Slashdot Mirror


Return of the TV Wristwatch

An anonymous reader writes "20 years after the Seiko TV watch, another Asian firm has given it another go. The Globe and Mail in Canada got their hands on the NHJ TV Watch and have posted a review. The writer thinks it's still just way too huge to be a watch but is still impressed."

186 comments

  1. I'd prefer the Seiko with the breakout box by adzoox · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Seiko Wristwatch TV wasn't a watch and it wasn't just a "thing" on your wrist. It had a breakout box that carried audio and power that fit on your belt. The actual wrist part of the device was MUCH smaller than this device (at least as it appears in the picture)

    I got one of the Seiko's off eBay as a novelty item not too long ago. I actually would like it if someone did the same with the breakout box also being an iPod like MP3 player. I'd rather have as small a device as possible on my wrist and have it tell time, if I want higher functions - connect the breakout box.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    1. Re:I'd prefer the Seiko with the breakout box by computechnica · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why not use Bluetooth instead of a cable. Your pocket harddrive Ipod could then stream video and audio to it or pair of sunglasses. Cool Stuff

    2. Re:I'd prefer the Seiko with the breakout box by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "I'd rather have as small a device as possible on my wrist and have it tell time, if I want higher functions - connect the breakout box."

      A little OT, but I always thought it would be cool if I could look at my watch and see the caller ID of who's calling my cell phone. I'm pretty picky about when I actually answer my phone, so if this watch had a "send to voicemail" button, it'd save me from digging into my pocket every time I feel that vibration alert go off. [CUE SELF GRATIFICATION JOKES]

      I'm looking forward to battery advances that allow something like a watch to have radio connectivity for a decent amount of time. Can't say I'm all that hindered at the idea of recharging my watch every couple of days, though. Why not? I do that with my cell phone.

    3. Re:I'd prefer the Seiko with the breakout box by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      Does Bluetooth have enough bandwidth for a lo-res video signal?

    4. Re:I'd prefer the Seiko with the breakout box by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      Why not use Bluetooth instead of a cable. Your pocket harddrive Ipod could then stream video and audio to it or pair of sunglasses.
      Nahh, let's cram the whole shebang in a baseball cap, with a drop-down HUD, a bit like the hat-radio in "Captain Scarlet"...
    5. Re:I'd prefer the Seiko with the breakout box by Mateito · · Score: 1, Troll

      > pair of sunglasses

      NO!!

      Just you just KNOW that some IDIOT is going to be watching TV while driving.

    6. Re:I'd prefer the Seiko with the breakout box by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why not use Bluetooth instead of a cable. Your pocket harddrive Ipod could then stream video and audio to it or pair of sunglasses.

      Not enough bandwidth. That's why not.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    7. Re:I'd prefer the Seiko with the breakout box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      barely - think of bluetooth as wireless USB 1.1 - the average TV tuner that is USB 1.1 pushes data at an average of 3Mbps.

  2. Absolute rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    haha 20years later and that is the best you can do ?
    shame on you
    not to mention that a lot of countries are switching off analog TV transmitters (for digital), so its going to be a great paperweight

  3. Don't like the trend by Sarojin · · Score: 0

    I want a watch that tells the time and just tells the time. A cell phone that only makes calls. A keyboard without Internet Keys. Why do I end up paying a premium for these simple devices? :(

    --
    HOW'S MY POSTING? CALL 1-800-POSTING
    1. Re:Don't like the trend by John+Harrison · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I want a watch that tells the time and just tells the time. A cell phone that only makes calls. A keyboard without Internet Keys. Why do I end up paying a premium for these simple devices? :(

      Please note that you are not forced to purchase this TV watch. You can buy a watch that just tells time at any number of stores. In fact, I understand that they are rather common and have gotten less expensive over time.

      As far as the cell phone goes, I want one that can receive calls as well, and find the fact that mine can store numbers to be very useful. Oddly enough each cell phone I have purchased it less expensive than the previous one and superior in every way.

      I have an IBM Model M keyboard that just had its tenth birthday. Why pay a premium for a new keyboard when you can just keep using your existing keyboard? If you want one, head to your local thrift store.

    2. Re:Don't like the trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you also one of those people who want an operating system without a browser, which just operates the system and a car without a stereo, power windows, air conditioning, which just drives?

  4. One question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WHY?

    1. Re:One question... by kfg · · Score: 3, Funny

      WHY?

      So you can have a convenient WebTV based interface with which to interact with your toaster remotely from the mall, silly.

      KFG

    2. Re:One question... by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      I gave up wearing a watch because I get the time from my cell phone. Convieniently, my cell phone(Nokia 3650) also has a screen that's bigger than this watch/TV, it has a 3GO video player built-in, and it has enough memory to hold an episode of The Simpsons. But it doesn't have a TV tuner.

      I have a sneaking suspision these guys could make far more money selling their 'lego size tuners' to Nokia, et al. It would be a better viewing experience for me, I'd have to carry around one less thing and, heck, I get enough chick-repelant carrying my D&D books as it is.

      TW

    3. Re:One question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still want to know how my web-enabled toaster-controlling watch manages to physically put the bread in the toaster.

    4. Re:One question... by Lord+Prox · · Score: 1

      So you can have a convenient WebTV based interface with which to interact with your toaster remotely from the mall, silly.

      Great, just what we need. A bunch of Dork Tracy's running around. Sign me up...

    5. Re:One question... by amber_of_luxor · · Score: 1

      I gave up wearing a watch because I get the time from my cell phone.

      It was when I got a pager, I could breathe a sigh of relief of not having to ask other people the time. It was the first timepiece I could carry, that kept accurate time.

      Amber

      --
      Wind Beneath Thy Wings
    6. Re:One question... by kfg · · Score: 1

      I still want to know how my web-enabled toaster-controlling watch manages to physically put the bread in the toaster.

      Don't be silly. It's obvious that that's beyond the capabilities of a watch or toaster.

      Your web enabled bread box hands off to your web enabled Roomba which kicks a field goal from long yardage. The engineers are still working out some kinks with the whole "bagel thing" though.

      None of this really matters, or course, because your Aibo steals the toast before you get home.

      KFG

    7. Re:One question... by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      This is surreal. I write about chick-repellant and get my first slasdot reply ever from.... Amber? :-)

    8. Re:One question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quick - hit on her before she gets away.

      Chances are, I'm behind a firewall or proxy.

  5. Pulp fiction time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fabienne: Whose watch is this?
    Butch: It's a TV, baby.
    Fabienne: Whose TV is this?
    Butch: It's Zed's.
    Fabienne: Who's Zed?
    Butch: Zed's dead, baby. Zed's dead.

    1. Re:Pulp fiction time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Not to mention how difficult it would be for Butch's father's friend to have hidden it up his arse all that time.

  6. I used to have a TV watch by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    I haven't used it for a while though. I moved to an area where we don't get cable, so there wasn't really anything to watch.

    1. Re:I used to have a TV watch by Phisbut · · Score: 3, Funny

      And with the cable constantly following you, you could always know how to get back home... now, it's a little riskier to go outside with no string leading you home... maybe you should invest in a wristwatch GPS too? ;-)

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    2. Re:I used to have a TV watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just get satellite. Keeping the dish lined up as you walk is a bitch, but not tripping over coax is a plus.

    3. Re:I used to have a TV watch by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Good thinking. I can build a dish into a sombrero, and it will keep the sun out of my eyes as well.

  7. what a great idea! by conJunk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    it's not like those of us who are actually trying to walk anywhere aren't already constantly dodging distracted pedestrians who's eyes are glued to the adverts on the bus shelters, instead of looking where they're going

    this is the sort of handy contraption that makes daily life for the rest of us that much more exciting!

    1. Re:what a great idea! by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      it's not like those of us who are actually trying to walk anywhere aren't already constantly dodging distracted pedestrians who's eyes are glued to the adverts on the bus shelters

      I personally would have no guilty feelings about intentionally walking right over the top of any pedestrian who is trying to walk and watch TV at the same time, but isn't really watching where they are going. My lack of guilt would be similar with regard to those people standing still in the middle of the sidewalk and blocking everybody's path.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    2. Re:what a great idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is the sort of handy contraption that makes daily life for the rest of us that much more exciting!

      Yeah, now you can be distracted by the adverts on your wrist.

  8. What is it with these watches.... by gorre · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I really don't understand what it is with geeks and these big ugly plastic watches! Personally I just like a very simple analog wristwatch.

    --
    "Madness is something rare in individuals - but in groups, parties, peoples, ages it is the rule." -- Nietzsche
    1. Re:What is it with these watches.... by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's actually not a watch - it's a wrist-mounted TV unit. Which makes it a bit of a misnomer; as the article states, nobody would wear it on his wrist like he would a watch.

      Offtopic part:
      I used to have a calculator watch in 7th grade. It beeped when you pushed ANY of the buttons, and I couldn't find any way to turn the beeps off. So the teacher wouldn't let me use it on my tests, because it disturbed the rest of the class. So I was taking math tests with no calculator, too many problems to do in my head or on paper, and I was no less geek than when I had it on.

      Now I don't wear a watch at all.

    2. Re:What is it with these watches.... by gorre · · Score: 0

      It's actually not a watch - it's a wrist-mounted TV unit. Which makes it a bit of a misnomer; as the article states, nobody would wear it on his wrist like he would a watch.

      I only skimmed the article and presumed perhaps it doubled as a digital watch; well if it isn't even a watch it's worse than I thought! Maybe it could be worn in tandem with a big calculator watch though ;-).

      --
      "Madness is something rare in individuals - but in groups, parties, peoples, ages it is the rule." -- Nietzsche
    3. Re:What is it with these watches.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to have an oldish metall wristwatch, please used to think it looked old.. and well it was, but the new crap ones was all plastic, and I cause have that for many hours on my skin before it turned red.

      Nowerdays when the mettal look is back, and doesnt cost as much (realy cheap actually) I dont use a watch at all.. Why would I? I have to carry my phone with me anyhow, and it has a clock.

      Why one would integrate a TV into a wristwatch and not a phone I dont understand, unless the wristwatch also had a phone...

      Im a geek, but I do NOT want to carry around more crap then I need to!..

    4. Re:What is it with these watches.... by vasqzr · · Score: 1

      I used to have a calculator watch in 7th grade. It beeped when you pushed ANY of the buttons, and I couldn't find any way to turn the beeps off.

      Hah, had you been a true geek you would have opened the wristwatch and disconnected the little coil that goes to the metal disk inside.

      That stops them from beeping.

    5. Re:What is it with these watches.... by Feyr · · Score: 1

      i had one of those too, i found you could open the back of the watch (it was just clipped in place, not screwer) and put a piece of paper between the spring and the speaker. no more beeps

      it was handy as we weren't allowed to have/use calculators. a watch just blended in

    6. Re:What is it with these watches.... by Gossy · · Score: 1

      It's actually not a watch - it's a wrist-mounted TV unit. Which makes it a bit of a misnomer; as the article states, nobody would wear it on his wrist like he would a watch.

      What about it makes it not a watch? If you look at the picture in the article, it has the time at the top of the screen. I'm guessing the time is shown even if the TV part is switched off..

  9. Too small by I_am_Rambi · · Score: 0, Troll

    I would rather watch tv on my 114 inch screen at a resolution of 1280x1024.

    1. Re:Too small by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      114 inch screen

      Stop buying those spam pills for your tv!

    2. Re:Too small by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

      Am I right in guessing that you have a projector? Or did you answer one of those "turn any TV into a big screen!!!1" offers?

  10. Pocket Watch... by thirteenVA · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Let me know when it's available as a pocket watch..

    1. Re:Pocket Watch... by guido1 · · Score: 1

      Let me know when it's available as a pocket watch..

      Oddly enough, the writer got sick of wearing it on his wrist "... is more repelling to women than a wet spot on the front of your pants..." and carried around attached to a lanyard in his pocket.

  11. Who would want to watch TV on their wrist? by autopr0n · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Seiko thing is a pretty amazing piece of engineering for the time, IMO. But who would want to sit there staring at their wrist for more then a few seconds. I mean, after a couple minutes wouldn't your arm get tired?

    Why not make some "eyephones", not to be so gibsonesq, but wouldn't a small monitor suspended a few inches from your face make a lot more sense for 'ultraportable' TV?

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  12. In case anyone wants one... by antiracist · · Score: 4, Informative

    these have been available for a while now from Dynamism. they're cheaper than i would have thought at $219. probably the cheapest item dynamism carries...

    1. Re:In case anyone wants one... by SlightlyMadman · · Score: 2, Informative

      probably the cheapest item dynamism carries...

      Nope, I think that honor goes to the iDuck.

      --

      Money I owe, money-iy-ay
  13. bah by abscondment · · Score: 2, Insightful

    TV on a watch is a waste of time. Shrink down a PDA and give me wireless access and then I'll give you a thought.

    1. Re:bah by spidergoat2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Exactly. If the tuner is the size of a lego block, it should, ( and probably will) be incorporated into a PDA, (or better, cell phone). That would make the most sense.

    2. Re:bah by Mikkeles · · Score: 3, Funny
      'TV on a watch is a waste of time.'

      I don't need a TV; I have a front loading washing machine;^) Now, if they could get that on my wrist, I'd be interested!

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    3. Re:bah by dltallan · · Score: 1

      I don't want to know what you are wearing that would fit into it!

      --
      Respectfully, David Tallan
  14. good grief! by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 3, Funny
    If I saw someone wearing that thing, I couldn't help but say:
    • Go Go Power Rangers

    It looks just like their wristband gadgets

    1. Re:good grief! by guido1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      If I saw someone wearing that thing, I couldn't help but say: Go Go Power Rangers It looks just like their wristband gadgets

      Just one question... How do you know that? ;)

    2. Re:good grief! by Inda · · Score: 2, Funny

      I had one of those big Casio remote control watches.

      I always had a chuckle in other people's houses... They would be flicking through the channels quite happily until I held down one of the buttons on my watch. The signal from the watch would block their remote (that's the way I like to think of it) and they would press the buttons harder and harder until finally giving up.

      I'm guessing I cost my friends enough cash over the years with their constant replacing of batteries. Did they not put two and two together and realise that the batteries only ran out when I was around? :)

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    3. Re:good grief! by the+real+darkskye · · Score: 1

      Ahh the good old casio remote watches, not just fun at friends, but at school too or even in a nice big shiney electronics store where they keep all the sony tv's together and they all turn off to the same remote.

      That said its past 5pm and its friday, where's the nearest pub?

      --
      Music is everybody's possession.
      It's only publishers who think that people own it.
      Fuck Beta
      ~John Lenno
  15. Cell phones by awhelan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Cell phones have become the piece of technology that everyone wants to show their friends now. A lot of people even use them as a replacement for their watches. There may be a market for cell phone TV's, but I can't see anybody buying this.

    1. Re:Cell phones by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      There may be a market for cell phone TV's, but I can't see anybody buying this.

      Many phones can already play divx/mpeg which is preferable as you can pause etc when distracted. The only time you'd be better with a TV tuner was to catch live events, say sport/news etc. Even then though, most phones now have net access, and why would you want to watch a football game on a screen where you can't even see the ball!!

    2. Re:Cell phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was an article in the Wall Street Journal the other day. The Japanese have two models of cell phone TVs to pick from.

  16. I'll say it again: by burgburgburg · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm not going to be satisfied until I get my flying car. I've given up on the personal jet pack, but I'm not backing down on the flying car.

    1. Re:I'll say it again: by corbettw · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to be satisfied until I get my flying car.

      Even if it meant being taken advantage of by a bunch of deranged, German scientists? Perv.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  17. Earthlings! by Digitus1337 · · Score: 1, Funny

    What is their obsession with digital watches?

    1. Re:Earthlings! by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Well there just a neat idea.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  18. My Goodness... by Mz6 · · Score: 1

    This is about the equivalent of when one of the members of RunDMC (I believe) wore the wall clock around his neck as a wrist watch.

    --
    Hmmm.
    1. Re:My Goodness... by antiracist · · Score: 1

      you're thinking of Flava Flav of Public Enemy

    2. Re:My Goodness... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, no. Not Run D.M.C..

      Flavor Flav of Public Enemy.

    3. Re:My Goodness... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Public Enemy. Flavor Flav if I remember rightly.

  19. The beginning of the end? by Synesthesiatic · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Aside from the woman-repelling aesthetic, I wonder how much longer over-the-air TV will even be available. It seems like it's on the way out, with cell phones slowing creeping into its airspace.

    Without broadcast TV, gadgets like this would be useless, and perhaps replaced by those same next-gen cell phones (with an expensive TV subscription plan of course).

    1. Re:The beginning of the end? by BillFarber · · Score: 1
      Without broadcast TV, gadgets like this would be useless.

      Except that when the time comes, these gadgets will get streaming broadcasts via WiFi.

    2. Re:The beginning of the end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd need 5000 cel phones per person to use up all that TV bandwidth.

    3. Re:The beginning of the end? by AlecC · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the UK, we are going to have broadcast TV indefinitely, but they are going to turn off the analog broadcast in about 2008 and have digital only. Digital broadcast - not satellite - is already up and running.

      I would imagind that the same is likely to be true in the US in due course, because there are some places which it will never by appropriate to run cable, and cutting someone off fram access to TV is downright un-American.

      Apart from anything else, what \re you going to wathc in your RV. And will they cable all the trailer parks? I know satellite is an option, but Digital Terrestrial is likely to be in there.

      Which means that the watch will have to pack in a full digital decoder. Hmm - another couple of years, I would say.

      Of course, things like this can affect the process. If there are a load of people going around with gadgets like this, advertisers will pay to get to them. If good enough, these can make their own supply.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
  20. Making progress by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Yeah...its still too huge, but its still a helluva lot smaller, and doesn't have a wire that has to go up your sleeve to the battery pack/antenna strapped to your arm. Fact is, there's been a lot of progress and once they've really worked out these flexible OLED displays, we will start to truly see a lot more miniaturization, as the display is the largest part of most of todays electronics.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:Making progress by kfg · · Score: 1

      Now all they have to do is develop 6 inch tall people to use these display devices.

      There's a reason the display is the largest part.

      KFG

    2. Re:Making progress by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      What I meant by largest part was the guts of the display take up considerable space, not the size of the screen itself. Our only real hope with that is wearable computers or holographic displays.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    3. Re:Making progress by kfg · · Score: 1

      What I meant by largest part was the guts of the display take up considerable space, not the size of the screen itself.

      Yes, believe it or not I actually understood that, but that still leaves the fact that the human interface is still the essential limit on miniaturization, and by human interface I mean to include such things as cord jacks and durability when sat upon, and when discussing display screens the area of the display alone is often much the largest factor in how small you can make the end device. This will still hold true even when we can simply spray a complete working TV on a bit of plastic sheeting.

      KFG

  21. Excellent quote by spellraiser · · Score: 5, Funny

    The writer of the review is quite the humorist. For instance:

    Sacrificing my public image in the name of science, I wore it as a watch for about an hour at the local mall. If you're into female repellant, wearing it this way will give you better results than a wet spot on the front of your pants.

    In light of this, I propose that slashdot's motto be changed to: News for Nerds. Stuff That Repels Females.

    Hmmm ... maybe not. Don't see it catching on, somehow.

    --
    I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
  22. What? by autopr0n · · Score: 2, Funny

    How is a it a 'wrist watch' if it's around your neck?

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:What? by antiracist · · Score: 1

      because he would hold it on his wrist and pretend he was reading a wrist watch.

    2. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no he didnt

  23. Public Enemy by mopslik · · Score: 1

    Maybe you're thinking of Public Enemy's Flava Flav? Same time-frame, though.

  24. What they need to do... by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...is have motion sensors in the watch that will let you wave the display in the air and use persistence of vision to make a bigger virtual display - kind of like they do with those LED wands that show messages in the air. That way if, y'know, your wrist was moving back and forth really rapidly then you could see a much larger image of, well, um... ...Star Trek. That's it. DS-9 all the way! w00!

    1. Re:What they need to do... by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 2, Funny

      With the rapid back and forth motion necessary to make the image visible, it would probably be better suited to watching pr0n, or at the very least, Voyager instead of DS9..

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    2. Re:What they need to do... by Xyde · · Score: 1
      That's the most stupid thing I've ever heard.

      All very well to wave your nokia phone around to show a text message, but to watch TV? You could maybe view a commercial before your arm got tired.

    3. Re:What they need to do... by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 1


      > That's the most stupid thing I've ever heard.

      That's pretty much what I was thinking as I posted it, but now that I've been modded "interesting" I'm wondering if somebody should actually rig one up and try it.

      Suddenly a stupid wank joke has turned into an experiment requiring millions of dollars in r&d... behold the power of the mod!

      Now watch somebody do it and become a billionaire off my idea. Bastards...

    4. Re:What they need to do... by mikael · · Score: 1

      Better still, have an oscillating laser to project the image onto a nearby surface.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    5. Re:What they need to do... by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Well if you can point them to this slashdot post than there would be a case for stealing your IP.

  25. Hmm, that thing got a hemi? by emorphien · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Well maybe it's bulletproof, and with your 4 friends you can unite in a non-homoerotic manner to call upon captain planet. Because he always gets the babes.

    Ok, seriously now, if that's the best they can do, no wonder they would rather use OLEDs for those things.

    --


    Presently here, but not there.
  26. While the neat factor... by Dagny+Taggert · · Score: 2, Interesting

    of this thing is pretty high IMHO, it's usefullness is almost zilch. First, when was the last time you watched broadcast TV? In my case, it's been years ago; then again, I rarely watch TV at all. The only good use I can think of for this thing is at sporting events when you want the camera's view. I grow tired of "gadgety" gadgets. I want smaller, lighter and multi-functional---the first thing that comes to mind is something like a Treo 600. A good, clear screen (OLED?) coupled with broadband wireless and a satellite tuner would REALLY set the world on fire, even if it looked like a geek's wet dream. I know, I know: we have to get past clunky and useless to get to cool and useable. But why did this thing ever leave the R&D Department?

    --
    Don't be a looter...and yes, I know that it's spelled with an "A" instead of an "E".
    1. Re:While the neat factor... by mrzaph0d · · Score: 1

      last time i watched broadcast TV was the other night when a storm ruined satellite reception and i needed to see the news to know how much closer the storm was gonna get.

      i woulda listened to the radio instead, but the #$%# baseball game was on and they didn't interupt for timely weather reports. *shrug* i get what i pay for..

      --
      this is just a placeholder till i send back my real sig from the future.
  27. Re:Poll Troll Toll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Returning stuff like Televisions and Wristwatches whilst having sex with a mare.

  28. Anything the Americans make... by manavendra · · Score: 1

    ...the Japanese can make ir smaller!

    --
    http://efil.blogspot.com/
    1. Re:Anything the Americans make... by emorphien · · Score: 1

      ...and more efficient and for half the price.

      --


      Presently here, but not there.
    2. Re:Anything the Americans make... by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      And conversely, anything the Japanese can make the Americans can make bigger. With the possible exception of anime.

  29. eyephones today! by nounderscores · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:eyephones today! by JCOTTON · · Score: 0

      Yeh, for $999 and $1900. Chump change. I am already nearsighted, dont need to make it worse.

  30. There is a cultural difference by superpulpsicle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In Asian countries there is a fashionable trend and social acceptance to wearing these newly looking watches.

    Like the Casio G-shocks and other hi-tech watches, they sold like hot cakes in the mid 90s. It wasn't until the year 2000 before they start making an appearance in the U.S. This TV watch will probably be a super trend in Asia for years before people start buying it in U.S.

  31. Try MY Television wrist watch by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 2, Funny
    It's a 12-inch b/w tv, with lead acid battery, inverter, and little cart with wheels, like the kind used for luggage. And I have some velcro straps to lash the TV to your wrist.

    Um, so you can call it a watch.

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  32. Why not.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just take it off the watch band and mount it in something else....say as a display on a helmet? It may be too large for a wrist, but that doesnt mean it won't have other applications.

  33. Watch what? by mratitude · · Score: 0

    I'm not too crazy about the idea of wearing a phone on my wrist, wearing a TV on my wrist is better?

    --


    Mod me troll, if you must, I can't help it.
  34. As with all gadgets... by WormholeFiend · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The usage bottleneck is still the battery... limited to one hour of tv in this instance.

    1. Re:As with all gadgets... by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      I wonder. Has anyone ever thought of putting together a portable generator?
      A small internal combustion motor like those used in RC cars powering a small alternator, add some electronics and presto!: portable power source.
      Might be a bit noisy though.

    2. Re:As with all gadgets... by denis-The-menace · · Score: 0, Troll

      Obviously, the best battery would be the wearer's own Blood.

      The question then becomes who blacks out first: you or the watch!

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
  35. VHF/UHF is dead (at least in Berlin) by yogibaer · · Score: 2, Informative

    In Berlin, they turned analog VHF/UHF off and switched to digital DVB-T this spring. The rest of good old Germany will follow suit in the next couple of years, which would make this the most expensive display of white noise around :-). A DVB-T wristwatch with a USB port would be very cool though: watch TV while they send that 2gigabyte file to your Notebook...

    1. Re:VHF/UHF is dead (at least in Berlin) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uuuuh... BS. They didn't force everyone to buy new receivers, DVB-T is just there as an additional gimmick.

    2. Re:VHF/UHF is dead (at least in Berlin) by ran-o-matic · · Score: 1

      The Dolby press release says they turned off analog in August of last year. See:
      http://www.dolby.com/press/wb_pr_0308_berlinpressr elease.html
      http://www.dvb.org/index.php?id=10&nid=35
      for a couple of press releases.

    3. Re:VHF/UHF is dead (at least in Berlin) by yogibaer · · Score: 1

      I am sorry about that, your are right. I mixed up dates. (I must confess, that I didn't own a TV for some time now, wristwatch or otherwise :-). Analog terrestial TV ended in Berlin on August 4th 2003 and rollout was completed in some other regions on May 24th of this year. For more information (if anyone of you ever carries his or her TV to Europe :-): The official site (in german, I am afraid) is: Das Ueberall-Fernsehen (http://www.ueberall-tv.de), for DVB-T and for digital TV in general Die TV-Plattform (http://www.tv-plattform.de). There is an overview over switchover activities in nine european countries from the Conseil supérieur de l'audiovisuel (in French, where DVB-T is translated as: La télévision numérique terrestre (TNT). The report has the title: Le développement de la TNT en Europe (http://www.csa.fr/actualite/dossiers/dossiers_det ail.php?id=14948). There is a lot of (2002) material about the "switchover" to digital to be found at the Information Society website of the European Union. The study from April 2002 can be found here:http://europa.eu.int/information_society/topi cs/ecomm/useful_information/library/studies_ext_co nsult/index_en.htm#2002 (scroll down to April 2002) and a lot of contributions by several broadcasters can be found here: http://europa.eu.int/information_society/topics/ec omm/useful_information/library/public_consult/inde x_en.htm#pc_digital_switchover_broadcasting. Sorry again.

  36. Another product for the same old sports niche by ianscot · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Wow, a portable video player with a tiny, tiny screen. This one, rather than storing stuff on a HD, limits you to VHF and UHF signals -- so I guess it's in a different niche than the various "iPod killers" we see coming down the pike lately.

    Instead it's the "I want to hear (and kinda squint to watch) the broadcast while I'm at the game" niche. This has the same appeal as an old lug-it-to-the-game TV from 1980ish. The article's right: it's for the "news/sports junkie" and that's about it. Only, of course, news junkies want CNN and sports junkies want ESPN, neither of which'll come in.

    What this article mainly does is impress me with the product Seiko made 20 years ago. The market for the new version isn't any better now -- if anything it's smaller, because people don't think of broadcast signals as the entire universe of TV any more. Eh (shrugs).

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    1. Re:Another product for the same old sports niche by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Only, of course, news junkies want CNN and sports junkies want ESPN, neither of which'll come in.

      That's why you need to buy the optional DirectTV Backpack. At 50 lbs, it's the perfect nerd accessory.

    2. Re:Another product for the same old sports niche by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead it's the "I want to hear (and kinda squint to watch) the broadcast while I'm at the game" niche.

      That reminds me of a golf tournament a few years ago on the BBC. It was on a quiet moment (hey it's golf), and the cameras picked up a girl in the crowd looking at a portable TV. She looked a little bemused until the commentator said "Yes! It's you we're looking at!"

  37. Re:Poll Troll Toll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    whilst

    He may be AC, but only UK folks use the word 'whilst.'

  38. Phones, maybe. Watches, no way. by Octagon+Most · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Phones with TV reception are far more likely to receive mass acceptance than these wrist monstrosities. Toshiba and NEC have working models in Japan, check this WSJ review, and SprintPCS is brining MobiTV to some of its models in the U.S.

  39. Ugly... by jcostantino · · Score: 2, Insightful
    So it's basically just an ultra-miniature TV with a digital watch tacked on to it. TV doesn't rule my life as much as knowing what time it is.

    I bought a new watch from Swatch, mechanical, autowinder, sweep second hand, aluminum band, skeleton front and back, 21 jewels, etc... awesome watch for $125.

    I would rather have a nice watch that tells time and lives for more than 1 hour of use. This TV watch (both old and new, actually) seem to be for people with way too much disposable income.

    --
    Reviews with a twist! http://www.sardonicbastard.com
    1. Re:Ugly... by poindextrose · · Score: 1

      Explain to me how that Swatch ISN'T ugly...

      --
      Karma: Raspberry Kiwi
    2. Re:Ugly... by jcostantino · · Score: 1
      It boils down to a case of personal aesthetics. After looking around for a couple months, I decided on the Swatch.

      I don't know what sort of watch you wear but personally I wanted a unique watch. It also doesn't hurt that it weighs roughly half of my old Guess Microsteel watch did.

      Since I don't wear any jewelry - I like to wear a nice fashionable watch. Not to Chuck Woolery standards but something that might be noticed and admired.

      --
      Reviews with a twist! http://www.sardonicbastard.com
    3. Re:Ugly... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "I would rather have a nice watch that tells time and lives for more than 1 hour of use. "

      Yeah, there's lots of products out there that just don't appeal to everybody. Sucks, donnit?

  40. Wow, the thing is huge! by Judg3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I used to have a Timex BeepWear Pro, and let me tell you - that thing wore out it's welcome real fast. It was 3 times the thickness of a normal watch, larger overall then a normal watch, and took 3 batteries which lasted about a month. I think I wore it for about 5-6 weeks before finally getting rid of it.
    It just screamed "I'm a geek!" and was way to cumbersome to be useful.
    From the looks of this TV watch, it would be the same way. Neat toy for a few hours/days, then relegated to the drawer of forgotten tech

    --
    Looking for hardware (Currently need: Large Etch-a-Sketch) Have one? See my journal!
  41. What's the status of TV on a PDA? by g.a.g · · Score: 1

    Is anyone working on, say, a SD card with a TV tuner (be it analog or DVB) for a PDA? It probably still would suck the battery dry in no time, but it would be fun while it lasts...

    Alternatively, have a purpose built solution, maybe employing something like the Archos Video Jukebox or the Media Center of MS. What's the status there?

    Is there any advantage to be had by going for DVB? Batterywise, eg? Which size antenna do you need anyway?

    Just fodder for thought (and replies).

    Greetings, g.a.g

    --
    Hurricane Application Group, Dept of Meteorology Control, Ministry of Proactive Defense
  42. Paperback-size ... TV? by FosterSJC · · Score: 1
    From the article:

    "For years, my car's been equipped with a portable Casio colour TV for whenever I find myself sitting in the parking lot waiting for someone. A little smaller than a paperback, it fits into the armrest compartment on my VW Golf. Compared to the Buick-like size of my old B/W portable beast, my "armrest TV", is a Mini Cooper."


    Maybe it is just me, but did anyone else read this and think "why are you even carrying a paperback-size TV around... carry a paperback book instead." There is still no more useful timekiller while you are waiting in a parking lot, on the subway, in a doctor's office, or just have a lot of free-time, than reading a book. TV rots your brain, didn't anyone ever tell you that?
  43. jesus this is dumb by sbma44 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Enough with the Dick Tracy fantasies! The idea of a TV watch is asinine. Practical considerations about size aside, there's no point to it. The point of a wristwatch is that it can be looked at immediately at any time. If you feel like checking the time, your wristwatch allows you to do it immediately, anywhere. The operation takes about half a second.

    These attributes do not apply to watching television. Whatever video you watch will probably be of sufficient length that the time wasted fishing a larger, more useful device out of your pocket is negligible. This is why wristphones are stupid, too. If the device's use takes more than a split second and/or it doesn't need to be accessible on an instant whim, there is no reason to put it on your wrist. I'm all for video-enabled cell phones. I see no reason why my portable electronics need to reside somewhere other than my pockets. Hey, why not attach an ipod to a headband? The controls would be SUPER accessible!

    Now can we please forget these stupid wristwatch gadgets and get on with the flying cars?

    1. Re:jesus this is dumb by jcostantino · · Score: 1

      Dick Tracy Watch? Although this is cool but showing as discontinued. I remember they were covered a couple years ago, Fossil was going to carry them, blah blah... never saw them actually for sale, then the Wrist Net crap came out, now the Palm watches are in Fossil's catalog (after not being there a few weeks ago) and marked as discontinued? Odd...

      --
      Reviews with a twist! http://www.sardonicbastard.com
    2. Re:jesus this is dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enough with your asinine dictatorship and piss off

  44. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  45. It's huge... LIKE AN X-BOX!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    roffles at teh ECHS-BOCHS humor...

  46. PDA TV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So are there any PDAs yet with a built-in TV tuner? That would make much more sense IMO. I'd actually buy that .

  47. Great idea by not_a_product_id · · Score: 2, Funny

    The only thing that can makes geeks look geekier - waving their arms around like crazies to generate the larger image. I can see the ads now: Repel women, attract SWAT teams.

    --

    ---
    We spoke for about a half an hour. I don't recall a thing we said. - Colorblind James Experience

  48. They're just a little too late. by foxtrot · · Score: 1

    A few years ago, all the geeks with too much income would be all over this.

    Now there's not as many geeks with too much income, and the ones who still have it look at the watch and say, "What, no Tivo?"

    -JDF

  49. Does anyone need 2GB of memory for their PDA? by sleepingsquirrel · · Score: 1

    ...not for my PDA, but for the tivo in my wristwatch TV.

  50. Watching porn just got harder. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    If the TV moves with my hand, it'll be really difficult to focus

    1. Re:Watching porn just got harder. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just wear it on the other hand.

  51. Indeed, WHAT is it with these watches.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really don't understand what it is with people and any ugly watch.

    I wear no watch at all... There are clocks all over the place, what's the point?

    oooooooooooooo, your watch is bigger than mine. I wish I could be you.

    1. Re:Indeed, WHAT is it with these watches.... by gorgon · · Score: 1

      If there are clocks everywhere, then you don't get outside enough. If you can't make yourself leave the city, at least go to a park once in a while.

      --

      And I'd be a Libertarian, if they weren't all a bunch of tax-dodging professional whiners.
      Berke Breathed
    2. Re:Indeed, WHAT is it with these watches.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, why do you need a clock in the park? Isn't the whole point to get away and relax?

      Who's stuck up now Mr. Time Slave.

      If you insist on being a slave and really need a clock then you have a PDA? Cellphone? Clock in the car? GPS? etc... Fuck watches

    3. Re:Indeed, WHAT is it with these watches.... by gorgon · · Score: 1

      I have no PDA, nor a cell phone. My usual trips to parks are by bike, foot, or rollerlade, so still no time piece.

      --

      And I'd be a Libertarian, if they weren't all a bunch of tax-dodging professional whiners.
      Berke Breathed
    4. Re:Indeed, WHAT is it with these watches.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go! Go!

  52. My favorite quote from the article... by Xaroth · · Score: 1

    "If you're into female repellant, wearing it this way will give you better results than a wet spot on the front of your pants."

  53. I4U reviewed the Wrist TV weeks ago already by i4u · · Score: 1
  54. what good is a watch without Mickey on it? by rtphokie · · Score: 1

    Wow, it only took 20 years to increase the size and weight of the watch several times over.

  55. fantastic for slobs! by yow2000 · · Score: 1

    All that's needed now is a wristfridge and a portable couch (unsigned)

  56. So do you wear a hat with a DISH Network antenna? by Illbay · · Score: 2, Funny

    Gives new meaning to the concept of "geek with a beanie."

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
  57. Re:Poll Troll Toll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope, anybody outside America uses British (or Regular) English. That being said, whilst hasn't been in circulation for the past 150 years...

  58. Only if.... by CaptScarlet22 · · Score: 1

    My local TV station would show porn!!

    Then I could put 2 of them on each wrist, and watch both wrists AND the 2 TV's....Wow that would be amazing!!!

    Otherwise forget it....


    --
    It's left blank because I have nothing to say to you punks!
  59. Interesting! Now life is nearly complete. by emtboy9 · · Score: 1

    This is a pretty cool gadget, and given the extra cash, I will probably pick one up when it is available, if for nothing other than the gadget factor.

    I wonder tho, what they will do when the US markets, at least, go from analog tv broadcast to digital broadcast. Since the FCC mandated that TV stations switch from Analog RF to Digital RF, will that affect the usabliltiy in the long run?

    Also, wouldnt it be neat if they could add a small port and start selling it with walkman sized portable DVD players??

    --
    "Our funds have never taken part in toxic or death spiral convertible financings of any sort" -BayStar's managing partne
  60. My prediction by TrentL · · Score: 2, Funny

    This invention will revolutionize the use of pornography. Think about it.

    1. Re:My prediction by bluenova · · Score: 1

      You'd have to be careful of which wrist you wore it on...otherwise it'd be kind of hard to follow the screen...

    2. Re:My prediction by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      " This invention will revolutionize the use of pornography. Think about it."

      My... [pant pant]... porn ... won't stop motion blurring.. [pant pant]

    3. Re:My prediction by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "My... [pant pant]... porn ... won't stop motion blurring.. [pant pant]"

      Put the watch on your other hand!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:My prediction by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2, Funny
      This invention will revolutionize the use of pornography. Think about it.
      They could put a motion-activated piezoelectric genetator like in the Seiko Kinetic watch...
    5. Re:My prediction by TrentL · · Score: 2, Funny

      Put the watch on your other hand!

      Better yet, put watches on both hands and have a threesome!

  61. Re:Your couches, chairs, etc.. all are COVERED ... by arpoodle · · Score: 1

    "In fact, they're now finding that most Women have large quantities of PBDEs in their breast milk"

    Just as well.. can you imagine.. flame-thrower jubblies..

    btw wrong thread???

    a

    --
    When a passenger of the foot, hooves in sight, tootel the horn trumpet melodiously
  62. What's the point...? by igrp · · Score: 1
    I agree that from an engineering point of view this is pretty impressive. But I can't stop wondering why anyone would want to buy one of these, aside from the cool, 'look-at-me' factor.

    I already have three TVs in my house. They have way better video and audio and don't suffer from the reception problems that these devices, naturally, suffer from. I have two computer screens at work that I could watch streaming video on (at least, financial networks usually offer streaming TV to business customers). Plus, there's a TV in the lobby. So that covers about 80% of my time.

    There's also a bunch of TVs at the gym. The same is true for most coffee shops. I also do have a built-in TV tuner & screen in my car. So if I ever find myself waiting for someone I could, in theory, watch TV on that (I never do though). That pretty much covers the rest of my time. And when I am not at work, at the gym or at home I am probably somewhere outside relaxing and certainly won't feel like watching TV.

    1. Re:What's the point...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a point, at least in many American lifestyles. However if I spend significant time on the subway or train it would be better then staring at the floor. Though might be more functional as a cell phone.

    2. Re:What's the point...? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      There's also a bunch of TVs at the gym.

      Gym?... gym?!

      ObCliche: You're new here, aren't you?

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  63. ungeek watches.. by arpoodle · · Score: 1

    I actually prefer my grandfather's 1950's mechanical self winder to any current fancy "geekery"...

    there's a simple elegance about a mechanical timepiece that a digital system can never quite match

    a

    --
    When a passenger of the foot, hooves in sight, tootel the horn trumpet melodiously
  64. What would I "watch"? by SIGALRM · · Score: 1

    The Good: The smallest TV available.
    The Bad: Lasts just over an hour per charge.


    That's bad?

    In any given day, there is probably less than one hour of good TV. I'm thinking, Simpsons re-runs, and... well, yeah that's just about it.

    --
    Sigs cause cancer.
  65. DAMN YOU AUTOPR0N by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was trying to get work done! And instead I am looking at naked chicks!

    1. Re:DAMN YOU AUTOPR0N by Leon_Trotsky · · Score: 1

      Sorry man, reading slashdot doesn't count as "work"...

      --
      Ohhh! Pay Dirt! A pair of half-eaten choco-pants!
  66. LCD screens by zymano · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can't compare to OLED screens. They still use too much power. The light emitter is always on therefore wasted energy. An Fed (field emitting display) is more efficient but is not mass produced by anyone.

  67. Proprietary Earbuds by phorm · · Score: 1

    The included earbuds have a proprietary plug which allows them to double as the antenna

    I guess that's one way to lock in the accessories. I would hope that this thing has an adaptor for regular headphones/earbuds, otherwise breaking/losing these could suck... and you can't replace them with a better pair of standard ones.

  68. PVR - PVR!! by deggy · · Score: 1

    At that size, add a CF slot in the base and DivX Playback (or even recording) software and i'd be sold!!

  69. Use an Archos? by magicianuk · · Score: 1

    There are several MP3/AVI players out there, plus the new ones from M$ etc. that can output a perfectly good audio and visual signals. They have a built in LCD screen, but there's no reason you couldn't plug in your Olympus EyeTrek or other heads up display, or (if the wristwatch supports a video in) on your wristwatch (and if it doesn't, then the equivalent of the iRock but a video transmitter that plugs into your MP3/AVI player should be simple (if power hungry even for the 3 yard range required)).

    The Sony version is supposed to integrate nicely with HD/DVD recorders etc. so that you can leave your cable box recording all your shows, have them dumped down to the player over night and watch them on the train on the way into work in the morning (and no, not while you're driving!)

  70. How do you pronounce Seiko by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it "Psycho" or "Seeko" or "Sayko" or ...

    1. Re:How do you pronounce Seiko by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually pronounced "jap-crap."

  71. Already obsolete! by YetAnotherName · · Score: 1

    It has an NTSC tuner. Weren't all stations supposed to go to digital ATSC broadcasts by 2006?

    Still, being able to watch snow year-round might be its own reward, for those of you who live in balmy or tropical climes, at least.

  72. "EYEPHONES"? by JCOTTON · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Eyephones"?
    How about "earglasses"? If you call watching at a distance "television", then radio is "telehearing". "What are you doing with those things on your ears, Joe?"
    "I'm telehearing, Jake. By the way, the things on my ears are 'eyephones'."
    I suppose you could call a cell phone as a "telephone". Makes sense.

  73. what's a TV? by Leon_Trotsky · · Score: 1

    Does anyone even watch TV anymore???

    --
    Ohhh! Pay Dirt! A pair of half-eaten choco-pants!
  74. Prevents brain reading aliens too by Graemee · · Score: 1

    Try tinfoil

  75. Headphone jacks by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1
    The included earbuds have a proprietary plug which allows them to double as the antenna.
    At least there's the chance of getting a good connection there. Standard headphone jacks must be the worst designed interface in all of creation, I have yet to plug a set of headphones into any device and not have to jiggle it around or hold it steady to make sure I get the sound in both ears.
    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  76. Wet spot on the front of the pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Repels females?


    But wetness in the female pants attracts males...


    Strange.

  77. I am NOT buying watch TV until... by red_gnom · · Score: 1



    I am NOT buying watch TV until it comes with at least 60" plasma screen.
    Period.

    1. Re:I am NOT buying watch TV until... by red_gnom · · Score: 1


      ...ok, ok, I am NOT buying watch TV until it comes with at least 60" plasma screen, AND remote control.

    2. Re:I am NOT buying watch TV until... by pappy97 · · Score: 1

      Dumba$$. Plasma is SO out (it has a finite life, and once the gas is used up, your TV is worthless).

      Get yourself a kick a$$ front projector and a nice screen. You'll spend less than a comparable plasma, just have to replace bulbs every 2000-5000 hours, and will have an AWESOME picture 3-10 times larger than the biggest "plasma."

      Plasma meant something 5 years ago, like when Sony Metreon first opened. It's NOTHING now. Get over plasma. All of us true videophiles have a long time ago.

  78. TiVo? by MellieMel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why do we need this? Seriously. What do you have to watch that is so time-critical that you MUST see it real-time? The News? What self-respecting geek watches TV news, when there's Google? Sports? Use a radio, check the scores online, or go to a sports bar.

    If there's something on that I want to see, but will be out of the house for, I just TiVo it. If I wanted to be low-tech about it, I could use my trusty VCR to tape it. Either way, I can watch Good Eats when I get home. I see no reason to carry a postage-stamp-sized TV with me. Are y'all that addicted to Jerry Springer?

    1. Re:TiVo? by jcuervo · · Score: 1
      Why do we need this? Seriously. What do you have to watch that is so time-critical that you MUST see it real-time?
      Seriously: The Simpsons.
      or go to a sports bar.
      ...You're kidding, right? Maybe where you live sports bars aren't gatherings of drunken jock retards. I personally prefer the drunken punk rocker retards.

      My next paycheck was already going to go for a pocket TV so I could snarf the Simpsons while I'm working late hours in the office.
      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  79. When I was younger by scribblej · · Score: 1

    In 1983, I was about eight years old. One of my memories is visiting the jewelry store down the block with my father. I don't remember what he was shopping for, but I do remember very clearly the awesome TV wristwatch they had on display. The clerk was kind enough to show it off to me (must have been a slow day) and when I asked how much it was, she told me it was "Four ninety five." Now, I didn't have much concept of money as a kid, but I still knew enough to know she didn't mean five dollars. To this day I still feel a bit of humiliation at the fact that she felt the need to tell me, "That's four hundred and ninety five dollars, not four dollars and ninety-five cents. You couldn't buy it with your allowance."

    Anyhow, I didn't realize that it was such a rare item. Is it really possible that there hasn't been a single other wristwatch telvision produced in the intervening 20 years? I sure thought it was cool when I was a kid...

  80. componentize by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    The wrisTV gets 1.25h per charge, and is kinda big (even compared to the screen). If they dropped the UI HW and VHF/UHF receiver, replacing it with WiFi/MPG, maybe they could get more hours with less weight and bulk. Plug the SDIO WiFi card into my Treo 600, and I'm watching 128Kbps movies. In a year or two, as the PCS network goes to 500+Kbps, I'm watching real video.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  81. Wrist TV + Pr0n + mid-air text tech = :-) by potus98 · · Score: 1

    Of course, the TV would need to employ similar technology to the mid-air text messages mentioned on /. a few days ago.

    THINK about it...

    --
    This one gang kept wanting me to join cause I'm pretty good with a bo staff.
  82. More fun is the GBA tuner by cardshark2001 · · Score: 1

    You can pick up a tuner for your GBA sp that will let you watch tv on it, and it still fits in your pocket (if you have big pockets like any respectable geek should). Not sure about battery life but I'll bet it's better than an hour, especially if you have one of those new improved 18 hour batteries from Lik-Sang.

    --
    WWJD? JWRTFA!
  83. Rates 5 stars for, "Bloody Ugly". by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    Either way, I can't stand wearing even a basic time piece, (which packs enough power to last more than the minimum 24 hours required to do its job).

    More to the point, TV is brainsucking evil, and it already takes a fair bit of work to avoid being exposed to a cathode ray tube these days. Why on earth would I want one strapped to my body like some sort of mind-control wrist manacle reminding me every five minutes to buy shit?

    Still, Saykoh's R&D kids must have had fun coming up with the device. It was obviously throw-away money spent more for its PR value than actually making direct profit. --If Wrist-TV was truly a necessity to this modern age where destructive televised thought patterns must be distributed to the public At All Cost, then I'm sure they'd have come up with something which didn't look like a piece of scuba diving equipment.

    --Something cool-looking and coveted by the masses which can more effectively feed the brain a lot of creepy messages mixed in with the candy. You know, like a Walkman.

    Repeat after me. . .

    Love is the most important thing in the entire universe and you will never, ever find it which means you are a giant loser. Being miserable, aloof and unkind is cool. Buy stuff.

    "Hit me baby, one more time."


    -FL

    1. Re:Rates 5 stars for, "Bloody Ugly". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just amazed that with your penchant for names and their obvious puns you didn't hit on the similarity between Saykoh and psycho...

  84. Sounds like a good recipe for by Tandoori+Haggis · · Score: 1

    tennis elbow and possibly w*k*rs cramp.

    --
    My hyperlinks aren't worth the paper they're printed on.
  85. It needs Video in. by Dieppe · · Score: 1
    Actually, if they could accept a composite video signal (or SVHS)! that would be perfect for some industries. For example a video camera operator could output from his camera to it to see the shot... or just as a remote monitor.

    Of course 1.25 hours is a little short for a full days work.. but short of being a geek wearing a huge brick on your arm, there could be a market for it.. just not here... yet. :)

  86. make it a cell/video phone! by gekhond · · Score: 1

    A wristwatch TV is silly. However!, I can't believe nobody has suggested making it a cell phone or even a video phone. That'd be useful. I hate carying around my cell phone, forgetting to take it places, fumbling to find it among the car keys and change. My watch on the other hand is a perfect, simple device that I never forget.

    Combine a watch with a wireless phone/video phone, throw in limited PDA functionality, and one of those retinal projection devices (no screen necessary), keep the size limited to that of a regular slim watch: it'd be perfect.

  87. Your .sig and digital watches by Vexar · · Score: 1
    Nietsche is currently most known for the "life is meaningless" quote.

    Secondly, Nietsche's father was a minister, and so he no doubt read and possibly obsessed over the book of Ecclesiastes (by King Solomon), which starts off with that quote in the first verse. I suppose we could end up discussing whether Daoist teaching predates the Hebrew Kings. Daoism seems to postdate Modernism, but I am Western, so that might be by observation.

    You'd have more profundity with a .sig that says "Tech is meaningless," or "The internet is meaningless." I'd even go for "wrist TVs are meaningless," although that's one of those things that you don't need to say.

    I am left to wonder if Douglas Adams fans have commented on your .sig as well. They would be the sort to attack a .sig saying "digital watches are meaningless," because earthlings are famous for the reputation of thinking digital watches are a really neat idea.

    It is really sad to meet people who consider their life meaningless; typically, their life is meaningless to them much of the time. Not to be too pop-culture (forgive the pun here), but Obey Your Thirst. When you find what quenches the deep and constant thirst, you will find meaning to life. Try to learn from the failures of others, though. First, the meaning of life is not digital watches. Second, Nietsche was famous for drug binges, and it did not improve his views on life, so skip that one, too.