Slashdot Mirror


Cannes' Palme d'Or goes to Michael Moore

An anonymous reader writes "The Palme d'Or of the Festival de Cannes was presented this year by Charlize Theron to Fahrenheit 9/11 by Michael Moore. I don't know if it's the first time this prize is awarded to a documentary, but I guess it's rare enough to be mentioned, especially given the problems this film encounters."

27 of 1,856 comments (clear)

  1. As Much As I Agree by dupper · · Score: 0, Troll

    With his positions and enjoy his movies, the man's a troll, plain and simple. He won not because of his movie, but because of his message. The festival is supposed to be about art, but now its been perverted into politics.

    1. Re:As Much As I Agree by Stevyn · · Score: 1, Troll

      Exactly. Bowling for Columbine was a lot of crap and manipulation. There's a whole group of people out there who got together because Moore completely distorted and took out of context of what they said in their interviews. This guy twists the truth to benefit himself and his bullshit message.

      Why is this on slashdot? Well, he's kind of like SCO. He makes a claim, has no real evidence to back it up, and then twists facts to make it seem like he was right all along.

      Why did he win? Europeans hate America politics at the moment so they loved this idea of Bush bashing.

  2. Why the hell is this on Slashdot? by xheliox · · Score: 0, Troll

    Wow.. Slashdot has stooped to a new low.

  3. Re:Cannes and Abu Ghraib by sql*kitten · · Score: 0, Troll

    , torture, rape and slaughter of Iraqi citizens

    Let me get this straight: you hope that abuse of Iraqi prisoners CONTINUES, just so that you can score a few cheap political points back in the US?

  4. Michael Moore, part of the Elite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Michael Moore is a sorry fat ass who cares more about the arrogant French and their viewpoints than common Americans. Like other Libruls, he wails against those who are well off (people with money) and how he is a commoner. He lives in a several million dollar house which makes him part of the "Elite". He like others of the "Elite" sneer their noses at the common and find ways to keep the common person down.

    He is probably at home with the French since he smells (being a fat ass) like the French who don't bathe.

    ASDF

  5. This is fucking bullshit! by east+coast · · Score: 1, Troll

    Is there no place where I'm not getting harassed by people's political views? Can't we have one fucking forum that remains clear of this bullshit? What makes it worse is that this one is even endorsed by management! These aren't random posts on some Yahoo! message board. For one fucking time I'd like to see people not throw their weight around to support their politics.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  6. Re:Cannes and Abu Ghraib by toupsie · · Score: 0, Troll
    But even more than Moore's documentary, I hope more and more images and video keeps coming out of Iraq in regards to the abuse, torture, rape and slaughter of Iraqi citizens, most of whom are guilty of no crime. That more than anything is Bush's legacy, his mark upon the world and truly the images that best define our Fascist Leader and his doctrines.

    Maybe you haven't been paying attention to the wall-to-wall coverage of the Abu Gharib "scandal" but the prisoners mentioned were not just Iraqi citizens, they were Iraqi citizens that were in the 1-A and 1-B sections of the prison. This area was reserved for the baddest of the bad. People that killed US Troops and planted IEDs. All without being in uniform and without a structured chain of command, i.e., terrorists. We can all appreciate the long lasting affects on my being forced to walk around naked with a pair of women's panties but it is not representative of Fascism. That would have been the decades of Saddam's brutal regime. He was a bit more brutal than West Virginia knickers on the head.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  7. Re:Censorship by Jim+Starx · · Score: 0, Troll
    warning, site may be offensive to compassionate conservatives

    read: Site may contain factual information...

    --
    The darkness... controls the music. The music... controls the soul.
  8. Re:Some factual errors yes, but overall quite good by Pave+Low · · Score: 1, Troll
    Those weren't just factual errors, those were deliberate distortions and lies.

    But he's a hero on slashdot. No surprise there.

    --
    SIG:Slashdot: indymedia for nerds.
  9. Re:Documentary? by Lobo_Louie · · Score: 0, Troll

    Funny, where was M*chael M**re when Comrade Clinton was the White House's occupant? There were serious shenanegans going on, but he didn't say shit. Hypocrite.

  10. Re:Cannes and Abu Ghraib by toupsie · · Score: 0, Troll
    Nice to see that "innocent until proven guilty" still holds sway in these troubled times.

    So you are saying these people are American citizens on American soil committing minor crimes? These are terrorists that attacked American soldiers not your garden variety criminal. Maybe its just me, I am a tad bit more concerned about the lives of our soldiers than the scum that rig roadside bombs. Guess my priorities are different than yours.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  11. Re:Documentary? by efaust93 · · Score: 0, Troll
    Moore only proves that people aren't interested in the truth. The shame is that anyone provided money for him to produce such garbage.

    If I produced a movie that said that had such lies - but lies against the left - I would be labeled a "moron" or "idiot" or even (what they consider the worst insult) a "right-wing radical."

    Moore speaks lies and he is lauded. He deceives people and he is rewarded.

    It's time to wake up America!
    http://efaust.blogspot.com

    --
    e. Faust
  12. Re:Documentary? by efaust93 · · Score: 1, Troll
    Oh, you won't hear anything from moore about Comrade Clinton. He's a saint in the eyes of the left.

    "Bush overlooked the terrror warnings"

    LIE

    Hmmm, Bush's only error was to keep on so many Clinton appointees so long. Clinton ignored the terror warnings. Clinton appointees did their best to separate the FBI and the CIA so information could not be shared.

    It's time for America to Wake up!
    http://efaust.blogspot.com

    --
    e. Faust
  13. Re:Documentary? by Ikari+Gendo · · Score: 0, Troll
    I'm sure there's an equal number of right-wing pages citing examples of Fox's left-wing bias.

    HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA.

    Prove that ridiculous supposition, or STFU.

  14. Re:Documentary? by efaust93 · · Score: 0, Troll
    No surprise you posed that as an AC.

    Moore does not speak in facts. He presents his twisted point of view. He make sure to NOT look at any of the facts. If he was sued, he would make sure to use that as his defense in court.

    It's time to Wake Up America!

    http://efaust.blogspot.com

    --
    e. Faust
  15. Re:Documentary? by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 0, Troll

    It's his right to say what he wants... but it's not his right to lie or to distort the truth with the intention of deceiving his audience.

    Which many believe is exactly what he does.

    --

    I write in my journal
  16. Re:Documentary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Because the people that he slandered with Bowling for Columbine are bigger men than he is, have more class, and they won't give him the free publicity that he'd get if they sued him. Its better to ignore people like Michael Moore, because attention is what he wants. For the most part, he is just preaching to his choir. The people who like his work, for the most part already believe the way he does, so he isn't changing anyone's minds. I think most other people can see that his movies aren't documentaries, they are political propaganda.

  17. Re:Documentary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll


    Shouldn't the President of the United States be expected to hold the truth in a higher regard than a filmmaker?


    Unless you are President Clinton you mean?

  18. MOORE is a lousy PIECE OF SHIT by terryfunk · · Score: 0, Troll

    This fat piece of shit isn't worthy enough for anything but to allow himself to be shit on.

    Of course, it was the frogs in frogland where he received the award, so I guess we should consider the source.

  19. Re:Documentary? by PeterPumpkin · · Score: 0, Troll

    What lie are we talking about? WMD? Well as far as I know, technically they haven't found any, but they did find a bunker loaded with 55 gallon drums of two pesticides that when mixed together make serin gas. Its suppose its up to the person to think of what those chemicals where meant for.

    BTW half a trillion dollars is nothing. When you compare to the GNP, its chewing up around one percent last time I checked. Some previous wars the US clocked in at over 100%.

    The international community respects us. They may not like us, but they respect us.

    Arabs are respected here. There are of course exceptions, there always are for every racial group. Abroad, only sundry ignorants will openly disrespect someone just because they are from the US.

  20. Re:Documentary? by Mc_Anthony · · Score: 0, Troll

    What? Bush lied? What did he lie about? Remember that Clinton had seen the same intel. and agreed with Bush. Furthermore, even the UN security council new Saddam had WMD... So, a sitting president, in a pre 9-11 world, is handed intl. that a regime like Saddam's is funding terror AND refusing to catalog it's weapons. A regime hostel to the US. Does the sitting president take action to protect America, or does he do nothing and hope for the best?

    As far are respect from the international community, we didn't have much to begin with. And in the end, America's safety is so much more important.

  21. give me a break by andih8u · · Score: 0, Troll

    slashdot's continual political pandering is just totally ridiculous...some guy winning an award at Cannes for a documentary is news for nerds now? Give me a freaking break. Donate my karma to someone, I'm done with it and this thinly veiled political garbage site.

    --


    slashdot, news for crazed liberal socialist zealots
  22. Re:And? by pauldy · · Score: 0, Troll

    Oh, before some fat ice cream eating micheal moore's ass kissing life flunky comes out and says something about this not being Hollywood I did misspeak I meant the movie industry in general which in the US we think of as "Hollywood." Sorry for the confusion.

  23. Re:Documentary? by SQL+Error · · Score: 1, Troll

    Do you seriously wish to compare the U.S. to Germany as it was in the 30s and 40s?

    Yes. Yes I do.


    And here's the problem: You don't have the faintest clue what you're talking about. You have absolutely no idea of what actually went on in Germany during the 30s and 40s - you can't do, or you would see how utterly absurd this comparison is.

    Or if you do know something about Germany in the 30s and 40s, you obviously don't care about facts if they don't support your argument, and instead of being merely ignorant, you are a propagandist for the enemies of civilisation. Not only do you use lies to attack the American government, but worse, you belittle the reality of the worst atrocity in human history.

    "Is it wrong to root for your government's defeat, if you sincerely feel its policies are so misguided that their success would lead to much greater harm in the long run than would their failure in the short run?"

    Well, since you have shown yourself to be devastatingly ignorant at best, I'd suggest you reassess your position.

  24. Re:And? by junk · · Score: 0, Troll

    you're right, we shouldn't address his work based on his girth. moore's crockumentary* has no merit because it's a lying piece of shit. his words become meaningless the minute he decides to defend them by asking why you need to find fact in "comedy." his poor man's savior facade is killed when you look at how much he charges to speak, the planes he demands he fly on, the hotels he requires he stay in and when he charges the parents of children kill in columbine to prescreen his film he makes about them. moore is a piece of shit and nothing more.

    *http://www.cbc.ca/story/arts/national/news/2004 /0 5/21/Arts/moore20040521.html

  25. Re:Entertainment ppl in France pick Anti-Bush movi by rjamestaylor · · Score: 0, Troll

    Nota Bene: I don't know specifically where Cannes is held, to be honest. It just seems so French it has be to France. Anyway, the point is that MM's 9/11 fits the agenda of the EMEs and thus it is of little surprise that MM won the Palm d'Grease award. News would have been a rejection of the movie given its premise, believe-you-me.

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  26. Re:You're wrong by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 0, Troll

    Actually, it is his right.

    Then why are fraud, false advertising, libel, and slander all against the law?

    It's not a right, or even necessarily legal, to speak untruths for commercial gain.

    --

    I write in my journal