Slashdot Mirror
Indian President Advises Open Source Approach
geo_2677 writes "The Indian President Dr. A Kalam has advised defense scientists to go for open-source software for software security, rather than be stuck with insecure proprietary software. Being a scientist himself, he surely knows what's good for his country." Speaking at the Indian Navy's Weapons and Electronic System Engineering Establishment, Kalam argued: "Open source codes can easily introduce the users to build security algorithms in the system without the dependence of proprietary platforms", though continues: "We should take maximum care to ensure that our solution is unique to protect our own defence security solutions implemented on open platforms." We previously reported on Richard Stallman's meeting with Dr. Kalam earlier this year.
...can be found on sarovar.org... it's one of the biggest public GForge sites out there.
The Army reading list
Being a scientist myself, I had to control my laughter and climb back into my chair before posting this.
Perhaps geo_2677 could explain to the researchers with whom I used to share an equipment room why a) you need to close the lid of a refrigerated centrifuge and b) why, if you're too freaking lazy to do a) at least don't run the goddamn thing with a foot of condensed water in it.
Yeah, if you want good, pragmatic common sense, ask a scientist.
What I'm listening to now on Pandora...
Please explain.
Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
He already said this months ago.
...Indian's political structure? I seem to remember that a woman was just elected as Prime Minister (a big leap for India!). How does the Prime Minister relate to the President? What is their area of power? Is there a Parliament or Congress?
:-/
AFAIK, Prime Ministers have always been used in Monarchies instead of democracies. So I'm a bit confused here...
Javascript + Nintendo DSi = DSiCade
Unfortunately I doubt this will heavily impact any nations/businesses tech policies outside of India. But at least it's a step in the right direction
Almost.
Uh oh. Somebody needs to get a visit from Bruce Schneier next! I suspect that his proposed unique solution would be better off if it was Open Sourced for peer review.
This is not a sig
I thought that said Indianan predident. I was about to start planning my campaign for Viceroy of Georgia.
At the very least, he should have publicly decried open source as an anti-Hindu plot. Pakistan would jump on the bandwagon immediately.
Bill Gates: I am here to let you know that we are prepared to slash prices to keep you as a customer.
President Dr. A Kalam: Thank you! Come again!
Bill Gates: But you haven't bought anything?
President Dr. A Kalam: Thank you! Come again!
At least the tech support will be a local call for them...
There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
"The Indian President Dr. A Kalam has advised defense scientists to go for open-source software for software security, rather than be stuck with insecure proprietary software...."
I [may] disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.
Perhaps you didnt noticed but the president of india is a moslem.
Incidentally his official website runs Apache/2.0.42 (Unix) PHP/4.2.3. A couple of brief excerpts from his bio here:
After a fairly secure childhood, during which he is said to have read as much as he could, he studied at the Madras Institute of Technology, where he specialised in Aero Engineering.
He has worked in leading defence and space organisations in research and managerial capacities. He contributed in a major way to the development of the Satellite Launch Vehicle (SLV) III, which put the Rohini Satellite into orbit. He has also been chairperson to Technology Information, Forecasting and Assessment Council (TIFAC).
A vegetarian, his interests include playing the veena and writing poetry. He has written two books, Ignited Minds: Unleashing the Power Within India and India 2020: Vision for the New Millennium.
Till now, Abdul Kalam has been best known for his key role in the nuclear tests at Pokharan in the Rajasthan desert on May 11 and 13, 1997. With most parties choosing him as their presidential candidate, he has become the 11th Indian to join a very select group.
An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
From the article --
Even today Kalam is in huge demand. He is Fellow of Indian National Academy of Engineering, Fellow of Indian Academy of Sciences, Bangalore, Vice-President of Astronautical Society of India, Fellow of National Academy of Medical Sciences (India), Honorary Fellow of Institution of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineers and an ISRO Distinguished Professor!
Wow, that's just too good. I'm quite speechless.
Okay, I just have to ask... what is condensed water? Is it like condensed milk; Water with most of the water taken out?
___
It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
If he plans on outsourcing the development work? LOL
My rights don't need management.
I believe he himself is a Muslim.
1) India has less income that the Europe and US per capita, but lots more people. If India has a choice, it makes sense for them to go with OS (which requires more labor but less money) than with proprietary solutions such as MS (which require more money but (perhaps?) less labor).
2) Using nonproprietary solutions allows countries to develop indigenous software industries; for now, and for awhile, this will probably foster OS in lots of ways. In the pharmaceutical industry, India has started out making lots of generics, but are now looking at developing and selling their own blockbuster drugs. If a similar path is followed by India in software, at some point they will have their own MS; at that point, the continued use and nurturing of OS is not assured - as the relative cost of labor increases, commercial solutions might become more attractive.
While it might be best for India to follow an open source pathway, this is not because it is always right to do so, but because it best fits their current circumstances.
Woohoo!
What really shocks me is why so many countries are still using MS at all in their gov't infrastructure. I've always wondered about the following scenario. (Note: Tinfoil hat required.)
MS is closed-source and rife with a constant stream of what are effectively root exploits being stumbled upon. What if some agency wanted to cozy up to MS and carefully craft backdoors and such, inject them into the OS and have them released into the world? Windows is so ubiquitous that your task has now become that much easier.
Furthermore only the random stumbling of a security researcher/hacker has a chance of discovering it. Probability == low in most cases. In which case "Oops, release patch (add new backdoor)".
Then there's the less nefarious scenario - an agency just sitting on little-known accidental root exploits and keeping them in their classified root kit.
Either way it strikes me that linux in particular (and open source in general) would give sovereign nations some peace of mind. Not bulletproof, but having a global community reviewing the source and tracking exploits openly would sure seem to me to be a better way to safeguard my country's secrets than relying on a huge foreign company with a crappy track record for security.
(You can now remove your tinfoil hats. No, wait, NEVER remove your tinfoil hat...)
Being a scientist himself, he surely knows what's good for his country.
If this is the case, I guess non-scientists can all remove themselves from politics. But would the world really be better off if William Shockley were president? If Edward Teller were in charge of arms control?
Imagine how much harder physics would be if electrons had feelings! -Feynman, maybe
Essentially, yes.
Being modded +1 funny will not increase your karma
if someone then mods you down, your karma WILL decrease
so if you post a comment that gets marked up +1 funny 3 times, then down -1 troll twice, then +1 funny 3 more times for, you don't end up with a sum gain in karma
you lose -1 for the troll
if you post a comment that half the moderating population think is -1 troll but the other half think is +1 funny and keep jumping between +4 and +5 funny, for example, then you end up just losing and losing more karma the more you are moderated down, despite also being moderated up
Does he mean that they will take open source software and modify it to meet their needs, or that they will make their own software open source?
Who will have access to the source, the general public, or just those with a "need to know".
Mathematics is not a crime.
He knows that countries have to protect their markets and target key industries. India is out the dominate the tech industry and George Bush is out to help him. Tech used to be an export growth sector in the USA but now it's considered a cost item and the Republicans are out to cut costs for business; that means outsourcing and more H1-B visas to create lower labor costs. Supposedly this is "good for the USA". India knows that Bush is bent on this path and is totally out to exploit it.
You do not gain any karma by beind modded funny. You must be modded Interesting, Insightful or Informative. Overrated, Underrated and Funny, although will boost the score on your post, have no affect on your karma. Offtopic + trolling, however, will have a negative affect.
Hmm, when was the last time I remember seing something like that -
uh, Einstein. Uh oh, this can't be good - I certainly hope they both share the same views about *not* using WMD...
[Now, I'm off to lift my le... Um, visit... at another place.]
Check this link out. Here Should explain thing some what.
-Pizentios
That is the funniest thing I've read all day.
Is it me, or does India continue to make LOGICAL political decisions?
They invested in education and social programs and created a workforce capable of doing our high-paying jobs. They then set up an economic environment where those jobs would come over, including investments in infrastructure and utilities.
Next the middle class over there starts to take off, and they make a national effort to help make sure that the benefit of the boom is extended to the less fortunate, so they can make more of the country self-sufficient.
They've managed to stay out of international conflicts and have sent peace ovetures to Pakistan. Now they're jumping all over Open Source as a way to improve their own efficiency and self-sufficiency.
All this, and I doubt India's federal gov costs anywhere near what these asshats over here who seem to actively work against us cost.
Between Colin Powell telling the Indians that there will be no attempt to curb outsourcing by American companies on the part of the Bush Administration and the following account of Tom Donohue's (CEO of US Chamber of Commerce, really good friend of Bush Administration, kind of like Ken Lay) speech in San Francisco:
Donohue acknowledged the pain for people who have lost jobs to offshoring - an estimated 250,000 a year, according to government estimates. But pockets of unemployment shouldn't lead to "anecdotal politics and policies," he said, and people affected by offshoring should "stop whining." - AP Newswire
Personally, I say we go build a freaking guillotine, cause as far as I'm concerned, he might as well have said, "let them eat cake".
Anyway good luck to India and how much to run our Federal government?
Arrogance is Confidence which lacks integrity. -- me
Yeah, there's been so much open source activity that I think Microsoft is actually getting more worried. All those patents they're trying to get seem to be one way they think they'll be able to beat open source.
Until just recently I thought open source / linux would be hopelessly lost to Microsoft, but as each new thing like this comes out, I'm beginning to think open source may put Microsoft out of the monopoly business.
I would feel sorry for Microsoft, except... what did they ever do for the open source community??
Soon, I think Microsoft is going to reap what it has sown.
Microsoft is sure taking a beating. Seems to me that their more afraid then their letting on. I mean take a look at all the patents that have tooken out in the last while. Bill and his army of unholy ghouls are reaching for a branch to hold onto in my opinon. Just my thought.
-Pizentios
Okay, once again, I'm failing to see the benefit the article claims.
How exactly does open-source code make for a more secure government? It would seem to me that giving the source-code to your encryption away, that you are practically begging others to learn how to hack it. At least proprietary software has a tiny measure of defense. It would also spread your possible leak-sources from the responsibility of one entity, the corporation that made it, to pretty much the entire world.
I believe, in the interests of National Defense, it would be best to have any sort of security source code until very tight lock and key.
Am I wrong here? Can someone tell me why?
-The Libra
"Please be patient--The future will begin momentarily."
Being a scientist himself, he surely knows what's good for his country
Yeah, like CalTech physics Ph.D. John Poindexter, who obviously knows what's best for America, e.g. Iran-Contra, Total Information Awareness...
If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
>> Perhaps you didnt noticed but the president of india is a moslem. ...
> I believe he himself is a Muslim.
I'm sure he's Mislim, as in:
Yo bizzle. Lets go smizzle that wizzle Mislim at my hizzouse.
THANK YOU!
;)
That makes sense then since my one post was at +5 funny then went down to +3 funny and just that hurt me. That explains it very well.
Guess i'll have to say something worthwhile to get my little bonus back
Der Tod ist der einzige Weg hier raus!
The "+3, informative" on your post makes me wonder if anybody else is getting it.
"Condensed Water," guys. As in, "it condensed out of the air." Which our lab-rat friend pointed out could be looked at as having had most of the air removed from it.
I read that and had this vision of GWB looking over some kid's physics exam...
I can think of several I wouldn't trust....
pseudo-scientist
Christian Scientist
Computer Scientist
Marine Biologist
Botanist
Archaeologist
Food Scientist
Paranormal Scientist
In fact, can you name a type of scientist that you would trust with knowing what is best for a country?
My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.
Either the paper's "Special Correspondent" took poor notes from Dr. Kalam's speech or Dr. Kalam doesn't know WTF he's talking about. Or maybe there's a language problem...
Roll-your-own security algorithms are a very bad idea, as most of us know. Get a professional to do it. Don't design your own ultra-secure AES alternative based on an "introduction" gained from looking at open-source code.
"Ensure a unique solution... to protect security" sounds like a euphemism for "security through obscurity" if I've ever heard one.
"has advised defense scientists to go for open-source software for software security, rather than be stuck with insecure proprietary software" Because open-source always is secure and proprietary always is insecure, right? -E-
In my experience, most scientists, while generally brilliant (from my perspective) in their field, tend to lack a lot of practical knowledge and common sense about the outside world.
It could just be me though.
Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
Actually, i've heard that jobs outsourced to India are being re-outsourced to the Phillippines, etc. Too lazy to back this up, but I CAN promise +5 informative to the first (and second, and maybe third) person who can.
And the l33t shall inherit the 34r7h.
If Pakistan wanted to perform a "first strike" operation, all they would need to do is submit a kernel patch and that would cause all of the Indian weapons to recompile their Linux kernel. Especially if they are running Gentoo, they could be busy for weeks.
It looks like what happened here is that Stallman went to India, had a talk with their President, talked to him about open source being a good idea, and the President bought it.
This doesn't necessarily say that the Indian President is a brilliant leader; one possibility is that he was swayed by someone's argument, the same way that many other leaders are swayed by Microsoft's argument.
I'm not saying that I'm disappointed, but it's one thing to have a leader be swayed by someone that gave him a convinving argument, and it's entirely another to have that leader come to the conclusion on his own.
Now, the thing is the Indian President is clearly a really smart guy, and he's an accomplished scientist, etc. I don't mean to imply that he ACTUALLY just bought Stallman's line without thinking about it. What I mean to say is that there are plenty of people who would point at the Stallman visit and try to use that to suggest that the Indian President only made his recommendation because he's parroting someone else's words. This is a means for them to dismiss his recommendation.
It's much more satisfying when someone figures out that Free Software is a good idea without activism being involved, so no one can imply that he didn't understand what he was saying.
Argh. I'm having a really hard time expressing what I mean. Oh well.
For example :
"Social Science" = people who tried to avoid science in school.
"Computer Science" = programming
and
"Physics" = real science
"Biology" = real science
"Alchemy"(some call it chemistry) == real science
We don't have a "parliament". We do have a congress whom he asked for consent. We also have a judiciary that just smacked the crap out of his lawiers for the detention without trial of American citizens as well as other individuals. The US is much more of a Republic than a Democrocy. Usually, the Congress is lead by an entirely different party than the presidency, but thats not the case right now. I prefer the system because it allows me to differntiate my representation in Congress from my selection of President. I can vote for a Democratic Congress and a Republican President! I suppose there are advantages and disadvantages to both systems. While our system may produce some strange results over s short period of time, there are some benifits to the way in which it was constructed. If I had my way, we would have a philosopher king!
Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
And to china!, and one of the biggest indian call-centers even outsources to Indiana for their 24/7 support!!! Not kidding.
Tech 1: Yeah they had a little nuclear exchange because everyone insisted running everything on root.
Tech 2: OMG we're going to switch back to Windows.
Slashdot in 5 Paragraphs
Seems too many people here are too close-minded to other countries to even have holes in their brains to praise them. And once again, you politically devoid people, Indian President is NOT the head of India, its the Prime Minister
I am sure this has nothing to do with Microsoft, Oracle, PeopleSoft, Sun, Adobe, and Apple being American companies.
Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
Look what the guy also said about bio-nano-tech : "The world market for nano materials, nano tools, nano devices and nano biotechnology should be over a hundred billion dollars. The fastest among them is nano biotechnology. Nanotechnology worked at the molecular level to create structures with fundamentally new molecular organisations, explained the President, adding that potential benefits covered diverse fields such as materials and manufacturing, nano electronics, computer technology, medicine and healthcare, environment and energy, aeronautics and space, biotechnology and agriculture. Many of these areas had applications in the defence sector and would help countries employing them to leapfrog in the science of warfare." It looks like the way the war is fought will never be the same after the bio-tech machines will be created. Imagine a thousand little T1000 !
They have our jobs, now they want us to write the code for them too.
Sesame Street was wrong. Sharing is not always a good thing.
Political correctness is the newest form of slavery.
I hadn't understood. Thanks for the explaining.
I guess God made him an offer he couldn't refuse.
A bit colonial isn't it to automatically assume that the Indian president needs an emissary from the US to tell him about open source?
Do you really think that Kalam has never thought about open source? After all he is not the president of the US - he actually has proven that he can think independently as a scientist. If you knew academic scientists you would know that they understand the value of open-source better than anyone.
A much more likely scenario is that Dr. Kalam wanted to meet with someone to discuss some technical details and get some feedback and maybe some publicity for his ideas of implementing open source. As there were noodles before Marco Polo went to Cathay and there was open source before Stallman went India...
1) India has less income that the Europe and US per capita, but lots more people. If India has a choice, it makes sense for them to go with OS (which requires more labor but less money) than with proprietary solutions such as MS (which require more money but (perhaps?) less labor).
I'm not saying that Windows is better or anything, but your logic is seriously flawed. There are very few jobs were adding a bunch of people actually increases efficiency. In order to actually get things you want to have as few people working on it as possible, less beuracracy, less chance of office politics coming into play, and less time spent delegating things and more time just getting them done. There is not a linear relationship between number of people working on something and how quickly it gets done.
As the old addage goes, too many cooks spoil the broth.
I cannot agree more.
M$ was cute when it was small. But, like the movie's carnivorous plant, getting giant and devouring everyone is not making them very popular.
As a consumer, I'd be stupid to want a single choice of software providers (not to mention the Freedom question). Yet, that's exactly what some fools want: a single brand option in the market.
If you have lots of people and no money, you go for solutions that use manpower (what you have) and avoid expensive equipment (that you don't have or can't afford). If you have lots of money but few people, you buy solutions, because your time is more valuable than your money.
You use what you have - if you have lots of people, then you use them. Where money is tight, you only buy what you can't get another way. Since with software India has a choice (commercial or OS solutions), they can throw programmers at problems and save their money for situations where they don't have another way. They can afford to be inefficient with people, but not with money, so even if the solutions aren't efficient, if they save money they make more sense than efficient solutions that cost lots of money (that they don't have).
Political scientist...?
>...geeks make better politicians, because they're more inclined to think rationally/logically.
While these qualities certainly matter, I would not rank among the first necessary to a leader.
I'd safely say courage, altruism and love for the country surpass those you cited by a great margin.
"I'm not saying that Windows is better or anything, but your logic is seriously flawed. There are very few jobs were adding a bunch of people actually increases efficiency."
If you have a lot of people increase in efficiency is not necessarily required if the goal is to achieve a certain aim. 10 people at 50% efficiency yields 5 units of useful work. 100 people at 10% efficiency means that efficiency is only 20% of what it was before, but you get 10 units of useful work. If it costs less than twice as much to employ these 100 people then you have a net benefit. In addition if you are keeping 100 people employed on an open source project, whereas buying in proprietary software from abroad costs the same amount (in initial outlay) but employs nobody in your country then you are further improving things for your country, at least initially, as you are potentially offsetting costs of unemployment, and so on, and may also foster a local industry. The downside is if people get used to working so inefficiently, or if it distorts the labour market too greatly.
You can see some of the downsides in instances where costly, inefficient industries receive government subsidies (e.g. the Common Agriculture Policy in Europe) beyond their usefulness. However, on the other hand, CAP was a useful tool in its day to foster self-reliance in European food markets. But you have to be careful that it doesn't outlive its usefulness and become pork barrel spending (although it sounds quite tasty if combined with a butter mountain and a wine lake).
So in summary, being inefficient, if it is cheap, may actually be good in the short term, especially if it is a training ground for new talent, but you have to make sure you wean people off it before it is too late.
"Being a scientist himself, he surely knows what's good for his country."
What a bizarre thing to say. Of course, all scientists are noble at heart and know what's best, and all the rest of us should shut up and eat our plastics.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Here's the proof:
Article from the Times of India. A blurb
TIMES NEWS NETWORK[ THURSDAY, MAY 29, 2003 12:06:03 AM ]
PUNE: President A P J Abdul Kalam on Wednesday urged Indian IT professionals to develop and specialise in open source code software rather than use proprietary solutions based on systems such as Microsoft Windows.
Stallman's visit reported in The Hindu and elsewhere:
Kalam, Stallman discuss open source software NEW DELHI, JAN. 31. The President, A.P.J. Abdul Kalam, last Thursday played host to two radically divergent poles of the global software industry.
Though the second link does not say 2004, I'm sure it was earlier this year, and a Google search should help you confirm that. Also the URL is dated 20040201.
The above information renders your argument incorrect and w/o H20.
An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
That's intended sarcastically. I have a good friend (and aerospace expert) at Naval Research Laboratories who is fed up with compartriots who can't code their way out of a paper bag.
But wasn't the main problem between India and Pakistand a dispute about Kashmir soverignity?
Didn't knew they had some religious war there too... *sigh* religions good for nothing *cough*
I'm a chainsmokin' alcoholic sociopath, so-ci-o-path
If things go by as Dr.Kalam envisioned , Im pretty confident that Open source will gain the biggest momentum worldwide.This is because
reports that there are very few linux users when compared to linux friendly nations.ofcourse i agree this may not be prefectly linear relationship in reality.Neverthelss , a reasonable estimate
1. A majority of Indian techies, might start using some variant of linux in the upcoming years.Rigt now,Most of them are still using Windows only.{ I observed that India ranks very poor in the number of registered Linux users.}
http://counter.li.org/reports/place.php
3.Once Linux Fever is caught up in India , we could expect a good increase in the number of open source projects , growth in popularity and confidence of open source projects.This will impact other developing nations , if they would realise the vast savings of the decision.
4.MS share in India will dwindle big time.. This would affect its revenue as India is such a huge market.
5. Indian colleges then would advance to use and advocate open source platforms and resources.This would help the indian progammers extend their scope and may improve their knowledge standard.Right now , most colleges in semi urban areas use proprietary operating systems.
May be im over optimistic..
Downside:
1. MS is silently attracting the techies and indian public by offering donations to the poor,AIDS victims etc..These will go down eventually.
2.This mite stir up some greedy and filthy politicians who get good bribes from corporate leaders and may work for delay in progress.
It's still a challenge for India to come up in technological arena with the onus of poor political stress on it.
Lets see where this takes !!!
Hello , this is my way.
Which way is yours ?
btw there is no right way
I'd note a few things about 'logic'. Let's start with newton.
Newton was brilliant yes.
He also was:
Stared at the sun once for an extended period, lost most of his sight.
Wrote bizarre raving religious tracts
Was an antisocial asshole
An Alchemist
Now the point is that skill in science means nothing when it comes to statecraft. The anti-social part is a big part of this. A major part of a politicians job is getting people to do what you want them to do. Being right is only half the battle. Additionally, scientists are not so hard to corrupt. You can get a prestigious professor to flack for just about any lobby if you pay him enough why should a president be so pure?
Photos.
That may be true of Bush, but the system works. He got slapped down by the supreme court (thank God). They are not unlimited even in times of war. Compare what he's doing with rosevelt's handleing of WW2! There has been less censership, racism, and dictatorship behavior under Bush! Shhh. Don't tell the Bush haters, they'll kill you if they know you know!
Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
If you go to this article at Kurzweilai.net (http://www.kurzweilai.net/email/newsRedirect.html ?newsID=3482&m=11262), you can find details (the(nano)arms race has begun), this does signify that a new dangerous nanotechnology arms race is being considered by countries around the world, this may be good for nanotechnology research, but, of course, it will probablly make the world a much more dangerous place, but, I guess if you have sufficient nanotech yourself (someday), then you may have to worry less if somebody else (country, terrorists, hackers) have some dangerous nano themselves..
Its always fun to see an Etats-Unians say a internationnal company is American.
Noyhing in IT is/whas ever produced or invented alone in the US. But if it make you sleep better at night keep thinking your right.
is an economices professor. Dr. Manmohan Dingh is the elected leader and in the Prime Minister.
You mean politicians, not scientists.
No, unless they distribute it and are using software licensed under the GPL or something akin.
Have you read the GPL?
IANAL but write like a drunk one.
Enough said.
IANAL but write like a drunk one.
hard-working Americans
Now that is some funny shit!
P.S.: My penis is 4" long, fully erect! Yeah, baby!
Everytime I see something like this everyone says "oh they're just looking for price cuts from Microsoft, they won't really go open source." Has this really been the case in the past? And will it be the case this time?
:)
I believe it's quite likely that the answers are no
Besides, all open source is simply a bad immitation of quality proprietary software. Take Windows, for example. Here you have a fine operating system, with beautiful graphics, a great web browsing experience, great support for collaboration, and a widely installed base. On the other hand, you have the open source Linux, which is hard to obtain, hard to install, hard to configure, hard to learn, hard to use, and hard to teach. Its graphics aren't as nice, either. Not to mention that the TCO of Windows is much lower than that of Linux. You can do with $100 more with Windows than you could ever do with Linux for that price. Linux is only cheaper if you don't value your time. Clearly, then, proprietary closed source patented copyrighted trademarked software with digital rights management, copy protection, and forced registration is a much better choice over open source, which is really crappy.
Winners always choose closed source.
Sincerely,
Bill Gates.
Huh? What's wrong with Archaeologists? Knowing a bit of history doesn't seem to be a bad thing in politics.
In other news, Stallman convinces the entire technology community of India to labor on the Hurd to overtake Linux as the premiere GNU kernel, with a preliminary shipping date of February 30, 2010.
Technocrat or not he was *told* to find a way to bomb the shit out of Japan, and later Vietnam.
He told JFK the numbers looked bad in Vietnam, ultimately those mistakes lie with the President; Kennedy, Johnson or Nixon.
Who deserves more of the blame, Rumsfeld or Bush, for the misshanling Iraq?
After you prosecute Halliburton* and every other US defense, technology and financial company for doing the same thing for 150 years or so and to the tune of trillions of dollars - come to think of it, isn't that the whole thing that the Bush Administration doesn't want people to know from Moore's 911? Come on, when the bribe you were caught giving was 180 million how many and for how much were there that didn't get publicized - it would be like saying there is only one bug because it is the only one that was reported.
* How about today I saw a blurb on Bloomberg news that Halliburton and others are using their offices in the Cayman Islands so they could make deals with countries that the US labels as "terrorist"
Brown and Root's Candidate
Most Unpatriotic US Company
Halliburton to stop Soldier's emails during 2004 summer
Empty trucks crossing Iraq to increase profits
Libyia
The Dresser merger also raised ethical questions. The United States had concluded that Iraq, Libya, and Iran supported terrorism and had imposed strict sanctions on them. Yet during Cheney's tenure at Halliburton the company did business in all three countries. In the case of Iraq, Halliburton legally evaded U.S. sanctions by conducting its oil-service business through foreign subsidiaries that had once been owned by Dresser. With Iran and Libya, Halliburton used its own subsidiaries. The use of foreign subsidiaries may have helped the company to avoid paying U.S. taxes.
and on and on...
Halliburton: We like third world people - for slaves
mining and oil are controlled by a small elite group that know no national boundaries
Though the second link does not say 2004, I'm sure it was earlier this year, and a Google search should help you confirm that. Also the URL is dated 20040201.
Actually, if you look closely at the top of the page, it says "Sunday, Feb 01, 2004".
Prez Kalam was heavily into FOSS long before this. During a meeting the Government of India (Ministry of Communication and Information technology) had with the IT industry and FOSS community on December 26th, 2002, the president's stand was clearly conveyed to us.
While a number of people have pointed out that the post of President in India is not an "active" one like in the USA, he wears many hats - and the second hat of his (as a scientist) is probably far more influential than the first one. Remember, this is the man who made India a nuclear power - not by policy, but by *action*.
As *President*, he can *reach* people, and he does. Industry and community are sitting up and lending a careful ear to what he is saying.
Even more important - this is a president the people *know*, *like* and *trust*.
You aren't remembered for doing what is expected of you
He frequently answers children's questions and
E-mail to President saves students career
Striving to be common...
- Being a scientist himself, he surely knows what's good for his country.
Being a politician himself, he surely knows what's good for the scientific community.Are we getting it yet?
Authority questions you. Return the favor.
If you read through any country catalogue for crypto you will find that there are 'Government' versions of the packages. The sole reason for this is because the algorithms used for Government are different (no idea if they're better, though ;-).
;-).
Don't be too rash to knock the guy - your judgement appears to be based on a lack of understanding (hereby hopefully corrected
Insert