Slashdot Mirror


Transmeta TM8800 And Ultraportable Announced

yerdaddie writes "The just-released Transmeta TM8800 has been integrated into a new ultraportable from Sharp. The smaller 90nm variety clocks and performs better than the older 130nm TM86XX Efficeons. It also seems the Orion Multisystems personal clusters discussed earlier on slashdot will be built around this processor variant. Hopefully Transmeta will be releasing a developer kit soon for eager hardware hackers."

116 comments

  1. Well by Daengbo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Since the new product is in Japanese, I can't really comment except to ask about Beowolf Clusters...

    1. Re:Well by burns210 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but these Beowolf Clusters would be much smaller, and less energy intensive, then their Opteron or Itanium counterparts.

    2. Re:Well by wwwillem · · Score: 1

      At least you have improved your Japanese a little with the knowledge that "$*#!*&$*#@&($ Microsoft Windows XP Professional" surely means "Sharp recommends Microsoft Windows XP Professional". :-)

      --
      Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
    3. Re:Well by tigersha · · Score: 1

      Call them Samurai Clusters then

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
  2. Interesting but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    someone wake me up when Sharp decide to build an ultraportable that runs Linux.

    Repeat after me. Winmodems are not modems.

    1. Re:Interesting but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      BAH, I use to think this as well, but now-a-days, who the hell cares, about modems?

      ahem

      Broadband has tripled

      and there are hotspots everywhere these days as well

    2. Re:Interesting but by brilinux · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actaully, sharp's PDA is Linux powered, the first widely successful Linux PDA made availiable, I believe. I have one, and I use it as an X server so that I can ssh into my FreeBSD box at home and run programs. It has a WiFi card, built in keyboard, and all around is very nice. There is also an alternative Linux distro availiable for it.

    3. Re:Interesting but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Zaurus is cool kit. Nice PDA.

      Its not an ultraportable laptop though...

    4. Re:Interesting but by commodoresloat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I had linux running on my Sharp Actius 100 about 4 years ago. There was even a driver that worked with the modem, as I recall. Let's see.... yeah, here's the archive of my install experiences.

    5. Re:Interesting but by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, if you are into LinuxMobile IBM thinkpads are really good choices.

      I own a small Thinkpad X31 and Linux couldn't be happier on this machine than any other. At least I can just imagine what will happen if I run Linux on my friends' Toshibas, Fujitsus, Dells, HPs, and what-nots.

      IBM's the real deal, no poppycock Win-anything!

    6. Re:Interesting but by metamatic · · Score: 1
      IBM's the real deal, no poppycock Win-anything!


      Except the Win-dows you are required to purchase with the machine, with profits sent to Microsoft. That's the deal-breaker for me.
      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    7. Re:Interesting but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you claim to disagree with the Windows license you should be able to get a refund on the operating system (because the Windows license says so).

      I think this is still the case, although it is more hassle than not having to do it at all.

    8. Re:Interesting but by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Doesn't it say that you get a refund for the entire computer, as opposed to just the OS? I'm pretty sure that Microsoft has lawyers who can write EULA's

  3. Battery life by Schreckgestalt · · Score: 2

    Could anyone who is gifted with the knowledge of japanese please tell me how much battery life it has?

    1. Re:Battery life by fidget42 · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to the fish, it gets 5 hours.

      "With the economical electrical design, approximately 5.0 hours* actualizing the long haul drive. In addition, if the MOBILE switch was changed to MOBILE mode, CPU throughput and picture brightness were held down, it becomes setting of electric power consumption concern."

      --
      The dogcow says "Moof!"
    2. Re:Battery life by CdBee · · Score: 4, Funny

      I tried babelfishing it, turns out that page is all about Dirty Schoolgirls who like hot sausage. That or I didn't get the right URL.....

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    3. Re:Battery life by Huogo · · Score: 1

      5 Hours claimed doesn't seem like all that much for a so called ultra effeciant chip. My laptop is an Acer with a Pentium-M 1.5 GHz, and it claims 5.5 hours battery life. I've used it for about 3.75 hours while keeping the screen brightness up, using the wireless networking components, and burning some CDs before it finally hit the critical battery warning at 10% and I pluged it in, and this is a standard laptop w/ dvd burner, 60 GB HD, and a 15" screen.

    4. Re:Battery life by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      While with the AMD and Intel chips, 5.5 would be a long stretch, Transmeta has a long history of getting 10+ hours of battery life with their chips. (I've even seen a report or two with over 20 hours of battery life.) I would expect that the battery life would be at least 10 hours, probably around their mean of 11, at least with the Crusoe. I doubt they would release a processor with extremely less battery life for the Efficeon line. So, 5 hours would probably be way too low, unless the system was being utilized at full usage the entire time, under the heaviest of applications.

      Check their website for more details - http://www.transmeta.com/efficeon/efficeon_tm8800. html

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    5. Re:Battery life by timts · · Score: 1

      since your laptop is so big, the battery size is a lot larger. but this one is probably the one with longest battery for that size.

      I could link my laptop to a UPS to claim that it can last 30hours. :D so size does matter here.

    6. Re:Battery life by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Ultraportables are thin and LIGHT. A battery is not light. 5hrs is not bad at all for an ultraportable - ULV P-M ultraportables get 2-3 hours.

  4. Another Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.engadget.com/entry/5844163416339364/

    Another Link provides some extra info.

    1. Re:Another Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant
  5. Enthusiasts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I know that Mini-ITX boards using VIA low-power chips have a strong following of hobby SFF projects. Is there something similar for the Efficion?

    1. Re:Enthusiasts? by mocm · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      ***Quis custodiet ipsos custodes***
    2. Re:Enthusiasts? by chill · · Score: 1

      VIA is better. The VIA Mini-ITX have hardware support for MPEG-2 (CN266) and AES, and the new CN400 boards also have hardware support for MPEG-4. They even release some custom stuff for Xine to support hardware acceleration of MPEG-2/4.

      This way you low-power, low-heat VIA CPU can focus on other stuff than video decode/encryption.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    3. Re:Enthusiasts? by Khali · · Score: 1

      I have had such bad experiences with VIA hardware that I will most probably never buy anything from them again.

      First there was this VIA Rhine-based network adapter (D-Link DFE530TX), which looked cool and I bought 8 of them (for me and friends). One year later, as 100Mbps ethernet networks were becoming more popular, we realized that the Rhine would fail under moderate to heavy load. There was apparently an undocumented hardware design problem which had to be worked around in drivers, at the price of performance. This took a long time to get it to work reliably under Linux and *BSD.

      Then I got a VIA KT133-based motherboard (Asus A7V133-C). It's only after I had bought it that I leant about the IDE support being unreliable and requiring -again- software workarounds to prevent data corruption. I also had difficulties getting a video grabbing device to work properly (DC10+), and the docs clearly stated that VIA chips were known to cause much trouble.

      To put it short, I would not trust VIA as a base for a mini-ITX system. So it's quite nice to see Transmeta as a possible alternative now.

    4. Re:Enthusiasts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I contacted Iwill about getting one of these boards to build a system with. They are currently priced at around $400-$500 each. A bit too pricey for my tastes...

  6. transmeta cpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    why is it that i still can't buy transmeta cpus easily to stick onto also easily available motherboards? these days low power, running cool and reliable are more important than high performance (24/7 devices).

    1. Re:transmeta cpus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can't buy them to stick onto easily available motherboards because they cannot share the same socket or pin outs of existing cpus. they have a northbridge and agp controller built into the chip so you don't need that on the mobo, etc.

      you'll see them in boards designed for them. but its not possible to make them drop in replacements ala what used to be possible in old socket 7 systems with amd or cyrix.

      get used to it. all cpu manufacturers will have their own packages and pin outs now.

  7. transmeta is so cool but.. by John_Allen_Mohammed · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How can I buy a transmeta chip and build a system from one ? I checked pricewatch but they dont list transmeta chips... and what sort of motherboard do they clip onto ? It seems to me, at least, they're cool factor (linus a former hacker) is very high but in reality it's very ambigious when it comes to the real world.

    Love to put to get a mythtv box with a transmeta chip at its heart but I guess that's not possible so far :( :( :(

    --

    Skype Me! username: john_allen_mohammed
    1. Re:transmeta is so cool but.. by mocm · · Score: 2, Informative

      I hope these boards will be available soon. And hopefully also with 90nm Efficeon.

      --
      ***Quis custodiet ipsos custodes***
    2. Re:transmeta is so cool but.. by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      Efficieons aren't socketed, so you have to buy an Efficeon motherboard. Which, for some reason, seem to be really scarce.

  8. From what little I can gather from the article... by Tuxedo+Jack · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It looks to have the following abilities/specs:

    1.26 kilograms (2.772 pounds)
    1.6GHz Transmeta processor
    Wireless B/G using an Atheros device
    CD/DVD drive
    Some kind of hyper-brightness ability for the screen
    Windows XP SP2 (NX flag support)
    ATI Mobility 7500 (probably at least 64MB RAM, since it says the laptop can play FFXI, and that's kinda video-intensive)
    A switch to convert from normal-power mode to mobile-power mode (thus changing processor efficiency and other things)
    Some kind of remote control a la the iPod Remote

    I can't read kanji and hiragana, so I'm quite out of it.

    I assume that Linux support will be forthcoming from the community for this, as Sharp states that they recommend XP Professional SP2 for this device at the top of the page.

    --

    Striking fear in the authors of godawful fanfiction, I am here, appearing in darkness, Tuxedo Jack!
  9. More info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
  10. What I would like to see.. by FluffyWhiteBunny · · Score: 1

    I want someting about the size of one of the old Sony picturebook, running on either a transmeta or via low power processor. It should have a color screen, although it doesn't have to be too fancy even older dual scan technology would be fine. It would need wireless, and should have decent (4+ hours)battery life. All for under $700USD. It wouldnt need all the bells and whistles that the Japanese like to stuff in their ultraportables, it just need to be able to browse web pages and run a word processor.

    1. Re:What I would like to see.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My NEC mobile pro 780 running netbsd fits the bill at only 200$.

      NEC mobile pro on ebay : 130$
      Cisco aironet wireless card: 20$
      512mb cf card for netbsd: 50$

      Running netbsd on a handheld? Priceless!

  11. How about releasing a mini-itx mobo? by solidhen · · Score: 1

    Or in fact any mother board that takes a TM8800 that is sold retail?

    Nah, that would mean selling more processors so they won't do it.

    --
    Some things are more important than an animated rat
    1. Re:How about releasing a mini-itx mobo? by mocm · · Score: 2, Informative

      You mean like this ?

      --
      ***Quis custodiet ipsos custodes***
    2. Re:How about releasing a mini-itx mobo? by fnj · · Score: 2, Informative

      That is not a TM8800 board. The processor it comes with has truly pathetic performance.

    3. Re:How about releasing a mini-itx mobo? by mocm · · Score: 1

      They are pin compatible, so the board can probably be upgraded. And the TN8600 is still better than a VIA CPU.

      --
      ***Quis custodiet ipsos custodes***
    4. Re:How about releasing a mini-itx mobo? by curtvdh · · Score: 1

      I have to ask, but why in the name of all of Satan's little helpers does this thing have both a parallel port and four (count 'em - 4!) RS-232 COM Ports? Why not replace the Printer port with a DVI-OUT, and just get rid of the COM ports alltogether? Who needs 'em?

  12. Use as external hard drive by BWJones · · Score: 4, Interesting

    and a Dirrect HDD function which lets you hook it up to another PC over USB and use it as an external hard drive (if only this were standard on every laptop).

    I have been wondering how long it would take the Windows world to adopt this feature. Of course it has been shipping with every Powerbook since the very first one (I believe the Powerbook 100 back in 1990 or 1991). Of course back then it was with SCSI and now it is with Firewire leading me to wonder why they used USB?

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Use as external hard drive by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      They used USB because it's a lot more common than Firewire on things that aren't Macs.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Use as external hard drive by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 1

      "I have been wondering how long it would take the Windows world to adopt this feature. Of course it has been shipping with every Powerbook since the very first one (I believe the Powerbook 100 back in 1990 or 1991). Of course back then it was with SCSI and now it is with Firewire leading me to wonder why they used USB?"

      Yeah, this feature is really good to have. Just like cars, you can actually use one laptop to bootup another dead laptop and put a OS back inside.

      Except that MacOS doesn't crash so easily...!

      If only the Wintel world would adapt this. Easy installation for all!

    3. Re:Use as external hard drive by mrklin · · Score: 2, Informative
      ... and iBook too.

      Pressing the letter "T" while booting will boot the computer into "target disc mode". From the mode, you can connect that laptop to any Mac with firewire and it will automatically mount and be available as an HD on the desktop.

    4. Re:Use as external hard drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been wondering how long it would take the Windows world to adopt this feature.

      In the Windows world we could always use the hundreds of dollars left over from buying equivalent-performing hardware to buy actual USB drives. As many as we wanted, really...

  13. Page Translation Courtesy of Systrans by iamatlas · · Score: 5, Informative
    My first time karma whore-ing!

    Approximately, it builds in the thin-shaped DVD drive of 9.5mm, lightness approximately 1.28kg (PC-MP50G approximately 1.26kg)* 1 scantness approximately 28.8mm (the most thin section) actualizing the light weight compact body. With business and it can carry about lightly with private, shows the high performance of completeness ahead going out.

    Due to the CD/DVD drive of built-in, the pleasure of DVD spreads e.g., you look at the movie software and the original work DVD with the business trip return and the coffee. It is the front tray system which taking in and out the disk is easy to do. In addition, if PC-MP70G of DVD multiple drive loading, it can compile television program and the image etc. of the digital video camera which were videotaped with the DVD recorder easily, can draw up original DVD. All you base are belong to Sharp

    From state of power source off, the button of the substance one touch just is done, Windows(R) without starting INSTANT PLAY which start * 1it is possible DVD and CD* adopting 2. Furthermore, using the remote control headphone where volume setting and chapter operation etc. belong, because it can do, it can enjoy in portable DVD player feeling.

    Letter and the picture clear vivid. It can enjoy with the image where also the DVD software and the broadband contents are beautiful brightly.

    * 1 When the DVD software and the CD software are enjoyed with INSTANT PLAY, it is necessary to set the disk to drive.

    * 2 It actualizesInterVideo (R )withInstant ON TM.

    Low adopting the trance meta corporation make Efficeon TM TM8800 1.6GHz which is proud of the electric power consumptionhigh performance to CPU. High operational frequency is actualized without increasing electric power consumption with adoption of 90nm process.

    Trance meta corporation makeEfficeon TM TM8800 strengthens also security performance. The safety for virus attack such as the cord/code execution with buffer overrun is raised.

    (C) 2002- 2004 SQUARE ENIX CO. and LTD. All Rights Reserved. Title Design by Yoshitaka Amano

    Indicating the 3D game and streaming image etc. insmoothly with the ATI corporation make MOBILITYTM RADEON TM 7500 which corresponds to 3D. High throughput It requires "FINAL FANTASY(R) XI for Windows(R) ", it is appointed to the official operational recognition personal computer.

    * 3

    The game software is selling separately. With the economical electrical design, approximately 5.0 hours* actualizing the long haul drive of 4. In addition, if the MOBILE switch was changed to MOBILE mode, CPU throughput and picture brightness were held down,* 5, it becomes setting of electric power consumption concern.

    * 4 It is the time when it measured Corporation electronic intelligence technical industrial association "JEITA battery methods-time measurement (Ver.1.0)" of on the basis. You can verify detailed measurement condition, in the support page classified by type of Mobius home page.Http://www.sharp.co.jp/mebius/ and actual drive time differ depending upon use environment.

    * 5 The operational frequency of CPU is held down low, in initial condition display intensity from under 2nd is changed in. There are times when occurs scene falling with such as animated picture playback.

    Maximum 54Mbps* 6 (standard value) building in the wireless LAN of the IEEE802.11b/g conformity which corresponds to high-speed communication. The Super G TM mode which raisestransfer rate* it corresponds to also 7. The other personal computer and the data can share "radio de chat" and network setting can be changed "entrusts Internet" and so on, can use automatically smoothly with the wireless.

    * 6 Numerical value of indication is maximum with respect to theory of wireless LAN standard, is not something which shows actual data rate.

    * 7 SuperGTM is the wireless LAN high-speed technology which the Atheros Communications corporation developed. SuperGTM function is used, it is necessary also for the wireless LAN equipment aheadconnectingto correspond to Super G TM.

    1. Re:Page Translation Courtesy of Systrans by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Funny
      at the end of the 2nd paragraph:
      ...videotaped with the DVD recorder easily, can draw up original DVD. All you base are belong to Sharp
      Well, now we know where the Zero Wing guys got their translation! "Courtesy of Systrans," indeed!
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Page Translation Courtesy of Systrans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goddamm you're right, ..I always pictured a bunch of japanese devs adlibbing over coffee and cigarettes, during an all-nighter to ship the intl. version. This proof makes it a little less funny (as if the joke wasn't stone dead already).

    3. Re:Page Translation Courtesy of Systrans by Compuser · · Score: 1

      If you do the Fish (same as systrans) you see that
      this was added by Iamatlas, presumably for a laugh.
      This statement is not on the original page.

    4. Re:Page Translation Courtesy of Systrans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      duh... the post you replied to was a joke pointing this out.

    5. Re:Page Translation Courtesy of Systrans by iamatlas · · Score: 1

      I don't pander to the slashdot crowd for laughs. I pander to the slashdot crowd for cheap laughs.

    6. Re:Page Translation Courtesy of Systrans by Compuser · · Score: 1

      lol

  14. ...but Transmeta may not survive. by reporter · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The "technology" that Transmeta developed is essentially a VLIW processor that can be micro-programmed to interpret the IA32 instruction set. By removing the hardware for direct decoding or execution of the complex IA32 instructions, the Transmeta chips save power.

    Unfortunately, for Transmeta, this "technology" is neither new nor hard to duplicate. The Opteron (AMD) and the new Pentium IV (Intel) are both VLIW processors microprogrammed to execute the IA32-64 instruction set.

    Both AMD and Intel have an R&D budget that dwarfs the annual revenue stream of Transmeta. It has had several years of losses and will likely head into bankruptcy by the end of next year.

    AMD and Intel are in a fierce battle that will destroy lesser players like Transmeta. Unfortunately for Transmeta, the IA32 processors are rapidly becoming commodities with shrinking margins.

    Is there a white knight for Transmeta?

    1. Re:...but Transmeta may not survive. by mocm · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, code morphing software and microcode are a big difference and I doubt that Intel or AMD can do it without violating Transmeta's patents. They also have the long run 2 (LR2) technology which they have successfully licensed to NEC, so with the Efficeon business picking up and more LR2 licenses, they may yet survive. Or they will get bought by Intel or AMD because they both can't do 90nm with 1.6 GHz at 7Watts.

      --
      ***Quis custodiet ipsos custodes***
    2. Re:...but Transmeta may not survive. by Yokaze · · Score: 2, Informative

      > The Opteron (AMD) and the new Pentium IV (Intel) are both VLIW processors microprogrammed to execute the IA32-64 instruction set.

      Neither the Opteron nor the Pentium IV are VLIW processors. Both translate x86 code to micro-ops, not VLIWs. From those both companies, the Itantium is the only VLIW processor. But none of them does code morphing, unless you run a VM on it.

      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
    3. Re:...but Transmeta may not survive. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I wonder if it would be a good idea for them to get bought out by Via, and merge the technologies of the Efficeon and the C3/Eden.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:...but Transmeta may not survive. by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      Intel and AMD will have to cater to the low-power market to drive Transmeta out of business. This is a good thing, because power usage on current mainstream CPUs is out of control.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    5. Re:...but Transmeta may not survive. by imgod2u · · Score: 1

      [I]The "technology" that Transmeta developed is essentially a VLIW processor that can be micro-programmed to interpret the IA32 instruction set. By removing the hardware for direct decoding or execution of the complex IA32 instructions, the Transmeta chips save power.[/I] A separate firmware layer lies there to interprete the x86 instructions. The VLIW processor core can only understand VLIW instructions given to it by the firmware. [I]Unfortunately, for Transmeta, this "technology" is neither new nor hard to duplicate. The Opteron (AMD) and the new Pentium IV (Intel) are both VLIW processors microprogrammed to execute the IA32-64 instruction set.[/I] They're not. While both the K8 and Netburst do decouple decoding, they decode into internal micro-ops which are more RISC-like than VLIW. Although Banias and K8, with micro-ops fusion, do resemble a bit of VLIW, but can hardly be called that.

    6. Re:...but Transmeta may not survive. by repetty · · Score: 1

      "...power usage on current mainstream CPUs is out of control."

      Amen.

    7. Re:...but Transmeta may not survive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's <I> and not [I], stupid.

    8. Re:...but Transmeta may not survive. by anubi · · Score: 1
      Power consumption - this has been of great concern to me as well. Not just the power, its also the resultant heat.

      With the geometries constantly getting smaller, yet the physics of diffusion being the same, and the power consumption/heat dissipation rising at what seems to be a neverending inexorable rate...

      Gee, guys, how long do we expect a processor to be in service these days before the inexorable laws of diffusion render the processor inoperable?

      Worse yet, I suspect its degradation is probably a statistical thing: that the processor will succumb to bit-pattern sensitivities long before it plain quits, with the resultant apparent random crashes making it appear to be a software problem.

      I knew when I was designing with the old 386SX machines, that I could reasonably expect the processor to run for 100 years easily. They were so confident of the processor reliability that it was customary to not use a socket for the processor, as the socket itself had a far higher rate of failure ( corrosion ) than the processor.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    9. Re:...but Transmeta may not survive. by Hoser+McMoose · · Score: 1

      While the VIA and Transmeta both make some very comperable performing chips (both in terms of raw performance and power consumption), you really couldn't "merge" the technlogy.

      The two companies have taken a dramatically different approach to things. VIA went for a VERY simple x86 core, not entirely unlike the original Pentium but with a few tweaks to the memory subsystem and bus, among other things. Transmeta, on the other hand, went for the most obscure possible way to make an x86 chip. They designed an entirely new VLIW architecture with a translation layer thrown overtop of it.

      The end result is the same, but the path to get there is totally different. One could probably make a valid enough argument for which of these is better, though I would tend to side with VIA on this one due to the fact that their managing the same performance when built on the same manufacturing process but with a die size less than half the size of what Transmeta has. What's more, VIA is actually making money on their processor business while Transmeta is DEEP in the red. I think things are only going to get worse for them as well now that AMD and Intel are both starting to offer processors with bthe same power consumption, better performance and low cost (the ULV Celeron chips from Intel and the GeodeNX line from AMD).

  15. Wake up!Sharp does build a ultraportable for Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    EmperorLinux offers the Sharp Actius MM10, MM20 with various distributions of Linux available (pre-installed). The Sharp features full Linux hardware support for: X, sound, USB, PCMCIA, WiFi, networking, hibernate, and more. They include a 56 Kbps PCMCIA modem.

    I have dual partition with Fedora Core 2 and Debian Sarge installed on my MM20. Check out the web site for more details.

    Welcome back from your deep sleep.

    http://www.emperorlinux.com/meteor.php

  16. No benchmark results for TM?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I did a big search for Transmeta benchmark results a couple days back when Orion was announced and found nothing of consequence.

    What's up with that?

    Sure, it is probably 'fast enough', but I want to know how fast.

    1. Re:No benchmark results for TM?? by mocm · · Score: 1

      The 90nm CPUs are not commercially available and Orion gave some LINPACK results. Here are some results from a Japanese article about the 130nm Efficeon.

      --
      ***Quis custodiet ipsos custodes***
    2. Re:No benchmark results for TM?? by dave_t_brown · · Score: 2, Informative

      Van's Hardware has done some Efficeon benchmarking here.

  17. Development kits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Development kits for this chip start at $445 and increase sharply from there. That is a problem for my students who are trying to do projects. The good news is that they can often, but not always, get donated evaluation kits.

    You can usually buy a chip on some kind of commercial board for less. Does anyone have any experience using boards that weren't intended as development kits?

    Given another poster's comment that the company may not be there next year, is it worthwhile (educationally) to develop for these chips? ie. Will the knowledge gained by doing a project with this chip be transferrable to other low power chips?

    1. Re:Development kits by hpavc · · Score: 1

      the transmeta kit can include all sorts of nicities like longrun dc power hardware as well. not sure if other packages are so nice.

      --
      members are seeing something, your seeing an ad
    2. Re:Development kits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are no longer offering Efficeon development kits to the public like those for Crusoe. You have to settle for the 3rd party IBASE MB860 single board computer, which basically has no where near the level of internal access and documentation of the previous Crusoe kits available to board manufacturers.

  18. Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When will it be available in the USA, like the mm10 and mm20?

  19. Re:Wake up!Sharp does build a ultraportable for Li by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yawn...

    Half opens an eye. MM20 is nice. Hmm. 2 Hrs battery life.
    Thats like a UPS isn't it? Not cheap.

    Thanks for the coffee

  20. CPU Efficiency Comparison by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am curious; is there any comparison chart of the efficiency (MIPS/Watt) of various CPUs?

    I wonder how the Transmetas really score...compared to PowerPCs, for example.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    1. Re:CPU Efficiency Comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Pentium M will win. At 1.3GHz you can run it at around 8 watts (peak). And the performance is phenomenal (basically equivalent to a 2.2GHz P4)

      At 2GHz it's up around 20W (higher voltage) and the performance is astounding: MUCH faster than a 2.5GHz PPC970 at integer work (for less than half the power), and faster than even a 3.4GHz Pentium 4...

    2. Re:CPU Efficiency Comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      contrary to what the other response to this said... Transmeta Efficeons -do- have the highest work/watt of any x86 CPU. The Pentium M is a bit faster but draws a lot more power overall, especially when idle or running workloads that don't need 100% of the cpu performance.

  21. FUD-thought by repetty · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Both AMD and Intel have an R&D budget that dwarfs the annual revenue stream of Transmeta. It has had several years of losses [smartmoney.com] and will likely head into bankruptcy by the end of next year."

    Intel and AMD stockholders must be wondering what the fuck their company's have been blowing their R&D budgets on.

    Smaller companies are almost always way more productive with a buck than big companies. That's why I would withhold publishing their obituary if I were you.

    Remember, Apple has been going out of business every year for two decades.

    --Richard

    1. Re:FUD-thought by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 1

      "Intel and AMD stockholders must be wondering what the fuck their company's have been blowing their R&D budgets on."

      AMD has been putting out good tech after good tech lately.

      On the other hand, Intel is in some serious (steaming brown substance) if they don't buck up. Seems like they are the ones playing catch-up now.. the Pentium architecture really needs a good overhaul.

      By that I meant GOOD! Our current P4s are really just extensions of the old P3 design, except they had a longer pipe line on it to make it scale better for those nice Ghz numbers.

      With the Pentium-M they actually went back to the original P3 design and tried to make it more efficient instead of making it clock so fast.

      In all... nothing new to see from Intel, move along..

  22. That's awsome!!! by solidhen · · Score: 1

    Do you know where I can buy one? I can't seem to find a URL on the ibase website.

    --
    Some things are more important than an animated rat
  23. Re:From what little I can gather from the article. by Panaflex · · Score: 1

    Hrm.. it appears to be 32MBytes of vram (http://www.sharp.co.jp/products/pcmp70g/text/p6.h tml)

    10.4" screen (Do they use inches for screen size in Japan??)

    I know next to nothing about Japanese, so grain of salt for us all!

    Pan

    --
    I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
  24. Both Opteron and Pentium IV are VLIW. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of listening to the Intel marketing department, I suggest that you look at the block diagram of the Opteron. Each IA32 instruction is converted into a wide instruction or a sequence of wide instructions. This instruction then drives, potentially, multiple functional units (e.g., addition and multiplication) in parallel. If that behavior is not VLIW, then what is VLIW?

    You say "tomato". I say "tomatoh". You say "RISC". I say "VLIW".

    1. Re:Both Opteron and Pentium IV are VLIW. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not seeing much in the Prescott internal block diagram to sugest that it is VLIW. Are all the micro-ops really attached in parallel?

      I'm not sure why the grandparent post said opteron had VLIW, because it should have basically the same micro-op core as the Athlon64.

      Besides, AMD technical doc 24112.pdf (Software Optimization Guide for AMD Athlon(TM) 64 and AMD Opteron(TM) Processors) doesn't seem to suggest that it is a full-on VLIW. The macro op might have one load-store with one compute (int or float), but it is still broken down again to single-op micro-ops:

      Internal Instruction Formats
      The AMD64 instruction set is complex; instructions have variable-length encodings and many
      perform multiple primitive operations. AMD Athlon 64 and AMD Opteron processors do not execute
      these complex instructions directly, but, instead, decode them internally into simpler fixed-length
      instructions called macro-ops. Processor schedulers subsequently break down macro-ops into
      sequences of even simpler instructions called micro-ops, each of which specifies a single primitive operation.

      A macro-op is a fixed-length instruction that:
      Expresses, at most, one integer or floating-point operation and one load and/or store operation.
      Is the primary unit of work managed (that is, dispatched and retired) by the processor.

      A micro-op is a fixed-length instruction that:
      Expresses one and only one of the primitive operations that the processor can perform (for
      example, a load).
      Is executed by the processor's execution units.

    2. Re:Both Opteron and Pentium IV are VLIW. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a clear difference between VLIW and the out-of-order processing that the AMD and Intel x86 chips do on their micro-ops: a micro-op can stall for an indefinite amount of time without regard to other micro-ops issued at the same time. The separate execution units operate largely independently, not in lock-step as in a VLIW design.

  25. hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you sure that's not an iBook?

  26. Re:From what little I can gather from the article. by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 1

    1.6GHz Transmeta processor

    Does anyone know if the new Transmeta processor is any better than the older ones?

    If AMD vs Intel has thought us anything, it certainly proves that clockspeed does not equal to performance!

    While Transmetas are really great power-wise (even predating the Pentium Ms), I really wonder if they can hold their own speedwise when compared to a 1.6Ghz Centrino processor.

    Anyway the Pentium Ms are pretty good.

  27. Devkits? Transmeta is too closed. by istartedi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Transmeta is too closed to hackers. That's part of the reason it's failing. Few hackers are going to buy one of their $1000+ devkits when they can get a mini-itx board for $200. Yeah, the 'meta board can supposedly peform better without a fan, but so what? Transmeta has no clue. They could have started a revolution, instead they tried to push disruptive technology through channels that didn't want disruptive technology.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  28. Easy by Erect+Horsecock · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Transmetta chips are small so that they can fit into tiny ass enclosures like notebooks, those orion things, and OQOs. If it had to be socketed (instead of a BGA) it would be thicker, the ceramic packaging would be larger and more expensive due to the use of pins...

    Etc...

    Its a space/size thing... I'm sure they could make one if they wanted but I doubt the demand would be enough to warrant the manufacturing costs (don't forget Transmeta pays TSMC or UMC to make the chips for them).

    FWIW

    --
    I hope you die painfully and alone.
    1. Re:Easy by Atomic+Frog · · Score: 1

      Generally solder down gives better performance than socketed.

      Yes, the chips are small. But it is possible to make them support a socket (how do you think they get tested?). I advise you to wait. If enough people want them, it'll happen. The first 1.6GHz Efficeons are only a few weeks old, you don't stock-pile 100,000 chips before you let loose to market!

      FYI, the new 90nm (it's no secret) are fabbed at Fujitsu, not TSMC or UMC. It's never been UMC. IBM was one of the earlier ones.

      The thing that saves you is just that little less wattage from the Efficeon, enough not to need a fan, which saves you space and power.

      In comparison, my Thinkpad runs a Pentium-M 1.6GHz (same clock), and the fan often comes on. The Sharp Mebius with 1.6GHz Efficeon, I believe, doesn't use a fan. I know for sure the predecessor from Sharp (a slower Efficeon at 130nm) has no fan.

      Wait for benchmarks. I think you'll be pleasantly surprised. A 1.6GHz Efficeon should be performance competitive with a 1.6GHz Pentium-M.

    2. Re:Easy by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1

      It scares me to think of what a person with your nick would know about "tiny ass enclosures".

  29. Transmeta is too closed? Don't be so sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    > Transmeta is too closed to hackers.

    Don't be so sure of that. I'm involved with the group that's reverse engineering the Efficeon and CMS right now.

    This is from the same people who brought you the Crusoe Exposed series of articles, but the Efficeon version will be *much* more detailed. As you'll see, Transmeta should not have relied on trade secrets in lieu of more patents. There are many smart people out there and this chip can and will be exposed.

    Besides, Transmeta is no longer releasing a full Efficeon devkit to anyone with cash, supposedly to avoid another "incident" like with Crusoe. Notice how only a 3rd-party SBC is available to the public in lieu of a real "development kit" this time. Unfortunately they were too late; the analysis effort is already well under way.

    1. Re:Transmeta is too closed? Don't be so sure... by istartedi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, you've sort of proved my point. 'meta is just a VLIW chip with some special firmware on it. The real magic is in the firmware. Now, I'm not suggesting that they should open source the firmware, but when you can't socket the thing into a PC MoBo, when you can't even buy the mini-ITX board at a reasonable price, when people have to reverse-engineer basic technical data, it's DOA for any real hacker (except hackers who like to reverse-engineer!). It's for "corporate partners only". It's closed. It's dead, and that's a shame.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  30. X31-too heavy, no trackpad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never understood why IBM uses accupoints, which are awful, the trackpad is the best mouse in the world, I even use a trackpad with my desktop.

    Besides, IBM does not know how to build small, X31 is much heavier than mm20.

    mm20 works great under linux and weighs only 1.99 pounds.

    An ultraportable must be light enough so that can be comfortably held with a single hand. mm20 has the right weight, X31 is too heavy.

    1. Re:X31-too heavy, no trackpad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people prefer different things. I like the Accupoints, I find them very easy to use and accurate. Trackpads drive me crazy - not very accurate and most trackpads are way too small to be really useful. I've been known to carry around an optical USB mouse just to avoid using trackpads.

  31. Not too impressive by Deslock · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What major advantages does this have over the 18-month-old Panasonic W2 other than a slightly better video card and smaller footprint? The W2 weighs 2.8 pounds, has a DVD-RW, 12.1" screen, big keyboard, 1.1 GHz CPU, and its battery lasts over 7 hours.

    In the USA, we get the older version of the W2, but it's still some-tasty.

    On a side note, some tips for running Linux on the W2:
    - Red Hat
    - Debian
    - leog forum

    1. Re:Not too impressive by wehe · · Score: 1

      There are even more Linux installation reports for small notebooks, e.g. Linux on Panasonic notebooks, Linux on JVC notebooks. As well as a survey of Linux installations on laptops and notebooks with TransMeta CPUs.

  32. Re:Wake up!Sharp does build a ultraportable for Li by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I also own a MM20 but I am using Slackware Linux. The battery life is actually between 3 and 4 hours of use. Remember that this is a ultra-portable. Only approximately 1.9lbs. That is an excellent battery life and form factor for this price. There are two additional batteries available from Sharp that provide 6 and 9 hour charges but add additional weight. It makes my IBM X series laptop look like a luggable.

    The Sharp MM20 is in my opinion that best ultraportable available outside of Japan for linux.

  33. mm20-hard disk mode-poor implementation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In order to use the computer in hard disk mode you need to use a cradle which is HUGE, heavier than the laptop itself, in order to keep the balance. It does not make sense to use the cradle on the road, I did not buy a 1.99 pound laptop in order to carry 5 pounds around!. In addition, knoppix does not recognize the cradle as a high speed USB device, transferring data under knoppix takes forever.

    In never use the cradle, for making backups of my linux installation and transferring data, I boot the laptop under knoppix from an external pocket DVD writer and save the data on an external firevire drive connected with a PC card. It works much faster than with the cradle.The pocket dvd writer I use is much smaller and lighter than the cradle and can be easily moved around.

    1. Re:mm20-hard disk mode-poor implementation by suranyip · · Score: 1

      no you do not need the cradle, at least here in japan you can get a directhdd cable and connect it directly.

  34. bolony! by khrtt · · Score: 4, Informative

    The "technology" that Transmeta developed is essentially a VLIW processor that can be micro-programmed to interpret the IA32 instruction set...

    Not INTERPRET, but rather TRANSLATE IA32 to native VLIW. The word "translate" means "compile binary to binary" here. The translated result is cached, which makes the whole thing run at a more acceptable speed.

    Intel and AMD do the same thing - IA32 is translated to an internal RISC-like code. They also cache the translated code. Only they do the translation in hardware, while Transmeta does it in software.

    The extra translation hardware drains extra power. The extra translation software uses up extra CPU clocks, effectively slowing down a Crusoe (or any transmeta CPU) compared to a Pentium (any recent Intel/AMD CPU) at the same clock rate. If you slow down the clock on the Pentium so that the performance equals to that of the Crusoe, you reduce the power consumption to the same level as the Crusoe as well. Or better.

    So, all in all, it's a wash. All mobile CPUs throttle down the clock when possible. The maximum speed for the Pentium is higher than for a Crusoe with the same clock. The die of the Transmeta chip is smaller. That's all the difference.

    Surprisingly, where Intel (not AMD) gets its edge with Pentium M has nothing to do with CPU core. It's the way they handle the L2 cache. They have a large L2 cache, but they only clock the block of it where there is an access. This saves a lot of power, while allowing for a larger L2 cache. Which has more effect on the CPU speed and power consumption than all the tricks with the core architecture.

    The original idea that made Transmeta chips so attractive had nothing to do with the core architecture either. The idea was that they would not only slow down the clock, but also reduce the supply voltage accordingly, which squared the power savings compared to Intel SpeedStep. Of course, by now both Intel and AMD do the same thing, so Transmeta doesn't have an edge there any more.

    AMD and Intel are in a fierce battle that will destroy lesser players like Transmeta
    Not necessarily. Transmeta is in a niche market, ultra-mobile IA32 devices. As long as they stay in a niche market, they have a chance. But I doubt they could make it into the mainstream CPU market in near future.

    Is there a white knight for Transmeta?
    Is there an SS1 for Transmeta? Wait, wrong topic...

    1. Re:bolony! by The+Conductor · · Score: 1
      It seems to me that, for Transmeta to survive as an independent player, they need native (or nearly native) VLIW code for computationally intensive tasks like MPEG (de)coding, and/or the OS and drivers re-compiled to native VLIW. That way they can get improved MIPS/watt on at least some of the code, but x86 compatibility at no worse MIPS/watt than a native processor.

      But then again Intel/AMD can do the same thing and make the micro-ops visible.

    2. Re:bolony! by khrtt · · Score: 1

      The strange thing, neither one of Intel/AMD/Transmeta would make the internal instruction set accessible. The only reason for this that I can think of is that they change the architecture between the releases of the chip enough that the code would break, and they want to keep being able to change it.

      Then, Intel might be afraid of coming up with another Itanium.

  35. Linux support for Sharp Mebius/Actius by suranyip · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I own a Sharp Mebius MM20 (Japanese model of Actius MM20) with a 1GHz TransMeta Efficeon TM8600. I managed to get almost everything working in linux, except for one thing: power saving modes (sleep/suspend). Actually, sleep did work with some versions of the kernel (2.6.6 maybe) but after resuming the wireless LAN would stop working (not sure if this is a problem with the ACPI or the Prism54 drivers). Unfortunately, as my main use of this notebook is to work on the road, this forces me to use it in Windows most of the time.

  36. Re:Devkits? hey look, a mini-itx efficeon system! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    http://www.ibase-i.com.tw/mb860.htm


    its "only" the 1Ghz model but thats what counts for getting into people's hands. the faster ones will follow.

  37. Re:What I would like to see.. - Exists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    look at the Sharp Mebius CV model. Its also an efficeon system but is much closer to picturebook size.

  38. nice ultraportables site by ultrapcs · · Score: 1

    Here is a nice site that discusses ultraportable computers and u-PCs (ultra-personal PCs): http://u-pcs.com/

  39. Re:Devkits? hey look, a mini-itx efficeon system! by istartedi · · Score: 1

    Anybody who follows mini-itx and 'meta has known about that for months. They've also known that you can't buy it retail in onesies and twosies--nowhere. Nowhere. It's dead. There are so many other solutions out there that unless you, like Slashdot, follow 'meta out of some warped allegience to Linus, it's not even on your radar. It's dead.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?