Slashdot Mirror


Looking for a Stand-Alone Calendar App?

Chadduss asks: "I don't know about all of you but I've been looking for a good calendar application for quite sometime. I have used the Mozilla calendar extension for Thunderbird but I had problems with it several times. Enter Mozilla Sunbird. That's right, another bird! It's still only version 0.1.1 but I for one hope to see it come out on top."

100 comments

  1. One bird too late by __aavhli5779 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was long awaiting the unveiling of another 'bird' app to complete the collection, but then Mozilla threw consistency to the winds with the renaming of Firebird... now I don't know what to think :(

    On the upside, Sunbird looks like a pretty nice app, but it comes with so much baggage (basically a whole NSPR/Gecko runtime). 11 megs for a calendar app? If Mozilla is going to continue spinning off parts of their suite as individual apps, they should at least consider taking the otherwise redundant parts and keeping them in one shared directory. Of course, with hard drive space and memory being available for so cheap these days, who cares except for the pycklers like myself :(

    1. Re:One bird too late by OmniVector · · Score: 3, Informative

      eventually the gecko runtime will be a separate library such that you can install it on the machine and then no longer have to distribute it with every app. give it time. as it currently stands you still have to install the entire mozilla suite in linux to install epiphany or galeon.

      i think another welcomed edition to this of suite of apps would be a contacts editor, and task editor (much akin to the outlook suite's combination of apps). the day you can syntax exchange amongst the mozilla suite across all 3 big platforms (*nix, windows, mac) would be a great day.

      --
      - tristan
    2. Re:One bird too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was long awaiting the unveiling of another 'bird' app to complete the collection, but then Mozilla threw consistency to the winds with the renaming of Firebird... now I don't know what to think :(

      Don't worry... due to naming issues Sunbird will shortly be renamed Sunfox. And Thunderbird will be called Thunderfox. All will be well, except for both apps sounding like poor porn star names :/

    3. Re:One bird too late by Leffe · · Score: 3, Informative

      I use the Firefox calendar plugin instead, it's the same thing - but without all the bloat :)

      Of course, you can't really launch it just by itself (or maybe you can - pointing firefox to the main XUL file of the app should be enough?).

    4. Re:One bird too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ooo I can't wait for the days of having to install TWO... THREE... FOUR different gecko runtimes at the same time to run all the Applications I want

      Mozilla 1.8 doesn't work with Gecko A
      FireFox 0.99 doesn't work with Gecko B or C
      ThunderBirdFox doesn't work with Gecko D or A
      SunBirdFoxFire doesn't work with Gecko B,C,D

      Windows DLL hell, here we come!

    5. Re:One bird too late by ShecoDu · · Score: 1

      You gave me an idea, when it's released as a library, the desktop environments can use the gecko engine all over the place and integrate it on the operating system, superior operating system anyone?

      I'm just kidding... get a sense of humor whoever mods me down.

    6. Re:One bird too late by Stinking+Pig · · Score: 3, Funny

      There is a solution: FireSomething. For instance, I am browsing with Mozilla SpaceKoala today.

      --
      "Nothing was broken, and it's been fixed." -- Jon Carroll
    7. Re:One bird too late by Vaevictis666 · · Score: 1
      I have it installed as a plugin into Thunderbird, and created a shortcut that runs this:

      "D:\Program Files\Mozilla\thunderbird\thunderbird.exe" --calendar

      That pops up the calendar right spiffy. You can also do --addressbook to run the address book/contact list without needing all of Thunderbird loaded.

      Not sure if it'll work as a Firefox plugin, but I'd imagine it should...

    8. Re:One bird too late by Delphiki · · Score: 1

      If I had any mod points I would definitely mod you down, mainly because you preemptively insulted anyone who does. Either even you dont' think your post is good, you think everyone is out to get you, that you're better than everyone else, or that you can get people to not mod you down by saying if they do they don't have a sense of humor.

      --

      Feel free to mod me "-1 - Angry Jerk".

    9. Re:One bird too late by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      5..4..3..2..1.. Thunderfoxes are GO!

    10. Re:One bird too late by Annoying · · Score: 1

      I just gave it a try and it does work in firefox. Thanks for sharing this trick, I wouldn't have thought to try and find command line switches for it.

  2. Still in early development phase... by mc_barron · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ...so I would imagine they are more interested in getting it working. They'll remove cruft and streamline as they approach a release version.

    I, for one, would very much like a standards compliant stand-alone calendar app. Being able to run my own online calendar is very nice as well, since I have between several computers throughout the day.

    Right now it requires SOME moz product (thunderbird, firefox, or mozilla suite) to be installed to work. Bit of a crutch, but something that over time will disappear. Can't wait!

  3. Ack! Bloat! by Txiasaeia · · Score: 5, Informative
    For people wanting to check out a nice, sub-1MB calendar app, check out Rainlendar. Transparency, to-do lists, skinnable, free, and very light-weight. Not that I'm against what Mozilla is trying to do, but why bother waiting for Sunbird to creep up to 1.0 when you can get a fully-featured, stable app right now?

    Disclaimer: I don't work for, nor am I associated with Rainlendar. For the record, I use iCal with my YzDock (OH NO APPLE'S GONNA SUE ME) dock.

    --
    Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
  4. No, I didn't RTFA by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Let's be honest here. We're all looking for an "open" Outlook replacement. I'd be interested in Sunbird on one condition -- it has to be truely open. If it only works (or only works well) with other Mozilla apps, then it may be open source but it's not really open. If it works with OOo, Pine, the KDE suite, etc. then I'm interested.

    The dream is to make my own Outlook replacement out of open software building blocks, and a calendar block is much needed. But so far the other blocks only work well with their own kind. It's not Open unless all the building blocks are interoperable and interchangeable. Until then, Outlook/Office wins.

    --
    If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    1. Re:No, I didn't RTFA by OmniVector · · Score: 2, Insightful

      outlook is a horrible design. leave it to microsoft to come up with the cludge of an interface of outlook. simply put users shouldn't have to go to their email app to edit their contacts. they shouldn't have to go to their calendar app to check their email, etc. breaking each component up into individual pieces and allowing each piece to integrate properly through designated interfaces is the way to go. it makes the mozilla suite not only more modular, but easier to use. just take one look at the powerful combo in os x: iCal, Mail.app, and AddressBook work VERY well together and they are totally separate apps. it's not a pipe dream, and they've proved it can be done and that it works well.

      --
      - tristan
    2. Re:No, I didn't RTFA by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      simply put users shouldn't have to go to their email app to edit their contacts.

      The way Outlook is designed to work, it does make sense to put everything there. An awful lot of people conduct their entire business day in their Outlook window. Their whole business day is conducted through that one piece of s/w. Opening extra apps to manage contacts or schedule a meeting does not make sense, for them.

      Contacts/email/calendar/tasks/notes/corporate intranet/some HTML financial reporting....all the same, through the single interface.

    3. Re:No, I didn't RTFA by cscx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's your opinion. You've never worked for a large company, have you? :-) There is a reason Outlook is called "groupware." It works best in large workplaces, where iCal, Mail, and AddressBook just don't do the trick. Outlook isn't really an everyday e-mail application.

      Outlook doesn't really show its power until you connect it to an Exchange server. Everything on the Exchange server can be shared -- Email, Contacts, and Calendars. You may think this sucks, but once you see it in action you can appreciate it. Imagine you work in a company of 1000+ people (not even that many to prove my point, but...). Now, you or your secretary needs to schedule a meeting for 50 people. But at what time?! How do you know what is the best time for everyone?

      1. Select your 50 people to invite from the global contacts list (which contains your entire company of 1000+, you can look anyone up)
      2. Look at Outlook's availability chart. There is probably a better name for this, but when you schedule a meeting, it shows you a grid of people's names along the left, and times along the top. Each box is color coded as to what that person has in his/her schedule! (I.e., free, tentatively busy, busy). Just look for the colume with the most free times and you've now just picked an optimal meeting time. It doesn't say what you're doing (privacy), but shows if you're available or not. However, you can also share your calendar with, say, your department or your secretary if she edits your calendar for you. I hope this makes sense -- the only other tools that really do this out there are Lotus Notes (horrid interface) and Novell Groupwise (used it a few times; requires NetWare which is expensive). Nice part about Groupwise is that it's secure.

    4. Re:No, I didn't RTFA by OmniVector · · Score: 1

      in usability 101 they make you design a clock, radio, phone and cd player into one physical device. the point of the exercise is to show that it's very hard, if not impossible, to do it well. you don't seem to understand that the very people you're directing outlook towards (average users at a business) are the very people who are going to have the most usability issues with a piece of do-everything software like outlook. it's not impossible to make a set of integrated applications separate. all it takes is good design. whereas if you look at outlook, it's nearly impossible to make it easy to use due to the nature that one is cramming 5+ functions into one application. you spread out the focus, reduce the usability, and in general, increase resources consumed (since most people only do one task at a time). if you need to switch between those tasks often and this is difficult in your particular opertaing system, then that is a problem with your window manager NOT with the application.

      --
      - tristan
    5. Re:No, I didn't RTFA by the_womble · · Score: 1

      Good point.

      Most users use some sub-set of the non-email features of outlook, but only that subset that they know how to use.

      When they do know how to use it (like MS Office) it tends to get used for stuff it is not the best solution for: e.g. using Outlook folders to distribute information when a web server could do a better job.

    6. Re:No, I didn't RTFA by yermama · · Score: 1

      Actually, a much bigger score at this point would be an *exchange server* replacement. Outlook IS a terrible app, but that is completely irrelevant. Users want it. Period. They insist upon it. Fine. Let me run an open server on the back-end that let's Outlook run like it's talking to AD/Exchange/Wins/Project Server/every freakin required MS app we pay big $$$ for now.

  5. Well, by KnightStalker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Any old farts like me who are still using dialup care. :-)

    Mozilla, do it for the old farts!

    --
    * And remember, it's spelled N-e-t-s-c-a-p-e, but it's pronounced "Mozilla."
  6. So, erm, what was the question again? by MegaT · · Score: 4, Funny

    What were you asking slashdot?

  7. Stealing from Pontiac again... by flabbergast · · Score: 3, Funny

    First Firebird, then Sunbird. Hmmm...did someone on the Mozilla core team work for GM, in particular Pontiac?

    All kidding aside, I think this is a good thing because I think there are a lot of people out there using Outlook just as a calendar, which is complete overkill. Likewise, Thunderbird is a good thing because once again people are using Outlook only for email and that's overkill.

    1. Re:Stealing from Pontiac again... by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Oddly enough, I use Outlook for both, but not on the same machine. I use Outlook for email on my laptop, and I use Pocket Outlook for calendaring on my Pocket PC. I don't do calendaring on my laptop, and I don't do email on my PDA. I can hear /.readers gasping in horror, but in PDA bang/buck the Pocket PC wins, so whatever runs on my desktop has to work with a Pocket PC. So far that's Outlook, but I'm open to a replacement.

      I really don't use Outlook's calendar (Schedule Plus) on my laptop except as a backup for my PDA. Frankly, it's annoying that I can't turn off the alarms on my laptop without turning them off on the PDA as well, so there's an opening for an open-source solution to do Microsoft one better.

      I can't switch from the Windows XP that came on my laptop until everything I do can be done with open software. This isn't my game PC, so it doesn't have to run Windows games, but among other things it does have to run Outlook so I can sync my PDA's calendar.

      By the way, there are more email clients than just Thunderbird. Sunbird better work with them, too.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    2. Re:Stealing from Pontiac again... by flabbergast · · Score: 1

      I know there are more email clients than just Thunderbird. I was trying to emphasize that people don't always use the best tools available, only what they're given.

    3. Re:Stealing from Pontiac again... by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1

      I'm only given Outlook in a work context, in which case I have no choice and I must use it. At home it paid for Outlook, because it is the best tool available. If I were given Outlook at home then I wouldn't care as much that it doesn't play well with others (but I'd still rather avoid it's exploit-friendly design).

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    4. Re:Stealing from Pontiac again... by runfaster · · Score: 1

      Try jpilot if you've got a Palm. That was keeping me in windows for a while myself...

  8. Re:Ack! Bloat! by OmniVector · · Score: 3, Informative

    simply put, sunbird will run on windows, linux, and os x. it will run decently on all 3 platforms (thanks to XUL and the new os x pinstripe theme used in firefox and thunerbird).

    people won't have the excuse of "i can't run that" or "it costs money", etc. it's quite a nice thing, actually. and the bigger plus yet is i don't have to ask people to download the entire mozilla suite + a plugin.

    --
    - tristan
  9. Re:Ack! Bloat! by Oncogene · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Excellent suggestion! I downloaded both Rainlendar and Sunbird, and decided to quickly run through both. Without listing reasons or any of that garbage that no one cares for, Rainlendar wins on a matter of efficieny and ease of use. Sunbird isn't complicated, but can it merge with one's desktop as with Rainlendar? No? Bah. Again, excellent suggestion, Txiasaeia.

    --

    - - - - - - -
    "All hail the glory of the Hypnotoad."
  10. Portable syncability?: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not even sure sync-ability should be a word, but nevermind.. ..but my point is that a desktop calendar is only valuable if it can be used with portable devices. In particular, there needs to be a version available for pocket Linux, PalmOS or PocketPC before it's going to be used by anyone looking for a serious calender application.

    1. Re:Portable syncability?: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like you are suggesting that they should base their project on some kind of standard of some sort for calendaring. That way people writing apps for PalmOS and PocketPC could just implement the standard on their platforms and sunbird can implement it on Mac, windows, and Unix, and they could all get along great. That's a great idea you have there, I suggest writing it up and submitting it as and RFC to the IETF. I'm sure they'd be interested in something like that. Good Luck!

  11. Thunderbird + Sunbird by sirmikester · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think that the mozilla developers should combine these two apps. People are looking for an outlook replacement, and both of these apps would provide this if developed together...

    Also, how about applying the firefox design methodology to the overall Mozilla Suite. Make sure that the overall Suite is relatively light and graphically impressive, but keep all of the components together. I use them all anyway...

    Still another idea, package Firefox, Thunderbird, nvu, and sunbird together in an online installer which downloads any of the components you select.

    I'm sure some of this has been already mentioned, but hey, who wants to check Google?

    --
    In linux libertas
    1. Re:Thunderbird + Sunbird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Still another idea, package Firefox, Thunderbird, nvu, and sunbird together in an online installer which downloads any of the components you select.

      They could call it "The Mozilla Suite" and have them all tightly integrated with lots of overlapping code to conserve resources. There would be no problems maintaining a project this large. There would be no bloat or cruft or bugs, and we would achieve software nirvana.

    2. Re:Thunderbird + Sunbird by denis-The-menace · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Finally!
      Someone who has realized that to have a meeting you have to TELL people about!
      Once you schedule a meeting in a Calandaring app, you need to send emails to the participants.
      The Address book in Thunderbird/Mozilla is not that useful compared to Outlook/Maximizer and other organizers. If I could have a Moz-based Organizer I could finally kill the VMware box that runs Outlook.

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    3. Re:Thunderbird + Sunbird by toomuchPerl · · Score: 1
      Packaging is the right idea. I do not want to deal with anything but Firefox -- I have no need to. I don't need a scheduling app, and I read my email with pine.

      I never want to deal with Netscape Navigator, Composer, and all that jazz again. Ugh.

      -toomuchPerl

    4. Re:Thunderbird + Sunbird by pyite · · Score: 1

      Will someone please mod this Funny rather than Insightful? Jeez.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    5. Re:Thunderbird + Sunbird by nandhp · · Score: 1
  12. Still in early development phase...PDA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Well the author did say a stand alone calendar app. So why not get a PDA?

    Or I guess he could write his own. There's certainly enough tech out there.

  13. both GNOME and KDE offer something by paramecio · · Score: 1

    "evolution" and "kdepim" are outlook-like applications. while evolution tries to handle mail too, kdepim leaves this stuff to kmail.
    I was expecting someone to comment about these tools.

  14. Re:Ack! Bloat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you realise you said 'Ack! Bloat!' and then listed transparency and skins as features of Rainlendar? Transparency & skins == major bloat (yes, even if it is sub 1Mb).

  15. sync by raffe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Will you be able to "sync" it if you have several different computers?

    Didnt see anytinh about it on the site.

    1. Re:sync by quake74 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I use Mozilla Calendar (and I suppose Sunbird behaves the same) and you can. You could use the same file on some shared folder, or use the same file on some FTP repository, or I think you could even use Webdav do share calendars. For example you can subscribe to all the calendars at ICalShare.

  16. Re:Ack! Bloat! by Oncogene · · Score: 0

    You come out and say that it's less than 1 megabyte, and still you suggest that it's bloated?

    Contradictory?

    --

    - - - - - - -
    "All hail the glory of the Hypnotoad."
  17. Re:Ack! Bloat! by DeadSea · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Go to site
    2. Admire nice feature set
    3. Download source archive
    4. Extract to /tmp
    5. Admire GPL license file
    6. Search in vain for .configure
    7. View source and see it requires windows.h doh!!
  18. Re:Ack! Bloat! by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1

    Sorry, gut reaction against a 11MB calendar app (Sunbird).

    --
    Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
  19. iCal by arska · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I use iCal (with iSync to my iPod, PDA and Mobile) happily.

    A

    1. Re:iCal by pcs305 · · Score: 1

      So you are iHappy.

    2. Re:iCal by ccmay · · Score: 1
      I use ICal too, and love it. I also set up WebDAV on my machine.

      I have my calendar, to which my wife subscribes. She has her calendar and a kids' calendar, to which I subscribe. Any changes she makes to her calendars show up on mine, and then on my Palm Pilot when I sync.

      I just hope that the new version of iCal with 10.4 includes more robust workgroup/multi-user features that do not require editing config files to get WebDAV working, and allow simultaneous multi-user publish and subscribe.

      -ccm

      --
      Too much Law; not enough Order.
  20. Pro-bloat by quake74 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Actually, I browse the web, I use email and I need a calendar application. The Mozilla suite really fits my needs well, expecially because there are windows and linux versions which behave pretty much in the same way.

    I'd rather see more time spent on improving the applications, rather than trying to figure out how to make them independent.

    Just my 2c.

  21. Outlook replacement by DrJAKing · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Outlook does a lot of things well - Contacts, Mail, Calendar, ToDo, Notes - and it integrates well with the desktop. It's a bit of a killer app for MS Office because it puts together most people's PIM needs in one place. The Mozilla approach of Browser + Mail might work for some but it makes no sense at all to me. I want an Outlook replacement, one which uses open file formats and isn't bloated. One that runs nice and quickly. It seems like a lot of people do. Thunderbird developers, please take note.

  22. Old School by Goo.cc · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am going to keep it real just go with the Unix cal and calendar commands. Real nice and lightweight.

    1. Re:Old School by Bishop · · Score: 1

      You should check out Remind. It was designed as a cal/clendar replacement. It has an optional GUI, postscript, and html output support. The postscript output is nice.

      Remind is written in simple C. The GUI is in TK. It should compile and run on anything resembling *nix, including MacOS, and Cygwin. Remind is licenced under the GPL.

  23. Rainlendar by MachDelta · · Score: 3, Informative

    Anyone else here use Rainlendar?
    I find its a VERY nice piece of software, even if it doesn't have all the fancy contacts/synching/whatever features of other calendars. Nope, its pretty much just stick notes on the days, and glance at your ToDo list. Nothing professional, but for me it works really well.
    No, its not perfect... but hey, it IS open source, so you could mod it yourself if you wanted! :)

    I'd reccomend it to anyone whos at that awkward stage between "No calendar" and "Bloated calendar". Heck, maybe even if you're already using a bloated calendar and just want something simple. Give it a whirl, it cant hurt.

    1. Re:Rainlendar by jmauro · · Score: 1

      It also runs only on Windows.

  24. Do we really need another? by Kevin+Burtch · · Score: 4, Insightful


    No offense to the guys doing wonderful work on the Mozilla project, but there are already lots of calendar apps out there.

    What people ask for in the corporate world is a full Outlook replacement. This does not exist in the F/OSS world.

    Yes, I know about Ximian Connector, but that's not free or Open Source, and when you start telling customers "well, everything is free unless you want to use all of Outlook's functionality, then you have to pay..." they look at you like you're trying to con them.

    Same goes with Codeweaver's Crossover Office.

    It's worse when you're trying to sell Sun's Java Desktop System (which is actually quite nice, BTW) and you tell them "yeah, you have to pay for this, then you have to pay for that..." and they start asking "how much else do I have to buy to replace Windows? This is starting to sound like it's not worth it."

    In the world of people fed up with MS, and having to drasticaly cut their budget, in fear for their jobs if they make a minor mistake, telling them they have to pay $60/head for people just to get Outlook funtionality doesn't go over very well.
    If they dropped the price to around $10-$25... it would probably fly of the proverbial shelves.
    Heck, JDS (the whole O/S) is only $50-$100/head and that's with a full year support!

    Oh, and ditto to the Exchange replacements... people ARE asking for it.

    --
    - Preferences: Solaris 10 (servers), Ubuntu (desktops), Solaris 11 (personal servers) -
    1. Re:Do we really need another? by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But how much does Outlook cost? How much do the Microsoft versions cost? Aren't those people paying for Outlook already? Doesn't Outlook cost about 90-100 bucks per copy? Isn't a $60 alternative cheaper?

      You could have said they are interested in costs associated with migration or conversion, but you didn't, you just insisted on the price per copy.

      If people are asking for open-source alternatives to Microsoft products, I hope they do so because of the benefits of open-source, not because they are cheap bastards who try to replace a $100 priced product with a $15 one (or a free one) and get the same functionality, if possible. Jeez, wouldn't that be nice. Of course such a product would fly off the shelves. I wonder why the heck Sun isn't making one and selling it for $15. Perhaps because they can't afford to?

      I really wanted to smack you with a Troll flag, but I noticed some people actually find you insightful, which is down right ridiculous. "You have to pay for this, you have to pay for that"-- OF COURSE you have to pay, that's how programmers get to eat.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    2. Re:Do we really need another? by Kevin+Burtch · · Score: 1


      I agree with you completely, but then I understand how both the F/OSS world and the commercial world works.

      The problem is, the people who are "in charge" of IT departments and budgets are not always the most logical people (think "PHB")... and many of the ones I speak of have zero exposure to Linux.
      They are afraid of such a drastic change, and they're used to MS's "oh, that's extra $ too" methods, so when discussing a Linux solution and they hear "oh, you have to buy this and that to get those functionalities", they get _very_ skeptical and wonder what else they're going to have to pay for... for things they haven't thought of yet.

      --
      - Preferences: Solaris 10 (servers), Ubuntu (desktops), Solaris 11 (personal servers) -
    3. Re:Do we really need another? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder why the heck Sun isn't making one and selling it for $15. Perhaps because they can't afford to?

      If they achieved only a QUARTER of Microsoft's market penetration they could afford to do it for a dollar a copy.

    4. Re:Do we really need another? by shyster · · Score: 1
      But how much does Outlook cost? How much do the Microsoft versions cost? Aren't those people paying for Outlook already? Doesn't Outlook cost about 90-100 bucks per copy? Isn't a $60 alternative cheaper?

      If you have a licensed Exchange Server, you receive the same amount of Outlook licenses as you have Exchange CALs. Exchange CALs are going for around $65, add in another $25 or so for Software Assurance. So, assuming you're using the Ximian connector to connect to Exchange, no $60 isn't cheaper than included (you're still going to need the CAL).

    5. Re:Do we really need another? by Tet · · Score: 1
      No offense to the guys doing wonderful work on the Mozilla project, but there are already lots of calendar apps out there.

      Name one. The best I've found is ical. It's a very sad statement that although over 10 years old, no one has written anything better in that time. Yes, it has flaws. But fewer than any of the alternatives. Lots of calendar apps? Yep. But they all suck. And that's not a healthy position for us to be in.

      Repeat after me: "A calendar has no place in an email user agent". Anyone that believes otherwise simply doesn't understand the issues. What people a crying out for is not a reimplementation of Outlook, but something that lets them manage their time with the same ease that Outlook does. That means sending out meeting requests, with calendars being updated as appropriate on acceptance. It means the ability to check others' calendars to look for a suitably free time slot. And it means being able to do so with the click of a button or two. It doesn't require calendaring and email to be the same application, though, and indeed, it's much better if they're not.

      But projects like Evolution are too hellbent on reimplementing all the mistakes made by Microsoft to step back and actually look at doing the right thing.

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    6. Re:Do we really need another? by Kevin+Burtch · · Score: 1


      And again, I agree completely with someone who thinks they don't agree with me. :)
      I agree that calendars should be separate from email clients... same with web browsers and news readers.
      I personally use Sylpheed for email, and a big part of why I do is the fact that it does NOT do HTML rendering - it is a pure email client.
      I also use pure news-readers, not a web-browser, and not a web portal to a newsgroup ('cept when searching).

      Unfortunately, there are (for the sake of this discussion) two types of people, those who are computer savvy and want distinct, efficient tools for distinct tasks, and the "users" who want a better version of exactly the same thing. MS has convinced them that Outlook is the best tool for the job(s), so that's what they want... Outlook, or something that is so similar they can't tell the difference.

      I'm not making this stuff up, I work for a Sun VAR and I meet with customers and discuss these things with them... my boss even more so. The people with the money, the customers who want to buy, the people making the decisions, the people with little or no exposure to Linux or anything Open Source... these are the people we are dealing with and showing these solutions to. They either want to completely replace MS-Exchange with something that does _exactly_ the same thing to the point the Outlook users will never see the difference, or they want to replace Outlook with something that again... the users will never notice the difference.

      This isn't academia, this isn't in Silicon Valley (I wish I were back there...), this isn't a LUG, this is Corporate America I'm dealing with.

      Unfortunately, what people want isn't always what's the most appropriate, most efficient, or most Logical... or else there'd be about 1/100th the number of SUVs on the road.

      (sorry if this sounds rantish, I'm extremely tired)

      --
      - Preferences: Solaris 10 (servers), Ubuntu (desktops), Solaris 11 (personal servers) -
    7. Re:Do we really need another? by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "What people ask for in the corporate world is a full Outlook replacement."

      The Kroupware project, with the Kolab server, is an Outlook replacement. It was paid for by the government for their own use (GPL obviously), and uses all the standard KDE email, calendar features.

      It also integrates with "legacy" Outlook clients, and legacy Exchange servers. That functionality costs you money, but hey, so does Outlook and Exchange!

      Other than that, if you're really serious about groupware, and need it to work and work reliably, then the Web groupware projects are really the only choice. There're about 5 really good ones, plus the usual assortment of one-person projects.

      And yeah, say all you like about their stability, but you can't compete with a mail client (Outlook) that leaves you completely open to having your corporate intranet fucked by anyone who sends a properly formatted email message. "How many machines do you want to patch today?"

  25. Stand-alone Calendar App? by danuary · · Score: 1

    cal(1)

  26. Todo Application by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 3, Informative

    I really liked the Calendar component on Mozilla before, but there's one thing that keeps me far far away from it and it's ilk: the TODO app. As of yet there are very few full-featured todo applications that will allow you to sort by category, view by category, list with date, category, and summary, add notes, and sync with the Palm. Evolution is the closest I've come thus far, and even it has trouble with category support for the Palm (I've managed to work around it, however). Until that point, these calendaring applications are nothing but mere toys.

    1. Re:Todo Application by macemoneta · · Score: 1

      Evolution would be perfect for me too, except that they completely blew off the memos/notes portion of the application. Does it really take 4 years to add simple text containers?

      --

      Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

    2. Re:Todo Application by dublin · · Score: 1

      As of yet there are very few full-featured todo applications that will allow you to sort by category, view by category, list with date, category, and summary, add notes, and sync with the Palm.

      If you're on Windows or Mac, just use Palm Desktop. It's a free download, and it offers all of the above. Quite useful on it's own, and it works with a Palm device like, well, it was (cough) made for it...

      Alternatively, consider a web-based alternative like Yahoo's or (soon) Google's hosted services.

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
    3. Re:Todo Application by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 1

      This is under Linux, so the Palm Desktop isn't an option here. I've used it before, and you're right: it does work well.

      I have a system that works well for me now, with Evolution at both home and work synced via a Palm Clie. I'm happy, but I'm always on the look-out for ways to improve what I have.

  27. PIM users by rueger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just as Mozilla is the odds on replacemnt for Internet Explorer, and generally is embraced by any IE user who tries it, it would be wonderful to have a replacemnt for the godawful Palm software.

    I for one would love to have a calendar/contact list that had all of the features that Palm Desktop lacks. If Sunbird could sync with Palms, and even better, between my laptop and desktop, it could build a nice sized user group.

  28. mmm... by manavendra · · Score: 2, Funny

    If Google provides a calendar, it will be indexed, searchable and you will get ads of comely women ready to meet you online (or real life) next to your meeting appointment.

    If M$ provides a calendar, there are flash and other rotating ads surrounding your calendar, you can add only entries for only the next 20 days but you can upgrade for better (and slower) version for only $19.99 per month.

    However, if there's an open source calendar, you get a webpage saying there's a calendar version 0.0.0.xx, no documentation, requires in-depth knowledge about your OS and several other scripts for it to even compile, does not actually work but ahh! keeps the nerd community happy!

    --
    http://efil.blogspot.com/
  29. Re:Ack! Bloat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No contradiction. 1 Mb = thunderthighs.

  30. Re:Ack! Bloat! by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd rather save 500k and skip the skins.

  31. Full PIM needed by n-baxley · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In addition to a calendar, a contact manager that can interface with both the calendar and the email app is desperatly needed on Windows. I'm trying to convice people in the office to move away from MS and the big pitfall is a PIM to replace Outlook. Who is working on something like this? Anyone?

  32. Plan by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    I use Evolution for my email and find its built-in calendaring adequate.

    However, before I started using Evo, I used Thomas Dreimeyer's plan.

    Plan has seen years of work on it, has lots of nice features, configurable birthdays, etc.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  33. Pine? by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

    Are you on crack?

    How are you going to "integrate" a terminal email client with a GUI calendar app?

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    1. Re:Pine? by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1

      The GUI calendar app should allow me to send meeting notices using any old terminal email client. It's more a case of not integrating the GUI calendar app with their GUI email app. Ever try sending a Schedule Plus appointment using Netscape email? You should be able to -- it's just email -- but you can't. Similarly, I'll only consider Sunbird if it can send notices via Pine or even Exchange; if it's locked into Thunderbird, forget it. I may end up using Sunbird and Thunderbird together, but I want the option to use something else.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
  34. Re:Ack! Bloat! by bcrowell · · Score: 1

    Freshmeat turns up plenty of possibilities, including some standalone apps and some lightweight ones. Self-promotion: I wrote a really tiny, simple one called When.

  35. just use extensions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just use the Firefox, Thunderbird or Suite extensions (contrary to what the submitter thinks, they are the same beast as Sunbird). Less than 1 Mb I believe.

  36. KOrganizer ? by Etyenne · · Score: 1

    Never used it myself (my whiteboard serve me well enough), but KOrganizer look good and is reputedly very well integrated with other KDE apps (Kmail, etc).

    --
    :wq
    1. Re:KOrganizer ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out Ko/PI too.
      Derived from Korganizer, runs on Windoze as well.

  37. Waiting for Chandler by TuringTest · · Score: 1

    Im eagerly watching the development of Chandler, which will be a step further in the concept of PIM. It's modelled after Lotus Agenda, whose designer works in this new project. The promised benefits of its first version are these:

    1. Strong information management capabilities. Internally, OSAF refers to this as the "soul of Lotus Agenda". We will provide an extensible framework for users to categorize, organize and retrieve all types of useful information such as URLs, attachments, notes, RSS feeds, etc. in addition to basic PIM data types such as messages, events, contacts and tasks. This generic information type (or Information Item as we call it) will have many built-in and extensible behaviors. For example, any Information Item can have arbitrary ad-hoc attributes added to it. Users can also relate information items to each other in user-defined schemas.
    2. Flexible and Extensible Presentation and Interaction Framework. This is a framework to allow the creation of task-centric documents personalized to a user's work habits. It includes a UI widget that is capable of querying for the relevant set of information items and displaying the related attributes and relationships of this set of items so as to provide the right context for the current task at hand. For example, the user can view a project view that displays all the messages (threaded topically), events, tasks and documents related to a certain project.
    3. Power email features. These are features to help the user process and organize messages faster while shielding the user from unwanted or irrelevant information (e.g. spam). For example, we will add capabilities to have one-click disposition of email messages under a variety of circumstances. This is not a kitchen-sink approach. We will not add all possible email features or even all features common to popular existing email clients (e.g. support for return receipts and possibly even signature templates for emails). We will focus on features dealing with high-volume email.
    4. Continue refinement of basic calendar and contacts functionality, focusing on how calendar and contacts inter-relate with each other and with other information items. This will further drive and validate our information management features
    5. Provide sharing and collaboration features around information items (this needs to be further designed and elaborated)
    6. Robustness and reasonable performance. Canoga will be our first release that should be safe for real data. We will have assurances about data integrity and recoverability. We will also ensure that future versions of Chandler will seamlessly accept Canoga repository data. We also need to ensure reasonable performance since we are targeting info-centric users who will process and store much more information than the regular user. Our goal is allow users to store and interact with a few million Information Items.

    --
    Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
  38. One bird too late-D-BUS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    D-BUS could make this possible.

  39. A Windows Calendar App by gravityZ · · Score: 1

    My employer produces a standalone calendar app called eventSherpa that is free (as in beer) to use if you just want to keep your own schedule. (We also have a publishing service which we charge for). It's worth a look if you're a Windows user.

  40. What you want by FreeLinux · · Score: 1

    Good choices are available.

    Evolution

    Kontact

    Kontact Features

  41. iCal by macdaddy · · Score: 1
    What more can I say? iCal. :-)

    Actually, I've only used iCal a couple of times. At my last job we used Corporate Time, then owned by Steltor (I think) and now owned by Oracle. The Mac versions I tried for well over a years were horrible pieces of shit. Everytime I'd modify a meeting all the attendees and resources would be removed. Fortunately the office secretary was really nice and added meetings for me (even better because she controlled the conference room resource). The program got much better in the end. I was even putting personal things in it. I miss it now. Any recommendations on a good web-based calendar would be gladly accepted.

  42. So, erm, what was the question again?-Break ups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "What were you asking slashdot?"

    Do I have to seperate my colors from my whites when doing laundry?

  43. What about for storing Calendar on the SERVER SIDE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there anything to store and share calendaring info?

    ala LDAP, or IMAP,

    Well... what about a todo list server based?

  44. iCal by chocolatetrumpet · · Score: 1

    Pretty simple... iCal.

    Thank you, Apple.

    --
    Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
  45. Calendar Software by digitaltraveller · · Score: 3, Informative

    Your in luck. I've been looking for something similiar and I bothered to search the web.

    A grumpy editor's calendar search
    Enterprise Solutions Overview
    Open Source Overview
    Linux Links

    Freshmeat is always worth a look too. The biggest problem I found was too much choice.

    So far I've tried Chronos but I found that not all it's CPAN dependancies were resolvable for me. I've also tried MyCalendar.
    It's nice and simple, accessible via the web, but unfortunately it's webpages are too big to fit in my cellphone's memory. My ideal solution would serve up some tight WML when necessary and possibly be accessible via Outlook for my secretary.

    So, I haven't found my ideal solution yet.

    If anyone has any opinion on the other web calendaring solutions, please share...

  46. Timecalendar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    TimeCalendar seems pretty good as a stand-alone. Last I checked it hadn't implemented the iCalendar standard like Calzilla or iCal, but I emailed the chap and he said that it was in the works. I need that, so am holding off buying the full version until then. Otherwise it seems like a pretty good thing. The free version is limited to two 'categories' such as work or home that can be switched on & off relatively easily.

  47. Re:Ack! Bloat! by Oncogene · · Score: 1

    Yeah, on a 486...

    --

    - - - - - - -
    "All hail the glory of the Hypnotoad."
  48. Re:Ack! Bloat! by xandroid · · Score: 1

    Whew, I'm glad you saved me those steps. I'll stick with Sunbird, thanks.

    --
    $ echo "ceci n'est pas une pipe" | sed -Ee 's/(eci n|pas )//g'
  49. Evolution + 'Connectors | OpenOffice's GLOW by velkro · · Score: 1

    At my last job, I used Evolution with MS Exchange connector to survive without having Windows on my desktop.

    At my current job, I've been lucky enough to get a beta copy of Hydrogen, Sun's iPlanet Calendar Connector, and it works reasonably well, though not a fully integrated as I'd like.

    Now, GLOW, OpenOffice Groupware's calendar is a standalone app, but also works with WCAP servers. It's new & buggy, but does both local calendaring and server-based, if you have a WCAP backend. It's certainly promising, and if integrated with OpenOffice would be quite nice.

  50. One bird too late-If you build it...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or you could try this one.

    He he, yea it's a demo (among many)
    . But it is a very nice calender app which is possible for the poster to make themselves.

  51. Re:Ack! Bloat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. I wrote the original comment. As I said, even though it's 1mb, skins and transparency and whatnot is and always will be bloat.

    Although in the case of transparency, that's probably not many lines of code at all. That'd be handled by NT5. So no wuccas there.

    But skins - yup. And I tried it out. The skin support is a bit iffy. It doesn't scale well, kinda fixed. And the todo list just grows and grows. And it kinda flashes a bit, and the option to lock it to the desktop (marked experimental) is indeed a bit buggy (disappeared once).

    So yep - another argument against bloat - should've worked on getting the good stuff going properly rather than doing skins and transparency etc. But whatever!

  52. Someone on Mozilla forum already asked for it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the Thunderbird help forum, some dude was wondering why Firefox and Thunderbird weren't intergrated, instead of having a nice intergrated package.

    http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=64 63 2&highlight=

  53. Exchange replacement by gentlewizard · · Score: 1

    If you don't mind substituting one Evil Empire for another (complete with megalomaniacal CEO's), check out Oracle's proposed replacement for Exchange, called Oracle Collaboration Suite. It's centralized in the database, like Exchange will eventually be, so instead of removing virii from dozens of Exchange Servers world wide, you only clean one database. It supports Outlook client, mobile clients, and web-based as well.

  54. Groupwise for Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Groupwise has been running on Linux for a while. Groupwise 6.5 Beta now out...it's pretty sweet:

    http://www.novell.com/products/groupwise/