Slashdot Mirror


China Plans 5-day Manned Space Mission

rune writes "Both the BBC and The Register have articles on China's next manned space mission. This time two taikonauts are planned to be on board the Shenzou VI spacecraft sometime during 2005 for about five days. There is also a brief mention of the plans of the Chinese Space Agency for lunar exploration." hrld1,kon adds a link to this article on Chinaview, the official English-language news source for the People's Republic of China.

55 of 245 comments (clear)

  1. A New Moon Race? by anidiot · · Score: 2, Funny

    Russians will be there first...

  2. I'm sorry... by dwgranth · · Score: 3, Funny

    but does anyone else think this sounds like some cheezy anime cartoon??? taikonauts on the Shinzu??

    1. Re:I'm sorry... by bushboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nope.

      Sounds to me like China's space program is really going well and also that China is very much a potential super power - time will tell.

      --
      A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
    2. Re:I'm sorry... by dwgranth · · Score: 4, Interesting

      fair enough... seeing that the US is thinking of shutting down the shuttle missions soon, and it sending astronauts by way of the Russian rockets.. maybe china will come out on top after all in the next round of the space race (Man on mars??)

    3. Re:I'm sorry... by Cali+Thalen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      POTENTIAL superpower?!? You'd better hope they don't decide to provide proof of it...

      Someone post some stats about China's military numbers and their nuclear arsenal...I'm too lazy to google...

      No I'm not...2.5 million in the military, first successful nuclear test, 1964, hydrogen in 1967....OK they're #5 among the main nuclear powers, but that's still ~120 nuclear missles can do enough damage to consider them pretty powerful.

      --
      Chaos, panic, disorder...my work here is done.
    4. Re:I'm sorry... by Mant · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Becuase US military planners don't think China will just build more misiles?

    5. Re:I'm sorry... by Rei · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not only that, but 24 - even 120 - is an incredibly small number of nuclear weapons for a country as big as China. The US, for comparison, has thousands (~10,000, if I recall correctly - it's been a while)

      China's nuclear arsenal is about as good of an example of a "deterrant arsenal" as you can get. And, barring a drastic change in military strategy, if the US tries a "try to break their budget through a big military buildup" strategy, it's only going to break our own budget.

      --
      POTUS Witch Hunt tracker: 75 charges filed against 19 witches, 4 witches cooperating and 5 witches have pled guilty.
  3. This is way cool... by ajiva · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm hoping that with China, and maybe India getting involved in exploring space, maybe the US might get involved too. A three or four way (with Russia) space race, could easily see humans "out there" in the next 50 years. At the current rate, I don't think we'd ever make it.

    1. Re:This is way cool... by AndyChrist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Five way, if you count private enterprise separately. Six if you count the ESA separately as well.

      I wonder if the current partners will try and bring China on board the space station project? It would probably be comforting to know there was another party that could reach it if the US and Russia (at the same time) were rendered unable to.

      Well, so long as no one is trying to render anyone else unable to, it's comforting.

  4. Made in China... by Dzimas · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I'm getting scared. TVs, computers, LCD displays, mp3 players, and nearly every other kind of high tech device is made in China. Now they're leading the "new wave" into space.

    Meanwhile in North America, we've perfected manufacture of the double bacon cheeseburger. Gulp.

    1. Re:Made in China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      But if we can sell just one double bacon cheeseburger to each Chinese, just think what we'll make!

      P.S. Don't worry! Years ago we had already done everything they hope to do some day. We're way ahead. And space is not for humans, but for our offspring, robots.

    2. Re:Made in China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm getting scared.

      Scared?? What is their to be scared of?? China is the mightiest nation on earth. They have a standing army larger than the population of the United States. By 2050, if we are still around, you won't have anything to worry about. In fact you'll be happy in your new job that was outsourced from "the mainland" to save China money :)

    3. Re:Made in China... by luvirini · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No. They've finally caught up to where the USA and Soviet Union were 40 years ago. Well, yes indeed, but that is a bit missing the point. Currently US does not have manned launch capacity and russia has not progessed all that far in those 40 years.

    4. Re:Made in China... by divide+overflow · · Score: 4, Interesting

      > They should pay Bill Clinton a royalty. His administration made their recent progress possible.

      Hardly. Credit or blame goes to 1) Hughes Electronics Corp. and Boeing Satellite Systems for unlawfully transferring rocket and satellite data to China and 2) Richard Nixon for agreeing to expand political and economic ties with China back in 1972.

    5. Re:Made in China... by killjoe · · Score: 4, Funny

      I noticed today that it's very cold. I am also blaming Bill Clinton for the coming of winter. While I am at it I think I should also blame Bill Clinton for the darkness. Oh yea also for the rain and that itching in my left butcheek. That's Clinton's fault too.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    6. Re:Made in China... by ducomputergeek · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Nah, now its a race between China vs. Rutan to see who can put a man in space longer. So far China's ahead, but Rutan got a man in space twice in 2 weeks on a USD 25M budget. Now that's impressive even if it was just sub-orbital. Also proves that Dual Stage to Orbit vs. NASA's Single Stage to Orbit pipe dream is more cost effective.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    7. Re:Made in China... by dasunt · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm getting scared. TVs, computers, LCD displays, mp3 players, and nearly every other kind of high tech device is made in China. Now they're leading the "new wave" into space.

      If the Yuan ever floats (which would be due to economic/legal reform in China), then I believe that it would quickly fall in value compared to the US dollar, and the trade issues would change. I don't think that the current fixed exchange rates are sustainable as China's economy becomes a good fraction of the US's economy.

      The other issue is the question if China's current growth rate is sustainable -- many predict it is not sustainable in the short term. Judging by the actions of the Chinese in regards to their money supply, they also believe that the current growth rate is too high.

      Currently, China has a strong economy, especially in regards with most of East Asia, but with the gov't interference, and the above issues, it will be an interesting future for them.

  5. life support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    they will remain in orbit for five days, although their craft could support them for up to one week.

    wow, IMO that's a pretty a small buffer! i would add more to accomodate for any miscalculations or if they must stay up for londer for whatever reason.

  6. LOL by DarkMantle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the Article.. "In order to create a craft capable of orbiting in space for five days, scientists say they have been trying to reduce weight and improve the performance of onboad instrumentation."

    The funny part is... the US sent men to the moon in the late 60's and the entire spacecraft had less computer power then a 486 computer... And they need to improve current technology???

    Just goes to show, with todays technology, we sometimes forget we can simplify things.

    --
    DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
    1. Re:LOL by nels_tomlinson · · Score: 4, Informative
      ... the US sent men to the moon in the late 60's and the entire spacecraft had less computer power then a 486 computer... And they need to improve current technology?

      Well, there's always room for improvement. I'm sure they'd like to send more men up with less rocket booster than we could do 40 years ago. I bet they've already caught up to where we were in the '60s; after all, they've been making ICBMs for a long time now, they claim.

      As for the instrumentation, they make a lot of chips in China, but I think they're all consumer-grade, not radiation-hardened. Nowadays they should be able to collect a lot more data on the ship and its performance than we could get during the Apollo era.

    2. Re:LOL by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Informative
      the US sent men to the moon in the late 60's and the entire spacecraft had less computer power then a 486 computer

      Actually, far less power than a 486. It was a 15-bit CPU (8K RAM, 64K ROM) with a memory cycle frequency of only 83 kHz.

  7. America, meanwhile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is happy to note they may be able to get manned craft into space as early as late next year

    1. Re:America, meanwhile by Guncrazy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You mean the American government may be able to get manned craft into space as early as late next year.

      Remember, Scaled Composites, a private American company, has just recently completed two manned flights into space. And through a partnership with Virgin Atlantic, they've already pre-booked quite a few future flights.

      If you really want America to take a commanding lead in orbital work and space exploration, close NASA. Within 12 months, every one of their scientists and engineers will be re-employed in the private sector, at companies that will find better and cheaper ways to do what NASA is doing today.

  8. NERVA-like designs by rbanffy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe they could develop (or copy) a NERVA-like design such as the one Pratt & Whitney has shown about a week ago.

    If I remember correctly, the Chinese government never signed anything that forbids them putting fission reactors in orbit.

    1. Re:NERVA-like designs by ducomputergeek · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Once took a course in college taught a couple ex-NASA and JPL scientist called "Design your own space mission". Our team chose Mars and was shocked to see many of the needed technologies existed on the shelf including nuclear rockets. Main problems still are with the Human body like radiation exposure and the effects of long duration space travel.

      Anyway, here is the big problem with nuclear rockets: getting them into LEO. At some point you have to launch the fuel. That tends to attract a lot of protesters. To early in the morning to google the exact mission, but there was a deep space problem launched by NASA from Cape in the last 5 years that used Plutonium as its fuel source much like the Voyager probes. Green Peace and other groups protested the launch because of potential dangers if the self-destruct had to be employed because the launch failed in the atmosphere. People living in Denver get higher doses of radiation on a daily basis then would have been released if the rocket had to be destroyed for any reason. But still it garners a lot of political pressures.

      Also, if I remember correctly, there are parts of the Moon treaty which prohibit (at least potentually) deploying such engines in space because the amounts of Uranium could be considered as a bomb/weapon in space. At least according to the treaty.

      Even if the Russians, Americans, and others decided to allow fission reactors in space (which is a real possiblity in today's world), there would still be political protests against the move just because the shipment of radioactive materials into space.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
  9. Let me be the first by bckrispi · · Score: 3, Funny

    to welcome China to the mid 20th century.

    --
    Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
  10. China needs to join the ISS by Ryu2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Currently, the International Space Station consists of pretty much every spacefaring nation on Earth, with the exception of China... due to US uncertainty over its motives. So China is planning to go its own way, build its own station, etc.

    I don't know about you, but as a Chinese living in the USA, I would really like for China to join the ISS -- we don't need another Cold War style space race, and cooperation with the world will, I believe, lead to greater transparency and scrutiny of China's space program anyhow.

    Indeed, it's absurd that China is currently one of only two nations with a operational manned spaceflight capability, but isn't allowed to join the ISS -- when the ISS is suffering from major logistical resupply problems due to the grounding of the shuttle.

    China has, for years, been on a path from isolation back in the 1950s and 1960s, to being a part of the world community in many ways. The US needs to ditch its outdated paranoia, or else the other nations (Russia, EU, etc) need to grow some balls and admit China into the consortium for the benefit of all sides concerned.

    --
    There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    1. Re:China needs to join the ISS by ucsckevin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i'll give you three reasons the US shouldn't let China join the ISS:

      1. Taiwan
      2. Tibet
      3. East Turkistan (Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region)

      say what you will but at least most Iraqis are glad the US invaded, and want us to stay for a while. oh, and we let them protest and practice their religion.

    2. Re:China needs to join the ISS by cosmo7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think one thing that sets China's space program apart from those of the US and Russia is the Chinese' ability to dedicate themselves to long-term programs that do not produce results for decades. Look at the Three Gorges Dam; no western nation would commit themselves to a project that economically makes the ISS look like a summer camp project.

    3. Re:China needs to join the ISS by mcrbids · · Score: 2, Insightful

      we don't need another Cold War style space race

      Except that the 1960/1970's era cold war won't happen again. Power in the 1960/1970s was concentrated into the US govt and the USSR govt.

      Today, there's too much distributed power.

      I watched an old James Bond movie not too long ago with my kids. In one scene, the phone rings in the car, and Bond goes to answer it.

      My teen children, watching, had no idea that was even unusual, since between my wife, myself, and my household, we have 6 phone numbers, two of them cellular! (work phone, home phone, home-office phone, my cell, wife cell)

      I had to explain to them how COOL that was back in 1980 when the movie first came out!

      Nowadays, it's not NASA vs USSR space, it's NASA, USSR, China, ID Sofware, Scaled Composites, the EU space consortium, etc.

      In short, the days of the two-sided pissing match are over. Power is distributing, as it does with technology, and the rules today are fundamentally different.

      Nowadays, it's damn hard for the Bond franchise to find technologies cool enough for the next Bond movie. Recently, they've all but stopped trying.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    4. Re:China needs to join the ISS by RandomCoil · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Look at the Three Gorges Dam; no western nation would commit themselves to a project that economically makes the ISS look like a summer camp project.


      The dam cost $24.65 billion.

      The ISS has cost estimates on the order of $30 to $40 billion (including shuttle launch costs)

      I'm not sure I understand your point. Anyway, a better comparison to China's dam would likely be the Panama Canal, the Tennessee Valley Project, or Hoover Dam. As for modern projects, how about New York's third water tunnel ($6 billion) or the $21 billion Chunnel. Oh yeah, the Iraq war ~totally~ dwarfs the cost of that dam too.
    5. Re:China needs to join the ISS by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Informative

      No western nation would commit themselves to it because of enviromental reasons. Also, rumor has it that the new Chinese dam was poorly constructed while billions of unused chinese dollars were rerouted to the corrupted in office.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    6. Re:China needs to join the ISS by amightywind · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here is a posting of mine on this topic. China has already approached the US and been rebuffed.

      --
      an ill wind that blows no good
  11. Re:Race to mars... by stevok · · Score: 2, Interesting
    unfortunately.. China is almost 40 years behind the U.S. so it may be a while

    Not exactly... As people have been mentioning with Space Ship One and the private space industry in particular, there is a lot of borrowed technology and knowledge from previous missions. A lot of the legwork has already been done. But you are absolutely correct in saying that competition is good. Ain't no good capitalist gonna let no pinko commie space rocket beat us to space again!!! (Holy crap that triple negative actually came out logically correct!!) I think it'll be interesting to see who gets to Mars first, China or non-government private enterprise. We're in for a good show no matter what.

  12. Re:Please, no more "taikonauts"! by red+floyd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sorry, but the word "Cosmonaut" was there first.

    The first man in space was Russian.

    --
    The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  13. At least somebody is doing something by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful



    Something is always better than nothing.

    Ever since the space shuttle disaster, and the bankrupt of Russia, both the Americans and Russians are stuck with the ultra-expensive ISS.

    The Chinese are doing something, and they ought to be congratulated.

    If the Indians can do it earlier than the Chinese, so much the better. I also heard that Brazil also has something under development.

    How about the Europeans ?

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:At least somebody is doing something by cosmo7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The ISS doesn't have to be ultra-expensive. The space program has become the pork barrel smorgasbord of American politics. If completion and operation of the ISS was opened to independent contractors costs would plummet.

      Think about it: DC. Huge contracts. Political oversight. Do you really think that money is being spent in the most cost-effective way?

    2. Re:At least somebody is doing something by luvirini · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unfortunately ISS has to be expensive for the reasons you say and a few more, like the safety requirement. Any new technology is dangerous and people die when making them better. In order for things to get better you that needs to happen. The total number of people who died in the early years of aviation was huge, but again for political reasons that cannot be allowed in the space programs.

    3. Re:At least somebody is doing something by Urkki · · Score: 3, Interesting
      • And to say that we can't let people die in large numbers in the space progra 'for political reasons' says more about you as a person than it does about those in charge of space programs, fortunately. I think you need to take a close look at sorting out your priorities if you think that human life - or any life - is that cheap.

      We let people die in various ways and huge numbers all the time... The economic choices we make help millions to die in 3rd world. The car industry makes thousands of people (both drivers, passengers and pedestrians) die every year. Pollution causes many many unncessary deaths every year. And so on.

      The point is, whatever human activity, people die! Can't stop it, fact of life.

      So the question becomes, how many people are allowed to die, what is the acceptable risk per person. And if you say "no death is acceptable" then I sure hope you for example don't drive a car, since a lot of people kill other people with their cars every day, and only way it can be stopped is to stop driving cars completely.

      If we want to progress science and technology, we have to accept higher rate of deaths than is acceptable in "normal life". If we don't, we can as well give up and let those willing to take the risks to reap the rewards as well.
    4. Re:At least somebody is doing something by luvirini · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You do not have to agree, but if you look at history "all" the real advances in technology have caused death in the phases of the enterprise.

      Yes people die when things are not good enough, in most cases the reson for them not being good enough is because we do not know enough.

      About attitude in general, I think that the current culture trying to overprotect people is stopping innovation in many fields. Some of them important some less important.

      I just wonder at what point the good of individual became more important than the good of all. Probably at about the point that humans started to think they can afford the luxury.

      Please note that I do not think that human life is cheap, but since the price of progress is the fact that people are willing to take risks, I for one feel the things are often worth it.

      To use the small example I used, Airplane development: Sure we could have done it the way NASA does spaceflight with maximum sudy and minimum risks, but in that case I think we would be currently at about the stage where the planes are seen to be safe for public when they have gone through an extended safety training before flying. The high number of people actually collecting the information that today is the basis of aeroplane design were all heroes, and many of them died a hero's death.

      To balance things, how many people have later been saved by use of planes to transport medicines and food and so on?

  14. Well ya by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Funny
    There certianly aren't any US companies that make high technology.

    And I'm also certian that the US didn't just complete the first non-government manned space flight and doesn't have billions of dollars going to develop private space flight.

    Give me a break.

    China is emerging as an ecenomic powerhouse, and it looks like it will continue down that path, provided their government doesn't screw up. However please don't pretend like all good things come from China. I gave just a small list of the US companies that produce advanced hardware, including what drives almost all the devices you listed. Your MP3 player may be built in China but it's usually using TI DSPs and AD opamps.

    You know it's perfectly possible for China AND the US to be economic powers, and for both to benefit from trade with each other.

    1. Re:Well ya by aallan · · Score: 2, Informative

      And I'm also certian that the US didn't just complete the first non-government manned space flight and doesn't have billions of dollars going to develop private space flight.

      Actually, the Virgin group of companies is British...

      Al.
      --
      The Daily ACK - Eclectic posts by yet another hacker
  15. Re:Please, no more "taikonauts"! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    The word taikonaut is not used in Chinese. The Chinese word for astronaut is yuhangyuan, and the official English term used in Chinese media is "Chinese astronaut".

  16. India and China by pagal_paanda · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's good to see that China and India are getting their feet dirty in the Space Race. More information about India's Space program can be found at www.isro.org and its previous achievements can be found at http://www.isro.org/programmes.htm I wish them good luck. I just hope that China's Space program be as open as India's

  17. Re:Please, no more "taikonauts"! by casuist99 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Um, no. Just because the Russians beat the US and English-speaking world to space does not mean the word was there first.

    In fact, the first recorded use of "cosmonaut" was in 1959, while "astronaut" was first recorded in 1929. Check the OED before you make silly, easily disproven statements.

  18. 486 by vlad_petric · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It was actually much less than that (probably comparable to a Z80). 486 would have been PFM (pure magik) for those times.

    FYI: even today, you can't send more than a 486 in orbit, mostly because of feature sizes. The smaller the feature size, the easier for cosmic radiation to screw things up.

    --

    The Raven

  19. So now that China has money to put men in space... by character_assassin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... does this mean that we can stop sending them economic aid? (http://www.tibet.ca/en/wtnarchive/2004/4/6_5.html )

    --

    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
  20. NO buddy, today we have PPC in space.... by cheekyboy · · Score: 2, Informative

    motorola makes PPC 603/604 based cpus for sats these days.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  21. 2008 wake up call by tod_miller · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why are you even scared - so what if China is developing fast, has 1/6 the world population, you can just be thankful (if you like) that for the last few millenia they have been content stuck behind a wall.

    I think China is interesting, they will grow rapidly, with ever increasing ties into Japan-tech and don't forget a little sporting event in 2008 that will wake up most of the western world to how great China is.

    I wouldn't think for one moment China wants to barrage the US with bombs, I think barraging them with LCD's, Chips and assorted gadgetry will suffice.

    Look what happened ot Japan after 2 nuclear bombs. They didn't reinvest into thier army, but in developing technology.

    If in 4 years I here rhetorical war mongering amongst a (hopefully not, why not go and vote today?) Bush administration I will wonder what country they will hype up as a threat to world security in order to keep their little club in power.

    You see, we have no right being scared, trying to hold back other countries. You cannot be anti-monopolistic and worry about China at the same time.

    Fact: China will become a (the) world super power within 40 years, and export technology, culture and politics around the world.

    I for one welcome our Chinese overlords... :-) hahahahahahahahhaha laugh. Oh read Neuromancer and see for yourself the Asian overtones that sweep the entire future worlds.

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  22. Re:Please, no more "taikonauts"! by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 3, Informative

    No, I think that you'll find that the English translation "cosmonaut" of the much older Russian word is what you're talking about: Konstantin Tsiolkovsky was talking about cosmonauts in his native Russian in the 19th century.

    Check history more thoroughly before you make silly, easily disproven statements.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  23. Re:Please, no more "taikonauts"! by francium+de+neobie · · Score: 2, Informative

    The word "taikonauts" is invented by western media. If you check the Chinese media websites, they use "astronauts" for the English term.

    Example: Xinhua news international (this is their government news agency so you can't get much more "official" than this)
    What the official Chinese media call their astronauts

  24. Re:Please, no more "taikonauts"! by lxt518052 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    If the word is to die, it will. But I don't see the reason why it should.

    In my opinion, the reason for the word taikonaut to exist is because it carries a Chinese background. You can say "Chinese astronaut", but it's too long and people don't like it when they can use one word. Also, "Chinese astronaut" could be confused with Chinese-American astronauts like Dr Leroy Chiaohttp://www.jsc.nasa.gov/Bios/htmlbios/chiao.h tml.

    As a Chinese speaker, I'm not satisfied with the word "taikonauts" either. It sounds wierd to a Chinese ear, especially when pronounced by a non-native English speaker like myself. But it is not possilbe to let the western people read Chinese characters. Even the original pinyin form "taikongren" would cause trouble to most English speakers. Since now people are using it more and more, I can only accept it. That's the way languages evolve.

    Language is a living thing. An lively language like English can never be pure. If you want a pure language, there is Latin. But I'm afraid few nowadays know how to pronounce it. During the past centuries, English has absorbed words from Latin, Greek, Indian, Chinese, and many other languages to accommondate ideas from different cultures as well as the new things happening everyday. It can't be perfect in translating these ideas, but certainly it has so far done a good job.

    --
    People who dislike China tend to mention Tiananmen Square a lot, but they always forget the Tank Man is also a Chinese.
  25. Re:sexist language by tbone1 · · Score: 3, Funny
    Why are you still using the offensive sexist term "manned mission" ?

    Because you chicks are so cute when your act like pouty feminists.

    Sincerely,

    W.J. Clinton

    --

    The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
  26. Quick! by Stupid+White+Man · · Score: 2, Funny

    The day they are to return to earth, I saw we all don gorilla masks and give the "taikonauts" a wonderful surprise.

    Damn dirty apes!

  27. "taikonauts" by Dan+East · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm curious why the occupation involved with the exploration of space must use names derived from the language of the country doing the exploring?

    In what way does "astronaut" convey that the explorer must be from the USA? Why the segregation? Because a precedence was set with "cosmonaut" during the cold war? Do russians and chinese use different names for the space explorers of other countries? Why doesn't the ESA have their own word in place of "astronaut"?

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.