Slashdot Mirror


Cometa WiFi Hotspot Network To Shut Down

Glenn Fleishman writes "The folks who announced in Dec. 2002 that they would install 20,000 for-fee Wi-Fi hotspots across the U.S. within two years ago reached several hundred locations in 18 months before shutting down today. Cometa Networks was funded partly by Intel Capital, and had AT&T and IBM's involvement in building the network. The firm resold access to its network, and urged partners to charge low rates, like $3 to $5 per day or $12 per month for unlimited access. Cometa lost its best chance for a big network last month, when McDonald's picked Wayport to build out over 12,000 Wi-Fi hotspots in the U.S." There's now an official press release up, with the CEO noting: "We do not think this reflects on the strength of the Wi-Fi industry or value proposition."

111 comments

  1. A glimpse at their business plan by ptomblin · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Spend millions install WiFi hardware at thousands of hotspots
    2. Give away free Internet access at these sites
    3. ....
    4. Profit!

    --
    The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    1. Re:A glimpse at their business plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is giving away free Internet access? When I read "for-fee", I assume it costs mony.

    2. Re:A glimpse at their business plan by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1
      2. Give away free Internet access at these sites

      Um. The business case was for-fee not for-free

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  2. Hmm. by James+A.+R.+Joyce · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, as much as I love WiFi hotspots and being able to walk into a coffee shop with my laptop, handing out free WiFi probably isn't the best business model. Especially relatively unregulated like this. Imagine if someone had actually abused it!

    1. Re:Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      handing out free WiFi probably isn't the best business model.

      Wow. Great comment!

      How do you feel about WiFi that costs money?

      The firm resold access to its network, and urged partners to charge low rates, like $3 to $5 per day or $12 per month for unlimited access.

      --
      I wish "first posters" would at least read the summary.

    2. Re:Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they did then they wouldn't be first posters

    3. Re:Hmm. by Stigmata669 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      handing out free WiFi probably isn't the best business model

      I disagree; handing out free WiFi is a great business model, it's just that the wrong business is providing it. Instead of some corporation trying to make money by setting up large networks of hotspots, local coffee shops(or even chains) should spend $60-$100 a month to get a DSL line and WiFi router (I know the Speakeasy TOS allows for this) and let the local patrons use it for free. Coffee shops and cafes are favorite places to do work and relax and making the atmosphere/conditions more desirable are well worth the cost.

      Worried about freeloaders? Then change the password on the AP every day, and print it on every receipt. Seems like a great business model to increase your customer base as a cafe.

      --
      Yawn.
    4. Re:Hmm. by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      That's close to what McDonald's does- handing out WayPoint passwords with Extra Value Meal purchases (that is, when you can get the illegal alien at the counter to understand the English for "Internet").

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    5. Re:Hmm. by bwy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A better business model would be to blanket the U.S. with a WiFi services, and have a setup where someone can sign up and be assured that he has access wherever he goes that has a hotspot.

      The T-Mobile stuff has two big problems- too expensive and not nearly enough hot spots. There is no way I'm paying their rates and only have access at Starbucks and a few select airport areas, etc.

      By the same token, any business owner should feel free to offer free WiFi in the hopes of attracting more customers- it costs very little for a small business- simply corporate grade DSL and a bit of hardware.

    6. Re:Hmm. by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Hey, WiFi could end up free in most cities just like airconditioning/heating.

      It probably costs businesses more trying to charge for WiFi.

      --
    7. Re:Hmm. by grozzie2 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I disagree; handing out free WiFi is a great business model,

      Finally, somebody that understands the concept. Wi-fi is not a business unto itself, it's a value add service that is part of the package for a real business. Take the coffee shop example, who wants to spend 10 bucks to get online for 20 minutes while you drink a coffee you bought for $2 ? It doesn't make sense. On the other hand, the coffee shop owner that has wi-fi in his coffee shop will have more traffic.

      For this business though, wide open access doesn't really do the job, because it allows non customers to use and plug up the internet pipe, which is why you need a controlled access sytem of some kind, ie a captive portal setup. problem is, mention 'captive portal' to your average coffee shop owner, and thier eyes go all glossy.

      I've installed a couple of these for clients, and they love it. A simple appliance that they can use to control who uses the hotspot, but it doesn't have the fees associated with it like the mainstream ones do, ie no subscriptions. One client gives away the tickets to anybody that buys a meal, and the other one is selling them for a buck. They just printed off a bunch of the access tickets it generates, and keep em at the cash register.

      Wi-fi is a value add to an existing real business, and most of the hotspot chains are realizing that. There's a lot more of them showing up on fuckedcompany.com than there is showing up in forbes....

    8. Re:Hmm. by sooth... · · Score: 1

      Have you heard of any open source projects that do the same thing?

      Thanks,

      Sooth...

    9. Re:Hmm. by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Not anytime soon... There are two major differences between heating/airconditioning and Wi-Fi:
      (i) Airconditiong/heating cannot be controlled easily. You either have to heat the whole building/store/whatever or you don't. Anyone that walks into the store/building/whatever will benefit whether they want to or not.

      (ii) Wi-Fi costs are variable (although I'm not sure if this is significant). Heating/airconditioning is fixed. If everyone starts using Wi-Fi, the costs will go up (at least for the bandwidth).

      I don't think internet access of any type (Wi-Fi or not) will be ever free unless it is replaced by something superior. For instance, I believe phones will be free in the future because internet is superior and would be the standard. In 25 years, I would not be surprised to see free phone being offered everywhere (possibly by the government).

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    10. Re:Hmm. by Thadddius_Brinks · · Score: 1

      http://www.nycwireless.net/pebble/

      open source read-only distro for installation in embedded access points, used throughout nyc for FREE access
    11. Re:Hmm. by sooth... · · Score: 1

      Thank you I'll check this out. =)

      http://www.boingo.com had an interesting system, but it isn't what we wanted.

      We were looking for a system whereby the owner or the Accss Point would give out free limited access to everyone but charge a nominal fee for broadband access with greater throughput.

      If I couldn't find it I'd be building it.

      Sooth...

  3. And Once again. by jwcorder · · Score: 3, Insightful
    We see that free free free does not work unless there is some viable way to make money money money.

    This is no different then free web space, free storage, or free internet. All of these glorious ideas have fallen by the wayside when people realized they could not be profitable.

    Welcome, WAP, to this cruel cruel world.

    --
    http://jayceecorder.blogspot.com
    1. Re:And Once again. by BaronGanut · · Score: 0

      Yep! Just look at open source software?

      --
      Mohahah!
    2. Re:And Once again. by jwcorder · · Score: 1

      Well if you run through the woods in the dark, sooner or later, you will hit a tree.

      --
      http://jayceecorder.blogspot.com
    3. Re:And Once again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not free! First moderators are as bad as first posters! Fine, don't fucking let me post.

    4. Re:And Once again. by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We see that free free free does not work unless there is some viable way to make money money money.

      Right, so car dealerships should charge people for those hot dogs they give out on Sunday, and all those grocery stores that draw business using freebie promotions should stop, because it doesn't work.

      Except it does. When your business model revolves around nothing but giving away crap, then yes, you are screwed. When you use free crap to leverage non-free crap (coffee and sandwiches), then you have what we know as an 'advertising expense'. $200 a month for a WiFi hotspot near a business park or university could easily earn ten times that back in increased customer flow.

      People with laptops have spare change, usually, and are not likely to sit at a cafe for four hours and *not* purchase a few cups of coffee.

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
    5. Re:And Once again. by jwcorder · · Score: 1
      Like I said

      Unless there is some viable way to make money

      I believe that cars and grocery stores both have those. I was under the impression that the WiFi was ad based. Turns out I was wrong. Stayed tuned because I promise that will happen again.

      --
      http://jayceecorder.blogspot.com
    6. Re:And Once again. by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 1

      Ah, didn't see that tidbit; my apologies.

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
    7. Re:And Once again. by ptelligence · · Score: 1

      what about free software? (free as in beer)

    8. Re:And Once again. by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      I have no idea what the hell that means but it makes me laugh lol hehe :)

      Are you implying that you can always find something to counter any argument?

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  4. Contracts by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Will make ya, or break ya. Sometimes profit is based on pure luck.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:Contracts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing in the business world is based on pure luck. If you believe that, your business will never get ahead. McDonalds didn't pick Cometa for a reason. Cometa is the only one to blame for losing the contract, not poor luck. They weren't competitive enough.

    2. Re:Contracts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, the company's capital resources couldn't support their model, and Cometa Networks will start running down its clock, with the end date not yet determined.

      Their resources couldn't support their business model? I'm not really sure that's a case of bad luck, more likely a poorly run business.

  5. for fee is different than for free by frovingslosh · · Score: 4, Interesting
    2. Give away free Internet access at these sites

    No, fee is different than free. Even the /. write-up said "that they would install 20,000 for-fee Wi-Fi hotspots across the U.S. within two years". I think the real issue with the business plan was that they expected people to pay too much for too little.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:for fee is different than for free by ptomblin · · Score: 0, Redundant

      You're right, I meant to say "nearly free" or "below cost". Same difference.

      --
      The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    2. Re:for fee is different than for free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      I don't understand how they expected people at McDonalds to pay for WiFi, it's like selling Ferraris at Wal-Mart...

      Remember most people at MCDonalds don't own a laptop, and if they do, they dont take it with them when they are eating.
      And this case says it all about the intelligence of the average McDonalds customer.

    3. Re:for fee is different than for free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice try. You're still wrong. Keep digging.

    4. Re:for fee is different than for free by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      I think the real issue with the business plan was that they expected people to pay too much for too little.

      Could it be that WiFi-at-McDonalds is cool, but also worthless?

    5. Re:for fee is different than for free by niteware · · Score: 1

      I pay 12 bucks a month for their service, try that with RoamZ or tMobile or ...... most of them want over $40 a month.... Great service and low prices....

    6. Re:for fee is different than for free by ptomblin · · Score: 1

      And you'll note that those "over $40 a month" services are still in business. Yeah, it's great to get service below cost, but enjoy it while it lasts because it's going going gone.

      --
      The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    7. Re:for fee is different than for free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Ah, but you are only thinking of customers with laptops. I think McDonalds may be thinking of two other types of customers:

      1. Customers with wireless PDAs who can very easily check mail while having a fast meal or even waiting in line.
      2. McD employees with laptops. There was an actual article somewhere talking about how McDonalds managers roam among restaurants doing administrative tasks with their laptops and checking in with the mother ship. The wireless network is already a paid-for asset to the McDonalds internal corporate communications, so selling bandwidth to customers is just 3. Profit!!!

  6. I know why this happened! by spun · · Score: 3, Interesting
    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  7. A Better Plan by tomwhore · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1) Educate folks to build free community wireless netowrks

    2) Help them build it

    3) Tie them togther

    4) Enjoy

    Personal Telco Project

    "Making tomorrows today yesterday"

    --
    Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap! Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap! Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap!
    1. Re:A Better Plan by FattMattP · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Feel free to set me straight if I'm misguided, but the problem with community wireless networks is the liability that you open yourself to. There was a story yesterday whose comments talk about that liability.

      --
      Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
    2. Re:A Better Plan by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Go check out Personal Telco and actually read their basic policies. There isn't very much you can do on a Personal Telco node- I run one out of my house (someday I'll get that old pizza dish hooked up so that I have Internet Access at the park across the street) and I have just about everything except for http blocked. Ted

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:A Better Plan by iwrigley · · Score: 1

      But someone, somewhere has to pay for the actual Internet connectivity.

      You can be as altrusitic as you like -- as long as someone's going to fund your altrusim...

    4. Re:A Better Plan by tomwhore · · Score: 1


      Most of our nodes dont block ports except for maybe 25. Everything else is open once you hit the I Agree button.

      We dont ask for a Name, Password, SS#, Credit Card or Blood Sample... Just that you agree not to break things and if you do a crime on the net its your ass your hanging.. AUPs are a nice thing.

      What node are you running?

      --
      Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap! Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap! Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap!
    5. Re:A Better Plan by mobileone · · Score: 1

      Setting up your own HotSpot is really not that hard. The PersonalTelco PortalSoftware page has a great review of Open Source Software for setting up your own HotSpot.

      All you need to set up your own HotSpot is
      * An Internet connection
      * An old PC ($25 from a garage sale)
      * An access point (Available from $100)


      The users database can be stored in Radius, MySQL, PAM or LDAP.

    6. Re:A Better Plan by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Evelyn Schiffler Park in Beaverton (though it's not entirely up yet- I need a better antenna, and I work in Salem so I haven't had any time, plus I still need to find a way to get the I Agree page up on my Wintel network). I use a Linksys BEFW11S4 router to separate the service from my local network- so I block more than the normal PT node does to protect my internal network from Wintel viruses.

      Ted

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  8. Removing my speech impediment... by jwcorder · · Score: 2, Informative
    We see that free free free does not work unless there is some viable way to make money money money.

    This is no different then free web space, free storage, or free internet. All of these glorious ideas have fallen by the wayside when people realized they could not be profitable.

    Welcome, WAP, to this cruel cruel world.

    Fee, Fee Fee Foe Foe Foe....After rereading said post and getting some language lessons, I would like to strike my previous post from the record.

    Good thing the story wasn't about applesauce and pork chops or I would have really been screwed.

    --
    http://jayceecorder.blogspot.com
  9. How about we just read the Slashdot post? by Hopelessness · · Score: 4, Informative

    Before even more people point out the flaws in their buisness plan, at least properly read the Slashdot post. It says for-fee, not for-free.

  10. RTFWU by gblues · · Score: 1, Insightful

    (Read the F***ing Write Up)

    The hotspots were for fee, not for free. They were charging for wi-fi access.

    Nathan

  11. An issue arising by gphinch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One problem we're going to have to deal with is that unless all hotspots are united under one brand, it's going to get kind of annoying to have to pay subscription fees to each different place you want to use, ie: $15 a month to Starbucks, $15 a month to McD's, $15 a month to Candlestick park. I'm against monopolization of any industry, but I'd take it here over having to subscribe to a different place everywhere I went.

    --
    in bed.
  12. Free Fees and you and me by tomwhore · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There are services that cost money to provide that are given away and the cost recouped either indirectly or as a markup in the overl price of other goods and services being offered.

    With Free Community Wireless Networking the cost of backhaul and Equipment to cover a small area (commercial frontage, public use space, dwelling) can often be either recovered by increased biz or absorbed as the cost of being a good neighbor.

    Just as Movie Theaters saw dramtic increases in summer time viewers with the inclusion of Air Conditioning so too are some biz and public spaces finding an increase base of use withthe draw of Free Wireless.

    Living in Portland OR and being a part of the Personal Telco Project I can say this as a proven fact and not simply as some slashrot debate point. The places where we have nodes are seeing marked increases in their customer base. Several places we have put nodes in have become social centers for nomad laptop workers.

    The problem with the Fee plans are that they simply will not wake up to the fact that customers will not pay for something that will quickly be seen on par with Lighting, AC, a glass of water, background music and those cool drink umbrellas.

    Wake up Biz People....The writting is not only on the wall its on your bottom line.

    --
    Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap! Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap! Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap!
    1. Re:Free Fees and you and me by gphinch · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Wi-Fi hotspots are an excuse for geeks to get out of the house, and while they're at Starbucks doing the same thing they do at home, why not pay $4.00 for a cup of coffee that would be $0.25 at home?

      --
      in bed.
  13. Pity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets see.. I pay $50 / month for DSL. I also have to pay for a $20 / month "basic phone" line just to get the DSL. By basic, it's just a dial tone, no caller id, no features, even the ringer stays turned off so I dont have to deal with telemarketers. I could care less about it. I get free long distance, 400 anytime minutes, free nights and weekends, and free mobile-to-mobile minutes on my wireless phone. Plus voice mail, caller ID and I can take it anywhere. So why do I need a wired phone? Just so Bellsouth can establish DSL service. Yuck! It stands as an emergency 911 phone in case the wireless phone's battery is dead (if ever..).

    That means I already pay $70 / month just to get DSL. I already have Verizon Wireless, so I might qualify for some kind of package deal discount.

    The wireless phone I have is already a data-capable G3 phone. Possibly just a flash upgrade will enable the higher rates. So, I am probably out just a USB cable to get online. Anywhere, whenever. Hmmm.

    Sounds like a good idea to me.

    You know, it seems that where the telco's dropped the ball with fiber-to-the-curb, the wireless providers stand to prosper using RF

  14. PTOMBLIN IS A FUCKING IDIOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't make excuses you fucking idiot. You can't read.

    ITS FEE

    You stupid fuck, don't say you meant to write "almost free" or "for a small fee".

  15. Commercial WiFi: Dead or Thriving? by G4from128k · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised that the investors pulled the plug because they must have known, from the start, about the high cost of a nationwide roll-out. Thus, the investors must have learned that subcription volumes are too low to create a going concern. Giving that Cometa was had lower subscription rates, that fact bodes ill for commerical WiFi.

    I'm especially surprised that Intel, one of Cometa's investors, let the venture go under. Intel seems to be giving away WiFi chips to help sell Centrino CPUs and would seem an ideal deep pocket to support a low-cost commercial WiFi network (road warriors with high-end Intel laptops see a win-win for Intel/Cometa). Either Intel thinks that WiFi does not need Cometa (because WiFi is thriving) or Intel realizes that WiFi is not going to generate sufficient returns through high-margin chip sales.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  16. Gosh by Azureflare · · Score: 1
    From his attitude, sounds like he would fit in perfectly at Microsoft! Isn't that their whole line towards security?

    Well, maybe not any more... but I know with the whole Raw Sockets debacle, they were very much talking like this guy is (of course grc.com has that story, I'm not sure how much credit people give him).

    Makes me glad I'm not using wireless... How dumb do you have to be?

    Great, leave your network open... Then when Comcast shuts down your internet connection 'cause people were doing illegal stuff on it, what are you going to say? "Ohhhh it wasn't me, it was some hacker!"

    Sorry, Comcast, or whatever the ISP is, won't be giving your connection back. The fact is, the connection is in YOUR name financially.

    Also, since I have cable with Cox, I have a monthly bandwidth limit... I wouldn't want someone taking advantage of my 400kb/s download all the time, I'd quickly run over my 30gb a month limit.

    Anyway, this is extremely offtopic.

    I've never used WiFi, so I can't really say anything about it. Guess I'll go do some work now, I'm feeling rather worthless after being done with classes for the semester...

  17. A glimps at ptomblin's business plan by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    1. Misread "for-fee" as "for-free" 2. ... 3. Profit!

    Actualy, I made the same mistake as you, for what it's worth. But I was able to figure out what was going on by reading the rest of the blurb...

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  18. We need wifi roaming. by autopr0n · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe if these places charged, for example $3/month or something it wouldn't be a big deal, but $12/mo for access to just one hotspot? Seems a little off to me, I mean sure buying access for one starbucks probably gives you access to all, but other starbucks employees, who's going to care?

    What we need is some sort of profit sharing system, similar to how the cellphone system works. And it should be an open system, so that anyone can sign up to be a part. It would also be great in that anyone could make money simply by signing up and setting up WAPs, without worrying about how they are going to bill people.

    And let me apologize, I don't have access to a spellchecker right now.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:We need wifi roaming. by vonsneerderhooten · · Score: 1

      And let me apologize, I don't have access to a spellchecker right now.

      Nor did you when you typed your .sig.
      ;-)

    2. Re:We need wifi roaming. by eggboard · · Score: 1

      That's $12 per month for unlimited access to their entire network.

      --
      Freelance tech journalist for the Economist, MIT Technology Review, Macworld, and others
  19. 5.) Watch them get booted by their ISPs... by ragingmime · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...who usually have policies against this kind of thing. See Comcast's here (look at item ix). (If you were thinking of having them get some kind of business-quality connection that would allow that, remember that someone has to pay the bills for that. Maybe I'm being too cynical here, but the idea just doesn't seem very feasible.

    --
    I produce electronic music and write little games. Have a look.
    1. Re:5.) Watch them get booted by their ISPs... by hawaiian717 · · Score: 1

      Speakeasy actually does let you share your WiFi connection.

      --
      End of Line.
  20. Cometa FREE Wifi in my area by fore1337 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We've just recently received FREE wifi via cometa at our local Barnes and Noble (ultra left-liberal book sellers). They've got a setup where they lease an IP to any MAC address for 2 hours per day. Great for sketchy p2p sessions w/ 1.8Mbit uploads.

  21. Re:IT SAYS FEE -- NOT FREE!!! by DustMagnet · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I'm not sure I know the difference. Could you tell me if I'm right. I think the difference between free and fee is it an r. Of course the blurb actually lists prices, so saying free and fee looks similar isn't a valid excuse.

    I'm glad to see someone else lost it on this thread. I lost it when I hit the two minite limit for the third time. While waiting I added swearing to my comment thinking it would fail again. It didn't fail. I'm calmer now, but I'm not proud of using the f-word here. (for the record, it's different AC comment, only the editors can track it to me, I hope.)

    Everything in the Slashdot comment section happens too fast. Posting early is the best way to get modded up. Using mod points early is the best way to have an effect. This leads to everyone rushing and being really stupid. If I want to write a long well written comment, no one will notice it. Bonus points don't help, because most people use every bonus they have with every post. I don't have a solution or I'd start my own Slashdot.

    --
    'SBEMAIL!' is better than a goat!!
  22. too bad (not really) by admiralfrijole · · Score: 5, Interesting

    i have to say that last summer, I was in NYC for MacWorld, and stopped in at a McDonalds to try out their new WiFi and stuff, got my value meal and a little card with a scratch off area and a access code under it, and went upstairs. I sat down, ate, and pulled out my PowerBook. It saw the AP no problem, connected right up, and when I launched Safari, it went right to my home page. no login or anything.

    Now I know that it was a trial location, and this was possibly one of the reasons that McDs went with the other company, but I'm not so sure I'm sad that a company whose security on their APs was so lax to go out of business.

    I mean, open APs are nice, but its really not in the public good, becuase they would have ended up getting abused for spammers and warez and such.

    (and yes, it was Cometa, because the little card has their logo on it)

    oh well...my $0.02

    --
    e to the pi i plus one equals zero
  23. PERL1 IS A FUCKING IDIOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOU FUCKING IDIOT!!!

    Its not free, its fee you stupid fuck.

    You can suck my balls for free, but if you want me to fuck you in the ass, I will charge you a fee.

  24. For-fee by autopr0n · · Score: 3, Funny

    We see that free free free does not work unless there is some viable way to make money money money.

    I think their problem was that people kept seeing "for-fee" and thinking it said "for-free", and so they never got paid.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  25. Here is what I found rather strange by MerlynEmrys67 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    41 employees... Ok that is normal for a startup, but 3 locations, illinios, washington, california ???

    Now tell me what the competative advantage to having 3 sites with an average of 12 people in a location. I have never understood the advantage of building hugely distributed teams - I've worked in them... I have also worked on very localized teams (everyone on the same part of the same floor of the same building) - I have yet to see a distributed team that can match a localized team

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them
    1. Re:Here is what I found rather strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In addition the company was very "top heavy" with manye executives and few techies.

    2. Re:Here is what I found rather strange by VirtualAdept · · Score: 1
      Just because they have three locations doesn't mean that they have an even number of people at each of those locations. Two of those sites could be solely for support and sales. Time zones are a bitch to handle for companies that deal across the nation, and being able to say that mid-working day for a customer's site in California is mid-working day for their service center in California is very handy.

  26. Cellphone companies seem to manage it. by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    What is needed is a sort of wi-fi roaming. Each hotspot could charge a base rate, and each "brand" could charge a monthly fee. If you see some new WAP, you can sign on with your provider's information, and they'll automaticaly be charged.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Cellphone companies seem to manage it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This already exists. Airpath Wireless provides roaming features between several large hotspot providers, as well as operating its own hotspot network. Airpath has WISPs in 17 countries and has roaming agreements with Sprint, iPASS, GRIC, and many others. Really cool stuff.

  27. Re:How to make money from wireless networks by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    2. Sell coffee, hamburgers, and assorted snacks at hotspot.

    Gee- and then you have McDonald's- giving out 2 hours of access with an extra value meal.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  28. More dead cable by StuWho · · Score: 1
    In the Nineties thousands of miles of fibreoptic lines were laid - far more than rational analysis of expected usage could justify - with the result that there is now a glut of bandwith and all the companies who spent millions laying the cables went bust.

    The same thing seems to be happening with wireless data services - both wi-fi and cellular (3G anyone) - the bandwagon is rolling.

    --
    "If you think nobody cares if you're alive, try missing a couple of car payments." Earl Wilson
  29. Odd... by Paul+Townend · · Score: 1

    It seems a really odd press release.....I mean, it says:

    "We've built a profitable business in the Seattle test market and to go national requires additional capital," Hellebust said. The company was unable to obtain the capital necessary for this expansion, and will wind down operations

    If the business was profitable in the Seattle test market....why close it down? Why not just let reserves build up gradually and then expand organically instead of in a couple of giant leaps?

    Methinks that it wasn't quite as profitable as they still claim...

  30. BigMac Eats Cometa by lub · · Score: 3, Funny

    Several cometes hosting rebel troops governed by evil and rebelious law were fretted by an unusual hungry BigMac. The 250 hotspots were digested within less than a second. BigMac's first comment: 'This was fun! Where exactly did you say that cluster of beowulfs is located? Buuurghrp.' The BigMac is now heading for McDonald's Plaza in Oak Brook, IL and dying to see Birdie. The extra-terrestial fresh quality of the Cometa, the main ingredient of McDonald's most popular burger, the Double Quarter Pounder with Cheese, Bacon and Eggs and Cometa, is a result of a unique process and BigMac's ability to eat the Cometa directly after catching.

  31. Well, as a Cometa subscriber... by Colazar · · Score: 1
    I'm bummed. I used the hotspot at a plaza where I worked to play my MMORPG on my lunch-hour. I figure I saved more than $12/mo by brown-bagging instead of going out to lunch every day.

    Ah well, the new downtown Seattle library is opening this week, and they're supposed to have a free hotspot...maybe that will work.

    --
    He decided to just watch the government, and kind of scale it down to size, and run his life that way. --Laurie Anderson
  32. cell phone companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are the cell phone companies dumb? .. Why dont they get on this bandwagon?? They can make buttloads of cash and already own infrastructure.

    Oh yeah that's right .. the FCC won't let 'em.

    Great now thanks to the FCC I have to pay for a cell phone AND internet access AND WiFi.

  33. Truckstop by Stormalong · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Interesting to compare these guys to Truckstop.net. Currently have rolled out 420 or so hotspots in 5 months, with plans to get around 3000 locations. Of course, their typical customers are truck drivers (hence the name), but anyone with with wireless and proximity to a location can sign up. Also, they charge the user directly, instead of charging the location. Still, once you sign up you can use any Truckstop hotspot at all, which can be pretty useful if you are travelling.

    You can get to a nifty map on their page that shows all current and planned locations.

  34. Re:Agreed by Bastian · · Score: 1

    I have no clue why Borders and T-Mobile think I would be willing to sit down with a cup of crappy Borders coffee and pay anything from $6/hour to $30/mo (with contract) or $40/mo (w/o contract) for wireless access.

    For one, I'm already paying $30/mo for broadband at home, so I can just make my own coffee and use my own internet access. My kitchen has a better atmosphere, anyway.

    For two, they are competing with a whole slew of independent or small roaster coffee shops that offer better coffee, are much more comfortable, and offer free wireless.

  35. A real business plan ... by quarkscat · · Score: 1

    1. Spend millions installing thousands of WiFi hotspots
    2. Give away free Internet access at these sites
    3. Eliminate "Supersize" and reduce portions
    4. Profit!

    (thanks, McDonalds!)

  36. "within two years ago"? by catbutt · · Score: 1

    what the hell does that mean?

  37. Re:Don't worry by Bastian · · Score: 1

    For-fee wireless is going to die out very quickly. It can't survive at Starbucks and the like because free wireless is already becoming something that you can practically expect an independent coffee shop to have. It can't survive at McD's because some of its competitors are already offering free wireless at all locations, as are some restaurants. It can't survive at the park because once folks realize that they can get free wireless almost everywhere else, they'll go back to toying with their computers indoors and using the park for playing frisbee and such.

  38. Re:Agreed by Huogo · · Score: 1

    T-Mobile hotspot is NOT $30/month. T-Mobile offers unlimited internet anywhere from a cell phone for $30 a month, or $20/month if you also have voice service from them. Hotspot plans are $4.99/month or $9.99/month, depending on features. Both have unlimited useage.

  39. Chunks of debris by Graymalkin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wouldn't be surprised but would be disappointed if Cometa's network was bought up by Wayport and T-Mobile. After using both services I've been left with a bad taste in my mouth for fee-based WiFi access. Both groups charge exorbitant amounts of money for access. Wayport charges $6.95 at most airports for unlimited access from the time you purchase until midnight, T-Mobile wants $9.95 for 24 continuous hours of connectivity. For month-to-month access Wayport charges $49.95 and T-Mobile charges $39.95.

    If you bought access for a large group of travelers or were somehow able to use the hotspots for all of your high-speed access needs the prices might not be so bad. For me and I'd assume a lot of other people that is way too much damn money. I might be willing to pay $12 a month for unlimited access but there is no way I'd fork over more than $20 a month. I've got WiFi access at my house with a faster connection than most hotspots I've come across.

    I'd sign up for a month-to-month contract is a heartbeat if it offered wide coverage and a low monthly cost. As it is I rarely use WiFi hotspots because of the price and inconvenience. It is really nice to be able to use WiFi internet access but I'm fine just listening to shared iTunes playlists.

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    1. Re:Chunks of debris by eggboard · · Score: 1

      Actually, you're not totally on target with prices here. The day rates are too high, I agree; that's got to change. But if you don't need month-to-month rates, you can get a pretty good deal today. T-Mobile cell subscribers pay $20 per month for unlimited Wi-Fi use with a 1-year commitment; it's $30 per month if you're not a cell subscriber with a 1-year commitment.

      Boingo Wireless resells Wayport's service for $21.95 per month (month to month, no cancellation fee; $34.95 per month after 12 months) along with several thousand non-Wayport locations, but not yet including T-Mobile. (Tell T-Mobile you want it!)

      It's very clear that a $20 per month rate for unlimited U.S. Wi-Fi is in the cards for the near future from several cell companies and aggregators like Boingo -- it'll happen.

      But it's also pretty easy to find free locations if you think $20 to $40 per month is too high. The for-fee locations are ever more appealing to business travelers of which there are apparently about 40,000,000 in the U.S.

      --
      Freelance tech journalist for the Economist, MIT Technology Review, Macworld, and others
    2. Re:Chunks of debris by Graymalkin · · Score: 1
      Boingo currently supports the following: Windows 98SE, Windows 2000, Windows Me, Windows XP, Pocket PC (2002 operating system with ARM processor and portrait screen).
      % uname -v
      Darwin Kernel Version 7.3.0: Fri Mar 5 14:22:55 PST 2004; root:xnu/xnu-517.3.15.obj~4/RELEASE_PPC
      Sorry but Boingo's service is not compatible with my computer. I should not have to download their special software to access their network. If they can't figure out a way to sell me connectivity without their software I'm not interested. The price is right but their convenience is not. Simply lacking PalmOS support Boingo is cutting off a huge swath of the business traveler market. By not having support for MacOS they're ignoring a growing segment of the business traveler market and a large portion of the recreaction traveler market.

      T-Mobile's service is a good idea and would be great if I were one of their subscribers. I am not however which makes their HotSpot service far too expensive for me to use more than occassionally. AT&T's (my provider) GoPort service (which piggybacks Wayport in many locations) is no cheaper for their customers than it is for their non-customers. Their GPRS data services are also horribly priced. AT&T's coverage has always been superior to T-Mobile's in my experience, especially now after the Cingular buyout but their data plans WiFi and otherwise are absoltely horrible.

      For me free WiFi hotspots aren't always an option though I take advantage of them whenever possible. When you're sitting in DFW or ATL there isn't exactly a plethora of free WiFi hotspots to connect to. The same goes for most of the Barnes & Noble and Borders bookstores in southern California.

      When $20 WiFi services become accessible to me and have connectivity in places useful to me I'll likely sign up for them. Until then they're priced horribly or are technically out of reach for me because I choose not to run Windows.
      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    3. Re:Chunks of debris by eggboard · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying that every service works for every at the right price yet. What I'm pointing out is that the service pricing is trending downward. Most of the cell data plans either recently upped their data rates or dropped their prices. You can get unlimited GPRS for $20 a month now, for instance. Boingo is one of three aggregators of hotspot access all of which require Windows clients, but it's the only one currently with an unlimited monthly plan at a fixed rate.

      My point, in brief: pricing is heading down.

      --
      Freelance tech journalist for the Economist, MIT Technology Review, Macworld, and others
    4. Re:Chunks of debris by Graymalkin · · Score: 1

      AT&T and Cingular both charge $80 a month for unlimited GPRS data access. Only T-Mobile is offering $20/mo data service, that is not a trend. AT&T and Cingular might drop their rates tomorrow making my arguement invalid but as of right now they are only offer extremely expensive unlimited access.

      WiFi hot spots aren't exactly lowering their prices either. Because Boingo has a subsidized network they're offering cheap but limited access to doesn't mean the core networks are lowering their prices. Boingo might be out of business next week. I think Boingo's situation is all the more sobering with Cometa calling it quits. Cometa was backed by companies with a good deal of money and they weren't able to offer unlimited cheap WiFi access. That does not really lend support to your assertion that prices are heading downward.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  40. starbucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    At Starbucks, Wi-fi connection powered by T-Mobile is obnoxiously expensive, as is a cup of stinky coffee. Unless you are already T-Mobile customer, you will pay $29.99/mo for one year or $9.99/day to get connected(here. Starbucks might have promotional price for day passes [=$6??]).

    I agree that it is convenient to have wi-fi connection at coffee shop, but since I have broadband up and running at home already and I don't go to coffee shop every freakin day anyway, signing up for one-year contract is too much to get such a minor benefit. In addition, I see people fighting over a limited number of wall outlets to juice up their laptop. Is this a good business model? I don't think it is. As a corporation Starbucks can't care less about WiFi because it's run by T-mobile, and regardless of success or failure of such extraneous service as this, they are the biggest coffee chain in the nation.

    What Cometa should have done is to establish partnership with rival coffee chains (e.g. coffee bean) and sell hotspot to the chain (corporation) as a product that attracts more customers, instead of using coffee shops as a place to sell their product to individual customers. I don't know about other countries, but in the US, the number of free hotspots is very limited. If there is a coffee chain that offers free WiFi access, I would choose them over Starbucks. Being WiFi ready alone might pay off the connection fees due to the increase in the number of customers per day, month and year.

  41. A practical question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately, I just subscribed to Cometa's AT&T offered plan two weeks ago. Seeing that the company was closing up and not wanting my credit card to get zombie billed by AT&T for upcoming months, I accessed the account management on Cometa and found that there is no option there for cancelling service--only changing billing info. And the site checks the billing info entered, so it wasn't like I could change my info to a non-valid number for it to dead-bill.

    I tried calling Cometa's number, but although it rings into Cometa's answer and call routing the destinations--help, AT&T account service, etc. are already "your call could not connect."

    I tried to go into AT&T Wireless' goport site, but it doesn't recognizne the cometa routed account.

    Anyone know who the heck to call in this case?

    1. Re:A practical question... by SageMusings · · Score: 1

      I suppose you might try contacting the bank that issued the credit card you used to initiate the account. Just tell them it was a fraudulent charge and not to accept any charges from that company.

      Am I missing something? It seems pretty easy.

      --
      -- Posted from my parent's basement
  42. Re:Agreed by grozzie2 · · Score: 1
    Thier pricing pages disagree with you. The 6.00 level is for an HOUR not a month...

    look here to see for yourself. 29.99 a month on annual contract, 39.99 monthly....

  43. Some folks actualy READ the TOS before buying by tomwhore · · Score: 1

    There are folks, a small number but still some, who READ the TOS before buying things like backhaul and make a EDUCATED choice to spend thier cash on ISPs who allow, yes allow , being a good neighbor.

    Here in Portland OR we have Easystreet, Spirtech, Integra, Speakeasy and a bunch more who have put down policy to allow folks to use what they buy as they see fit.

    Yea I know its not for everyone, I know most would rather stay stupid and smile a big cheesey white glitter tooth for the mass consumption media.."have another happy meal everything is ok just keep paying for a service we wont let you use"

    Super Size your Comcast service? Well sure pump it up to a t3's worth of backhaul...but dont do anything listed in the tos or your criminal bad person...

    Live free or die

    Bang bang Have a nice day.

    --
    Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap! Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap! Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap!
  44. Problems with Wi-FI by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From a business perspective, here are the problems I see with Wi-Fi:

    i. Too many competing WAPs (i.e. wireless providers) basically means that you can't roam. This problem exists in the cellphone world as well but they are trying some things to overcome. For Wi-Fi to take off, it would be desirable for people to roam between stores without paying for each one. Note: I am only talking about non-free (possibly low cost) Wi-Fi here. Obviously if it is free, this isn't an issue.

    ii. The second thing, which is probably the biggest, is that the number of people using Wi-Fi has to increase. In other words, more people need to be carrying around notebook computers, (future) PDAs, etc. Right now, I don't think enough people have portable computers for this to really matter. Granted, professionals and IT people, along with some computer-savvy people, may carry their notebooks all the time, but most don't. At best, wi-fi will only be a small market for now. Until more people starting using portable computers with wi-fi capabilities, it won't take off. The fact that McDonald's is rolling this out will have little impact IMO since most of their customers don't carry notebooks around. Lastly, if only a few people benefit from wi-fi, then the cost will always be too high--critical mass won't be reached.

    Having said all this, I am NOT saying wi-fi won't take off. I do expect it to become popular in 5 years or so, especially when wi-fi is a standard for home networking and workplace too. All I'm saying is that whoever that uses wi-fi now will not make any money. Those in the market will probably lose money for years but will definitely get some technical advantage.

    --
    Sivaram Velauthapillai
    Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    1. Re:Problems with Wi-FI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen some of this in our local community, Iowa City. There is a wireless isp that is offering unlimited access to any one of their hotspots for $20/month. They have a number of coffee joints as well as the main university campus lawn, a few restaurant, the ped-mall etc. And of course their still growing.
      This isp has seen that people will pay for a service if they feel it's something they could use. This is called capitalism.

      Wifi is not a hot dog. Nor should it be compared to a hot dog. You can't cause mass problems with a hotdog. With a public FREE access point you sure could.
      If every user that is on a hot spot has been verified by means of credit card you instantly remove your spammer/hacker problem.
      In addition, having a company that deals with the hot spots, available by phone, is a lot more productive than your coffee joint employee trying to muddle his way through configuring a customer's laptop for dhcp rather than a static ip that they might previously have setup. This is what the industry calls SUPPORT! Let someone who receives monetary motivation resolve the problem.

      =$.02

  45. Has to be offered as an add-on feature by ducomputergeek · · Score: 2
    What do I mean by this? Well our local downtown coffee house for instance. They had a pay-mode Wifi system that they were charging $5 - $10 an hour to use depending if you rented a laptop or brought your own. Nobody used it. They once said they rented out time for about 10 hours per month and it didn't even cover their bandwidth charge.

    Sometime in the last 2 years they started offering the service free. Guess what, a lot of people came in with their laptops, like me, and used it and purchased coffee. I might even stay a couple hours while doing work and then purchase lunch. And I would go to this coffee house over a couple others because of the free access. They probably paid half their BW bill a month from me alone purchasing additional goods.

    Now there are several other coffee houses that offer the same free service. So I pick based on which is closest. Same with Hotels. Its a cheap way to offer high speed access to many guests. I know its something I look for in business travel.

    But none of these services give away the service or get revenue directly from the wifi access, however they do get additional customer loyality and usage because its there.

    --
    "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
  46. Wi-Fi is not just an add-on by themadcaplaughs · · Score: 1

    Guess Wi-Fi will become a big thing in the years to come. Its use is not again for individuals though .. it is for offices, corporations, hospitals and stuff.

    I guess in the heat of the moment, we often forget that Wi-Fi essentially is wireless LAN. Think of a place like India say, where the majority of computerisation of organisations is still to happen. Don't you think that if I company were to take up the business of providing Wi-Fi solutions to organisations, even to users who want a wireless home, they could be hitting a really huge market.

    I would say that thinking that Wi-Fi is just an add-on is myopic. I think it can be the basis of a wireless future for mankind.

  47. Re:Shame about B&N's by madmaxmedia · · Score: 1
    That's why this news is particularly disappointing. B&N was rolling out Cometa for $15 a month unlimited, $5 for 24 hours. That's half of what Starbucks/ TMobile charges. In SoCal there are enough B&N's that I would consider the monthly fee.

    Starbucks could've locked down the coffee shop market even more had they gone with a cheaper provider (not that they really needed to). Well, at least this gives local, independent coffee shops a chance at competing by offering free Wifi. I wonder if Coffee Bean and Tea Leaf is going to do something chainwide-