Slashdot Mirror


School Internet Program Audit Shows Fraud and Waste

uid0mako writes "CNN is reporting on the abuses of E-rate. E-rate is a government-sponsored program that provides discounted Internet access and internal connection gear such as wiring, adaptors and servers to underprivileged schools. One of the incidents includes $24 million spent on 74000 wireless network cards that never left the loading dock."

75 of 387 comments (clear)

  1. Do tell!!!! by dreamchaser · · Score: 5, Funny

    What, fraud and corruption in a government run program paid for by the little guy? I find this so hard to believe!

    *note to the sarcasm imparied: my tongue was firmly in cheek.

    1. Re:Do tell!!!! by ch-chuck · · Score: 2, Funny

      Memorable scene from the movie "Casablanca"

      Captain Renault: I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here! [A croupier hands Renault a pile of money]

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    2. Re:Do tell!!!! by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny
      > What, fraud and corruption in a government run program paid for by the little guy? I find this so hard to believe!

      Still more evidence that we live in a culture of the people versus the powerful! To compensate for the waste in the programme, and to ensure that children not on the loading docks of the powerful can also ride on the information superhighway, we must double funding for this program immediately! The American people are big-hearted enough to know that it's right to chip in a couple more bucks a month on their phone bills. It's for the children!

      > *note to the sarcasm imparied: my tongue was firmly in cheek.

      I see your sarcasm and raise you cynicism.

      Prediction: We see my sarcastic comment used - without sarcasm - in the John Kerry campaign this summer.

      Side bet: After we see the Kerry spot, the Bush campaign uses the same text, but replaces the "people versus the powerful" and "ride the information superhighway" phrases with "not be left behind on the information superhighway".

  2. Leaving the dock by antic · · Score: 4, Funny

    Who said that they needed to leave the loading dock? Aren't they wireless?

    Har.

    --
    'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    1. Re:Leaving the dock by elFarto+the+2nd · · Score: 2

      You can be sure they'll be leaving the dock now...In the backs of serveral cars

      Regards
      elFarto
  3. I'd say thats fraud: by wishiwascool · · Score: 5, Insightful

    24000000 / 74000 = ~$324/NIC

    guess they weren't buying Netgear cards at that price... ouch!

    1. Re:I'd say thats fraud: by Sancho · · Score: 5, Funny

      The prices probably included thousands--if not millions--of feet of wireless ethernet cable.

    2. Re:I'd say thats fraud: by Servo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Having worked in an educational environment before (community college), my guess is that the reason why they sat unused is because they didn't have the computers to put them in.

      It is typical to do some sort of political purchase like this as to "spend money to look good" but then the tech types get involved and realize they just ordered 74k wireless cards for 200 386's.

      --
      A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
  4. What was one school doing... by ArbiterOne · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... with 74000 wireless network cards? Creating an geomagnetic field disturbance for science class?

  5. Remodeling at ratepayer expense by John+Jorsett · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Shortly after this program started, one of our local schools wired itself, and oh-so-coincidentally did it in a way that required recarpeting and painting the entire place to repair the "construction damage". All paid for out of the fund of course. I'll bet there are ten times more little scams like this that add up to way more than the big noticable ones.

    1. Re:Remodeling at ratepayer expense by shione · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If they needed new carpeting and painting in the first plae but couldnt get the funds for it, I don't think it's that bad as it would have been funded by the gov't anyway.

    2. Re:Remodeling at ratepayer expense by jokach · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd be interesting to see what kind of 'impovements' came of the school that received the 74000 wireless cards for 2.4 million ... do the math and I bet this school has the same new carpet, new paint, and a ton of neat-o expensive gadgets that suddently appeared around 1999. Wonder what their excuse was ...

    3. Re:Remodeling at ratepayer expense by Eccles · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is by no means limited to schools or computers, of course. (And heck, at least they were upgrading facilities that the county might not otherwise budget for.)

      They're doing road construction near where I work. At one point, they put in part of the new road, connected it to the old, and then tore up the old road. Less than six months later, they put road back where the old road used to be, and closed the new section while they extended it. In other words, they tore up road they knew they were going to need again shortly thereafter, but undoubtedly they get paid more this way.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    4. Re:Remodeling at ratepayer expense by fatray · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The local schools see this as free money. They can put in the biggest, stupidest possible proposal to the feds. If it is approved, great! Remember, the guys in DC that administer the program are paid to give out money to schools, not to teach them about networks.

      If the local schools thought it was important to wire the schools, they would find the funds and would design a much more cost-effective system. This has the effect of concentrating power in Washington. I think that local school boards should avoid starting to rely on a steady stream of free money from DC. The money is free now, but might come with a lot of strings later.

    5. Re:Remodeling at ratepayer expense by John+Jorsett · · Score: 2, Insightful
      (And heck, at least they were upgrading facilities that the county might not otherwise budget for.)

      The problems is, you're taxing people in other areas to pay for your school's facilities. Schools are, and should be, local entities. If the local taxpayers don't want to spend the money to maintain the infrastructure, then why should you and I, who don't even benefit? Then there's the whole issue of dishonesty - claiming the funds will be used for one purpose, while secretly doing something else with them. We have a highway "trust fund" that officially has billions in it, but has been borrowed against by Congress so that most of the money will never lay a single square foot of road. My local municipality has systematically looted the sewer fund. Now that routine pipeline breaks are dumping raw sewage into the ocean, they're screaming that the fund is broke and rates have to go up. Think of that next time some politician talks about another "trust fund" for some great purpose.

    6. Re:Remodeling at ratepayer expense by Warlok · · Score: 2, Insightful
      in keeping with the whole point of public free education.


      Then I posit that publickly funded free education is a bad thing. It's a government run youth progandizing system designed to keep the overachievers held down, the active doped up on Ritalin, the stupid made to feel good about themselves, and everyone docile enough to never question government and authority.


      A more educated populace is a more prodctive populace


      When Alexis de Toqueville visited the U.S. in the early 19th century, he found the populace was mostly literate and well educated. Note that this was before Massachusetts instituted the Prussian model of public education (conditioning young "commoners" to follow simple orders, be literate enough to read gun manual, and obedient enough to respond to bells and sounds - they were training them to be cannon fodder in future Prussian wars), when people were regularly schooled at home or in community run schools.


      meaning that we'll have a stronger nation more easily to support us when we retire


      That is the most socialist thing I have heard anyone say about education, and supports most of my vehement opposition to public education. Quite frankly, I don't want your kid's fscking money when I retire - that's why I have a retirement account and savings, so I can retire an not be leech on society. And I'll be damned if my kid's money is gonna go to support your socialist ass when you feel you'v earned a rest. You want a rest, grasshopper, stop playing away the summer and start saving for it.


      defend us when we are invaded and too old to fight on the front lines


      Are you saying that, should an armed invasion of the U.S. happen, that you wouldn't hobble your broken-down socialist ass onto your lawn to defend your home and family? I'd defend my home and family with a ball-point pen and some shipping twine in a wheelchair if I had to. Oh, but wait, you're a socialist (see previous paragraph) - I guess you'll just have to wait for the government to tell you what to do or save you. Have fun.


      blame the cold war. The Federal government literally prints money


      You're not going back far enough. Blame the Whig/Republican party during the Civil War. They illegally setup the national banking system and started printing fiat paper currency, backed by nothing more than promises and hot air. They setup to protectionist tariff system that crippled the economy and has left it wheezing ever since. They started the basis of the modern military-industrial complex we know and love today. Everything since then is resting on the cracked foundation the tyrant Abraham Lincoln left us with.

      --
      ...and you run and you run and you can't stop what's been done...
  6. Situation Nortmal... by BJZQ8 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have watched the e-Rate program since its inception, and am neck-deep in it now...this sort of thing happens over and over again. It is a multi-billion-dollar boondoggle, typical government program. Schools are forced to hire entire staffs, or outsource, just to fill out the hundreds of pages of paperwork. The end result? Rejection, or perhaps more paperwork. But in any case, all of those billions are funneled to IT giants like Microsoft and IBM, as well as the Telecom companies that are given "preference" for their stone-age T1 technology. Want to put in your own glass fiber between buildings? Not covered by e-Rate, because that would step on the phone company's toes. Better to lease a dozen T1 lines, in their eyes. The whole thing needs to be gamma-irradiated and shot into deep space...and the "Universal Service Fee" that covers it eliminated.

    1. Re:Situation Nortmal... by BJZQ8 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Depends on the size of the school. The larger schools, particularly in higher-poverty-rate areas, can make millions off of this, because they get huge hardware discounts...up to 90%. Smaller schools, or ones in more average-poverty-rate areas, get discounts on "leased-line" and telephone service only. In the district that I take care of, it's a definite balancing act...we will get 68% off of hardware, but ONLY if the discounts extend that far (which is a determination made by e-Rate AFTER you have done all of the work.) So if they decide to fund only down to 69%, we're screwed, and all of those trees will have been killed for naught.

  7. Heard about this on Rush Limbaugh yesterday... by JargonScott · · Score: 5, Interesting

    He was talking about a school system in Arizona (I believe) that spent some ridiculous amount on a system from IBM that was so complicated, the school system couldn't maintain it. The best part was how IBM "forsaw" that this would happen, and charged and additional $27M to build a "lavish support center" that the teachers could call for tech support.

    What the hell's wrong with these people!?! (Not IBM, I think that part is hilarious)

    --
    Nuke Gay Whales for Jesus.
    1. Re:Heard about this on Rush Limbaugh yesterday... by jamie · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I heard that same show. I don't see why this is surprising. The network cost $80 million to put together, and IBM included a $27 milllion support contract with the bid. Why is this news? Of course a very large, complicated network requires support.

      On the same Rush Limbaugh program, minutes later, a caller who claimed to be an anonymous IT expert explained that schools will put together a $500,000 network when they could just purchase a $100 cable modem. This sounds like one of the usual idiots who sees that a T1 is 1.5 Mbits/sec, local cable provider offers 1.5 Mbits/sec, hey they must be the same thing! And what expenses could there possibly be apart from bandwidth?

      The caller and host went on to agree that everyone could save a lot of money if we just got some of the "12- and 13-year old boys" in class to string up the network themselves. Rush isn't the most reliable source for information...

    2. Re:Heard about this on Rush Limbaugh yesterday... by CarrionBird · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Why does a school even need a T1? Anything more than a decent broadband connection is overkill. They certainly don't need wireless.

      Teachers actually worked for years before Al created the internet. This is just another thing to spend money on to make us feel better about our dieing education system. I'd rather see them have enough rooms and teachers and no broadband at all if need be. It is handy for research and other occasional projets, but is not a necessity for every class hour.

      The money could be put to much better use, but nobody wants to hear that.
      --
      Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
    3. Re:Heard about this on Rush Limbaugh yesterday... by burnsy · · Score: 2, Informative
      Rush was reading from the New York Times and the network was built to support ONE school district in Texas.

      You can read the article here...

      Waste and Fraud Besiege U.S. Program to Link Poor Schools to Internet

    4. Re:Heard about this on Rush Limbaugh yesterday... by deepfreeze77 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes of course, because if *you* survived on 2400 bps in 1989, then kids in school today should be able to as well? That's the worst kind of logic I've ever heard. The bottom line is this: Kids grow up these days with broadband all around them. Learning needs to be mentally stimulating to be effective. You can't take a kid who has been exposed to flashy presentations (video games, et al.) and put him in front of a TRS-80 connected to "that internet-thingy" and expect it to be effective.

      It's also true that, 95% of the time, it's really not worth it to cowtow to the federal/state governments to get the "free" money they're giving out for education, but public school boards are afraid of the bad PR they will get if the public finds out there was "free" money being given away by the federal/state government and they didn't get it. Damned if you do, and damned if you don't. Education has become big business, and it's what is killing the Public School System.

      --
      my hovercraft is full of eels
  8. Socialism does not work by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'll keep this in mind when I get my next phone bill and notice the 30% taxes added on to it. At least half of that is the "Gore Tax", which was put to such great use as we see. Now that almost all American public schools have their intarweb installed, I see no reason to continue this financial rape of the public. This program should be phased out, since it has clearly outlived its usefulness. It's nothing less than irresponsible to suggest that a federal tax be used to pay the monthly internet bills for schools and libraries (neither of which are supposed to be federally controlled to begin with).

    1. Re:Socialism does not work by ThisNukes4u · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, thats the idea. Local governments are supposed to be more in touch with the local public and their needs than the big, scary fedral government. In practice this is far from the truth, as states' rights are being corroded, such as President Bush wanting to ban abortion in all of America. This should be unconstitutional. Every state should choose their own policy on abortion, as it affects the individual states more than the government. This is only one example.

      --
      thisnukes4u.net
    2. Re:Socialism does not work by Otter · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'll leave the flaming about socialism to others, but what clearly does not work is throwing a surcharge, tax or fine on one thing (telephone service, cigarettes, insider trading violations), accumulating a huge slush fund and then expecting that money to be used for its advertised purpose.

      It's happening again with the fines on mutual funds (that are supposed to be going to "investor education") and it will happen again as soon as the vultures start shaking money loose from the fast-food companies.

    3. Re:Socialism does not work by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Given a choice between paying for the fraud and waste in my local government and paying for Wanker County, Oklahoma's fraud and waste, I'd rather keep it local. At least I could vote against the people who were responsible. And if the citizens of a certain area, such as Chicago, are OK with government waste, that's their business. Besides, in this country we have this thing called a constitution, which limits federal power. Yes, this has been massively abused already, but I'd rather minimize federal taxes going to pay for things the feds were never intended to regulate.

    4. Re:Socialism does not work by BJZQ8 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What most people don't know is that a huge majority of the money doesn't go to internet access at all; it goes to the huge network of Microsoft Exchange Servers and Cisco 3725 routers that schools heap up for no reason. Additionally, things like voice mail and cell phones are covered under the program. It's really much, much bigger than most people realize...a wonderful form of corporate welfare.

    5. Re:Socialism does not work by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Call me an asshole if you wish, but I do not consider it my responsibility to buy computers for your wife's school. If your local politicians are inept or they just don't value education, your schools will suffer for it. That's just life. Gated community or not, the people must decide they value education and elect a government that values it too. If your city or county cannot do that, don't come whining to the federal government nanny to make up for local incompetence. Yes, I know, think about the children, bla bla bla.

    6. Re:Socialism does not work by walt-sjc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You have fallen into the same simplistic trap. If the federal government killed these programs and dropped taxes 50 - 80%, local governments could afford to raise local taxes to pay for LOCAL things like police, roads, water service, etc. with NO assistance at all needed from the feds.

      Local governments are MUCH MUCH more accoutable than the feds. I can go to a city council meeting and say NO to projects on a regular basis. I can pick up the phone and directly call my councilman and talk to him for a half hour or so. Try that with your senator and see how far you get.

      The federal government has NO BUSINESS at all increasing taxes to pay for school programs. It's not their job. The federal government should only be doing federal scope projects that only the federal government can do, such as the military, air traffic control, trade pacts, treaties, space exploration, etc.

      Have you ever been to DC? Ever seen the massive size of our government? It's disgusting, and that's only the tip of the iceburg.

    7. Re:Socialism does not work by lysium · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Last time I checked, greedy corporations taking billions from inefficiently-run funds does not constitute "socialism." Sounds more like a pluocracy to me.

      ===---===

      --
      Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
    8. Re:Socialism does not work by walt-sjc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If the federal taxes were not so high then the local governments could afford to raise taxes a little to pay for these local programs. They money is there, but the federal government adds about 90% overhead.

      As an example: Go to DC and look at the main Department of Energy building. It easily holds a few thousand people. Realize that the DOE has HUNDREDS of buildings and sites around the country. Do they create energy? No. Do they manage it? No. Do they help reduce costs of energy? No. Are they doing research? Not much. Then WTF are they doing? Wasting billions. According to the DOE web site, they have 4 goals, two of which are envirnmental related. Then remember that we have "pollution credits" available to keep spewing filth. Another is research, then remember that most of the research is being done by universities with virtually free student labor, and that the government has near zero alternative energy research going on.

      I could go on, department after department. Most of the federal government is waste - probably near 90% of all dollars spent.

    9. Re:Socialism does not work by RussDavisDotCom · · Score: 2, Informative

      I invite all of you to investigate the E-Rate program further before you make such quick decisions.

      First of all, to clarify: The universal service charge on your phone bill doesn't JUST got to schools.

      1) It goes to High Cost telecom services (when Joe Blow built his house 40 miles away from the closest neighbor but wants phone service that doesn't cost $400 a month.)

      2) It goes to for Low Income telecommunications. Anyone that has 'life line' service (my grandmother has it, she's on a fixed income) that's very cheap so that she can call 911 if she gets sick. Without it, her phone bill would be affordable to her.

      3) It also goes to Rural Health Care to supplement the cost of providing health care to rural towns or locations. They supplement their Internet Access (for Medical purposes) and Telecommunications; without this, there would be a lot fewer resources available to rural health care clinics that may provide health care to 2,000 people who otherwise would have to drive 100 miles.

      4) Finally, it provides access to Schools and Libraries to help bring a low telecommunications cost for both the telephones in a school and for Internet Access (whatever is required from the ISP all the way to the classroom demarcation point).

      There are numerous regulations that must be followed in order to participate in the E-Rate program; I know this because I was an IT director for a school district. The process for filing is very technical and many school's applications are tossed out due to technicalities.

      SLD (the non-profit that runs E-Rate for Schools) has hired many technican auditors that are wise to many of the schemes that unscrupulous districts and vendors use to obtain more than their fair share. Honestly, the whole program is like with anything else dealing with money. If someone is willing to break the law, there is little you can do to stop them. Most controls are put into place to keep the honest honest. When someone is determined to scam a program, all the auditors in the world aren't going to 'stop' them... all they're going to do is catch them on the back end.

      I worked at a school district with over a 90% poverty rating. We had around 2000 students (it was a rural district) and could never afford to provide Internet access to every classroom if it weren't for the E-Rate program. We were able to be switches, e-mail servers, DNS servers, DHCP servers, etc. in order to build a network that will support the newest educational uses coming down the pipes. Most of the equip. that we used for these projects was carefully chosen because of it's survivability in a school environment, life-cycle, and cost (cost being the predominant factor). Even though we were only paying 10% of the cost, we didn't want to screw any other district that were trying to do the same thing we were.

      In the end, when I left, we had a great network that enabled us to slash our network costs because of not having to maintain old equipment any longer that was out of warrenty. We were also able to realize a HUGE cost savings (about 9k a year) with a VoIP phone system (yes, we did the Return on Investment outlooks... it still pays yields 9k even after we paid for it.), and we have video conferencing locations through the district that enables our kids in a rural southern state to take classes that would have NEVER been available to them because of our lack of funds and size. Our kids have access to great AP science courses tought by universities in our state. Our Internet access is now usable because of this program! Kids can do research w/o having to worry if the network is going to work or not.

      It all comes down to this: We changed the way our children learned for the better because of this program.

      So, before you condemn it... I invite you to ask one of your local schools how it benefits them; sure, some districts are going to abuse it... but the majority are doing exactly as they're supposed to be... trying to make a difference in an otherwise bad situation.

      --
      My favorite phrase: You have 5 Moderator Points! Use 'em or lose 'em!
  9. Dammit! by Mz6 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Why couldn't they get access points? They could be the Robin Hood's of the Wireless World setting up AP all over the USA!

    Ahh.. i can dream atleast...

    --
    Hmmm.
  10. Internet in schools... by bludstone · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is not an entierly bad idea, but its not being done properly.

    First off, not every kid should have an internet connection. Period. The Internet is not sesame street (which every kid SHOULD have.) In fact, I consider it more like the streets of NYC, at night, in the bad part of town.

    Its simply not safe for kids to have un-guided access while at school. Blocking programs are even worse. As such, internet connections should be wide open and subjet to constant teacher review. Perhaps a single lab, with all monitors in view of the proctor would be considered adequate.

    The rest of the money here is simply wasted. The current problems with america's education system is epidemic. Youve got underpaid, unmotivated and uneducated teachers, attempting to simply control a group of apathetic and uncaring students, who have little to no motivation and guidance from their gaurdians. The problem cannot be pinned on any single group. Everyone is messing up here, equally.

    And as Americas education system continues to collapse the nation will be seriously hurt by this. A nation of unmotivated morons cannot compete with.. well.. india. Nor should we be able to. I dont know if youve looked at the job market in minute detail, but a major part of the problem is that people are too incompetant to do the job.

    --

    no .sig
    1. Re:Internet in schools... by jrsimmons · · Score: 2, Interesting
      First off, not every kid should have an internet connection. Period. The Internet is not sesame street (which every kid SHOULD have.) In fact, I consider it more like the streets of NYC, at night, in the bad part of town.
      While I agree that not every kid should have an internet connection, I don't believe it is because of the dangers of the 'net. Cost is truly the prohibiting factor here. Internet connections into the classroom increase classroom efficiency. Labs only improve student efficiency outside of class, and then only when the student has free time during the day to go to the lab (rather than another class). The solution to inappropriate content in the public schools is not the lock down net. As a public provided service, it is well within the school's rights (and the student's best interest), for the sites visited from the public computers to be monitored. Proper supervision of this type can keep inappropriate content in check.

      The rest of the money here is simply wasted. The current problems with america's education system is epidemic. Youve got underpaid, unmotivated and uneducated teachers, attempting to simply control a group of apathetic and uncaring students, who have little to no motivation and guidance from their gaurdians. The problem cannot be pinned on any single group. Everyone is messing up here, equally.
      While I'm sure there are some people who fit this image, it is unfair to cast this sterotype on the entire education system as a whole. Countries like India, China, Japan, etc, do not attempt to educate EVERY child. The consequence of inadequate performance is often horrible. Is this how we should incent our children in the US? I'd rather not. If education standards in the US are so poor, then why do we still have so many international students in our Colleges and Universities? We have problems in our education system partly because our goal of "teach every child, equally and fairly" is so high.
      --
      If you would like to be a leader with a large following...drive slowly down a windy two-lane road
    2. Re:Internet in schools... by TheSync · · Score: 2, Informative

      Japanese students who expect to go to college take several hours of additional privately funded classes outside of school every day to prepare for entrance tests as well.

  11. This just in by cubicledrone · · Score: 5, Funny

    Education bureaucrats waste large amounts of money.

    In other news, the sky was reportedly blue this morning and there seems to be a large amount of water west of Oregon.

    More late-breaking news as it becomes available. We now return you to your regularly scheduled argument about text editors.

    --
    Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
  12. Typical of school systems by xsupergr0verx · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just finished high school at a public school. This is not at all uncommon. They spent $50k on a lab for the CCNA students and found the two worst teachers I have ever had to teach it. Both were underqualified and took the same 4 semester course over the space of 2 weeks. Obviously, they passed the class instead of learned the material, and it showed. Of the 18 students who started the first year (myself included), only 3 made it to the next year, Semester 3. Cheating was rampant on tests as the teacher thought his time was better spent ticking out emails and doing lesson plans for his biology classes than enforcing anti cheating measures.

    After the 15/18 failure rate, he was replaced the next year. This new teacher was even more awful. He took the course the same way, and used us remaining 3 students to "help him" rebuild the lab. This involved taking old donated computers from the A+ lab and making them seaworthy for the class. Oh, and grabbing some old desks from the woodshop on the other side of the campus and doing chimp work with a drill to make them able to stand. Of the 3 remaining second year students, all of us dropped out. Of his 24 first year students, all of them dropped out as well.

    These wastes of money were apparant, we got these expensive routers and bridges and our teachers were unable to answer simple questions about them. Useless, I think the routers ended up being shipped to another school so they could try their hand at the CCNA program.
    Oh, and other schools in the district have had the CCNA program for a few years, and are turning out graduates due to good (suprise!) teachers.

    --

    Click here for a free picture of an iPod!
  13. from cnn: by ikea5 · · Score: 3, Informative

    from cnn: The cards were purchased in 1999 for about $24 million, including supposed installation charges. The price is with installation charges included.

    1. Re:from cnn: by jmauro · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In 1999 the installation wasn't as easy or clean as it is today so it probably took a good hour. Drivers were buggy and sometimes Windows wouldn't play nice with them. The cards also cost in the neighborhood of $275-$300 to begin with. The price on those silly things has just come down in the last 2 years.

  14. Money well spent? by Blackaxis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "The program, run by the FCC and administered by a not-for-profit corporation, is widely credited for helping poor and rural schools get wired, giving students better learning tools." .. Of all the problems with poor and rural schools, they spend money on this? Technology is a good thing, but when my rural school only had an 800 average SAT score (of the people motivated enough to take it), you have to wonder why resources get wasted like this.

    1. Re:Money well spent? by Paulrothrock · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I concur. The reason rural and urban schools are doing poorly is because nobody wants to take jobs there. Where would you want to live, in a suburb within driving distance of everything, or a small rural town two hours from the nearest Wal-Mart, or an inner city where you could be shot?

      Pay teachers more to go to these areas, and more good teachers will go there. That $24 million could pay for a couple thousand teachers instead of going to some stupid wireless initiative. If the teachers aren't there, the kids *will not* benefit from technology.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  15. Predictable due to design of 1996 Gore tax by XavierItzmann · · Score: 5, Insightful

    a) 1996 - Gore/Clinton tax *your* phone bill to "put internet on every school"

    b) Any school can spend whatever money and get the ERATE fund to reimburse the school

    Waste and abuse happens because this tax should not even have existed to begin with. If school districts had to spend their own money, based on *local* taxation, this sort of careless purchasing would not happen.

    You vote for politicians who introduce taxes, you bring this upon yourself.


    --
    The next pasture is always greener
    1. Re:Predictable due to design of 1996 Gore tax by velo_mike · · Score: 3, Insightful
      If school districts had to spend their own money, based on *local* taxation, this sort of careless purchasing would not happen.

      Sure it would, schools are notorious for misspending money no matter how they get it. As long as it comes from mandatory taxes, this kind of waste will continue.

      --

      At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
      Alan Greenspan

    2. Re:Predictable due to design of 1996 Gore tax by velo_mike · · Score: 2, Informative
      Then how do you find a politician who DOESN'T introduce new taxes? I have yet to find just ONE!

      SlashJames, may I introduce you to Ron Paul, R-TX. Sadly, he may very well be the only one.

      --

      At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
      Alan Greenspan

  16. Come on Bush!! by Pedrito · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think we need to get George Bush more directly involved to find out what's going on here and to ask the really tough questions like, "Is our children learning?"

  17. More fallout from the 80s by malus · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is called "Trickle down economics". The Teamsters get the cash, and it trickles down to the rest of us

    1. Re:More fallout from the 80s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You stupid fucking retard. This shitstorm was dumped on us by the Clinton/Gore administration, you ignorant pile of rotted baboon jism.

  18. That's a lot of bandwidth by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2, Funny

    Never underestimate the bandwidth of 74000 network cards on a truck that has never left the loading dock.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  19. Computers in schools by jesterzog · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's a shame that there appears to be so much abuse of this programme. Sometimes I wonder if these types of programmes are really necessary, though. Mostly out of interest, what kinds of advantages do children actually get out of having computers in schools? By themselves the use of computers certainly doesn't cover the primary topics that schools are usually expected to teach, so presumably there's some expectation that having them there will either hugely benefit children in some other way, or will positively enhance the effects existing teaching.

    I guess that in theory children can get used to having them around. To some extent it means that computers would be available for someone who might be able to learn from them extensively if they wouldn't have been able to otherwise. But is anyone out there aware of any actual research that demonstrates that computers in schools results in a verifiable positive return? (Keeping in mind that lots of people who never had computers in school were simply trained in the workplace.)

    I don't mean to criticise, but I ask because I see a lot of people and governments claiming that it's a good thing. On the other hand, I haven't actually seen much evidence or that much that might convince me that we're much better off than we were a few years ago, when significantly fewer schools had access to computers.

    I also don't mean to imply that maybe schools shouldn't have computers at all --- only that pouring vast amounts of money into actively supporting an infrastructure that deprecates so quickly might not be very effective. If the availability of technology means that most of people will already end up having reasonable computers in their homes within the next decade anyway, then pushing them so much in schools could be quite obsolete.

  20. Re:Duplicate (who would have guessed?) by makomk · · Score: 3, Informative
    It's basically the same story [slashdot.org] as told earlier.

    No, more like a new developement in the story (though anyone who hasn't read the previous story yet should do NOW!)

  21. I worked at a school... by Fenis-Wolf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That took advantage of this program. Our district received a massive government grant (in excess of 20 million? I think). This was of course split up between 5 seperate smaller districts in small towns. Each one of these districts had an elementary, middle school, and high school. In addition there was a Vocation School. This money from the government lead to a massive revamp of IT services in all those schools which included:
    -Connecting 5 towns to the Vocation School with redundant fiber lines
    -Purchasing top notch routing and server equipment for each of the schools
    -purchasing in excess of 200 brand new computers for each building
    -and the founding of an Internet Service Provider which server the area as a dial up provider and as the central hub that tied the schools together.
    It also led to the vocational school receiving much needed tech upgrades to CS labs and the Photo and Design Mac labs.
    When this government money is well spent, it can be a great force for good. But once a unscrupulous contracter gets his hands on those kind of funs, these massive frauds occur.

    --

  22. I hope they don't nerf this... by Raleel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Despite the fact that there are abuses, and they may be wide spread, I was part of a group of students who wired a dozen or so schools in the town where I went to college. we did the network diagrams, organized the groups, taught people how to do patch panels and the like.

    It was in the top three most rewarding experiences in my life, and one of the most valuable for jobs skills. it was a truly unique experience, and I would hate to see this go away because some people can't freaking be honest.

    I'd be happy with oversight (lots of stuff needs oversight) but don't remove it. I heard that there was a proposal to just turn it into generic school grants or something, and I think that would be a mistake as well :)

    --
    -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
  23. Vi! by suso · · Score: 3, Funny

    Vi is better.

  24. Re:This is how public schools work by tcopeland · · Score: 2, Informative

    > The US public school system is
    > tremendously wasteful.

    The worst thing is that even if you homeschool your kids, you still pay taxes to support public schools. So you pay double - once for the homeschool books/supplies/etc and once into the maw of the Dept of Education.

  25. You're being sarcastic, right? by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I sure hope you're being sarcastic and that's not a kneejerk reaction. The problem isn't companies, the problem is SCHOOLS being morons and taking all this "free money" and spending it on multi-million dollar solutions when a $100 switch and a box of cable would fit their needs.
    The real problem is that this all paid for through a tax on your phone bill (think: Universal Service Fee, meaning most people never realize how much they pay for it) and the structuring of the program encourages waste. "Buy the biggest and best things that you can so we can get good PR for helping the children!" Meanwhile, anyone who questions the program's merits stands a chance of being labeled "against education" or even a racist, since the program (supposedly) exists to help poorer schools.

    A better article on this can be found at the New York Times.

    --
    Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
    Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    1. Re:You're being sarcastic, right? by ElvenMonkey · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Part of the problem is the pay that the public sector gives tends to be rather poor, and a reasonable number of those employed in the Network teams aren't that knowledgable about computers. Sure they can use windows and office, and do simple AD maintenance, but when it somes to the nitty gritty stuff they haven't got a clue and just outsource stuff or go with what salesmen say. Shockingly regularly you find that the network admin is a former teacher who's just doing it more as a hobby. I guess it goes hand in hand with the attitude that if you're a teacher you can teach anything. Sometimes they're good, they teach themselves a lot of stuff, but often seem to just learn enough to get by. I'm part of a more unusual (in education) team, with people that know what they're talking about, and can at least tell the difference between a network card and a modem. Pays still bad though. Many places just don't realise, despite how often they are told, that if they spent that little bit extra in salary they'd save a lot more in useless purchases and would probably have a much better and more secure network. The British government keeps pouring money into these different schemes, capturing headlines, but failing to solve the issue that education is overall woefully underfunded. If they'd just pour that money into education generally they'd solve way more problems, rather than earmarking it for a specific purpose.

      --
      "Joy is not in things; it is in us." Richard Wagner
    2. Re:You're being sarcastic, right? by ElvenMonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh yeah... hell how I know that. "Here's a truck load of money for you to spend, but it must be spent on new computers." "We haven't got sufficient network infrastructure to deal with that extra load, we need a whole new distribution point." "That'll cost to much, you're only allowed to buy network cables" "But that means we'll have to use our spare old hubs and route all traffic down a single 100mb pipe" "so?" or even better, a few years back the government looked at support staff salaries, saw that they were crap and said "Right we'll set up a bonus scheme", so once a year I can apply for a bonus, jumping through a few hoops to get it. All of 150 GBP, PRE-tax (nice government, giving money to itself)

      --
      "Joy is not in things; it is in us." Richard Wagner
    3. Re:You're being sarcastic, right? by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well I don't know about our friends on the right side of the pond, but here in the US we spend entirely too much on education and spend even MORE on it every year... Meanwhile almost none of it actually reaches the classroom. The problem here isn't how much money is spent, it's how the money is (mis)spent.

      I also work in the public sector as a tech in a local government. I *know* the pay sucks, but that's not why I'm doing the job. It's entirely possible to get very qualified IT people in a public sector job; the problem is it takes time and effort and interest to find them. The government instead usually just decides to throw money at the problem instead of taking the time and energy to actually solve it.

      Really what it comes down to is the government shouldn't be involved in education anyway. Let education become a free market like everything else and spend public money on more important things like defense.

      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
  26. I work for a state education agency.... (groan) by tenaciousdRules · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First, Kids need to read books at school. Google is great.... for the LITERATE. Now, I am programmer/analyst and my charge is to write the code that performs analysis on student test data. The results my programs output are factored into deciding wether or not a particular school/district is "making it" according to the Bush endorsed "No Child Left Behind Act". Billions of dollars of federal money are on the line. I am performing these analyses on my state issued Pentium III with 128 megs of RAM and a 15" monitor. I think this computer cost $3.49 at Comp USA. Some ass just allowed a purchase of 27 Meelion dollars worth of new fangled walkie-talkies and I can't get a flat screen or at least a $5 stick of RAM?

    --
    --Always, I mean never..., No I mean always check your references.--
  27. Apathy by mccalli · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I'm reading a lot of comments along the lines of "This is a surprise?", and "so? That's the way these things go". This is depressing.

    Look - a clear and serious fraud has been commited. People should be livid about this, even more so if this kind of behaviour is the norm. Just because it always happens doesn't make it right, and only pressure and accountability will ever sort the situation out. Shrugging the shoulders and going "so?" is really not all that helpful.

    Cheers,
    Ian

    1. Re:Apathy by lux55 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree 100%.

      Unfortunately, apathy is an eventual product of democracies that stop considering free thought about justice to be a meaningful endeavour. We're living for our material desires now (fast food, movies, cable tv, going to the bar, etc.), not for any sort of sense of integrity or "doing what's right". We'll play rhetorical tricks, saying things like "what _is_ 'right' anyway? how do we know for sure?". When we see others doing things like this, as long as it doesn't negatively affect us directly, who cares?

      This is a predictable effect of the belief in moral materialism sweeping over many parts of the world right now, which makes it all the sadder to see happening because it's getting worse and there's no end in sight.

  28. how much were these cards?!? by CaptainFrito · · Score: 2, Insightful
    that amounts to $324 per wireless card. In these quantities, they should run about $40 even for latest-and-greatest super b/g cards.

    I think that the never leaving the loading dock issue is the smallest issue here. the price should tell you that actually shipping these cards was probably irrelevant from the beginning.

    wonder how much they spent on the access points...

  29. My Experience With IT In Schools by $criptah · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was a high school student several years ago; most of my family works for public schools and I have heard a lot of great stories about how IT works or does not work for teachers and students. Here is the summary.

    As far as I remember, IT was a total disaster in my school. We were able to get computers and get them setup; however there was no qualified support. There was no single person responsible for providing user assistance and doing system administration! When computers crashed, students were not really allowed to repair them, instead our librarians tried to come to the rescue; it took them hours and hours to fix a simple problem. Go figure.

    When it came to security of networks and school computers, it was even worse. First of all, every damn computer had some sort of "cop" software installed that prevented access to "bad" sites. As a result, students were not research about breast cancer or human sexuality eventhough the pages came from dot GOV. The best part about it was the fact that students usually knew more than teachers and staff; boy, it was fun seeing old ladies trying to remove a picture of a naked chick from the background.

    Then there were students who did not know what to do with computers due to the lack of knowledge. I went to a good school that was required to bus certain number of students from the inner city and other "problematic" areas in order to meet some sort of a standard. Some of these kids knew zero about computers and there was nobody in school who could teach them. At least several computers had to be replaced every year because a frustrated student's actions.

    My girlfriend work for public schools in MA. The state of IT in her schools is simply pitiful. They have the oldest technology, and virtually no help. Two guys who are in charge of the system have no interest in making things work. When the schools receive new computers or software, there is not enough training provided; therefore, nobody can use them efficiently!

    So what's the point? Well, the point is that you can waste government's money in many ways. Direct stealing is just one of them.

    1. Re:My Experience With IT In Schools by SwedishChef · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My girlfriend work for public schools in MA. The state of IT in her schools is simply pitiful. They have the oldest technology, and virtually no help.

      Ok... so why don't you volunteer a few hours a week to help them? It should be more rewarding than watching old ladies try to remove dirty pictures.

      Ten years ago, when both of my children were in public school in a rural, mostly agricultural, school district I was contacted by the teacher who also had little experience with computers and networking. On my recommendation they ran fiber between all the buildings and used Linux (Redhat 4 and then early SuSE) for email, web, and - at least later - web proxy (and filtering). That teacher told the school board that my help had saved them over $50,000 and countless hours of fruitless effort.

      I also became a reading volunteer on a program that helped younger students - especially hispanics - learn to read.

      In addition, I nstalled Linux on several computers inherited by the Schools by the Public Utility District and put them into the library for kids to check out and take home. One student (mind you, the graduating class of the HS was around 40 in any typical year) used Linux as his senior project as a direct result of puzzling out how to make that Linux computer do what he wanted 6 years earlier.

      Now my company does engineering services for this school district under the E-Rate program. But if that were gone I would still volunteer my time as a parent and member of the community. It's an easy way to make a difference.

      --
      No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
  30. Look where it happened! by John+Harrison · · Score: 2, Informative

    Have you ever bid on a government project in Puerto Rico? We did once. The RFP was so full of irregularities that inidicated the process was corrupt that we complained and the whole thing got shut down. It was clear that the winner of the process had been selected before the search began and they were local and weren't qualified to do the work. This sort of thing happens all over, but the most blatant case I ever saw was in PR.

  31. The replies in this thread are some of the most... by the_rajah · · Score: 2, Funny

    common sense and (fiscally) conservative I've ever seen on Slashdot so far. Refreshing.

    "If you are not liberal when you are 20, you have no heart. If you are not conservative when you are 40, you have no brain." -Winston Churchill

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
  32. The system is self-perpetuating by mi · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I actually know a very intelligent girl, whose father is a public school teacher and administrator. When we argued about private schoold being generally better, I mentioned, that, may be, being a good teacher is not the same as being a good administrator. Boy, did she get mad. I mean, really, sincerely, mad at me. She said, her dad had worked for free for several months, because the school had no funds. This time, I kept to myself my opinion, that this was, indeed, a sign of a devoted teacher, but bad administrator.

    Anyway, guess, who did she study to become, and is currently becoming? A Washington lobbyist! No kidding...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  33. Well... by ShadowRage · · Score: 2, Insightful

    tell us something that isnt new with the US public school system.

    Thing is, the people who run the school system are not good with managing money. this is proven fact, the dont look into the best priced software, or hardware, or anything.
    it's whoever treats them to the best lunch.

  34. Re:Let's get this over with... by cluckshot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How about lets really get real. The reason the cards stayed on the dock is that the school teachers/admin simply didn't know how to use computers in the first place. They were not going to use them, they were going to set them like trophies on their desks.

    I have had a running fight with my daughter's teachers for 4 years now that they should send me emails if there are any problems. I have offered to add my address to their email address book and been forbidden. I have been told that writing me would take too much time but a parent teacher conference was ok.

    This year I finally had one teacher who actually notified by email. The others NOT! Most teachers classrooms you find that the computer is neatly covered with a dust cover and maybe a potted plant is mounted on the top. (NOT USED EVER!) This spring our school system disposed of several thousand 3 year old computers which were "Out Dated" and replaced them with new ones. The new ones are used jsut as much as the old ones. (Get out your dust blower please!)

    How about discussing this in the MEDIA or how the Gore Tax was passed without a Vote of Congress which is a violation of the US Constitution or ...

    --
    Never Politically Correct ~ I prefer the facts If you don't like what I say, get a life, or comment yourself.
  35. Re:schools careless purchasing by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I refuse to assist, and will work to actively bring down, any group which claims some sort of right to my earnings.

    That's why I refuse to buy a house. I don't have any kids, and really don't care to pay out to send your kids (not yours, personally) to skool so they can cut class and talk about how teh new hiphob album is teh best(typos intentional).

    Well, that, and the fact that with the slow death of IT, I never know when I'll have to pack up and move to get my next job. =\

  36. Re:schools careless purchasing by velo_mike · · Score: 2, Insightful
    That's why I refuse to buy a house. I don't have any kids, and really don't care to pay out to send your kids (not yours, personally) to skool so they can cut class and talk about how teh new hiphob album is teh best(typos intentional).

    I'm not refusing to buy - you're either paying it directly or their charging the landlord and he's passing it along in the rent bill - but property taxes are a huge consideration. Good thing I love rural areas.

    --

    At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
    Alan Greenspan

  37. For the Greater Good? by josh3736 · · Score: 2, Informative
    (This will most likely be lost in the sea of comments, but here I go anyways...)

    The problems is, you're taxing people in other areas to pay for your school's facilities. Schools are, and should be, local entities. If the local taxpayers don't want to spend the money to maintain the infrastructure, then why should you and I, who don't even benefit?

    Because you've done something for the greater good? And that's the problem, no one wants to do good unless they see a way that they will somehow benefit from it.

    And on the note of local funding -- no one wants to fund their local schools anyways, especially in the areas this program is targeted to. You go into a poorer area and say "Hey, we are going to raise taxes to pay for schools!" ...duck because there's gonna be a shitstorm.

    You say, "If the local taxpayers don't want to spend the money to maintain the infrastructure, then why should you and I, who don't even benefit?"

    The local taxpayers say, "If the taxpayers who actually have kids in the schools don't want to spend the money to maintain the infrastructure, then why should you and I, who don't even benefit?"

    And then the people with kids in school say, "I just can't afford it, and besides, isn't everyone supposed to help pay for the schools?"

    On a side note, here in Ohio, it was recently ruled unconstitutional to support schools exclusively through property taxes. Problem is, that's the only place districts really have to get money. The state funding system is entirely fucked up. Not only has the state bugeted money to districts, then taken half of the money away halfway through the year, but the entire funding system has been ruled unconstitutional no less than FOUR times! (The CNN page says 3, but that is from 2002.)

    I wish that if I was doing something unconstitutional, even after being ruled against four times, I could keep doing it without consequence!

    Fuckwit politicians.

    1. Re:For the Greater Good? by Warlok · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Because you've done something for the greater good?


      You're drinking the government Kool-Aid if you think giving your kids and your money to the government to lock them inside a brick building six hours a day, keeping them calm and docile with drugs if necessary, taking years to teach reading (which is a necessary skill, easily learnable in 6-8 weeks with phonetic skills), and forcing socialization on them is for the "greater good".


      Your arguments about taxpayers are spot on - no one wants to pay for it, so in steps the government to steal the moeny from you for it (yes, it's theft - they take my money without my consent under threat of violence. Muggers are actually more honest about it - they produce the gun before they ask for my wallet). So, if the current system isn't working and no one is happy with it, why are we continuing to try to patch it up?


      The Indians have a saying: When you find yourself riding a dead horse, the best thing to do is dismount. However, it seems that when it comes to public education (which I posit is a dead horse), we are more willing to paint the horse a festive color, try to revive the horse, put more people on the horse, feed the horse more high-quality oats, or anything other than get off the damn thing.


      How can you help? Simple - get off the horse. Home school your kids - when the government agents come knocking on your door to ask why your kids aren't in school, tell them your home-schooling, don't need your schools, thankyouverymuch and close the door. When you reward poor choices with more money (like raising funding to schools based on the number of kids in the school), the best way to help is to reduce your involvment in the behavior.

      --
      ...and you run and you run and you can't stop what's been done...