Slashdot Mirror


Doom Movie in Production For Aug 2005 Release

Lord Prox writes "Doom: The motion picture is now in production from Universal Pictures for a release date of August 5, 2005. According to IMDB the cast includes The Rock, Rosamund Pike, Razaaq Adoti, Ben Daniels, and Karl Urban. The plot and setting is right from the game."

48 of 398 comments (clear)

  1. So..... by FatherKabral · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who's going to play the big floating eye?

    1. Re:So..... by cryptochrome · · Score: 5, Funny

      Angelina Jolie. That creepy freak.

      --

      ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

    2. Re:So..... by Xpilot · · Score: 4, Funny

      They could use the same guy who plays the big floating eye from "The Lord of the Rings".

      --
      "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    3. Re:So..... by tepples · · Score: 4, Funny

      Who's going to play the big floating eye?

      Probably whoever played Sauron, of course.

    4. Re:So..... by skaffen42 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I heard he wasn't interested. Aparently he was worried about getting typecast.

      --
      People couldn't type. We realized: Death would eventually take care of this.
    5. Re:So..... by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Surely they would rather have the fine floating eye from "Big Trouble in Little China". Please don't tell his boss he's been sleeping.`

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    6. Re:So..... by AbbyNormal · · Score: 4, Funny

      No floating eye, not enormous, freaky inhuman floating lips.

      --
      Sig it.
  2. Didn't we already discuss this to death? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    1. Re:Didn't we already discuss this to death? by FortKnox · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What's worse is there hasn't been a discussion about Halflife the motion picture which is also now in production...

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    2. Re:Didn't we already discuss this to death? by yoz · · Score: 4, Informative

      Perhaps because it has nothing to do with the game?

      On the subject of a movie of the game, Gabe Newell has nixed the idea for the forseeable future.

  3. Censorship? by 2.7182 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I heard that an issue was the amount of goriness. Remember the soldiers hanging from meathooks ? Apparently the director wants to show that!

    1. Re:Censorship? by telbij · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why would they censor it? They have that in Hellraiser, Event Horizon, Silence of the Lambs, etc...

    2. Re:Censorship? by BabyDave · · Score: 5, Funny

      [Joke shamelessly pinched from a Charlie Brooker cartoon about the Doom movie from several years ago ... ]

      The movie features a cameo appearance by Macauley Culkin:

      Culkin I get strung up on a meathook and beaten insensible with a carjack. It's a great honour - apparently the part was written specifically for me.

    3. Re:Censorship? by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Chicks got hung on a meathook back in Texas Chainsaw Massacre, and that guy was actually after a PG-13 rating.

      People remember that as one of the goriest slasher flicks of all time, but if you watch the movie closely, you see very little actual blood or gore.

      You see a girl being lifted up, camera cuts to the front, you see the washtub underneath her - you know what it's for, but there's no blood. Your imagination supplies the scary parts.

      But of course, that was just good filmmaking, which I don't expect of a "Hey this is a popular game, I bet we could rake in a couple bucks, see if the Rock is available" flick.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:Censorship? by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Good filmmaking makes you scare yourself. Really gory movies aren't usually scary to me. I think the classic examples is from Reservoir Dogs - when he cuts the ear off. The music, the camera pan/tilt, the screams... you never see anything but you immediately start imagining what might be happening.

      My wife pointed out that the filmmaking in A Time to Kill (was on TV last night) did the same thing; you never see the terrible things they're doing to the girl, but you know what's going on.

      The "rake in a couple bucks" attitude is likely to be the perspective of the studios. But the filmmaker, writer, etc. are fans of the game... so you're going to get a mix of the studio perspective (money) and the gamer perspective (how cool can we make this). Could make for a no-brainer that's fun to watch.

    5. Re:Censorship? by Minwee · · Score: 5, Funny
      A lot of money is going to be spent on CGI effects, like being melted in acid.

      I'm sure you could save a few bucks and just use real acid. Just be sure to keep your goggles on.

  4. That's going to be a real technical challenge by Exmet+Paff+Daxx · · Score: 5, Funny

    How do you make a movie without vertical clipping? I think it's going to be a real challenge to explain to the audience why a rocket fired 300 feet below someone can hit them. Should make for interesting cinematography though.

    --
    If guns kill people, then CmdrTaco's keyboard misspells words.
    1. Re:That's going to be a real technical challenge by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just wait until they show off the BFG in Doom The Movie by firing a shot down a long hallway, then running into a small room and herding the poor demons around the room while waiting for the BFG shot to hit the end of the hallway, then blat, they all fall dead for *no apparent reason* :-)

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    2. Re:That's going to be a real technical challenge by piquadratCH · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I think it's going to be a real challenge to explain to the audience why a rocket fired 300 feet below someone can hit them.

      Since when does Hollywood give a shit about accurate physics? Hell, Doom 3 has a better physics Engine than most Hollywood movies!

  5. So basicly what youre saying is..... by sholde4 · · Score: 5, Funny

    No plot and Mars.

  6. You finish eating the floating eye corpse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You feel a strange mental acuity.

  7. I'm excited! by gowen · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hooray! Because we all know that films based on video games are always great

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    1. Re:I'm excited! by halivar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, my bottom three would be Wing Commander, Super Mario Bros., and Street Fighter. I mean, come on... you got Christopher Lambert, I got Jean-Claude Van Damme (sp?). Obviously, your choices look like Oscar contenders next to my icons of B-movie badness.

      Think about it: would you rather spend five days strapped in a chair forced to watch Milla Jovavich and Angelina Jolie, or Jean-Claude Van Damme and John Leguizamo? Choose very, very carefully.

    2. Re:I'm excited! by Idarubicin · · Score: 4, Funny
      Sweet Zombie Jesus, why did anyone let him near AvP? I saw it two days ago and I'm still so fucking angry I want to take an angle-grinder to the guy's face.

      Really? I heard it was a great comedy. I mean, really great. Bust-a-gut funny. Tears rolling down your cheeks funny.

      It was a comedy, right? Right?

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  8. Flashlight or gun? by general_re · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...cuz you can't have both, Mr. The Rock.

    --
    ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
    1. Re:Flashlight or gun? by CGP314 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, if the main character is the rock, now I can understand why he can't use a gun and a flashlight at the same time.


      -Colin

  9. Best job EVER! by grm_wnr · · Score: 4, Funny

    I want the post of Gaffer for that movie!

  10. Oh no, not the Rock... by halivar · · Score: 5, Funny

    The poor man's Vin Diesel.

    He'll probably have to type IDKFA every thirty seconds just to make it through the movie.

    1. Re:Oh no, not the Rock... by hambonewilkins · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Agreed. The rock at least has some personality. Vin Diesel plays the same Mr. Gravely Voice in every movie.

      The Rock is a poor man's Ahhhhnold. Vin Diesel is a poor man's The Rock.

      --

      God Bless America. Why? Did it sneeze?
    2. Re:Oh no, not the Rock... by Jbrecken · · Score: 4, Informative

      Oh really. And can you name a good Vim[sic] Diesel movie except for Pitch Black?

      Iron Giant.

  11. Talented Rock by CleverNickedName · · Score: 5, Funny

    I believe the rock will not only do all his own stunts, but he will also be doing all his own camera work too.

    You can't beat those first-person movies.

    --


    Unfortunately, I am not Wil Wheaton
  12. The plot and setting is right from the game. by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Funny

    In other words, there is no plot, and the movie is set in several hallways and rooms that look identical to the one in the last scene.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  13. I'll say it again... by cjpez · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... with any luck, it'll be every bit as good as the comic book.

  14. Delay as marketing strategy! by DirtyJ · · Score: 5, Funny
    release date of August 5, 2005

    To let the general public get the full Doom experience, they should push the release date back like 5 or 6 times and eventually put it out in 2009.

  15. Finally by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    A story so short there is no need to read the article.

  16. Just because it's on the imdb doesn't make it true by Aash · · Score: 5, Informative

    Anyone can submit info to the The Internet Movie Database, and it's rather notorious for posting incorrect information about movies which are still far from release.

    I'm not saying that the casting news at the imdb definitely isn't true, I'm just saying to take it with a grain of salt.

    --

    --
    These aren't the droids you're looking for.
  17. Recipe for box-office victory by Apostata · · Score: 4, Funny

    1. Star-studded cast - check

    2. Fantastic storyline - check

    3. Less than a year from production to release - check

    Wow - how will this not be a hit?

    --

    This wasn't just plain terrible, this was fancy terrible. This was terrible with raisins in it. - Dorothy Parker
  18. delay waiting for video hardware to catch up by OffTheLip · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will movie theaters need to upgrade to the latest video equipment to be able to run this film?

  19. yeah right by nomadic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The plot and setting is right from the game.

    Oh come on, do you think they can really condense the intricate storyline, complex characterizations, and nuanced dialogue of Doom into a 2 hour movie? I think not.

    Good god, people, Doom had a bad storyline EVEN BY VIDEOGAME STANDARDS. Who actually thinks it will make a good movie? If you answer "me", then please explain it to me.

    The funny thing is most slashdot stories about something the MPAA has done are followed by comments about "who cares, Hollywood movies are so bad why would you want to watch them anyway?". You do realize that you can't honestly be in both camps, you know? You can't criticize the mindless drivel that Hollywood puts out and then say in the next breath that you're eagerly awaiting Doom.

    Alright, I MAY see it, but that's only because Rosamund Pike is sexy as hell. When you're the sexiest woman in a movie that also stars Halle Berry, that's something special. But the movie itself isn't something that a sentient being should look forward to.

    1. Re:yeah right by CAIMLAS · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Even though doom has a "bad" storyline, that doesn't mean it won't make a good movie. A good scriptwriter can resurrect even the blandest of plot outlines into an excellent, hillarious, action-packed film.

      Take Indiana Jones, for example. It's one of my favorite films, and just came to mind, so I'll use it. How do you summarize the storyline (of, say, raiders of the lost ark) for that film? How about, "US archeologist battles nazis in egypt to try and regain ancient biblical artifacts" - now think of all the completely cheesed out films you've seen with similar plots. It's all in the presentation. Consider Beowulf - not much to that plot, really, in summary, but it evolved over time to become a wonderful epic.

      Even if they were to use the basic plot laid out at the beginning of (and gradually throughout) Doom 3, they would have something to start with. Then give the mischelaneous people encountered throughout the game a larger role (or other people) in the character's quest. Add a lot of jokes (in the nature of films such as Shrek), and it would strike a cord with many of the people that played the original doom. (Well, with my group atl east. Remember the 'demon' - the red bull-like creature that charged? We called it a penis monster because it looked like a giant cock. I'm sure other sexual references could be made throughout the film... but maybe that's just my twisted sense of humor). Another action film that I'm reminded of that would have been bland and boring sci-fi without the humor is The 5th Element. Remember those damn pig creatures? The action was -cheesy-. But it was a pretty freakign good film, as there was a large amount of humor intertwined throughout it.

      That said, I agree with you. It'll likely suck horribly. I think their best bet is to not try to make it a horror film, but to make it a film that appeals to what made Doom initially popular - to a large respect, just running around shooting things and having blood squirt everyhwere, making jokes at 4am while drinking mountain dew about the game characters, etc. etc. - I'm thinking along the lines of things like the "exploding wall of blood" scene in Evil Dead 2. That would Rock (and, now that I think about it, The Rock would probably be a pretty damn good "Ash" type character, as he's quite over the top with his acting... hrm. I'm starting to see a lot of (likely unfulfillable) potential here.

      Still, there's no way it could be worse than tomb raider. (On second thought, at least TR had fleshy boobs...)

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  20. Re:Good luck! by mopslik · · Score: 5, Funny

    They have a lot of work to do in order to recreate the atmosphere created in DOOM3.

    But think of the money they'll save by not having to hire a lighting crew.

  21. Possible? by 21chrisp · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Call me a pessimist, but I can't see modern Hollywood producing such a violent and gory film. This will probably be another sci-fi/horror flick turned PG-13 (which you can't really call Doom). No studio in it's right mind is going to release a film with people gutted and hanging on hooks. Soccer Moms of the world would have them for lunch.

  22. True to the original by Dachannien · · Score: 4, Funny

    The really sad thing here is that the Doom movie is likely to be more true to the original than Peter Jackson's LotR trilogy was.

  23. My son read the script by jmichaelg · · Score: 4, Interesting
    My son is an avid film buff and Doom player. By chance, he got a copy of the script. An excerpt from his email describing the script:
    Bad doesn't begin to describe it. It is one of the single best examples of everything thats wrong with Hollywood. The charachter sic development is so awful that you actually want everyone to die so that the movie will.
    (spoiler warning)...
    And one of the marines (john) and his scientist sister figure out that essentially this virus from another planet infects the DNA of people and then, if they are bad, manipulates their inner badness into an external representation making them monsters (resulting in lines like "we've all got a monster inside"). So John, since he has not been infected because all the monsters know that he is so good (literally thats the rationale), has his sister pump him full of the virus, and it manipulates his goodness into an angelic form making him an angel (seriously).
    1. Re:My son read the script by jkovacik · · Score: 5, Funny

      Turns into an angel, huh? So The Rock finishes the movie in God mode. Figures.

  24. Huh? by TrentL · · Score: 4, Informative

    Chicks got hung on a meathook back in Texas Chainsaw Massacre, and that guy was actually after a PG-13 rating.

    That guy (Tobe Hooper) must have been a very forward thinking individual, because the PG-13 rating wouldn't exist for another 10 years.

  25. Re:So..... who will play the eye? by Wizzy+Wig · · Score: 4, Funny
    Is Marty Feldman still alive?

  26. I know how it ends!!! by DroopyStonx · · Score: 5, Funny

    ooh THE ROCK types IDKFA!!!

    HA HA HA, yeah, it was posted 4832984 times before this post and each are marked funny. IT'S FUNNY, PEOPLE.

    We can't hear this one enough, can we?!

    "Hey, The Rock!"
    "IDKFA?!"
    "Yes."

    *insert joke about flashlight* ... ...

    IDKFA!!! HA HA HA.

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!