Slashdot Mirror


Midway's Slugfest, Ballers Inappropriate For Kids?

Thanks to ABC News for its article discussing controversy over the content of Midway's officially licensed baseball and basketball videogames, as the story explains: "Nine-year-old Stephane Safar likes to play MLB Slugfest, a video game rated 'E', that is, for everyone 6 years old and older... But then he played it in front of his mother Amy, and what she saw went well beyond real-life baseball, as players punched and kicked each other during the course of the game." Amy explains: "Does he know that that's not really how Barry Bonds acts out on the field? Does he know that Nomar [Garciaparra] can't punch somebody?" Midway's NBA Ballers also comes in for criticism, with Kimberly Thompson of the Harvard School of Public Health complaining: "I think the message that kids take away from NBA Ballers is, it's all about money... Women are objects in this game."

89 comments

  1. Ballers by pudge · · Score: 4, Informative

    Saying women are "objects" in Ballers is an understatement. They are actually purchased in the game, just like a house or car. And the NBA endorses this. Lakers legend Jerry West was slated to have his likeness in the game, and he backed out once he saw the content.

    1. Re:Ballers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "I think the message that kids take away from NBA Ballers is, it's all about money... Women are objects in this game."

      If the NBA, NFL and MBA are appropriate for children, then so are these games.

      Seriously, how many pro players of the above sports are convicted of drug posession, spousal abuse, rape, murder, violent crimes, illegal weapons, doping, brawling in games, clearing the bench (in all sports) . . . and go around driving expensive cars and living in expensive homes (you see NBA and NFL guys on MTV's Cribs with their extravagent houses and cars all the time - not that there is anything at all wrong with that, though).

      So what, do they want the game to be a lie and pretend that these sports franchises are wholesome and goodnatured? Jesus, our team alone (Portland Trailblazers) is filled with nothing but convicted criminals. And look at Barry Bonds and his doping. Look at half the Cowboys. Look at Wilt Chamberlain. Look at that guy who killed his limo driver with a shotgun. Look at Kobe. Look in any direction and see that a game in which players "buy women" is the LEAST offensive of the things they do.

      And besides.. IT IS A FUCKING GAME.

      And since when don't women sell themselves to the highest bidder? Are you telling me that these whores who go after guys in bands and sports are there for any reason other than the fact that the dude is rich and/or famous?

    2. Re:Ballers by pudge · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're conflating the sporting event with the people who participate in it. I can go to movies without knowing or caring about the lives of the actors. And, in fact, I do.

      Anyway, since when does the fact that something really happens justify its inclusion in entertainment? Saying it happens in real life is a non sequitur.

      Further, the things you speak of are not endorsed by (e.g.) the NBA, but the NBA does endorse this game.

      And besides.. IT IS A FUCKING GAME.

      A game that is rated E for Everyone, and contains prostitution. This is really more about the rating of the game than anything else. If it were rated M for Mature (not that I think it deserves such a rating), there would be far less of an outcry.

      Personally, I think the ESRB has a big gap between T and M. M is a bit of a stigma and implies explicit content, whereas IMO suggestivity, as exists in Ballers, is not appropriate for T and not explicit enough to warrant an M. Regardless, an E rating for this game is just stupid.

    3. Re:Ballers by lightspawn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And besides.. IT IS A FUCKING GAME.

      Exactly! It's even called NBA Ballers, for crying out loud... what do you expect?

    4. Re:Ballers by Boglin · · Score: 2, Funny
      Are you telling me that these whores who go after guys in bands and sports are there for any reason other than the fact that the dude is rich and/or famous?
      After all, women have never been attracted to muscular or atheltic men.
    5. Re:Ballers by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "If the NBA, NFL and MBA are appropriate for children, then so are these games."

      The E-for-everybody rating overrides this statement. Video games and television shows are not rated the same way. For a fight to happen in a video game, it has to be put in. A fight during a sporting event, however, cannot be prevented.

      "So what, do they want the game to be a lie and pretend that these sports franchises are wholesome and goodnatured? "

      Games are meant to be fun, not to be true reflections of what they're recreating.

      "And besides.. IT IS A FUCKING GAME."

      Normally I'd agree. However, if they're rated as E-for-everybody, they really should respect that as well as they can. The last thing video games need right now is attempts at heavy handed legislation due to complaints that the ratings system isn't an effective babysitter.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:Ballers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful
      Lakers legend Jerry West was slated to have his likeness in the game, and he backed out once he saw the content
      Funny. The developers' diary on IGN said they'd dropped him because they negotiated for a fixed number of legends, and they removed the least interesting guys. The roster hasn't changed since well before they ever showed the game.

      In other words, West isn't included because he's not on the 20 most interesting legends list.

    7. Re:Ballers by mcgroarty · · Score: 4, Funny
      I'm one of the developers. (Look under the programming credits.)

      Ballers wasn't our favorite choice, but we couldn't get management to agree to "Shootin' in the Hood."

    8. Re:Ballers by pudge · · Score: 3, Informative
      From the ABC article:
      But Jerry West -- who has been a part of the NBA for 41 years and whose silhouette is used in the league's official logo -- was supposed to be one of the "NBA legends" featured in NBA Ballers. When he learned what was in it, he insisted upon being removed.

      "The only thing that a player has is, to some degree, his reputation and his integrity," West says. "I think all of us would like to feel like that's important to us."
      I had heard this originally when ESPN (both ABC and ESPN are owned by the same company) ran the same story weeks ago, except the link between his asking to be removed because of the content seems, to my memory, to have been more overt. Regardless, we can't know who's telling the truth, I guess, but I'd put my money on the guy who isn't trying to defend his product, and who has a long history of being trustworthy, and nothing to prove or gain by lying. :-)
    9. Re:Ballers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The legends were picked by the development team and marketing voting for their favorites. Period. I don't remember Jerry getting any votes.

    10. Re:Ballers by pudge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And again, I am not saying the game shouldn't be made. I think the idea is kinda lame, but I hate that part of the NBA culture, so I am not the target audience. I just think it an E rating for it is clearly disingenuous and stupid.

    11. Re:Ballers by pudge · · Score: 1

      So you're saying Jerry West is lying?

    12. Re:Ballers by mcgroarty · · Score: 4, Informative

      Do me a favor and play the game before taking the article for its word. In the game you acquire friends -- girls and boys. And all of the female images were cleared by the ESRB. You're being joined by women (and men) dressed far more tastefully than your average modern school student.

    13. Re:Ballers by pudge · · Score: 1

      And by approving the concept, the ESRB is showing its own obsolescence. And tastefulness relative to average modern school students is not a measurement I'd be proud of.

    14. Re:Ballers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Jerry West never even had an opportunity to see the game until the last All Star Game, long after the roster was finalized.

    15. Re:Ballers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, great - so now you're promoting homosexual prostitution?! [/sarcasm]

    16. Re:Ballers by pudge · · Score: 1

      Do you think Midway would appreciate you calling Jerry West a liar, on their behalf?

    17. Re:Ballers by neura · · Score: 1

      OMG!

      PLEASE mod this up as Funny! =)

    18. Re:Ballers by Pluvius · · Score: 1

      Saying women are "objects" in Ballers is an understatement. They are actually purchased in the game, just like a house or car.

      Is this like in Fight Night 2004, where you "buy" women who act as your valets? In that case, you're not buying the women, you're buying their services.

      Rob (Not those kinds of services)

    19. Re:Ballers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't believe I understand the intent of your question. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt and assuming you're not just trying to be unpleasant because you've been contradicted. No, Midway would not want to go on the record as officially calling West a liar because it doesn't benefit the company. The developers may well personally object to his slander however.

    20. Re:Ballers by mcgroarty · · Score: 1

      (Moderators: Joke)

    21. Re:Ballers by Klowner · · Score: 1

      So women are literal objects in this game? A new level of game realism is upon us! Horray!

      (I'm kidding, don't hurt me)

    22. Re:Ballers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So women are literal objects in this game?


      Yeah, I'd like to see the source code for Ballers. Wonder if they use the design patterns? WomanFactory. WomanAdapter. WomanIterator. WomanObserver. WomanState.


      Fun stuff!

    23. Re:Ballers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the ever-popular WomanVisitor.

    24. Re:Ballers by pudge · · Score: 1

      No, Midway would not want to go on the record as officially calling West a liar because it doesn't benefit the company.

      Yet, you did, on their behalf. I am wondering why you did, if your company would not wish you to. Is this question unfair?

      The developers may well personally object to his slander however.

      I think you don't know what "slander" means. I slandered no one. You libeled West.

    25. Re:Ballers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Settle down pudge -- it's possible both stories are true. Maybe they cut him but withheld telling him until after he asked to be removed.

    26. Re:Ballers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The developers may well personally object to his slander however.
      I think you don't know what "slander" means. I slandered no one. You libeled West
      So you believe you're Jerry West.

      The usage was correct: Slander means he (Jerry) lied about the developers' work, saying something negative.

    27. Re:Ballers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, this can't be a sexist game if there's a WomanManager...

    28. Re:Ballers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What? Women are things." -Lee Majors, Family Guy

    29. Re:Ballers by pudge · · Score: 1

      So you believe you're Jerry West.

      Huh? So you don't know what libel means, either?

      The usage was correct: Slander means he (Jerry) lied about the developers' work, saying something negative.

      No, he didn't lie about the developers' work. He -- if it is as you say -- lied about the circumstances of his lack of inclusion. He criticized the developers' work (i.e., the content of the game), but didn't say anything false about . He just gave his opinion.

      And your libel is that you called him a liar.

    30. Re:Ballers by pudge · · Score: 1

      it's possible both stories are true

      Hey, don't tell me that. I was just reporting what ESPN reported, and then someone from Midway started calling West a liar.

    31. Re:Ballers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My favorite part was when someone from Midway started calling Pudge a bitch.

    32. Re:Ballers by pudge · · Score: 1

      Rock!

    33. Re:Ballers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not libel if it's true, pudge.

    34. Re:Ballers by pudge · · Score: 1

      Truth is one defense of libel, but since you've not proven it's true, the charge would still stand. Further, truth is not necessarily a defense of libel. Technically, it is written defamation, and defamation does not require falsehood. However, in this case, since West is not only a public figure but also the one who made the initial statement, then yes, chances are proof of truth would dismiss a libel charge.

    35. Re:Ballers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      beaten on a technicality

      You win the cigar and Altoids :(

  2. and yet, so apt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny that the "it's all about money" comment is in relation to the NBA, and not MLB.. Yeah, they're probably both guilty of it, what with the crazy black-out rules, and insane endorsements for everything from chewing gum to credit cards...

  3. Hrm.... by Hank+Reardon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What the heck, I suppose I'll take a Karma hit for this...

    I think the message that kids take away from NBA Ballers is, it's all about money... Women are objects in this game.

    I guess I must have missed something. With all of the endorsement deals, players being paid so much that only one team can afford to pay them, tales of sexual conquest (a-la Wilt Chamberlain), and the inconsistent enforcement of the rules, isn't this an accurate representation of the NBA?

    I quit being interested in the NBA as players like Dennis Rodman became more and more common. I miss the general good-natured playing of Larry Bird, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, Michael Jordan and Magic Johnson. Bring back that level of sportsmanship and finess and I might change my opinion.

    --
    There's so little difference between politics and jihad lately...
    1. Re:Hrm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean Bird and the somewhat racial comments he's making now? Kareem and his appearances at the playboy mansion parties? Michael and the marital issues, baseball, in-out retirement? Magic...let's not forget the reason why he retired to begin with.

      Don't get me wrong. I love 'em all and like how they played the game...but to talk about "the good ol' days" and post those names as if they were squeaky clean was a bit misleading.

    2. Re:Hrm.... by pudge · · Score: 3, Funny

      You mean Bird and the somewhat racial comments he's making now?

      What's wrong with being sexy?

    3. Re:Hrm.... by Hank+Reardon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I never meant to imply that they were squeaky clean. Sorry if it sounded that way. I suppose a little explaination is in order.

      I couldn't care less what kind of racial comments Bird is making; he's entitled to his opinion, as is everybody else. I haven't heard any of the racial comments he made, so I don't know much about them. In all the time he played, I can't recall a single racially-based incident on the court. It's a non-issue for me.

      Likewise with Kareem. Who the hell cares if he hung out with Hugh Heffner? He was also busted for smoking pot after he retired. He played ball very well and kept his personal bullshit off-court.

      Same with Jordan. His marital issues are his. How did they affect his playing and conduct on the court? And, if he was a decent baseball player, why shouldn't he play that, as well? Kobe also has marital issues, and has been accused of rape, however unlikely the charges appear to be. Why didn't I use him as an example of the players I miss? According to his teammates, he acted aloof and wasn't really a team player. You never heard that about Jordon.

      And Magic is a perfect example, in my opinion. He screwed up, he admitted it, he used his star power to get the message out about how not to make his same mistakes, and he quit the one thing he was good at not because he wanted to, but because he was worried that some of the physical contact in basketball could put his fellow players at risk.

      Neither Kareem, Jordon or Magic were seen bragging to the news media about sleeping with multiple-hundreds of women and lamenting about how nice it was. To his credit, Kobe seems very contrite about his missteps.

      Look at Rodman's actions on the court. Belligerant and unsportsman-like as a rule, not an exeption. I recall a game where he hauled off an kicked a reporter in the crotch. All Rodman ever appeared to care about was promoting himself, not playing a good game of basketball.

      Wasn't it Spreewell that choked his coach on the sidelines on national TV? I think he paid a fine to the NBA for the assault where your or I would have been jailed.

      The current professional players have been tainted in my eyes by the constant wrist-slaps that the organization gives them for criminal offenses on the court. I'm sure there are pleanty of good players who don't let their personal lives intrude on the playing of the game, but they get harder to find as the younger players emulate those who get all the screen time because of the on-and-off-the-court bad-boy bullshit.

      --
      There's so little difference between politics and jihad lately...
    4. Re:Hrm.... by pudge · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I couldn't care less what kind of racial comments Bird is making

      The word is not racial, it is racist. Racial means "of or pertaining to race." Saying Michael Jordan is black is racial. Saying black people suck is racist. Racial is neutral, racist is negative.

      FWIW, Bird made no racist comments. He said that basketball is a black man's game, and blacks are -- in regard to basketball -- better athletes. That's not racist, that's being minimally observant.

    5. Re:Hrm.... by Hank+Reardon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are correct that the word is not "racial". The parent poster used it, so I responded directly to his comment; next time, I'll be sure to quote from the parent message as I just noticed that it was posted by an AC, so not everybody will see it.

      And, knowing the quote now, I'd say Bird's comment was, in fact, racial in nature. :)

      --
      There's so little difference between politics and jihad lately...
    6. Re:Hrm.... by Maserati · · Score: 1

      As a Warriors fan (Hi, my name is Mike...) I have to correct the Spreewell incident. That was a locker-room incident, not sidelines and definitely not televised. Spree went way over the line in assaulting a coach (however provoked) and was rightly suspended for a year. Of course, Carlisemo was fired at the end of the season, spent some time doing awful tv spots during the playoffs and only wound up back in coaching last years (Spurs). Spree played great team ball with the Knicks during their last Finals appearance and is now part of the ruling triumvirate of the TWolves. One rehab'd himself, the other took years to work his way back to an assistant coaching position. Frankly, as a Warriors fan (see above) I'd have preferred to keep Spree.

      And Magic Johnson was very obviously good at two things.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    7. Re:Hrm.... by Hank+Reardon · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the clairfication.

      I had quit watching basketball quite a while before the incident and only heard about it via late night sports news. I thought I remembered catching a glimpse of the incident, but I must be mistaken.

      And Magic Johnson was very obviously good at two things.

      I'm curious what you consider the second to be?

      --
      There's so little difference between politics and jihad lately...
    8. Re:Hrm.... by pudge · · Score: 1

      Yes, since you didn't know what Bird was talking about, I wasn't criticizing you, just clarifying for your sake. :-) Cheers,

    9. Re:Hrm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Playing basketball and having gay anal sex (resulting in his well deserved disease).

    10. Re:Hrm.... by Maserati · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I was thinking of Wilt Chamberlain and HIS "magic johnson".

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    11. Re:Hrm.... by Kyn · · Score: 1

      David St. Hubbins: We say, "Love your brother." We don't say it really, but...
      Nigel Tufnel: We don't literally say it.
      David St. Hubbins: No, we don't say it.
      Nigel Tufnel: We don't really, actually mean it.
      David St. Hubbins: No, we don't believe it either, but...
      Nigel Tufnel: But we're not racists.
      David St. Hubbins: But that message should be clear.

      Ganked from IMDB.

  4. a-HA! by orangesquid · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does he know that that's not really how Barry Bonds acts out on the field? Does he know that Nomar [Garciaparra] can't punch somebody?

    Tell that to my black eye!!! Damn that Garciaparra...

    Oh, and, how does Barry Bonds act out on the field, if you would be kind enough to explain?

    --
    --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    1. Re:a-HA! by luke923 · · Score: 1

      Does he know that that's not really how Barry Bonds acts out on the field? Does he know that Nomar [Garciaparra] can't punch somebody?

      The question I want to have answered is do we allow this, or do we have the ultra-realistic game where Barry Bonds, Jason Giambi, and Mark McGwire take their steroids before the game? "Yes, Johnnie, if you want to be successful, you must find as many ways to cheat without getting caught. After all, if you get caught cheating, the problem was that you got caught." I think that's the lesson people really want their children to learn.

      --
      "Good, Fast, Cheap: Pick any two" -- RFC 1925
    2. Re:a-HA! by MentosPimp · · Score: 1

      No. The ultra-realistic game will keep the players and the game the same.
      It will, however, allow you to listen to simulated talk-radio shows after each game. If one of your star players had a big home-run, you get to listen to fat slobs with no knowledge of weight-training - or even exercise in general -pontificate about the use of steriods in sports and freely slander any athlete they feel like.

  5. Message by sbszine · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think the message that kids take away from NBA Ballers is, it's all about money...

    Whereas in real life, they do it for the love, plus a small stipend for meals and cab fare.

    --

    Vino, gyno, and techno -Bruce Sterling

  6. Nomar might not hit people.... by 512k · · Score: 1

    but Pedro
    knows how to handle himself.

    --
    ------ Work is so much easier when you don't
  7. well... by ImTheDarkcyde · · Score: 1

    i seem to think that acceptable content for a little kid do you all recall the three stooges? I do. Saying this game influences kids to act violent while playing sports is like saying that when your friend calls you a knuckle head you poke his eyes out and hit him with a 2x4 maybe they should just include a "v chip" type apparatus in consoles that blocks out all the badness, who knows who cares, violence is here to stay

    1. Re:well... by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Saying this game influences kids to act violent while playing sports is like saying that when your friend calls you a knuckle head you poke his eyes out and hit him with a 2x4..."

      There was a story a couple of weeks ago about lightning strikes. Somebody in that thread described a friend of his wife's dying due to a strike. I play UT2004 a LOT. The lightning gun is my favorite weapon. Sniping with it was fun as heck for me. (still is! just haven't had time to play...) Despite finding so much pleasure in shooting video game sprites with lightning, reading the "A friend of my wife's was killed by lightning" really jolted me. I found that heart breaking. I have to ask: How desensitizing can games be if I react like that to somebody dying?

      I'm at a point now where I don't even think 'scientific proof' will convince me that video game violence is dangerous.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Despite finding so much pleasure in shooting video game sprites with lightning, reading the "A friend of my wife's was killed by lightning" really jolted me.

      Ha! Nice one!

  8. Well... by Poseidon88 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Women are objects in this game.

    That only proves they used good encapsulation.

  9. That's your problem by duffbeer703 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "Does he know that that's not really how Barry Bonds acts out on the field? Does he know that Nomar [Garciaparra] can't punch somebody?"


    If you don't think that the game is appropriate for your kid, don't buy it. Professional sports is a scummy business... maybe kids wouldn't be affected by the portrayal of athletes if we didn't program them to idolize athletes.

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    1. Re:That's your problem by bckrispi · · Score: 1
      If you don't think that the game is appropriate for your kid, don't buy it.

      At the risk of re-stating what has been said numerous times in this thread, the problem isn't with the game itself, but with the ESRB rating of "E". As a parent who grew up with technology, I use these ratings as a benchmark for what my child can play. The rating is the first factor I consider when I decide if the game is "appropriate for my kid". From what I read in the FA, there are numerous things in these games that should have disqualified them from being given an "E" rating.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    2. Re:That's your problem by Tojosan · · Score: 1

      I agree that if it isn't appropriate for 'your' kid, then you shouldn't buy it. The problem is that when something is rated 'E' and the box looks good, the parent ends up buying it before they see the true content.
      Then they are shocked when they see the actual game play.
      Parents should make an effort though to know what they are buying. Especially in this day and age when any game is $50! My rule is if I don't know, I don't buy it.

      As to your point about accuracy, you are right, sports can be a scummy biz. And we could have a whole other discussion on your point about idols.

      Be well,
      Tojosan

    3. Re:That's your problem by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1
      Imo, you shouldn't use those ratings, as they often don't justify the game (example being the main post).

      Next time your kid wants to buy a game, do your lil' research on google, and you get a much better personal rating for yourself.

  10. wait... by Hinkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Does this mean parents assume anyhting sold with a "g" label is what they consider appropriate? Last time i checked they were guidlines for parents. Anyone who lets there 10 year old kid play a game they have never even seen before shouldnt have them :) Seriously, you dont have the 10min it'll take to watch your kid play the game when you get it for them? I think far to meany people are blaming there kids behavior and influences on media,school,tv,games, etc. instead of on the fact that parents spend allmost no time with there children anymore, but then again im only 20 years old what do i know :)

    --
    -=Hinkey=-
    1. Re:wait... by pudge · · Score: 1

      Does this mean parents assume anyhting sold with a "g" label is what they consider appropriate?

      Of course, the parents here -- who complained about the content of the games after their kids have been playing them for some time -- have been negligient. That's without question.

      Anyone who lets there 10 year old kid play a game they have never even seen before shouldnt have them :)

      Absolutely. But does that negate the responsibility of the ESRB to grant reasonable ratings? If so, what's the point of having ratings at all?

      I am not even blaming any children's behavior on games. I am just saying the rating is indefensible. Hell, even without the implied prostitution, it is indefensible. That kind of selfish, materialistic bullshit is NOT appropriate for everyone, and only somethine with a corrupted soul themselves could think otherwise.

    2. Re:wait... by bckrispi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      but then again im only 20 years old what do i know

      Since I assume you don't have kids, let me answer your question: You don't know shit.

      As a parent, I *do* use the rating system to determine what's appropriate, that's the whole reason the ESRB system is there.

      Anyone who lets there 10 year old kid play a game they have never even seen before shouldnt have them

      Yeah, that's great. I have no problem knowing the contents of each and every game I get for my kid. The probelm is is that he has four grandparents and three great-grandparents (uncles, aunts, etc.) who aren't as tech/game savvy. The ESRB should be a simple-to-use (and ACCURATE) way of discerning the games contents and appropriateness.

      Seriously, you dont have the 10min it'll take to watch your kid play the game when you get it for them?

      Uhhhh, you mean to tell me there's a way I can preview an entire store's game library before I make a purchase?? Last time I checked, there were demo consoles set up for a limited number of titles.

      I think far to meany people are blaming there kids behavior and influences on media,school,tv,games, etc. instead of on the fact that parents spend allmost no time with there children anymore

      The reason games are being blamed is because uneducated parents purchase inappropriate titles. The ESRB system is meant to be a way of informing parents of the game's contents. If the game has graphical violence and "prostitution", I would expect to see that on the label (and I *certainly* woudn't expect it to get an "E" rating. As far as your last silly statement, I could spend 23 hours a day with my kid, it's the 1 hour where he goes unsupervised that I need to worry about.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    3. Re:wait... by mcgroarty · · Score: 2, Informative
      Hell, even without the implied prostitution, it is indefensible
      Please play the game before you make this kind of comment. You gather a posse -- boys and girls. At no point does the game suggest that you're acquiring a girlfriend or a boyfriend. The people you gather in your posse stand courtside and cheer you on as you play. Period.
    4. Re:wait... by ImTheDarkcyde · · Score: 1

      haha, thats funny, it said "reply to this | parent" haha.. just found that funny... anyway, im not going to blame parents for buying the bad games, the games are not the problem. i think its more the environment where the kids are brough up, i've been playing DooM since before i was in school and i've yet to kill an animal that wasnt an insect(demon or otherwise) i think all it just takes a parent to makes sure the kids know its not real, and it wouldnt hurt the parent to play the games either just to check for stuff their kid shouldnt see

    5. Re:wait... by Nakamiya · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked, there were demo consoles set up for a limited number of titles.

      Last I checked there were demo discs that contain serveral game demos given out free at stores, and ocationaly in the mail if you register your console. And last I checked there were places to rent most if not all of games currently on store shelves.

      And as for those given as presents, you can play it yourself to look at it's content before giving your kid the ok to play it.

    6. Re:wait... by pudge · · Score: 1

      Please play the game before you make this kind of comment.

      Please understand my criticism before you respond to it.

    7. Re:wait... by eliza_effect · · Score: 1

      And, not to mention, that if you don't have the ability, time, or willingness to preview all the content that they view on a console, you may do very well to simply not buy them a console at all. It would keep you from being offended, at least.

    8. Re:wait... by Reapy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that or just pay 20 a year for something like gamespot.com where they have gameplay movies and numerous screen shots of practically every game that is released for any system. That's how you browse a game store's entire library...

    9. Re:wait... by MentosPimp · · Score: 1

      I think he has.

      You are saying that making money and then spending it in a game makes it unsuitable for
      children.

      I dont think it is out of line to disagree with that point of view. In fact, I would think most people would disagree with that.

    10. Re:wait... by mcgroarty · · Score: 1

      The point I didn't address was your complaint against consumerism. If you equate that to prostitution, I'm afraid I can't find a rational response. Even Lasn/AdBusters doesn't take it that far.

    11. Re:wait... by pudge · · Score: 1

      You are saying that making money and then spending it in a game makes it unsuitable for children.

      OK, so you don't understand it either. Cheers!

    12. Re:wait... by MentosPimp · · Score: 1

      OK, so you don't understand it either.

      Here is my understanding:

      You have a game (NBA Ballers) in which your performance nets you currency. That currency allows one to buy homes/cars/"posse" - which is all secondary to the game.

      You then state that (disregarding the off-base prostitution remarks):

      That kind of selfish, materialistic bullshit is NOT appropriate for everyone

      If this isn't your intention, then state it more clearly.

    13. Re:wait... by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      I think for 20 you are wise beyond your years. Sounds like you'll make a fine parent one day. Just don't be of the lazy ass variety that expects things to be done for them. Instead of relying on some system that doesn't work. I'm not saying it's wrong for a 9 year old to have the game, but it is wrong for her to have bought it, without having researched the content. And even so after she found out, rather than going to ABC she should have been a parent and offered her son guidance, by asking him questions and reinforcing that it is make believe.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    14. Re:wait... by pudge · · Score: 1

      If this isn't your intention, then state it more clearly.

      I honestly wish I could give a damn about what you think enough to bother spelling it out for you.

    15. Re:wait... by Neillparatzo · · Score: 1

      Hitler.

    16. Re:wait... by ProtoCat · · Score: 0, Troll

      Hitler...

    17. Re:wait... by pudge · · Score: 1

      Shhhh, you'll blow my cover.

    18. Re:wait... by MentosPimp · · Score: 1

      I honestly wish I could give a damn about what you think enough to bother spelling it out for you.

      Well, at least you are being mature about it.

      Heaven forbid you take the time to clarify an argument to your audience, since you deemed that argument worthy enough to post in public.

      How silly of me to assume so.

  11. Barry Bonds? by BTWR · · Score: 2, Informative
    "Does he know that that's not really how Barry Bonds acts out on the field? Does he know that Nomar [Garciaparra] can't punch somebody?"

    Barry Bonds is not in the MLBPA (MLB Players Assoc). Therefore, he is not "bought" along with all the other players when EA buys the rights. In fact, in one game (MVP Baseball?), instead of buying Bonds in addition to the MLBPA, they made a charachter with Bond's exact stats, and he's some white guy on the Giants with some generic name. It's the biggest rip-off since "Mr. Dream" was the double of Mike Tyson in "Mike Tyson's Punch-Out" in all ways except he was just some no-name with Mike's former abilities :)

    1. Re:Barry Bonds? by Rethcir · · Score: 1
      Don't forget "QB Eagles" helming the all-star team in Tecmo Superbowl!

      On that note, don't you think it would be awesome if they re-released Tecmo Superbowl for GBA with modern teams, players, etc?

    2. Re:Barry Bonds? by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1

      That was/is one of my favorite games of all time. My team was Buffalo, so I also had to suffer the indignity of seeing "QB Bills" throw my touchdown passes.

      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
  12. NFL Blitz+GTA= by bigdady92 · · Score: 0

    Ray lewis gathering his crew up for a night on the town knifing people and then going to work the next sunday while driving his Escalade and his fur coat and tackling the snot out of quaterbacks.

    I wish they made a game where you could combine sports and GTA, that way you can truely act like the thug that players in all 3 of the major leagues are becoming.

    Anyone remember Dalls of the 90's? Raiders of today? NBA for the last 5-10 years? Thuglife has come home so let's fire it up on my PSX!

    --
    Wheel of Time: Book by Book and Sumview (summary review) Bigdady92 style: http://bigdady92.blogspot.com/
  13. Easy to explain,. by AzraelKans · · Score: 1
    The ESRB has an automatic software system to rate games:

    If it detects a boob or two is rated A+ (until a bribe by the publisher is collected)

    If it detects any red liquid or "pooty mouth" language is rated M (Mario was rated M for "magma" until a big N cheque was collected)

    If any guns are detected is rated T

    Anything else is rated E.
    So is easy to spot why the system didnt detected prostitution. Now all we have to do is to tell the developers to get the girls topless and offer a handy cheque to the ESRB and the game will be rated "M" plus a huge sales boost.

    I just love the smell of the game industry in the morning!

    --
    Go ahead MOD my day!
    More opinions here
  14. It's only going to get worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Midway has been forced in the past to leave a lot of stuff out of games like Slugfest at the request of MLB (surprisingly, at least in slugfest 20-03 it was mostly stuff said by the commentators, the only "violent" image removed that I know of was when someone charges the mound, the camera would cut away to somewhere else on field and you just heard the beating taking place.)

    I wouldn't be surprised if later versions of slugfest or any others drop the MLB or NBA or whoever endorsement altogether, so they can put whatever they want in.

  15. Now if only they were parametrically polymorphic by Jtheletter · · Score: 1
    Women are objects in this game.

    How convenient, I'm an object-oriented programmer. ;)

    --
    -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
  16. Disgusted by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    I don't know about the rest of you guys, but I wanna know. That kid was 9 years old right? Who in the hell bought the game for him in the first place? Is she such a bad parent that she can't grab a Gaming magazine or pull up a sysnopsis of the game online? I don't care if it's "Let's play with the Muppet Babies" the game gets my ok before my kids get to play it.

    Since when is a watchdog group or a rating on a box by a censor board better than my judgement for my child? When you take the advice or the opinion of someone else lady, make sure their opinions are the same as yours. What you think is wrong or exploitive others may find absolutely apropriate. I grew up playing Street Fighter -> Street Fighter OMG We are sick to death of it. Well I never Axe kicked anyone because Guille did it in the game. Why because it's just that a game. Teach your kid right from wrong, don't rely on someone else to look and decide if it should be apropriate. If you do then the only one to blame, is yourself. I think you need to be more into your sons life than to let a 9 year old play video games. Make his ass go outside and physically play baseball. Thats what he needs to be doing anyway. My kids are allowed to work on a computer. Notice WORK. They are under age 9, and are very astute programmers for their ages. Neither ar ein 5th grade yet. When it comes to video games at my house, there are two people to ask. Me and God, and I'll tell you at my house God ain't gonna do a thing to get a video game that I haven't ok'd.

    Don't wait till your kid goes apeshit and becomes a mass murderer in an afternoon and then expect to blame it on a game, because it's that a game. If you have taught them well then they know the difference so lighten up move on, cause we have.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!