Slashdot Mirror


Exceptional Seeing At Dome C in Antarctica

Michael Ashley writes "A paper published in Nature today reports on the exceptional astronomical seeing conditions at Dome C (Coral link) in Antarctica. Obtaining the data posed some significant technological challenges, given that Dome C is uninhabited over winter. The experiment was controlled by a PC/104 computer system that had to survive temperatures down to -85C, and supervise the generation of its own electricity using a jet-fuel powered stirling engine. The computer, running Linux, communicated with the outside world using an Iridium phone. The results are also covered in New Scientist, and the Sydney Morning Herald. Disclaimer: I'm a co-author."

252 comments

  1. Three cheers for global pollution by nlawalker · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like making the ozone hole actually accomplished something.

    1. Re:Three cheers for global pollution by garcia · · Score: 4, Funny

      They claim it's great in the winter when the sun is below the horizon. The reason they claim they can't see anything in the summer is because they are all covering their faces (see here for an example of what I mean!

      This poor motherfucker is the one that is actually there in the Winter (when they claim the telescope is controlled via sat. phone). Notice how *HE* can see!

      The other guys are such wimps. Fur lined face masks and goggles. Sheesh!

    2. Re:Three cheers for global pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it was a hole, but not the one you are thinking of. Think goat!

    3. Re:Three cheers for global pollution by tonyr60 · · Score: 1

      "They claim it's great in the winter when the sun is below the horizon. The reason they claim they can't see anything in the summer is because they are all covering their faces (see here [unsw.edu.au] for an example of what I mean!"

      Obviously FreeBSD country with the red clothing and provision for horns on his head...

  2. the hole in the ozone is good for something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    polluters, the other scientists.

  3. Mod submitter up... by zaren · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    for providing a Coral link with his article. Good jorb!

    --
    Come to the University of Mars! Classes starting soon!
    1. Re:Mod submitter up... by mantera · · Score: 1

      What's a Coral link?

    2. Re:Mod submitter up... by rokzy · · Score: 3, Funny

      What's a link?

    3. Re:Mod submitter up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's a jorb?

    4. Re:Mod submitter up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you mod the submitter?

    5. Re:Mod submitter up... by dodo_dodo · · Score: 3, Funny

      What?

    6. Re:Mod submitter up... by racas · · Score: 1

      Please see this Home Star Runner cartoon for an explanation.

    7. Re:Mod submitter up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wh

    8. Re:Mod submitter up... by Hello+this+is+Linus · · Score: 0

      W.

      --
      Hello, this is Linus Torvalds, and I pronounce Linux as Linux!
    9. Re:Mod submitter up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the FAQ on left hand side under "Help" header.

    10. Re:Mod submitter up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is a coral link?

    11. Re:Mod submitter up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  4. Vow by savagedome · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dome C is uninhabited over winter. The experiment was controlled by a PC/104 computer system that had to survive temperatures down to -85C

    Now, that's a savage dome!

    1. Re:Vow by Ubergrendle · · Score: 3, Funny

      With a -85C ambient temperature, think of how much you could overclock your Athlons...

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    2. Re:Vow by Huogo · · Score: 1

      For a while, until the Athlons managed to heat the the entire region...

    3. Re:Vow by rts008 · · Score: 0

      Does this mean I can move there and my graphics card will "see" better when I play BF Vietnam?...Cool, I can skip the upgrade I had planned and just buy a pair of mittens instead!

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    4. Re:Vow by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      With a -85C ambient temperature, think of how much you could overclock your Athlons...

      I remember a forum post somewhere a while ago (from the pre GHz days) of some guy in Ohio during the winter who overclocked his computer to a ridiculously high settting and set it up outdoors. He called it the "Snow Bunny". According to the guy, it made it to the desktop and ran for a while.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  5. Surviving temps down to -85??? by grape+jelly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The experiment was controlled by a PC/104 computer system that had to survive temperatures down to -85C...

    Wait a sec! =-P Computing equipment *loves* cold, as long as you don't have to worry about condensation. =-P In other words, it's not hard to design a system that can survive -85C. Just do a google search for Liquid nitrogen cooling. Yay for overclocking fiends who make it so you don't even need to mention computing hardware. ;-)

    btw, there's a tom's hardware link on the results page. Check it out. There's a pic of a CPU mount covered in frost. That *can't* be good! =-P

    1. Re:Surviving temps down to -85??? by Homology · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Large fluctations in temperature can be quite bad for hardware : it will contract and expand, and thus inducing stresses on the computer. And relability is a big factor : You can't just fly down there to replace broken parts.

    2. Re:Surviving temps down to -85??? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Informative
      When you do a circuit design, you take into account both maximum and minimum delay paths. These are usually spec'd over a recommended operating temperature range, which most likely doesn't get quite that cold.

      While colder can often mean faster, sometimes a signal requires some minimum delay to work correctly. This is especially true of the minimum hold times required on inputs after a clock transition. So it's possible that some signal might go out of spec if you drop the temperature too far. It only takes a single bad signal to hose the whole system.

      Unlike just dropping the temperature of the CPU chip which will have relatively uniform characteristics, getting the whole system cold might cause a wider range of timing variations. Moreover, even dropping the external heat sink of a CPU to extreme cold doesn't mean the chip itself is in the cryogenic range. They usually run at temps well above the bulk of the heatsink.

    3. Re:Surviving temps down to -85??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're full of it. Capacitors will freeze and change value drastically. Bye-bye power supply, bye-bye everything. We're not just talking the CPU here, we're talking ALL OF IT.

    4. Re:Surviving temps down to -85??? by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing the CPU doesn't mind so much as the hard drives. Moving parts may not like being that cold...

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    5. Re:Surviving temps down to -85??? by mtDNA · · Score: 1

      Cold is fine for the CPU, but what about the power supply, motherboard, etc?

      --


      If you watch TV news, you know less about the world than if you just drank gin straight from the bottle.
    6. Re:Surviving temps down to -85??? by moonbender · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Read the part on the events of May 17th 2004. This has got to be the coolest troubleshooting situation I've ever heard of. An extract (do read the linked paragraphs for the full story!):
      The PC/104 computer was also on the RS-485 bus, and we reasoned that by rewriting the Linux device driver (which we had written in the first place, so we knew what we were doing) we could make the computer impersonate the control panel, and convince the engine that it should keep running. Fortunately, we had a snapshot of the communication traffic between the engine and the control panel from earlier testing in the lab with the manufacturer's MSDOS-based software. But with no hardware available to test our code, we had to modify the driver, send patches over the 2400 baud Iridium link, and rmmod/insmod the driver to try to restart the engine.
      And to think I get nervous flashing a computers CMOS...
      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    7. Re:Surviving temps down to -85??? by Xaleth+Nuada · · Score: 1

      Computing equipment *loves* cold...In other words, it's not hard to design a system that can survive -85C.

      Flawed Logic let me explain:

      Condensation is always a worry because computing equipment warms up as it runs thus creating condensation on the equipment.
      Ever try starting your car in negative temps? Doesn't work so well right? Battery Dead? How well do you think your CMOS batteries are gonna fair in -85C?
      No moving parts to freeze? Can you say Hard Drive? Keyboard? Power Switch?
      Last but not least. The user. You got to have some damn heavy mittens for -85C.

      How do I speak with any authority on this subject. I work for the Army. -40C is the lowest storage temp our equip can handle. Lowest operating temp? A balmy -34C.

      --

      I read Slashdot for the .sigs
    8. Re:Surviving temps down to -85??? by mpoulton · · Score: 4, Informative

      Computing equipment *loves* cold, as long as you don't have to worry about condensation.

      Ah, not so! *processor cores* love cold, not electronics in general. Specifically, electrolytic capacitors freeze and fail below their rated temperature, and it's really tough to find any that are rated to temps that low. Also, because of resistance, capacitance, and crystal frequency value changes at low temps, oscillators and filters tend not to behave. This doesn't even consider the issue of thermal expansion coefficient differences causing BGA chips to pop off the circuit boards! Making anything electronic operate in that environment is highly non-trivial.

      --
      I am a geek attorney, but not your geek attorney unless you've already retained me. This is not legal advice.
    9. Re:Surviving temps down to -85??? by 1984 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Pfft. Next you'll be telling us it's tricky to design space probes to be caught by passing helicopters.

    10. Re:Surviving temps down to -85??? by toddestan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would just put the parts in an insulated box (not too insulated, but enough). As long as you never shut the thing off, you wouldn't have to worry much about the cold. Do it right, and you could probably keep the temperature of the whole system from fluctuating much at all.

      My guess is that due to power restraints, the computer spends most of it's time powered off, or atleast in an extremely low power state.

    11. Re:Surviving temps down to -85??? by tonyr60 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "You can't just fly down there to replace broken parts."

      You can actually, but I guess cost/benefit comes into it.

      I live near Christchurch, New Zealand and once or twice a winter a fully loaded hercules takes off for an emergency trip to Antarctica to rescue some poor bastard that has broken an appendage etc.

    12. Re:Surviving temps down to -85??? by Michael+Ashley · · Score: 3, Informative

      Some electronics operates below its specified minimum operating temperature, and some doesn't. For example, we had some solid-state disks that were rated to -40C, but that failed at -20C. Mostly we have found that PC/104 computers, memory, etc work fine at -60C. M-Systems solid-state disks have been very reliable.

      You want to avoid spinning up a hard disk at -85C though! The altitude (4000m equivalent) also tends to be rough on hard disks (both due to the cooling problems and the smaller head-gap), which is why we avoid hard disks in critical applications. Actually, one of our experiments is running on a Dell laptop with a normal 2.5-inch IDE drive and RT Linux. It has worked fine for two years now.

    13. Re:Surviving temps down to -85??? by Voivod · · Score: 1

      I doubt the board surface temperature actually made it down to -85C. The powered circuitry itself acts as a kind of heater, so as long as it's in a box and powered on all the time it probably kept itself much warmer than this. "Extended Temperature" support in PC/104 boards usually means -40C to +85C.

    14. Re:Surviving temps down to -85??? by strikethree · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, semi-conductors are only semi-conductors at near room temperatures. If it gets too hot or too cold, your semi-conducting material becomes an insulator.

      strike

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    15. Re:Surviving temps down to -85??? by Mr_Dyqik · · Score: 1

      It's a hell of a lot easier to fly down there to replace broken parts than it is to replce broken parts on a space telescope at L2...

    16. Re:Surviving temps down to -85??? by Basehart · · Score: 1

      Whay not just design some little robot people to breathe on it to keep it all nice and warm?

    17. Re:Surviving temps down to -85??? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      no but making a pc104 computer survive low temps' is almost child's play.

      i have one that has survived from -25F to 100F outdoors for over 7 years now.

      it's called making a sealed and INSULATED enclosure. a 386 based PC104 board will generate enough heat to keep it above 32F easily in that kind of cold. about 6 inches of styrofoam will do that, throw in a dessicant can and seal all cables coming out and you are set for cold weather.

      cooling is almost as simple, but takes lots more energy. add into that styrofoam cube a peltier junction and small fan and you can keep it within the heat tolerances (ok 10degF below the 140degF mark is cutting it close.. but they dont have 100F days up there often.)

      Making something survive cold and stay comfortable is easy.. just use that waste heat it generates.

      now keeping a sterling engine running in that cold.. That is impressive.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    18. Re:Surviving temps down to -85??? by amorsen · · Score: 1

      If you had RTFA you would have known that they kept the computer on for 30 seconds every 2 hours, and powered it through winter on 5kg of Lithium batteries.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    19. Re:Surviving temps down to -85??? by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      This is not bad, but what about the incredible feat the software engineers at JPL and elsewhere regularly pull off with the deep space probes? Example

  6. linux astronomy in antarctica... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But nerds are my mortal enemies"
    -Homer Simpson

  7. Screen shot of web page on mobile phone by kbahey · · Score: 4, Informative

    Look at this photo. It is the author's Kyocera mobile phone with a web page showing the temperatures, memory usage and free disk space. Says battery temperature is -34.5 (is that C or F?)

    1. Re:Screen shot of web page on mobile phone by ludw · · Score: 0

      Perhaps C, because it's a C after 34.5?

    2. Re:Screen shot of web page on mobile phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it says -34.5C, what do you think?

    3. Re:Screen shot of web page on mobile phone by Speare · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Nevermind that the others have pointed out the "C" in the image. At -40, the scales equate. That is, -40C == -40F. So it almost doesn't matter which scale we're discussing.

      google: -40 fahrenheit in celsius

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    4. Re:Screen shot of web page on mobile phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Currently?

    5. Re:Screen shot of web page on mobile phone by xutopia · · Score: 2, Funny

      Celvin?

    6. Re:Screen shot of web page on mobile phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Cold?

    7. Re:Screen shot of web page on mobile phone by Innova · · Score: 2, Funny

      Says battery temperature is -34.5 (is that C or F?)

      Seeing how it says -34.5C I'm guessing that would be C.

    8. Re:Screen shot of web page on mobile phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hobbes?

    9. Re:Screen shot of web page on mobile phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Do American scientists use the Fahrenheit scale at all? I'm honestly asking. I'd presume that since the rest of the world uses Centigrade/Celsius and Kelvin, they'd stick to those scales too.

    10. Re:Screen shot of web page on mobile phone by eingram · · Score: 1

      That'd be Kelvin (K). And there is no negative degree on the Kelvin scale. 0 degrees Kelvin would be absolute zero (the lowest possible temperature (same with the Rankine scale)). In Celcius that equals about -273.

    11. Re:Screen shot of web page on mobile phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, American scientists use C or K.

    12. Re:Screen shot of web page on mobile phone by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 2, Informative

      You don't need google to see where the degrees everybody else uses and the degrees the U.S. uses coincide.

      Let x be that temperature.

      Then from the usual conversion formula:

      f = c * 1.8 + 32

      x = x * 1.8 + 32

      -0.8 x = 32

      x = -40

      Q.E.D.

      Not that it matters all that much; all civilized countries figured out celsius degrees years ago.

      ...laura

    13. Re:Screen shot of web page on mobile phone by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

      Depends. Most academic scientists use C or K. As far as industry goes - i dunno. Government, it's a toss up. the USGS still uses a lot of Imperial units, I wouldn't be suprised if some government organizations stilled used F.

    14. Re:Screen shot of web page on mobile phone by xutopia · · Score: 1

      you overestimate people's stupidity! :)

    15. Re:Screen shot of web page on mobile phone by Craig+Davison · · Score: 1

      That's why Kelvin's not a degree. It's an absolute scale.
      -34.5 degrees Celsius is 238.7 Kelvin.

    16. Re:Screen shot of web page on mobile phone by eingram · · Score: 1

      Eh, it's Slashdot. I can't really assume anything. ;)

    17. Re:Screen shot of web page on mobile phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0 degrees Kelvin would be absolute zero (the lowest possible temperature)

      Doesn't the third law of Thermodynamics(sp?) state that it is not possible to reach absolute zero?

    18. Re:Screen shot of web page on mobile phone by eingram · · Score: 1

      Doesn't the third law of Thermodynamics(sp?) state that it is not possible to reach absolute zero?

      Yup, that's what it says.

    19. Re:Screen shot of web page on mobile phone by transient · · Score: 1

      Or just start using celsius temperatures until you're comfortable with them in their own right.

      --

      irb(main):001:0>
  8. Seeing Conditions by ottergoose · · Score: 5, Informative

    What is "seeing"?

    "Seeing" is a term that astronomers use to quantify the turbulence in the atmosphere and how it affects observations from the ground. The stars appear to twinkle because of the effect of this turbulence. In conditions of bad seeing, the stars appear to twinkle vigorously, and the images that you take with your telescope are blurry. In conditions of good seeing, the stars appear more stable, and you can take very sharp images.


    You'd think they'd have a cooler word for that...

    1. Re:Seeing Conditions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called "spun". When you are high on acid everything seems more clear! The stars are brighter, they appear more stable, and they may even talk to you!

      It's a special thing really but due to the public's negative view on the whole "drug thing" the scientists though it would be better to just call it "seeing". No one was the wiser.

      Sorry but you just ruined it for everyone.

    2. Re:Seeing Conditions by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 3, Funny
      You'd think they'd have a cooler word for that...

      I apologize in advance for recycling an old joke, but here are some ideas for 'cooler words' (and phrases):

      Untwinkly.

      Non-Twinklifying.

      Steady-State Stars.

      De Tinky Winkied Star.

      Sluggish Stars (antonym of 'vigorous').

      Lethargtic star viewing.

    3. Re:Seeing Conditions by DrEldarion · · Score: 0

      You'd think they'd have a cooler word for that...

      I'd say they're cool enough already.

    4. Re:Seeing Conditions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Lethargic star viewing

      Sounds like me on the front lawn after a night of drinking.

    5. Re:Seeing Conditions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      We astronomers refer to the twinkling of stars because of such seeing conditions as scintillation. I guess no one liked that word, though, so we dropped it to just "seeing".

    6. Re:Seeing Conditions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'cooler words' (and phrases) for "seeing":

      Hysteresis filtered ?

    7. Re:Seeing Conditions by darrylo · · Score: 1
      You'd think they'd have a cooler word for that...
      "Scrying" ...
    8. Re:Seeing Conditions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scintillation is often used by physicists for the emission of tiny sparks (okay photons...) of light from atomic interactions (as in "scintillation counters"), so astro-physicists I guess are less likely to use the term for anything else.

    9. Re:Seeing Conditions by Mr_Dyqik · · Score: 1

      Scintillation, particularly of gamma-ray burst afterglows, refers to intensity variations caused by the interstellar medium, so it's taken.

    10. Re:Seeing Conditions by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1

      It can mean two things. And it does. But I see you're a radio guy, so you probably weren't to know!

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
    11. Re:Seeing Conditions by Mr_Dyqik · · Score: 1

      The term seeing also applies to the radio bands, so it's not just a measure of intensity variations.

    12. Re:Seeing Conditions by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1

      I never said anything about seeing. I was talking about scintillation, a subset of seeing. Nor did I imply that only optical wavelengths could have seeing or scintillation. My point was that, contrary to your post, scintillation is in fact the proper term for "twinkling", whether or no the term has other astronomical meanings. I'm not sure why this should be problematic.

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
  9. It's a bird, it's a plane...No it's Tux by GillBates0 · · Score: 4, Funny
    The experiment was controlled by a PC/104 computer system that had to survive temperatures down to -85C...The computer, running Linux, communicated with the outside world using an Iridium phone.

    I would have to say Linux was the ideal choice in this case. Penguins are polar creatures. you know. I wonder how the Microsoft Rainbow-bee-man would've fared under such conditions.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:It's a bird, it's a plane...No it's Tux by recharged95 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but the MS butterfly would definitely not make it. What's needed is the FreeBSD guy to heat things up down there.

    2. Re:It's a bird, it's a plane...No it's Tux by krgallagher · · Score: 1
      "I wonder how the Microsoft Rainbow-bee-man would've fared under such conditions."

      Funny, I associate that with MSN. When I think of a Windows I think of the teddy bear logo from windows WFW 3.11.

      --

      Insert Generic Sig Here:

    3. Re:It's a bird, it's a plane...No it's Tux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I think of Windows, a cute cuddly teddy bear is the last thing on my mind.

    4. Re:It's a bird, it's a plane...No it's Tux by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      or the BSD Daemonettes. if they wre there, I doubt the place would go uninhabited through the winter.

    5. Re:It's a bird, it's a plane...No it's Tux by value_added · · Score: 1

      Getting a bit off-topic, but does *anyone* get that rainbow-bee-man guy???

      Maybe it's me, but the only difference between commercials in which a fleshy middle-aged guy runs around in children's clothes and the Arnold Friedman home videos is that the commercials were shot in colour.

    6. Re:It's a bird, it's a plane...No it's Tux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Getting a bit off-topic, but does *anyone* get that rainbow-bee-man guy???

      Any time I see the ads where he runs around blocking the kids' view of the real world, I have to wonder who is going to protect the kids from him?

    7. Re:It's a bird, it's a plane...No it's Tux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If ever a comment deserved 6 points for teh funny, this'd be it. Thanks.

  10. Could have used an... by PhraudulentOne · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hell, all that they had to do was stick a new Geforce and an Athlon in there and she'd be warm as toast ;)

    --
    You create your own reality - Leave mine to me.
    1. Re:Could have used an... by StevenHenderson · · Score: 1

      Even better - any of the Prescott P4s!

    2. Re:Could have used an... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just posted the IP of the box... A good slashdotting would warm that puppy up.

    3. Re:Could have used an... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed..until the battery died.

      That's the fun of multiple design constraints - they get in each other's way.

    4. Re:Could have used an... by suckmysav · · Score: 1

      " Or just posted the IP of the box... A good slashdotting would warm that puppy up."

      Over a 2400 baud line? Somehow I doubt it. Sure, you'd /. the comms line OK, but the PC's CPU wouldn't be doing any extra work.

      Yes, yes, I know it was a just a joke, but hey this is slashdot after all . . .

      --
      "You can't fight in here, this is the war room!"
  11. Someone has to ask ... by YetAnotherName · · Score: 1

    ... does the PC/104 run Linux? No really, I'm curious ... never heard of it before.

    (Don't bother to mod this post up, I've got all the karma I could possibly spend.)

    1. Re:Someone has to ask ... by DiS[EnDeR] · · Score: 4, Informative

      A PC/104 is just a form factor. And provides standards for things such as environmental operating parameters.

      CPU boards usually have an intel clone processor MACH86 or VIA Athena.

      So they can run any OS your desktop can.

      --

      Harder.. Better.. Faster.. Stronger
    2. Re:Someone has to ask ... by joshtimmons · · Score: 3, Informative

      PC/104 is a form factor and external bus specification, not a CPU type. It could have had any of many embeddable cpus on it.

    3. Re:Someone has to ask ... by redJag · · Score: 1

      The computer, running Linux, communicated with the outside world using an Iridium phone.

      Not to mention that it's right there in the submission! Didn't even have to RTFA..

    4. Re:Someone has to ask ... by DiS[EnDeR] · · Score: 2, Insightful

      http://www.diamondsystems.com/
      Heres our PC/104 supplier. We also use a GPIB card from National instruments connected to an Agilent Data logger. Add a Modem Card, Video Card, and two DMM32 Data Aquisition cards. Plus the DMM16 thats already on-board.

      The new Athena Processors have video on-board, and faster CPU's.

      I believe Intel sued over teh Mach86 processor and they had to switch.

      --

      Harder.. Better.. Faster.. Stronger
    5. Re:Someone has to ask ... by sgant · · Score: 3, Informative

      From the article in case it get's slashdotted:

      To operate our experiments over winter, when there was no one at Dome C, we had several problems to address:

      1. For hardware reliability, we wanted to remove all moving parts in the computers, i.e., no disk drives, and no fans. So we used a small PC/104 form-factor computer system with solid-state disk drives.
      2. We had to generate our own electricity. We took two approaches to this:
      1. One experiment, ICECAM, relied entirely on a 5 kg pack of lithium thionyl chloride batteries. The batteries had to provide power for a year, so minimized the power consumption of the computer. The experiment only needed to take data every two hours, so we built a CMOS oscillator to power-up the computer for 30 seconds every two hours. We used MS-DOS 6.22 for the PC/104 computer since it boots quickly and was able to average 10 frames from the CCD camera and store them to CompactFlash disk.
      2. For the experiment that obtained the seeing results, the AASTINO, we needed much more power, up to 400W, and we had to operate continuously, so we used stirling engines running on jet fuel. For software reliability we chose Linux, Redhat 9 to be precise. Software and hardware watchdog timers helped to ensure that the system would recover from most failure modes.
      3. The ambient temperature at Dome C reaches a low of -85C during winter. Computers, and electronics in general, are not designed to operate at these temperatures. We took two approaches:
      1. With ICECAM we had no reserves of power for heating, so we buried the computer in a crypt seven meters below the ice surface, at which point the temperature is stable at the yearly average of -57C. This is still outside the computer's specfication. Fortunately, a test in a low-temperature fridge showed that the computer and solid-state disks worked reliably at these temperatures. ICECAM's camera, a Watec 902-HS, had to remain outside, and tests shows that it was able to operate flawlessly down to at least -80C.
      2. With the AASTINO, the stirling engines produced up to 6 kW of waste heat, which we utilized to maintain a comfortable operating temperature of about -10C.
      4. Internet connectivity was provided by an Iridium phone, which acts like a 2400 baud modem.
      5. The hardware and software had to be carefully designed so that we could recover from most problems remotely. There were no reset buttons to press, and no prompts to "click OK to continue".

      The PC/104 computers we used were made by DSP Design, however it in unclear whether the company still exists, since all our attempts (using e-mail and filling out their laborious on-line enquiry form) over the past 6 months to have a simple technical question answered have received no response.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    6. Re:Someone has to ask ... by Oriumpor · · Score: 1

      The PC/104 is a standard for the cards that slot into the most common Embedded systems. Oftentimes PC/104 MB's will include a Compactflash or PCMCIA adapter, or expect you to convert IDE to do the same via an adapter.

      In short they are X86 micro motherboards. So yes, they will run linux.

    7. Re:Someone has to ask ... by LWATCDR · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Actually they should have used netBSD since it runs on everything!
      Just kidding. PC/104 is a form factor like ATX or ITX I have seen PowerPC, StrongARM, Mips, and of course x86 based systems use that form factor. Of couse if you run across something that you have never heard about before let me tell you about a little secert. It is called Google! It is so cool. Just go to www.google.com and type in PC/104 and all these neat links show up. I wonder if anyone else knows about it yet :)
      Sorry I had to put in the reguired use google comment :)

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    8. Re:Someone has to ask ... by Voivod · · Score: 4, Informative

      The CPU is called the VIA C3 and the chipset is the VIA Eden. The "Athena" in your post refers to a Diamond Systems product name for the board which uses this CPU, not the name VIA calls their own CPU.

      The "Mach86" you're thinking of is the ZFMicro ZFx86 chip. They are battling National Semiconductor, who produced these CPUs under contract for ZFMicro until ZFMicro was no longer able to pay their bills. Intel is not involved at all.

      The other big PC/104 CPU vendors are Transmeta, STMicro (STPC), and AMD (Geode). Recently the Pentium 4-M have been popular for boards which don't need to support extended temperature.

      PC/104 rocks for applications like this. Disclaimer: I work for a PC/104 company. ;-)

    9. Re:Someone has to ask ... by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Sure why not? It's an x86 so there is no reason you can't boot up a main distro. If you wanted you can run linux on many DVD players too (those that use a DSP)
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    10. Re:Someone has to ask ... by tdrury · · Score: 3, Informative

      as others have said, PC/104 is a board form-factor, but it's more than just a size (roughly 4" square). It also dicates the bus. PC/104 uses .1"x2 stackable headers for the ISA 8-bit and another, smaller, .1"x2 header for the ISA 16-bit bus. The two headers are stuck right next to each other. So you can have non-x86 processors on PC/104 but they must be able to read/control the ISA bus. So chips like the StrongArm must include a little glue logic as a bridge.

      Additionally, there is PC/104+ which includes the 32-bit PCI bus in a 4x2mm stackable connector on the opposite side as the ISA headers.

      There are more features to PC/104 but the size and bus signals are the most important.

    11. Re:Someone has to ask ... by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      True, but my comment about the x86 referred to TFA where they said it was on an Intel platform. I kinda assumed the form factor part and my DVD player comment was to illustrate that linux can run on darn near anything.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    12. Re:Someone has to ask ... by Hockney+Twang · · Score: 1

      .1"x2 header...4x2mm stackable connector

      Mixing English and metric measurements? For shame.

    13. Re:Someone has to ask ... by rasz · · Score: 1

      >PC/104 rocks for applications like this. Disclaimer: I work for a PC/104 company. ;-) so you must realize that Taiwanese SoC for ~50$ can do the same :)

  12. Corrected Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    The link that the submitter provided to himself doesn't work. The correct link is: Michael Ashley

  13. As Captain Murphy would say.. by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 2, Funny

    God I hate those jerks in Dome C!

    1. Re:As Captain Murphy would say.. by nb+caffeine · · Score: 1

      i dont even know why we have a dome C. total suck dome...

      --

      "Something's wrong with you...and I hope we never do meet again." - Deftones When Girls Telephone Boys
    2. Re:As Captain Murphy would say.. by default+luser · · Score: 1

      Uh oh!

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

  14. Iridium? Didn't they go bust? by kbahey · · Score: 1

    Iridium? Didn't they go out of business a few years ago?

    Or have they switched to niche markets like in this case?

    1. Re:Iridium? Didn't they go bust? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Their assets were bought, very shortly before their satellites were supposed to have been deorbited. I don't recall who bought them.

    2. Re:Iridium? Didn't they go bust? by Phat_Tony · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Iridium was the dumbest investment opportunity since a 3,000 Guilder Tulip bulb in 1624. The constellation cost $5 billion to construct. It was immediately obvious from the very outset to anyone who spent a little while playing around with the math that there would never be any way to make money from this. You could estimate any reasonable supply/demand curve and come up with a loss- from 1 phone at $5 billion apiece to 5 billion phones (about 1 per person on earth who can ho,d a phone) at $2,001 apiece (the phones cost about $2,000 to produce), there was no number in between where they could conceivably ever make money. In fact, there was no way they could do anything but lose billions.

      So they went bankrupt, and no one would buy the system. It was a textbook case of a colossal business failure, and no one would touch it with a 10-ft pole. The judge hated to rule that a $5 billion infrastructure system burn up in the atmosphere, and luckily, at the last minute, Dan Colussy stepped in with a $25 million bid- less than half a cent on the dollar of initial construction costs, and swept it up.

      Then what? The new Iridium Satellite LLC started cleanning up, which it's still doing. Very profitable. It turns out that, while it's impossible to recoup a $5 billion investment on a satellite phone system is impossible, recouping an investment 1/200 that size isn't so bad.

      --
      Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    3. Re:Iridium? Didn't they go bust? by andfarm · · Score: 2, Informative

      The US Military.

      --

      TANSTAAFI: There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free iPod.

    4. Re:Iridium? Didn't they go bust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's an old joke: "We expect to lose a little on each sale, but we'll make up for it in volume."

    5. Re:Iridium? Didn't they go bust? by mrm677 · · Score: 1

      Iridium was the dumbest investment opportunity since a 3,000 Guilder Tulip bulb in 1624. The constellation cost $5 billion to construct. It was immediately obvious from the very outset to anyone who spent a little while playing around with the math that there would never be any way to make money from this. You could estimate any reasonable supply/demand curve and come up with a loss- from 1 phone at $5 billion apiece to 5 billion phones (about 1 per person on earth who can ho,d a phone) at $2,001 apiece (the phones cost about $2,000 to produce), there was no number in between where they could conceivably ever make money. In fact, there was no way they could do anything but lose billions.

      Iridium was concieved by a Motorola engineer whose wife was complaining about the lack of continuous cellular service as she drove through the Illinois suburbs. No joke!

    6. Re:Iridium? Didn't they go bust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the phones cost about $2,000 to produce

      I seriously doubt it costs $2,000 to manufacture the phones. It would not surprise me at all if Motorola could manufacture the phones for less than $100. I would also guess that the initial investment was largely research and development. Iridium could likely have built and launched more satellites at a fraction of the initial cost.

    7. Re:Iridium? Didn't they go bust? by danila · · Score: 1

      Well, someone had to invest the 5 billion. And I suspect that they had some very decent analysts to evaluate the project. In retrospect everyone is an investment guru, of course, but from their view the project was potentially very profitable. It was very risky as well, but that is not a reason to ignore it. High-risk, high-payoff - absolutely normal investment situation.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    8. Re:Iridium? Didn't they go bust? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      I know it isn't fair to do this, but when I see that $5 bills flushed down the toilet, I can't help but remember that this is around the estimates I've heard of the cost of distributing all the excess food the midwest produces to every hungry person on earth.

      I also can't help but remember that the launch of Iridium involved giving rocket technology to China so they could launch the satellites cheaper than was possible over here. Thanks, Al Gore.

      On the other hand, we can get data connections to the south pole.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    9. Re:Iridium? Didn't they go bust? by Phat_Tony · · Score: 1
      bzzt, Wrong.

      I've got a nice bridge in Manhattan I could sell to you, why don't you give me a call?

      No one had to invest the $5 billion. In fact, no one should have invested it- the world is worse off for that investment. We launced $5 billion worth of scarce capital out into space, and earth will never, ever see anything near a $5 billion return on that investment. It's hard to come up with worse ways to spend it. Apparently their analysts were not very decent, because when I first heard about it, I drew the supply/demand curve on the back of a napkin, and it was immediatly obvious to everyone I showed it to that the project didn't stand a chance. If I'm so smart, how come Mototrola didn't get it? I don't know, but I've got a lot of backup on this one. For one thing, Mototrola took this on the regular fund-raising rounds, and couldn't get investors. AT&T and NTT thought it had no chance of profitability. So did almost everyone else. They eventually had to restructure the entire plan, because they couldn't find any traditional investors who would take a part in it. They eventually ended up pre-selling pieces of the (supposed future) profits from their air-time rate plan to an odd batch of investors, largely royalty, oil barrons, and third world governments, and other people who saw Motorola's pie-in the sky numbers, and thought they were buying a piece of the future. People who also happened to know very little about economics or calculating expected returns. In general, you probably shouldn't invest in anything where Venture Capitalists during the 90's universally thought it looked like a sure looser, and you have to turn to Saudi Princes (some of whom think Al Queda is a good investment for the future) to get your funding.

      There are lots of colossal business failures I'd call risks, or intelligent gambles, that just didn't pay off. But I hate it when people seem to think that stupid and high risk are the same thing. You could call it a high-risk endeavor to spend $1 trillion dollars designing the ultimate mousetrap, but that's not a high risk proposition: there's no risk at all, it's absolutely definite it will lose a fortune. Same with Iridium. Explain to me how the logic is wrong that, going into this from the beginning, there was no price they could set on the product where they could even conceivably come within an order of magnitude of making a profit. Perhaps you didn't get that supply curve I was talking about. I only set the up the unrealistic boundary conditions- everyone has a phone, or no one does. Let's take a look at that. The system cost $5 billion to put up, $80 million a month to run, phones cost $2,000 apiece, and the population of Earth is about 6 billion. They knew from the outset that cell phones were cheaper, lighter, and provided better service in every local market. Iridium was only for rich people who travelled a lot and were willing to pay massive premiums not to have to switch phones and yet were willing to carry a big, heavy, awkward phone- or for people in the middle of nowhere who had a lot of money and really needed to communicate.

      Do you think there are 1 million people who will each pay $3,000 for this? That means a million people who are willing to pay $2,000 for a phone and $3/minute for air time, when 99.9% of the population of the world that could possibly afford that much money lives within range of a higher quality cellular communications system that costs a fraction of the price. That's what Motorolla thought, but every investment firm disagreed, and it doesn't sound likely off the top of your head. All they actually got was 27,000 people, about one fortieth of what they needed to just break even. So they were off by a bit.

      I'm not the only one using his 20/20 hindsight to say this was stupid from day 1. This has become a textbook case in business classes and textbooks for how 2 minutes of common sense math can show that $5 billion in capital was a sure waste. How this ever got through Motorolla is beyond me.

      --
      Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    10. Re:Iridium? Didn't they go bust? by danila · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the nice informative reply. That's all there is to say. :)

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  15. Hmmm what can I say... by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

    ... oh yes:

    Cool!

    --
    ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  16. PC/104 Computers... by DiS[EnDeR] · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I work with Diamond Systems PC/104 computers everyday. These systems are robust and the specifications for operating environments are crucial to applications such as these. Their ability to operate in extreme conditions, temperature, vibration, make them fit for such roles.

    We've used PC/104 computers (running QNX 4.25) for everythign from Remote power stations, Fuel cells, even UAV's.

    --

    Harder.. Better.. Faster.. Stronger
    1. Re:PC/104 Computers... by kbahey · · Score: 1

      And of course, they run Linux too, just like the guys in Antarctica did.

    2. Re:PC/104 Computers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ... even UAV's.
      Urban Assault Vehicles? (google google google) Oh, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles!
    3. Re:PC/104 Computers... by soundman32 · · Score: 1

      We use PC/104 boards.

      Unfortunately, we still write compiled MS BASIC running under MS-DOS 6.2

      The computer may have 16MB of RAM, but we're stuck with 640KB.

      Event protected mode DOS is just a bit too new tech for us here :-)

      Neil

      --
      No sharp objects, I'm a programmer!
  17. Offtopic by St.+Arbirix · · Score: 1

    This is offtopic, but how's that Coral link thingy work? As it open participation?

    --
    Direct away from face when opening.
    1. Re:Offtopic by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just stick .nyud.net:8090 on the end of your domain name (before the /) and it'll grab the content and cache it -- any future queries will return their cache instead of downloading from the original page. The coral links also work like your web browser and update the content when it is out of date.

  18. Re:I Can See into the Future!!!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    madam jojo can see all but she's modded +5 lunatic, not insightful

  19. outta beew by Himring · · Score: 4, Funny

    Base camp: So how's it going there?
    Dome C: Weh, Biwwy daywed me to stiwck my tung to the waw. Oh, and we'we outta beew....

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    1. Re:outta beew by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I'm just picturing the process the poster had to go through to determine that spelling.

      (I went through it myself just to double-check.)

    2. Re:outta beew by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 4, Informative

      Dude, I used to live in Alaska. The solution to the tongue problem, at least according to the neighborhood experts, is to urinate on it until it gets unstuck.

      BTM

      --
      That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
    3. Re:outta beew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The solution to the tongue problem, at least according to the neighborhood experts, is to urinate on it until it gets unstuck.

      You better have a friend along or be sure to drink a few before heading outside to lick things, then. I don't know about you, but my tongue is a bit of a distance from my crotch at all times.

    4. Re:outta beew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You need to do more Yoga.

    5. Re:outta beew by Celsius10 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Which is also known as a "Saturday night" in Germany.

      --
      "Little things hitting each other. THAT'S WHAT I LIKE!" - Time Bandits
    6. Re:outta beew by Wes+Janson · · Score: 1

      I dunno about you, but not only am I hesitant of my abilities to project urine into my face, but I'm also rather disinclined to do so, even in an emergency. Then again, you must already be rather odd to be living in the frozen corner of the globe known as Alaska.

    7. Re:outta beew by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Then you could end up with two sensitive bits frozen-stuck to the damn flagpole.

      Great idea. Not.

      --
    8. Re:outta beew by danro · · Score: 1
      I dunno about you, but not only am I hesitant of my abilities to project urine into my face, but I'm also rather disinclined to do so, even in an emergency.
      Spoken as someone who has obviously not been frozen to a solid metal object and violently ripped loose...
      Take my word for it, I live in Sweden, and one winter when I was a very young and very stupid kid I managed to get my tongue stuck on a lightpole (don't ask).

      After realizing that I could either freeze to death or free myself I pulled myself free...
      There was blood and pain like you wouldn't believe!
      Oh, and did I mention that the entire part of skin that had touched the metal stayed frozen to it and was ripped off?
      Later (when I had healed enough to eat normally) I looked at the pole and you could still see the outline of a tongue frozen to it, it stayed there, as a monument of my stupidity until spring.

      If you ever get yourself into that situation (and don't have a friend that can stop laughing at you long enough to rescue you with a cup of hot water), my advice is to pee freely.

      Yes, it's gross, but in my opinion it beats the alternative...
      --

      "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
  20. Mostly off topic by bryan1945 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But I've applied for a job down there (no reply so out for this year); anyone work down there and have any advice for getting a foot in the door?

    Thanks

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    1. Re:Mostly off topic by CrackedButter · · Score: 0

      Bring lots of porn, it gets loney there...

    2. Re:Mostly off topic by moofdaddy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But I've applied for a job down there (no reply so out for this year); anyone work down there and have any advice for getting a foot in the door?

      First thing i would do is refrain from asking job advise on slashdot.

      --
      Be better in bed. Wikiafterdark!
    3. Re:Mostly off topic by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'd just go down there for a week, talk with people, and pass out resumes.

      --
      That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
    4. Re:Mostly off topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      I'd just go down there for a week, talk with people, and pass out resumes.

      I heard Southwest Airlines is offering a special from Reno direct to Dome C. Just get to the airport early so you can get the pink boarding pass. You don't want to be in the middle seat for THAT flight.

    5. Re:Mostly off topic by brainspank · · Score: 1

      go there and stand outside for a few hours, and you'll be able to leave your foot wherever you like.

      --
      It's only a model.
    6. Re:Mostly off topic by identity0 · · Score: 1

      Shit, I knew the jobs situation in America was bad, but *this* bad?

      All I can say is, they work in Antarctica and they use Linux - obviously, wear a tux to the interview ; )

    7. Re:Mostly off topic by spindizzy · · Score: 1

      Well seeing the origin of this project being Australian would probably help. Though it looks like the money came from Italy and France the research mostly seems to be coming from Australia. Not suprising seeing we have one of the largest Antartic claims.

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
  21. PC/104 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PC/104? I guess Internet keyboards aren't rated for the cold.

  22. But when needed small fast OS, they used MS DOS by notestein · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One experiment, ICECAM, relied entirely on a 5 kg pack of lithium thionyl chloride batteries. The batteries had to provide power for a year, so minimized the power consumption of the computer. The experiment only needed to take data every two hours, so we built a CMOS oscillator to power-up the computer for 30 seconds every two hours. We used MS-DOS 6.22 for the PC/104 computer since it boots quickly and was able to average 10 frames from the CCD camera and store them to CompactFlash disk.

    1. Re:But when needed small fast OS, they used MS DOS by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1
      under constant running (no booting up -- but the same schedule of photography), how long would the batteries last?



      p.s. I
      have 6 gmail invites and only need 3 people to complete an offer.

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    2. Re:But when needed small fast OS, they used MS DOS by Voivod · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The only downside to MS-DOS for power consumption sensitive applications is lack of power management support. For modern CPUs with advanced power management and ACPI support this can make a big difference in idle power consumption over time. A idle CPU running DOS will often be noticibly hotter to the touch than one running Linux or Windows.

    3. Re:But when needed small fast OS, they used MS DOS by pz · · Score: 1

      My reading-through-the-lines on that one was not that they needed a small fast OS for ICECAM, they needed an OS that would cold boot, communicate with a device, write data to CF, and shutdown, ALL IN 30 SECONDS. No version of Linux or Windows I've seen can do that ... but perhaps they do exist. Anyone care to correct me?

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    4. Re:But when needed small fast OS, they used MS DOS by karnal · · Score: 1

      power-up the computer for 30 seconds every two hours.

      Energy saved is energy saved, but if it only takes 10 seconds to boot DOS, then take 20 seconds worth of pictures, would it really be worth it to have an OS that might take longer, just to have power management for the 20 total seconds of picture taking???

      --
      Karnal
    5. Re:But when needed small fast OS, they used MS DOS by Voivod · · Score: 1

      No, that's why I said savings occur "over time". Of course DOS was the right choice for his particular application.

      I just wanted to mention the DOS power management issue since I think most people are not aware of it. It's kind of intuitive to assume that DOS being a small simple OS would naturally draw much less power than big ugly Linux or Windows, but this is not the case.

    6. Re:But when needed small fast OS, they used MS DOS by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

      The Linux kernel won't boot as fast as MS-DOS, but it's not far from it. A properly configured kernel for that type of system could probably start in about 3 or 4 seconds -- not counting the BIOS startup which would affect MS-DOS equally.

    7. Re:But when needed small fast OS, they used MS DOS by Voivod · · Score: 1

      You're too used to desktop PCs pz. When you build a Linux system from scratch it's easy to get it to boot quickly especially if the BIOS gets its job done fast. 30 seconds is plenty of time for this task for Linux. WinCE could do it as well.

    8. Re:But when needed small fast OS, they used MS DOS by Craig+Davison · · Score: 1

      Your BIOS does power management for you while you're in DOS. Video blanking and HD shutoff, at least, that I'm aware of.

    9. Re:But when needed small fast OS, they used MS DOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the bios doesn't halt the cpu when there's nothing to do. this means ms-dos runs your cpu full-bore all the time.

    10. Re:But when needed small fast OS, they used MS DOS by C32 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think he means you don't get an "idle" process running HLT instructions like in linux/windows (meaning the cpu is using a lot of power doing nothing).

    11. Re:But when needed small fast OS, they used MS DOS by amorsen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Linksys WRT54G boots in a few seconds. It runs Linux.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    12. Re:But when needed small fast OS, they used MS DOS by kevlar · · Score: 1

      I wonder if it would be possible in this scenario, to use only CF memory for RAM and put the device in a suspended, powered off state. The idea would be such that when the computer powers back on, it would only require the OS to continue execution where it left off, rather than reloading the entire OS and loading their app.

      This could be useful for projects where minimal power is a necessity but performance is not.

    13. Re:But when needed small fast OS, they used MS DOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's basically what JPL did with the Mars Rovers. Makes sense, although I don't know the temperature reliability of flash memory. The Mars Rovers keep their electronics at moderate temperatures.

  23. Fahrenheit and Celsiusconverge... by lothar97 · · Score: 1

    at -40 F/C. Thus, it's not too far off. -34.5 C is -30.1 F, and -34.5 F is -36.9 C. When it's that cold, 5-10 degrees each way makes no difference. I camped on the ice of the Ottawa River in February, and let's just say I don't want to experience -30 C windchill again.

    --

    1. Re:Fahrenheit and Celsiusconverge... by fr2asbury · · Score: 1

      Like I've said, there comes a point where you don't really feel that much colder, it just kills you quicker.

  24. Thermal Control by Detritus · · Score: 3, Interesting
    One technique that I've seen used is to put the PCB for the computer inside a box lined with foam insulation. This also works with hard drives. The electronics produce enough heat to keep the interior of the box at a reasonable temperature.

    The hard part would be coming up with a thermal control system that worked at both extremes, a hot summer day and the dead of winter.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:Thermal Control by slashjames · · Score: 1

      I don't think "a hot summer day" is something most of us think of when we think of Antartica.

    2. Re:Thermal Control by psyconaut · · Score: 1

      Warm enough in the summer that a foam-lined box full of electronics would get close to operating max, though.

      -psy

    3. Re:Thermal Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did anyone else read this as "PHB" instead of "PCB"?

      No?...thought not. Interesting mental image there for a second, though...

  25. geography question by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Funny

    so, how far is the secret nazi base from Dome C?

    1. Re:geography question by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1

      Well, the nazi base is just a few miles west of Kurt Russell's base. So, they can't be too far apart.

  26. Good sense of humor by arose · · Score: 2, Funny

    They seem to maintain a good sense of humor despite the cold. What do the authors look like?

    --
    Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  27. And yet the Hubble is still better by ewanrg · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Not to belittle a heck of an achievement, but I was glad to see the author explain how even under such extreme conditions and with much improved equipment than was used they would be able to do as well as the Hubble only 10% of the time. Which (IMNSHO) again points out the need to keep the Hubble up there.

    However, I think Site C shows promise for imaging sites that are not in the right plane for Hubble to get a look at, or where the long winter night would allow for extended exposures...

    Obligatory plug - please check out my online novel

    1. Re:And yet the Hubble is still better by Celandine · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is no part of the sky that the HST can't look at, though obviously at any given time its choices are more limited (e.g. it can't point within 50 degrees of the Sun, but the Sun moves wrt the stars...) The key point about this work is that it would be much, much, much cheaper than HST. Moreover, it's looking at the moment as though the JWST, HST's successor, as well as being very expensive to the US taxpayer, will be restricted to the infrared. A ground-based optical telescope with high resolution could clean up at that point. Pity we can't have another one in the northern hemisphere, though.

    2. Re:And yet the Hubble is still better by Mr_Dyqik · · Score: 3, Informative

      We're building a sub-mm polarimeter (Clover)to go to Dome-C (Dome-C is the best site in the world for sub-mm, being high, dry, cold and calm) starting now.

      The total budget is 4.3M GBP, including new detector development, and the telescope will be collecting data from Austral winter 2007 onwards. This telescope will have better results on CMB B-mode polarisation than the Planck satelite mission, before Planck reports results, for about a tenth to hundredth of the cost. The Planck project has a 15 year head start. Admittedly Planck isn't designed to only make the measurements we are trying to make.

      When something goes wrong, we'll be able to send someone out to fix it, and if someone invents better detectors, we can send some out to be installed.

      Hubble is limited to the resolution of its 2m mirror, while optical telescopes on the ground are now reaching 10m (Keck), with sub-mm telescopes reaching 50-100m (LMT and GBT).

      Hershcel/First will be the sub-mm equivalent to Hubble, and is limited to a single 3m mirror, while ground based sub-mm telescopes are using 64 15m mirrors spread across 60 km of the Atacama desert, simulating the resolution of a 60 km mirror.

    3. Re:And yet the Hubble is still better by Mr_Dyqik · · Score: 2, Informative

      Magdelena Ridge Observatory, New Mexico will be 14 1.4 m telescopes in a 400m baseline array. MRO has pretty good seeing in the optical.

    4. Re:And yet the Hubble is still better by justins · · Score: 1
      Not to belittle a heck of an achievement, but I was glad to see the author explain how even under such extreme conditions and with much improved equipment than was used they would be able to do as well as the Hubble only 10% of the time. Which (IMNSHO) again points out the need to keep the Hubble up there.

      Nonsense. The only advantage Hubble has is that it can see more. Pretty important, but still.

      How many observatories could be built there for the cost of a Hubble? I bet it's a great enough number that it would compensate for the fact that they perform as well as Hubble only 10% of the time, particularly in light of the fact that they could still be doing productive work the other 90% of the time.

      Reducing the cost of spaceflight profoundly would probably change that equation somewhat.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    5. Re:And yet the Hubble is still better by OneOver137 · · Score: 1

      The only advantage Hubble has is that it can see more

      This statement is incorrect if you don't specify the difference between "seeing" and light gathering ability. Seeing is a function of (a) the atmosphere (or lack thereof) above, and (b) the optical instrument's Modular Transfer Function (MTF), which is basically the efficiency of image reproduction and related quantitatively to the system's resolution, which is proportional to 1/D.

      Light gathering power is proportional to the area or r^2. Hubble's 94"(?) primary is much smaller and gathers about 10% of the light of Keck, but without the atmosphere scattering photons and shifting the phase of the incoming wavefront, it actually 'sees' better than Keck. If you put Keck in orbit, there would be no comparison--hence the desire to put Kecks on the Moon.

    6. Re:And yet the Hubble is still better by dbacher · · Score: 1

      Hubble was designed for operation for a particular period of time. With shuttle flights being limited and us now being down 2 shuttles from the fleet, we have to prioritize it versus other projects. They are currently building robots in Canada for use to repair and keep Hubble operational. These robots will be used to keep it up, however, there is a much better solution if we can get the budget. What better solution? If there were a telescope attached to the ISS and if there were a telescope attached to the new station they are talking about building for assembly of the CEV, these telescopes would both be free of the earth's atmosphere, and (more importantly) would be somewhere where it would be easier to maintain them long term. Not trivial, but easier. Also, if we were to have a semi-permanent base on the moon (which isn't inconceivable), one would imagine that a telescope on the dark side of the moon might be able to provide as good or better imaging as well, and if there were a permanent or semi-permenant human presence, could be maintained easily.

      --
      If your code is acting bloated, and is running rather slow, it's likely and predicted that some loops you will unroll.
    7. Re:And yet the Hubble is still better by KjetilK · · Score: 1

      How good? I thought mainland US had around 1" median? 0.07" is pretty awesome, I have to give them that. Best I've had was 0.47" IIRC.

      --
      Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
    8. Re:And yet the Hubble is still better by Celandine · · Score: 1

      MRO will be an optical interferometer, with all the limitations that implies. Not a general-purpose instrument.

  28. The possibilities... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this overclocked? It better be. At -85C...

    IMAGINE THE POSSIBILITIES!

  29. Warning for those in Antartica... by sgant · · Score: 4, Funny

    Stay away from the Norwegian camp....they dug up something in the ice and we've lost contact with them....

    Last we heard, one of their sled dogs were running this way with a helecopter following it....

    --

    "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    1. Re:Warning for those in Antartica... by ambrosine10 · · Score: 1

      What is this a reference to?

    2. Re:Warning for those in Antartica... by geekboy2k · · Score: 2, Informative

      "The Thing from another world", or just "The Thing"

      Original: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0044121/

      John Carpender's excellent remake: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0084787/

      (Sorry - don't know how to make the "html-syle" hyperlinks)

    3. Re:Warning for those in Antartica... by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      And don't cross those big mountains. Danforth keeps dropping hints that he saw something over there.

      -Peter

    4. Re:Warning for those in Antartica... by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      "The Thing from another world", or just "The Thing"

      Or yet another video game that's been defiled by the use of Cam Clarke's voice.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  30. Iridium phone? by raehl · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm apalled that we are polluting Antartica with this radioactive material. What if the phone melts down? This could have devastating consequences for all of Antartica's residents.

    1. Re:Iridium phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Iridium is a nobel metal like palladium or platin and *not* radioactive.

    2. Re:Iridium phone? by Silverlancer · · Score: 1

      Iridium is the company, and by the way, Iridium isn't radioactive in the first place, so the joke doesn't work :)

    3. Re:Iridium phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iridium is the name of a satelite phone system. Posted for those with no sense of humour.

    4. Re:Iridium phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An iridium reactor meltdown killed the dinosaurs, dumbass.

  31. Antarctica at night? by Geiger581 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Has to be the most hellish place on the surface of the earth. Dante's Inferno does in fact have the very heart of hell full of darkness and ice, in fact. A more miserable condition than any volcanic brimstone, I'd say.

    1. Re:Antarctica at night? by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Dante's Inferno does in fact have the very heart of hell full of darkness and ice, in fact.

      What, Caina? Caina's a doddle; just collect a whole bunch of velox berries every chance you get. And anyway by that point you really ought to have a whole bunch of artefacts giving resistance to cold. Quit whining!

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  32. Dry Ice Boils at -78.5 C : ) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could we perhaps see some solid CO2 on the ground as snow? Haha. Probably not, but that would be cool. Punny.

  33. OMFG MODS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guys, seriously, this wasn't meant to be informative. It was meant to be Funny. Please mod as such.

  34. Re:Dry Ice Boils at -78.5 C : ) by Geiger581 · · Score: 1

    Doesn't carbon dioxide sublime/deposit at that temp? I was under the impression that is didn't exist as a liquid at atmospheric pressure.

  35. Sterling engine? by alwaystheretrading · · Score: 3, Informative
    ...and supervise the generation of its own electricity using a jet-fuel powered stirling engine.

    Okay I'm interested in seeing this jet-fuel stirling engine. How well does it work in extreme cold?

    For those of you who may not know much about stirling engines, here's some information.

    1. Re:Sterling engine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I wanna see info about the Stirling engine! Bet it works better at -85C.

    2. Re:Sterling engine? by kindbud · · Score: 2, Informative

      WhisperGen made the Stirling engine generators used by the author. They offer two models, AC and DC.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    3. Re:Sterling engine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since a Stirling derives its power from the *difference* in temperatures between its hot side and its cold side, the lower the outside temperature, the more power you get from burning a given quantity of fuel.

  36. Linux Journal had an article 10 years ago by fataugie · · Score: 1

    I remember reading about an Antarctic Linux station and thought it was neet-o back then.

    --

    WTF? Over?

  37. Simple Solution - Prescott Time by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    computer system that had to survive temperatures down to -85C

    Simple solution, just put a Pentium 4 Prescott in there. Keep the whole place nice and toasty.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  38. Now you can see the alien overlords coming... by IronChefMorimoto · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thanks to the excellent astronomical seeing conditions at Dome C, the Australian scientists started work on their second paper:

    "Quasi-Formulaic Investigations into the Space-Time Arrival Calculations of the Zarlanian Horde"

    The paper is being rushed to press with journals such as Nature and New Scientist in the hopes of beating the inevitable alien invasion and, thus, enjoying the publicity prior to enslavement and/or annihilation.

    "We're pretty excited about this second research opportunity. As soon as we turned on our Dome C equipment and saw the bristling plasma gun turrets from the Zarlanian Horde lead star cruiser, we knew that we had at least 1 more paper opporunity in us," said Rich Godfrey, a previously unmentioned post-doc working on the project.

    The research team is taking full advantage of the excellent seeing conditions now, confident that they'll be able to put together a rough draft of the paper shortly before the first scout troops from the Zarlanian Horde arrive.

    IronChefMorimoto

  39. Re:Offtopic (Coral link) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    want to know more? see ... http://www.scs.cs.nyu.edu/coral/

  40. Bit harsh on Andrei... by aurelian · · Score: 1

    Not giving him a coat. Poor guy must have frozen out there.

  41. RTFA: solid state equipment by kirkjobsluder · · Score: 3, Informative

    No moving parts to freeze? Can you say Hard Drive? Keyboard? Power Switch?
    Last but not least. The user. You got to have some damn heavy mittens for -85C.


    The article specifically says that they used solid-state hard drives. The system was operated remotely so I imagine no keyboard was used.

    In addition, -85C was only the exterior surface temperature. One computer was installed under the surface with an average operating temperature of -57C. Another experiment was warmed by waste heat from the stirling engine.

  42. 20/8 vision or 38,000 ft equivalent observatories by 4of12 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You'd think they'd have a cooler word for that...

    As someone with myopia, I'd suggest laymen's terms like "20/20" or "20/10" or whatever (what would it be? "20/8") to describe the improved perspicacity available in low turbulence air. [BTW, I'm looking into Lasik and wondering just how good my vision could get...]

    Or, you could perhaps express it in terms of

    At what elevation above sea level would I need to be at the equator or at New York's latitude to gain equivalently good views of the stars? Higher than Everest, I'd guess.

    The ultimate, of course, is the Hubble, above the atmosphere. But the transportation and maintenance costs of the Hubble are considerably greater than Dome C.

    BTW, nice work, nice web page. Thanks for sharing it.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  43. Bigger geography question by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

    My first thought on seeing the map was where the really important sites are - like buried space ships with frozen, morphing monsters and underground pyramids full of aliens. Any fool can take out a secret Nazi base...

  44. Banana oil! by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

    Let's try an experiment. You and I each get
    $1,000 to buy clothing for our chosen destinations. You hike through the molten lava fields into the active volcano and back out (ha!), and I'll hike the equivalent distance across any part of the south polar shelf. Who's going to be alive when the helicopter comes back?

    1. Re:Banana oil! by mav[LAG] · · Score: 1

      You might be alive but how will we know it's really you and not just an imitation?

      --
      --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
  45. Sheesh, you can do it in your head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    F = 9/5 * C +32

    C = (F-32) * 5/9

  46. Really good war story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The last question in TFA:

    Can you tell us about the dramatic events of 17 May 2004?

    By 17 May 2004 the AASTINO had worked remotely for 100 days in 2004, and then something went wrong...

    The WhisperGen engine has a control panel connected to it using an RS-485 bus running on CAT-5 cable. The control panel contains a microprocessor, and the engine expects to communicate with it regularly (at least once a second). When this communication is interrupted, the engine shuts down and reboots its own microprocessor.

    Unfortunately, this is what happened on 17 May. - the engine went into a cycle of rebooting every 40 seconds. Once the engine has stopped, we had a ten hour window in which to try to restart it before the 200AH lead-acid batteries would lose too much capacity and become too cold for a restart (which requires 15A at 24V for about 15 minutes).

    During this period we worked feverishly to come up with a solution. Our first priority was to shut down all unnecessary power consumption in the AASTINO - we can do this via a series of Dallas one-wire switches which control power to all the subsystems. A call to the engine manufacturer came up with the suggestion that we wiggle the CAT-5 cable connection - we suspect they forgot that we were over 4000 km away from our engine!

    The PC/104 computer was also on the RS-485 bus, and we reasoned that by rewriting the Linux device driver (which we had written in the first place, so we knew what we were doing) we could make the computer impersonate the control panel, and convince the engine that it should keep running. Fortunately, we had a snapshot of the communication traffic between the engine and the control panel from earlier testing in the lab with the manufacturer's MSDOS-based software. But with no hardware available to test our code, we had to modify the driver, send patches over the 2400 baud Iridium link, and rmmod/insmod the driver to try to restart the engine.

    All the while, the internal temperature of the AASTINO was plumetting towards ambient, at about -60C. We first modified the driver to allow the link traffic to be analysed, and this confirmed the communication problem with the control panel. After several attempts at generating fake packets from the control panel, punctuated by breaks in the Iridium link and agonizing waits for the system to redial (it is dialout only, controlled by a crontab entry), we were unable to prevent the engine from rebooting.

    We watched helplessly as the battery temperatures sank below the minimum threshold for engine restart. Over the next 24 hours we received the occasional connection from the AASTINO computer, but that was all. We are now hoping that the solar panels will be able to recharge the batteries suffiently to re-establish communication before the Dome C station opens for the summer.

  47. UserFriendly by rope · · Score: 1

    Heroic tech team just went there. http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20040915

  48. okayyy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what this is all about is polution. if the view
    is like 2.5 times clearer in the antartic, then
    we poor suckers are breathing air 250 % more dirty
    here... pollution! yes! prolly my great grand
    mom hand very good view from the back of her garden
    in europe some 90 years ago ... *sigh*

    1. Re:okayyy... by Mr_Dyqik · · Score: 1

      No, what all this is about is atmospheric turbulence, water vapour content, and base altitude.

  49. Cheap asteroid hunting by Baldrson · · Score: 1
    Take a big circular dish, put mercury in it, spin it around on its central axis. If you do that at the South Pole with enough curvature in the resulting mercury pool, you might be able to take in a really large portion of the sky with fantastic light gathering capability. Asteroid hunting would be a snap. This would miss the equators of course, and a lot of the asteroids are associated with the Zodiac, but it would be a very cheap way of gathering data from a very remote location with good "eyes".

    Problem: Environmentalists would probably freak out.

    1. Re:Cheap asteroid hunting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What!

      You'd be able to see a 5-degree circle of the sky centred on the north pole, and NOTHING ELSE.

      Put on of those scopes on the equator and you're rocking.

      p.s. Asteroids are mostly in the plane of the solar system, so something in the tropics is better.

      Problem: you've been huffing on that Mercury, haven't you.

    2. Re:Cheap asteroid hunting by Cliff+Stoll · · Score: 3, Informative

      Freezing point of mercury is -38C (which is just about -38F) ... so it would be solid through much of the Antarctic winter.

      When I froze mercury in the lab, it made a surface that wasn't optically useful -- lots of tiny bumps.

      Also of interest: the century old Mt. Wilson 100-inch telescope used mercury bearings for the polar axis. In the 1970's, mercury pollution worried the operations staff; I don't know what was done about it.

    3. Re:Cheap asteroid hunting by Baldrson · · Score: 1
      When I froze mercury in the lab, it made a surface that wasn't optically useful -- lots of tiny bumps.

      Ah, well, so much for that idea. I wonder why the same thing doesn't happen when spun molten glass mirror blanks are used? Or does it?

    4. Re:Cheap asteroid hunting by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      large mirrors for telescopes take years to grind and polish

  50. This happens a lot. by juuri · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This actually happens quite a lot and is one of the reasons large companies farm off risky things to spinoffs. Typically they wait for the spinoff to flounder AFTER it has sucked in huge amount of external capital and then at the last moment buy everything back for pennies on the dollar.

    A good portion of certain companies DSL setups was done this way.

    --
    --- I do not moderate.
  51. It would be more impressive... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Read the part on the events of May 17th 2004. This has got to be the coolest troubleshooting situation I've ever heard of.

    It would be more impressive if they'd gotten the engine started before the batteries cooled off too much and everything ran down.

    But they did get qutie a bit done (installed observability and confirmed the failure mechanism) before the station went dead until spring. Too bad it was too broke to fix in the time available.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  52. Antarctica..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... the world's newest chip cooler. Coming to an ebay near you!

  53. Webpage with Telescope Health Data by modus · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can view the health reports (temperature etc.) that that telescope sent back via Iridium here.

    There may be other tasties too -- I haven't dug too much.

  54. Why a stirling and not peltier effect by GuyFawkes · · Score: 1


    stirlings are pretty puny by any standards, have moving parts that will wear out and therefore a limited mtbf, are bloody expensive and very prone to any condensation or icing.

    I'd have thought peltiers (which the russians used to generate power in space) would have been a much better solution. No moving parts, 200,000 hour mtbf, dirt cheap, compact, and will scale to any desired power out[ut.

    Does anyone know why stirlings were used?
    Would be most interested to know for a fact.

    cheers

    --
    http://slashdot.org/~GuyFawkes/journal
    1. Re:Why a stirling and not peltier effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why a stirling engine and not a thermoelectric
      generator? Because ordinary bismuth telluride
      modules running as a Seebeck generator are no
      more than 3%, and in practice more likely 1.5%
      efficient. That's why.

      AC

  55. Re:Dry Ice Boils at -78.5 C : ) by Artifakt · · Score: 1

    At that temperature, CO2 will deposit if it's over a non-reactive substrate. In this context, CO2 in the air perfuses into the H2O ice already present, insinuating itself gradually along with other atmospheric gasses (even though those are still vaporous at that point), and never forms a distinct layer. You can measure an index of trapped CO2 in the regular ice, but that's not as exciting somehow.

    --
    Who is John Cabal?
  56. Put Linux in the BIOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    they needed an OS that would cold boot, communicate with a device, write data to CF, and shutdown, ALL IN 30 SECONDS. No version of Linux or Windows I've seen can do that

    LinuxBIOS can boot from power-up to login prompt in three seconds (half way down the page for 2/15/01). Since Linux is capable of multitasking, they could then run their software while they wait for the CF to mount (probably much quicker than IDE).

  57. Re:Warning for those in Antartica... [OT] by 808140 · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is off-topic, but in html, a link is made by Free gmail invites!. Clicking on "Free gmail invites" would then take you to http://www.goatse.cx.

    The 'a' I believe stands for 'anchor', and 'href' for HTTP Reference. Note the '/' before the 'a' in the closing tag, it's important.

  58. Third world proof of concept by theolein · · Score: 1

    I grew up in South Africa, where the major part of the country is above 1000meters above sea level. In the center of the country, the summers are hot (around 20 centigrade at night) and it rains on occasion (humid) and the winters are cold (below zero at night) and absolutely dry.

    Because we lived in the countryside, I remember often watching the stars at night and the view is beautiful. What was interesting, and on topic in this case, is that the view of the night sky is much better on a cold winter night than in the middle of summer.

  59. Please give information more clearly!!! by mbrother · · Score: 1

    As a professional astronomer, it drives me NUTS when stories like this make it so hard to figure out what they're really talking about. In this case, what kind of seeing, in arcseconds, is achieved and how often. It took me nearly a minute of poking around to find out, and that was really the point of the story.

    I can't tell you how many "news" stories about astronomy I've read that left me scratching my head trying to figure out what they were talking about. This IS better -- the information was in the links -- but come on! If you're not telling a professional anything in the lead-in, what are you really telling anyone else? You might as well just issue press releases willy nilly claiming all sorts of crap without any hard numbers.

    E.g., why not lead in with something provocative like, "Less than 1/10 an arcsecond achieved in Antarctica, nearly comparable to the Hubble Space Telescope!"

    That's quantitative and still understandable and sensational.

    --
    Professor of Astronomy, Author of Spider Star & Star Dragon (Tor)
  60. Re:20/8 vision or 38,000 ft equivalent observatori by mbrother · · Score: 1

    Well, quantitative seeing measurements are usually for the benefits of astronomers, not lay people. You tell us 10 arcseconds, 1 arcecond, or 1/10 arcsecond, and we immediately know the significance of the number (with the complimentary information of the wavelength in question).

    In a lot of press releases, you get numbers about what size object could be resolved on the moon, from a mile away, etc., which makes more sense to most laypeople than 20/20 -- which most lay people don't understand anyway. Especially when telescopes blow that away by orders and orders of magnitude.

    --
    Professor of Astronomy, Author of Spider Star & Star Dragon (Tor)
  61. Dark Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... convince the engine that it should keep running.

    Reminds me of Bomb #20

  62. Wow--Near the precision of HST. by aggiefalcon01 · · Score: 1

    What is an "arcsecond"?

    An "arcsecond" is a unit of angular measurement. There are 360 degrees in a circle, and 3600 arcseconds in a degree. The full moon is 1800 arcseconds across. A star observed from the best mid-latitude observatories appears to be between 0.5 and 1 arcsecond in diameter. A star observed from Dome C would on average appear to be 0.27 arcseconds in diameter.

    How would a telescope at Dome C compare with the Hubble Space Telescope?

    The Hubble Space Telescope (HST) has a 2.4 m mirror, and delivers 0.05 arcsecond resolution at visible wavelengths. The best seeing we measured at Dome C was 0.07 arcseconds, however, this figure becomes lower when corrected for the finite size of the outer scale of turbulence (see Tokovinin, PASP, 114, 1156-1166). We don't have enough information yet to accurately determine the correction. While a 2.4 m telescope on the ground can never equal HST's performance, a somewhat larger telescope, say 4m, at Dome C could well produce images of equivalent resolution to HST for about 10% of the time. And in the near-infrared (e.g., the K band at 2.4 microns), the percentage should go up to 50%.

    --
    Global warming is neither science, nor politics. It is a religion.
    1. Re:Wow--Near the precision of HST. by aggiefalcon01 · · Score: 1

      Forgot to mention--that's from the FAQ, not me.

      --
      Global warming is neither science, nor politics. It is a religion.
  63. Re: Coral Link? by aggiefalcon01 · · Score: 1

    At least I'm not the only one ... I don't know, either. I would guess, though, that it might be something "pre-hardened" against the /. Effect.

    --
    Global warming is neither science, nor politics. It is a religion.
  64. Disclosure, not disclaimer by danila · · Score: 1

    I am puzzled why everyone keeps adding "disclaimers" to their posts. Do you imply that you disclaim the liability for your research? Do you imply that being an author somehow makes you less qualified to write about it on Slashdot? Or do you imply that we should not trust your results at all?

    May be you mean something completely different? May be you just want to inform us that you wrote the paper and so this post to some small extent results not from the story being objectively important, but from your desire to promote it. If so, then please call it "Disclosure" in the future, because this is what you do - you disclose information about your authorship.

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  65. No, it's the Userfriendly crew! by billstewart · · Score: 1

    OK, Columbia Internet or whatever they're called, AJ and Miranda going to the South Pole. This week's userfriendly.org strip.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  66. Whaa ? Urinate ? .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you get that up there ? (*interesting possibilities*) or are we just talking about pressure based fluid dynamics here ?.

    Oh, yeah ... I live in the tropics ...

  67. Hindsight by XNormal · · Score: 1

    It was immediately obvious from the very outset to anyone who spent a little while playing around with the math that there would never be any way to make money from this.

    Remember that Iridium Outset = 1987. At that time cellular phones were a specialty item used by high-rolling executives, charge per minute were astronomical and coverage patchy. The investment in Iridium didn't seem more dangerous than, say, the development of a new business jet. It was pretty difficult to imagine that in just a few years prices will drop by orders of magnitude and cellular phones will become a fashion item for schoolkids.

    They did assume in their business plan that the prices of ground-based competition will drop, but not by that much.

    --
    Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
  68. 'What' ain't no ... by the_twisted_pair · · Score: 1

    ..country I ever heard of. They speak English in What?

  69. Re:Warning for those in Antartica... [OT] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should also mention that they need to be complete URLs (including the "http://" bit), and that the trailing slash on the URL is polite ("http://www.goatse.cx/")

  70. I'll be there by dargaud · · Score: 1
    I'll be in charge of all atmosphere science experiments at Dome C the coming winter (yeah, staying there 13 months or so). So if you want me to run experiments for you, let me know !!! I also accept donations in form of overclocked laptops to test for winter conditions...

    Check out my site for past trips to Dome C. Note that it will be the first winterover at Dome C ever, with 8 french and 8 italians.

    Can't post much more right now as my connection's been hit by lightning...

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  71. FoV of LMTs? by Baldrson · · Score: 1
    Is 5 degrees the maximum field of view achieved by liquid mirror telescopes? I had heard it was relatively easy to achieve extremely low focal ratios with LMTs.

    In any case it might be especially useful for detecting polar-orbit debris.

    Also, having a data-point on small asteroids that are zipping past the earth might be scientifically interesting as well.

    PS: Mercury demential has very different symptoms from ignorance.

  72. Best Customer:DoD by Slashamatic · · Score: 1
    The best customer for Iridium is the DoD. Now they have a telephone that truely does work anywhere they happen to be invading. State uses them too for providing emergency communications in places with a dodgy infrastructure. True, I guess their call-plans are pretty good, but it is people like that who will keep it going.

    Some countries use Inmarsat for embassy/consular emergency comms, but it needs a pretty good horizon to get a signal if you are far from the equator as the sats are geostationary.

    The main mistake of Inmarsat was to discount the growth of GSM roaming which for most people is pretty adequate. It doesn't work everywhere but you would be amazed where it does work (even in Malaysian jungles).