Slashdot Mirror


PhoneGaim Brings Phone Calling To IM Users

An anonymous reader writes "Eweek has an article on how PhoneGaim integrates IM and phone into one program making it possible for AOL/ICQ, MSN and Yahoo users to call each other, landlines and cellphones. It talks about how it could be a Skype-killer since it's based on open standard SIP and comes with free PSTN calling (5 minutes per day), free voicemail via email, and even supports incoming phone calls from PSTN. It's out first for desktop Linux (maybe the start of a new trend?) but it's open source so expect a MSWin version shortly from Gaim team."

158 comments

  1. Sweet! by l33t-gu3lph1t3 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Now THERE is your linux IM-EMAIL-VOIP killer app.

    --
    ------- "From bored to fanboy in 3.8 asian girls" ----------
    1. Re:Sweet! by jomas1 · · Score: 1

      " Now THERE is your linux IM-EMAIL-VOIP killer app."

      From the blurb:
      "It's out first for desktop Linux (maybe the start of a new trend?) but it's open source so expect a MSWin version shortly from Gaim team."

      It's a possible killer app that is not exclusively linux. I don't see how that will make it a killer app for linux as much as I'd like it to be.

    2. Re:Sweet! by Ari_Haviv · · Score: 5, Insightful

      it could be a killer open source app but how can it be a killer app for linux if it will be for Windows?

      But thinking in terms of "killer" for one platform is the old way of thinking. Open source itself is the killer feature for an app no matter what platform it's on. But if the platform itself is open source-that's a 2fer.

      --
      Join Team Mozilla #38050 Folding@home
    3. Re:Sweet! by fyonn · · Score: 1

      shame, I was hoping that it would be compatible with ichatAV for the mac, that uses sip to do voice and video conferencing, it seems a missed opportunity to allow phonegaim to speak to ichatav users.

      dave

    4. Re:Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lindows....... Not w... L
      as in Lindows

    5. Re:Sweet! by wyldwyrm · · Score: 1

      I'll adopt a "wait and see" attitude for that one. I hardly use Gaim in the first place, maybe will check it out to see if the quality is good, but using up those 5 "teaser" minutes won't take long. Just reminds me of some of the people who were so pleased with internet phone calls; had a client who SHUT OFF HIS PHONE SERVICE(he was on dial-up) and called because his modem was giving "no dial tone" errors....

    6. Re:Sweet! by Ari_Haviv · · Score: 1

      it will be ported to windows...any operating system eventually

      --
      Join Team Mozilla #38050 Folding@home
    7. Re:Sweet! by hackel · · Score: 2, Informative

      If it indeed uses SIP, then it will work (eventually), that's the whole point of an open standard.

    8. Re:Sweet! by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      It is still too early to tie a commercial service like that to be linux-only.

      The plan I'm on is that I am getting people used to not using Microsoft applications, using the closest opensource equivalent whenever possible.

      There is still a danger that Microsoft operating systems would still have a stranglehold, but I don't think putting up barriers to easy transition is appropriate, even if there is fantastic stuff on the other side, an abrupt transition is still a turn-off. At the very least it would move people away from IE, OE and MS Office.

    9. Re:Sweet! by opello · · Score: 1

      SIP is the service, PhoneGaim is (likely) just a plugin for gaim

    10. Re:Sweet! by dacarr · · Score: 1
      Well, remember too that for the longest time vendors would build apps for OS/2 as well.

      OK, maybe that's a bad comparison, but the point is that people would be considered wise to build The Killer App(TM) for many platforms. Esp. here with phonegaim, you have the Windows version Really Soon Now - once it comes out, J. Random Luser will be able to see the Really Cool Things that Linux has to offer, if only just a sample.

      --
      This sig no verb.
    11. Re:Sweet! by magefile · · Score: 1

      You can make sip-sip calls. Besides, Gaim already can do iChatAV, right?

    12. Re:Sweet! by Mudcathi · · Score: 1

      After fighting with that Gator nonsense for several years, anything containing the letters GAIM is sure to make me think of the phrase "killer app"

      --

      "He who throws mud, loses ground." - proverb

    13. Re:Sweet! by thamaht · · Score: 1

      So, lemme get this right, because someone can and will probably port the original program, this somehow affects how the original program performs? I shoulda just waited and hoped this came up in the metamod list..

    14. Re:Sweet! by Curtman · · Score: 1

      I can't think of a single application that is 'exclusively linux'. When you've got the code, and the rights to do what you want with it, whats stopping you from porting it to any other OS? Nothing. This isn't a bad thing.

    15. Re:Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then how did he call you...? ;)

    16. Re:Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After fighting with that Gator nonsense for several years, anything containing the letters GAIM is sure to make me think of the phrase "killer app"

      The letters you're looking for are GAIN. Thanks for trying though.

    17. Re:Sweet! by SirPrize · · Score: 1

      How about the linux kernel? ;-)

    18. Re:Sweet! by Ari_Haviv · · Score: 1

      it doesn't affect how it performs but it takes something away from its exclusiveness. Let's have another example in reverse. MS office is a killer app for Windows. A lot of people feel they can't consider linux because they 'gotta' have MS Office. But what happens if it ended up on linux? They don't need Windows as much anymore. It's much easier for them to switch to linux now that Windows doesnt have the killer app. But it's not going to happen. The point of killer apps is to keep people from considering other platforms because they 'gotta have it'

      --
      Join Team Mozilla #38050 Folding@home
    19. Re:Sweet! by fyonn · · Score: 1

      You can make sip-sip calls. Besides, Gaim already can do iChatAV, right?

      afaik, gaim can exchange simple text based messages with ichatav, and probabaly swap files and the like. both are aim clients after all, what I'm wondering is if a phonegaim user wwith me on their buddy list will see the little phone indicating that I've got a mike and can make phonecalls, and would it work if it did?

      I couldn't find any mention of it on the phonegaim site but if it's there then that would be great, I know a few people who'd want to know

      dave

    20. Re:Sweet! by Curtman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Cooperative Linux is the first working free and open source method for optimally running Linux on Microsoft Windows natively. More generally, Cooperative Linux (short-named coLinux) is a port of the Linux kernel that allows it to run cooperatively alongside another operating system on a single machine.

    21. Re:Sweet! by thamaht · · Score: 1

      You said that thinking about a killer app for one platform is the old way of thinking. So, you think of this as *nix only killer app.. am I missing something?

      People aren't going to be caused to switch over to *nix for a VOIP app, I don't see why you and others are frothing at the mouth over the idea of Windows users *possibly* getting to use it.

      Actually, I think I do, but being blunt with it would be bad for my karma.

    22. Re:Sweet! by Ari_Haviv · · Score: 1

      no no no. Open source apps by definition can't be exclusive to linux. My point is that we should look at the open source aspect as the killer feature of linux and not because it has this "killer" app or "killer" feature that does XYZ that is currently not on Windows. It may eventually be ported. or perhaps we'll see a closed source app on windows with the same features. but it will be a closed source app on a closed source OS and open source apps on linux have an advantage that can't be simply copied

      --
      Join Team Mozilla #38050 Folding@home
    23. Re:Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember when most Internet based software was out for most of the UNIX systems before Windows. If anything the trend has been getting worse over the last ten years with no sign of letting up.

  2. That's nice... by LighthouseJ · · Score: 0

    but only time will tell if it actually will be useful or will it fall to the wasteside like the phones in the early 90's with the cameras built into them that I think AT&T built.

    1. Re:That's nice... by memco · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It doesn't strike me as something that will be very big. Especially with a whopping 5 free minutes a day; what kind of conversation can you possibly have in five minutes that couldn't just be done over IM? I've used iChat's VOIP, but only once in a blue moon; frankly I only use it because someone calls me. I wouldn't think it's worth the $20 phone or $5 a month fee for a number. It's simply not usefull enough to coulgh up the dough for extra hardware or services. It'll most likeley end up being one of those things you show people just to say "hey, look what I can do", and then never use it again.

      --
      Get me a meat pie floater!
    2. Re:That's nice... by argent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's getting hard to find a high-end cellphone WITHOUT a camera now.

    3. Re:That's nice... by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1
      If I understood it correctly, the 5 free minutes are for PC-to-phone calls. PC-to-PC calls should remain free.

      More interesting is the question if they will offer secure PC-to-PC calls, encrypting the voice data, like Skype does.

  3. I think this is the answer by Bold+Marauder · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Whenever I show someone who uses XP what linux has to offer that XP doesn't, I'm usually stumped. (explaining "better security" to a dial-up user who only checks their mail mostly results in blank stares).

    This is something that, once on a knoppix cd, should make a lot of people think seriously about using linux.

  4. BT/Yahoo in UK announced service in UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    This week BT/Yahoo announced an upgraded yahoo messenger product that does the same, however pc->phone connects are billed to users landline account. PC->PC are free, International charged at destination countries local rates.

    1. Re:BT/Yahoo in UK announced service in UK by roror · · Score: 3, Informative

      but, they use the public internet. So, basically the user is paying the higher landline cost for the lower phone-over-public-internet quality.

  5. Sounds interesting by QangMartoq · · Score: 4, Interesting
    But I wonder - Is the 2.28 cents per minute rate (domestic US only, others higher) a good deal?

    What about the call quality?

    A quick look at the site shows the adapter to be about $90 - which, I think, is required to be able to use a normal telephone. That kind of upfront cot is not going to win over customers!

    1. Re:Sounds interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      A more detailed look (or a look at all, actually) will reveal that they have a SIP handset available for $19.95 US via sipphone.com.

    2. Re:Sounds interesting by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      The rate seems pretty good, assuming the call quality is good. I'm getting a business internet / phone package where long distance is 2.99 cents a minute. One benefit of is that the time is metered in six second increments rather than the full minute.

      I'm not sure exactly what technology is being used, I think it is similar to VoiP as each phone call takes away a small amount of bandwidth from the internet service, and the conversation doesn't happen over normal phone lines, at least on my end.

    3. Re:Sounds interesting by sveinungkv · · Score: 1

      The adapter is for routing incoming calls to your homephone. If you prefer using your computer for it it will be free for other SIP users, and a subscription fee for a phonenumber + per minutt fee for calls to normal phones. http://store.sipphonestore.com/

      --
      Spelling/grammar nazis welcome (English is not my first language and I am trying to improve my spelling/grammar)
    4. Re:Sounds interesting by SquadBoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For a hardware VOIP solution how is 2.99 cents a minute better than say 0.00 cents a minute?

      http://www.packet8.net

      http://www.vonage.com

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    5. Re:Sounds interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's better then Packet8 and Vonage because there is NO MONTHLY FEE.

      It's also better because you can call any other SIP phone in the world and any other PhoneGaim user in the world.

  6. where is RPMs by anandpur · · Score: 1

    I am not an user of Linspire. Please help me find RPM for my FC2

    1. Re:where is RPMs by peawee03 · · Score: 1

      Or Tarballs to compile from source... no, wait, they do make tarballs! Slackware Telephone!!!

      --
      I wish I could write clever and witty sigs.
    2. Re:where is RPMs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    3. Re:where is RPMs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats the sourcecode to gaim... not phonegaim.

    4. Re:where is RPMs by Ieshan · · Score: 1

      And if you've never compiled -

      > tar zxvf whatever.tar.gz
      > cd (directory)
      > ./configure
      > make && make install

      Assuming you're on Redhat, asking for those RPMs.

    5. Re:where is RPMs by netsharc · · Score: 1

      The AC below claims it's the source-code to Gaim. Looking at the filename (and the reputation of Lindows/Spire as thieving bastards), I suspect the same. Has anyone looked at it, to see if it's any different to the vanilla gaim source?

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    6. Re:where is RPMs by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Well, I did the looking, and it does contain files like "sipphone.c", so I guess I must apologize to Linspire for speaking bad of them.

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
  7. O. S. X! O. S. X! by numbski · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Okay, okay. I'm excited.

    Here's the deal. The house I just bought is POTS. I've long wanted a way to hook a box up between my NID and all the phones in my house, and have that box intercept all calls, and run it through a 'spam' filter if you will. Be able to filter calls by wildcard (block all calls from area code 803, or an exact number, or numbers without caller ID) and give a generic message to the caller, heck even pick up the call and hang up immediately. If it passes the filters, ring the house phones.

    I know that this gets off-topic, but it seems to me that this is a step in the right direction (possibly) of accomplishing what I want without having to go buy IP phones for my house.

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  8. What I would like to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    is a solution like this that will allow computer users to call VoIP services like Vonage and packet8 without having to use PSTN services. I.e. purely Internel calls.

    1. Re:What I would like to see by blastedtokyo · · Score: 3, Informative
      It exists...it's called FWD

      For vonage the instructions are here while for Packet8 it's here.

    2. Re:What I would like to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and it works, though it's strangely quiet :(

  9. VOIP still sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Seriously. People have been trying to do VOIP for years, but hardly anyone wants it. There's the "neat" factor, but for anything but that international calling (if the call is to someone as tech-savvy as yourself, of course) it's useless.

    1. Re:VOIP still sucks by DARKFORCE123 · · Score: 0

      I'll bite troll.

      With VOIP with Vonage, I can call anyone on with any type of phone in the world for pennies per minute.

      Also for those people who aren't too savvy and still use high charge long distance who I talk too a lot, I can create a virtual number in their own area code so it is a local call for them.

  10. Vonage & SIP? by Duwke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does vonage use SIP? I would think not, but I noticed that both use the same softphone
    http://www.vonage.com/features.php?feature=softpho ne
    http://sipphone.com/softphone/

    Don't tell me Xten thought ahead and created a transport abstraction so that either could be used... cause I want to use GAIM with my vonage account!

    1. Re:Vonage & SIP? by silas_moeckel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes you can actualy. Vonage is a standards based VoIP service you just need to know where to point your VoIP endpoint to register put in the password (Hard to get unless it's a softphone account) I currently run Vonage through an Asterix PBX it's not that hard to get working. Hit up google for the particulars.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
  11. If only.... by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...they supported IM through SIP then I might make use of this product. I have no desire to place phone calls through my computer, especially if I have a limited number of minutes or have to buy extra hardware or the cost is going to be more than using the old-fashioned phone sitting on my desk right next to my computer. What I REALLY could use is a linux IM client that supports SIP. My company uses MS products for all it's IT, but everybody in my group runs linux desktops. Now that they've rolled out a corporate IM solution based on MS products we're effectively SOL unless/until somebody develops a SIP IM client for linux... I'd find a linux SIP IM client infinitely more useful than a linux SIP phone.

    1. Re:If only.... by wfberg · · Score: 4, Informative

      unless/until somebody develops a SIP IM client for linux...

      Does a java client cut it?

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    2. Re:If only.... by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 1

      Does a java client cut it?

      Sweet! Thanks for the pointer to this. I've been searching for a client for a long time but never thought to search for a java based one... I'll try this out at work tomorrow and see how it does.

    3. Re:If only.... by jone1941 · · Score: 1

      What is the IM'ing protocol, I'll get started, SIP is a pretty easy protocol to deal with, but it is just the handshaking, what is the comminication means after it has been connected? If it is MS based then it can still be proprietary and you may still be SOL (or are you saying you need SIP or MS). Honestly though, reply to this with the SDP header and I'll see if I can't get started.

      --
      Fear trumps hope and ignorance trumps both
    4. Re:If only.... by chefmonkey · · Score: 4, Interesting

      We're working on it, but it'll probably be a bit of time before we can dig up the time to add all the necessary features. (n.b. this is still alpha code. I'm pointing it out in case anyone wants to help develop).

    5. Re:If only.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      gaim-vv supports voice and video msn and yahoo protocols. The msn one is based on sip.

    6. Re:If only.... by shimen · · Score: 1

      you mean http://gaim-vv.sourceforge.net not http://gaim-v.sourceforge.net

    7. Re:If only.... by kasparov · · Score: 1

      If I'm correct, I believe that that IM is done entirely with SIP. SIMPLE is the SIP IM extension. You can read up on it here.

      --
      There's no place I can be, since I found Serenity.
  12. Little OT: Linked Screen Names by sparkhead · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Is there a way to have linked screen names in GAIM so they all show up in the same buddy list window?

    1. Re:Little OT: Linked Screen Names by Rysc · · Score: 1

      Yes. RTFM.

      --
      I want my Cowboyneal
    2. Re:Little OT: Linked Screen Names by sparkhead · · Score: 1

      The accounts options in Gaim are not the same as the server-side account linking done by AOL. I'd like to reuse that info.

      If you know differently, feel free to correct. RTFM isn't terribly useful, but I'm sure you knew that.

    3. Re:Little OT: Linked Screen Names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do the following:
      Rightclick on buddy A
      chose "expand" from the menu
      Then drag buddy B into buddy A

      It is slightly difficult to guess this behavior by reading the word "expand". Would the following alternative would be easier?

      Chose menu->buddy -> "create metacontact"
      An empty metacontact appears in the buddy list
      Drag buddy A into the empty metacontact
      Drag buddy B into metacontact

    4. Re:Little OT: Linked Screen Names by Zebbers · · Score: 1

      whats all that different?
      I have found no difference that is important. AOL is just playing catchup to third party solutions.

  13. To those wondering.. by wfberg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The service (with 5 minutes free etc.) used is SIPPhone, the company that was started by the Lindows guy.

    The 5 minutes for free can only be gotten by using phonegaim ON lindows, buying a SIPPhone device, or by buying $20 of SIPPhone minutes. Not actually free, then, just included with the cost of your purchase.

    Note that you can only call people if you're BOTH using phonegaim. You could just exchange (S)IP numbers and use any normal SIP client for the same effect. Nothing to see here. There are already dozens of free SIP clients.

    Note that skype, while a cooky closed-source, non-standard product, does have good support for using it behind NAT, which is harder with SIP. (Personally, I say, give me the IPv6 already).

    --
    SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    1. Re:To those wondering.. by wfberg · · Score: 1

      I meant to spell, "kooky", of course. *sigh*. My c/k zen is quickly fading..

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    2. Re:To those wondering.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Note that skype, while a cooky closed-source, non-standard product, does have good support for using it behind NAT, which is harder with SIP.

      A VOIP protocol that plays nice with NAT would be a beautiful thing. Asterisk's native AIX protocol will go through NAT but I'm not aware of anything else using it, and there's a patch for H323, but nothing for SIP :-(.

    3. Re:To those wondering.. by cuban321 · · Score: 1

      That's IAX not AIX.

    4. Re:To those wondering.. by cwernli · · Score: 1

      Note that skype, while a cooky closed-source, non-standard product, does have good support for using it behind NAT, which is harder with SIP.

      This might just be the reason for SIP never taking off - Skype does one thing, and does it really well, so there's no incentive to switch to anything SIP-based.

    5. Re:To those wondering.. by chill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Note that you can only call people if you're BOTH using phonegaim. You could just exchange (S)IP numbers and use any normal SIP client for the same effect. Nothing to see here. There are already dozens of free SIP clients.


      Really? I was under the impression that you could attach a SIP number to a Buddy and call them as long as they had SIP capability. Like...MSN Messenger.

      While there may already be dozens of free SIP clients, name one on Linux that integrates IM (presence) with SIP.

      STUN "Simple Traversal of UDP through NAT" was designed to go with SIP and deal with NAT. It works pretty flawlessly.

      -Charles

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    6. Re:To those wondering.. by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      Every time I see one of these stories I get confused. Why mess around with running VOIP on a general computing device. When I was deciding what to do about my suddenly increased long distance needs I looked at the software VOIP solutions for about 30 seconds before going with Packet8. So why not just quit messing around with software and just call Vonage or Packet8 or one of the other hardware VOIP vendors?

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    7. Re:To those wondering.. by dago · · Score: 1

      Well, if you RTFA, "PhoneGaim also lets you make phone calls to regular telephones"

      --
      #include "coucou.h"
  14. Re:O. S. X! O. S. X! by ph · · Score: 1

    Check out Asterisk. It will do all of the above, and more.

  15. Re:O. S. X! O. S. X! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This solution is possible. Use Linux PBX Asterisk with one digium TDM card. Asterisk offer all you need easy and are open source.

  16. Re:O. S. X! O. S. X! by silas_moeckel · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can do this now. Asterix makes a good PBX you just and outward and inward facing physical lines as you desire more inside extensiuons (Groups of phones) and outside lines. The cards are a few hundred and it needs a modest PC to run everything. Pretty much you can add any type of extension be it VoIP or POTS and any type of outside line be it VoIP POTS ISDN or a PRI. You can implment outgoing dial plans so that long distance is autmoticaly routed to the VoIP with fallback to land lines etc etc etc. Right now I run my house with these (it helps that I baught a small pile of dirt cheap Diamond USB attached inside POTS lines) every phone is it's own extension and I have POTS and VoIP external lines.

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
  17. why can't the OSS crew create a free VOIP system? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    I mean, that would rock!

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  18. Re:missing the point by LuYu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, if your friend or parent is in, say, India, will you just call them? I would say this is a very useful tool for travellers of any kind. Even college students who go out of state should find this useful.

    The reason the two go together is cause it is about communication, and IM servers provide an easy way to find people (easy as compared to memorizing phone numbers). Also, whether or not you are using voice, you still need text messaging to send links and files because communication is no longer limited to speech.

    By the way, file sharing already works (for MSN, at least). The only thing that is missing (from what most people are used to with p2p) is a search tool and persistent shared directories. Right now direct transfers involve actively sending files.

    --
    All data is speech. All speech is Free.
  19. phoneGaim by beegood · · Score: 1

    Didi I misread the Linspire site or will this ONLY work on Linspire?

    1. Re:phoneGaim by theefer · · Score: 2, Informative

      You misread the site indeed. It works everywhere, just grab the source and compile it. Or wait for someone to provide RPMs/DEBs/ebuilds.

      PhoneGaim is Free Software (GPL).

      --
      theefer
    2. Re:phoneGaim by gnalle · · Score: 2, Interesting
      From the faq : All code changes are being provided to the Gaim project and will hopefully be merged into the main Gaim distribution.

      However I wonder if gaim-vv will end up replacing phonegaim.

    3. Re:phoneGaim by digitalpeer · · Score: 1

      Sure, it's open source. However, the more interesting thing is this is not directly supported by GAIM. Also, there are reports that not all code is available for download to create your own build. All of this gaim affiliation they speak of is purely assumed from what I understand. Please correct me if I'm wrong. The FAQ also says it is not a fork, when it actually could end up being one.

  20. Where are mandrake, redhat, suse, debia, slackware by urbieta · · Score: 1

    I think its time to make packages for mandrake, redhat, suse, debian, slackware and any other major distros so we can start using this software across linux :)

    How about a knoppix cd with this software ready to run? I bet it will appeal on my windows freak friends heh

  21. sort-of-OT by jbellis · · Score: 1

    is there any cross-platform video chat software that doesn't suck?

  22. google slashdots slashdot :) by i621148 · · Score: 1

    here is an interesting effect.
    when you read the google tech news. the main story about phonegaim points to this very thread on slashdot...
    google news

  23. Re:missing the point by letxa2000 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    What I'd really like (and it may already exist, but I haven't been able to find it) is a totally hardware, totally internal VoIP solution.

    That is... We have a main office and I'm in a remote location (another country). I want to be able to buy a piece of hardware I can just connect to my remote location's LAN (which is connected to the Internet) and buy a piece of hardware that connects to the LAN at my main office. The hardware at my remote location would just connect to a normal phone while the hardware at my main office would just connect to a phone line (or extension of a PBX). When the line/extension rings, it goes over the Internet and rings my phone at my remote location. If I want to make a call, I pick up my phone and I'm given a dial-tone from my main office.

    But what I want is a pure hardware solution. I want to pay for the hardware and be done with it. There should be no monthly fee since once I have the hardware I'm not using anyone elses resources.

    Likewise, I should be able to make free phone calls to others that use the same hardware as long as my phone knows their IP address (or there is a free/cheap service that maps their number to their current dynamic IP address).

    Is there something like this? In theory the hadware ought to be dirt cheap since all it really would require is a network card, an ADC/DAC, and a microcontroller to perform the logic. Such a device could probably be built for less than $30, so it ought to be availble to the public for less than $100 for each location.

  24. Ripped off Icon from iChatAV by xirtam_work · · Score: 2, Informative

    is it just me, or is the icon for PhoneGaim just a complete rip-off of the iChat AV icon on Mac OS X.

    I can't get excited about this PhoneGaim as I already use a SIP phone client as well as iChat AV.

    I expect Apple to add voicemail in the next version anyway. It's been touted in many of the forums I read already.

    1. Re:Ripped off Icon from iChatAV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a rip-off. It's an open source innovation. You can't own an icon, man.

    2. Re:Ripped off Icon from iChatAV by xirtam_work · · Score: 2, Informative

      actaully, you can own an icon. It had to be designed.
      just because something is open source doesn't automatically make it righteous.

      remember, this has come from a company who have tried in the past to rip off apple's iphoto virtually button for button before hand.

      I can tell you stand by your opinions 100% by the fact that you've posted using your slashdot account Mr Coward ;-)

    3. Re:Ripped off Icon from iChatAV by jlaxson · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that it's a complete ripoff, but there are certainly similarities. This wouldn't be a first for Lindows/Linspire (it seems they're behind PhoneGaim), either. See LPhoto (iPhoto) and LSongs (iTunes) for enlightenment. I won't complain: they say imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

      As far as Voicemail in iChat, I post this from the Tiger developer preview, and I don't see anything related to voicemail yet. It could, of course, come later.

      --
      On Apple Input Peripherals: They're okay, I guess, but I was really hoping for a one-key keyboard and a 109-button mouse
  25. Re:missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is the parent post in English? What in the world is he trying to say ?

  26. Re:missing the point by rd4tech · · Score: 1

    I'm interested in that too, if you find anything, please do let me know.

  27. Nuts! by bobthemuse · · Score: 1

    I was really hoping this would be an AIM client for my cell phone. All the providers in my area charge my $.05 for each IM sent/received, similar to SMS. This is even though I'm paying the monthly data charge for up to 1MB of data (WAP). Damned crooks. A small downloadable chat client would be fantastic!

    1. Re:Nuts! by sveinungkv · · Score: 2, Informative

      You could do that by creating a Jabberaccont, adding AIM to it, and download a Jabberclient for the phone (it's a lot of them, try jabber.org)

      --
      Spelling/grammar nazis welcome (English is not my first language and I am trying to improve my spelling/grammar)
    2. Re:Nuts! by dspyder · · Score: 1

      Get a Symbian phone and download Agile Messenger for free or IMPlus for pay...

      Then get T-Mobile or Cingular's $19.99 unlimited data plan and you're good to go.

      Now, I have found that keeping a cellular GPRS connection on all day long just does not work, even if you get good signal strength (you won't indoors).

      --D

  28. it looks like gaim-vv by bferrell · · Score: 5, Informative

    with terminating POTS service hung on the back of it.

    see http://gaim-vv.sourceforge.net/

  29. Open Source by samhalliday · · Score: 3, Informative

    in fact... its more than just open source. its *free software8 and is distributed under the GPL. sweet! (remember... not all "open source" software is free, it simply means the source code is viewable; like java.)

    1. Re:Open Source by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1


      (remember... not all "open source" software is free, it simply means the source code is viewable; like java.)


      And remember, not all "free software" is Open Source, it simply means you didn't pay for the program; like Internet Explorer.

      Wow. Back to hashing over concepts from what... 1998? This is why the FSF publishes its definition of Free Software and OSI publishes it's Open Source Definition.
    2. Re:Open Source by samhalliday · · Score: 1

      all *free software* IS open source. free is free as in gratis AND free as in freedom. stay to your side of the line sprocket... and no tresspassing!! ;-) [oh god... i can't believe i just quoted a fraggle rock episode]

  30. Is this new? by Lispy · · Score: 1

    Maybe I am missing the point but how is this new? Isn't this just a crossover of Gaim with GnomeMeeting?

  31. It appears that the source code is broken. by Da+w00t · · Score: 2, Interesting
    There are two phonegaim specific files that are not in the latest tarball, off linspire.com *or* phonegaim.com.

    linphone.h, and osipua.h. During compiling:
    In file included from gtkblist.c:51:
    sipphone.h:3:26: linphonecore.h: No such file or directory
    sipphone.h:4:20: osipua.h: No such file or directory
    Hrm.. Lets see.... GPL software mods ... missing pieces of the mods... sound familiar? I'm not going to start hopping up and down like a crazed gully dwarf screaming "GPL VIOLATION!", but has anyone else successfully built phonegaim from source? I'm looking into starting to use SIP phone service (asterisk, vonage, sipphone.com), and this was one of the options I was looking at.
    --

    da w00t. mtfnpy?
    1. Re:It appears that the source code is broken. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh.

      Those two files can be found in the linphone-base package. Atleast, that's where I found them.

    2. Re:It appears that the source code is broken. by JonS · · Score: 1

      GPL Violation? I don't think so - it looks more like they've just glued gaim and linphone together.

      You can probably replace the missing files with stuff here.

    3. Re:It appears that the source code is broken. by xxdinkxx · · Score: 1

      I am on a notebook that is compiled for a 386 enviroment so I cannot be of any use for compiling this code for a 586 enviroment. However, I would not regard that as a straight up gpl violation, so much as lazy packaging.
      here is one instance of linphonecore.h

      and here is osipua.h

      it is also worth noting: That there have been issues getting linephone 0.8 working, thanks to the latter file.

      good luck, and I hope someone with the right enviroment can compile this. :-)

    4. Re:It appears that the source code is broken. by NastyGnat · · Score: 1

      specifically, for all the gentoo users, there will be a list of missing files from the source posted to the forums shortly. Somewhat of a howto for building this, should be fairly accurate for everyone else as well. No guarantee it will work for everyone though... just thought I'd mention it. Look for mos19k in there as "nastygnat" is deprecated almost everywhere else.

      --
      -- this space for rent --
  32. Re:Hmm.. by argoff · · Score: 1

    I'll probably lose karma for this. "Gee Bill, what the hell is that Gaim-y smell? Is it your phone?"

    That's funny, I thought all innovation came from M$ - because they have "intellectual property" :)

  33. Can anyone recommend by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 0

    a hardware solution to voip ? Like cisco or something?
    Sorry for being a bit off topic.

    --
    Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
  34. No credit to the Gaim team, in the slightest by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As usual, Lindows seems to be cruisin' for a bruisin':

    PhoneGaim (pronounced "Phone Game") is an Open Source project started by Lindows, Inc.

    I believe that should read, "PhoneGaim is an open-source project, using open-source code from Gaim with SIP technology added by Lindows, Inc."

    Also, the main page is bullshit:

    Available immediately, and exclusively for Linspire

    Uh, try, "source is available on the downloads page", not "you must be running Linspire". Then again, they could have crippled it so badly that it will only compile on Linspire...

    1. Re:No credit to the Gaim team, in the slightest by magefile · · Score: 3, Informative

      The full quote is: "Available immediately. Exclusively for Linspire, PhoneGaim can be downloaded and installed with one-click," meaning that Linspire's exclusive "thing" is the 1-click installation. Whether it's really one click or not, and whether that'll actually be exclusive once RPMs come out, is another question. Misleading, but I think you misinterpreted it.

  35. Now if I could find ... by jc42 · · Score: 1

    ... a small (iPAQ or BlackBerry or Tungsten sized) gadget that runs linux and can do IP over 802.11*, GSM and GPRS, I'd grab it and start developing software. Imagine what we could build if something like this were available to those of us who just want to do it ...

    (Actually, all that in a laptop would be a good start. But so far, I haven't learned of a laptop with hardware for all three wireless comm systems. And there's the ongoing problem of publishing the proprietary specs so that 802.11* hardware works seamlessly on a linux laptop. But maybe we'll soon read that WiFi "almost works" on linux, just like it "almost works" on OSX. ;-)

    Anyway, in our house, we have a Tungsten C (PasmOS + WiFi) and a BlackBerry 7280 (java VM + IP over GSM and GPRS). We keep thinking how nice it could be to have one pocket/purse-sized toy with all three and the programmer accessability of linux. If someone were to put one together and find a way to make it legal to use all three paths to the Net, we could start a real explosion of Open-Source, standards-based portable computer/comm gadgets.

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    1. Re:Now if I could find ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The latency which GSM dialup or GPRS adds probably makes using it for VOIP in-practical. Remeber with GSM dialup that the signal is most likely sent from your mobile to the base station and onto the mobile switching centre as a digital signal but then its converted to analouge modem noise, placed onto the PSTN network and sent to ISP where its changed back to a digital signal at their analouge modem. I've found GSM ping times to typically be 1 second, thats quite noticeable when your doing voice. Also the datarate of GSM dialup or even many GPRS packages isn't suitable for many voice codecs and you'll find your effective data rate is more like 4 kilobits per second than 10.

  36. Re:missing the point by dago · · Score: 1

    Put a sipura 2000/3000 (see voxilla.org) at your main office and take a SIP Phone with you.

    For IP adresses, dyndns.org, zonedit.com and many other provide such services

    --
    #include "coucou.h"
  37. gaim updates by tannhaus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My only problem with this would be the frequency you have to update gaim to keep yahoo and others working. If they're going to use gaim they should have some type of notification built in to notify you when a new version is available...AND KEEP IT UPDATED.

    It won't be so bad for Joe Blow if all of a sudden he can't connect to Yahoo but sees a new update is available. Then he installs the update and Yahoo works again. He's satisfied and doesn't think anything of it. The problem will be when these lindows users download this and can't connect to yahoo or one of the other services. Then they think gaim is crap...when in reality yahoo just broke things on purpose again.

    1. Re:gaim updates by Gleapsite · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So what if in Gaim a patching system was implimented, and the default option was to alert the user when patches for specific protocols were available. so Jow Blow downloads the latest of Gaim and get an alert saying "Yahoo has changed their protocol, we are currently working on fixing this, please bear with us" or something of that like. This way we inform the users whats going on, and we don't actually have to have a fix to alert them that its broken. AND we can place the blame where it belongs, right on Yahoo's doorstep. just a thought

      --
      face the world with eyes of fire.
    2. Re:gaim updates by rich951 · · Score: 1

      No idea if it's a Windows specific thing, but there's a Release Notification option in the Plugins section of the Preferences... Handy this morning, told me to go to 0.80 :) Didn't have an option to download and install the latest version though.

  38. Re:missing the point by ealm · · Score: 1

    Well, then you should investigate SIPPhone further, since that is exactly what SIPPhone can do to you.
    www.sipphone.com.
    You can use any regular phone and call over SIP to other phones, cells, SIP clients, PhoneGaims...

    Check out the Call-In-One adapter.

  39. PBX hardware; no more by ipstacks · · Score: 2, Informative

    www.asterisk.org - I haven't looked to see is it has the ability to do the toll by-pass you are asking for, but I know a couple of Cisco routers can do it. Software PBX, analog/digital/VOIP phones mix and a toll by-pass link between the two sites with a dial plan should do it.

    --
    Which distro does Linus use?
  40. Re:O. S. X! O. S. X! by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

    I've been playing with Asterisk myself for a week or so and it's pretty damned good (although takes some time getting your head around the configuration). I've got an FXO card on order to connect it to my POTS line and I have a couple of DDIs registered (for free!) at VoipUser which direct over the internet to my Asterisk server.

    I've been looking for a half decent SoftPhone for linux and haven't been able to really find one - the best I've found is IAXComm, which has an annoying habit of missing the occasional call. So I'm hoping that PhoneGaim is what I've been looking for... but damned if I can get the thing to compile...

  41. It would be better.. by pugdk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    if the gaim team would finish the support for normal IM's before throwing themselves into this kinda project.. I mean, I *still* can't get MSN to work using gaim... If I'm lucky I can connect but then I can't receive messages and if I try to write someone I will be disconnected immediately.. Please fix this before making a voice version :)

    1. Re:It would be better.. by pardus · · Score: 1

      First of all it isn't the Gaim team that works on PhoneGaim, its a fork. Secondly although Gaim isn't perfect msn works on any machine I know using Gaim .. maybe you should check your config ?

    2. Re:It would be better.. by ChipX86 · · Score: 2, Informative

      We didn't write this, despite Slashdot's very screwed-up information about all this.

      You're not the only person hitting that MSN bug, but it's something that not a lot of people (and no developer, as far as I know) has been able to hit. We're looking into it.

    3. Re:It would be better.. by pugdk · · Score: 1

      Well I get the bug all the time, so let me know what I can do to help solve this issue.. having to use MSN messenger really ticks me off :(. The funny thing is the bug seems to be windows specific! Gaim works perfectly with MSN under linux (debian, default gaim package from unstable) but I've never had gaim working with MSN in windows (and unfortunately I'm forced to use windows on my corporate laptop)

    4. Re:It would be better.. by pugdk · · Score: 1

      Well, there's hardly any MSN settings to tweak (as far as I can tell) in gaim, also it's never worked for me running windows as i said below, but it has always worked when running gaim under linux, go figure heh.

  42. Re:O. S. X! O. S. X! by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

    Oh, and if anyone finds a Symbian-UIQ SIP or IAX client that will run on my SE P900, that'd be really handy (I haven't found one yet, although there seems to be stuff available for the Symbian-60 devices). VoIP-over-bluetooth and turn it into a flashy cordless phone when I'm at home. :)

  43. Linspire, phonegaim by ites · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The reputation of Lindows/Spire is undeserved. They have always made the source code for their modifications to Linux packages freely available.

    Phonegaim was paid for by Linspire and they have made the source code available as required by the GPL. This was mentioned in one of Michael Robertson's emails a few days ago.

    You should stop speaking ill of people who do nothing wrong.

    --
    Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
  44. Re:missing the point by malverian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Cisco produces hardware VoIP phones. When I was studying for my CCNA in highschool, we visited one of the Cisco headquarters and they told us to just go ahead and make a phonecall to anywhere out of the country.

    While that in itself isn't telling, the phones were set top units (no computer needed) that had an ethernet cable plugged into them.

    Slightly off topic, but may appeal to the geek in you. Their cameras and televisions, projectors, thermostats and lighting was controlled by hardware TCP/IP based units. Very neat stuff.

    --
    You're just mad because the voices in your head talk to me.
  45. a word from Gaim by L.Schierer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a gaim developer, I'm rather curious to know where this idea that we will be providing a win32 version of this fork has come from.

    1. Re:a word from Gaim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is PhoneGaim a Fork of GAIM?
      All code changes are being provided to the Gaim project and will hopefully be merged into the main Gaim distribution.

      They seem to believe that you will be adopting all their code changes.

    2. Re:a word from Gaim by L.Schierer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      We have not as yet seen a patch from them, and I know from the brief glance we gave to the source when this came to our attention yesterday that if submitted as it currently exists, it would be unacceptable, as they have ignored some of the more basic design concepts in Gaim's source. So my question stands, I remain rather curious where this idea (on both their part and /.'s) comes from.

    3. Re:a word from Gaim by shimen · · Score: 1

      seeing that its GPLed why dont you now take there code and put it back where it all came from (Gaim)?

    4. Re:a word from Gaim by trashme · · Score: 1

      Why should it be the job of the Gaim team to dig through the Phonegaim source and make sure that a patch applies cleanly?

      If the Phonegaim developers really want their changes merged, they will supply a patch that conforms to the design guidelines layed out by the Gaim developers.

      Note: I am not affiliated with the Gaim project.

  46. Not exciting unless it's a firewall-buster by lkcl · · Score: 1

    Skype have been incredibly smart.

    they use OTHER PEOPLE's computers to route phone calls. not only to initiate them (to bypass firewalls) but also to make them (hence the dramatic increase in quality).

    they use the entire skype network as a distributed system to foil attacks and stupidity.

    any product that does not do this cannot expect to succeed: they will be too vulnerable to a) people who think a NAT is something that bites you b) telecoms regulation c) traditional telcos with a lot of money to lose.

  47. gnome crap ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought lindows/linspire was kde based..I have a kde gentoo box and cant get this crap built without gnome..yuck, yuck....all I want is something like net2phone commcenter which has 2cents/minute us long distance but that only works on windows and wont install under wine :(

  48. blah blah blah by XO · · Score: 1

    Somewhere in this thread, and also on the #gaim IRC channel, the Gaim developers have expressed their complete lack of involvement with this project. Moderators, please seek out their comments (ChipX86 and L.Schiere) and moderate them UP.

    The slashdot article is not just a little off, it's virtually wrong on every thing.

    --
    "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  49. Re:missing the point by bert.cl · · Score: 0

    That's why I run emacs on my cellphone :D

  50. Re:missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gaim is an instant messenger. Its just that, an instant messenger. Not an instant text messenger. but sends messages of all kinds instantly, as its an instant messenger. Instant messages can be files, voice, streaming pictures, and so on, as they all convey messages, and instantly. This perfectly fits into gaim's goal of being an instant messenger. Last time I checked, phones were a form of instant communication.

  51. Waste of time and resources by ShadowRage · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This has to be one of the most useless apps I've seen.

    first, it only works for lindows, you can get the source, but without some serious issues (I had to hack my makefile, and no prevail)

    no documentation whatsoever, so you gotta guess the deps.

    you could go with gaim-vv rather than this. this is just a waste, it cant connect to any other sip networks except the one run by lindows, and it can only communicate with other phonegaim clients, and it costs money to call a landline, not to mention the rates high for VOIP.
    The last comment in the article should be edited out because the GAIM devels have zero involvement with this.

    just dont bother with this, it's overhyped, only reason it's getting media coverage is because a company is behind the new features. gaim-vv is much better IMHO.

    bottom line, phonegaim is a cruddy hack. dont bother with it.

    1. Re:Waste of time and resources by nucleusDubar · · Score: 1

      > "it cant connect to any other sip networks except the one run by lindows"

      Not true. It uses SIPphone as the SIP service so you can call any of the networks that they are connected to: FWD, IPtel, Iaxtel, SIPgate, etc.

      > "and it can only communicate with other phonegaim clients"

      No, you should be able to call anyone on any of the above networks, regardless of whether they are using a client or hardware.

      > "and it costs money to call a landline"

      True but I think it's cheap, like 2 cents/minute.

  52. Another program from Lindows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Say what you want about Lindows, but these guys are consistently delivering useful programs for Linux. First nvu for html editing, then Lsongs, then Lphoto and now PhoneGaim. Bashing Lindows is almost an olympic sport on Slashdot, but they are out-delivering all other desktop Linux companies put together.

    Also, all those programs and constant updates are one click easy via their CNR technology which also gets routinely disparaged. Meanwhile posts to slashdot complain about makefiles and such not working. Now that is poetic justice.

    And every one of those programs is open source so while it may debut on Linspire it's available to all. Desktop linux needs Lindows and 3 more companies like it.

  53. Free PSTN calling, NATs and bandwidth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This works well on Mandrake, but you have to also install Linphone. I was able to get the free calling to the PSTN as well.

    It also works fine behind my Nat - I know there was one comment that only Skype works behind Nats. Not true.

    Anyone can now call my computer from ANY phone in the world (I used SIPphone to assign a virtual number for $5). It's pretty remarkable that I can receive calls from anyone on the world directly on my PC.

    I can click one button and phone any other phone in the world right from my IM client. Am I the only other person who thinks this is two great tastes that taste great together?

    Also, I setup 2 computers with PHoneGaim and it seems to use g711 codec to communicate. It takes about 65k, but there is a lower bandwidth modem option which I did not try.

  54. If you don't want to use the computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want a phone that can be used WITHOUT a computer, then get a hard phone - not software. You'll find a list with links to cheapest buyers at:

    SIPhardware.com

    The cheapest ones are about $50, but they plug directly into your net connection and work whether your computer is on or off.

  55. I'm surprised.. by Klowner · · Score: 1

    .. they didn't call it PhoneLinAIM?

  56. SIP is a bug not a feature by aminorex · · Score: 1, Informative

    Ok, so it's not as bad as h.323, but SIP is not
    firewall-friendly -- Skype is.

    We should make it talk IAX2.

    --
    -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  57. A little IRC quote... by Dr.+Nnivel · · Score: 1

    I was sitting on the #gaim IRC channel earlier today (actually, starting immediately after seeing the article), and the following is a quote of one of the things I heard.

    (12:05:45) KingAnt: Hmm, I just noticed this in the slashdot post thing: "but it's open source so expect a MSWin version shortly from Gaim team."
    (12:07:40) skiy left the room (quit: Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)).
    (12:08:55) peetah left the room (quit: "Leaving").
    (12:09:03) grim: yeah.. lemme jump right on that..
    (12:09:04) grim: pfft
    (12:11:55) Essington [~jason@essington.registered] entered the room.
    (12:12:00) Err: you didn't expect anything better from a slashdot post, did you?
    (12:12:37) grim: actually i expected less.. :)

    PhoneGaim is not officially affiliated with Gaim, except for the fact that they have common code. So this probably isn't something that should be expected as a Windows port any time soon... at least, not from them.

  58. Re:Sweet! -- But you missed the point by octaene · · Score: 1

    Open Source Software doesn't mean all Linux all the time. It means giving users a choice. Maybe you'd like to 'rage against the machine' while at work on your corporate dicated Windows box?

  59. Not quite... by thedji · · Score: 1
    But what I want is a pure hardware solution. I want to pay for the hardware and be done with it. There should be no monthly fee since once I have the hardware I'm not using anyone elses resources.

    Ahhh... you mean like you can get for mobile phones?
    --
    ... and then there were none
  60. Re:Where are mandrake, redhat, suse, debia, slackw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Friends don't let friends use Windows (or Lindows, for that matter).

  61. Not IM on phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad. I thought "PhoneGaim" would be an instant messenger program ported onto a certain type of phones (perhaps Sony Ericsson, like mine), but I'm disappointed to see it's this VoIP stuff or whatever this computer phone calling thing is.

    Then I started wondering if it could still be ported onto phones. Just think, I've got my buddy list to carry around with me on my SE T-616, and I can do all kinds of cool, free calling, if I'm near an open wireless network.

    Too bad I'd probably have to all kinds of hacking and modifying the firmware on my phone, just to *maybe* get a connection to a network that keeps fading in and out as I walk through my office building. It would seem a bit complicated, but definitely worth it just for the ability to call all of those people!

    Then I woke the heck up and realize that all I have to do is PUNCH IN A 10-DIGIT-NUMBER and I can ALREADY TALK TO ANYONE I WANT!

  62. Finally. by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    Finally someone recognises that IM and Voice are different enough to use separate protocols for the two. I'm fed up with this bullshit where IM protocols have to implement their own voice protocol because the existing ones simply mustn't be good enough. :-/

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    1. Re:Finally. by chamcham · · Score: 0

      I keep meaning to test the iLBC codec over a GPRS connection (T-Mobile T-zones is only $9.99/mo for unlimited internet access). The end idea would be to make a VoIP call using iLBC to an Asterisk server at home. Which would then forward the call to Vonage. iLBC is <15kbps, so 56k gprs connection should be adequate... i just don't know about the latency..

  63. Convergence is GOOD! by fikx · · Score: 1

    I like the idea of being able to tie lots of instant communication services into one package. Between stuff like this and asterix, linux and open source could redefine how we talk. 'bout time too.
    Since VOIP is still pretty bandwith intensive, is there anyway to use this and asterix to route voice data over POTS while having data-type stuff (webcam, text, etc.) go over the internet for one call? Yeah, POTS will go away eventually, but it may have some uses yet ;)

    --
    AB HOC POSSUM VIDERE DOMUM TUUM