Slashdot Mirror


Meet Lucy, The Orangutan Robot

Roland Piquepaille writes "Lucy is not an ordinary robot, driven by software. She's a pure product of artificial intelligence (AI). And after a three-year long training, she's now able to make a difference between an apple and a banana, which is quite handy for an orang-utan, even if she doesn't eat them. Her five microcontroller chips wouldn't like this... In "A Grand plan for brainy robots," BBC News Online tells us that Lucy is the brainchild of Steve Grand, an honorary research fellow at Cardiff University's School of Psychology. And why did he choose an orang-utan design? "I made Lucy as an orang-utan because, can you imagine how scary it would be if she looked like a human baby?," said Grand. More details and references are available in this overview which also includes the cover of Grand's last book, 'Growing Up with Lucy: How to Build an Android in Twenty Easy Steps,' which was already reviewed on Slashdot."

95 of 336 comments (clear)

  1. Best quote in article... by jhouserizer · · Score: 3, Funny

    Best quote in the article: "I like 'intelligent' people. It's the thick ones that worry me."

  2. Heh by Ash87 · · Score: 3, Funny
    "Meet Lucy, The Orangutan Robot."

    Contender for best story title? =D

    1. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Meet Lucy, The Orangutan Robot."

      Contender for best story title? =D


      Contender for worst failed first post attempt?

    2. Re:Heh by Penguinisto · · Score: 2, Funny
      "Contender for worst failed first post attempt?"

      No, that would be "To hell with the monkey, I want my Linux Fembot with a penchant for evil!"

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    3. Re:Heh by mcmonkey · · Score: 1
      No, that would be "To hell with the monkey, I want my Linux Fembot with a penchant for evil!"

      This is going to be the best. prom. ever.

  3. The final test... by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny
    she's now able to make a difference between an apple and a banana,

    The final test will be if she can pull the football away just before Charlie Brown tries to kick it.

    that or rip his legs off...

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:The final test... by ozbird · · Score: 3, Funny

      The real final test is for the robot to know what the fruit is, but is able to lie about it:

      Lister: OK try again what is it?
      Kryten: It's a banana
      Lister: No it isn't. What is it?
      Kryten: It's a banana
      Lister: No it isn't! What is it?
      Kryten: It's an orrrrrr its an orrrrrrr
      Lister: It's an orange say it. IT IS AN ORANGE.
      Kryten: It's an orrrrrr it's an orrrrrr It's no use sir I can't do it
      Lister: You can. I'm going to teach you. (Puts down banana picks up apple) Ok what is it?
      Kryten: It's an apple
      Lister: No No No. What is it?
      Kryten: Oo it's no use sir I just can't lie I'm programmed to always tell the truth.
      Lister: Kryten it's easy look. (holding an apple) It's an orange (picks up orange) it's a melon (holding a banana) it's a female aardvark.
      Kryten: Oo that is just so superb sir. How d'ya do that, especially calling a banana an aardvark. An aardvark isn't even a fruit. It's total genius.

  4. King Louie's head on a toaster oven. Creepy. by The+I+Shing · · Score: 4, Funny
    It doesn't need a baby's head... it's creepy enough as a primate.

    I haven't been this creeped out since the first time I saw that Quiznos Subs commercial.

    And what's with that glowing blue Terminator eye? Imagine that thing chasing Linda Hamilton around.
    Your clothes... give them to me... I'll take that banana, too...
    Can't he cover that thing with fur or something? Make it look like a toy instead of like something out of madman's nightmare?
    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
    1. Re:King Louie's head on a toaster oven. Creepy. by rjelks · · Score: 4, Funny

      OMG, I followed the link and yikes. It looks like a combination of the Terminator, Chucky and some scary-assed monkey thing. Very cool idea, but I'm going to have nightmares about this one.

      -

    2. Re:King Louie's head on a toaster oven. Creepy. by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 1

      It looks like... *snip* ... some scary-assed monkey thing.

      Yes, but does it have FIVE ASSES???

      --
      sudo eat my shorts
    3. Re:King Louie's head on a toaster oven. Creepy. by jaxdahl · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you read Star Wars books like any respectable slashdottter, you'll find that C-3P0 was designed to be as neutral as possible to a wide range of cultures, it has eyes, fixed arms, neutral mouth with no teeth, open gesture.

    4. Re:King Louie's head on a toaster oven. Creepy. by nlindstrom · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I thought when I saw it: "Oh my $DEITY, that looks like a hyper-intelligent Chucky! Ahhhhhhh!"

  5. And $20000 dollars to finish my robot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    My girl robot.

    1. Re:And $20000 dollars to finish my robot by digital+bath · · Score: 1

      This is gonna be the best prom ever..

      --
      find / -name "*.sig" | xargs rm
    2. Re:And $20000 dollars to finish my robot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      FUCK YOU CHOADMUNCHER!!!! THat's not a funny joke at all. Who the fuck cares about prom?!!! I certainly don't! I'm 34 years old, why the fuck would I care about prom you fucking cunt!?? I wnet to prom back in 1988 and it was no fucking big deal. I had a girlfriend and we had sex before, during and after prom. BIG FUCKING DEAL!!! You are a fucking worthless pil of shit dumps you asscunt!!! IF YOU THINK IT'S SO FUNNY TO make fun of people who don't make it to prom, you need to fucking grow up! There are many more milestones in a person's life beyond prom. They are much more important. If prom is where you topped out, then I feel sorry for you because you are missing out on what adult life has to offer. For one thing, it only gets easier to get laid after high school. Epecially once you get a REAL FUCKING JOB you bitch! If you pull in decent money, then chicks will be on your jock in an instant. 2. If you're REALLY luckym, you mifht even get a wife!!! I have a wife and it's one of the best things in life. Sexy any time you want it with a beautiful REAL woman. I'll bet after your prom and high school career you went to work delivering pizzas and fucking your plastic pussies and blow up girfrends. My life is probably ten times better than your pathetic existence if only because of the fact that I GET LAID regularly. Prom menas nothing to anyone with intelligence who moves onto an adult life. You're a stupid pathtic moron if you think that your insult about loner geeks who jump at the chance to go to prom with a robot girl if funny. It's not. If I had a chance to date a robot girl, I would in a heartbeat I love machines more than people anyway. At least you can trust machines to never make a mistake. Only humans make mistakes. I can't believe you would post this stupid, lame joke twice in the same thread and not hang your hea in shame. I'm am aso surrised that you think you are clevelr when you are not. You are a FUCKING IDIOT!!!! You need a punch in the mouth asshat. I hope you get the fucking beating you deserve you little cuntflap. You can't offend people like me because we are byond your childish games. Now fuck off bitch! FUCK OFF!!!

    3. Re:And $20000 dollars to finish my robot by digital+bath · · Score: 1

      dude, it's from a commercial.

      $20 says you cried yourself to sleep on prom night.

      --
      find / -name "*.sig" | xargs rm
    4. Re:And $20000 dollars to finish my robot by Reece400 · · Score: 1

      Holy Shi* dude, that's the craziest rant i've ever seen! it's from a credit card commercial, no one's being made fun of.... take a valium, a bottle for that matter, and calm down before your veins pop or something :S

      Reece,

  6. Lucy's home page by morcheeba · · Score: 4, Informative

    Lucy's home page is an even better place for technical details, including an anatomical overview and scrapbook pictures

    1. Re:Lucy's home page by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2, Funny
      The FCC's going to have to censor that. She's completely nekkid!

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
  7. SSI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    cluster-capable system implementing native SSI (Single System Image) which is something that no other operating system can do today

    umm...unicos/mk?

    dyyghrnmiw

  8. scary by AnonymousCowheart · · Score: 3, Funny

    he said: "can you imagine how scary it would be if she looked like a human baby?"
    did you guys look at the picture of that thing? It looks like my mother-in-law! Thats friggen scary! I guess he spend all the money on research, and not on matching eye's.:)

    1. Re:scary by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      I guess he spend all the money on research, and not on matching eye's.:)

      It actually surprised me a bit to find out he didn't have mismatched eyes as well. My eyes have a slight variation in pigment, and I usually put some asymetry into the eyes of anything I draw just as a kind of signiture.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
  9. If his goal was... by Atario · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...to avoid being scary, he's failed miserably.

    Can't sleep...orangutan robot'll kill me...can't sleep...orangutan robot'll kill me...can't sleep...orangutan robot'll kill me...

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  10. Extinct by Ethernet_Jedi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe he could build and program an entire zoo (extinct species and all)..No feeding, no vets, just an occasional tune-up :0

    1. Re:Extinct by CreatureComfort · · Score: 1


      Yeah, and then he could get celebrity endorsements for every animal. That would be cool.

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
  11. Well, by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

    Even if her conversations are above the "why don't you just download me?" level, she won't get too far if she looks like she was standing in front of, and looking at a microwave oven as it was exploding.

    Maybe she was trying to download the oven?

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  12. Are there any... by incom · · Score: 3, Interesting

    opensource AI projects? It'd be interesting to play around with something, even very primative. It' would need to be OSS so I could actually modify it though.

    --
    True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
    1. Re:Are there any... by Dan+Crash · · Score: 1

      Depends on what you mean by AI, of course, but OpenCyc is a great project that could really use more contributors.

      --
      He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
    2. Re:Are there any... by devnull17 · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's all kinds of great stuff available, even if some of it is very old. You can even get an implementation of SHRDLU with the mechanical components replaced by a 3D Java layer.

      SHRDLU, like most AI projects written in the past 40 years, uses LISP, so it's actually not that hard to read. (Incidentally, SHRDLU is more than a bit unstable, but if you can get it to work, it's pretty amazing, especially for something written in the 70's.) Definitely worth a look, if only for the "coolness" factor.

      One of the greatest things about AI is that most of the work on it comes from academia--virtually everything is available for free, if you know where to look.

    3. Re:Are there any... by asavage · · Score: 2, Informative

      It isn't free, but the MATLAB neural network toolbox is really nice and you can see and modify a lot of code. They have some nice demos like appcr1 which is a neural network that takes images of letters and can tell you what letter is being shown. It tests it with random noise being added to the image and it works quite well.

    4. Re:Are there any... by tanksalot · · Score: 1, Informative

      You can also check out JOONE

      It is a java based open source (developed on sourceforge) Neural Network Framework.

      --
      "I am not denying the existence of stupidity, or of stupid people." - phyruxus
    5. Re:Are there any... by sakti · · Score: 1
      --
      "It is better to die on one's feet than to live on one's knees." - Albert Camus
  13. Realistic features to be added to Lucy 2.0: by mystery_bowler · · Score: 3, Funny

    - Incredible tree-climbing ability
    - Facial-gesture mimicry
    - Pick parasites out of fur (useful!)
    - Poo-flinging

    And I don't know if it's all orangutans, but the ones at my local zoo have an affinity for tire swings. They wear through the rope and then roll the tire into the safety moat.

    --

    My sigs always suck.
    1. Re:Realistic features to be added to Lucy 2.0: by doublem · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's because they're trying to build a bridge over the moat so they can escape.

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  14. Picture in article by nebaz · · Score: 1

    Did you see the picture of the orang in the article? Looks like the crypt keeper from tales of the crypt.

    An AI crypt keeper is the last thing we need.

    --
    Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
  15. Hi. I'm Troy McClure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    hi. I'm Troy McClure. You might remember me from such robot-apes movies as "Bedtime for Bender" and "Bananabots: Gorilla Rampage"

  16. Cover it with fur? by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 2, Funny

    Fur?! Good god man!

    A thick blanket is what is needed here!

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  17. Would you put your brain in a robot body? by generic-man · · Score: 1

    Controversy continued on Monday as surgeons successfully transplanted little Django's brain into a robot monkey body. Scientists now say human-to-robot brain transplants will be possible within ten years. On a sad note, however, Django died late Tuesday, after drinking his own urine. (Sealab 2021, I, Robot)

    --
    For more information, click here.
  18. Re:according to my psychology professor... by Jerf · · Score: 1

    I think your psychology professor may be a Scientologist in disguise. Are you learning about Thetans or clearing? If so, run!

    (First sentence is a joke. Rest of paragraph is not!)

  19. That Robot violates the #1 rule of robotics by Lord_Pall · · Score: 3, Funny

    That it not be absolutely terrifying looking.

  20. Bat-Shit Terrifying by Enigma_Man · · Score: 3, Funny

    That is one of the most frightening things I have ever set eyes on in my entire life. I can't imagine that a baby would have been even _more_ terrifying. Look at the cover of the book. It resembles the aliens from "Mars Attacks" to me. Also, according to the article, Frankenstein is a robot? I always thought he was a meat-bag like us? And, do we all have to refer to the hour-too-long movie "AI" every time Artificial Intelligence is referenced? Would it be infringement otherwise? Yeesh, I can't stop looking at that train wreck of a face... haunt me all night. -Jesse

    --
    Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    1. Re:Bat-Shit Terrifying by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Well, Frankenstein was built, so even if he was composed of human body parts, wouldn't that make him at least half-robot.

      Quite a bit like fantasy flesh golem, but animated by technology instead of magic.

  21. WoW by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    It's a DO-IT-YOURSELF Orangutan Erector set, from Hasbro Toys. Where can I buy one? I wonder if these will sell like Tickle Me Elmo's?

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  22. Question WRT development language by NecrosisLabs · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is she programmed in Ook?

    1. Re:Question WRT development language by dhalgren99 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but will she run linux?

  23. At least they're thinking ahead by robson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Considering that the real ones are headed for extinction, at least we'll have some facsimile as a reminder.

    (Not sure whether I should follow that with a winky-face or a sad-face.)

  24. Reminds me of this... by ebonkyre · · Score: 2, Funny
    It looks kind of like the Teddy Ruxpin Borg.

    --
    "Time is an abstract concept devised by carbon-based lifeforms to monitor their ongoing decay." - Thundercleese
  25. The Japanese do it right by macshune · · Score: 4, Informative

    I don't know if this is a trend exhibited by the majority of Japanese android/robotics researchers, but from what I've seen they tend to follow a no-face design ethic that I'm most pleased with. I think it's safe to say that most people would find anthropomorphic robots that don't look 100% identical to people (there's something off with that one) very creepy.

    And besides, these Japanese robots look way cooler and have this implied subservience about them, at least to me. It's a lot harder to humanize and attach (scary) emotion to something that's faceless and non-human looking, rather than something that looks like a hairy/scary-ass rendition of a planet of the apes extra.

    1. Re:The Japanese do it right by Zilfondel2 · · Score: 1

      Best quote: "Normally, I wear fur, but since we're such close friends I feel comfortable about stripping off."

    2. Re:The Japanese do it right by Yokaze · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think it is a particular ethic, as there research insitutes which concentrate on the facial part alone. IRC, the reasoning for the no-face design is, that when a robot has an actual face, people are trying to interprete its expressions. A hard to read face gives people a bad feeling. So, they are developing independently from the robots faces which can express "feelings".

      Robots have a different association in Japanese culture. In Western pop culture the first reference to a robot I can think of is Maria from Metropolis, in Japan Astro Boy. So, I'd say the bad feeling is also partly rooted in culture.

      > It is a lot harder to [...] attach [...] emotion to something that's faceless and non-human looking, [...]

      Um, I'd like to refer to Tamagotchis. It is not uncommon that people attach feelings to things.

      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
    3. Re:The Japanese do it right by macshune · · Score: 2, Interesting

      thanks, i appreciate the insight, it's nice that i now have a reason behind the face-less design theme. i totally agree about hard to read faces...some folks' scariest childhood memories revolve around unblinking eyes or faces missing key components. an example would be if eastman & laird had kept the ninja turtle's pupils out of the cartoon show. they would have been way creepier and probably not done nearly as well.

      fyi, when i mean "emotion" i'm not just talking about positive, so-cute-it-makes-guys-ovulate emotions, but scary, creepy emotions too. and maybe it's a question more of intensity. a de-skinned animatronic kitten with a lazy eye that glows krypton-green is less scary than a steel-lattice PCB cookie jar topped with an exaggerated primate head with a glowing green krypton eye with a grimacing i'm-gonna-eat-your-children face!

    4. Re:The Japanese do it right by Kiyooka · · Score: 2, Informative

      This has been noted before by Carl Jung (see his little-known theories of "uncanniness", can't find a link) and by a robot designer in Japan (can't find link to story on /., can't find anything today!) When something vaguely resembles a human it's amusing and cute, but when it reaches a certain threshold of similarity (which is to say it looks too much like a real human) people suddenly and severely dislike it.

      If you want people to like it, you have to keep pushing the similarity until people can't tell the difference anymore. Otherwise, it's like you're talking to a slightly defective human, which is very very unnerving. Imagine talking to a robot that's in every way exactly like a human, except that it stares at you and never blinks. Or every now and then it turns it's head 360 to look out the window, or bends its elbows backwards to pick something up off the ground. Freaky!

    5. Re:The Japanese do it right by jwgoerlich · · Score: 1

      ... Carl Jung (see his little-known theories of "uncanniness", can't find a link) and by a robot designer in Japan ...

      I am not so sure about Jung, but the Japanese roboticist is Mashiro Mori. Insofar as I know, he was the first to put forth the "Uncanny Valley" theory. The idea is that people exhibit a positive reaction to a robot that is somewhat human. This is one side of the valley. However, people respond with disgust if the robot is very realistic but, for whatever reason, not quite right. The arch of the scale is based upon movement and appearance.

      http://www.arclight.net/~pdb/glimpses/valley.html

  26. Something similar may have been done already by Bimo_Dude · · Score: 1

    I haven't been able to find any more of the sordid details about it, but I do remember this

    --
    "Teleporting Rodents with D-Cell Battery Displacement" theory -- IgnoramusMaximus (692000)
  27. Hifen by leandrod · · Score: 1

    Whence the 'orang-utan' hifen?

    --
    Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
    DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
    GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
  28. Connections... by bobej1977 · · Score: 1
    Am I the only one drawing the connection between that escaped gorilla and this AI orang?

    We all know Bubbles was the mastermind behind the recent Jackson family assaults on our children and our public decency.

    And you know that gorilla that uses sign-language? Well, when the researcher tells you Koko loves you, Koko is really outlining the Monkey Master Plan to overthrow humanity.

    No wonder Heston joined the NRA...Those damn dirty apes...

    --
    The meek shall inherit the earth, in 3 by 6 plots. - Lazerus Long
  29. I would bet by nate+nice · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I would bet that the thought of a baby would be on the order of 1,000,000 times of that of this robot. And probably 100,000 times that of a real Orangoutang. Obviously I have absolutely no backing for those figures. As for AI, the studying I have done has made me conclude it's a failed, crack science at this point for people who really have no concept that a brain doesn't act like a computer, or a computer programmed to act like a brain. In order for this to work we have to be able to quantify a brains element, chemicals etc and we haven't much idea of most of these anyways, and if we do we don't have a clue as to how they function together.

    I'm just sick of recursive "best yet" algorithms that claim to be AI when in fact it's nothing more than deduced logic and we are, thankfully, a but deeper than that.

    So, go ahead and study AI as perhaps one day something may come of it but be realistic in that you're becoming skilled in a clever art of trickery and deterministic patterns. Good luck!

    --
    "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    1. Re:I would bet by KrispyKringle · · Score: 1
      Nice rant. But I don't think you're right.

      For one thing, the point of AI research, short-term, is to provide machines that can do reasoning on their own. We aren't talking, ``I think therefore I am.'' We're talking about self-driving vehicles, for example (a very real possibility, even if DARPA's Grand Challenge was a bit of a bust). For that matter, there are plenty of reasonably efficient ways to make entirely self-learning software (expert systems and the like are good at this within a limited context).

      You are right that we don't know how humans think, so we don't know if we're emulating them or not. But blame psychology or neurology for this. AI research is, at least, churning out real results.

    2. Re:I would bet by Quino · · Score: 1

      Though I don't understand how they measured this, but a human baby is supposed to be about the same intelligence as an adult chimp (or was it a gorilla? Don't remember).

      And the article was almost devoid of technical details -- but he did allude to the fact that this was something different from most approaches that are called "AI", so I was actually expecting maybe a more fundamental breakthrough, or attempt.

      Otherwise, I actually agree with the general sentiment of your post (and I don't think it's a popular position with technologists). But my philosophy professor summerized it as "intelligence as we know it is inately biological". It took him an entire semester to convince me, but he eventually did.

      I personally think that the definition of AI will change, and I do still find it hard to believe that we won't be able to eventuall create machines that can do incredibly sophisticated tasks autonomously -- though it does appear that human-like intelligence isn't likely to happen until some more fundamental breaktrhoughs in our understanding in how our brains work (I now imagine that the breaktrhough will be in psychology/philosophy and not in computing sciences, basically).

    3. Re:I would bet by sonpal · · Score: 1
      I would bet that the thought of a baby would be on the order of 1,000,000 times of that of this robot.

      Better we watch out then. That's only 30 years away in terms of compute capability if Moore's Law holds up (and it will hold up, because even if we can't make one chip faster, we can definitely keep adding parallelism).

      Obviously I have absolutely no backing for those figures.

      It doesn't matter. A human could be a billion times smarter, and that's only 30*2 = 60 years away because of the exponential nature of compute capability. If intellegence is an emergent property, you and I are going to see an man-made intelligent entity in our lifetime.

      If you don't like it, protest or pray to stop it. I, on the other hand, am fascinated by this stuff (and would love to work on it).

    4. Re:I would bet by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      You are assuming that increasing the computational capability increases the "intelligence" of AI constructs in some linear fashion, which of course it does not. I could give you a machine that is a billion times faster than todays fatest machine and the current AI tech would still be at roughly the same level.

    5. Re:I would bet by bobej1977 · · Score: 1
      I think there is a distinction between machine intelligence and artificial intelligence. Machine intelligence is, as you say, a very long way off and would require huge advancements in materials science. I'd even argue that it will never happen. Perhaps a century from now we'll find that nano-scale engineering is done by what we'd call a genetecist instead of a physicist. And is a 'biological information processor' just a brain?

      Artificial intelligence on the other hand is simply the simulation of the processes which underpin intelligence (decision making, pattern recognition). The goal of most AI research is to create systems which can replace human intelligence, not stand along side it.

      There are some ambitious projects to simulate human intelligence in-toto which usually fall under the AI moniker, but I suggest you study biology instead of computer science if that's your goal.

      What I think you really are interested in is machine intelligence. Developing machine intelligence requires a much deeper understanding of information than we currently have since it requires that we know the What and Why rather than just the How. Unfortunately, we lazy computer engineer types will have to wait for the computer scientists to lay this groundwork for us*.

      * - Yes, we all like to consider ourselves scientists, but I submit that you are an engineer unless you are actively doing research.

      --
      The meek shall inherit the earth, in 3 by 6 plots. - Lazerus Long
    6. Re:I would bet by jbischof · · Score: 1

      when you quantify a non-quantifiable thing, it doesn't matter what number you use. A baby is 10^26 times as intelligent or twice as intelligent. All we know is that the freaky robot isn't very smart.

    7. Re:I would bet by nacturation · · Score: 1

      The average human has 1 billion neurons. Lucy has about 30,000. In humans, each neuron has between 1,000 and 10,000 dendrites connecting it to other neurons. So basically, you're looking at an average of at least 1 trillion connections in the human brain.

      AI will be a lot more advanced when we can find a good storage and computational means of processing that kind of volume of information in parallel.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    8. Re:I would bet by allanc · · Score: 1

      Can you cite a source on the numbers you give there?

      (Not a flame, just curious)

      --AC

    9. Re:I would bet by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      "AI research is, at least, churning out real results."

      But do you really think these results are really AI? Albeit I am all in all very uneducated in the grand scheme of the field but with my limited understanding and intuition I see more or less better ways to resolve patterns in things rather than emotional thought and decision. It's just something we have that is a part of intelligence that I think a computer or machine, perhaps even biological, cannot have if human developed unless we can eventually quantify our chemical reactions and why they exist.

      I'm definitely down with blaming the psych folk though! :)

      I would agree with most folk in this thread that it is an area of research I would love to succeed eventually. Too ambitious? Too ideal?

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    10. Re:I would bet by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Sure, here's the reference. Looks like I was off by a bit. Human brain has an average 100 billion neurons, not 1 billion. :) Lots of great stuff there.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    11. Re:I would bet by KrispyKringle · · Score: 1
      I'm reasonably knowledgeable about computer science, but when it comes to AI, I'm a layperson. So I'm not entirely sure what the goals of AI are, exactly. It's certainly a departure from traditional computation, in which the problems are quite clearly defined. But I don't think the intent is precisely to do things that are not Turing-recognizable; that is, the goal is not to do something that is beyond the realm of typical programming logic. Instead, it's to figure out how we humans make good guesses about things, how we make decisions, and implement that methodology.

      I think you may be right about emotion (though it may very well be implemented by accident rather than through understanding what causes emotion in us; regardless, who's to say we really feel any more than a machine programmed to react a certain way feels?), but when it comes to the decision-making stuff, it seems a reasonable, if disputable, assumption that humans make decisions based on logic that could be processed by any Turing machine; were we to figure out what that logic is (as Bayesian spam filters, for example, attempt to do), we would be able to implement it on a machine.

      I saw a recent headline either here on Slashdot or on Kuro5hin that said that humans may use Bayesian logic in ordinary decision making. That would imply that any decision we make could be made by a sufficiently accurate algorithm. (I happen to doubt that this is the case; I've taken a minimal amount of psych, and research seems to indicate that people are quite inconsistent with conditional probabilities; for example, school children,wheen asked what the probability of seeing a woman at the beach wearing a bathing suit was, rated it as higher than the probability of seeing a woman at the beach, implying there are more women wearing bathing suits than total women!)

  30. do female androids dream of body image? by sahen · · Score: 2, Funny

    Lucy's picture on the book cover is pretty heavily airbrushed... I bet once she looks in a mirror, she'll be in for a lifetime of robot-angst.

    1. Re:do female androids dream of body image? by supun · · Score: 1

      maybe about electric sheep.

      --
      :w!
    2. Re:do female androids dream of body image? by nlindstrom · · Score: 1
      No, she'll turn homicidal and start killing everyone, beginning with her creator.

      Can you guess what's next? That's right...

      I, for one, welcome our new cybernetic orangutan overlords!

  31. Re:I for one... by dicepackage · · Score: 1

    This is bringing us one step closer to the planet of the apes

  32. Thanks, BBC by barryfandango · · Score: 4, Funny

    "... the cutting edge of artificial intelligence or AI, a title used by Steven Spielberg for his 2001 film starring Haley Joel Osment and Jude Law."

    Now that's good journalism: a little background about the history of AI for the lay-people who might be reading this article.

    --
    In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane. -Oscar Wilde
  33. BIG question by bonch · · Score: 1

    An AI robot being taught to recognize banana-shaped objects, anyone?

  34. Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Couldn't they have gotten a better face for the poor thing? It looks like it was dragged out of the dumpster by the dog, and then viciously attacked by mauling centipedes, whereupon it flopped on the metal body of the ape and took on a very sinister appearance. I vote they spend their budget on getting a cute orangutan face!

  35. My suggestion.... by TBone · · Score: 1

    I think I would follow this with a scared-and-crapping-my-pants face myself, jesus, if this is what they look like, get rid of them!

    On a serious note, orangutangs going away is sad :(

    --

    This space for rent. Call 1-800-STEAK4U

  36. Is it me... by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

    ...or does that kind of look like Tom Servo in a halloween disguise?

    "Mike, you'll NEVER be extreme" - Crow T. Robot

  37. Bottom-Up Vision/Language by Yoda2 · · Score: 1
    My research is somewhat related (and open source) so I thought I'd offer up a link. EBLA does bottom up language acquisition based on visual perception. Here's a short paper.

    The work being done by Deb Roy's Cognitive Machines Group @ MIT might also be of interest.

    Sure would be nice if Grand started making bits of code and a few technical papers available. Guess he can't just give it away if its his bread and butter though.

  38. I guess they had two choices by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Two choices available for the head :
    Chucky, from Childsplay,
    And this freaky uncombed urang utang thingy :)

    I think i can understand why they went with this one. ;)

  39. Shit, shit, shit. by gardyloo · · Score: 1

    This'll get modded as redundant, as well it should. But... holy crap:

    http://www.cyberlife-research.com/diary/0104.htm

  40. AI?? by JohnLi · · Score: 1

    The article mentions that they dont use software to cheat. Does that mean that any sort of matching via a database is not "real" AI??

    --
    The / in /. would be more accurate if it leaned to the left. http://www.metricnut.com
  41. Brain Farts? by Surak_Prime · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It has occurred to me, whenever the subject of AI is broached, that scientists seem to be doing a bang-up job of heading towards replicating the proper function of a brain in computer hardware, but none of the projects I've seen try to replicate the errors that result when the brain cell sending or receiving a message dies, is replaced incorrectly, is deformed one way or another, or is subject to any of the other myriad flaws of flesh.

    Could it be that sentience, in the end, is the result of brain farts?

    --
    :::The Spear in the heart of the Other is the Spear in the heart of You; You are He - Surak of Vulcan:::
  42. Sounds like inferior cephalopod nerves to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Your nervier (brainier) mullosks have amazing nerve fibers. They get used for experiments all the time because they're just huge, big enough to place electrodes in the axons and measure voltage changes.

    Guess flexible wiring is more pleasant to be strapped into than a squid or a cuttlefish, though I doubt it'd be as fast. Cephalopods have very fast nervous systems, they're lightning quick partly as a result.

    rjt

  43. No! by The+Queen · · Score: 1

    Servo had CURVES, baby. Mmm...

    "Luncheon meats make the sawdust in your stomach explode." - Crow T. Robot

    --

    The House Between - Original Sci-Fi Series
  44. man, this robot is ugly by i4u · · Score: 1

    the japanese developed a nice looking actroid:
    Realistic Japanese Female Actroid Robot

  45. Lucy's brain by topynate · · Score: 2, Interesting

    has 50000 'neurons'. Does Steve Grand really think he'll approach mammalian intelligence with so few? I agree strongly with him giving Lucy a rich environment, but maybe he should be looking at using something like FPGAs to get more neurons on board for a reasonable cost. That's what Hugo de Garis is doing, and he had much more ambitious plans. The company he was working for failed though, so I don't know whether he's still making progress in actual building of AI. Anyone?

  46. Considered advanced... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

    When she can drink beer out of the can, lift cars and hit/give the finger to hells angels.

  47. A new "ism" approaches by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I grow weary of all the people with cyberist attitudes who are scared of machines simply because they don't look exactly like us. If you look at the best of our CG characters today, they STILL don't look like us. I imagine that the first humanoid robots will probably look a lot like CG characters come to life. Get rid of those old fashioned attitudes... ;P

  48. Case in point: by Kiyooka · · Score: 1
  49. They tried... by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

    I read a piece about him in the tree-unfriendly Mail on Sunday sometime last year and apparently he (or was it his wife?) tried mutilating an existing cuddly orangutan, but it didn't fit.

  50. Re:I would bet ... you don't get it. by fygment · · Score: 1

    If we wanted to build a bona fide organic human brain, yes we would need to quantify not only the brain's elemental composition but also how it functions. You are right in that it clearly seems beyond our reach to do that.

    But AI isn't about building an organic brain. It simply seeks to replicate the output on a particular level i.e. not at the neuronal level but at the behavioural level say. To achieve the latter do we need to understand the deep functioning of the brain? There seems to be no compelling reason. And fundamentally, AI has to work with the materials available i.e. silicon and metal and our concept of logic. Organic systems evolved to suit their medium. We can't (at the moment) use that medium so we can only expect to have to find an alternative means to the same end. Sort of like fixed wings and airfoils vice flapping wings of bone and feathers.

    As for the "trickery and deterministic patterns", that's human arrogance at work. How do you know that that isn't all there is to it? You don't. There is such a problem with the definition of intelligence that it actually makes benchmarking quite ... impossible. Do a Google search on the topic.

    What is particularly nice to see is that the "oragutan" has learned over a long time period. It still mystifies me why we expect to achieve learning in short time frames (see all the arguments about how neural networks take too long to train). A human child using the most sophisticated natural computer (the brain) still takes years to grasp all the basic elements needed for survival. Heck, the Darwin awards show that decades is often not sufficient for adequate human learning.

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  51. Creatures by metaomni · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Something that is worth noting is the 'game' that Steve Grand helped create. The entire Creatures series (1, 2 and 3) was revolutionary in the AI-software industry. It melded a game that anyone could relate to, with some serious AI running in the background. The whole concept for the games was fascinating. It's a shame that his company has now gone under. The series in its hayday had a cult following, and I'm sure there are still some out there who play it.

    Man those games were obsessions...

  52. Frankenstein is a robot? by tuckericj · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And I quote: "...conjures up fears of super-clever robots, the likes of Frankenstein..." Umm yeah.

  53. C-3PO? by Prof.+Pi · · Score: 1
    I think it's safe to say that most people would find anthropomorphic robots that don't look 100% identical to people (there's something off with that one) very creepy.

    OK, what about C-3PO?

    I guess if you're going to build an anthropomorphic robot, you need to give it an irritating voice to balance out the face.

  54. Monkey business by motters2001 · · Score: 1

    Lucy isn't the most attractive robot I've ever seen. Here's my own robot-ape. http://www.fuzzgun.btinternet.co.uk/flint/index.ht m My open source AI software can also be found here: http://www.fuzzgun.btinternet.co.uk/rodney/compone nts.htm