Slashdot Mirror


Via Will Join The 64-Bit Fray

ancice with news that Via plans to introduce 64-bit chip codenamed 'CN.' "It was revealed at the Fall Processor Forum. The chip 'will have much better performance, particularly when handling video and audio information ... However, it won't depart from Via's emphasis on low cost, small size and modest power consumption.' Features include 'high-speed Front Side Bus, ... Floating Point Unit that can achieve floating-point additions and multiplies using only two clock cycles, an increased cache size, high-speed data movement, and out-of order, superscalar execution that allows the processor to achieve high clock rates while executing multiple, simultaneous instructions for high definition digital entertainment.' The story was reported by ZDNet. The offical release is here. Expected release date is first half of 2006." Update: 10/06 13:10 GMT by T : Also at the Forum, VIA showed off a dual-processor Mini-ITX board, about which more below.

An anonymous reader submits "Via gave a sneak preview at the Fall Processor Forum of what is likely the world's first dual-processor mini-ITX mobo. The "four-wheel drive Hyundai" is expected to ship in "early 2005," according to the article at LinuxDevices. Looks like Via is cooking up some higher-end hardware in hopes the security processing features in its CPUs can carry it into higher-margin markets. I don't know, though; I think I'd rather have a PocketPC cluster ... "

189 comments

  1. And it will still suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Having a 64-bit chip doesnt mean its a great CPU. I've had a via, it was like having a moped. Sure it was fun to play around with and got you from point a to point b, But do you really want your friends to see you with one?

    1. Re:And it will still suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      it was like having a moped. Sure it was fun to play around with and got you from point a to point b, But do you really want your friends to see you with one?

      Ah, you mean like fat women?

    2. Re:And it will still suck by Phosphor3k · · Score: 5, Insightful
      These are not high-end chips.
      "it won't depart from Via's emphasis on low cost, small size and modest power consumption"
      Just like all of Via's current line, they are meant for low cost low power systems. In combination with Via's SFF motherboards they are great for car PCs, media center PCs and firewall/router PCs. They are not meant to be high end workstations, so stop treating them as though they are. Just like any other product, they have their niche.
    3. Re:And it will still suck by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Sure it was fun to play around with and got you from point a to point b, But do you really want your friends to see you with one?

      Hell yes. All of my friends were really impressed with the MythTV frontend I built with a Via EPIA motherboard. Just a tiny motherboard in a tiny book-sized case with no moving parts and network, video/tv-out, mpeg2 decoder, and sound all integrated into the box.

    4. Re:And it will still suck by Paladin128 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Amen! I've got a bunch of little mini-ITX systems that I use with LTSP, and I've got an 8U portable rack (the kind used typically for live audio gear) with a beefy server, a 16-port switch, a router/firewall, and other goodies. It's basically a network-in-a-box. I do gigs with a local DJ and set up quick and dirty cyber-cafe's. The boxes boot Linux and run Firefox (with a stripped-down browser.xul so they can't do anything funky like install extensions). People love it! You can run an event anywhere, and have a totally secure bunch of very responsive PC's. On my rig, I can get up to 15 of these guys going, and they're fast for just browsing! And cheap!

      --
      Lex orandi, lex credendi.
    5. Re:And it will still suck by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "I got my cheap $10 mobo w/a VIA Samuel 3 processor, and performed worse than my previous PII. Oh, and don't try installing Oracle on it..."

      You see the stragest posts on slashdot somtimes... okay all the time.
      A 10 dollar mobo that you can not run Oracle on.. Okay tell me this has got to be a joke. Maybe not because I shure would not want to pay $10 for a Mobo that would not run Doom3, Autocad, and Maya.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    6. Re:And it will still suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Large and heavy tits have merits far beyond your imagination I think ;)

    7. Re:And it will still suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In combination with Via's SFF motherboards they are great for car PCs, media center PCs and firewall/router PCs.

      (emphasis mine)

      Errrm...how do you know this? Maybe you meant "they should be", as the chips don't exist yet? That is unless you work for Via and have access to pre-production models, in which case your defensive position makes a lot more sense. Many of us regular users know all too well the difference between what Via says, and what Via does.

    8. Re:And it will still suck by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

      I don't think you'll find that fat women manage to 'get from a-b' very often ;-)

    9. Re:And it will still suck by negro · · Score: 0

      OK, let me rephrase that. The mobo I got for home use/testing sucked.

      Besides, if you are planning to use VIA processors on your company, beware: Oracle doesn't provide any support in that case.

    10. Re:And it will still suck by phoenix321 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe they are quite sufficient for most home users? Working on a 500MHz Athlon after being used to a 1800+ has made me quite indifferent to processor speeds.

      I'd prefer a fast and responsive interface any time over high processing speeds. And watching the cpu usage on the 500mhz machine, I swear most things I do at home except gaming are limited by ram size. hdd seek speed may be an issue but only after the ram is full and the OS needs to swap. Swapping sucks that much, I'd invest insane amounts of money to have 2 gig of ram on my next machine when there's finally a notebook with a Radeon Mobility 9800 without a Dell logo available.

      If there's no regular gaming habit, a strong VIA cpu is sufficient wide and far. MP3 encoding and DVD processing is the hardest task by now and I've no problem setting the machine aside for an hour or so. If the owner isn't going to play recent games, I'd save any money possible on the CPU and invest heavily in ram and fast harddrives. If there weren't all that noise and heat, a 15k rpm drive was perfect. But I'll never want to experience a machine bogged down while swapping ever again. Argh, I'll calm down now...

    11. Re:And it will still suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      While they may have their 'niche', they suck at making decent products for it. Ask anyone with a Hauppauge card what they think about their Via chipsets..

    12. Re:And it will still suck by ratboy666 · · Score: 1

      I bought several VIA Samuel 3 main boards.

      Very nice - integrated sound, video, 10/100 NIC. Low power.

      Unfortunately, came with a CPU fan (but that can be removed, and the CPU underclocked).

      Can boot from the NIC, so no hard drive or floppy needed. I run one headless as as MP3 player.

      Another is a network fax machine.

      And etc.

      Cheap, slow, good (as in -- didn't crash, or cause great deal of other grief wrt. drivers, etc. at least not with Linux 2.0).

      What "sucks" for some is manna for others. No, I *never* intend to install Oracle on these boxes. I *never* intend to benchmark with reference to a PII. Until I can get an underclocked PII mini-mainboard for $10 at least.

      And no, the Samuel 3 was not my first choice. That would have been an older Transmeta. The price point wasn't there, though...

      Ratboy.

      --
      Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
    13. Re:And it will still suck by the_mad_poster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Problemo: even with gaming, I don't want a blistering fast processor. However, when I built my PC, the slowest proc available with an 800MHz FSB was 2.6 GHz. I don't NEED a 2.6GHz system to satisfy my addiction to GTA: Vice City, but that 800 FSB and the DDR 3200 ram was pretty sweet. Of course, now I'm finding that my 845 Intel chipset could quite readily be replaced by a mobo with an 865PE, but whatever.

      The problem is that in the midrange the chips offer a lot more than just their raw processing speed. Honestly, if you need a low end system, just buy an old Intel or AMD on the cheap . If you want a midrange system and you're looking at a 64 Bit VIA, the problem isn't necessarily the speed of the processor as much as it's the feature set on it. So, even though you may not need the speed it offers, you may need some of the other features.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    14. Re:And it will still suck by Niles_Stonne · · Score: 1


      This sounds like a very interesting idea...

      Do you have more information or a web site on it?

      I could see "Paladin128 Boxes" (or P128 Boxes?) being a popular addition to some parties/locations.

      --
      Sticks and Stones may break my bones, but copyright will always protect me.
    15. Re:And it will still suck by Paladin128 · · Score: 1

      No real info on a website or anything. I just started this up. I mostly due web programming for local youth ministry programs (Roman Catholic), and they needed a way to show off the web sites at thier events. So I built this rig and they hire me to set it up and run a night.

      The app server is AthlonXP based with gobs of RAM and 2 on-board NIC's. It's running k12LTSP (Fedora Core 2 with LTSP installed and configured). I got the rack at guitar center -- a Road Ready (brand name) 8-space (translation: 8U) rack. I also got the rackmount power strip at Guitar Center. The case was hard to find -- it's a 3U case that's only 16" deep -- most are like 20" or more deep, and that wouldn't fit in the rack.

      Now, the reason that this meager server is enough to drive 15 clients is because they run Firefox as a local app, rather than just use X to display it across the network. Most LTSP rigs use dual Xeons with 4GB of RAM and 15,000RPM SCSI disks to drive up to 50 workstations. And usually the limiting factor (particularly with KDE and GNOME) is RAM on the server and disk bandwidth. Now, maybe a dual Opteron rig with 16GB would be able to handle a good bit more.

      --
      Lex orandi, lex credendi.
    16. Re:And it will still suck by Fweeky · · Score: 1
      "local youth ministry programs (Roman Catholic)"

      We have a bunch of those around here; they're called "public schools" :/
      "maybe a dual Opteron rig with 16GB would be able to handle a good bit more."

      You'd probably be better off buying a second 4GB Opteron and having 2, 2-way 4GB Opterons with their own drives, rather than a single 16GB one. Costs about the same, probably performs about the same, but also gives you some redundancy and lets you share network bandwidth about more.
    17. Re:And it will still suck by ameoba · · Score: 1

      What world do you live in where you can't find slower CPUS?

      What kind of world do you live in where an 845-based board runs at an 800MHz FSB?

      Considering that the 845 only runs at 400 & 533MHz FSBs, you're only pushing that CPU to about 1.7GHz (without overclocking the mobo).

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    18. Re:And it will still suck by Paladin128 · · Score: 3, Informative

      In cases like that, most would just buy the second 2-way Opteron and max the RAM out on both of them. Seriously, if you're sporting a rig like that, you can get about 100 clients 2 machines with 4GB each. If you max them both out with RAM, (which going from 4 GB to 16 is only about $5000 each), you can push that to probably over 300 clients with just the two servers, assuming you've got enough disk bandwidth (probably fileserver with 15K RPM drives in a RAID-5 configuration). Segment your gigabit network nicely, and spend about $500 on each client ($350 if you're using CRT's instead of LCD's), and you've saved a TON vs. Microsoft solutions because of liscencing. Plus, management is a breeze! The clients rarely break down, as they have no moving parts. Upgrade an app on the server, and it's already upgraded everywhere else. Only need to backup one fileserver. I've talked to people who have set up LTSP or something similar and not entered the server room for 2 years!

      Now, this solution doesn't work for everyone, such as my company, which does content production (using Flash, Maya, and plenty of other graphics-intenive apps that wouldn't work nicely in an LTSP setup). Where would it fit? Telemarketing call centers. Schools. Stock brokers. Largely clerical outfits. Anywhere where the needs of most of your workers are very simple (web, email, office stuff).

      The other application is kiosks. My terminals are virtually unhackable. They boot straight into a non-priveleged user account that runs Firefox and Metacity in a chroot-jailed environment. Firefox is totally stripped to the bone -- no menus at all, all the shortcut keys for advanced stuff disabled, no file:/ about:/ etc, CTRL-ALT-BACKSPACE is disabled, root logins disabled. They can't do squat. They're trapped in from boot to shutdown. Web browsing is filtered by a proxy, often using a whitelist to one specific site. I offer the kids $20 if they can open another app or go to a different website. No one has collected yet.

      --
      Lex orandi, lex credendi.
    19. Re:And it will still suck by lonesome+phreak · · Score: 1

      Well, that depends on how I define my "a-b" doesn't it? In certain circumstances they would work fine...

      --
      Maybe we DID take the blue pill. You wouldn't remember anyway.
    20. Re:And it will still suck by halfelven · · Score: 1

      Wow, really?
      Was it the 600MHz EPIA, or the 1GHz thing?
      Could you encode video real-time on that mobo?

      I'm extremely interested in this issue. Could you please reply to my email address instead of Slashdot? (see address above)
      Thanks!

    21. Re:And it will still suck by halfelven · · Score: 1

      Awesome!
      Can you provide any details on how to strip down Firefox? A URL to documentation or something?
      (If you prefer, you can reply by email instead of Slashdot - see my address above)
      Thanks!

    22. Re:And it will still suck by Genin · · Score: 1


      Epox "EP-4GEM800I" Intel 845GE Chipset Motherboard for Intel Socket 478 CPU -RETAIL

      - Specifications -

      CPU: Socket 478 Intel Pentium 4/Celeron Processors
      Chipset: Intel 845GE + ICH4
      FSB: 800/533/400MHzB

      --
      I am forced to conclude you are the master of the obvious. May others take heed of your wisdom.
    23. Re:And it will still suck by Paladin128 · · Score: 1

      Uncompress browser.jar, and edit the various .xul files. Particularly browser.xul.

      --
      Lex orandi, lex credendi.
    24. Re:And it will still suck by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      I'm living in a world where people know that the 845GE chipset can be used to run the FSB at 800/533/400.

      And, I repeat: At the time I made my purchase the slowest clocked P4 running at 800FSB was the 2.6C processor. Actually, the 2.4C might have been the slowest clock (and, afaik, still is) but, IIRC, I bought the 2.6 on sale so that it was only 5 or 6 bucks more than the 2.4

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    25. Re:And it will still suck by ameoba · · Score: 1

      erp.

      Worst. Post. Ever.

      Forgot about the faster 845s - I haven't really paid them much attention since the 865/875s came out.

      Misread the bit about the CPU - thought you were saying that the slowest CPU you could find had the 800MHz FSB.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    26. Re:And it will still suck by l3pYr · · Score: 1

      Ask anyone with a Hauppauge card what they think about Hauppauge's amazing software and driver support..

      --
      RTFA and cite your sources or prepare to get pwnd
    27. Re:And it will still suck by Anonymous+Luddite · · Score: 1


      If you need to run Oracle and you're considering low end hardware, you're terribly confused...

      I have built two systems with the ultra cheap Samuel CPU/mercury mb. both times, they did exactly what I expected.

      They are cheap and seem to be stable. sure, you won't run a new video game or (heheh) Oracle on them, but if you want a comp for children or something for grandma to check the email, why not? they preform acceptably if you're not stingy with the ram.

      I expect the new chip will have its' place in the scheme of things as well.. Just don't expect it to compete with sometihng that cost 3 times the price.

    28. Re:And it will still suck by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      when there's finally a notebook with a Radeon Mobility 9800 without a Dell logo available.
      It's not quite a 9800, but it's close (9700) and it's the opposite of a Dell.
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    29. Re:And it will still suck by FyRE666 · · Score: 1

      You know, I'd like to see a /. article about your project there - maybe slap a quick website up with some more info? Cheers!

    30. Re:And it will still suck by Paladin128 · · Score: 1

      I couldn't handle the bandwidth usage. I want to push it more prime-time eventually, and even sell these units, but I don't have the resources now. Plus, my rig is a bit of a hack. I want a few more components first... and to find a better case manufacturer. The case I found, while it met my dimension requirements, has really shitty rack-ears which make it hard to screw in to the damn thing. Talk to me in a few months.

      --Aaron

      --
      Lex orandi, lex credendi.
    31. Re:And it will still suck by ahdeoz · · Score: 1

      If you don't intend to install Oracle, you don't need a 64 bit CPU. That's what it comes down to.

    32. Re:And it will still suck by An+Ominous+Cow+Erred · · Score: 1

      I would hate to be a student at your lab. I'd ask to transfer to someplace else. Or egg your house or something.

      Impressive from a technical standpoint though.

    33. Re:And it will still suck by ratboy666 · · Score: 1

      No need for Oracle, no need for 64 bit...

      Interesting idea. I'd mod this idea up.

      But... there are other uses for 64 bit-ness.

      The first is address space with simple multi-threaded apps.

      Under a 32 bit address space, and assuming a 2MB stack, only 1000 threads can be started. It would be reasonable to support more threads, and with a 64 bit address space, it is.

      Dealing efficiently and simply with large data (movies) is also facilitated by having a large address space.

      If the software can be simplified, the systems can be more reliable. And for applications like a home media center, I believe that this is important.

      No, I don't want Oracle. But I do want reliable multimedia, with no "2GB" file size limits. I do want simple, reliable software.

      Sure, we only really need a ___ (fill in the blank) bit system! I am sure that we could do with simple 8 bit systems for most tasks, limited to 64KB addressable at any one time. But we have progressed.

      The 64 bit consumer processor will give us the ability to run simpler software and build more complex functions on that base. I *do* want voice recognition in my appliances. And stuff like that.

      Ratboy.

      --
      Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
    34. Re:And it will still suck by phoenix321 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ha ;) no way I'll mistake this for the real thing. No offense, but a mobility 9700 is in no way ever close to a mobility 9800 except for the successive character in their model numbers. ATI is just too errrm let's say hesitating to call this thing by its real name. The mobility 9700 was a version of the desktop 9600xt, the mobility 9600 was something older, but the new mobility 9800 is a slightly toned down X800(!).
      60 percent more graphics power while only using slightly more energy. No way I ever buy my new gaming notebook without one, except when nVidia surprisingly unveils a blistering fast chip really soon now because I'd trust their drivers more than ATI's. Until then I prepare for the current mobile GPU flagship, trust me. But not from Dell, but that's a personal matter for me... ;)

    35. Re:And it will still suck by Paladin128 · · Score: 1

      It's not a lab. It's a portable computer lab, and I'm often hired to demonstrate a new organizational web site. People log on to use the site and for no other purpose. These are basically kiosks.

      In a regular lab, there would be more freedom. How much more would depend on the purpose of the lab. I don't want anything unneccessary running. More software = more chances to screw things up.

      --
      Lex orandi, lex credendi.
    36. Re:And it will still suck by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Oh! Well that's different then. I guess I'm a bit out of touch, since I haven't upgraded (or planned to upgrade) recently. Also, I do my gaming on a desktop PC, so I wouldn't really know.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    37. Re:And it will still suck by Enahs · · Score: 1
      Wow, and it's really hard to support VIA processors. No, really, it is. I mean, it's so hard to find a way to support the darn things.

      I'm running Debian on a VIA-based box (as my main machine, in fact) and the real secret is don't compile in optional i686 instructions. GCC is braindead in this regard. It doesn't build binaries that do conditional checking; it just goes right ahead as if nothing were wrong. Then you'll get a helpful, meaningful message for any binary built to target i686-type processors:



      "Illegal instruction"



      Don't trust any software that can't support VIA processors.

      --
      Stating on Slashdot that I like cheese since 1997.
    38. Re:And it will still suck by An+Ominous+Cow+Erred · · Score: 1

      Ahhh my apologies. ^^; Years of dealing with overzealous school admins has conditioned me to have a knee-jerk negative response to anything that sounds like a locked-down student lab. xD

  2. VIA willbeat INTEL by Unixfreak31 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    At this rate will INTEL ever release an x86 compatabile 64bit cpu? I think not I know flamebait kill me now.

    1. Re:VIA willbeat INTEL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Over on the Debian mailing lists, there is a person who claimed to have loaded the AMD64 port on a Dell (laptop?) with no problem. Neither the computer or the Intel chip advertised any 64bit capability. Benchmarks were promptly run and seem to indicate this chip is an underperformer...

    2. Re:VIA willbeat INTEL by gilesjuk · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's possible the Install disc is still 32-bit code, possibly to allow more widespread testing. It then boots into a 64-bit system.

      If it actually ran on an Intel 32-bit box that would be interesting. I know Intel have x86_64 compatibility planned.

    3. Re:VIA willbeat INTEL by drsmithy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Uh, you mean like the x86-64 Xeons Dell has been selling in servers for weeks (if not months) ?

    4. Re:VIA willbeat INTEL by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

      Well, they will have to if they want to stay competitive. I'm sure they are scrambling as fast as the can. For the time being, they'll just have to up their GHZ on their 32bit chips.

      On a side note, I have been looking for some time now to purchase a via processor and motherboard for a file server. Anyone know of any sites that sell them?

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    5. Re:VIA willbeat INTEL by fitten · · Score: 1

      I know Intel have x86_64 compatibility planned.


      It's more than planned. You can buy one from Dell right now if you want. Dell's been selling them for a month or more.

    6. Re:VIA willbeat INTEL by ttldkns · · Score: 1

      linitx.com if you're looking for a miniITx format board/proc. May i reccoment the VIA Nehimia 1Ghz board to meet all your small computing needs :)

      --
      How many computers are too many?
    7. Re:VIA willbeat INTEL by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

      That is exactly what I am looking for. I'll check that out.

      Thanks!

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    8. Re:VIA willbeat INTEL by hvrbyte · · Score: 1

      They already have.

      You can buy 64bit Xeons right now, and if you are lucky enough to find one, buy a Pentium 4 with the F extension, then get a motherboard with the 925X chipset, and you are all set.

      Dell even has some workstations with the 64bit Pentium 4 If I were you though, I would get an Athlon64 instead, power consumption and heat dissapation is WAY less than a Pentium 4 or Xeon chip

    9. Re:VIA willbeat INTEL by ttldkns · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ah yeah, also, if you plan to run linux on it (who wouldnt for any type of server) the EPIA wiki will be like a bible to you!
      http://www.epiawiki.org/wiki/tiki-index.php

      They have kernel patches for the M1000 board's hardware DVD decoding (among other things) as well as listing all the kernel options to optimise it for a via processor.

      --
      How many computers are too many?
    10. Re:VIA willbeat INTEL by ahfoo · · Score: 1

      This is by far Via's biggest problem. I know several people looking for one and I never see them in any bricks-and-mortar hardware shops. I don't put much belief in the idea that shops are intentionally keeping them out, I think Via just doesn't realize how much demand there is in the DIY market and they're not pushing hard enough. They really need to have a little more faith in themselves and get these things out in the retail channel in a big way.

    11. Re:VIA willbeat INTEL by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

      I think it is a niche market and I think the stores don't see any profit in carrying the products. They don't compete performance wise with the Intel/AMD offerings and are only of real use to people who want low power/noise systems. I know newegg used to carry VIA processors and motherboards but have not for about a year.

      The site posted above has, by far, the largest selection that I have seen. They have good prices too. It looks like I will be able to get the processor/MB/Case for well under $200.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    12. Re:VIA willbeat INTEL by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      You mean the Noconas that RedHat had to essentially hack a special software paging mode into the kernel for over 4GB of memory for? The ones that didn't implement the NX bit? The ones that, for the most part, just plain wouldn't run stock x86-64 binaries that run perfectly on Opteron?

      Yeah, Intel's staying on top of the game alright.

    13. Re:VIA willbeat INTEL by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

      Will do. I will probably just put gentoo on it since that is what I am use to. I won't really need to put anything on it besides samba

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    14. Re:VIA willbeat INTEL by VoidWraith · · Score: 1

      heat dissapation is WAY less

      That's a reason not to buy one... unless you like having a hot processor.

      Also, and more on-topic, haven't we (being most posters in this thread) been forgetting Itaniums, which have been available for a long time (they're on their second iteration of Itaniums now)?

      The original poster is wildly incorrect.

  3. Cyanide? by ImaLamer · · Score: 3, Funny

    CN?

    The new VIA Cyanide chipset, the killer of all other chipsets!!!

    Too bad only half of the population will notice their presence.

    1. Re:Cyanide? by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      Of course in my excitment I didn't notice that they were talking chips and not chipsets.

      Time for bed there ImaLamer... it's only 9:09 in the morning.

    2. Re:Cyanide? by Dorothy+86 · · Score: 0

      maybe it stands for CowboyNeal?

    3. Re:Cyanide? by halivar · · Score: 0

      Too bad only half of the population will notice their presence.

      And that half, 1% will we tearing their hair out trying to figure out why nothing works, and the other 99% will be telling them, "I told you before you bought it, dude; it may say Via on the box, but still a freaking Cyrix."

    4. Re:Cyanide? by Alan+Cox · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well one of their previous processors was codenamed C4, and the story has it this was changed because "C4" is a high explosive and they feared confusion when shipping large numbers of small packages labelled C4 around

    5. Re:Cyanide? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's a little myth about the C3. It's a Cyrix in name only. If you want a Cyrix, get a pre-NX Geode from AMD.

      It's a Centaur chip. Centaur was the division of IDT that made the WinChip (slow, but VERY cool), and then IDT sold it off to VIA.

    6. Re:Cyanide? by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Funny

      DAMNIT! You have no idea how much I was looking forward to trying to get through airport security with a laptop labeled "C4 Inside!"

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  4. Code named..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Codenamed.... CN for Code Name? Perhaps Container Name? Succeeded by DN.

    1. Re:Code named..... by hussar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Constant nuisance" if the EPIA-M board I have is any indication.

      Oh sure, it'll run simple applications that aren't all that demanding, but I had to stop running the distributed.net client on it because it would heat up and shutdown. Their video and sound drivers are also difficult to get running on anything other than the outdated distros they offer binaries for. Trying to turn the box into a linux-based PVR was just too much work, so I'll be turning it into a router and building my PVR with an EPoX MicroATX board and an AMD 2600+ XP CPU.

      --

      Bureaucracy loves company.
    2. Re:Code named..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps you meant:

      DN := cn=via.com,c=us

      there's no 'dn' attribute in a DN. :)

    3. Re:Code named..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Counter-anecdote, away!

      I've had no problems with my EPIA-M using open source drivers. I never bothered with the binaries. I use the 2.6 kernel and the alsa drivers for sound. I built the video driver from cvs recently. Works just fine. I use unstable gentoo, about as opposite as you can get from the outdated distros they support. By the way, I've never had heat problems even while doing long compiles.

      It's perfectly capable of playing any video that there's a native driver for. (WMV9 is a pain in the butt.) The open source drivers even support mpeg-2 acceleration just fine.

      The system is cool and quiet; something my dual Athlon monster could never be.

    4. Re:Code named..... by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

      Succeeded by DN.

      Nope! CN++.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    5. Re:Code named..... by BJH · · Score: 1

      Actually, I find more and more PCs (not servers, obviously) these days simply can't handle running under full load for very long - they'll overheat after a few hours and reboot.

    6. Re:Code named..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will be CN Tower! Next stop for the VIA Rail will be Space Needle, followed by Freedom Tower, former site of WTC Twin Towers.

    7. Re:Code named..... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Nope! CN++.

      Wrong again - it'll be called CNN!

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    8. Re:Code named..... by C3ntaur · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I feel your pain. I went out and got an Epia M6000 and Hauppage 250 with the idea of building a small, quiet (the M6000 is fanless) MythTV-based PVR that I would be happy to have in my living room. What a royal PITA that turned out to be! I don't doubt that it can be done on the M10000 using software decoding, but I was not able to get much more than a segfault out of the binary drivers Via had released for a distro I didn't want to run anyway.

      I persevered though, and spent another WEEK compiling Gentoo packages before I finally decided that the extra $150 for a Shuttle SN41G2 and the noise that came with it was a reasonable sacrifice to make for something that would Just Work.

      A day later, I had a fully functional PVR. I'm sorry, but I won't consider Via for anything running Linux again until they start providing proper driver support for their products.

      --
      Loading...
    9. Re:Code named..... by ahfoo · · Score: 1

      Yep, I just ran memtest86 on my sister-in-law's IBM Thinkpad P4M 1700 notebook. The memory was fine but it still craps out under strain. Works fine with a linux LiveCD, but under XP running a few apps it sounds and feels just like a hair dryer and locks up tight in a few hours. The hardware isn't damaged, it's just not able to run so freakin' hot.

    10. Re:Code named..... by orrigami · · Score: 1

      I will have to go with, CN XP!
      Like all super cool next gen computer parts.

    11. Re:Code named..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use unstable gentoo...

      What? Is there a stable gentoo somewhere?

    12. Re:Code named..... by ahdeoz · · Score: 1

      Computer chips don't get any hotter from thinking, same as human brains. There's a level of electricity required to make them run, and that's it. Some fancy new systems can "sleep" and "wake" but that's it.

    13. Re:Code named..... by nbvb · · Score: 1

      D'oh!

      #include

  5. Sounds like a 'TiVO' target by grunt107 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With the statement that it can be used in a digital media stream for output to HDTV (and Linux-type media center), it sounds like this chip is intended for TiVO-like services.

    If it is as low powered as touted, I would use it in embedded systems (like house/applicance control). And of course low power means good for laptops.

    1. Re:Sounds like a 'TiVO' target by vidarh · · Score: 2, Informative
      I bought a M12000 based machine in an e-Otonashi case to use for streaming to my TV, and it works great. The VIA CPU's are slow, but their Mini-ITX motherboards make up for a lot of it by having hardware MPEG2 decoding on most of them. I'd be careful (that is, test before you buy) about the M12000 for systems where you need support for other video formats, or high (as in higher than TV) resolutions, but I guess the newer VIA CPU's might be getting there.

      The main appeal to me was that with the e-Otonashi case, I can run the system completely fanless. I was originally planning to tear out the HD and replace it with a 512MB compact flash, but after hearing (or rather not hearing) the system in action I decided to use the compact flash for my digital camera instead - I can barely notice the HD when the disk is heavily trashing and I'm reasonably close to the machine, but even then it's quieter than my old Sony DVD player.

      Word of warning though: Setting up Linux on the VIA Mini-ITX boards can be a real pain. Getting the basic stuff up and running is trivial (For people in the UK I can recommend LinItx.com - they delivered my system quickly and with Fedora Core 1 pre-installed, but getting the best out of the TV out and hardware MPEG2 decoder was painful (thanks to VIA not being particularly forthcoming with specs) when I did it a few months ago.

    2. Re:Sounds like a 'TiVO' target by dufke · · Score: 1

      Which linux media player did you use that supports the VIA's hardware decoder? Is playback smooth?

      --
      __
      Comment submitted. There will be a delay before you understand what you posted.
    3. Re:Sounds like a 'TiVO' target by halfelven · · Score: 1

      Is there a way to buy just the fanless power supply, not the whole case?
      I'm very interested in fanless power supplies for VIA mobos, but only the supplies, because i already have the cases.

    4. Re:Sounds like a 'TiVO' target by vidarh · · Score: 1
      VIA has released a version of Xine with support for the MPEG2 hardware built in. For me that one never worked very well. If you want to try it, search for VeXP.

      I've used both Xine and Mplayer without problems, and yes, playback is smooth with the hardware decoder. With the M12000 it's not smooth for any reasonable resolutions if you don't use the hardware decoder...

      The main problem was getting the right X drivers installed... Take a look here for one approach. And in particular, note that if you run into weird problems with the colour balance, you've installed an old buggy driver - I almost went crazy before I stumbled across the explanation somewhere.

      If you haven't bought a VIA EPIA board yet, research it thoroughly before doing so - the different boards can have quite different chipsets on them, so the level of support for Linux (particularly video and audio) may wary quite a lot.

  6. Via? VIA?!? by Toby_Tyke · · Score: 3, Interesting

    VIA you say? *shudder*

    After my last horrific experience with their 4 in 1 driver set, I vowed to never touch another board with a VIA chipset again. That way lies maddness and death.

    --
    "I realise this is not a very popular opinion but it's the truth, and there for needs to be said" -Bill Hicks
    1. Re:Via? VIA?!? by mirko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Via also made the EPIA processors which are mostly used in their barebones computers.
      I have one at home which I use as a Linux server and it reached 400 days uptime before I had to reboot it because of a Linux ethernet driver failure.
      So, I'd say VIA might be technically good if you keep using their products only.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    2. Re:Via? VIA?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Give the guys a chance. After that disaster that is the via 686 chipset I sweared to never buy any of their products. That is, until I tried a Nehemia based mini-itx. Man, those systems rock. Absolutely silent, the perfect PC for that tiny firewall/small server you keep running 7/24.

      I'm actually quite excited about the new 64bit version. I don't need a 8GHz monster that needs a 250W fan to keep it from burning, but a nice, low power, silent system.

      After Smorgrav

    3. Re:Via? VIA?!? by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      I too remember the pain of using old Via motherboards (MVP3's were horrible). But they've come a long way and the reliability (and performance) of their modern stuff is much better.

    4. Re:Via? VIA?!? by askreet · · Score: 1

      Yea, I've used many M7VIZ boards which are based on the KM400 chipset (AMD chipset supporting up to a 333Mhz front side bus, for those who dont know.) And I've found them to be rock-solid performance and stability.

    5. Re:Via? VIA?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sweared to never buy

      "swore".

    6. Re:Via? VIA?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear you. I installed the VIA 4-in-1 driver on an Abit mainboard (don't remember the model -- it was circa 2001), and when I restarted my computer as prompted, it failed to boot. Turns out, the driver fried one of my DIMMs. (I've been doing this sort of thing for quite a few years, so I know I was using the right version, etc.)

      It is true that VIA has improved since then -- my current machine (against my better judgment) has a VIA chipset, and it's worked flawlessly. However, in the back of my mind there's still a tiny itch just waiting for them to nail me again...

    7. Re:Via? VIA?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      After my last horrific experience with their 4 in 1 driver set

      I have come to suspect that the problem with VIA is not their hardware, but their Windows drivers. I have had plenty of trouble with my VIA-based boxes in Windows, but a lot of people seem to have good stability under Linux or *BSD.

    8. Re:Via? VIA?!? by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that was the chipset where I finally made the full switch to Linux, because Win98/ME wouldn't boot more than three times without me reinstalling the drivers.

    9. Re:Via? VIA?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EPIA motherboard, C3 and Eden processors.

  7. CN is also China's TLD by mirko · · Score: 2, Funny

    As we recently heard about China'0s adopting their own chips and software, could it be the world version of the Chinese standard processor ?

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
    1. Re:CN is also China's TLD by ancice · · Score: 1

      China? Via is Taiwanese. They are totally different places with different political systems.

    2. Re:CN is also China's TLD by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      That's not what the Chineese think!

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  8. Via or VIA? by Inda · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the linked Press Release:

    Note to reporters, editors and writers: VIA is spelled in ALL CAPS.

    Yes I read the F**cking article.

    Finicky? Me?

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    1. Re:Via or VIA? by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      so you're only allowed to say the company name when it's done really loud? As in, when shouted it's the company, when spoken on a normal volume it's the word used when giving directions?

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    2. Re:Via or VIA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is VIA an acronym for something? I would assume that it refers to circuit board terminology, where a via is a hole through a board to connect paths on different layers, as opposed to one that is there for a lead of a component to go through. (Of course they'd probably also intend it to encompass the standard meaning of the word as well.) But I can't imagine what reason they'd have for insisting that it be spelled in all caps unless it were an acronym for something, for which I can find no references.

    3. Re:Via or VIA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VIA Rail never say what it means either. Anyway, the Taiwan semiconductor company stole the rail company's logo and got away with it!

    4. Re:Via or VIA? by Saeger · · Score: 1
      Yes I read the F**cking article.

      Was that self-censorship really necessary, Mr. Classy?

      If you're going to use colorful language, at least have the decency to use it fucking correctly.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
  9. Re:No MacOSX for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your mom agrees heartily

  10. Down Periscope by hcob$ · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think this topic about a new via chipset requires my favorite quote from Down Periscope.

    After Turbo "fixes" the radio... again... "It's running like a Swiss... Car....."

    --
    Cliff Claven
    K.E.G. Party Chairman
    Founding Leader of: Koncerned for Egalitarin Governance
    1. Re:Down Periscope by dartanion · · Score: 1

      His name was Nitro, his nickname was... Miiiiike.

    2. Re:Down Periscope by hcob$ · · Score: 0

      my deepest apologies! *bows ungainfully*

      --
      Cliff Claven
      K.E.G. Party Chairman
      Founding Leader of: Koncerned for Egalitarin Governance
  11. Funny name for the chip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's really funny VIA would name their chip CN considering that (in canada at least), the main passenger rail transportation company is called VIA rail and the main commercial rail transportation is CN.

    1. Re:Funny name for the chip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, really funny -- considering CN is the international country abbreviation for CHINA, whereas CA is for Canada.

    2. Re:Funny name for the chip by VoiceOfRaisin · · Score: 1

      you too can have your own CN tower case.

    3. Re:Funny name for the chip by k4_pacific · · Score: 1

      CN is the reporting marks (letter codes on freight cars and waybills) used to designate the Canadian National Railway.

      --
      Unknown host pong.
    4. Re:Funny name for the chip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...so, you're worried that a couple hundred lumberjacks and a few dozen moose with be confused?

  12. Another Competitor. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We all know what AMD did to the processor market with the introduction of the K7. It never hurts for more healthy competition. Via la 64bit!

    1. Re:Another Competitor. by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      Competitor? VIA CN competing with Athlon64 is like Celeron competing with Itanium. (If we ignore that they are both Intel and one isn't 64 ;)).

    2. Re:Another Competitor. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ICBW, BITYHBT. YHL.

    3. Re:Another Competitor. by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      It's like a 64-bit version of Intel's Shelton (1GHz Banias with NO L2 cache) competing with the A64. How about that?

  13. Heck yah. by Icegryphon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now my toaster can have more then 4 GB of memory. mmmmm toast.

  14. Re:No MacOSX for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a fantastic post!
    Incoherent enough to make no real sense while somehow subtley hinting at some generaly ideas. It manages to start a Mac on X86 flame war while leaving the reader uncertain if they have just read something that makes sense. A total waste of his life as much as this is a waste of mine.
    Kudos you retarded Assferret.

  15. hmmmm by eggdropfan · · Score: 1

    CN -> .cn -> china -> via -> nuclear hampsters -> mad scientists

  16. Prrof reading? by beeglebug · · Score: 1, Funny

    The chip will have 'will have much better performance Should have used the preview button!

    1. Re:Prrof reading? by beeglebug · · Score: 1, Funny

      Prrof? Maybe I should have too...

    2. Re:Prrof reading? by fireman+sam · · Score: 1

      Damn, your reply was funnier than your original comment.

      --
      it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
    3. Re:Prrof reading? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Want to talk proofreading? On the page with info on the dual processor mini-itx board you can find the following gem:

      The DP prototype board eschews the DB-15 VGA port traditionally found on Via's motherboards in favor of a DVI port for use with flat-panel displays. However, DVI is backward-compatible with AGP, so perhaps a VGA port will be snuck in under the wire before the final version of the board reaches production "early next year."

      Things wrong with this sentence:

      1. DVI is a connector type, nothing more. It comes in analog (DVI-A) and digital (DVI-D) signalling types, with both often present on the same connector.
      2. AGP is a bus technology. AGP, AGP2x, and AGP4x are a single host, single device bus which has priority access to main memory. You cannot compare AGP, DVI, and VGA because they all mean very different things. Incidentally if you think you can compare DVI and VGA, you need to look up the meaning of "HD15". VGA is a signalling type, which can be compared to DVI-A.

      DVI is a "VGA port" (meaningless term) if you have a VGA-compatible display adapter behind it. VGA-compatible monitors typically use a male HD15 connector to connect to a female HD15 connector on the display adapter or motherboard. However, with the use of a standard, commonly available adapter widget, you can take the VGA signals from DVI-A and put them on an HD15.

      These people are either dumb, or need editing badly. Actually, they're dumb either way, because there is simply no need for a "VGA Port" on the unit. All that is needed is a DVI to HD15 adapter included in the box.

      Are all articles on linuxdevices written by the same person? There's no attribution on the article so it seems like they are... If so, I know I never need visit the site again.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Prrof reading? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Funny
      "will have 'will have" is not a quine.

      Get it? Quine? Hah! Oh. See, there're these things called "quines", and they... oh, forget it.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    5. Re:Prrof reading? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      There are three types of DVI ports. DVI-A (VGA with a DVI port instead of HD15), DVI-D (digital video signal with a DVI port), and DVI-I (VGA signal AND digital signal sent down a DVI port). My guess is it's DVI-I.

  17. Interview with CEO of VIA subsidiary Centaur by UnderScan · · Score: 4, Informative

    ./-ers might not like VIA, but you should really give them a chance. Their subsidiary Centaur is the group that designs their chips.
    CEO Interview: Glenn Henry, founder of VIA processor subsidiary Centaur

  18. Nano-ITX by Sketch · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So the SP uses the nanoBGA CPU and CN400 northbridge. Does this mean we will finally see the long awaited nano-ITX board VIA originally announced last year and still has yet to deliver, despite announcing availability months ago? Or are they giving up on the Nano-ITX and just giving us Yet Another Mini-ITX?

    --
    -- OpenVerse Visual Chat: http://openverse.com
  19. Interesting, but.... by Mshift2x · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The Eden Chip is relatively slow compared to the latest Athlon and Pentium 4 flavors. The mini-itx market has filled it's niche of being lower powered, not high preformance demanding systems. It's done well there. Unfortunately, the eden chips will probably be too slow, even after working in unicen, to beat a high speed pentium 4 or athlon.

    1. Re:Interesting, but.... by rainman_bc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, but a little more competition never hurt. Remember AMD used to suck ass until the Athlon XP. Recall some of the earlier processors had compatibility issues and such too. I installed a Thunderbird 1.4, and using a $50 Alpha heat sink (and fan of course) I couldn't get that darned processor cooled enough. It ran so hot I had to underclock it to 1ghz...

      Really, we've got VIA, and Transmeta coming to the table now to play. What's the worse that can happen? MORE competition to drive up performance while keeping down price? Hell imagine if Intel had a monopoly on the processor market right now eh...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re:Interesting, but.... by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Dunno about that... I had a K5-166 that was just fine for 3 years, and actually seemed a bit faster than the wife's P200 with mmx. Maybe the 64mb ram on the K5 made a difference (the P200mmx had 48mb, both ran win95).

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    3. Re:Interesting, but.... by JamesTRexx · · Score: 1

      The VIA chips were never ment to compete with the speed of AMD or Intel. Their purpose is to provide a low power solution.

      --
      home
    4. Re:Interesting, but.... by Fweeky · · Score: 1
      "I installed a Thunderbird 1.4, and using a $50 Alpha heat sink (and fan of course) I couldn't get that darned processor cooled enough. It ran so hot I had to underclock it to 1ghz..."

      It's not AMD's fault you don't know how to apply thermal paste properly. My 1.4 Tbird's living under a £5 Thermalright SK6 and it's perfectly happy running at full load 24/7 (with a VIA chipset, no less).
    5. Re:Interesting, but.... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The first generation Athlons blew the P3 (Intel's competitor at the time) away in floating point benchmarks and were slightly faster in integer (or maybe the other way around). They also had faster FSB speeds (200 MHz Vs 133MHz). I happily ran a 1GHz T-Bird at 1.33GHz (FSB changed from 200MHz to 266MHz) for several years (before I got a Mac. The machine is still working, but now someone else is using it). I replaced the fan with a Zalman flower cooler after a couple of years to reduce noise, but apart from that had no problems with it.

      The Athlons at work, on the other hand, have been nothing but trouble, but only because they were all shipped with ultra low budget fans that seem to have a MTBF of about 6 months.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:Interesting, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try removing the protective film over the heatsink tape. You wouldn't believe how many computer manufacturers forget to do that.

    7. Re:Interesting, but.... by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      lol true about the fans... I recall I had my little proc fan on my p166 die on me. didn't know for about a year :)

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    8. Re:Interesting, but.... by pchan- · · Score: 1

      Remember AMD used to suck ass until the Athlon XP

      your memory is short. i remember them making a 40mhz 386 processor that kicked intel's ass.

    9. Re:Interesting, but.... by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      I distinctly remember hearing people had compatibility problems with that processor, and the 486 clone, and the k5, and the k6...

      In fact, I know some morons who, until recently, were still making those claims - that they would buy an Intel proc only because of that reason.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    10. Re:Interesting, but.... by Techbox · · Score: 1

      Isn't the VIA chips based on the old Cyrix core? Wasn't Cyrix x86 based processor consume lots of power?

  20. Re: Via? Via! by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "After my last horrific experience with their 4 in 1 driver set, I vowed to never touch another board with a VIA chipset again"

    Maybe you simply lack some positive experience with Via hardware? The most stable x86 system I ever had, a 486, was Via chipset based. What I currently have uses Via KM266 chipset, performs solid and very stable. With non-Via chipsets, it's been a mixed bag for me.

    I really like them advancing the art for power-efficient CPU's. For many applications, the underlying hardware is increasingly irrelevant, and other factors like power consumption become important. In the old days, computer hardware just couldn't be fast enough. Nowadays PC's are way faster than needed for almost any application. Next on the list is price, and as a result, ordinary PC hardware has become dirt cheap. What's next? Ergonomics, reliability, durability. Read: low power, small, low noise. Via CPU's fit in there nicely.

    I think a big problem for Via CPU's market share in desktop systems is not their technical merits, but their availability. If you want to buy AMD or Intel, any computershop has something on offer. But if you want to buy Via C3, matching motherboard (socket 370), or Mini-ITX board, your choices in supplier are extremely limited (at least where I live, the Netherlands). If Via wants to sell more of this stuff, they should focus on making sure that you can actually get it somewhere.

  21. CN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "64-bit chip codenamed 'CN.'"

    CN stands for.. CodeName!

  22. Dual EPIA is a great idea!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hey, a dual EPIA1000 is a great idea. I'm not so interested in the size as a cheap dual CPU system with low thermals.

    Multi-processing is non-existant on a single, low power CPU system like the VIA M/E lines. But a low power dual system offers the kind lateral of processing power that a much more powerful single CPU platform can only offer.

    Of course there's always the A64's great power characteristics, but if you're looking to live in the sticks off of solar power, you start dreaming of dual systems they'll run on 26Watts total.

    1. Re:Dual EPIA is a great idea!!! by wonkavader · · Score: 1

      But does the stuff most of us would want to do with it -- specifically video compression and decompression -- use dual-processor systems well?

      I know the VIA boards last time I saw a review (I think it was a year and a half ago, in the 1 Ghz incarnation) didn't QUITE have the umph necessary to play video without dropping any frames.

      Is a dual configuration really going to change that, or do we need more speed on the single processor?

      Or for that matter, is the real bottleneck memory, io, etc?

    2. Re:Dual EPIA is a great idea!!! by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      It won't do much of a change if it's MPEG2 stuff and/or the program isn't multithreaded. However, the OS can still be run on CPU 0, with the media player on CPU 1, and if it IS multithreaded, the playback thread on CPU 1, and everything else (OS, UI thread) on CPU 0.

  23. CN is from Centaur by reporter · · Score: 1
    The new chip, CN, is actually from Centaur Technology headquartered in Austin, Texas.

    Via bought Centaur ages ago. Via is based in Taiwan and carries all the associated baggage: Taiwanese transferring American technology to Beijing and the Chinese military . Hence, although Centaur is American, I will boycott this chip for ethical reasons: e.g. Tibet .

    1. Re:CN is from Centaur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently you've never been in a Taiwanese disco. If you had, you'd realize that all of the Tibetan outlaws are living at government expense in Taiwan. It's much more complex than you could possibly imagine.

    2. Re:CN is from Centaur by pe1rxq · · Score: 1

      Since every major chip manufacturor has plants in china I assume you won't be buying any new pc's anytime in the near future?

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    3. Re:CN is from Centaur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's unfair, I know, but I will assume you are an American. You should boycott yourself for ethical reasons: e.g., americal natives, vietnam, etc. Jump off a bridge (far from ground/sea/river below) or a tall building.

  24. Re:Strange little co-incidence by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 1

    Here in Canada, VIA and CN are both strongly associated with trains:

    Here in the states VIA chipsets are known as trainwrecks.

  25. Other SFF boards? by Xaroth · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    All this talk of the VIA boards reminds me that Intel was talking a lot about how picoBTX systems should be available sometime soon. I saw that Gateway is already shipping the first standard BTX systems, but I was wondering if anyone out there in /.land had some better dirt on when the picoBTX systems are supposed to be available.

    Google seems to be filled with months-old news about picoBTX, so maybe someone here has the scoop?

  26. Ha you think that ITX boards are small... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out this custom motherboard by SONY, on their ultraslim VAIO X505 laptop.

    Its a 512MB 1GHz Pentium M system too!!!!

    This is a small mobo!

  27. AMD by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

    I think AMD chips make for much better toasters. (-:

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    1. Re:AMD by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      It was a reference to the fact that Mini-ITX boards fit into toasters.

      Now, AMD DOES make a Mini-ITX board, but it uses even less power than VIA's chips (the Geode NX DB1500).

    2. Re:AMD by Icegryphon · · Score: 0

      That and the cliche of ipv6 with toasters having ip addys. ;) after all something needs to be running them toasters.

  28. Better picture of X505 mobo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The X505 1GHz PentiumM motherboard the Japanese vaio site

    Yep, thats a minidisc!

  29. This could be an interesting cluster machine by Analogy+Man · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I was considering putting together my first Beowulf cluster. I wanted to go with 64 bit processor to run CFD codes. To maximize CPU's I was considering dual processor boards. Also of concern is energy consumption/heat etc.

    The boards for the AMD64 have a lot of features a compute node would not need. A compute node needs a network connection, processor, memory and one hard-drive...I don't need 5 PCI slots etc.

    This interesting solution offers:

    Modest Power Consumption

    Small form factor

    Modest Price

    Dual processor

    This is worth a look at the detail specs.

    --
    When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
    1. Re:This could be an interesting cluster machine by myc_lykaon · · Score: 1
      I wanted to go with 64 bit processor to run CFD codes.

      It may well be enough for the job at 32bit. My PhD was on application of CFD to cardiac flows, so it was 3d time dep. The boundaries were non-compliant but I used a dual P2 300MHz machine and I could complete simulation of an entire heart beat in 6-12 hours. As you are aware, code efficiency is the key since non-linear solvers are still improving. I hand coded the solver so I gained alot that way.

      Anyway don't disregard lower spec machines for this compute intensive work. A lot of useful research is done on low end spec boxes and many academics are used to squeezing the last cycle out of them even though it seems from the news that all universities have access to Blue Gene class machines.

    2. Re:This could be an interesting cluster machine by Analogy+Man · · Score: 2, Interesting
      As a former Aero Researcher I am now more interested in the Beowulf side. I am in the request/approval process for obtaining some NASA solvers (CFL3D, XFOIL...).

      I had considered going the e-bay route with box lots of older processors/motherboards, but from what I have read on the compute cluster groups that option is is high on the Watts/(Compute Power) scale. Factoring in HD, RAM, Power, Cases, Power Supplies etc the $/(Compute Power) is not that great either.

      Going the AMD socket 754 route I was stuck with $120 MOBO, with and ATX form factor. Needing some heavy duty cooling if I went dual processor...

      Just as a proof of concept on a cluster older machines are an inexpensive option, but in the long haul I have come to the conclussion that being about 6 months behind the bleeding edge at the time of purchase is about right.

      --
      When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
    3. Re:This could be an interesting cluster machine by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      >Just as a proof of concept on a cluster older machines are an inexpensive option

      It sounds like you've got too much time on your hands and are looking for ways to kill it.

      a) There's nothing to prove - MPI/PVM just works.
      If the software supports it, then it will work.

      b) If you want to practice installation - Ma, I know how to install a Beowulf cluster! - (waste of time, since there's no skill* in that any more), just do it on your desktop using free trial version of VMWare GSX and Fedora ISOs or whatever. You don't even have to burn CDs.

      c) If you really need a cluster to compute something, you'll buy the fastest machines you can afford, why would you buy Via to save money and then compute at a speed lower than single CPU Opteron system? Unless you want to call yourself clustering expert, that is.

      * Nowadays one can get a complete MPI-ready software kit that includes automatic installation/deployment for couple hundred dollars. That's for those who want to focus on creative work and computing instead of screwing around and reading how-to docs.

    4. Re:This could be an interesting cluster machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's an article on building a 12-node cluster from EPIA M8000's .... uses 60 watts (total) at idle ... passive cooling.

      http://www.mini-itx.com/projects/cluster/

  30. What advantage will this have (besides perhaps higher raw clockspeed) over other embeddable 64 bit cpus? MIPS chips have been 64 bit and low power for over a decade.

    --
    ------ Take away the right to say fuck and you take away the right to say fuck the government.
    1. Re:MIPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cause everybody here uses MS Windows.

  31. Re:No MacOSX for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "generaly ideas" you seem to be unable to comprehend may just be the fact that you CAN modify the hardware of your computer. Maybe this is "incoherent" for stupid mac users. The "reader" is pretty certain of what's been mentioned, unless of course he's a Mac users, in which case, he is "uncertain if they read something that makes sense". As uncertain as they are for "why did they buy this Macintosh crap in the first place".

  32. DVI/VGA by sbryant · · Score: 1

    From the article:

    The DP prototype board eschews the DB-15 VGA port traditionally found on Via's motherboards in favor of a DVI port for use with flat-panel displays. However, DVI is backward-compatible with AGP, so perhaps a VGA port will be snuck in under the wire before the final version of the board reaches production "early next year."

    What does that mean? DVI is backward-compatible with AGP?? Sounds like somebody doesn't know what they're talking about!

    I don't expect the old VGA port to reappear, as you only need to stick an adaptor in the DVI port.

    -- Steve

    1. Re:DVI/VGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does that mean? DVI is backward-compatible with AGP?? Sounds like somebody doesn't know what they're talking about!
      I don't expect the old VGA port to reappear, as you only need to stick an adaptor in the DVI port.


      Well, duh, don't you think that's exactly what he meant? If it can provide a DVI signal then it can provide an analog signal.

    2. Re:DVI/VGA by Yannic · · Score: 1

      Actually DVI doesn't necessarily mean you can use an adapter to get VGA.

      I know of three flavours of DVI:
      DVI-I ("Integrated") has both a Digital and Analog signal. The converter you speak of doesn't really convert anything; except where the pins go.
      DVI-A ("Analog") is just analog. It's rare, but you usually see these with an HD15 (VGA) connector on one end.
      DVI-D ("Digital") is just digital.

      DVI also comes in single- and dual-link. I've seen some Matrox dualhead cards that just have one dual-link DVI-I connector.

      \/\/\/

  33. They're doing multicore chips, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to this ExtremeTech article, which seems to be a bit better than the ZDnet story. It's based on interviews with Glenn Henry, the founder of Via's Centaur division.

  34. Nice! by the_leander · · Score: 1

    I'd love one, but atm I'm skint and I can't really justify the cost of getting another system :-D

    --
    regards, the_leander
  35. Just a note by peeon · · Score: 2, Informative

    This new processor most likey not be able to go fanless. This new via c3 core has higher heat than the Nehemiah cores. 20 watts to 15 watts I believe. I have one of the first 1 gig Nehemiah cores and it is on the brink of the max temp without no fan.

    1. Re:Just a note by MagusX · · Score: 1

      You are aware the 1Ghz Nehemiah cores arn't designed to be fanless, right?

    2. Re:Just a note by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      You are aware that Nehemiah is also the codename for the C5P, not just the C5XL, and this DP board runs two C5P Edens (read: the ones that could probably do 1.6 or 1.8GHz if you pushed stock voltage into them, but are clocked at 1GHz with a low voltage) - the fanless ones.

  36. CN == cyanide by outanowhere · · Score: 1

    Kinda makes you go hmmm...

  37. Re: Via? Via! by renoX · · Score: 1

    > I really like them advancing the art for power-efficient CPU's.

    I'm not sure they're "advancing the art" as you said, just making a smart commercial move: Intel with its PentiumM could also sell high performance low power CPU: I've seen a SpecInt bencmark where a PentiumM consuming 20W had the same result as a P4 consuming 80W!
    But as Intel or AMD sells their low power CPU more expensive than their 'normal' CPU, very few people buy one (and for PentiumM I don't think that desktop motherboards exist) and they don't have incentive to introduce cheap low power CPU..

    This is market differentiation.. not necessarily related to tech capabilities of the vendor.

  38. Re: Via? Via! by doctormetal · · Score: 1

    I think a big problem for Via CPU's market share in desktop systems is not their technical merits, but their availability. If you want to buy AMD or Intel, any computershop has something on offer. But if you want to buy Via C3, matching motherboard (socket 370), or Mini-ITX board, your choices in supplier are extremely limited (at least where I live, the Netherlands)./i.

    Then you did not look very well. I had no problem finding an epia mainboard in the netherlands.
    I have a epia M10000 running as a network server (fedora core 2)

  39. As reported ...... by onlyjoking · · Score: 1

    ... on The Register .... yesterday ..... or was it the day before?

  40. Re: Via? Via! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is what drives me up the damn wall if im going to be using a socket 370 platform id much rather use an older celeron or pentium III which do way more powerwise and really do not cost that much or Consume a whole hell of alot of power either, no passive cooling is out of the question but still it doesnt require a 7000 rpm finger remover like modern cpus do.

  41. Remember the K6 by benzapp · · Score: 1

    The K6 233 was the fastest processor on the block for a 3 months or so in 1997, before the Pentium II was released. It even beat the Pentium Pro 233 at the time. 2 years later, they had the Athlon.

    --
    I don't read or respond to AC posts
  42. The Fact that it's x86, obviously. by ItMustBeEsoteric · · Score: 1

    This means there are countless more compatible apps. I would have thought that was obvious.

  43. Re: Via? Via! by mikefe · · Score: 1

    Another benefit of a VIA processor is that they keep up with the instruction set advancements of Intel and AMD.

    --
    There: Something at a specific location.
    Their: Owned by someone.
    Please make sure your english compiles.
  44. Cool. Now think of it this way. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    I like names.

    This universe is made of pure Energy. All Matter is merely an illusion created by this Energy.

    Within this medium, Consciousness can also be defined by the movement and patterns within that Energy, and thus Consciousness becomes an expression of Energy. Just as Matter is also an expression of Energy. Is there a difference between the two?

    --Now, of course, I don't know the maths behind how it all works, (though I am certain it can all be described through maths), but there do seem to be direct relationships between Matter and Consciousness, and indeed, the line appears to be very blurred. For instance. . .

    Take the name of the street you live on and a nice thick dictionary. Find where your street name appears in that dictionary. If the street name does not appear directly, if it is a person's name, then take the root of that name, or if it is a compound word, look up both of those words and perform the following. . .

    Read the definition you find, plus all of the definitions of the twenty or so words which appear before the name of your street and the twenty words which appear after the name of your street.

    Then consider that the street is the place you live. It is the physical base upon which you are exploring and growing your own Consciousness and your interaction with the world around you.

    'CN' and 'VIA', both being Canadian rail companies, call up many things. What does Canada represent in the world? Does the fact that the Progressive Conservative party, (the 'PC' party???) sold off the national train system to a private corporation figure into the equation?

    Exploring names can reveal many base aspects of reality, make us aware on other levels.


    -FL

  45. Re: Via? Via! by forkazoo · · Score: 1

    I work at a computer store, and I had my company purchaser check into the VIA hardware. Unfortunately, it is sufficiently obscure that none of our regular suppliers carry any of it. I don't know that he ever tracked down a source, other than ordering it retail from England, or something rediculous. So, the problem of availability isn't limited only to the Small Shop not ordering it. VIA needs a massive PR campaign, to get more local shops to start asking about it, so more suppliers start carrying it.

    I really wish our normal suppliers carried the stuff -- I Want It. I have dozens of ideas that could be well suited to a small, low power computer. I just can't get it local. Grrr... It's even hard as hell to find online to special order!