Slashdot Mirror


MST3K Rightsholders Sue Over Theater Commentary

An anonymous reader writes "How can people who parody people sue people who parody them? Mr. Sinus is being sued by Best Brains Inc. the owners of the rights to Mystery Science Theatre 3000 because they are using a name/format that is too similar to their own. Here is the story." Evil thought: Apple should include a "three silhouettes yakking on merged soundtrack" mode in iMovie.

82 of 312 comments (clear)

  1. Um, because. by MoxCamel · · Score: 4, Informative
    How can people who parody people sue people who parody them?

    That's an easy one. Because the people who are being sued are not parodying them. They're blatantly using the MST3k formula. At one point they even called the show "Mister Sinus Theater 3000." They also tried to license rights to MST3k. They knew what they were doing. Duh.

    Now, can we get back to feeling sorry for people that steal music please?

    1. Re:Um, because. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      How can people who parody people sue people who parody them?

      Can we parody people who sue us? It might be fun to get a group together and taunt lawyers in court. It would probably make jury duty more fun, too.

    2. Re:Um, because. by ahsile · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Exactly. Parody is still covered under copyright laws. Therefore a copy of a parody is still breaking the law.

    3. Re:Um, because. by ahsile · · Score: 2

      No, they just can't copy MST3K's name and/or format. There are many other ways to do parody.

    4. Re:Um, because. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Now, can we get back to feeling sorry for people that steal music please?

      I know what you mean! My cousin downloaded the mp3s for Metallica's latest album, and now nobody else can listen to it.

    5. Re:Um, because. by Fnkmaster · · Score: 5, Interesting
      They aren't suing for the parody in the usual sense (with respect to copyrighted material), they are suing for trademark infringement. Parody is an affirmative defense for trademark infringement, but it's apparently very narrow in scope, more so than the copyright infringement defense.


      This isn't such a clear cut case - are they really trying to parody Mystery Science Theater 3000 or are they trying to sell tickets to their live show which uses a similar format and trade off of the MS3TK brand name?


      So as far as I can tell, as long as they don't use a name that is deceptively similar to "Mystery Science Theater 3000" or "MST3K" they are probably fine. "Mister Sinus" or "Mister Sinus Theater" is probably still deceptively similar. Nobody is trying to stop them from doing their show under some other name. So... they would have to convince a judge that they are really making a parody of MST3K itself, AND that what they do does not carry a substantial chance of being confused with the original (i.e. something endorsed by the original company), AND that their use of adult material does not run a substantial risk of harming the business of the MST3K people.


      Alright, now back to our normal business of feeling sorry for people who steal music.

    6. Re:Um, because. by Gooba42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's the JibJab argument about the definition of parody in a copyright sense.

      A parody is a derivative work which pokes fun at the original work. If this was making fun of MST3k then it is a parody. Since it is only imitating MST3k rather than parodying it, they have grounds on which to sue.

      --
      I just found out there's no such thing as the real world. It's just a lie you've got to rise above. - John Mayer
    7. Re:Um, because. by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Now, can we get back to feeling sorry for people that steal music please?"

      I thought we were worried about the people downloading music that haven't been proven to have actually stolen any.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:Um, because. by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Insightful
      They're blatantly using the MST3k formula.

      Aside from having a name too close to the original, the idea is hardly original. How many times have you sat in a Saturday afternoon matinee and heard a few jokers in the front moking the film? (Ok, maybe never happened to you, but has to me and occasionally I've been one of them.)

      "Togehter I shall rule the world!" -- Tom Servo

      BTW, didn't the original guy who did this show get screwed by rightsholders?

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    9. Re:Um, because. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, dumbass, instead no one can:
      1) Go ask to be licensed by some guys to do the same thing they were doing *and* doing it in the same way *and* use almost the exact same way
      2) get turned down
      3) go ahead and do it anyway and just hope no one will notice.

      IF you were to *read* the (brief!) article, you would note the plantiffs just want the Mister Sinus guys to not use the Mister Sinus 3000 style name. It doesn't seem like such a big deal to me.

      People can still make fun of movies all they want--just don't call yourself MST3K without permission. (Unless, perhaps if you really *are* parodying them... which is not what the Mister Sinus guys are doing (apparently... although perhaps they'll claim different in court, if it gets to court).)

      Yes. I *am* an anonymous coward.

    10. Re:Um, because. by ePhil_One · · Score: 4, Informative
      Seems to me it's the name AND format Best Brains is complaining about-

      To paraphrase from the article:

      "All we want is for them to stop using our name"

      IANAL, but I'm pretty sure if they don't defend their trademark, they lose it. And if they license to this group they'll be diluting the brand, since they can't guarantee the quality of humor, there's no mad scientists, no sketches, etc. In other words, it's not MST3k, it's MST3k-like.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    11. Re:Um, because. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      My cousin downloaded the mp3s for Metallica's latest album, and now nobody else can listen to it.

      Please thank your cousin on my behalf. The world is a better place because of him.

    12. Re:Um, because. by Mattcelt · · Score: 5, Informative

      Did you even RTFA? The MST3K owners don't even want them to stop doing the show - they just want them to use a different name, one that isn't so close to the original!

      This isn't about copyright AT ALL - it's about trademark infringement, which is a wholly different beast!

    13. Re:Um, because. by Stargoat · · Score: 2, Informative
      MST3k stole that formula from Svengoolie in Chicago. He was doing the same thing back in the 70s.

      They have even admitted to taking the idea from the Svengoolie show. I've noticed Richard Koz is not suing anyone.

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    14. Re:Um, because. by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2, Insightful


      If there is a name conflict, then there is a trademark case, but otherwise, get over it.

      Did you RTFA? Best Brains isn't asking them to change their format. They're asking them to stop using their name for it - specificially becuase it's a trademark issue. (The complaint is that the show "Mister Sinus Theatre 3000" is blatantly meant to cash in on the Best Brains trademark, but it's being attached to a show that Best Brains doesn't want their name attached to.)

      It's not a case of "stop doing this thing thats a little similar to something we did". It's a case of "stop trying to use our name and thereby associate us with it."

      And remember, with trademarks, the trademark owner has to be a bit of a over-reactive jerk about it or the trademark gets Frisbeed.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    15. Re:Um, because. by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Insightful

      BTW, didn't the original guy who did this show get screwed by rightsholders?

      I missed Joel too. Mike just wasnt as funny in delivery. Maybe because Joel always had that "just rolled out of bed after three hours of sleep and smoked a joint" delivery.

    16. Re:Um, because. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Informative
      BTW, didn't the original guy who did this show get screwed by rightsholders?

      Apparently not. From the official MST3K site: (boldface added by me)

      Q: Why did Joel leave MST3K?
      A: Hodgson, who had created the series and labored on it ceaselessly for five years, asked off the show, pleading burnout. In the press release announcing his departure, Hodgson summed it up by saying:

      "It's time for me to hang up my red jump suit and move behind the camera. Besides, there's an old show business adage I once heard Adam West say: 'Stay in the same costume and before you know it, you end up signing pictures at an R.V. show.' Maybe it was Clayton Moore, now that I think of it."

      Q: When he left the show, didn't they say that Joel was going to continue working behind the scenes? But that never happened. Why?
      A: Yes, the press release about Joel's departure did say that Joel would "remain a member of the MST3K writing team and...also direct several episodes." Best Brains staffers later said that was the intention, but, as they tell it, almost immediately Joel got an opportunity to work on some other projects in Los Angeles, and he plunged into work on them. He soon was working full-time there on these other projects, and found there was no time to return to Minneapolis. Eventually, Joel had only a financial stake in the series, but no longer offered creative input.

      Q: I've heard rumors that Joel was fired and that there was bad blood between him and the rest of the cast and crew.
      A: Joel could not be fired. He was the show's creator. No one could have made him leave if he hadn't wanted to go.
      Although he covered as best he could during his time on the show, those that know him well say Joel is a shy person who was very uncomfortable in front of the camera, and was even more uncomfortable with his growing fame. Joel also reportedly prefers creating concepts to the day-to-day work of maintaining them. Once a project is up and running, those close to him say, he likes to move on to a new creation. "I want to become a behind-the-camera guy," Joel explained when he left. "I want to get on to the NEXT weird show. I want to bean idea man."
      Jim Mallon, however, resisted Joel's attempts to step away from the series, and felt it was Joel's responsibility, as host, to devote himself to the MST3K franchise. Ultimately the two parted ways. In retrospect, we think all sides now realize it was a healthy change for the series, and all the former cast members are on good terms with one another. That was certainly apparent during Joel's 1998 visit to the BBI studios to shoot his appearances in episode 1001- SOULTAKER. The authors of this FAQ were present at the taping, and Joel and the current cast got along comfortably and there was no tension at all during the taping.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    17. Re:Um, because. by Lehk228 · · Score: 4, Funny

      never let the facts get in the way of a good "OMFG they are opressing us" article.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    18. Re:Um, because. by mccoma · · Score: 2, Funny
      My cousin downloaded the mp3s for Metallica's latest album, and now nobody else can listen to it.

      --Please thank your cousin on my behalf. The world is a better place because of him.

      while your thanking your cousin, please tell him / her to download any song that has been played 50 times in a day on a Clear Channel radio station. It will be fun listening to them pick some new music.

  2. Muppets From Space? by PythonCodr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does this mean that Disney licensed the MST3K parody commentary bit for their DVD's commentary track on Muppets From Space?

    1. Re:Muppets From Space? by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Does this mean that Disney licensed the MST3K parody commentary bit for their DVD's commentary track on Muppets From Space?"

      Doubtful. They're not calling it Miss Terry Sign Ass The Ater.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  3. Not exactly... by Meostro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Presentations of Mr. Sinus, which was previously known as Mr. Sinus Theater 3000, have Pollet, Egerton and Erler sitting in the cinema's front row, poking fun at chosen movies by making silly comments and signing songs.

    I have to say that in this case, I agree that the big corporation is probably in the right. Three guys trying to cash in on MST3K fame, literally using the same acronym and doing the exact same thing, heckling bad movies. They're not making fun of MST3K, they're just ripping off their format.

    While I would certainly watch, and probably laugh heartily, methinks they might lose this one.

    Alamo Drafthouse approached us maybe about a year ago about licensing Mr. Sinus

    This is interesting because the Drafthouse apparently saw the similarity and tried to nip it in the bud (a.k.a. cover their ass) with a license, but is still presenting the group and allowing them to continue with the same format/name.

    1. Re:Not exactly... by Kissing+Crimson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "But the more we looked into it, the less comfortable we felt about it. The way they represent their product is different than the way we do ours. Ours is really more for any viewer, while they seemed to be going in a different direction creatively."

      Seems like saying this publicly was a bad idea. If Best Brains Inc is going to claim that Mr Sinus Theater 3000 is too much like Mystery Science Theater 3000, publicly claiming they did not accept the licensing becuase it was not enough like the original might weaken the case.

      OTOH, the spirit of the suit is justified: they really are blatantly ripping off the original MST3K and should be appropriately punished.

      --
      What's that smell? Ah, that's my karma burning...
    2. Re:Not exactly... by addie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're right on legal grounds, of course. But there are several reasons why I don't think this should be a big deal:

      1) The show is no longer on the air
      2) The Mr.Sinus group is playing at a theatre, not distributing to a wide audience
      3) The concept, while obviously funny, already owes a great deal of its success to the fact that it used someone else's material to parody

      Although the MST3K group has a right to their concept, this looks more to me like a group grabbing for money instead of taking pride in their work and letting it go. After all, imitation is the most sincere form of flattery (or some such cliche). And I'm willing to bet the Mr.Sinus productions will only increase the demand for DVD releases of MST3K, etc.

      Oh, sue this sue that. Everyone thinks they're entitled to it all.

    3. Re:Not exactly... by Jason+One · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have to say that in this case, I agree that the big corporation is probably in the right.

      Best Brains is not a "big corporation." Ever since MST3K was cancelled, Best Brains basically just sells merchandise and licenses the occasional episode to Rhino for VHS/DVD release. As far as I know, they currently consist of about three people, including Jim Mallon (president of the company, formerly a producer for the show and the original voice of Gypsy).

      This is hardly a case of a huge behemoth looking to crush the little guy.

    4. Re:Not exactly... by write_with_numbers · · Score: 2, Informative

      "I have to say that in this case, I agree that the big corporation is probably in the right."

      Can we really call MST3K the big corporation?

      I remember watching a behind the scenes special on the Sci-Fi Channel during the last season of MST3K. On this special the viewer was given a backstage tour of the set, and they proudly displayed the new equipment that Sci-Fi had bought them. This earth-shattering new device was.... A Light!

      I think the real issue here is that it is a blatant rip-off of format with content that doesn't meet the approval of Best Brains. As an avid MSTie I believe that if Mr. Sinus would either change their name or clean up their content they would avoid this lawsuit.

      --
      You teach a child to read and he or her will be able to pass a literacy test. - George W. Bush
    5. Re:Not exactly... by EvilJohn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But again, it's not that simple. Best Brains flouted "keep circulating the tapes", so they can hardly make a legal case about the format of what they're doing. Heckling movies is a time honored tradtion, and these guys do it LIVE, not on tape.

      The Alamo Drafthouse approached BBI about the licensing of the NAME, not the format. Mr Sinus Theather 3000 is close, and yes actionable, but just plain Mr Sinus? I have my doubts about that.

      --

      Less Talk, More Beer.
    6. Re:Not exactly... by ruiner5000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Funny, but no one had ever heckled or made fun of crappy movies before, had they? These guys started because Sci Fi canceled MST3K. MST3K didn't do it live, they didn't do modern movies, they didn't do it with a live interactive audience, at Quakecon. In reality these guys continuing this are driving DVD sales for MST3K. Otherwise sometimes being in a 8AM Saturday morning time slot isn't doing much for you. Being in front of 4,000 Quakecon attendees gets a whole new group of fans for MST3K. All this makes me want to do is see Mr. Sinus Dirty Dancing for the 3rd time, and follow that up 30 minutes later with Evil Dead 2. Can't beat that combo. Then the next weekend I'll check out Tron with the Tron guy. Whoops Best Brains, you stepped in some Trumpy dumpy. MS had it right, and because of it I get to check out Red vs Blue at Drafthouse this month as well. Sucks if you don't live in Austin. Best Brains is far from being a big corporation.

      --
      ignorance is bliss. googlefiberatx.com
    7. Re:Not exactly... by Babbster · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If the Austin group was called, say, "Front Row Players" or "Commentastic" this suit wouldn't exist. Instead, the group currently calls themselves "Mr. Sinus" which was gleaned from their first name which was "Mr. Sinus Theater 3000." In other words, they were, and are, trading on the familiar name in order to promote their product which is itself more than similar to the original product.

      Best Brains isn't claiming to own the rights to making funny comments over movies. They aren't even claiming to own the rights to silhouetted heads in front of a movie screen making funny comments about movies. They're claiming to own their trademark (which is still active) and object to someone diluting same. That's what you do if you want to retain a trademark - they have to be AGGRESSIVELY defended or they can be lost.

  4. Sue us all by MikeMacK · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The lawsuit centers around the comedy troupe's portrayal of the "Mystery Science Theater 3000" format

    That format would be sitting in a theater and making fun of a bad movie? Guess they better start suing most groups of teenagers I've ever seen at a movie

  5. different takes by seringen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    i think it's fair enough that he doesn't want them to use the Mystery Science Theatre 3000 name since it's more adult themed than MST3K is. I wouldn't mind showing MST3K to pretty much any kid, so their recalcitrance to license it seems completely reasonable. There's no patent on commenting on movies (yet) so the austin people should just change their schtik a little.

  6. Evil thought: Apple should include ... by AzrealAO · · Score: 4, Funny

    Evil thought: Apple should include a "three silhouettes yakking on merged soundtrack" mode in iMovie.

    That would probably be fine, as long as they didn't call it "Merged Silhouettes Theatre 3000" or MST3K for short.

  7. Speaking As a Local by the+darn · · Score: 4, Informative

    These guys are the best...I've seen them abuse Masters of the Universe, Dirty Dancing, and Top Gun. The Xmas Clip Show is supposed to be INSANE. I always have wondered how they manage to get away with the name in this litigious age, though. It seems not even comedy is safe from stupidity.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas un post.
    1. Re:Speaking As a Local by Performer+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yep not even comedy like Mystery Science Theatre is safe from being ripped off by people who can't even come up with their own parody format.

    2. Re:Speaking As a Local by landley · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You mean like "What's up Tiger Lilly" predating MST3K by many years...

      The Mr. Sinus guys do witty commentary about movies. Woo. Google for "Wizard People, Dear Readers" for somebody else doing the same thing to Harry Potter and the Sorceror's Stone. (You can download the MP3 to play along with the movie.) A group called "The Yuppie Pricks" does it to the movie "Office Space" down at the drafthouse from time to time too.

      The Sinus guys _don't_ have fake plastic robot hand puppets, they don't have a fake sattelite, their logo is a kite with eyes (not a ball of string planetoid), there's no banter with some mad scientist conducting experiments on them... None of that. They just make fun of movies that haven't aged well, and a few years ago there was no way to explain that to people in a small number of words except "like MST3K". When people started understanding who they were, they backed as far away from that as they could without losing the name they'd built for themselves.

      It sounds like the Drafthouse's lawyers invited this by prodding the original guys into action worrying about a contingency that wasn't a problem before they made it one. John, Owen, and Jerm are cool and funny, and they parody their OWN movies. (Not the 1950's drek that MST3K parodied primarily because they didn't have to pay to license them.)

      By the way, the Sinus guys can't do DVDs because they're parodying stuff that's still actively under copyright like "The Karate Kid" and "Mac and Me". They DO respect intellectual property, big time. They've never parodied even one movie that MST3K parodied, it's all original material.

      You'd rather they used a less crowded formula like stand-up comedy, or new lyrics to popular songs? Sure, there are FAR fewer people doing those, that would be WAY more original...

  8. Re:We just want them to stop using our name by Euphonious+Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "We just want them to stop using our name," he says.

    I agree. Choose a different name, guys. Exercise some creativity.

  9. Definition of parody. by Performer+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't think they're parodying a parody, they're just flat out ripping off someone elses parody.

  10. Disagree with BBI here... by bullitB · · Score: 2, Informative

    Having seen two Mr. Sinus shows, I gotta say this seems bogus to me. What business are they losing here, exactly? People are going to spend money to go to a Mr. Sinus show instead of paying for and old episode of MST3K on DVD? Yeah, right.

    If they used robots, or filmed it, or if the show were still being made (or even aired on TV), BBI may have a leg to stand on, but it seems to me they're just trying to cash in on some good fans here.

    1. Re:Disagree with BBI here... by BarryNorton · · Score: 2, Informative

      RTFA - it's not about direct (competitive) loss of earnings, it's about loss of reputation due to the "adult type humour" in the version that's being passed off...

  11. How many people are going to read the article? by chuckgrosvenor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Probably none, including the person who posted the article, and the people who approved it.

    They deliberately used the name of the show (the acronym) and approached the owners for the rights. They weren't doing a parody of the show format, they were attempting to capitalize on it.

    Not the same thing as just doing a commentary, or even a Rocky Horror Picture Show type presentation (which let's face it, is what MST3K rips off in the first place to some extent).

  12. For Free Publicity? by rwiedower · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Mallon says Best Brains declined the licensing, but that Alamo and the comedians did not want to stop using the "Mystery Science Theater 3000" likeness. "We just want them to stop using our name," he says.

    They should just call it Austin Theater and leave it at that. It was their instance on keeping the MST3k name that got Best Brains angry. The name "Mister Sinus" is obscure enough to cause confusion to anyone who didn't get the MST3K reference, which would be unnecessary unless they were just trying to drum up publicity. Oh, wait...

    1. Re:For Free Publicity? by strictfoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The /. article was of course poorly written, making it seem like Best Brains was doing something evil when in fact they are totally in the right.

      --
      I've just signed legislation that'll outlaw Russia forever. We'll begin bombing in five minutes.
  13. jeez by veritron · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Mr. Sinus and Mystery Science are one syllable and a slight intonation apart from each other - pronounce both names out loud, the names of the groups are almost identical. If you're going to almost exactly steal someone's idea, don't do it like these guys did. If the guys who made Mister Sinus don't get their asses kicked in court, something's wrong with copyright law.

    1. Re:jeez by Babbster · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're absolutely right, except for your closing statement. It's not copyright law, it's trademark law. The boys behind MST3k probably wouldn't even be suing if it weren't for the fact that if they let it go, especially knowing all about the group, they could eventually lose their trademark (unlike copyright which requires no active defense to maintain).

  14. An Austin resident speaking here... by rarose · · Score: 3, Informative

    Mr. Sinus is done at 9pm to midnight on Friday and Satuday nights... in the Club district... in a drafthouse.

    Ain't nobody taking their kids there by accident.

    --
    --Rob
    1. Re:An Austin resident speaking here... by Ksatriya · · Score: 2, Informative

      And also none of the Alamo Drafthouse locations allow kids under age 18 inside without a parent, regardless of what the movie is rated. Something to do with the fact that they serve alcohol, I guess. For the venue, the adult content seems entirely appropriate.

  15. Re:live performances are different by tgd · · Score: 3, Informative

    Want to bet?

    You absolutely have to pay royalties/licensing to ASCAP or other organization managing the licensing for the music in question to perform that music legally.

    Most professional bands do. Schlocky local bands don't, but they are breaking the law as much as anyone is stealing music online.

  16. obvious by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "We just want them to stop using our name," he says.

    Okay, those comedians are dumb for choosing such an obviously similar name. I have no sympathy for them; they should change it immediately. They could call themselves "Three Jackasses".

  17. Now they know how Joe Don Baker felt! by payndz · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "Yeah? Yeah? Not so funny now, is it, punks! *gasp, wheeze* Oh man, ah need to sit down and have a beer an' a burrito, catch ma breath..."

    Seriously, though, I'm with Best Brains on this one. If you're going to rip off the MST3K format (*cough*BeavisandButthead*cough*), at least do something different with it (*cough*BeavisandButthead*cough* - oh, wait, I didn't need to cough that time). Even the name of this group is taking the piss! 'Mr Sinus Theater 3000'? What, do they call themselves Mick Napoleon, Blackbird R Tobor and Tim Smallmotor?

    --
    You must think in Russian.
  18. The Greater Good by Ray+Radlein · · Score: 4, Funny


    When I first read the headline, "MST3K Rightsholders Sue Over Theater Commentary," I thought that perhaps Best Brains had decided to sue anyone who talked in the theater while a movie was being shown.

    Kind of a shame, really -- they had the makings of a wonderful Class Action lawsuit against Obnoxious Yapping Assholes.

    1. Re:The Greater Good by geoffspear · · Score: 2, Funny
      Sadly, while a class of plaintiffs can file a lawsuit against an individual or corporation, there's still no way to file a lawsuit against an entire class of defendents.

      I think I see a new goal for Tort Reform. It would be wonderful to be able to sue entire groups of annoying people, then have lawyers track them all down to collect fines and bankrupt them all. Sure, the lawyers would end up with billions of dollars and the person filing the lawsuit would get a $5 rebate coupon, but it would be worth the satisfaction.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  19. Reference Humor by MikeMacK · · Score: 2, Interesting
    He says Mr. Sinus' lean toward adult-type humor goes against the spirit of MST3K.

    True, the spirit of MST3K was always "reference" humor, it was amazing how many inside references they could get in one show.

  20. Same/Different by Luyseyal · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Mr. Sinus vaguely follows the format of 3 individuals making fun of a movie. Making fun of movies in public has been done since, what, probably the 1890s? Another poster mentioned Rocky Horror.

    Mr. Sinus uses no characters from MST3K. If MST3K thought the idea of making fun of movies was original, they should have filed a business method patent. So, MST3K's only real problem is a possible confusion of names, thus, Mr. Sinus' dropping the "Theatre 3000". Consequently, while Mr. Sinus is a partial tribute to MST3K, as is evident from their theme song, it doesn't violate any of MST3K's rights.

    Frankly, I'm highly disappointed in Best Brains, Inc. Apparently, they're not using their namesake.

    -l

    --
    Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
  21. I've seen quite a few comments of support... by lucason · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How strange and scary!

    Are they ripping of the format? I don't know, hell I don't care.

    If the first stand up comedian would have patented his bit that would have set us back a few laughs. Wouldn't it.

    Ever seen the amazing resemblance between Richard Pryor and Eddy Murphy's stand up bits? Ever seen the similarities between Dennis Leary and Bill Hicks? Ever really looked at Lenny Bruce and seen the groundwork for everything that came after that?

    All entertainers start out by copying there idols. Only the good ones surpass them. Rarely is ever do they forgive them.

    All this legislation crap makes me sick to my stomach. It used to be cool to be copied. It meant you were doing something GOOD, worth copying. Artist, programmers, writers, they wore it like a badge of recognition. Now they wine like little kids. Sad, sad, sad!!

  22. Also disagree with Best Brains... by vistic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I kind of agree (with your disagreement)... MST3K was made in my home town and I've been a fan club member (#18624) since I was in 5th grade. My letter I wrote to join the club must have taken less than a few hours to get to Hopkins from Eden Prairie. So I instinctively want to side with Best Brains on this point... but I really can't.

    I really wish they would consider this an homage and not be litigious about it... I don't think these Mr. Sinus people were intending to rip off Best Brains... and it's not like they're stealing income from them either with their local live show. It's cute.

  23. Best Brains Inc. - Hardly a Major Corporation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For those who gripe about this being another big corporation squelching the little guy, you should know that last I heard, Best Brains was Jim Mallon (the producer of the show) and some office staff. They are the littlest of guys, and because of rights issues (which they respect), they can't distribute a good chunk of their own show's run. So protecting what little they have doesn't seem out of hand to me.

    1. Re:Best Brains Inc. - Hardly a Major Corporation by dr_dank · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't see where they're getting the money to do this. Since the show ended, it's Mallon, Barb Tebben and one or two other people. Is mail order of sundry MST3k items enough to keep the doors open?

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  24. Interesting by antifoidulus · · Score: 3, Informative

    that they are suing over this, but have given their blessings to The Digital Archive Project which encodes and shares the shows that were not released commerically on DVD.
    I remember a quote from Kevin Murphy(one of the few founding members of the show to stay with it the whole time) "Ideas are free my friend"

  25. Re:that's just wrong by ewhac · · Score: 4, Informative
    All but about ten of the episodes are in public domain now.

    The term "public domain" has a very specific legal meaning. MST3K episodes are definitely not public domain. Although it may be strongly inferred that Best Brains doesn't mind unsanctioned copying (the phrase, "Keep circulating the tapes," appears prominently in the end credits of many shows), the shows themselves do not enjoy public domain status.

    Some of the shows are available commercially on DVD. That should be the first place MST3K fans look for episodes.

    Schwab

  26. Re:live performances are different by SethJohnson · · Score: 2, Informative


    Ok, so I'm at a concert and a bunch of fools are shouting "Freebird!" The band on stage laughs and indulges the drunks with a few chords from freebird. Does Skynard get paid for this?

    Check ASCAP's website. Their licensing only applies to the playing of actual recordings in public.

    By your rationale, Tony Hawk can sue any skateboarder who performs a trick that is identical to his.

  27. Wow, what a backlash by PhracturedBlue · · Score: 3, Informative

    Seeing as how Mr. Sinus is local to Austin, most people here will never have seen it. However, the comments here are relaly harsh. Did they rip off the concept? Yes. Did they rip off the name? Yes. But to claim that MST3K should have exclusive rights to poking fun at a movie is absurd. These guys pay hommage to MST3K in their intro, the show is somewhat interactive, has a decent comedy routine in the middle, and is certainly original (they do lots of movies the MST3K guys would never touch) While I lived in Austin, I saw every Mr. Sinus show, and they are generally hillarious (Red Dawn was one of my personal favorites, the Village People Special was probably the worst of the bunch). They started doing the show after MST3K was pulled from the air. The show is mostly for adults, as there is almost always adult humor and language (The Christmas Specials bring this to an extreme). They are a comedy troupe doing original work in a stylistic format. And it is pretty damn funny.

  28. What about my pirate dvds? by gadders · · Score: 2, Funny

    They all have several heads in front of the screen. While I get sued?

  29. I wish people would actualy read the artical... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    its fun!

    MST3k isnt suing because they are using the format, they are suing because they practicaly used the same name and then tried to make money. They knew exaclty what they were doing because they actualy tried to obtain licensing and mst3k rejected it because they did not like the way that mst3k would be portrayed. This isnt a parody of mst3k, its somone stealing the mst3k format and using it to make money.

  30. Re:Wait...wait... by superstick58 · · Score: 2, Informative
    I'm not sure if Best Brains is drawing issue with the format. It sounds more like they are trying to protect their trademark, that is, the Mystery Science Theater 3000 name. IANAL but I remember something in a law class way back when that if you don't defend your trademark it can become publicly used like xerox.

    So if they let this one go, pretty soon you'll be seeing all sorts of creative variations on MST3K in your local "adult" section.

  31. "deceptively similar"??? by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I don't see what about "Mister Sinus" is NOT parodic. Yes it might confuse people who are not familiar with MST3K but if they're not familiar with it to begin with, that just means they won't get the parody; it doesn't mean that they will start buying "Mister Sinus" products thinking they are "Mystery Science" products. "Mister Sinus" is obviously a parody, and obviously not an attempt to be deceptive. "Mister Science" maybe is questionable but not Mister freakin Sinus! You don't lose your right to parody something just because you're too clever or too obscure about it.

    Now, whether a trademark judge would agree with me is another question; certainly cases like this have been won by the original trademark holder, even in cases where the parody is even more blatant. Personally I think trademark law should not be used at all to stifle free expression whether in the form of parody or criticism; to me it should only be a remedy in cases where the attempt to deceive and steal markets is obviously the main point of the trademark violation.

    1. Re:"deceptively similar"??? by rjstanford · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't see what about "Mister Sinus" is NOT parodic.

      Their name may be parodic. Their act (I live in Austin) is damn near identical. If it was a true parody, they would be doing a send-up of people who made fun of movies. They're not. They're making fun of movices themselves, just like the MST3K people do. That's the difference.

      Look at it this way. Creating a mock product called Queen-ex that proported to be a way to remove makeup from people in drag with amusing side effects like automatically applying facial hair? That's a parody. Creating a product called Queenex that's a facial tissue? That's trademark infringement, plain and simple.

      Besides, say out loud, "I'm going to go and see the Mr. Sinus Theatre guys as they make fun of Top Gun." If someone heard you say that, and wasn't a regular Alamo Drafthouse attendee, they'd think that you were talking about MST3K. Worse, what about, "I went to see the Mr. Sinus Theatre people do Top Gun, and it sucked balls." Same problem, but now with a negative connetation that's not Best Brains' fault. That's what the Best Brains folks don't want happening.

      For the record, the Mr. Sinus sendup of Top Gun rocks. It was just an example.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    2. Re:"deceptively similar"??? by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Parody both makes fun of and pays tribute to the original. If there was an attempt to deceive people into thinking this product was produced by MST3K, that would be one thing, but that doesn't seem to be the case. I don't know, I haven't seen the show, but it sounds to me like they are making fun of MST3k, using different types of content and different themes, including adult themes. And MST3k in turn was making fun of films that they showed unedited as part of their expression -- hence the hypocrisy that many feel marks MST3k's decision to sue.

      Frankly, I think MST3k is using their trademark to stifle the creativity of another artist working in the same form. For me personally that kind of expression trumps trademark law -- as I said in my previous post, a judge may not agree with me, but I of course have truth on my side ;^). They are not just copying mst3k; they added themes not present in the original and are making humourous commentary on it.

      Incidentally, I don't think you can trademark the "format" any more than you could be sued for expressing yourself using a sonnet or limerick. They can trademark the name and the characters, but not the idea of sitting in a theater cracking jokes about stupid movies. (In fact, the latter is something I was doing long before MST ever came out).

      All that said, if I were the artists, I would probably change the name if the MST3k guys asked me to. But I just don't think they should be legally forced to. They are expressing themselves and in the process making fun of and paying tribute to another artist.

      It is like the singer El Vez -- he dresses and looks like Elvis, he copies his song formats, and does something different yet entertaining with it. I don't know if Elvis is trademarked but if the company that owns that trademark sued El Vez I think they should lose. I don't think this case is any different. Perhaps the parody of MST3k is lame, but it is not the law's job to differentiate between clever parody and lame parody.

  32. Re:live performances are different by tgd · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not specifically Skynard, but the licensing organization (BMI or ASCAP) absolutely does. Then they figure out how to divvy out the money to their members.

    Its not my rationale, its the law. You may disagree, but to be blunt, you're wrong.

  33. Re:live performances are different by gilroy · · Score: 4, Informative
    You know what I really love on slashdot? When someone posts a link to "prove" their point, and end up pointing out how wrong they are. From the linked FAQ:

    I know that I need permission for live performances

    Later in the same FAQ

    2. How much will it cost to obtain an ASCAP license to perform music?

    The annual rate depends on the type of business. Generally, rates are based on the manner in which music is performed (live, recorded or audio only or audio/visual) and the size of the establishment or potential audience for the music. For example, rates for restaurants, nightclubs, bars and similar establishments depend on whether the music is live or recorded, whether it's audio only or audio visual, the seating capacity of the bar or restaurant, the number of nights per week music is offered, the number of musicians, whether admission is charged and several other factors. ...
    Concert rates are based on the ticket revenue and seating capacity of the facility.


    Oh, I'd say it's pretty clear that even for live music, they expect their cut.
  34. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  35. Re:Maybe if the started MAKING MST3K again... by elmegil · · Score: 2, Informative

    Um, they're doing just fine selling new releases of old episodes, why do they need new material to defend what they currently hold--much of which hasn't been released yet? As long as sites like DAPCentral (use google) are honorable and don't distribute episodes that are commercially available, they just help the brand, and won't get spanked. If you RTFA, you'll note that Mallon's beef is that these guys are taking the MST3K format and using it for more "adult" humor, and still want to trade on the idea that they're like MST3K.

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  36. Re:OT: MST3K reruns? by H_Fisher · · Score: 2, Informative
    Nope. Unless something changed in the last 24 hours, the reruns ended in Jan. when Best Brains' last contract with the Sci-Fi Channel ended.

    They'd been showing an ever-smaller pool of reruns for several years; as time went by they lost the rights to keep showing about 1/2 of their last three seasons, so they were down to about 10 - 12 episodes in the rotation.

    I love MST, but I kind of hate to see one group of smartass movie lovers going all corporate on another group of smartass movie lovers. But in their defense, Best Brains has been tolerant of those who trade copies of MST eps online or on tape, as long as they don't sell / copy the ones commercially available on VHS or DVD...

  37. Re:live performances are different by ccwaterz · · Score: 2, Informative
  38. Read the Article by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They named themselves "Mister Sinus Theater 3000" and do the same skit with adult humor.

    Mister Sinus Theater 3000 sounds almost exactly like Mystery Science Theater 3000 when said out loud. No one is going to confuse Muppets in Space since they aren't similar to the trademark.

  39. Alamo Drafthouse rocks! by hng_rval · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is by far the best theater I have ever been to. They serve food and drinks, including alcohol, while you watch the movie.

    Some of my best movie-watching experiences were at the drafthouse in Austin this summer. We went there to see Dodgeball, and before the movie they had a cage setup outside where they held a dodgeball tournament. Our technically inclined team got its butt kicked, but we had fun nonetheless.

    They held a special pre-screening of Harold and Kumar go to White Castle. They had a road rally scavenger hunt where we listened to clues on a CD and had to visit places all over Austin and call in for more clues when we got there. The last place in the road rally was a secret location where they were screening the film.

    We got all the White Castle burgers we could eat (not many, they're disgusting) and after the movie the stars and writers came on stage to answer questions and chat about the movie.

    I heard they did a special screening of Open Water on Lake Travis where you watched the movie while dangling your legs in the water.

    The Mr. Sinus stuff is clearly a trademark infringement, and it's meant to be. It's too bad that Best Brains won't let them use the name, because it is a pretty clever parody and has built up a pretty strong brand in Austin. To go to a Mr. Sinus show you have to order tickets online at least a day in advance. Hopefully they can change the name to something decent and keep the brand with something like "Sinus Live".

    --
    Thank you Mario! But our princess is in another castle!
  40. Re:Like "TheatreSports" vs "ComedySportz" by LordSkippy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The guys doing this show sound like hacks."

    "If I had to put money down, I'd Mr. Sinus are interested in dick/fart jokes and "racy" humor. But I haven't seen their show, so it's only speculation."

    And I'd gladly take the money you'd put down. You are right on one thing - you're only speculating. Yes, the show does contain dick/fart jokes and "racy" humor, but the vast majority of the humor is inline with that of MST3k.

    Did they rip off MST3k? Well, they most certainly used it as the foundation of their show. The cancelling of MST3k was the inspiration for putting on the first shows - which at the time wasn't very far off from your "college kids" analogy.

    But dick and fart jokes? Well, if you knew about the drafthouse, you'd understand why the humor can be "racy." The drafthouse is more like a dinner theater than a movie theater. They removed every other row of seating, installed tables (more like a short bar) instead, and sell food, drinks and beer. You have to be at least 18 year old to be in the theater. (http://www.drafthouse.com/) So, it's an older audience than saturday morning on Sci-Fi. The humor can be, and in such a venue is even expected, to be dirtier and racier. However, the balance between blue and non-blue humor is very well done. The Mr. Sinus guys are much better than just "hacks."

    Plus, Mr. Sinus takes on movies that MST3k wouldn't ever take on. MST3k basically stuck to B-movies in the Mystery or Sci-fi catagory. Dirty Dancing and Top Gun would fall into neither of those. And, as their theme song states: They can do shows with nudity.

    The differences in venue and movie types is enough to give it a different feel than MST3k. It's half MST3k and half the local improv comedy club.

    If you're ever in Austin, you need to catch a show. Also, they do shows in Houston from time to time (and San Antonio as well, I believe.)

    --
    My karma is in a nose dive
  41. Mr. Sinus Kicks MST3K's Ass by smcdow · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Disclaimer: I live in Austin, and I've seen both MST3K and Mr. Sinus.

    Verdict: Mr. Sinus kicks MST3K to the curb. No contest.

    Regarding the lawsuit, Mr. Sinus is a LIVE show, and MST3K was taped and rebroadcast. This is enough of a difference to throw out any "stealing the format" argument. When MST3K goes live (and goes live in your neighborhood movie theater), then there may be overlap issues. Until then, these shows have two very different formats.

    --
    In the course of every project, it will become necessary to shoot the scientists and begin production.
  42. Re:Erm... by aronc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Erm... so the "Maybe this will jog your memory." line as Cal goes into the backseat of the car bit from the MST3K movie was intended for all viewers??

    Actually, that's a perfect example of how MST was for all ages. For an adult it's a touch of racy/raunchyness but at the same time a kid would simply not get it. I gather from other comments around the net that the Mr. Sinus guys would have gone with a line more akin to "I told you I don't fuck on the first date".

    See the difference?

    --

    jello.
    aka aron.
  43. Re:I was wondering why my CD went blank. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    So it should be called "stealing potential revenue"?
    It's already called "copyright infringement" aka "pirating," do we really need a third name for it?

    No, we need a fourth one! One with either more syllables or adds a hyphen.

    (Similar to how WWI's "shell shock" became WWII's "battle fatigue", which became the Korean War's "operational exhaustion", which became the Vietnam War's "post-traumatic stress disorder".)
    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  44. Now I see about errors in the articles by rfc1394 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The issue in the original item that the above article refers to is not that the people at Sinus are doing a parody of Mystery Science Theatre 3000, nor is it because they are doing a type of parody where they pick on some movie, the issue is that they apparently are using the same or a similar name to "Mystery Science Theatre 3000."

    Now I understand why people complain about errors in the articles on /.

    --
    The lessons of history teach us - if they teach us anything - that nobody learns the lessons that history teaches us.
  45. Further information by MilenCent · · Score: 2, Informative

    1. Mister Sinus is in the wrong, period. It's perfectly okay to make fun of movies in the Mystery Science style, but it's not okay to rip off their name. Maybe it would be if this were parody, but the thing being parodied is not MST, it's the movies, so that defense will probably collapse. To the guy who said Mister Sinus, in terms of quality, "kicks MST to the curb," I have to respond: I seriously doubt it.

    2. The Mystery Science style has been seen in a non-MST DVD before. Take a look at the director's commentary on Ghostbusters some day. Rather slick, if jittery.

    3. Best Brains has implied that copying episodes is okay, with "Keep circulating the tapes" in the credits of earlier episodes. Kevin Murphy, voice of Tom Servo and author of A Year At The Movies (which is GREAT, by the way) has condoned internet episode distribution in an interview (but it should be said that he is no longer a Best Brains employee, and wasn't one when he said it). But most fans, and distribution systems such as the DAP, refuse to trade episodes that can currently be purchsed. There are almost ten times as many episodes that aren't available as are, and some of the best ones (like the Gamera series and the other Japanese movies brought to the US by Sandy Frank Enterprises) will probably never be made available for official purchase because of rights issues surrounding the movie.

    But there is one really cool thing about all this: MST3K still has the cultural mindshare, among geeks at least, to make the front page on Slashdot! Cause for some celebration, perhaps.

  46. Fair Lawsuit... by evilviper · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I certainly don't think anybody could win a lawsuit, if they were claiming they invented the format of people in a theatre mocking a bad film, but MST3K does have a solid lawsuit. Why? Tradmark!

    Is it hard to see the problem with calling your show "Mr. Sinus Theater 3000"? Maybe if he left off the "3000" it wouldn't be quite so obvious, but as is, it's obviously infringing on their trademark.

    Next on the block, let's create a company that sells computers, and call them "Kom Pack".

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant