Slashdot Mirror


Japanese Cell Phones Offer a Glimpse of the Future

Dynamoo writes "Vodafone K.K. have announced a new range of phones, available exclusively in Japan which easily beat everything else in terms of features. In particular, two phones from Sharp, the V402SH and V602SH between them boast a TV tuner, camera with optical zoom, virtual karaoke machine and dog bark translater (woof woof), according to this review. Perhaps some features are more useful than others, but with a bit of luck we'll see these features in worldwide mobiles sometime in 2005. In the meantime I guess I'll just have to learn to speak dog by myself."

62 of 313 comments (clear)

  1. Hmm... by Lanzaa · · Score: 4, Funny

    I need a klingon translator. That would be better.

    1. Re:Hmm... by nuclear305 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How is this offtopic? The story mentions a bark translator...and the poster wants a klingon translator instead.

      Personally, I think a klingon translator would be more useful...

      In my eyes, cell phones are starting to follow the path much like ICQ. They originally started out simple and functional...then it turned into a race to see how many useless features could be packed into it--rendering it mostly useless.

    2. Re:Hmm... by Talinom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes. Star Trek.

      I am a simple person with simple tastes.

      1) I want a phone that works like a phone should work. No games, no internet, no walkie-talkie functions, and no stinkin' roaming or overage fees. An easy to use directory would be nice, though.

      2) I want this same phone to look exactly like the communicators on ST:TOS. Voice recognition, too, so when I say "Kirk to Enterprise" or "Kirk to Starbase 1" it dials the programmed number.

      Really, is that asking too much?

      --
      "Giving money and power to governments is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." - P.J. O'Rourke
  2. Do we need these features? by Espectr0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They actually want to make a regular computer inside the cell phone.. I actually want a cell phone that can be heard everywhere, with a nice battery and perhaps send pictures and such (which can already be done).

    1. Re:Do we need these features? by Stopmotioncleaverman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It depends on who you define as 'we'.

      You and I, it would appear not. The general, cellphone-buying market? Maybe.

      It has seemed to me for a while that cellphones are really trying to be PDAs. But then if you want a device that does everything that a PDA can do..........why not just buy a freakin' PDA? And if you want a portable computer..........why not just buy a freakin' PDA?

      I want a cellphone that I can walk around with, and that goes bring bring hello. Cellular. Phone. If I'd wanted a PDA, I'd have bought one.

      However, kids and city boy executives with shiny suits, who are, let's face it, the main market sector buying new phones, seem to want the latest, greatest, smartest, flashiest, most function-packed portable computers. And if there's demand for it, then cellphone manufacturers will make it. It's just a shame as far as I'm concerned that I have to buy some bloated device full of functions I'll never use and will chew up battery power at the rate of a small fish-gutting farm.

      I know, if I want something that just goes bring bring hello, I could just carry a Soviet brick around with me. Unfortunately the last time I tried my soviet brick on my network it seemed to fall off regularly. That and the fact that my pockets aren't made of high-tensile reinforced nanofibres to carry the extreme weight :)

    2. Re:Do we need these features? by moxruby · · Score: 4, Insightful

      if you want a portable computer..........why not just buy a freakin' PDA?

      Because a PDA, while useful, is bulky and an additional gadget to carry around - if your going to carry a PDA, it might as well have an inbuilt phone.
      The current crop of "smart phones" are too big, however a few more years of minituarisation and we'll see cheap phones with good battery life and the regular PDA features such as calendar, internet access, decent addressbook, mp3 player, java VM, email client etc. in a form factor around that of today's regular phones.

      The tech is not quite ready yet, but I predict that within ten years, nearly everyone will be carrying a tiny phone-come-PDA with an inbuilt camera.

    3. Re:Do we need these features? by Texas+Rose+on+Lava+L · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Economist recently had an interesting article on how cell phones are marketed and why people buy them. Basically, when (some) people buy phones, they're looking more for a status symbol than for a device to actually make phone calls on. For example, teenagers might spend $3 on a ringtone because they're looking for a way to establish an identity.

    4. Re:Do we need these features? by trollhaugen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Japanese mobile phones run on a different network than US cellular phones, which perhaps indicates why they're so much smaller and lightweight than US phones. Although they have more features, they don't use up an exorbitant amount of power (although, in Japan, you can go to some convenience stores like 7-11 and get your phone charged at a vending machine while taking money out of an ATM). US phones look like the "dealbreaker" phones Micheal Douglas uses on the beach in "Wall Street" compared to the thin, light, Japanese models. An extraordinary high percentage of the Japanese population have mobile phones, most notably young people. They don't have PDA's really, but everyone has a phone and dare I say it, they are practically addicted to them. Obviously this points out a distinct cultural difference between the high tech cell phone markets in the US and mobile phone markets in Japan. Apples and oranges. Someday there we will perhaps be a happy medium. I predict that, in the future, most people around the world will have phones that resemble PDAs, and that those phones will become more and more like personal computers, or will at least function like extensions of them. In time, people will come to rely on these devices/phones.

    5. Re:Do we need these features? by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is 1 reason behind this:
      1. Ego
      You have about 15/16 different telecom companies with 2/3 major standards all battling it out. Thing is CDMA is essentially an American standard, developed by Qualcomm (I think), and there is no way it would bend over for a European cheese-eating monkey standard like GSM (developed by Nokia and Ericsson, I think).
      Further the mobile phone system here isn't an open or uniform standard like in Europe/Asia. Even with GSM here, y'all had to shift it to a different frequency - 1900 MHz instead of the 900/1800 bands used in Europe/Asia. Your mobile is tied to your provider, whereas in Europe/Asia, buy the phone from anyone anywhere, and simply plug in the GSM chip supplied by the provider you choose. As any slashdotter will tell you, when you use Open and Uniform standards, you get growth and innovation. So this is the unfortunate situation in the US of A. CDMA may be a better standard technically, but GSM is the what the worlds uses. Which is why while most of us are happily MMS-ing, Text messaging is only now becoming a big deal in USA.

    6. Re:Do we need these features? by Hast · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually the Vodaphone network in Japan has some compatability with GSM. They have a couple of phones that are "world phones" and can be used with any GSM network. However no-one has managed to unlock one of these phones yet, so you can't use it outside Japan. (Unless you have a japanese mobile phone account, which would be expensive.)

      Besides you can't really blame Clinton that Japan has their own mobile phone system. They are actually worse than the american system because they have multiple phone systems which are incompatible with each other as well as the rest of the world.

      Now that Vodaphone is on the japanese market that may help the situation though. I certainly hope so because I'd much rather get a phone in Japan than here in Europe. I like stupid features like described in this article.

    7. Re:Do we need these features? by thetroll123 · · Score: 2, Funny

      if I want something that just goes bring bring hello, I could just carry a Soviet brick around with me

      In Soviet Russia, the bricks carry you. And they go hello hello bring.

  3. dog bark translater by F13 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is this for blind people?

  4. I can honestly say... by vondo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...that I don't want a phone with any of those features. I want a phone that
    a) doesn't sound like crap
    b) lasts a few days on a charge
    c) functions as a bluetooth access point for my PDA/Laptop
    d) doesn't cost more than $150

    1. Re:I can honestly say... by Three+Headed+Man · · Score: 2, Funny

      I definately agree with you on that. There's no need for all these extra features on a cell phone. Take the camera for instance: you would be better off with a small portable digital camera, unless you're going to a strip club, and they won't let you take a camera inside. They'd never take away your cell phone.

      Another useful (offtopic) thing about strip clubs: give the girls $2 bills; it's dark and they'll mistake them for $20's.

      --
      I'm probably at the karma cap. Mod up a funny troll instead, it lightens the mood :)
    2. Re:I can honestly say... by Matey-O · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hmph. I just bought a Moto v600. Lasts a week on a charge, bluetooth, GREAT SCREEN, camera.

      It also has the java stuff and plays games and uses mp3s as ringtones and a whole lotta other stuff.

      But it's also a pretty damn good phone for $175.

      My wife sounded like a LOT of you guys: I don't want a damn camera, I don't want a damn color screen....

      Then she IM's me with a link to the V600. Says it's pretty. Likes the 'environmental mood lighting'.

      Some engineer figured that, for another $3, he could put red, green, blue, and white LEDs behind the top and the camera would sell like hotcakes.

      Not because of the camera, or the quadband, or the JVM....but because it's pretty.

      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  5. Battery Life by fembots · · Score: 2

    in the article, both phones have 2 hours talk, and what happens when users are using the other non-talking functions??

  6. Japanse dogs? by nmoog · · Score: 5, Funny

    Japanese dogs don't go "woof-woof" they go "wan-wan".

    And cats go "nya-nya"

    Just thought I'd clear that up before you rushed out to buy one for your non-japanese pets.

    1. Re:Japanse dogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's spelled "baguette", you faguette.

    2. Re:Japanse dogs? by MBCook · · Score: 5, Funny
      It's a dog translator.

      It turns the Japanese dog's "wan-wan"s into "woof-woof"s.

      Why you would want that? I don't know. Now something to turn my French Poodle's "le woof, le woof" and my Mexican Hairless Chiuaua's "el yipo! el yipo!" into a simple "bark bark" I could understand, that I'd pay for.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  7. Phones that let you see into the future! by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cool!

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  8. I got one of these by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 5, Funny

    Man, my dog talks like a sailor. He's all "get me some fucking dogfood, goddamnit" this and "you best be taking me for walk, shithead" that.

    1. Re:I got one of these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      My dog talks like a pirate. He's all "Wh3r3 15 d4 fu!1n9 w4r3z d00dz?!?" this and and "W1nd0w5 15 th3 gr347357!" that.

  9. Re:TV tuner? by Oriumpor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Anyone who has to stand in public transport for hours a day.

  10. Re:TV tuner? by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Honestly, who would want to watch TV on a cell phone? "

    Somebody who's at a restaraunt waiting to be served. Somebody taking a dump at work. Somebody trying to find out what happened after an Earthquake and all the power's out. Somebody riding the bus. Somebody taking a...

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  11. 2005? by sych · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hold on, we're almost half-way through 2004 already, they're not even out in Japan yet; the USA still hasn't managed to convert to GSM let alone UMTS or any other 3G standard, there's probably a tonne of localisation to do, and you're expecting to see these things worldwide in 2005?

    You must be joking, right?

  12. Dream I had a year and a half ago by BlueJay465 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Technology has been evolving at a rapid rate. Consumer grade cellphones had been blended with actual camcorders and were able to record and transmit at 1080i over the airwaves. The video calls were amazing. They were still quite a bit more bulky than the ones you have in your pocket, due to the extra features and they had more of a shape of a camcorder. There seemed to be a lot more vigilante news reporting at this time too, and there was a lot more chaos in the world.

    Maybe the time I saw in my dream is closer than I thought.

    Mod me offtopic if you feel necessary, I think it quite in context.

  13. "Dog bark translator"....?! by Mmm+coffee · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know this is off topic, but if you haven't spent enough time with your dog to know what he/she is thinking, feeling, and expressing without a fscking dog bark translator, then you're probably a crappy 'parent'.

    Right now my dog (Jenny) is laying on the chair next to my computer desk with her head propped up on the arm, staring at me with one ear perked straight up. That clearly says "You're supposed to be petting me instead of browsing Slashdot, you moron." Just learn how to speak dog, it's cheaper and more rewarding.

  14. with a bit of luck, we WON'T be seeing these by neurojab · · Score: 4, Interesting

    >with a bit of luck we'll see these features in worldwide mobiles sometime in 2005

    correction: with a bit of luck, we WON'T be seeing these features in worldwide mobiles EVER.

    Whatever happened to the engineering concept of affordance?

    Portable phone: The ideal one is really portable and really a phone. Make it small, light, have the battery last forever and never lose calls. I'll buy that one. Keep the dog translator, thanks.

    1. Re:with a bit of luck, we WON'T be seeing these by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I'll buy that one. Keep the dog translator, thanks. "

      I hope you don't consider yourself a geek.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  15. Re:why is the US so far behind? by Espectr0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why do Japan, China and Korea get the coolest phones years before we do?


    Because they are the guinea pigs and the phones get tested there before trying it in the "final" markets. Oh, and also demand

  16. What??? by nizo · · Score: 2, Funny

    No builtin fork and cheese grater???

  17. Re:why is the US so far behind? by sych · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's your regulatory environment.

    While in the USA, multiple different companies went off and developed multiple, incompatible systems (which weren't particularly future-proof), and Telcos even implemented different networks in different parts of the country, the Europeans got together and developed GSM (Global System for Mobile telecommunications), which I'm sure you've heard of by now.

    They actually bothered to implement things like inter-network and overseas roaming, and anticipate the need for an upgrade path for future requirements. They also assigned and reserved radio spectrum across Europe, and much of Asia followed suit.

    Meanwhile, the USA hadn't reserved the same spectrums, so even when US operators decided that the bigger GSM handset market was a good thing to be involved with, handsets from Europe and Asia still couldn't be used because they had to be modified to work on different frequencies!

    It's one case where an unregulated, free and open market has been quite detrimental to consumers, and in fact the whole country.

  18. Less is More by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They actually want to make a regular computer inside the cell phone.. I actually want a cell phone that can be heard everywhere, with a nice battery and perhaps send pictures and such (which can already be done).

    I don't even want that much. Was with you until you said pictures. All I want is a phone with a good battery life and a decent address book. I don't mind a few other features (such as a calculator or a few simple games like Tetris to pass the time if I am stuck at the airport) but they had better not murder my battery life or distract me from the main features of the phone.

    My Kyocera 2325 suits me quite nicely. The address book is superb (I love the auto-dial feature where it matches letters that I type to the contacts book -- can call my GF by typing in "788" or my boss by typing in "726" -- that's the coolest speed-dial feature I've ever seen -- much nicer then a list of speed-dial numbers that need to be remembered), the SMS interface is sleek enough and it has the calculator mode that I desire. The battery will last about three days even with fairly heavy usage (I am landline free so I make all my calls on the cell) -- what more could you ask for? Sometimes less is better.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  19. Bark Translater by zolon · · Score: 2, Funny
    Wait a momemnt. Does this mean I can finally understand what the heck my ex was saying?!

    (( Yes, this was a poor attempt at humour. ))

    Sin

    --
    Merf
  20. Re:When? by Deitheres · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well several alternatives have been proposed, such as:

    Cellular Relaying Antenna Point (CRAP)

    and

    Aggregate Nesting Node of Outrageous Yuppies and Ignorant Goofballs (ANNOYING)

    and

    Standardized TDMA Focusing Umbrella (STFU)

    However, all these names were rejected by focus groups. The first two were classified as vaguely insulting (although the respondents could not quite say why). The respondents also said that STFU made them feel like they had made a stupid post on slashdot (kind of like this one....)

    Please note that I am (obviously) not a professional creator of acronyms.

    --
    Just like driving a car:
    (D) to go forward
    (R) to go backward

  21. I wish US phone were built as tough. by dbleoslow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After spending 3 years in Japan, I was disappointed at the build quality of US phone when I returned. Anyone who's used a Japanese mobile phone will tell you they are built to hold up much longer than the ones in the US. I feel like if I drop my US cell once, it's a goner. I banged my JP phone up alot and it's still going strong.

    Forget adding features, add some better plastics!

  22. Features by uspsguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My only question: does it actually make usable phone calls?

    --
    Profanity - The sign of a small mind trying to express itself.
  23. Most requested features by platypibri · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. How about a phone that doesn't drop calls? 2. Maybe eliminating dropped calls. 3. I'd also like a phone that doesn't $@%#$&* drop calls!!!!!!!!! Um, the battery thing too.

    --
    Yeah, I guess I'm funny like that.
  24. phones are replacing PCs by bhny · · Score: 2, Insightful

    in japan, for some kids the phone is their pc. they don't email they send text messages, they browse the web on their phone.

    it's not obvious in the U.S. with our backwards cell phones, but in other parts of the world people are buying phones instead of PCs

  25. What a waste by reynolds_john · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Phone manufacturers (and software developers) are keeping the price of these silly things artificially high.

    Back in the late 90s I heard from a developer that Nokia told them at a conference that they *could* make cell phones that updated themselves over the network; they don't because they want cell phone turnover on the rate of about one a year.
    The service still sucks at times, and the stuff they add on just simply doesn't justify the insane prices you pay. Think about it - $150 for a good new phone, and (average) $60 a month for a decent plan.

    That's $870 a year for a PHONE.

    Price for a regular home phone, $150 a year, maybe $200 if you add on a good long distance plan. And unlike your cell, the home phone is good for life (we just threw away my grandfather's phone that he got from AT&T in the early 60s).

    Perhaps I'm the anomoly, but I want quality service, long battery life, and a decent menu system (are you listening, Motorola?) over every other feature they come up with.

    Just my 2 cents.

  26. In Japan, cell phones take place of cheap PDA by DB_researcher · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In Japan, these high-end cell phones are just used as PDA by young people, because these cell phones are not so expensive ($50~$100), and have basic communication mechanisms (phonic and e-mail) and web-browser. For most Japanese, cell phones are not only phonic communication tool but also necessary informational equipment.

    In such situ., there will be "cell-phone-geeks", and want more complicated functions, like dog-human translater or tv, no doubt.

  27. Re:where's the beef? by josh3736 · · Score: 2, Funny
    the V602SH comes with [...] a weather indicator."

    And now we need our phone to tell us what the current conditions are? Considering that you generally would have your cell phone outside, why can't you just, oh, look up??? If you really need it, have a temperature sensor inside the phone so the cell network isn't flooded with weather data. (Idea! Better patent it!)

  28. Similar to parenting by Deitheres · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a pet owner, I agree with you. I can't say I have children, but it seems to be the same way. I mean, when my cat is being bitchy, he either needs food, water, or attention. I don't need a translator to tell me that. I have seen some products that claim to translate the cries of a child. I imagine that there is/could be a market for a product like that, but that is a saddening prospect. Your child is crying. Gee, maybe he/she is hungry, needs a new diaper, or just plain misses you. Do you need a translator to figure that out? It seems to me that the world is moving away from a "hands on" approach to parenting (either a child or a pet), and these things maybe are not so obvious anymore. If you're getting that quality time (and yes, you can have quality time with a pet), you don't need a dang cell phone to translate anything for you.

    If you are going to build translation capabilities into a cell phone, why not make it something useful, like japanese to english and vice versa. I would certainly appreciate something like that, even if it only worked for basic phrases. Put an SD slot in there, and you can switch out the language cards when you are going to a different country!

    --
    Just like driving a car:
    (D) to go forward
    (R) to go backward

  29. you say this because you havn't seen it by lingqi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Sharp models have very nice displays that boast 640x480 resolution on a 3" screen. you have to realize that people use it for email / web browsing (well, maybe more mail than web for vodafone service) more than they use their phone for a phone, since calls are so expensive comparatively.

    it also comes with 2mpix digital camera, which, coupled with the screen, is a very nice treat.

    the phone isn't too expensive when you factor in the various contract-length discounts. It comes out to be less than 200USD for the top of line vodafone has to offer, and consider how much a slim 2mpix digicam alone would cost you, i don't think it's a terrible price.

    comments on the article is that, though: isn't this kind of old news? vodafone TV has been around for like half a year now and the reception isn't terrific - especially, erm, on subways; the pet-emotion-translator has also been about 8 monthes or so if not longer. it's an add-on 32MB SD card software package, though, so didn't try it.

    phones with digicams that comes with optical zoom was probably first seen on one of the earlier model panasonic FOMA phones (for NTT docomo) and that was like two years ago.

    hmm, but maybe i'm just spoiled bathing in the abundant supply of unnecessary toys readily available in japan.

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

  30. Re:These phones don't have enough gadets... by maxbang · · Score: 2, Informative

    <a href="urlhere">link text</a>

    --
    I also reply below your current threshold.
  31. Battery life? by kuzb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With all these additional features getting strapped on to phones, they must be coming up with some unique new battery solutions.

    I wonder if it would be too much to ask for a cellphone that *just* made calls and lasted a really long time between charges. I think I could safely trade in the dog bark translator for that.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  32. In Japan, we already do by achurch · · Score: 2, Informative

    . . . in a way, at least. The Japanese term for "cell [mobile] phone" is technically keitai-denwa, but in reality, everyone except NHK news announcers just says "keitai" (pronounced KAY-tie). While the origin of the word is obvious, I think it's fair to say that "keitai" represents the conglomeration of features that have been squeezed into these devices more accurately than "cell phone" does.

  33. GOD I WANT TO HACK ONE ! by MajorDick · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would give ANYTHING to hack a series of those ala Barbie Liberation Front style. Change the "dog-bark" translator so it returns all kinds of EVIL and RUDE translations, like "Im going to eat your throat out in your sleep" and "Hah I pissed in you shoes" etc etc.

    Way back when in early 95 my dad was running Win95 beta or RC , I gained remote access, installed and shared a folder that I then uploaded all kinds of 2001 a space odyssey WAV's to his system and replaced the default sounds. My Dads name was Dave, so it was friggin perfect, instead of the shutdown sound it would go into the "Dave, What are you doing Dave" sequence and so on, about 10 sounds in all.

    ANYONE stupid enough to USE a dog bark translator deserves anything I can make it say.

  34. Simple. by TechnoFreek · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cell Phone. Cellular Telephone. Cellular PDA-Gaming Platform-Calendar-Planner-Universal Remote-Translator-Dictionary-Infrared Scanner-Laser Pointer-RC Probe-Camera-Swiss Pocket Knife-Movie Projector-Telephone? I sure hope I didn't forget anything.

  35. Those phones are even cooler in the flesh by Gleenie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I work at Vodafone NZ; we've dealt with our Japanese colleagues on a few occasions relating to 3G. They brought their phones with them. Way cool. Some of that technology is filtering down to the 2G phones being manufactuerd by the likes of Sharp also.

    Interesting was the speed with which they were able to roll out 3G sites: thousands of cells per month. Unlike us their 2G system is completely incompatible with WCDMA so they had no concerns with radio or core interoperability - and thus they were able to rollout at an unheard-of speed. Kudos to Vodafone K.K. They have been remarkably successful!

    --
    -- Your mother uses Emacs.
  36. Re:why is the US so far behind? by jettoblack · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Except that the countries with the most advanced cellphones (Japan and South Korea) are using proprietary and incompatible standards just like the USA did, so your argument doesn't hold up.

    I'm not saying standards like GSM are bad, but if this really was a standards issue, wouldn't we all be ooh-ing and aah-ing over Europe's awesome high-tech GSM phones, instead of Japan's awesome high-tech (insert random 2.5G/3G celphone standard here) phones?

    If anything, Japan has proven that GSM isn't the best technology for densely populated urban areas.

  37. Captain Obvious on the Tech Front by Mulletproof · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Japanese Cell Phones Offer a Glimpse of the Future"

    Um, the Japanese cell phone market has been providing glimpses into the future for quite a while now. They are regularly on the bleeding edge of industry technology. Freakin' duh, man.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  38. Re:TV tuner? by peachpuff · · Score: 3, Funny
    "Somebody taking a dump at work."

    Yeah, those guys already love the "walkie-talkie" feature. Actual overheard conversation:

    *be-deet*
    "Where are you?"
    *be-deet*
    "Taking a shit."
    *be-deet*
    "Wanna see a movie?"
    *be-deet*
    "Okay, when?"
    *be-deet*
    "Five-thirty."

    I swear, video conferencing will take off when they put it on a cellphone with a built-in wall projector. And people in restaurants will use it to talk to people who are taking a shit.

    --
    -- . . ramblin' . . .
  39. Now we can all be Timmy. by psoriac · · Score: 4, Funny

    Woof Woof!

    What's that Lassie?

    Woof!

    Hold on girl let me take out my cell phone!

    --
    I browse Slashdot at +3, Funny
  40. I don't want phones to have these features by egburr · · Score: 2, Interesting
    How many incredibly annoying features do they have to cram into these phones?

    Yesterday, a phone at a table near me announced very loudly to the entire restaurant "You have an incoming call!" over and over and over again. It took the guy forever to figure out how to answer it.

    What do I want in a phone?

    Limit the annoyance capabilities (volume, music, etc.)

    Let me have two or more phones share a single phone number. It has got to be possible, but nobody will do it. That's the only missing feature that makes me think back fondly about my old land-line phone. If someone wanted to reach whoever picked up first, or leave a message for whoever checked first, they only had one number to call; now they have two (me and my wife) and have to leave a message for both if neither of us answer. And soon half our calls will consist of "sorry, he's not with me; try his mother (or father) instead".

    Let it be an option to create a blacklist of numbers (including "unknown") which will NOT generate a ring at all.

    Let me hit END to drop an incoming call unanswered so I can place an outgoing call immediately instead of having to wait for the incoming call to eventually shunt over to voicemail.

    Get three-way calling working better. I have had 5 different models of phones in the past 4 years, and NONE of them has handled three-way calling well at all.

    Let me choose between color and black-and-white for the display. I never had any trouble reading the B&W display on my older phones at a quick glance. With this color display on my new phone, I have to shield it from the light, even at max contrast, and stare at it for a few seconds just to read the clock which is in larger numbers than everything else.

    Make data cables available. I should not have to go to the store and stand in line for half an hour praying that when I get to the end of the line and ask to have my phonebook copied out, that their computer isn't down, that their cable isn't broken, that their software isn't misbehaving, that the person I get actually knows how to perform such a simple task, etc.

    Make the equipment consistent. Every time I upgrade (mainly due to loss/damage) my phone, I have to get a new charger (usually included), new car charger, new headset, new data cable (if available!), new belt clip/holster, etc. And I use the term "upgrade" loosely, because out of all the phones I have had, I still like the first one best. If that model were still available, I would keep getting it, but unfortunately being 4 years old it is obsolete.

    --

    Edward Burr
    Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
  41. Other Vodafone Japan 2.5G & 3G models by Bushcat · · Score: 2, Informative
    You can see other Vodafone Japan models here.

    Sharp model numbers begin or end in SH. Sanyo in SA. Toshiba in T. NEC in N. English-language PDFs of the manuals for several models are also available.

    The review didn't mention the 800 series: 801SH and 801SA.

    Other goodies: the 601T has T4G 3D accelerator and a TV output jack when playing games. 401D also has a 2MP camera. The 401SH needs a really good signal for TV, and it kills the battery. The 401SA and 801SA have the same type of body sliding mechanism to reveal the keypad, all the others flip.

    The latest Sharp models, including the 801SH, have electrical and optical audio, so one can rip direct to the SD card. Unfortunately it's DRM City, so getting music onto the SD card via a computer involves Panasonic's awful SD Jukebox software and one of a small number of card readers.

    The 801SA can place videocalls to similar handsets. The 801SH and 801SA use W-CDMA in Japan, and tri-band GSM when roaming internationally.

    Finally, the VC701SI is a 3G modem card made by Seiko.

  42. The coolest freatures I've seen comes form S.Korea by iustus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When I go home to the U.S. on leave, I recognize most of the American cellphones are really korean, only about one to two years behind. Last February I showed some friends my SKY Slide phone and they said "wow, yeah, my sisters getting that one next month" or "hey I was looking to get that one after my current one", then I told them that I purchased mine a year ago, second hand. Well, it good to finnally know we're finally catching up.

    Anyway, here the public transportation system is very good, so everyone has an all in one bus/subway card. The best feature yet has been the cell phone that acts as one of those, where the person takes thier cell phone out, waves it in front of the subway entrance gate, and it subtracts from thier phone bill.

    Its not hard to see where thats going. . . regardless of any stupid features like cameras or karaoke, mp3 players etc. . . its easy to imagine someone instead walking up to a counter at 7-11, the cashier ringing up what you order and then you just pay by waving your handphone in front of a little reader.

    --
    Saying "Militia really just means National Gaurd" is like saying "Press really just means PBS"
  43. Re:why is the US so far behind? by Gleenie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While that's true, the difference is that in Korea and Japan there were a few large companies that spanned large regions or the whole country. And where the companies were regional, roaming onto other regions was neither difficult nor expensive.

    In the USA by contrast, the Bell breakup shattered your industry into a million tiny competing pieces, who all went out and made life as difficult for each other as possible. That of course was the natural conclusion of the court order, which put so much fear of personal penalites (ie, you personally could go to jail) due to anti-trust issues into the company executives.

    Also worth noting that for 3G, both Korea and Japan are following the rest of the world this time round and choosing WCDMA. It's likely that the US will be as isolated in it's 3G standard(s) as it was in 2G.

    --
    -- Your mother uses Emacs.
  44. Amen by sjb2016 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was in Japan for 10 months last year. I bought a middle of the road JPhone (now Vodaphone) model that has a camera, 10 secs of video, internet, e-mail, and an amazing alarm clock for about $30 (US)(had discounts). The best part was, I didn't even have to sign up for a year contract. I could do post-pay and not sign up for a year, how novel is that? I refuse to buy a cell phone in the States (or anywhere else I may live) unless I can buy the phone I want but not have to sign up for a year.

    The stupid contracts and poor handsets (relative to Japan anyway) are really a function of the youth of the cell industry in the U.S. Here, market saturation is low and demand is high, so companies have tons of consumers willing to pay huge amounts on crap contracts and horrible handsets. In Japan, where something near 80% of people have a cell phone, the companies must offer better phones and contract options to steal customers away form competitors. Ah, the free market at work. But what do I know, I use a Mac.

  45. Practical Features: by cryptochrome · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Let it replace all the other electronic devices you have on you. Like:

    1) A LED flashlight. So handy, so simple.
    2) Built-in usb plug letting it operate as a combination modem and flash drive. Of the generic variety, so you don't need to install special software to use it as such.
    3) AM/FM/Weather radio. Keep up with news and sports.
    4) Civilian band walkie talkie. Generic analog or smarter digital, with encryption. If it can use bluetooth, it is already capable of using the right frequencies.

    Please add your own ideas...

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

  46. Odd by NeGz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've noticed it a few times before, and others may have pointed it out. But anyhow...

    I can easily see someone like my dad subscribing to the "it's just a phone, all it should do is let me send and recieve calls" opinion, which is, of course a perfectly valid one.

    But geeks? Slashdot Geeks!? I mean, features like dog translators are obviously useless crap, but don't geeks (like myself) normally like their tech things to get bigger (smaller), better and faster? Even I use an old Ericsson T39m (calls, address book, bluetooth/IrDA, WAP, email, SMS) and I don't feel the need to upgrade.

    Perhaps there's some kind of inbuilt geek mechanism that doesn't trigger for mobile phones but does for PDAs, notebooks, MP3 players, PVRs, etc. :) (Or perhaps it's because the later are often targeted at us, whilst the prior is not.)

  47. Nokia 7700? by Dakkus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well.. The Nokia 7700 will be introduced withing a month or two. It'll include a TV receiver, a camera, and mp3 player. To name a few things. The best thing is it's running Symbian, which is already a big operating system for cell phones. As it's widely used, you also get many programs for it. You can also code your own programs for it at least with C++, Java and Python. So, the Japanese aren't actually that much far away from us.