Slashdot Mirror


XM Portable Satellite Radio Receiver with Hard Drive

daveplot writes "XM announced today the new XM MyFi. The hand-held MyFi gives users the personal freedom to enjoy XM Radio's Ultimate PlayList of more than 130 digital XM channels in two ways: a 'live' listening mode and a time-shifting "memory" mode. The MyFi's live mode enables users to listen live to all of XM's 68 commercial-free music channels, plus premier news, sports, talk, traffic and weather channels. MyFi's memory mode -- called 'My XM' -- allows users to store five hours or more of XM's outstanding content with the press of a button, even when the unit is not in use. The MyFi makes it possible to enjoy XM Satellite Radio anywhere, anytime, effortlessly. More information is at XM411.com." We had a story mentioning this a few days ago.

127 comments

  1. I heard you on the wireless back in Two-OhOh-Four by fembots · · Score: 5, Interesting

    XM Radio has every reason to push MyFi, in its press release, it mentioned "MyFi is a revolutionary product that dramatically expands XM Radio's appeal and potential subscriber base". The easier it is to listen to their contents, the more subscribers they will get.

    $349.99 is a bit pricey, but with enough advertisements/sponsors etc, they might even be able give it away for free??

    I wonder if any other company is going come out with a competiting product (like TiVo vs MythTV)? Might be another lawsuit in the making. And how about time-shifting local radio station? There are times when you want to skip some ads, or probably pre-record some live converstion before you head into a no-reception area.

  2. 404? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article 404'd on me initially. Now it seems to work, finally.

  3. If only... by daveschroeder · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ahh, if only one of the new iPods and this XM device were one and the same. :-)

    1. Re:If only... by BarryJacobsen · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ahh, if only one of the new iPods and this XM device were one and the same

      Give me $5 and some duct tape.

      iPod and XM device not included. Offer not valid in KY and ME. 10 cent cash refund in MI. Included sales tax if ordering from WI. Other fees may apply. Caution: Contents may be hot and contain peanuts.

    2. Re:If only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I know!

      But atleast there's a tool to convert XM Radio stuff into mp3.

    3. Re:If only... by shadowkoder · · Score: 2, Informative

      Might want to check out soemthing similar called podcasting, http://www.ipodder.org/.

    4. Re:If only... by dj245 · · Score: 1

      Maine has no restrictions on such offers that are state-specific and would make the offer invalid. Try New Jersey or Texas- they love that kind of litigation.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  4. Bad timing or intentional? by lxt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Was this bad timing on Apple or XM's part, or intentional? Surely there'd be reduced press coverage on the XM device with the new iPods being launched...

    1. Re:Bad timing or intentional? by jseale · · Score: 1

      I don't think it would've made much of a difference here since MyFi apparently can't download files off a PC like iPods can. MyFi's HD is only intended for time-shifting. We be talking apples and oranges here, no pun intended.

  5. why doesn't XM or Sirius team up with apple? by ntxb229 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Either XM or Sirius should team up with apple to launch an Ipod with satellite radio. I bet that would help sell satellite radio subscriptions.

    1. Re:why doesn't XM or Sirius team up with apple? by eclectro · · Score: 2, Funny


      Yes, and the resultant device would have a battery life of about 15 minutes.

      Maybe apple could make extremely long extension cords fashionable.

      It might work.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    2. Re:why doesn't XM or Sirius team up with apple? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but would I be able to use the same extension cord for my PSP?

    3. Re:why doesn't XM or Sirius team up with apple? by deuce868 · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the size of the devices for these things? No way apple would touch that. You would have to sleek down the devices a ton to make them look anywhere close to decent.

  6. No way to get other content on? by PornMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Man, I have to think that the most ridiculous thing is selling a hard-drive based music player without any way to put on mp3/AAC/etc.

    1. Re:No way to get other content on? by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 2, Funny

      Get out the torx bits, I smell a HACK!

  7. Plug My Product! by provolt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dear Slashdot,

    My company is releasing a product. We would like a organize a grassroots advertising programs. Our marketing team has created a number of press releasing. Would your site please post our adverstising for free?

    1. Re:Plug My Product! by bersl2 · · Score: 2

      Maybe we need a plug.slashdot.org so those who would bitch about this kind of "advertising" can block it...

    2. Re:Plug My Product! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Slashdot,

      I wrote an operating system in my garage, but I'm too lazy to finish it myself. I'm looking for a way to convince thousands of people around the globe to do my work for me.

      Any ideas?

    3. Re:Plug My Product! by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Cowboy N.. take down a memo...

      Dear Mr Gates...

      Thank you for writing....

    4. Re:Plug My Product! by jtseng · · Score: 1

      Dear Submitter,

      Slashdot will be more than happy to help you with your marketing efforts. All you have to do is provide us with a URL to your product information and watch those hits come in!

      Sincerely,

      Slashdot.

      --

      Sanity.html - Error 404 not found

    5. Re:Plug My Product! by _KiTA_ · · Score: 1

      Release something that's really cool and geeky, and we'll get back to you.

      I'm surprised no one has mentioned XM fighting tooth and nail and lawsuit against that poor bastard who rigged up something like this XM MyFI thing with a connector cable and a recording program on his computer. Was on Slashdot YRO a few months ago...

    6. Re:Plug My Product! by Natchswing · · Score: 1
      Actually, a while ago Slashdot announced they'd be putting paid advertisements on the front page in the form of story submissions.

      So, advertising - yes. Free? Probably not.

  8. Re:I heard you on the wireless back in Two-OhOh-Fo by IANAAC · · Score: 2, Insightful
    but with enough advertisements/sponsors etc, they might even be able give it away for free??

    Oh Ick. Just what we need - more ads on a pay service.

  9. How long until this thing streams video? by ArmedLemming · · Score: 1

    I can't imagine the technology is that far off to stream video content to one of these things via satellite. I suppose the big hold up will be getting all the rights sorted out...

    -Chris

    --
    Two fish swim into a wall, one turns to the other and says, "Dam".
    1. Re:How long until this thing streams video? by kd3bj · · Score: 2, Informative
      Streaming video to wireless handhelds has be possible for 20+ years. That's terrestrial broadcast TV, of course.

      To stream satellite video to a handheld, you'd have a problem with getting enough antenna gain. Today's satellites aren't powerful enough to send video without groundstation antenna gain.

      Then again, if you were willing to wait 100 minutes for each minute of video, then it could be done, I would think.

    2. Re:How long until this thing streams video? by waynelorentz · · Score: 1

      Sirius tested this about a year ago. You could tune to the special test channels, but there was no audio. Don't know what happened with it.

      On the other hand -- Sirius is currently available on Dish Network. Perhaps it will flow the other way soon.

  10. Sirius better get a move on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really hope Sirius comes out with one of these before the end of 2005. Howard Stern I need. The NFL I do not.

    And it would be nice if it were closer to $200.

    1. Re:Sirius better get a move on by AveryT · · Score: 1

      Word. XM is no use to me. I'm sure Sirius will come out with something similar and hopefully the price will come down by Jan 1, 2006.

      If Satellite Radio truly is the wave (no pun intended) of the future I wonder if there will eventually be a shakeout. With Howard on Sirius, will XM become the BetaMax of Satellite?

    2. Re:Sirius better get a move on by jsc19702 · · Score: 1

      If anything Sirius is the BetaMax of Satellite. They have a much much smaller customer base. Remember Sirius has to get an additional 1.3 million subscribers (from an AP Press article that I read) just to pay for Stern alone. Sirius is bleeding cash at a exponential rate (much worse than XM).

  11. Trademark infringement? by Oriumpor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    *cough*RIPOFF*Cough*

    Sure the name of the Neuros MyFi means something else, but sheesh it doesn't take by one google search.

    Hell for 399 bucks you could get a neuros that will (finally) do timed recording with a 40gb hd and all the niceness of having linux in your.... backpack. The thing is freakin huge but XM didn't even bother to be original in the naming of their Ipod wannabe.

    1. Re:Trademark infringement? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I hope the ensuing fight means the name "MyFi" goes to obscurity. What a shitty name. I hate WiFi because it really doesn't mean jack. "Wireless Fidelity" Huh? Fidelity to wired? At 1/5th the bandwidth of base-wired (54Mbps only gets ~20Mbps in actual performance)?

    2. Re:Trademark infringement? by papercrane · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was going to post this if someone else didn't. They shouldn't be able to walk all over Neuros just because they're a small company...

    3. Re:Trademark infringement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      If you are going to call it trademark infringement link to the trademark information (not sure if that link is going to workfor other people, but if it doesn't Search Page.)

      Digesting some of the jucy bits:

      Owner (APPLICANT) NEUROS AUDIO, L.L.C. LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ILLINOIS 2 NORTH RIVERSIDE PLAZA, SUITE 200 CHICAGO ILLINOIS 60606

      Goods and Services IC 009. US 021 023 026 036 038. G & S: PLAYERS AND RECORDERS OF DIGITAL AUDIO EMBODIED IN ELECTRONIC FILE FORMAT; RADIOS; AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR CREATING, MANAGING, PLAYING, AND RECORDING DIGITAL AUDIO. FIRST USE: 20021115. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 20021115


      Going Anonymous this time.
    4. Re:Trademark infringement? by petsounds · · Score: 1

      I think WiFi means exactly what it says.

      fidelity, according to dictionary.com, means:
      The degree to which an electronic system accurately reproduces the sound or image of its input signal.

      Fidelity is not a value in itself; it is merely a concept used to describe the faithfulness of the sound. You can have good or bad fidelity. So, in the case of "WiFi," you have a level of fidelity associated with the limitations of wireless technology.

    5. Re:Trademark infringement? by jerw134 · · Score: 1

      *Fi matches Delphi's other XM receiver, the SkyFi.

    6. Re:Trademark infringement? by jerw134 · · Score: 1

      *cough* XM bought the trademark from them a couple months ago *cough*

    7. Re:Trademark infringement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Word Mark MYFI
      Filing Date August 2, 2004
      Owner (APPLICANT) Delphi Technologies, Inc. CORPORATION DELAWARE M/C 480-410-202 P.O. Box 5052 Troy MICHIGAN 48007

      Is that why they filed for it as the "Principal?"

    8. Re:Trademark infringement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For future reference, it's "iPod" not "Ipod". A simple Google search will confirm this.

  12. Music nirvana: combine XM with iTunes-like product by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Give me lots of channels, time shifting, and the ability to buy (preferrably unencumbered) tracks out-of-band (i.e., I can browse for tracks, not just wait for them to be played) and I will sign up. This service is so almost there.

  13. no computer needed by AssProphet · · Score: 1

    who's going to be the first to remedy this!

    How do they expect anyone to buy this with the lack of details on this site?

    I want to know if you can save individual songs or if you have to record things in time blocks. Anyone know what format these songs are stored in?

  14. WAIT A MINUTE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't 'time shifting' the whole reason that the PC USB XM Adapter was discontinued?!?

    WTF?

    1. Re:WAIT A MINUTE by sidepocket · · Score: 0

      But since you can't connect this to a PC, the music theoretically can't get onto the web without some sort of crappy-sounding analog transfer.

    2. Re:WAIT A MINUTE by psetzer · · Score: 1
      I think that such a device would be discontinued pretty soon after someone discovered that, hey, we have a digital audio stream coming into our PC! Let's redirect it to a compression utility and save it. You could expand your collection of MP3s drastically by ripping all the stuff that they're beaming at you, and there's nothing that the RIAA could do, since they wouldn't be able to find out.

      StationRipper is a similar utility for Web Radio, but I've had to ramp back my usage since that sucker can fill a moderately sized hard drive in no time at all. I've left my computer and come back with over a gig of new music. You are limited to what the Web Radio stations are playing at the moment, but if you have some Techno obsession, you'll never be wanting for music.

      --
      "Anyone who attempts to generate random numbers by deterministic means is living in a state of sin." -- John von Neumann
  15. Any way to get the music off of the device? by fdawg · · Score: 1

    What format does the device store the music in? Is there anyway to get music on or off? Since its satellite and all of those new XM equipped cares come with antennea on the roof, what kind of reception should we epect to get sitting in our cubes at work? I thought XM required line of sight. Am I mistaken?

    1. Re:Any way to get the music off of the device? by dykofone · · Score: 1
      I've been trying to read between the lines on this thing, and I think I finally figured it out.

      Basically, it acts like the traditional XM "portable" receivers that can be switched between docking stations in the home or car other semi-permanent setup. Those require an external antenna to be run somewhere with a good view (though my desk unit will pick up a signal through the wooden roof at home, but not through the metal roof at work).

      It doesn't look like this unit comes with an internal antenna, in fact it looks to come with an indoor and an outdoor antenna as well as the docking setup for each. So I'm thinking this isn't a revolutionary device, but instead adds a little more functionality to their existing product line: the only music you can listen to while on-the-go is the music that you've recorded onto the device while it was plugged in. In other words, you set it up on your desk or in your car to record all night, then you listen to new audio as you drive around, and when you get out you can listen to the audio you recorded overnight.

      This is just my interpretation though, because my experience with satellite radios is they wouldn't work very well in your pocket as you walk down the street. They solved this problem by letting you record onto the same device you'd already have for home and office.

      As somebody who already owns a home kit and car kit with a receiver that goes between each, I'll skip buying this product and just copy 5 hours of programming at night onto a cassette and listen to it on a walkman.

    2. Re:Any way to get the music off of the device? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      What happens at work depends on how high up you are, whether you have a south-facing window, and whether you have a local repeater. I brought mine into work a couple of times, and while I had a hard time finding the sweet spot, it does work. This is in the middle of a floor in an office building with no windows closer than about 30 feet in any direction.

      The trick is that I'm picking up a terrestrial repeater. The satellite signals are at 0%. This repeater must be pretty close and quite strong, since I even get a usable signal in the company parking garage. It's nothing but concrete and steel, and it still works.

      Here's something to try: bring in the radio, plug it into your line-in, run ices and icecast, and stream oggs to everyone else on the LAN.

    3. Re:Any way to get the music off of the device? by iocat · · Score: 1
      A cassette! A walkman! Good lord! Don't you know that you lose an almost unoticeable amount of fidelity with a cassette! Why, that's unthinkable! MP3s on the other hand are digital and perfect.

      Seriously, it kills me to see people desperately trying to figure out ways to record a digital signal from XM when you can just tape it if you want to record it. Yeah, I know tape degrades, but XM's playlist isn't infinite either; you can always just rerecord it. Sometimes analog solutions are ok.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    4. Re:Any way to get the music off of the device? by LoadStar · · Score: 1
      It doesn't look like this unit comes with an internal antenna, in fact it looks to come with an indoor and an outdoor antenna as well as the docking setup for each.

      It includes a home and car setup (with associated antennas, yes) but also has the "First-ever built-in XM antenna" (see the bottom of this page.)

  16. Re:I heard you on the wireless back in Two-OhOh-Fo by plover · · Score: 1
    The licensing's the thing.

    Groups like ASCAP send representatives around to stores and restaurants today and check out the music they have playing. If they determine that it's coming from a non-broadcast-radio source, they demand vigorish from the store owner. The case I remember (vaguely) found that a restaurant could play live broadcast radio or TV for the enjoyment of its patrons. But they could not tape a radio or TV show and then play the tape at a later time without paying the licensors.

    Anyway, the whole reason I bring up the licensing thing is that these groups have already shown their opposition to "useful" recordings of their programming. If MyFi can indeed become "ReplayRadio", you can bet that the audio won't be digitally handed out to you the subscriber. The best you'll be able to hope for is to grab the analog signal somewhere and redigitize it yourself (along with all the crappy artifacts that reencoding brings.) They'll make it as easy as possible to use from their user interface, but as difficult as possible to intercept on the way to the speakers.

    --
    John
  17. but does it have stern? by acomj · · Score: 1

    Seriously, time shifting is much more usefull if you have talk radio. IIRC sirius has NPR and Howard, I don't think XM had alot of talk.

    Time shifting just means you can skip the songs you don't like..

    1. Re:but does it have stern? by MustardMan · · Score: 1

      XM Has opie and anthony. I seriously considered signing up for the service just for those two. I know it's immature toilet humor, but I laughed my ass off at those guys before they got canned for broadcasting a couple having sex in a church.

      In fact, O&A were the first big name act to go to satellite after making a name for themselves on traditional radio. Howard followed in their footsteps. Their first show on XM was basically a giant FU to Howard, who did his damnedest to interfere with their careers when they were on the air.

    2. Re:but does it have stern? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No but XM has a contract with the ACC, PAC10, and BigTen. Plus they signed an exclusive contract with MLB to begin next season... Seems to me there are a lot more fans of college sports and pro baseball than there is of Howard Stern.

  18. It doesn't have a hard drive, just flash. by JoelJohnson · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.gizmodo.com/archives/xm-myfi-by-delphi- 024234.php

  19. MyFi already trademarked? by SeaEye420 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I believe that the people at neurosaudio might take issue with that "MyFi" name, since it is their trademark according to their fact sheet.

    Read about the feature here

    --
    Wort Wort Wort!
    1. Re:MyFi already trademarked? by SeaEye420 · · Score: 1

      Well, I posted about this on the neuros message boards, and it looks like they may have sold their rights to the name...I'll post more as soon as I hear more

      --
      Wort Wort Wort!
    2. Re:MyFi already trademarked? by OzzyRulez · · Score: 1

      According to an article at engadget.com, Delphi filed for the trademark on "MyFi". http://www.engadget.com/entry/5213323776608634/

    3. Re:MyFi already trademarked? by SeaEye420 · · Score: 1

      Yup, it turns out they sold the trademark so they could have more money for R&D. Wow, a company that favors R&D to flashy marketing... :)

      --
      Wort Wort Wort!
  20. XM Subscription by pawnIII · · Score: 2, Interesting

    $350 + XM subscription, going to be a little bit harder to sell this product. Sure XM is a great service, but I couldn't see getting one of these, unless I can tap into my dads service.

    1. Re:XM Subscription by DaHat · · Score: 1

      Why? It's not unlike when XM first came out, one could easily spend 250 on a receiver and another 50 on the antenna... now you can pick up a receiver for under 50 (although the antenna prices don't seem to have come down as far).

  21. Re:I heard you on the wireless back in Two-OhOh-Fo by MBCook · · Score: 2, Informative
    My family bought a XM radio in the last year. It's one of the little silver ones that slips into a boombox. Let's compare prices. This thing is $350, includes the reciever (which can apparently time shift), a home kit, a car kit, headphones, and a little more.

    Compare that to my SkyFi radio, which was $99. Add the home kit for $70, and the car kit for $70 and you're at $240. If you want to be able to listen anywhere, you need the boombox which is $99. So now we're at $340. Now if you include the fact that this new one can be used anywhere (and doesn't need a big boombox full of D batteries) and time shifts, that's a great deal.

    $10 (or so) to make it portable and add timeshifting. Sounds fine.

    Now if you want to argue that ALL XM radios are overpriced, that's a different argument. But compared to one of their current offerings, this is a good deal.

    Unless you ONLY want to listen to it in the car ever. But if you've had XM for a while, you'll want to start being able to listen to it at home too, and maybe out doing yard work, and...

    My one comment is, I'm a little worried about the timeshifting. I hope it doesn't try to do that while on batteries, because I would think that would eat them up if it recorded much stuff. Hopefully only when in a crade (the car, at home, etc.).

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  22. Cool tech, but... by brett77 · · Score: 1

    Couldn't they make this thing look a little "cooler"? I mean, with the onslaught of portable media devices and the thousands of man hours spent trying to make the aesthetics on these devices as appealing as possible, why are Delphi's products waning in this area?

  23. Will it give the RIAA fits? by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 1

    Well, it is kinda playing good quality sound stream...

    What about DRM?

    1. Re:Will it give the RIAA fits? by MBCook · · Score: 2, Informative
      It's full of DRM (just like other XM radios) but it doesn't matter because there is no way to get the audio off the device (legitimatly) other than through the analog out port, which is a loophole in the law. Other than that, you'd have to hook something up to read the device's memory while it's on and decrypt the signla from there, or intercept it between decrypting and the DAC (assuming they aren't on the same chip).

      At best you might be able to get a digital out through a home connection kit, but I assume that the digital out ports have encryption on them to prevent you from copying that audio like I imagine that DVD players have.

      I'm sure they'll try to find a way to complain though. I noticed that XM now has a stereo component XM player, it would be cool if that could timeshift. Now if they would just get some more of my favorite talk radio people (Dr. Laura, Paul Harvey, and I'd LOVE an NRP station (who has a deal with Sirrius, I think) so I could hear This American Life and A Prairie Home Companion and Car Talk. But that's another discussion).

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    2. Re:Will it give the RIAA fits? by iocat · · Score: 2, Funny

      It has an NPR station now. Or at least a "public radio" station. XM 133, "XM Public Radio." Check out the details here . Not sure if it has actual NPR, but it has the WBUR feed which is equally bor-- er, entertaining.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

  24. Slashvertisment... by Quixote · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Talk about an advertisement! Jeez... can we cut out the hyperbole a little bit, please?

    The MyFi's live mode enables users to listen live to all of XM's 68 commercial-free music channels, plus premier news, sports, talk, traffic and weather channels.

    Wow... what a way to work in the number of channels, etc. into the schpiel.
    What else did you expect? That MyFi would not allow some channels to be heard??

    1. Re:Slashvertisment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What else did you expect? That MyFi would not allow some channels to be heard?? "

      Actually, YES. Their online service doesn't let you listen to every channel, I wouldn't be surprised if there was some similar posturing surrounding a device with a built-in recorder.

  25. Re:I heard you on the wireless back in Two-OhOh-Fo by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

    I'd been researching like crazy to see if there is a way to get XM service for free. I don't think there is anyway in hell possible. Any slashdotter is welcome to prove me wrong!

  26. Only 5 hours from a HD ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems like they'd be able to squeeze a lot more audio than five hours worth onto a device equipt with a hard drive.

    What's going on here?

  27. Hmm by ICECommander · · Score: 1

    Hacked in 3...2...1... Streamripper anyone?

    --
    All your Sybase are belong to us.
  28. I don't think it actually has a harddrive. by pavon · · Score: 1

    Nothing in the articles says it does, and the 5 hour capacity that they gave in the article, could be done with as little as 256 MB (probably 512 MB - don't know what XM's average bitrate is). I think that was just a faulty assumption on the editor's part. So you could only hold five or six albums, which you would likely want to switch out often. IMHO, that isn't worth the hassle when you have all the XM stations to listen to, and it would increas the complexity, support issues, and (to a lesser extent) the overall cost. If they did give it enough space to hold an entire music collection, then it would be far too expensive. So I can see why they left that capability out.

    1. Re:I don't think it actually has a harddrive. by SirDaShadow · · Score: 1

      You have a point. Assuming that 131072 Kbytes are allocated (128MB) and assuming it stores ct-ACC at 8Kbytes/sec, it would yield about 4 and a half Hrs, or almost 5 hours.

  29. It's called a revolution.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's see....
    Portable device able to record audio produced from radiowaves. The radio waves are being transmitted from a large distance.
    Hmmm...
    I think sony had a recordable walkman from the early 80's. And moving forward, some of the small MP3 players have the ability to record radio.

    Nothing to see here.... Just another balloon that needs to be popped.

  30. I think I'm done with Sirius now... by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 4, Informative
    There are a lot of people that enjoy either one or both services; But I am beginning to realize XM is more my style.

    If you are looking at getting either services, here are a few lessons I learned over the last year and a half....

    (i) XM seems to be going for the "deep playlist" crowd whilst Sirius is going for the "I would like to hear my favorite song many times a day" crowd. both approaches are valid. Depends if you are the type of person who likes pounding hits all day or, if you are the type of person who likes to listen to the "B" sides of records.

    (ii) XM's pricing approach is to have a cheap base price $9.99 but charge for services after that ( premium channels, online streaming is extra ), etc. Sirius has plans for premium channels, but have so far resisted the effort, they trying to have a hefty base package. I use streaming, but I would like for it to be optional, since I may what to go with yahoo launch ( once they start supporting Mozilla ) or real radiocast.

    (iii) Do not depend on the FM transmitter. Those things produce horrible sound. If you live in a city, forget it; you're going to be dodging stations on even short commutes.

    (iv) They both have less than CD quality sound and expect it to get worse as they try to cram more and more obscure stations in very limited bandwidth.

    (v) Do check xmfan.com and siriusbackstage.com to find the problems current users are having.

    --
    Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
    1. Re:I think I'm done with Sirius now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In regard to point (iv) i'd just like point out that yes the sound is not-quite-cd quality but it is still much MUCH better than broadcast AM/FM

      oh, also in regards to point (i) I think you just need to get off stations 1-10

  31. 5 Hours? by razmaspaz · · Score: 1

    That's it? It has a hard drive with 5 hours on it? Lets see here. MP3 encoding at ~1meg/minute. No that can't be right. Lets go WAV, 10 meg/minute so 5*60=300 so its 3000 megs. A 3 gig hard drive and its $349. WTF? This thing should be able to time shift hundreds of hours at that price. And if tivo can sell a 40 gig hard drive in their unit...and its $99. XM is not going to sell these things as well as they think.

    --
    I tried for 5 years to come up with a clever sig...only to realize that I am not clever.
    1. Re:5 Hours? by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      I think the biggest concern I have is that I'm most likely going to be out of satellite range for times usually longer than 5 hours (i.e., I'll be working at my desk inside a building - usually for 8 hours). Also, a majority of the "two funny guys" radio shows are 4-5 hours in length already, so you have room to record only one day's show?

      With the rock bottom prices on Flash RAM these days, this seems pretty pathetic...

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    2. Re:5 Hours? by dr+bacardi · · Score: 1

      Don't forget there is a terrestrial signal too... my XMPCR works fine inside my office. YMMV of course; I don't know where all the ground stations are, and you may not be near one.

  32. Cable TV's broken promise coming to radio by erroneus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm old enough to remember the beginning of Cable TV and the promises they made. They promised a crystal clear picture (mostly fulfilled) and commercial-free TV except for local channels carried.

    Well now everything, including the premium movie channels are carrying commercials. Kinda pisses me off because when cable started to catch on, they cut back on the signal strength of local air stations practically forcing the watcher to buy cable TV. Some people think I'm imagining things that local TV over the air was always bad. I tell them to compare that with their local ethnic TV station... out here local spanish TV comes in clear as a bell. They didn't cut back signal strength.

    So if satelite radio catches on, the same will happen to the local radio stations. I mourn already...

    1. Re:Cable TV's broken promise coming to radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In my experience, cable reception has usually been *worse* than broadcast. At one house I went with DirectTV before it had local stations, so I went out and got a nice big 12-foot long TV antenna and laid it down over the insulation in my attic. I got the best TV reception I've ever seen from that setup. It was absolutely flawless, even better than the satellite channels.

      I currently have a mix of analog and digital cable. They both look like crap; the analog is filled with noise (especially on the lower channels), and the digital is so compressed it looks like a bad RealMedia streaming video.

    2. Re:Cable TV's broken promise coming to radio by Scott7477 · · Score: 1

      You are right on; but missed one thing. Half of the programming itself is a commercial disguised as a show. Think of "You've Got Mail"...one gigantically boring AOL pitch...

      --
      "Lack of technical competence coupled with the arrogance of power, as usual, leads to no good end."
    3. Re:Cable TV's broken promise coming to radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cable TV isn't analogous to satellite radio here, because sat radio doesn't retransmit local radio. Sat radio wasn't even designed to do that; it was designed to supplement existing radio stations, not retransmit them. As far as commercials go on cable TV, you might have a point if sat radio increases their ads. The opposite seems to be happening, though; all of XM's music channels went commercial-free earlier this year. (About half of them had 1-6 minutes of commercials during certain hours of the day.) And I don't think cable ever promised that all of the non-local channels would be commercial-free, since that's very expensive to do, and the buck would somehow have to be passed to the consumer. I think TBS always had commercials (to use an early example on cable).

  33. It's NOT time-shifting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...why have the marketdroids and geeks started using this term so heavily. It's just a freakin' delay. You can't time-shift shit from the future back to now. Only if you can do that should it be called time-shifting.

    1. Re:It's NOT time-shifting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shut your pedantic hole

  34. For people in the workplace! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My experience with XM radio in a building or home with a metal roof = 100% signal loss.

    1. Re:For people in the workplace! by daveplot · · Score: 1

      That's why you put your antenna in the window or outside. I work in a office with no windows and ran the antenna wire above the ceiling panels to a neighboring office with a window.

  35. It should be noted by ICECommander · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The poster is the owner of xmxpert.com and owns stock in both XM and Sirius:

    "I opened a Scottrade account last week and purchased $450 worth of XM Stock and $50 of Sirius stock. I'm going to stay in it for the long haul, even though it has gone down every day, but it will go back up. It's all gone down $56.90 so far."
    His blog can be found here http://www.davidplotts.com/mt/

    --
    All your Sybase are belong to us.
    1. Re:It should be noted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You people are forgetting about Opie and Anthony on XM. They're ten thousand times better than Howard and they're already doing their shows on XM. If you don't believe me, check it out, you'll drop howard like a used sock.

    2. Re:It should be noted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      In the blogosphere, journalistic "conventions" such as "full disclosure" are obsolete and void. Please get up against the wall and prepare to be owned.

  36. Re:I heard you on the wireless back in Two-OhOh-Fo by AuMatar · · Score: 1

    Agreed. Isn't the whole point of switching to satelitte radio is to lose the god damn ads?

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  37. Re:I heard you on the wireless back in Two-OhOh-Fo by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Insightful
    $349.99 is a bit pricey, but with enough advertisements/sponsors etc, they might even be able give it away for free??

    Well, it ain't free but you can get one really cheap -- there's this device that offers constant free music and talk streams all the time, and you can rip any stream you want by connecting another device. Most of the free music is paid for by advertising. It's pretty cool if you like advertising; they call it a "radio."

  38. Re:I heard you on the wireless back in Two-OhOh-Fo by swordboy · · Score: 1

    $349.99 is a bit pricey, but with enough advertisements/sponsors etc, they might even be able give it away for free??

    Yeah... and they could call it MyFM.

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
  39. Re:Music nirvana: combine XM with iTunes-like prod by paul248 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Give me lots of channels, time shifting, and the ability to buy (preferrably unencumbered) tracks out-of-band (i.e., I can browse for tracks, not just wait for them to be played) and I will sign up. This service is so almost there.
    The critical missing element is that XM is only a one-way service, and for good reason. Transmitting to a geosynchronous satellite from a small battery-powered device would be a nightmare. Plus, they'd have to allocate bandwidth on the satellite for every user.

    I'm not saying that such a service would be impossible, but it would be a very big step from what they're doing now.
  40. Re:I heard you on the wireless back in Two-OhOh-Fo by ti.payn · · Score: 0

    I am pretty sure that anything that is a "public performance" requires ASCAP fees ... even if it is playing the radio. I was surprised when I found this fact out as one has to wonder how many times the ASCAP thinks it should be paid for one perfomance.

  41. Dear Lawyer, by Adam9 · · Score: 1

    Dear Lawyer,

    We forgot to tell you that we're going to use a product name that another company has already registered. How much will it take to settle this?

    Respectfully yours,
    XM

    Word Mark MYFI
    Goods and Services IC 009. US 021 023 026 036 038. G & S: PLAYERS AND RECORDERS OF DIGITAL AUDIO EMBODIED IN ELECTRONIC FILE FORMAT; RADIOS; AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR CREATING, MANAGING, PLAYING, AND RECORDING DIGITAL AUDIO. FIRST USE: 20021115. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 20021115
    Mark Drawing Code (1) TYPED DRAWING
    Serial Number 76448417
    Filing Date September 10, 2002
    Current Filing Basis 1B
    Original Filing Basis 1B
    Published for Opposition December 23, 2003
    Owner (APPLICANT) NEUROS AUDIO, L.L.C. LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ILLINOIS 2 NORTH RIVERSIDE PLAZA, SUITE 200 CHICAGO ILLINOIS 60606
    Assignment Recorded ASSIGNMENT RECORDED
    Attorney of Record Andrew J. Gray IV
    Type of Mark TRADEMARK
    Register PRINCIPAL
    Live/Dead Indicator LIVE


    1. Re:Dear Lawyer, by Recip_saw · · Score: 1

      Wondered a bit about this myself - when contacted Neuros reported by email that Delphi (who makes the radio) bought the name from them. Neuros has now renamed their FM modulator gizmo. Quoting the email (which I won't post in whole since I see that as bad karma without permission first):

      "No , we sold the name "MyFi" to XM/Delphi. We will now call the MyFi feature "NeuroCast".

      Makes sense for Delphi to buy the name - they have spend a lot of money on building the "Fi" brand.

    2. Re:Dear Lawyer, by Adam9 · · Score: 1

      Here we go...


      JoeBorn
      Neuros Audio Team
      Administrator

      Posted - 10/26/2004 : 5:48:50 PM

      It's true we sold the mark to XM a month or two ago. It wasn't that important a mark for us and they were willing to pay, so we said what the heck, more money for product development.

  42. Anybody Worried??? by sidepocket · · Score: 0

    Anybody else a little worried to have my cell phone next to my right nut and my MyFi next to the left one?

    1. Re:Anybody Worried??? by SpiffyMarc · · Score: 1

      Hate to break it to you, but the XM signal is reaching your nut regardless of whether or not the receiver is there. The XM signal is probably bouncing off my head this second.

      Satellite receivers are passive; they don't transmit (hence the name.) That's why most satellite systems for televisions have telephone lines plugged into them.

    2. Re:Anybody Worried??? by rco3 · · Score: 1

      Nah.

      You can put your nuts in the microwave, as far as I'm concerned. They're not MY nuts.

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
  43. Hurry up, Sirius! by thedarb · · Score: 1

    Well damn, I hope Sirius gets something like this soon. I chose Sirius some time ago because *all* it's music channels are commercial free, and I can listen to the music streams over the web.

    *TheDarb

    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
    1. Re:Hurry up, Sirius! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of XM's music channels are commercial-free too, and there's 68 of 'em, compared to Sirius' 60 (last I checked). Plus, you save $3/month if you don't actually listen online (which is why most of us buy hardware in the first place ;).

    2. Re:Hurry up, Sirius! by mroell · · Score: 1

      Sirius already has a product like this, minus the stream capturing (which I don't have a use for anyway). Anyway, it's a unit called the XAct. Go Here

      --
      I have no sig.
  44. Re:Music nirvana: combine XM with iTunes-like prod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why buy the tracks from the device? Would you type in a credit card number? Use an account that could be abused? It would never work.

    However, getting the thing to attach to a computer through iTunes might...

  45. Sirus radio!? by KingPunk · · Score: 1

    i wonder if XM's competitor Sirius Radio is going to be doing something similiar.
    i believe that it would be much better for buisness
    meh, i want howard, timeshifted, so i don't have to wake up at
    6am daily to listen to him rant about the fcc and the "big government"!
    the new saying in two-oh-oh-four, i want my howard stern!, screw MTV!

  46. Re:I heard you on the wireless back in Two-OhOh-Fo by erick99 · · Score: 1
    I bought the same radio, the Roady, and the home kit for $49 delivered this past June. XM runs specials almost constantly though I found this deal through fatwallet.com.

    I pay $9.99/month for the service and I pay another $3.99/month to login and listen over a computer (that was for my 14 year old son).

    Sirius is $2 cheaper per month if you want the radio and the online listening. However, XM has some stuff that I want that Sirius does not have, so, it depends on what you want.

    The prices for the radios and homekits/car kits/boombox, etc. are all over the map. Before buying I would search the bargain sites such as fatwallet, anandtech, etc.

    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
  47. Could be interesting but one question by niall2 · · Score: 1

    What is the FAA/FCC ruling about using one of these receivers on an plane? I assume it is only good for domestic flights but it sure would beat the selection offered by the current in flight music providers.

    --
    Today is a gift. Save the receipt.
    1. Re:Could be interesting but one question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The FAA doesn't allow passengers to operate any kind of radio receiver on a plane. JetBlue and (I think) ATA both offer XM's service to passengers, though.

  48. astroturfing, slashvertised by spoonyfork · · Score: 1
    Congrats /. you've been slashvertised again. For as long as this has been going on, OSDN must be getting paid to host these. People decry the ClearChannels of the world but love sat radio? Talk about a monopoly over content.

    Sat radio is bad technology at a very bad price. Wake up people.

    --
    Speak truth to power.
  49. No FM? by Bubba+Bui · · Score: 1

    You would imagine that for $349 they would at least put an FM radio in there, for the not-so-uncommon cases where you're too far away from a repeater and you don't have unobstructed line-of-sight to the satellite -- or for when you want content that is just not available on XM, such as Howard Stern or NPR.

    1. Re:No FM? by Miamisky · · Score: 1

      Good idea! I'm going to tell GM to put pedals in my car, for when I run out of gas.

  50. Re:I heard you on the wireless back in Two-OhOh-Fo by plover · · Score: 1
    No, the ruling was specific -- the fees were paid by the broadcaster at the time of broadcast, and therefore did not need to be paid by the business.

    As a matter of fact, this is what the ASCAP site's FAQ has to say about general licenses:

    Frequently Asked Questions About General Licensing

    ASCAP LICENSING OF BUSINESSES
    (Nightclubs, Concerts, Hotels, Businesses, etc.)

    1. I'm interested in playing music in my restaurant or other business. I know that I need permission for live performances. Do I need permission if I am using only CD's, records, tapes, radio or TV?

    Yes, you will need permission to play records or tapes in your establishment. Permission for radio and television transmissions in your business is not needed if the performance is by means of public communication of TV or radio transmissions by eating, drinking, retail or certain other establishments of a certain size which use a limited number of speakers or TVs, and if the reception is not further transmitted (for example, from one room to another) from the place in which it is received, and there is no admission charge. Your local ASCAP licensing manager can discuss your needs and advise how ASCAP can help you.

    --
    John
  51. Good idea, wrong implementation. by B0bbi · · Score: 1

    Wrong use of good technology. I own two TiVo's, I subscribe to Sirius, and I'm eagerly awaiting the day that I can hit quick rewind on my radio (since I keep trying to do it by accident ANYWAY).

    But since 99% of the stuff I listen to on the radio is talk anyway (I have an ipod for music), the only reason I would ever time-shift something would be to avoid commercials, that's impossible to do. There isn't a visual clue that the commercials are over. The only way that could be possible would be if the device somehow knew commercials were over - and, well, we've been down that road before with television, haven't we....

    I do want a hard drive on my Sirius. But only a small one, so I can rewind back a few seconds, as I mentioned above, for those moments when I wonder - hey, what did they just say? Time-shifting just doesn't make sense to me.

    1. Re:Good idea, wrong implementation. by ArtStone · · Score: 1

      Replay Radio does a pretty good job of recording radio streams to mp3 files. Its primary purpose is to capture Internet streams, but anything that can be plugged into the sound card input would work - except that the software on the computer doesn't have an ability to change the channel on the radio.

      It seems to me that we're rapidly approaching the point where conventional "over the air" broadcasting has no purpose. For music, all the stations are doing is playing digital files that are available elsewhere, restricted to a specific playlist. For other types of "content", the amount of time it takes to download a 30 minute radio program on a cable connection is close to trivial and dropping. A library of recent content would be more appealing than "live", unless the shows have a true interactive component.

      Just imagine how much better the public interest could be served with WiMax (or similar technology) on the 20Mhz of broadcast spectrum currently used by FM radio.

      --
      Final 2006 "Proof of Global Warming" US Hurricane Count -> 0
    2. Re:Good idea, wrong implementation. by B0bbi · · Score: 1

      I like call in shows - those will always require the live element :)

      But yeah, the idea of being able to pull down high quality sound is appealing.

  52. Radio Shark by bombadillo · · Score: 1

    Don't Forget me

    And to think the radio shark was hot shit not even a month ago.

  53. My XM? Lame! by WiseWeasel · · Score: 1

    That's a really uninspired name. XMan woulda been soooo much better. XMan: The walkman for superheroes...

    --
    "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
  54. Button overload by edgar_is_good · · Score: 1

    I know I've been spoiled by the ipods interface, but I'm looking at this thing and it appears to have 12 (!) buttons, five of which are two option buttons, and a little selection pad. Is this really necessary? Maybe people have patented having fewer than 12 buttons...

  55. XM or Sirius? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    Pro or Con, which product gives the most bang for the buck?