Slashdot Mirror


More On The Open Sourcing Of Iraq

popdookey writes " The BBC's broadcast, The World, has run a piece on the growing Linux movement in Iraq as was previously reported here on Slashdot. 'In Iraq, a group of computer users has started writing open source computer code. They're Linux enthusiasts. The idea is to make low-cost, home-grown software and is said to hold great promise for developing countries. It could leapfrog Iraq into a more competitive future. The World technology reporter Clark Boyd reports.'"

61 of 287 comments (clear)

  1. after bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    now bill gates gonna invade iraq too

    1. Re:after bush by arjun · · Score: 5, Funny

      microsoft is waaaay ahead of you, check thisout !

    2. Re:after bush by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Rest assured, if there is in any way whatsoever, any connection at all between these coders and bin Laden, not matter how ridiculous(their mothers,fathers,cousins,friend passed by a stall where an apple(not a mac) was purchased by someone who SAW the nefarious criminal, SHOCK!) , Microsoft will use it to say that Linux supports terrorism.

      Wait,wait...sorry. Microsoft will get SCO to use it to say that Linux supports terrorism!

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    3. Re:after bush by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No. Microsoft will go the extra mile and get Dick Cheney to say it.

      Cheney will say anybody is a terrorist - except Halliburton.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    4. Re:after bush by Rei · · Score: 2, Informative

      ... whose graves are mysteriously not turning up.

      The largest mass grave had under 2,000 bodies in it, and these were from the 1991 Shia uprising. There have been about 50 of them found so far, most of them small (50 bodies), and most of those dating to times of war or uprising.

      Tony Blair gave a figure of 300,000 and credited it to the UN. However, his figure came from HRW, which is not UN affiliated, and HRW stated that their figure was simply a pre-war estimate based largely on talking with Kurdish sources and asking them how many were "missing" dating as far back as the Iran-Iraq war.

      --
      I just invaded Grammar Czechoslovakia and duped Grammar Neville Chamberlain; now it's on to Grammar Poland.
    5. Re:after bush by Rei · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of those 2,000, A) They're not 200,000, and B) most of them died in a revolt.

      In case you're not familiar, most of the OFF "documents" came from the oil ministry, which was run by a Chalabi associate. Go on, go into more detail about OFF! Please! The far right's rage over a story that they know so little about is always amusing.

      --
      I just invaded Grammar Czechoslovakia and duped Grammar Neville Chamberlain; now it's on to Grammar Poland.
  2. Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by Phekko · · Score: 5, Funny

    Iraq is anti-US. They code Linux stuff in Iraq. Ergo, Linux is anti-US. Bomb Linux!

    --

    Sigs for Nerds. Sigs that Matter.
    1. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Iraq is anti-US.

      What, do you mean even after we've bombed the shit out of it, shot the shit out of it, and tortured the shit out of it, they are still anti-US?

      What the fuck?

      Goddamn ungrateful motherfuckers.

      I say we bomb the place.

    2. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by mirko · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Iraq is anti-US.

      Wrong.
      US is anti-Iraq : AFAIK, Iraq never invaded nor bombed US.

      They code Linux stuff in Iraq.

      GCC/GLibC-compliant would be a better assertion.

      Ergo, Linux is anti-US.

      This however is true :
      US = United Corporations (Microsoft, GM, Enron, Monsanto, etc.)
      Linux poses them a genuine threat as it counterbalance their marketing approach and very few besides Linux shall survive without changing business models.

      Bomb Linux!

      How do you bomb software ?
      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    3. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by Pros_n_Cons · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You mean Iraqi's are now getting tech jobs?
      pre-war they had 1 million soldier employed, now they employ what 100,000 soldiers? The economy there is bad for ex killers or skilled labor workers from what I hear, but the tech is booming, doctors, teachers, educated people are seeing double and triple thier old incomes. It's possible this war could change iraq into a technical competitor. Now if only the U.S. could pay our own teachers here triple....

      --

      -- "of course thats just my opinion, I could be wrong." --Dennis Miller
    4. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by syn3rg · · Score: 2, Informative

      The attempted assassination (April 1993 in Kuwait; 11 Iraqia arrested) of an ex-president (and yes I'd feel the same if it had been Clinton) is internationally accepted as an act of war.

      --
      The contents of this message have been doubly encrypted by ROT13
    5. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by hugzz · · Score: 2, Informative
      Iraq is anti-US

      Wrong.
      US is anti-Iraq : AFAIK, Iraq never invaded nor bombed US.

      A lot of the world is anti-US. Doesn't mean they're bombing or invading the US. That isn't the definitive guide to who is or isn't anti-US

    6. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by mirko · · Score: 2, Informative

      A lot of the world is anti-US.

      Or maybe it's just the US which is paranoid because as far as I see here in Europe, we just pity you for having such corporation, or testosteron-driven presidents.

      Really : we like American people, we felt sorry for you when 2 planes hit the WTC, we even told you at this time, if you do not remember how compassionate we sincerely were, then you definitely have a problem.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    7. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by Rei · · Score: 2, Informative

      You mean the thing that was at its very worst a depleted chemical so far gone that its side effects were "nausea and dialated pupils"

      Congratulations everyone: We've found the "Weapons Of Mass Inconvenience" that we invaded Iraq for. We can pack up and go home!

      A single shell of what is at *worst* decayed-to-the-point-of-worthlessness chemical weaponry that has undoubtedly been sitting in some field for the past decade is nothing. The US has chemical weapons shells strewn across testing ranges in several parts of the country; Iran and Iraq were in a *chemical war* with each other, and you expect this third-world banana republic to know where every last one is?

      When you're not looking "at worst", one might be cynical and note the fact that the US has proclaimed "WMD FIND!!!" about 50 times thusfar in this conflict, only to be later proven wrong with each one. The rate of false-positives with soldier-carried WMD detectors is god-awful, and the mobile labs are simply "pretty bad". The big problem is that organophosphates tend to show up as nerve gas, and other phosphorous chemicals as blister agents, unless studied in a fully equipped stateside/base-side lab.

      Lastly, some loony in our country - a first-world, wealthy, *relatively* uncorrupt nation - managed to acquire and send anthrax to dozens of people. Are you saying that in some backwoods country like Iraq, with a very educated workforce, an equivalent (and even far less successfull) thing couldn't be done?

      --
      I just invaded Grammar Czechoslovakia and duped Grammar Neville Chamberlain; now it's on to Grammar Poland.
  3. OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Iraq is downloading communism! Torvalds for president! Stallman for information minister!

    1. Re:OMG by guile*fr · · Score: 3, Funny

      HURD will crush the hords of penguins, daemons will bath on their blood, Redmond will burst into flames?

    2. Re:OMG by Unique2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can see it now:

      "There are no Microsoft infidels in Baghdad. Never!"

      --
      No trees were harmed in the posting of this message. However, a great number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
  4. Nice blurb by beacher · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's just nice seeing a linux article (featuring Iraqis ) that doesn't paint Linux users as terrorists. Don't let Didio interview them, she'll spin an article like "Iraqi Terrorists create KJihad which is what we knew all those Linux users were up to anyways. "

    Nice blurb. Hope Iraq recovers just to face the same job market as over here. Sorry... Yes, someone already peed in my cornflakes.
    -B

    1. Re:Nice blurb by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "if the new government becomes stable and protects freedom for its citizens"

      Which new government would this be?

      The Quislings run by an ex-Baathist-thug, former Saddam assassin, CIA asset Allawi?

      Or the phoney elected one they intend to put in place next year - presumably headed up by the same Allawi?

      It has been said for months that the Bushies intended to find a new Saddam-like strongman to put in place - just like they did the original Saddam, who was a CIA asset for years before he assumed power. Well, now they've done it - again.

      And the Iraqi people know it.

      Unless Sistani can force truly open elections, there is NO chance any Iraqi government will be stable - or protect freedom. And it's questionable whether even an openly elected one will protect freedom - or survive both internal insurgency and external CIA/Mossad manipulation.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  5. Grass roots, corporation-free democracy? by mennonot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My favorite quote from the founder:

    "I wanted to find people to share knowledge with; to learn from them; to speak with guys who share my thoughts."

    He also talks about how the use of open-source software preventing the monopolization of the market by corporations, a big issue in all economic spheres in Iraq right now.

    Sure it's idealistic and a long way off for most Iraqis, but it could be the seeds of important alternatives for the Iraqi people.

    And finally a good sign: "Microsoft refused the be interviewed for this report."

  6. Linux report as WMA audio file by Advocadus+Diaboli · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd like to listen to that report, but unfortunately I did not yet discover how I am supposed to playback a WMA file (Windows Media Player format) on my Debian box. :-(

    1. Re:Linux report as WMA audio file by Alranor · · Score: 2, Informative

      Does mplayer not cope with wma files?

    2. Re:Linux report as WMA audio file by Short+Circuit · · Score: 3, Informative

      Debian doesn't include mplayer...but you can still download it from their website.

    3. Re:Linux report as WMA audio file by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      use vlc (apt-get install vlc), it plays wma files out of the box.

    4. Re:Linux report as WMA audio file by Apreche · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't know about everyone else, but I have two programs, xmms and mplayer. mplayer has never failed to play, absolutely perfectly, any video file I ever throw at it. Which is more than I can say for any windows video player. Likewise xmms does not fail to play any audio file I ever throw at it. If yours doesn't, maybe you didn't choose the right options at compile-time or maybe you are using a binary distro that didn't add those things in for you. Either compile them yourself from source or use a source based distro like gentoo or lunar linux. However I do have a friend who runs debian and his mplayer/xmms is as good as mine. Maybe you just don't have the codecs installed or something?

      --
      The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
  7. They work fast by neilmoore67 · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is a, IIRC, recently formed Linux user group in Iraq: http://www.iraqilinux.org/ IMHO it's a good change for open source to make an impact if Iraq's public services are going to have the opportunity to make a fresh start on handover.

    --
    You've probably noticed that people's noses get bigger as they get older. That's because old people are huge liars.
  8. Import restrictions? by LondonLawyer · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought there were restrictions on exporting Linux from the US to Iraq (which somehow mysteriously don't apply to MS)?

    1. Re:Import restrictions? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 4, Informative

      Possibly the cryptoloop stuff, but remember that Linux is a global project.

      That's why distributions like Debian distribute encryption-related stuff from servers outside the US.

    2. Re:Import restrictions? by Alexis+de+Torquemada · · Score: 2, Informative

      The exemption is for source code in general (as opposed to binaries). So you can ship $DISTRO with the full kernel and gpg sources, as long as you include neither cryptoloop nor gpg in binary form. It's a rather strange law...

  9. Developing countries by locarecords.com · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It is very interesting to see how developing countries are looking at Linux and other open source software as a means to leap-frog over technological problems and to create their own home-grown technology industries.

    I have just got back from a conference in Slovenia at Cyberpipe which was full of Linux and open-source enthusiasts developing software that was situated locally.

    And of course, there are also political and economic implications of Linux as it allows countries to avoid the costly licensing problems of Windows etc and also avoid the reliance on the US for closed technologies.

    There were some extremely innovative lo-tech hi-tech solutions to problems. For example re-use of old 8080 PCs with Linux installed to control various devices - one in particular was a 12 bank screen for projecting images using old black and white monitors.

    --
    ---- The Open Source Record Label : : LOCARECORDS.COM
    1. Re:Developing countries by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, uCLinux doesn't support the 8086, but try ELKS. (reference)

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  10. Well that's not right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    What kind of f'ed up imperialism is this?

    They should be required to buy US software!

    I'm writing my representatives.

  11. Bloat solution? by Stallmanite · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe poor countries developing Free software is just what we need to keep the GNU/L bloat under control.

    1. Re:Bloat solution? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 3, Informative

      This might be a troll, but I'll bite.

      Don't like GNOME? Use windowmaker. If that's still too fat for you, use oroborus. Still too big? Try setting your window manager to "twm".

      Don't like OpenOffice? MS Office isn't much better...maybe you'd better stick to HTML and CSS with Bluefish. Or maybe vim or Emacs.

      FireFox still too slow? As long as you're dropping features by moving away, try w3m or lynx...two very capable text-based browsers.

      Don't have a 3D accelerator? Play software-rendered Quake. Or (using that same project) use the SDL's aalib target.

  12. I can see it now... by node+3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    First, SPA "License Inspectors" are sent in. All they find is Free Software. Undaunted, Bill Gates sends in his own lawyers...

    Then it's a year later and the WMA's still haven't been found.

  13. Slow going for linux in Iraq by phreakv6 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Actually its just the opposite that linux today [Wired news] reported few days back. Slow going for linux in Iraq

    --
    fifteen jugglers, five believers
  14. Re:wma? by Pflipp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Weapons of Mass Applications?

    I lost you there.

    --
    "We can confirm that Debian does *not* ship the version with the trojan horse. Our version predates it." [CA-2002-28]
  15. Windows "backdoor" by carvalhao · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is definitely THE major "backdoor" into Windows market share. While in most developed coutries Linux must open it's way into an already large Windows user base which has economical resources to buy the licences, in developing countries it has the opportunity to get a fresh start PLUS a user base that will hardly be able to pay Windows licences!

    As this applies not only to home users but also to governments in these conditions, this is a major victory. As these countries increasingly become the agricultural and industrial centers of our globalised economy, while the developed countries become information and knowledge producers, the need to interface may leed to:

    1 - The adoption of open middleware standards

    2 - The widespread use of Free Open Source software

    Either way, Open Source gets something out of it! :)

  16. US Law (from Silicon Valley LUG Open Letter) by LondonLawyer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Linux is the Free/Open Source UNIX-like operating system kernel that runs on many modern computer systems. Linux is available under the GNU General Public License, which means that users may freely copy, change, and distribute it, but must make source code available to recipients and may not impose any restrictions on further distribution. Linux does contain some security features that use encryption. As such, it is classified under ECCN 5D002. Because Linux is open source, it is eligible for export under License Exception TSU in accordance with 15 CFR 740.13(e).

    On May 7, the President exercised his authority under the Wartime Supplemental Authorization Act of 2003 to suspend most of the provisions of the Iraq Sanctions Act of 1990. On June 27, 2003, the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) published an interim final rule (68 Fed. Reg. 38188) amending the Iraqi Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 575, to include a general license authorizing certain new transactions. The export of items controlled by the Department of Commerce was addressed in 31 CFR 575.533(b)(2):

    The exportation from the United States or, if subject to U.S. jurisdiction, the exportation or rexportation from a third country to Iraq of any goods or technology (including technical data or other information) controlled by the Department of Commerce under the Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR chapter VII, subchapter C) for exportation to Iraq must be separately authorized by or pursuant to this part.

    The term "controlled by the Department of Commerce" means subject to a license requirement under the Department of Commerce's Export Administration Regulations (EAR). Items subject to a license requirement under the EAR include items on the Commerce Control List that are listed in 15 CFR 746.3 as requiring a license for exportation or reexportation to Iraq.

    Under Section 746.3 of the EAR, an export license is required to export or reexport to Iraq any item on the CCL containing a NS Column 1 in the Country Chart Column of the License Requirements section of an ECCN. Software classified under ECCN 5D002 is controlled for NS Column 1.

    It is important to note that proprietary operating system software such as Microsoft Windows and Sun Solaris have been classified as mass-market encryption products and are eligible for export under ECCN 5D992. These products may be exported to Iraq without a license under the interim final rule (68 Fed. Reg. 38188) amending the Iraqi Sanctions Regulations.

    Under the provisions of License Exception TSU, open source and the corresponding object code may be exported to all destinations except Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Sudan and Syria. Thus, open source and the corresponding object code are treated as if subject only to AT (anti-terrorism) controls. Items subject to AT controls may be exported to Iraq under the interim final rule (68 Fed. Reg. 38188) amending the Iraqi Sanctions Regulations.

    Source: http://linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=7318

    1. Re:US Law (from Silicon Valley LUG Open Letter) by danharan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The US/UK tag-team also vetoed many other goods. Iraq for example was refused pencils (the graphite can be used to make bombs), paper, ink, chlorine (essential for water purification, but can also be used to make weapons), lightbulbs... the list goes on.

      According to the UN, sanctions have killed over a million people in the time they were in place. People like Denis Halliday even quit and called the sanctions genocidal, squarely pointing the finger at the US and the UK.

      So I'm not the least bit surprised that they would consider Linux dangerous. Anything that could be considered "dual-use" could be banned- even if they are essentials like chlorine.

      What is perhaps more surprising is that a government would keep passing such stupid laws. They won't stop me, e.g., from bringing a Linux distro and encryption packages with me if I go to Cuba. Btw, I live in Canada, so won't face repercussions from the US; I wouldn't recommend this type of behaviour for US citizens as they can decide to give you a hard time.

      --
      Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
  17. hardly surprising by manavendra · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Contrary to the more obvious knee-jerk reaction and wisecracks this post might invoke, I can can understand how the populace of Iraq feels having been subject to years of anarchy, tyranny and then several years of painful, forced and widely questioned war

    We have all seen dozens of documentaries and newsreports of what the people have Iraq have had to face, especially since this new war

    Yet, in a way, things can only become better. Perhaps the fanatics/militants will target something else (or at least outside Iraq) once the formal hand-over/creation of a sovereign Iraq is completed (think its only 9 days to go now).

    The people of Iraq realize the only way forward is to make the most use of whatever resources available, be it hardware or software. Most services and businesses need technology, and though hardware costs cannot be eliminated entirely, open source software solutions go a long way in reducing costs.

    --
    http://efil.blogspot.com/
  18. Re:How fucking dumb can you be? by kfg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What he means is that once any code has left the US US restrictions no longer apply to that code at that non US location. It need only "escape" once, through some means or other, and then it is "free."

    Why would the Iraqis download Linux from the US when they can download the French Mandrake from Paris, Prague, or Dresden?

    KFG

  19. This is entirely logical by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 2, Funny

    After all, they already have the beards, and I'm sure sandals are pretty popular in the Arabian desert ;-)

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  20. Re:A link to the Iraqi Linux Group? by MajGeek · · Score: 2, Informative

    I couldn't RTFA so I don't know if it's the same group but the Iraqi Linux Users Group headquartered in Baghdad is here.

  21. Re:How fucking dumb can you be? by mirko · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Much of the development effort behind Linux now comes from USA and code is stored on servers in USA.

    • KDE : Trolltech (Norway)
    • Gnome : Miguel De Icaza (Mexico)
    • mPlayer : Hungary
    • Mandrake : France
    • SuSe : Germany

    etc.
    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  22. Re:How fucking dumb can you be? by mpe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Much of the development effort behind Linux now comes from USA

    Only in the sense that Linus now lives there.

    and code is stored on servers in USA.

    Actually it is all over the planet. Quite a bit of OSS is deliberatly developed outside of the US because of the political minefield of "export restrictions" which exist.

  23. Licenses are'nt the issue by MajGeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Thing is, we're all assuming the average Iraqi, or even the average Iraqi government minister, *cares* about licensing issues. They don't. This is a country where you can buy pirated CDs with anything you want for next to nothing. If they decide to go with Microsoft products, they'll buy them for a fistful of dinars, install them, and use them for the next three generations with nary a thought of a visit from Redmond copyright police. If Iraq becomes the next bastion of software freedom and advances the cause of FOSS throughout the world, it will be because FOSS DOES THE JOB. Not because of pure idealism, or any longing to breathe free air after decades of tyranny. It's a good opportunity for FOSS advocates to break into an emerging market, but the focus needs to be on the capabilites, ease of use, great support, and security of future development -- not licensing platitudes.

  24. Uh Huh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "The idea is to make low-cost, home-grown software and is said to hold great promise for developing countries. It could leapfrog Iraq into a more competitive future."


    Yes, yes, of course it will. Jesus Christ. Does anyone here actually, truly and genuinely believe that a handful of Linux users in Iraq are going to make the nation more competitive when their main natural resource (oil) is being plundered so freely by The West?

    Linux is not the answer to all of the world's problems. Oh, hold on, here's an idea. Stop 'coding' yet another MP3 ripper for KDE, get out a pen and some paper and start writing to your congressmen about the Allies' invasion and occupation of Iraq.

    Free software may help Iraq in the future, but it won't do Jack Shit until they get the rest of their immediate problems sorted first.

  25. Leapfrogging by cowbutt · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The idea is to make low-cost, home-grown software and is said to hold great promise for developing countries. It could leapfrog Iraq into a more competitive future.

    This has happened before; when the former eastern bloc countries wanted to get on the Internet when the iron curtain came down, despite being not especially wealthy, they bought current equipment. As a result, for many years, sites in countries such as Slovenia and Poland were faster than sites in France and Germany that were making do with equipment they'd bought many years earlier.

    --

  26. Re:Slovenia as a developing country?!! by kd4evr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Current state of affairs in Slovenia:

    - officially joined EU May this year
    - may adopt currency (Euro) in next couple of years
    - inflation some 4% and dropping
    - cost of living close to EU, paychecks lower, though

    - parrent is correct, no globaly-strong economic players there
    - only suitable for investors and VC with thich skin and stamina
    - too expensive and inflexible public administration (could be true in a lot of places, though)
    - taxes the life and blood out of decent citizens and straight businesses
    - little to no perspective for young people & families

    Developing country is a wrong label for Slovenia. The correct indication is that Slovenia is a country that could be well off and has every chance of being a member of the 'developed' club; however, with a self-centered attidute, minorty complex of a small nation and a prevailing sense of envy and narrow-minded greed in most of the population, the nation is draining its resources the wrong way.
    As a non-fitting member of this Slovenian society, constantly contemplating a well known sport of the nation: emigration (or e-migration, for that matter) I still have to develop a term like 'Retarding' country for the state of affairs...

    Damn retards even renewed the M$ licenses without a wink of an eye - for big bucks; at the same time the news was out that M$ flexes to zero to stay in business against the cheaper and the better.

  27. And none if this would have happened... by rotor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...if it weren't for one of the people most vilified by slashdotters. It seems a little ironic that people who are so against what the Bush administration has done in Iraq are so excited about the freedoms that the Iraqi people are starting to see as a result of those actions. Yeah - Bush has problems, but the course in Iraq was the right one to take.

    --
    Addlepated - punk & metal
    1. Re:And none if this would have happened... by dave420 · · Score: 2

      Right one to take? Ask the tens of thousands of families in Iraq who've lost loved ones over the last year, and are still being shot at by overzealous guys in uniform. Now, those guys have better boots and bigger guns. They're also worse at restoring power and water, and can't tell the difference between a normal iraqi and a militiaman. Right course to take my ass. If you really believe that, I pity you. Turn off Fox.

  28. it's going to take time. by nabil_IQ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was a bit realistic when I said it's going to take between 2 and 5 years t have a solid base to build on. Tons of challenges down there now, security is the bigest issue.

    Iraq does have a large technology work force, they lack direction and lack resources. Just so you know, Iraq governement and educational institues been running Unix since the 1970s on mainly ICL mainframes (International Computers Ltd., too bad they are gone now). I personally knew few Unix gurus in Iraq and it's just a matter of time to contact them and show them Linux.

    Linux isn't the solution for everything, but I beleive Linux can do a great job in the servers and office desktop environments, home users will still want to play their favorite game or watch some DMCA compliant movies :P. basically Linux can save Iraq (as a governement and/or businesses operate there) large sums of money by implementing it in government and businesses establishments and in educational institues for both server and desktop environments.

    again, it's going to take time. So let's stay hopefull.

    --

    Won't somebody please think of the Karma!
  29. rebuilding the country is the first priority by jack_canada · · Score: 2, Insightful

    why develope linux in iraq if nobody can afford a pc??

  30. Very Astute by PingPongBoy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Open source is never more relevant to Iraq. The whole idea was to open source the oil.

    You get some of it with

    ftp oilfield.com

    Maybe not. It's been slashdotted.

    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  31. This gives a whole new meaning to.. by StarfishOne · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Enduring Freedom" :D

  32. Linux and Open Source by Brandybuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The story was about the growth of Linux in Iraq. But what about non-Linux operating systems? Are Net/FreeBSD banned because of their mascot, but OpenBSD not because its mascot is Puffy? Enquiring minds want to know!

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  33. you're the idiot by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Interesting
    if you've been paying any attention at all to anything that has happened in Iraq since their so-called liberation you'd know that most Iraqis want us out and that the longer we stay the stronger more radical forces like al-Sadr get. Even the Washington Post is reporting that the handover is a joke. Most Iraqis recognize the CPA as a puppet of the occupation rather than as an indigenous government. It is spectacularly stupid to put into power a long time exile with open CIA contacts and expect the Iraqis to welcome him as their new leader. The security situation is a nightmare. Like everyone else, I'm glad the thug Saddam is gone too, but what we've left is a power vacuum that is quickly being filled with radical elements on both sides and laying the groundwork for civil war. Meanwhile, US companies are basically looting the country's wealth, doing their best to squeeze every last penny out of the country before the handover becomes official.

    I think it's really cool that linux is gaining ground in Iraq, but the grandparent poster is correct -- linux isn't going to stop the the looting, it's not going to solve the security situation, it's not going to work without electricity, and it's not going to bring freedom or stability to a nation teetering on the brink of civil war.

  34. cool - a new justification for the war by commodoresloat · · Score: 2
    So you're saying the invasion was justified not because of WMD (which never materialized), not because Saddam had ties to al Qaeda (which everyone with a clue agrees that he did not), and not because we would "liberate" Iraq (since we've been against having local elections from the beginning even though many in Iraq have been begging for them, we've shut down newspapers, we're installing a handpicked leader who has been working with the CIA for years, but rather because it might increase the number of linux users in the world. About 10,000 Iraqi civilians dead, exactly 841 American soldiers dead, who knows how many civilian contractors, and over $119 billion spent, and it is worth it why? Because there will be more people recompiling their linux kernels on a saturday night!

    You'll have to forgive the Iraqis if they aren't yet jumping for joy about the open source revolution; they may have other things on their minds right now.

    1. Re:cool - a new justification for the war by commodoresloat · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Sorry; you're misinformed. You're saying the one sarin rocket that was found -- and even US generals admitted the Iraqis didn't seem to have any idea what this thing was -- is evidence of Iraqi WMD threatening enough to the US to justify an invasion? Hell, there are rednecks in Idaho stockpiling more chemical weapons than have been found in Iraq! What's more, the sarin weapon found was a binary weapon, that most observers agreed was probably manufactured in the US and probably sold to Saddam by a US or German company before the 1991 Gulf War. The question to be asking is not whether there is evidence of WMD ever existing in Iraq but rather whether there was a large enough WMD program existing in 2003 that it was a significant threat to the US, and the answer to that question is clearly and resoundingly "NO."

      As for al-Qaeda, again, you're misinformed. The 911 commission found no significant COOPERATION between SADDAM HUSSEIN'S GOVERNMENT and al Qaeda. That is very different from saying no ties at all between Iraq and al Qaeda. Of course there have been "ties"; al Qaeda is a very successful international terrorist organization partly because it attempted to cultivate ties to intelligence agencies around the world. All the evidence is that such attempts failed with respect to Saddam Hussein's government. Hell, there are "ties" between al Qaeda and the CIA that are more significant than those claimed in Iraq! While the panel did find that there was communication between these parties, no evidence suggests there was cooperation and in fact much evidence suggests that the relationship between these two entities was rather hostile. The CIA disputes the specific claims of one of the 911 Commission members (hardly the "most liberal" one, as you say), and the evidence that many raise about Kurdish cooperation with al Qaeda in northern Iraq hardly supports the case. Even if that evidence is true, that area was not under Saddam Hussein's control at all since the 1991 war, when it became part of a "no-fly" zone. Did you even read the 911 Commission's comments on the issue?

  35. Asymmetric Propoganda [re: truth is out there] by rm3friskerFTN · · Score: 2, Informative
    Can't help but comment on you sig, "The Truth is Out There" linking to Moore's 'Unfairenheit 9/11' website

    In the interest of balance and intellectual honesty, you might wish to also link to the Iraqi Torture Video

    hand amputation

    finger chopping

    beating with metal pipe

    arm breaking with metal pipe
    ... presumably more videos exist but DOD refuses to release them

    From the Wall Street Jounal Online Edition:

    The American Enterprise Institute held an unusual video screening [several days ago], and hardly anyone showed up. One who did was the New York Post's Deborah Orin: The video only lasts four minutes or so--gruesome scenes of torture from the days when Saddam Hussein's thugs ruled Abu Ghraib prison. I couldn't bear to watch, so I walked out until it was over.

    Some who stayed wished they hadn't. They told of savage scenes of decapitation, fingers chopped off one by one, tongues hacked out with a razor blade--all while victims shriek in pain and the thugs chant Saddam's praises.

    Saddam's henchmen took the videos as newsreels to document their deeds in honor of their leader.

    But these awful images didn't show up on American TV news ["the truth is out there" but being hidden from us???].

    In fact, just four or five reporters showed up for the screening at the American Enterprise Institute think tank, which says it got the video via the Pentagon. Fewer wrote about it. ["the truth is out there" but being hidden from us???]

    [snip][snip][snip]

    As Orin notes, this "raises a very complex problem in the War on Terror. It's worse than creating moral equivalence between Saddam's tortures and prisoner abuse by U.S. troops. It's that we do far more to highlight our own [western liberal democracy] wrongdoings precisely because they are less appalling."

    Part of the problem may be that the press hasn't quite figured out how to deal with such "asymmetric propaganda," [the internet changes everything ;-];-];-] as Orin calls it. Yet it doesn't seem that it would be that hard to provide context--to make sure that every story about American abuses at Abu Ghraib also included graphic descriptions of what went on there before Iraq's liberation.

    [snip][snip][snip]

    --

    I believe Juanita