Slashdot Mirror


Cut-Rate Windows 'XP Starter Edition' in Thailand

zlel writes "Microsoft has decided on an official name - 'Windows XP Starter Edition' - for the stripped-down, cut-rate version of Windows that it first began offering in Thailand last summer."

27 of 478 comments (clear)

  1. Analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is this the software equivalent of those first cigarettes behind the toilet block? You know, the ones that get you hooked for life?

    1. Re:Analogy? by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You get hooked when your data and files start accumulating in a proprietary format which may be difficult to translate over.

      --
      It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
    2. Re:Analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
      So by your argument, cigarettes must be a good product, as people continue to smoke them? Don't by any chance work for a cigarette PR firm, with thinking like that?

      You've missed the point. Just as people on drugs are addicted and don't see any alternative, so people on MS products get stuck with proprietory data formats and incompatibility and don't see any easy way out of their prison, even if they want to leave. The quality of the product has nothing to do with continued use.

    3. Re:Analogy? by Nasarius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And your infrastructure. It's not trivial to switch a network with thousands of users from Exchange to a Unix/Linux product.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    4. Re:Analogy? by Aero+Leviathan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People generally start smoking because they like cigarettes, to my knowledge. I didn't say they weren't hazardous to your health, nor did I say Microsoft products were 'good for you' (although I'd be surprised if you made an argument they were actually unhealthy... although I suppose on Slashdot, anything goes...)

      Also, MS Word can save as RTF and a variety of other formats, you know... it's up to you.

      I guess IHBT, IHL, etc. I will HAND :P

      --
      ~ Aero
    5. Re:Analogy? by finkployd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      IMAP makes a nice replacement for the mail portion of exchange. Plus as an added bonus it scales nicely. Last I heard MS ran some 200-400 exchange servers for their company which is insignificant compared to the university I work at with 130,000+ users and 4-5 million emails a day. We tend to laugh at them when they try to tell us Exchange would be the way to go without actually realizing out infrastructure is larger than anything they know how to support effectivly.

    6. Re:Analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      RTF was designed by one of Microsoft/Corel as a least common denominator format for word processors. It doesn't have any page formatting features (yes it does) , no tables (yes it does) , no embedded images (yes it does) , nothing. The only application it might be useful for is email, but it doesn't even do hyperlinks. (yes it does)

      wow. did you even try it out before you posted your stupid diatribe?

  2. Starter Edition. by jb.hl.com · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is anybody else making the connection between "starter" and "free first rock of crack", but the next is $x"?

    --
    By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
  3. And the difference is? by rms_nz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Good to see good journalism is going out the door - it would be nice for it to mention what makes it "cut-down".

    I know it says "As part of the deal, Microsoft also stripped out some unspecified features from both products" but surely there must be more details available than that?

  4. The Microsoft mentality by jdkane · · Score: 5, Insightful
    We don't want to provide a version of XP without Media Player to the EU. That would be catastrophic to our business.

    However Thailand can have this nice stripped down version of XP.

    1. Re:The Microsoft mentality by rsmith-mac · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's free trade for you; Microsoft is free to decide who they want to sell to, what they want to sell, and how they want to sell it, all to maximize their profit margin(their goal as a business). You can't have control over Microsoft, and that kind of free trade at the same time.

  5. No Product Activation by Anita+Coney · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've read several stories about this stripped version of Windows, and what they all fail to mention is that it also lacks Product Activation. Sure, Product Activation in Asia is like duct taping your BMW's door shut in Detroit, but it's still significant.

    People in Thailand can share their copies with their friends and family. But those of us in the rest of the world cannot. It just makes NO sense. We pay MORE for restrictions!!!

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:No Product Activation by Feztaa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People in Thailand can share their copies with their friends and family. But those of us in the rest of the world cannot. It just makes NO sense. We pay MORE for restrictions!!!

      It makes perfect sense. The market determines the price; people are willing to pay $300 for a box of windows, so MS charges $300. Other countries can't afford that much, so they reduce the price to help move the product.

      The fact that you pay more for more restrictions is just funny; you have alternatives.

    2. Re:No Product Activation by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 4, Insightful


      I've read several stories about this stripped version of Windows, and what they all fail to mention is that it also lacks Product Activation.


      I suspect that Product Activation and other recent anti-copy measures have little to do with protecting sales. It is actually an attempt to derail a dangerous perception.

      First, consider that "piracy" does not harm Microsoft. In the past decade or so, Microsoft's products have been widely pirated. Yet Microsoft's sales have still been impressive. And even an illegal copy of a product will work within Microsoft's lock-in business strategy.

      So why all the recent activity with licensing? Microsoft must show that their products cost something. They must avoid looking like their software is free. If they fail to do this, they simply reenforce a major threat to their business; commodity software. Or, more specifically, the commodity operating system.

      This new product reflects this strategy. Microsoft hasn't been especially concerned with the wide-spread illegal distribution of their products in Asia in the past. However, when the Thai government starts looking at Linux, Microsoft suddenly takes special steps.
  6. The Good and the Bad.... by CommanderData · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A stripped down version of Windows XP and Office XP could be infinitely better than the full versions in the USA if the right features were removed- remove active scripting and VBA from these products, take out a good percentage of the obscure features of Office that no one uses, and presto- a less bloated, more secure computing environment that just happens to have the MS logo on it.

    Hell, for 38 bucks I would give it a try if they rolled it out here. Of course they won't do that, because this whole tactic is about training the next generation of PC owners (developing nations) to become dependant upon MS crack.

    --
    Urge to post... fading... fading... RISING!... fading... fading... gone.
  7. How do you strip down XP anyway? by Slayk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It comes with like two useful applications. Pretty soon it'll be down to the shell and a handful of .dll files.

    1. Re:How do you strip down XP anyway? by name773 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      use the tool for the job:
      apple for graphics
      *nix for servers
      windows for solitare

  8. Re:Features left: by MrMojado · · Score: 3, Insightful

    those features have been left out of every other version as well!

  9. So crime does pay then? by grolschie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The reward for ripping off software, is price reductions and less bloated software? What message is Microsoft giving here?

  10. Another way to look at it by howman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Although there has been a lot of talk about how open source is safer and better in many ways than m$, pehaps m$ does have one thing *nix doesn't... As closed source there is no need for developers to learn english to create packages that work in their languages or for their needs.
    Now don't get me wrong, I think M$ is evil... but, even though a non-native english speaker can run *nix in their own language, any programming they want to do is predominantly restricted to English.
    I work in Japan and we do a fair amount of programming in C as well as other languages, and funny enough, although the english abilities of my co-workers are nominal at best, a few verbs and the odd noun, if I speak to them in code they understand me compleatly... It is truely weird... The other day I was trying to tell one of the programmers that the coffee machine was out of sugar, the standard english phrase "The coffee machine is out of sugar' had no effect, as soon as I said 'if led = 1 then sato(sugar) = 0' I was understood...
    So back to my origional statement, although I think open source is much better for the computer industry, the lack of having to learn english in order to get something to work for your business is a definate plus to the managers who decide to implement something purely on the basis of cost.

    --
    flinging poop since 1969
  11. Re:So crime does pay then? by baywulf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No the message given out there is "Competition (from Linux for example) brings price reductions."

  12. And so it begins... by Garwulf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually, I'm not surprised something like this has happened.

    Microsoft is starting to see Linux as honest competition for the desktop market, and acting accordingly to become competitive again. I think you'll see something similar happen here - it wouldn't surprise me if the asking price for Microsoft software is cut dramatically in the next twenty-four months, and it also wouldn't surprise me if the quality starts to improve again.

    All in all, this is a good thing, not a bad thing. The end users can only benefit from this.

    --
    Robert B. Marks
    Author, Demonsbane in Diablo Archive
  13. Re:Faux Pas! by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You haven't used XP, have you? Both XP and 2k were great about restarting. And not needing to when you install things.

    Some things require reboots (Like Direct X), but that's because they modify files currently in use.

    Oh wait, this is /. where blind attacks against the "Evil" Microsoft gets you rewarded.

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  14. Just how stripped down? by dtfinch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Windows XP Home is pretty stripped down as it is. If they intend for this to compete with Linux, why strip it down at all? Linux is still free, and is usually distributed with 90% of the software you'll ever need.

    This is one of Microsoft's big problems. You ask how much for a FULL, unrestricted version of Windows to put on a single DESKTOP system, and the answer is in the thousands of dollars, because they only expect enterprise users to need such functionality, and only on dedicated servers. If you buy XP home or professional, and install 3rd party server software to handle a peak of over 10 users (5 for home), you are violating the EULA.

    Linux and similar operating systems give you the freedom to do whatever you damn well please with your system, something that Microsoft is incapable of offering without cutting deeply into their profits, because of their high market share.

  15. Nearly exact analogy ... by quarkscat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    to a drug dealer passing out crack cocaine
    laced marijuana cigarettes to the kiddies
    for free. Where else is the next generation
    of Micro$oft clients going to come from?

  16. Re:Faux Pas! by bgeer · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I use 2K/XP nearly every day unfortunately, and virtually every time I install something it asks me to reboot. Whether it's InstallShield's problem or Windows's problem is irrelevant.

    Also, your argument about DirectX is laughable. You don't even have to restart Linux to upgrade LIBC! ***LIBC***! Even the package manager that is actually upgrading libc is using libc! And it works just fine. This has been true since ELF was introduced way back in what '96 or so?

    The whole reason behind the rebooting problem is the registry, and if MS gets rid of it I'll gladly stop making fun of it. Until then you and the rest of the MS-defender crowd will just have to keep stretching your credibility trying to defend it.

  17. So they really could make a stripped down version by foniksonik · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was under the impression that MS wasn't able to make a version of Windows without all the bells and whistels... I guess it's okay now that all of their lawsuits have been settled. So they are guilty of anti-trust and they are liars, this isn't news.

    When will the US see a version of Windows that is JUST an Operating System? I wouldn't even mind it if they included a separate disk with 'bundled' but optional software, like a music player, a photo album tool, and maybe some video editing software... heck for the good PCs they could even include some sort of DVD authoring tool. ;-p

    --
    A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.