Slashdot Mirror


3D Chocolate Printer Made from Legos?

enrico_suave writes "Whoot.org (linked via Coral P2P Cache because the poor guy is hosting on a ADSL line) has cool design pics, a now removed video clip, and some interesting details of the process. From one of the plog entries: 'We've developed a print head that will print 5mm 'pixels' of the consumable. It basically acts as a pump. It's a medium sized lego gear (driven by a worm gear attached to the motor) with four axles that repeatedly squeeze and release a pipe attached to a funnel that holds the consumables. a half-rotation of this wheel yields a blob.'"

165 comments

  1. Not 3D by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's not a 3D printer. It only moves on two axes. The chocolate is somewhat thick, but it's still just one layer. A nice design, though.

    --
    That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    1. Re:Not 3D by Reik · · Score: 2, Informative

      The 3D plastic printer we have at work (granted it's a cheep one), prints exactly like this. The third dimension is simply moving the holding tray down every time it prints a layer.
      Maybe he's going to add this next. Maybe he already has it. I didn't want to joing the sheep in vaporizing his ADSL line.

      eric

    2. Re:Not 3D by LuxFX · · Score: 4, Funny

      The 3D plastic printer we have at work (granted it's a cheep one)

      Can you really say that about any 3d printer? It's like saying, "Yes I drive a Ferrari, but it's one of the cheap ones...." hehe

      --
      Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
    3. Re:Not 3D by notthe9 · · Score: 1

      Your analogy fails. Ferrari's are an expensive type of car. Stereolythographic printers are not just an expensive version of a 2D plotter, but can only be really compared to other rapid prototyping devices.

    4. Re:Not 3D by twoshortplanks · · Score: 5, Interesting
      This is just a prototype. The next stage in development is to have mechanism after each 2D print to put down some form of powder that can support printing things not directly on top of the previously printed layer. This is what real 3D printers do. You then shake out or vacuum out the powder once you're done leaving a proper 3d object.

      We were thinking icing sugar.

      Mark (who hasn't really been involved in this apart from talking to James about it over tea every morning)

      --
      -- Sorry, I can't think of anything funny to say here.
    5. Re:Not 3D by Reik · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, I don't think $20k for a piece of equipment is really any kind of significant investment for anyone but a small garage company, and we're far from that.
      Technically, it's an FDM machine. Fused Deposition Molding.
      I believe you just dump an IGES file to it....then maybe sometime next year, you'll get your part.
      If you saw how cheap looking and feeling the resultant product is and (as I've already implied) how utterly painfully slow it is then you'd understand why it is cheep.
      We've had it for like 3 years and it was the cheep model then.
      These things have been around for quite a while.

      eric

    6. Re:Not 3D by ONOIML8 · · Score: 1

      Corn starch is what you want.

      --
      . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
    7. Re:Not 3D by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Years ago, someone worked out how to print holograms in sugar coatings on chocolate. How about printing a hologram on top of the chocolate to make it look like a 3D object? Or chocolate that still seems to be there, just fuzzier, when you bite off half the chocolate.

      But I have to admit, this was a really, really cool design.

    8. Re:Not 3D by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a nice design but it's about as useful as a chocolate teapot!

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    9. Re:Not 3D by allism · · Score: 1

      But that wouldn't TASTE as good as sugar icing...

    10. Re:Not 3D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'cheap' not 'cheep'

    11. Re:Not 3D by MarkusQ · · Score: 1
      The 3D plastic printer we have at work (granted it's a cheep one)
      'cheap' not 'cheep'
      Maybe his spellchecker is one of the cheap ones.

      -- MarkusQ

    12. Re:Not 3D by kundor · · Score: 1

      His ADSL line isn't feeling it, it's linked through a Coral distributed cache. Read away. ;-)

    13. Re:Not 3D by ONOIML8 · · Score: 1

      Taste isn't a concern. After the product has set you simply vibrate the corn starch away and recycle it for the next product. This is how most commercial food molds are made

      --
      . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
  2. whoot! smoke that server! by Scottarius · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    will as slashdotting be something that makes james go whoot?

  3. Woah by punkrockguy318 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow... Very cool. Awesome. Man, I thought I was cool when I made a merry-go-round. sheesh, shows offs...

  4. No Fair! by Bryan_W · · Score: 3, Funny

    They included the coral link in the story. Now what are karma whores suppose to do?

    1. Re:No Fair! by cbrocious · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bitch about it being slashdotted, duh.

      --
      Disconnect and self-destruct, one bullet at a time.
    2. Re:No Fair! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Include a Coral link that actually works?

    3. Re:No Fair! by Daverd · · Score: 5, Funny

      They included the coral link in the story. Now what are karma whores suppose to do?

      Complain about the coral link, apparently.

    4. Re:No Fair! by loid_void · · Score: 1

      Exactly; they don't work very often, and taking down the video proves that coral has little use...

      --
      Anyone seen my jagged little pill?
    5. Re:No Fair! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like you found out!

    6. Re:No Fair! by Spocko · · Score: 1
      They included the coral link in the story. Now what are karma whores suppose to do?

      I just typed in the address minus the coral part. 5 times.

    7. Re:No Fair! by Justin205 · · Score: 1

      You're an evil, evil bastard.

      I love the way you think. :D

      --
      "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
    8. Re:No Fair! by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 1

      My complaint is that it seems to be very slow. I can't believe it is a cache link. If it wasn't a cache, at least I wouldn't have got my hopes up.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    9. Re:No Fair! by aslate · · Score: 1

      Well, actually i get a problem when i click the link. I get a "Net Timeout Error" from Firefox when i click it, and i've never been able to access and of those coral links before.

    10. Re:No Fair! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Can you access this URL:

      http://www.google.com.http.l2.l1.l0.nyucd.net:8090 /


      It could be that you are behind a (buggy) Win 2K DNS Server...

      From Coral's web site:

      Some DNS servers do not support DNAME records (RFC 2672). Coral
      uses such records to help client reuse nearby Coral DNS servers once
      such servers are discovered. While old resolvers should fail
      gracefully given additional information provided by Coral DNS servers,
      some (including Windows 2000 DNS servers) unfortunately do not. We
      are currently looking into some alternative mechanism or work-around
      that enables similar functionality.


      While this obviously isn't an ideal solution, users that cannot access
      DNAME records can try to append .http.l2.l1.l0.nyucd.net:8090 (note the "C" in
      nyuCd) to the end of hostnames, instead of the traditional .nyud.net:8090, to be able to use Coral today.


      http://www.scs.cs.nyu.edu/coral/overview/#problems

    11. Re:No Fair! by illuin · · Score: 1

      Post the google cache link, obviously ;-)

  5. dammit by jpmkm · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Nice cache. This whole thing is absolutely pointless without the website.

    1. Re:dammit by ashkar · · Score: 2, Informative

      It appears that Coral is having problems. Trying any website via Coral is a dead end right now.

    2. Re:dammit by ryanmfw · · Score: 1

      I guess we slashdotted Coral! Uhoh. Next it's gonna be Akamai and Google. Soon, /. will need caches of caches. :-/

      --
      Hurricane Ivan: A 17th century prison collapsed. All of the inmates escaped.
    3. Re:dammit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next it's gonna be Akamai and Google.

      Google is on Akamai networks, so you'd only have to take down the former.

  6. Request... by Idealius · · Score: 1

    Edit > Find in this Page

    "Mirror" > Next.

    "The Text you entered was not found."

    Please change above. ..Wait! I just did >.

    Sorry! (^_^)

  7. Exec Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the glance over the page I took:

    The printer is made with two controllers, one for each axis of the printer, which communicate via IR. The X axis is the master, and sends commands to the Y axis controller. The Y axis controller is on the print head itself, where (I suppose) the X axis controller is on the case. Standard plotter design, really. The print mechanism is four axles that rotate and squeeze a tube filled with melted chocolate. Black & Green 75% cocoa, if it means anything to anyone. 5mm dots, but that's sufficient to make a decent picture.

    I didn't see any pictures of the device. There were some images of the controller motor setups from Mac Brick CAD, but no real pics. The video was removed from the original site, so it didn't get mirrored.

  8. "In other news on Wall Street... by Stick_Fig · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...the price of chocolate has suddenly skyrocketed to $100 a pound due to its newfound usage as printer ink. Lexmark has patented the new chocolate-printing technology, and their lawyers plan to sue Nestlé for patent infringement for selling chocolate that works on its system under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act."

    --
    ShortFormBlog: Writing a little. Saying a lot.
    1. Re:"In other news on Wall Street... by garcia · · Score: 1

      You wish... You can get candy bars for 5 cents now. Problem is that you only get 1/4 of the chocolate that you used to and it costs $35 to get the rest.

    2. Re:"In other news on Wall Street... by rootofevil · · Score: 2, Informative

      well, if you look at the new cartridges from HP, thats not far off. The 94/95 have decreased substantially in size (but not in price) from the 56/57 cartridges, which made a similar decline from the 15/45/78.

      and all most of you do is bitch about how much lexmark sucks for protecting their revenue stream, while HP is giving it to you and you smile and walk away, blissfully unaware.

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    3. Re:"In other news on Wall Street... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Logically you could just buy 4 candybars for 20 cents, and get the same amount of chocolate you used to. :-)

    4. Re:"In other news on Wall Street... by Linker3000 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think you mean "Digital Millennium Candy Act"?

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    5. Re:"In other news on Wall Street... by arose · · Score: 3, Funny

      At last we can share physical things, like we do with music now... MY PORSCHE, IT'S MELTING!!!

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    6. Re:"In other news on Wall Street... by Haydn+Fenton · · Score: 1

      Tha printer isn't actually 3D, it only has 2 axis and the chocolate is only one layer thick.

      Although there are plenty of actual 3D printers.

      w00t, my first post using DVORAK.

    7. Re:"In other news on Wall Street... by Speare · · Score: 2, Funny

      The weekly chocolate ration will be increased to 20 units next week.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    8. Re:"In other news on Wall Street... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Nah, the DRM they're going to put on candy bars soon will prevent you from owning more than one at a time.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    9. Re:"In other news on Wall Street... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Although there are plenty of actual 3D printers.

      Yup. My inkjet here seems pretty three-dimensional, too.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  9. Also interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Saul Griffith at Mit Media Lab has worked with 3-D lego printers that put down wax and chocolate.
    His master's thesis: http://web.media.mit.edu/~saul/mlmasters/sm_master s.pdf
    is about "Towards Personal Fabricators: Tabletop tools for micron and submicron scale functional rapid prototyping".

    I'm more intested in putting down plaster myself.
    Then you can cast metal in it...

    1. Re:Also interesting by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm more intested in putting down plaster myself.
      Then you can cast metal in it...


      Indeed, what but do you make your casting model with?

      Aha!

      KFG

    2. Re:Also interesting by caffeineboy · · Score: 1

      If you put down wax, you can easily do lost wax investment casing, or you could make a plaster mold and then do a wax burn out in an oven if you want a plaster positive mold.

      --
      +++ ATH0 +++
    3. Re:Also interesting by cfuse · · Score: 1
      Saul Griffith at Mit Media Lab has worked with 3-D lego printers that put down wax and chocolate.

      Have you noticed how waxy this chocolate tastes?

  10. Connection in Pittsburgh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He complains about connecting in Pittsburgh on the way to SF in his latest post. Actually, it is not a bad place to kill time. They have free wireless in the middle core.

  11. Not far off by GoClick · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know that really don't seem that far off. Not with confections maybe but it's almost gotten this bad. You should all move to Canada. Or vote. Damnit you Americans need to take a stand against your corrupt politicians. Write more letters, not emails.

    1. Re:Not far off by grasshoppa · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, lately, I've been considering exercising a different freedom: The right to bare arms.

      They're so damned white, they'll blind our politicians stupid.

      Not that we'd notice a difference.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    2. Re:Not far off by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      blind our politicians stupid.

      I think you are much, much too late.

    3. Re:Not far off by tehdaemon · · Score: 1
      " they'll blind our politicians stupid."


      Not a chance. You actually think that they can see anything through those dollar signs??? They are blind (and stupid!) enough already.


      I recommend trying bear arms. With bears still attached. After the bears have eaten a few of the fatter politicians mabe the rest of the politicians won't be in such a hurry to ban guns and save the wildlife anymore. ;))

      --
      Laws are horrible moral guides, moral guides make even worse laws.
    4. Re:Not far off by dipipanone · · Score: 1

      > I've been considering exercising a different > freedom: The right to bare arms. Boring. Come back and let me know when you want to join the struggle for the right to bare arse.

    5. Re:Not far off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take a stand against the corrupt politicians...

      Too bad the win-or-lose system that we have won't let you make any sort of incremental progress towards installing a non-party candidate.

    6. Re:Not far off by chaoaretasty · · Score: 1

      That idea's nothing but moon shine.

  12. editors on drug? by hdd · · Score: 2, Informative

    how could a story like this one get onto /. front page, it's nothing more a 2 axis lego printer with a an exaggerated name (there is one on the back of lego mindstorm invention retail box, and you can build one from the step by step instruction that comes with ULTIMATE BUILDERS SET (3800)) yeah, it can squeeze chocolate, but it's not like we have girlfriends anyway.

    --
    This Sig is removed due to factual inaccuracy
    1. Re:editors on drug? by kfg · · Score: 3, Funny

      yeah, it can squeeze chocolate, but it's not like we have girlfriends anyway.

      Ah, you have yet to learn the proper application of chocolate.

      KFG

    2. Re:editors on drug? by plasticpixel · · Score: 1

      How could a story like this get into the /. page when is was 'news' two years ago. Sheez....

      I feel like Bill Murray in Ground Hog day.

  13. Ooh! by iamdrscience · · Score: 3, Informative

    Looks like a fatal misunderstanding of the Coral P2P cache. Coral only caches the page/file linked through it, not the images, video, etc. on the page. So people going to the page will be able to read what he says about it, but his ADSL connect will still be slammed on all the images (it's slow now... surprisingly not slashdotted yet).

    Also, since Coral doesn't cache links, anybody clicking on his links to look at anything other than the one page linked to by slashdot will further increase the load on his server (or more likely just be disappointed and continue the DoSing of this poor guy's DSL line).

    1. Re:Ooh! by Guspaz · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually it looks like you misunderstand how relative URLs work :p

      Most image URLs on sites are relative, which means they don't store the full URL (IE, "http://foo.com/myimage.png"), but instead only the relative path ("myimage.png" or "./myimage.png").

      The hostname is assumed to be the current host, unless that's overridden in the HTML.

      Unfortunately, the creator of this website made the fatal error of using fully qualified URLs instead of relative URLs for his image files. If he were to realize what was going on, I'd imagine he'd immediately make that change.

      So while you're correct in the context of THIS page, in general the Coral P2P cache will cache most images on most sites.

    2. Re:Ooh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So while you're correct in the context of THIS page, in generSo while you're correct in the context of THIS page, in general the Coral P2P cache will cache most images on most sites. al the Coral P2P cache will cache most images on most sites.

      Oh, yes indeed, it does!

    3. Re:Ooh! by fbform · · Score: 1

      If he were to realize what was going on, I'd imagine he'd immediately make that change.

      Good point. So I wondered why he isn't changing it. And I found that www.whoot.org resolves to 213-152-53-77.dsl.eclipse.net.uk, and realized the guy is probably fast asleep. The story was posted at 2200 EST, so that was 0300 GMT. He might sleep in on Saturday morning. Might it be a good idea for Slashdot if stories linking to personal websites and small companies were posted only when the site owners were likely to be awake and in a position to reconfigure their site if necessary?

      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    4. Re:Ooh! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      With a site that small, who could guarantee that he'd be there even during the day? I know when I was using my PC as a webserver, I never checked it (although I never had any real content, either...).

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    5. Re:Ooh! by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure if his DSL connection was being slashdotted, he would probably check what was happening when he realised it was taking him 60 seconds just to load a webpage.

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    6. Re:Ooh! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Well, considering the A in "ADSL," it's possible for him to not be able to serve any pages but still download (although he'd have a problem requesting pages, unless he had some QoS set up with his webserver at a lower priority).

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  14. On P2P linking... by Black.Shuck · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...it would be nice to see Slashdot using Coral-links *before* an article goes live, instead of "Oh yeah, whoops... We get a lot of visitors, right? Better quickly edit a P2P link in there before someone notices the new arti..."

    Here's a JavaScript Bookmarklet I made to make Coral-linking a cinch:

    javascript:l=document.location.href;if(l=='about:b lank'){l=prompt('Input a URL to Coralise:','');};if(l!=''){if(l.search(/\.nyud\.ne t\:8090/)==-1){document.location.href=l.replace(/\ b\/(\b|$)/,'.nyud.net:8090/');}else{if(confirm('Yo u are already looking at the Coral-cached version of this page.\n\nVisit the Coral web-site instead?')){document.location.href='http://www.scs .cs.nyu.edu/coral/';}else{void(0);}}}else{void(0); }

    Put that in your Favorites or Bookmarks -- make sure it is a single line of text, not those multiple-lines. Then just click it when you want to see a cached-version of the page you are currently looking at. Using it on an already cached page will ask you if you want to visit the Coral web-site.

    1. Re:On P2P linking... by Black.Shuck · · Score: 5, Informative

      Oops... There appear to be a few erroneous spaces in that link. Here are the fixes:

      about:b lank

      Should be...

      about:blank

      And this one...

      /\.nyud\.ne t\:8090/

      Should be.../p>

      /\.nyud\.net\:8090/

      And this one...

      http://www.scs .cs.nyu.edu/coral/

      Should be...

      http://www.scs.cs.nyu.edu/coral/
    2. Re:On P2P linking... by Nermal6693 · · Score: 1

      Warning: Slashcode has gone and put spaces into that code :(

    3. Re:On P2P linking... by Black.Shuck · · Score: 2, Informative

      Screw it, it's all messed up.

      I made a page which has the link on it:

      Coral P2P Bookmarklet

      Coral-linked, of course. ;)

    4. Re:On P2P linking... by ashkar · · Score: 5, Informative

      Or if you use firefox, mozilla, etc., Coral has a context menu extension that you can install here.

    5. Re:On P2P linking... by Black.Shuck · · Score: 1

      Cool! As you can tell, I had no idea. ;)

      Thanks for the link.

    6. Re:On P2P linking... by ricotest · · Score: 1

      There appears to be some erroneous HTML in your comment. Here is the fix.

      Should be.../p>

      Should be...

      Should be...
    7. Re:On P2P linking... by ricotest · · Score: 1

      The amusing thing is that the cached site is down but the original site is still up :)

    8. Re:On P2P linking... by adavies42 · · Score: 1

      The part that displays a dialog if the current page is blank doesn't work on Safari 1.2.3. If you just enter a hostname without a protocol, it replaces the "lank" in "about:blank" with that, and fails to add the coral part (i.e., "google.com" becomes "about:bgoogle.com"; if you enter a full URI w/protocol, it's echoed directly into the location bar, again w/o coral. What exactly are you doing with that grep against /\b\/(\b|$)/?

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
    9. Re:On P2P linking... by Black.Shuck · · Score: 1

      That part of the RegEx is looking for the first *singular* occurence of a forward-slash (ie; ignoring the forward-slash pair in "http://") followed by a word-break (\b) or end of line ($):

      /\b\/(\b|$)/

      I assume Safari is interpreting "\b" as a literal character, rather than a word-break.

    10. Re:On P2P linking... by adavies42 · · Score: 1

      It works fine when used on an existing URL (i.e., when clicked while on a webpage), just not when one is typed into the dialog.

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
    11. Re:On P2P linking... by Black.Shuck · · Score: 1

      Ah. That's entirely my fault -- you have to type a fully-qualified URL, including the trailing-slash. For example: http://slashdot.org/ will work, but www.slashdot.org or slashdot.org won't.

      To be honest I only tested that dialog with copy-pasted URLs, which tend to be fully-qualified when you copy them directly from a web-page anyway.

      Laziness on my part. ;)

  15. mirror by teknickle · · Score: 1, Informative

    hey, just use the ultimate mirror: google. http://www.google.com/search?q=inurl%3Awhoot.org+l ego&btnG=Search&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8 I found the articles and pics. Sweet. (I would throw it on my own server, but not ready for getting slashdotted myself).

    1. Re:mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your search - inurl:whoot.org l ego - did not match any documents.

      Suggestions:

      - Make sure all words are spelled correctly.
      - Try different keywords.
      - Try more general keywords.
      - Try fewer keywords.

  16. A sequence of events by iamdrscience · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is what went through my mind during the split second as I read the title.

    "3D Chocolate Printer"
    What the crap? Somebody made 3D printer out of chocolate?

    "3D Chocolate Printer Made from Legos?"
    Made from legos? What? This person made it out of chocolate legos? Insanity. That is so awesome.

    And then a second later I realized what it actually meant and while it's pretty cool, it just couldn't live up to my above first impressions. That said, I'm going to go see about making some chocolate legos.

    1. Re:A sequence of events by robson · · Score: 2, Funny

      Likewise. Here's what flashed before my eyes:

      [sign on a closed-down movie theatre that reads: Yahoo Serious Festival]
      Lisa Simpson-"I recognize all three of those words but that statement doesn't make any sense."

    2. Re:A sequence of events by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Who needs a whole printer? A drum, a hose and a pump will do me just fine! Mmmmm...

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:A sequence of events by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile I'm going to get to work on my 3D Lego printer made of chocolate.

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
  17. "Transparent" Coral caching my butt... by nweaver · · Score: 0

    Opera doesn't like it. It tries to download rather than just render.

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
    1. Re:"Transparent" Coral caching my butt... by Kurayamino-X · · Score: 1

      my copy likes it just fine, version 7.11 in case your wondering.

      --
      ...I got nothing.
  18. Chocolate ... I'm in love by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 2, Funny

    I never thought it would come to this but I just fell in love with a printer. :-P

    --
    in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
    Francis Smit
  19. What's with all the food articles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I guess _someone_ at Slashdot is pretty hungry...

  20. Shit. by antoy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just when you think you've gotten used to the zany Slashdot titles, you get '3d Chocolate Printer Made From Legos'. We're officially on another dimension now.

    1. Re:Shit. by prattboy · · Score: 1

      Better yet... what's this "plog" that is mentioned in the title. Did the editors mean blog? Or did I miss out on a trendy new tech term?

    2. Re:Shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know just when you've spent a lifetime mastering Width and Height.. BAM they come and throw Depth at you.

      On the plus side, now I've figured out a quicker way to get past this bump between the kitchen and the carpet.

    3. Re:Shit. by dspacemonkey · · Score: 1

      I think a plog is a Project Log.

      I'm not sure if that's what is meant in this case though, or if it is just a typo.

  21. Plural.. by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 4, Informative

    The plural of "Lego" is, and has always been, "Lego"

    Thank you, and goodnight.

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    1. Re:Plural.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll? I was just trying to be helpful.

    2. Re:Plural.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As soon as I saw the article headline, I knew that the legions of Lego plural crusaders would be on the case, helping to keep the world safe for Danish trademarks. However, I was rather surprised that it took 30ish posts before the first one appeared.

    3. Re:Plural.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The plural of "Lego" is, and has always been, "Lego"

      WRONG. Jackass.

    4. Re:Plural.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh goodie, is it name calling time?

      Remember kids, nothing gets a point across like resorting to name calling!

    5. Re:Plural.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The plural of "Lego" is, and has always been, "Lego"

      Don't worry, when I am supreme ruler of the world, I shall make use of the word "Legos" punishable by death.

      Those scum will regret their cretinous mauling of that fine expression.

    6. Re:Plural.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your link says LEGO bricks... still not "Legos"!

    7. Re:Plural.. by flyneye · · Score: 1

      concider the legi of the field,stacketh they not?
      yet i say to ye,duplo in all its glory hath not invented the choco-jet USB. -flyneyes epistle to the unwary chap 8 verse 47 side 2

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    8. Re:Plural.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bollocks! There's no way that Jackass is the plural of Lego.

    9. Re:Plural.. by kundor · · Score: 1

      The point is that "Lego" is no more correct than "Legos" for the plural. Everyone correcting it to Lego is just as wrong, and while we're going to be wrong anyway we may as well use accepted english usage and go with Legos.

  22. Nice try by causality · · Score: 1

    What's this about a motor??

    Nice try, but everyone knows that Real Men only
    program printers in Pure Lego.

    --
    It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
  23. Great excuse for school by sentientbeing · · Score: 2, Funny


    Teacher : Wheres your science homework?

    Kid: The dog ate it.

    Teacher: What have I told you about missing homeworks? Im sick of your excuses.

    Kid: Its true this time. Honest. I printed it out with chocolate ink.

    Teacher: *Slap* Thats enough. Principals office now!

    --

    ------
    beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
    1. Re:Great excuse for school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Chocolate is poisonous to dogs and cats.

      "The lethal dosage of theobromine in dogs is between 250 and 500 mgs/kg, or about 2/3 to 1 1/3 of baking chocolate for every 2.2 pounds of body weight. However, serious non-fatal poisonings have been reported in dogs after eating smaller amounts.

      At our practice, a 20-pound dachshund showed serious signs of poisoning after eating 3/4 of a pound of milk chocolate and another 22-pound dog died after eating two pounds of baking chocolate."

      source:
      http://www.apogeecomgrp.com/drkevin/chocolate.html

    2. Re:Great excuse for school by shufler · · Score: 1

      Just because it's poisonous, doesn't mean they won't eat it.

  24. Re:dammit - minor point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    don't you think your first sentence necessitates the second one? as in, no shit sherlock.

  25. Come on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should find a new way of coming up with headlines apart from tacking a question mark on the end of any given sentence?

    It doesn't make sense to use queries in that way?

    You should use a full stop or even an exclamation mark?

    "3D Chocolate Printer Made of Lego!"

    Much better?

  26. plog: wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is a plog?

    I know blog

    I know wiki

    I even know "bliki"

    what is plog?

    1. Re:plog: wtf? by comwiz56 · · Score: 0

      project log... i know... ridiculous

    2. Re:plog: wtf? by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      Plog

      What's the matter, having problems with google?

  27. Google cache... by llZENll · · Score: 5, Informative
  28. Feeding time by triffidsting · · Score: 5, Funny

    I gather from the recent two stories that the /. editors are hungry - whose turn is it to feed them?

    --
    Non, je ne veux pas coucher avec toi ce soir.
  29. I'm sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    But that is the best headline ever.

    -Spexx

  30. The only important question is... by John+Miles · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... does the printer support proportional rendering of chocolate superscripts in Times New Roman?

    --
    Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
    1. Re:The only important question is... by protohiro1 · · Score: 1

      That was really damn funny man. I am laughing here.

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    2. Re:The only important question is... by twoshortplanks · · Score: 1

      James is working on getting it to support SDL files; So if you can render a 3d object out of your fonts...

      --
      -- Sorry, I can't think of anything funny to say here.
  31. Gillette Business Model by cynic10508 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Great... You just know that Hershey's is going to charge an arm and a leg for a refill cartridge!

  32. Plog? by Puff+Daddy · · Score: 1

    Plog? What the hell is that?

    1. Re:Plog? by shrewmy · · Score: 0

      Project log!!! Just another fun *log word for people who don't want to sound girly for writing in a diary.

  33. Willy Wonka by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy a relative of Mr. Wonka? As for me I wait for a 3d lego xerox machine.

  34. More Pictures of The Printer by twoshortplanks · · Score: 4, Informative

    These are some development pictures I took of the print head testing. Note at this stage James, Nicholas and Leon were playing with the consistancy of the chocolate and managed to print something that didn't totally look unlike something much more worrying.

    --
    -- Sorry, I can't think of anything funny to say here.
    1. Re:More Pictures of The Printer by god · · Score: 2, Informative

      And here are some more pictures taken by Katrien earlier on in the project. You can see Nicholas (the print head designer) and James (2-axis, software). Oh, and Richard (support). We managed to do this in a three weeks and as we talk James is demoing this at FooCamp2 (assuming he managed to assemble it again). The best bit about this is having the meeting room full of Lego...

  35. It's Lego! by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's not Legos. It's like sheep. I have one sheep. You have one sheep. We have many sheep. This field is full of sheep. The printer is made of Lego!

    1. Re:It's Lego! by twoshortplanks · · Score: 3, Funny
      And the 3d printing team have lots of lego sheep.

      (I can't believe someone had to say "stop spending all your time building sheep and get back to making a 3d printer" to them)

      --
      -- Sorry, I can't think of anything funny to say here.
    2. Re:It's Lego! by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      People who say Legos make Baby Jesus cry. ;_;

      Ok, so it's not *Baby* Jesus, but it's the closest I could find. :P

    3. Re:It's Lego! by k98sven · · Score: 1

      Naw.. Lego being Danish, the canonical plural must be the Danish. Hence, I present you with: legoklodser.

      (And "Lego" is an abbreviation of the danish "LEg GOdt" = "play well")

    4. Re:It's Lego! by n3k5 · · Score: 1
      Lego being Danish, the canonical plural must be the Danish. Hence, I present you with: legoklodser.
      legoklodser is the plural of legoklods. it means lego bricks. which is the correct way of referring to multiple, err, lego bricks.
      --
      but what do i know, i'm just a model.
  36. Even More Pictures of The Printer by twoshortplanks · · Score: 1, Troll

    Here's a couple of more recent pictures that I found on my digital camera. You can see the whole printer (with chocolate) printing in these shots.

    --
    -- Sorry, I can't think of anything funny to say here.
  37. Actually... by MikeSweetser · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...it's "LEGO bricks" or "LEGO pieces". Not Lego, or Legos, or even LEGO. LEGO pieces/bricks, to review to the company (which should always be capitalized) and the actual objects themselves. This is straight from LEGO (who really wants it as "LEGO® bricks" but you can't have everything :))

    Mike

    1. Re:Actually... by MikeSweetser · · Score: 1

      That should be "refer". I kan tipe gud.

      Mike

    2. Re:Actually... by Jeppe+Utzon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Lego is a contraction of "leg godt" which is danish for "play well"

    3. Re:Actually... by Lewis+Daggart · · Score: 1

      The reason they want to be called LEGO bricks is the same reason Klenex wants to be called Klenex facial tissues.. so they can keep their brand name. If they're simply called legos, then other companies can create their own legos and argue that its a generic term (i dont know the exact legal terms here so forgive me). If they call then LEGO bricks, then they've covered their tail.

  38. LEGO operating systems already exist... by mikelang · · Score: 2, Informative
    ...and can be conveniently used:
    1. Re:LEGO operating systems already exist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the Asterix RTOS, which was developed at the univeristy I study at, and I get to use it in the RT-course Im taking:

      http://www.mrtc.mdh.se/projects/asterix/index.ph p? action=show_section&what=files&sec_id=2

      I have no idea how it compares to BrickOS, NQC or the java firmware, since I havent used any of those, since I cant afford mindstorm-lego.

  39. Green & Blacks by nickovs · · Score: 2, Informative

    >Black & Green 75% cocoa, if it means anything to anyone.

    I'm guessing that it means Green and Blacks chocolate. G&B make some of the best organic chocolate around in my opinion. I wonder however if they did extensive scientific testing before they settled on the relatively high cocoa content 75% stuff. I think I should apply for research funding to look into this in more detail :-)

    --
    If intelligent life is too complex to evolve on its own, who designed God?
    1. Re:Green & Blacks by allism · · Score: 1

      Best organic, hell, they make some of the best dark chocolate around, period. Great stuff for making chocolate mousse with.

      Mmmm, mousse...I think I'll have to make some tonight...

    2. Re:Green & Blacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Organic chocolate?

      Who makes (or eats?) inorganic chocolate? The Transformers?

  40. Plurality by gidds · · Score: 1, Informative
    This one's always confused me. Here in the UK, 'Lego' has always been a mass noun; the individual bits of plastic are known as 'Lego bricks' or 'bits of Lego'.

    And yet I keep reading the word 'Legos', which makes no sense here. Is the term officially different in the US, or have you merkins been getting it wrong all the time (unthinkable!)?

    --

    Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    1. Re:Plurality by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      I've never heard anyone use Lego as a mass noun in the US. Whether it's "officially" different or not, it does seem to be a genuine difference between US and UK English, just like hood vs. bonnet or Microsoft is vs. Microsoft are. "Lego" is singular here, and "Legos" is plural.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    2. Re:Plurality by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      Is the term officially different in the US, or have you merkins been getting it wrong all the time (unthinkable!)?
      The company maintains that Lego is plural.
  41. Maybe they should make it a laser... by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 1

    ... I really want to see the user's face when he prints something, and sees the whole printer turn into a hot steaming pile of stuff =)

    Then imagine getting a support call like "URGH! MY PRINTER TURNED INTO JUICE!!!", it is something that won't happen everyday!

  42. I told you so... by Coupons · · Score: 1

    The dog really did eat my homework!

    --
    If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, would it? ~ Albert Einstein
  43. Legii !!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Adding "ii" makes anything a plural + youre cool 'cos you speak LATIN!

  44. Moneymaker! by TheHawke · · Score: 1

    I can see potential with this invention. Take the basic idea then utilize it to decorate cakes and confections with. Print your loved one's face on a triple-layer chocolate cake for their birthday and watch as their jaws hit the floor with astonishment. I can see dollar signs perking already!

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
  45. Chocolate and water form concrete by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1

    On the picture site it says that mixing water and chocolate (to dilute the chocolate) is a bad idea. Usually, this is done with milk, because of solubility of fat components or whatever.

    Anyway, a guy I know is in the 'chocolate decoration' business. He works for a chocolate company and designs new desserts, and good-looking chocolate items for exhibitions and magazines. As you may know, photos in magazines usually aren't of the _real_ food (because this would look unattractive), but highly processed. Like roasted chicken is covered with brown shoe shine to make it look more 'tasty' (in a magazine, that is). I kid you not.
    Anyway, this guy told me that if you add a small (critical) quantity of water to molten chocolate, it solidifies to something he called "concrete". He told me that it this happened, it was impossible to get it out of the jar, and it had to be thrown away. I have tried it and not succeeded, maybe because I used the wrong type of chocolate. It is not something you want to happen in a printer...
    Z

  46. If the output bugs you.... by AetherBurner · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is the best way to be a frog...If the output bugs you, just eat it! Also, it beats a shredder for disposing of the output.

  47. Re:Please, it's not 'Legos' by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

    Yeah you're right but you are fighting a losing battle (or should that be 'loosing'?). Look what they did to 'couldn't care less'.

    --
    Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?