Slashdot Mirror


Titan's Surface Revealed

MattKeeler writes "NASA's running a story on the recent findings of Cassini, the satellite orbiting Titan, one of Saturn's giant moons. New images reveal details of the moon's surface and a variety of materials that cover it."

169 comments

  1. Sirens! by spellraiser · · Score: 5, Funny

    I want to see pictures of the Sirens! Where are they??

    --
    I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
    1. Re:Sirens! by Nspace13 · · Score: 1, Informative

      they're at the bottom of the pool, they are just statues anyway. rock on fellow vonnegut reader

      --
      steal this sig
    2. Re:Sirens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      someone (moderator!) doesn't read. this should have been modded funny or left alone. the sirens of titan is an extrememly famous book by kurt vonnegut, and they were really just statues. jesus people don't mod what you don't understand.

    3. Re:Sirens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because YOU think you're being funny; doesn't mean that you actually are. Not everyone else shares your own exaggerated opinion on your sense of humor.

      "Offtopic" may, technically, have been inappropriate. But "overrated" certainly does fit. So, between two different mods with the same point value, what difference does it REALLY make, if someone uses the "wrong" one?

    4. Re:Sirens! by foistboinder · · Score: 1

      Crap! I thought I was going to beat everyone to the punch posting about Sirens, only to find someone else did it and it was the first post.

    5. Re:Sirens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As you wish:

      Sirens

    6. Re:Sirens! by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Mmmmm, Elle McPherson and Kate Fischer... *drool*

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  2. Best...comment...EVER! by Big+Nothing · · Score: 4, Funny

    "We're seeing a totally alien surface"

    No shit, Sherlock?

    --
    SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
    1. Re:Best...comment...EVER! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      "There are linear features, circular features, curvilinear features."

      Oh no! Not more faces!

    2. Re:Best...comment...EVER! by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 4, Funny

      Here's an ASCII picture of those linear and circular features:

      O | O | X
      -----------
      O | X | 0
      -----------
      X | 0 | X

    3. Re:Best...comment...EVER! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is proof that there is no intelligent life on Titan. Anyone with the least bit of intelligences knows that the results of a tic-tac-toe game are pre determined.
      Call me back when they start playing chess or risk. ;-)

    4. Re:Best...comment...EVER! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm for all we know the results of Risk or Chess are predetermined, we just don't have the computing power to evaulate the nessecary number game states yet.

    5. Re:Best...comment...EVER! by sbaker · · Score: 3, Funny

      So on Titan they play tic-tac-toe with Oh's, X's *and* Zeroes! Boy those guys are just *so* alien - we may never learn to communicate with them.

      --
      www.sjbaker.org
    6. Re:Best...comment...EVER! by snake_dad · · Score: 1

      Don't knock it.. they might be trying to teach us a revolutionary new form of mathematics that will automatically lead us to a grand unified theory, and the warp drive :)

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    7. Re:Best...comment...EVER! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call it... three player.

    8. Re:Best...comment...EVER! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the Robot Arms apartments. Bender tosses around in his bed, muttering. He dreams a bunch of ones and zeros, and a two.

      Bender: Ones ... zeros ... one ... zero ... A-a-ah!
      [He wakes up]
      Fry: Bender, what is it?
      Bender: Whoa, what an awful dream. Ones and zeroes everywhere. And I thought I saw a two.
      Fry: It was just a dream, Bender. There's no such thing as two.

  3. Dupe?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative
    Seen this before?

    /. par for the course again :)

    dupe + fp = ninja?

    1. Re:Dupe?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, that article didnt show pictures. this one does. hence the PICTURES in summary, fuckwit.

    2. Re:Dupe?! by Latent+Heat · · Score: 4, Funny
      Last time this story got posted, the thread got clogged with whining about NASA funding, worrying about contaminating Titan, lame Borg jokes, and the general Slashdot name calling.

      This time we will get it right and only post informative and insightful comments regarding what the pictures show and the possibility for life elsewhere than Earth . . . oops, too late.

    3. Re:Dupe?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "first infrared images" link shows the exact same pictures (and more!).

    4. Re:Dupe?! by Teancum · · Score: 1

      While this is sort of a dupe, it is from a different news source. Instead of some Australian newspapers (who deserves the scoop), it is straight from NASA. So in a way it is a dup.

      I don't see why this got posted on the main page though. As a follow-up in the Science section only, perhaps, but not up front like this.

    5. Re:Dupe?! by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      yea and in the last thread, no one answered my question... can the Huygens probe be re-aimed to a better landing site based on the new information about the surface?

      hopefully this time around i can get an answer

    6. Re:Dupe?! by egumtow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Huygens doesn't really have a landing site. It's supposed to do all its science while parachuting. If it happens to not land in a methane ocean, or whatever, and instead survives on the ground, that's a bonus. In which case its batteries would die in 1/2 hour or so.

      As the orbit parameters for Cassini are still up in the air pending future TCMs (trajectory correction maneuvers), I would guess the parameters for Huygens' "launch" are still up in the air as well - and thus adjustable.

      I don't have any official answers. But almost certainly Huygens' atmospheric entry point can be adjusted.

    7. Re:Dupe?! by snake_dad · · Score: 1

      On the June 29 JPL briefing on Cassini/Huygens it was mentioned that they might be able to adjust the trajectory by about one degree. I don't know how that translates to distance on the surface. Briefing available here (sorry, Real format only). Even more briefings here.

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
  4. a case of the jaggies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    man that shit is jaggy

  5. Re:Uh, I'm not a regular of this place by tigress · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh, don't worry. It happens all the time. We consider it a feature. :)

  6. Jack Handy by deutschemonte · · Score: 5, Funny

    What if there was life on Titan and they shot down our probe because they thought it was attacking them with it's scanning technology.

    Then they would send a probe to our moon and scan it with their weapons technology.

    That would suck.

    --
    The preceding message was based on actual events. Only the names, locations and events have been changed.
    1. Re:Jack Handy by l810c · · Score: 4, Funny

      I bet the tin foil hat sales on Titan are through the roof right now.

    2. Re:Jack Handy by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Funny

      In other news the Pentagon confirmed that German intelligence had uncovered evidence of WMD on Titan. The weapons are believed to have been developed by the Titians, a cult cloaked in mystery and understood to have clashed previously with ancient Greek culture. A spokesman said this probably explained the disapperance of Atlantis and that Titan had been moved from position 825 to position 7 on the Places To Be Invaded list. When questioned President Bush had only two words on the matter, "Jelly Babies".

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    3. Re:Jack Handy by evohe80 · · Score: 1

      If you look carefully to the photo on the article, you'll notice that what it's believed to be a crater resambles the main weapon of the Death Star. If it is active, i'll be happy they *only* shoot down the probe and not the Earth.

    4. Re:Jack Handy by peaworth · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course there are WMD there. They found evidence of hydrocarbons there. Better mount an invasion to secure the oil... err- liberate the Titans.

    5. Re:Jack Handy by nyekulturniy · · Score: 2, Funny

      In other news, Lockheed Martin decided to merge with the moon Titan, instead of Titan Corporation of San Diego. "Titan the moon has been around since the formation of the planets, 10 billion years ago," Lockheed said in a press release. "Titan Corporation has cash-flow problems, and is implicated in the Iraqi prison scandal. Not to mention all that hydrocarbons out there make it possible for us to form a partnership with ExxonMobil in exploiting Titanian oil."

      --
      Nyekulturniy... Proudly confusing readers and editors since 1981!
  7. Just think.. by MikeDX · · Score: 1, Funny

    If we find out that Titan has a twin, and they collide.. we could indeed have a real-life "Clash of the Titans!"

    1. Re:Just think.. by Lispy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, or we could call it a dupe. Just like this story. ;-)

    2. Re:Just think.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that post was as dumb as the movie you referenced.

  8. Interesting... by garagecartel · · Score: 0

    Well obviously nothing too outrageous was found: i.e. aliens, space ships, etc. or we wouldn't have even heard about it :).

    --
    -- [H]itman_forhire
    1. Re:Interesting... by garagecartel · · Score: 1

      Well After further reading....Maybe I was wrong!.... "These suggest geologic activity on Titan, but we really don't know how to interpret them yet..."

      --
      -- [H]itman_forhire
    2. Re:Interesting... by essreenim · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting the cluster of Alien cities imaged from outer space already by Cassini:
      Here


  9. Woah by mfh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For a millisecond, I thought I was looking at a picture of an inhabitable world. That's one misleading photo, imho... Not to mention, heavily pixilated.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Woah by torpor · · Score: 3, Informative


      Titan isn't habitable, you say?

      I thought Titan was one of the reasons hydrothermal vents were so interesting?

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    2. Re:Woah by pyr0 · · Score: 4, Informative
      I believe you are actually thinking of Europa, a moon of Jupiter. It is thought there is an ocean of liquid water beneath the icy crust. Thus, if there are any hydrothermal vents at the bottom of this ocean, there may be life.

      The interest in Titan, as the article points out, is that it is thought to contain a frozen snapshot of pre-life forming compounds similar to what was around in Earth's atmosphere ~4 billion years ago.

    3. Re:Woah by Biogenesis · · Score: 1

      Yes, it seems that someone doesn't understand that scaling an image up doesn't magically generate more information, regardless of how good your interpolation algorithm is.

    4. Re:Woah by pyr0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How is the photo misleading? Also, (moderators) how is this interesting? False-color spectrographic images are pretty standard for this sort of thing. The article clearly states this fact.

    5. Re:Woah by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      Wow, you must be pretty dumb. Nice user ID though.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    6. Re:Woah by c4miles · · Score: 1

      So, you want a visible wavelength picture of the surface of a moon whose atmosphere totally obscures the surface? You'd be looking at the top layer of some orangy-brown clouds.

      Somehow I think that would be less interesting.

    7. Re:Woah by dolo666 · · Score: 1

      Wow, you must be pretty dumb. Nice user ID though. How is he dumb? Oh I'm sorry, that must have been a troll.

    8. Re:Woah by dolo666 · · Score: 1

      How is the photo misleading?
      Because it looks at first glance like Earth does with the naked eye. That's why. Until you start reading and realize what you're looking at, that is. Scientists are supposed to know better than to use colors that are misleading. They should have used pinks, blues and blacks or something else.

    9. Re:Woah by AliasTheRoot · · Score: 1

      I thought the main interest was that it had an atmosphere that could possibly be within Terran norms of pressure etc?

    10. Re:Woah by pyr0 · · Score: 1

      Ok, let me rephrase then. How is the photo misleading, considering that the title of both the slashdot posting and the linked webpage is Titan's Surface Revealed. The fact of the matter is that the context that the picture appears in should trump any notion that we are looking at Earth. If someone had to read the title and half of the article to figure that out, then there is something wrong.

    11. Re:Woah by dolo666 · · Score: 1

      >How is the photo misleading, considering that the title of both the slashdot posting and the linked webpage is Titan's Surface Revealed. Because it's not the surface. It's a diagram based off some imaging. They make it sound like it's a normal picture and it's not. It looks like any number of Sim City maps I've seen. The public are not geeky enough to understand the photo and will think it's a digital image much like the Mars photos. Scientists should have thought of that and given the image a more technical colour pattern. Green doesn't mean cold to the human eye, it means flora.

    12. Re:Woah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article clearly states this fact.

      I'm not familiar with this word "article". Is it somehow associated with the pretty picture?

    13. Re:Woah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the main interest was that it had an atmosphere that could possibly be within Terran norms of pressure etc?

      That and a few other notable things as well. The grandparent post pointed out that Titan's atmosphere is a much colder version of the hypothesised atmosphere of Earth when life was forming.

      In addition there is the fact that Titan is one of the few places we know of were a "triple point" exists for a common chemical. By triple point I mean that the temperatures and pressures are such that a particular substance naturally exisit as a gas, liquid or solid. On Earth we have a very important chemical, normally called water, that can be found in all three forms.

      On Titan however, it is not water but methane that can be a gas, liquid or solid. So Titan may well have a weather system that includes percepitation, but it would be methane rain, sleet, and snow. Yet, it would still be arguably the closest to an "earth-like" atmosphere we currently know of.

  10. Look .. by kick_in_the_eye · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    .. at all the Penguins. They sure are smart down there.

  11. Picture quality by fbonnet · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Their camcorder sucks.

    1. Re:Picture quality by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      You think NASA could have afforded a better one. How many hundreds of millions of dollars did this mission cost? I'm sure they could have at least sprung for a mid-range Sony MiniDV with 1.2 Megapixel stills. SIG: There is no sig.

    2. Re:Picture quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have to be careful in case the Titanians have probes out with night-vision goggles to stop taping.

  12. Re:Uh, I'm not a regular of this place by MikeDX · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    At times like this, you can always whore some karma by reposting some +5s :)

  13. Re:Uh, I'm not a regular of this place by Minwee · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's because we all have short attention spans around here. If something is important enough, it gets brought up again and again.

    By the way, did you hear about those pictures from Titan? I can't wait to see them.

  14. Source of life by underpar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The idea of Titan holding the key to our understanding of pre-life earth has always been interesting, but a little too optimistic.

    I mean, isn't Europa the one that's supposed to develop life?

    1. Re:Source of life by caston · · Score: 0, Interesting
      Europa, Titan and Mars are seen as the planets/moons most likely to have life other than Earth.

      Europa has ice on the surface but it is believed there could be a warm ocean below where aquatic life could live off the heat of volcanic ocean vents much like some basic life on earth does.

      Titan is supposed to be the only moon with an Atmosphere.

      --
      Beings aspergers AND pulling chicks... I enjoy the challenge!
  15. I love articles like this... by NeoGeo64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because I like reading about space exploration, and the fact that NASA's webserver can't be slashdotted.

    1. Re:I love articles like this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is impressive. Does anyone have a list of sites that continually resist slashdotting?

    2. Re:I love articles like this... by zenneth · · Score: 0

      I can only imagine how many NASA employees also read /. in their spare time.
      Well, I can't vouch for the "spare" part. I'm sure even NASA has IT people who surf the web at work.

      --
      The Chronic *WHAT* les of Narnia!
  16. Please oh please oh please be cheese! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    New images reveal details of the moon's surface and a variety of materials that cover it."

    We already have a moon that looks like a pizza (Io), but I always enjoy my moon with extra toppings.

  17. Cassini is Orbiting SATURN by grondak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Come on.

    --
    [Error 407: No signature found]
    1. Re:Cassini is Orbiting SATURN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      "NASA's running a story on the recent findings of Cassini, the satellite orbiting Titan, one of Saturn's giant moons. New images reveal details of the moon's surface and a variety of materials that cover it."

      Right, the parent said it. Cassini is orbiting Saturn, and does flybys of Titan. Cassini is on a complicated looping orbit so it can slingshot around the Saturn minisystem and visit the interesting moons.

      Details can be found at:
      http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/operations/saturn- tour. cfm

    2. Re:Cassini is Orbiting SATURN by wombatius · · Score: 2, Funny

      Closer to accurate than the Los Angeles Times front page blurb on the Cassini orbit insertion, which heralded its entrance into the orbit of Jupiter.

      They had a one-in-nine chance of getting the planet right, I guess.

  18. False-color picture by wazlaf · · Score: 2, Informative

    Too bad this is only a false-color image and has no relation to the colors visible to the human eye. While this is probably nice too look at for scientists in order to do some research, it leaves the rest of us clueless about "What Titan really looks like"..

    1. Re:False-color picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [I'm posting AC because I don't have my login data available right now.]
      There _are_ visible light pictures of Titan, made by Cassini and also (some 25 years ago) by Voyager. Google for "Titan Voyger".
      But they aren't interesting. A yellow sphere.

    2. Re:False-color picture by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 4, Informative

      Too bad this is only a false-color image and has no relation to the colors visible to the human eye.

      There are pictures corresponding to approximately what the human eye would see - kind of boring, and similar to the pictures taken by Voyager 2. The improvement in Cassini's false-colour pictures is due to the use an infra-red camera and some carefully tuned filters, letting the spacecraft peer straight through Titan's distinctly murky atmosphere. This is the breakthrough - it's finally possible to figure out what's under that atmosphere, and at high resolution too!

      The preliminary maps of Titan from Cassini's imagery are already beating the best images taken from Earth - including the astounding images taken from ground-based telescopes by the European Southern Observatory. Interestingly, features on the different maps do match up - which definitely shows that they're real feature, and not random camera artefacts.

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    3. Re:False-color picture by eidolons · · Score: 5, Informative

      To see what Titan looks like we'll have to wait for Cassini to start making its closer fly-bys. I think the article said Cassini will do 45 or so fly-bys in the next 4 years and they'll get to around 600 miles away. That'll allow some very high resolution images of Titan and will be really interesting - this is still too far away to make any really revealing below-atmospheric level observations, as the atmosphere is so opaque and dense.

    4. Re:False-color picture by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      It looks like the Smog Planet. The atmosphere is opaque. If we landed a probe on Titan, we'd probably see a wall of brown air.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    5. Re:False-color picture by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      That's what the Hyugens LANDER is for.

      --
      Not a sentence!
  19. Titans Cloud. by torpor · · Score: 1, Interesting


    I was wondering, that bit about the cloud, do they mean that the ring of sky that Titan has traced around Saturn has thus far gotten 'dense' enough that its a single 'cloud', encompassing both Saturn and the rings?

    Kind of a 'ring of Titan' that has captured the planet and its lesser minions?

    If so, thats pretty interesting. Might be useful to know how that works, if we're going to get any terraforming done in the next 100 years.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    1. Re:Titans Cloud. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, they're saying that the cloud of particles following Titan around in its orbit is larger that Saturn and rings. Titan orbits Saturn at about 1.2 million km, and Saturn's rings (and thus presumably the cloud) are about 150 thousand km in radius. So the could isn't surrounding Saturn, it's surrounding Titan and following Titan in its orbit.

      Still pretty neat, there's a giant gas cloud as big as the planet orbiting it.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:Titans Cloud. by heptapod · · Score: 1

      Larry Niven thought up a concept like this in his book "The Integral Trees".

  20. Re:Just like Earth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, they discovered a parallel NYC and LA,thereby proving entropy theory.

  21. True-color image by Latent+Heat · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is the city. Los Angeles, California. My name's Friday and I work here . . . (cough, cough cough!).

  22. And I thought they were orbiting Saturn by whimdot · · Score: 2, Funny

    At least it looks like Marvin would like Titan more than expected.

  23. ROFLMAO...+5 Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL. That has to be the funniest sh*t I've ever read. And that closing jab at Bush? Pure genius.

    Your post, my good sir, belongs on Best of Slashdot.

  24. Public service announcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Behold, Philistines!

    For the brainless: Parent is making a joke.

  25. Re:Ethics of this Situation by underpar · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    TNG? TNG?!? Say it with me "2001".

  26. Busted. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=113425 &cid=9606847

    If you're going to crib a post from an earlier story at least try to get one that wasn't posted the day before.

    1. Re:Busted. by Creamsickle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, that was my post that I AC'd. It is an interesting point, don't I deserve a chance to get some karma for it this time?

      --
      On the 0th day, God created C
    2. Re:Busted. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't even make an effort to rephrase the thought and even left the lame ST:TNG remark in there. You deserve the karma bitchslap for being lazy even if you had posted the original AC comment.

    3. Re:Busted. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmmm. Ok, I can see your point of view. Mods, mod the original poster up!

  27. Re:Uh, I'm not a regular of this place by Zorilla · · Score: 1

    What's a planet?

    (Fan of Ralph Wiggum)

    --

    It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  28. After by Trailwalker · · Score: 1

    Looks like the after part of this shot of California.

  29. Not offtopic by spellraiser · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ok, this is the last time I try to post a literary reference on slashdot. Don't you people read books?

    Check this out. Good book. Read it.

    And stop modding stuff down just because you don't get the reference.

    --
    I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
    1. Re:Not offtopic by marcello_dl · · Score: 1, Offtopic


      Don't you people read books?

      Only if the title contains the magic words: "technical reference".

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    2. Re:Not offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Don't you people read books?"

      There's a dumb question.... According to Taco, reading books is passe. If you can't see it on a screen, it ain't worth seein'.

      I think the technological literati are a diminishing breed, along the lines of the technological tea-totalers. In ten years books will be a quaint notion to them:

      "When I was a boy, we used read BOOKS! Printed on paper! Made from dead trees!"

      "Pfft! When I was a boy, we didn't have gravity or weather! Cocaine was a penny a pound!"

  30. Orbiting Titan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Incorrect. Cassini just started orbiting SATURN. Cassini has a probe that NASA plans on launching late this fall to puncture Titan's clouds and land on the surface.

  31. Impact crater? by bjparker · · Score: 3, Funny

    Note the circular feature, a possible impact crater, in the northern hemisphere.

    That's no impact crater, they've found a Death Star!

    1. Re:Impact crater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Death Start? Nope that was Mimas.
      http://sse.jpl.nasa.gov/planets/profile.cf m?Object =Sat_Mimas

    2. Re:Impact crater? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That's no moon, it's an obligatory reference.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Impact Crater? by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

      OH, there is one, but the chozo sealed it to prevent the phazon from escaping, and when the seal broke, the bounty hunter, Samus Aran destroyed the source of the phazon.

    4. Re:Impact crater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was the first Death Star. This is the second model, without the small exhaust port directly below the large one that leads directly to the nuclear reactor.

      Luckily, Cassini is so small it can evade their turbo-lasers. They'll have to destroy it ship-to-ship.

    5. Re:Impact crater? by AaronD12 · · Score: 1
      You beat me to it, but you're right! Holy crap! Look at this:

      Is Titan the Death Star?

      Impact crater my ass. Interesting about the white methane cloud. Could that be the famed "exhaust port" that was the demise of the Death Star in the first place?

  32. Oh shit... by Epistax · · Score: 4, Funny

    I hope they don't see my weed garden.

  33. Legos? by 955301 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... a variety of materials that cover it.

    So, are there any Legos? Cause, I mean, you can build freakin' anything out of Legos. Life can't be too far behind.

    --
    You are checking your backups, aren't you?
    1. Re:Legos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about Legos, but LEGO-brand building blocks, perhaps.

    2. Re:Legos? by 955301 · · Score: 1

      No asshole, I meant what I wrote, Legos.

      Whatever dood. I would never be able to keep someone like you as a friend. Too stiff in the trousers.

      --
      You are checking your backups, aren't you?
    3. Re:Legos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to take a joke. Do you think anyone would mean what I said seriously? Nevermind, you obviously did.

    4. Re:Legos? by 955301 · · Score: 1

      You need to work on your sense of humor then, cause your delivery sucks.

      It doesn't matter what "anyone" thinks, you responded to me. And it was lame and nitpicky upon inpection.

      --
      You are checking your backups, aren't you?
    5. Re:Legos? by NarrMaster · · Score: 0

      I wanna damn Von Neumann machine made of Legos, that cruises around picking up other Legos, and making another copy of itself. That would really "whip the donkey's ass", so to speak. It would kinda be like a life form.

      --
      That's right. All your base.
  34. Not the usual channels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The full text of this article from The Economist follows. The original content is subscriber-only; it is reproduced here in the hope and expectation that you will find it useful.

    ----

    Coding theory

    Not the usual channels

    Jul 1st 2004
    From The Economist print edition

    [Image]

    How to transmit information reliably

    ON JULY 1st, a spacecraft called Cassini went into orbit around Saturn--the first probe to visit the planet since 1981. While the rockets that got it there are surely impressive, just as impressive, and much neglected, is the communications technology that will allow it to transmit its pictures millions of kilometres back to Earth with antennae that use little more power than a light-bulb.

    To perform this transmission through the noisy vacuum of space, Cassini employs what are known as error-correcting codes. These contain internal tricks that allow the receiver to determine whether what has been received is accurate and, ideally, to reconstruct the correct version if it is not.

    Such codes go back to 1948, the year when Claude Shannon, universally regarded as the father of coding theory, published a paper which showed the maximum theoretical rate at which information can be transmitted without error. But it is only recently that real codes have started to approach Shannon's theoretical limit. Those on Cassini, while powerful, still have some way to go, because the probe is limited to the technology available when it was built in the mid-1990s. But developments in coding theory made at the time Cassini was being assembled are now coming to fruition. As a result, as well as spacecraft, tomorrow's consumer-electronic devices, from mobile phones to high-definition televisions, will be able to receive and transmit data at something close to Shannon's limit.

    Turbo coding, as the first of the new techniques to come on stream is known, was invented by Alain Glavieux and Claude Berrou, two researchers at the Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Télécommunications de Bretagne in Brest, France. It is now being deployed in third-generation (3G) mobile-telephone networks, and will allow wireless access from 3G phones to be over ten times faster than from an old-fashioned dial-up line.

    Turbo-charged transmission

    Turbo coding takes one of the techniques deployed on Cassini--known as convolution coding--and doubles it. Convolutional codes work by adding some of the bits (the ones and zeros of binary arithmetic) from a block of data, and transmitting that sum alongside the raw data. The decoder then works backwards, to make sure the sums add up correctly. If they do not, it knows there has been a mistake and fiddles with the appropriate bits to try to correct the errors. Unfortunately, it does not always succeed.

    What Dr Glavieux and Dr Berrou showed was that combining two convolutional codes would yield a dramatic improvement in performance--one that would go almost all the way to the Shannon limit. To do this, you have to shuffle the bits in each block of data at random. Each block is then broadcast twice--once unshuffled and once shuffled. One convolutional decoder works on the unshuffled data, and the other on the shuffled data. The shuffling means that an error which affects one block will not affect the other at the same place in the sequence.

    If the two decoders disagree about a particular bit in the message because transmission noise has introduced errors, they consult one another by feeding their "opinions" about the error to each other, along with a measure of how confident each is about its opinion. Each decoder then uses the other's input to make a decision, and the process is repeated until they agree with each other.

    This feedback loop has proved to be

    1. Re:Not the usual channels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      How was this redundant? It wasn't posted before; moreover, the article is interesting and on topic. My guess? Moderator didn't read the post.

    2. Re:Not the usual channels by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 1

      Dear Economist Troll,

      What you're doing is wrong, but I think I love you. A few people on Slashdot made references to Cassini using something called 'convolution coding' in a previous article's comments, and I didn't know anything about what they were talking about - but now I know.

      I think I'm going to have to get a subscription to the Economist now...

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
  35. Re:Ethics of this Situation by Hoodsen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Where is the ethical question? First of all, the idea that there is life on Titan is just speculation. Second, we are just taking pictures from outside the atmosphere at this point, no need to get excited just yet. Lastly, are you really saying we should base our ethics in regards to this on a science fiction television show? Think about what you are saying for a moment, not within the context of Star Trek, but within the context of real scientific possibilities that could await us.

  36. times like this by phyruxus · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    >>At times like this, you can always whore some karma by reposting some +5s :)

    I already have excellent karma, you insensitive clod! ;)

    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
    "d'Oh!" ~Homer
  37. Who's to say it isn't inhabitable? by SageMadHatter · · Score: 1

    For a millisecond, I thought I was looking at a picture of an inhabitable world. That's one misleading photo, imho... Not to mention, heavily pixilated.

    Planets are not the only celestial bodies that can be inhabitable. After all, a moon is simply a "planet" that orbits another planet. Having read the article, they spoke about clouds of gas on Titan, suggesting to me that there is some sort of atmosphere. The article did not mention however what the size and gravity is for that moon, does anyone here know?

    Mad Hatter

    1. Re:Who's to say it isn't inhabitable? by GregChant · · Score: 5, Informative

      Those clouds of gas, as you call them, are believed to be methane, which is supposedly the primary ingredient of its atmosphere. If you could light a match on Titan, the whole moon would be engulfed in fire faster than you could say "who farted?"

      Titan is believed to be one of the most inhospitable worlds in the solar system: I wouldn't go planning your vacation just yet.

      But, to answer your question, from the ESA:
      Diameter (atmosphere): 5550 km
      Diameter (surface): 5150 km
      Mass: 1/45 that of Earth
      Average density: 1.881 times liquid water
      Surface temperature: 94K (-180 degrees C)
      Atmospheric pressure at surface: 1500 mbar (1.5 times Earth's)
      Atmospheric composition: Nitrogen, methane, traces of ammonia, argon, ethane

    2. Re:Who's to say it isn't inhabitable? by aiabx · · Score: 4, Informative

      I wouldn't worry too much about Titan bursting into flames. While there is lots of methane, there isn't very much in the way of oxygen, which you need to burn the methane. If you think about it, if the atmsophere were that explosive, a meteor would have set it off billions of years ago.
      -aiabx

      --
      Just this guy, you know?
    3. Re:Who's to say it isn't inhabitable? by GregChant · · Score: 1

      Of course, that's why I said if you could light a match :)

    4. Re:Who's to say it isn't inhabitable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would also make for interesting entry-footage:

      "Nasa TV commentator: So far everything went to plan, the probe is a bit of course, controllers will now fire truster #2 for 5 seconds to correct for this... ooops"

    5. Re:Who's to say it isn't inhabitable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't most match heads contain oxidised fuel?
      I thought you could light one regardless of the atmospheric contents, it just won't burn for long

  38. So is there liquid methane? by dave1791 · · Score: 1

    From the comments in the story, it is either a negative or a not likely. Otherwise they would have mentioned something that could turn out to be liquid methane.

  39. so ... by ciupman · · Score: 1

    ... no monolith?

    --
    I fuse with Mercer every single day...
    1. Re:so ... by pyr0 · · Score: 1

      Wrong moon...Iapetus is the one that we should be searching for large black monoliths.

  40. Re:Ethics of this Situation by essreenim · · Score: 1

    Actually i'm not a Star Trek fanatic but, if the principle of First Contact was implemented by Spanish, Portuguess, and those explorers that came after - Dutch, English, Italian.., those parts of the world which were abused (Africa, America, Australia..), would not have been.
    In fact if my history serves me, and it doesn't always, the first exploration of an UNinhabited island was carried out by the Portuguese. THey managed to infest the island with rabbits, and to this day much of the vegetation as been eaten away by them...

    We should not do anything until we have some kind of mechanism of first contact/analysis/non interference in natural development etc.

  41. Huh? Which mod is huffing Titan's atmosphere? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who went and mod'ed the parent post as 'Interesting'? What's so interesting about him claiming to have been the origin of some AC post from yesterday?

  42. What is the point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...of these missions? How does this change my life? How does this improve the quality of life for people on Earth? So there is a methane cloud on Titan. SO WHAT? I'm not trying to be a bastard, or rain on anyone's parade, I really don't understand. I find it really interesting and fascinating, but I always somehow feel that this is really getting us nowhere. I want to explore as much as the next guy, but what tangible benefits are there?

    1. Re:What is the point... by Daagar · · Score: 1

      Coach K turning down the Lakers coaching position doesn't affect my quality of life either. Even worse, I don't find it interesting of fascinating. Yet way more moula is tossed around on deals like these than on scientific research.

    2. Re:What is the point... by cherokee158 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The benefits are not always obvious, and sometimes the only benefit is more accumulated knowledge. But accumulating knowledge through exploration has, in the past, led to discovering new continents, new natural resources, new technologies that DO dramatically alter everyone's lifestyles (for good or ill) and even new religions. (Not much hope for a pantheon of weather gods once you understand the basics of meterology. Science can and does alter the way people think about the universe.)

      For an excellent discussion of just how often seemingly obscure scientific discoveries can and do impact world events, I highly recommend perusing a copy of Isaac Asimov's Chronology of Science and Discovery. It really puts the impact of science and research on human history into focus.

    3. Re:What is the point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure many people said the same thing about Ben Franklin deducing that the key at the end of the kite drew electricity.

      Over two centuries later, that discovery came in fairly handy, I'd say.

  43. warning tin foil hat required by 09za+ · · Score: 1

    Wanna see something on mars
    http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/e01_e06/full _jpg_ctx_map/E05/E0502144.jpg
    geologists: please debunk

    1. Re:warning tin foil hat required by 09za+ · · Score: 1

      first it appears to be a hill ..look at the shadows
      to me it looks like ruins
      if not explain the erosion pattern.
      open your eyes
      All I can do is point out the picture..it's up to you to see it. Not my fault if you think water can create such regular looking lines and aligned structure-like mounds

    2. Re:warning tin foil hat required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its a crater you dumbass.

      And to get you back onto a real topic .. for example the 'face' on mars which would have been a much better image for you to post ...

      Your mind sees what it wants to see, it doesnt mean its aliens, it doesnt mean its some act of some imaginary god, its just your dumbass brain mis-interpreting it.

      damn you're dumb.

  44. Rupe by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    We're getting the latest false color images of hydrocarbon rafts in methane seas from Saturn's largest moon, and you don't think that's "News for Nerds"? Maybe you're not really a geek - just a dork. Test: have you ever dis/reassembled any device, yielding both extra parts and a working device?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Rupe by Teancum · · Score: 1

      Yes, both mechanical, electrical, and software. And software disassmembly is perhaps the hardest, but the easiest to get rid of garbage that should never have been there in the first place.

      The test for a real hacker: Ever dis/reassemble any device, get it working, and get another really cool device from the left over parts?

      All I said is that this should have been put in the science.slashdot.org section rather than on the main page. Yes, this is news, and I regularly read the science section anyway (and grateful that the gaming section is off to itself). I wouldn't have missed this story had it been put there, but much fewer people. At least I knew how to check the "No Karma Bonus" button on the post.

    2. Re:Rupe by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you *are* more of a dork than a geek: why so shy about using your karma points?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  45. I dubya knight of the square peg in the round hole by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Funny

    You're just claiming WMD to invade and harvest all those "hydrocarbons", on Earth represented mostly as "natural gas", oil and coal. Crusader!

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  46. fireproof world by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    For any of that methane to burn, it would need oxygen, notably absent from an atmosphere similar to Earth's (except for the "substituted" carbon content).

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  47. Landing on Titan by JC_England · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Huygens probe is:

    Made by ESA (The European Space Agency);
    Due for release on Christmas day IIRC;
    Will enter Titan's atmosphere about 21 days later;
    Will live for less than 4 hours while (hopefully) parachuting down to the surface;
    Should give us "ground truth" to compare with all the Cassini remote sensing.

  48. solaris by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Vast, complex hydrocarbon rafts in a methane sea... could we have an embryonic Solaris in our system? Or not so embryonic? These dreams... where do they come from...

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  49. Life on Titan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Today when I was "watching" SMS chat on TV I missed a couple of heart beats when someone sent there a line "informing" that Cassini had found insect-level life on Titan. Surely that must be false since that is the only source I have come up with such news.

    Disappointing, but the initial feeling was great. Still waiting for the Real One...

    1. Re:Life on Titan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, I'm a dumbass! I believe every stupid comment made in SMS chat!

      That's why my stupid country elected such a stupid president! because we are all so damn stupid!

      Kill me now, cuz I'm too stupid to notice!

  50. Chances for life? by wayne606 · · Score: 1

    Any biologists out there care to speculate on exotic forms of life that can grow at 94 degree K? Probably no chance to use water as a catalyst ...

    Any astrogeologists (if that's not an oxymoron) know what the chances are of localized hotspots on titan (e.g. is the core hot?)

    1. Re:Chances for life? by barakn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Regarding hotspots, see my post to original (not this dupe) story . All active living organisms on Earth contains liquid water within the interior of their cells. At 94 K liquid water is impossible, and it's hard to imagine life occuring in a solid phase. This leaves something truly exotic: cells filled with an organic solvent such as ethane, which is not nearly as good a solvent or catalyst as water. Such an organism seems unlikely.

      --
      "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
    2. Re:Chances for life? by VoidEngineer · · Score: 1

      Molds. Apparently, there was mold growing on the outside of Mir.

      Also, virus and simple bacteria can survive those temperatures, I believe. At the very least, they can survive cryo-preservation.

      Actually, there is an interesting point which is whether or not it's necessary for life to grow at the temperature Titan is currently at. Perhaps Titan has "Warm Ages" just like Earth has "Ice Ages". Hell, maybe every 10,000 years or so, the planet heats up 40 or 50 degrees... who knows? If so, maybe bacteria, molds, and other critters come out of some type of deep, frozen hibernation, and hang out until the end of the warm age.

      For anything bigger than cellular organisms, however, the entropy and heat problem is going to be difficult to overcome. I would speculate on methan-based jelly-fish critters, however, as being plausible, although improbable.

      Although, hell... maybe they got some shrimp type critters there like we have under the ice caps and down at the bottom of the trenches by the thermal vents. If there are liquid seas, then the pressure at the bottom of the sea is going to be fairly high, and there's still the possibility of some type of molten core. These things together pose the possibility of cold-water type critters, which there are plenty of under the ice-caps on earth.

    3. Re:Chances for life? by wayne606 · · Score: 1

      Based on the little biochemistry I know, I'd say that water is a rather unique chemical, and it's due to its special qualities (e.g. hydrogen bonds, interaction with other polar molecules) that life as we know it is possible. Sure, there may be biology based on other compounds, but the more we know about our biochemistry the less likely it seems that an equally "powerful" system could arise. There are organisms that life at higher and lower temperatures, but I think they generally use tricks (like anti-freeze compounds) to extend the range of liquid water as a solvent. 90 degrees K seems way out of bounds to me.

  51. Impact Crater? by John+Marter · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's no impact crater. It's the primary weapon.

  52. Three times redder than they human eye can see?!?! by sbaker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Near-infrared colors, some three times redder than the human eye can see"

    What the fsck does that mean?

    Some of the wavelengths are three times as long as 'Red'?

    Visible 'red' light is around .65 to maybe .75 micrometers. So are they are saying 2.1um or so?

    I do wish these articles would just say what they mean and not try to make it seem more 'amazing' with fuzzy statements like that. It's like "WOW! THREE TIMES REDDER!" - when in fact, near IR is nothing special - most cheap camcorders can take pretty good pictures in that frequency range.

    Ack!

    --
    www.sjbaker.org
  53. The tangible benefit by cat_jesus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is as of now, unknown. Many great discoveries in science and technology came about because of investigations elsehwhere. The point is, we don't know what we will discover or how it will influence other investigations or discoveries. We do know that almost all scientific investigations lead to discoveries in other areas. That's what makes it worthwhile.

  54. Re:Three times redder than they human eye can see? by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2, Informative

    Visible 'red' light is around .65 to maybe .75 micrometers. So are they are saying 2.1um or so?

    I do wish these articles would just say what they mean and not try to make it seem more 'amazing' with fuzzy statements like that. It's like "WOW! THREE TIMES REDDER!" - when in fact, near IR is nothing special - most cheap camcorders can take pretty good pictures in that frequency range.


    Silicon photodetectors, like the silicon CCD chips in camcorders, have a cutoff at about 1.1 micron. They won't see 2.1 micron infrared.

    Furthermore, John Q. Public reading that press release will have no idea what a "micron" is, but probably _will_ get the general idea from a phrase like "three times redder". If you want an accurate description of what's going on, why on earth are you reading a press blurb?

  55. Re:Ethics of this Situation by shaitand · · Score: 1

    You realized that we are a natural element and that anything we do is a mechanism of natural development?

  56. Re:Ethics of this Situation by 12357bd · · Score: 1

    Sure, and so are our understanding and culture, being natural is not a reason to not use intelligence, I prefer the other way.

    --
    What's in a sig?
  57. Naming places on Titan by DrVikarius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, here we have a wonderful probe sent by Earthlings to finally take an actual look at Titan, and it may soon resolve some of its mysterious features. I can't help thinking of the Kurt Vonnegut character, Salo (from "The Sirens Of Titan"), the million year old robot who was stranded on that world, whose journey through the Universe was to present to any race of beings he met a message he kept on a dogtag around his neck. The message consisted of a single dot, which meant in his language: "Greetings!" Here's hoping that they (the folks at JPL and the IAU or International Astronomical Union or whoever) will name a mountain range or at least a small crater or something "Salo". I'm sure some of them must know about this, and here's hoping that they will at least consider it. (In fact, they could just name a tiny crater "Greetings" and that would be appropriate enough, imho)

  58. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  59. JOSHUA sez: by Big+Sean+O · · Score: 1

    A strange game. The only winning move is not to play. How about a nice game of chess?

    --
    My father is a blogger.
  60. Hey, wait a minute by BollocksToThis · · Score: 1

    I recognise that white spot... that's a specular fucking highlight! They're using POVRay!

    Man, first they faked the moon landing, and now they're faking satellite pictures... bastards!

    --
    This sig is part of your complete breakfast.
  61. There seems to be a whacking great crater... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    ...in the images which IMESHO would be fittingly named Salo.

    Sadly, the atmospheric readings rule out an anthem sung in the Ganny Quaver.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  62. I guess that's why... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    ...they didn't plan to drop the probe on Europa.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  63. Only true for certain wavelengths by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
    This is still too far away to make any really revealing below-atmospheric level observations, as the atmosphere is so opaque and dense.

    If you do your looking with certain wavelengths, the atmosphere is no longer opaque. At that point, the density doesn't matter very much 'coz you can mathematically correct for any distortion it induces.

    I want a clearer picture of the "dragon" that ESO mentioned, 'coz I bet it's structurally similar to Valles Marineris on Mars. And won't that pose a pretty puzzle for cosmologists? (-:
    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  64. Another link by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    Your link didn't work for me, but this one does. So what's the big deal? The Lips of Mars? (-:

    How do I find a higher res MOC image of 28.38lat x 331.81long or thereabouts?

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  65. Correction by GISGEOLOGYGEEK · · Score: 1

    Ok, am I the only one that noticed that Mr. CmdTaco stated above that Cassini is orbiting Titan?

    Of course the satellite is in fact orbiting Saturn.

    It's necessary that I point out this fact because so many Americans don't even understand that the Moon orbits the earth.

    --
    George Bush + Linux = "I will not let information get in the way of the fight against Windows"
    1. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you'd look above, you'd see that many other people have noticed the same thing.

    2. Re:Correction by GISGEOLOGYGEEK · · Score: 1

      The people who posted ABOVE posted after me.

      dumbass.

      --
      George Bush + Linux = "I will not let information get in the way of the fight against Windows"
  66. Yes we read books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Don't assume we all read the same authors though.

    Bill Bryson

  67. Leaked Preliminary Cassini Images of Titan by mr-winter · · Score: 1