Slashdot Mirror


What are My Rights Against Video Surveillance?

Violated Privacy asks: "A video bugging device was recently discovered in the bathroom of the house I share with three others. After sharing this find with one of the housemates, I am sure whose camera it is. Needless to say, we're both rather upset over the matter. What are our legal rights in this matter? It's not the government doing it, but another private citizen with whom we willingly (until now...) share a house. Are there special considerations? (Yes, I should ask a lawyer. I plan on doing that tomorrow when I get a chance. The problem is, most lawyers aren't exactly experts in this area.) Has anyone on Slashdot done research into this field of privacy law?"

205 comments

  1. URL? by brunson · · Score: 4, Funny

    What's the address of the website you're on?

    --
    09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    Jesus loves you, I think you suck
    1. Re:URL? by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      Boy, for someone that is so obviously pissed off that they were being recorded. They sure didn't hesitate for a second to post a link to a site where you can purchase it direct. Its almost as if this whole story was fabricated to put a little cash in some dumbasses pocket. Hmmmmm....

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    2. Re:URL? by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 2, Informative

      I posted that because it was the quickest way to make people understand what I was talking about. It was late and I had work in the morning. Story subissions are lame without links, and I didn't exactly feel in the mood to start building a web site around my discovery. Here's my little makeshift page with a few more details on the insides of the bastard.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    3. Re:URL? by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      Check SkinnyWhiteGeekBoyAss.com, that's what category I'd fall under...

      --
      ± 29 dB
    4. Re:URL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did you find this camera? Were you shopping for hidden spy cam yourself and saw this radio for sell or something? Do you have CIA equipment to detect cameras? Inquiring mind wants to know.

  2. No rights. by christopherfinke · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is completely legal. There's no use going to the police; people do this all the time. You should probably just put it behind you.

    Oh, and could I have my video camera back? Thanks.

  3. But of course. . . by the+argonaut · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Any lawyer you speak to is far more likely to be an expert on it than some random guy on /. (apologies to the lawyers in the audience). And even if a lawyer isn't an expert, s/he is probably more than capable of finding the answers or pointing you in the right direction.

    --
    fuck you.
    1. Re:But of course. . . by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2, Funny

      While reading this I anticipated the second sentence to read:

      And even if a lawyer isn't an expert, s/he is probably more than capable of spewing off some legal BS and charging you $200/hr anyway.

      Besides, anyone with any savvy knows that if you put lemon juice on your face, video cameras can't record you.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    2. Re:But of course. . . by itwerx · · Score: 1

      A lawyer will also point out a few other possibilities, like maybe the roommate in question didn't know about the camera either!
      The story submitter needs to do some research (or at least post more info).
      At the moment we don't know if that clock-radio (or whatever it is) might have been picked up at a garage sale or eBay or god-knows where.

      (Now if the submitter knows for a fact that it was purchased new then it's a different story... :)

    3. Re:But of course. . . by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      But of course. I'm not taking this as real legal advice; but I still thought everyone could perhaps give me pointers before I got a chance to talk with a legal expert. Don't worry, I'll be sure to let those who care know what happens.

      I have talked with a lawyer friend, and he is unfamiliar with criminal law but he cited numerous precedents in civil law. I'm pretty confident in the course of action to be taken, but it won't be pretty...

      --
      ± 29 dB
    4. Re:But of course. . . by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      I can't give my reasons really, but I am sure the house-mate purchased the camera, and I am certain he had it in place on purpose.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    5. Re:But of course. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, give us some details! We want the dirt on this guy!! :)

  4. Looks pretty expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I would say unplug it and hide it in a closet, then casually mention that the alarm wasn't working too well so you threw it away and bought a new one.

    Watch their reaction when they realize that their $350 just got tossed.

    1. Re:Looks pretty expensive by karnal · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you want to be really evil, just take the camera and hide it.

      Then act normal around said person. Never admit to taking it. And keep watch for other cameras.

      Of course, you have to know how to keep a straight face around people - not many people have this gift. But I would definitely get more pleasure out of having the person "wonder" who knew.... haahahaaa!

      --
      Karnal
    2. Re:Looks pretty expensive by TheCarp · · Score: 2, Funny

      Better yet...

      break the camera into bits.

      Take a shit

      drop bit sof camera on top of the shit.

      don't flush.

      Ask him to remove his device from the bathroom.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    3. Re:Looks pretty expensive by mobby_6kl · · Score: 2, Funny

      Here's my suggestion:

      0) Replace the camea clock with a regular one
      1) Prit out the famous hello.jpg
      2) Point the camera at the picture.
      3) There is no profit, just fun.

      Bonus points if you install surveillance on the dude between 0) and 2) and send him a printout of his face in the "bueeee" mode.

    4. Re:Looks pretty expensive by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 2, Funny

      What if there is a camera watching the first camera, or better yet, a circle of cameras all watching each other ?

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    5. Re:Looks pretty expensive by the+real+darkskye · · Score: 2, Funny

      The you could watch the submitter shower in bullet-time obviously!

      --
      Music is everybody's possession.
      It's only publishers who think that people own it.
      Fuck Beta
      ~John Lenno
    6. Re:Looks pretty expensive by sysadmn · · Score: 1

      Nah, you want to really mess with his mind. Buy the same version of the clock WITHOUT the camera and swap with him. What's he gonna say?

      --
      Envy my 5 digit Slashdot User ID!
  5. What state? by Atzanteol · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Different states have different laws on this... For instance, in Massachusetts so long as they weren't recording *sound*, then it's perfectly legal (yes, believe it or not!).

    We *are* trying to fix this little loop-hole, but legislation has tied the bill up for a bit...

    --
    "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

    - Charles Darwin
    1. Re:What state? by GigsVT · · Score: 2

      Who is "we" and why are you trying to "fix" this?!?!

      Upskirt sites all over the net will be censored!

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:What state? by Atzanteol · · Score: 2, Informative

      "We" is the voters in the state and the legislation. AFAIK the bill has been passed, but is tied up in some committee...

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    3. Re:What state? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A man sold a house to a nice family, in this great state we live in, but not before he installed hidden cameras in just about every room.

      He was cought after the family discovered the camera wiring during a re-model.

      The only law he was breaking? Theft of electricity.

      Maybe someday the laws will catch up with the real world.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    4. Re:What state? by HyperbolicParabaloid · · Score: 1
      I'm not so sure this is entirely accurate. Massachusetts' wiretap law resulted in the conviction of a guy who secretly videataped police harrasing him, but ended up convicted of invading their privacy! According to the story in the
      Boston Globe, July 2001, The Supreme Judicial Court upheld the conviction:

      "We conclude that the Legislature intended (the law) strictly to prohibit all secret recordings by members of the public, including recordings of police officers or other public officials interacting with members of the public, when made without their permission or knowledge," Justice John M. Greaney wrote in the majority opinion.

      Note that the court also said that this out come is a Bad Thing (TM).
      --


      -------------------------
      A person of moderate zeal
    5. Re:What state? by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      I can't find any links, but I'd heard it on the radio (WRKO). Apparently the current law only covers recording of *audio*, and so long as you don't record audio (just video) then you're within your rights. There is a bill that I believe has been passed, but not yet adopted, to correct this...

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    6. Re:What state? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's amazing the number of people here acting like they know the answer. This is an issue of state law. I've seen many news reports and there often isn't a specific law. My state has one, it's called something like "improper photography".

      My favorate peeping tom story was a tanning salon owner who got caught. There was no law against it and it looked like he might get off, until they figured out that some of the people he filmed were minors. Ouch!

    7. Re:What state? by the+argonaut · · Score: 1

      I am assuming that you mean "legislature" where you have stated "legislation".

      And that you are either implying that either:

      A) the bill has been introduced but is tied up in committee.
      - or -
      B) the bill has been passed but not yet signed into law or it is not yet being enforced for some reason.

      As it would make no sense for it to be tied up in committee if it has already passed.

      --
      fuck you.
    8. Re:What state? by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      See, I can't find a source (just heard it on the radio while driving home). I *think* they said it had been passed, but was awaiting somebody to do something (not waiting to be signed though - they aren't waiting on Mitt).

      *shrug* If I find anything I'll post it...

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    9. Re:What state? by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      Think I found it.

      http://www.mass.gov/legis/history/s02464.htm

      Which is a revised version of:

      http://www.mass.gov/legis/history/s00177.htm

      Sounds like it's gone to the Steering committee. Guess it hasn't been passed yet...

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    10. Re:What state? by the+argonaut · · Score: 1

      Rock. On. Good work, grasshopper.

      Didn't mean to come across as attacking. Just lookin' for a little bit o' clarity on the issue.

      --
      fuck you.
    11. Re:What state? by ConsumedByTV · · Score: 1

      This is one of those cases where it's an entirely fucked judgement.

      Think about it for a moment. A corrupt cop breaks the law, he gets off because you have proof. Nonsense.

      --


      "Not my manner of thinking but the manner of thinking of others has been the source of my unhappiness." - M
    12. Re:What state? by HyperbolicParabaloid · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the court pretty much said the same thing in its judgement, even though it ruled that this is what the law required. The Rodney King tape, for instance, would be illegal in Massachusetts.

      --


      -------------------------
      A person of moderate zeal
  6. Report it to the police by Engineer-Poet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In most places I've heard of, invasion of privacy is a crime; there have been numerous news items about people (mostly men) being prosecuted for putting cameras in restrooms and changing rooms. So go to the cops first. At the very least you'll get a police report out of it.

    1. Re:Report it to the police by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      You might want to try the cops, but they don't know the law, they just enforce laws they think are important and easy to catch people doing. A lawyer is your best bet, their job is to know the law, especially since the laws vary from state to state.

      I do know that I've seen issues about this in public places (cameras in bathrooms) and the use of cameras in places like this were found to be illegal.

      Actually, a quicker cheaper thing to do would be go get a baseball bat and teach the person a lesson regarding this. Someone that does something like this is a pretty sick fuck and should be treated as such.

    2. Re:Report it to the police by the+argonaut · · Score: 1

      Whether you call the police or a lawyer depends on what you're trying to achieve.

      If you want to press criminal charges (if applicable), call the police. Contrary to stated opinion, police do know the law (maybe not off the top of their collective heads, but it's pretty much a certainty that they have a copy of the statutes and prosecutors they can consult), and in the end the state is the entity that's going to prosecute the room mate, not your private attorney.

      OTOH, if you want to sue you'll need an attorney. But as stated elsewhere, you'd better make sure he's got deep enough pockets to make it worthwhile. Even if it's not a criminal offense, I think you may still be able to sue for IIED or under some other tort theory.

      Standard disclaimers apply: IANAL (although IAALS, whatever that's worth). As I (and others) stated before, don't look to /. for your legal advice unless you're just looking for amusement. Call a lawyer if you really want an answer.

      --
      fuck you.
  7. call the police by sribe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    First, take pictures of the device so you have documentation in case the pervert housemate gets suspicious and tries to remove it quickly. Then call the police; in most states this is a criminal act that can get the perv arrested. (I recall a case in the past couple of years where prosecutors discovered that their state's law had been written before video was invented, and was worded in such a way that it only covered audio recordings. The perv in that case got off, but the state legislature fixed the problem promptly.) Do not hesitate about calling the police and getting this person in trouble; this is the act of a sick and potentially dangerous person who needs either intense involuntary psychiatric treatment or prison time, or both. Do not worry about your lease and so on, those things will work themselves out. Go to the police NOW!

    And remember, if your name is on the lease, you can grant permission to the police to search the premises without a warrant...

    1. Re:call the police by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Umm its a clock radio....

    2. Re:call the police by El · · Score: 1

      The heck with pictures of the device -- confiscate the device! Then find the receive if it's wireless, or the other end of the cable if it's not. Confiscate whatever recording/viewing equipment is on the other end, and any tapes you can find. Take them to another location and review the tapes at your leisure. Hey, if somebody wants to use several hundred dollars worth of equipment to violate your privacy, at the very least they should permanently lose their equipment. What can they do, anyway? Complain to the police that "hey, my roommate stole the equipment I was using to spy on them!"

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    3. Re:call the police by multriha · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they say to the police, and they'll get no worse than the charges they'd initially get, while you'll get charged with grand theft. Great scheme.

    4. Re:call the police by DaveJay · · Score: 2, Funny

      >...The perv in that case got off...

      I'm sure he/she did. ;)

    5. Re:call the police by El · · Score: 1

      Only if they can prove that you took it. Don't tell them!

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    6. Re:call the police by PKPerson · · Score: 1

      confiscate the device, and then broadcast a tap of the perv's mother's home on the frequency.

    7. Re:call the police by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 2, Informative

      Did take pictures, but I'm not sure about the search aspect. I'll take that up with the police when the time comes (soon). My name is on the lease, but I would love to find a way to limit the scope of any searching/seizing done. I'd prefer not to have all of my electronics shuffled through and held while the courts grind away, and I know the other two (innocent) roomies feel that way too.

      (By the way, we *do* rather plan on finding a new house-mate, whether it be by his moving out or ours.)

      --
      ± 29 dB
    8. Re:call the police by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer to stay on the good side of the law, and there are numerous potential other plaintiffs in this case. At least one person who may have bene watched/recorded/masturbated to/whatever was under the age of eighteen, and I know *I* don't want to be holding the bag for child pornography.

      Besides, how do I expect to hold my invasion-of-privacy grounds by invading his? That definitely wouldn't fly in court.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    9. Re:call the police by deacon · · Score: 1

      Move your stuff out to a storage unit. Any search will be only of the house you are in, not an external storage unit.

    10. Re:call the police by FacePlant · · Score: 1

      ... and get your classified ad ready, becuase you're going to need somebody new to make up the the old guys rent.

      --
      My Heart Is A Flower
  8. Honestly... by Otter · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Realistically, does it matter? On the one hand, whether or not this is illegal, it's certainly outside the bounds of acceptable roomate behavior (to put it mildly). I'd be either getting out or kicking the perpetrator out immediately, depending on which option is available. On the other hand, are you going to sue the guy if you could? Unless he's loaded, there isn't a deep pocket available to make a lawyer bother taking you on.

    That leaves a criminal case, and fortunately you're not expected to do legal research before requesting one. If you want to go that route, call the police and have them and the local prosecutors decide what can be done.

    1. Re:Honestly... by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      The present people in the house don't want to push civil charges, but I can't speak for the people who had lived with him in the past. At this point I'm trying to keep myself out of trouble rather than get him in it.

      And yes, a changing of the guard is in the very near future.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    2. Re:Honestly... by joshki · · Score: 1

      If you're trying to keep yourself out of trouble, you need to report it IMMEDIATELY. If you fail to do so, you are an accessory to the crime -- don't delay, call the police NOW.

      --
      I do not read or respond to AC's. If you want a discussion, log in. Otherwise, don't waste your time.
    3. Re:Honestly... by ConsumedByTV · · Score: 1

      How?

      --


      "Not my manner of thinking but the manner of thinking of others has been the source of my unhappiness." - M
  9. Violence. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't understand why you wouldn't just beat the fuck out of the person for doing it? Whatever happened to direct justice/vengeance? You know, it's not a BAD THING to get your own justice when someone does something wrong to you. Fill up a pillow cases with bars of soap and everyone can have at the prick. Hey, maybe you can even videotape it!

    1. Re:Violence. by fruity_pebbles · · Score: 1

      I second the beating solution.

    2. Re:Violence. by ClioCJS · · Score: 0

      I third it.

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    3. Re:Violence. by evilmuffins · · Score: 1

      I'm always up for a good beating.

    4. Re:Violence. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Violence. (Score:4, Insightful)

      REALLY !!??

      Is this "News for Morons"?
      Illegal, unethical, STUPID.

    5. Re:Violence. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well then, tell me where you are. I'll oblige you.

  10. Q I got for you'vs by danalien · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Are you more upset for:

    A) $PERSON invaded your privacy

    B) $PERSON caught you on $TAPE, $DOING what ever $YOU'vs where doing?

    --
    I don't claim I know more than I know, and if you know you know more than I know, then by all means, let me know.
    1. Re:Q I got for you'vs by sfjoe · · Score: 1


      I don't get your point. In this matter, A = B

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    2. Re:Q I got for you'vs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In case B, he might be too embarrassed to raise a stink about it. The culprit could "defend" himself.

    3. Re:Q I got for you'vs by danalien · · Score: 2, Insightful
      no, not quite.

      A's - I'm upset because $PERSON didn't ask me for permission. *a matter of principle* ...

      B's - I'm upset because $PERSON got a peek into my 'secrete/private'-life. *a matter of humiliation*

      --
      I don't claim I know more than I know, and if you know you know more than I know, then by all means, let me know.
    4. Re:Q I got for you'vs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He can't "defend" himself if he's dead.

    5. Re:Q I got for you'vs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok.. using variable names in this case is just downright gay. Talk in english, not in C++.

      kthx.

    6. Re:Q I got for you'vs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > kthx.

      Saying "kthx" is just being a fucking MORON. Grow up!

  11. You're even more screwed than you think... by r00k123 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1) As a member of the house, he can legally record anything happening in it.

    2) As long as he does not try to reap any financial gain from it, he can freely post it anywhere he sees fit. Yes, this means he could plaster it all over the web and you'd have no legal recourse (assuming you and your roomie are over 18)

    There was a case a while back of a father taping his twenty-something year-old daughter (without her knowledge) and posting the videos to the net. She brought him to court and lost.

    You can't make him erase it and you can't bust him for taking the footage. As long as he doesn't sell it you're SOL.

    IANAL. But even if I were you should be taking everything you read here with a grain of salt. Follow up with an actual attorney tomorrow.

    1. Re:You're even more screwed than you think... by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      The laws might vary from state to state.

    2. Re:You're even more screwed than you think... by TheCarp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      heh heh

      You could "forget about it" until you can invite someone under 18 over and have them use the bathroom.

      Then "find" the camera... call the police, be sure ot tell them that a minor uysed the bathroom and was probably recorded... get him arrested for child porn.

      Overall I like the idea of hitting his pocket... search and destroy! Leave no
      evidence.

      Better yet get compensation... have a friend sell them and keep the money

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    3. Re:You're even more screwed than you think... by Txiasaeia · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If he did this, he *needs* to make sure that he doesn't tell anybody about the plan, else *he* could be in trouble for getting the minor on tape. Otherwise, wish I had mod points when I needed them!

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    4. Re:You're even more screwed than you think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't make him erase it and you can't bust him for taking the footage. As long as he doesn't sell it you're SOL.

      Bullshit. With three or four roommates and a half dozen friends cornering the guy, each with a baseball bat in hand, you'll be able to make him do just about anything you feel is necessary to even things out.

    5. Re:You're even more screwed than you think... by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      Then "find" the camera... call the police, be sure ot tell them that a minor uysed the bathroom and was probably recorded... get him arrested for child porn.

      Uh, I doubt there's any legal definition anywhere that says "using the toilet" == "pornography" (market definitions are another matter...).

    6. Re:You're even more screwed than you think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, this means he could plaster it all over the web and you'd have no legal recourse

      What a fucked up country. Normally the rights of a picture of a person belong to that person, especially when it comes to distribution. You should try photographing a person in Germany (that is the person is the main motive as opposed to taking a photo of a street where people are happening to walk) and distributing that picture. You are held liable for unauthorized distribution of copyrighted works faster than you can say "land of the free".

    7. Re:You're even more screwed than you think... by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Okay, I'm more sure in my legal rights and responsibility now that I've talked with a lawyer.. I'm the guy who submitted the question. Want pictures of the camera taken apart to see what's inside? Here you go. Okay, hopefully that will be proof enough.

      Anyhow, it's quite likely he (if he's been recording) has video of at least one female under the age of eighteen. That's one of the things I'm worried about, actually. I want him to get due punishment, but I'm not out to ruin the guy.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    8. Re:You're even more screwed than you think... by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      If he's been recording, there's a very real chance he has footage of at least one person younger than eighteen. That's one of the big "if" questions that's not been answered yet.

      My lawyer friend, who specializes in civil matters, tells me there are definite precedents set, though, specifically Benitez v. KFC in my state of residence, Illinois.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    9. Re:You're even more screwed than you think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want him to get due punishment, but I'm not out to ruin the guy.

      If he did in fact tape a minor, then his due punishment is jail time (with all of his jail buddies knowing what he's in there for) followed by spending the rest of his life sexual predator lists. He _will_ be ruined.

    10. Re:You're even more screwed than you think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even better, do a real life goatse!

    11. Re:You're even more screwed than you think... by nullportal · · Score: 1

      Criminal laws (polic enforce) as well as civil laws (you must file suit) in the US vary by state, as pointed out in another thread. However, ... > B.S. in all 50 states, at least as to civil liability, and in most other nations also. Criminal liability may vary, but places with stronger criminal laws against secret surveillance, such as California, would make the activity described criminal. > Again, BS in all 50 states as to civil liability. You can't exploit someone elses personality (identifying features, individual reputation, etc.) without at least implied consent maliciously or for profit except in certain exceptional cases that mostly involve journalists and important public interests. > CITATION? (Describe the name of the case, or court and date it occured in.) Thanks. > Nonsense. If the police don't help, take the bozo to your state's version of small claims court (might be called justice court or such) and use its procedures to find out information about what may have been done with the information obtained, as well as whatever else that court might be able to do to help you. Of course getting a lawyer to take your case could get you even better results, but usually the cost of that can be handled only if there's money to be recovered from the bozo. > If you make me wade through your pointless drivel, and then tag on at the end that it's a joke, I'm still going to treat it like the drivel it is. That's the price of getting a "5" mod enticing me to read your pointless drivel. Sheesh - the net may be full of prepubsecent pranksters, but should Slashdot be?

      --
      The difference between /. and the real world is that only one of these makes you work hard for the sta
    12. Re:You're even more screwed than you think... by nullportal · · Score: 1

      "What a fucked up country. Normally the rights of a picture of a person belong to that person, especially when it comes to distribution."

      Please be aware that you are responding to a troll who got a "5" mod for reasons best known to neuropsychiatrists.

      --
      The difference between /. and the real world is that only one of these makes you work hard for the sta
    13. Re:You're even more screwed than you think... by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

      Then "find" the camera... call the police, be sure ot tell them that a minor uysed the bathroom and was probably recorded... get him arrested for child porn.

      He should not lie -- such sort of manipulation is exposed in court anyway. But he should complain and press for intent to commit adult privacy violations and child porn charges - after all he is reasonably likely to have had minors over (eg: a roomates mom, dad and little brother dropped in to say hello while driving by?).

      Also, regarding what a poster above you said:
      > 1) As a member of the house, he can legally record anything happening in it.

      Nonsense. His house is not an internet sleaze joint. There are probably laws that go something like this: "Reasonable expectation of privacy", etc. If there aren't (HIGHLY unlikely) - your country or state should pass them.

      Also, is there a law against taping audio conversations without notification. Personally, I think taping all your _own_ conversations should be allowed, but that's besides the point. But if there is a law like that, use it to sic undisclosed video taping. (eg: 2 people discussing things in the bathroom (use lip reading if no audio.) person alone talking to himself)

  12. Hit them where it hurts. by chris_mahan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Reformat their hard-drive.

    (use a knoppix cd to boot the beast)(wear gloves at the keyboard)

    They'll assume drive failure the first time. The second time, they'll get a really uncomfortable feeling.

    PS: I don't actually advocate doing that. I would just move.
    PPS: If you really want to do something, call a lawyer.
    PPPS: Landlord?

    --

    "Piter, too, is dead."

    1. Re:Hit them where it hurts. by R2.0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Hit them where it hurts"

      I'd suggest in the balls.

      Same advice if your roomate is female - the clitoris is quite sensitive (news to most Slashdotter's) and a good kick between the legs will have a satisfactory effect.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    2. Re:Hit them where it hurts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would actually recommend autoclave instead (google can find it). Run it at level 5 and NOTHING can be recovered from the drive. Has an added benefit of destroying any hidden partitions (where most reinstall files would be located).

    3. Re:Hit them where it hurts. by Otter · · Score: 5, Funny
      (use a knoppix cd to boot the beast)

      Is there any question to which "You should use Linux!" is not the answer? ("What should I do about the hidden camera in my bathroom?" "Linux!")

      Anyway, unless the roommate has a really old computer, he'd be better off using a Gentoo LiveCD with its Pentium optimization. That should save at least four or five milliseconds.

    4. Re:Hit them where it hurts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Is there any question to which "You should use Linux!" is not the answer?
      Linux! Glad I could help clear that up for ya.
    5. Re:Hit them where it hurts. by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      (Yes, I'm the story submitter. Yes, I'm jumping on the humor train.)

      He's one of those WinXP guys with virus/worm infestations only dreamed of by Linux geeks. I suppose if he only gets women electronically, it seems fitting that his deseases come that way too.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    6. Re:Hit them where it hurts. by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      So, you mean, he might ENJOY getting his hard drive formatted?

    7. Re:Hit them where it hurts. by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      Is there any question to which "You should use Linux!" is not the answer?

      No. And yes, I answered that question using a Knoppix CD. The answer to that question therefore was to use Linux.

  13. chances are good.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (IANAL) _any_ lawyer would take your case, regardless of their legal expertise. you're not taking on a multi-billion dollar corp here, you're taking on an individual with much less cash and other assets. you may not necessarily have to _prove_ your case (although that wouldn't hurt), you could just annoy him with your lawyer into settlement or something. and if he doesnt pay up, file a lien in your state against him, something that goes on his credit report and will follow him whereever he goes.

  14. Start by throwing the room mate out...now. by j-turkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Does their name appear on your lease? You may want to talk with a lawyer first, but if one of my housemates tried to pull any of that, I would likely change the locks and leave their possessions on the lawn for them to collect.

    There are some things that you shouldn't tolerate. I believe that this is one of them...regardless of the legality of their actions.

    As far as them releasing pictures of you on the can and in the shower, your rights vary from state to state (if you're in the US). Contact your state AG's office for details.

    --

    -Turkey

    1. Re:Start by throwing the room mate out...now. by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      if one of my housemates tried to pull any of that, I would likely change the locks and leave their possessions on the lawn for them to collect.

      In most states, evictions require subtantial prior notice.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    2. Re:Start by throwing the room mate out...now. by j-turkey · · Score: 1
      In most states, evictions require subtantial prior notice.

      This is why I asked if the roommate's name was on the lease. If it isn't on the lease -- and they're just sort of "there"...it's not necessarily an eviction. Of course, IANAL.

      --

      -Turkey

    3. Re:Start by throwing the room mate out...now. by ConsumedByTV · · Score: 1

      That's not the case in California.

      If someone lives there, it takes major work to get them out legally, even if they don't pay rent. If you try to shut of power, water or anything else, you're breaking the law.

      You have to walk a thin line or you will end up paying damages by the day.

      --


      "Not my manner of thinking but the manner of thinking of others has been the source of my unhappiness." - M
  15. Call the cops. by FreeLinux · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's illegal in all 50 states (I'm assuming you're in the US). It often falls under the Peeping Tom laws but, there are also more stringent and specific laws in many places. In many states the person will become a registered sex offender, as they should be.

    Here's a case from 2002. This story, dated August 2004, sounds very much like yours.

    1. Re:Call the cops. by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      It was recently discovered in Massachusetts that so long as no sound is recorded, it was perfectly legal to video tape somebody. There was a case recently where an offender was found 'not guilty' in a case like this. I don't have any links at the moment (heard about it on the radio), but there is a bill that's going through the local govt to correct this oversight.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    2. Re:Call the cops. by be951 · · Score: 1
      Good cites, but other posters have mentioned that if the person lives there, the OP may have no recourse. So neither case you mentioned quite matches the circumstances. In some ways, that makes sense. By living with someone, you give up a large measure of privacy compared to the public which has no right to any part of your home, or even a landlord whose rights to enter your home are limited by law even though he may own the property.

      The OP's brings to mind one of those Fox shock shows from a few years ago about bad behavior "Caught on Tape!" One of the clips was from a guy who put a video camera in his bathroom because (allegedly) he thought his roommate was using his toothbrush (evidently it was often already wet when he went to brush). Turns out his roomie was doing a quick brush to the inside of the toilet each day.

    3. Re:Call the cops. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had proof that I'd been brushing my teeth with such a brush, I wouldn't let the whole world know. Both of these roommates are dorks.

    4. Re:Call the cops. by MrIcee · · Score: 1
      • It's illegal in all 50 states
      Not so for Hawai'i... here the law reads that it is LEGAL as long as at least ONE of the parties involved knows about it.
    5. Re:Call the cops. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that about 2/3 to 3/4 (estimated by the shows producers) of those "real tape" shows are staged?

  16. Do it the old fasioned way by avida · · Score: 1

    Just get one of your friends to beat the tar out of the suspect. After you are sure, of course.

  17. Simple by bhima · · Score: 2, Funny

    Pawn it...

    --
    Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    1. Re:Simple by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1
      Pawn it...

      I think you mis-spelled that...

      (But seriously, if the law doesn't provide for locking up this weirdo and destroying all the recordings, the law is seriously broken.)

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    2. Re:Simple by bhima · · Score: 1
      Pawn: the act of giving something for secuity of a loan.

      Check it out on Wikipedia or something.

      Yes, the law is seriously broken. This should not suprise you.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    3. Re:Simple by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Yes, I speak English, thanks. It was a rather feeble attempt at humour; I couldn't manage something genuinely funny in this context.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  18. Infect their computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    If the video stream goes to a computer, come up with a picture, which digitized would contain a JPEG virus and attack GDI+ interface of their Windoze machine.

    1. Re:Infect their computer by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 1
      a picture, which digitized would contain a JPEG virus and attack GDI+ interface of their Windoze machine.

      Congratulations, Anonymous Coward, you win the Best Slashdot Post of the Day Award!

  19. Translation... by kenthorvath · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... I am thinking of setting up a webcam of my roommates and was seeking the legal opinion of non-lawyers.

    1. Re:Translation... by dhaines · · Score: 1

      I was thinking it was a script idea for the timely new sitcom remake "Three's Company Too."

  20. Bug the dork, send the video to his parents by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Revenge is a dish best served cold.

    Set up a secret camera in his room to record the dork. When you catch the guy smoking pot or masturbating, send the video tape to his parents.

  21. Try the peaceful way. by Max+von+H. · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why don't you confront the person face to face before unleashing some greedy lawyer onto the case? If the culprit's one of your housemates, I guess you can just talk it over... I mean, if the recordings were only done for private purposes and only involve adults, kicking the guy out and destroying the evidence sounds like a reasonable punishment.

    Of course, if it's your landlord doing it and selling/sharing the stuff among sickos, it's another story.

    Just remember that not everything in life should be judged in court, dialogues can solve many things without getting to ruin one's life with punitive damages or jailing. Someone watched your butt, it's not the end of the world for Khtuhlu's sake! You'll save yourself a lot of stress that way and probably live longer :)

    --
    -- It's always darker before it goes pitch black.
    1. Re:Try the peaceful way. by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      I agree. Even if suing is the traditional US way of solving every possible problem ;)

      If you cannot talk about problems with your housemates in a peaceful way, then you honestly have bigger problems than a fscking camera.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:Try the peaceful way. by smalloy · · Score: 1

      I agree that things like this shouldn't automatically end up in court.

      Try taking control of the situation yourself. Beat him within an inch of his life, and then throw him the hell out.

    3. Re:Try the peaceful way. by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      If the culprit's one of your housemates, I guess you can just talk it over... I mean, if the recordings were only done for private purposes and only involve adults, kicking the guy out and destroying the evidence sounds like a reasonable punishment.

      [perv]
      "Whew...got off easy on that one. Wonder how tech savvy my next roomates will be?"
      [/perv]

      Destroying the evidence? Not just the camera/radio, but also, all of his webspace, all of his CDROM's, all of his hard drives, etc., etc...
      Are you sure no other copies exist? 20 years from now, will pics of your drunken, naked ass turn up when you're running for school board? After all...now you've pissed him off by catching him and kicking him out. And he is not wound too tight.

    4. Re:Try the peaceful way. by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1
      I mean, if the recordings were only done for private purposes and only involve adults, kicking the guy out and destroying the evidence sounds like a reasonable punishment.

      It does? That sounds like no punishment at all to me.

      What is the disincentive to stop this guy doing it again? They should destroy all known copies, lock him up and/or fine him a fortune, and set a condition that if any copy ever surfaces in the future, he gets locked up and/or fined a fortune again. Something like this ought to become an example to anyone else thinking of violating someone's dignity in the same way in future.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    5. Re:Try the peaceful way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd be better off drugging him and then gouging his eyes out.

    6. Re:Try the peaceful way. by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 3, Informative

      Honestly, I'd rather not have made this discovery; I'd rather not be involved at all.

      The problem is liability. I know about the camera, as do both of my other victimized housemates. There have been other residents of this house eith the perv before any of us three came along. I have no idea if/when/how they'll react, but I definitely do NOT want to be on the wrong side of the law when that happens.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    7. Re:Try the peaceful way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're definately going to have to kick him out. Call the cops, have them come over to make him leave safely.

      You do what he did to his roomates, you can't stay. This isn't being drunk one night and taking a swing, it's far more threatening, and has far reaching consequences.

      When the cops come over, tell them why you have to kick him out. They'll take the lead there if jail time is appropriate. Needless to say get rid of stuff you shouldn't have before you make the call.

      Your name is on the lease. He broke the trust. Now you've reason to be concerned for you personal safety and that of the other people living and visiting there. He's got to go, and no expectation he should be able to stay.

  22. Totally depends on gender by R2.0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    You Roomate Action

    M M Physical violence, combined with targetted property destruction (erase HD, etc.)

    F F Same as above

    F M Police, court system - get him tagged as a sex offender for life

    M F Sorry, you are S.O.L. Can't beat her up, legal system won't help. Just try to get the tapes/data erased and kick her out. Of course, if she's kinky enough, maybe there should be a change in strategy.

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    1. Re:Totally depends on gender by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      M F Sorry, you are S.O.L. Can't beat her up, legal system won't help. Just try to get the tapes/data erased and kick her out. Of course, if she's kinky enough, maybe there should be a change in strategy.

      How many guys would actually give a crap if a chick were spying on them? C'mon. If it's there, and remains there, it means that she likes looking at your butt or your dong. If she's not nasty, why not try to get a piece of that ass?

      If she is nasty, well... consider your usage of the bathroom as a charity case.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    2. Re:Totally depends on gender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and why doesn't this logic apply to men checking out women.

      The world is not a fair place and women get all of the breaks.

    3. Re:Totally depends on gender by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      It's more like the women are a bit more uptight, and the men are more aggressive in the "checking out" area. If a woman checks out a man, it makes it all that much easier for him. :-)

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    4. Re:Totally depends on gender by Pseudonym · · Score: 1
      How many guys would actually give a crap if a chick were spyig on them?

      Speaking as a fat bearded geek: If some chick was spying on me, there might be a good case to have her committed.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    5. Re:Totally depends on gender by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      The world is not a fair place and women get all of the breaks.

      So don't get caught. I'm at high school and completely surrounded by hot chicks 90+% of the time, and it works for me ;)

  23. give us more info by austad · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm curious as to how you figured it out? Was your roomie a weirdo and gave you the heebie-jeebies? Have you seen those clocks before and the thought crossed your mind that you might have one in your house?

    I always wonder how many of the hotels I've stayed in have had hidden cams. In the high school I went to for about 3 years, we noticed that one of the mirrors in the boys bathroom across from the library looked a bit different than the rest. It didn't reflect as much light. Behind that wall was the teachers lounge. One day after school when most people were gone, we went into the lounge. Along that wall was a series of closets. We opened one of the closets, pushed some stuff to the side, and in the back, someone had chipped out part of a cement block to be able see through the two way mirror they had installed in the bathroom. We never brought it up to anyone, and I'm sure it's probably still there today (11 years later).

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    1. Re:give us more info by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 4, Informative

      Added a picture of the front of the unit to my page.

      To answer your question, the clock just didn't look right. I'm not paranoid, but apparently at least curious enough to look closely.

      The clock/radio/camera had been displaced in the bathroom by a larger/better mini-stereo a week or two ago. This past weekend, it was put back up on the shelf and plugged in. That was the source of my initial curiosity.

      What got me really thinking was the lack of a tuning indicator. Actually, I was trying to figure out if the holes lit up with LEDs to show approximate tuning or what, and how the tuning of the radio worked. I peeled back the sticker on the front, and noticed the 3/4"-or-so lens assembly behind the leftmost hole.

      It appears the tuning indicator was one of the casualties of the conversion to a camera, though the radio itself still works fine. In the pictures, you'll also note that the space for the back-up 9V battery is taken by the transmitter. Otherwise, the clock is still as fully functional as the day it rolled off the Sony production line.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    2. Re:give us more info by rworne · · Score: 1

      That top pic is what it looked like before discovery? If I paid $300+ for such a device, it would have to be much more convincing. That sticker plastered on the face looks like ass and I'd never expect a commercial product, especially from Sony to look like that.

      I'd also not expect to discover a camera in my roomate's clock radio. Good catch.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    3. Re:give us more info by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      The sticker originally looked better, before I peeled it off and stuck it back on a time or two. It looks rather like frosted plastic if you're not paying attention. After I thought about it for more than a fraction of a second, the sticker did seem quite odd. The thing is, I don't usually ponder the nuance of what appears to be a $10 radio. There are usually better things to think about, like the patterns in the ceiling tile, or the patterns in the linoleum, or the dire toilet paper shortage...

      --
      ± 29 dB
  24. Deficiencies of the baseball-bat approach by Engineer-Poet · · Score: 1
    It's easier to get an eviction order and restraining order with a police report in your hand than a baseball bat. Also easier to sue for damages, etc.; if you use the bat on the wrong thing, you could find the tables turned on you.

    There may be other uses for a baseball bat in the resolution of this matter, but I would not presume to offer advice. I'm sure our imaginations are up to the task.

    1. Re:Deficiencies of the baseball-bat approach by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1

      I used to be a landlord. Even with a police report, it can take 30-60 days to get someone evicted (at least in VA) -- or longer. It is not easy to get someone out of a building. If their name is on the lease (either alone, or with yours), unless you can prove they're breaking the law (and a police report doesn't prove the law was broken, but an arrest would), you probably won't be able to get an eviction.

  25. turnabout is fair play... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    put this on his computer, this in his bedroom light, and use this to call and make threatening remarks like:

    "i know what you did in the bathroom..."

    ...or something like that.

  26. AL,AR,CA,DE,GE,HI,KS,ME,MI,MN,NH,SD,UT illegal by redelm · · Score: 5, Informative
    Just Googled this hit. Plus a few others may have "Peeping Tom" statutes.

    1. Re:AL,AR,CA,DE,GE,HI,KS,ME,MI,MN,NH,SD,UT illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI

      Georgia = GA, not GE

    2. Re:AL,AR,CA,DE,GE,HI,KS,ME,MI,MN,NH,SD,UT illegal by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, I'm in Illinois.

      MY lawyer-friend says it should be covered by civil law, if nothing else.

      --
      ± 29 dB
  27. A suggestion... by jo42 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hang a photo of the goatse guy in front of the camera...

  28. Turnabout ... by bryanp · · Score: 3, Funny

    If he doesn't know that you know you could always give him a special show. May I suggest pointing it at images of a certain man of the goats we've all come to know and fear? Or perhaps his girlfriend in her tub?

    --
    "An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." Col. Jeff Cooper
  29. SOMEONE MOD THIS ALL THE WAY UP!!! by hummassa · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This is the best idea. EVER. No lawyer fees. No frills. Just secretly hang the goatse and/or tubgirl in front of this. Hilarity ensues. You are a genius, jo42. one megakudos for you.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  30. Laws by rkrabath · · Score: 1

    Some states (wisconsin for sure.) have laws against filming people when they have a "reasonable expectation of privacy". I suggest asking a cop or a judge in your area

    --
    Who do I have to blackmail to get some representation around here!?!?!?!?
  31. Ass Kicking by pete-classic · · Score: 2

    If you are male, and your house mate is male, kick his ass. Twice. If you are female and your house mate is female, kick her ass.

    If you are female, and your house mate is male then get your brother or boyfriend to kick his ass. If you don't have either, get some guy who wants to be your boyfriend (but never will be) to kick his ass. In either case start listening to your mother when she tells you something is a bad idea.

    I have no idea what you should do if you are male, and your house mate is female. That's too freaky and weird for me to get my head around.

    Hope this helps.

    -Peter

    1. Re:Ass Kicking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no idea what you should do if you are male, and your house mate is female.

      This goes without saying. You're posting on Slashdot, after all, so you are most likely a male who's befuddled by women.

      Let me clue you in, dude: If you're a guy and your female roomie wants to see your junk so bad she hides a cam in the bathroom, you FUCK HER!

    2. Re:Ass Kicking by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Funny
      I have no idea what you should do if you are male, and your house mate is female.

      Kick her ass. Equal rights, and all that.

    3. Re:Ass Kicking by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      I have no idea what you should do if you are male, and your house mate is female. That's too freaky and weird for me to get my head around.

      Only on /....

  32. Geek revenge, and a fun hacking project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Secretly videotape him masturbating. Record onto a video loop, and hack that output to the 2.4 Ghz transmitter, so when he watches the video he sees himself.

    Then send a copy to his parents, and upload it to Usenet as "paris_hilton_sex_video.mpeg"

    Oh yeah, then beat the shit out of him.

    Don't forget to auction off your new video surveilance clock radio on Ebay.

  33. Seek legal help by linuxwrangler · · Score: 1
    A California court held that upskirt video was not illegal.

    The feds are working on outlawing peeping Tom activities.

    You need a lawyer to determine your rights which will depend on the laws and court decisions of your state and details like whether or not anyone caught on video was a minor (big no-no).

    Of course there is the direct approach.

    --

    ~~~~~~~
    "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
    1. Re:Seek legal help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard in the last couple weeks that in California a new law has been passed requireing permission before recording any picture of a private individual except as routine outdoor security recordings. You would need to verify.

    2. Re:Seek legal help by ChoGGi · · Score: 1

      The girl's aunt admitted to sexually assaulting Russo with a tree branch, police said. :)

  34. Child Porn waiting to happen by RLMorgan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If a minor goes into that room, it could become automatic child porn. I remember reading of a case of a hidden camera and the person who put it there LOL at the people upset about it. Until a 14 year old came forward and said they had changed clothes in that room. That gave the police all the probable cause they needed to confiscate everything and haul him away on a child porn charge. He now has to register as a sex offender.

    1. Re:Child Porn waiting to happen by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      I said in another comment, I'm worried about this. If he's recording, then there's a high chance he has a person under the age of eighteen on tape.

      --
      ± 29 dB
  35. Talk to the landlord by dacarr · · Score: 1

    You should notify your landlord about this. Plain and simple.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  36. What Congress is doing about it right now... by Randym · · Score: 2, Informative
    Go to http://thomas.loc.gov/ and in the Word/Phrase box enter "Video Voyeurism". This will bring up the "Video Voyeurism Prevention Act of 2003".

    --
    DNA is a Turing machine. You, however, being dynamic and emergent, are not.
  37. do it in this order (i'm a cop, really i am) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    1. : be sure. the only thing worse than doing it is having people wrongly think that you are capable of doing it.
    2. : lock weirdo out for the interim. best to have friends over once you start this process.
    3. : get the tapes aka "evidence"
    4. : locate the vcr, the computer, cables etc. the works.
    5. : move them all to a secure location.
    6. : call the cops.
    7. : wait for the cops to arrive
    8. : while waiting for the cops to arrive call the landlord.
    9. : when they're all together get the weirdo moved out.
    10. : move. terminate your lease based on a fear for personal safety etc./whatever.
    11. : obtain a restraining order against the weirdo.
    12. : move on in life.
    13. : if they ever approach you, deal with it appropriately...
    1. Re:do it in this order (i'm a cop, really i am) by joshki · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Ordinarily I refuse to even read AC's, however in this case since some IDIOT modded you up, I feel the need to respond.

      You are obviously NOT a police officer. First of all, I've never heard an officer refer to him/herself as a "cop." Secondly, your advice is complete BS. DO NOT EVER tamper with evidence!!! The second you start moving stuff around you've very likely destroyed whatever case the DA may have had, and you've certainly destroyed whatever civil case you may have had.

      Call the police, follow their advice. Not some AC "cop" from slashdot.

      --
      I do not read or respond to AC's. If you want a discussion, log in. Otherwise, don't waste your time.
    2. Re:do it in this order (i'm a cop, really i am) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, your advice is a whole lot better. Hint: watching CSI and Law & Order does not make you any kind of expert on crime or the law.

  38. Why post this here? by Nick+of+NSTime · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dear Slashdot, I am currently in county lockup for running over a homeless man in downtown Chicago. He was lying on a wireless access point that I wanted to warchalk. I'm using my one phone call to post an AudioBlog entry that will be crossposted to Slashdot, so I ask you, the Slashdot reader: How should I plead in my arraignment tomorrow?

    1. Re:Why post this here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was just hoggin' the connection to get first post, you inconsiderate clod !

      --Homeless Guy

    2. Re:Why post this here? by rts008 · · Score: 0

      Tell the judge that u were using Windoz and all of a sudden there was this BIG CRASH....

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  39. Where to find state law information? by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 1

    OK, following up a question with a question:

    I know California has laws on the books about electronic surveillance ... although I can't seem to find them online. Maybe my Google-fu is weak today. I dunno.

    In any case, I have my house under electronic surveillance as part of a security system. I've got video feeding into Motion (http://motion.sourceforge.net), and recording any events. Some of the cameras are obvious, others are quite well hidden. I have signs posted by the front door stating that the house is being monitored by "live video systems."

    Anyone know where to look up the legal framework I need to know to defend this system in the event it's necessary? I'd hate to get a burglar to court, only to be sued for invasion of privacy or something.

    --
    Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
    www.fogbound.net
  40. Revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Piss on their toothbrush in front of the camera.

  41. First Mistake by pixel_bc · · Score: 1

    Do not ask legal opinions on Slashdot.
    Do not collect $200.

    Go directly to a real lawyer.

  42. I believe... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

    You are perfectly within your rights to evict him. A civil suit should be followed up, and a court order to forfeit any recordings, along with penalties should any become public isn't unfair.

    If it were anything other than your personal bedroom or the bathroom, you might have an even more difficult time of this than you'll likely have... not that it will be easy.

    And as others have said, it's doubtful that police involvement or criminal prosecution will be possible. Shameful, that.

  43. Fingerprints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can you prove which roommate put them there if you go touching everything. Wouldn't preserving fingerprints be a good idea?

  44. Intrusion/Invasion of Privacy by MisterManiac · · Score: 2, Informative

    IANAL, but I am a law student (admittedly a lowly first-year).

    Your options here will definitely vary by what state you're in. There may be a state law against unauthorized recording (for instance, the one Linda Tripp violated in Maryland, although I don't know the particular law and I'm not sure if it would apply here).

    More likely, though, you could have a civil claim (not criminal), although this would again depend on what state you're in. This might represent an "intrusion upon seclusion" or "invasion of privacy" tort - you should research the law on this in your state, or get a lawyer to do it for you (probably the better idea). If you happen to be in California (or even if you're not), I know some cases that might be relevant just because I just had an assignment on this sort of thing - Shulman v. Group W Productions, Sanders v. American Broadcasting Corporation, Walker v. Darby, and Sanchez-Scott v. Alza Pharmaceuticals. (California Supreme Court, California Supreme Court, 11th Circuit, and California Appellate Court, respectively)

    Of course, this does not constitute legal advice - just some ideas on where you might want to research. You should absolutely call a lawyer.

    1. Re:Intrusion/Invasion of Privacy by nullportal · · Score: 1

      Good answer. Best of luck on exams.

      --
      The difference between /. and the real world is that only one of these makes you work hard for the sta
  45. This is America - sue them by mjlizzad · · Score: 1

    I am not a lawyer - so please consult one. There is a common law cause of action in tort for invasion of privacy. Basically you sue the person, and hope for punitive damages since your actual compensatory damages are small. I would think you'd be able to find a lawyer to take this case on a contingency basis (usually 1/3 of recovery).

    See http://www.cs.sunysb.edu/~tony/334/ethics/Privacy. html

  46. For all those who are suggesting "beat the crap" by JamesP · · Score: 1

    make sure you turn the camera off before you do it...

    --
    how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
  47. Call the cops by alienw · · Score: 1

    Call the police. This is most likely a criminal matter, so they would be the ones to contact first. There was a news story about a similar situation where a landlord was doing this exact thing. Needless to say, he got busted for a plethora of laws including child porn.

  48. Is it really a camera? by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 1

    How do they know it's a camera? Were they browsing the spy-supply website and happened to see that clock radio and now assume that it's a camera? That's a real Sony clock radio, which you can purchase without a camera. Or did they somehow find the receiver module? That's a 2.4GHz transmitter and it's not like they could flip through channels on the TV and suddenly find video from the bathroom.

    I think they need to take a screwdriver to that clock radio before making any serious mistakes.

    1. Re:Is it really a camera? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, using tcpdump, he found out that his neighbor shopped for that camera.

    2. Re:Is it really a camera? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      He could have been trying to figure out what was causing the interference with his 802.11a/b/g/eieio equipment. Or maybe he bought one of those X10 camera kits and was surprised to find something transmitting already. Or maybe he was warspying.

    3. Re:Is it really a camera? by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      I examined the clock, then went about finding it on the Internet at large. Here's a dissection.

      As it happens, I have two X10 receivers that I got from an estate auction a couple years back. That's how I verified the camera was live and broadcasting.

      (It is NOT now, I disconnected the CCD board from the transmitter before screwing the thing back together.)

      --
      ± 29 dB
    4. Re:Is it really a camera? by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      There are also "wireless camera detectors" on the market. Basically just .9 to 2.4GHZ RF detectors with a signal strength LED bar graph.

      Heh. Hook the camera back up, then use your X10 reciever to record the culprit taking a dump/shower.

      Post the video...

  49. A clock in the bathroom? by mOoZik · · Score: 1

    How much time do you spend there? Geez, man. Besides, those things have limited range, so it could very well be the person you're living with.

  50. Re:Ewwwww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Definitely if you're a female and a guy did this to you, tell your dad, if he's not too old. He'll no doubt get a bunch of his 40-50 year old buddies and pretty much kill the guy.

  51. Why do you have a clock in your bathroom at all? by magefile · · Score: 1

    I mean, how much time do you spend in there? Jeez. Get a watch or something.

    If legal options are not available, and you feel like having some fun before leaving/making them leave, "replace" the clock with a different model, hide the bugged one in a dark closet, maybe point it towards Goatse. As has been suggested before. Oh, and make sure roommate #3 knows about the camera - they deserve to be in on the revenge.

  52. reverse astroturf? by gumbi+west · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Even though most who write in will talk about how awful this thing is (and 99.9% will probably mean it), this ad/article is not form them.

    This is obviously a reverse astroturf (is there a real word for that?). This guy gets his product put on slashdot (better advertising that having it be a popunder on new york times as far as I can see) for free!

    Way to go slashdot editors!

    1. Re:reverse astroturf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that most slashdotters who might be interested in such a thing would just spend $50 on an x10 camera, cut a pinhole in cheap clock radio, and hack the camera into it. A stealth advertising campaign like that is more likely to create stealth competitors.

    2. Re:reverse astroturf? by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      I assure you this is a very real situation, and this is not astroturfing.

      (After talking with a lawyer, I'm not so nervous about remaining anonymous.)

      --
      ± 29 dB
  53. It can be illegal by Facekhan · · Score: 1

    Depending on what state you live in it may be illegal. Especially since it is in the bathroom. I would report it to the police and approach a civil attorney about the issue as well.

  54. A Man Faces Charges in Videotape Peeping Case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  55. Cameras can do that?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If you cannot talk about problems with your housemates in a peaceful way, then you honestly have bigger problems than a fscking camera.

    Wow, a camera that checks file systems? I'm gonna get me one of those! Do they make good replacement for Windows 98 scandisk? I hate that thing.

  56. Darik's Boot and Nuke by TheScienceKid · · Score: 1

    Why not use DBAN ( http://dban.sourceforge.net/ )? That way you won't need to nanny it for very long.
    All it takes is for you to boot the cd or floppy and hit enter, it will do a secure wipe of all the partitions/disks it can find and you can almost certainly remove the floppy once it's started.
    It would be relatively trivial to set it to reboot when it's done too.
    This way, unless your friend has access to a scanning electron microscope ( hope he isn't a slashdot reader... http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/01/0 3/0239230&tid=137&tid=134&tid=14 ) it's going to leave far less trace than wiping it in knoppix with ordinary unix tools.

    1. Re:Darik's Boot and Nuke by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      Thanks, that's goot to know...

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

  57. Re:Why do you have a clock in your bathroom at all by Down8 · · Score: 1

    I mean, how much time do you spend in there? Jeez. Get a watch or something.

    Well, it's obviously posted by a woman, so you never know....

    -bZj

    Yup, there's my chauvinist generality for the day.

    --
    .sig
  58. IIED? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Waht's IIED?

  59. Fuck lawyers. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    Break his arms and legs. Seriously. Get yourselves a couple of pickaxe handles and hide them in your room. Act normal around the guy, get him extremely pissed one night, then go Shallow Grave on him.

  60. Tell Police, Get Lawyer, Consider Suing by reallocate · · Score: 1

    First, consult a lawyer. A lawyer does not need to be an expert in privacy law to look up the relevant law for the state you're in. Or refer you to another lawyer who does have expertise and experience in that area.

    Go to the police and make a complaint. That doesn't guarantee anyone will investigate and prosecute, but they certainly won't if you don't tell them.

    Consider civil action: sue 'em. That's what suits are for. That means, though, you need to be convincing when you say you know who did it.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  61. questions: by joper90 · · Score: 1

    Is it only guys in the house? what exactly was the camera lookin at..? post us a pic of him.. Is he gay.. i.e like u too much?

  62. Until you take action by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1

    Until you figure out your course of action, buy a kit bag. Every time you go in the bathroom, put it down in front of the "radio", blocking the lens. Your horny roommate will be treated to shower noises and a blurry picture of black Cordura.

    --
    This is not my sandwich.
  63. Punish! Punish! Punish! by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I'm sick and tired of everybody positively drooling over ways to fuck this guy over. Unless this is somebody you've hated for a long time and you've been dying to nail for something---anything---maybe you need to take a slightly more sympathetic approach: This is somebody with a problem and he should seek professional help resolving it. Confiscate the camera and confront him as a group. Tell him that this is intolerable and illegal behavior and whatever else you can prove to be true. Tell him that, morally, he's doing something sexual with a nonconsenting partner. Then demand that he go seek professional help. Hell, blackmail him into getting it. And if you decide to vote him off the island, he will almost certainly leave without a fuss.

    My concerns:

    1. Going legal will be expensive. And if it doesn't work, you've taught him that he can get away with it.
    2. Just kicking him out will put him in another roommate situation, exposing (sorry!) the new roommates to the same spying.
    3. Calling the cops might not accomplish anything either, which has the same side effect as (1) above. If it does work, it might ruin his life when the possibility for making his life better exists.

    Meeting with the landlord and having him thrown out is probably the most expeditious way of dealing with this. If the roommate decides to make a stink, the landlord should start formal eviction proceedings against him, and call the local reactionary newspaper columnist with a great story on how hard it is to throw a dangerous roommate out of a house in order to protect the other tenants.

    I freely acknowledge that you are under no obligation to do anything positive or helpful in your situation, and that under the law you have the right to be as destructive and punitive to this individual as you can get away with. There is a huge difference between having a right and doing the right thing.

    --
    This is not my sandwich.
  64. Umm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Anarchist Iraq, the video cameras capture you ... :)

  65. You need Police involvement by budgenator · · Score: 1

    IANAL, but my take is
    1. you don't know what has been recorded
    2. not knowing the above you can't know if it's illegal
    3. if it is illegal any self-remedy could be destrying evidence.
    4. not reporting might be considered being an accessery after the fact
    5. not reporting might in fact be a crime for you i.e. your a MD, nurse, teacher and might suspect child-abuse.
    A good procesecutor can probably find a seeming unrelated law that makes this illegal. If I place a video camera in my bathroom, that's obviously a camera the law might be one thing, hiding a camera inside another otherwise innocuous device is probably a whole different critter. Another thing to consider is if it's illegal, what happens if the FBI cracks a ring of child-porn or up-skirts back thru the server logs, to the ISP to your address, what's to keep the perv from saying "Chris must have been doing it"?

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    1. Re:You need Police involvement by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      I'll be talking with a police detective tomorrow; I've now talked with a few other "people who should know" like police officer friends of my family. It's going to be a mess, but everything should turn out alright. I've been advised against getting a uniformed officer to visit; a plain-clothes detective should be able to handle the matter in a much simpler/less of a shoot-from-the-hip manner.

      As for that last concern, he is actually the sole person in the house who uses his own MSN account; the rest of us use a university dial-up. I'm not saying all our equipment wouldn't be seized, but we should be in the clear legally.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    2. Re:You need Police involvement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      he is actually the sole person in the house who uses his own MSN account

      Ah, well then. Perhaps he has already been punished enough.

  66. Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I wonder what sony thinks about this...

    And thanks for the breakdown of the camera. Nothing like a good dose of paranoia.
    As for the pics The antenna seems to be pointing up. The range cant be very good on that thing. How close was the guys recording equipment? Was it to tape or to his computer?

    btw this image is probably the best one on your site.

    1. Re:Thanks by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      The antenna is, unless I'm mistaken, the white, curved wire that runs horizontally between the transformers and the transmitter. The guy's room shares a wall with the bathroom, so range doesn't need to be very good. Just the same, I was able to intercept the signal in my bedroom upstairs with another receiver.

      --
      ± 29 dB
  67. Re:Punish! Punish! Punish! by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

    I, personally, want to go with something like your solution. Unfortunately, due to the other victims involved, could be exposing myself to a lot of liability for disposing of evidence and all that.

    --
    ± 29 dB
  68. Don't see the right comment to reply to, so... by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

    Was this guy a friend, or just a roommate of opportunity?

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    1. Re:Don't see the right comment to reply to, so... by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      I had known him before, but he's primarily a roomie of opportunity. I am (er, was) rather ambivalent about him.

      Don't get me wrong, I'm non-evil. I'm not looking to nail him to the wall. Just the same, after consulting with many others (IRL, not just here...) it seems that with the great power to destroy his life comes the great responsibility to actually do it.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    2. Re:Don't see the right comment to reply to, so... by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

      Going further OT...

      I noticed in your LJ that you are a member of the Peoria group and go to Western...

      Are you from P-town? I grew up there (Richwoods '96).

      --
      "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    3. Re:Don't see the right comment to reply to, so... by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      Farmington, actually. Class of '99. I knew a few people from Manual and one or two from Richwoods, but I didn't move to Farmington until the summer after your graduation, so it's not that likely we know the same people.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    4. Re:Don't see the right comment to reply to, so... by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

      My little brother was Richwoods '99, but I am pretty sure he didn't know anyone from Farmington...

      Anywho, it's nice to see someone else from central Illinois around /.

      --
      "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
  69. Turnabout is fair play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this a room that this other evil roommate also uses? If so, why not obtain another video receiver, and watch what HE does while HE's in there? (Or SHE if it's female, same concept.) Then, you can say to this roommate at some point, "Hey, let's watch a movie!" And when they sit down, you can pop into the VCR a tape you've made of them wanking in view of this camera or something.

    I think that should make it clear enough to them that this kinda thing isn't okay.

  70. Who modded as Insightful??? by Burb · · Score: 1

    Troll, maybe. Funny, perhaps. Since when was beating up your roommate considered insightful???

    --

  71. Why Plead by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
    I highly suggest you tell us where your arraignment hearing is and we will /. the court house.

    Of course... why you would crush a homeless guy instead of just drawing over him comepletely eludes me.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  72. Re:Punish! Punish! Punish! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    agreed, at this point your options are rather limited.

    I'd definitely hold "Kicking the crap out of 'em" as a strong Plan B. If you don't have the heart to do that, go chat up your local hardheads and I'm sure they'd practically volunteer to beat some sense into your housemate.

    (yea i know, posting AC, but can you really advocate violence these days without a visit from the 50?)

  73. Ouch by Rydinare · · Score: 1

    Wow, that sucks. I guess something has to be said for having a good idea of the type of person you're living with before you live with them.

    --
    http://www.slashgames.com
  74. Where to start by lecuyerjm · · Score: 0

    A good way would be to break his face with his camera. Then you go see a lawyer