Slashdot Mirror


MP3.com Archive Not Lost (1.7 Million Songs Saved)

macdaddypunk writes "We all remember last December's grim news: MP3.com closed its doors, warning thousands of musicians that 'all your content will be deleted from our servers.' However, as the Wall Street Journal reports today, most of the original MP3.com archive was never deleted! Two companies, GarageBand and Trusonic, claiming to have a legitimate copy of the archive, are now enabling former MP3.com artists to visit www.MP3isBack.com and recover their MP3.com music, instantly re-generating their artist pages with just a few clicks. Trusonic, itself a Vivendi spin-out, focuses on licensing music to retailers for in-store airplay. GarageBand, like a HOTorNOT for music, offers free mp3 downloads and claims to host the definitive charts of independent music."

11 of 215 comments (clear)

  1. So what your saying is... by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...that all your content is not belong to /dev/null? Sweet.

    1. Re:So what your saying is... by va3atc · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...that all your content is not belong to /dev/null? Sweet.

      Though I could swear some music these days come from /dev/urandom

      --
      Candle burns its brightest in the dark
  2. More evidence..... by bizpile · · Score: 5, Funny

    This just goes to support theory that once you put something on the internet, it exists forever.

    1. Re:More evidence..... by osewa77 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Yes, but what about the original privacy policy, which was the reason why they said they could not pass the musicians' information to CNET?
      "We were told we could not buy the artists' music files and personal information because of the Vivendi privacy policy,"
      Do I some deception that needs to be exposed and rightly concemned?
  3. Does the MP3.com library belong on archive.org? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    http://archive.org has an entire section for music. And archive.org is composed of librarian/historian types, not questionable-business-model e-biz types (ie MP3.com). Their mission is to make sure digital things do not get lost. And they could certainly take several TB of additional data, since their archive grows at a ridiculous rate as it is.

    Furthermore, the songs could be licensed any way the artist wants- from public-domain to super duper copyrighted with a http://creativecommons.org license.

    http://reeddavid.com

  4. The Catch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The songs that TruSonic/GarageBand have are only the ones that were included in TruSonic's broadcasting program. If you didn't opt-in, your songs are gone (or at least, TruSonic just doesn't have them). Also, it was already known a while ago that TruSonic still had these songs, it's just that now the authors are able to access them again.

  5. Bravo by LFS.Morpheus · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd like to congratulate the author of this snippet on their ability to work in a link to HOT or NOT.

    HOT or NOT on slashdot. I never thought I'd see the day...

    --
    The space unintentionally left unblank.
  6. Talk about a flip flop. by Tower+Laid+Waste · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a recording artist, I have a lot of friends who were directly impacted by this whole thing. In fact, a friend of a friend lost an entire album worth of his stuff when his hard drive crapped out a couple weeks after MP3.com closed down and supposedly deleted all the music. I suppose he might be able to recover his old recordings now, but of course with all the attendent red tape, it will be an uphill battle. With all the copyright issues and flipflopping, you can never tell where you stand as an artist. One minute you have a deal, the next minute they screw you. This is just another example. More than anything else, we need consistent, principled application of copyright policy, not companies who "deleted it before they decided to keep it" or whatever's going on here.

  7. PureVolume by jeeryg_flashaccess · · Score: 5, Interesting

    PureVolume.com is a much better alternative to garageband and mp3.com. What I like most is how simple and clean each bands interface is. Check it out! http://www.purevolume.com

    Also, many of the artists on purevolume have, or had started with mp3.com.

    --
    Life is like pants... fit in or you don't fit in.
  8. Re:A consideration. by ArchieBunker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The truth is 90% of the people can't tell 256k mp3 from the original cd track.

    http://wso.williams.edu/~jmaster/shnmp3/
    http:/ /www.geocities.com/altbinariessoundsmusiccla ssical/mp3test.html

    Google turns up plenty of listening tests. What good does SHN do through a $2 sound card DAC and 2 inch pc speakers?

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  9. Re:GarageBand? Apple (tm)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Apple licensed the name from Garageband.com. No lawsuit. Don't worry.