Slashdot Mirror


A Babe in Tuxland

Joe Barr writes "This is the kind of story that WagEd and MS would love to see in one of their astroturf campaigns. But this story is real grassroots, with a real Sysadmin writing it and a real granddaughter as the babe using Linux. A sweet tale, with tips on Linux for kids." Newsforge and Slashdot are both part of OSDN.

86 of 507 comments (clear)

  1. Whoops. by CGP314 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tux babies, not Tux babes


    -Colin

    1. Re:Whoops. by JoeCommodore · · Score: 4, Informative

      The title is a play on words from "Babes in Toyland" - a Victor Herbert operetta from 1903. ...of course, the best version was the film with Laurel and Hardy.

      --
      "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    2. Re:Whoops. by Mateito · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sorry if its been, but I thought somebody would have posted this link already.

  2. Sick! by CrankyFool · · Score: 5, Funny

    OK, how many people here were expecting someone, you know, kinda hot?

    SHE'S FOUR YEARS OLD! HAVE YOU NO DECENCY ?!

    -roy

    1. Re:Sick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...because there's nothing hotter than a girl with acne and a big sore on her foot.

    2. Re:Sick! by the+gnat · · Score: 3, Funny

      Goddamnit, I clicked on the link expecting photos of some sorority girl in a halter top and cutoffs, probably in the middle of an all-night coding session. Or, better yet, a group of them wearing pajamas and playing LAN games. Admit it, you've all had the same fantasy.

  3. Mission by Daemonik+CyCow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Man, I love this. This is the kind of thing I dream about at night, this is total evangelist fodder (can that be used in a good way?)

    1. Re:Mission by B'Trey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, this is warm and cute and cuddly and completely precious. It's also complete and utter bullshit. Not that I'm saying it's not true - I certainly assume that it is true in regards to the facts of the situation. Howver, the conclusions it tries to draw are completely unrelated to the facts. It's a snow job.

      The basic interface between MS and Linux is essentially identical. It's point and click. There's only so much variation you can have. And yes, a child can learn to point and click on Linux just as well as they can Windows.

      But when people say Linux is difficult, they don't mean that it's difficult to figure out how to start a program, how to type text into a dodcument, or how to log on to the system. They mean that it's difficult to configure a printer, to setup the network, to install the driver for that new wireless card, etc.

      I've been using Linux for over ten years, and it has made tremendous strides. An average user can sit down and install Mandrake or SuSe or Red Hat without difficulty. They can fire up Open Office and type out a letter or open Mozilla and browse the web. They can do all of these things without difficulty - IF everything works right. The problem is that things don't always work right, and when they don't work right, getting them fixed is usually much more difficult on Linux than it is on Windows. That's what people mean when they say Linux is difficult to use, and four year old girls, no matter how cute and cuddly, do nothing to address that.

      --

      "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

    2. Re:Mission by ckaminski · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As someone who's done his fair share of windows admin work (10 years, 3000+ users and PC's), I can tell you that the same is VERY true of Windows. With the exception of device support, which is unparalleled in Windows, there are just as many times when the shit hits the fan, and there's no quick solution in Windows, as there is in Linux.

    3. Re:Mission by Oblio · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem is that things don't always work right, and when they don't work right, getting them fixed is usually much more difficult on Linux than it is on Windows.

      I don't know... when I'm diagnosing a friends problem because "things don't work right" in windows, maybe a quarter to a half of the time I end up with "time to reinstall"... The WORST I have in linux is "you compiled your kernel wrong".

      I think I'd rather debug a freak linux problem than a freak windows problem any day.

      That said, my problems with linux come from when you want to do something relatively simple (printer sharing comes to mind) and it becomes exceedingly difficult because there is no clear, concise documented method to get it done. (Note that I found a document that WASN'T the standard HOWTO that walked me through this recently, so I'm not saying that this particular problem is intractable)

      --
      Pax -- Ob
    4. Re:Mission by b12arr0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're right. My four year old can already configure a printer, setup a network and install drivers for her new wireless card in Windows since it's so easy. So, it must be Linux thats giving her issues. I'll go unload it when I get home.

    5. Re:Mission by Oblio · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think this is the one that ended up being the most help (I had problems getting the steps in the general printing howto to payoff for me)...

      debian windows shared printing

      Make sure to force the CUPS sharing into RAW mode...

      --
      Pax -- Ob
  4. Why logout? by Metasquares · · Score: 4, Funny
    We were all surprised when on the second day K.D. asked her mom to log out so that she could have her login.
    Couldn't she have just used su?
    1. Re:Why logout? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      That poor girl, she's gonna be an outcast because she doesnt use windows. At school, she'll be disadvantaged. "Windows?" she will ask. "What is that?". All the other normal people will make fun of her.

      So, for your children sake, use Windows. Its the only socially acceptable platform available. If she was 16 and 200 pounds with glasses and terrible acne, sure, give her linux, or maybe even an apple (for the alternative lifestylers among us).

      Please, think of the Children. Use Windows.

    2. Re:Why logout? by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 5, Funny

      Until the day comes when all the other kids get marked down for not turning in their papers on time, since their computers got knocked out by a virus.

      Then KD, due to her better grades and intellectual superiority, will become popular, right? Right?!?!

  5. I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by darthcamaro · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Like everyone else I've got alot of old hardware that Windoze won't run on - but you can run Open Office, Mozilla on top of KDE/GNOME on a Pentium I and it'll work for kids quite well. No need to upgrade and shell out additional cash. And hey KDE Games are GREAT for kids..and they're free!!!

    1. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 4, Funny
      No need to upgrade and shell out additional cash. And hey KDE Games are GREAT for kids..and they're free!!!

      Bah if that's they way you think you can raise kids, they're going to be ridiculed at school and your family will be branded as being poor. Way to screw up your kids' social status for years to come. Look, if you want to be a cool parent, shell out $3000 for the top of the line Alienware system with Windows XP Pro running on it. You will be the COOLEST parent on the block. Material wealth is very important to the social status of children and is second only to how good looking their family is.

    2. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by pe1rxq · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Material wealth is very important to the social status of children and is second only to how good looking their family is.

      Only if you teach them to think like that....

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    3. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't know what kind of P1 you have, but it's been my experience that modern linux distros (Mandrake, SuSE, RedHat) run like crap on anything less than a p2-333.

      --
      So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    4. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by Red+Alastor · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I'd not let a child use a Windows box. Not only for the kid's mental health but because Windows can be easilly messed up, and it's a pain in the ass to frequently reformat/reinstall, especially if you are not the one who made it crawl. With Linux and a separated login it's a lot safer.

      You are really the typical Windows user aren't you ? It doesn't matter if the product is crappy as long as it looks good and everyone seems to use it.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    5. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by Mantorp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A number of the kids' games I've loaded on my XP machine won't run properly unless logged in as admin.

    6. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by micromoog · · Score: 4, Funny
      I find BeOS runs much better on "modest" PCs.

      Yeah, OS's tend to run faster when you're not running any applications.

    7. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by B3ryllium · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "DeepFreeze" is a cool tool for stability; just get the system in working order, and then freeze it. Every time you turn it on, it will be as though nothing happened the last time you used it. Hard drive will be exactly as it was the day you froze it.

      It's awesome for public access terminals. Eliminates the need to reformat/reinstall, and virtually eliminates viral infections as well (because if infected, a simple reboot is all the cure needed).

  6. Should have mentioned "parental controls" by bgat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... like Linux's built-in features to prevent K.D. from accidentally finding sites that aren't age-appropriate, or at least haven't been pre-approved by Mom and Dad.

    --
    b.g.
    1. Re:Should have mentioned "parental controls" by tuxette · · Score: 2, Funny

      If she's as smart as they make her out to be, then she'll have no problem deliberately finding those sites that Mom and Dad don't approve of ;-)

      --
      People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
    2. Re:Should have mentioned "parental controls" by Red+Alastor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What is the point of parental control ? Can't we just educate kids. It's not like seeing a nude body will traumatize them for life.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    3. Re:Should have mentioned "parental controls" by Daemonik · · Score: 3, Informative

      Open Mozilla's Options menu

      Go to General->Connection Settings

      Select Manual Proxy Configuration

      HTTP Proxy: Localhost Port:80

      No Proxy For:sesamestreet.com, nick.com, etc.

  7. Four year old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yea, that's great. And when she starts having trouble you can just tell her to RTFM!

    1. Re:Four year old... by archen · · Score: 3, Funny

      Kid: how do I do xxx?
      Mom: RTFM
      Kid: dUd3, 1 4m go1n9 +o HaX0R J00r bOX0r !!
      Mom: how do you talk with numbers like that?

      Kid: sp34k n0+ +4Lk, J00r Gr4m0r $ux !

    2. Re:Four year old... by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mom: My grandma is dead you insensitive clod!
      Kid: 50 +h4+'5 y 5h3 d1dN+ ]\/[0v3 4r0u]\[d 4L0+!!

  8. The phrases... by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 5, Funny
    My four-year-old granddaughter, K.D.
    ... and ...
    K.D. had watched her mom, my wife...

    ... have got me slightly worried. Slightly.

    1. Re:The phrases... by thdexter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think he was listing, in the second phrase.

      --
      I'm on a road shaped like a figure eight; I'm going nowhere but I'm guaranteed to be late.
    2. Re:The phrases... by LostCluster · · Score: 3, Informative

      Out of context quoting on your second snip... the full phrase was

      K.D. had watched her mom, my wife, and me using the various Linux-based computers in our home...

      Her mom is the writer's daughter. The writer's wife is a different person being listed along with the writer, since all three use the Linux-based computers in the home.

  9. Sure, if you can dumb it down into a kisok... by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The whole idea behind this setup is taking the time to put the system-important screens outside of the 4-year-old's view, so therefore she could click around the screen and even get to the web without getting into much trouble.

    A Windows-expert parent could set up Windows to be the same way. The key thing to having a kid be able to use a computer without breaking it is having a smart admin as a parent.

    1. Re:Sure, if you can dumb it down into a kisok... by rusty0101 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Might want to remember that the article is not about dumbing down the interface to make it "safe" for a child to use.

      It is about refuting the claim that Linux is "hard" to use.

      Can Linux be hard to use? Sure. At the same time if I turn off desktop icons and disable the TaskBar in Windows, you might find it hard to use Windows as well. That isn't the way Microsoft ships it, and the way Joe Barr configured his daughter's account is not the default view for Linux. In the default view for both Windows and Linux, you are working with a Point and Click interface. If you can learn one, you can probably learn the other, either as well, or instead.

      Then again I use four differen't OS's on a regular basis. You might have more trouble switching between two.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
  10. Kids can do it... by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "My four-year-old granddaughter, K.D., hasn't had any trouble figuring it out, and if she can do it, you can too."

    User Intelligence:
    Boss with MBA 4-year-old girl

    Seriously, though - kids learn at some incredible rates. They pick up language, new skills, etc. so much faster than adults. We often have to fight through a lifetime of doing something one way in order to do it a "better" or just plain newer way.

    BTW, the article is chock full of acronym hell if you're not pretty familiar with Linux (not so worried about the /. community).

    1. Re:Kids can do it... by pe1rxq · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One of the key things is wanting to do a job instead of wanting to use a certain tool...

      I have seen kids using sparc xterminals with netscape 4.75 (It was a few years back) on a linux system with twm as window manager for days without a problem, it wasn't until the first parents got to use them that there were complaints about it not being windows....

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    2. Re:Kids can do it... by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      y daughter uses both linux and windows 2000. I catch her boting into linux on a regular basis to do her homework on OO.o or just plain websurfing or games like frozen bubble..

      I asked her what the difference is to her...

      she said, "nothing. they are both almost identical I like the KDE stuff better as it's prettier" when I told her that lots of people have trouble using linux her answer was, " that is stupid, there is almost nothing different..." my answer to her is "lots of times, adults are very stupid."

      remember that next time you deal with someone in Marketing whining that the color of her desktop is not what she wants or the new version of a app has a different icon or slightly different menu.

      lots of times, adults are very stupid.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  11. $699 by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny

    These Linux tots better start their paper-routes and set up their lemonade stands early: Darl's going to be on his way to take their candy money.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  12. linux is not hard by kwoff · · Score: 3, Funny
    Linux is not hard unless you convince yourself that it is.
    Somebody let Eric Raymond know that.
  13. Wow, I'm not impressed. by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A pre-schooler using a computer, I can't fathom that! Come on, seriously, why is this such a big deal? When I was two I could use a Commodore Vic20. That included plugging in cartridges, using the tape drive, and loading programs... Just like Dad and without a login.

    Almost a year ago my (at the time) 4 year old cousin was visiting my parent's house while I was in town. She asked for the laptop and fired up IE. She was on her favorite website (I don't remember what it was, Blues Clues?) in seconds. She knew the URL, she knew exactly where she wanted to navigate to, and she didn't need my help... I was utterly confused by the flashing, moving, and colorful icons. I couldn't discern what was clickable and what wasn't. She knew and that's all that mattered.

    Now... If I sat her down in front of a Linux machine w/KDE installed and told her "this is the IE icon" (or however she understood it) you don't think she would be able to do the same thing?

    This article reeked of parental excitement. Their child was interested in using the computer!!!

    Kids know computers... I realize that they are saying that KDE is easy enough for a child to use... Anything in X was that easy. It's the rest of Linux that isn't so easy.

    She was shoving the system tools off, "out of sight out of mind"... It's not so easy for a regular user of a system to do that. You might actually have to deal w/something on the computer if you aren't 2 years old.

    Linux is getting there but it certainly isn't as easy as they seem to be making it out to be. I wish it were but it's not and while I believe in advocating its use to everyone that might benefit from it, I don't think insulting people by saying "My two year old can use it, so can you" is the best way to go.

    1. Re:Wow, I'm not impressed. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yeah, when I was two and a half I could read the newspaper, that doesn't mean that kids who can't read the newspaper at that age are stupid. I was using Apple 2s in the same capacity as you were using your vic 20 when I was four or so (I didn't have access to a computer prior) but that doesn't mean everyone can.

      On the other hand, a four year old can use Windows just as easily as linux. You can do the same stuff to windows that you can do to linux. (Hide the taskbar, etc.) Of course, you will have to get a 101 key keyboard, because that pesky windows key will pop it right up, but the odds of hitting control-esc are somewhat slimmer. Regardless either way you can give the user extremely limited rights and hide most of the system from them.

      Other than that, you're spot on. Saying that linux is easy because a child can play games and mash the keyboard on it is ignorant and overlooks the broader issue of actually using the system to get work done.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  14. Old story, it's easy with a personal sysadmin by fantomas · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Software is easy for you, me or any four year old if you have a personal sysadmin to setup, configure, and support your usage. (grin) ...

    Seriously though the issue is - how easy is Linux/Windows/MacOS/any other software if you don't have a handy guru to help you configure and then support you when it goes wrong?

    The issue is not how easy a kid finds it when their dad is a software guru (though it's kinda cute, my Apple-crazy friend's 4 year old son is similar), but how Joe Public, who has no software engineer friends, finds setup and maintenance and patching.

  15. K.D. by ZenBased · · Score: 2, Funny

    and her last names starts with an E ? That would be rather freaky ;)

    --
    http://www.virtualconcepts.nl/
    1. Re:K.D. by Ripplet · · Score: 2, Funny
      and her last names starts with an E ? That would be rather freaky ;)

      No, it would just mean at least one of her parents was rather geeky ;)

      --

      Skiing? Check out The Independant Skiers Portal

  16. Too young? by SirNAOF · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As wonderful as it is to see a young child able to use Linux, is it really necessary for children use computers? They are wonderful tools, and there are many games for young children that help them learn, but really, couldn't the parents teach the children just as well?

    The real problem is when parents let their children sit in front of a TV or computer all day. There's a lot more to life than just staring at screens.

    --
    Jeremy Baumgartner
    1. Re:Too young? by John_Sauter · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I think it is important for children to use computers, and not just the games.

      Computers barely existed when I was young, but, remembering that the most important skill I learned in High School was typing, I introduced my children to my Apple II when they were in elementary school. At first we would type their assignments together on the computer; later they did the typing themselves. Their comfort level with computers allowed them to find jobs in the computer industry, and with luck they will be able to support me in my old age.
      John Sauter (J_Sauter@Empire.Net)

    2. Re:Too young? by javatips · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, it's not necessary for children to use computer, but children like to learn things. A computer is like any other thing they play with... And they like it because when they use it they learn stuff. My 3 years old daughter just love playing with the computer. She likes Bob the Builder web site, she like the 101 Dalmatians Print Studio... She can print dalmatians drawing, then she gets some pencils and start coloring them, then she take some scotch tape and tape the colored drawing on the walls.

      Most of the time, she does not want to stop playing with the computer... I don't beleive studies that say that a children attention cannot span more than 15 minutes. A child on a computer can play with the same game for hours if you let him do it. I try not to let her play for more than 30 minutes at a time, but its always difficult to make her leave the computer.

      Recently she even started playing with Zelda on my N64. She just walk around, but each time she plays it, she learned a little bit more how to actually go where she wants.

      As you said, the problem lies when parents use these tools as a replacement for the attention they should give to the children. But like any tools, when they are well used, they will expand the knowledge of the children. At least, a computer is more interactive than a TV.

      We live in a world full of technology... So the children must learn it... As long as you give attention to your children and that you expose them to a lot of different things, then it's a good thing. When you start using technology to discharge yourself of your parenting role, then it's a bad thing.

    3. Re:Too young? by uptownguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...parents just don't have time to sit around and cook. In our current economic climate, both parents working is the norm...

      Forgive me for being pedantic and going off for a minute on your otherwise insightful post... BUT...

      It isn't that our current economic climate leads both parents to work. It is rather that the current social climate leads both parents to feel as though they need to make enough to have a certain amount of stuff (Keeping up with the Jonses) which from a standpoint of either survival or happiness contributes nothing. One parent working would lead to the family "struggling" -- but "struggling" doesn't mean having to walk for five miles to get jars of clean water. It doesn't mean sending the children to bed hungry twice a week to make ends meet. It means cutting their hair yourself. Or not being able to pay the dues for the soccer club. The time to cook is there. It has always been there. And we live in one of the richest nations in the history of the world. Even being "lower middle class" in the US means having enough stuff. It's all about choices.

      Again -- I'm not saying that parents who don't make these choices are bad. I'm trying to point out that it is certainly possible to have that time back but it isn't the economy that leads people away from having one parent raise the child. It is the society at large.

      --


      I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
  17. What about seniors? by BillFarber · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd be more impressed by a 90-year old figuring out how to use Linux.

  18. Hardly new or interesting by menscher · · Score: 2, Funny

    When I was that age, if you asked me how to spell my name I would respond "D A M I A N Return" (Commodore PET user since before I can remember). And I learned how to count because you had to fast-forward the tape so-many-seconds to reach a certain game (TRS 80 model 100). Now maybe if she was programming....

  19. Debian JR by robstah · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Debian Jr. project has been around for quite a long time. Its aims are to package and maintain a collection of relevant applications for the younger generation within the Debian framework.

    This is very much an active project which is working with some of the other organisations. I myself have experimented with some of the stuff it includes with my niece. As mentioned in the article tuxpaint seems to be very popular for the pre-school age group.

    The growth of these "Custom Debian Distributions" (the contents of which can usually be used on a traditional Debian install) should help bring free software into lots more situations.

    --
    Rob 'robster' Bradford
    Debian Planet Guy
    We are the apt. You will be packaged. Resistance is futile.
  20. a heart warming /. story.... get out... no really by psyberjedi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is how to get linux onto the desktop and into the home. This girl will probably use linux for the rest of her life. This is great for the entire community. I dont know if one exists, but perhaps a website to turn kids to linux would be a great help the future of the OS. It is not as sexy or carry the bragging rights that kernel development does, but developing more software that a kid can use (not necessarily that young) opens the door to the next generation.

    KDE while not my WM of choice (dont be shocked by the tone of my voice...), has a number of fun toys for kids, and Debian Jr. will help yours truly bring along my lil' jedi with linux from an early age.

    --
    He who confuses his religion with his science knows neither.
  21. Yes, but... by artemis67 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Has she compiled the kernel yet?

    1. Re:Yes, but... by essreenim · · Score: 5, Funny

      Girl_A: Hi, wanna play barbie, K.D.
      K.D.: l0g0ff

  22. It's sort of funny.... by budhaboy · · Score: 3, Interesting
    reading other's comments that dis the author for merely dumbing KDE down to a kiosk... I presume those folks don't have kids. My son LONGS for the day he can 'use' a computer. He struggles with lack of freedom he sees in having to ask for help in using the computer (when his parents do not).

    It's important to allow toddlers the illusion of freedom, it helps reenforce the idea that curiosity can lead to great things.

  23. So... by the_mad_poster · · Score: 5, Funny

    My users are dumber than 4 year olds?

    Wait.. that's insulting to 4 year olds... sorry, let me correct it:

    My users are dumb.

    --
    Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
  24. This highlights something.. by adamgreenfield · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've thought to be true for quite some time. Linux really shines in its ability to customize the user's experience to fit the user's needs. This is a strongpoint that really lends itself to application in Elementary and Pre-Elementary learning enviroments.

    This article also highlights a good example of postive computer interacion where the childs family took and interest in their computer activites and really made the whole thing a good experience. Interesting reading.

    --
    -Adam C. Greenfield
  25. My three year old could do ktuberling by mainframemouse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Emily, my three year old could do the Mr Potato head game. What I found curious is the machine is dual boot and she knew which OS had the game. I'm glad other posters have mentioned using X is childsplay not linux. I've still not got full functionality from my radeon 9200 under linux. That said, I'd rather let Emily run amok in linux than window.

  26. Perl, SDL, OpenGL, Festival, kids... by Speare · · Score: 3, Informative
    In the evenings where I'm not busy, I've been writing my own Linux application for edutainment purposes. I call it Toy::World. My daughter is now four years old, and just the other day I created a new account on one home Linux machine for her to use.
    • Perl
      A kid's application should be like clay, changing it on a whim to try new things quickly.
    • SDL
      This Perl module provides scripted access to the SDL (Simple Direct-media Layer) libraries. Hopefully, this whole thing will be mostly portable to Windows.
    • OpenGL
      When the graphics are simple, and hardware assisted, a scripting language like Perl starts making more sense. The actual application logic doesn't need a lot of horsepower.
    • Festival
      I pipe many text messages off to Festival, since young kids aren't going to be able to read a prompt like "How many apples do you see?" I wish the TTS community had better packaging for alternative voices like MBROLA's extensions... I've yet to get anything but three pure Festival voices working.
    • OpenDE
      I want to develop Perl bindings to the Open Dynamics Engine, letting the on-screen toys "fall" and "bounce" and interact realistically. It looks very promising, but I'll save that work for later.
    • Toy::World
      My library consists of about 3000 lines so far, not counting the docs and auxilliary helper routines. I'm working to make extensions as simple and flexible as possible, so the curriculum can grow quickly and spontaneously.

    Toy::World will be able to handle basic lessons and drills at first, such as counting and adding, letter and shape identification. I want to start building on those ideas into the usual early-childhood skills of understanding money, subtraction, words, matching, memory skills, and animal identification.

    I've yet to work out the basic reward system, but I'm thinking of a sort of token-winning, token-spending theme, where you can play certain lessons to win on-screen coin tokens Mario-style, and some lessons may require spending those same tokens (or Mom can check out the totals for a few real-world benefits).

    With a lot more work, I want to get into more hands-on experimentation. Simulated water-pouring, block-stacking, multiplication drills, cause/effect lessons, and even networked "shared toys" simulations involving small groups of children.

    By that time I hope to have opened the project to community help. Contact me if you're interested.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  27. My GOD! by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 5, Funny

    SHE'S FOUR YEARS OLD! HAVE YOU NO DECENCY ?!

    It must be this script kiddie porn I've been hearing so much about...

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  28. Kids are Smart by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think this story nicely illustrates how smart children can be. I have a brother who just turned six, and has seen Windows installs so often he can do it (at least he instructed me last time when I did it). That said, he insists on Linux these days "because it has better games". By these, he means rafkill, xonix, and sopwith. For sopwith, he even figured the controls (which are about the most horrible ever - especially on a Dvorak keyboard) in a few minutes.

    I'm gonna give the kid a book about programming and see how long it takes before he writes some revolutionary app that only he could think of...

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  29. KDE, Mozilla Firefox, TuxPaint, TuxRacer ... by daveewart · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My daughter is almost 3 and has been using her own KDE session on my Debian box for the past few months. I set up a username for her, so that I could log her in and know that she couldn't mess up anything I cared about.

    We were gobsmacked when we realised that she had figured out how to type her username and password, though. She was *so* pleased with herself when she got that sussed out.

    On her desktop, she has Mozilla Firefox set to go to BBC CBeebies - appropriate content for pre-school and you can't 'escape' the site, since all links are internal. She also enjoys using TuxPaint to draw pictures for us.

    I'm hoping she's going to do a spot of Toddler Linux Advocacy at the local playgroups soon ...

    --
    "If you think the problem is bad now, just wait until we've solved it." --- Arthur Kasspe
    1. Re:KDE, Mozilla Firefox, TuxPaint, TuxRacer ... by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bearing in mind that kids are pretty smart...you'd better hide the location bar, the "Tools" menu ...oh, and the "Manage Bookmarks" entry in the Bookmarks menu...

      Actually, if she's determined enough to bookmark the site, then edit it to point somewhere else, you'd better stop her saving pages...in case she edits a link and opens up the new, local page which has her link to www.innocentSoundingURLThatPointsToGoatPorn.com.

      I guess this is the same as the real world though...hide all the chemicals and protect all the table corners but they'll still manage to run headlong into a wall with a vase on their heads.

  30. Re:IANAP by Ripplet · · Score: 4, Funny
    if I ever have a kid, I pray I don't go around boring the heck out of other people with stories about my kid.

    Sorry to disillusion you pal, but you will. It's in the parents' charter or something.
    (And yes, IAAP!).

    --

    Skiing? Check out The Independant Skiers Portal

  31. Not a real world example. by doublem · · Score: 4, Funny

    Based on the complexity of the language in the article, we can safely conclude that the grandfather is of above average intelligence and education.

    Given the warm and caring nature hinted at in the narrative itself, we can conclude that this individual probably married a woman of comparable intelligence, as he lacks the characteristics necessary to desire a shallow woman lacking in intelligence.

    We can also assume that his children, following the usual human pattern of using their parents' relationship as a template, made similar choices in their choice of a spouse.

    Thus we can see that this four year old is the product of at least two generations of intelligent people marrying intelligent people, with a clear value for nurturing their offspring.

    In short, this is about a smart kid with a caring family who learns how to use computers. Not applicable in the workplace, as this kid is probably smarter than most the people I work with.

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    1. Re:Not a real world example. by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 3, Funny

      Given the warm and caring nature hinted at in the narrative itself, we can conclude that this individual probably married a woman of comparable intelligence, as he lacks the characteristics necessary to desire a shallow woman lacking in intelligence.

      Let's be clear about this. NO MAN lacks the characteristics necessary to desire shallow women.

  32. Isn't that a little young? by Frag-A-Muffin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't know about the rest of you, but I hope my kids don't take a liking to computers at such a young age. I'm going to try to keep them away from computers for as long as I can. I'd rather them "play" the old school way. Take them outside as much as possible. Make them do more physical activities.

    --

    AirSpeak - http://itunes.com/apps/AirSpeak
  33. Not a surprise by elhondo · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm pretty sure a lot of four year olds have been posting as AC's for quite some time.

  34. I'm not surprised by jht · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My not-quite 2-year-old son has been "using" an old iMac for a few months now. He used to watch my wife and I on our computers, and would scoot up to take the mouse from us and try clicking things. So I took a 4-year-old iMac we had around, set it up minimally, and installed a few kids' programs (Jumpstart Preschool, Finding Nemo, and a couple of others), and set it up so he could just wake it up, grab one of the programs in the Dock, and go to town with it.

    He mastered it very quickly. Now he calls it his "Mac-y", and asks to use it almost daily. We let him have a half-hour or so at a time, and he's picked up a decent amount of skill very quickly. He likes doing letter drills the most.

    Funny anecdote: one of the first times we let him use it, he was having a little trouble pointing the mouse properly. I went to help him position it, and he pushed my hand away and said "No!". After a minute, he figured it out himself. Now I help him with very little and don't volunteer it - I wait for him to ask.

    And a pet peeve: Why do all kids' programs require the CD to be present? Don't you know we can't trust a toddler with a CD? I have to make .DMG files out of each one, and have them automount at startup so he can use all his programs.

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
  35. So who followed the same procedure as me? by Beek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    - Read headline, click on article
    - Quickly scroll through article looking for pictures of this "babe"
    - Found none, went to comments
    - Found out she was four years old
    - Forwarded michael's email address to perverted-justice.com

  36. Linux is not hard to use if setup specifically for by Stone316 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    a person. In this case its his daughter but same could be said for other types of people. I could go home and install linux for my parents and customize it for their particular needs. Chances are, if I did my job correctly, they wouldn't have too many issues.

    However, the issue arises when an average user has to do some setup themselves.. They buy a new printer, digital camera, etc. Thats where the issues are now in linux. On Windows you put in the cd that came with the product and a few clicks later your ready to go. I think most of us are aware of the issues you can experience in linux.

    Yeah, his kid has knows how to use a computer but newsflash, tons of kids do. My daugher has had her own computer since she was 2... Now if his kid could use a cash register and count out correct change i'd be impressed.

    --
    "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
  37. You're a Troll by soloport · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So why am I headded over to my friend's house (a VP of Marketing -- no dumbass) this morning to help him get his printer to work on Windows?

    I help CPAs, Morgage Brokers, etc., every single day with the same crap people say makes Linux "hard".

    Look, computers are hard. Can't people see the forest for the religeous trees?! When you get used to one environment, anything else looks "foreing". That makes it real convenient to say "that... that... thing! It made me work at figuring this... this... thing I don't even have to think about in my world."

    You are just adding more religeon to the noise. Windows is much harder to learn -- in many respects -- as is Linux. You just don't run into many folks (yet) who've had to go the other direction: Linux to Windows.

    I've been using Unix for twenty years. Last environment used (before switching to Linux) was Solaris. Let me tell you, young whipper snapper, when I had my first try at Windows (1998). I about had a nervous breakdown.

    I still don't like Windows XP verry well. It just doesn't feel right. Everything is so fucking hard to get done in that stupid practically-windows-only environment, with a command prompt that won't auto-complete! Why is it 2004 and DOS won't auto-complete?! Morons.

    You're missing the very fact that in many, many cases, when "things don't always work right" you can't even get them back to working whatsoever -- as you watch Windows eat itself alive and laugh at you while it makes you play "pin the tail on the problem". It blindfolds you!

    Some people have paid me thousands to fix their Windows problems. Simple stuff, like getting printers to work or their Outlook to quit behaving "weird". Thousands, because they keep asking me to come back to do more -- install this software, fix this little glitch, remove this spyware my daughter installd ("my computer's slow"). Translation? "It's too hard for me to do it". In my opinion, it is Windows which isn't quite baked enough and ready for anyones' desktop.

    You want "easy"? Then everyone should be using a PDA or maybe a Mac.

    1. Re:You're a Troll by naelurec · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the simple answer is "under the hood" Windows is significantly more complex and difficult than Linux. When the gooey goodness on Windows breaks, it tends to be very difficult to get it fixed.

      I do lots of admin -- I found lately I have been on an upswing fixing Windows boxes and realized that so many times the "solution" is a reinstall. Yikes.

      Within the last 48 hours, I have two instances where a full system reinstall is the "solution" -- someone was troubleshooting an email issue on w2k and a OEM tech support person (wireless card) said to reinstall drivers several times. Eventually this broke something in winsock which caused ALL network functionaility to break.

      After googling and talking to other techs, I came to the conclusion the only way to fix this problem properly was to reinstall all of Windows. Of course, since his network access was severed, backup was done to floppy disks (it was an older laptop) -- yikes. For an issue that wasn't even initially a problem with Windows cost this particular individual 2 days of productivity getting his system back in order.

      Another system (WinXP Home) when booted up one morning simply reboots over and over again. The safe mode doesn't even work -- hangs on "mup.sys". Blech. No rhyme or reason why this stopped working, no one really seems to know WHY this occurs and so far, seems like the "fix" is a reinstall. Great.

      Of course, this was only the two recent issues. But even things like spyware infections have required me to reinstall the entire system and spend hours reinstalling programs, downloading security updates, reconfiguring, etc.

      Needless to say, from an administrative point of view, while *nix definitely felt like a lot larger learning curve, I have found that it makes more sense and is a lot more logical. Infact, I'd much rather admin a *nix box when issues happen than a Windows box (even though I did get a MCSE and have been using Windows for 14 years) because quite frankly, it is possible to troubleshoot whereas Windows-- blech.

    2. Re:You're a Troll by B'Trey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I strongly suspect that you're a troll but I'll take a few moments to reply for the benefit of those that may take you seriously.

      First, I'm not a zealot. Computers are tools. They aren't spouses or lifemates or religions. They're just tools that do a job. I use Linux for two reasons. One - it's cheap. I run a web server, a mail server, a couple of mailing lists, a DNS server, etc. on my home network (seven machines.) I simply can't afford to purchase Windows server software to do all that. (Well, I guess I could afford it - I make a decent living. But I simply refuse to lay out that kind of cash for what I'm trying to do.) Two - it's powerful. It drives me batty that Windows doesn't have decent scripting and command line tools. Some of that is correctable (Cygnus, Perl, etc) but some of it is not (the lack of links on the file system.) And some of the stuff that is technically correctable can't be done because I can only install approved apps on the server. (I work as a system administrator for a government system.) I've been working in both Windows and Unix environments for a long time.

      You're right that there are people who have no business sitting down at a computer. They simply don't grok them, and no amount of training seems to get through to them. For those people, it doesn't matter if it's Linux or Windows or OSX. It's hard.

      You (and other posters to this sub-thread) are also right that Windows has hard problems too. But I run a network of seven computers at home, four of which are Linux boxes and four of which are Windows boxes. (My laptop dual-boots, for those who noted that those numbers don't add up.) At work, I have two independent networks - one is unclassified and one is classified. There are about 60 machines on each network, all of them Windows. I spend more time on Google researching problems on those four Linux machines than I do researching problems for over 120 Windows machines.

      That isn't a scientific study. It's my personal experience.

      But to me, the key thing is that when I have no clue how to accomplish something on Windows, I can usually start poking around the menus and options and figure it out without having to hit Google. With Linux, I sometimes have no idea where to even start, and I'm not a Linux newbie.

      One quick case in point. I was about ready to pull my hair out last weekend. I moved a hard drive from hdb to hda last weekend. Before moving it, I was mounting hdb as the root of my fs, with LILO installed on the mbr of hda. I configured lilo.conf, and did a chrooted lilo, shutdown and moved the hard drive. My system went scizophrenic. It claimed it was mounted hdb as a ReiserFS system when it was actually mounting hda as ext3. You Linux gurus probably already know what I did - or rather, didn't do. I didn't update my fstab when I moved the hard drive.

      I'm sure that there are a number of horror stories people can post about things they did or problems they've had with Windows too. I've got a few myself. But things like this consistently pop up to bite you in the ass with Linux, and all too often you don't even know what to Google on to find the answer. (I never was able to solve this problem on Google. A newsgroup post get the answer for me a couple of days later.) They happen in Windows too, but not near as often. In many ways, the additional complexity of Linux that causes problems is the very reason for that additional power I was praising just a few paragraphs up. I'm very aware of that. I'm not knocking Linux or praising Windows. I'm simply saying that, in my experience, Windows is much easier to administer than is a Linux box.

      --

      "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

  38. Re:Linux is not hard to use if setup specifically by elmegil · · Score: 2, Interesting
    You obviously don't use Windows much. 99% of the time I can get a windows driver installed and working right the first (or maybe second) time. Especially if I ignored included CDs and go download directly from the manufacturer.

    Ever try to get wireless working on your linux machine? Using PCMCIA on a laptop? Go try that with anything that you just bought off the shelf because it was cheap and tell me how the Linux vs Windows installation is. And I'm not even talking about the driver itself, I'm talking about which #@$! file gets updated (and don't start with "use the gui then" because the gui didn't even recognize the card) and what it needs in it to work.

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  39. And another thing... by soloport · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My family uses Linux -- and only Linux. Not because I'm a Linux zealot. They use it because it's what they know. It's what they know because it was the only environment their dad could put together that would not require him to become a full-time system administrator, at home.

    We have six kids (now age 9 - 19). Thus we've always had many computers around -- the kids spend equal amounts of time with PS2, TV and PC.

    We've tried Windows many, many times. We always go back to "easy" Linux. It just runs; We all know it; It offers us all the games we need; Got tired of hearing "IE sucks", "Outlook sucks", "Office sucks", etc., etc.

    Had I been able to make more of a living, sooner in life, half of them may have had Macs, by now. The others would probably still be happier with Linux.

    Again, it isn't about Linux, Windows or Mac. It's about what is most familiar.

  40. i started at 18 months by Cheeze · · Score: 4, Funny

    I started my kid at 18 months. I setup my file server to start up gcompris automatically. I highly recommend it. It has age-based programs from coloring programs, to advanced math skills.

    I started off with him just adjusting the monitor and sitting on the keyboard. 4 months later, he's still doing some of that, but he's much more interested in the sounds, using the keyboard, and moving the mouse around. I have him using a cheap $20 trackball (the crappy one with the lights in it) and he still hasn't broken it.

    I fully expect to have him doing basic tech support for his mom when he's 3. by the time he's in school, he'll probably be the only toddler with his own laptop.

    --
    Why read the article when I can just make up a snap judgement?
  41. The old circumsicion argument by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    A bit off topic, but I just had to listen to a similar argument used for circumsicion. He'll be different from every body else, so you better clip the tip of his penis off. I figure if he's that worried about fitting in when he's older he can make that decision himself.

    Or the truly disturbing one.
    "I want him to look like me when he's older".

    I never understood that last one. Do the kids eventually say - "Uh no Dad, lets not compare units today."

  42. As a learning device by digidave · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've found that my three year old son has learned spelling, phonics, fine motor control and problem solving at a far greater pace than his same-age cousin due to using a computer.

    I bought my son a used computer when he was two as a present for potty training. He generally runs Windows because of all the educational games, but does use my Linux computer for some games.

    My best tip is that your kid should learn to login themselves... it's a great way for them to learn to spell words. Change up the password every week or so and tell them which word it is. My kid learns to spell five or six letter words in a day or two.

    Anyway, despite possible problems with creating a computer nerd with no social life, I think two and three year olds should always have a computer available to them. Just limit the time they spend on it.

    --
    The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
  43. Re:Uh...anyone see a double-standard? by mwood · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, but I don't see this one as a problem. There are special rules for giants. One of Microsoft's problems is that they behave as if they were still a tiny startup instead of a dominant force in their industry. You are not allowed to beat up on the little kids, but the little kids are allowed to hit back.

  44. Linux hasn't been hard to *use* for ages.. by msimm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Its the installation, configuration and maintenance. The article isn't really even about Linux its about a few friendly applications and the logon feature. I converted my mother over to Linux a couple years ago and currently my wife has been using it for a little over 2 years (babe in tuxland).

    Its never been the day to do that causes problems, it installing new hardware, needing to change configurations, its all the little things people do in Windows and with their Apples everyday that quickly become monsterous with a Linux distro.

    Managing a Linux workstation still requires a level tolerance and patience that the average computer user doesn't/shouldn't have. I use it because I love using it, but there are times I'd like to throw the whole box straight out the livingroom window.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  45. Re:Uh...anyone see a double-standard? by theLOUDroom · · Score: 5, Informative

    Uh...anyone see a double-standard?
    Microsoft posting this kind of story and passing it off as real news = "astroturfing."


    What I see is someone who doesn't know what "astroturfing" means. /. is not attempting to hide the source of the article.

    --
    Life is too short to proofread.
  46. Re:To summarize by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Informative
    so that one instance invalidates the 95% of the time that drivers automatically work under Windows

    I use Debian with udev and hotplug (which are quickly becoming defaults). When I boot my computer, it automatically finds and configures everything I have attached to it. When I plug in my USB palm, it loads the appropriate module so that Kpilot can sync with it. When I plug in a keychain drive, it loads the appropriate module and mounts it. All of my printers worked with the drivers shipped with CUPS. I plugged a PCMCIA NIC into my laptop, and it beeped after it loaded the driver and configured the network. My sound card Just Works. My USB mouse Just Works.

    Why do people still think that Linux is in 1997? I know that there are some annoying driver problems, just as there are in Windows, but the vast majority of hardware I've come across does the right thing without intervention.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  47. Re:Linux is not hard to use if setup specifically by elmegil · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Oh yes, stating simple facts makes me a troll. I know a lot of people much smarter than I who have had the same types of problems with wireless cards--but all just different enough to not be able to help each other. Gotta love the slashbots.

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  48. Re:Because what can you do with Linux? by hogger · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It's all relative to your skill level and available dollars I suppose.

    What you did, from your perspective, might seem cut and dry and inexpensive to you. You built the PC yourself. It's safe to say that some would say it's bizarro to expect the user to build their own PC. Some would say it's bizarro to expect the user to fork over all the money for WinXP when open-source alternatives are available.

    From my perspective installing mythtv or freevo on a debian box requires no more effort than installing XP, rebooting, visiting windowsupdate, rebooting, visiting windowsupdate, rebooting, installing ATIs software, rebooting, updating ATIs software, etc... I can have a mythtv box setup from absolute scratch (box of parts from newegg.com) in less than 5 hours.

    I too have a multimedia PC in my livingroom. It's based on linux. It took very little time to get up and running. It can:
    • rip dvd, encode to divx
    • play divx
    • pause live TV (mythtv)
    • host recorded TV files (mpeg) for any PC in the house
    • play games (mostly UT2004)
    • play mp3s

    I'm sorry but a house full of kids with all Linux *is* bizarro world because it's not normal.

    I'll agree that a house full of kids using Linux isn't normal. If normal is what you're shooting for then feel free to point your gun at the ground and shoot. I'm sure you'll hit your target.

    All of their friends use Windows

    Yes, most of their friends use Windows. Most of their friends are normal. Most of their friends' parents drive SUVs. We don't have an SUV. Should I go buy an SUV?

    all the good games come out for Windows

    We play a lot of Unreal Tournament 2004 at hour house. Is it not a good enough game for you?

    and all the good professionally written, professionally packaged, and easily installed software is written for Windows

    I've run out of patience on this one. You're clearly clueless.