Slashdot Mirror


Companies that Still Don't Ship to Canada?

mstich asks: "I'm curious as to why some companies make it so difficult to ship to Canada (from the U.S.A.). I'm only about 200km (124mi) from Detroit, so distance surely can't be the problem. Companies like NewEgg state that they won't ship to Canada, even though they will ship to Alaska (albeit, at an inflated cost) and some, like Crucial, do ship to Canada but they won't extend their 'free second day shipping'. Are there really that many underlying costs that show up when crossing the border? Is this just another money grabber? Does NAFTA fit into all of this, somehow?"

142 comments

  1. stop whining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    you canadians are all the same with your beady little eyes and your flapping heads

    1. Re:stop whining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      you canadians are all the same with your beady little eyes and your flapping heads

      I would expect such blatant racism on Fark, but on Slashdot? Mods please ban this asshole.

    2. Re:stop whining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its a south park reference

    3. Re:stop whining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Canadian" is not a race, it's a nationality. Sure, he may be a bigot, but he's not necessarily a racist, and if you're from Canada, I think you just proved him right. :-P

    4. Re:stop whining by Jahf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Mods can't ban, they can only lower this one post's score.

      If poster's scores are lowered enough times, they will begin to automatically post at score:0 but they will still be able to post.

      Personally, I wouldn't mind a slight overhaul of the ratings system but even if banned, there are so many ways around that it often makes just as much sense to de-karmatize them to oblivion so that they can post from the same account and just be ignored.

      And don't be so surprised about finding that here ... while there are lots of intelligent folks here, there are alot of immature dipsticks, too. It will get modded down.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    5. Re:stop whining by Scottarius · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      i guess you guys don't watch South Park

    6. Re:stop whining by revmoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would expect such blatant racism on Fark, but on Slashdot? Mods please ban this asshole.

      Since when are canadians a race?

      --
      I would expect such blatant racism on Fark, but on Slashdot? Mods please ban this asshole.
    7. Re:stop whining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess no.

    8. Re:stop whining by Jahf · · Score: 1

      Sure, and I saw that episode, but perhaps this isn't the proper place to put it when so many of the readers did -not- watch it and have no frame of referrence to know that you thought you were being funny.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    9. Re:stop whining by Scottarius · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Judging by the moderation more people got the joke than didn't. You can't please everybody.

      If people refrained from telling jokes because a few people might not have the correct frame of reference than there wouldn't be much humor around.

      But if the post offended anybody than I apologize. I wasn't trying to be racist.

    10. Re:stop whining by tverbeek · · Score: 1
      I would expect such blatant racism on Fark, but on Slashdot? Mods please ban this asshole.

      That isn't racism. It's nationalism. Just as ugly, just as stupid, but not the same thing.

      (Oh, and perhaps you might enjoy reading the FAQ for this site, which explains how moderating actually works here.)

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    11. Re:stop whining by ziggyboy · · Score: 1

      Mods delete posts. I've seen it myself. 3 refreshes after an anti-American post (which was kinda terrorist) was deleted after about 2 minutes.

    12. Re:stop whining by ziggyboy · · Score: 1
      I've done some studies on "racism" before. dictionary.com says:

      A group of people united or classified together on the basis of common history, nationality, or geographic distribution.

      So yes, Canadian can be considered a race.

    13. Re:stop whining by arb · · Score: 1

      Mods can't ban, they can only lower this one post's score.

      If poster's scores are lowered enough times, they will begin to automatically post at score:0 but they will still be able to post.


      Enough down-mods and the poster's sub-net will be blocked from posting. It doesn't even take many down-mods - I had a comment moderated up and down a number of times and got banned, because they don't take into account any up-mods, just the down-mods. I am still banned BTW, just posting via a different sub-net...

      It doesn't matter if the user is logged in or not either - the entire sub-net the user posted from will get banned, so anyone else on that sub-net will also be banned as a consequence.

    14. Re:stop whining by Jahf · · Score: 1

      a) Are you sure it didn't just get modded to -1 oblivion (if it was your post then I'll buy it since you can track that alot easier)?

      b) If that happened it wasn't a Mod ... a Moderator is just a /. user with 5 mod points on a random day who moderates your post. To be deleted it has to be done by an Admin ... you know, one of those few folks who actually run /. There is a big distinction between the two.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    15. Re:stop whining by Jahf · · Score: 1

      As I replied to another on this thread, no Moderator can do that. It requires higher permissions to ban someone. And generally speaking asking for someone who has those higher permissions (as in a /. administrator) by posting something like "Mods, ban this guy" is kind of like walking up to a random table in the cafeteria and saying something to a manager, hoping he'll be close enough to hear what you say.

      If someone does something offensive enough to need admin attention, they only way of being sure it gets that attention is to send a note to the /. admins directly. They do respond to email (at least they did both times I sent in a note). "Mods" can't do anything other than moderate a message up or down.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    16. Re:stop whining by arb · · Score: 1

      As I replied to another on this thread, no Moderator can do that. It requires higher permissions to ban someone.

      Not quite.

      There is code to automatically ban a poster's IP address (or sub-net) if the poster receives too many down-mods in a certain time-frame. While an individual moderator cannot directly ban someone per se, enough down-mods and the poster will be banned. It does not take any editor interaction, it is an automatic ban.

      And generally speaking asking for someone who has those higher permissions (as in a /. administrator) by posting something like "Mods, ban this guy" is kind of like walking up to a random table in the cafeteria and saying something to a manager, hoping he'll be close enough to hear what you say.

      Again, not quite.

      While it is true that moderators cannot do anything but moderate a message up or down, the cumulative effect of enough down-mods will cause a poster to be banned. It has happened to myself and several other users that I know of in recent weeks. Correspondence with the editors has confirmed this fact, and while they do generally respond, it can take quite a while for them to get around to replying. For the record, the editors generally will not do anything to lift an automatic ban.

    17. Re:stop whining by Jahf · · Score: 1

      Still, the Moderator can not arbitrarily ban someone at another's request.

      And if a comment is so poorly received that it can be modded down so many times as to do an auto-ban, perhaps that should be a signal to the user that they are in the wrong place.

      While I think perhaps auto-bans should expire after a given time (perhaps they do), I do not disagree with the admins' choice to not interfere.

      What I might want to see is auto-ban meta moderation, so that meta moderators could view a thread and judge whether the poster's ban is proper. Say 10 votes allowed and a 70% in-favor vote required to lift the ban.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    18. Re:stop whining by arb · · Score: 1

      And if a comment is so poorly received that it can be modded down so many times as to do an auto-ban, perhaps that should be a signal to the user that they are in the wrong place.

      Maybe, maybe not. All it takes is a small handful of moderators who disagree with what you are trying to say to mod you down, rather than post a comment. It is one of the areas where moderation is broken - many moderators use moderation as a way to say "me too!" or "I don't agree" rather than properly rewarding/oenalising good/bad posts.

      What I might want to see is auto-ban meta moderation, so that meta moderators could view a thread and judge whether the poster's ban is proper. Say 10 votes allowed and a 70% in-favor vote required to lift the ban.

      That sounds like a good idea, although it is unlikely to be implemented. From what I can see, even if the down-mods that caused you to be banned are meta-moderated as unfair, the ban sticks. 8-/

    19. Re:stop whining by Branvanman · · Score: 1
      How about just answering the guy's question?

      Cultural references aside, americans don't fare any better in the world arena when it comes to smartness (witness the recurring stereotype of yankees in Europe).

      It's so double-standard to look at others in contempt and not at your own failings. It's called hypocrisy.

      What is wrong with a genuine question as the one posted here? Is it soooooo difficult to give a straight answer? Or is it that you try to disguise your own ignorance with sarcasm and deprecation?

      Are you now going to conclude that I'm also a whiner, thereby I must also be ....Canadian?

      The One

    20. Re:stop whining by has2k1 · · Score: 1

      you have seen too much southpark.

  2. IANALBIPOOTV by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ask a lawyer. Maybe the legal departments of large companies won't allow them to do business in Canada because they don't want to incur the expense of complying with Canadian law.

    Just a guess.

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    1. Re:IANALBIPOOTV by JAZ · · Score: 1

      on complying wiht canadian law...

      I wonder if would a company have to offer it's website/phone support in both french and english. That might drive the cost of business up a lot.

      Either way, I sure the main problem is with trade regulations and foreign customer management, not so much with physical shipping.

      foreign... interesting word... I wonder if I comes from Foe - Reign: someone under the reign of a foe? Guess it wouldn't kill me to look it up would it.

      --


      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -- Homer Simpson
    2. Re:IANALBIPOOTV by a+whoabot · · Score: 1

      Dictionary.com:

      [Middle English forein, from Old French forain, from Late Latin fornus, on the outside, from Latin fors, outside. See dhwer- in Indo-European Roots.]

    3. Re:IANALBIPOOTV by jcenters · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ah, Anal-Bi-Poo TV, isn't that the new pr0n channel?

      --

      vi ~/.emacs

    4. Re:IANALBIPOOTV by Rob.Mathers · · Score: 1

      Actually, even Canadian companies don't have to do this. Many do (mostly ones who are large enough that they serve a significant portion of the country, so they will more than likely have some french customers.

      However, there is no obligation for companies (other than regulated ones like Air Canada, Via Rail, etc.) that aren't based in Quebec to do anything special.

      --

      My other sig is funny!
    5. Re:IANALBIPOOTV by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      I was going for "I Am Not A Lawyer But I Play One On TV."

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    6. Re:IANALBIPOOTV by perlchild · · Score: 1

      One Word: Customs
      that explains the shipping restrictions(NO-ONE will guarantee next-day shipping through a border, since if customs seizes it, for any reason, and "further investigation" is indeed, a valid reason, as far as I know(but IANAL) to detain a shipment for more detailed inspection.

      Local regulation might also be to blame for something else, lots of special prices, etc... only apply for a specific jurisdiction, so some larger retailers might choose not to sell to Canadians, just so they don't have to negotiate their specials twice with their suppliers, or deal with the odd case, where a special can't be offered to one client from one place, and can be to a client from another.

    7. Re:IANALBIPOOTV by jcenters · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know, but I was doing this thing called "being a smart ass."

      Oops, there I go again. lol

      --

      vi ~/.emacs

    8. Re:IANALBIPOOTV by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1

      Probably true. Amazon.com won't ship many electronics or software to Canada because the laws about warranties are different.

    9. Re:IANALBIPOOTV by J4 · · Score: 1

      You've got the ass part down anyway.

      "Look ma, it works with acronyms too!" - Rorschach

  3. Not NAFTA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Well, it might in some way, but the big bottleneck is US Customs Service. And Canada's equivalent might be a player in the equation as well.

    1. Re:Not NAFTA by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      One of our customers is the Senate of Canada. One day I got a call from Canadian Customs asking me what the value was of the updates we where sending the Senate of Candada was. Well I said they where free. The Senate already had bought the software and the updates where included. Well that was just not good enough. So I had to ask, "Why do you care?"
      The answer was so that they could charge themselves and import duty! I had to say,"Let me get this straight? You the goverment of Canada need to charge the goverment of Canada for this update?
      Good grief.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:Not NAFTA by Omega+Leader-(P12) · · Score: 1

      The government loves doing this, as a Federal department equiptment (I won't say which one) we don't pay PST, cause as a lower form of government the provience can't tax the feds. But we do pay GST. So if we spend $10,000 on a new lab machine then the finance department takes 7% on top and next year we get a really small chunk back as part of that budget. So budgets of departments with few people have budgets that appear larger than they really are.

      Every department feels the need to stick it to the others, especially as money disappears at the end of the year. Which causes a mad rush to ensure you spend every penny or your budget will be reduced next year. Cause you obviously don't need the money. You can't bank money to purchase something big, so there are all kind of things purchased in April that can be "justified" that just aren't needed. Computer upgrades are a great way to bank money in bug cardboard boxes incase they are ever needed cause we can't throw anything away.

      That one change could improve efficiency drimatically, but because the money must be spent there is more waste than there needs to be.

  4. Customs by planetmn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I believe that you still need to fill out customs documents. Call UPS and just ask what paperwork they need to ship to Canada.

    --
    /., where "Apple and Google provide Iran with nukes" will be refuted with "But Microsoft is a convicted monopolist"
    1. Re:Customs by loftwyr · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's the big thing. The customs documentation and extra costs involved in declaration and shipping are just too big for as small a market as Canada is (I live in Canada).

      Why bother getting and filling out the right forms for a small market with its own distribution chain?

    2. Re:Customs by Rob+Parkhill · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think the customer service hassles when dealing with customs is part of it too. I know that I've been more than a bit pissed off in the past when I paid a hefty sum for shipping, and then got nailed for 2X the shipping cost for brokerage fees by UPS or FedEx Ground.

      I imagine that a lot of customers end up bitching out the company they bought the product from, or even refusing to accept the delivery due to the extra fees. It just might not be worth it.

      The smarter companies parter with a place like BorderFree.com that specializes in dealing with Canadian customs.

      Another thing to consider is that a lot of electronics bought from US stores do not have a warranty in Canada. The super-cheap electronics places in town used to specialize in these "grey market" items. Not illegal to buy them, but if it ever breaks, good luck getting it fixed.

      (BTW, if you ever have the choice, pick FedEx Express or USPS for shipping to Canada. Never use UPS or FedEx Ground. While you might think you are saving some money, you get shafted by brokerage fees once the item gets to the border. UPS will hold your package hostage until you pay the fees, and FedEx ground will deliver the package and hit you with a letter demanding the fees up to a month later.)

      --
      "Tomorrow's forecast: a few sprinkles of genius with a chance of doom!" - Stewie Griffin
    3. Re:Customs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to a knuckle-dragging crossburner wannabe yank from alberta?

    4. Re:Customs by Sebby · · Score: 1
      "The customs documentation and extra costs involved in declaration and shipping are just too big for as small a market as Canada is"

      Well they certainly won't grow that market if they keep ignoring it...

      --

      AC comments get piped to /dev/null
    5. Re:Customs by Tr0mBoNe- · · Score: 1

      Yep... I just got something from New York (I live in Downtown Toronto) and I had to pay brokerage fees and a little duty. Apparently they don't like it when I import Lucky Strike's and get them at 1/3 cost for a carton (13.95 USD regular 55 if you can get them in canada)

      but the biggest thing that annoys me is when I go on my roof to chill and smoke, I can see Buffalo, New York (unfortunatly) and can walk to the US to get stuff... but even if I walk back with the carton, SNAP! duty is put on it.

      And the free trade legistlation only applies to companies sending certain items like food, some lumber, and un-assembled materials. They spent 10 years putting that together and it will never be perfect... but it's better than living in Mexico.

      meh.

      --
      while(1) { fork(); };
  5. NAFTA by jon787 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Does NAFTA fit into all of this, somehow?
    If NAFTA fit into this in anyway it would be making the trade EASIER, not harder. Unless I'm completely missing some minor detail about the North American Free Trade Agreement.
    --
    X(7): A program for managing terminal windows. See also screen(1).
    1. Re:NAFTA by bintrue · · Score: 1

      Ya because we ALL know that the government uses applicable names for everything.

      --
      -/bin/true successfully doing nothing day after day.
    2. Re:NAFTA by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      And always has the inteneded effects.

      -Peter

    3. Re:NAFTA by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      NAFTA reduces the duties on items shipped across the border between certain types of parties, but it doesn't reduce the paperwork... In fact, it adds a form.

    4. Re:NAFTA by Sebby · · Score: 1
      And does 'easier' mean that Canadian have to pay extra duties on electronics, etc. that gets shipped to them, while American receiving stuff from Canada do not? Because it is certainly 'easier' in this sense.

      Mind you American do pay something I believe, but a heck of a lot less than Canadians do.

      Seems to me we got the bad end of the deal. I guess we have Mulroney to thank for all this...

      --

      AC comments get piped to /dev/null
  6. Customs forms and Brokerage fees by andawyr · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are a couple of problems, one small, and one not so small.

    1. Extra forms to fill out. The company either doesn't want to take the time to fill out the single (small) form, or thinks that the forms will take a long time. Understandable, but frustrating to the paying customer.

    2. Irate phone calls from customers who were levied heavy brokerage fees. I was one of these customers a few weeks back, when I got nailed TWICE with brokerage fees (to the US, and back into Canada) for a piece of hardware I sent back for free repair. I bitched so hard at UPS that they dropped the brokerage fees. However, even after that, the cost of the free, under-warranty repair was still $100 US.

    Brokerage fees drive me nuts, since most of the time they appear after the fact, and are not consistently applied. This is very frustrating, not to mention expensive.

    1. Re:Customs forms and Brokerage fees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      The brokerage fees levied by the couriers (or their shill companies.. the "brokerage houses") are, to put it simply, a scam.

      "We charged you an extra $50 for brokerage to clear customs" == "We saw you coming and soaked you for some more cash"

      It's your legal right to clear the package yourself (or get your own broker). Of course, in those cases the shipper says you have to pick it up in their warehouse in {vancouver, toronto, st. john's NFLD, whichever is farthest from you}.

      The worst for this is UPS, then DHL. The best method to ship to Canada is USPS (yes, the post office). Canada post charges a flat $5 for packages, and that's usually just to assess GST charges (which you have to pay anyway).

    2. Re:Customs forms and Brokerage fees by FlyingOrca · · Score: 1

      The first time a big brown courier company tried to charge me for brokerage, I dug into it a bit and discovered that I can clear stuff through customs myself for a tiny fraction of their charge. Since then, every item I order from the States has been accompanied by two crucial words: "clears own". In other words, have the shipper instruct the carrier that you will clear it yourself.

      Now, if you're not in a major centre that might be a bit of a pain in the ass. I'm in Winnipeg, though, and it's a piece of pie. Last set of bike parts I ordered, I saved $50 in fees at the cost of 45 minutes of running around. YMMV of course. Cheers!

      --
      Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.
    3. Re:Customs forms and Brokerage fees by andawyr · · Score: 1

      Yup, this will work, as long as you do NOT ship via UPS Ground. You do not have the option of clearing it through Custom's yourself if this is the case.

      However, living in Winnipeg, which is the major point of entry for UPS Ground, you may have that option. In Calgary, we don't.

      So, NO UPS for me. Ever.

    4. Re:Customs forms and Brokerage fees by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "It's your legal right to clear the package yourself (or get your own broker). Of course, in those cases the shipper says you have to pick it up in their warehouse in {vancouver, toronto, st. john's NFLD, whichever is farthest from you}. The worst for this is UPS, then DHL. The best method to ship to Canada is USPS (yes, the post office). Canada post charges a flat $5 for packages, and that's usually just to assess GST charges (which you have to pay anyway)."

      DHL is bad?

      Earlier this year I bought a bunch of stuff from amazon.co.jp and had it shipped to me in Canada via DHL. It arrived at my address in 2 days in perfect condition. Then 3 weeks later the customs bill showed up and it ONLY had the Canada Customs $5 scam fee plus the normal 15% taxes. There was no brokerage fee and no hassle. My package was not held hostage.

      (Actually paying the bill was a bitch though. They don't give you instructions or anything. They should have a web form for that.)

    5. Re:Customs forms and Brokerage fees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't use sticky notes, I write directly on the edge of the monitor in water soluble pen. One note, under my partitioning notes, says "UPS=steep brokerage fees". If that's the only way a seller will ship from the US, then they don't get my business. I vastly prefer USPS. If I'm not home when they deliver, the package goes to a post office a couple of blocks from me where I can pick it up at my convenience.

  7. Warranties / Distribution Rights / ... by peterjt · · Score: 5, Informative

    Also, bear in mind that while a distributor might have the rights for a product in the States, there is no guarantee that they have the rights to distribute that same product in Canada.

    Issues like support come into effect; normally, if you buy a product in the States, service for that item are doine through the US based manufacturer, not the manufacturer's Canadian arm.

    Some manufacturer's actaully sell different "model" numbers in the two countries with slightly different feature sets. for instance documentation in English & French; not just English..

    1. Re:Warranties / Distribution Rights / ... by mschiller · · Score: 1

      In The US... The documentation would be English and Spanish... I hardly ever see anything with JUST english these days...

  8. Many reasons by twoflower · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There are several reasons; one is that the necessary paperwork to get the package through customs is a pain in the ass for the seller. They don't want the hassle.

    Another reason is that many sellers only have permission to sell products in the U.S.A. -- i.e., they haven't bought the rights to sell the product in Canada. You need to find another distributor who has bought those rights, but sometimes that's difficult because the (smaller) Canadian distributor isn't nearly as well-known.

    --


    --
    Twoflower
    1. Re:Many reasons by Teddy+Beartuzzi · · Score: 1
      Yeah, that little green USPS form is so complicated... Description, Value, tick Merchandise, sign your name. 10 seconds.

      The other problem mentioned by others, delays in Customs, I've found almost always the reason is that the seller screwed up. They'll tick gift instead of merchandise, trying to save the customer some money. They'll undervalue the item, or leave it off entirely.

      Stuff like this seems to route the package into the "cavity search" group. They'll spend weeks investigating realistic prices, origins etc, to make sure everything is on the up and up.

      Fill in the forms accurately and honestly, and things zip through Canada Customs.

  9. COULD IT HAVE SOMETHING TO DO WITH CALLING THEIR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    President a moron? Gee probably. Paul Martin and Jean Chretien are responsible for this. Fucking tools.

  10. Policies by Guspaz · · Score: 1

    Some companies have return, replacement, or warranty policies that say they'll pay the shipping in certain circumstances. Since shipping to canada costs a lot more (fees, tarrifs, etc), that can cost them a lot of money.

  11. Horse's mouth by jguevin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Have you tried asking any of the companies in question? Believe it or not, they may be staffed by humans who can answer your questions.

    Crap, I sound like a troll.

    1. Re:Horse's mouth by John_Booty · · Score: 1

      "Have you tried asking any of the companies in question? Believe it or not, they may be staffed by humans who can answer your questions."
      ----------

      If they're not interested in taking money from Canadians, they probably wouldn't be interested in spending the time to answer them, either.

      Also, a lot of the reasons why companies don't ship to Canada come from laziness or ignorace of what's required, legally and customs-wise, to ship to Canada. Companies don't want to admit to that!

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    2. Re:Horse's mouth by danbeck · · Score: 1

      No, your post is very insightful. Instead of using "Ask Slashdot" for a firstline of techsupport, most of the tools who send these questions in should simply do the obvious thing. That being, either google for it, or ask the person/entity involved. 90% of the ask slashdot questions can be solved in one of those ways and it's usually quickly pointed out in the comments.

  12. customs by flabbergast · · Score: 5, Informative

    I worked for an online car parts store, and we refused to ship to Canada. Why? Because when the online store first opened we did ship to Canada, but the package would get held up in customs. On top of that there are additional charges (on top of UPS/FedEX rates) to get it OUT of customs. It became this awful nightmare, getting phone calls from irate Canadians who blamed us when shipping a part from Iowa to Windsor cost $70 and would take 3 weeks. Yes, there are ways around it (I think if you sent it FedEX Air FedEX would take care of customs) but do you know how expensive it is to ship a radiator by air? So, we either stopped offering it or we offered FedEX Air which was extremely expensive.

  13. Customs and scams. by isaac · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Problems with shipping to Canada:

    CBSA are notorious for holding up packages for weeks for customs clearance. Sometimes things "go missing."

    Cross-border claims for goods damaged/missing in shipment are a giant hassle. In certain high-value businesses (like computer parts), there are plenty of fraudsters who take advantage of this, claiming goods never arrived and disputing the charges.

    It doesn't matter to the merchant whether the recipient has committed fraud or the item has been stolen or destroyed in shipment or customs clearance - they still end up eating cost. Apparently this happens sufficiently often with trans-border shipments that a lot of computer vendors won't ship to foriegn countries, or even to "America Junior". ;)

    Compounding the issue are territorial reseller agreements - some manufacturers limit a reseller to domestic sales only. If you sell some items that you can't sell to a foreign buyer, it's often easier to reject all foreign orders than to have to check each order for said items.

    -Isaac

    --
    I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
  14. its the system by sigxcpu · · Score: 1

    "I'm only about 200km ..."
    thats the reason.

    --
    As of Postgres v6.2, time travel is no longer supported.
  15. One word by crmartin · · Score: 1

    Customs.

    I used to have to get stuff shipped from the US to Canada, and I was constantly running into customs issues. And yes, this was after NAFTA.

    1. Re:One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well... if it comes in a white powder that is not sweet.... no wonder.......

  16. Duties & Consumer Laws by duffbeer703 · · Score: 0, Troll

    To sell stuff in Canada, you have to conform to all sorts of regulations. One example is bilingual documentation. It's a waste of NewEgg's time & money to have to check each product for compliance.

    Certain items may have a import duty on them as well, in which case the shipper collects it from you (the buyer) upon delivery. If you refuse to pay the fees (which are often outrageous), the vendor eats the shipping cost.

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    1. Re:Duties & Consumer Laws by FlyingOrca · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To sell IN CANADA, you have to conform to certain documentation regulations... if you're in Quebec. I don't believe you have to provide documentation or services in French if you're located in Canada but outside Quebec.

      To sell goods TO CANADIANS, which is what we're talking about here, you don't have to do any such thing. And as for import duties:

      1) anyone who has ordered anything from the States expects to pay GST and import duty on pickup;

      2) import duties are not generally outrageous; in my experience they're less than the GST or about the same

      Now, brokerage fees can be outrageous (see discussion earlier in this thread), but they are an avoidable scam by the carriers, and have nothing to do with the shipper.

      --
      Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.
    2. Re:Duties & Consumer Laws by Trepalium · · Score: 1

      Customs can be a little ridiculous. Packages a bit too often go 'missing' in customs, for some strange reason, or are delivered after being very badly repacked (e.g. damaged) after an inspection.

      --
      I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
  17. e-Commerce solution by KILNA · · Score: 1

    In addition to the legal risks and direct costs others have mentioned, It's a lot cheaper to develop an e-commerce product that only supports U.S. domestic shipping and payment methods. Often the APIs for foreign locations require a complete re-work of the product... it's twice as much work to write a postal code and province validator for another country, so you have to justify the time and expense. Not to mention if you're doing things right you're quoting prices in loonies not USD. It's not that much work, but it is the perception of a ton of extra work that is the barrier to entry for internationalizing systems.

    --
    Error: PANTS NOT FOUND. Press <F1> to continue.
  18. Canada. Hmmm. Canada? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 0, Troll

    Is that _still_ a separate country? Damn, I thought we annexed them a long time ago.

    I'm not sure I could respect any country that considers a 'Smartie' a stale-tasting M&M-like candy. Yuck.

    Okay, I'll concede - we'll take BC and the Yukon; you can keep the rest. That way we can get to and from Alaska (over land) without going through customs. Getting through the US/Canada border is about 50 times harder than the US/Mexico one. (Fact)

    1. Re:Canada. Hmmm. Canada? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EAT SHIT AND DIE FUCKER. No one insults our smarties NO ONE!

      Please try to keep posts on topic.
      Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads.
      Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
      Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
      Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)
      If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.

    2. Re:Canada. Hmmm. Canada? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      And at least that weird soda you guys had with the little cellulose balls floating in it went away. That was just TOO strange. At you call your dollars 'loonies'? Hilarious.

      I kid because I care. You guys are awesome, really. Our first line of defense against those Ruskies invading from over the North Pole! Plus, Canada is where we keep our Aurora Borealis.

    3. Re:Canada. Hmmm. Canada? by Down8 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I don't want BC, b/c Vancouver is there, and that city has admitted they lost the war on drugs.

      And I've had equally hard times getting abck from TJ as from BC - though Mexico doesn't charge to leave their country.

      -bZj

      --
      .sig
    4. Re:Canada. Hmmm. Canada? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the way you keep your sick and unemployed out of hospitals, and send the better jobs overseas!

    5. Re:Canada. Hmmm. Canada? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's pretty cool, isn't it? We like to think of it as 'evolution in action.' If you get sick or unemployed, hey, nice knowin' ya!

    6. Re:Canada. Hmmm. Canada? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, by all means, try to annex us.... it'll make that dust-up in the desert they're in look tame by comparison. You can, as the saying goes, take my country from my cold, dead hands. :-)

      That, and where would the US find enough soldiers willing to put up with a -40F winter? :-p

    7. Re:Canada. Hmmm. Canada? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Uhm, yeah. You guys have fewer soldiers than Iraq did, and you saw how easy they were for us to take down. :)

      re: -40F winter

      Hey, I know better - I'm in Seattle, and Vancouver's weather isn't that much different than here.

      Really, we should just merge, and just call ourselves Usanada or something. United States of North America? Hmm. Hey, if that happened, we would _definitely_ not put up with any shit from Quebec! :)

      I'd prefer that BC, Washington, and Oregon just split off into our own little Pacific Northwest paradise, and let the rest rot in hell, though.

    8. Re:Canada. Hmmm. Canada? by Down8 · · Score: 1

      Flamebait? Flamebait?

      The Moderator has obviously never been to Vancouver. I didn't make that shit up - that quote cam from residents of the city! Then it was proved to me, by having to step over needles while walking down town.

      Psh... flamebait.

      -bZj

      --
      .sig
    9. Re:Canada. Hmmm. Canada? by oogoliegoogolie · · Score: 1
      re: -40F winter
      Hey, I know better - I'm in Seattle, and Vancouver's weather isn't that much different than here.

      An American saying that it's WARMER in Canada than it really is! That's a new one. :)

    10. Re:Canada. Hmmm. Canada? by oogoliegoogolie · · Score: 1

      we'll take BC and the Yukon; you can keep the rest

      If you anex any part of canada you have to take Quebec. You know you want to.

      Imagine, the US with a near monopoly on maple syrup, and that stupid-looking disturbing clown from the Quebec winter carnival will be yours! He'll frighten any evil-dooer to surrender.

    11. Re:Canada. Hmmm. Canada? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Well, I suppose that _would_ give us our own French types to pick on. We'll get back to you on your proposal.

    12. Re:Canada. Hmmm. Canada? by mnewton32 · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer that BC, Washington, and Oregon just split off into our own little Pacific Northwest paradise, and let the rest rot in hell, though.

      Let's take Northern California too, I think their sick of those southern bastards stealing all their water. Oh, and you get way more snow in Seattle than we do in Vancouver!

    13. Re:Canada. Hmmm. Canada? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, I meant to say they're, but I started typing something else and forgot to change it... I'm not uneducated, really!

    14. Re:Canada. Hmmm. Canada? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      True, all the way down to San Francisco, I guess, would be good.

      As for snow in Seattle, we get, what, maybe a couple of days of snow a year? That ain't much...

    15. Re:Canada. Hmmm. Canada? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure I could respect any country that considers a 'Smartie' a stale-tasting M&M-like candy. Yuck.

      That's funny... I don't think I could respect any country that considers amber-coloured water to be beer.

      LOL!

  19. I know, I know... by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's mostly our fault. We mericans have treated you Canadians like you are part of the US for so long, that now you're actually starting to believe it.

    Sorry, you really are in a different country.

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
  20. Int'l Address Issues by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 1

    Believe it or not, there are plenty of US companies that cannot store Canadian addresses in their databases. It is quite common for in-house software systems to expect numeric postal codes, and postal codes of exactly length 5.

    Most people in the US tend to look at you funny the first time they hear you say "postal code" instead of "ZIP code".

    --
    the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
    1. Re:Int'l Address Issues by Nos. · · Score: 3, Informative

      What's funny is Companies that will allow you to select Canada as the country, pick from the available provinces, the only give you 5 chars to enter in a zip code. (In Canada we have a six character Postal Code).

    2. Re:Int'l Address Issues by BizidyDizidy · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm....

      This must be some new definition of the word funny that I am unfamiliar with.

      --
      The safest way to approach lava is to have another person with you and he goes first.
  21. Re:COULD IT HAVE SOMETHING TO DO WITH CALLING THEI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Last time I checked their president was a moron...

  22. Black market, dude by orthogonal · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm curious as to why some companies make it so difficult to ship to Canada (from the U.S.A.).

    I don't know why, either, but I can suggest a practical work-around:

    1. Find an elderly person in the Lower 48 states who takes a bunch of expensive prescriptions drugs. That's nearly any old person, so this part is easy.

    2. Offer to ship the old fart some of your cheap Canadian versions of prescription drugs. Given the exorbitant prices of the same drugs in the U.S. will immediately agree to your proposal. Then have gramps ship you cheap American electronic products in exchange.

    3. Profit!

    (This comment is a satiric joke about the American health "care" system. It is not advocacy for or instruction in black market cross-border transactions. orthogonal is not a lawyer and this is not legal advice. orthogonal is not a doctor and this is not medical advice. Void where prohibited. orthogonal loves America and its great Christian Leaders King George Bush, Failed Marshall von Rumsfeld, and Inquisitor General John Ashcroft. Scaring peace-loving people with phantoms of lost liberty... only aid[s] terrorists [by eroding] our national unity and diminish[ing] our resolve. We have always been at war with Eastasia!)

    1. Re:Black market, dude by RustyTaco · · Score: 1

      That's Field Marshall von Rumsfeld, peon! The field marshall thinks we need to have a talk with you at our happy-fun vacation island south of Florida! Don't worry about making arangements yourself, we'll get you there at no cost to you.

      - PFC RustyTaco

  23. You must be new here. by Antisthenes · · Score: 1
    Mods please ban this asshole.

    The asshole that has the same name as you? Read the fine FAQ.

    Ever browse at -1:Uncut and Raw?

  24. CDW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CDW stopped shipping to Canada when they bought out MicroWarehouse and MacWarehouse Canada last year. Now you need to call CDW Canada (1-800-603-8966) to place an order from within Canada. The only problem was with Apple, who don't allow their products to be shipped across the border, but now that the iPod mini is available up here its not such a big deal anymore.

  25. benefits of world power by Down8 · · Score: 1

    Well, we endure the WASP hatred of North America, so we get the good stuff. Canadians don't have to deal with such hatred, so they don't get the goodies.

    Even Steven, in the end....

    -bZj

    --
    .sig
  26. Try Local by Sepper · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you can't get it shipped, try buying Local! If a company is willing to ship it here (Canada), they probably have a Candian version of the Store.. Like Tigerdirect or Amazon (although Amazon.ca doesn't have much compared to Amazon.com)

    Or simply buy at a local store... Like the Vermont public TV said: "A dollar spent in Vermont stays in Vermont"... Apply where you live...

    --
    I live in Soviet Canuckistan you insensitive clod!
    1. Re:Try Local by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CDW has also just recently opened up in Canada. http://cdw.ca/ or 1-800-603-8966. (Ask for Dan ;-)

    2. Re:Try Local by Ankle · · Score: 1

      Local is generally way more expensive than buying the same item in the USA. I order most of my stuff from the states as a lot of items are almost double the price to buy from a Canadian store(Good example of this was the ATi Radeon 9800 PRO at release, $399usd which was roughly $540Cad after currency conversion but stores here charged $700+CAD for it. Ram is also another great example and still is to this day.). The only problem is customs who likes to ding you for not only GST but PST and that totals to 14.5%. Not to mention how lots of things like to get banged up and damaged by Canada Post.

      I always hear about the horrible UPS fees but I've never experianced any for duties thankfully. The last item I ordered through UPS 3-5 day shipping actually arrived the very next morning from the states for all of $10usd roughly for shipping and the item was more than the amount required for customs to ding it for tax.

    3. Re:Try Local by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe a little off topic, but I've been known to buy from amazon.ca and ship to a US address instead. With the exhange rate some items are lot cheaper than the US amazon.com and I still get the item in a week.

      Just saved $20 on a DVD boxset. :-)

  27. Small market? by FlyingOrca · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't think too many companies operating in the States would voluntarily shut themselves out of TEN PERCENT of the US market; that's about the proportion in additional sales that Canada would represent.

    In tech, since Canada is arguably the most wired nation in the world (can't recall where I saw the stats, but I did see them recently), the market gains might be even higher. Think that's insignificant? Walk over to your sales department and ask them if they'd like you to boost sales by ten percent. ;-)

    --
    Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.
    1. Re:Small market? by cdrudge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then walk over to your legal department and ask them if they want to deal with Canadian laws. Then walk down to the shipping department and ask them if they want to deal with international shipping. Then go over to the programming people and tell them that they will now have to have different logic for international shipping then domestic shipping. It's not just a free 10%. It does come at a cost.

    2. Re:Small market? by DZign · · Score: 1

      also go to the bookkeeping department and ask if they want to process foreign sales.. at least here in Europe these things are treated different regarding to VAT (every 3 months you've got to report the VAT office what you sold abroad, ..), in your own accounting they're also booked different, ..

    3. Re:Small market? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and while you're at it, talk to the documentation people about translating everything into French for the people in Quebec. (I believe that it's required by Canadian law - but head back to leagal to make sure.)

  28. What's even funnier... by mindaktiviti · · Score: 1

    but so annoying, is going on "mapquest.ca" but it just pointing to mapquest.com, as opposed to maybe the Canadian version (say you go to global maps etc). It'd be nice if it pointed to the global maps and had Canada as the default. :(

  29. 1 word! by Cyclone66 · · Score: 1

    Paperwork. You have to fill out more forms when shipping internationally. That and their streamlined shipping process probably doesn't fit in with the extra work/alternate shipping methods.

  30. this is by mattboston · · Score: 1

    just another ploy to try to take over the world. First Canada. Then Mexico. Then the rest of the world.

  31. It's quite simple by black+mariah · · Score: 1

    1. Going through customs is a pain in the ass.
    2. See #1.
    3. See #2.

    Shipping to Canada is no easier than shipping to Mexico, England, Russia, China, or any other country. It takes less time, but the process is still the same. I've sent a few items to Canada and thus far have not had a problem, but I've been sending used items of small value. Not new computer equipment that I'm sure would be held up.

    --
    'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
  32. No UPS ever by FlyingOrca · · Score: 1

    That's kind of my general rule, too (with the exception of my trusty power supply). Mostly because after the aforementioned episode, they sent me threatening letters for three months (despite numerous calls to their customer disservice line) asking me to pay the brokerage fees they'd already cancelled! Wankers.

    --
    Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.
    1. Re:No UPS ever by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      Hmph... ditto for my girlfriend, I thought she just had bad luck, but they screwed up delivery, screwed up the bill, screwed up billing, then screwed up cancelling the billing and finally, screwed up cancelling the collection agency which they screwed up by calling to collect for the screwed up bill.

      There were about 5 lengthy phonecalls involved, 2 letters of apology and probably about 3 hours of time.

      She then tried to use the privacy act to have them destroy all her personal information as she never wants to conduct business with them again. I'm sure they screwed that up too... but they've shut up for a while.

  33. Much more work to ship to Canada by ables · · Score: 1

    Our company recently created a mess for ourselves trying to ship something to Canada when a critical shipment was returned to us because we didn't have the proper customs forms filled out. We do low-volume, high-cost sales, so we just double the shipping costs now to Canada just like for other foreign countries, but I can see a large-volume, low-margin company deciding not to deal with any of it.

    The whole thing surprised me. I figured what with NAFTA and crossing the border so easily that shipments wouldn't be a problem. I mean, their phone numbers even look like ours.

  34. Re:COULD IT HAVE SOMETHING TO DO WITH CALLING THEI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HAHA HAHAHA, WOW! SOmeone mod this +1999 FUNNY cuz it is teh first time ive ever heard such a funny thin gabout MR. JEORGE BUSHES! OMFGWTFBBQ!!!1!

  35. customs charges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The customs costs can be high, there is a lot of paperwork, and they have to fill out a lot of insurance claims due to "beaver damage".

  36. Re:COULD IT HAVE SOMETHING TO DO WITH CALLING THEI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod Parent up!

  37. I could be wrong but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ... I always thought Canada was part of the US.

  38. Canadian laws and shipping by FlyingOrca · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...are far less of an obstacle than they are made out to be. I order from small specialty companies in the USA fairly often. I sometimes have to pay a shipping surcharge, and always specify that I will clear items through customs myself. However, the big courier companies have all managed to ship my purchases quickly and easily.

    Now postal service is another issue. USPS shipments to Canada get blackholed so frequently it's just not worth it. But really - why use one country's postal service to ship to another country? Use an international carrier in the first place. (I don't know whether it's the USPS or Canada Post dropping my packets, and I'm not trying to assign blame. I just know stuff doesn't get through and it's kind of daft - for me at least - to keep using them.)

    Anyway, Canadian law does restrict entry on certain items (off the top of my head, certain kinds of firearms would be a good example). Other than items that are banned in Canada, I haven't heard of legal issues shipping here from the States. Can you give me an example? I should add that I'm from the USA originally; not only does my family ship a lot of private stuff back and forth, we make a lot of purchases from the US as well.

    And shipping via a big courier company from the US to Canada is pretty painless. If your shipping department can't handle it, I think there might be something wrong with your shipping department. ;-)

    Now what do you mean about programming for international shipping? Are you saying that if your order system was designed so poorly that it can't handle orders to the USA's biggest trading partner (let alone other international destinations), and can't easily be expanded to handle them, that it's not worth the cost of changing it? Sounds like a specious argument to me, but if you have specifics, I'd love to hear them. Cheers!

    --
    Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.
    1. Re:Canadian laws and shipping by Rob+Parkhill · · Score: 1

      How do you go about dealing with customs yourself? The big shipping companies have never let me do that. (Well, UPS would let me use my own brokerage service, but there was a $25 charge to send them the paperwork!)

      --
      "Tomorrow's forecast: a few sprinkles of genius with a chance of doom!" - Stewie Griffin
    2. Re:Canadian laws and shipping by FlyingOrca · · Score: 1

      I just ask the vendor to instruct the carrier that I will clear the item through customs myself once the carrier notifies me that it has arrived. Then I pick up the paperwork from the carrier, take it over to customs (usually a few blocks, they're all near the airport), clear it, take the completed paperwork back to the carrier, and go home with my stuff. I actually found out about this after UPS tried to charge me more than the original cost to clear some bike parts.

      They like to make things difficult so they can charge you ridiculous fees, but it's really not that tricky. Make a few calls to the carrier and to CCRA. A disclaimer, though: I live in a smallish city that happens to be a major port of entry, which is a nice combination. It might be more of a pain in the ass if you don't. Cheers!

      --
      Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.
  39. South Park? by CaptainPinko · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I believe this was a reference to South Park's Terence and Phillip. SP seems to look up to Canada's social progressiveness.

    --
    Your CPU is not doing anything else, at least do something.
  40. Just my opinion by 10100 · · Score: 0

    Personally, I think that this has nothing to do with a lack of market. Even though Canada has a smaller population than the U.S., there are still plenty of people who would order products via the internet or a catalog. Really, I think the issue is in the transportation of goods across the border, especially in the case of electronic equipment. In going on a business trip to Canada, I had to bring several PCs with me, and was stopped at the border for nearly an hour. Even though the borders are "open", both Canada and the U.S. are cautious about allowing certain goods to pass through without considerable questioning.

  41. Credit Card Address Verification by Michael+Spencer+Jr. · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I work for a major credit card processor. Don't worry, I'm already at the karma cap.

    Electronic credit card processing systems have an address verification service available. My company primarily uses Vital Processing Services (vitalps.com) and that system's address verification service supports checking the leading digits of the street address, as well as the billing zip code. It does this by sending an address-verification query to systems owned by whatever bank owns that card. That bank checks that query against their billing information for that customer, and reports back if some or all of the address information matches ("ZIP MATCH", "EXACT MATCH", "NO MATCH", etc.)

    This address verification service only supports numeric zip codes and street addresses. If address verification is attempted against a Canadian address, the address verification system returns SYSTEM NOT AVAILABLE. (It's not available because the bank that issues that card is in a foreign country, even if someone types in a 5-digit zip code when doing the transaction.)

    It's impossible for an Internet merchant to get perfect protection against fraud while accepting payment from Visa or Mastercard, but they can eliminate many of the common sources of fraud by always using a tracking shipping carrier (and getting a signature proof of delivery every time), and only shipping to an address that the address verification system indicates a match with. (If the customer is ordering an item as a gift, sending it to a different address than they receive their credit card billing statements at, best practices state the merchant should ask the customer to call their bank and "whitelist" that shipping address.)

    Since many (most?) processing systems' address verification services don't support international address verification, most merchants must choose to either ship merchandise internationally without getting an address match, or to manually find the phone number for the bank that issued the card and *call them*. (Merchants who accept credit cards are given access to a system that lets them look up the first 6 digits of a Visa card or the first 11 digits of a Mastercard and find the bank that issued that card.) For small merchants, or merchants with occasional big-ticket purchases, they can take the time to personally attend to those transactions and make phone calls. For a large discount Internet superstore of some kind, though, they just don't have time to personally handle every address-mismatch.

    So for convenience, they just refuse to accept cards that return a SYSTEM NOT AVAILABLE address-verification match.

    --Michael Spencer

    1. Re:Credit Card Address Verification by compwizrd · · Score: 1

      on the billto:, I just put my canadian street address/city, and then put MI in the State, and a michigan zip code in.

      And then I put my US mailing address in the shipto:

      Works a lot more than you'd think, some CC verifiers only check that your name and street address matches.

      Some places only check that your name matches...

  42. It can be done. by rueger · · Score: 1

    The customs problem is a big one, or more acurately, the god awful UPS brokerage charges, which usually far exceed the actual duties.

    What's funny is that there are lots of companies who manage to ship to Canada, or even to drop ship large groups of items and then ship from within the country.

    It is possible to handle Canadian orders successfully and without surprises, and some retailers even have sites that will calculate brokerage and duties before you commit to the order.

    Ultimately it really comes down to one thing - some companies really don't want an extra 30 million customers.

    NAFTA never did much for individuals or everyday consumers. Mostly it just allows large corporations to move money (and some people) around with less overhead.

  43. Fast shipping to Canada ? by Lupulack · · Score: 1
    There's a problem with that as the shipper has no way of controlling how long Customs will take to deal with the package. On the other hand , my dealings with Crucial shipping to me in Canada have been wonderful. 4 days is pretty good turnaround considering it spent half that in customs.

    /me *heart* Crucial

    --
    The fact that no one understands you doesn't mean you're an artist.
  44. Have package shipped to a US mailbox by Bishop · · Score: 1

    If you are not too far from the border lookup a store that has mailboxes. In the past I have used a UPS store just across the border. The UPS store I use charges $5 per shipment, and dosen't require any addition paperwork or other nonsense. I just give them a call before ordering. As a bonus the store has a real shipping address, not a PO BOX so all companies will deliver there.

    Also some shops don't have an online order form for a Canadian address, but if you call they will sometimes ship to you. Due to brokerage fees the US PostalService is still the best way to ship across the border. Usually it is pretty fast.

    1. Re:Have package shipped to a US mailbox by tarp · · Score: 1

      Then cross the border to the U.S., get your package, open it and make it look like a used item you previously owned (and therefore must have already paid GST and PST on), then drive back to Canada customs-free :-).

  45. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  46. Damage from Customs by FlyingOrca · · Score: 1

    All I can say is that it's never happened to me, nor have I heard of it happening to anyone I know - and my family orders a lot of stuff from the States. You can be sure that if it did happen, though, I'd be complaining loudly and publicly until they did something about it. ;-)

    --
    Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.
  47. Insentitive Clod! by Vagary · · Score: 1

    Actually in the 2001 census, 17% of the population listed their ethnic origin as being partially Canadian and 23% entirely Canadian. "North American Indian" was a separate category.

    I'm not sure that ethnic origin and "race" should be considered synonymous, but I think this is enough evidence to demonstrate your ignorance.

  48. BLAME CANADA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BLAME CANADA!

    oops..... they killed kenny...

    again....

  49. Oh no? by lorcha · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Well, how many US e-commerce sites do you see that have sites that are also in Spanish? Because there are more Hispanics in the US (35 million in 2000 census) than there are Canadians in Canada. But that brings up a good point: In order to take advantage of the 30 million Canadians (2001 census), you gotta have pages in French, 'cuz there are 7.2 million pompous assholes in Quebec.

    Another thing you have to remember about business is that you need to focus your marketing and sales efforts. 10M people does not necessarily mean 10M potential customers. Hell, my company won't do business with 99% of the US population and we're doing just fine, thanks. But I gotta tell ya that if I was in the e-commerce business, I'd be much quicker to translate my frickin' pages into Spanish and sell to all the Hispanics in the US and the 105 million Mexicans in Mexico than I would bother with Canada.

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
    1. Re:Oh no? by FlyingOrca · · Score: 1

      I think your logic is a bit off here. First, just because there are 35 million "Hispanics" (race, how quaint) in the USA doesn't mean that you're excluding them by not having a Spanish-language option in your e-commerce business. You are in fact excluding the fraction - and I'm guessing it's small - that don't speak English well enough to use your site, can't find an Anglophone to help, and yet still WANT to use it.

      Second, as has been pointed out by others, you do not have to offer pages in French in order to get business from Canada. Oh, sure, you might lose some business from Francophones who (a) don't speak English well enough to use your website (again, probably a smallish fraction), and (b) are stubborn / proud / militant enough to avoid getting an Anglophone to help.

      Thirdly, on selling to Mexico: good idea. Just remember that it would be more costly to accommodate a different language AND international shipping etc. than it would be to accommodate just the international shipping - and that is IIRC the question that started this whole thread.

      I stand by my analysis. :-)

      --
      Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.
    2. Re:Oh no? by lorcha · · Score: 1
      doesn't mean that you're excluding them by not having a Spanish-language option in your e-commerce business.
      You have obviously never been to Miami. Hint: they have no desire and see no reason to speak English down there. I'm also guessing that you have never been in business. What difference does it make if you have totally shut them out or just encourage them to shop elsewhere? The end result is the same. They're still gonna shop elsewhere.
      Second, as has been pointed out by others, you do not have to offer pages in French in order to get business from Canada.
      Who said you did? I was just saying that you don't get to do business with all of Canada if you don't have your site in French. Only 75%. I still say better to translate into Spanish if you're going to go to the trouble.
      Just remember that it would be more costly to accommodate a different language AND international shipping etc. than it would be to accommodate just the international shipping
      And it's even less costly to throw up your hands and say "forget it" which is what most businesses wind up doing (which is what started this whole thread).
      I stand by my analysis. :-)
      You should open up an electronics website and sell to Canadians from the US, then. It sounds like that's a huge market just ripe for the pickin'! :-) Just don't ask me for any startup money! hahah.
      --
      "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  50. Brokerage Fees, how legal are they? by phorm · · Score: 1

    I wonder about exactly how legal these "brokerage" fees are.

    Firstly, you've got the postal rate for shipping a package to Canada. They know that they'll likely have to assess a package for tax if it's crossing the border. You've already paid your fee for the postal service, why shouldn't that be included (and yes, I know it depends on the value of the package, but that's b.s. in itself since it doesn't cost any more to assess tax on a $250 package than a $50 one)

    Secondly, you as the reciever are 90% of the time being charged after the fact for a package. You have no formal arrangement with the shipping broker, nor have you been given the allowance to assess the fees of their service. Basically, they have supplied a service without duely informing you, and charged you afterwards.

    Can I give somebody an invoice to fix their computer for $100, then tax on an extra $25 as an "oh, well that's because I had to assess the taxes" as a waybill a week after I've sent the machine home? Damn straight I can't, so why can they.

    Pehaps I'll try paying the fees via Visa next time, and then backcharging the bastards.

  51. Parts missing by phorm · · Score: 1

    As per the recipient claiming goods were missing, etc... how is this any different from shipping to a local?

    When I get a package, it must be signed for indicating it appears to be in good shape and seems to be together, etc. Anything that hasn't arrived... not signed for.

    You can check that it was signed off upon receipt, you know.

  52. Paypal by phorm · · Score: 1

    For anyone using Paypal from Canada... this also seems to apply. As I've used it for 2 years many times over, but it still shows that my actual address is unverified...

  53. eBay by JeffGB · · Score: 1

    Also, a lot of American sellers on eBay will only ship within the US. I've never checked, but I'm sure very few people from Canada or any other country limit their auctions to thier own country.

  54. NAFTA URL by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1
    If NAFTA fit into this in anyway...
    Take a look for yourself at the text of NAFTA.

    BTW in Chapter 10, article 1007 prohibits specifying a specific vendor or product in a tender. In other words any tenders specifiying cruft like M$, M$-Windows, M$-Exchange, etc. is in direct violation of NAFTA.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  55. NewEgg.com by grubber33 · · Score: 1

    I contacted someone on the NewEgg.com staff via e-mail regarding their international shipping policies. I was told the main reason they didn't ship to Canada was that it would be difficult for them to prosecute fraudulent credit card users, among other things. So it's essentially a conflict of laws. You might want to use NCIX.com in the meantime. I also find BBF.ca useful.

    --
    The only difference between genius and stupidity is genius has its limits.
    1. Re:NewEgg.com by psyconaut · · Score: 1

      Thank you! :-)

      I've been trying to buy a particularly hard-to-source part in Canada and BBF just found three mail order suppliers.

      -psy

  56. More idiocy by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

    This is even more asinine when you consider that full U.S. ZIP codes are nine digits and a hyphen. Only the first five are required for most mail, but if you know all nine, you should use them. At the very least, it provides some sanity checking against the rest of the address.

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.