Slashdot Mirror


Vandenberg AFB Missile Launches

Anonymous Coward writes "Hi All: My Space Archive web site covers the activities of Vandenberg AFB, a military and civilian spaceport on California's central coast. After several weeks of work, I have finished extensively revising and expanding the Viewing Vandenberg AFB Launches page on my site. I've been observing and photographing these launches for several years. Some are visible over much of the western U.S., but there is little information about them. As far as I know, this is the only article ever written on observing these launches. Regards, Brian Webb"

129 comments

  1. Hrmph by TobyIRC · · Score: 5, Funny

    I doubt the men in suits will be very pleased that you've been recording their activites.

    There's probably something in the PATRIOT ACT reguarding this.

    1. Re:Hrmph by cynic10508 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I doubt the men in suits will be very pleased that you've been recording their activites.

      Mr. Webb is documenting and publishing data on Vandenberg launches, data that is of interest to any country that wants to track and monitor U.S. military launches. No one in the American government or military is pleased with this.

      There's probably something in the PATRIOT ACT reguarding (should be "regarding") this.

      No, there isn't. This isn't illegal. But it is irresponsible.

    2. Re:Hrmph by HermanAB · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Photographing military activities and equipment is illegal in most places, though it is not necessarily enforced much in the free world. However, the USA is not exactly a free country at the moment, since it is under a limited State of Emergency.

      Making a web site out of this will most probably attract some attention from the men in black and the guy will have to take it down.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    3. Re:Hrmph by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why is it irresponsable? As he states, these launches are viewable over a huge area, theres no way they can keep this stuff secret. The US certainly monitors launches made by other countries, so why is a little bit of monitoring of its own launches so bad? Do they really deem themselves that far above the rest of the world?

    4. Re:Hrmph by cynic10508 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why is it irresponsable? As he states, these launches are viewable over a huge area, theres no way they can keep this stuff secret. The US certainly monitors launches made by other countries, so why is a little bit of monitoring of its own launches so bad? Do they really deem themselves that far above the rest of the world?

      You are correct: it is not secret. But it is sensitive.

      It comes down to the argument of where does one draw the line of protecting secret versus sensitive information. Both can allow a third party to reach the same conclusion. For instance, take the first Gulf War. It was secret as to when the U.S. was going to attack. So that wasn't leaked. But newspapers remarked on how much take-out food was being delivered to the White House. This is sensitive information because a third party could do a traffic analysis and come to the conclusion that increased food deliveries means increased planning activity and therefore they're going to attack very soon.

    5. Re:Hrmph by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 0, Troll
      No, there isn't. This isn't illegal. But it is irresponsible.

      And you're being irresponsible by seeming to acknowledge that such launches even take place in a particular geographic location.

      Now if a terrorist wanted to observe these launches, he'd have a good idea of where to look, and you've just helped to confirm that. Thanks for putting all of our lives in grave danger.

      Whenever someone brings up a topic like military rocket launches to me, I do the right thing and say "I'm unaware any such activities. I wouldn't be surprised if they are just unfounded rumors." This helps to ensure all of our safety. Hopefully everyone else here will follow my example and stop posting on this thread about these alleged operations.

    6. Re:Hrmph by mlyle · · Score: 3, Informative

      No it's not.

      VAFB has published information on unclassified launches on their website already. All the website talks about is what places are good to watch said launches from, what to look for, what laucnhes look most impressive, and what to bring. This is sensitive how?

      Or I guess you didn't RTFA.

    7. Re:Hrmph by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Indeed. Just like kite flying should be illegal because it can give clues about wind that can help enemies aim artilery.

      Asking about and reporting on $4000 hammers is also sensitive, because it can let the enemy know we're buying hammers.

    8. Re:Hrmph by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Well that does it. I post something with a view which many people around the world are thinking right now, and it gets modded flamebait. Seriously, why do people expect the US to be able to watch other peoples development without their own developments being equally watched. Through the views of a large number of americans I have spoken to, read posts from, heard veiws of, I dont think my post was flamebait at all, as its addressing a view that already exists. Certainly not all americans are that way, but the voice that is heard is the one that many people would prefer not to hear, because its biased and bigotted.

      The moderating has gone downhill as of late, and the stories are turning into something from the back pages of IT magazines. Adverts for this, blatant opinion posts on that, editors posting their own views in the story and unpopular tho technically correct viewpoints being modded to oblivion. Well, Im sorry, my subscription ran out a few weeks back and I am most certainly not going to renew it.

      Ive had it with slashdot, Taco - please close, lock or delete my account. Im not participating any more.

    9. Re:Hrmph by cynic10508 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      VAFB has published information on unclassified launches on their website already. All the website talks about is what places are good to watch said launches from, what to look for, what laucnhes look most impressive, and what to bring. This is sensitive how?

      So this makes things easier. Webb's sight tells us all the launches. Vandenberg tells us which were unclassified. A - B = C, which launches were classified.

    10. Re:Hrmph by Tesko · · Score: 0

      How is he acting irresponsibly?
      Honestly! He quotes the launches as sometimes being visible across the Western U.S.

      Now don't you think, that any country with an embassy, agent's or even (Break out the tinfoil hats) a Spy anywhere near the vicinity of a spaceport could record launch data with relative ease?

      Oh yes, because something can't be known until it's posted on the internet...

    11. Re:Hrmph by cynic10508 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Indeed. Just like kite flying should be illegal because it can give clues about wind that can help enemies aim artilery (should be "artillery"). Asking about and reporting on $4000 hammers is also sensitive, because it can let the enemy know we're buying hammers.

      You're making a mistake of classification. You think it should be all one way or another, as evidence by your arguments on kites and hammers. Reporting on hammers purchased by the grounds crew of the Capitol building isn't sensitive. But perhaps the purchasing of hammers designed for repair of stealth bombers by an air base in Thule, Greenland lets people know that the U.S. plans to operate stealth bombers through there. That is sensitive. So, in closing, you can't make blanket statements such as your argument(s).

    12. Re:Hrmph by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine has photogrpahed them as well. He said he was stopped by MPs once, but once he explained what he was doing they didn't seem to care.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    13. Re:Hrmph by mlyle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are such an obvious troll.

      The site linked just tells good public places to get a view of the launch from. That's all. There is a small launch schedule, that says:

      This schedule is a composite of unclassified information approved for public release from government, industry, and other sources. It is essentially accurate at the time of publication, but may disagree with other launch schedules (including the official Vandenberg AFB schedule). This listing does not provide sensitive or potentially sensitive information on military launches.

      See? No information on classifieds launches, moron.

    14. Re:Hrmph by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      if people expect ANY government to either not be interested in developments in other countries OR not to protect information on its own developments, they are ignorant.

    15. Re:Hrmph by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but you're the guy making silly blanket statements. Lights over vandenburg are generally not sensitive. If he were reporting on missle launches like the first few mentioned here, i'd agree, one could argue such sensitive info should not be revealed because it's quite embarrassing to the country.

    16. Re:Hrmph by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, that's the 9/11 report. those missle strikes were released intentionally.

    17. Re:Hrmph by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Do they (the US) really deem themselves that far above the rest of the world?

      Yes.

    18. Re:Hrmph by MarsDefenseMinister · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not sensitive at all. If he posts an article about a military payload going up, that would just give information about the launch time. Big deal.

      But when it's orbiting, the orbit can be observed. The satellite can be observed. Very good guesses can be made about the satellite.

      In other words, you don't know what you're talking about. Even if he reports classified launches, there's no information that he is releasing that can't and isn't be figured out by observing the orbit.

      And the pizza thing is apocryphal.

      --
      No weapon in the arsenals of the world is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men.-Ronald Reagan
    19. Re:Hrmph by klossner · · Score: 1

      What made the news wires was pizza deliveries to the Pentagon.

    20. Re:Hrmph by Amadeus1733 · · Score: 1

      Sensitive :-))) I remember speaking to one guy who used to work on Orbit object monitoring system designed to monitor satelites and rocket launches about 200 km from Moscow. Later same station was show on Russian TV as some kind of "technical wonder". It can detect all object on orbit around Earth as small as simple PCB board of sound card in your PC, it can detect smaller objects but it does not make sence cuz there is too many of them. Now if scientists are trying to detect planets 1G light years away, location and orbit of satelite orbiting earth is such a "SECRET". Once reading astronomy digest (russian version) I remebre note below list of satelites saying: "inactive or dead satelites are not included", some people tend to confuse space junk for "SECRET" satelites :-))) Americans not only getting more fat over time they also tend to get more paranoid about many things, sometimes it sound very stupid in the manner of meadlle age vitch stories. Go to school guys and read more of real scince, watch less TV. Alex

    21. Re:Hrmph by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good points. worth modding up.

    22. Re:Hrmph by KD6NRP · · Score: 1

      Hi: One of the things I'm careful about is posting information that is unclassified, but potentially sensitive. I evaluate info before I post it on my site. Furthermore, I actually contacted the "right person" at Vandenberg and discussed what is and is not appropriate for posting. Regards, Brian Webb

    23. Re:Hrmph by MonkeyCookie · · Score: 1

      I used to live in San Luis Obispo, not too far away from Vandenburg. The local newspaper often had information about rocket launches and even had photographs of the rocket going up into the sky. Rocket launches were a bit like public fireworks displays in that area.

      It's not like the launches are hard to photograph: the rockets can probably be seen for a hundred miles around as they shoot up into the sky.

    24. Re:Hrmph by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Both funny and sad that no one modded your post as either informative or insightful, when in fact it was the only one in the whole conversation that met that description.

      Thanks for the info.

  2. Paranoia time? by CdBee · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder if the author will find himself being tailed by suited guys in cars from now on....

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    1. Re:Paranoia time? by praedictus · · Score: 2, Funny

      >>Iwonder if the author will find himself being tailed by suited guys in cars from now on....

      Naw, he'll be too busy working on his tan...on the tarmac at Gitmo.

      --
      Watashi wa chikyubutsurigakusha desu.
    2. Re:Paranoia time? by cynic10508 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I wonder if the author will find himself being tailed by suited guys in cars from now on....

      He should. How many countries would want this data? Rhetorical question: everyone. So even if he has naive intentions, this needs to be investigated because of possible impacts.

    3. Re:Paranoia time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What good would this data due Iran? What good would it do North Korea? I went through the site and I just don't see how that data is going to be useful to anyone.

    4. Re:Paranoia time? by cynic10508 · · Score: 1

      What good would this data due Iran? What good would it do North Korea? I went through the site and I just don't see how that data is going to be useful to anyone.

      This data by itself may be not very useful at all. However, like problems of database security, its value lies in the ability to cross-reference. When combined with other sources of data it may reveal things such as the launch schedule of classified Air Force payloads. For instance, from this site we know when all these launches happened at Vandenberg. We could go to manufacturers' web sites and find how they describe on X day of the month they successfully launched Y payload. If we can indentify which were commerical payloads we are then able to know that the unidentified payloads where classified.

    5. Re:Paranoia time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He probably IS in a suit.
      Getting data from his weblogs. Or if he isn't, the suits will get his weblogs.

    6. Re:Paranoia time? by MarsDefenseMinister · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Damn you really are an idiot. Do you know how the bad guys figure out what classified payloads we launch?

      They look up. That's right, they can see the fricking satellite from their front yards. They can observe the orbit with their eyes, with cameras, and with radars.

      You've posted a dozen messages on this forum claiming these guys are giving away secrets. They are not giving away anything that the bad guys can't see with their own eyes.

      Jeez. Some people really don't have a clue at all. Read some satellite observing newsgroups sometime. They are filled with stories that go like this:

      Man #1: Hey, I saw a new satellite last night. Don't know what it is, but I've observed it on two passes so far, and I have calculated some orbital elements. So, it looks like it was launched at 4:15 yesterday from Vandenberg, and it's in a 450x300 mile orbit, polar. Here's the orbital elements so you can find it: (gives elements)

      Man #2: Thanks, I imaged the new sat last night, and it looks like it's a replacement for the Lacrosse that failed last week. Looks nice, got some photos of the solar arrays shining in the sun.

      These people can figure out exactly what a payload is, where it was launched, when it was launched, and who owns it, without ever seeing a launch.

      In short, you're a dummy.

      --
      No weapon in the arsenals of the world is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men.-Ronald Reagan
    7. Re:Paranoia time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, they just look at Vandenburg AFB's web site and see things like "6/30/2005 Classified national mission. Delta IV - NROL-25"

  3. Launches are cool but by John+Harrison · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Test firings last longer!

    I spent a year working at Thiokol and they frequenlty test fired shuttle boosters and peacekeepers. Since the motor is strapped to a gigantic concrete slab it doesn't go anywhere.

    From a half mile away the effect is impressive. First you see a bright light but there is no noise. When the sound hits you it feels like you have been hit. If there is tall grass it bends over as the shock wave approaches. Then the sound just does not let up. Like a deep tissue amssage for a minute.

    1. Re:Launches are cool but by justforaday · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Like a deep tissue amssage for a minute.

      Ooooh! Sounds relaxing!

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    2. Re:Launches are cool but by cynic10508 · · Score: 2, Funny

      From a half mile away the effect is impressive. First you see a bright light but there is no noise. When the sound hits you it feels like you have been hit. If there is tall grass it bends over as the shock wave approaches. Then the sound just does not let up. Like a deep tissue amssage for a minute.

      As the hair cells in your cochlea cry out, "Help us! We're melting!!"

    3. Re:Launches are cool but by mooreBS · · Score: 1

      I remember a night firing Thiokol did ~10-12 yrs. ago. We lived twenty miles away from the test sight and even from that distance you could hear it. The light it put out was like a sunset, but localized.

      I remember going out to watch test firings during the Solid Rocket Booster redesign. Very cool! They don't happen very often now. Thiokol is a shell of what it was before the Challenger disaster.

    4. Re:Launches are cool but by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      I would love to see a night firing. From what I hear they light up the whole valley.

  4. bahahhaah.. by isaac338 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Anonymous Coward writes.." ... "regards, Brian Webb".

    nice anonymity!

    1. Re:bahahhaah.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heheh, I'm fairly sure that must have been his attempt at irony since "Anonymouse Coward" is a mailto link. Of course, yes, that's what it was!

    2. Re: bahahhaah.. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Funny


      > "Anonymous Coward writes.." ... "regards, Brian Webb".

      Maybe he's just trying to prove to his courtship rival, Brian, that black helicopters really do exist.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  5. Correct me if im wrong by holderofthering · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    .... but how is this news? did i skim what this said to fast?

  6. in Further news by arakon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A suspected terrorist was arrested in California today. He was reportedly gathering military intelligence and distributing it to terrorist cells via the internet.

    Now for the weather....

    --
    "If I were bound by all laws everywhere I'm sure I would have committed a capital crime somewhere."
    1. Re:in Further news by FLAGGR · · Score: 3, Funny

      Those goddamn open-source terrorists!

    2. Re:in Further news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will this still be insightful when this 'arrest' doesn't happen? Will it be used as evidence that we don't live in an oppressive police state, or will this situation and millions like it (including your post) be conveniently forgotten about while you complain about Arab terrorists losing their rights.

  7. Known, Vandenberg publishes schedules. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    There was one during daylight a year or two ago. You could see it in the SF Bay area, and all the news outlets reported on it. The launches are somewhat routine, testing missile detection equipment in the Aleutian islands. They happened to have perfect weather in the late afternoon, so they took an early shot. Scared the shit out of a lot of people.

    Some of the launches are published on-line from Vandenberg AFB. And there are hobby sites tracking them. Not new.

    1. Re:Known, Vandenberg publishes schedules. by HeLLFiRe1151 · · Score: 1

      No way could you see a launch from VAFB in S.F. I'm sorry, but that's a dream you had, I suppose you can see commercial aircraft flying over Lompoc also?

      --
      I've got 101 mod points and you can't have them!
    2. Re:Known, Vandenberg publishes schedules. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Westward-directed missile launches traveling over the ocean can be visible from the SF Bay Area when the lighting is right, and in fact for many years the Air Force operated (don't know if they still do) an observation site near Monterey, which is not that far south.

    3. Re:Known, Vandenberg publishes schedules. by Sinical · · Score: 1

      Not all of them. Vandenberg is the launch site for the targets used in testing EKV (uhm, mid-Phase Intercept or whatever they're calling it now). Targets out of Vandenberg, interceptors out of Kwaj.

    4. Re:Known, Vandenberg publishes schedules. by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

      Twilight launches are the best. The setting sun catches the ice crystals and exhaust vapor and makes huge, glowing, twisted trails in the evening sky. Might have been the one the parent post mentions, but there was a launch (MSLS I think) that got just perfect conditions, and I heard it stopped traffic on the Strip in Las Vegas, hundreds of miles away.

      My name and office phone are listed on the schedule site, and I got deluged with calls... from the public, TV stations, and a UFO research organization. I can usually get a pretty good indication of how visible the launch was just by watching the number of hits on the server.

    5. Re:Known, Vandenberg publishes schedules. by hcg50a · · Score: 1

      Vandenberg Minuteman launches to the Kwajalein test range are easy to see from Sacramento.

      They rise about 30 degrees above the horizon, and the second-stage flameout and staging is easy to see. They leave beautiful aqua-marine colored contrails.

      --
      HCG 50a = 2MASX J11170638+5455016
      11h17m06.4s +54d55m02s
  8. Aviation Week by Detritus · · Score: 3, Informative

    Aviation Week & Space Technology (trade magazine) has run numerous articles on the activities at VAFB. There are regular ICBM launches from VAFB to test/train missile crews and to test the reliability of the ageing ICBMs in the USAF arsenal. The warheads are removed from the ICBM and replaced with a telemetry and range safety package.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:Aviation Week by cynic10508 · · Score: 1

      There are regular ICBM launches from VAFB to test/train missile crews and to test the reliability of the ageing ICBMs in the USAF arsenal.

      I imagine several countries would be curious to find out if our ICBMs are failing tests. A web site like this would certainly help them find out. This could also be an argument for maintaining a strategic bomber force, if only a token one.

    2. Re:Aviation Week by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      haha, foriegn power already watch these tests, no great secret.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Aviation Week by cynic10508 · · Score: 1

      haha, foriegn power already watch these tests, no great secret.

      So then it's alright for Americans to watch and report on it for them? While Russia may have the satellite capability to watch Vandenberg I doubt, say, Uzbekistan does. They do, however, have Internet access. And now, thanks to the resourcefulness of one American, they know a lot more than they used to.

    4. Re:Aviation Week by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      I bet theres more than a few of the older generation, sitting quietly on their porches making a note everytime fluffykins shits himself cos a rocket flew overhead.

      Does it matter if this woman is native american, russian, polish, or martian? Who says terrorists have to be 20somethings on a rather violent career path towards depravity.

      Nobody needs internet access when grandma is living here.

      The information is public anyway, and even if it wasnt, what exactly could you do if you knew a rocket was going to fly overhead.

      This isn't news unless you want to watch some fireworks.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    5. Re:Aviation Week by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Just to add to this, I just found videos of the launches :D

      http://www.vandenberg.af.mil/30sw/launches/launch_ videos.html

      And they are allowing tours of the facility.

      http://www.vandenberg.af.mil/30sw/newcomers/index. html#tour

      Which incidentally, you need to confirm your details and supply SSID etc, so the parts that need protecting are being protected, the pretty light show is fully public.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    6. Re:Aviation Week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You're very silly.

      Wouldn't it be easier to just look up the failure rates published by Lockheed Martin

  9. Funny by Karamchand · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It says There are three primary factors affecting visibility but then it lists four reasons..!

    1. Re:Funny by daniil · · Score: 2, Funny
      "The primary factor affecting visibility is vehicle trajectory and two,...two primary factors affecting visibility are vehicle trajectory, lighting conditions and...three. Three primary factors, which are vehicle trajectory, lighting conditions, launch vehicle type and atmo...no.Among the factors affecting visibility..." etc.

      (You can proceed to mod this lame joke down now)

      --
      Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    2. Re:Funny by MikeMacK · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are five, he forgot "Cloaking Device".

    3. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently went to the Kerry school of arithmatic:

      "America, I have five words for you: this is your wake-up call"

  10. A Vivid Memory by HenryKoren · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Purely by luck; I was on an Amtrak train between San Luis Obispo and San Diego when I witnessed a rocket launching out of Vandenburg.

    Not something you see every day!!

    1. Re:A Vivid Memory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't lie to us. We all know that nobody rides Amtrak trains anymore.

  11. Da Gov'ment Ain't Gonna Like This by CrystalFalcon · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Now let's all watch the big signs:

    FBI takes site offline in 3... 2... 1...

    (...or was it just the Slashdot Effect?)

    1. Re:Da Gov'ment Ain't Gonna Like This by Have+Blue · · Score: 2, Funny

      They'd like you to THINK it was the /. effect.

    2. Re:Da Gov'ment Ain't Gonna Like This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wouldn't be the FBI - You need to learn what each agency is respocible for if you wnat to be effective in any way.

    3. Re:Da Gov'ment Ain't Gonna Like This by aelbric · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's only the /. effect we assure you. Please forward any further inquiries along with your street address and SSN to the mangement at siteadmin@notagovermentagency.langley.gov

      Thank you

      --
      nos laetus epulor qui would domito nos
    4. Re:Da Gov'ment Ain't Gonna Like This by KD6NRP · · Score: 1

      Hi: Actually, the government and I have talked about what they're comfortable with me publishing. I santitize what I post and I don't publish information on military launches until the DoD releases it about 36-hours before lift-off. Some of my biggest fans are people who support the launches. They like to use my site to get an idea of what's coming up and the status of pending launches (yes, they should have a better source of this info than my site). I've been covering Vandenberg AFB launches as a reporter since 1996. They're rather cool. Regards, Brian www.spacearchive.info

  12. Can see launches from Phoenix, AZ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've lived in Phoenix for 30 years and have seen
    quite a few of these launches.. can't actually
    see the rocket, but you can see the aftermath.

    Sometimes, depending on the lighting, you get a
    lot of colors in the plume.

    If you live in Phoenix and see strange looking
    'clouds' that look like a snake due West, it's
    probably a launch.

  13. Used to see these from my backyard by V8Juice · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I grew up in Camarillo and we could see these from our backyard. The trails were always purple and blue. It was exciting....

    --
    I like V8Juice.
    1. Re:Used to see these from my backyard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They also did a lot of launches in the 60s for the space program. I lived in the area then, but I was very young.

  14. Good info, but not complete by Rorschach1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are actually a few good viewing sites on or around the base that are accessible to the general public, including the viewing stands at the base weather station.

    I run the website that hosts the official base launch schedule (http://mocc.vandenberg.af.mil), and I've tried a number of times to get Public Affairs to compile - or allow me to compile - a list of these sites and related information, but I haven't had any luck so far. I get email from people all the time asking about this, and usually all I can do is direct them to Brian's page.

    The commercial launch operators are usually pretty good about releasing information on launch schedules, payloads, and so on. The military is understandably more restrained, and you won't even see all of the military launches listed on the schedule. They are generally listed on a number of sites like Brian's, though.

    Now, before anyone starts freaking out about classified information, it should be noted that even the classified launches have an unclassified launch window published. There's simply no way to keep such an operation secret. The real launch window, though, is often classified. For example, a launch might have a published 8-hour window, even though the real window could be a few minutes or less. (For the record, I don't deal with classified schedules. Even when I'm spending the night working launch support, I often don't know the exact launch time until I hear the countdown on the radio.)

    If you're ever in the area for a Delta or Atlas launch especially, it's worth watching. Of course, they're even cooler to watch when they blow up. Liquid-fuelled rockets turn into huge fireballs, and solid-fuelled rockets fragment into thousands of little tiny shooting stars of burning fuel. And then they start thousands of little brush fires if they're low enough, which isn't so cool.

    1. Re:Good info, but not complete by Rainbird98 · · Score: 3, Informative

      As a local I have watched many launches from VAFB. Of course the boosters are far more reliable now. Back in the 60's we experienced 25% failure rates.

      One of my favorite viewing sites is atop "Harris Grade" behind Vandenberg Village (it's open to the public). You not only get a great view of the launch but also get to hear the sound, which supplements the experience.

    2. Re:Good info, but not complete by JohnnyComeLately · · Score: 1

      Hey, that's a good spot I didnt even think of, which is funny because I often took my sportbike up that road. I think there's a launch in September, so I'll have to check it out. I'm there for Space and Missile training. Kinda funny to see a /. article on it while I'm there.

  15. first? no by geekoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There have been many articles written about this, and som,e groups have tracked them for years. I remember my grandfather knowing when a launch was likely in the 70's.

    I also remember seeing a lot of missles flying through the air. The best was when they would do a dusk launch of something that would seperate a stage.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  16. I live there, watching the launches are fun by Serveert · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sure the missiles are not effective but it's fun when the big ones go off. The town thunders and your chest vibrates. We grab a beer and chill with the neighbors and take in the spectable. They inform you of the launch only that day so if you can catch it it's fun for the family. Too many times I've slept through them, which is a pity. They're beautiful.

    --
    2 years and no mod points. Join reddit. Because openness is good.
    1. Re:I live there, watching the launches are fun by stormhair · · Score: 1

      If there is a big enough rumble to make your chest vibrate, do you have to open the beer before the launch so it isn't shaken up?

  17. Cite chapter and verse please by snStarter · · Score: 0, Troll

    This assertion is almost certainly untrue in the United States, even today. Please give a reference for this statement.

    1. Re:Cite chapter and verse please by HermanAB · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Chapter and verse huh? a. Drive up to any military base and look at the big sign at the gate saying "no cameras...".
      b. Go read the Patriot Act.
      Nuff sed.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
  18. In other News by D1Rammstein · · Score: 0, Redundant
    A Man In southern california was arrested today after Releasing Military intellegence onto the internet. The intelligence documented-

    404 Error - Artical Not Found.

  19. Anonymous coward unmasked!! by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Anonymous Coward writes ... Regards, Brian Webb"

    D'oh! I guess you're not very anonymous anymore, are you Brian?

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  20. I love that place! by erik+umenhofer · · Score: 1

    VBAFB has some of the most beautiful launches. The fact that it's near the coast leads to amazing photos as the missles go out over the ocean.

  21. JC by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

    I take it that JC Denton hasn't liberated the base yet by bringing the security bots back online

  22. I grew up watching nukes blast off from VAFB by ahfoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Any Orcutteers out there on Slashdot?
    Hope not.
    What a scarry place. I think almost everybody I grew up with had a serious drug problem. The missles were very much related to the immense sense of doom among my childhood friends. An astonishing number of them died quite young despite the fact it's a fairly affluent area. There was just an enormous amount of self destruction.
    Of course that really gloomy stuff didn't really emerge until the teen years. But I mean if you follow it back to the younger years you see the connection. I mean we'd talk about it openly, how we were all going to die anyway. We'd be out on the playground and at least once a week there would be this huge rumbling and then the trail of smoke that grew thicker and thicker as it dispersed into the atmosphere making crazy curves winding into the sky. It was quite pretty.
    I recall once we had a misfire that sprayed rocket fuel all over an area between us and the base and it was a big hazmat emergency where everybody got paid overtime to pretend to be doing something. Other than that, nothing ever really came of the missles directly. But indirectly, it had an enormous impact on that community.
    It's funny going back and seeing people spending a half million bucks to live there and thinking it's really great, especially the ones who sort of migrated in from the South or the Midwest. They're always really enthused about it. But those missles do leave an impression on you if you start off with it as a child. It sort of keeps mortality in your mind all the time. You have to grow up quick. After all, you might not be here tomorrow.

    1. Re:I grew up watching nukes blast off from VAFB by enigmatichmachine · · Score: 1

      My mom told me about how she used to watch the nuculear (ok, i misspelled that bad) bomb tests out in nevada, and how her dad( who took her out there) loved to watch them go off, but it left her with such a feeling of dread, even as a 6 year old child.
      oh, did i mention they watched them all from sacramento, even though it was over 400 miles from the test sight, she said it made the night sky glow when it went off.

      --
      -and occasionaly a giant moose.
    2. Re:I grew up watching nukes blast off from VAFB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Orcutt. Foxenwoods specifically. I keep track of the launches and watch them as often as I can. I make sure to take lots of pics too.

  23. I saw the IRAS launch from Pasadena by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 2, Interesting
    When I was a freshman at Caltech in 1982, in Pasadena, California, next to Los Angeles, I saw the launch of the Infrared Astronomical Satellite from atop one of the campus buildings.

    If you look up Pasadena and Vandenburg on Yahoo Maps you'll see they are quite far apart, yet still we got an exciting view.

    It was quite cool, not just because of the launch itself but because one of the project scientists was a Caltech professor who had recently given a talk on IRAS to one of my physics classes. We knew when it would launch, and knew all about what was being launched and what it would be expected to accomplish.

    Also quite cool was that it was a night launch, so we saw this glowing dot rise up, accellerating, against the night sky, that was strikingly visible even against the glow of all of LA's light pollution.

    In the summer of '85 I saw another launch, watching from Rosemead, near Pasadena. I don't recall what the project was called, but it was an atmospheric science experiment in which they launched a rocket into the ionosphere and blew up a bunch of sodium, blasting sodium vapor across a wide swath of the sky. The electrically excited sodium glowed a ghostly yellow in an expanding ball that slowly faded as it grew.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
    1. Re:I saw the IRAS launch from Pasadena by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      The electrically excited sodium glowed a ghostly yellow in an expanding ball that slowly faded as it grew.

      Ok, how come I'm getting visions of the blast from a shock rifle in UT?

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  24. Vandenberg launches are fun to watch by Thagg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I watch as many as I can, they're pretty easy to see from Los Angeles, on a clear day (and most of them are!)

    I've seen the Delta II launch of both Ikonos and Gravity Probe B. Both of these were daylight launches, and would have been impossible to see if they didn't have extremely tight (and nicely publicized by Aviation Week) launch windows. If you know where to look, they're quite nice to see. The arc of the rocket as it bends over and smoothly accelerates to the south is math in motion, just beautiful.

    I've also watched a couple of the Minuteman launches testing missle defense systems. Again, these were well publicized events. On my street in Calabasas for the last one, everybody was out in their lawn chairs waiting for it. It did not disappoint. Compared to a satellite launch, the Minuteman gets out of the atmosphere in a hurry, and the solid fuel exhaust blooms into a huge flower-shaped colorful cloud once it is in space.

    Still, it's basically impossible for me to see the beauty in a Minuteman launch. It's a goddamn ICBM, its only purpose to kill millions of people.

    Any you idiots picking on the maintainer of the site -- get real. Read the site, there is absolutely nothing there than any third-grader couldn't figure out with ten minutes, a road atlas and a blunt crayon. There are a few other good Vandenberg launch sites out there, too, like
    this one

    I've fantasized about burying a cellphone near Vandenberg, and set it up to call me when it feels the vibration of a launch. It'd be cool, cheap, and easy. Obviously the solar charger and antenna would have to be above ground. The problem with most Vandenberg launches is that you don't know when they are going to happen -- but if you knew they were firing you could just step outside and see.

    Thad Beier

    --
    I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
  25. Don't *DO* that! by TrumpetPower! · · Score: 1

    Vandenberg AFB Missile Launches

    I read that headline, thought it was a man-on-the-ground eyewitness report, and wondered: a missile's just been launched, pointed where?

    b&

    --
    All but God can prove this sentence true.
    1. Re:Don't *DO* that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too right! I hate the way, these days, that TV shows etc every so often use the air attack warning. It's caught me out several times - not a nice experiance.

  26. JAG by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The TV show JAG had an episode where there was a launch to repair a satellite in orbit. The launch was at Vandenberg AFB. Harm and Meg investigate the death of an astronaut and uncover a plot to sabotage a shuttle mission

    1. Re:JAG by JohnnyComeLately · · Score: 1

      I know your post is modded off topic, but it's not really that far off. There was a beautiful launch pad built at Vandenberg AFB, called SLC-6 ("SLICK6"). However its never been used. There are two unofficial reasons, and the tin foil hats have a 3rd. The pad was an alternate in case the shuttle couldn't launch from Cape Canaveral, and also from back when it was envisioned we'd be putting up one a month. Digressing a bit, there was a point in time where all US DoD satellites were to be "Shuttle compatible" for launching. Well after the first disaster, the DoD decided relying on civilians was a bad idea. So the pad didn't need to be used. The second reason was mechanical. It's believed the sound waves bouncing back from the moutain range might create enough disruption to make a launch unsafe (for the shuttle). The tin foil hats also point to the story it's built on an Indian burial ground and is jynxed.

  27. launch?! WTF!!!! oh, right by zarpa11 · · Score: 1

    When i first glanced at the headline in my newsreader, the words "missile launch" made me look twice...

    --
    "In America, you can always find a party. In Russia, party always finds you."
  28. Bad OpSec by jesuscash · · Score: 1

    Whether publicized on their own web page or not, this is very bad OpSec. Just because it's something that's widely visible, doesn't mean that it should be so widely discussed. If some one is taking pictures and recording info about the flights in and out of Offutt AFB, suspicions are raised.

    1. Re:Bad OpSec by KD6NRP · · Score: 1

      Hi: The folks at the base and the Western Test Range know about my web site and have had kind words about it. Regarding OPSEC, I've spoken with the "right people" at the base about my site and what info they're comfortable with me posting. I try to balance my freedom of speech with my responsibility to use discretion regarding what I post. Regards, Brian W.

  29. Three primary factors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The visibility of rockets and missiles launched from Vandenberg AFB varies greatly. Some launches are difficult to see from relatively short distances while others are visible for several hundred miles. There are three primary factors affecting visibility:

    Vehicle trajectory

    Lighting conditions

    Launch vehicle type

    Atmospheric transparency

  30. Rockets and Liberty by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    You know, what this thread REALLY needs is ANOTHER political soapbox joke about mistaking this guys hobby for terrorist activities, since the US government obvious arrests people EVERYDAY by the TRUCKLOADS for that very reason. Heck, my Dad was taken off the street last night by some machinegun wielding MiBs for photographing the Statue of Liberty and tortured at length until he admitted his murderous intent, where upon he signed a confession and awaits trial next month.

    God, what I wouldn't give for the ol' Beowulf Cluster jokes again... -__-'

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:Rockets and Liberty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, if you took off that fucking "Free iPods" link from your sig, somebody around here might actually take you seriously. You could perhaps even take a class on the proper usage of the Caps-lock key.

  31. an apt qotd from slashdot by doofusdog · · Score: 1

    Yesterday upon the stair I met a man who wasn't there. He wasn't there again today -- I think he's from the CIA.

    --
    log out, go kiting.
  32. Why do people mod up this troll. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Read a few followups, and you'll see that Vandenburg Air Force Base publishes the same info as the web site in question.

    This guy's having a fun time trolling, and most of the mods who didn't RTFA are falling for it.

    I wish /. make it a requirement to RTFA before modding. Shouldn't be hard if they set a session cookie when you follow the link.

  33. Pynchon reference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    michael, if that "rocketman" department was a Pynchon reference, your karma with me has just gone up a few points.

    If it wasn't, go to hell.

  34. For all launches at VAFB, classified or not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...unclassified notices for aviators and sailors are published that indicate otherwise open downrange areas to avoid at particular times, so that a rocket stage or debris doesn't land on the reader. This info is unclassified because it's not nearly as specific as the actual (maybe classified) launch window, doesn't specify the launch vehicle or payload, and is usually general enough not to give a very clear idea of the precise launch inclination or trajectory. -- Mark

  35. See the launch sites. by Hans+Lehmann · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you get a chance, take a ride on the Amtrak Coast Starlight (for non-USA'ns, Amtrak manages what is left of the American passenger train service.) Do it while you can, there's been talk lately of eliminating this money-losing route. The track runs along the beach for much of its route, including the section through Vandenberg Air Force Base. There aren't any public roads through this section of the California coast, so this is the only way to see it without getting a visitor pass to the base. As you go whizzing by, you'll see not just some launch pads, but also the gigantic Vehicle Assembly Building, similar to the one NASA has in Florida. Built in the early days of the shuttle program, but then mothballed in favor of the Florida facility.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    1. Re:See the launch sites. by aggiefalcon01 · · Score: 1

      ... but also the gigantic Vehicle Assembly Building, similar to the one NASA has in Florida. Built in the early days of the shuttle program, but then mothballed in favor of the Florida facility.

      I've been there, and have often been amazed to think of the amount of money that went into creating that huge shuttle-launch complex which in the end was entirely useless, and probably always will be.

      --
      Global warming is neither science, nor politics. It is a religion.
  36. fighter + ring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hopefully he'll ignore that strange circle thing stuck to the bottom of a fighter-interceptor mounted on top of a 747...

  37. What about the Titan IV? by amightywind · · Score: 1

    Very cool post!. But you do not mention the vehicle and (secret) missions of greatest interest: those launched by the Titan IVA-B. They are launched out of Vandenberg at the rate of 1 or 2 a year. They typically launch huge spacecraft into polar orbits. With the big solid boosters and the ability of the core stage to yaw radically it must put on quite a show.

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
    1. Re:What about the Titan IV? by KD6NRP · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, the Titan IV is history. The last one went out of VAFB a few years ago (if you wanted to confirm this, go to www.spacearchive.info/vafblog.htm). The heavy lift role is being taken over by newer vehicles. The Titan IV put on an awesome show.

      Regards,

      Brian W.

  38. I live near this base by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    So.. if I were to post an Ask Slashdot about how to muffle the sound of these missiles so I don't awake to pant-browning-thunder at 1 am in the morning, would it make it or would I be rejected so somebody can ask how to do something needlessly difficult using an iPod and a PocketPC?

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  39. Granted, But Nothing To Be Done by cmholm · · Score: 1

    Granted, it's crappy opsec, but there's nothing to be done about the fact that a major spaceport is run next to a metro area of 20mil, and this ain't the PRC. Due to the location, the USAF has published mariner's and aviator's alerts for years. As another post pointed out, the exact launch window isn't bandied about.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
  40. The Missiles Are Not Effective? by cmholm · · Score: 1

    Rather than just fly off the handle with assumptions, I'll ask what "not effective" means. Are the satellites not achieving orbit? Are the ICBM RVs not making it to Kwaj? Usually? ;)

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
    1. Re:The Missiles Are Not Effective? by Serveert · · Score: 1

      Well, the anti ballistic missiles aren't effective against decoys. So if China sends over 500 missiles and only 2-3 of them have the actual warhead then we've just wasted billions of dollars.

      --
      2 years and no mod points. Join reddit. Because openness is good.
    2. Re:The Missiles Are Not Effective? by cmholm · · Score: 1
      Ah, gotcha. Now I can feel free to split hairs. Most of the rockets out of Vandenberg are satellite launches. Many are randomly selected ICBMs from the arsenal to see how well they're aging, and give the launch crews some practice. A few are targets for the ABM test launches out on Kwaj, about 1000 miles southwest of me. So, none of the launches you're watching are ineffective, unless they go into the drink before their time.

      As for ABMs themselves, to say they're ineffective against decoys broadbrushes the topic a bit, IHO. Missiles based in Alaska will have this problem, because the warheads are still exoatmospheric. If, at some point, we base on the mainland, or heavens be, out here in the 50th state, the RVs will be dropping into air and rapidly sorting themselves out. In any case, the Chinese aren't in a position to poop 500 missiles yet. Anybody other than the Russians are going to be sending a very limited package. Given that non-proliferation has had it's day, it seems dumb to continue leaving ourselves wide open. Just how much is worthwhile to spend will naturally be a bone of contention. Whether someone tries to slip a nuke in the back door on a container doesn't negate the utility of protecting the front.

      --
      Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
  41. why you don't much info about launches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    In the 70s my dad was stationed at Vandenberg AFB. He worked as a cable monkey running wire in the tunnels that connect the launch sites with the control room. He knew the days when they were going to do test launches so one launch he went out to the beach in Lompoc with some of his friends to photograph the launch. He was stopped by MPs and they took his film. This is probably why you don't see much info about the launches.

  42. See you and raise by 87C751 · · Score: 1
    I grew up in Camarillo and we could see these from our backyard.
    Hell, I grew up in Lompoc. Atlas launches used to shake dishes off the shelves. It was annoying...
    --
    Mail? Put "slashdot" in the subject to pass the spam filters.