Slashdot Mirror


Amateur Rocket Reaches Space

PatMouser writes "An amateur rocket carrying a ham radio avionics package reached the edge of space May 17. Launched from Nevada's Black Rock Desert, the 21-foot Civilian Space Xploration Team (CSXT) GoFast rocket quickly attained the 100 km altitude to make Amateur Radio and amateur rocketry history. Two earlier CSXT attempts to reach space--the last almost two years ago--were unsuccessful. A jubilant Avionics Team Leader Eric Knight, KB1EHE, called the successful launch 'a phenomenal experience.' The full ARRL article can be read here. There's nothing on CSXT's site yet..." (See this pre-launch story for more details.)

217 comments

  1. First step.... by kidgenius · · Score: 5, Funny

    Alright....next step is to add a couple extra pounds of propellant, and 3 guys. j/k

    1. Re:First step.... by funk_phenomenon · · Score: 2, Funny

      And some lawnchairs and a few balloons.

      --

      Even the samurai
      have teddy bears,
      and even the teddy bears
      get drunk

    2. Re:First step.... by wackysootroom · · Score: 1

      Alright....next step is to add a couple extra pounds of propellant, and 3 guys

      You must be talking about Darl, Chris, and Bill, right?

    3. Re:First step.... by simcop2387 · · Score: 1

      no that'd be a couple hundred pounds of propellent. ... what you wanted them to no go into a permanent geosynchronous orbit? Whats wrong with you?

  2. Define Space by NETHED · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does this mean it is in orbit, or just went into space and fell back down.

    I was part of a Super-Loki rocket team in WI a few years back that went sub-orbital. (I was a camera systems specialist=ohhh, pretty pictures, look!!) It was an Amatur rocket, so does that count?

    --
    --sig fault--
    1. Re:Define Space by idommp · · Score: 4, Informative
      My car goes sub-oribital every day. Anything under 17.5k mph is suborbital. The question is: How high up did your rocket get. And did you have some way to measure the altitude?

      These guys had multiple GPS units broadcasting back the position of their payload.

    2. Re:Define Space by mla_anderson · · Score: 2, Informative

      Knight said several West Coast hams who learned about the rocket launch from ARRL news accounts showed up to assist in locating the vehicle, which was estimated to have returned to Earth some 26 to 30 miles downrange from the launch site. It came down.

      --
      Sig is on vacation
    3. Re:Define Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

      well if this rocket could carry 3 people and be reused, it would win the xprize.. it made it about 63 miles.. which according to nasa and xprize, it's space.. if it orbited or just came back i dont know, but it still reached space as the thread title states

    4. Re:Define Space by NETHED · · Score: 1

      Super Loki This is a link to the rocket site. If I remember correctly, we got upto 105,000ft according to the radar tracking (or was it GPS...) I don't know, been a while.

      And on a side note, how well does GPS work at that alt?

      --
      --sig fault--
    5. Re:Define Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://earthlab.meteor.wisc.edu/~rockets/wrfs97in. htm

      Teaches me to preview....

    6. Re:Define Space by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 5, Informative

      According to The Previous Slashdot story:

      "The suborbital vehicle will attain an altitude of 100 km or 62 statute miles--high enough to be considered 'space'--linger there for a couple of minutes then arc back to Earth some 26 miles down range."

      So, they didn't actually launch an Amateur Satellite into orbit (darn!).

      But it looks like these guys are trying just that.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    7. Re:Define Space by deglr6328 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just straight up and down. In other words they made a sounding rocket. huzzah. welcome to the 1940's.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    8. Re:Define Space by taniwha · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Amsat have been putting up payloads for 30 odd years - they piggyback as ballast on other people's launches.

      There a bunch of other amateur satellite projects - for a start check out:
      http://cubesat.calpoly.edu/
      http://ssdl.stanford.edu/
      http://www.arliss.org/

    9. Re:Define Space by Unca'+Scrooge · · Score: 4, Funny

      So, they didn't actually launch an Amateur Satellite into orbit (darn!).

      To be precise, they did place their satellite into an orbit, just a highly eccentric one with a path that happens to intersect the Earth.

      Still a fantastic achievement, in any event...

    10. Re:Define Space by bobhagopian · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the U.S., "space" is anything above 80km (about 50 mi). Evidently the equivalent marker is at 100km in Europe. Of course, none of this matters, since there is no sharp boundary.

    11. Re:Define Space by nukey56 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Where did that 19 mile mark come from? Right there in the summary it clearly says that
      the 21-foot Civilian Space Xploration Team (CSXT) GoFast rocket quickly attained the 100 km altitude
      (you also said that later on...)

    12. Re:Define Space by thogard · · Score: 3, Informative

      The air density above the earht isn't consistant. For example the air pressure at 60,000 ft at the equator is about the same as at 20,000 ft at the poles.

    13. Re:Define Space by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 1

      105,000ft? People have been higher than that in balloons (US Naval officers Malcolm Ross and Vic Parther reached 113,740 ft).

    14. Re:Define Space by fuzzybunny · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, but show me the part about the balloon that got there within 2 minutes.

      *pop* "AAAIEEEEEeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee" *splat*

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    15. Re:Define Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the U.S., "space" is anything above 80km (about 50 mi). [...] Of course, none of this matters, since there is no sharp boundary.

      I believe Homeland Security are working on that.

    16. Re:Define Space by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 2, Funny

      >To be precise, they did place their satellite into an orbit, just a highly eccentric one with a path that happens to intersect the Earth.

      The orbital calculations probably just simplified the Earth's mass and gravity to a point source. It makes the math lots easier. Unfortunately, Planet Bloat (tm MS) spoiled an otherwise excellent orbital launch.
      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    17. Re:Define Space by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      To be precise, they did place their satellite into an orbit, just a highly eccentric one with a path that happens to intersect the Earth.

      The same thing happens everytime I throw a baseball, though it certainly doesn't reach the same altitude.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    18. Re:Define Space by dead_penguin · · Score: 2, Informative

      And on a side note, how well does GPS work at that alt?

      To prevent people from cheaply building their own missile guidance systems, commercial GPS receivers are limited to a maximum altitude of 60,000 feet and a maximum speed of 1000mph. Link here.

      These are legal restrictions though, not technical ones. I have no idea what the "real" limits are.

      --

      It's only software!
    19. Re:Define Space by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      I suspect that, with a good enough antenna and an approprate algorithm, you can use GPS anywhere you can see four of the satellites from -- GPS on the moon, anyone?

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    20. Re:Define Space by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      You can get a waiver for those limits. At least you could. I bet it costs a pretty penny though. What about GNU Radio? could it break those limitations?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  3. Go Minnesota! by ODD97 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Apparently one of the main people working on the craft is from Minnesota, a talk radio station was interviewing him tonight. They have located the beacon on the craft, and are at the moment trying to get to it, but the weather is bad, and it's in a desert location. It's kind of a Wright brothers moment.

    --
    The emperor is naked.
    1. Re:Go Minnesota! by D'Sphitz · · Score: 1

      w00t!

  4. When does your crazy project stop being amateur? by aardwolf204 · · Score: 5, Interesting


    I dont get it. I mean, I understand the concept of "Amateur Radio", and "Amateur Rocketry" right, but theres got to be a point when your mad scientest project gets out of the garage and into, say, space, and all of the sudden like pair of twin torpedos slaming into the death star your Amateur project gets a slashdotting and its pro.

    Hell, I can go pro by buying an $8,000 digital SLR camera, why is it that shooting a home brew satelite into space is amateur? (j/k)

    Its not like some homies duct taped an 8-track to an upside down trash can and stuck some dinomite under it, right? Please, for the love of god, come up with a better classification than this!#!

    Hell, even in soviet russia amateur rockets launch you.
    Come on, you know you were thinking it too

    --
    Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
  5. Re:I hope they have insurance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Nah, it landed on top. It didn't rearend it.

  6. I take it the rocket by tbjw · · Score: 5, Funny

    wants to retain its amateur status so it can compete in the olympics.

    I'm sure it can make its costs back in sponsorship though.

    1. Re:I take it the rocket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear that Nike hired them to launch a new advertising campaign.

    2. Re:I take it the rocket by Chemisor · · Score: 1

      Let me guess: it want the gold medal in the high jump category?

  7. So ... by NightWulf · · Score: 4, Funny

    How long before someone creates the first amateur ICBM. Then moves on to become the world's first amateur nuclear power?

    1. Re:So ... by JudgeFurious · · Score: 5, Funny

      World's first amateur nuclear power? Isn't that taken what with France and all?

      "Well now, that was off said. He'll be cryin himself to sleep tonight on his HUGE pillow"

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    2. Re:So ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this kid got halfway there...

    3. Re:So ... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      How about the first amateur spy satellite, or the first communication satellite? Something tells me that if Nasa isn't too concerned with tracking these things, the Department of Defense (DoD) WILL BE!!!

      Duck and cover boys! Something tells me the men and black might be giving these amateurs a lecture soon. Also, does this fuel more reasons to startup the "Starwars" project that was going on in the 80s under Regan?

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:So ... by term8or · · Score: 1

      Actually, since none of the governments that currently possess nuclear ICBM's make 50% of their income from them it's really a question of when the first professional nuclear power comes on line. And the answer is probably quite soon: http://www.greenpeace.org.au/media/nukes_details.p hp?site_id=11&news_id=1173

      --



      "As a writer / novelist you might want to spellcheck your sig. :) " - AC
    5. Re:So ... by phoxix · · Score: 1

      World's first amateur nuclear power? Isn't that taken what with France and all?

      I know this is a joke, but about 80% of France's power comes from nucler power plants. Additionally their design on nuclear power plants rivals the American nuclear designs in terms of stability. (And anything beats the crappy Russian RBMK nuclear reactor design)

  8. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  9. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by skyman8081 · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's professional when you get paid to do it.

    --
    Two Roommates and a Boyfriend, updates Monday, Wednesday, and Friday
  10. Re:Apathy again! by Grant_Watson · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Eh, might someone wake me up when they actually reach space?"

    It's kind of arbitrary. 100km or 60mi is the cut-off, so if they made it past that -- which they apparently did -- they "reached space."

  11. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by bersl2 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Last time I checked, "amateur" meant that you are not getting paid for doing something.

    This is not AFAIK a money-making venture. Therefore, these people are amateurs.

  12. Recovery of the rocket by Woogiemonger · · Score: 5, Funny

    I really hope that when they reach the landing site they don't find any petunias or sperm whales.

    1. Re:Recovery of the rocket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


      I really hope that when they reach the landing site they don't find any petunias or sperm whales.


      Maybe it'll land in a certain nightclub, in a certain plural zone.

    2. Re:Recovery of the rocket by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      Oh no, not again.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    3. Re:Recovery of the rocket by Nept · · Score: 1

      What is this big flat thing coming toward me? ground ... I think I'll call it ground. I wonder if it will like me ...

      --
      "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
  13. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by reezle · · Score: 0, Redundant

    How about defining it by whether people are getting paid for their participation, or are doing it as a hobby...

    Amateur Athelete used to mean 'not paid'. Seems a logical definition to use here. (yes, they changed the rules for atheletes, but who ever said they were logical?)

  14. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by sploo22 · · Score: 2, Informative

    amateur. n. "A person who engages in an art, science, study, or athletic activity as a pastime rather than as a profession."

    profession. n. "An occupation or career."

    (American Heritage Dictionary)

    --
    Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
  15. K7R by 2br02b · · Score: 4, Funny
    An HF special event station, K7R (for "rocket") didn't get much airtime, Knight said, "because we've been really focused on the mission."

    Hmmm... the ham dialect of l33t Speak?
    1. Re:K7R by forkazoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      While both 1337 spe4k and ham are dialects of hackish, they are not directly decended from each other. l33t is, if anything, decended from ham, as ham predates l33t. Most hackish linguists feel that the gamerz weren't especially aware of ham when l33t was developed. The similarities arise from the similar circumstances of origion of the two dialects. Both are designed to be extremely terse, due to limited available "bandwidth." In the case of l33t, any time spent of the numpad detracts from game play, while with ham, you need to key out each letter with multiple strokes.

    2. Re:K7R by blincoln · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The similarities arise from the similar circumstances of origion of the two dialects. Both are designed to be extremely terse, due to limited available "bandwidth." In the case of l33t, any time spent of the numpad detracts from game play, while with ham, you need to key out each letter with multiple strokes.

      What?

      I've been watching "1337" evolve and devolve for over a decade. It may *now* involve a lot of numeric keypad usage, but I can't believe it started as a way to be efficient.

      Ten or twelve years ago there was hardly any number usage at all, just the dorky "i aM a HaXoR, aLL VoWeLZ R LoWeRCaSe" capitalization. I would see variations like using zeroes for o, fours for a, ones for l, threes for e, and sevens for t, but writing it "3Y3 4M 4 H4X0R, 4LL V0W3LZ R NuMB3RZ" actually takes more effort than spelling it normally.

      I see it as being a deliberate obfuscation, like slang or the illegible writing style that taggers use.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    3. Re:K7R by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 1

      Ha ha. Yeah, I know that was meant to be fuhny, but here in the You Ess Ay you can apply to the FCC to get what's called a "1x1" call sign for special event stations (one letter before the number, one letter after). The call sign is issued for a finite amount of time and can be used by a different club/orgainzation in the future.

      --
      Someone you trust is one of us.
    4. Re:K7R by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      Bull. The letters and misspellings were substituted to get around automated profanity filters on BBSes. So you could say thinks like fuxor and a55h0le which would otherwise be disallowed.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    5. Re:K7R by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      I clearly overstated the case. I suppose, leet Haxor probably evolved most directly from phreak, with its deliberate mis-spellings. The leet/ham connection was intended more as a joke than anything else. I'm a metallic foils haberdasherer by training, not a real linguist.

      411 y0ur 8453 4r3 8310|\|g 70 u5!

  16. Re:Apathy again! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Informative

    Arguably, making orbit or Earth escape trajectory is a much less arbitrary definition than simply going up to where the atmosphere is really thin. After all, "space" is a nebulous concept. We're always in space. It just so happens that this little planet has air for us to breath. Achieving orbit means that the craft is actually a craft capable of flight outside the influence of our gravity. (sort of)

  17. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by aardwolf204 · · Score: 4, Funny


    I'm usually not one to reply to my own post but I've seen here way too many posts that basicly say "It is amateur because you are not being paid", while this rule does not explain this anomaly.

    If I were to spend 10 years learning and praticing ballroom dancing would I not become a professional ballroom dancer?

    --
    Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
  18. yow by nappingcracker · · Score: 0

    a far cry from the DD rockets i used to get mischievous with when i was a kid...mmmmm...double deee...

    --
    |plastic....or gasoline?|
    1. Re:yow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure you're not dreaming of cup sizes there, buddy? ;)

    2. Re:yow by nappingcracker · · Score: 2, Funny

      no no no, i got a 32oz big gulp coffee cup, but as we all learned again a few days ago, DD == E, sheesh . actually im not even sure of estes sells those missiles any more. friggin things were outta sight. dynomite!

      --
      |plastic....or gasoline?|
  19. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by yo303 · · Score: 1
    The GoFast vehicle--named for one of the project's commercial sponsors...

    Commercial != amateur.

    yo.

  20. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by h4v0k · · Score: 3, Interesting


    Classifications other than amateur:

    When you can do it reliably, it becomes "private space travel".

    When you do it for money, it becomes "commercial space travel".

  21. Any one told Homeland Security about this? by Rank_Tyro · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anyone that could launch a radio into space could launch a re-entry vehicle full of bio-engineered, which could upset the entire eco-system. Those damn terrorists would love to get in on something like that. Imagine........just one rocket full of bio-engineered corn over the corn belt could bring the entire country to it's knees as every farmer in middle america got sued for copyright infringement by the patent holders. :-)

    --
    Today's show is brought to you by the number 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0: 25
    1. Re:Any one told Homeland Security about this? by kidgenius · · Score: 1
      Nah....the vegan-organic-hippies would just have to find something else to eat besides veggies

      hmmm.....maybe they'll turn to animals on steriods!

    2. Re:Any one told Homeland Security about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Well another bioterrorist option would be to insert pig genes into popular breeds of kosher/halal[1] animals (chicken, cattle, sheep). Leave for a few generations (a few years) and then announce it.

      Something similar but already done though not as effective IMO.

      [1] halal = muslim equivalent of kosher.

    3. Re:Any one told Homeland Security about this? by confused+one · · Score: 1

      I know you're being funny; but, just to be clear... You have to have permission from the FAA to launch a rocket like this. Soooooo.... the department of Homeland Security knew about it and approved the launch.

    4. Re:Any one told Homeland Security about this? by khallow · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah yes. I too was worried about the insidious destruction of the corn belt economy till I realized that the terrorists would have to get permission from the FAA. Now I can sleep again.

    5. Re:Any one told Homeland Security about this? by jafac · · Score: 1

      for that matter:

      1. Invent and patent bioengineered corn.
      2. Eat said corn, take a standard airline flight over Iowa.
      3. Use the air-lav. - FLUSH.
      4. Sue every farmer in Iowa for copyright infringement.
      5. PROFIT.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  22. YOU FAIL IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you didn't even get first!

  23. Just damn cool by chaffed · · Score: 0

    I get the worm and fuzzies when I hear about everyday people doing what NASA does. Mmmmmm... warm and fuzzies

    --
    What could possibly go wrong?
    1. Re:Just damn cool by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 2, Funny

      I get the worm and fuzzies

      My wife gets a worm and fuzzies when I do to her what NASA does--put a load into space.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    2. Re:Just damn cool by chaffed · · Score: 0

      So I get modded down as overated! What dickless SOB. It's one of those people who can't let things be as they are. I'm not asking to modded up either. Hell I'm at nill so I guess there's no way but down.

      --
      What could possibly go wrong?
  24. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by Restil · · Score: 1

    Only if you get paid to do it. :)

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
  25. Laws governing space launches? by nighty5 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Im sure airlines have laws on what can go into domestic aircraft space.

    It kind of scares me that there is no mention of laws relating what, how, who can launch into space.

    Space junk falling back onto earth has to be a concern....

    1. Re:Laws governing space launches? by taniwha · · Score: 5, Informative
      I fly at Blackrock a lot (where this flew). One of the reasons we choose this spot is that it's easy to get an FAA waiver (ie permission to use the airspace) - it's south of the air traffic from Portland and north of the traffic from SF.

      We do it 3-4 times a year have been for 15 years or so. We arrange ahead of time and then we call into ATC before we light up the waiver and again when we're done. We regularly get waivers to 100k ft ASL (20 miles up) well above the 30k ft commercial planes fly at. Though we seldom fly that high.

      Getting a waiver above 100k ft is much much harder - the normal FAA ATC doesn't have juristiction above there - you have to apply to a different part of the govt. who worry about things like stuff landing on other countries etc etc

      Want to come to a launch? - you're welcome - check out www.aeropac.org

    2. Re:Laws governing space launches? by acceber · · Score: 5, Interesting
      It kind of scares me that there is no mention of laws relating what, how, who can launch into space.

      Scaled Composites, which is a company founded to develop and design experimental aircraft obtained the world's first license for a sub-orbital manned rocket flight in early April, for their Ansari X Prize entry.

      I don't know about laws relating to private rockets but I'm sure there are regulations in place and the team behind GoFast have been responsible in abiding by what rules exist, especially as its made amateur rocketry history and is a controversial area in law right now.

      What with terrorism and 9/11 the enforcing of the law in this area would probably become more strict, even if they can potentially be used as weapons and have the ability to shoot down aircraft (despite the fact that this isn't very likely as guidance systems are exceedingly difficult to design).

    3. Re:Laws governing space launches? by khallow · · Score: 3, Interesting
      It kind of scares me that there is no mention of laws relating what, how, who can launch into space.

      So what would be your answers to these questions?

      1. What shouldn't go into space?

      2. How should things go into space?

      3. Who can go into space?

      I ask these questions because I wonder what you're really worried about. After all, there's nothing really dangerous getting lauched into space at the moment. So why do we need laws now? My answers to the above questions.

      1) We already have regulations for dealing with terrorist attacks and other means of deliberately inflicting harm. Further, the history of using rockets for terrorist attacks is pretty ineffective. Military grade rockets are relatively easy to come by. The sole exception to this rule appears to be Hamas in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. They seem relatively insistent on building the Qassem rocket. Note that these terrorist activities are already illegal.

      The US already requires lauchers to purchase insurance against third party harm seems to fix the other problems with what can be launched from Earth. If it's too dangerous, then the launcher won't be able to afford the insurance.

      2) We don't need to regulate "how" things get into space. Physical law does a more than adequate job here.

      3) I don't get why we need to regulate who gets into space.

    4. Re:Laws governing space launches? by MurphyZero · · Score: 1

      True FAA ATC may no longers apply, but isn't it still the FAA(?).

      The FAA space launch office is getting more involved with commercial space launch now as well. They are also getting aware of DOD and civil (NASA, NOAA, etc.) launches as well so that what applies to the government launches won't bite them in the ass with respect to commercial launch licensing.

      --
      Our founding fathers removed the guys in charge. Be American. Vote incumbents out.
    5. Re:Laws governing space launches? by MurphyZero · · Score: 1

      There are laws--international laws. One link: Space Laws and Treaties do a google search for others. So no matter where a vehicle is launched, an entire nation is liable. Though to date, most launch accidents have killed citizens of the launching nation only. Shuttle Columbia was I believe the first time this was not true, but the Israeli was a willing passenger who knew the risks.

      Within the US, commercial launchers require licensing from the FAA. To launch from a government range, the launcher must also follow all sorts of government oversight and requirements...which is why they launch overseas when they can.

      Insurance is expensive. The insurance is required because of the dangers at liftoff through orbit insertion. Not only that, but there are also the end of lifetime dangers of the satellite/rocket.

      Russia was sweating bullets when Mir came back in. Fortunately they had a good plan, and the thrusters functioned well enough (a definite question mark) to get it on the trajectory they wanted. While small satellites will likely burn up on the way in, parts of MIR survived to impact.

      --
      Our founding fathers removed the guys in charge. Be American. Vote incumbents out.
  26. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by zik · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No matter how many years you spent doing ballroom dancing you'd never become a professional until you got paid. And even if you were terrible at it but got paid you'd still be a professional.

    But let's say you're a good dancer who isn't paid. People might say you were "very professional" in your attitude or presentation but in that case they're using an analogy - saying you're as good as a professional, not saying you're actually a professional.

    I think a lot of people are confused about this word. We use the term "amateurish" to talk about things which are crappy and I really think this helps to add to the confusion. For instance I write free software which by definition is an "amateur" activity since I don't get paid for it but I'd really like to think it's not "amateurish" and crappy!

    There are some other distinctions used these days too. I play in a band which you'd definitely describe as "amateur". But maybe someday we'll get booked at a venue and become "semi-pro", meaning we get paid to play - but not enough to give up our day jobs. Not quite "professional" but not "amateur" either.

  27. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 3, Funny
    Please, for the love of god, come up with a better classification than this!

    The difference is simple, and you see examples of it everywhere: The basic variation of anything is "amateur".

    Now if you take that, add a couple of small features targeted at business users, and then jack up the price by 70%, it becomes "professional".

  28. Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Rocket Carrying Ham Radio Payload Reaches Space!

    NEWINGTON, CT, May 17, 2004--An amateur rocket carrying a ham radio avionics package reached the edge of space May 17. Launched from Nevada's Black Rock Desert, the 21-foot Civilian Space Xploration Team (CSXT) GoFast rocket quickly attained the 100 km altitude to make Amateur Radio and amateur rocketry history. Two earlier CSXT attempts to reach space--the last almost two years ago--were unsuccessful. A jubilant Avionics Team Leader Eric Knight, KB1EHE, called the successful launch "a phenomenal experience."

    "It just roared off the pad and flew into space," said Knight, who lives in Unionville, Connecticut. "Everything went like clockwork this morning, and it was an awesome experience. We're all kind of on an adrenaline high right now."

    The GoFast vehicle--named for one of the project's commercial sponsors--lifted off from the desert floor at approximately 11:20 AM PDT. The CSXT team, plus observers from the Federal Aviation Administration, were up and at the launch site several hours beforehand, however, and Knight said the rocket crew--which includes several radio amateurs--did a "dress rehearsal" prior to the actual countdown and launch.

    Knight said several West Coast hams who learned about the rocket launch from ARRL news accounts showed up to assist in locating the vehicle, which was estimated to have returned to Earth some 26 to 30 miles downrange from the launch site. Knight said Monday evening that the rocket had not yet been recovered, but the ham radio telemetry package was continuing to transmit.

    "We have a telemetry beacon telling us where it is--that it's alive and waiting to be found," Knight said. The rocket transmitted telemetry on the 33-cm amateur band and color Amateur TV pictures on 2.4 GHz. An HF special event station, K7R (for "rocket") didn't get much airtime, Knight said, "because we've been really focused on the mission."

    "Everything came together very well," Knight said. His avionics crew includes eight Amateur Radio licensees, most of whom also were involved in the 2002 launch attempt. Former Hollywood stunt man--Ky Michaelson of Minnesota, directs the 18-person CSXT team.

  29. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by bersl2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    !bersl2.RTFA

    Though it has been argued (unsuccessfully) that a sponsorship is not necessarily a waiver of amateur status (a bit of a stretch, stretched further by my application of it to this situation). So YMMV: Jeremy Bloom v. NCAA (Warning: DOC file...).

    And interestingly, as I preview, the banner ad is for Nike.

  30. Re:Apathy again! by sr180 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Achieving orbit means that the craft is actually a craft capable of flight outside the influence of our gravity. (sort of)


    Thats not even close to being correct. While in orbit, the craft is completely under the influence of our gravity. Its just that its centrifugal force is equal to gravity and hence keeping it in orbit.

    --
    In Soviet Russia the insensitive clod is YOU!
  31. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We use the term "amateurish" to talk about things which are crappy

    Well, if your refering to porn I agree with you there.

  32. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

    NASA doesn't get paid... they get funded. (you could argue that someone funded this launch too...)

    --

    "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

  33. Re:Apathy again! by taniwha · · Score: 3, Insightful

    more importantly it also means you probably have some sort of guidance system (other than fins). It's pretty easy to go straight up - but to get into orbit you basicly have to go straight up (to get out of the atmosphere as fast as possible) and then turn 90 degrees sideways and go fast enough that you fall back at the same rate the earth is falling away from you. That's hard - without air fins don't work - you need some sort of reaction control or thrust vectoring as well as some inertial system so you know where you are and where you are going

  34. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by hutkey · · Score: 1

    are the sponserers amatuers too ;)

  35. Out of curiousity by dtio · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In theory, could a private individual put a satelite in orbit?

    Am I free to build, launch and use my own space gadgets?

    What does international law say about this?

    1. Re:Out of curiousity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Slim chance-- The problem is you have to equip your rocket with a guidence system. However most countries will not let you build rockets w/ guidence systems under the reasoning that these rockets could be turned into guided bombs. This said, certain educational/non profit orgs can file (at least in the US) for the privilidge to build guided rockets.

    2. Re:Out of curiousity by G-funk · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you launch them from a ship in international waters, sure. Otherwise you've got to deal with the government of whatever country from which you launch and their version of the FAA.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    3. Re:Out of curiousity by WegianWarrior · · Score: 3, Insightful

      AFAIK, there is no international treatys which restrics who that can fire lumps of metal into orbit - but there is a treaty describing what's not allowed. Only caveat there is that it's a "Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States
      in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies", meaning it may or may not apply to you as a private person.


      The main trouble I see is that you need to travel thru someones airspace to get there - and to fly thru controlled airspace you need permission from the relevant autorites in your country. As others have noted in reference to the article, in the US you need a waver from the FAA. In other nations you need to apply to the local aviation autority to launch somethign that passes thru the regulated airspace, providing you can get permission at all.


      International law is not whats stopping you - it's the local laws that are the nail in your plan.

      --
      Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
    4. Re:Out of curiousity by cyclone96 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sure, provided that you obtain the requisite license from the Department of Transportation if launching from US territory (or if you are an American operating in international territory). You can find some of the US code that governs this here.

      Essentially you have to prove you won't kill anyone on the ground, damage property, or act in a manner that is detrimental to national security or foreign policy interests to get a license.

      Under international law, the United States government is ultimately responsible for damage from vehicles launched from US territory (even non-government launches by private individuals or companies), and it looks like it will pay out up to $1.5 billion (it's in section 70113 of the above link).

      --
      Worst...sig...ever!
    5. Re:Out of curiousity by Ckwop · · Score: 1

      Not totally true.. If you shot downwards from a few miles off the artic right through the centre of the Alantic Ocean you could achieve orbit before crossing another country.

      Simon.

    6. Re:Out of curiousity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Depending on the country the permission to actually fly the thing may be the least of your worries.
      The environmental impact analysis of the rocket engines and fuel and the explosives regulations are far more likely to be restrictions.

      For example in the Netherlands rockets may only be fired by the military.
      Amateur rocketeers have to report to the military where arrangements are made for the rocket to be launched from a shooting range (normally used for artillery practice).
      The military will inspect the vehicle for proper installation of the engine and fuel and perform the actual launch.

    7. Re:Out of curiousity by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

      Just a matter of money. Pick the right country with cheaply bribe-able officials. Africa sounds good, the added advantage of some parts is their position suitably close to the equator.

    8. Re:Out of curiousity by Teancum · · Score: 3, Informative

      Even then, you would probabally need to get permission from the nation who is the official registrar of that ship you are floating in. Almost all ships in the ocean, and all commercial vessels, are registered to a specific country, mainly to deal with maritime law and other subtle legal issues such as what country a child belongs to when they are born aboard ship, if a crime happens what country has juristiction, and should that ship be allowed to trade in a given port or not.

      Ships registered to the U.S.A. are given protection of the U.S. Navy and Coast Guard, and an attack against an American flag ship is considered an act of war against the U.S.A., with all of the consequences that follow from that.

      There are nations that do a "flag of convience" like Liberia, who only charge a modest licensing fee and do practically no inspections. (An inspection consisiting of "Yeah, the ship is there" is probabally a little bit too much for Liberia) Of course, the Liberian Navy isn't exactly going to go out of their way to help you out either.

      The point here is that if you launch from a ship, even in international waters, you need to get permission from the government who you have the ship registered to. That is why I've suggested in the past that the Liberian Space Agency might end up with the largest fleet of space going craft, but even so you have to deal with at least some sort of government.

      Who knows, maybe this can be a source of revenue for Nauru to suppliment their income from domain sales.

    9. Re:Out of curiousity by BCW2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Passing through a countries air space is not a problem. It's a matter of altitude, thats why NASA shoots over the Atlantic. By the time a vehicle crosses land, it's too high to do anything about.

      You can claim anything, what you can defend or enforce is what is paid attention too.

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
    10. Re:Out of curiousity by confused+one · · Score: 2, Informative
      wrong wrong and sooooo wrong. You can build it. You must get clearance from the FAA to fly it. They must approve the design and launch facility as safe. If you're going to put something into orbit, there are other government orgs. you must also get approval from.

      If you can get all the paperwork approved, then, yes, you (a private individual) could launch a rocket.

    11. Re:Out of curiousity by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      You know Africa is not a country, right?

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    12. Re:Out of curiousity by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1
      You know Africa is not a country, right?

      Yes, that's correct, it is a continent. A continent full of various countries, many of them suitably small, with officials suitably for sale and dollar/euro having nicely high value adjusted to cost-of-living and position suitably equatorial.

    13. Re:Out of curiousity by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Just make sure you tell the US, the Soviets, the Chinese, etc. that you are launching something into orbit. They've all got satellites watching for rocket launches. You wouldn't want people thinking that WW3 was going to start without them.

    14. Re:Out of curiousity by MurphyZero · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure that you are right that the ship/platform country of registry would be considered the country of launch in the absence of a definitive country. (Sea Launch is a consortium of a Norway? ship, a Russian? rocket and Boeing.--I wonder what country would be at fault if one of those landed in Brazil.)

      Due to the international law and treaties, Liberia would probably not agree to allow the licenses. Unless you got enough insurance, at which point you might as well launch from your home country.

      --
      Our founding fathers removed the guys in charge. Be American. Vote incumbents out.
  36. Re:excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would you care to tell us if you are someone that this happened to, or just someone that wanted it to happen?

  37. UFO by hutkey · · Score: 2, Funny

    hey!
    did anybody "claimed", they definitely saw an UFO,
    in that area?

  38. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by natmsincome.com · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Amateur doesn't mean you don't get paid to do it. It means you can't survive JUST doing it.

    1. Amateur radio may be sponcered but they guy/girl still has a day job.
    2. Amateur ballroom dancing may get paid to dance but can't survive just painting.
    3. Amateur painters can sell their work but if it doesn't bring in enough to live it's still just a hobbie.

    As you can see Amateur doesn't mean you don't get paid it just means you don't get paid ENOUGH to just do X without having another job.

    So answering the question when does it stop being amateur? When it pays enough money so they don't have to do anything else.

  39. Re:MOD PARENT +5 FUNNY ROFLOLOLOL!!!!111 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Err dude, if your parents had encouraged you to read as a child then perhaps you would have understood the reference.

    As it is, you look like an idiot.

  40. Re:MOD PARENT +5 FUNNY ROFLOLOLOL!!!!111 by momerath2003 · · Score: 1

    You should take the introductory course Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Allusions 101.

    --
    I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
  41. Re:You Yanks... by Darthmalt · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Oops, needed French help...

    Obviously you have no shortcomings at all

  42. Re:Apathy again! by rebelcool · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Achieving orbit means that the craft is actually a craft capable of flight outside the influence of our gravity.

    No it just means the craft has enough angular velocity tangental to the earth that it essentially outruns the earth's ballistic gravitational pull. Gravity still definiately has an effect though as it pulls the craft around the earth.

    While achieving orbital velocity is an order of magnitude more difficult than reaching space and coming back down ballistically, reaching escape velocity to break orbit is even harder. Hence the massive 'moon rocket' Saturn V's that propelled the moon craft to over 24,000 mph (orbital velocity is closer to 17,000). The moon craft actually re-entered earth's atmosphere at over 30,000 mph!

    --

    -

  43. Re:Apathy again! by dj245 · · Score: 1

    Achieving orbit means that the craft is actually a craft capable of flight outside the influence of our gravity. (sort of)Achieving orbit means that your vehichle is going so fast horizontally that the horizon is always falling out from under it. It is in constant free fall. If there was no atmosphere to induce atmosphereic friction, you could put yourself in orbit at 1 kilometer given enough speed (watch out for mountains!)

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  44. Soon now.... by refactored · · Score: 1
  45. Re:Apathy again! by rebelcool · · Score: 4, Informative

    and then turn 90 degrees sideways and go fast enough that you fall back at the same rate the earth is falling away from you.

    And have a magical engine (and inertial dampening system) that can accelerate to orbital speed fast enough and without tearing the ship apart. Actually orbital craft angle backwards as they accelerate through the atmosphere instead of going straight up.

    --

    -

  46. Re:You Yanks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't you know the Brits are more concerned with wearing funny cloths are calling it sophistication rather than actually doing something worth while?

  47. Re:Apathy again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Thats not even close to being correct. Centrifugal force is a myth. Nothing is pushing the orbiting body outwards. If gravity was to suddenly be turned off, the orbiting body would depart tangentially, not radially as you imply with your "centrifugal" force. A body in orbit is essentially falling continuously to Earth, its horizontal velocity component means that it just keeps missing.

  48. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2. Amateur ballroom dancing may get paid to dance but can't survive just painting.

    I totally agree.

  49. Re:You Yanks... by Rellik66 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Then what about Big Ben?

    --

    Too many zeros, not enough ones

  50. Re:Apathy again! by taniwha · · Score: 1

    yes but not a lot - drag is, well, a real drag - proportional to something evil like the cube of your velocity (I forget exactly) - best trick is to go straight up a slowly as possible 'till you're past the worst of the air then once it starts to get thin kick the accelerator and start the arc over into orbit (yes no one pulls exact snappy 90 degree turns, I was just trying to draw a mental image of the problem you have to solve)

  51. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but i thought everyone liked "amature" sites?

  52. Hmm... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    Ballroom dancing, what a bizzare analogy to use on slashdot.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Careful... It's just a step away from invoking Godwin's law, as we move on to Hitler-like demands for more ballroom.

    2. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My mother was a professional ballroom dancer. You try thinking of something better after 8 hours of removing worms and spyware from a corporate network.

  53. Re:MOD PARENT +5 FUNNY ROFLOLOLOL!!!!111 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would not guarantee the poster to know about it anyway. I started to read several years before starting school, and I still read a lot and I don't get the reference.

  54. Ooooooooh well... by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    Launched from Nevada's Black Rock Desert...

    And then the FAA stepped in and had all the involved parties arrested for questioning and further investigation.

    1. Re:Ooooooooh well... by Xenith · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except they had a valid launch license. :)

      Oh, and the fact that there were FAA personal *on site* monitoring the launch (and giving final approval).

      --

      Never argue with a fool. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
      -Xenith
  55. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by cps42 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, according to The Professional Photographers Association of America the rule is that you've made more than 50% of your annual gross income in one tax year from the activity in question.

    I believe that is a pretty common definition, but it's been a long time since I worked for a member of PPA too. :)

  56. Re:You Yanks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Such as consuming 3 times more of the world?s natural resources than we produce?

  57. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by dbIII · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Hell, I can go pro by buying an $8,000 digital SLR camera
    People go pro with thirty year old pentax 35mm SLRs, so long as they can produce quality pictures and sell them to people. Crap pictures that no-one will buy from an expensive camera just make someone an amateur with a good camera. By definition, you are a professional at whatever your profession is - whatever you make the money at. Many amateur athletes are a lot better at what they do than the professionals - they just don't make any money out of it.
  58. Re:Apathy again! by Q+Who · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's not even close to being correct. Gravitational force is a myth. Nothing is pulling the orbiting body invards. A body in orbit is essentially following the shortest path in space-time curvature.

  59. units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    kilomiles per hour???

  60. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  61. Re:Apathy again! by ari_j · · Score: 3, Informative

    Orbital craft are launched straight up because it is inefficient to try to accelerate tangential to the Earth's surface at low altitudes, due to the air density. They fly more or less straight up to about 30km before really pitching over to start the tangential acceleration into a periodic orbit (as opposed to a once-through orbit like the one you enter when you jump off the ground). Low earth orbit basically begins around 130km, where the atmosphere has thinned out enough that you can remain in orbit. I think the ISS is in the 230km-300km range.

    I'm going to plug a great simulator for you all, and that is Orbiter. You'll learn a ton about astrophysics just by starting the program up and trying to get into orbit your first time, and it won't quit from there.

  62. What ARRL Means by serutan · · Score: 5, Informative

    In case you are wondering, as I was, how you get the acronym "ARRL" out of "National Association for Amateur Radio" but don't want to search the site... one of their pages explains that it stands for American Radio Relay League, founded in 1914.

  63. Amateur? by techgeek10101 · · Score: 0

    Let me get this straight.. Its an amateur rocket with commercial sponsers?

  64. Guys? Look here... /|\ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the funny retort.

  65. Non-myth by Carl+T · · Score: 2, Informative
    Centrifugal force is a myth.

    Centrifugal force is highly real, as you will no doubt feel if you place yourself on a merry-go-round. It's just a matter of having an accelerated frame of reference. If you and your friend were orbiting the earth, and gravity were turned off for him, the centrifugal force would indeed make him depart radially from you, though the Coriolis force would eventually bend his path.

    There's a good explanation at http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/corf.ht ml

    --

    This signature is not in the public domain.
    1. Re:Non-myth by Xrikcus · · Score: 1

      No, what you feel is the force of whatever it is trying to hold you in. There is no force out, it's a force in acting against the direction of travel. When you feel a "centrifugal force" what you feel is the pull in your arms, or the pressure of your seat against you inwards.

    2. Re:Non-myth by sotonboy · · Score: 1

      I think the words you're looking for are centripetal accelleration.

  66. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by cablepokerface · · Score: 0

    For instance I write free software which by definition is an "amateur" activity since I don't get paid for it but I'd really like to think it's not "amateurish" and crappy!

    Actually, I use your software and it's really amateurish and crappy.

    jk ... I never used your software ... :)

  67. No offense, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " I still read a lot and I don't get the reference."

    No offense, but this makes you "culturally illiterate".

  68. Super Loki = Not Amature by 69charger · · Score: 1

    The Super Loki is not an amature rocket. It may have had an amature payload, but was a NASA sounding rocket brought to Sheboygan by the Florida Spaceport Authority.

    1. Re:Super Loki = Not Amature by DoraLives · · Score: 1
      In particular, it's a weather rocket. They shoot 'em all the time out at the Cape. A buddy of mine once laid his hands on a spent one (earlier model, not the SUPER Loki), god only knows how, and gave it to me just for fun. I gave it to my son for Christmas, years ago. Quite the conversation piece. At something over seven feet in length, it looked quite substantial in the living room.

      "You mean that's really a real rocket? Like you mean they fired it out at Cape Canaveral?

      "Yep."

      "Whoa. Totally cool."

      Not sure if my son even still has it anymore or not. Been a while.

      --
      Is it fascism yet?
  69. Muppetry by HerrGoober · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ok I'm just out of bed but I read, "An amateur rocket carrying a ham..." And immediately thought of the Muppets' 'Piiigs Iiiiiin Spaaaaaaaaaaace!' (sorry)

  70. Sort of... by Burning1 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I'm affiraid that you're not entirely correct either... Generally, a person becomes a professional at an activity when they support their lifestyle through an activity. To continue the metaphore:
    • A beginning dancer is an amature.
    • A dancer with 10 years of experience is still an amature.
    • A dance performer with 10 years of experience who works in a coffee shop is a professional waitor or waitress (but still an amature dancer.)
    • A dance performer or instructor who pays their rent through performing or instructing is a professional dancer.
    1. Re:Sort of... by teh*fink · · Score: 2, Informative

      "amature" is not a word. if anything, it would mean "not-mature," which i doubt is the meaning you're going for.

      --
      "I DARE you to make less sense!"
    2. Re:Sort of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [...] affiraid [...] metaphore [...] amature [...] amature [...] waitor [...] amature [...]

      There's so many of these, it must be a troll.

    3. Re:Sort of... by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      I was horribly tired when I wrote that. I'm sure that most people understood me.

  71. And how does that affect the project? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, then... if one were intending to launch a satellite from a ship, would that massively effect the engineering and launch procedures compared to a land-base launch?

    It sure sounds more difficult.

  72. Weren't NASA the first amateurs? by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1

    I always thought most americans since the Challenger mishap judged NASA to be a bunch of amateurs. BJ

  73. Maybe we can get an amateur probe to investigate.. by CptNerd · · Score: 2, Funny

    If they can put a ham radio into space, maybe someone will build an amateur Mars probe. We definely need someone to investigate this new face on Mars.

    Is Opportunty watching Late Night when NASA isn't watching?

    --
    By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
  74. Re:You are a retard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, I can only see one, whats the other ?

  75. Job Growth by Queuetue · · Score: 1

    Is this where job growth is heading? Private space charter and cargo organizations?

    Are there niches here for smart, innovative, hardworking software guys to learn to fill, without having to start over in college?

    It seems software is going the way of the dodo, until the U.S. decides to adapt itself to a global economy. Can the space race get the job market moving again in a way that biotech can't (meaning, not requiring another 6-8 years of college for entry-level positions.)

    Just an out of work hopeful...

    1. Re:Job Growth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with my luck, if I went into this field, it would be outsourced to the little grey guys with the big almond eyes.

  76. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

    Alright, try this one on for size. I'm currently involved in two separate and distinct business pursuits. Both make money, but neither alone pays the bills. In fact, both together don't pay the bills, but let's assume that sometime in the next month or so that status changes and both together pay the bills, but neither alone will pay the bills.

    Oh yeah, one's in the food business and the other is my website (and a few related materials on the website). They're not at all related to one another. (I'm also pursuing freelance writing, in case anyone's interested in hiring a writer for some reason)

    Am I an amateur in both areas? I.e. amateur barbecue man and amateur web publisher? Or am I a--wait for it--professional amateur?

    --
    Like what I said? You might like my music
  77. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by LupeSpywalper · · Score: 1

    So Linux is an amateur os? Except those who make the distribution CD's, like Red Hat ? Debian will forever be an amateur distribution ?

  78. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by ponxx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > No matter how many years you spent doing ballroom dancing you'd never become a
    > professional until you got paid. And even if you were terrible at it but got paid you'd still
    > be a professional.

    That is not entirely true. As a dancer you can simply declare yourself "pro" and start entering competitions for professionals.

    On the other hand in many countries amateurs teach and do demonstrations and get paid for all of these, though usually there are some limits. The distinction between amateur and pro is pretty arbitrary really... In the case of space rockets i think amateur has come to mean "not financed by the government or a business with intent of making a profit", or something similar.

    > We use the term "amateurish" to talk about things which are crappy and I really think this
    > helps to add to the confusion.

    In the sometimes rather bizarre dancing world "amateurish" can actually mean the opposite. In this case it is a distinction to the social dancer. In this case "looking like an amateur" means to look like a serious competitive dancer...

    Anyway, i never thought i'd see a ballroom dancing reference on slashdot!

  79. Re:Apathy again! by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's not even close to being correct. The space-time curvature is a myth. A body in orbit is purely imaginary because the earth is flat, the heavens are anchored in one place and do *not* move. The earth spins like a fan blade, because it is attached to a huge fan, the center of which is the Sun.

    --
    Like what I said? You might like my music
  80. Re:Apathy again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    That's not even close to being correct. The Greek heathen Eratosthenes has shown via ingenious deduction that the Earth is a sphere with a circumference of 250,000 stades.

  81. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by duggy_92127 · · Score: 1
    I've seen here way too many posts that basicly say "It is amateur because you are not being paid", while this rule does not explain this anomaly.

    That explanation is quite simple: they're all using the word wrong in that industry.

    It is amateur until you are being paid to do it.

    Doug

  82. And in other news... by Spudley · · Score: 2, Funny

    A guy who was clinging to the side of the rocket when it was launched has been awarded the X-Prize postumously.

    --
    (Spudley Strikes Again!)
    1. Re:And in other news... by Fractal+Dice · · Score: 1

      A guy who was clinging to the side of the rocket when it was launched has been awarded the X-Prize postumously.

      I would reword that as "he won the X-Prize and a Darwin Award"

  83. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by bsartist · · Score: 1

    Linux itself is neither amateur nor professional - it's software, not a person. Asking whether it's professional is asking whether the software itself gets paid to do its job of running your computer - obviously a nonsensical question.

    If you're speaking of the Linux core developers, many (if not most) of them are indeed professional programmers. That is, they write programs for a living; the fact that they chose to forgo payment for a particular bit of code doesn't change their professional status.

    --
    Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
  84. Mainstream news coverage? by JessLeah · · Score: 1, Funny

    This seems like a big, big event. WHY wasn't it picked up by, oh, the New York Times? The Los Angeles Times? The Times of London? The Washington Post?

    It seems that those presently in power (as a broad class of self-interested individuals, not some shadowy "conspiracy") have a vested interest in keeping the public convinced that only large corporate entities and governments can get any real work done. Perhaps that is why they don't want to broadcast the news that a group of amateur geeks launched a freaking rocket into space? It might start people thinking...

    1. Re:Mainstream news coverage? by at_kernel_99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Its not a conspiracy, its stupidity. The general public doesn't have a friggin clue about how significant this or the Scaled Composites events are. When I was young and ignorant, I thought the round-the-world nonstop flight (i.e. Rutan's Voyager) would be huge news & possibly spark a new interest in aviation. But basically nothing happened. All the hoopla 6 months ago for the Wright 100th anniversary was largely unnoticed by the media. The SpaceShipOne launch last week & this amateur rocket are further examples of how science doesn't sell. If the thing had exploded on the ground & killed half the team, THAT would be news. If SpaceShipOne blows up or crashes into a trailer park, the media will be all over the story. But if they have another ho-hum flight where nothing goes wrong, it ain't news. Apollo XIII, anyone?

  85. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by loconet · · Score: 1

    So the linux kernel is an amateur project?

    --
    [alk]
  86. What Really Happened by Walrus99 · · Score: 5, Funny

    What really happened: The parachute opened early and it was caught by a gust of wind, the rocket ended up in a pine tree down the block and they had to throw sticks and a frisbee at it to get it back. A fin was damaged by the frisbee but can be repaired with some elmers glue. A frog has been captured to be the payload for the next flight.

    1. Re:What Really Happened by NUBlackshirts · · Score: 1

      I see I am not the only one who has felt the wrath of the "Rocket-Eating Tree Gods".

  87. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by p3d0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's simpler than that. You are a professional when the activity in question is your profession.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  88. Amateur radio IN YOUR FACE :P by celerityfm · · Score: 2, Funny

    Every time theres an amateur radio story posted to /., either about morse code or BPL, all these haters show up and start saying ham radio is dead and that its a waste to give all these airwaves to these "hams".

    Where are the haters in this thread? Oh OHHH its because we launched a ROCKET INTO SPACE. Has your hobby done that? HMM!? What about dozens of satellites, space station experiments and space shuttle experiments? What about being a vital part of our nation's emergency communications network?

    I didn't think so. To all the rest, thank you for the resepect. I'm not trying to say ham radio is the best hobby, I'm just saying the haters need to recognize. :P

    --
    ...unfortunately no one can be told what The Mat^H^H^HGoatse is...they must experience it for themselves...
  89. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1
    2. Amateur ballroom dancing may get paid to dance but can't survive just painting.

    If they paint houses for a living, they probably can.

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  90. HOLY CRAP, I'M OLD! by raygundan · · Score: 1

    I did not think I would live to be old enough to see this. Someone young enough to use the word "hater" defending ham radio? This is just two steps away from the supreme court issuing a ruling containing "w00t, d00d."

    In the meantime, I suspect we will soon be seeing X-TREME denture ads, and all da playas in da hizouse will be talking about how their retirement investment portfolios are off da heazy fo' sheazy.

    1. Re:HOLY CRAP, I'M OLD! by celerityfm · · Score: 1

      heheh. How old are you? I'm 24, been licensed since I was 11 :)

      As to the "hater" stuff :P, I only threw in terms like that as a way of sortof sporting a virtual "ironic trucker hat" if you know what I mean. I find jeffk/somethingawful style antics to be completely hilarious and by including them, even on a small level, I'm able to speak to all levels of common internet forum lurker/poster.

      Meanwhile I look forward to supreme court rulings including "w00t, d00d" and the like :)

      --
      ...unfortunately no one can be told what The Mat^H^H^HGoatse is...they must experience it for themselves...
    2. Re:HOLY CRAP, I'M OLD! by raygundan · · Score: 1

      I figured you were joking, so I tacked my joke onto it. I'm 27, but haven't managed to get around to getting licensed-- I keep finding something else to tinker with. I just moved, though, and there's a "crazy antenna junkie" up the street from me with a house that looks like a metal porcupine who I should probably go meet. He's either a ham, or an evil scientist-- and either way I want to hear about his cat mind-control project.

      It just struck me as particularly funny to hear slang like "hater" applied to a hobby that is largely the domain of the generation of Nerds before us. The ones who wore puffy trucker hats non-ironically, and who didn't have an internet to make global communication easy and cheap.

  91. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whats wrong with ballroom dancing?

    Anyway, I think you hit the nail on the head, I should have made it more clear when I said that a ballroom dancer of 10 years can become pro just by going to pro competitions.

    I'm the only ballroom dancing network admin on slashdot thanks to my mom (pro ballroom dance instructor)

  92. Re:Apathy again! by g1zmo · · Score: 1

    Threads like this make me smile in the mornings.

    --
    I have found there are just two ways to go.
    It all comes down to livin' fast or dyin' slow.
    -REK, Jr.
  93. Hit you where it hurts by Gorimek · · Score: 1

    Sure, but you don't need to take down a space ship to stop their launch. It's quite enough to attack the people who sent it up, assuming they're still planetside.

    That has a lot of problems if the launcher is the mightiest military machine of all history, as in NASA's case, but much less if it's a bunch of private individuals.

    As for the altitude, I think there is an internationally agreed altitude where it is OK to travel.

  94. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
    Out of curiosity, how does that handle people who, say, are the benefactors of gigantic trust funds? I can imagine someone who makes $BIGNUM in interest each year, but only $20,000 from working in their chosen full-time profession. I'd still give them the benefit of the doubt and call them a professional photographer, even if they don't meat the "50%" criteria.

    Note that this is a hypothetical question and does not apply to me, so don't bother asking for a loan. ;-)

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  95. Re:Apathy again! by hesiod · · Score: 1

    > Threads like this make me smile in the mornings.

    But in the afternoon, I just shake my head -- the morning coffee effect is long gone.

  96. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by KnightStalker · · Score: 1

    Why don't you ask IBM?

    --
    * And remember, it's spelled N-e-t-s-c-a-p-e, but it's pronounced "Mozilla."
  97. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by hesiod · · Score: 1

    > So the linux kernel is an amateur project?

    The kernel itself, yes, of course it is. Amateur project != bad quality, however, so many professionals use the "Amateur kernel" in professional projects, due to its high quality.

  98. My hobby is Geocaching. by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    We've already had tons of satellites up there.

    1. Re:My hobby is Geocaching. by celerityfm · · Score: 1

      True, and what a cool hobby it is!!

      Cheers and good hunting

      --
      ...unfortunately no one can be told what The Mat^H^H^HGoatse is...they must experience it for themselves...
  99. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by ponxx · · Score: 1

    > Whats wrong with ballroom dancing?

    Absolutely nothing, i love it!

    Actually, thinking about it, our club is full of scientists, particularly physicists, and they also appear to be amoung the more successful competitors, and I can think of a few people going into IT as well...

    I guess i just didn't think anyone would admit to it on Slashdot ;)

  100. KISS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Professional - Whore
    Ameteur - Slut
    Me - Sick

  101. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by KingRobot · · Score: 1

    Meet another ballroom dancer network admin. I've been involved in the style of dancing for the past two and a half years. This is actually rather amusing; It makes you wonder how many other activities slashdotters are involved in that they just don't want to admit to.

  102. Re:Apathy again! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    This is rather disturbing actually. An ancient Greek, thousands of years ago, figured out that the earth is a sphere. But somehow, Christianity took over, and according to its holy book, the earth is flat. Sure, most Christians won't publicly admit to believing this (though they will admit to believing in Creationism), but it's printed quite clearly in the book they claim is written by god.

  103. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by loconet · · Score: 1

    Totally agree.

    --
    [alk]
  104. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With 800,000 hits a day anything is possible. its good to know I'm not alone. The sport is really amazing and anyone who thinks otherwise obviously hasnt tried it. Do you have a USABDA chapter in your area? (Hehe, United States Amateur Ballroom Dance Association) I've added you as a friend, probably not likely to find other ballroom dancers on slash but maybe in the distant future there will be a dance icon on /. heh

  105. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Love it too, do you have a USABDA chapter in your area? I'm not afraid to admit it, I cherish the fact that my mother could bestow this skill upon me before she left this world.

  106. Re:Apathy again! by antispam_ben · · Score: 1
    I'm going to plug a great simulator for you all, and that is Orbiter. You'll learn a ton about astrophysics just by starting the program up and trying to get into orbit your first time, and it won't quit from there.
    Phuque. That's all I need, yet another timesink.
    --
    Tag lost or not installed.
  107. Re:Apathy again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > While achieving orbital velocity is an order of magnitude more difficult than reaching space and coming back down ballistically, reaching escape velocity to break orbit is even harder.

    Actually once you are at orbital velocity it takes only a small nudge to begin spiraling farther and farther out from the center of the earth's gravity well. You would probably crash into the moon unless additional propulsion was used, but waiting many years for that to happen wasn't an option for NASA scientists who chose to propel their craft much faster than the minimum escape velocity (ie 17,000 mph).

  108. Re:Apathy again! by ari_j · · Score: 1

    It's a great timesink, too...Even at 10,000x acceleration it take a hell of a long time to fly to Jupiter. :)

  109. Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur by ponxx · · Score: 1

    > do you have a USABDA chapter in your area

    I currently live in the UK...

  110. Step three by Oshkoshjohn · · Score: 1

    Now we most definitely are waiting for someone to invent a warp drive. To infinity...and beyond!

    --
    Goddamned kids! Get off my lawn!
  111. Re:Apathy again! by esampson · · Score: 1

    Wrong again. There is no bending of Space-time and there is no such thing as gravitational force.

    The Earth simply sucks.

  112. Amateur means doing it for "the love of" by jordandeamattson · · Score: 1

    An Amateur is someone who does it for "the love of" the activity or from a deep passion. A Professional is someone who just does it for the paycheck.

    I have a dear friend who is in "fulltime ministry" with college students. He draws a paycheck every month, but he says, "I never want to become a professional!" He says, that it is from the pleasure he gets, the passion he has from working with students, that he gets the energy to get out of bed every morning.

    Of course, in our society, we have been conditioned to think that being a professional is better. I would rather see amateurs doing things.

    I would like to see amateur politicians, doctors, etc. People who love to do what they are doing.

    Yours,

    Jordan

  113. Re:Apathy again! by MurphyZero · · Score: 1

    For safety purposes, Cape Canaveral defines reaches orbit as when the perigee is greater than 70 miles. At that point, you're pretty sure it's not coming right back down if the engines fail. It is a highly arbitrary number, but with some reasoning behind it.

    --
    Our founding fathers removed the guys in charge. Be American. Vote incumbents out.