Slashdot Mirror


AOL to Give Away Spammer's Porsche

introverted writes "CNN is reporting that AOL is giving away a spammer's Porsche. As part of a settlement with a spammer, AOL took the spammer's Porsche Boxster S, and they're running a sweepstakes (already ended) to give the car away."

140 comments

  1. Late! by awx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is this three or four weeks old now?

    --
    Feel that power? That's mah MOUSING FINGER
    1. Re:Late! by ExTycho · · Score: 5, Funny

      quite late, ah well /. usually get there quicker, so give them credit for that.

      but yeah.. this is *exactly* how to deal with spammers.. they've been offering us penis extentions for the last decade.. now its time to take theirs away!!

    2. Re:Late! by swordboy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not late, just a DUPE!

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    3. Re:Late! by blowdart · · Score: 2, Funny

      Spammers send the same message multiple times, so posting this spammer story multiple times is fitting, no?

    4. Re:Late! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've already discussed both this and the followup on slashdot.

    5. Re:Late! by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 2, Funny

      The slashdot editors are spamming us with this story.

      Ummm, what kind of car does Cowboy Neal drive??

      Raffle, anybody?

      --
      resigned
    6. Re:Late! by compwizrd · · Score: 1

      Slashdot cruiser? :P

    7. Re:Late! by RealityMogul · · Score: 1

      That's actually funny but there's nobody here that has been here long enough to remember it.

    8. Re:Late! by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

      What they do is find all the karma whores by seeing who copies who's post to get karma. I hear it is on purpose, notice the text is the same too I believe.

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    9. Re:Late! by corpsiclex · · Score: 1

      fill the rest of us in?

      --

      eBayDig 1s a typo saerch engien
    10. Re:Late! by Lucky+Kevin · · Score: 1
      "Ummm, what kind of car does Cowboy Neal drive??"

      Surely you mean "What kind of horse does he ride?"

      ... and don't call me Shirley!

      --
      Kevin
      "It's not the cough that carries you off, it's the coffin they carry you off in" O. Nash
  2. The duke of dupes! by nordicfrost · · Score: 3, Funny


    This was in the mainstream media, even. And Slashdot.

    1. Re:The duke of dupes! by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Informative

      Slashdot is mainstream media, acording to news.google.com. It's pretty scary doing a search to find more news on a Slashdot story, and the first link on Google is back to Slashdot. That's just not right.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:The duke of dupes! by electrichamster · · Score: 1

      Dammit you're right! We demand to be an underground community!

      I mean c'mon, it's not like the latest kernel update is major world news - although god help me, one day I hope it is :)

    3. Re:The duke of dupes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, underground is so much better. Same with music, I only liked N*Sync when THEY were underground. And then they totally sold out!!!11

    4. Re:The duke of dupes! by ari_j · · Score: 1, Funny

      news.google.com will find thousands of news stories about a given event. Typically, only a few hundred are Slashdot articles. :D

  3. Fascinating!! by hog2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    More info is available here.

    --
    --Kirk
  4. Remove this item by sailboatfool · · Score: 1, Insightful

    and you will save diskspace from all
    the useless posts.

    --
    He is the best sailor who can steer within fewest points of the wind, and exact a motive power out of the greatest obsta
  5. Laps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Yeah it is doing its laps

    *ducks*

  6. Old article - but it is an update by Karl+Prince · · Score: 2, Funny

    Let's hope the winner know's someone with a driving licence...

    --

    mailto:EatSpamAndDie@princeweb.com
    1. Re:Old article - but it is an update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Let's hope the winner know's someone with a driving licence...

      Let's hope that you know somebody who passed fourth grade english.

      know's != knows
      licence != license
      moron == Karl Prince

    2. Re:Old article - but it is an update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The OP's usage of "licence" is correct.

      Licence = noun. "Hunting licence"
      License = verb. "Licensed practitioner"

    3. Re:Old article - but it is an update by LauraScudder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I smelled bullshit rule. Check it out, license and licence are mearly variant spellings of the same word. There is no noun verb rule with them. I don't like the variant, since it makes much more sense to inflect license -> licensed than licence -> licensed.

  7. Bio-Hazard by AndroidCat · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's probably got spammer cooties.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  8. Re:Repost? by rkaa · · Score: 0

    Unless (heaven forbid) ALL spammers driver Porche?!?!

  9. Speaking of March 30th, let me just say... by chimpo13 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does it come with a CD Multiplayer? And any guesses what they'll fill it with?

    mark my words
    Slashdotters are laughing now, but just wait until the RIAA/MPAA take a cue from AOL and start liquidating pirates assets...

    I'd continue the cutting & pasting of +5 mods, but I'm far too lazy. Thanks Claws Of Doom and WormholeFiend for me stealing the first +5 comments.

    1. Re:Speaking of March 30th, let me just say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Slashdotters are laughing now, but just wait until the RIAA/MPAA take a cue from AOL and start liquidating pirates assets...

      What good will basements full of used CD-Rs do anyone?

    2. Re:Speaking of March 30th, let me just say... by Walkiry · · Score: 1

      >>but just wait until the RIAA/MPAA take a cue from AOL and start liquidating pirates assets...

      Will that include the pirates' MP3 and DivX files? They're, after all, Stolen Property(TM) according to them.

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    3. Re:Speaking of March 30th, let me just say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll have to read the 1st time this showed up on /.

    4. Re:Speaking of March 30th, let me just say... by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      It's probably all been hashed over from the 1st time this story showed up on /.

      And I shouldn't have been rated "interesting". Probably "smart-ass" would be better.

    5. Re:Speaking of March 30th, let me just say... by Ryosen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Fortunately for the rest of us, The **AA is not a legislative body or law enfocement agency.

      The sooner people remember this small fact, the sooner they can stop worrying about their parents' basement.

      --

      Ryosen
      One man's "Troll, +1" is another man's "Insightful, +1".
    6. Re:Speaking of March 30th, let me just say... by Walkiry · · Score: 1, Funny

      The question is, should an smart-ass mod option be +1 or -1? ;)

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    7. Re:Speaking of March 30th, let me just say... by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are you saying AOL is a legislative body or law enforcement agency?

      That will be a scary day, incidentally. They own a big chunk of 'land' in cyberspace already...

      --
      resigned
    8. Re:Speaking of March 30th, let me just say... by chachob · · Score: 1

      Fortunately for the rest of us, The **AA is not a legislative body or law enfocement agency.

      well actually, they indirectly are...

    9. Re:Speaking of March 30th, let me just say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. They just control legislative bodies and law enforcement agencies. Nothing to worry about there.

  10. Re:I would rather by SB5 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I would have liked to give the man a free castration.

    I am not a doctor, so I would probably botch it badly.

    --
    If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
    it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
  11. The Ultimate Spam by jstrain · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is your penis too small? Do you strike out with the ladies? Forget those pills, pumps, and creams that never work! What you need to increase your manhood isn't in a bottle. When you need to overcompensate due to phallic insecurity, choose the solution that over 50% of males age 26-45 rely on. Get a Porsche!

    1. Re:The Ultimate Spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, way fewer than 50% rely on a Porsche. Maybe 0.5% do.

      The rest rely on web porn.

    2. Re:The Ultimate Spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he means just those this teeney-peenie syndrome.

    3. Re:The Ultimate Spam by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      Y'know, it's funny...when a woman celebrates her fiftieth birthday by buying the toy she's wanted all her life and can finally afford, you don't hear a bloody thing about midlife crises.

      rj

    4. Re:The Ultimate Spam by the+gnat · · Score: 1

      when a woman celebrates her fiftieth birthday by buying the toy she's wanted all her life and can finally afford, you don't hear a bloody thing about midlife crises.

      No, you hear about "aging ungracefully". Besides, middle-aged women aren't usually as ostentatious in their sudden lifestyle changes; I don't know many lawyer's wives who decided to become biker chicks. Similarly, why do you think Demi-Ashton was such a big deal? Guys her age do the same thing (or try to, at least) all the time.

    5. Re:The Ultimate Spam by ilumits · · Score: 2, Funny


      It's difficult being a male looking for a new car these days.

      -If you purchase a large sedan, you're old.
      -If you purchase a small sedan, you're gay.
      -If you purchase a minivan, you're whipped.
      -If you purchase either a sports car, SUV, or large pickup truck, you have a small penis.

      What does that leave? A Schwinn?

    6. Re:The Ultimate Spam by leviramsey · · Score: 0

      Purchase a medium-size sports sedan, such as the Cadillac CTS or the forthcoming Cadillac STS.

    7. Re:The Ultimate Spam by nomadic · · Score: 1

      If you purchase a Cadillac, you're REALLY old.

    8. Re:The Ultimate Spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Purchase a medium-size sports sedan, such as the Cadillac CTS or the forthcoming Cadillac STS.


      Which has got to be the single most impractical and overpriced style of vehicle. The auto execs must be laughing themselves silly about how the American auto market has been manipulated to this ridiculous state.

  12. Darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a shame that it really *was* a dupe :/

  13. Re:I would rather by Choron · · Score: 2, Funny

    You can have that too, you'll just have to wait for the second sweepstake where you can win all the guy's personal data, including his address :)

    How about greeting him with a "Do you feel lucky, punk ?" when he opens the door ?

    --
    "Naughty, naughty, naughty, you filthy old soomka !"
  14. THE AOL PR FORCE IS STRONG LUKE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    AOL are getting their Porsche $ back 100 times over with all this free publicity, perhaps spam is a good thing they are thinking ?

    1. Re:THE AOL PR FORCE IS STRONG LUKE by JPriest · · Score: 1

      How much money do you suppose AOL's mail platform is worth? I bet the cost of this Porche is less then even the electric bill to run it.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    2. Re:THE AOL PR FORCE IS STRONG LUKE by gujo-odori · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You can run a Porsche on electricity now? Wow!

  15. Unusual punishment? by GillBates0 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Okay, this isn't exactly a punishment meted out by law enforcement authorities, but even then, isn't it unusual for a corporation to "sieze" a person's (albeit a spammer's) car?

    Maybe he got a better deal by giving away his car rather than an equivalent amount in money - but how'd they reach the settlement amount? Had the spammer's actions caused enough damage to AOL to justify the $1million settlement claim? My guess would be that the spammer's actions cost them bandwidth and diskspace - but are they justified in charging him the amount just because their users didn't delete the junk soon enough or their filters are lame?

    Not I'm justifying spam or spammers...but if they reach an out of court settlement for a million dollars, on the grounds that they won't pursue a lawsuit against him - it sounds an awful lot like extortion to me. I would like to see the damages of $1million justified in public - otherwise every crook company (we have plenty of them - RIAA/SCO/etc) could go around threatening people with lawsuits (which the individuals couldn't afford) and demand out-of-court settlements and the people being sued would have no choice but to pay up unless they had resources to pursue their case in court.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:Unusual punishment? by rickward · · Score: 1

      More than likely, the spammer person ran a corporation, and the corporation owned the car for tax reasons and stuff. Disclaimer: I am not an accountant. As for your extortion argument... wow. I never thought of that. The terms of most out-of-court settlements are kept confidential by agreement of both parties, and the records are sealed by the court, so neither party CAN go public like you want. Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer.

    2. Re:Unusual punishment? by Tom7 · · Score: 1

      A settlement is an agreement between the two parties. You can't "demand" a settlement.

    3. Re:Unusual punishment? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      In civil lawsuits, there are compensatory damages and there are punitive damages.

      Compensatory damages are intended to compensate for the losses incurred by the plaintiff.

      Punitive damages are intended to punish.

      If there were only compensatory damages then there would not be any disincentive to spammers, they'd compensate the plaintiff and be off and to it again because the net earnings are still pretty good.

      It is possible that the punitive damages were excessive, I really don't know, but I thought this guy ran a pretty large operation, so compensatory damages might be pretty high.

    4. Re:Unusual punishment? by swb · · Score: 4, Funny

      My guess is that it was all they could get ahold of.

      1) File lawsuit against spammer.

      2) File motion to freeze spammers assets. Make case that spammer has shown willingness to be sneaky, underhanded, pushing fraudulent products, etc and that its necessary to ensure spammer has viable assets should plaintiff win.

      3) Win case. Spammer's business assets are near zero except for car, which couldn't be sold due to freeze. Everything else is leased/rented or of zero salable value. AOL agrees to take car before spammer decides to park it on street with keys in ignition to spite AOL.

      4) Spammer goes to farm field owned under another corporate umbrella, digs up cash vacuum sealed in plastic sacks stuffed in PVC pipes. Pays attorney and re-starts spamming business.

      5) AOL sells car, claims "victory" in war on spam.

    5. Re:Unusual punishment? by Jester99 · · Score: 1

      ...Are they justified in charging him the amount just because their users didn't delete the junk soon enough or their filters are lame?

      And how much money do you think it costs to hire a team of programmers to write good filtering software that's capable of handling AOL's volume of spam? A million bucks sounds not too unreasonable to me...

    6. Re:Unusual punishment? by donnyspi · · Score: 0

      its funny. laugh.

    7. Re:Unusual punishment? by leviramsey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ask any plaintiff's attorney. If the case goes to trial, the odds are very much against the plaintiff winning.

      The objective of the plaintiff's attorney is thus not to win at trial but to convince the defendant that pushing the case to trial is not worth it and settle.

      More often than not, the defendant in this case is a corporation. Cf. the breast implant class actions of ten years ago. Dow Corning etc. would have almost certainly won at trial (the evidence demonstrating liability was and is virtually nonexistent). However, they realized that it would cost billions to fight it in court, so paying a settlement would be the better deal.

      What I propose is some form of loser pays. How's this for a novel idea: have each legal team submit a weekly summation of how much they're claiming in legal costs that week. At the end of the trial, the figures are totaled. The percentage of jurors that found for the defendant determines the percentage of the total cost paid by the plaintiff and vice-versa. Thus, if it's 8-4 in favor of the defendant, then the plaintiff has to foot 2/3 of the total legal cost for both sides, with the defendant footing the remainder.

  16. Are you on crack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    All the hottest chicks from YOUR country are here right now practically giving it away just so they can find an American to marry and become a citizen. We've got the pick of the crop here (not Slashdotters necessarily, but the rest of us.) No wonder you're upset.

  17. ~The Essence of Slashdot~ by Freston+Youseff · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Where it is "funny" to talk about shooting a spammer in the face, whereas you get Karma Kastrated for suggesting the same thing for a evil shitbag like Ralph Nader.

    --

    1. Re:~The Essence of Slashdot~ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ralph Nader shall smite thee down, mortal.

  18. Re:I would rather by stor · · Score: 3, Funny

    Settle mao che minh, people might think you have a weak member and are trying to compensate.

    So anyway, friend, if you _do_ have problems similar to the above, or know anyone that does, there's this stuff I've heard about that i'm sure you'd be interested in: Ci@lis. It's great. Did wonders for me. Like vi@gr4 but better! Lasts all weekend! Buy one now! It's the best! It works wonders. Gives you a surging er3c71.on, healthier physique, feeds the pets, buys dinner, and frees you from SP4.M! Click on the link below for this 3xclus1.ve 0ff.er: buy one get one free!

    Your friend,
    xxOIJ4.HEUUl7@hotmail.com

    --
    "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
  19. Re:I would rather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...in a drive-by in his former automobile.

  20. Isn't it ironic, dont'cha think by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wouldn't it be ironic if the spammer was the one sending those "GET OUT OF DEBT NOW!" messages.

    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
  21. Yeah it's a dupe but.... by SlashdotMakesMeKool · · Score: 3, Funny
    Cowboy Neil can't resist the posts with the little piggy on them.

    SQWEAL for the cowboy!!!!!

    --

  22. Re:I would rather by fatphil · · Score: 4, Funny

    A doctor would know not to use a Magnum to perform the castration.

    You're not a doctor, so ...

    --
    Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
  23. The "Fortune" box by shish · · Score: 1
    Fortune-of-the-(however often the front page is updated):

    Porsche: there simply is no substitute. -- Risky Business

    --
    I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
  24. ahhhhhhhhh.... I'm being spammed by slashdot!!!! by night_flyer · · Score: 3, Funny

    maybe I can take one of their cars!

    ::looks out window and sees their 1975 Pinto Wagon ::

    Nevermind...

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  25. Here's The Downside... by bfg9000 · · Score: 3, Funny

    The guy's life reads like a spam-filled success story. If I post this article at work, we'll lose 10 people tomorrow.

    "Hi everybody, I'm Robin Leach, and I'm here today looking at the gorgeous 20 million dollar home of [insert spammers name here]!! It's a fabulous castle bought with all that email money, because spamming REALLY DOES WORK!!! Of course, he had the cheapest mortgage on the planet! Boy, he's more loaded than half of Hollywood, and it's like he didn't even work for it! With spam, he seems to MAKE MONEY OVERNIGHT!!! While you stupid peasants are out there slaving away, he's clicking "Send Now" and watching his fabulous dragon's mound of gold coins pile ever higher! He's so smart, he doesn't even need a spellchecker! He has a stable of Porsches and a stable of lovely ladies! And that huge penis of his is a favorite around town! He has no problems meeting ladies because Spamming REALLY DOES WORK!!" He's living the American Dream, and I'm just poor fat old Robin Leach!!!

    --

    I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

    1. Re:Here's The Downside... by the+pickle · · Score: 0

      If I post this article at work, we'll lose 10 people tomorrow.

      Great! Do it, and let those of us far more responsible, far less gullible, and currently unemployed have their jobs!

      Where did you say you worked, BTW? So I know where to send my resume...

      p

  26. Dude. by unlinear · · Score: 1, Funny

    Whoah.
    Deja Vu.

    1. Re:Dude. by jcuervo · · Score: 1

      "I saw a story go by, and then another one that looked just like it."

      "How much like it? Was it the same story?"

      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  27. Why the Porsche you say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Porsche was probably part of the liquidation of assets. If they guy didn't have enough hard cash to pay the settlement/award to AOL, AOL can then start liquidating his assets to get all the money they were awarded. I don't know who gets to choice which particular assets get "disposed" of, but I guess AOL worked with the government to just keep the Porsche as a Porsche and not convert it into cash. The spammer probably made out on the deal also, as I believe the cost of turning assets back to cash would have been charged to the spammer. So instead of converted the $40K Porcshe into $30K cash or whatever someone would have bought it for minus the cost of selling it, the spammer probably got the full 'value' out of it.

  28. Say it isn't so! by grantsellis · · Score: 1

    It's a second Porche.

    Double my parents chances. :)

  29. Boxster? by Gumshoe · · Score: 0, Funny

    It's a Porsche Inboxster.

    1. Re:Boxster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      60% Overrated. What a waste of mod-points.

  30. Re:ahhhhhhhhh.... I'm being spammed by slashdot!!! by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 0

    Oh, puhlease! Cowboy Neal has better taste than that! He drives the Slashdot Cruiser!

    --
    resigned
  31. Re:Here's where we talked about it already by The+Human+Cow · · Score: 3, Funny

    Am I the only one who thinks it's funny that a link to the dupe got marked redundant?

    --
    The Human Cow - bringing you scrumtrelescence since 1995
  32. valid usernames by samhalliday · · Score: 3, Funny
    (from article)
    NEW YORK (AP) -- America Online said its members have submitted more than one million AOL screen names for the Internet company' s unorthodox drawing for a spammer' s seized sportscar.

    aaah, one million valid email addresses for phase two! WARRRAARARRAGAAARRAAGG!!

  33. Why for free? by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't you rather make him pay for it?

    1.) Find spammer.
    2.) Castrate him.
    3.) Add insult to injury: make him pay for it.
    4.) Profit.

    It would be fitting because he has been making us pay for his abusiveness.

  34. Have a nice day. by Freston+Youseff · · Score: 1

    I don't claim party allegiance of any kind. First link from google that came up. Evil shitbag scam artist.

    --

    1. Re:Have a nice day. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Big business never pays a nickel in taxes, according to Ralph Nader, who represents a big consumer organization that never pays a nickel in taxes."

      Well no shit, it is a non profit organization. Then again, it is a Dave Barry quote that was probably only intended as a joke.

      The rest of the web page just goes on and on about what is probably a questionable way to raise funds for some organizations Ralph Nader is involved with, all along practically implying that he pockets the money. Brilliant.

  35. Unusual? Bah! by finelinebob · · Score: 1, Funny


    You obviously don't watch enough late-nite TV. Don't you know that you can buy cars and homes siezed from similar low-lifes by the FBI, IRS, repo men and other organizations? Auctions are being held right now near you! You can also obtain financing for your low-life auto auction purchase!

    1. Re:Unusual? Bah! by GillBates0 · · Score: 1
      If you RTFA, you will observe that this was done by a private CORPORATION: namely AOL, which IMHO is a tad different from LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES (which I mention in my comment) like the FBI/etal.

      But you're right, I don't watch enough trashy late-night TV...I consider my time too valuable to be wasted watching the trash that Fox/etc feed you day after night.

      --
      An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  36. Great idea! by arvindn · · Score: 4, Funny

    1. Announce sweepstakes for spammer's porsche
    2. Get people to sign up; collect email addresses
    3. Sell email addresses
    4. Profit!

  37. Re:Remove this item (poety?) by JPriest · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Remove this post
    and you will save time for all
    the useless people

    Remove this person
    and you will save time for all
    the people that never knew

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
  38. Garth! by douglips · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    That was a haiku!

  39. Re:Did the spammer Voilate the law? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

    We have these things called "civil torts". When you damage someone by costing them lots of money or time, you can get sued to get it back.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  40. Re:Did the spammer Voilate the law? by TheLink · · Score: 1

    And I suppose uncivil torts are extorts eh?

    I'll await your retort ;).

    --
  41. A little vague... by tux_deamon · · Score: 1

    Who exactly is Ralph Nader scamming and how is he benefitting? Are you talking about student PIRG fees? You mean the fees that the student body overwhelmingly opts to adopt by popular vote? You mean the fees which are entirely optional? Do you mean the student PIRGS whose parent company was founded by Ralph Nader 30 years ago? The Ralph Nader who has selflessly dedicated his life to consumer and environmental advocacy? You mean the Ralph Nader who lives in a studio apartment and owns neither a car nor a television? He's your evil shitbag scam artist?

    1. Re:A little vague... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      liberals don't understand how awful Al Gore would have been as a president


      Yeah, it would sure be awful to have nine-eleven still be associated with the emergency hotline in the American zeitgeist.
    2. Re:A little vague... by Freston+Youseff · · Score: 1

      ...Ralph Nader who lives in a studio apartment and owns neither a car nor a television...

      Sounds like even more of a deluded idealogue dirtbag to me. In any event, his dirty little special interest programmes have no business on the default fees list of multiple public university. I can imagine how ecstatic an idealogical freak like yourself would feel if Ann Coulter managed to get some authoritarian nationalist agenda put on the roster of initial fees that a student "can opt out of". Nader, that stinking sack of shit, needs to find private channels to fund his lobbying interests with.

      --

    3. Re:A little vague... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to official sources, Bill Clinton is more responsible than George W. Bush for terrorism in the world today. Had Al Gore been president, nine-eleven would have taken place on one-twenty-five.

    4. Re:A little vague... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would liberals suggest that Nader cost Gore the 2000 election? The liberals voted for Nader. It's the wishy-washy moderates who make that charge.

    5. Re:A little vague... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no business on the default fees list of multiple public university.

      The do if the student goverment so decides it (which they have).
      I can imagine how ecstatic an idealogical freak like yourself

      Looked in the mirror lately?
      Nader, that stinking sack of shit, needs to find private channels to fund his lobbying interests with.

      Nader doesn't have anything to do with PIRG. He hasn't held a leadership role there for at least 3 generations.

    6. Re:A little vague... by Freston+Youseff · · Score: 1

      >>no business on the default fees list of multiple >>public university.

      The do if the student goverment so decides it (which they have).


      LOL! That is just about the stupidest rationalisation of anything I have seen this month thus far! Let's put aside the notion that protecting idiots from themselves via "consumer advocacy" lobbying interests in government is, shall we say, thick-headed.

      Now, suppose Fred Phelps manages to get his filthy special interest agenda funded in a similar manner through several public interests. Or that Bob Jones University's "Student government" decides declare February 21 as "Nigger Lynching Day". I would imagine that a bleeding heart such as yourself would get mighty upset. So, yes, my friend who completely lacks reason, lobbying for private interests through a public university's roster of student fees is unethical.

      --

    7. Re:A little vague... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL! That is just about the stupidest rationalisation of anything I have seen this month thus far!

      You probably say it's stupid because you either don't understand it, are trolling, or both. If the first is the case, I'll try to explain it.

      At a public university, students have collective powers to enact policy. The students, by majority vote, have decided to fund the Public Interest Research Group. If other students don't like that policy, they can organize and vote to change it. However, they can always opt out of paying the fee simply by refusing to do so.

      Of course, none of this has anything to do with Ralph Nader, but I thought I'd explain that to you since you seem confused. Hope it helps.

  42. Hang on a minute by Khanivor · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who thinks AOL sending me a Cd in the post every fortnight asking me to join up with the crappy service is spam? Spam that is far worse then the digital form as it involves so much wasted resources and environmental damage deleivering the discs. So let's have a compo where the winner walks off with a million bucks in AOL shares. Hypocrites.

    1. Re:Hang on a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They're not hypocrites. CDs cost money to send, emails through relays do not. Therefore, AOL is paying for their advertising while spammers are not.

      Junk mail isn't illegal. Spam is. Junk faxes. Junk emails. Things where the spammers dont pay for the medium - where YOU pay for the medium - those're the ones that're just plain wrong.

      Don't blur that line or you can have it used against you. Next thing you know, people think it's all the same and junk'll come with no recourse.

  43. Wow! by shiftless · · Score: 1

    Where can I find a $30k Porsche Boxster S?

  44. ok, ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    let's take away posting privileges for the moron who submitted it and remove approval privileges for the party who let it slip through.

    There are plenty of interesting articles so we don't need repeats.

  45. They already did this... by MacFury · · Score: 1
    otherwise every crook company (we have plenty of them - RIAA/SCO/etc) could go around threatening people with lawsuits (which the individuals couldn't afford) and demand out-of-court settlements and the people being sued would have no choice but to pay up unless they had resources to pursue their case in court.

    The RIAA have already done this will people using P2P programs to share music. When you are being faced with $500,000 fines for every song on your computer...cutting a deal for $2500 doesn't look so bad.

    I hate the rich

  46. ha ha, faggot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that'll teach you to mouth off un-anonymously. Eat shit slashbot.

  47. Luck by Quill345 · · Score: 1

    I guess one lucky winner will have his/her e-mail address published on AOL's page... ;)

  48. Would you want it early? by WinterpegCanuck · · Score: 2, Funny

    Actually, I am kind of proud of this being old news. Re-affirms my hopes that not many /. users get, let alone read, their monthly AOL-Members Newsletter. *sniff*

  49. yarr by tyblu · · Score: 1

    Slightly counteracts the fact that AOL sucks sweaty llama balls.

  50. Re:Repost? by rkaa · · Score: 1

    Huh.. modded DOWN? I thought I was rather funny. And I intend to go on writing THE SAME FUNNY QUESTION each time Slashdot break the AOL Porche story anew. So there.

  51. Settlement my ass by billcopc · · Score: 1

    The world looks more and more like a never-ending Jerry Springer episode. The point is that AOL had no business seizing this man's Porsche, they should have sued him dry and let the prison dogs drill him a new asshole.

    Let's see here: the Bush gov't has spent bazillions to seek out and destroy Bin Laden/Saddam etc. We catch this one little spammer prick that we'd just love to have drawn and quartered on national TV, and yet they just say "Give us your shiny red car" and let him loose. And now make a media crazy by raffling away the car. Good lord, I'd rather raffle away the privilege of slicing this guy to pulp with an AOL-CD launcher. Naw, I'd be cheap and keep that entertainment for myself.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com