Slashdot Mirror


Area 51 Hackers Map Buried Surveillance Network

advair writes "There's a story on SecurityFocus about a pair of Area 51 'hackers' who discovered a buried network of wireless motion sensors on the public land surrounding the "operating location near Groom Lake, Nevada." Using a frequency counter and a GPS receiver, they tracked down and logged 30 - 40 of the sensors, before the FBI and Air Force raided one of them, and questioned the other. Now one of the guys has been charged with a federal crime for allegedly removing one of the devices that was protecting a base that doesn't officially exist."

46 of 876 comments (clear)

  1. Area 51 is a hoax by the goverment by mpost4 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My bet is area 51 is just a deco, think about you set up a "base" you plant a few "good" stories for the conspiracy theorist to love, you play the whole thing up. you have a real base some where else. Every one will flock to area 51, then you do your real work at area 52 (or what ever they might call it) I also doubt there are any extra terrestrial research going on in the government, think about it you need the best of the best to even think of starting it, and the government well its the government what other insult do I need to lob at it.

    Area 51 is probably just a few buildings there to keep the amount of people to perpetuate the image that area 51 is real.

    This people probably have fallen for it, and the government might have just planted the motion sensors to keep them busy, they the person steal one I don't know, but either way the government sorta unofficial clams it, and the conspiracy theorists will go wild.

    1. Re:Area 51 is a hoax by the goverment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Wait, this is the same U.S. government that gave us Amtrak and the USPS?

      Don't go blaming the government because Americans prefer travelling cross-country in their own personal conveyances rather than using more efficient means of transportation.

      As for the USPS it works just fine. I'd like to hear how much you'd charge to pick-up, transport and deliver a letter from one coast to the other, let alone millions of letters and packages on a daily basis.

    2. Re:Area 51 is a hoax by the goverment by jedrek · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I live in Warsaw, Poland.

      My friend sent me a letter from Germany on friday morning, via DHL (private company), paid 38euro (about 45-50US) for it. I got it on tuesday morning.

      Another friend sent me a package on thursday afternoon from Missouri, via USPS. It was a Muvo2 MP3 player in its original box, with all the manuals, power supplies, etc. He paid $20US for it, and I got it on... tuesday morning.

      Don't knock the USPS.

    3. Re:Area 51 is a hoax by the goverment by mekkab · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Totally OT but very good info, thanks! I believe what you say about there being specific depots that are the problem. In His book of Essays, Jonathan Franzen does a good job of exposing all the serious problems that Chicago post office had (mail not delivered for years, carriers drinking in their cars until 7 pm and getting overtime, managers "hiding" from irate customers)

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    4. Re:Area 51 is a hoax by the goverment by meatspray · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ehh. They maintain an unmarked air service (full size jets) that flies in and out of Las Vegas. They buss hundreds of people in from from the local towns every day. A Little too elaborate for a simple hHoax. If you're gonna go through all that trouble, you might as well do something classified there.

      It's pretty well known that it an aircraft testing facility. Probably some really neat stuff under wraps there but I doubt that any alien testing is going on there.

      It seems to me that the government has gone soft though. I expect that years ago these people would have simply ended up missing. Bodily harm is a wonderful deterrant. These guys are really lucky they're not classifying them as terrorists.

      The stuff that's there is classified. We don't have any viable reason to snoop around there. Our government (all governments) have stuff that they need to do in secret. If we don't like it that's really too bad. There's enough bad stuff going on around us in plain sight that we should be looking in to and raising hell about.

    5. Re:Area 51 is a hoax by the goverment by 1010011010 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I doubt it. AT&T was working on some hideous IPX-based "internetwork" service. Microsoft would probably have attempted to make NetBEUI routable, or something. Apple would have had their own Appletalk-based internetwork.

      Dreck.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    6. Re:Area 51 is a hoax by the goverment by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Dial up UUCP, if you please. Besides, if the Internet didn't exist, someone would have invented Frotznet by now which would have been much better. Alas, that person got stuck in a Usenet flamewar and never did have that great idea. And so it goes...

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    7. Re:Area 51 is a hoax by the goverment by emtboy9 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, that one. But as was stated earlier, not everyone lives in the US, and a good number of those pay far more in taxes than I do a year.

      What is it that Sweden is up to now? something like 40% on average?
      UK is close, yes?

      Every government has its good points and its bad points. One of the good points to the US government is a history of technological innovation, as well as a LOT of innovation from the private sector.

      This by no means exhonerates the current administration for its actions, BUT, taken as a while, the US gov't has done quite a bit for the world, and often for little to no thanks.

      And before you bring up the whole imperialist thing that seems so popular, it was not too long ago that the Soviet Union was the largest country in the world, Japan was increasing its borders via military conquest, and a good portion of the world was part of the British Empire.

      --
      "Our funds have never taken part in toxic or death spiral convertible financings of any sort" -BayStar's managing partne
    8. Re:Area 51 is a hoax by the goverment by evol262 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Start shooting? Yes. Knowing what the government is doing with your tax dollars is not one of you unalienable rights (not that any of those are really secure anymore, but that's another rant). This is not an act of civil disobedience. Those civilians would be crossing a line that says "If you cross this line, you will be shot." Our government keeps certain things hidden from us to maintain our superiority. Hell, there are a lot of things we don't use in time of war because we don't want foreign militaries to get a hold of them. Expect that military CS, beanbag guns, and possibly lethal measures (read: claymores and a Spectre gunship if it's needed. Also, expect that the leaders of this gathering would be sent to a chain-link cage in Guantanamo as insurrectionists or terrorists.

      --
      "The more corrupt a society, the more numerous are its laws." -Tacticus
    9. Re:Area 51 is a hoax by the goverment by Sleepy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Um, the USPS is actually a model government service.

      Their costs are low considering they're legally bound to providing universal service. A private company could "save" costs by not delivering to unprofitable districts, but we'd probably lose something as a nation. I don't know what executive pay is in the USPS, but I'd wager it isn't as off-kilter as Enron was. The USPS is quite accountable for its expenses.

      Amtrak is another bad example. Even the people who cheerleaded the privitization roadmap for Amtrak did not intend to see Amtrak get where it is. Amtrak is so underfunded it is dropping routes, and skipping maintanance on expensive parts which means higher costs later. Poorly maintained train tracks means it's not safe to run over 60MPH so there's a speed penalty taking them... no one takes them unless they have to.

      The current Amtrak will never get us 100+ mph routes, at which point it becomes competitive with driving.

      A much better example of ineptitude would have been the IRS.

      I've seen some articles quote that 40% of federal income tax revenue is lost on pure overhead. Plus there is no backup collection method if the 40 year old master database crashes (possible, and no one understands the damn thing). It will never get fixed.

      I always thought, liberal or conservative, it made more sense to AUTOMATE the federal tax by eliminating the paperwork and going to a sales tax model (excepting food and medicine of course), and if the overhead was 5-10% instead of 40% that's quite an improvement.

    10. Re:Area 51 is a hoax by the goverment by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The US has the highest taxation percentage in the world when you factor in the many hidden taxes.

      Do you have a source for this statement, or is it simply conjecture?

      I'm personally taxed around 30%, with an additional 5-10% taken out for medicare/social security.

      I'm taxed around 25% by the federal government, plus the additions for medicare and social security, which come out to ~7% of my gross income when combined, most of which is social security (medicare is ~1%). The parts that irritate me there are that I will likely never see the SS money, and the medicare comes out to more than the cost of my own health and dental benefits.

      Then with the income I have left, I pay 8.5% on every purchase I make, 3.5% on my mortgage for property taxes, 65 dollars a year for vehicle registration, tolls on the roads I drive on, exhorbitant tax on gasoline, alcholol, and tobacco.

      Most of these are state taxes, though a few are mixed taxes (alcohol, tobacco, gasoline, iirc). I pay a state income tax between 4 and 5 % in addition to these (which could explain your 30% previously), but when I lived in California the state income tax was more like 10%, and tobacco was significantly higher (tobacco taxes vary from city to city here in Virginia, but I can buy a pack for $2 in Richmond, whereas in San Diego, CA, I was paying easily $4/pack 2 years ago). In some states there is no sales tax, and in most states they vary by city (because sales tax is solid income for the state, county, and city). Here, for instance, there's an 11% tax on prepared food, but no tax on most grocery items. Anything else tends to run in the 4% range. I also pay property taxes on my car which run in the 10% of the car's value (based on whatever they decide the car is worth, usually without looking at it), though there are some tax rebates that reduce that cost, as well as state and city stickers with additional costs, and the registration cost. They're all fairly small (except the property tax, but again most of that has been rebated, for now), but they add up.

      We even get double taxed on a portion of our income, as social security is based on your before tax income, even though a large portion of that you will never see. Then when you get older, all of the social security taxes you paid may give you back some social security payments, which you will have to pay taxes on.

      Not to mention that you're getting taxed when you get the money as well as when you spend it.

      Let's also not forget that most of the products we buy are imported, and they are taxed at importation and that cost is passed along to us.

      Solution: don't buy so many imported products... Never mind that in many areas we have lower import taxes than other countries, and that you can import goods from some countries (and/or in some categories of goods) with no taxes on the importation.

      Their are infrastructure taxes on every form of communication, usage taxes, 911 taxes, about 50% tax of various kinds on airline tickets.

      Don't forget that many airline taxes are local as well, though since 9/11 many new federal taxes have been added.

      So tell me please, how the US has lower taxation and all of those stupid socialist countries pay way higher taxes for things like universal health care, etc.

      It's really quite simple: everything you're complaining about exists to some extent in those other countries, but that first tax (the 30% income tax) is higher, as well.

      I sat down one day and did the math, and by the time I was done, I realized that about 68% of my income goes to paying one form of tax or another. Think about that before you go spouting off your inaccurate tax comparisons between the US and the "socialist" countries.

      Think about a few of the taxes you're complaining about and why they've been implemented. Start working at the local, state, and federal level to repeal some of those taxes, and to change the way tax

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    11. Re:Area 51 is a hoax by the goverment by wass · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Yeah, USPS is pretty damn cool, and cheap too.

      Once at a bar, my friend went to the bathroom. While she was gone me and another friend talked about sending her some kind of 'souvenir' from the bar. We got the bright idea of sending one of those cardboard beer coasters. So we wrote her name and address on the coaster (we didn't even know her zip code so we left it off), put a stamp on it, and gave it to the bartender to drop in a mailbox. We were doubtful it would ever get to her, bit sure enough she got it in good condition within 1-2 days.

      Since then I've mailed all kinds of fun stuff with addresses written on them, like chewing gum wrappers, tiny post-it notes, etc. I think everything has arrived intact and relatively quickly. And all for a single stamp.

      So in my personal experience, USPS totally rocks.

      --

      make world, not war

    12. Re:Area 51 is a hoax by the goverment by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Begging your pardon, but White Sands is in New Mexico. I have driven through the base (they have a highway that runs through the middle of it). The terrain is as you would expect - lotsa desert. They also have warm welcoming signs such as "exiting your car in this area is a Federal Crime" One needs little incentive to loiter however, as they have other signs proclaiming the area to be a live fire exercise area.

      This was on my way to Roswell, NM, home of the purported UFO crash site. I was living in San Diego and this girl I was seeing somehow got tickets to a place called the "corn ranch" (think that was it) - they looked like concert tickets. Anyway, once a year (this was July 4th weekend), they open up the ranch to interested parties. When I went in 97, a couple had bought the ranch without knowing what occured there (according to the couple, who led the field trip). Once they found out the legend, they opened it up as a tourist trap.

      The crash site itself was aganist a small cliff - seems the saucer came down, impacted just at the bottom of the cliff, and bounced - 15 miles according to local legend. The Federales came and investigated and started to shush things up - they apparently drove the 15 miles to its final resting place, grabbed the saucer, and then the veil of mystery begins. How true or not this is is anyone's guess. I offer my own impressions merely because I don't think a lot of people have been there. BTW - Roswell is a largish town, but certainly not a city. Mebbe comparable in size to Winchester, VA for those who have been there. They of course have alien tourist crap as far as the eye can see, and it's fair share of alien nutjobs.

      --
      "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
    13. Re:Area 51 is a hoax by the goverment by ryanwright · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sorry, the government hasn't admitted to keeping little green men there.

      That's because they don't. I worked with a guy who worked for several years at Area 51. Every day he boarded an airplane with blacked out windows with other employees and was flown to work. He gets very angry when people talk about UFOs and aliens. He said, "There are cool things that I can't talk about. But there are no damn aliens. I worked there for years, I should know."

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
    14. Re:Area 51 is a hoax by the goverment by istewart · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I firmly believe that Roswell was a practical joke in its entirety.

      Think about it. The war's over, and a bunch of Air Force officers who got suckered into staying on get stationed in Podunk Farm Town, New Mexico. One day, a NACA (or whoever) weather balloon with a crash test dummy or two crash-lands in some farmer's field and the farmer flips and calls the air base. These poor, bored Air Force officers decide to have a little fun with the locals. It gets out of hand. The next day, an irritated telegram comes in from the head office in Washington. A legend is born.

      Even if this explanation were to be confirmed, perhaps by one of the officers involved if any are still alive, the conspiracy nuts still wouldn't believe it. Go figure.

    15. Re:Area 51 is a hoax by the goverment by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a relative who works at a reasonably high level at lockheed marting on the mil contracts sideas an engineer.
      Though he's been there (Area51) only a few times,that he's admited to, (guy makes clinton era gore look like a wild drug crazed party animal, more wooden than pinochio) his boss has been there several times. Though he's never talked about anything secret, he has said they do have secret research going on there, but most of it is the kind of secret that they wouldn't be to terribly suprise to find out a forign intell agenency has good clues to what kind of things are there, just not the details. almost at the level of 'oficially secret even if everyone knows about it'.
      Several of LM's 50's-70's uber secret planes that we now know about where developed/tested there.
      What he basicaly said (this was a few years ago, feb-march of 2000) was along the lines of 'we're doing somthing there, couldn't say exactly what' when someone (one of my uncles I believe) said somthing about jail in a hidden prison he said it was he didn't actually know, but even if he did worst that would likely happen is he'd get fired, maybee fined a couple grand. He went on to say security for persons entering the base was pretty strong, lots of checks and escorts to keep you in your areas only. but that he hadn't been there in a few years as he worked on new subcomponents for some systems (avoided saying wich subsystems) and not experimental craft so rarely had reason to be at Area51.
      He also pretty much said the concept of aliens at 51 was ridiculous. To many people on base to hold the secret, and to many aerospace experts who KNOW the sota engaged in mundane work and research NOT to notice and recognize signs of UFO experiments. To many to guarantee secrecy.
      Basicaly, yeah they still do low to med grade secret stuff there, and no your not gonna sneak/con your way in.
      Frankly I think they do also practice keeping secrets at a known 'secret' base so they can better hide the trully secret stuff like what the parent poster was suggesting.
      Just my two cents.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  2. So he removed one? by in7ane · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Nowhere does it mention that one of these things was seized from the guy. What happened to assumed to be innocent until proven guilty? For all they know the thing could have broken, batteries run flat, someone drove over it, etc. Or for the conspiracy nuts - they removed it themselves just to accuse the guy.

  3. It's not smart to play with fire. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Yes, there IS another base located somewhere else. There are several bases from which the Aurora is flown, for example.

    But it's not smart to play with these people. You could disappear and no one would ever see you again, alive or dead. Trust me, I know what I am speaking of.

    Do NOT fuck with these people, if you care about your future.

  4. Re:... or so the aliens would have you believe! by SilentChris · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes, Area 51 has always been a "real base", just a military base (secretive like most military bases out there).

    My guess is that they're conducting experiments and tests on areas they don't want the public to see (WMDs, biological/chemical warfare, etc.) Conspiracy theorists take the tight security and wrap it around inplausable stories, which the government probably doesn't mind (better having the crackpots think they know what's going on than important people ACTUALLY knowing what's going on).

  5. Re:Agreed. by medazinol · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Bob is still around and doing physics privately. He still insists when asked that what we worked was true. Personally I beleive him. When a person comes out and says stuff like he did fully knowing that his life wil be ruined and never asks for a dime then he deverses some kind of respect or admiration?

  6. Re:No name? by the+unbeliever · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There's no such thing as "public land" -- the government owns every single bit of land in the country that's not owned privately (and even then -- there's property tax)

    It also doesn't matter if the DOD name was on it or not, it doesn't belong to you, so why take it? Basic theft.

  7. Area 51 does now exist by LokiSteve · · Score: 5, Interesting

    During the Clinton era it was acknowledged that Area 51 (Dreamland, Groom Lake, etc) existed. This was about the same time that Area 51 buffs reported a dramatic decrease in activity at and around the base. It was acknowledged in a very generic manner, but was acknowledged none the less.

    Supposedly, the reason for the abandoning of the base was because the radiation from atomic tests wasn't going the "China Syndrome" way, back into the earth, but coming back up (area 51 was the 51st grid on a map used for nuke testing).

    I haven't followed it for a while, but last I heard, the experts were pointing at Arizona and New Mexico as the new locations for many, mini, Area 51s.

    --
    END OF LINE.
    1. Re:Area 51 does now exist by Artifakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are a lot of area 51s out west. Yucca Flats, where a lot of nuke tests happened, has an area 51 (if memory serves, they have areas up to about 100 or so marked off on the unclassified maps, actually showing at least some of the surface craters). Near White Sands New Mexico there is at least one more area marked 51, which was a missile impact area (just Nikes and small surface to air designs, no live nukes used there). You see the military is rather unimaginative when it comes to naming these things, and when you have a big military base, it's rather common to just number all the parts. You may be conflating the Yucca Flats area 51 with the one at Groom lake, which was supposedly used for aircraft testing, but again supposedly may hae some chemical (not nuclear) contamination.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    2. Re:Area 51 does now exist by blair1q · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, the government curtailed activity at Groom Lake because the Cold War was over and we weren't spending money to refurbish a Cold-War facility unless we needed one, and certainly not one that wasn't much of a secret any more.

      P.S. As for the "maps and photos" people are googling up, well, l-o-l, but the DoD knows how to make a deal with anyone in the satellite geometrology biz to crock the data for certain coordinates to alter or erase things. I personally know of two other actual places where you can walk up to the fence and see the vast array of constructed objects of clearly governmental design that have (a) never shown up on a map on paper or electronically and, (b) don't show up on any satellite photo, either. Neither facility is likely to be a total secret, given the light perimeter security (one has a public highway splitting it in two), but they're clearly not advertising them for obviosly good reason (so I won't, either). Now Area 51 is a good distraction. Keep the nutbars chasing what they can "uncover with enough effort" and away from active facilities.

  8. Re:*Puts on the tin foil hat* by pe1rxq · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Why should any government decide what I am allowed to know?

    Jeroen

    --
    Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
  9. Television Special by wls · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There was a television special recently about this. What I found even more interesting was a different security compromise.

    A private investigator was hired to watch the airport in Las Vegas and he observed which cars came and went on a frequent basis. He was eventually able to deduce which cars' owner were spending the day at Area 51.

    At that point, it became a simple matter of just following the cars to a plush neighborhood. When he went to knock on the door and asked about Area 51, they said "no comment" and shut the door in his face. One would think that just mentioning Area 51 would be enough to inspire curosity from the non-involved.

    An once-insider agreed to secretly meet with them doing the whole inside-a-hotel with blured-face and altered-voice routine. He examined maps and photos and said they were accurate. He also said that there were no UFOs at Area 51, and that the big secret was the abusive politics and unsafe worker conditions.

    Guess Area 51 scooby gang missed the television special on S4, where the anti-gravity from borrowed UFOs go on.

  10. the 'government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    There is no such thing as "The Government"
    In this country, you and I are the government.
    If the government owns something, you and I own it.
    Too many ppl have fallen for the ignorant notion that there is a discrete entity named "the government" that can help or hinder them.

  11. Is this shady journalism? by UM_Maverick · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In this post on the Area 51 site linked to from the article, Joerg Arnu (one of the "hackers" in the article) claims that Poulsen lured him into the interview under false pretenses, then refused his requests not to use the interview, hung up on him, and didn't return any further messages. I haven't read much of Poulsen's stuff, but is this typical of him?

  12. Re:No name? by the+unbeliever · · Score: 2, Interesting
    and since the people in general *own* the government.... well, you do the math

    No offense, but go back to basic civics.

    The government is not "owned" by the people. The representatives in government are elected by the populace, all save the President, who is elected by the Electoral College, and only the Electoral College (the popular vote, in the long run, means dick in the Presidential election).

    The government owns its own property, the government owns its own buildings. I'm sure that in a communal sense, sure, since our tax dollars paid for it, we may own some small part of it, but effectively? No.
  13. Re:Not a lot of sympathy by JDevers · · Score: 2, Interesting

    RTFA? How about you RTWC (read the whole comment), he says exactly that a few lines down.

    Public, means accessible and for the public good, not for YOUR good alone. For instance, a community park has a fence surrounding a dangerous sink hole. You are NOT allowed to go in and remove a section of the fence just because it is on public land even if you intended to go back in and replace the section.

  14. Re:... or so the aliens would have you believe! by Mike+Farooki · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For several years, whoever happens to be President of the US at the time has made an annual Presidential Determination to prevent "disclosure to unauthorized persons of classified information concerning that operating location." Here is Bush's Determination from last year :

    http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/09/20 030916-4.html

  15. Re:Wrong !! ;( by JMandingo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I know a girl took a week long trip around area 51 for her honeymoon. Weird, huh? Stayed at all the tourist trap hotels around there. At one point, she and her husband had a picnic in "Area 51" about 100 yards into the desert past a "no trespassing" sign. 20 minutes into their picnic a jeep pulled up and a guy told them to get the hell out of there. *Something* is there, something worth having the surveillance and personnel to protect to that level.

    --
    Vonnegut was right: Of all the words of mice and men, the saddest are, "It might have been."
  16. Legal Reform by logicnazi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While I know that often plea deals are important in order to garner testimony about organized crime or other criminal activities this sort of case illustrates (or at least might illustrate since I don't actually know who is telling the truth) the potential dangers. Bizarelly I find myself in agreement with Ashcroft, plea bargains should be *only* be offered in return for becoming an informant, it should be banned (legally and not just by the AGs rules) otherwise.

    For instance in this case the government has *every* encouragment to file suit against this guy even if they have no evidence. The threat of prison time is scary enough that any normal person will take a plea agreement accomplishing what the government really wants, stopping them from investigating area 51 (it would not surprise me at all if part of his probhation is not to even passively map the sensors, or even go close to area 51). The plea bargain allows the government to exercise considerable power by the threat of legal action without any real chance of court review.

    Moreover, as far as I'm concerned giving someone a deal for pleading guilty should be a violation of the 5th ammendment. After all a plea bargain is a reduced sentence in return for not insisting on your innocence. Or put another way in the presence of a plea offer there is a penalty for insisting on your innocence. Sure it isn't technically punishing someone for refusing to incriminate themselves but this is certainly within the spirit of the ammendment, if the implicit privacy argument is considered a valid constitutional principle than this sort of broad interpratation of the 5th is perfectly reasonable as well. I really can't see any pragmatic difference between a law which penalizes someone for not testifying to their guilt (which presumably could only apply if the individual was convicted) and a general practice of giving significantly reduced sentences in return for the admisson of guilt.

    Some people will protest that my position would rob the judicial system of discretion. Not at all, judges would still have plenty of discretion to give a light sentence. The change would just stop penalizing individuals for insisting on innocence. I also think it is only because upper class white kids always recieve plea bargains in drug cases (while poor black ones often don't) that the public is willing to stand for things like mandatory minimums and extreme drug sentences. I doubt most of the prosecutors are overtly racist but many people's gut reaction to seeing a well dressed white kid busted for drugs is a good kid who screwed up while a black kid in baggy pants and so forth is far more likely to be thought of as a bad person. Sure, the problem will still exist in sentencing but at least the system will be a little better and more open (it is easier to see that a judge is racially biased in his deciscions because everything is public record while often the surrounding facts to a plea bargain aren't so publicly accesible).

    --

    If you liked this thought maybe you would find my blog nice too:

  17. Here it is! by phoopee3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Using the latitude and longitude garnered from wikipedia, and terraserver, we can clearly see that this place is an airport. Area 51

  18. Re:... or so the aliens would have you believe! by waynelorentz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Apparently if a base doesn't exist, it is free from abiding by EPA regulations.

    Actually, whether a base officially exists or not, it is usually exempt from EPA regulations. That's one of the problems that some cities (San Antonio, Austin, etc...) are having redeveloping old military bases into high-tech centers, airports, and whatnot. After the military closes the base, and the civilians go in to redevlop, there's all sorts of nasty crap left over in the ground because the military is exempt from many EPA regulations.

    But don't blame the military, blame your representatives in Congress. They love exemptions, and have even exempted themselves from many federal laws, like labor laws, ADA, and others.

  19. Joerg Arnu Interview by timlee · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I took a look at Dreamland Resort's forums and found this message regarding the article posted by Joerg Arnu.

    Message posted by Joerg (Webmaster) on May 25, 2004 at 17:18:30 PST:

    For the record: I was suckered into that interview under false pretenses. Only at the very end of the interview did Mr. Poulsen reveal the true nature of his article, namely to accuse my friend Chuck Clark of stealing one of the sensors. This is a lie, fabricated for a cheap story!

    Upon learning this, I immediately requested that he not use my interview. Mr. Poulsen refused, hung up on me and since then does not return my calls or emails.

    This is certainly not very good journalism, and I most certainly want to distance myself from the article, which is based on lies and speculation.

    Although most of my experiences with the media were very positive, all it takes is one bad experience. In the future I will certainly be more reluctant to work with the media. A lesson Chuck has obviously learned long before me.
  20. Sensors nothing new or unusual by dsrtegl · · Score: 5, Interesting
    When I was in the Coast Guard, stationed at a LORAN station (in Nevada), we couldn't put up a fence around the station because it would interfere with the signal. We had a gate across the road, and underground pressure sensors along with beam sensors above ground to detect intruders. Since LORAN isn't sexy, we didn't have many trespassers but I did have to go out and shoo off the free range cattle that wandered in from time to time.

    I would have been pissed if some yahoo started messing with them, too. After all, they are there to ensure that no one vandalizes the equipment or gets fried by the 21,500 volts that exist across the base insulator of the antenna. We were most afraid of some BASE jumper getting killed while trying to climb the tower. In LORAN the whole tower is "hot" instead of a small radiator at the top.

    And if they broke one, I'd have to fix it.

  21. the problem with the USPS... by molo · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The problem with the USPS is that they use their government-granted monopoly on US domestic mail to subsidize their international shipping division. It makes it hard for companies like DHL, FedEx and UPS to compete internationally.

    But they still make sure that they run the whole thing at a loss, that way they can go to congress to get more funding whenever they want. They can also increase domestic postage whenever they want. The whole thing is a big scam.

    -molo

    --
    Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
  22. The problem of cliche by zeropointentity · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The problem with area 51 is that it's become notoriously cliche to suspect something 'spooky' is going on. Mention aliens in full seriousness to anyone, and chances are they'll laugh in your face. It's a myth, and a mighty good one, and perfect to mislead every ol' shmuck. Guys with trucks and such are probably employed only for the purpose of keeping myth alive just to give the people something to care about. Kinda like an amusement park with AK-47's. Besides, if everyone's eyes are focused on this red herring, then the real stuff is still flying under the radar.

  23. That's fine, but by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They were messing with stuff that doesn't belong to them. It eve said right on it that it was government property. Just because you find something on public land, doesn't mean it's yours to mess with. I work on public land (state university) and thousands of cars are parked here every day. Doesn't give you the right to go in any of them and mess with them, you'll be arrested and/or beaten up if you do. They are still the property of the person that holds the title, despite being parked on public land.

  24. Re:OT: One more data point... by jridley · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The funny thing is how much businesses come to believe that FedEx can do no wrong. Mostly they're excellent, but there are some areas of the country where they're NOT the best, and some businesses refuse to listen to you when you tell them what the "conditions on the ground" are.

    I had a friend who was a pharmacist at a hospital in northern Michigan (UP, Keweenaw area). He ordered some medical supplies from a place, and said "ship them UPS overnight. *DO* *NOT* ship them FedEx." Well, they shipped them FedEx overnight.

    About 5 days later the boxes were still not there. He called them and said "You shipped them FedEx, didn't you?" They had, and (as he knew) FedEx in that area is not guaranteed. They weren't going to drive 180 miles round trip from the depot to deliver one stinkin' package. They put all the boxes on a pallet, and when there's enough to bother, then they send out a truck.

    UPS, OTOH, has a local depot, and plenty of packages come into the area, so they have no problems delivering overnight (though there is a cutoff line, way out on the peninsula, where they don't guarantee 10:30 delivery anymore).

    This was 20 years ago, I'm betting FedEx has a local presence now, but I know there are still parts of the country where there are better choices than FedEx.

    This story always comes to mind when I'm watching the commercials where the guy didn't use FedEx, so the package is delayed.

  25. They test a lot more than missles and planes by lamoile · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I live about 100 miles north of Groom Lake. They test all kinds of things like microwave weapons to knock out communications. Once or twice a month my cell phone squelches worse than any CB you've ever heard. This lasts for a few hours. I've also seen unmanned vehicles flying in the area, some going almost faster than the eye can track them.

  26. If one extends this thinking. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It is reasonable to assume that military science is extremely advanced in many more areas than simply aerospace. Indeed, with even the slightest use of reasonable thought, it is perfectly logical to assume that almost all of the technology which Slashdotters and the public at large consider 'New' and get all excited over, is really stone-age by comparison to what could be available if only it were allowed. --That in fact, the reality we all live in is a total farce -which for some reason- nearly everybody seems happy enough to play along with.

    "Oooh. Digital paper." "Oooh. Bigger hard drives." "Oooh. Internal combustion."

    This stuff is only impressive in the way that withheld candies are impressive to children. To pretend that we are actually pushing the boundaries of human knowledge and capability with any of this crap is nothing short of willfully stupid.

    "Yeah? So what?" --Some might ask. "We know this is how it is, but there's national security to consider."

    Er. . . Well, no, that's a very thin excuse. This goes far beyond secret planes which fly faster. Technological advance has happened in areas and directions which go amazingly far beyond a simple question of keeping the better airplanes out of the hands of the commies. (Which in itself is an incredibly stupid concept which again, everybody on the planet plays along with.)

    The war in Iraq is an excellent example.

    Saddam and his forces could have been removed with very few soldiers with much greater efficiency and cleanliness than was done. The kind of technology available and in use today makes it possible to shut down a city or a stronghold, walk in and murder or abduct the people you want to murder or abduct with ease and simplicity. The only reason to commit giant forces with archaic weapons and broken, (and some would say, nonexistent) tactics to a giant overseas ground war is this. . .

    To create a huge, infernal endless war designed to kill millions of people and absorb billions of dollars in goods. --There is a LOT of money and power to be had from big messy wars. Understanding how this is true and where the power comes from and goes to, who it benefits and why, is the first step to grasping how the real world works.

    Consider this. . .

    One of the other directions military research has gone in has been toward that of mind control and mood altering. In fact, this could easily be considered the holy grail of military science; when you can control a population, then the need for guns and tanks is instantly nullified. --And anybody who has any level of competency in research, and who has the courage to look at frightening possibilities rather than seek comfort in ridiculing others while avoiding the pain of being ridiculed themselves, (and geeks have strong sore spots regarding this given their experiences through life; and isn't it curious that those most able to see through the veil are also those targeted with some of the most deliberate and cruel social programming?) --Anybody who knows how to question and has the balls to do so, knows that the holy grail of mind control was discovered long ago, and is widely implemented today across all strata of society in many different forms.

    Secret planes that go fast?

    The military industrial complex, (to use an old but accurate term), has more than secret planes in its bat belt!

    The 'other' effects of cell phones upon the human brain and cognitive function were not only well understood, but were deliberately designed and were the primary reason for the proliferation of the wireless technology. --And population control through EM is only one way; combined with chemicals in our food, the direct psychological programming in advertising, music, television and movies -through all strata of media- combine to provide a means of near total control of humanity.

    Many of you laugh. Would it be mind control if you feel that knee-jerk desire?

  27. Re:OT: One more data point... by Charcharodon · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Yeah FedX is a pain where I live, since they won't deliver anything without a signature that is an express package, so I end up driving 100 miles round trip to go get my box, usually computer parts. I've begged companies to send it USPS or UPS or do FedX ground since I don't have a similar problem with a signature, and the bastards end up sending it 2nd day express anyway.

    At $2.45 a gallon and 3 hours of driving I just find a different company to order from instead of fooling with FedX.

    They do have a deal though that you can sign up for a preauthorized drop point, either at your house or another location that can solve my problem of them wanting a signature, but I haven't gotten around to doing it yet.

  28. Re:OT: One more data point... by jridley · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Use this phrase, I've found it useful:

    "If you ship FedEx, the package will be refused."

  29. Re:OT: One more data point... by jridley · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Oh, I don't like UPS, in fact I prefer FedEx over UPS. But if I have my choice, I'll pick USPS, or Airborne Express. I've had the least amount of trouble with them. USPS handled almost all my 150 or so eBay sales shipments a few years ago when I was cleaning out, and no package was reported damaged. One of the five that I sent UPS (buyer's choice) was damaged. Every package I get via USPS looks like it was just picked up at the shipper, carried by hand 20 feet and placed in my box.

    But as has been mentioned, I'm sure there are depots where they are understaffed and underpaid, and stuff gets abused. Probably true of all companies.