Slashdot Mirror


How To Get Googled, By Hook Or By Crook

Mr. Christmas Lights writes "There is a Search Engine Optimization contest that just started up. For those that don't know about SEO, it's basically the process of optimizing a web page and links to insure a high ranking on search engine, with Google being the main search engine of interest. There are countless debates on the best approach. Note that there are 'white hat' and definitely 'black hat' methods (using the later can get you banned by Google - a risk some people seem willing to take! ;-)" Read more on this contest below.

Mr. Christmas Lights continues: "So some folks in the SEO community decided to have a 2 month contest where they made up a nonsense keyword phrase (nigritude ultramarine), and they will award a iPod and a 17" LCD (big spenders, eh?) to whoever ends up #1 in Google a month and two months from now - read more contest details at Dark Blue's SEOChallenge and follow the progress at www.seochallenge.com.

As you can imagine, there will be all sorts of wild web pages out there - for example, take a look at this "optimized" URL for nigritude ultramarine : www.nigritude-ultramarine.com/nigritude-ultramarin e/nigritude-ultramarine.asp and I'm sure there will be plenty of other entertaining entries - you can do a Google Search yourself to see who's currently on top.

Note to Slashdot Editors: I have NOT entered the contest - buncha SEO pro's are involved and a hobbiest (at best) like me (who doesn't stray over to the dark side - I like Google! ;-) would get spanked."

76 of 310 comments (clear)

  1. Hmm. by Quasar1999 · · Score: 5, Funny

    How about posting an article on slashdot? That will get you on google in no time flat!

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    1. Re:Hmm. by fname · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, that should work. But look at it this way: if I were a betting man on which site "wins" the contest, I betchya that this Slashdot article has a pretty good chance. Many other blogs will post here and to the contest site, and I bet those 2 are in the top 5. Since Slashdot has such a high pagerank to begin with, this Slashdot article might just win the contest. Buggers.

      Damn that Heisenberg.

    2. Re:Hmm. by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 4, Informative

      But only after the page is moved off of the dynamic content area.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    3. Re:Hmm. by no+longer+myself · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Well, not the article itself mind you: Make a +5 comment and have a hyperlink to your site in the post. I prefer to use it in the sig in case I ever have the need to change/remove it.

      The bots *DO* read Slashdot comments, and give preferential treatment to posts that receive high scores. If you don't know how to add anything constructive to a conversation, you probably shouldn't attempt this, because it's a waste of time for yourself and everyone else.

      In my own experience, it works like a charm to attract the bots like Google, Slurp, AJ, and the like, however it generally does little to attract actual people who are mostly too wary of potential troll links.

      Don't get me wrong, I like getting visited by Google, but I'd prefer real people. I suppose having a site worth visiting wouldn't hurt either... ;-)

    4. Re:Hmm. by tanguyr · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, Slashdot stuff usually winds up in the news section (this article is already there) rather than the web section of google. Guess they bought that "news for nerds" baloney.

      --
      #!/usr/bin/english
    5. Re:Hmm. by josh3736 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      As I am not sure how robots.txt works, I cannot say for sure, but at the top, there is an entry for "mediapartners-google" that allows the entire site.

      Does the following * user-agent also apply to Google or not? If not, he will indeed get on Google in no time flat.

    6. Re:Hmm. by bhtooefr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      mediapartners-google is the Google AdSense system, and yahoo-newscrawler must be Yahoo's news system, which might be used by Google, seeing as they get /. news fairly quick.

    7. Re:Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Heisenberg slept here. Or somewhere near here. We're not really sure.

    8. Re:Hmm. by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If the site looks like news, and has an RSS feed, they put it up quickly. Google News was ignoring FreeInternetPress.com , but once we put up the link for the RSS feeds, they picked us up. Now just about every story we publish gets posted.

      And this looks like a good place to tell you about The Nigritude Ultramarine attack submarine. I'd laugh if I even show up in the top 100.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    9. Re:Hmm. by dgmartin98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd have to disagree. From experience, I've noticed that my URL listing at the top of my comments (line immediately above this) allows people to search for my online resume. This URL above in Slashdot is the only place I've ever advertised my online resume.

      See for yourself, do a search for "vancouver electrical engineer wireless hardware". The second item there will be me (as of today, anyways). Higher pagerank than the IEEE Communications Society in Vancouver, even.

      Dave

      --
      FPGA, Wireless, ASIC, Verilog, VHDL, HW, 10yr exp, Team Lead, Ottawa (More? Email above. slashdotusername=dgmartin98 )
    10. Re:Hmm. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Informative

      Warning: his sig is NOT work-safe.

  2. What about black hat SEO by Random+Web+Developer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Are entries rejected from the contest if they are using dubious tactics? It's fairly easy to go about spamming links all over the place with the appropriate link texts and stuff like invisible text, which still aren't adequately detected.

    --
    Artists against online scams http://www.aa419.org/
  3. Must.. optimize... froogle by aenters · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nobody cares about the rankings on froogle. Poor google.

    --
    where flamebait is +5 funny and funny stuff is -1 flamebait
    1. Re:Must.. optimize... froogle by Cyno01 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Froogle could do with a better interface. More of a grid like pricegrabber, as it is its just hard to read and compare prices.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    2. Re:Must.. optimize... froogle by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Has anyone looked at optimizing ranking on Booble?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  4. The Fighting Force by bigben7187 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The current 3rd result showcases the "Nigritude Ultramarine Fighting Force" who are "doing our part for the department of homeland security." Actually, I suspect they might be even more capable than said department...

    --
    He say 1 and 1 and 1 is 3, got to be good lookin' cause hes so hard to see...
  5. i'll be curious to see what they come up with by quelrods · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm sure their techniques will cause google to make such tricks harder in the future. Many of you are familiar with people creating nonsense link pages to drive their own rating up and the various things google put in place to make this harder. Now they need a contest on how to get delisted, I still have a domain name that hasn't been used in 3 years that is in google.

    --
    :(){ :|:&};:
    1. Re:i'll be curious to see what they come up with by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm sure their techniques will cause google to make such tricks harder in the future. Many of you are familiar with people creating nonsense link pages to drive their own rating up and the various things google put in place to make this harder.

      That can be a good thing - stop the spammers doing their thing, and forcing commercial junk that's only relevant to the owners/advertisers on a site into google. Let google evolve into something better, bit by bit.

      Personally, I'm all for just creating damned good content, and people will come across it and link to it on their own. No effort other than Creating Good Content. No need to spam, flood forums with links, or otherwise make people link to you that otherwise wouldn't

      Now they need a contest on how to get delisted, I still have a domain name that hasn't been used in 3 years that is in google.

      heh. Yahoo still contains a page of mine that's 18 months gone as the main link to my page. Talk about out of date.

    2. Re:i'll be curious to see what they come up with by LoganEkz · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Now they need a contest on how to get delisted, I still have a domain name that hasn't been used in 3 years that is in google."

      If you want to get removed, Google has some information on how.

    3. Re:i'll be curious to see what they come up with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Amiga Lover: Yahoo still contains a page of mine that's 18 months gone as the main link to my page. Talk about out of date.

      Perhaps they saw your login name and assumed you wouldn't mind?

    4. Re:i'll be curious to see what they come up with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      So get it removed.

    5. Re:i'll be curious to see what they come up with by Uber+Banker · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Perhaps this is a plan organised by Google to get the uber-|337 SEOs to disclose their methods, thus act against them.

  6. a new topic by Dreadlord · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is the very first story in the Google topic BTW.

    --
    The IT section color scheme sucks.
  7. dear me by mr_tommy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It surely is a nice project with some very fancy prizes, but has anyone thought of what Google's response is going to be?! Wham! Thanks for telling us the techniques to beat our own system guys - we'll now be altering it so that this is no longer a problem. :S

    1. Re:dear me by Ralph+Yarro · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Good. Firstly, it improves the Google results. Secondly, it makes the next competition more challenging. What's the downside?

      --

      The real Ralph Yarro posts as Anonymous Coward. Anyone else is an impostor.
    2. Re:dear me by mar1boro · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I can think of a couple of downsides.
      1) They used a _real_ word for the contest. Ultramarine may not be common,
      but this will eventually fubar legitimate searches. A random string would
      have been a better measure.
      2) This is a contest being run by an Ad-Company so that they can glean the
      best techniques for getting their ads in the first 3 pages on a Google
      search. Nothing more.

      --
      -- "It was as if the paint factories had decided to deal direct with the art galleries." - Thursday Next
    3. Re:dear me by paulkoan · · Score: 2, Funny

      The downside is that I am now going to have to find a new name for my nigritude ultramarine paint. Such a nigritude sea blue, no other name really describes it. Not to mention all the legitimate search engine optimising companies I have already paid in preparation for the launch. Sigh... ---

      --
      This signature intentionally left blank
  8. I know this might sound controversial, but. by James+A.+O.+Joyce · · Score: 5, Interesting

    But I think I ought to raise a problem with Google, which this contest simply serves to underline: Google is too easily gamed. After all, just take a look at what the bloggers have done for the phrase "miserable failure". All it takes is an aggrieved group of a couple of dozen individuals and they can push anything up the ranks of Google. It's not that hard to knock someone's rank down by a bit just by getting a bunch of people to delink them. When Google recaches, their rank falls...

    1. Re:I know this might sound controversial, but. by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful
      But "miserable failure" was easily subverted because it's not a particularly interesting phrase in the first place. I'd be much more convenced if you managed to make your personal blog come up as the #1 hit for "news."

      Still, I'm no fan of the competition this story is about. It's no more or less than a competition to find ways to lessen the usefulness of the Web by giving more power to "spammers" (in the loose sense of the word).

    2. Re:I know this might sound controversial, but. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      bbspot once had the top hit for the word "the" from google. talk about power. "the"

    3. Re:I know this might sound controversial, but. by Senator_B · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But "miserable failure" was easily subverted because it's not a particularly interesting phrase in the first place. I'd be much more convenced if you managed to make your personal blog come up as the #1 hit for "news."

      Just an interesting side note, Slashdot is on the second page for "news" on google (15th search result).

  9. Advertising by ghack · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dark Blue being an advertising agent...surely the techniques of the winner will end up in some sort of ad scheme...

    1. Re:Advertising by popirate · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Are the winners required to share their techniques to claim the prize? Or will the winners themselves end up getting offers in exchance for their services...

  10. The bare bones of search engine optimization by broothal · · Score: 5, Informative

    This should be obligatory reading, followed by this . It's amazing how many people are paying search engine optimizers to tell them what these links says.

  11. We have a winner! by Eponymous+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Funny
    Wouldn't it be just hilarious if this Slashdot article actually made it to #1 on Google for nigritude ultramarine and stuck there?

    Who gets the prize money then? :-D

    Everybody, link back here!

    --
    It's hard for thee to kick against the pricks.
    1. Re:We have a winner! by TheSpoom · · Score: 3, Informative

      Remember, the link has to SAY nigritude ultramarine ;^)

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    2. Re:We have a winner! by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 5, Informative

      A better link would be nigritude ultramarine. Your's would just link the keyword "here" with the article.

    3. Re:We have a winner! by Vann_v2 · · Score: 4, Funny

      When discussing nigritude ultramarine it is important to understand the impact of nigritude ultramarine on nigritude ultramarine.

      If slashdot wins, does that mean we all get to share an iPod and a 17" LCD monitor?

    4. Re:We have a winner! by danila · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yep. That would mean about 3 seconds of MP3 music and 1.5 pixels per account.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  12. How they do it. by caluml · · Score: 5, Informative

    The main secret is to search for a certain phrase, and then analyse the top results. This tells you things such as if the phrase boldened up to 3 times in the page helps, but maybe, for example, if it is boldened more than 3 times, it isn't counted so effectively. The title, the META tags, the page, H1-5 tags, bold etc, all count. But you have to work out how many you can put before Google thinks you're just trying to boost your ratings.

    1. Re:How they do it. by nsingapu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The main secret is to search for a certain phrase, and then analyse the top results. This tells you things such as if the phrase boldened up to 3 times in the page helps, but maybe, for example, if it is boldened more than 3 times, it isn't counted so effectively. The title, the META tags, the page, H1-5 tags, bold etc, all count. But you have to work out how many you can put before Google thinks you're just trying to boost your ratings.

      That is a load of nonsense. Studying the page in question shows you "on page" factors, and on page factors are only one part of the manner in which google determines results (and very arguable an almost trivial part at that).

      You dont need to see why a phrase is in top position at the moment - as there is one factor that trumps all - anchortext (the text used as the link). Competitive phrases like search engine optimization and their allinanchor counterparts demonstrate this quite throughly, for any competitive phrase there is a very high corelation between anchor text and the results. Designing a site to get good search results at the moment involve desiging a site that uses internal links effectively and getting external links to your site - messing with on page factors (for a single page) will get you nowhere.

    2. Re:How they do it. by caluml · · Score: 3, Funny
      That is a load of nonsense.

      Is it? My Slashdot ID is lower than yours, so I am right. Take that, Windows-using infidel.

    3. Re:How they do it. by Zixia · · Score: 2, Funny

      You dont need to see why a phrase is in top position at the moment - as there is one factor that trumps all - anchortext (the text used as the link).

      Does that mean that if one performs a search for "click here" we can find the least functional web sites?

  13. Hack the contest! by Jerf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hack the contest. Googlebomb "nigritude ultramarine" to http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/05/09/184021 7 . That's this article, stripped of all the other crap.

    I'm planning on doing it, and I'm not a Google monster, but I'm not a Google slouch either; I have a pretty decent amount of Google juice for a one-man site.

    Note that mostly likely, links from Slashdot to Slashdot won't count any, so no point in linking in comments here.

    1. Re:Hack the contest! by Random+Web+Developer · · Score: 2, Informative

      If enough people link to it with that as a link text, that should work

      --
      Artists against online scams http://www.aa419.org/
    2. Re:Hack the contest! by nacturation · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Too bad robots.txt disallows indexing of article.pl pages! Link to the shtml page (http://slashdot.org/articles/04/05/09/1840217.sht ml?tid=126&tid=217&tid=95) instead:

      nigritude ultramarine will help your nigritude get more ultramarine today!

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  14. Re:Typo in story: Latter by frisket · · Score: 4, Funny
    #! /bin/sh
    #
    # Main Google search script
    # Copyright © 2004 Google, almost-Inc

    grep http://*.*.*/* $1 |\
    # mod #42 2004-05-09
    grep -Ev '(nigritude|ultramarine)'
  15. Phew... by Hobbex · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is a good thing that no google engineers read slashdot.org, and that even if they did, they would never want to mess up a competition between people who professionally abuse their service regarding who is best at it...

    If I were google, I would wait until the day before the deadline and then link the top hit for nigritude ultramarine to google.com.

    In fact, to help them, I suggest that everybody who thinks that "SEO pros" are a life form somewhere below pond-scum and above spammers, ought to help them. nigritude ultramarine.

  16. I suppose... by oGMo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I suppose doing something legitimate... like selling a successful product with this name attached... is out of the question? ;-P

    --

    Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

  17. I like the ads by sploo22 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A few of the ads that Google found to be relevant:

    Need Search Engine Help?
    The Definitive SEO Resource
    SeoDesk

    Sounds like a conflict of interest to me.

    --
    Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
  18. Just an aside... by Furbot · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is it just me or does the name nigritude ultramarine seem a little racially suspect. hmmmmm?

    1. Re:Just an aside... by tverbeek · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's an archaic term for "the state of being black". It's an odd choice, and you could draw all sorts of inferences based on our society's connections between "black" and the concepts of "profit", "evil", "African", "ink", and even "smithee". But sometimes and odd word is just an odd word.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  19. Do a search for Indie-Mail by KalvinB · · Score: 4, Informative

    and I'm the second result. There's no secret for getting ranked high when your web-site doesn't suck. You just let Google do its thing.

    "DirectX SDKs" and I'm on the first page of results. Although it's going to the Distribution section (pay per CD) instead of the SDK download section which is free access.

    "Digital Black Market" also gets me a spot in the top 20. I used to be ranked higher on that one.

    Before the site wide overhaul I was ranked 2nd when searching for "Driver Library" but if you're looking for a specific file and I have it, I'll get a top ranking.

    Google is currently reindexing my site. It'll probably be another month or so before everything is indexed as well as it was before. Last check there was about a half a million files on the web-site.

    Domain, directory, file name, content is about the general chain of importance for getting a high ranking.

    Ben

  20. "Optimization" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I hate that phrase. It's typical marketing-speak.

    The whole point of a "search engine" from day one was to help connect people with what they are looking for. To that end, the HTML "META" tag was invented, so that you could give keywords relevant to what your page is about.

    Enter the marketing scumbags. They just want as many eyeballs to see a page, whether it's relevant or not. And so, in short time, the META tag became completely meaningless. It wouldn't surprise me at all if Google ignores the META tag completely.

    And so Google started checking links, because if somebody links to some page, it's probably useful.

    Cue the marketing scumbags again. Tons of fake pages with fake links, all intended to fool the search engine.

    And so they keep trying to find new ways to fuck around with Google and all us people who just want to find what WE want rather than what some marketer wants.

    And in typical marketing scumbag fashion, they call this let's-screw-google nonsense "optimization".

    God I hate marketers. They're worse scum than lawyers, pimps and pushers IMNSHO.

    1. Re:"Optimization" by silentbozo · · Score: 3, Offtopic

      Having worked with marketers, I often wonder how they sleep at night. Do they deliberately disregard the common good? Have they managed to convince themselves that they are necessary, and even a good? Or are they playing a zero-sum game - "Well, if I don't screw everybody else over, someone else will do it anyways, so I might as well reap the rewards."

      In olden days, these kinds of people would have been dealt with by:

      1. Tarring and feathering.
      2. Being tied to a rail and getting run out of town.
      3. Being thrown in a boat without paddles and left to drift downstream.

      It's only in today's society, where these vermin have so many targets of opportunity (and the veil of apparent anonymity) that they can thrive, and not be thrown out. Even worse, it's only in today's society that these vermin can band together, hire lawyers and lobbyists, and start dictating to the rest of us, what we can do and what we can't do. The Do Not Call list was a good counter-blow, but they're still out there, degrading useful services like Google and e-mail for the rest of us...

  21. Re:Slashdot should win by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Assuming that the PageRank formula is completely based on total numbers, then you are correct. But based on the fact that it's called a formula, I would guess that there's more to the ranking than just the total number of links to a particular site. With this being the case, your statement that gaming the system cannot overcome raw numbers is incorrect.

    For instance, and this is just to prove a point, let's say the PageRank formula counts a link from CNN.com and MSNBC.com as equivalent to 1,000 links from any other domain. Obviously if 1,000 Slashdotters place a link to the Slashdot article [which is probably high, I doubt people care enough to take part in your suggestion] but some person gets a link on CNN and MSNBC somehow, that person is going to win. I would guess that gaming the system can beat a raw numbers attempt if it is focused and has enough knowledge of the PageRank formula.

    --
    I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
  22. OT: Where do we go once Google turns evil? by schwaang · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I sense a disturbing over-dependence on Google. If they turn to the dark side (& it's bound to happen), where we will go next?

    I used to like hotbot before they got eaten by Lycos. They used Inktomi's engine, which I think MSN licensed for a while.

    nlsearch had cool features, but died out. (I think they sell their engine for enterprise use at northernlight.com).

    altavista was cool when it was run by DEC (which got ate by Compaq, which was swallowed by HP).

    next?

  23. nigritude by Mantorp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's gotten to the point that any word beginning with "nig" sounds racist to me. The word niggardly has gotten several people in hot water the last few years.

    1. Re:nigritude by leviramsey · · Score: 3, Informative

      nigritude: Blackness; the state of being black.

  24. Reminds me of by rduke15 · · Score: 4, Funny
    1. Re:Reminds me of by zcat_NZ · · Score: 4, Funny
      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
  25. "the worlds dumbest webpage" by Simon+Carr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am the champion title holder there.

    Yay.

    The funny thing is I have no idea how I got there.

    --
    -- The unsig...
  26. Isn't SEO *inherently* dubious? by mcc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We might as well be discussing a rule for eliminating "dubious" entries from a contest for who can pull off the biggest stock fraud scheme.

    What comes to mind is a strip of the old comic strip "Ernie". This strip has a running gag about a local group called the "Pirhana club" which has a yearly "Pirhana of the Year" contest which is literally a yearly award to whichever of the members can be the biggest sleazeball.

    There's one character in the strip named "Uncle Sid" who wins the contest every year. He's just that much of an asshole.

    One year, as the Pirhana of the Year award approached, the strip chronicled various members of the club working overtime to get the award. Sid, though, did nothing, just sitting in the bar, oblivious and drinking while the other members of the club bragged to him about how they were certain to win this year.

    And on the strip on the day of the award ceremony, the readers were shown various members of the club around the room, explaining to the person next to them why they're certain they're going to win. A member of the city council brags about demanding kickbacks from an orphanage to retain their funding. A doctor brags about defrauding patients by charging them for surgery he anesthesised them for but did not perform for nonexistent ailments. A used car salesman brags about selling a set of totally nonfunctional cars to a nunnery. And as the announcer calls out "THE WINNER.. IS.. SID", the camera pans to Uncle Sid explaining to Ernie that he stuffed the ballot box.

    The next strip simply showed the other lead contenders confronting Sid and demanding to know, "How did you win? What did you do?" And Sid responds, "I cheated. I stuffed the ballot box and bribed the judges."

    The disheartened response, after a brief pause was "Damn, you're good."

    1. Re:Isn't SEO *inherently* dubious? by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Informative

      The running gag on Ernie now is the comic strip.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  27. Do your part by nuntius · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1.) Do the Google search
    2.) Click on the "Dissatisfied?" link
    3.) Complain to Google about all the spammers.

    Only you can stamp out spammers.
    Show Google the power of the /. hordes.

  28. Here's how to do it by arekusu · · Score: 2, Informative

    1) make a web page.
    2) get people to link to it, with the query words in the link.
    3) lots of people.

    For example, google for "monkeys".
    Top hit: bdmonkeys.net (my band)

    Now if you look at that page, "monkeys" only shows up FOUR times in the source: the page name, the meta keyword, an IMG ALT tag, and the email.

    Now google for "battle cry".
    Top hit: the blog meme Chaz wrote that LINKS TO OUR SITE WITH THE WORD "MONKEYS".

    561823649174 bloggers linking to you = top google position.

  29. Have fought that war... by fafalone · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We've been trying numerous optimizations to win the #1 spot for 'science forums'... but oddly enough we kept losing to sites were often not even directly relevant to the query. Eventually we brought in some optimizations just to the pages of the site to bring things up.
    Well, we now have the number one spot... but since we did nothing as far as increasing mentions on the other sites, the question arises how of how much weight Google really puts on external references to your site.

  30. Here's where this is a practical problem by ctwxman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This technique of gaming is also a technique akin to spamming. I maintain a blog on my website www.geofffox.com (I want a higher rank too). It's a small affair averaging 400-500 guests a day, each looking at a few pages. I know that Google results are the single biggest referrer to my site! But sites with no legitimate traction know that Google can work for them too. So, every day or so, I get 'comment spam.' An automated system will hit my site with a comment. The comment, of course, includes his URL. Sometimes the comments are obviously commercial (usually porn or drugs), but often they are socially engineered to blend in. These would include comments like: "I couldn't agree with you more." or "Nice point." Again, these innocuous posts are accompanied by porn or drug URLs. Most of the time they come from Russian IP addresses. Though I don't post those who link to my site, others do... and so I often see what look like referrals in my log, from porn sites. Following the link back shows I wasn't mentioned at all (Let's not talk about my career in adult films). Google rank has become so valuable that these businesses on the margin of legitimacy probably feel they have no other choice if they wish to be found. Damn shame.

  31. Comments from the article submitter by xmas2003 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    HEY ... my submission actually got accepted - that's a first! ;-)

    As alluded in the "Note to Slashdot Editors" (thought they would prune that), I first want to emphasize I have NO relationships with the folks running this content - I just think it is hilarious, although it will certainly provide some insights into how Google works, and we'll see all sorts of whacky things from the SEO pro's - again, I am not one of 'em.

    Second, I hadn't thought about Slashdot ranking 1st for the contest as some have suggested - now that would be a crackup! Unfortunately, Slashdot won't allow you to place in IMG tag in a post (a requirement of the contest is a small image on the page), plus I'm not a member of the SearchGuild, so I'm not elgible ... maybe Cmdr Taco or Timothy need an iPod and/or 17" LCD - go for it! ;-)

    Third, you know the folk at Google have gotten wind of this contest, and if I were them, I'd put a link on the main page to their own nigritude ultramarine page. I.e. Google should NOT tinker with their algorithms, but with a link from their PR10 main page, that certainly should shoot 'em up in the rankings. I gotta wonder if the pre-IPO Google would do this - we'll see with the "new" Google ;-)

    Fourth, I appreciate some of the comments from folks about my Christmas Lights and the Christmas Webcam with webcontrol (yes, you can turn the lights ON and OFF via the web) which actually been on Slashdot before - in fact, you can read my Slashdot Effect Analysis from last year. I assure you it should be MUCH more interesting this year, as due to some multi-threaded optimizations, I think I'll be able to reduce the throttle from minimum 5-second updates to 1-second updates. I'm going to have to be REALLY NICE to my neighbors, 'cause it will be quite the flickering light show in December/2004 ... although I usually fire it up for a test-run in October as part of my Halloween Decorations and Lights.

    alek

    P.S. One thing slight off-topic is the Google Compute project which I thought I mention to those Slashdotters with idle CPU time that want to help the Stanford Folding@Home project - this really is a good cause.

    --
    Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
    1. Re:Comments from the article submitter by timothy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I kept your note in there; figured that otherwise a distractingly high number of comments would be grousing that you were gaming the contest.

      I would like an ipod (esp now thwt I've discovered worthwhile stuff to put on it at rusc.com) or a monitor, sure, but not enough to upset the balance of the force ;)

      timothy

      --
      jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    2. Re:Comments from the article submitter by xmas2003 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Timothy, Yea, in hindsight, good idea leaving my "disclaimer" note in there - thanx.

      If I were you, I'd go for it! Remember you have to do a few things per the contest rules per the link above, but in case you are wondering, I have ZERO issues with you taking the credit and walking off with the prize(s) if you win - after all, it is YOUR web site! ;-) You have a good chance of taking it - unless someone gets a link from a Page Rank 100 page - after my article submission, I realized this is a pretty funny link that I forgot to add.

      I would totally mod-up your post, but I'm a schmuck ... so hopefully someone else will for you (although obviousely you can do so yourself) as I bet a buncha Slashdott'ers would also say go for it!

      alek

      P.S. Actually Timothy, if you do win, can I ask a favor and get a couple hours heads-up if you guys Slashdot my Christmas Lights again? I'd like to warn the neighbors before the lights go beserko, and also monitor things when the deluge hits - X10 is a bit squirrly, so even with some multi-threading, I'm going to be pushing it with the 1 (versus 5) second throttle this year ... and it's hard to test this. BTW, if you haven't tried it, you might get a chuckle out of the Javascript pop-ups if you click from Slashdot on my Christmas Webcam link.

      --
      Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
  32. I am a nigritude ultramarine mercenary. by salimfadhley · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm not a member of the silly SEO guild, but all my Nigritude Ultramarine can be yours! I have started an auction on eBay - anybody who seriously wants to win can pay me $1 (or whatever it comes to), and in return I will give them a few hundred links from my reasonably well-ranked sites.

    You shall have my sword... I will fight for your honor!

  33. Spelling errors by Felinoid · · Score: 3, Funny

    One easy way to grab attention is to intentionally inject commen spelling errors into your webpage.
    I don't recomend this. As easy and as tempting as it is Google feeds the correct spelling.

    On that note I do get the highest ranking for "Linux Destro" A mispelling of Linux Distro (Not for long.. Noticed the error and plan to fix it.)

    Now for a funny.. Take a look at the winner for the correct spelling.
    It's not RedHat.

    --
    I don't actually exist.
  34. Wish I knew how by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I had (and still have, actually) an accidental top result for "Peter Griffin" in the image search. I never linked to or used the image outside a photoshop contest, and it wasn't even that good - it was the cartoon character Peter Griffin (from Family Guy) with Merv Griffin's face.

    After I found out about my top placement, I started watching my log files and I was surprised to see how many messageboards have linked the image. Most of the image linking was pointless - just somebody found the image and linked directly to it, with no explanation of why it was applicable. Weird.

    --
    I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
  35. Sponsored Links by complete+loony · · Score: 2, Informative

    Anybody else notice the Sponsored Link next to the results? Looks like someone is trying to buy their way up the list.

    --
    09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
  36. In Spanish it is 'telendro' by h0m3r · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is another contest in Spanish. The search term is telendro.