Slashdot Mirror


VIA Announces Lead-Free Motherboard

linuxprox writes "VIA announced today that their AS-1210 motherboard will be the world's first lead-free motherboard. 'The transition to 'green' manufacturing for VIA has been very smooth and we have been able to ship lead-free processors and chipsets since the end of last year,' said Richard Brown, Vice President of Marketing, VIA Technologies, Inc. 'The AS-1210 clearly demonstrates the technology leadership of VIA and Yamashita in being the first to market with a lead-free motherboard that meets the requirements of the international market.'"

88 of 347 comments (clear)

  1. more to read by tedtimmons · · Score: 5, Informative
    I was trying to figure out what the lead was used for (traces, solder, and capacitors was my best bet). The following link from Intel is a press release, but contains a good overview of lead use:
    http://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/20 040407tech.htm

    And more from Intel:
    http://www.intel.com/research/silicon/leadfree.htm

    And more information from AMD:
    http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/TechnicalResou rces/0,,30_182_4040,00.html

    Disclosure: I don't work for, or own stock in AMD or Intel. I haven't purchased an Intel chip since the Pentium came out.

    -ted

  2. Dammit.. foiled.. by brxndxn · · Score: 5, Funny

    All my plans of turning worthless motherboards into precious pencils has failed!!

    --
    --- We need more Ron Paul!
    1. Re:Dammit.. foiled.. by Mateito · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Now we baby them so much that the sissies make it to adulthood,
      > mate with other sissies, and spawn yet more sissies.

      And without them, we wouldn't have Slashdot.

  3. Green Computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    VIA Green Computing page

    It's too bad they don't do monitors. Those CRTs are the biggest source of lead in computers. Of course, I don't like electrons being shot at my face, so it's not all bad, but still. They are a pain to dispose of.

    Cross your fingers for affordable OLEDs. (fp?)

    1. Re:Green Computing by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      CRTs are a pain to dispose of?

      I put two to four of them at a time out there and the trashman hauls them away. For our regular $15 per month trash pickup.

      You probably just live in the wrong locality. I buy lots of used computers and scrap out a lot of stuff.

      --
      resigned
    2. Re:Green Computing by BetaJim · · Score: 2, Informative

      CRT's don't fire any electrons at you. They would never make is out of the glass envelope (lead-free glass or not). The lead is there to shield you from the low energy x-rays produced by the electrons striking the phospher, glass and other parts of the screen.

      --

      "Drug related crime" is a misnomer, "prohibition related crime" is the more accurate and correct phrase.

    3. Re:Green Computing by greenhide · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Technically, you're not suppposed to do this. Components like this, along with things like batteries, aren't supposed to go to the normal dump. They're supposed to be hauled to a special sectioned off part of the dump, and the days during which you can do this are limited. This is true where I live, at least (Central Virginia).

      Plus, my understanding is that outside of the States, regulations are even stricter. Of course, I've heard that in some countries, a recycling tax is added to items like computers, and the companies are thus responsible for the costs of safely disposing of/recycling the computers. Anyone who knows more about this care to share?

      --
      Karma: Chevy Kavalierma.
    4. Re:Green Computing by HermanAB · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, at least the lead in the CRTs is inside the glass, in the form of a complex crystal, so it ain't goin nowhere...

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
  4. Green? by Unnngh! · · Score: 5, Funny
    'The transition to 'green' manufacturing for VIA

    Aren't most Printed Circuit Boards already green?

    Ah, nevermind...

    1. Re:Green? by DAldredge · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, they make some red and blue ones that they sell to the people that put windows on the side of their towers.

      I wish I was joking.

  5. New lead free motherboard... by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 5, Funny

    New lead free motherboard*

    *Supply your own solder.

  6. Oh lordy by boomgopher · · Score: 3, Funny

    So I shouldn't have been eating my old motherboards all these years?

    Please confirm my Slashdot friends! Woe is me...

    --
    Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
  7. Whoopie! by SCSi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I can let my toddler chew on motherboards without worrying about that pesky lead!
    Thanks VIA!

  8. A nice start, but... by Mr.+Darl+McBride · · Score: 5, Informative
    This is really more of a touchy feel-good move than a substantive move in cutting back on the more dangerous parts of the motherboard.

    This doesn't do a thing about the lethal levels of sheel negceba that go through most boards, not to mention the chemicals used in most non-paper capacitors, which are not only lethal poisons, but as tasty as anti-freeze to most animals.

    Add to this the PCBs in the transformer that go with their power supply, and you've pretty much only addressed the fourth worst problem. The real problems have several orders of magnitude more impact on the environtment and worse -- solutions already exist to solve all three for prices only 5-10% higher than what they pay for existing chemicals!

    1. Re:A nice start, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Paper capacitors and PCBs ? Geez, we're not talking about ENIAC's motherboard here. :-)

      Capacitors on modern surface mount motherboards are either ceramic (aluminum oxide) with metal (silver, palladium, tin) layers or "dry" tantalum caps. The ones you're thinking of are probably the "wet" tantalum caps which were wetted with sulfuric acid, which is certainly unpleasant although I wouldn't call it a lethal poison.

      You won't find any PCBs in the power supply transformer, either. Except in some very specialized high voltage applications, they've been banned for at least 20 years.

      I have no idea what "sheel negceba" is.

      Most of the lead in the environment comes from depleted lead-acid batteries, but there's no practical alternatives to those yet so tin-lead solder gets promoted to the top of the list.

      The biggest concern with lead-free solders is the higher temperatures they require to make them melt. Since all of the components on the board are also subject to this higher temperature, there can be negative effects on reliability.

    2. Re:A nice start, but... by another_henry · · Score: 3, Interesting
      the PCBs in the transformer that go with their power supply

      I don't know about your other points, but PCBs (Polychlorinated Biphenyl) are most definitely not used in computer PSU transformers. Back in the 1960s they were used as a flame-retardant additive to oil in big "pole pig" transformers that supply houses or whole streets. When they were found to be carcinogenic (and only mildly so, I might add) use was discontinued and they are absolutely forbidden from being used in any equipment manufactured nowadays. In fact I think it's an offense to even own anything that contains them.

      FWIW I've heard second-hand stories of old electric company techs who would literally swim in the stuff. Cancer rates for them weren't significantly higher than the general population.

      --
      "Studies have shown that people who eat peanuts live longer than those who do not eat."
    3. Re:A nice start, but... by justins · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have no idea what "sheel negceba" is.

      It's someone talking out of their ass.

      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
  9. "Lead" by TWX · · Score: 5, Funny

    For some reason I thought that all of the discrete components were going to be surface mount instead of through the board when I read that the board was "Lead free"...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  10. Graphite... by Thinkit4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...is in pencils--a form of carbon. Won't get that past here.

    --
    -I am an elective eunuch.
  11. Lead-Free Mobo's by Carlos+Silva · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of course i didn't RTFA but .. are they too expensive? I fail to see the consumer advantage on this kind of thing.. maybe they'll do some kind of special ad campaign.. Marketing guys just love to be able to say thing like "We're environment friendly" :-)

    1. Re:Lead-Free Mobo's by Chilliwilli · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I believe it's called Corporate Responsibility, it's been suggested that as corporations power and reach overtakes that of most governments they will need to take on the governments responsibilities to sustain a health market place. You can look at it from another point of view if we all die or get fat or whatever) who's going to be around to buy mobo/burgers/stuff's then?

      --
      Cure cancer.. and stuff! www.team45.info
    2. Re:Lead-Free Mobo's by dustmite · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No such thing as self-regulating "corporate responsibility". "Corporate responsibility" comes from a big (government) stick. The sudden move to lead-free is forced onto manufacturers by new regulations (EU regulations IIRC). You don't honestly think corporations came up with this all by themselves do you? Sure, I can picture it now, in a board meeting: "hey, let's raise our manufacturing costs by voluntarily reducing some of the polluntants in our products". Uh, riiiight. Now, back to the real world. Here is roughly the order of things: (1) companies make products that pollute, (2) government passes new regulations, (3) companies protest until they're forced to accept regulations, (4) companies produce product with fewer pollutants, (5) PR department puts a "we care for the environment" spin on the company's (forced) compliance, and issues press releases that give the impression the move was voluntary. Name ten real-world examples where companies moved directly to step 4 voluntarily. Heck, name one.

      Admittedly if products start really killing large sectors of the populace, then some companies are sure to start making voluntary moves. But I'm willing to bet that government regulation WILL appear long before the voluntary self-regulation even in that case.

  12. Not the first lead free mobo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Nec PowerMate eco computer, released in 2002 supposedly has lead free solder on the motherboard. To quote a press release, "The unit also contains a motherboard made with lead-free solder, which protects both the individuals involved in reclamation, and the ground water in case of disposal". I assume this means that there is no lead in the motherboard? Unless capacitors or other parts have lead?

  13. No lead but... by valkraider · · Score: 4, Funny

    50% more mercury...

    :)

    It's a joke people...

  14. you insensitive clod, by pangloss · · Score: 5, Funny

    my pre-1963 computer only takes leaded!

  15. Correct. by DAldredge · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just like how coal plants release more radition and heavy metals into the environment that nuclear plants. But which ones to the 'enviros' target the most, the nuke plants because it gets them more press.

    1. Re:Correct. by ewhenn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When you state that "coal plants release more radition and heavy metals into the environment than nuclear plants", do you mean as a whole, or per output unit. Surely there are MANY more coal fired plants than nuclear plants thus it might be easier to surpass the gross output. What we REALLY should be concerned with is Units of heavy metals per KWH (kilo watt hr) produced.

    2. Re:Correct. by Shurhaian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Except that A) nuclear plants don't release massive amounts of heavy metals and greenhouse gases(not nearly so much as coal, for sure) and B) the fact that the waste can be(well, is) concentrated makes it easier to deal with than the same waste being vented into the atmosphere.

      --
      NB: YMMV. IANAL. Take the above with a grain of salt.
    3. Re:Correct. by DAldredge · · Score: 5, Informative

      Per KwH.

      They also release a lot of heavy metals, so much so that warning about fish from lakes around most of the coal plants in East Texas have been issued due to their high levels of heavy metals.

    4. Re:Correct. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Which is also stupid, because most of the "waste" that comes from nuclear plants is in the form of clothing, and other consumables not directly related to the operation of the reactor (but contaminated nonetheless).

      I had the opportunity to see some of the stuff that went into the big casques that go to Nevada. Pretty lame stuff. I was expecting 55 gallon barrels with glowing fluid coming out (not really, but it's more fun that way).

      Not only that, but 95% of the stuff produced (yes, produced) by our fission reactors can be recycled, and reused as fuel. The rest of the 5% is in such incredible demand from academia and industry (for research) that it could make a fortune alone. Except our country is too fucking stupid (and paranoid) to recycle spent fuel.

    5. Re:Correct. by nomadic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To continue your analogy you can have all your cyanide in one place where it is easy to control and prevent others from getting or you can spread it all over every surface in your house. Which form would you rather have?

      Well my analogy already showed how cyanide in the ocean isn't dangerous because it's so dilute, so you don't need to extend the analogy at all. And it falls apart at the point you're trying to make because it's extremely difficult to store it safely, unlike cyanide.

      There are several general responses to this assertion. The first is that we can just put it in a large, specially-made storage facility like Yuca mountain. Unfortunately not only is that still dangerous (and the danger is compounded by having so much of the material in one place), it's also very expensive and these things WILL fill up. We already have way too much waste now that we can't get rid of, so it boggles the mind how so many people here are arguing that we should increase the amount of waste a hundredfold by opening up many, many new plants.

      Another common solution brought up is to dump it into ocean trenches and let the earth's convective system draw it down and out of harms way. It's an interesting idea, but you can't just drop it at the ocean's surface over a trench and assume it will fall right where it needs to go. And the depths involved pose serious challenges to large scale movement of the waste down to the right place. Plus it is somewhat risky to just toss this stuff down there and assume it won't come back out until it's not radioactive anymore.

      I know it's geek chic to assume everyone against increased nuclear use is against it "just because they see the word nuclear", but it's just not true. I think nuclear plants can operate safely (with intense government oversight and regulation--no, this is not something that you want "the market to decide"), but I don't think it's a smart idea to put more into operation until we figure out something to do with the waste that's more clueful than sticking it in a hole in the ground.

    6. Re:Correct. by AJWM · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's per unit of power. In fact, were the extraction process easy, we'd get more energy out of coal by using its thorium content in a nuclear reactor than we do by burning the carbon. As it is, the thorium ends up as part of the coal ash (and the flue gases).

      Per KWH, coal plants are far dirtier than nuke plants -- in all senses of the word "dirtier".

      --
      -- Alastair
    7. Re:Correct. by slittle · · Score: 2, Interesting
      With coal all that radiation is dumped into the air slowly.
      Quoth Dans Data:
      Of course, what power costs you, the consumer, isn't what it costs, full stop. There's greenhouse gas emissions and other power plant exhaust pollution, depletion of resources, destruction of wilderness by mines and their associated infrastructure, and more.

      Most of Australia's electricity is generated by coal-fired power plants, which emit an awful lot of carbon dioxide. And coal plant fly ash contains radioactive uranium and thorium in surprising amounts. Even if the ash is effectively caught by filters, something still has to be done with it.

      Not that fly ash scraped out of a filter and dropped into a bucket is actually amazingly dangerous stuff, but waste of similar levels of activity that happens to come from nuclear power plants is treated like pure megadeathium. You certainly can't get away with burying it in dams .

      --
      Opportunity knocks. Karma hunts you down.
  16. No leads? by pyrrhonist · · Score: 5, Funny

    How do you connect peripherals? Oh wait...

    --
    Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
  17. Re:I had no idea this was a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Mobos don't just suddenly dematerialise when you're through with them. Instead they sit in land fills and get rained on and leech lead into the groundwater.

  18. Not because of our blue eyes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    They don't do this out of altruism, they have to if they want to sell their products on the EU market, since from 2006, all electronic products will have to be lead free.

  19. Re:Way to get the lead out! by Kenja · · Score: 2
    "Ok, I know, it's not punny. Sorry."

    You should be punnished for that. Still, at least it wasn't a pun about German sausages, eh? They're the wurst.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  20. Some Quotes... by DAldredge · · Score: 4, Informative

    "[T]he campaign of fear now being waged against genetic modification is based largely on fantasy
    and a complete lack of respect for science and logic."
    Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore.

    "Solar power and windmills are not a realistic way out. Nuclear energy is the only real and practical solution, but there has been such a hysterical reaction to it."
    James Lovelock, developer of the Gaia Hypothesis.

    "Extreme weather events are definitely on the decline over the last 40 years."
    Dr. Madhav Khandekar, a meteorologist with 25 years experience at Environment Canada.

    "They have cheated the case and I am angry about that, because that will come to our account. They use bad data, as well as for the Brent Spar as for the French nuclear tests. I am against nuclear tests, but one should use scientific, sound arguments ... Greenpeace has harmed the environmental case."
    Paul Crutzen, Nobel Prize winner for his work on the ozone layer, who cancelled his Greenpeace membership.

    "In truth, what the environmental community has become is a money machine"
    Alfred Runte, environmental historian, board member of the National Parks Conservation Association from 1993 to 1997 and author of Yosemite, The Embattled Wilderness.

    "In 2000, say World Health Organization and other studies, malaria infected over 300 million people. It killed nearly 2,000,000 - most of them in sub-Saharan Africa.
    [...]
    "[these deaths] are due in large part to near-global restrictions on the production, export and use of DDT.
    [...]
    "Where DDT is used, malaria deaths plummet. "
    Paul Driessen, author of Eco-Imperialism - Green Power. Black Death. - "A former member of the Sierra Club and Zero Population Growth, he abandoned their cause when he recognized that the environmental movement had become intolerant in its views, inflexible in its demands, unwilling to recognize our tremendous strides in protecting the environment, and insensitive to the needs of billions of people who lack the food, electricity, safe water, healthcare and other basic necessities that we take for granted."

    "Greenpeace is lobbying against industry plans to exclude products such as DDT from a POPs [persistent organic pollutants] phase-out."
    Greenpeace annual report, 1999)

    1. Re:Some Quotes... by NivenHuH · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While I don't believe in the Greenpeace's message, I do believe that we, as humans, need to do what we can to lessen our impact on our environment. If we can find 'green'-alternative ways to fuel our power plants, then we should, reguardless of how much $$ it might cost to develop the technology. It's kinda the same idea as taxing the rich.. If our country gave you the means to become rich, then you should have to pay out a little more in taxes.. If our environment gave you the means to build a product, then you should at least do what you need to do to preserve our environment.. Unfortunately, with most businesses, it's not about ethic; it's about profit.

      --
      Just when you make it idiotproof, some idiot builds a better idiot.
    2. Re:Some Quotes... by Brandybuck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We should definitely lessen our impact on our environment. The first step is to abandon this "green" religion that's been pushed on it. It prevents any sort of rational thought on the matter.

      The green way is to recycle aluminum cans, which involves significant energy and chemical expenditure for the recycling. The old fashioned way, before the greenies took over, was to use returnable bottles. It was called "conservation". People didn't waste resources simply because it was wasteful. Nowadays we can waste as much as we want so long as we separate our waste into the proper waste containers first.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  21. Thanks EU! by taped2thedesk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Interesting to see a company that is succeeding with lead-free... They are requiring the phase-out of lead-free components by 2006, and now a lot of companies are scrambling to change their product designs and processes to make this possible. I haven't heard of much success in this area.

    I think electronic components have a blanket exemption for now, but this exemption is coming up for review soon. Just to be safe, most companies (including mine, which is part of an exempted industry) are trying to come up with lead-free products.

    Not sure how much of an effect this will have... I remember reading that on average, electric components are less than 1% lead. In addition, the substitutes being explored to replace lead solder (silver and antimony) may actually cause more groundwater pollution, because they are more soluble. Doesn't seem like it's much more than a feel-good measure.

  22. Re:Pay a premium for the board by BillyBlaze · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In that article, PCBs refers to polychlorinated biphenyls, a poison, not printed circuit boards. I'm not aware of any connection between the two.

  23. A telling story by dc_dog · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The House Small Business Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform and Oversight held a hearing today on "Green Gazelles." The term is used to describe a fast growing business that utilizes environmentally friendly processes in its operations. Look for this trend to contine as a niche market for consumers who are willing to pay more for "green" products. Of course, there is no official certification to determine whether your business is "green" or not so feel free to turn off some lights in your store and advertise away!

  24. Lead by GaussianInteger · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, the earliest pencils WERE made from lead, until graphite was found to be a much better substititute. I wouldn't nitpick, but I think the above nitpicking gives me more than ample justification =). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead

  25. How about..... by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No water needed for making? What was it? 150 gallons of water just to make memory sticks?

    --
    1. Re:How about..... by rtaylor · · Score: 2, Funny

      And poof, that water was gone. You cannot get it back, it has been obliterated.

      The only way to get that water back when an ice comet crashes into the earth, and you don't want that to happen.

      We're all going to dehydrate because of RAM!

      --
      Rod Taylor
  26. Re:Earth Day.. by NivenHuH · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, obviously, it's not putting lead out into the environment when you trash your old MOBO.. I guess it doesn't help that there are still other harmful materials in PCB's, but, every little bit counts. You have to work your way around one problem before you can focus on the next..

    --
    Just when you make it idiotproof, some idiot builds a better idiot.
  27. Re:How much before? by sugar+and+acid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Lead is on of the problems in many landfill sites with contamination of ground water, and also increasing the cost of reuse of the land after the dump has stopped operating, as inevitable some lead has found its way there, the old common culprit being car batteries and the like.

    Computers and other electrical goods are a lesser but probably more common concern these days as it makes up a large volume of waste, I think most people know to dispose of car batteries and other things with large amounts of lead and other heavy metals properly now or at least the shop that changed it does and the high concentration of lead makes extraction and recycling practical.

  28. Lead Free is nice but... by irrelative83 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    there are more important issues regarding PCs and the evironment. Why don't PC manufacturers make computers that use less power? Nvidia's new graphic card needs a 450 watt power supply - so what if the mobo is lead free? The thing still draws enough power to burn twice as much oil as needed.

    1. Re:Lead Free is nice but... by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Informative

      Which means dick in the big picture.

      Do you know how many watts a 200HP car engine produces in theory?

      Over 149 thousand watts. Generated by a relatively inefficient small engine. Burning gasoline.

      So before you go apeshit over a video card that uses 100 piddly watts, get some perspective.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  29. props by IggDawg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's cool that they're getting into the push for lead-free electronics. It's certainly not easy or cheap to validate lead-free components. I work in acoustic micro imaging, so I look at the insides of ICs, MEMS, and other electronics all day. we get a lot of work from companies doing moisture sensitivity level testing for lead vs. lead free parts. The lead free parts have to go through a hotter solder reflow profile, so any moisture will cause even more damage. The insides of most of the parts look like someone set a bomb off. it takes them a long while and many iterations before they can pull it off right.

    So, props to them for getting with it.

    disclaimer - I don't work for these guys, nor do I buy their products. I'm just a concerned scientist :P.

  30. Nice quotes... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    However, it's too bad reasonable voices like these are being ignored. And organizations like Greenpeace, PETA, the Sierra Club are being taken over by crazies. The Sierra Club in particular used to be a club for hunters and outdoorsmen, but has turned into an eco-nazi propaganda organization.

    I agree that DDT and nuclear power would do quite a lot of good for the world, by the way.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
  31. Lead free? by Spudley · · Score: 2, Funny

    A lead-free motherboard? No leads? How am I going to plug anything into it?

    Or do they mean no lead-time...? it gets delivered as soon as you order it. Now that would be nice.

    --
    (Spudley Strikes Again!)
  32. How to desolder the capacitors? by Ark42 · · Score: 3, Insightful


    Without lead, am I going to be able to desolder the exploding tawain capacitors in order to replace them with good ones, or do I just have to buy a new computer every 6 months now?

    (note to mods: if you still havn't heard of the capacitor problem, go google about it before modding)

    1. Re:How to desolder the capacitors? by GigsVT · · Score: 3, Informative

      What, you think they'll weld them into place with copper or something?

      No lead just means using a silver/tin or such solder instead of lead/tin. You can still use normal soldering equipment.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  33. Re:PC has met motherboards by another_henry · · Score: 5, Informative
    Actually solder is usually 40% lead, so it's not really a miniscule trace. I'd wager there really is quite a lot of it in motherboards and other circuit boards. I know that in the average CRT there's a kilogram or so, used to shield the user from xrays.

    I'm not qualified to say how this can be safely disposed of, or whether it really needs to, but an awful lot of old electronics do end up in public landfills and other locations where they could potentially leach(sp?) into groundwater. It's something worth considering when people are upgrading their electronics and computers annually.

    --
    "Studies have shown that people who eat peanuts live longer than those who do not eat."
  34. Re:PC has met motherboards by madcow_ucsb · · Score: 2, Informative

    No, it doesn't mean much for you or me, but when you start moving millions of pieces, the lead starts to add up. Yea lots of other nasties are used in the fab process, but hey, why make it worse than it needs to be?

    The semiconductor company I work for has pretty high volume (nowhere near intel though...) and we went lead-free not too long ago. Customers demanded it, so we gave it to em.

  35. Suspect found: by Tribbin · · Score: 2, Funny

    http://computerfan.de/fun/HP_Gabon.jpg

    --
    If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
  36. Great news kids! by whovian · · Score: 2, Funny

    I will feel soooo much better when my son pulls chips off his motherboards and sticks them in his mouth! Thanks VIA!!!!

    --
    To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
  37. Re:PC has met motherboards by 0racle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Miniscule traces perhaps, but miniscule traces from hundreds of thousands of components is a whole hell of a lot. Besides, I'm sure the plants that produces these parts are a lot cleaner, environmentally.

    So quit your whining, cleaner components are good, whether your talking traces or massive amounts. For everything that happens there's always someone whining about it.

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
  38. Oooo shiney by mog007 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The article has a site load meter... and it's not entirely red yet... what's the matter with us fellow /.ers? Have we become weakened?

  39. sources of environmentalism by feelyoda · · Score: 4, Interesting
    just thought I'd give pause to all those that think they are fighting the pig capitalisms in their green efforts.

    If you view environmental concerns as a luxury good, it makes sense that people only addressed such issues after the average person in society accumulated a fair ammount of wealth.

    to quote the Cato Institute here:

    President Bush today commemorated Earth Day in Maine, where he is touting his environmental policy and highlighting his plan to restore wetlands in the United States.

    "Earth Day is traditionally a day for the Left -- a celebration of government's ability to deliver the environmental goods and for threats about the parade of horribles that will descend upon us lest we rededicate ourselves to federal regulators and public land managers," writes Jerry Taylor, Cato Institute director of natural resource studies, in "Happy Earth Day? Thank Capitalism." He argues that businessmen, not bureaucrats, "deserve most of the credit for the environmental gains over the past century."

    "Indeed, we wouldn't even have environmentalists in our midst were it not for capitalism," Taylor writes. "Environmental amenities, after all, are luxury goods. America -- like much of the Third World today -- had no environmental movement to speak of until living standards rose sufficiently so that we could turn our attention from simply providing for food, shelter, and a reasonable education to higher 'quality of life' issues. The richer you are, the more likely you are to be an environmentalist. And people wouldn't be rich without capitalism."
    And to say that without capitalism there wouldn't be polution to begin with, is to say that it is bad that technology that allows humans to look beyond the brutish nature of the world.

    Happy Industrial Revolution Day!
    http://while-true.blogspot.com/
    --

    Robo-Blogs of the world: UNITE!
  40. Re:VIA is reliable by cojsl · · Score: 2, Informative

    Granted the KT133 was a stinker, and largely the reason early Athlons were percieved as unreliable, but since then they've been solid. I'm posting from a KT600 box, just finished a KM266 econo box, and have build dozens of other VIA based boxes including my VIA EPIA based Car Computer!

  41. Re:PC has met motherboards by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Insightful

    political correctness has met the IT sector once again. For gosh sakes, what's the problem? I don't plan to eat my motherboard - you might argue "it's thrown away one day", but some miniscule trace of lead found in the solder isn't going to hurt anything - more goes into the environment when i lose a sinker fishing than when I throw away a dozen motherboards.

    There's a reason why my State banned the sale of lead sinkers. For gosh sakes, what's the problem with trying to be more environmentality friendly? If VIA can sell a lead-free motherboard that works well at a decent price and make a profit while doing so why is this political correctness? It's being a good corporate citizen. Why is this a bad thing?

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  42. Re:Earth Day.. by NivenHuH · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Interesting.. I can completely see where you're coming from, as society today seems to be about 'consuming', which in turn boosts our economy.. which gives $$ to producers to influnce consumers into consuming even more.. A perpetual problem really..

    While I don't see the conservation movement returning (well, unless we run into a problem of a shortage or we overflow ourselves with unrecyclable wastes), I do see working towards 'green' solutions as a compromise for conservation.

    It would be nice to buy one MOBO, and use it for years, however not only would this be unfeasable for the manufacturer (.. they have to make $$ of the next-latest & greatest), but it's unfeasable for technology in general.. If we didn't have faster and faster machines, then we wouldn't be able to accomplish the problems we've solved with bigger and badder machines.. and if we didn't purchase the next-generation technologies in each product cycle, there would be no reason for technology to increase..

    It's sad, but it's reality.. =/

    --
    Just when you make it idiotproof, some idiot builds a better idiot.
  43. Re:PC has met motherboards by scdeimos · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The mix of tin and lead in solder varies somewhat depending on the application, with 60/40 and 70/30 being common. I was curious myself about the claim of "Lead-Free" since every solder joint in the system would have to have lead, right? From VIA's Lead-Free Manufacturing page:

    ...and the solder balls now consist of a tin, silver and copper composite.

    Of course, I don't know what everyone's got against lead. If all the claims you hear were true then my old man (who breathes in solder fumes for up to 80 hours a week) should have died of lead poisioning forty years ago. He reckons milk is the answer. :)

  44. Re:So, what is in there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    There have been lead-free solder alloys available for some time. The early ones were based on bismuth, but the melting temperature was so high it tended to fry all the components on the board and even cause the boards themselves to delaminate.

    The current favorites are the tin/silver/copper alloys, such as this: http://www.alphametals.com/products/solderpaste/om 338.html

    Their melting ("reflow") temperature is only about 20C above the standard 63/37 tin-lead solders, so it's not too hard on the boards or components.

    Believe it or not, there's a lot of science that goes into putting all those little parts on the board, melting the solder and cleaning up !

  45. Re:Way to get the lead out! by Weaselmancer · · Score: 2, Funny

    You don't know how lucky you are - if this was 500 years ago, you'd receive the medieval punishment for telling bad puns.

    You'd be drawn and quoted.

    Weaselmancer

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  46. Some more quotes... by m.koch · · Score: 4, Informative
    "Lead Poisoning is the most common environmentally caused disease in the United States, affecting 4-5% of children nationwide."
    link

    "Lead poisoning is the leading environmentally induced illness in children. At greatest risk are children under the age of six because they are undergoing rapid neurological and physical development."
    link

    "New research suggests that millions more children than previously thought might have lead-linked mental impairment, while another study supports a strong link between lead exposure and juvenile delinquency."
    link

    "Lead is a highly toxic metal that was used for many years in products found in and around our homes. Lead may cause a range of health effects, from behavioral problems and learning disabilities, to seizures and death."
    link

    ... and these are just some quotes from google results.

  47. Re:Just wondering... by DarkMan · · Score: 4, Informative

    The origin of the problems is typical heavy metal toxicity - lead has many available electron orbitals that can form weak bonds with proteins. At the active sites of enzymes, where there are many ligands on the protein, the heavy metal can sit in there, and bind tighter than the intended species. This essentially blocks the action of those affected enzymes. Different heavy metals have different affinities for different enzymes [0], so have different effects, but that's the general mechanism for heavy metal poisioning.

    The next problem is that because the metals bind to proteins, they stay there, so that as each plant or animal is consumed, there is a concentrating action as you move up the food chain. Thus, for example, herbivourus fish might collect a small quantiy of mercury, the fish that eat them have more, and the tuna that eat those have even more. Ok, that's not lead, but I can't reacall a specific example for lead at the moment - the principle still holds. It's worth noting that the typical human diet puts them at the top of the food chain.

    There is a difference between lead as a metal, and lead in a compound. It should be clear that the lead that is the problem is bioavailable lead - a solid lump of the metal might not be the biggest source of lead - although I suspect that chewing on a block of lead would be as bad, or worse than the paint.

    With lead in a fish tank, I suspect that the lead forms a thin layer of an oxide or similar, that reduces the rate the metal dissolves at. This is similar to aluminum and chromium, but I think it's less efective. The small lead released would probably be less damaging to the fish that the effect of other metals (for example, iron would make the tank acidic, aluminium would make it alkaline, and so on). That's a case of minisming hard (although I'd suggest that a plastic would probably be better).

    [0] Non enzyme proteins tend not have that many bindable sites, and those that do generally don't suffer much. It's principly enzyme blocking that's a problem, in general.

  48. Re:Earth Day.. by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You know, if people didn't go out and by new mobos every six months because they're substituting for diminished manhoods, then they wouldn't be trashing their old mobos every six months. This race to get the biggest and fasted CPU and GPU on the block is much more dangerous than the lead in a mobo that's being used past its planned obsolescence date.

    I think this just depends on what you do with the old mobo. Perhaps I am alone in this, but I rarely throw away working electronics. I can usually either find some use for them, or find someone who wants them. My last computer was given to my girlfriend who doesn't feel the need to upgrade as often as I do. I have given coutless parts to friends and family, because I had replaced them, and they could use them. About the only thing I have considered throwing away is my old 486, which I haven't been able to find a good home for. I haven't brought myself to do it yet, mostly because I am a pack-rat, that and the fact that it was still working perfectly the last time I fired it up (though I did put newer hard drive in it, to get it there). Even that, I would rather give to someone who will use it than put it in a land-fill. I've considered a school, but I think its too old for even them.
    I guess my point is, it isn't the upgrade cycle that is causing the problem, its the idiots who throw out perfectly good hardware. Sure, it won't run the latest games well, but it might do well for someone's over-glorified typewriter.

    --
    Necessity is the mother of invention.
    Laziness is the father.
  49. Re:PC has met motherboards by canajin56 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know about milk, but apparently cilantro (coriander / Chinese parsley) can help. When patients are given soup with plenty of cilantro juice in it, their levels dropped much faster than those who are receiving normal treatment only. Of course, this isn't scientific evidence, and they have no idea if it works on its own, or just as an aid to conventional chelation. Still, it is something to keep in mind.

    --
    ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
  50. Re:Green means.... by SideshowBob · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What in the hell? Green does NOT mean living in a thatched hut eating berries. If 6 billion people reverted to hunter/gatherer the planet would be stripped bare in less than a year. No green wants that.

    For F's Sake people, use your brains and quit spouting propaganda at each other.

    Green means finding a technological solution to the fossil fuel problem (finite supply, source of pollutants). There is absolutely no reason to think that a hydrogen powered SUV is in any way a step backwards.

    Green means putting solar on your roof and becoming energy self sufficient. Maybe even sell surplus back to the grid. (yes I am aware of the pollutants that solar manufacturing potentially represents, however a) its localized and controllable, b) advances over time will lead to reductions in the pollutants, as scale of economy increases)

    Green means finding a technology solution to feeding our children without destroying the land that we grow it on (or perhaps you think that the Dust Bowl was good for our moral fiber?) The answer here is not patented genetically modified foods, which can't be seeded from the previous year's crop and require exorbitant licensing fees to biotech companies.

    Green means encouraging/funding zero population growth (i.e. replacement births). Yes this is "family planning". In most nations of the world family planning means just that, planning how many children to conceive - or rather how many NOT to conceive. But to bass ackward U.S. conservatives all they see is 'abortion' when they hear family planning. Sheesh.

    Green means smart progress, yet people like you spout your bullsh*t anytime you are confronted by the idea that change can be good. No no! Protect my comfortable status quo! Never mind that even if we did nothing, eventually it will be changed for us by the laws of physics!

    Sorry for the rant, mods do with me what you will..

  51. Re:PC has met motherboards by GigsVT · · Score: 3, Insightful

    CRT there's a kilogram or so, used to shield the user from xrays.

    Yeah, but that's mixed in the glass, and isn't going anywhere for the next several millenia or more. In several hundred million years when that glass gets subducted under the mantle and remelts, I doubt humans will be around to worry.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  52. The solder problem by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative
    Modern soldering practice is incredibly sophisticated. Soldering down a ball grid array surface mount package requires very tight control of the temperature and the physical properties of the solder. The components can only take soldering temperature for a short period.

    The trouble with lead free solders is that they all have considerably higher melting points than lead-based solders. The "standard" lead-based solder has a melting point of 183C. The best available lead-free solders have melting points in the 220C range. That's a big jump. All the manufacturing processes have to be reworked. Some components need to be redesigned for higher soldering temperature tolerance. Some components must be repackaged in different plastics. It's not trivial.

    Here's a good summary of the issues.

  53. Re:PC has met motherboards by descentr · · Score: 2, Informative

    CRTs do not "use" X-rays, but they certainly produce them. In fact, Roentgen discovered X-rays specifically using a CRT. The X-rays are produced when the cathode ray strikes the glass wall or the screen itself.

  54. Second American Revolution... by vudufixit · · Score: 2, Funny

    If it happens, I will make sure NOT to melt down any Via motherboards to cast lead bullets for our muskets.

  55. Re:PC has met motherboards by DebianRcksLindowsLie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Go ask anyone who's got a child who's eaten lead-based paint and is now sick forever if lead is safe. This is a GOOD thing. If we kept our components forever no one would care, but people in countries like China are disposing of all that US waste - and killing themselves by doing so. It's deplorable. I'll be looking into this.

  56. Re:PC has met motherboards by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 3, Insightful
    printf ("Jorkapp is a Programmer");

    Stick to programming. Your physics isn't all that hot. ;)
    --

    How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  57. Re:My source. by m.koch · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Now fucking appoligize.

    For what? You did just like I said. Besides, do you think that copying from a google search with the keywords extreme, quotes, environmentalists is a deliberate and constructive way to contribute to a discussion?

  58. Re:PC has met motherboards by scdeimos · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ok, that begs the question: how many parents are feeding lead-based paint to their children?

    Seriously, though, people aren't generally in direct contact with the lead contained in their motherboards, cards, hard disks, etc. The problem is supposed to occur at disposal time when it is alleged that lead and other heavy metals leach out of the refuse and in to the water table, and hence into the local water supply/food chain. With recycling companies breaking-up computers and other electronic devices into their constituent materials and reselling "raw" materials this should become less and less of an issue.

    I'm not convinced of the lead problem myself. There isn't anything in this world today where everyone says it's good for you and nobody is saying it will kill you - just look at diets and mobile phones. One well-known atmospheric scientist who is a big proponent of global warming at the moment was pushing the coming of an ice age in the 1960's and 70's. His excuse? He was "wrong" back then. So, who's right and who can you believe?

    If you were to look at this from an anti-Lead-Free point of view, one could wonder whether Lead-Free petrol has benefited the environment or not, since Lead-Free petrol has caused increases in SO2 emissions which cause H2SO4 acid rain and decimation of forests in Sweden and Norway as well as damage to old and ancient structures in France, Italy and Greece.

  59. Re:PC has met motherboards by calethix · · Score: 2, Funny

    What exactly is this "kilogram" you speak of? I think it might just exist in the same alternate universe where people get to upgrade their computers annualy.

  60. Re:PC has met motherboards by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2

    The pollution isn't appreciable at your consumer (and disposer) end - the critical mass is in manufacturing. And in the landfills loaded with your neighbors disposed boards. Every one of us does our part, whether we notice or not. The same might be said for your lost sinkers, but the scale is too small and diffuse to matter (yet).

    Capitalism eats away at the communistic principle of hiding production costs where the Party collects its dues, the factory, obscuring the full costs including disposal and even occasional cleanup. So corporations with a sustainable strategy are getting out from under their eventual liability by moving to cleaner production. Intel is one of the most forward-strategic corporations on the planet, and Via is their competition, with a longterm survival attitude. You might drop this "political correctness" kneejerk and get with the program for a livable future, like the rest of us.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  61. Re:PC has met motherboards by tftp · · Score: 4, Informative
    The X-rays are indeed produced when electrons are stopped. The energy has to go somewhere... some into phosphor, some emitted as X-rays.

    However, Roentgen tubes use much higher voltages (100 kV at least) than CRTs (about 25 kV), and so the intensity of X rays is much lower. The screen itself, made of thick glass with a trace amount of lead, is sufficient to stop them. I tried to measure the radiation at the screen with a dosimeter, and got nothing except the usual ambient radiation (10 micro Roentgen / hour or so).

  62. EU & DOD mandate for future by mabhatter654 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    both the EU and US DOD have lead free mandates comming up very quickly. I know 3 years ago when I worked at an electronics contract manufacture it was starting to be a hot topic in the press. It's a huge achivement to finally see a lead free commercial product of any type! All of the lead free alternatives dramatically reduce the solderability of parts...everything takes tighter manfacturing controls. It's a manufacturing productivity and quality nightmare. Not to mention purchasing getting passives [resistors, capacitors, & connectors] that are also tinned with lead free solder!

    good job!

  63. sure, it is all a big conspicary... by dunkelfalke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    first, many eu companies produce in taiwan, malaysia and so on. second, many non-eu companies produce in eu (amd in dresden for example)

    --
    Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
  64. Re:PC has met motherboards by Grab · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Correctly rated as "troll". But to enlighten you...

    One mobo is not a big problem. But the zillions of circuit boards thrown away every year, when they're all taken together, *are* a problem. It's the same as smokeless zones - one campfire is not a problem, but an entire city with coal fires screws up the air.

    You don't plan eating your mobo, but wherever they're shipped to (usually China) for "recycling", this shit dissolves out of the piles of boards and seeps into the water supplies. So people over there are *literally* eating and drinking the metals out of your mobo. Life expectancy in those areas is pretty damn short, due to poisoning from lead, cadmium, arsenic and other nasties.

    Grab.

  65. Re:PC has met motherboards by HokieJP · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There isn't anything in this world today where everyone says it's good for you and nobody is saying it will kill you - just look at diets and mobile phones.

    Yeah, but there are many things that everyone says are bad for you, and no one thinks are good. Lead is one.

    With recycling companies breaking-up computers and other electronic devices into their constituent materials and reselling "raw" materials this should become less and less of an issue.

    BTW, How many computer recycling companies are accepting computers from your area? Maybe I'm just uninformed, but I haven't heard of any that would take my old computer parts.