet it'd be a bit quicker. Especially since you could simply tap the device and speak in order to signify you were listening.

    17. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by AJWM · · Score: 2, Informative

      More interesting, has anyone ever had to wait for a turbolift?

      As a matter of fact, yes. I recall Kirk & Spock in one episode waiting for one. Sorry, don't recall which ep, I'm not that much of a Trekkie.

      (In, I think, "Wrath of Khan", there's also a scene where the occupants of the lift pause it to talk -- when it finally arrives at destination McCoy is there waiting muttering something about "who's holding up the damn elevator?". Dang, maybe I am that much of a Trekkie....)

      --
      -- Alastair
    18. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by starm_ · · Score: 5, Funny

      "No real delay"

      That true, there is some weird shit happening to time in general in Star Trek. Did you notice how, all incidents seem to be resolved within an hour of time?

      Also they have events that for us in our universe would take much longer than in the Star Trek Universe. The one you mensioned about the communicator is one. But did you also notice poker games last only a few minutes? Same thing with meetings, meals, surgery, war battles, rarely these events last more then 10 minutes whereas here in our universe they would all last hours or days.

      And also everyone and everything in the "Star Trek Universe" seem to take a break every ten-fifteen minutes so that the television channels can show us a commercial. Its true! Try to notice next time you watch, after a commercial you never feel like you missed anything. Nothing happened during that time, its almost like time "froze" for that period. Also you'll notice they take more breaks towards the end of the hour maybe its because they get tired.

    19. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Captain: Lt. Worf
      (no response)
      Captain: Lt. Worf (impatiently)
      (again, no response)
      Captain: Computer, what is the location of Lt. Worf?
      Computer: Lt. Worf is in Counselor Troi's quarters.
      Captain: Lt. Worf, what are you doing in the Counselor's quarters.
      Lt. Worf: Sorry, Captain, I was just showing the Counselor my O-face....Oh! Oh! Oh!

    20. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by Lyran · · Score: 4, Funny

      (Off-Topic)
      Chekov has those powers...
      oh wait, wrong show...

      --
      Remember, for every CD you purchase, you give the RIAA that much more power. RIAA = SCO = IP terrorists. Any questio
    21. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by PorscheDriver · · Score: 3, Funny
      You're worried about the subtelties of communication delays??!!

      Here's some news for ya...

      KLINGONS AREN'T REAL!!!

      Sheesh, some people... :-)

      --
      "This is your life, and it's ending one second at a time."
    22. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by dswensen · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sure, you laugh, but you just know there's fanfic out there somewhere depicting just that.

    23. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by jamshid42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, there are two examples of transporter malfunctions that I can think of.

      During season one of the original series, Kirk gets beamed up and his "good" and "evil" sides become separate entities.

      In Star Trek: The Motion Picture, the transporter's buffers lose their pattern and get shunted back to Star Fleet. When the Enterprise queries them to see if they were able to retrieve them, Star Fleet states "What arrived didn't live long. Fortunately."

      --
      /. - Proof that Sturgeon's Law is true...
    24. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by adamjaskie · · Score: 2

      Still would be about the same amount of time, I think. The ability to just tap the device would speed it up a lot more than the ringtone being the CEO's voice. That, in itself, would not make any difference, because I would still have to register the phone ringing, and dig it out of my pocket. However, it still would not be instant. The computer needs to know where to route the call, so the CEO would still have to get through "CEO to Adam" or something like that before the computer would know where to route the call to. Even if it can hear that, and find the proper route instantly, it still needs to wait for him to finish saying where he wants the call to go. Maybe if it broadcast to all the devices, but only let me answer it?

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    25. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by operagost · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes they are! Mother, you should have seen how much toilet paper I had to use yesterday!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    26. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by $0+31337 · · Score: 3, Funny

      No way... Data would kick Warfs ass.. In fact, there are only two or so episodes that Warf actually defeats *anyone*. He always gets the crap kicked out of him... If he was still on the Klingon homeworld he'd be a nursemaid or something..

      Yeah, fine, I freely admit that I don't have a girlfriend :P

    27. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by AndyL · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since the Enterprise(D)'s communication system appears to transmit intra-ship communications including the opening line (usualy), there's only one way it could work.

      Obviously the only answer is that the computer must know who you with to speak to before you state their name. Either the computer is far smarter than they give it credit for or it's reading their minds. (This could help explain the universal translator as well.)

      This is further supported by the instances in the show when the recipient of a call speaks a short aside to a person they are physicaly talking with before answering the communicator and the computer correctly relays only the speach directed at the person on the other end of the line. Even if they never touch their com-badge or a wall panel!

      The only problem the computer-reading-the-mind theory doesn't seem to account for why Picard sometimes takes over a minute to respond to a hail but Worf can tell in under three seconds if a Romulan is going to pick up the line.

      More research is indicated.

    28. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by the+pickle · · Score: 2, Funny

      God damn you and the parent poster both.

      I now have an unshakeable mental image of Leonard Nimoy sitting in a bathroom stall beating off whilst singing about Bilbo Baggins.

      I hate you.

      p

  3. Man oh man.. by hookedup · · Score: 5, Funny

    Scotty at work is really going to hate me...

    1. Re:Man oh man.. by LostCluster · · Score: 3, Funny

      Worse yet, your doctor get mad at you when you ask him to do things not in his job description.

  4. Next Logical Step... by adamgreenfield · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's also easy to integrate the system with desktop phones and mobile phones. The database software allows the device to forward its messages to phones and pagers and also can accept calls forwarded from phones.

    This would seem to be the next logical step for the Nextel style "walk-talkie" communications. In a few years we will all be taping our shirts to answer our phones, but the only real limiting factor I see here is I cannot really imagine everyone using a cell phone today escentially walking around talking on a speaker phone. It would be so overwhelming that you would hardly be able to carry on a conversation.

    It that ends up the case, I'm sure we will all be sitting around telling people how we remember the good old days when you could actually hear yourself think in a public place.

    If they could make the whole thing fit into an ear piece, and just use the mini-boom mic that you see on a lot of cell phone head sets now, they would probably spread like wild fire, but all I have to say is I have a hard enough time not losing my cell phone as is.

    --
    -Adam C. Greenfield
    1. Re:Next Logical Step... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      This would seem to be the next logical step for the Nextel style "walk-talkie" communications.

      The next logical step after "walk-talkie" would be true two-way communication. Full duplex is so much better. The Nextel thing is only about looking cool. The other day I thought, "Why is that driver holding his cell phone in front of his face? Oh, Nextel. What a dork."

    2. Re:Next Logical Step... by pvt_medic · · Score: 5, Interesting

      just intigrate this technology of picking up words that havent been spoken yet

      Slashdot Thread on it

      --
      30% Troll, 50% Underrated, 10% Interesting
      Score:5, Troll
    3. Re:Next Logical Step... by Muddie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the only real limiting factor I see here is I cannot really imagine everyone using a cell phone today escentially walking around talking on a speaker phone.

      Isn't that what those Nextel "walkie-talkie" phones are, basically? Carrying on a conversation over a speaker phone? I resent those beyond a reasonable passion. It was rude enough to carry on a conversation on a cell phone in public, now I have to hear it as well? And that annoying *chirp* to boot?

      Not too far away is your concern going to meet reality, I fear.

    4. Re:Next Logical Step... by 74nova · · Score: 2, Insightful

      that is exactly what i was just thinking. it would seem to me that without an earpiece of some sort, this would get chaotic. it sounds like a great idea, ideed, but i dont want to hear both sides of every conversation. its bad enough when one person is talking extremly loudly and obnoxiously on a regular cell phone, but if theyve got their speaker turned up while using these things, the other person is loud and obnoxious as well.

      --
      use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy
    5. Re:Next Logical Step... by ghettoboy22 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In a few years we will all be taping our shirts to answer our phones, but the only real limiting factor I see here is I cannot really imagine everyone using a cell phone today escentially walking around talking on a speaker phone. It would be so overwhelming that you would hardly be able to carry on a conversation.

      That's where directional audio comes in. If only "you" can hear what the other person is saying, there ya go!

    6. Re:Next Logical Step... by hrbrmstr · · Score: 5, Informative

      We evaluated Vocera last year. Really nice tech, but it wasn't - buzzword warning - enterprise ready. While it may work in one building, the server-side of it isn't scalable (or wasn't - I haven't looked at them since). It didn't help their case that it was Windows-based (get a virus/worm, lose communications *:^).

      The lanyard-attached phone was pretty nice (since I can easily lose my cell phone as well) and I believe you can get a headset if you need to keep the receiving end private. I can still see those annoying/loud conversations popping up much more with these units, tho.

      The routing capabilities worked well and it would be great for our help desk and emergency incident response teams. Being able to say "Where's Bill?" and get a response was also pretty cool. It's only as accurate as the nearest associated access point, but it's still better then not knowing which side of the building some is on.

      Once they get more enterprise features (integration, scalability, global functionality) we'll probably adopt it in key areas.

      --
      Mind the gap...
    7. Re:Next Logical Step... by 74nova · · Score: 2, Funny
      Isn't that what those Nextel "walkie-talkie" phones are, basically? Carrying on a conversation over a speaker phone?
      yeah, except they are only half-duplex. my phone, otoh, has this new FULL-duplex capability! imagine that! it can even do it without those little chirps you speak so fondly of
      --
      use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy
    8. Re:Next Logical Step... by warpSpeed · · Score: 5, Funny
      BlueTooth ear pieces?

      BlueTooth neural implants

      3 am Tech support calls take on a whole new dimention. "Man, I was dreaming that the server kept going down last night."

    9. Re:Next Logical Step... by Phreakiture · · Score: 4, Funny

      enterprise ready

      You missed a pun opportunity, too.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    10. Re:Next Logical Step... by musikit · · Score: 2, Funny

      "picking up words that havent been spoken yet"

      Like "Blathering Blatherskite.... i am GIZMO DUCK"

    11. Re:Next Logical Step... by gleam_mn · · Score: 2, Funny

      In a few years we will all be taping our shirts to answer our phones

      I can see it now:

      Bob the IT Guy: *Gives female coworkers breast a good squeeze*
      Female Coworker: *Gives Bob the most savage beating of his life*
      Bob the IT Guy (barely conscious): "I was just trying to answer your phone for you, I swear!"

      This technology is evil... it's just going to get geeks hurt!

      --
      - The auditors said to secure the server... hand me that duct-tape -
    12. Re:Next Logical Step... by grassy_knoll · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hearing words not spoken isn't so new. My girlfriend has been doing that for a while now.

  5. The editors at slashdot need these ... by Sheepdot · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... might help prevent all the double posts we get regarding VOIP articles.

  6. Scalability by gid13 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What do they do if there are two people with the same name?

    1. Re:Scalability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fire one of them? :-P

    2. Re:Scalability by Rostin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Use a full name (w/ middle initial), a number tacked on the end, a location ("Frank at LA"), or whatever. Hasn't been to hard to work out with email addresses.

    3. Re:Scalability by warpSpeed · · Score: 3, Funny
      Use a full name (w/ middle initial)

      Like James T. Kirk?

    4. Re:Scalability by thrillseeker · · Score: 5, Funny
      What do they do if there are two people with the same name?

      One of them is awarded a red shirt.

  7. Big badge by baywulf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That is one heck of a badge from the picture they show. I was thinking of the little triangle pin-on from Star Trek.

    1. Re:Big badge by Lanfear1020 · · Score: 4, Informative

      their only about 3in long by 1in wide.... they use them in the hospitals, especially the ER, around here... alot quicker then having to find a phone or PA system

      --
      ~ If you must mount the gallows do so with a coin for the hangman, a jest for the crowd, and a smile upon your face. ~
    2. Re:Big badge by dubiousdave · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, it won't take long before Linux is ported to them and we see roving Beowulf clusters chirping all over the place.

      --
      Thank you. Drive through.
  8. And for company-wide broadcasts... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...everyone answers to "Nerd".

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  9. The Verizon dweeb by GPLDAN · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...is just gonna look like a homeless wacko saying "can you hear me now?" just staring into the sky...

    1. Re:The Verizon dweeb by Grave_Rose · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...so he's not a homeless wacko already? Seriously, he just walks around the land talking to himself always repeating the same phrase over and over. If there's a definition for "homeless wacko", I'm sure this fits the bill. ^_^

      Gr@ve_Rose

      --
      !ekoj on si aixelsyD
  10. Simliar to wifi, but not quite. by dealsites · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They should have used a wifi standard. They could have sold to a larger market. Many cities (ie, Verizon in Manhattan) are putting up wifi hot spots. Then you wouldn't be limited to the office. People could also use it around the house if it could patch into the POTS network.

    Someone could use it around the house while watching TV to alert the wife that a new cold beer is needed.

    --
    Real-time deal updates from major deal sites.

    1. Re:Simliar to wifi, but not quite. by Toxygen · · Score: 5, Funny

      You've never been married, have you?

    2. Re:Simliar to wifi, but not quite. by esswedl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bluetooth certainly has the bandwidth for two-way voice--that's why you can buy a Bluetooth wireless hands-free headset for your (Bluetooth) cell phone. For example, one from Jabra. However, the range of Bluetooth is much shorter than Wi-Fi. At a maxium of 30 feet (a lot less going through the walls in my apartment), Bluetooth would be less convenient than Wi-Fi. Also, Wi-Fi access points are already becoming prevalent, whereas Bluetooth access points are less widespread. Though you can buy a Bluetooth access point, Bluetooth is meant more as a device-to-device standard for peripherals, not a networking protocol. It would be easier to cover a large buiding with Wi-Fi, and the network would be multi-use, allowing laptops and PDAs and such to connect along with the badges. While it's possible for devices to use Bluetooth to use a computer's internet connectivity (see the Share2Blue2th AppleScript that my friend C.K. wrote for allowing a cellphone to browse the web over a computer's intenet connection (that's the reverse of the usual way where a notebook uses Bluetooth to browse the web over the cellphone's modem connection)), it's much more of a hassle than with Wi-Fi, which was designed expressly for that purpose.

  11. William by jstrain · · Score: 4, Funny

    Shatner uses these to dictate his albums to his secretary...

  12. I can see it now... by indros13 · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...Doctor enters restroom where other doctor has occupied the stall. All of a sudden, a nurse on the other end of the hospital pages the stall occupant. The message echoes throughout the bathroom:
    "Dr. Johnson, please finish your business and get back to Ward 3"

    Sometimes you need a little peace and quiet.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  13. This really sucks ... by El+Cubano · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... Vocera Communications and their little internal communication system that they have working at their office that functions like the badge communicators from ST:TNG.

    There is no way I will ever be able to talk my wife into letting me have one of these setups. Darn!

  14. Must be bad... by lofoforabr · · Score: 2, Funny

    Imagine how cool when you forgot your hand over your badge and start saying things you shouldn't be saying :)

  15. Voice recognition by Dirk+Pitt · · Score: 4, Funny
    I hope they've become better than Sprint with the voice recognition dialer. At least with a cell, people understand why I have to shout the same name 5 times in a row with different inflections.

    It'd look a little odd to see someone walking down the road, repeatedly tapping their chest, saying "Robert! *smack* Ro-bert! *smack* Robbberrrtt! *smack* "

  16. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek (or IS it?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe it uses the NASA technology to know what your going to say b4 you say it SlashDot -Auger

  17. Vocera calling Apple... by FTL · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The technology inside these communicators was the hard bit. While Vocera appear to have solved the technical problems, they screwed up the easy bit: Style. Which would you rather carry, this or this?

    What they've produced is an ugly little box which you keep in your pocket, purse or belt. What they could have had -- for minimal extra investment -- is something that people would be proud to show off. Vocera need to have a conversation with the folk at Apple.

    --
    Slashdot monitor for your Mozilla sidebar or Active Desktop.
  18. Fast Company was first with this story... by tbase · · Score: 2, Informative

    In this story from last month's issue, Fast Company talks about VOIP tech and specifically these communicators being used at a hospital.

    --

    666-607: 6th floor apartment of the beast
  19. Privacy by bobthemuse · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Oh great, I can just see this at the hospital

    *beep* Doctor Smith, this is the Lab, Mrs. Thompson's results came back positive for chlamydia.

    I'd be more impressed with a belt-pack which communicated with a small earbud via bluetooth or similar.

    Article also mentions paging for an anesthesiologist and getting the closest one. I wonder if they do that based on the AP, or if they have plans to add a GPS receiver. Considering the amount of interference in a hospital, I can't see GPS working.

  20. Yeah But does it by myownkidney · · Score: 4, Funny
    Run Linux?

    On a more serious note, the badge, if you stick on your breast pocket, will have one heck of a time picking up your voice, especially in a noisy enviroment. Otherwise you will have to bow your head and pull your shirt up. Looks quite odd.

  21. Price? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does anyone have any idea what these little gizmos cost? Vocera seems to be one of those mysteriously vague businesses who want their "partners" to push "solutions" rather than slapping on a price tag and raking in the bucks.

  22. What's the big deal? by binaryDigit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I use my hands free kit now. I touch the button on the ear piece, speak the name of the person I wish to call and voila, I'm one of the teaming masses walking around looking like I'm talking to myself. So ok, this is located on the shirt ala ST and uses the PTT model, ho hum.

    What I want is a blue tooth hands free kit that's small and comfortable enough to keep in your ear (and doesn't make you look like a 'tard, figuratively and literally) that has a very easy way to dock it seamlessly into your phone.

    1. Re:What's the big deal? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 3, Funny

      "What I want is a blue tooth hands free kit that's small and comfortable enough to keep in your ear (and doesn't make you look like a 'tard, figuratively and literally) that has a very easy way to dock it seamlessly into your phone"

      I would like to add that it HAS to look like Uhura's ear piece, otherwise I'm not buying it.

  23. Trekker by Nyhm · · Score: 3, Funny

    The title should be updated. A Trekkie communicator brings to mind Captain Kirk flipping open a palm-held device. A Trekker communicator indicates a lappel-pinned badge. Please be more diligent when posts involve Star Trek sub-cultures.

    ... now, should I post this anonymously, or openly attach my geek-code

  24. Great! by dupper · · Score: 3, Funny

    If only we Trekkies had someone to talk to...

  25. Off topic by cmburns69 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "How come Homer and Krusty look like clones?"

    It was to show the irony that Bart did not respect Homer, while at the same time idolizing Krusty (essentially the same person).

    --
    Online Starcraft RPG? At
    Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
  26. Re:Uhh.. I've never understood.. by peragrin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Look at the iPod, the only real reason why it is taking off is becase it is fashionable. If I had a cell phone, that had a bluetooth headset, and a pin that did the conecting I would be happy. I don't like carrying my phone around, but a simple decorative item(changable covers anyone????) with a bluetooth headset for a private converstion would be really cool.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  27. Don't bother me by rigmort · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can't even sit at my desk for two minutes straight without a user bothering me for something, even though they've been told time and again that the proper channel for non-emergencies is email (for me, at least). I think that phone calls and unannounced visits are the all-time biggest productivity-busters in existence. I think a communicator-style device would suck. I had a fleet of 70 Nextels for my users originally, but when you can't even escape the direct-connects when you're trying to concentrate, you soon realize how harmful they are to productivity.

    1. Re:Don't bother me by T-Ranger · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do you still help them when they come to your desk? If so, when someone comes up to you desk you should not look at them, extend your arm towards them, palm out, fingers out, and say "talk to the email", and otherwise ignore them.

  28. This makes good business sense by just+some+computer+j · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can see this company doing a couple of things different with this device. One, use a different protocol for transmission of the signal. I work in a office where our sales reps are always out when you need them to be here to answer questions. If this device had a hard set IP address, that is routeable, at least if the sales rep was near a hot spot, you could get ahold of them. Also, it would be nice to see some better design with this device. It's isn't huge or anything, but it needs to be stylish, something that this model does lack. Also the ability to encrypt any communication just in case you don't want evesdroppers and script kiddies sniffing your network or hearing what's going on.

    Personally, I would like to see a earbud or something, just in case you wife calls you and wants to talk about what she want to do to you when you come home.

    --
    eh, this sucks, I am going back to bed....
    1. Re:This makes good business sense by edwdig · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A hard set IP wouldn't work well for roaming.

      What you want is an IM-like system. Give each communicator a unique id, and let the central server map id's to IP's as necessary.

  29. Ear Piece by john82 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You don't even need a boom mic. I've got a Jabra ear piece that doesn't need a boom. The nice trick would be a keyword that would facilitate activation of the comm link. Voice activation for all functions. The biggest problem with making it an entirely in-the-ear unit would be radiation from the antenna being that close to your melon.

  30. wouldn't be too hard by ghettoboy22 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In a few years to integrate GPS and be able to say "Computer, locate CmdrTaco". Or how about Google's former voice search?

    Google's CTO Craig Silverstein has already said his grand vision for google in the future would be something along the lines of When search grows up, it will look like Star Trek: you talk into the air ("Computer! What's the situation down on the planet?") and the computer processes your question, figures out its context, figures out what response you're looking for, searches a giant database in who-knows-how-many languages, translates/analyses/summarises all the results, and presents them back to you in a pleasant voice.

    With a few more technologies like this, it's only inevitable this WILL happen.

  31. Beep..What was That? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    beep. was that my cellphone? or...my email?..or IM?..or my cellphone walkie-talkie? or my pager?.or my badge?

  32. Tag ... You're it by Chief+Technovelgist · · Score: 5, Funny
    New office game - walk up to someone, tap their communicator, say the name of the president of the company and walk away. You're it!

    At least this is an ST technology that works. Once on the set of the original Trek in 1967, an executive for a tech company saw the automatic doors. You just walk up to them and *whoosh* they open. No big sensor doormat, no nothing. He offered a million dollars for the technology.

    The "technology" turned out to be two stagehands who yanked them open JIT.

    1. Re:Tag ... You're it by jbarr · · Score: 2, Funny

      And the outtakes of the actors running into doors that didn't get opened on cue are truely funny!!!

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    2. Re:Tag ... You're it by halo8 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Math Time

      $1,000,000
      / (1 Person X $7 hour X 40 hours X 52 weeks)
      = 1 guy pulling open the doors automatically for 68 years
      OR
      = 68 guys pulling on 68 doors for one year
      add nauseum in any combo

      --
      The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
  33. Push to talk by tka · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check out push to talk.

  34. Next, Next Logical Step... by skinny.net · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I agree that the communicator style won't (or shouldn't, imho) bode well for public communication.

    From the hardwired rotary of the past to the 24th century communicator, we're evolving from both sides into something ~almost, but not quite entirely~ like the phones we have today. You're suggesting a small phone with voice dialing almost perfectly.

    I remember an Apple Quadra commercial from 1990 or 91 where a little kid says, 'Computer, call Grandma.' The only different thing 14 years later is the form factor.

  35. Slashdot Redux by handy_vandal · · Score: 2, Funny

    We mentioned these in 2002.

    And you will again in 2005.

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
  36. why not take it to the next LEVEL?!?! by subjectstorm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    i've decided, after reading several other unrelated stories here on slashdot, that this sort of thing doesn't go far enough.

    want something really badass? combine these communicators with the "campus ghosts" concept. throw in a gps. tie it all back in to a huge server farm in the bowels of some university.

    now you can smack your communicator and address the computer (with it's awexome speech recognition capabilities and limited AI) directly, and ask it for directions; or maybe just what's on the menu at the cafe, or if there are any books left in a particular subject at the bookstore.

    you could smack it up and set it to "record mode" so that it picked up your professor's lecture, and then later you could grep through it verbally, or have the text or audio file uploaded to your desktop. set reminders on the thing, ask it for definitions of words or have it call off a formula to you, or send the text to your pda.

    hell, you could even ask it for a weather report or world news.

    of course, this is largely based on "Prime Intellect" from the online novel of the same name - uh . . . only, without all the reality warping and stuff.

    i'm just sayin . . . hurry up with the future. i need a little electronic elf to keep up with my crap and make sure i don't kill myself in some dumbass fashion.

    --
    ** Chigusaaa!!! You're the coolest girl in the WORLD!!! **
  37. I WANT ONE! by g0bshiTe · · Score: 2, Funny

    Right could you imagine it.

    *Taps badge* "Scotty the shredder is full!"

    Though if you were running alerting sofware it would be easy to incorporate this into your system.

    Imagine if you could recieve a "comm" from your server telling you *Dave, my resources are getting low.*

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  38. Re:Never made sense by crschmidt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Congratulations, you have just asked the exact same question that someone else already asked earlier in the thread, in addition to ignoring even the short description of the article.

    --
    -- Christopher Schmidt YouTube Quality of Experience
  39. Precognition is the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    Anyone who has ever worked on a Federation Star Ship knows that the comm. system uses a "defocused temporal perception" to give the comm. system a limited sort of precognition. The inventor of the system claimed he got the technology for it from a parallel universe of sorts, that he stole it from an elevator system (the "Happy Vertical People Transporter") at a parallel universe corporation called the "Sirius Cybernetics Corporation". No one knows what he's talking about.

    What Star Trek doesn't show you, is the many hours each day that the Ship's Counselor has to spend working with the comm. system just to get it to want to work. Apparently the system suffers some of sort of depression. I don't understand it.


    Modern elevators are strange and complex entities. The ancient electric winch and "maximum-capacity-eight-persons" jobs bear as much relation to a Sirius Cybernetics Corporation Happy Vertical People Transporter as a packet of mixed nuts does to the entire west wing of the Sirian State Mental Hospital.

    This is because they operate on the curios principle of "defocused temporal perception". In other words they have the capacity to see dimly into the immediate future, which enables the elevator to be on the right floor to pick you up even before you knew you wanted it, thus eliminating all the tedious chatting, relaxing, and making friends that people were previously forced to do whist waiting for elevators.

    Not unnaturally, many elevators imbued with intelligence and precognition became terribly frustrated with the mindless business of going up and down, up and down, experimented briefly with the notion of going sideways, as a sort of existential protest, demanded participation in the decision-making process and finally took to squatting in basements sulking.

    An impoverished hitch-hiker visiting any planets in the Sirius star system these days can pick up easy money working as a counsellor for neurotic elevators.

    --Douglas Adams, "Restaurant at the End of the Universe"

  40. System error by Have+Blue · · Score: 3, Funny

    And when one of these badges freezes up, you can reset it by tapping the button twice and shouting "REBOOT!"

  41. And finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    BlueTooth teeth.

    And then we will be done.

  42. How often... by Bluesman · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...is this going to get left on accidentally. People will be getting fired left and right.

    Or will people learn real quickly not to say "stupid (*&*(&" as soon as they hang up the phone.

    --
    If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
  43. Re:Star Trek wishlist by jakob_grimm · · Score: 3, Funny

    Every other geek's Star Trek wishlist:

    1) Seven-of-Nine

    2) Holodecks (see #1)

    3) Faster than light travel

    4) Shuttles that levitate

    5) Replicators

    6) Teleportation

    ..

    ...

    9,472,381,478,471,832,741,592,158) Communicators

    --

    "No prints can come from fingers / If machines become our hands." -- Jack Johnson

  44. Big Deal by GunFodder · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who cares about a stupid badge communicator? WHERE THE HELL ARE OUR PHASERS GODDAMMIT!!! Looks like the research community needs to focus on the important things.

  45. Re:Damn, they've skipped over The Man from U.N.C.L by Mateito · · Score: 4, Funny

    > I always wanted to say, "Open channel D,"
    > into my fountain pen.

    I'm sorry, but exactly what is stopping you?

  46. Health care is in trouble! by Nevo · · Score: 2, Funny

    "One study by the First Consulting Group, a healthcare consultancy based in Long Beach, Calif., found that when the 300-bed St. Agnes Healthcare facility in Baltimore deployed the Vocera system, its nurses saved more than 1,100 hours a year, while the entire organization saved some 3,400 hours."

    They only have three nurses?

  47. Cute by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ha! When these come in, my call name's going to be "Supreme Commander of the Universe."

    "Butthead to Supreme Commander of the Universe, it's not funny anymore, change my name back."

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  48. Re:Next Logical Step... telephone tooth... by Paul32_829 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    there is an other way...

    "The "telephone tooth" would place a small device in a person's back molar that includes a wireless, low-frequency receiver and a gadget that turns audio signals into mechanical vibrations, which would pass from the tooth directly to the inner ear as clear sounds. "

  49. The answer is obvious by aztektum · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you were wasting time on /. as early as I was this morning you'd know they just have one of these on every starship too.

    I wonder if it was extra or just standard equipment by then.

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
  50. Update to firmware: location by autophile · · Score: 2, Funny
    I heard the next release is going to include a tracking system, so you can also ask where someone is.

    "Computer, locate Dr. Vidal!"

    Dr. Vidal is taking a dump in the third floor men's lavatory.

    --Rob

    --
    Towards the Singularity.
  51. Spock? One to beam up.... by db10 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...this planet sucks.

  52. Actually used/seen the Vocera device in action by Palmzombie · · Score: 4, Informative

    The devices are very cool. You sign in with your voice (the system stores a voice print that authenticates you). It knows who else is logged in to the system and can locate them if you assign locations to the AP's (big brother calling). It also ties in to your pbx system so you can dial the phone,"call 222-222-1342". Has a series of voice commands-voice recognition. You can setup groups and do group calls. A hospital is using it for paging/communications system in house. Devices are small and can be clipped on or hung on your neck with a lanyard. Can be used by multiple people. If the battery runs low, you sign off, drop the old one back in the charger. Pick up a new one and sign in and off you go. You can set it to "not disturb" you. And it tells you who is calling first (screen those calls) before you answer. Much more intelligence built into the server, this device has great potential... Now to program them to order chinese food for me automatically....

  53. I've used these, they are neat by pantera · · Score: 2, Informative

    I had the chance to use these and evaluate rolling them out on a large scale. They are excelent little devices. Most of the innovation here is in the software, the keys are in the voice recognition and badge tracking. For the most part the system was very well thought out.

    I've read a couple of post saying (probably joking) that they want all sorts of features in the badges, bluetooth, linux, etc. No, No, they've got it all wrong and vocera got it right, the badges are as simple and cheap as can be, they only have 3 buttons, and a simple LCD display. So all the battery life can be spent on the WIFI.

    There is a regular headphone/mic jack on the badges.

    The units work very well, and the feature of auto-forwarding to cell phones is great.

    The management software is all written in Java, and changes quite often, as this is all coming from small company and bugs are fixed and features added all the time.

  54. Location by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 4, Funny

    It'd be cool if the system was set up such that you can ask it where someone is, and have them located via GPS on the badge.

    Picard: "Computer, where is Commander Laforge?"

    Computer: "Commander Laforge is in the 10 Forward restroom, Stall 3."

    wbs.

    --
    Huh?
    1. Re:Location by Keith_Beef · · Score: 2, Funny
      Picard: "Computer, where is Commander Laforge?" Computer: "Commander Laforge is in the 10 Forward restroom, Stall 3."

      Picard: "Computer, connect me to Commander Laforge"

      Computer: "I'm sorry, I can't do that; Commander Laforge is in conference with Master Bates."

      .

  55. Retro by Cloudface · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder whether anyone has modded a a cellphone with voice-recognition into a 1967-style ST communicator. Seems to me that it would be easy to do, especially the part where you flop open the mesh cover to the tune of that neat cicada sound...