Slashdot Mirror


MP3.com Archive Not Lost (1.7 Million Songs Saved)

macdaddypunk writes "We all remember last December's grim news: MP3.com closed its doors, warning thousands of musicians that 'all your content will be deleted from our servers.' However, as the Wall Street Journal reports today, most of the original MP3.com archive was never deleted! Two companies, GarageBand and Trusonic, claiming to have a legitimate copy of the archive, are now enabling former MP3.com artists to visit www.MP3isBack.com and recover their MP3.com music, instantly re-generating their artist pages with just a few clicks. Trusonic, itself a Vivendi spin-out, focuses on licensing music to retailers for in-store airplay. GarageBand, like a HOTorNOT for music, offers free mp3 downloads and claims to host the definitive charts of independent music."

32 of 215 comments (clear)

  1. So what your saying is... by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...that all your content is not belong to /dev/null? Sweet.

    1. Re:So what your saying is... by va3atc · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...that all your content is not belong to /dev/null? Sweet.

      Though I could swear some music these days come from /dev/urandom

      --
      Candle burns its brightest in the dark
    2. Re:So what your saying is... by The+Munger · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, yes. But you have to pass it through a couple of filters, auto-pitch-tune it and slap a barely dressed teenager into a film clip.

      --
      Refuse to make a statement in your sig!
  2. More evidence..... by bizpile · · Score: 5, Funny

    This just goes to support theory that once you put something on the internet, it exists forever.

    1. Re:More evidence..... by osewa77 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Yes, but what about the original privacy policy, which was the reason why they said they could not pass the musicians' information to CNET?
      "We were told we could not buy the artists' music files and personal information because of the Vivendi privacy policy,"
      Do I some deception that needs to be exposed and rightly concemned?
    2. Re:More evidence..... by theantix · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Think about it for a second. They "are now enabling former MP3.com artists to visit www.MP3isBack.com and recover their MP3.com music, instantly re-generating their artist pages with just a few clicks. " Sounds pretty clear to me that they aren't allowed to redistribute the music without permission of the orginal artist due to the mp3.com orginal TOS, but they could pass on the files without right of redistribution. And if the artist reauthorizes the distribution on the new sites, they have the files and the permission.

      --
      501 Not Implemented
  3. Thank god for this by ObviousGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While most of the music loaded up there was utter crap, the few gems that were hidden among the dross really made the service worth it.

    I'm glad someone was able to save the data, this will definitely make retrieving the files easier for everyone.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
  4. Send in the RIAA lawyers in... by Cyno01 · · Score: 4, Funny

    3...2...

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Send in the RIAA lawyers in... by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Informative

      Uhm, nope. This is just a provider who has possession of a legit copy of the tunes that was given to them, and they're requiring the owner of the songs, the artists, step forward before distributing them.

      RIAA has nothing to do with this. These were all indie bands to begin with...

  5. Does the MP3.com library belong on archive.org? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    http://archive.org has an entire section for music. And archive.org is composed of librarian/historian types, not questionable-business-model e-biz types (ie MP3.com). Their mission is to make sure digital things do not get lost. And they could certainly take several TB of additional data, since their archive grows at a ridiculous rate as it is.

    Furthermore, the songs could be licensed any way the artist wants- from public-domain to super duper copyrighted with a http://creativecommons.org license.

    http://reeddavid.com

    1. Re:Does the MP3.com library belong on archive.org? by vwjeff · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I love archive.org but I have a serious question. Before posting this I went there trying to find how they get the cash to support multi-terabyte databases of info and all the bandwidth needed. I want to donate to this worthy project. It took me a long time but I finally found this page. From the looks of it they have collected just over $2600. Archive.org says that they are a registered non-profit so they must be getting donations from other sources.

    2. Re:Does the MP3.com library belong on archive.org? by burns210 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I am sure this is impractical, but humor me. Right now, archive.org uses a mass of rackable server in a central(or multiple) locations.

      is it at all possible to write a distributed filesystem over the internet? Using ssh, if possible? I mean, it would have to have many multiple redundencies(google has 3 copies of everything they use in their googleFS), but could they use a 80-120 gig drive on few dozen/hundred/thousand peoples computers to host the archive?

      Then it lends itself to a p2p system... which then lends itself into a freenet with better long-term caching features.... Aww, one can dream.

    3. Re:Does the MP3.com library belong on archive.org? by adpowers · · Score: 4, Informative

      I believe they get a lot of money/support from Alexa. They have some dedicated lines to Alexa which Alexa uses to send their internet crawls to Archive.org (which are shown on Archive.org after a six month or so delay). They also team up with the Library of Congress (at least for all the September 11th crawls).

      I think they can handle the storage space. They already have over half a petabyte. They bandwidth, however, might be a problem since they are maxing out their .5 gig/second line. All the Grateful Dead tapes are clogging their bandwidth.

      Archive.org is a very worthy project. I am going to make my donation once I get my finances in order (aka, decide how much money I have to give and how exactly it will be divided up).

  6. You mean these bands didn't keep a local copy? by Bronster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I mean, come on - one single writable CD can hold a hundred or so songs. How hard would it be for even the most prolific band to keep a copy of everything they submitted to MP3.com.

    Ok, so I don't keep everything I post to usenet, or slashdot, but only because the work to recreate them is rarely worth the effort. If you've spent enough effort to get a decent quality recording, there's no way you'd even keep the MP3 as the master copy, but hey - more power to those who didn't care enough.

    1. Re:You mean these bands didn't keep a local copy? by The_Mystic_For_Real · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't really think the issue was of the songs ceasing to exist, although they may, as bands break up and computers and cds get lost/stolen/broken all the time. I think that what would have been lost was all the work done to gather all the songs into one place. If the music had been deleted, then there may still be a copy sitting in someone's attic, but they may not want to track it down and upload it again.

      --

      _____

      Thank you.

  7. The Catch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The songs that TruSonic/GarageBand have are only the ones that were included in TruSonic's broadcasting program. If you didn't opt-in, your songs are gone (or at least, TruSonic just doesn't have them). Also, it was already known a while ago that TruSonic still had these songs, it's just that now the authors are able to access them again.

  8. Bravo by LFS.Morpheus · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd like to congratulate the author of this snippet on their ability to work in a link to HOT or NOT.

    HOT or NOT on slashdot. I never thought I'd see the day...

    --
    The space unintentionally left unblank.
  9. Talk about a flip flop. by Tower+Laid+Waste · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a recording artist, I have a lot of friends who were directly impacted by this whole thing. In fact, a friend of a friend lost an entire album worth of his stuff when his hard drive crapped out a couple weeks after MP3.com closed down and supposedly deleted all the music. I suppose he might be able to recover his old recordings now, but of course with all the attendent red tape, it will be an uphill battle. With all the copyright issues and flipflopping, you can never tell where you stand as an artist. One minute you have a deal, the next minute they screw you. This is just another example. More than anything else, we need consistent, principled application of copyright policy, not companies who "deleted it before they decided to keep it" or whatever's going on here.

  10. PureVolume by jeeryg_flashaccess · · Score: 5, Interesting

    PureVolume.com is a much better alternative to garageband and mp3.com. What I like most is how simple and clean each bands interface is. Check it out! http://www.purevolume.com

    Also, many of the artists on purevolume have, or had started with mp3.com.

    --
    Life is like pants... fit in or you don't fit in.
  11. Great news by digitalgimpus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Some great no-name artists work were saved.

    Good news.

    Sounds like a decent offer for artists. Their service sounds rather good, and it's a decent offer (3 songs for free). And unlike P2P, it provides promotion capabilties essentially allowing people to keep track of a band they are interested in.

    P2P is just hosting. People still need to find it, and figure out where to find more about the band.

    This looks like a decent service. I could see some small bands with websites linking to their page on the service. A good way to organize your bands online promotional info and let fans keep up to date.

    I'd personally rotate the songs every so often (if they allow that, which I think they do). Let people keep coming back to hear new songs.

    Just my $0.02. It looks like a decent site. I hope some bands will make good use of it.

  12. Wouldn't any half-serious musicians... by rsidd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    have high-quality master backups of their recordings? At the very least, CD quality, but probably a higher-quality multitrack thing? I can't imagine a band actually losing access to their recorded work because of MP3.com's shutdown.

  13. Re:Hrmm... by MachDelta · · Score: 4, Funny
    Perhaps I should RTFA...
    ..but that wasn't really supposed to be funny
    Hm. You just pulled a "You must be new here" on yourself, and got both posts modded up.
    Impressive!
  14. Re:A consideration. by ArchieBunker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The truth is 90% of the people can't tell 256k mp3 from the original cd track.

    http://wso.williams.edu/~jmaster/shnmp3/
    http:/ /www.geocities.com/altbinariessoundsmusiccla ssical/mp3test.html

    Google turns up plenty of listening tests. What good does SHN do through a $2 sound card DAC and 2 inch pc speakers?

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  15. Re:A consideration. by ibbey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry, but you're a moron. A well encoded, high bit rate (or VBR) mp3 is audibly indistinguishable to virtually anyone. Sure, a "cd-quality" 128kbps mp3 may have artifacts, but that is the fault of the encoding, not the format. Go download LAME and encode a file using it's standard settings & I challenge you to tell the difference from the source. Of course, for the test to be fair, you need to listen to the source on the same system (ie, your computers speakers). Most people tend to listen to the CD out of there stereo system & mp3's out of there $10 computer speakers, & wonder why the mp3's sound so bad.

  16. Re:GarageBand? Apple (tm)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Apple licensed the name from Garageband.com. No lawsuit. Don't worry.

  17. Attention RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    MP3's and they aint yours.

    Suck it. Suck it hard.

  18. a true geek . . . by lavaface · · Score: 4, Funny

    would've linked to this

  19. anyone... by hiroshi912681 · · Score: 4, Funny

    anyone got a bittorrent?

  20. Well it was back by KalvinB · · Score: 4, Funny

    before Slashdot got to it.

    Ben

  21. Terms & Conditions by lunartik · · Score: 4, Informative

    TERMS & CONDITIONS: What am I committing to?

    For every song you host with GarageBand.com, you must agree to the contract below. It probably looks scarier than it really is, but please read through the whole thing. The key points are:

    You confirm that you own the music you're uploading and that it obeys all content laws (e.g. it's not pornographic), that it contains no viruses, and that you're not a minor.

    You grant us non-exclusive permission to use this music however we see fit (as part of a marketing promotion, for example)

    Rest assured, however, that we're not going to sell your music (unless, of course, you decide to sign a recording or licensing contract with us).

    Please, have your attorney check this out. We're sure you'll find it's fair and surprisingly chilled out. Here's the whole enchilada:

    GARAGEBAND.COM INTERNET MUSIC HOSTING AGREEMENT

    We have attempted to outline below in straightforward English the terms you agree to when you host your music at www.GarageBand.com ("GBC"). Please be aware that these terms if accepted by you, create a binding legal agreement between you and GBC which affects your rights. We strongly urge that before accepting these terms you print out a copy and review it with your attorney, manager and other representatives and if you have no such representatives that you seek other independent qualified guidance. We reserve the right to make changes to the Internet Music Hosting Agreement in the future, although these changes would not apply to you unless you accepted the revised terms.

    The basic submissions terms which will constitute our agreement if you accept by clicking the "I ACCEPT" box or submit any material to GBC are as follows:

    1. GBC Rights.

    Any sound recordings, musical and/or vocal works, pictures, videos, song lyrics and/or other materials (collectively the "Material") submitted by you shall be available for us to use on a non-exclusive basis anywhere and everywhere throughout the universe without any payment to you. We will not sell or license your music to others (making your music available to visitors of our site shall not be considered a sale or license), but GBC will be authorized to reproduce, distribute, publicly perform,
    publicly display and digitally perform and/or distribute the Material in whole or in part, alone or together with other material. GBC shall also have the right to use the Material for the
    purpose of promoting GBC products and services and to use the name, likeness and biographical material and any logos, marks or trade names of you or any individuals performing or otherwise represented in the Material or the artist or
    band included or referred to in the Material without any payment to you or any other persons or companies.

    2. Ownership of Materials.

    At all times you shall retain full ownership of the Material while granting to GBC the following non-exclusive rights: By accepting
    this agreement and/or submitting any Material, you are guaranteeing to GBC that you are of legal age to enter into contracts (you're not a minor) and have all rights, approvals and/or consents necessary to submit the Material on the terms provided herein. You also guarantee that no permission is required from any other individual or company for us to use the Material and other rights provided herein. You further guarantee
    to GBC that the compositions, recordings, lyrics and other materials contained in the Material are original, created only by you and do not contain any "samples" or excerpts from
    the material of others and do not otherwise infringe on the rights of any other individuals or companies. Although we're big believers in free expression, you also guarantee that the
    Material does not and will not violate any laws or be defamatory, libelous, pornographic or obscene. Finally, you guarantee to GBC that the Material will not contain any "viruses" or other information which may damage or otherwise interfere with GBC computer systems or data or tha

  22. Trusonic FAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Trusonic FAQ
    4a. I was told that my music was going to be deleted after the sale of MP3.com. What happened?
    Trusonic has the audio files of songs upload to www.mp3.com, but only if those songs were enrolled in the Trusonic Music Program as of December 19, 2003. Trusonic does not have access to songs that were not enrolled in the Trusonic Music Program.

  23. read carefully ... by miles+zarathustra · · Score: 4, Informative
    As a composer, I was told I can only recover 3 songs for free. The rest cost $7 each.

    Or give them $100 for 'lifetime' membership, though they obviously cannot guarantee they'll be around for anybody's lifetime.

    Yet another mu$ic indu$stry scam ... composers are forced to pay in order to get their stuff heard. Hey! Is anybody listening? We're the ones doing the work. You should be paying US!!