Slashdot Mirror


Google Used to ID Hit-And-Run Victim

jafiwam writes "Google has been used (according to CNN) to help identify a hit-and-run victim from 1993. Detective Pat Ditter used Google to identify victim David Glen Lewis, 39 who died after being hit by a car while out of town. An image involving a fairly unique pair of glasses was found on the Texas Department of Public Safety web site, and a similar image on the Doe Network (involved in unsolved cases). This was after Det. Ditter began working on unsolved cases utilizing Google as a tool in that process. Makes you wonder how it took law enforcement that long to think of this. Process servers, employers and significant others already use Google for theses purposes... why not cops?"

134 comments

  1. i'm glad by ginotech · · Score: 4, Interesting

    that law enforcement and government agencies are finally starting to use the internet to its full potential.

    1. Re:i'm glad by Apreche · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. I am also glad. It may seem big brother-ish at first, but in fact its the opposite. The key difference is that the information is free and available to everybody. That's the way all information wants to, and should, be.

      --
      The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    2. Re:i'm glad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Think of all the fun when competing terrorist organizations and drug gangs "buy keywords" from search optimization companies to frame each other.

      Sometimes people trust google results too much.

      "Innocent if my blog has a better page-rank than the guy I'm trying to frame" is not a good legal standard.

    3. Re:i'm glad by wheany · · Score: 1

      You're wrong, information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  2. They do use Google... by sgant · · Score: 5, Funny

    But it's not a simple matter of typing in someones name and it comes up "he was killed in a hit-and-run , hit F5 to solve the case".

    The cops USE Google, but they still have to be the ones that put 2 and 2 together to get a conclusion.

    --

    "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    1. Re:They do use Google... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, of course not, because "F5" is different depending on which web browser they use. And if they're using a Mac, it's a whole different process altogether ("drag the victim into the case-solved file").

    2. Re:They do use Google... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it's not a simple matter of typing in someones name and it comes up "he was killed in a hit-and-run , hit F5 to solve the case".

      It's F6. F5 refreshes, dumbass.

    3. Re: They do use Google... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Funny


      > The cops USE Google, but they still have to be the ones that put 2 and 2 together to get a conclusion.

      That's what the psychic consultants are for.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    4. Re:They do use Google... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, thank you for explaining this to us, Captain Obvious.

    5. Re:They do use Google... by StateOfTheUnion · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I think you hit the nail on the head . . . A lot of cases don't get solved not because the police don't have tools but because they don't have the manpower.

      Many cases get shelved not because they are unsolvable but because there is too much other low hanging fruit that can more easily be addressed first. To get the most bang for the taxpayer dollar, easy cases get solved first and if there is time, the tough ones that take more time are addressed. Too often because of resource limitations, the more difficult cases are never addressed.

    6. Re:They do use Google... by sgant · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Then why don't they have a tier system of police work?

      You have a guy in the office, not a gun-carrying/badge-waving cop...but a researcher. Someone that digs through the evidence, searches on the web to come up with possible solutions to cases then turn them over to the gun-carrying/badge-waving guys to go out and make an arrest or search warrent or other "cop-doings".

      Just a thought...and not, not the CSI guys.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    7. Re:They do use Google... by sgant · · Score: 1

      well, from the story here at Slashdot it made it seem like "Wow, he just used Google and WHAM he solved the case".

      I was pointing out that it's not that simple.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    8. Re:They do use Google... by NetNifty · · Score: 3, Funny

      "The cops USE Google, but they still have to be the ones that put 2 and 2 together to get a conclusion."

      Sure about that?

    9. Re:They do use Google... by StateOfTheUnion · · Score: 2, Interesting
      They do . . . at many police stations these higher tier individuals are called detectives. Uniformed officers typically pass cases off to detectives when the case involves significant research.

      Unfortunately, detectives are often given a certain number of hours to work a case. If they can't get a significant lead or significant potential progress on the case within that time, the case gets shelved and the detective is handed another case. Though I don't disagree that a better priorization system may result in more effective use of detective's time, I think that the root cause of the problem is that most police departments don't have enough people to get the job done.

    10. Re:They do use Google... by st1d · · Score: 1

      Now that's funny. Wish I had a mod point to spare. :)

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
    11. Re:They do use Google... by ashkar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sadly, they don't have enough manpower because they're too busy trying to make money off of people driving 5mph over the speed limit. How about they get traffic cops to start working on real crimes?

    12. Re:They do use Google... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      I thought *all* police cases were solved within an hour?

      Or have I just seen too much American TV?

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    13. Re:They do use Google... by nathanh · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Sadly, they don't have enough manpower because they're too busy trying to make money off of people driving 5mph over the speed limit. How about they get traffic cops to start working on real crimes?

      Speeding is a real crime. If you're travelling at 35mph then an increase of 5mph (14.3%) will increase your braking distance by 30%. The distance travelled during your reaction time is also increased by 14% however the reaction and braking distances are in different scales so cannot be simply added together. At any rate, the combined stopping distance at 40mph is something in excess of 30% more than at 35mph. That could easily mean the difference between life and death.

      The Great Lie of motoring is that 5mph isn't a big deal. It's not a real crime. Surely driver attention, skill level, quality of car, surface conditions, they all outweigh the dangers of speeding. I'm a better driver than everybody else; I should be allowed to speed. Cops should be arresting those Real Criminals instead of poor little old me when I was only exceeding the speed limit by 5mph in my 2500kg V8 4WD truck.

      Anybody who seriously believes those arguments should have their license immediately revoked. You only have to look at real world case studies to see that speed reduction on USA highways was the major factor in 9000 fewer road deaths in 1974.

      In 2002 the USA road toll exceeded 43,000 deaths. One-sixth of those deaths were solely due to unsafe driving speeds and speed was a contributing factor in more than one-half of the fatalities

      Speeding is a crime because it results in deaths. It harms society. Not only because of the human cost (which is the most tragic loss) but also because of the wasted time and money spent cleaning the spilled blood off the roads.

      So the message is clear: STOP SPEEDING.

    14. Re:They do use Google... by evilviper · · Score: 2, Insightful
      How about they get traffic cops to start working on real crimes?

      Problems with that:

      1. Income from traffic tickets helps to pay for police. Not directly, but still... Without it, most cities would probably only be able to have half as many police.

      2. Why do you think traffic laws shouldn't be enforced? Traffic fatalities are a MAJOR cause of death... Far above anything else police are involved in, let alone, anything they can help prevent.

      3. Do you really want traffic cops to become detectives? There is no magic formula that is going to make that happen.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    15. Re:They do use Google... by eliza_effect · · Score: 1

      "Speeding" wasn't the cause of 7167 deaths you listed. The cause was the inability of the driver to control his or her vehicle. Their high rate of speed may have compounded the fact that they were a poor driver to begin with (or exacerbated a situation beyond their control), but generally in my experience, most vehicles do not simply become more dangerous as their speed increases. Also, all vehicles are not created equal. A small, light, all-wheel-drive car will be much safer at high speed than a large, heavy, truck-like vehicle. This isn't to say that speeding is ok, but I find in most cases that the quality of judgement and experience are far more important factors when considering someone's personal safety while driving. If you don't know the limits and can't handle the dynamics of your vehicle, driving slowly will not help you very much. The consequences may be different, or less severe, but you will sill end up in trouble.

    16. Re:They do use Google... by winwar · · Score: 1

      "Income from traffic tickets helps to pay for police."

      Well, they could use taxes like everybody else. At least this would result in all voters having a say in how many police they want. Second, how much of that revenue goes back into paying for the cops writing the tickets? If there is no "net gain" your argument is worthless. Finally, what happens if everyone obeys the traffice laws? Are we going to fire all those police? I think not....

      "Why do you think traffic laws shouldn't be enforced?"

      Reasonable ones should be. For instance, speed limits based on road conditions-not concerns of residents or the desire for ticket income. Ones that directly relate to safety such as failure to yield (running stop signs, lights) and reckless driving. But how often do you see those enforced? Or police in a POSITION to enforce those laws? Not often. I have observed more than once an officer IGNORE those offences when they could have SAFELY stopped the vehicle. Now you tell me, do they REALLY care about safety or do they want easy revenue?

      "Traffic fatalities are a MAJOR cause of death..."

      And what does speeding have to do with traffic fatalities? Not much. Now, going too fast for conditions, that has a LOT to do with accidents and POSSIBLY fatalities. But going too fast for conditions and speeding ARE NOT THE SAME THING.

      More important considerations for fatalities would be things like wearing seat belts and available air bags. A belted passenger with air bag will likely survive a high speed crash whereas a person without either could die in a low speed one....

      Finally, if speeding is a safety issue, why do cops hide? Shouldn't they be in plain view at all times? Heck, it would be better if they drove the roads at the speed limit. This has an amazing compliance rate. Granted, now the cars are probably tailgating each other....

      "Do you really want traffic cops to become detectives?"

      Ah, agreement! Considering the ability of the last officer(s) I met to accurately fill out a police report, I wouldn't trust them to investigate a cat trapped in a tree....

    17. Re:They do use Google... by winwar · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Speeding is a real crime."

      Well, it is a minor one for the most part. In fact, I suspect nearly everyone breaks it. When everyone breaks a law, you had better consider the reasons for it....

      "You only have to look at real world case studies to see that speed reduction on USA highways was the major factor in 9000 fewer road deaths in 1974."

      Well, I can't read the case studies so I will take your word for it. But it is currently 2004, so those statistics are out of date.

      "In 2002 the USA road toll exceeded 43,000 deaths. One-sixth of those deaths were solely due to unsafe driving speeds and speed was a contributing factor in more than one-half of the fatalities"

      Over 7000 deaths due to unsafe driving speeds? Sorry, I don't believe you. Citations please. Despite your beliefs to the contrary, speed does NOT kill. Going to fast for conditions may result in an accident that MAY kill. Those are NOT the same things.

      BTW, where were the predicted massive increases in deaths due to increasing US speed limits? Lots of people are still waiting.... This indicates that speeding is NOT a major factor in traffic fatalities.

      Ah, here is some REAL data (http://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/). Traffic fatalities per million miles travelled in 2003: 1.48 deaths. This is a HISTORIC low.
      Some quotes from the annual NHSTA report (2002) "Unfortunately, impaired driving and failure to use safety belts continued to be major contributors to fatalities on our highways." and We will focus our efforts on increasing safety belt use, reducing impaired driving, improving inter-vehicle compatibility, reducing fatalities and injuries from rollover collisions,..."
      Gee, speeding isn't even mentioned. So much for speeding and death rates....

      "Cops should be arresting those Real Criminals instead of poor little old me when I was only exceeding the speed limit by 5mph in my 2500kg V8 4WD truck."

      Well, yes they should. Murderers actually kill people. Other criminals haved caused REAL harm. If someone's speed has caused harm, then by all means arrest them. If it is LIKELY to cause harm, then ticket them.

      "So the message is clear: STOP SPEEDING."

      No it isn't. But, hey, never let the facts get in the way of your beliefs.

    18. Re:They do use Google... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      best comment of the week ! roflmao

    19. Re:They do use Google... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      And what does speeding have to do with traffic fatalities? Not much.

      On the contrary, it is the cause for a lot of accidents, and surely many fatalities. I've seen plenty of accidents happen because someone was driving so fast they couldn't stop when another car changed lanes, stopped, turned out in front of them, etc.

      Finally, if speeding is a safety issue, why do cops hide? Shouldn't they be in plain view at all times?

      Only if they can have a constant presence all through their jurisdiction. People slow down when they see a cop, and speed up when he is out of sight... Not letting people know when there is a cop around causes people to slow down in general, not just when they see a cop car. Hiding is much more effective.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    20. Re:They do use Google... by Spoke · · Score: 1
      The Great Lie of motoring is that 5mph isn't a big deal. It's not a real crime.

      You're right, travelling 5mph over the speed limit is not necessarily a real crime. At least here in California, we have a law called the "Basic Speed Law". What this means is that most posted speed limits are only a recommended maximum speed, and not the maximum allowable. There are many cases where one can safely and legally exceed the speed limit, though not many people are aware that they legally can (but do anyway).

  3. Similar story by erick99 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Last year when I was doing web work for a car dealer a state policeman happened to come into the showroom asking for assistance. He had a piece of a tailight lens and that was it. Something had hit a parked car on some private property and that piece of lens was the only evidence. When the parts department said they couldn't help I poked my head up and volunteered. This drew some sneers from the "pros" behind the counter who felt that I couldn't possibly help with anything related to cars. Anyway, using Google I narrowed it down to a specific year and model of a Ford pickup. The police were able to track down the owner - it's not that big of a town. It was fun, though it took about two hours and I got quite a headache looking at so many images.

    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
    1. Re:Similar story by Space_Soldier · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they'll have a role for you on CSI: Washington D.C. Every years seems to bring a new CSI show.

    2. Re:Similar story by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Just search for the part number if available. Works every time ;)

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:Similar story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No part number. Just a small piece of the center of the lens.

  4. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  5. New Meaning by whiteranger99x · · Score: 4, Funny

    I guess that puts a new meaning to Google's "Don't be evil" slogan. =)

    --
    Join the TWIT army now!
  6. Re:You would think... by Misinformed · · Score: 1

    Yes, and everything you read in teh intraweb is true.

    --
    --

    Slashdot: Racism against Indians OK. China bad, USA good. Blue pill in water supply.
  7. Actually... by bloxnet · · Score: 1

    Google makes a standalone internal search engine server called the Google Appliance. We have one in use at my current job and I was just thinking it would be neat to see what just a little bit of effort from several law enforcement agencies and one of these appliances could do.

    1. Re:Actually... by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Slightly OT:
      We just replaced (Wholesale) our old search with something like 12 of these things. Searches have never been better! (75K employees in company).

      back OT:
      If the cops could get together across state and agency lines with Google providing the search and DB indexing I'm sure there would be a lot less unsolved crimes across state lines!

      Just wonder what the leagal impact would be?
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  8. Facial Recognition software? by StateOfTheUnion · · Score: 4, Interesting
    In my ignorance I may be opening a can of worms here but . . .

    What about facial recognition software used for this purpose? If drivers license pictures were standardized and pictures taken at the morgue were made to the same standard (assuming the face of the disceased in not injured/damaged) is facial recognition software good enough to be used to try to identify John Does?

    1. Re:Facial Recognition software? by HellYeahAutomaton · · Score: 2, Informative
      This is already being done.

      Check out this paper on "Image Matching Using A Criminal Database":

      http://mailweb.udlap.mx/~ingrid/caminoreal/Bobbie. pdf

    2. Re:Facial Recognition software? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "What about facial recognition software used for this purpose?"

      If they were going by a pair of glasses, they may not have had a face left to recognize.

    3. Re:Facial Recognition software? by CptnSbaitso · · Score: 1
      If drivers license pictures were standardized and pictures taken at the morgue...is facial recognition software good enough to be used to try to identify John Does?

      Seems like a great idea. I know my driver's license photo looks like I'm dead.
    4. Re:Facial Recognition software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about facial recognition software used for this purpose?

      Google Faces! I love it. Sketch what the face looks like, and Google finds images that look like that.

      Think of the pr0n uses...

  9. Re: Soon you will see by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


    > Google will soon be starring in TV's CSI :)

    LoL. "CSI:Google"

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  10. already been done by rdunnell · · Score: 2, Funny

    I know that a couple CSI episodes and a couple NCIS episodes used a generic looking search engine page. I don't know whether or not they'd use Google unless someone paid them to but the concept's there.

    Of course, the TV search engines can tell you a person's entire life history with only a first name and a hair color. They're pretty powerful, you know...

  11. What does this mean for criminals? by HellYeahAutomaton · · Score: 1
    Surely if the cops are googling, criminals have been googling for a while too. Will changing metatags for better "I'm-no-criminal" placement help them evade the long arm of the law?

    It's only a matter of time before Google will have the new GEvader Beta system....

  12. So... what is the news here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The masses are finally discovering google's advanced search capabilities?

    Now if google could only date (date when google archived the information) the result entries....

  13. This Immediatley by aLe-ph-1(sh) · · Score: 0

    Brought to mind a article in a previous edition of wired that I read. The story. I think this is a great use of search tools. It brings chills to my spine, the story, and the way that this man seems to be fighting with his own ghosts. Well written, and shows promise to anyone who has had to hole a memorial service for someone who couldn't be found. I hope that the police to hop on this train and use the tools that they have right in front of them. It also is great that there is a netowrk like the John Doe network of people, all looking out, trying to help these lost souls...

    --
    sig!wind down the juuice, let the tubes roar with the glow of alternative powers, not they that be." me, today...
  14. Damn you! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


    > The police were able to track down the owner - it's not that big of a town.

    I was wondering how they caught me, you jerk.

    If you had a slower internet connection I might have made it across the border.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  15. Re:Theses puposes? by Limburgher · · Score: 1

    I meant PURPOSES. How tacky, to make a typo in a post mocking a typo. . .

    --

    You are not the customer.

  16. Sort of off topic... by rampant+mac · · Score: 1
    But ever put your name in to a Google search?

    I did, and it brought up an obscure post (circa 1996) I made to some alt.linux.* newsgroup about re-formatting Linux text files so they would be readable in Windows.

    Spooky.

    --
    I like big butts and I cannot lie.
    1. Re:Sort of off topic... by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

      I put my name, and got many pages of 2 different people which aren't me. And it's not like my name is at all common where I live, let alone that the set of people in which this is at all a name is less than 10 million worldwide.

      --
      ^_^
    2. Re:Sort of off topic... by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      I share my name with some people who are far more famous than me. My username, however, was unique last time I Googled it.

    3. Re:Sort of off topic... by jrumney · · Score: 4, Funny
      But ever put your name in to a Google search?

      Apparently some 14 year old girl on the other side of the world has the hots for me. I read it in her livejournal.

      Google: bringing false hope to thirtysomething geeks since 1998.

    4. Re:Sort of off topic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I died in 1921 at the age of eighty-six.

      Funny, that.

    5. Re:Sort of off topic... by black+mariah · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, and there's not a damn thing spooky about it. It's actually quite useful. I found a short piece of code I wrote this way. I'd lost it in a crash and thought it was gone forever. I'd posted it to a Python newsgroup and it was still on there.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    6. Re:Sort of off topic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is it false hope because she's 14 or because she's probably talking about some other dude?

  17. CSI: Google Geek by Cryofan · · Score: 4, Funny

    The story of how one Google-obsessed computer geek solves crime after crime, all the while consuming vast quantities of pizzz, snacks, soda and coffee...

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
    1. Re:CSI: Google Geek by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Assisted by his Magic Blue Glowy Thing from ThinkGeek that exposes all evidence.

    2. Re:CSI: Google Geek by jrumney · · Score: 1
      consuming vast quantities of pizza, snacks, soda and coffee...

      I think given the nature of the work you'd have to throw some donuts in there as well.

    3. Re:CSI: Google Geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah what's that ultra violet lamp all about? It's in UK crime programs as well -- the blue glow lamp will find evidence of blood that's been washed and scrubbed off any surface. Does anyone know if this is for real? Hmmm, perhaps I should use google... naaah couldn't be arsed.

    4. Re:CSI: Google Geek by wfberg · · Score: 1

      Yeah what's that ultra violet lamp all about? It's in UK crime programs as well -- the blue glow lamp will find evidence of blood that's been washed and scrubbed off any surface. Does anyone know if this is for real? Hmmm, perhaps I should use google... naaah couldn't be arsed.

      Don't you watch the discovery channel? Luminol is the stuff they spray on the crime scene, then they look at it in the black light. It's not all crazy magic, this one's actually chemistry.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    5. Re:CSI: Google Geek by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Assisted by his Magic Blue Glowy Thing from ThinkGeek that exposes all evidence.

      Wait, I saw that on the show, Las Vegas, last week.

      Now, if you've never seen the show, let's just say that they rely on a lot of "magic" technology. Such as surveilance cameras that can change frequency on the fly ("hey, let me see that in infrared, now ultraviolet") or surveilance tapes that let you zoom in and pan the camera around during playback.

      Last week, they showed off a new toy. A magic "blue glowy thing", but this one had new features! Picture 6 pen-sized lasers strapped to the side of the pistol-shaped (okay, hair-dryer sized) device. You point it at a wall and not only do you get a funky blue glow, but you also have 6 red dots on the wall.

      Seriously? I only watch the show for the eye-candy.

      The female eye-candy... because the tech eye-candy is complete fantasy.

      Oh, then there was the chip that could "decrypt anything" hooked up to a USB token.

      (Crossing Jordan is another show that uses a lot of "magic" technology... usually it's Nigel playing around with sounds or images. Last week it was Nigel pulling frames off of shattered DVD disc, of which he only had 1/4 of the disc.)

      /em dons a curmudgeonly air.

      Darn tech noobs...

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  18. I'm not by The_Mystic_For_Real · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I see 2 problems with the government and law enforcement using the internet. I don't want the government using the internet for their job. They tend to over regulate and sometimes take full control of things they use, no one wants that.

    The second is that Google is a private corporation and there is no guarantee that google does not the display search results that it wants displayed instead of the real ones. Just too much power in Google's hands in my mind.

    --

    _____

    Thank you.

    1. Re:I'm not by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 1

      Google's power comes not from its search algorithms or from its ability to skew the results. It comes because people use it. People use it because it is the best of the web search engines.

      As soon as people stop using Google, Google has no power. Sort of like your avatar in Black & White. If Google is proven to skew results, people will stop using it.

    2. Re:I'm not by The_Mystic_For_Real · · Score: 1

      My concerns are not based on the idea of consistantly skewing results. It's the one time when one of the heads of Google's misstresses comes under investigation and the search results are changed for that one search to get her off.

      --

      _____

      Thank you.

    3. Re:I'm not by idiotnot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, what's the solution, then? Leaving unsolved cases unsolved, because you, personally, don't believe it's the right way to go about investigating things?

      In this case, if you'd bothered to read the article, the detective turned to google after the standard means came up empty. Note the dates -- this guy had been missing for eleven years. I've worked in law enforcement....sometimes you don't always find the information you need in police databases. They're old systems, often difficult to use (even for a geek like me). And sharing of data amongst localities isn't always the best. It took years to get the NCIC established so that officers can check for outstanding warrants nationwide. Things like missing persons data isn't as centralized.

  19. Re:Soon you will see - "CSI effect" by Tek+Tekson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I often sneer at the fantastic search capabilities (and impeccable graphics) dramatized in the CSI shows. If only the state was so organized to have so many databases immediately on hand... and if only the software was so good. Perhaps Google is in fact one step in that direction.

    Also interesting, there is a phenomenon called the "CSI effect" referring to jurors expecting capabilities similar to the tv series in real-life forensic investigations...

  20. Criminals who have the imagination to do that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... can make a lot more money doing legitimate work. Seriously.

  21. sheesh by ezzzD55J · · Score: 2, Insightful

    anything else being ID'd by any other 'technology' and it would've been 'Your rights online' ...

  22. pedant alert by cinnamon+colbert · · Score: 1

    "fairly unique " ?

    1. Re:pedant alert by gilgongo · · Score: 1

      Hey - what's an occasional tautology amongst friends? I note the poster didn't say "David Glen Lewis, 39 who became somewhat dead after being hit by a car while out of town."

      --
      "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
  23. New Market for Search Optimization Sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    New meaning to "buy search engine placement on Google" services.

    They can now sell a service to make yourself show up _low_ in pagerank and make the people you're trying to frame show up _high_ in pagerank.

    What a great way to frame someone - just buy his name on all the terrorist keywords.

  24. I call this google stalking ... by adzoox · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I do this all the time with problematic eBayers and Yahoo auction buyers and sellers that I run into.

    I once had a guy email me and accuse me of stealing his Bang & Olufsen turntable that I was selling on ebay. He said he sold one on ebay two weeks prior to my auction and that the bidder (who happened to be 100 miles from me had made a claim that it was broken. He paid out on the claim. He accused me of being in cohorts with someone to pull a fast one and get the turntable, collect on insurance, then resell it on ebay for a double profit.

    Well, I ended up googling his email address. Turns out - I got something to this affect on a "Discreet Personals Website" in Colorado:

    "Male looking for other males for discreet, private meetings - into play, but nothing too rough"

    I emailed him and told him I had found some information about him that I might post to eBayers That Suck dot com.

    He didn't bother me after that.

    I always google any problematic customer to see if they are a complainer on line or have anything "strange" about them - or are possibly on another business's hit list.

    I google potential girlfriends names and if I have them, email addresses.

    If you google my ID; adzoox, it brings up my website and home town of Greenville SC and things about me in the Upstate of South Carolina. Lots of google results are my slashdot posts from the past 3-4 months.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    1. Re:I call this google stalking ... by aLe-ph-1(sh) · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This reminds me of something someone did to me when I was looking for a new apartment to share with room mates on CL . He came up with a list of things that were basically ture about me, through a simple search, I guess. I was first suprised, & taken aback. I felt violated, in a way, but I guess this is just how things go in our informative society. But then I thought about things a while, and thought that this was actual a good way to weed out potential trouble makers, and also, to scare off others. I never did get in that room share situation, but it did make me think.

      --
      sig!wind down the juuice, let the tubes roar with the glow of alternative powers, not they that be." me, today...
    2. Re:I call this google stalking ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well, I ended up googling his email address. Turns out - I got something to this affect on a "Discreet Personals Website" in Colorado:

      "Male looking for other males for discreet, private meetings - into play, but nothing too rough"


      Just curious - would you have held it against him if his email had come up on a straight dating site? That is, would you still have blackmailed him if he had been searching for female company?

    3. Re:I call this google stalking ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I googled homophobe, and your name came up.

    4. Re:I call this google stalking ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Erhm, y'kno, unless you want other people to have more "Google stalking" material on you, you might want to have written that narrative a little better.

      Right now, it makes it sound as though you were in cahoots with that auction scammer, and that you blackmail your customers :/

      Now, I know that *probably* wasn't your intent, and I know better than to judge a story from only one side of it, but... well, I usually post as though someone were looking over my shoulder... (Hi ECHELON! How's the fnord?)

    5. Re:I call this google stalking ... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      its worth a shot. HOwever if it was a posting to a straight dating site the other guy might not have shut up so readily.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    6. Re:I call this google stalking ... by adzoox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I didn't blackmail him - he was stalking me - literally, he was emailing constantly, he even called, he also made a false report to my better business bureau. I had every right to find out information about him. His information was OUTSIDE the norm, but I would agree, as a straight man, I held bias and stereotype against him - well - it worked.

      --
      Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    7. Re:I call this google stalking ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heheh. Yeah, that's why I choose generic pseudonyms for services like that. Preferably ones which are connected to medium-to-long-term trends in computing fields.

      Just try finding anything out about me: Mr. ClassCastException.

    8. Re:I call this google stalking ... by dillon_rinker · · Score: 1

      The key is "discreet". Gay/straight has nothing to do with it. There would have been no basis for 'blackmail' had the personal ad said "Gay, Gayer, GAYEST! Flamboyant male, years/light-years out of the closet seeks same for wildly publicised relationship!". He was susceptible to 'blackmail' because he had publicised something he wanted kept private.

  25. New use by TheRaider · · Score: 2, Funny

    New way of using Google to help the cops: Click me

    1. Re:New use by BillX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Adjust the query thusly, and it will give directions and a street map to them... Clicky

      Adjust for actual location/district/beat, of course.

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
  26. Another incidence of google solving crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I saw this on a TLC documentary about a year ago. This guy Patrick Critton hijacked a Canadian plane to Cuba back in 1971 and got away. The Canadian police re-opened the case, and searched for the man in all the police databases. Nothing was found. So then they did a Google search on the guys name, and lo and behold, one link from a local newspaper in Westchester County, NY had this guys name. The police went down there and sure enough, it was the same guy, over 30 years later. He had turned his life around and become a pillar in the community, mentor to young kids, etc etc.

    Here's a link
    http://www.canoe.ca/CNEWSLaw0206/11_hijacker-cp.ht ml

    1. Re:Another incidence of google solving crime by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Well if he hasn't done anything like that again for 30 years and is now a decent chap, why go chuck him in jail for 10 years? Just for "completeness"?

      Should ask the people who were directly affected by him in the relevant crimes whether they think the world would be a better place with him in jail or not.

      --
    2. Re:Another incidence of google solving crime by balloonhead · · Score: 1

      He was involved in an armed robbery with a fatality (article doesn't mention if he committed the murder). He hijacked a plane.

      Damn right he should go to jail. If society jailed people dependent on their contribution to society, then the socially deprived would spend all their time in jail and the rich would get away with anything.

      Oh wait...

      --
      This idea was invented by Shampoo.
  27. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  28. eBay for stolen items by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    A friend of mine had his laptop stolen a few years back, and filed a police report. He setup a regional search on eBay to notify him of hits on auctions for the laptop model and make he had. Sure enough, about 6 months later, he got a hit on a laptop with the same make, model, and system specs (the picture of the item also showed a distinct scratch the laptop had).
    He contacted a detective with the sheriff's office and they contacted eBay, got the seller's contact information, and ended up recovering the laptop and arresting the guy. The sad part is, the police "never thought" of watching eBay for stolen items, especially expensive things like laptops. Now, the local sheriff's department utilizes eBay's saved searches to track stolen items being sold in the metro region on eBay, and I have heard they have successfully made arrests and/or recovered stolen items in other cases as well.

    There's always a chance a criminal will pursue eBay to auction off stolen items, especially because the winning bidder will often live far away, and the fact that it's hard to sell expensive stolen items locally without getting caught.

  29. Google and privacy by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    What if law enforcement could obtain logs of all the searches associated with your Google-set cookie for the past three years?

    It'd also be useful data for industrial espionage types...

  30. Police demographic by stimpleton · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Makes you wonder how it took law enforcement that long to think of this"

    This is of little surprise to me.
    If we look at the demographic that is the police, then the only saving grace is that they would probably contain a small percentage of "forward thinkers" - maybe 2-5% of their number, just as in most organisations.

    Police officers often do not hold any formal qualification outside of high school, or their own training instutions.

    Fundamentaly, police in the field need the ability to arrest, tackle, and subdue violent offenders. The fact is, they need special...uh...abilities, to do this. Not the ability to "think outside the square".

    Later in their career they will graduate to perhaps detective. They then utilize past experiance and gain new initiative.

    They would now have the opportunity and freedom(in work) to move beyond the text book.
    There must be so many "old schoolers" in the police, where challenging tried and true process's requires seniority, an innovative bent, and the ability to say no to the old school.

    --

    In post Patriot Act America, the library books scan you.
    1. Re:Police demographic by StateOfTheUnion · · Score: 2, Informative
      Fundamentaly, police in the field need the ability to arrest, tackle, and subdue violent offenders. The fact is, they need special...uh...abilities, to do this. Not the ability to "think outside the square".

      Huh, most cops make quick assessments of situations and make life and death decisions based on limited information in a very short time frame. To say that they don't "think outside the square" is either ignorant, insulting or both.

      I would recommend asking if your local police department permits "ride alongs." This is when you ride with a cop through his/her entire shift and see what they have to deal with on a regular day. Lots of police depts. in the USA permit this after a suitable background check.

      The post makes me think that most of your knowledge of cops comes from the Fox show "Cops." Chasing bad guys and tackling them to the ground is exciting TV, but it's only a part of the everyday job that cops normally do. A lot of the time is spent assessing situations, talking down potentially violent, disturbance situations, analyzing situations, and weighing the available evidence in he said/she said situations.

    2. Re:Police demographic by winwar · · Score: 1

      "Huh, most cops make quick assessments of situations and make life and death decisions based on limited information in a very short time frame."

      So in other words they make life and death decisions based on (potentially) crappy data? Gee, that makes me feel better :)

      "To say that they don't "think outside the square" is either ignorant, insulting or both."

      Umm, I don't think police as a whole are of significantly above average intelligence. But I could be wrong. Many (most?) are educated, but that has little to do with intelligence.

      Frankly, in my experience, they aren't very good at what they do. But that may be no different than any employee in any field-of course most people can't really screw up your life... When a friend who is a cop tells me most of them are "idiots", that doesn't tend to instill confidence... Of course, all of my observations, and yours, are only anecdotal. And may very well be wrong. And I sincerely hope I am, but I have yet to find any convincing evidence to the contrary....

  31. Very True by sideshow · · Score: 2, Informative

    A 50+ year old copkiller cold case was sovled by the LAPD last year. All the homicide detectives had to do was just check the fingerprint found at the scene against the FBI's computers and they found their man.

    Matching fingerprints isn't as easy as searching Google but it's pretty damn easy compared to olden days (the 80's) where the two prints were put side by side and someone had to visually compare them.

    After that murder case was solved the LAPD decided to assign a group people to work on these cold cases. They have tons of physical evidence that can be matched against different databases (blood, fingerprints, DNA, etc.). All they need is the manpower to go through it.

    --

    Hollow words will burn and hollow men will burn.

    1. Re:Very True by mi · · Score: 1
      All they need is the manpower to go through it.

      They need brainpower to automate doing it -- once and for all. Many organizations lack that, prefering to "work harder, not smarter" -- especially, government offices...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    2. Re:Very True by sideshow · · Score: 1

      Automate? You've been watching to many movies. Forensic science takes a whole bunch of people that start their names with the word "Doctor".

      It's not like CSI, I'm sorry.

      --

      Hollow words will burn and hollow men will burn.

    3. Re:Very True by mi · · Score: 1
      Yes, automate. The subthread was about a cop finally getting around to matching the fingerprints long available to LAPD against the FBI database.

      The FBI database contains thousands of entries and is, of course, on-line (not on the Internet, but a terminal was, evidently, available to LAPD). The LAPD's database is (or should be) online too. There can only be so many different software packages for fingerprint maintainance and it is certainly within the LAPD's and/or FBI's resources to order converting "plugin" from their vendor if neccessary.

      Once that is done, the software will be able to automatically check LAPD's entire archive for high-probability matches within hours. All new entries to the police department's database should also be checked immediately.

      Creating such system requires one person within LAPD to have a combination of real CS degree, certain non-conformity with "established procedures" and above average persuasion power... Sadly, I doubt a government agency is capable of atracting a single such person.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  32. DUH by Lord+Kano · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Process servers, employers and significant others already use Google for theses purposes... why not cops?

    Because police are stupid. We have judges and courts because all throughout history we can see that the people who enforce the laws are not able to do so without oversight.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  33. Google is a search engine people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This silly story is like saying, I drove my car around and found the suspect. Wow! My car solved the crime! Google zealots.

    1. Re:Google is a search engine people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's more like saying "a car was used to catch the suspect". The thing is that police has used cars (unlike Google) for that purpose for decades, so it's not exactly worth a headline anymore.

  34. Similar story-Pattern matching. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "No part number. Just a small piece of the center of the lens."

    Were's the "semantic web" when you need it?

  35. After all, they paid for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now if only the USPTO would google for prior art.

    1. Re:After all, they paid for it by mazarin5 · · Score: 1

      If they did, they would just get this.

      --
      Fnord.
  36. Police demographic-Pulled from interior. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Police officers often do not hold any formal qualification outside of high school, or their own training instutions. "

    Uh huh.

    "This is of little surprise to me.
    If we look at the demographic that is the [Slashdotter], then the only saving grace is that they would probably contain a small percentage of "forward thinkers" - maybe 2-5% of their number, just as in most organisations.

    [Slashdotters] often do not hold any formal qualification outside of high school, or their own training instutions. "

    I can make up stuff too. Welcome to slashdot.

  37. DUH-Moron duty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Because police are stupid. We have judges and courts because all throughout history we can see that the people who enforce the laws are not able to do so without oversight."

    That's funny. Something similiar can be said about the public.

  38. I call this google stalking ...Underpants. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I googled for "underwear gnomes". Why does your name keep showing up?

  39. Instead of Google Search... by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    ... you can of course use Googlism. :-)

    Hmm, let's see...

    Who is Jugalator?

    1. jugalator is right
    2. jugalator is starting on a dire wolverine

    Well, the first one sounds correct :-), but the second one will surely scare any employers away. :-(

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  40. Amber alerts??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You would think with the massiave popularity of google, and its ability to geotarget so well... that it would be feesiable to see amber alerts popup when people searched from the targeted areas...

    course, Amber works best by catching people driving with the kidnapped child, but still any extra coverage would be good for the victum.

  41. The question that every Slashdot user is asking... by comrade009 · · Score: 0

    When will I be able to use Google to get laid?

  42. Re:Criminals who have the imagination to do that.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not all crimes are motivated by the desire to make money.

  43. Sounds like the basis for a TV show by Sqwubbsy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Google CSI Miami.
    Google Cold Case.
    or
    NYPD Google.

    1. Re:Sounds like the basis for a TV show by ggvaidya · · Score: 2, Funny

      NYPD GOOG?

  44. Another headline from a non-thinker by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Ditter began working on unsolved cases utilizing Google as a tool in that process. Makes you wonder how it took law enforcement that long to think of this."

    Actually, law enforcement has been using internet search engines as long as they have been around. Just because an occasional case manages to get some media attention, does not mean the method is anything new at all.

    Keep in mind, also, that Google has reached near retardation levels of attention in the media. Anything anyone does which results in something positive could just turn up as a media-worthy article to mention Google.

    Look back 6 years and you'll see the same BS with Yahoo.

    I swear, if the public had any less of an attention span, people suffocate from forgetting to breath.

  45. robots.txt will soon be illegal by ftzdomino · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does this mean disallowing google from your robots.txt is obstruction of justice?

  46. Re:pedant alert - now orange color by cinnamon+colbert · · Score: 1

    not a tautology. an incorrect use of a word.

  47. Huh? Why is this "spooky?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a search engine - what did you expect?

  48. The cops on Law and Order do this, have for years by Primer · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just about every variation of the TV show Law and Order (The normal one, Special Victims Unit, and Criminal Intent) has used google in their investigative research. In fact, they've even turned it into a verb:

    "I googled for bla bla bla..."

    Seeing that TV usually mimics reality, I have a feeling that real cops have been using google longer than we think.

    Daniel

    --
    This is necessary...life, feeds on life...
  49. Re:Not a biggie by antoy · · Score: 1

    Will you people stop with the "Nothing to see here" thing? It's getting very tiring, and most of the time it doesn't mean anything.

  50. Did the cops use this to find a drug dealer? by babajuma · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have been wondering about this. Earlier this year i was looking at the stats for my personal web page i set up on geocities.

    For some reason i was getting all these hits from google with people typing in "tommy savage" who ran a guest house i stayed at in Amsterdam. Turns out he the law thinks he is some huge drug dealer. Shipping huge amounts of grass into Greece.

    The big question is did all the cops have to do is type his name into google and up pops my website with directions on how to find him?
    I hope not because incoent or guilty he looked after me when i stayed there.

    Here is the website incase any of you are curious.
    http://www.geocities.com/babajuma
    or if you just want the bit about tommy
    http://www.geocities.com/babajuma/tommy.html

  51. dating the archive by ChipMonk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They already do. Take a look at the Google-cached copy of a page, and you'll see something like "This is Google's cache of ((BLAH)) as retrieved on Sep 21, 2004 05:14:22 GMT" at the top of the page.

  52. Image Quality by Detritus · · Score: 1

    One problem may be the quality of the images in the driver's license database. The last time I renewed my license, they gave me one of the new computer generated licenses. The quality of the picture was horrible. It's a blurry postage stamp sized picture that vaguely looks like me.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  53. Re:Soon you will see by evilviper · · Score: 1

    No, Google isn't fake. To be in CSI, everything must be as far from reality as possible, and work perfectly despite being used by idiots spewing nonsense.

    I really hate that show.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  54. you fail it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    14m3.

  55. in the box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get out.

    This article could have been "Detective Tracks Dead Through Web" or even "A9 Sees Dead People."

    Remember, it doesn't have to be found via Google to be on the Web. Remember?

    Geez.

  56. Dumbass, not-news article by jusdisgi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Makes you wonder how it took law enforcement that long to think of this.

    No, not really. I'm pretty sure the cops figured out google a while ago, all around the world. It's just that its successful use is not fucking news!

    What it really makes me wonder is what on earth these guys at CNN were on when they decided to run this.

    --
    Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
    1. Re:Dumbass, not-news article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's the start of a trend: law enforcement is dying...

  57. Re:pedant alert - now orange color by gilgongo · · Score: 1

    Hooray! At least *somebody* got my joke!

    --
    "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
  58. Because they're not very smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I had a kid run over my dog a few years ago (like 3) and I got his license plate. The trooper I talked to could find his name and address but it was pretty far away (in the same state) and he couldn't get a phone number for him. It took me one lookup on anywho. When the cop called back I gave him the number and he was astounded that I could get it.

    1. Re:Because they're not very smart by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      When the cop called back I gave him the number and he was astounded that I could get it.

      Similar story for me. Five or six years ago, we were working on adopting our son, and we needed to apply some pressure to the birth father -- he wasn't the type to take responsibility, even when all it would take was signing a paper saying "ok, he's yours". I was able to use various Internet resources to look up the name, address, and telephone number of his employer, and gave that information to the state social worker involved in the case.

      The guy wasn't happy when he got a call at work. But the social worker told him that he'd keep getting called -- at work and elsewhere -- unless he took care of business. Not surprisingly, he did.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  59. Re:Theses puposes? by melios · · Score: 0

    At least it wasn't on porpoise.

  60. shortage of police manpower by alex_tibbles · · Score: 1

    I read an interesting article a while back (linked off /.) about a mac user who tracked down an ebay scammer who ripped him off over an {i,Power}Book. The shipping address was in a city, and the city cop who he contacted was too busy to work on the case (simple mail fraud was not important enough). However, the next time the guy pulled the scam, the shipping address was out in the 'burbs and the local cop was bored (having no work) so jumped at the chance to nail a crim, put a lot of hours in, and got the guy.
    So wealthy suburbs don't necessarily have a shortage of police manpower....