Slashdot Mirror


The Joypad That Became A Rotary Controller

jaromil writes "Speaking of human/computer interface, so simple, so neat, a usb knob to switch among desktops can give us quite some feeling about operating a machine... how about such controls around the monitor?" The knob in this case is switching between different effects possible with EffecTV. This make me wonder what creative uses people are putting Griffin's PowerMate to.

157 comments

  1. Wait a minute by ravenspear · · Score: 5, Funny

    knob...can give us quite some feeling...

    I think I already have one of those.

    1. Re:Wait a minute by uberchicken · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah. I'm suspicious. The caption for LifeTV reads "My seeds flow on the net". Uh huh.

  2. Very bad idea by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "how about such controls around the monitor?"

    As any mouse user can tell you, taking your hands off your keyboard is damaging to your productivity.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
    1. Re:Very bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Parent has never edited audio or video. Taking your hands off the keyboard is only bad for clerical work. Broaden your horizons d00d.

    2. Re:Very bad idea by flakac · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As any mouse user can tell you, taking your hands off your keyboard is damaging to your productivity.

      My wife is a mouse user, and quite frankly, I don't think I'll ever convice her that the mouse is a productivity killer. While I mysef, having grown up with command line interfaces (MS-DOS 3.1 anyone?) on the PC, I really doubt that Joe User has any sort of shell installed (Cygwin or MinGW MSYS) at all. I may prefer to use command-line tools, but that doesn't mean that all people do. So to answer your point, most mouse users, just like my wife, need the mouse to function. Just because you or I may be able to work more efficiently without one doesn't mean that the vast majority of people could function without one.

    3. Re:Very bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Parent has never edited audio or video. Taking your hands off the keyboard is only bad for clerical work. Broaden your horizons d00d.

      If you are clerical than taking your hands off the keyboard may be even a sin.

    4. Re:Very bad idea by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "As any mouse user can tell you, taking your hands off your keyboard is damaging to your productivity."

      Doesn't using Lynx all the time get old after a while, though?

    5. Re:Very bad idea by node+3 · · Score: 1

      As any mouse user can tell you, taking your hands off your keyboard is damaging to your productivity.

      Yet people still use a mouse. Why? The "damage" to their productivity in removing their hands from the keyboard is offset by the boost to productivity gained by using a mouse.

      So no, this isn't a "Very bad idea" in the slightest. What's a bad idea is not trying new things.

    6. Re:Very bad idea by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      While I mysef, having grown up with command line interfaces (MS-DOS 3.1 anyone?)
      No version of doMeS-DOS has a command line interface. It has a GUI that you type.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    7. Re:Very bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10 points question: what's a GUI?

      Bonus question for 2 points: what is a text mode display?

    8. Re:Very bad idea by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 3, Funny

      It doesn't take very much to draw the conclusion that using the web and being productive are not capable of intersection.

    9. Re:Very bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet people still use a mouse. Why? The "damage" to their productivity in removing their hands from the keyboard is offset by the boost to productivity gained by using a mouse.

      Or they're using poorly defined software which is downright hostile about letting you use only the keyboard to move around the interface.

      (Keyboards with supplemental mouse pointers like the IBM nubby are a wonderful way to avoid taking your hands off of the keyboard in those situations.)

    10. Re:Very bad idea by toddestan · · Score: 2, Funny

      A lot depends on what you're doing. I don't suppose you control your web browser with just a keyboard?

    11. Re:Very bad idea by wcbarksdale · · Score: 1

      I don't know. Even as an emacs user, I have to admit there are some tasks that are made faster by using a mouse. For example, suppose you have 30 files in a single directory, and you want to categorize them by creating subdirectories.

    12. Re:Very bad idea by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Or they're using poorly defined software which is downright hostile about letting you use only the keyboard to move around the interface.

      Like Photoshop?

    13. Re:Very bad idea by Performaman · · Score: 0

      Yes. And those tasks can be made even faster by not using EMACS.

      --

      I have gas, but my car uses petrol.
    14. Re:Very bad idea by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, I don't use Firefox myself and my browser doesn't have Find As You Type

      Well, I do use Firefox, and find as you type doesn't seem to work (assuming you don't have to switch it on); there's always ctrl-f though. Besides, you *can* navigate between links in a page without find as you type - tab/shift-tab navigates between objects in a page. Considerate website designers/builders can even set the tabindex of the various objects, to give priority to more important objects (eg a search input field, or the main navigational links, etc) Sadly, far too few people actually do so...

    15. Re:Very bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's be funny if it was remotely comparable to the real world. But pretty much every browser ever made allows the user to surf using just a keyboard.

    16. Re:Very bad idea by loucura! · · Score: 1

      Ctrl+L, then type about:config, then enable the typeaheadfind options you use, I don't like links only.

      --
      Black and grey are both shades of white.
    17. Re:Very bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not a pan-t-hose apologist. I can't stand his posts. That said, what the hell are you going to do to people who get on your nerves? Kill them? Sterlize them? Cut off their testicles?

  3. Wow. big news. by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wow! Knobs are useful? I never would have thought..(/sarcasm)

    I only have 16 knobs attached to my PC via USB/Midi.

    1. Re:Wow. big news. by metlin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not just that, there has been something similar by Apple - don't remember what it's called.

      And musicians have been using such stuff since time immemorial.

      A sonification lab I used to work at has been using such an off-the shelf knob made by Apple for quite sometime.

    2. Re:Wow. big news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just that, there has been something similar by Apple - don't remember what it's called.

      It was called: a mouse.

    3. Re:Wow. big news. by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

      Yeah. MIDI controllers with many knobs is wonderful in music software. I used to have one of the MiniKORG controllers like the author has in the background of his project images.

      What I'd like to do is figure out how to get one of these puppies set up to control various aspects things in Xwindows. Alternate mouse buttons, alt, ctrl keys, launch apps or scripts.. mmmmm.

    4. Re:Wow. big news. by metlin · · Score: 1

      Oh hell yeah.

      The former lead guitarist in my band had something similar, but a lot more sophisticated, by Nakamichi. Those things rock, but are expensive as hell.

      I wouldn't want to use them on X though, there are far geeky music-related things that one can do with them =)

  4. iPod... by eobanb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you think about it: weirdly, the iPod is a rotary controller that became a joypad. The first iPods had the mechanical scroll wheel and then they moved to the touch wheel....but the latest generation also rocks left, right, up and down. I personally love these kind of interfaces. Scroll wheels on mice are similar, as are just plain old dials, but they requre you to lift up your finger/hand repeatedly to scroll far enough in either direction. The iPod doesn't. What if that kind of interface was more widespread?

    --

    Take off every sig. For great justice.

    1. Re:iPod... by SlashHoe · · Score: 1

      Apple would probably sue you for patent infringement. They have the click wheel patented.

    2. Re:iPod... by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      Knobs *are* a simpler human interface, but they cost more in every respect. They are mechanically more complicated, they take up more space (usually) and they are more complicated to use in a design (more pins and they go deeper behind the control panel). However, maybe it is time to use more knobs that are really digital and only seem analog (kinda like on a ham handi-talkie. To the user, even a knob with discrete positions seems analog in that each position can be thought of as corresponding to options that are in arranged in space even if that space is not physical, but spectrum or even purely imaginary.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    3. Re:iPod... by pocopoco · · Score: 1

      >Scroll wheels on mice are similar, as are just
      >plain old dials, but they requre you to lift
      >up your finger/hand repeatedly to scroll far
      >enough in either direction.

      IBM actually makes a line of mice that have their TrackPoint microjoystick instead of the scroll wheel. In addition to being able to scroll as much as you like without petting the thing like you have to a scroll wheel, it's also pressure sensitive so you can scroll a lot/fast or a little/slow as you like by just pressing differently.

  5. Who cares by zerdood · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    /me fails to understand what the great benefit of knobs is. there is always an almost-as-easy (and perhaps easier) way to do things, so why waste your money?

    --
    My sig would have been a lot cooler if /. didn't filter out HTML tags 0.o
    1. Re:Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      /me fails to understand what the great benefit of knobs is.

      The great benefit is that knobs are *cool*. They make things look needlessly complicated, and therefore awesome. I want knobs and blinking lights and switches and big levers and pipes and wires everywhere in my computer room! A glowing panel full of unlabeled buttons! And one of those freaky monitors from the movie Brazil! And a cooling system half the size of my room, full of some weird green liquid like in Serial Experiments Lain! It would be the *best* computer room *ever*!

    2. Re:Who cares by jdray · · Score: 1

      So I can play Tempest, maybe?

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    3. Re:Who cares by diersing · · Score: 1

      I have a non-functioning television circa 1978 I'd like to sell you. With your fetish for knobs and things that blink, I'm sure you'll have it back in shape in no time. I'll sell it for $1 but shipping is almost a grand. Yeay knobs!!

    4. Re:Who cares by base3 · · Score: 1

      The Powermate is not all that good for Tempest, because it doesn't spin freely (think dodging a flipper that's almost on top of you). A better choice for a spinner is the Logitech Wingman Warrior joystick, which includes a spinner that does freewheel. Unfortunately, the last Windows version supported is Windows 98, and it's a PC 15-pin gameport device so won't work on a Mac.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
  6. Move the rabbit ears a little to the left... by Matey-O · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think Solitare is on channel 4...

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  7. De-Evolution? by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We went from knobs that were attatched to our televisions to buttons that evolved by having remotes and such.

    So today I look at this and I see, the knob but for computers of today and I ask myself, is this proof that old but simple technology is still useful today even though we evolved and changed the standard from knobs to buttons/touchpads/screens

    1. Re:De-Evolution? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the switch from knobs to buttons in itself a de-evolution in user interfaces in a few respects.

      I think knobs are great. They give a more linear feel to a control rather than just holding down a button. With a button, you are held captive by how fast the maker wants to allow the setting change. With a knob, a quick twist, or turning as quickly or slowly depending on fine/coarse tuning, is all that is needed.

      Both knobs and buttons have their places though. I suspect buttons are used because they are cheaper, and bean counters love cheap.

    2. Re:De-Evolution? by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      And because I have well over 1000 channels, and would not want a nob that percise. Digitally doing channel management like this allows them to insert or remove channels as arbitrarily as they want rather than having to map to a predefined amount of notches in a dial.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    3. Re:De-Evolution? by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

      Of course you could always have something along the lines of a jog dial or mouse wheel, where the interface is rotary, but not arbitrarily limited in range.

      Ford uses these for volume controls on their radios, and it's the same technology that is used for the scroll wheel and ball rollers in mice.

      You could even have an exponential acceleration, so a slight twist would change by one channel, but a fast twist would change by 50 or something like that...

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    4. Re:De-Evolution? by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      It would be nice if you could program a subset of those 1000 channels onto discrete knob positions. Instead of having a row of 10 radio buttons programmed to your 10 favorite channels, you'd have a knob with 10 programmable positions. It would be analog to the person, but digital to the machine. This is already done, but not in consumer electronics. It's been eons since knobs on radios were really analog, but somehow, probably because of cost and size, knobs aren't popping up on televisions and computers. Every penny spent on a consumer device costs thousands of dollars to the manufacturer. As long as the consumer doesn't mind pushing buttons instead of twisting knobs, why should the manufacturer go to the added expense. The only spec most consumers pay attention to is the one behind the $. Besides, convenience is the only quality not normallly mentioned on a spec sheet, maybe someone should quantify it.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    5. Re:De-Evolution? by juancn · · Score: 1

      It's not just that, the thing about knobs and any rotational interface is that the human hand is much better at performing rotational movements than discrete linear ones.

      Think about doorknobs, the steering-wheel (although not a hand movement, but the principle applies also).

      Another example is the trayectory a mouse cursor follows on the screen, you'll see that the trayectory is always a curve, and linear trayectories are very hard to mantain.

  8. Bad idea. by Power+Everywhere · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Having another button or a knob on the kayboard might be a good idea, but we're years off since no mainstream operating system supports multiple desktops at this time. Apple's close with Expose, but it's still a far cry from the real thing.

    1. Re:Bad idea. by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mac OS can do the real thing too -- and with more eye candy than Windows or Linux!

      So yeah, actually ALL major operating systems can do virtual desktops, just not by default (and Linux doesn't do it by default either, since it defaults to TWM!)

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Bad idea. by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      No. By 'default', Linux boots a console. And again, by 'default', it allocates 8 virtual terminals you can switch to with alt+numberkeys.

      Once you install X, you're not using the default, unless you meant a distro's default, in which case none of them default to twm.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    3. Re:Bad idea. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was trying not to be that pedantic.

      I suppose I should have said X instead of Linux though...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:Bad idea. by Edie+O'Teditor · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I was trying not to be that pedantic.
      Close, but in Soviet Russia, no cigar fails YOU!
      --
      If X is the new Y, and Y is "X is the new Y", solve for X.
  9. damn... by ilikeitraw · · Score: 0

    ... knob homie is one of those smart engineering folk.
    he should extend this so it works with other appliances, like:
    http://www.tv-b-gone.com/

    i want to turn off people, animals, blenders, radios, airplanes, trains... oh, the list goes on.

    1. Re:damn... by Shark · · Score: 1

      Any respectable action hero could tell you: All you need is a big enough gun.

      --
      Mind the frickin' laser...
  10. ummmm by way2trivial · · Score: 2, Informative

    Virtual Desktop Manager from microsoft

    Manage up to four desktops from the Windows taskbar with this PowerToy.

    http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/downloads/pow ertoys/xppowertoys.mspx

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:ummmm by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Manage up to four desktops from the Windows taskbar with this PowerToy.

      It works ok, I guess. But it leaves all your applications in the same taskbar, instead of having an independant taskbar for each desktop. And if you click the taskbar button for an app on another desktop it brings the app to you, instead of switching you to that desktop. It also lacks options for spanning one window across desktops. Scroll wheel on the desktop doesn't switch between them. There's no graphical pager. Definately an improvement over single desktop mode, but they still have a ways to go before they have a usable window manager.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:ummmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Definately an improvement over [noun1] , but they still have a ways to go before they have a usable [noun2].

      This one sentence could be said for pretty much anything produced by Microsoft.

    3. Re:ummmm by EvanED · · Score: 1

      You can set it so that you have separate taskbars. Not sure where; I don't see it during a quick survey of the options, but it definitely does it on my computer.

    4. Re:ummmm by dwlovell · · Score: 1

      You can have the seperate desktops/taskbars behavior you want simply by right-clicking anywhere on the MSDVM quick-launch part of the taskbar and then un-check the "Shared Desktops" option. Works great for me.

      -David

  11. More wires? by Chocolate+Teapot · · Score: 1
    I suppose now that both my keyboard and mouse are wireless this would not be a major problem, but still, it still seems like adding a bit more clutter to my already anarchic desk.

    Also, is it possible to actually use this thing without steadying it with your other hand? I really would not want to stick it to the desk. Wouldn't the whole thing turn when you tried to twiddle the dial?

    --
    Modest doubt is called the beacon of the wise. - William Shakespeare
  12. Second scroll wheel? by Alystair · · Score: 1

    How about we simply add another scroll wheel to the mouse? Does anyone know of any experiments/products like this? Added productivity without needing another couple limbs (although I could sure as hell use another pair)

    1. Re:Second scroll wheel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yes, I'm using a cheap A4 Tech Mouse wtih two scroll wheels (one clickable). It was a shame the drivers for the side buttons are so crap, so I've reverted to using Microsoft drivers as I find the side buttons more useful than a second scroll wheel. The second scroll wheel does have the advantage of scrolling faster, or with the drivers it defaulty scrolls horizontally. I only got the mouse because it was cheap, IMHO a second scroll wheel isn't that useful.

    2. Re:Second scroll wheel? by ComputerSherpa · · Score: 1
      ...without needing another couple limbs (although I could sure as hell use another pair)

      That can be arranged. Just get yourself a set of these.

      --
      Information wants to be anthropomorphized!
    3. Re:Second scroll wheel? by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      The extra pair of limbs I want generally are attached to some other features that I happen to like. Since I prefer them attached where they are, I think I will just keep the collection together and have a much better time.

      --
      You never know...
    4. Re:Second scroll wheel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are scroll wheels on the Logitech cordless keyboards for example..

    5. Re:Second scroll wheel? by Alystair · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is that Doc Oc is my current background, I am a graphic designer so of course the first thing I did was remove all the copyright text from the image etc. You can pick up the bad ass background here in PNG goodness: http://www.wecutclutter.com/priv/sd/doc-oc.png

    6. Re:Second scroll wheel? by scaryfish · · Score: 1
    7. Re:Second scroll wheel? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      That's very cool. Thanks!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  13. Good idea? by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    Having another button or a knob on the kayboard might be a good idea, but we're years off since no mainstream operating system supports multiple desktops at this time.

    Call me old-fashioned but I find pressing Alt-number or Alt-arrow more than adequate.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
    1. Re:Good idea? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Call me old-fashioned but I find pressing Alt-number or Alt-arrow more than adequate.

      Unless you happen to have a kajillion keyboard shortcuts, like I do in Gimp. Please stop thinking Windows + Word + Excell, or pretend you're so cool because "what's wrong with the old studd?", and realize many people actually use off-keyboard controls quite productively.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/studd/stuff, too. nobody cares about old studs :)

    3. Re:Good idea? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Get a Mac -- it's got an extra modifier key (the Command or "Apple" key). So instead of a kajillion keyboard shortcuts, you can have 2 kajillion! Map your desktop switching to "shift-ctrl-alt-cmd-[arrow keys]." : D

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  14. Some notes on USB interfacing... by enginuitor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The fact that the author used a USB game pad as the electronic base of his device brings up an issue which increasingly plagues electronics hobbyists... Manufacturers are beginning to see many useful protocols (such as RS232) as obsolete and completely remove support for them from their products. While the average American consumer, who uses arbitrary metrics and units-of-measurement-become-buzzwords (megapixels... gigahertz... etc.) to judge the worth of a device, would not care much about seeing those ugly trapezoidal plugs disappear from the back of their computers, it presents a huge problem for us hobbyists who rely on good-old '232 and similar "old" interfaces for easy communication with a computer. Anyone who's ever written (or tried to write) USB interface code knows that's Hell to work with. Fortunately, though, there are solutions... including handy interface chips which handle all the nasty USB work and provide a simple asynchronous serial interface on the project end. However, I still will never buy a motherboard without RS232!

    1. Re:Some notes on USB interfacing... by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've written USB firmware from scratch for the 68HC908JB8 microcontroller...yes, it is tough. But once you get everything working, you don't have to do much to change from one type of device to another. The problem is that there isn't a huge amount of free USB firmware out there for all the various USB microcontrollers. That's because most people, like me, finally got around to writing firmware when it became their job to do so.

      However, USB is powerful and should be adopted by hobbyists. If you really need a serial port, there are many premade serial-to-USB converters and chips.

    2. Re:Some notes on USB interfacing... by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      But are you really one of those guys who wants 2Billion people to loose 2 irqs just becuase 100.000 dont have to spend 5$ for a interface card?
      If you want Rs232, you can get it without problems. Hell, you can get ever 32 port pci cards.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    3. Re:Some notes on USB interfacing... by khrtt · · Score: 3, Informative

      Anyone who's ever written (or tried to write) USB interface code knows that's Hell to work with.

      From personal experience, serial interface code is even usually more of a hell to work with than USB. The personal experience I'm talking about includes about 20 of each of USB and serial interfaced devices, both firmware and drivers.

      You see, USB has some structure to it, control and data channels (called "pipes"). Control channels define a standard format for messages. Both control and data channels support error control by retransmission, and some other nifty features. You don't have to re-invent anything, the whole protocol has been designed for you, OSI layers 1 through 6 for custom devices. Standard device classes that have a device class defined for them effectively have application layer defined too. You can use your valuable design time to concentrate on functionality. Implementation is non-trivial, but you can easily lift most of it from some sample code that the USB chip vendor gives you with their SDK.

      With serial ports, on the other hand, you have to design and write the whole darn thing, layers 2 through 7, every time over again. The first time you do it, it's fun, almost like a class project from school. Then it grows old quickly. For a data channel, you basically need a simplified version of TCP/IP. For control you need guaranteed delivery of command packets. Not rocket science, but consider that USB does it all for you right off the bat.

      Besides, you rs232 geeks should know that you can by a USB-to-serial adapter chip for, like, 50 cents. Stick it on your board, hook up to USB, and voila - you got yourslf a serial interface on both the host OS and the firmware ends, only much faster. Highly recommend:-). Can't give you a reference off the bat, but I think TI makes one of these.

  15. PowerMate any good? by Hank+Chinaski · · Score: 1

    I'd like to have a good direct volume control on my PC. The PowerMate is rather pricy at 40 dollars. Is it any good? Would i be receiving value for my money? Is it really solid?

    --
    IAAL
    1. Re:PowerMate any good? by spinlocked · · Score: 4, Funny

      The PowerMate is rather pricy at 40 dollars. Is it any good?

      It's OK. Nicely machined, sexy looking, works under Linux but certainly not worth $40. I've bought more useful gadgets for a lot less.

      It's one of those things you initially think will be great, but one day, in an idle moment you look at it and think: I haven't touched that device in 6 months. And then you think about selling it on eBay, but never quite get round to it.

      --
      # init 5
      Connection closed.


      Oh... ...bugger.
    2. Re:PowerMate any good? by spinlocked · · Score: 1

      Oh, and the USB cable is stupidly short - only about 18".

      --
      # init 5
      Connection closed.


      Oh... ...bugger.
    3. Re:PowerMate any good? by Blackeagle_Falcon · · Score: 1

      The PoewrMate's a mac-oriented peripherial. You're expected to plug that 18" USB cable into your keyboard.

    4. Re:PowerMate any good? by spinlocked · · Score: 1

      I know. The original parent asked about a volume control for his PeeCee.

      --
      # init 5
      Connection closed.


      Oh... ...bugger.
    5. Re:PowerMate any good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to knock the cute PowerMate, but only 20 bucks will get you a nice old stereo receiver at a thrift store. Use it as an amp between your soundcard and speakers. Place it under your monitor.

      Now you've got a physical knob, a headphone jack, and radio plus whatever else your receiver came with. Not to mention good retro points, and if you chose carefully, better resale value on ebay later.

    6. Re:PowerMate any good? by ATMosby · · Score: 1

      Don't settle for the plain silver one that seems to be everywhere. Order the special black one from their web site. So very cool. I use mine on my tablet pc to move forward and back in pdf books.

    7. Re:PowerMate any good? by arjovenzia · · Score: 1
      If I were you I would go 'Ye Olde' analogue and put a stereo potentiometer (variable resistor) on the line out jack. Thats what I've got. There are hundreds of types of knobs you can choose from, and it'll only cost you a couple of bucks for the pot, cable and plugs.

      Of course, a key component is putting it together, but if you have any skill with a soldering iron, it should pose no problems.

  16. Re:Ignore the troll. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ignor? Sounds Russian.

  17. 16 knobs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny


    I only have 16 knobs attached to my PC via USB/Midi.

    16 knobs and what do you get? Another day older and deeper in debt... st. peter don't you call me cause I can't go, I owe my soul to the company store.

    1. Re:16 knobs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent funny. Don't you listen to Bo Diddly (or if you don't, don't you listen to This Bike Is A Pipe Bomb? (Surely those cover every possible musical taste.))

  18. Griffin Powermate... by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

    Check out the Griffin Powermate ("the coolest volume knob your computer has ever seen")

    I have one, and I must concur - it is pretty damn cool.

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    1. Re:Griffin Powermate... by tepeka · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree - it's amazing. I bought one for my 76-year-old father, who uses a CRT iMac and has bad enough vision that he can't get a driving licence anymore. It's set up to trigger the Mac's Zoom feature. Twist it to the right, and the screen zooms in on the cursor position, twist it to the left and it zooms back out. Click it once and it magnifies the cursor position four times, click it again and it returns to 1X. It's a great bit of kit. He looked at me like I was mad when I showed it to him first, but now he raves about it. Of course, it helps that OS X has a great accessibility feature to use it with...

    2. Re:Griffin Powermate... by torpor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have two, one on each side of my USB keyboard, and I have to say that once you've used a 2-Powermate setup for audio/video/midi editing, you'll wonder how you'll ever go back to that primitive mouse interface.

      In fact, I rarely use my mouse any more, actually, except when I really need to. Everything I need to do is way more fun from either side of my 'pinball rotary' setup. No more right-hand-only RSI .. well, at least not as a result of any mouse activity, anyway ..

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  19. Creative use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at Girder!!!

    http://www.promixis.com/products.php

  20. GoScreen! by antdude · · Score: 1

    OK, it is not free but it is the best one and so small in terms of resources and memory. Home Page.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  21. Re:Wow. big news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the musicians are having the most fun kludging stuff together to make some phat sounds out of the common peripherals they already own. I have been hooking up a Sidewinder Force Feedback steering wheel to the x-y controller in FL Studio scratching it like it was a vinyl turntable. and also use the gas/brake pedals for stomp-box effects and a wah controller for the guitar...Easy shit. Also, try using a Wacom tablet as a tool similar to what a KORG KAOSS Pad can do. I am amazed that it's taken the rest of the geek community is just starting to catch on. Oh well, kudos for those who make the most of it.

    Move along, nothing to see here.

  22. Oblig. reference by jgalun · · Score: 3, Funny

    My monitor goes all the way to 11!

    Er, 12 actually.

  23. pantyhose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    How about pan-t-hose. Does that sound like a troll's username?

    1. Re:pantyhose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it sounds like someone is culturally ignorant of eastern Eurpoean names.

    2. Re:pantyhose by Edie+O'Teditor · · Score: 1
      No, it sounds like someone is culturally ignorant of eastern Eurpoean names
      Opposite water, it sounds like a nylon fetishist. Especially one who has never actually got the suggested garment off a willing female - at least without offering payment. Not that it's a bad thing, but I think "gusset sniffer" might have been a more honest choice.
      --
      If X is the new Y, and Y is "X is the new Y", solve for X.
  24. Oh right on! by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    Very cool hack. I wonder if Griffin would consider starting building keyboards with integrated knobs, alongside or in place of numeric keypads?

    I also wonder if there's any interest in mapping, say, a row of toggles to stuff like this. Literally switch from desktop 01 to 11. This kind of goes to the whole 'antiquing' fad that has folks building mini-itx gramophone players/iceboxes/televisions, fitting bakelite handsets to cellphones, etc..

    Another interesting hack would be to have two knobs and run the pointer like an etch-a-sketch. It'd be ten out of ten for style but minus several million for good thinking..

    1. Re:Oh right on! by man_ls · · Score: 1

      I know in Windows, you can assign the mouse cursor to numpad arrow keys.

      Enable that, and bind the knobs to NUMPADUP and NUMPADDOWN, NUMPADLEFT, NUMPADRIGHT respectively, and you're set.

    2. Re:Oh right on! by MoonBuggy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I wonder if Griffin would consider starting building keyboards with integrated knobs, alongside or in place of numeric keypads?

      Y'know what'd be better - Apple putting the (presumably patented, since we haven't seen it on anyone else's hardware) iPod scroll wheel into a keyboard or even on a standalone USB panel. As several have said, it's more usable than anything else because you can scroll long lists without repeatedly removing your finger. Physically grasping and moving a Griffin Powermate involves reconfiguring the way you're moving your hands and they can't be continuously spun as easily as the iPod wheel.

      The Apple mouse continues to live without a scroll wheel though, which is, IMO, a much needed addition (FYI, I was under the opinion that moving from the 5 buttons of my Razer Boomslang to the 1 button Apple mouse would never work, and I've got them both hooked in now - I never use the Razer and the only bit I miss is the scrollwheel. All the other functions can be achieved more quickly with one hand hitting hotkeys on the keyboard as I click). I really miss a useful scrolling tool on my mac, and a nice little touchwheel on the edge of the keyboard would be quick, simple and fluid to use while I'm typing.

    3. Re:Oh right on! by igrp · · Score: 3, Informative
      Y'know what'd be better - Apple putting the (presumably patented, since we haven't seen it on anyone else's hardware) iPod scroll wheel into a keyboard or even on a standalone USB panel.

      That's an interesting idea. According to this article, Apple did not invent the iPod scroll wheel though. Apparently it was designed by Synaptics.

      Apple does, however, have a patent that covers mice with a rotary dial.

    4. Re:Oh right on! by migurski · · Score: 1
      Y'know what'd be better - Apple putting the (presumably patented, since we haven't seen it on anyone else's hardware) iPod scroll wheel into a keyboard or even on a standalone USB panel. As several have said, it's more usable than anything else because you can scroll long lists without repeatedly removing your finger. Physically grasping and moving a Griffin Powermate involves reconfiguring the way you're moving your hands and they can't be continuously spun as easily as the iPod wheel.

      For wacom-type tablets or powerbooks/iBooks with a touchpad, this could be implemented in software.

  25. technology comes full circle by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We went from knobs that were attatched to our televisions to buttons that evolved by having remotes and such.

    Part of the reason that buttons on TVs became attractive is because it reduced the overall foot print of the TV. I have one 19 inch TV circa mid 80s that measures 25inches across, and one 27 inch tv that measures 24 inches cross, the key diffrence is the 19 inch has the old style turnknob and the 27 inch has but a handfull of buttons. More picture but smaller footprint, it's a good tradeoff, so long as you don't loose the remote control.

    But who in this day and age would want to flip through the 100+ channels available on cable TV? Those who remember tuning in UHF might remember this noice *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK* *CLICK*! This would be far too impractical, but at the same time round volume controls are back in fashion. Unlike buttons they allow us to choose how fast we turn the knob, and we can remember there and abouts how far to turn to get at the right loudness level. I don't consider this to be de-evolution at all because the controls are often digital rather than an old style pot the likes of which gets cloged up with dust and dirt and becomes scratchy over time, but rather an evolution of what works and bringing to forth to the next level. Besides it's a hell of alot easier to spot the volume control if it's a knob rather than buttons.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    1. Re:technology comes full circle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're forgetting a few things.

      1) Early UHF/VHF tuning knobs were basically analog. The VHS knob had 13 positions and was physically wired to separate crystals or tuning circuitry. UHF knobs were initially just a variable resistor (IIRC) without "clicks".

      2) Later versions of TVs had better tuning circuits, possibly even "digital", so the UHF knob went "clicky". Not sure if the UHF knob just signaled position back to the tuning circuit ("hey, I'm now on position 59, tune UHF59!") or if it was still wired up to the tunint circuitry.

      3) Eventually, digital tuning got good enough that all you needed was a channel up/down control because things had gotten simple enough.

      Those old-style VHF/UHF tuning knobs were *expensive* because of the number of physical contacts within the switch. Buttons are a heck of a lot cheaper and TV manufacturers switched to the cheaper solution as soon as the tuning circuitry allowed them to. (Not because round knobs were "in fashion".)

    2. Re:technology comes full circle by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Those old-style VHF/UHF tuning knobs were *expensive* because of the number of physical contacts within the switch. Buttons are a heck of a lot cheaper and TV manufacturers switched to the cheaper solution as soon as the tuning circuitry allowed them to. (Not because round knobs were "in fashion".)

      Would this be more or less expensive than a sliding switch. I remember early in the days of cable the converter boxes employed the use of 30+ segmented switch, where each contact was wired up to a small pot on the inside of the box. You could adjust each pot to any channel whether it be in the VHF range or CATV range.

      There was a barrier to just using a pot for the TV turner for channels 2-13, at least in America. There is a large gap between channels 6 & 7. Freq list at end of post.

      Why go with a segmented switch when just a pot would do? Well there would be a blank spot of 92mhz when all you need is a range of 78mhz. Assuming an average of 6.5mhz (Should be 6mhz, but the numbers don't have a consistent gap) it would create a dial that is 1/2 useless. This would look sloppy.

      Why not go with a TV with dials, one dial 2-6, another for 7-13, and the last one for UHF 14-83 (before it was realocated). That's a good question. I know this is how analog radios that tune in TV work.

      To me it seems going with a single segmented dial was a fashion choice rather than a cost choice.

      2 55.25
      +6mhz
      3 61.25
      +6mhz
      4 67.25
      +10mhz
      5 77.25
      +6
      6 83.25
      +92
      7 175.25
      +6
      8 181.25
      +6
      9 187.25
      +6
      10 193.25
      +6
      11 199.25
      +6
      12 205.25
      +6
      13 211.25

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  26. Whores!! by vegasbright · · Score: 0

    Wow, I wonder how much Taco gets for sales of this device.

    --

    Tyler: You don't know where ive been, Lou. YOU DONT KNOW WHERE IVE BEEN!!
  27. ActiveWireInc.com by MacFury · · Score: 2, Informative
    ActiveWireInc.com

    Makes a USB controller card for a very reasonable price. They even make add on boards to easily control motors and such. You should check them out. I talked to the owner of the company and he was very helpful in answering questions about the board, and helping me plan the design of my computer controlled camera mount.

  28. Re:Oblig. reference (OT) by dissy · · Score: 1

    But it goes to 11! 11 is better!

  29. Not such a bad idea by uberdave · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If your productivity is text oriented, then yes, taking your hands off of the keyboard is damaging to productivity. If it is graphic oriented, then a mouse, or graphic tablet is better. What if your productivity is music oriented? You're better off with a piano keyboard than a typewriter keyboard. In short, matching the interface to the task will always give you better productivity.

    Having said all that, a horizontal thumbwheel mounted on the edge of the keyboard, underneath the spacebar allowing me to scroll sideways from desktop to desktop would be cool.

    1. Re:Not such a bad idea by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      In short, matching the interface to the task will always give you better productivity.
      Bah! Why bother - just make it skinnable.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Not such a bad idea by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      If your productivity is text oriented, then yes, taking your hands off of the keyboard is damaging to productivity. If it is graphic oriented, then a mouse, or graphic tablet is better. What if your productivity is music oriented? You're better off with a piano keyboard than a typewriter keyboard. In short, matching the interface to the task will always give you better productivity.

      I'll agree with that, which is why I prefer keyboards with the little Thinkpad-style pointer nub in the middle of the keyboard. (I also have an external mouse for extended use.)

      Nothing better then not having to take your fingers off the home row to click on a button in a dialog box. (Usually, a poorly designed app without clearly defined hot-keys, or where you can't tab around the fields in a logical order.)

      Might be interesting if keyboards had not one, but two thumbwheels down by the space bar. Although on a traditional keyboard, more then one thumbwheel would be problematic. Not sure where you'd fit a thumbwheel on most laptops.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    3. Re:Not such a bad idea by WhiteDeath · · Score: 1


      From memory, Creative makes/made a "skin" - a plastic keyboard overlay that looks like a piano keyboard.

      I don't think it was terribly successful (serious musicians preferred the greater number of keys and better feel of a real MIDI keyboard.

    4. Re:Not such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although on a traditional keyboard, more then one thumbwheel would be problematic.

      "more than one".

    5. Re:Not such a bad idea by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Agreed. I hate to use the mouse when typing, but haven't yet quite managed to avoid it entirely. For the next laptop I buy a clitmouse may well be the deciding factor. Unfortunately, I hear that IBM holds a patent on them.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    6. Re:Not such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen several microJoystick pointing devices that made no claim to be TrackPoints (which they probably would if they were paying IBM money).

    7. Re:Not such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're mistaken.

      The Creative ProdiKeys (http://www.prodikeys.com/) is a piano keyboard attatched to the normal keyboard's bottom. It actually IS a piano keyboard.

      It's still in production today. I've absolutely no idea as to its popularity, though.

    8. Re:Not such a bad idea by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Toshiba laptops come with the keyboard nubby pointer (newer ones ship with both a touchpad and the nubby). Not sure when they started using the nubby, but the Toshiba Tecra that I bought back in 2000 had one.

      You can also get IBM Model M clone keyboards with the pointer built in, but it's not quite the same feel. I haven't tried the official IBM version since it's a $250 keyboard (the clone keyboard was $100, useful for a server room).

      Not sure if any other laptop manufs include the nubby pointer or not. My old Zeos laptop had a full key down in the lower right that acted as a mouse pointer (very odd).

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    9. Re:Not such a bad idea by meme_police · · Score: 1

      I bought my Dell D600 just because it has the nubby and touchpad. I would have bought an IBM but I got the Dell with a 3 year warranty for only $850 using my employee discount.

      --

      The meme police, They live inside of my head

  30. That's nice, but... by jlanthripp · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Contour ShuttlePro is nicer. My stepdad, a retired cinematographer and photographer, is into video editing and uses one on his PC. All the buttons and the wheel itself are programmable and so forth. Definitely worth the ~$100US price tag IMHO, if you're constantly editing video. It should be quite nice for gaming as well, though I haven't tried it for that yet.

    --
    "Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    1. Re:That's nice, but... by Colol · · Score: 1

      And if you don't have the cash or a need for all the features of the ShuttlePro, there's always the ShuttleXpress. Fewer buttons, but you still have the jog and shuttle. At half the cost of the Pro, it's not a bad deal if your needs are more modest.

  31. Ob Simpsons by igw · · Score: 2, Funny

    "please refrain from tasting the knob" -Ralph Wiggum

  32. Knob? knob creek? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Knob creek

    www.machinegunshoot.com

    now thats some tactile feedback

  33. my KDE3 beats that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try in your mac's putting "the gimp" on Winkey+menukey+Ctrl+Alt+Shift+Z. Scares the s**t outta the newbies arround my linux box.

    1. Re:my KDE3 beats that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why?

  34. Re:Second scroll wheel? No, a better idea... by Crusty+Cracker · · Score: 1

    How about a mouse with a scroll-trackball on top? I'd buy one... it would be very helpful for image editing on the pixel level.

  35. Keyboards! by fozzmeister · · Score: 1

    WTF you say, I have an Philips Aurilium sound card, which it seems is both a soundcard and a keyboard (the knob on it sends a Vol+/- keypress to the computer that then alters the volume), A USB keyboard and a keyboard on my laptop. X11 is already not liking this fact (and the whole soundcard seems to stop working when the keyboard in the soundcard doesn't get picked up correctly). Does anyone else have problems like this?

    Going back on topic, is this thing another god damn keyboard! and if so how on earth are you supposed to configure X11 for this insane setup.

    Shit I can't help thinking with such wierdness a static text based configuration file is good enough.

  36. Pong by wkitchen · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh man, that would be perfect for playing Pong.

  37. i made my powermate send midi data by FFON · · Score: 1, Interesting

    here is the use i found for my powermate

    made a max/msp patch to make it send midi CC data

    http://www.johnmccaig.com/downloads/patches/iknob. zip

    --
    .cig
  38. Shimming Magnets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The most interesting use I have seen is in the shimming of magnets. Powerful electromagnets based around a fixed core require a level of shimming to make minute adjustments to the field in the name of homogeneity. These are often done through a control PC interface such as via these USB knobs.

    Jon.

  39. Innovations in computer controls by Thai-Pan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you think about it, the major innovations in computer interfacing hardware have pretty much been the keyboard, the mouse, and the mouse wheel.. Not too much to it. I can't help but wonder if there's space for more to come along.

    I think the iPod's new touch wheel that also tilts around is pretty snazzy. Imagine if they put one of those suckers on your laptop right next to the regular touch pad. "Turn the wheel" to scroll around, do so while pushing down on the right side to switch applications, press up or down on it to scroll a page at a time... Maybe I'm dreaming again, but I think it's a pretty versatile control system that really isn't used to its full potential.

    1. Re:Innovations in computer controls by arose · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hate all touchpads and the like (haven't used an iPod, but should be the same), the problem is lack of tactile feedback except for the drag on your finger.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    2. Re:Innovations in computer controls by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      That's a strange thing to say, there's never been an end to innovations... anything you can think of has probably already been done... like the trackpoint, glidepoint, split keyboards, zero angle, movement of the function keys, the boomslang type devices, multibutton mice, trackballs, wacom type tablets, pucks, lightpens, yoke/flight controllers, pedals for both games and chording keystrokes, voice command, joysticks, both proportional and touchpads, force-feedback of various sorts, including mice and joysticks... and those are just the mildly practical interface devices...

      Before Apple started hacking with it, it was called a Jog-Dial, and you can get them just fine on a keyboard, almost exactly as you describe:

      http://www.bella-usa.com/

  40. Dialing in. by lullabud · · Score: 1

    I agree, using a scroll wheel to switch desktops just doesn't sound like the tool is fit for the job. A virtual desktop is not a sort of thing that you have to "dial in". It's not a matter of precision, you're either on desktop 1, 2, 3, 4, etc.. The tactile sensation that knobs offer goes quite well with tuning things that require a matter of precision. Think microscope, slr camera, guitar string. This need for precision is why outboard midi controllers have been around for so long, and why people like Roland brought out things like the JP 8000 years ago. The technology is there where the need is, and the Power-Mate definitely fills that need in a lot of instances. I just don't think switching desktops is one of those instances.

  41. Re:and lets not forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Channel 6 Live Streaming

    Christ, is that a volcano? Holy shit! Mount St. Helens erupted!!

  42. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  43. Haptic interfaces, kinetic perception. by torpor · · Score: 4, Informative


    In the field I work in (synthesizers), the perceptive nature of our customers (musicians) when relating to a user interface is indeed a tricky and wonderful force to behold. Rotary knobs, and the general 'feel' of a system as a result of simple interface kinetics, is fairly well-established in this field.

    I've always viewed the standard computer interface (keyboard/mouse) as being curiously unburdened by progress and change; you cannot say the same for the synth business, where there is no one standard for how you ought to use knobs.

    I've got two PowerMates, both on each side of an Apple extended keyboard, they are without doubt among the most precious peripheral I have on my desk. I've also got a couple of faderfox boxes, an LV1 and an LX1, which are also awesome primary/secondary interfaces, as well offering endless rotaries for various nefarious uses..

    The attempt by Microsoft to commodotize their 'peripheral assets' (MS Natural keyboard) while providing pitiful support (beyond HID) for application authors, and the tendency of other interface mfr's to vector off into 'cool but ultimately useless plastic hack' (anyone remember the Cyberman?) is fairly common. Once again, its all about the operating system.

    But you know, if you want to know more about endless uses for rotary knobs, look no further than the audio/synth/pro-media tool markets. Especially of the 80's and 90's .. a veritable wasteland of proprietary hack after propietary hack, all with their own individual utility lifespan, designed to give muso's a haptic kick or two.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  44. I have two.. by torpor · · Score: 1

    .. (as I have already mentioned elsewhere) .. and I think that maybe your problem is you need to buy another one.

    The thing is, I don't really agree with you on the assumption that everyone will wind up in the same boat as you.

    Sure, the cables are short: but not if they're plugged into your USB keyboard. I have an Apple extended keyboard (fantastic) and it serves as a hub- I have a black and silver PowerMate plugged into each side, and the short cable length, in this situation, is a plus, not a negative.

    I've set up my PM's for every major app I use, and the driver defaults already for a lot of 'regular' apps, such as my web browser. Its quite fun to sit back in my chair, thumbmates in hand, one to scroll the window, the other to select hyperlinks in a web page. After 20 seconds of use, its now the most 'natural-feeling' way of surfing the web for me; I find the mouse to be utterly awkward in comparison. ick!

    Great for movies and audio scrubbing too! Way more fun to skip frames with a big fat wheely knob than try to get the mouse to do anything accurate ..

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  45. Tivo needs to read up by JVert · · Score: 1

    PVR's are in heavy need of a nice rotary controller. A single large knob that you can modify the volume and time shifting controls with. With a knob you can get a nice feel for how far ahead back or ahead you want to go without flooding the IR.

  46. JP? by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    This need for precision is why outboard midi controllers have been around for so long, and why people like Roland brought out things like the JP 8000 years ago.

    I've never heard about this JP before, which is rather understandable considering how old it is.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  47. Re:Second scroll wheel? No, a better idea... by canon006 · · Score: 1

    Here you are - 4-d Optical Mouse

  48. Alternate approach by AllenChristopher · · Score: 1

    The Griffin is fine but pretty limited. Turn right, turn left, click right, click left, click, long click. All the click commands tend to stick together so it's mainly useful on only the one axis.

    I suggest using a gamepad and Joystick 2 Mouse 3.

    I'm using a PS2 controller now, which gives me two analog sticks (four axes) and 16 or however many buttons. Moreover Joystick 2 Mouse supports a shift key system, so 15 buttons can be set to have two commands.

    There's essentially nothing in the UI I can't control with it. I have it to the side of my keyboard and can use it without picking it up.

    What's *really* great is that I have it mapped to control things like brush opacity in Corel Painter and take care of all the major shortcuts. With my Intuos 2 in one hand and the left half of the PS2 pad in my other, I don't need to touch the keyboard at all when painting. It reminds me of Data playing that strategy game with the cups on his fingers.

    Wacom recently clued in to the importance of extra controls, but their Intuos 3 fingertrack system is currently more limited than the gamepad approach. Once the image software supports the tracks in a more creative way that may change.

    PS2 controller for $20, adapter for $10, Joystick 2 Mouse 3 is free... $30. Most people already have a gamepad of some sort, too.

  49. wearable computing by FrenZon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some time ago I used the powermate in a wearable computing project using tones and computer-synthesised voice as feedback.

  50. Apart from the fact that it doesn't work it's nice by lokedhs · · Score: 1
    This quote was interesting:
    Because the most of USB joypad and the generic driver emits an event when any button is pressed, there is no way to know which channel is set when the application is launched.
    It should be fixable. Otherwise, the main reason for using a knob, a visible way of seeing which option is chosen, dissapears.
  51. Huh? by pavon · · Score: 1

    As any mouse user can tell you, taking your hands off your keyboard is damaging to your productivity.

    And blinding quoting rules out of the text book, without understanding why they are correct is harmfull to interface design.

    This is for use with video effect software! How much typing do you think they will be doing? In fact, it appears that this is a kiosk set-up, and this simple knob replaces the keyboard altogether. This is a much cleaner and intuitive interface for this application than using a full keyboard, will decrease the amount of time learning the system, and if anything will improve productivity.

    1. Re:Huh? by pocopoco · · Score: 1

      It's worth pointing out that even in the video effects example given in the article, using the keyboard is far more productive. With the dial you have to click past x other effects just to get to the one you want. A keyboard can be setup to enable the effect you want simple by pressing a single button for each of them.

      So the keyboard may not be as easy to use, but it certainly is more productive as long as you assume the user can figure out which button does which. Given proper visual aid (ie. a little diagram with the keys circled in red and functions listed, or a keyboard overlay, etc.) that would take maybe a 8 year old or older. ;p

      If I were going to make a custom box like the guy in the article did, I would just make one with big, labeled buttons. A sensitive control knob is useful for moving through footage where the linear relationship of the options you are moving through exists and is natural. For moving through a list of effects, however, it's simply a pain. Similarly having it by the monitor is just stupid; try holding your arm up by the monitor for an hour, it's a pain in the ass. The dial should be close to the user where it can be accessed easily and what you select with it should be visible on the screen.

      If this is a kiosk and the monitor is down by the user's hands and so easily accessible then OK, but then I question why a touchscreen isn't being used in that case (e.g. tap the screen, little menu pops up with functions and descriptions, tap function, and your on, etc.).

    2. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try holding your arm up by the monitor for an hour, it's a pain in the ass.

      I think you are talking about holding your leg up by the monitor, because holding your arm is more like pain in the shoulder.

  52. Physical User Interfaces by Tony.Tang · · Score: 4, Informative

    Phidgets (http://www.phidgets.com/) is something that has recently become extremely cheap and accessible to software guys like me who HATE hardware. Phidgets make it really easy to build physical user interfaces (think nobs, switches, pressure sensors, etc.) without needing to do any hardware stuff yourself.

    They are extremely easy to use, as you can see by these undergrad projects (http://grouplab.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/phidgets/gallery /index.html).

    Full disclosure: I am a member of the lab from which this stuff was developed.

  53. How to scroll continuously with a Powermate by Tv · · Score: 1
    Physically grasping and moving a Griffin Powermate involves reconfiguring the way you're moving your hands and they can't be continuously spun as easily as the iPod wheel.
    Just put your finger on top the thing and rotate. It's not that hard.

    Here's how I use my Powermate:

    • Rotate to adjust volume
    • Tap to pause/unpause music
    • Double-tap to skip to next song
    • Rotate while pressing to seek inside song
  54. Re:and lets not forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on, it's goatse, but it IS rather funny in this context. At least for me. The mods had higher standard, I suppose... ;)

  55. Built into my keyboard already :) by PontifexPrimus · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have a Logitech Cordless Desktop MX connected to my linux box, and using Hotkeys I can easily set the volume with the spinning disc in the top center of the keyboard. This is very useful since I often watch movies with large volume ranges and I can very quickly and very precisely adjust the loudness that way. I especially like the fact that the disc doesn't have a fixed "start" and "end" position but rather spins freely, making it similar to the iPod scroll wheel.

    --
    -- Language is a virus from outer space.
  56. Powermate as awesome ergonomic left-hand scroller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I think the market has missed the point with the Powermate. It is sold primarily as a volume control, but I've found that leaving it on the left side of the keyboard, with the left-right knob movement bound to arrow up/down makes for a more comfortable and ergonomic work environment. When scrolling through long webpages like slashdot, I can relax my (right) mouse hand and let my left hand use the knob to scroll up and down. It feels more natural than having two mice, as one can operate a knob just fine with no warmup (try left-handing a mouse immediately after using your right - it's hard for most). With the knob, switching back and forth between left and right hand scrolling is smooth and easy, no fumbling around. It works just fine in virtually every application without any special settings. Try scrolling with the Powermate, you'll like it!

    So, here's my problem - I can't do this in Linux! There is a linux driver for the Powermate, but apparently it's only preconfigured use is as a volume control for XMMS, for which I could care less. If anyone has figured out how to bind the Powermate knob to keystrokes in Linux, please post some clues! I presume it would take a 2.4.x kernel (which has the Powermate driver built-in) and some X Windows config stuff to do the binding. Thanks!

  57. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  58. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion