Slashdot Mirror


Private Mars Mission Planned For 2009

Enkidu writes "Spiegel and other German media are reporting that a complete private Mars mission (automated translation) is planned for 2009. Organizations behind are AMSAT and Mars Society Germany."

54 of 187 comments (clear)

  1. American Companies by artlu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am surprised that a company like Boeing has not attempted to break into the privatized space arena. It seems like the government regulations/costs are too constricting to focus on space travel from a government perspective. Maybe we'll have an X-Prize to mars within the next 25 years!

    --
    -------
    artlu.net
    1. Re:American Companies by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As one of the largest provider of aerospace technologies to the US government, why on earth would Boeing compete with itself? Sure, Boeing isn't going to Mars, but they have produced a lot of stuff that went up into space...

    2. Re:American Companies by qbzzt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I am surprised that a company like Boeing has not attempted to break into the privatized space arena.

      There are US companies in this arena, but Boeing is too big and corporate for it. Big companies like guaranteed profits, not high-risk high-reward ventures like private space flight.

      --
      -- Support a free market in the field of government
    3. Re:American Companies by Seoulstriker · · Score: 4, Funny

      I am surprised that a company like Boeing has not attempted to break into the privatized space arena.

      Boeing doesn't have the technology or motive to travel to Mars yet. I think we'll see Union Aerospace Corporation really go all out on this and try to establish a Mars base by 2145. The UAC has the mining and space technology to outdo easily any other space ventures.

      --
      I am defenseless. Use your button. Mod me down with all of your hatred.
    4. Re:American Companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Well, Boeing did an internal study on building a business out of privately funded exploration of Mars. Unfortunately, the resulting 3-phase business plan was:

      1. ???
      2. ???
      3. ???

      So they shelved it.

    5. Re:American Companies by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe it's because boeing is smart anough to relize that there isn't money in space travel. About the best you can do right now is selling space hardware to others (nasa) or launching commercial satilites.

      Space travel lacks one big thing. A true compelling reason that everyone agrees on that makes it needed, and makes it worthwhile, to make money from space travel is all but impossible. If say we ran out of gold on earth, and it became the most important thing to keap life going on earth, and we found some out and space, then you would have something. Until such things happen, it's not going to work. Space tourism will never keap it up since there isn't anough people wanting to go, or have anough money to go. And often people who want to go are those without the money, and those with the money are the ones who don't care to go.

    6. Re:American Companies by MouseR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's no financial incentive to go to Mars. Not for the government, less so for corporations.

      Unless you could charter enough of the red stuff back by the ton and sell half a gram for a few dozen millions, then it might turn a few corporate heads.

    7. Re:American Companies by Coryoth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe it's because boeing is smart anough to relize that there isn't money in space travel. About the best you can do right now is selling space hardware to others (nasa) or launching commercial satilites.

      Space travel lacks one big thing. A true compelling reason that everyone agrees on that makes it needed, and makes it worthwhile, to make money from space travel is all but impossible.


      Correct, space travel is currently uneconomic. That does not make it pointless to invest in efforts researching it, because if you make it sufficently cheap, it will be economic. Whether space travel is "worth it" is a function of the cost of space travel. Bring that cost down, and all of a sudden your equation changes.

      When flight was first invented it wasn't all that practical or economic either. Flying across oceans was simply beyond the range of aircraft, and rail and trucking was almost as fast as airplanes, but a hell of a lot less expensive. "Why would anyone use airplanes for transport? All you do is get a nice view from up there which isn't enough to sustain an industry. Building planes big enough to carry any sort of worthwhile load would be unbelievably expensive - there's just no money in it."

      You don't need a compelling reason, you just need to keep researching new technology and improvements to make space travel cheap and efficient. That's what the X-prize is all about - bringing low cost reusable launch systems into existence. Scaled Composites looks like they've pulled it off too - though we'll have to wait to be sure.

      Jedidiah.

    8. Re:American Companies by maxpublic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The first company capable of building ships able to go to the asteroid belt and conduct mining operations, then return to Earth with the bounty will make itself unbelievably rich. There's unimaginable wealth scattered throughout the solar system; the biggest obstacle right now is that it costs more to extract that wealth than you could expect to gain.

      To think that this situation will remain forever unchanged is just plain foolish. Affordable space travel will be developed no matter the whining of the naysayers. Each advance puts *someone* that much closer to cashing in on a frontier that'll make the current crop of billionaires look like amateurs in comparison.

      It won't be a race between corporations who can't look beyond the quarter, much less strain themselves over a five-year plan. It'll be a race between people with vision and the ability to plan 20, 30 or even 50 years in advance. *They* will be the ones to win, and have the last laugh over everyone who said that it couldn't be done.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    9. Re:American Companies by bilsaysthis · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You're forgetting that the nations of the world, though the UN, have already signed a treaty that prevents any single nation or private corporate entity from exploiting extraterrestrial resources. No corp would be allowed to go to the Asteroid Belt and bring *anything* back unless they agreed to give the minerals to the UN for use/dispersal.

    10. Re:American Companies by maxpublic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And *you're* forgetting that there is no one-world government, and that any country with a corporation capable of make a profit off of space will whip out their willy and piss in the U.N.'s general direction.

      Do you honestly think the U.S. would bow to any U.N. treaty over something like this? Pause a moment while I laugh my ass off.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    11. Re:American Companies by UID1000000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think that they should be kicking themselves in the arse now. There is one valuable asset elsewhere---land. I don't see any "new" land here on Earth. Like people have said before, "God isn't making any more land". It's true the most valuable asset out there is land.

      The problem that exists is the fact that the land isn't something that we can utilize right now. The technology exists to make habitats in extreme places like Mars or the Moon but the technology to get it there is what's lacking.

      I think that is the movitation to get into space personally. It's got to be something that we can keep. Wouldn't it be great to have a home here and a condo on a nice flat out on Mars? Sure the ping time would suck when playing your favorite FPS and the commute would be a bitch but new industries would develop. This is where the biggest payoff would be. If someone privately went to the Moon or to Mars and colonized. If the could colonize and sustain they could charge whatever they wanted to allow people to move into their colony. It's kinda like the expansion of America. Once there they'd need a shitload of transportation, communications, etc. $$$.

      --
      UID 1000000 is just around the corner.

  2. Irony by jdkane · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wouldn't that be hilarious of the Martians "plans a research flight up to the year 2009 to" Earth.

  3. Wow, better get cracking...! by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No private organization has even been to the moon, and NASA is going pretty great lengths to ensure they understand all effects and implications from staying in space a very long time.

    Seems overly ambitious to me, although the goal sounds honorable. :-)

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:Wow, better get cracking...! by ZZeta · · Score: 5, Informative

      "No private organization has even been to the moon, and NASA is going pretty great lengths to ensure they understand all effects and implications from staying in space a very long time."

      Be careful, this has nothing to do with staying is space for a long time. They aren't sending a human, living, person.

      It's all right there in google's attempt at translating.

    2. Re:Wow, better get cracking...! by fname · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe not what you meant, but there has been a commercial satellite that orbited the moon. This was in 1998, when a launch mishap left a satellite in a useless, near Geosync orbit. It was sent around the moon (twice, I think) to help it get into GEO. I think getting a moon orbiter is well within reach on a commercial scale, but Mars is a lot tougher and landing is a lot tougher.

    3. Re:Wow, better get cracking...! by JambisJubilee · · Score: 2, Interesting

      NASA also has the responsibility to make sure our bioforms don't contaminate other (possible) ecosystems - not only pre-mission, but end-mission as well. Take Galileo's crash into Jupiter for example.

      I'm not sure whether we can trust private corporations with the same responsibility

  4. Yeah right.... by gnuman99 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Yeah, and by 2001 they will go to Jupiter... oh wait..

    Seriously, they can't even get to *Earth's* orbit, and they are planning to go to Mars?

    1. Re:Yeah right.... by mjbkinx · · Score: 5, Informative
      Seriously, they can't even get to *Earth's* orbit, and they are planning to go to Mars?

      they have sent up private amateur radio satellites into earth orbit for years using some spare space in ESAs arianes since 1980.
      they're a rather large group of scientists who work on the project for free in their spare time.

      here are some infos in english (and german)

  5. Let me guess... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 3, Funny

    Powered by cold fusion and manned by Ewoks.

    1. Re:Let me guess... by aussie_a · · Score: 2, Funny

      manned by Ewoks.

      Don't be ridiculous. It would be ewoked by Ewoks.

  6. That's nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Goatse has funded several probes to Uranus.

  7. Re:Money by ZZeta · · Score: 2, Informative

    "How can a private group raise the money for a mission like this? I would think the cost would easily be in the hundreds of millions of dollars range, maybe the billion dollar range."

    Please! RTFA!

    It'll cost 10 million euros! Not a penny less, not a penny more.
    I don't remember the exact current exchange, but I think that should be a little over 12 million US. Dollars.

  8. Re:Money by nick-less · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How can a private group raise the money for a mission like this?

    the point is not raising 100 billons to fund a mission to mars, the point is doing it for less than 100 billons...

  9. Re:Linux to Mars? by IAR80 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Suse

    --
    http://ebgp.net/ccc/
  10. shuttle by IAR80 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe they plan to use the shuttle form the Bahrain deseret.

    --
    http://ebgp.net/ccc/
    1. Re:shuttle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      The shuttle in Bahrain isn't suitible for actual space flight, it's only an atmospheric test model. However, people do talk about using the booster made for Buran and her sister craft to go to mars.

      http://k26.com/buran/Future/Mars/_energia_to_mars. html

  11. Sounds a bit kinky to me... by Infinityis · · Score: 2, Funny

    Private Mars Mission isn't kinky in itself, but if you couple it with the two subheadings in the article:

    500 Kilos heavy probe

    and

    Favorable Mars position

    Suddeny, "Private" takes on a whole new meaning...

  12. You rocket scientists out there... by MisanthropicProgram · · Score: 4, Insightful

    do you really think it can be done for ten million euros as they say in the article?

    1. Re:You rocket scientists out there... by logic+hack · · Score: 2, Funny

      They're outsourcing most of the work to martians to save on costs.

    2. Re:You rocket scientists out there... by bwy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Considering SpaceShipOne rings in at around $20 mil US, and most people would say that they operate pretty efficiently and without any ridiculous overhead, I'd hate to see what 10 mil euros will buy when it comes to building a Mars ship.

    3. Re:You rocket scientists out there... by bigpat · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Considering SpaceShipOne rings in at around $20 mil US, and most people would say that they operate pretty efficiently and without any ridiculous overhead, I'd hate to see what 10 mil euros will buy when it comes to building a Mars ship."

      By then, 10 million euros will buy you 100 million us dollars, so they could just use cheap american labor and materials.

    4. Re:You rocket scientists out there... by quax · · Score: 2, Informative

      RTFA - they do not build their own launch vehicle. They want to hitch a cheap ride on Ariane when there is excess capacity.

      Most of the money will go into building the probe.

    5. Re:You rocket scientists out there... by RollingThunder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Keep in mind that SpaceShipOne is a manned vessel.

      Things get somewhat easier when you don't need to accomodate for those annoying carbon based life forms and their needs of water, food, and air. ;)

  13. Private?? by euxneks · · Score: 4, Funny

    This trip to mars brought to you by McDonalds: I'm Lovin' It!

    --
    in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  14. Re:Money by imsabbel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hm. The last missions by the usa or the eu didnt cost more than a big movie...
    There are plenty of people that could finance a probe to mars instead of, say buying a football stadium or a fleet of privat jets or whatever billionaires do with all their money...

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  15. Aiming High by ravenspear · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While I applaud attempts like this, if governments couldn't get it right with Beagle then private orgs are certainly going to face some very difficult work to make this happen.

  16. About AMSAT's Phase 5-A by Koyaanisqatsi · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here is a PDF with some discussion on the planned Phase 5-A mission, or a amateur satelite to Mars

    http://www.amsat-dl.org/p5a/p5a-to-mars.pdf

    And here is the main Phase 5-A website on AMSAT-DL, with text in both German and English:

    http://www.amsat-dl.org/p5a/

    Stuff like this makes you proud of holding a HAM license :-)

    73s

  17. Onward to space, Free Marketeers! by gonerill · · Score: 2, Funny

    I imagine the sub-etha communication system will be provided by WorldCom and the fusion propulsion unit by Enron. Once it launches and hasn't been heard from for a while, Arthur Andersen will certify that the craft did, in fact, land on Mars as projected, steered there by the invisible hand.

    A few quarters later, the taxpayer will bail out the investors.

  18. Absent from the article... by irokitt · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is the fact that the company formed for the mission is named The Union Aerospace Corporation.

    Are they asking for volunteers yet?

    --
    If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
  19. Translation of the Spiegel article by Daikiki · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm not a native speaker, mind, but should be a little less incomprehensible than what the fish churns out ;)
    --
    Marburg Consortium plans mars mission before 2009

    A German consortium of scientists, engineers, and technicians wants to prove that private groups are also in the race for interplanetary flights. By 2009, the group plans to send a probe and a satellite to Mars.

    The Amsat consortium has approximately 1200 members working largely as volunteers on the rpoject. The mission of exploration will cost around 700 million Euros, according to Amsat in Bochum, Saturday.

    The goal of the mission is to prove that private organizations can make space flights within the solar system possible, according to Karl Meinzer, professor of Space Flight Technology at the University of Stuttgart. The 500 kilogram probe will be put into earth orbit on board an Arianne rocket.

    The space flight organization intends to purchase spare capacity on a rocket that would not be filled enitrely by other satellites. Later the probe would be brought into an orbit around Mars where it would serve as a communications relay.

    Ground Control in Bochum

    Meinzer says, We'd be able to receive signals from transmitters already on Mars". The Observatory in Bochum would serve as ground control. Before the actual flight to Mars could commence, the probe will have to be placed into orbit around the Earth. "We can't set a term for the rocket launch, but we must begin the flight to Mars within a limited timeframe." In 2007 and 2009 Mars will be in a beneficial location for the flight.

    After the nine month flight to the neighbouring planet the probe will begin sending signals from Mars to Earth. The signals will be broadcast on amateur radio frequencies, so that anybody with a transceiver will be able to receive them.

    Another goal of the mission will be investigation of the Martian atmosphere. To achieve this, the Munich Mars Society, also an organization of scholars and technicians, wants to send along the "Archimedes" probe on the mission to the red planet. "Once in Martian orbit, a 14 meter diameter balloon will inflate above the probe", said Hannes Gabriel of the Mars Society. The balloon will slow down substantially as it glides through the atmosphere towards the surface of the planet with its landing craft. The researchers hope this will yield better opportunities to collect data.

    The 30 year old Amsat consortium has succesfully lanched satellites into space, according to Meinzer. Since the eightiies they have participated in a total of nine missions.

    --
    I want the fire back.
    1. Re:Translation of the Spiegel article by Daikiki · · Score: 4, Informative

      The mission of exploration will cost around 700 million Euros

      Oops. That was supposed to read 10 million Euros, not 700 million Euros. I do apologize.

      --
      I want the fire back.
  20. Sorry, are we talking about the man who... by leonbrooks · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...missed or almost missed practically every single major turn of the computer industry, such as the Internet? Has anyone told you that Chicago (MS-Windows-95) almost shipped without a web browser because of that? Have you ever read "The Road Behind^WAhead"? Pile of money? Check. Vision...? Anyone...?

    If anyone from Microsoft did such a thing, it would be Paul Allen - who IPOF is funding Bert Rutan - but I think he'd require more signs of life on Mars before he cut a cheque for it, since he seems to be an evangelist for materialism.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:Sorry, are we talking about the man who... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Informative

      Has anyone told you that Chicago (MS-Windows-95) almost shipped without a web browser because of that?

      It DID ship without a web browser. Internet Explorer was shipped a few months later with the awesome ability to *snicker* show web pages while they were loading. Yet all downloads happened in the same browser windoe. i.e. If you clicked on a link to download, you'd then have to wait as the browser load bar told you the status of the download. If you left the page, you'd lose the downlaod.

  21. Hey, let me ask a question. . . by Sialagogue · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just how stupid does an announcement have to be before working journalists decide not to report it? A private mission to Mars by 2009?

    Okay fine, in that same spirit:

    "Dear Speigel:

    I plan to evolve into a being composed entirely of ionized gas and electromagnetic energy by 2009. I realize this is an ambitious timeframe, but with recent advances in genetic engineering and non-CFC spray bottle technology I believe it's achievable.

    Please call me if you have any questions, or I'll be happy to seep into your offices in five years."

    --
    The only acceptable defense of scientific results is to say that they were the product of the Scientific Method.
    1. Re:Hey, let me ask a question. . . by apanap · · Score: 2, Informative

      What's stupid about that? Just getting there is pretty simple, just fire your boosters at the right time... And AMSAT has a history dating back to the 1960's of building space crafts... They're not sending people there... And yes, IAARS.

      --
      Give me a job. Please?
  22. with an 'M' by LuxFX · · Score: 3, Funny

    You know what sucks? Seeing this headline and reading "Planned" as "Manned". I was getting all excited.

    --
    Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
  23. Re:Money by miu · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It'll cost 10 million euros! Not a penny less, not a penny more.

    I defy you to find a group of people who can manage to bring in lunch in at the initially projected price. Unless these have purchased all their hardware (and none of it fails in the meantime), paid all their people (and none of em die or jump ship), paid all their service fees (and none of the providers goes out of business or sells the service out from under them), and 10 million other things I can't think of then "not a penny less, not a penny more" is the kind of head in sand statement that will cause them to fail or flail around missing deadlines until they fail.

    --

    [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
  24. Easily fixed by CiXeL · · Score: 2, Interesting

    SPOIL the environment there. Send a simple probe containing dozens of cultures of bacteria and lichen that would most likely survive the environment and have it land in an area most suitable. If the environment is already contaminated. There won't be as much opposition. Besides, we're going to have to contaminate it one way or another unless we just never intend to colonize it which is just a waste.

    1. Re:Easily fixed by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Theoretically possible, although I tend to think you could bomb the area with high temp bombs to sterilize the landing area. In any case, sure, it's possible, if you want your ass landed in jail for the rest of your life. One nut can't just send a "simple probe", it takes a lot of nuts with a lot of money, who don't mind being villainized for the rest of human history.

      As for whether it's a "waste" to not colonize it, I'm not convinced that it isn't a waste. Mars a big freaking ROCK. It's not that interesting of a place to colonize.

      I personally believe the future of colonization are huge human-built space stations with spin gravity (probably Cylinders) with earth-like environments. There's little that can't provide over living on a rock.

      We just need to get over the romantic notion that it's fun to live on a rock that's not the earth. The only thing that makes it exciting is the fact that no one has done it, but from a realistic standpoint, there just ain't that much that's interesting about it.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  25. Three Words by CiXeL · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Oil on Titan"

  26. Re:Prepare yourselves... by bigpat · · Score: 3, Funny

    "My prediction: If any private company gets within sniffing distance of sending people to Mars, the environmentalists and scientists will go hand-in-hand screaming about contaminating the native environment."

    Then we'll just have to grind up the "environmentalists" for martian fertilizer.

  27. Re:Umbrella? by shogun · · Score: 2, Informative

    "The Company" is more formally known as Weyland-Yutani.

    Just FYI..

  28. Re:What's the point? by Rxke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So these scientists studied and worked all their lives for nothing? They'd better give up doing what they're good at, and search for another job in wellfare/environmental development etc.?
    Think about it, this is in essence what you are proposing.
    No use to be a scientist/engineer/whatever if you decide to use *all* your money for 'better' goals. For them these goals you propose ae equally valid, but it's just not *their* forte. And again and again and again: money 'wasted' on stuff like this doesn't disappear into thin air, it is an investment in jobs, material science, etc.
    You can't just go and kill sciencebudgets to use that money for the 'good cause.'

    And this 'trying to compete with NASA' mantra is getting old. What's everyone not working for NASA supposed to do? let NASA run 100% of spaceflight business and bail out?
    That's like saying to Microsoft: "yea, you're the biggest, we (other OS'es,) quit, have fun."