Slashdot Mirror


The iPod Gets WiFi, Sort Of

thecounterfeit writes "Engadget has a story on Pocketster Pro, a new application that lets you add WiFi to the iPod. The catch? You have to connect it to a Pocket PC with both USB Host capability and WiFi first, but once it's up and running you can wirelessly swap tunes with any other similarly equipped iPods."

52 of 206 comments (clear)

  1. In a related story by YankeeInExile · · Score: 5, Funny

    In a related story, an iPod can carry 490 passengers from New York to Sydney, Australia. The catch? You have to put it inside a Boeing 747 ....

    --
    How does the Slashdot Effect happen given that no slashdotters ever RTFA?
    1. Re:In a related story by System.out.println() · · Score: 3, Funny

      this is Slashdot. I think I speak for most of the people here when I say "Priorities? wtf?"

    2. Re:In a related story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
      What the hell is wrong with you people? George Bush has asked Congress for the power to suspend the presidential elections and you people can only talk about iPods? Get some priorities for fuck's sake!

      As long as Apple gets a G5 Powerbook out before next summer I couldn't care less. Democracy is an illusion anyway, but Macs are a way of life.

  2. Quick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    somebody ping the RIAA!

    1. Re:Quick by ThePDW · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can bet the RIAA is having kittens right now!

    2. Re:Quick by sploo22 · · Score: 4, Funny
      PING www.riaa.com (68.163.90.10) 56(84) bytes of data.
      From 68.163.93.162 icmp_seq=1 Destination monopoly unreachable
      From 68.163.93.162 icmp_seq=2 Destination monopoly unreachable
      From 68.163.93.162 icmp_seq=3 Destination monopoly unreachable
      From 68.163.93.162 icmp_seq=4 Destination monopoly unreachable

      Control-C
      --
      Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
    3. Re:Quick by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ahem. A monopoly is a company that has attained the majority of the market in a segment of the economy and uses its position as the market leader to supress potential competitors.

      The RIAA is not a company, they don't sell products -- it's an independent organization created by the 5 major record labels and many independents to protect their shared interests. And last I checked, 5 companies is significantly more than the 1 company required for a "monopoly."

      Furthermore, they're not exactly doing anything anti-competetive, at least nothing effective. The last dozen or so CDs I bought at my local record shop were all independent artists with no influence on the RIAA. The shop, incidentally, is owned by TransWorld and closely tied to Ticketmaster and ClearChannel -- but they have no problem selling me non RIAA-cds, and for less money ($10-15). Price fixing collusion is bad, but by definition collusion requires two companies...so it can't be monopolistic, and it's not anti-competetive because LOTS of artists sell their albums in stores and online for WAY less than the average CD cost reported by the RIAA.

      The "problem" with RIAA cd prices isn't that they are anti-competition, but that the RIAA members know they have music you want, and they know they can charge a lot for it and still make money. So that's what they do. Kind of unfair, but not illegal, not anti-competetive, and not monopolistic.

      Nice joke and all. But it's not accurate.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    4. Re:Quick by zurab · · Score: 2, Informative

      RIAA is not a monopoly - you are right; they are a cartel. RIAA members do not fix prices for consumers - they don't sell directly to consumers (unless you are a part of some "11 CDs for the price of 1 plus 'shipping'" club). RIAA and its members fix wholesale prices to stores - i.e. they are not competing against each other on the pricing basis. One of the reasons, as I understand it, is that they want to keep more small stores on par with big businesses so they can have more outlets for their products while reeling in more cash. I don't know what the actual numbers are but the cartel controls most (nearly all) of the market by both units sold and sales amounts; so they are in a position to do this with their non-compete agreements amongst each other.

      This actually makes more sense if you consider that RIAA member companies are also part of or own other media channels like broadcast media and movie production; in which they also hold majority shares. The media outlets that they do not directly control, they have asked (read bribed) the Congress to enact legislation to help them out: indefinite extension of copyrights, broadcasters/webcasters fees, taxes from sales of consumer products that can copy content, DMCA, as well as newly proposed acts like INDUCE act, CBDTPA, etc. This is generally bad for consumers as it prevents true competition in the industry by guaranteeing revenue models for the cartel members; mostly non-competitive state of the industry also prevents any innovation in the type of content, its price and its delivery methods.

      Such behavior is not only bad for consumers, it's also bad for artists; but I'll let you figure that out yourself since I gotta sleep now.

  3. This is too fucked up. by JessLeah · · Score: 4, Funny

    The thing only works with Pocket PCs? How ironic is that? Apple's latest brainchild, co-opted by Windows CE hackers, to do something so geeky that only Unix nerds would want to do it... my head is spinning. Part of me says "Wow, this is cool", but an equally large part says "EW, Windows!"... I'm so lost and confused.

    1. Re:This is too fucked up. by SpooForBrains · · Score: 4, Insightful
      to do something so geeky that only Unix nerds would want to do it
      Oh yes, transferring twelve new CDs from your mate's iPod to yours wirelessly. Clearly something only "Unix nerds" want to do.
      --
      "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
    2. Re:This is too fucked up. by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But it brings up the question... who owns both an iPod and a Pocket PC?

    3. Re:This is too fucked up. by 0racle · · Score: 5, Funny

      Unix nerds would alreay be doing it with a very small shell script.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    4. Re:This is too fucked up. by metalligoth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Plenty of people like the PocketPC because it has an interface superior to the Palm, and the OS is less buggy. I'm a long time Apple user and I think PocketPC is one of two things M$ has ever done right. My last PDA was a PocketPC, my current is a Treo, but my next will be a PocketPC again. Palm sucks.

      This post is coming to you from my OS X iBook.

    5. Re:This is too fucked up. by iamacat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Plenty of people like the PocketPC because it has an interface superior to the Palm, and the OS is less buggy

      This could go either way. Why should programs I close on PPC just hang around in the background until I run out of memory and kill them through Start/Settings/System/Memory/Running Programs?

      But mostly both Palm and PPC suck, especially when it comes to developing software. Sun 3 with a 68K processor, 8MB of ram and 100MB hard drive was a usable development machine with a standard C++ compiler - exceptions and all, on-"device" debugger, an easy to use UI toolkit (XView) and lots more. For todays 400Mhz XScale PDAs with 256MB RAM, I would settle for an equivalent functionality from remote. But no, we get crippled compilers (CE), ridiculous heap sizes (Palm) and tedious UI programming (both, although .Net is making a dent).

    6. Re:This is too fucked up. by babbage · · Score: 2, Funny
      Unix nerds would alreay be doing it with a very small shell script.

      ...and that's why they never seem to have girlfriends... :-)

  4. share!~ by 2057 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've been a big fan of large size Mp3 Players, but I always wanted to be able to go up to my friend and zap him the latest albums I got, then also recieve all the albums he had...If a TI-83 can do it, then the next gen ipod should also!

    --
    For The Best Jazz/Hip-hop fusion > COlD DUCK
  5. Holy battery drainer, batman! by Shoeler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let's see - my iPaq with wifi gets maybe 1.5-2 hours of playtime.

    Add USB usage and that's gotta drop - at least a little.

    Add processing for data transfer.

    Add external battery.

    Call this a novelty, I will.

  6. The catch? by yawhcihw · · Score: 5, Funny

    You'll be clubbed to death by any Apple evangelist who sees you doing this...

  7. Newton... by Rgb465 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Too bad the Apple Newton didn't come with WiFi... ;)

    1. Re:Newton... by pyrrhonist · · Score: 4, Informative
      Too bad the Apple Newton didn't come with WiFi... ;)

      It didn't come with it, but the good news is, you can run a Newton with WiFi!

      You can do it two ways:

      I'm currently using a Farallon PN595 hooked up to a wireless ethernet bridge, so I have access to my contacts and notes through NPDS using a web browser.
      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
  8. Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've always wondered why iPod doesn't come with bluetooth? I don't see a reason.

    1. Re:Question by dave420 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because bluetooth has a ridiculously low transfer speed, and would be nearly useless in this situation. Bluetooth earpieces for the iPod would be a great idea, however, if they could get the frequency response good enough to not piss people off.

  9. Aireo 802.11 Interface Works Today by wyngarth · · Score: 5, Interesting

    SoniqCast's Aireo player already has 802.11b (11Mb) integrated already. Interesting option to download files to it while it's sitting in your car. Interesting quirk however, is that it doesn't take DRM-protected files. SoniqCast says they're working on it. Good think I still have all my P2P files...

  10. Re:How is this possible? by ischorr · · Score: 3, Informative

    While the iPod can play copy-protected files, the protection that Apple uses currently allows protected files to play on an unlimited number of iPods.

    The iPod can, however, also play unprotected MP3s and AAC files.

  11. iPod + iBook by powerpuffgirls · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why don't we just connect iPod to a iBook, which conects to a AirPort? This will keep everything in the same franchise :)

  12. Heresy by supercytro · · Score: 4, Funny

    Apple products working with Microsoft products? What vile heresy is this?

  13. It might be more useful if... by proxima · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As far as I'm aware, there's no way to connect two iPods directly to each other. If you could use a small USB hub and a pocket PC to bridge the two, I could see that being a lot more useful than having two PocketPCs, each equipped with wifi adapters.

    Just a thought.

    --
    "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
  14. Crystal Ball of Real Slim Shady? by powerpuffgirls · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If wirelessly beaming songs between iPods is popular, wouldn't Apple develop something to fill the need rather quickly?

    Do all these 'Get-Around-Something' companies just try to make a quick profit before the "Real Slim Shady" comes into play? Or do they actually have a bright future?

  15. Why not just connect it to a laptop... by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With either a Mac or Windows laptop, the iPod can be mounted as a drive and then shared... which is all that's really going on here anyway. That's just functionality of the OS, no extra software needed.

    Of course, this is Slashdot where we like to do things the hard way...

    1. Re:Why not just connect it to a laptop... by Graff · · Score: 3, Informative
      you cannot download songs from an iPod onto a computer (without 3rd party software)

      Sure you can. Plug the iPod in. Open up a terminal window. Type in (replacing iPodName with the actual name of the iPod):
      ditto --rsrc /Volumes/iPodName/iPod_Control/Music/ ~/Desktop/Music/
      I'm using the ditto command (a standard shell tool that comes with Mac OS X) because it properly preserves data forks and file metadata. You can use any copying tool you want, but some may not get all of the filesystem metadata. The files will still play fine but they might lose custom icons and stuff like that. No big deal either way.

      You can copy the files directly through the Finder but that's a little tougher since the Music directory is an invisible folder. There are ways of making it visible but its just easier to use the Terminal.

      By the way, it's more fun to use this command because then you can see each file listed as it is copied:
      ditto --rsrc -V /Volumes/iPodName/iPod_Control/Music/ ~/Desktop/Music/
      When the copy operation is finished you'll have a folder named Music on your Desktop (assuming Mac OS X here). Just import the whole folder into iTunes - much easier because the files are sorted in a way that doesn't make much sense at a first glance (the folders are a type of hash that makes it easy for the iPod to find a song quickly against an internal table).
  16. An inevitable evolution of bluetooth phones by ehack · · Score: 4, Interesting

    An inevitable evolution of bluetooth phones is going to be P2P. Tell your phone what you're looking for, go for a walk on campus, or have coffee at starbucks, and it'll be there when you get back home. The phones eg. P800 can already be used for listening to MP3s, and they can be programmed in Java and C++, it's only a matter of month till we get fully integrated Bluetooth P2P.

    --
    This is not a signature.
  17. The odds... by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The catch? You have to connect it to a Pocket PC with both USB Host capability and WiFi first, but once it's up and running you can wirelessly swap tunes with any other similarly equipped iPods.

    What are the odds that 2 out of the 14 people who actually buy and use this device will be in range of each other.

    1. Re:The odds... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 3, Funny
      What are the odds that 2 out of the 14 people who actually buy and use this device will be in range of each other.

      100%... When I put them all in a room and shoot them.

      - Apple Lover

  18. iPod Exchange Provider by powerpuffgirls · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Will we start seeing hotspots (intentional or otherwise) allowing iPod users to exchange files?

    Imagine a pseudo-P2P service run by hotspots installed (or infected) with the P2P apps......

  19. Re:How is this possible? by Justin205 · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you either A) use unprotected MP3s or B) use iTunes to rip CDs to AAC format, its all unprotected.

    iTunes simply outputs standard old M4A files, not the copy protected ITMS ones.

    --
    "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
  20. Forget file-swapping by ElGanzoLoco · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Forget file-swapping, and give me an iPod that can stream music directly to airport-express... I really believe this is what the next-generation iPod will be. Battery life will be a bitch though. In 2 or 3 revisions we probably even have Airport-express-extreme which will do audio AND video, and the assorted iPod capable of streaming your photos, mpegs and mp3s to your home cinema. This will be the day I buy another iPod.

    --
    Hello! I'm a disaster waiting to happen!
    1. Re:Forget file-swapping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      don't forget it! imagine a future where a lot of people own ipods. you're sitting on a bus and you get a "knock." another ipod user activated a "wireless knock" to check to see if anyone on the bus had an ipod, and it found you. you accept this "knock" which lets him browse your songs, and you can browse his as well. you swap a couple of songs and move along, perhaps w/o knowing who you just exchanged songs with. illegal? maybe, but fucking cool!

    2. Re:Forget file-swapping by pyrrhonist · · Score: 3, Funny
      you accept this "knock" which lets him browse your songs, and you can browse his as well. you swap a couple of songs and move along, perhaps w/o knowing who you just exchanged songs with.

      Then you play one of the MP3s which you got off his ipod, which exploits a buffer overrun in the ipod's MP3 codec. When the bus passes by a WiFi hotspot the exploit's embedded P2P server connects to thousands of users worldwide. As you step off the bus, you get a "knock" on the back of the head from the RIAA's jack-booted shock troops who arrest you for being a terrorist.

      But it's fucking cool!

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
  21. it's going to be a while by jbellis · · Score: 2, Informative

    a full-fledged computer can barely do acceptable voice recognition after hours of training (or not, depending on your tolerance for error). It's going to be a while before you can "tell your phone what you're looking for."

    Unless you meant typing it on the phone's chiclet-keyboard. Eww...

  22. I Have Something Even Cooler... by bfg9000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...it's called, uh.. a radio. You guys should try it. It cost me like a tenth of what my iPod cost me, and already has some sort of integrated wifi. I've listened to like a million songs and didn't pay for ANY of them! I don't know how Kazaa is gonna survive in the face of this new technology. I just hope it stays underground, otherwise Microsoft or someone will buy it all up and ruin it.

    --

    I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

    1. Re:I Have Something Even Cooler... by Holi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      otherwise Microsoft or someone will buy it all up and ruin it.

      A company far more evil than Microsoft has already done this.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  23. Re:Let's just hope by DeltaSigma · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are many audio equivalents to goatse. I might be into wireless music swapping were it not for the fact that I could count on all of my associates sending me the same crap I can hear on any clearchannel station.

    Wireless music swapping promises me nothing more than clearchannel without the ads (which isn't much better). The entire feature as envisioned by hundereds, if not thousands, of ecstatic individuals is entirely asinine to me.

  24. Re:FireWire CF adapters for older iPods? by ian+mills · · Score: 2, Informative

    he said he had a second gen not a third gen ipod. ie the ones that had touch pad scroll wheels. the docks are only for 3rd gen ipods.

  25. If you have a Pocket PC and Wifi, skip the iPod by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you've got a PocketPC and Wifi, just keep your music on your home computer, and run a streaming server, to stream the music to your PocketPC.

    1. Re:If you have a Pocket PC and Wifi, skip the iPod by scribblez · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It'd be out of juice before long, though

      --
      "What seems to be the problem, osciffer?" (pronounced aus-if-fer.. bah forget it)
  26. There is a way to connect two iPods by gotr00t · · Score: 5, Informative
    Since Firewire is a peer to peer protocol, unlike USB being host and client, it is technically possible to connect two iPods together and share files. An implementation does exist, but its described as being "slow and buggy"

    One of the iPods must have iPodLinux installed, which should include firewire support, as well as SBP2 support. Compile this as a module, and then connect the two iPods together with the Sendstation Pocketdock if they are 3G, or just a regular 6pin to 6pin FW cable if they are 1st or 2nd generation. Put the other iPod into firewire disk mode, and the one running linux should be able to mount it and access the files. This is incredibly impractical, as typing on the iPod requires turning the scroll wheel until the right character appears (incredibly annoying), and also very slow. However, it just goes to show that it _is_ possible for iPods to share files with just minimal extra hardware.

    1. Re:There is a way to connect two iPods by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's too bad nobody has come out with a little box with a firewire controller, disk controller, and just enough logic to do a one-way sync. If you could make it cheap enough (and perhaps build in an uplink, so it could act like a firewire hub or something) I could see it selling (however, IANA Market Analyst)

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:There is a way to connect two iPods by EvilFrog · · Score: 3, Informative

      Firewire is an Apple technology, and networking over it is part of the specification. It was Apple that figured it out to begin with. It's the user-made implementation that's "slow" and "buggy". The reason why Apple hasn't implemented this is because it would piss off the RIAA if they made it any easier for people to share files, and a moderately healthy relationship with the RIAA is necessary to keep iTMS running. This is the same reason why they make the music files on the iPod invisible when you mount it on your computer, and why music bought from iTMS has DRM.

    3. Re:There is a way to connect two iPods by Smurf · · Score: 2, Informative
      All Sony notebook and desktop computers have TCP/IP over firewire driver for Windows. It works VERY well and is not "slow" nor "buggy". Just because Apple hasn't figured it out dont mean it dont exist.
      Actually, Panther also supports TCP/IP over FireWire. It works VERY well, and is not "slow" or "buggy". It works with any FireWire enabled Mac, iBook or PowerBook.

      You see, they are actually talking about connecting two iPods directly through FireWire, without a computer in the middle. Connecting computers through FireWire is a problem that was solved long ago.

  27. This is about as elegant as... by LightningBolt! · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is about as elegant as adding WiFi to your lawnmower... by running over a PocketPC with the lawnmower.

    --
    Old people fall. Young people spring. Rich people summer and winter.
  28. PocketPC Interface by Baricom · · Score: 2, Interesting

    On the other hand, I think Palm's user experience knocks Pocket PC out of the water. I am very much a fan of their interface design. They built the Palm organizer from start to finish to simplify use on the go, and the fact that they broke into a market where Apple tried and utterly failed is enough to earn my respect.

    May I recommend Piloting Palm, ISBN 0471089656? It's an excellent look into the planning that went into engineering the first Palm Pilot. It's written by two Palm executives, so there's probably some bias, but then again, I doubt you'd be able to find neutrality from Microsoft, either.

    Remember, not everybody wants to carry a full-featured computer around in their pocket. My Tungsten C does everything I could possibly need to do away from a computer.

  29. not ipod specific by rizzy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's no reason why a similar hack couldn't be used to swap songs between two Rio Karmas. Remember, the Rio Karma comes with enough connectivity options to make a grown man weep (usb, ethernet, RCA). And with the Karma, you can do it out of the box without any 3rd party add-ons.

    Why is this special?