Slashdot Mirror


USAF Studies Teleportation

ArchAngel21x writes "Star Trek fans may be happy to hear that the Air Force has paid to study psychic teleportation. But scientists aren't so thrilled. The Air Force Research Lab's August 'Teleportation Physics Report', posted earlier this week on the Federation of American Scientists (FAS) Web site, struck a raw nerve with physicists and critics of wasteful military spending."

114 of 678 comments (clear)

  1. For the love of..... by BWJones · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Initially I thought this may have some relevance to encryption as there is a phenomenon of quantum teleportation that appears to have some scientific validity and would have significance in military and strategic planning and communication. However, when I actually started reading the article, at first I could not stop laughing until I reached this part:

    From the linked .pdf :An experimental program similar in fashion to the Remote Viewing program should be funded at $900,000 - 1,000,000 per year in parallel with a theoretical program funded at $500,000 per year for an initial five-year duration.

    What!!!!!???? I am thunderstruck that this recommendation could be made. 1.5 Million dollars for essentially a program that the CIA back in the 1970's decided was full of crap and decided to abandon. By the way, the CIA's program was ill conceived and full of it back then too amounting to a huge waste of taxpayer dollars.

    Other conclusions in the document are: "We will need a physics theory of consciousness and psychotronics, along with more experimental data, in order to test the hypothesis in Section 5.1.1 and discover the physical mechanisms that lay behind the psychotronic manipulation of matter." What can I say? The status of basic science education among those who make funding decisions within certain areas of government are pitiful.

    Even worse is this statement: "This phenomenon could generate a dramatic revolution in technology, which would result from a dramatic paradigm shift in science. Anomalies are the key to all paradigm shifts! " which has got to be the work of someone with a marketing background and absolutely no self respect in the scientific community. A document like this would be laughed out of the NIH or any other respectable scientific funding agency, but the scary thing is funding like this has always been able to go forward under the guise of military funding in crisis situations where fear abounds. Combine that with no understanding of science and this is what you get. If any of my students came up with something like this, I think I would cry.

    Hey, if the Air Force wants out of the box thinkers, I can come up with all sorts of biomemetic and bioencryption stuff for 1.5 Million that would be based in scientific fact with reliable peer review science behind it.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:For the love of..... by Raindance · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree with you that it's a terrible, terrible waste of money and Bad Science.

      However, the statement you lambasted,

      "This phenomenon could generate a dramatic revolution in technology, which would result from a dramatic paradigm shift in science. Anomalies are the key to all paradigm shifts"

      is quite true, if a bit sensationalistic. I'm not certain, as you said, it shows "no understanding of science". It's a reasonable paraphrase of some of the assertions in Thomas Kuhn's 'The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" which is the backbone (along with Popper's ideas and some french folks' theories) of modern conceptions of science and how science changes.

      Sometime somewhere someone really made a big mistake, and thus this research program was born. However crap it may be, though, it does show awareness of modern approaches to scientific change.

      RD

    2. Re:For the love of..... by BWJones · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My criticism has more to do with the style of writing which borrows commonly used "catch words" that seem to be popular with marketing folks these days. Specifically I was referring to his use of "paradigm shifts" twice within two serial sentences. I am surprised we did not see the invocation of "world class" among other gems of marketspeak which I am loathe to include in this post.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    3. Re:For the love of..... by Raindance · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Understood and agreed. I've found that bringing discussion of "paradigm shifts" into research is usually just used as a distraction to shift attention away from bad research.

      RD

    4. Re:For the love of..... by Rorschach1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You shouldn't take a report like this as evidence that the Air Force believes in psychic phenomena. They dole out quite a bit of money for various studies, and the people getting the money and doing the studies sometimes aren't the right people. The company I used to work for did a lot of papers for the Air Force and other agencies, and often I got the impression that it was material we had very little background in.

      It really came down to the company being a lot better at selling itself to these agencies than actually doing worthwhile research.

    5. Re:For the love of..... by Rei · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nonono. We need to keep giving the military more money. They always put it to good uses. They'd never, say, misplace 1 trillion dollars. More money for the military is the solution to everything.

      Even sarcasm. :)

      --
      "Now we're getting to Science -- I love this!" -- Dr. Steven Chu, Energy Secretary confirmation hearings.
    6. Re:For the love of..... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Just to be clear - they funded a study into the general areas and applications of teleportation by a private individual/small company. Some of the conclusions seem a bit wacky, however, there is no evidence in this documentation that the recommendations are accepted or that this guy's conclusions are accepted.

      I don't think there's anything fundamentally wrong with paying somebody to do some background research on potentially "out there" research areas, and figure out what application they might have to the military. However, with rather complicated topics like this, they should be hiring people with appropriate qualifications, and relying on a review of the research by qualified scientists before they do anything else with it. I assume they would do that before pouring millions a year into some of this stuff.

      The point where I start becoming wary is the point where he starts saying things like this:

      The debate among scientists and scientific philosophers is highly charged at times, and becomes acrimonious to the point where reputable skeptical scientists cease being impartial by refusing to examine the experimental data or theories, and they prefer to bypass rational discourse by engaging in ad hominem attacks and irrational "armchair" arguments.

      I don't know the specifics of the Chinese studies he mentions, but I know that most of the psychokinetic stuff from the 70s has been thoroughly discredited when repeated under controlled conditions. If you can only bend a spoon with your mind when its your spoon and your on national TV, then I don't think you're really bending the spoon with your mind. Incredible claims require incredibly strong evidence to back them up. If this guy can repeat any of the results that the Chinese studies he mentions were able to produce (he says they were repeatable, but fail to say by whom - if they just said they were repeatable, that fails to rule out the most likely explanation of simple scientific fraud), then by all means, fund away.

      It is a bit disturbing is that this same fellow is making recommendations on military funding of mainstream scientific propositions, like quantum cryptography and computation, entanglement research, and thereotical string theory stuff. And he thinks they should wait-and-see while D-Brane theory matures, but run full steam ahead with psychokinetic research.

      He also seems to recommend that some of the most outrageous and least likely to pay off topics should be pursued the most vigorously, like "biological quantum teleportation", based on a single, unpublished paper in the arxiv.org online repository (i.e. a non-peer reviewed scientific publication with no credibility to speak of). Additionally, he recommends funding FTL communication based on entanglement, demonstrating a complete lack of understanding of the concept of group vs. phase velocity. Without at least an inkling of which direction to go, funding a million bucks a year of FTL communications research based on the irrelevant mechanism behind entanglement is useless.

      So yes, this guy is a quack, but it looks like nobody is taking the recommendations seriously. Was the study a waste of $25,000 (what the Yahoo News article says the company was paid for this work)? Perhaps, but lots of small research projects happen and end up going nowhere, and like they say, it's sometimes worth pursuing a bit of cursory research in even unlikely areas to see if anything interesting gets turned up. In this case, it didn't pay off (and I doubt this guy will be doing any more studies for the Air Force).

    7. Re:For the love of..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
      American lysenkoism, such as it is, is the result of giving money to the people who promise the most. It's a collective problem, without any one identifiable person driving the drivel.

      I saw this in the telecom industry. Our company had a mania for the "make or buy" decision. That meant, in practice, that the money went to the group that made the biggest promises. Consequently, everyone promised more than they could actually accomplish. Managers knew that, of course, but they went along because they were subject to the same pressures. You could see, year after year, more hyperbole and overstatement creeping into goal statements, mission statements, and everything. It becomes an erosion of honesty, and (like in lysenkoism), one can imagine drifting off into a fantasy world.

      In industry, of course, the free market will eventually stop such corporate fantasies. If only because people stop buying the resulting products and the company flounders.

      Another example of such over-promising is the Institute for Soldier Nanotechnology. Mind you, the ISN is a bunch of competent people doing real research, and I expect them to do great things. Still, they cannot resist making wild promises on their web site, http://web.mit.edu/isn/aboutisn/index.html.

      "Imagine a bullet-proof jumpsuit, no thicker than ordinary spandex, that monitors health, eases injuries, communicates automatically, and maybe even lends superhuman abilities."

      Uh huh. Lemme see. How much force needs to be applied to stop a bullet in the thickness of spandex? Quite a bit. If you do a minor calculation, you'll find it's completely ridiculous, yet these guys with physics Ph.D.s tolerate this kind of crap as advertisement.

      They tolerate it because if they don't, someone else will say it, and that someone will get the money. The Army guys play along. That way, they can presumably point out to congressmen the wonderful things they will get from their research money.

      Personally, I think that the root of the problem is that no one is really paid to evaluate these research proposals. It's expected to be done in one's spare time.

    8. Re:For the love of..... by mi · · Score: 2, Informative
      Now why is the USA going down the road to Lysenkoism?

      The really bad part about Lysenkoism was the guy's ability to send representatives of competing scientific ideas to GULAG -- through the universal accusations of treason.

      As long as that ability is nowhere to be seen around here (and it is not), bringing up the scumbag's name is no better than mentioning Nazis :-)

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    9. Re:For the love of..... by Zondar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is only when you expand your beliefs of what is "possible" beyond the limits of your 'basic science education' that real discoveries are possible. Lots of people in history have been laughed out of town that turned out to make significant scientific discoveries.

      I mean, *everone* knows the Earth is the center of the universe... /rolleyes (That darned Copernicus)

      And as for those "invisible streams of particles" - *I* don't see any particles, and I don't feel them either! Everyone knows you're making it up!! (Radioactivity? Marie Curie, anyone?)

      Tiny little dimensions curled up so small that even particle accelerators can't see them? Science fiction (oh yeah, that's called String Theory, isn't it?)

      And...

      And...

      Remote Viewing sounds a lot like the work of Edgar Cayce - whose actions still mystify people today. Being able to go into a "trance" and deliver accurate medical diagnoses of people whom he had never touched, only had the address and a rough physical description... even to the point of breaking off the diagnosis session when the person died ACROSS THE ATLANTIC OCEAN...

      Whether it's real or not, I'm not sure anyone really knows or can prove one way or another yet. However, there have always been theories on a 'collective unconscious' or something similar - something like a giant radio channel on which the thoughts and actions of everyone everywhere is available.

      Don't laugh at the 'unbelievable' too hard. It might be next year's Science Today.

    10. Re:For the love of..... by BWJones · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Some of the conclusions seem a bit wacky, however, there is no evidence in this documentation that the recommendations are accepted or that this guy's conclusions are accepted.

      But this is an advocation for 8 Million dollars of taxpayer funded money. A lot of good science can be done with 8 Million dollars.

      don't think there's anything fundamentally wrong with paying somebody to do some background research on potentially "out there" research areas, and figure out what application they might have to the military.

      Is it worth 8 Million dollars? Do you know how much education could be done for 8 Million dollars? Do you know how much science could be done for 8 Million dollars? Hell, do you know how much 8 million dollars would be if compounded with interest over 20 years? That would certainly help pay down our deficit and make US science more competitive.

      I don't know the specifics of the Chinese studies he mentions, but I know that most of the psychokinetic stuff from the 70s has been thoroughly discredited when repeated under controlled conditions.

      If it is not testable, then by definition it is not science. This is why real science is peer reviewed and documented. If your peers cannot duplicate your results or have access to your data, then there very well may be some suspect work going on.

      It is a bit disturbing is that this same fellow is making recommendations on military funding of mainstream scientific propositions, like quantum cryptography and computation, entanglement research, and thereotical string theory stuff.

      What is disturbing is that this person is confabulating real science with bogus ideas. I call shenanigans! Seriously though, this is how lots of crackpots justify their products and ideas by making them sound plausible through the lens of real science. To the untrained, this could appear plausible. But like shark cartilage and crystal healing (placebo effects aside) much of this stuff is complete bunk.

      Was the study a waste of $25,000 (what the Yahoo News article says the company was paid for this work)?

      I'll field that question.........The answer is yes .

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    11. Re:For the love of..... by killjoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I just want to pick a nit with you. You said.

      ' Incredible claims require incredibly strong evidence to back them up.'

      This is a ridiculus statement to make. All claims should be judged by the same criterea. Just because you think the claim is ridiculus you should not be able to raise the bar for proof beyond any other claim. Science is science, proof is proof. You don't get to say "this proof is not sufficient because your claim is incredible".

      --
      evil is as evil does
    12. Re:For the love of..... by pilgrim23 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Folks. this is how it works: It is 90 days till the end of the budget cycle. You have $2-3 million left over, If you do NOT have a documented use for that money come Appropriation Day then your budget will be docked by this amount. Budget and the size of your department are all that matter in government land. It matters not one jot what this is spent on, it MUST be spent and it must be spent in a document able way. If the idea is hair brained, stupid, and a waste it may or may not be dredged out of the cesspool of bureaucracy and scrutinized on Slash dot or other forums (like the Congress), but in most cases it just makes another month's pay for a Beltway Bandit "Think Tank" or "Institute". Face it folks: Taxes are never levied for the benefit of those taxed, and the money gained is never spent in a worthwhile way.

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    13. Re:For the love of..... by winwar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, because we are nitpicking...

      When exactly does science "prove" something?

      How does science or the scientific method "prove" something?

      It doesn't.

      It gathers evidence to support hypotheses, which then may become theories, laws and paradigms. But it hasn't "proven" anything. It provides the most likely explanation, at best.

      And I think it is reasonable to expect that incredible claims have incredibly strong evidence to back them up. Otherwise, they are unlikely to be accepted. If you claim teleportation is possible, you had better be able to do it, at least on a small scale, otherwise people will rightly think you are crackpot....

    14. Re:For the love of..... by antiMStroll · · Score: 2, Informative

      For the record, this is far from the first study of its type performed for the American military. There's a long history of this kind thing, especially through the seventies.

    15. Re:For the love of..... by Sammy76 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Right, and the roads I drive on, libraries I use, schools I attend, courts that uphold our laws and the military that defends us are all completely worthless and solely for the benefit of some politician and their corporate whores.

      I'm sure if we eleminated taxes and spent our windfall on more shit from Wal-Mart the invisible hand of capitalism would take care of all our problems for us.

    16. Re:For the love of..... by Total_Wimp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Whether it's real or not, I'm not sure anyone really knows or can prove one way or another yet. However, there have always been theories on a 'collective unconscious' or something similar - something like a giant radio channel on which the thoughts and actions of everyone everywhere is available.

      A teenage friend of my daughter told me the other day about his desire to get free energy out of magnets. His theory was that since they're constantly pushing against each other, you can use that push to power a fan which would turn a wind turbine. He believed that the theory hadn't been adequately tested and he wanted to borrow some or the high-powered magnets I had gotten out of hard drives.

      Naturaly I gave him the magnets (never squash initiative in a teenager if you can possibly help it), but they came with discussion of putting in as much energy as you get out, potential energy in a gravity well, etc.

      He was a kid, the magnets were basically free. His "experiments" would cause no harm. I sat down and told him the truth before letting him proceed. If we're going to have this kind of relationship with full grown men, I'd prefer we did it with free magnets and an education program instead of 7.5 million bucks of our hard-earned tax dollars.

      TW

    17. Re:For the love of..... by FurryFeet · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do you think they'll use Tiger Teams to coordinate synergies into digital convergence devices in order to create Best-of-Breed teleporters?
      (I have got to stop taliing to marketers. It's not healthy).

    18. Re:For the love of..... by TheUglyAmerican · · Score: 2

      "Imagine a bullet-proof jumpsuit, no thicker than ordinary spandex, ..."

      Possible. All you need is a material that becomes rigid in a more or less linear fashion in response to acceleration. Such a material would be flexible for normal activities but the moment a bullet tries to penetrate it (a force attempting to accelerate the fabric at a rate faster than it can physically tolerate), it would become rigid and spread the force of the bullet over a wide area rendering it non-lethal.

      Of course I could be wrong.

      --
      "Written on the pages is the answer to the never ending story..."
    19. Re:For the love of..... by pipingguy · · Score: 4, Funny


      Krusty: So he's proactive, huh?

      Lady: Oh, God, yes. We're talking about a totally outrageous paradigm.

      Writer: Excuse me, but 'proactive' and 'paradigm'? Aren't these just buzzwords that dumb people use to sound important? Not that I'm accusing you of anything like that. .....[pause]..... I'm fired, aren't I?

      Myers: Oh, yes! - The rest of you writers start thinking up a name for this funky dog; I dunno, something along the line of say... Poochie, only more proactive.

    20. Re:For the love of..... by azav · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, hello. Catholic church? I need a priest who can exorcise Marketing Speak from a poor slashdotter.

      Yes, I'll hold.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    21. Re:For the love of..... by JudgeFurious · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You really don't have a clue about this do you? Sure the roads you drive on, libraries you use, schools you attend, and courts that uphold our laws as well as the military that defend us all get taken care of and they're each and every one a worthy reason to pay your taxes. But if you think the end of the year "Find something to do with this money quick!" effect doesn't happen then you're wrong.

      It's the result of the culture of government. Work in it and you'll see it in person. I can only speak to local government and a little bit to state level but I think it would be shocking if the same things didn't happen on the Fed level.

      From the start of the fiscal year management guards their funds like the money is coming out of their own checking account. At the start of our fiscal year you can't order a pack of friggin CDR's without three signatures. The department managers all turned in budgets that were approved and that included these expenses. They've been approved once before you even ask for them. But when the time comes to buy them it's an ordeal. They're like this over most anything you can imagine needing and big items like Servers involve piles of paper justifying their purchase. "It's the taxpayers money" is the phrase of the day. Then a funny thing happens near the end of the fiscal year. All these money hoarding managers start to figure out that they've still got money available that's "use or lose". See, all of them padded the shit out of their budgets when they turned them in for approval and they haven't used 3/4 of the total yet.

      Suddenly you can get anything that you can think of for about a month. It's a spending frenzy and some of the stupidest shit you can think of gets bought. Some good gets done from time to time but usually it's spent on stuff we don't need to do things we're never going to do.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    22. Re:For the love of..... by FindFirstOne · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's tempting to generalize when promoting fringe science. It's also tempting to generalize when debunking fringe science. Perhaps the most maligned of the fringe projects has been the SRI (not CIA) remote viewing study which has been referred to in this thread. People who take the time to read the reports of this study find two things: One, that the percentage of hits (remote views which conformed to the experiment's criteria for accuracy) was statistically significant; Two, that outside the controlled conditions of the lab, it was only possible to state the probability that an attempted view would or would not be a hit. Statistical significance is interesting science, but weapons require higher predictabilities, and no way was found within the time frame and parameters of the experiment to alter or affect the probabilities in any way. The outcome was "interesting" in the physics sense, but was fundamentally uncontrollable; and therefore, by the standards of the experiment, a failure.


      This is where it's our job not simply to lump everything together and call it crap. Something odd happened at SRI: A "wild" phenomenon, being studied on the basis of a "look under every stone" philosophy, seemed to prove out real -- that is, statistically significant -- but not significant enough, and intractable to attempts to improve the odds. It's useless as a weapon or as just about anything else, but barring repeating the experiment we must accept that something odd enough to be genuinely disturbing happened to the technically sophisticated science workers and technicians who formed SRI's in-house volunteer test group.


      This is just a plea to not throw out the baby with the bath. Because a far-out experiment fails doesn't mean that nothing was learned. We frequently learn more from our failures than from our successes. As Robert Heinlein said, if you don't bet, you can't win. Finding that remote viewing, though uncontrollable, may be accurate at rates slightly but consistently better than chance, suggests not necessarily funding more remote viewing experiments but looking more closely at basic physics for chinks where some tiny thing may have been misinterpreted for no other reason than "common sense". In other words, stay loose.

    23. Re:For the love of..... by javaman235 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is no free market, and you should stop hoping it's going to come in and save the day for you.

      Yep, the free market is just a fairy tale. Companies who fail to produce viable products go on forever.

      What are you talking about?

      --
      -The art of programming is the pursuit of absolute simplicity.
    24. Re:For the love of..... by dbIII · · Score: 2, Insightful
      through the universal accusations of treason.
      Treason is OK in this neck of the woods - they even gave Ollie North another decent job - but being "Unamerican" is a different story, as McCarthy showed.

      There is also more to Lysenkoism than sending people you don't like away - and it is better that we don't go down to path to the nations science being controlled by crackpots.

    25. Re:For the love of..... by dbIII · · Score: 3, Informative
      it would become rigid and spread the force of the bullet over a wide area rendering it non-lethal.
      Becoming rigid it would nicely allow the energy to propagate into your body - you want something that absorbs energy. You see this in car design with crumple zones, and with the shift in bike helmet design from the rigid shell helmets that survive a knock but transmit a lot of force, to soft foam helmets that break easily but not much force gets to your skull.

      Really stiff materials transmit waves very well, and really thin things transmit very little energy in the form of waves out along the thickness of the material - most goes right in. Real bullet proof vests are thick, made of materials that are not very strong (kevlar is a type of nylon) but are very light and absorb a lot of energy. Also think of window glass - very strong, very stiff, can't absorb much energy VS polycarbonate, the plastic known as bullet proof glass.

      All you need is a material that becomes rigid in a more or less linear fashion in response to acceleration
      Visco-elastic materials behave in a similar way, and most metals behave differently under very high strain rates - but you really need something to absorb energy, so the opposite would be better. Something that gets squishy and squirts everywhere is a whole lot of energy that doesn't get through. Thixotrophic mud (spelling will be wrong) gets sloppier when you stir it.

      Someone is bound to post back that kevlar really is strong - it is very strong for a polymer and it doesn't weigh much per unit volume, so people tend to confuse strength to weight ratios with strength. However, something an inch thick is going to be stronger made from low quality steel than kevlar. Stength is how much force a material can take for a given cross section - that's all it is.

      There are stronger polymers than kevlar, but you wouldn't want to use them in a bullet proof vest since they don't absorb much energy.

    26. Re:For the love of..... by tcgroat · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I wouldn't put it quite that way. I say that the reason humans can fly in airplanes is because we quit trying to do it with feather-covered ornithopters. If you fixate on the goal of a flying machine with flapping wings, you wouldn't come up with the airplane. In other words, you extend and apply the proven science, rather than hoping some miraculous new science appears to validate the conclusion you insist upon.

      Assuming the article wasn'r a work of satire, which it certainly could be!

    27. Re:For the love of..... by julesh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Admittedly, in the unlikely event that they are right (yeah, right!), what would result would qualify, IMO, as a paradigm shift... it would mean that almost all of our physical theories about the way the universe works were fundamentally _wrong_. We'd have to abandon relativity and quantum theory as they would, for the first time since their development, be unable to explain observable and repeatable phenomena. This, I think qualifies as a "paradigm shift", just as the introduction of these two theories were the last two such shifts we have experienced.

  2. Carte blanche? by October_30th · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Air Force has paid to study

    Heh. I guess that's like during the good old Cold War. If you just got some sort of an idea of how to beat the enemy, you've got a blank check.

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
    1. Re:Carte blanche? by magarity · · Score: 2, Funny

      if this technology falls into the "wrong hands"

      Dude, it's *psychic* technology... it's in everyone's head already.

  3. Why is this a surprise? by gkuz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In a country in which a substantially larger portion of the population believes in the Virgin Birth than in evolution through natural selection, and which has just this week demonstrated that majority, why should anyone be surprised?

    1. Re:Why is this a surprise? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually New Age and modern charsismatic evangelicalism have many of the same roots (basically they're the product of early post-modernism). Things like the veneration of subjective experience over objective facts - 'I can feel sense the spirits of the dead' is very close to 'I can feel the Holy Spirit in this room'. They're treating subjective feelings as objective facts.

      Traditional evangelicalism is more like you describe. This was a product of the enlightemnent - everything must be proved/explained - so you'll find those kinds of christian more 'bookish' and generally reject experience as a means to understand anything.

      Interesting society is still changing - I've been to churches where dogma is almost anatheama and everything is debated and reasoned out, and it's not uncommon for everyone to have a completely different opinion - my own feeling is that will be mainstream within 20 years (at the moment it's a few hundred 'emerging' churches), as society is
      already a long way along that road - you can see it in slashdot between the 'QT might be true, you never know' and the 'this is bollocks' type of people, getting into arguments about how it's wrong to say anything is bollocks just based on solid scientific evidence...

  4. Well by ShooterNeo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While highly implausible, the whole idea of science is to discover things that one wouldn't expect. If soundly gathered evidence suggests psychic powers or teleportation is real, then we should investigate it. If the facts fit, then no matter how much someone might not desire to accept an explanation (whether it be for or against any phenomena), it is most likely the truth.

    1. Re:Well by FooAtWFU · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If soundly gathered evidence suggests psychic powers or teleportation is real, then we should investigate it.

      The thing is... it doesn't.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    2. Re:Well by BFaucet · · Score: 4, Funny

      Phychic powers have been studied for centuries. No one has made any convincing argument or presented any substantial evidence in this area.

      I have also called Cleo and she said she sees the project failing.

      --
      -Derick
    3. Re:Well by dlakelan · · Score: 4, Informative

      There is good science to suggest that the conservation of energy is real. This has been tested repeatedly.

      There is also good science to suggest that the theory of relativity is real, every day in particle accelerators across the world it's used to make predictions that turn out.

      The combination of conservation of energy, and relativity suggests that on any largish scale, there can be no teleportation. Of course these things break down when quantum theory is important, but quantum theory seems to be unlikely to be important for the teleportation of large scale objects over large distances.

      the way this goes is that conservation of energy (and mass, which is energy in relativity) must be a local phenomena, because if it is non-local, then two different observers will see things differently, one sees that mass a disappears and mass b appears simultaneously at a different spot, another observer moving in a different relative frame will NOT see these as simultaneous, thereby violating conservation of energy since mass b will appear first, then mass a disappear.

      when you bring in quantum theory, there is uncertainty involved, and relativity hasn't exactly been melded properly with quantum, so things get a little more muddy, but we're talking about very SMALL effects on the order of 10^-34 joule seconds (hbar).

      IN other words, there is already a huge set of scientific evidence against the idea that this is possible.

      --
      ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) http://www.endpointcomputing.com a scientific approach to custom computing.
    4. Re:Well by cephyn · · Score: 2, Funny

      But was she expecting your call?

      --
      Moo.
    5. Re:Well by khayman80 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I agree that this is a serious waste of taxpayer money- this kind of pseudo-scientific bullshit has no place in any government organization.

      However, most scientists that discuss teleportation don't talk about simultaneous teleportation. That *would* definitely be impossible due to relativity, like you mentioned.

      In reality, quantum teleportation is a legitimate scientific topic (that's what I study, as a matter of fact). It's possible because the teleportation isn't instantaneous- it happens at a speed less than or equal to the speed of light. The reason it is called teleportation is that quantum effects are used to make a particle disappear from point A and reappear at point B (a suitable time later) without crossing the intervening space. Cool, huh?

      This effect has already been demonstrated for photons, and limited effects have been demonstrated for single atoms. Whether or not it will ever be possible on a larger scale is a matter of debate... but it isn't a debate about relativity.

    6. Re:Well by Carnildo · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is good science to suggest that the conservation of energy is real. This has been tested repeatedly.

      There is also good science to suggest that the theory of relativity is real, every day in particle accelerators across the world it's used to make predictions that turn out.

      The combination of conservation of energy, and relativity suggests that on any largish scale, there can be no teleportation. Of course these things break down when quantum theory is important, but quantum theory seems to be unlikely to be important for the teleportation of large scale objects over large distances.

      the way this goes is that conservation of energy (and mass, which is energy in relativity) must be a local phenomena, because if it is non-local, then two different observers will see things differently, one sees that mass a disappears and mass b appears simultaneously at a different spot, another observer moving in a different relative frame will NOT see these as simultaneous, thereby violating conservation of energy since mass b will appear first, then mass a disappear.


      Actually, it works out. Observer A sees what's happening as teleportation, while Observer B sees it as time travel. You get the same phenomenon when moving something through a wormhole, and the physics of that are fairly well worked out.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    7. Re:Well by halfelven · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is good science to suggest that the conservation of energy is real. This has been tested repeatedly.
      There is also good science to suggest that the theory of relativity is real, every day in particle accelerators across the world it's used to make predictions that turn out.
      The combination of conservation of energy, and relativity suggests that on any largish scale, there can be no teleportation.


      In the 19th century, there was "good science to suggest" that, given a strong enough rocket engine, objects can be accelerated to speeds bigger than 300000km/s. There was also "good science" that suggested that the space is flat and euclidian.

      What i'm saying is, your argument boils down to "our present knowledge is perfect, thereby anything contradicting it cannot exist."

      I am not saying that said teleportation project is sound and sane. I am saying that one should look at whatever paradigm he/she adheres to with caution.
      Too often i see people otherwise rational that seem to imply that psychic phenomena are made impossible by the simple fact that a million newagers believe in them ("if a pothead believes in X, then X does not exist"). A million newagers may have an irrational belief, yet that does not make certain things impossible.

      Again, i am not implying anything, i just don't like it when people take a transitory scientific paradigm as dogma.

  5. Bait and Switch? by Hallowed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd say this is a fast one they are trying to pull to funnel the money to some black project....hell it could just be for the AF general staff coffee and doughnut fund!

    --

    1. When the pin is pulled, Mr. Grenade is no longer your friend.

    2. Do not eat iPod shuffle.

  6. random slashdot quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    classically, the random slashdot quote at the bottom of this article was "You cannot achieve the impossible without attempting the absurd."

    Dan Tedrick

  7. Classified by dmomo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's probably money procured for something they don't want to tell us they are using it for.

  8. With the current administration... by myowntrueself · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With the current, rather theocratic US administration, I'm surprised they don't try training field medics in faith healing...

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    1. Re:With the current administration... by JFitzsimmons · · Score: 5, Informative

      Link 1
      Link 2
      Just a couple of examples.

      --
      Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master. -Anonymous
    2. Re:With the current administration... by Carnildo · · Score: 3, Funny

      You mean, besides announcing that God speaks through him?

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    3. Re:With the current administration... by eliktronik · · Score: 2, Informative

      He said it to an Amish group in Lancaster, PA:

      "I trust God speaks through me. Without that, I couldn't do my job."

      http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1172948/p osts

      It's also been reported in many other places, just do a google search.

    4. Re:With the current administration... by fyngyrz · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Link 2 concerns allowing religious organisations to apply for the same charitable grants that non-religious organisations can. That's only fair.

      It is not fair until religious organizations pay taxes. Presently, they're parasites, a condition created and continuously enabled by pathological government favoritism.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    5. Re:With the current administration... by fyngyrz · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Now, if churches are profit-making, you would have a point.

      No. I have a point anyway. A very solid one. I'll make it in some detail for you to pick at.

      Look here: I pay taxes; the government builds roads. My family drives on roads and otherwise benefits from roads. So I am really pretty happy to pay for roads.

      In sharp contrast, the church doesn't pay taxes. However, churchies drive on roads, the materials to build their churches are delivered on roads, etc.

      Ergo - and there really is no way out of this - I, and other taxpayers, pay for the churchies to drive on and otherwise benefit from roads. There is zero way out of this. They're not paying, I am, and they get the benefit. So I'm paying for them.

      The problem here - and it is a huge problem - is that I do not support the idea of giving free stuff to churches. I support the idea that if you want to give free stuff to a church, that is perfectly OK, of course. But you don't have my authority to give my stuff to a church, just because you like it.

      As it turns out, since the funds are now in government hands, the government is paying for churchies to drive on roads. This is blatent religious favoritism, at the very least, and nepotism as far as the usual administration goes, because we usually have a bunch of religious yahoos running the country, who of course have no problem giving my money to a church in this fashion.

      Any supposedly "non-profit" operation gets this benefit (which is what I presume you were referring to with your tax section quote - I can't quote sections, that's why I have an accountant and a lawyer, but anyway...)

      The problem here is staring us right in the face. If the church or any NP receives a major benefit derived from my money that I do not and for which they do not have to share in equal cost - like roads, defense of property, lunch, etc... then I am being robbed; it may seem like Robin Hood style action to the religious folks - manna from heaven, as it were - but it is manna taken out of my little nest egg while they get a free lunch, and I don't like it.

      If I have to pay to drive on roads, so should those people. It is just that simple.

      This applies to everything that I pay taxes for, and the church or a supposedly NP entity does not.

      These entities profit from the stuff that I paid for, because they did not invest in them. Free benefits for them, but I pay.

      Just one more reason I maintain that our government is completely out of control.

      Relevant section of the First Amendment:

      Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion

      Now, I read that several ways. It means that congress can't say "you can't create X religion(s)", it means congress can't say "you must adhere to X religion(s)", it means that congress can't say that "you must not adhere to X relgion(s)", it means that congress can't say "you must support X religion(s)", and it means congress can't say "you must not support X religion(s).

      And there is the key: Making me pay for the X's to have free roads is making me support X religion, no matter whether I adhere to it or not, no matter if I want to support it or not. It is government sponsorship - big time - for superstion. It's not just wrong in conscience, not just wrong in principle, but it is entirely wrong constitutionally and therefore has no legitimate basis in law.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  9. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 5, Funny

    If someone gave me money to study "psychic teleportation", I'd be like "Thank you, Allah!" and immediately begin researching liquor and hookers.

    "Guys, you're not gonna believe this! Last night, I as at this strip club, I closed my eyes and when I opened them, I was face down in the gutter a few blocks away!"

    --
    [o]_O
  10. Stephen King's short story about teleportation by WilliamsDA · · Score: 3, Informative

    Stephen King wrote a nice short story about teleportation called The Jaunt. I'm not much of a King fan, but the story is very good. In The Jaunt people can teleport between different locations, but they have to be put to sleep first, otherwise something very bad happens. Most of the story is from the perspective of a father telling his family, all of whom are about to go "Jaunting", about the history of how it was invented and its side effects. Very interesting read.

    1. Re:Stephen King's short story about teleportation by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 2, Informative

      That sounds a lot like Alfred Bester's "The Stars My Destination" (originaly published as 'Tiger! Tiger!'). Even the term 'jaunting' is used the same way.

    2. Re:Stephen King's short story about teleportation by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't waste your time on Stephen King's short story. I suspect he culled most of his information from The Stars, My Destination, written by Alfred Bester sometime before 1977. It's much more than just a story about jaunting (his term, afaik), it's a story that involves jaunting with a rich science fiction scenery, good characters and development, plot, and rich background. It might be considered steam punk to a degree by some.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    3. Re:Stephen King's short story about teleportation by Xikteny · · Score: 2, Informative

      To all the people saying that King stole ideas from A. Bester, if you'd actually read the story, you'd know that in the story, it says that it's called jaunting because the scientist who invented it read The Stars My Destination.

  11. Hey, if they want to waste money... by jd · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I'd be more than happy to conduct research into anti-gravity, photon torpedos, inertia damping systems, faster-than-light warp drives....


    Just pay me a few million, and I'll do whatever research into fantasy physics that they want. I'll even throw in a few Powerpoint presentations for good measure.


    If the choice is between spending billions on reserching quackery in the military, or spending the same money on bringing US education up to decent levels, I think the education would be money better spent. We might even end up with politicians who know the difference between Sweden and Switzerland.


    But if they're determined to throw money away on absurdity, then the least they can do is throw some of it in my direction. I think I could find better uses for it than anyone the USAF could hire from the Psychic Hotline.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Hey, if they want to waste money... by TheRealFixer · · Score: 2, Funny

      We might even end up with politicians who know the difference between Sweden and Switzerland.

      Hey, I can't fault that mistake. They probably got their information off of the Internets.

    2. Re:Hey, if they want to waste money... by killjoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Think of it this way. Every million spent on quackery is one less million to spend on bombs. Of course without enough bombs we can't make the people of falujah obey allawi but that's another discussion altogether.

      --
      evil is as evil does
  12. Insulting... by bloggins02 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Star Trek fans may be happy to hear that the Air Force has paid to study psychic teleportation [...]

    Please, this is an insult to Star Trek fans everywhere. The Star Trek vision, if anything, was about using science and technology to enhance people's lives. It was and is in no way about this pseudo-scientific nonsense. (BTW, "pseudo" in this context means "false, but masquerading as", NOT, "kinda" or "quasi".)

    If anything, Star Trek fans would (and should) be appalled by this.


    End of rant.

    1. Re:Insulting... by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Funny
      Please, this is an insult to Star Trek fans everywhere. The Star Trek vision, if anything, was about using science and technology to enhance people's lives. It was and is in no way about this pseudo-scientific nonsense.

      Which is why about half the aliens they encounter are telepathic, psychic, equipped with ESP, able to transition into pure energy, or have telekinetic powers. And that was before the bloody Pah-wraiths which turned the end of Deep Space Nine into something resembling Buffy the Vampire Slayer...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Insulting... by anagama · · Score: 2, Insightful

      • If anything, Star Trek fans would (and should) be appalled by this.

      My sentiments exactly. I'm a bit taken aback by the negative comments you got on this. I think Trek fans are probably bothered when ST deviates from a hard sci-fi stance. But, I think even when ST deviates into new-agey garbage, there is still a basis to say it isn't magic, just a technology humans don't yet understand. For example - worm hole aliens = Bajor's gods. I placate myself with Clark's "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" (or something close to that) statement (gosh - hope I got attribution right as well).

      The difference between ST and X-Files for example, is that ST presumes there is an explanation for things, even if it is one we don't yet know or can't understand. Fantasy (like X-Files or whatnot) - deals only with mysticism and paranoia. Star Trek hasn't always avoided that, but it sure is better than most.

      The reference to ST fans is offensive to the fans, most of whom, I presume, have a soft spot for hard sci-fi - even if ST fails to be hard sci-fi all the time, that says nothing about the fans' preferences for stories rooted in non-mystical plots.
      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  13. Coverup by Kyn · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is just the cover story. The money is really being funneled into the Stargate program.

  14. My 2 cents... by John+Seminal · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Who knows what government already knows that the public, and even scientists in universities, do not know. For all we know, there was a UFO that crashed and the government has discovered alien technologies. There seems to have been an exponential growth in technology. Where did it all come from?

    What proof do I have? Just look at Sam Cassel.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:My 2 cents... by dwbryson · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean this Sam Cassel ?

      If that isn't evidence of UFO's I don't know what is.

      --
      - "Never let a computer tell me shit." - DelTron Zero
  15. Watch out when your sleeping tonight by glrotate · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maj. Ed Dames' astral body may come kick you in the nuts.

    1. Re:Watch out when your sleeping tonight by BWJones · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maj. Ed Dames' astral body may come kick you in the nuts.

      Then he would have to worry about my corporal body kicking back. :-)

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
  16. RTFA!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Air Force did NOT pay to study this. They commissioned a study and one of the recommendations was this, and they have already stated it will not be funded. Hurray for illiteracy!

  17. It's a joke by ajs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Has to be a joke. Read the PDF. The name of the sub-contractor is "Warp Drive" and the end of the document contains discussions of "negative energy" and all kinds of totally bogus junk that looks like it was culled from a Star Trek script.

    Seriously, this is some fan-boy trying to rile up the millitary conspiracy theorists (and apparently doing quite well).

    Until the DoD comes out and says, "yes, this is ours and we published it in all seriousness," please stop believing everything you read on the Internet.

    1. Re:It's a joke by supabeast! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You've obviously never worked for the US Government as a contractor or employee. The government loves to request huge piles of documentation about all sorts of crazy things from contractors, who regularly just copy & paste from old documents, swap some names around, and replace the logos on the first page with logos of the relevant contractors and agencies. The thing is, much of this paperwork is huge, and these agencies have piles of the stuff printed and bound, on CD, on DVD, and on various government intranets -- so much of it that, in fact, nobody ever looks over it. So when silly nerds working on documentation get bored, they tend to stick some really stupid stuff in there, knowing damned well that nobody notices. It's just like the silly names that go into network protocols and such. Bored geeks looking for cheap thrills try to see what they can get away with.

      On a related note, I was once working on a very serious project where I named all of the client systems after food - chicken, pizza, and taco, and named the server Megadoomer after an Invader Zim episode. I just about died trying not to fall over laughing when my coworkers would turn red with embarassment when discussing the network during meetings because they thought the names were terribly silly. But it was government work, so nobody cared enough to make me change anything.

  18. Why not? by cnelzie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...of course it probably hasn't entered into anyone's mind here that the whole thing is a 'hoax' project designed to cover up whatever actual project they might be wanting to or actually are currently working on.

    No, I am not suggesting some kind of bizarre conspiracy, just some 'front project' to cover up something that may involve new laser assault/defense systems, sonic weaponry, or new methods of fighter control mechanisms or something that might be really cool, really plausible or equally 'cool' yet disturbingly vile that they would rather not explain to the American public or Congress.

    So, seeing that most of the nation, albiet only by a small fraction in the larger scheme of things, would fall for such crap, they decided to trot out that story. One, to be able to push it past such science-blind people as the majority of this nation and secondly to thumb their noses at the rest of us that would know and understand such a thing is bollox, yet are unfortunately unable to do anything significant about it...

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
    1. Re:Why not? by cmdr_beeftaco · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or it could be they want us to think it is a hoax project because they are tantalizingly close to actually teleportation. It has been my experience that they only use these double-double-cover-ups when the project has some serious voodoo. But then again I could be wrong.

    2. Re:Why not? by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 2, Funny

      This doesn't fool me, I know they just ripped the telepads out of one of them UFOs and are now intending to teleport into hell to bring back specimens.

  19. Quantum Physics and the Quantum Mind by jmulvey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think some of the justification behind this research may be based on the fact that some researchers are starting to believe the brain is a quantum device. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mind

    Quantum theory (at least mathematically) does allow for teleportation, and so capabilities such as "remote viewing" and so forth *might* be there. But who knows.

    1. Re:Quantum Physics and the Quantum Mind by bhny · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Penrose and his wacky quantum ideas are way outside of mainstream thinking on the brain.

      his logic seems to be:
      -consciousness is mysterious
      -quantum physics is mysterious
      -therefore consciousness involves quantum physics

      about as sensible as collecting underpants

  20. Missile Defense by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 2, Informative
    Hey, compared to the billions (with a B) spent on missile defense (which has almost no chance of working) this is a drop in the bucket.

    Given the choice, 8 million that MIGHT have a radical payoff is a bargain. Billions spent on a specific application of physics is pointless. Even if the system works, the only application for a missile defense system is knocking out high-speed projectiles.

    It won't help with knocking out asteroids (too much kinetic energy involved) nor will it help defend against more mondane forms of attack.

    Considering that the Pentagon spend $600 million on air travel, this is cake, Cake.

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    1. Re:Missile Defense by ch-chuck · · Score: 4, Funny

      8 million that MIGHT have a radical payoff is a bargain.

      Psychic Research is probably about the only way they're ever going to find Bin Laden anyway.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  21. Basic theory of science by macaran · · Score: 2, Insightful
    In my humblest of opinions, it's a silly thing for any scientist to be upset about. The basic, overarching, redundent, axiom of all physical science is "all interactions of matter in the universe are deterministic."

    That is to say, there is not such thing as a "spirit realm" or "magic" or any way of controling the universe without a clear cause and effect. This is a compleatly logical assumption to make. If you don't make it, science becomes a guess work filled with "maybes." It is nessiary for the scientific method.

    It is not nessisarly true. For all practical purposes it seems to be true. However, ask anyone who belives in a god, or who practices magik, and they will tell you it is falce.

    You can not say a study is worthless based on an axiom. For instance, I give that all Jews are gready, therefore all people trying to deny anti-seminism are wasting time, because it's true. Likewise, I give that magical mater interactions are inpossible, therefore all people studying them are wasting time, because they don't exist.

    Anyway, it probibly is a waste of time; people just need a valid argument for it being a waste. :-o

    1. Re:Basic theory of science by halfelven · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's a good thing you're humble, because you're wrong.
      Total determinism was an ancient dream of science that proved wrong. Einstein was the last of the "titans" to believe in it. The quantum physics guys demolished that dream.
      At the quantum level, everything is a probability. It's just that things play out in such a way that, at a macro level, the Universe appears to be deterministic. But that's just an emergent property of a probabilistical foundation.

      But i agree with you that psychic phenomena should not be rejected outright, based on present day's scientific dogma.

  22. Re:Spend Spend Spend!!! by vaderhelmet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You have to remember though, that the government _does_ tax us. Significant wasteful spending, while temporarily boosting the money of a few, will eventually be distributed into the taxes of the many. In situations like this the pros and cons need to be evaluated... Anyone thinking with their head on straight would see that wasteful science is bad science.

  23. Summary of 88 page report by Sai+Babu · · Score: 2, Funny



    Maybe you can push a string after all.
    But only if it's a really tiny string and there's enough grant money.

  24. Closed minded psuedo-intellectuals by aristotle-dude · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Any scientist worth anything would at least look for some evidence for or against rather than dismissing out of hand like the lot of you.

    I'm quite frankly tired of the hypocrisy I see on ./. On the one hand you accuse the christian right of being bigoted or closed minded while in the same breath demonstrate how close minded and bigoted you are.

    Want to see who you are complaining about? Look in the mirror.

    Science is supposed to be a tool for discovery, not a religion like some of you make it out to be.

    Is aids research a waste of money because no cure has been found yet? Are all studies that reach a dead end a waste of money or do they provide us with valuable insight?

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    1. Re:Closed minded psuedo-intellectuals by beeplet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't see this as hypocrisy - I see it as holding studies of psychic phenomena to the same standards as other scientific studies, i.e., well-documented methods, peer-reviewed results, and demonstrated repeatablility.

      The additional skepticism most people apply to claims of telekenesis probably comes from the fact that is an overwhelming number of counter-examples in everyday experience. Can you move objects with your mind? I can't. Therefore I am not very likely to readily believe that anyone can. This is different than saying, for example, "I can't play piano, therefore I doubt anyone can," because playing the piano is an ability which is a matter of degrees. If you can push a key, you can imagine someone playing a fugue. If you can walk, you can imagine running a marathon. But if every experience of your life confirms that you can't move objects just by thinking about it, not even a little bit, it is reasonable to hold someone who claims they can to a very high standard of proof.

    2. Re:Closed minded psuedo-intellectuals by Dominic_Mazzoni · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Any scientist worth anything would at least look for some evidence for or against rather than dismissing out of hand like the lot of you.

      Exactly. We're being critical of the report because it recommends that the U.S. military spend millions on research on dubious ideas, with no evidence that the ideas have any merit.

      I'm quite frankly tired of the hypocrisy I see on ./. On the one hand you accuse the christian right of being bigoted or closed minded while in the same breath demonstrate how close minded and bigoted you are.

      Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. There's a difference between being open minded to the possibility that you might be wrong, and wasting enormous amounts of money and effort into an idea that has already been shown countless times to be worthless, when there are millions of other, very promising ideas, that should be funded.

      Want to see who you are complaining about? Look in the mirror.

      Science is supposed to be a tool for discovery, not a religion like some of you make it out to be.


      That's exactly right...and the way the tool works, is that you discover whether something is true or not using a repeatable experiment. Since every attempt to repeatably test psychic powers and teleportation has failed, there's clearly nothing to discover. Think of it this way: if someone really could repeatedly predict the future or teleport, don't you think more people would know about it? The fact is that everyone who has claimed to have this ability has been unwilling to demonstrate it under scientifically controlled conditions.

      Someday, if someone does discover psychic or telekinetic abilities and they can reproduce them under controlled conditions, scientists will be lining up to study them and try to learn more about how it works.

      Is aids research a waste of money because no cure has been found yet? Are all studies that reach a dead end a waste of money or do they provide us with valuable insight?

      There's a huge difference. AIDS research isn't blind - it doesn't succeed or fail completely. AIDS research is focused on understanding how HIV works, exactly how it might be destroyed or suppressed, or how its symptoms could be treated. Even the most theoretical AIDS research starts with a very specific theory about exactly how AIDS could be cured, based on observations made in other experiments.

    3. Re:Closed minded psuedo-intellectuals by oGMo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ah... moderate or post, moderate or post... let's post:

      Can you move objects with your mind? I can't. Therefore I am not very likely to readily believe that anyone can. This is different than saying, for example, "I can't play piano, therefore I doubt anyone can," because playing the piano is an ability which is a matter of degrees.

      This is logically unsound. This assumes that TK is something that doesn't need training (or perhaps innate ability). This implies that it exists in a particular manner, which you then claim it does not, because you don't have it. Circular reasoning!

      I'm not claiming it does exist or not, and I do agree with your first paragraph: it should be held to the same standards of repeatability as anything else. But the parent poster is who I agree with most. People are unwilling to even study something because it conflicts with their personal beliefs. This is science as a religion, not science as an academic tool.

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    4. Re:Closed minded psuedo-intellectuals by Moofie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OK, /., you can all come over to my house. We'll look in my mirror. All, what? Couple hundred thousand of you. Who have different opinions. And are not part of the same consciousness.

      How can something with three quarters of a million minds be "closed minded"? How can something that spans every nation and (probably) every socio-economic group be "bigoted"?

      Are there closed-minded people? Sure. Are there bigots? Absolutely. But the community is not the same thing as its individual members.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    5. Re:Closed minded psuedo-intellectuals by srleffler · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Any scientist worth anything would at least look for some evidence for or against rather than dismissing out of hand like the lot of you.

      Actually, that is not how science works. If scientists accepted and looked for evidence for or against every hypothesis, we would never make any progress. You have to have some way of filtering the small number of ideas that are likely to be fruitful from the much larger pool of ideas that aren't going to get you anywhere. The way we do this is through a paradigm--an overall understanding of "how things work". Ideas that don't fit the current paradigm are rejected. We may of course miss some valid ideas that way, but the vast majority of ideas that are rejected are worthless. The valid ideas we miss will get picked up later, in some future paradigm shift.

  25. RTFYA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Read the Fine Yahoo Article:

    "The views expressed in the report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Air Force, the Department of Defense (news - web sites) or the U.S. Government," says an Air Force Research Lab (AFRL) statement sent to USA TODAY. "There are no plans by the AFRL Propulsion Directorate for additional funding on this contract."

  26. Star Trek *Next Generation* by spaceturtle · · Score: 2, Informative
    The Star Trek vision, if anything, was about using science and technology to enhance people's lives.

    Maybe he meant Star Trek the Next Generation, you know the series where a couple of hours in paranormal training by native Americans allows Commander Riker to do weird shit like stopping time that 500 years of space age science hasn't achieved.

  27. Missed opportunity... by beeplet · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I can't believe that a serious report would put psychic teleportation on the same scientific grounds as quantum entanglement... Quantum physics has produced plenty of weird and wonderful phenomena, but not all strange experimental results are equally credible (or incredible). The author seems to have no sense of scientific skepticism. These two quotes jumped out at me:


    "A comprehensive literature search for vm-Teleportation within the genre of spacetime metric engineering yielded no results. No one in the general relativity community has thought to apply the Einstein field equation whether there are solutions compatible with the concept of teleportation."


    (Or maybe the idea simply hasn't gotten by peer-reviewed publications?)


    "The conditions for fraud and sleight of hand [in the psychic teleportation experiments] were totally eliminated, and multiple independent outside witnesses (technical and military-intelligence experts) were present at all times to ensure total fidelity of the experiments."


    (Sure... Isn't that what they all say?)

    I guess it might be worthwhile in a very preliminary report to give all of the options equal consideration, but to suggest that they all deserve funding for further research makes the study kind of pointless. I wonder if they people who commissioned this report can actually take it seriously?
  28. sounds like the Soviet Union by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    back during the Cold War, there were a lot of Soviet programs in this sort of thing, and other pseudo-science fields.

    you can find a lot by yahoo searching for Scalar Weapons which is a system suposedly developed in the 60s and 50s which the USSR can use to control the weather, and used to shoot down the Challenger space shuttle.

    remote viewing in the CIA is something that's on the Discovery channel on cable all the time -- also shows about crop circles, UFOS, and "psychic profilers" solving murder mysteries

    similar quackery was investigated by the Nazi scientists who were deeply into the occult and other "black arts" including the flat earth society and the hollow earthers (how do you reconcile those two groups? flat and hollow??)

    In fact, a squad of Nazi troops took a super large cannon/gun out to an island in the middle of the ocean and tried shooting STRAIGHT UP trying to shoot across the "hollow earth" center to rain shells down on London. It didn't work.

  29. Biological counterargument to psychic phenomena by G4from128k · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If telekinesis, ESP, etc. were biologically possible, it would have been evolved by some creatures already. Imagine the incredible advantage a predator would have if it could read the mind of the prey and know that the prey was hiding behind a tree or that the prey was about to jog to the right or left. Or what if a predator (or prey) could telekinetically cause a stick to trip its opponent. Yet, no animal (or plant) seems to have such powers.

    It is unlikely that humanity is unique in have some never-before evolved power. The more scientists study animals, the more they find that humans are not qualitatively different from other creatures, only quantitatively different. Other creatures can count, create tools, have emotions, participate in social structures, practice deception, be aware of what others might think or do, etc. We exhibit these properties to a greater degree than do animals, but we are not unique. (In fact if humans did have psychic power, they would have little need for social systems, tools, etc. because psychic power would let them snare prey/beings with lesser powers.)

    Finally, we find no "physical" basis for psychic power. The four forces of gravity, eletromagnetism, the weak force, and the strong force do not provide a basis for psychic power. It is unlikely that some magic biologically created material could manifest and manipulate some unknown fifth force without either biologists, chemists, or physicists becoming aware of it..

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  30. Psychic Teleportation by CyanDisaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    In the report, author Eric Davis says psychic teleportation, moving yourself from location to location through mind powers, is "quite real and can be controlled."

    Yeah. It's called 'walking.' Or am I looking at it totally wrong?

    Hope be with ye,
    Cyan

  31. Deep space Radar Telemetry by mailman-zero · · Score: 2, Funny
    "...struck a raw nerve with physicists and critics of wasteful military spending."
    Just wait until they hear about the SGC and the rest of the Stargate program!
    --
    Let's play video games with mailmanZERO
  32. Did anyone... by neutz · · Score: 2, Informative
    try the phone number listed in the document?

    Frank B. Mead, Jr.
    (661) 275-5929

  33. RE: For the love of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Having worked at AFRL, I can tell you that this is probably a real report. However, it is a study done by a small business, probably what is commonly called an SBIR. The study itself cost somewhere around $100k, and the results will be used to determine if further study is justified.

    These contracts produce wildly varied output quality. Some is amazing, some is crap, but the program is part pork (funding small startups) and part science, so you get what you pay for. The amounts presented in the paper are recommendations by the contractor based on their opinions. It is not necessarily what AFRL is going to put their money into. Actually, AFRL has not nearly enough money to pay for further research into this risky a field at those dollars. Groups like AFOSR, DARPA, perhaps. But AFRL funded $1M programs are reserved for stuff that is closer to reality and the warfighter.

    AFRL _is_ a reputable funding agency, but this document is not representative of their work. And the marketing speak is an inherent part of this kind of paper, since it is a pitch by the contractor to continue funding them for further investigation.

  34. There is no such thing as chaos by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Some would say that there really is not such thing is chaos in the universe. But rather, the notion of chaos is nothing more then order beyond comprehension. That said, maybe consciousness has some form of predictable order to it and thus we really don't have free will. If this is the case, the being psychic is nothing more then a higher level of thought for the sub-conscious process more of the chaos around us.

    Just a thought ;)

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  35. When was this thing written? by h4x0r-3l337 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The date on this report says august 2004, but on page 31 it says "The largest commercially available computers can store 40 gigabytes on a single hard drive."

  36. Great flipping Cthulhu on a pogo stick... by zunger · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well, the section on wormholes is 90% kosher. He even goes so far as to calculate the amount of exotic matter needed to create such a wormhole, and seems to have read most of Visser's (excellent) book on the physics of them.

    It might have helped had the authors of this report read the rest of Visser, however. Such as the calculations showing that exotic matter is intrinsically quantum-mechanically unstable, to the extent that such a wormhole will collapse within a time strictly less than the time it takes for a light signal to get through said wormhole.

    Which is good, because teleportation by wormhole lets information travel faster than light and is therefore equivalent to building a time machine.

    I really hope that we don't have our government funding research into time machines. Because then this is going to start sounding like a very bad movie plot.

  37. Re:Jon Ronson: The Road to Abu Ghraib by payndz · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Nobody takes the guardian seriously anymore... and called for the assassination of the president [msn.com]

    Oh please. It's not like this was a Guardian editorial. Charlie Brooker, the author of said column, is a humorist and comedian, for fuck's sake. And one who enjoys winding up the easily offended, at that. Occasionally he goes right to the edge - such as when he got an issue of PC Zone magazine pulled from the shelves of the UK's largest chains of newsagents for a comic strip called 'Cruelty Zoo' - but while his stuff is often twisted, it's still very funny.

    Check out TV Go Home to see what else he does for a living.

    --
    You must think in Russian.
  38. Black Projects & Black Holes ... by quarkscat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The people who coughed up the money for
    these dubious "projects" should be put up
    against a wall and shot. (That is one tax-
    payer expense I would be happy to cover.)

    But the previous /. poster is correct --
    really, really assinine projects are often
    a cover to fund other "black" projects.
    The "Iran Hostage/Exchanged For/Military
    Spare Parts" quickly morphed into covert
    funding for the Contras. Once a big chunk
    of money is "off the books", it becomes much
    easier to hide from the US Congress and the
    taxpayer. In the past, our "government-
    within-a-government" has used such methods
    to fund the assassination of Latin American
    leaders, the overthrow of governments, and
    even an invasion or two (Bay of Pigs?).

    Considering how money earmarked for the war
    against terror in Afghanistan was siphoned
    off for the run-up to the war in Iraq, one might
    ask exactly where has the huge sum of money
    earmarked for the reconstruction of Iraq gone?
    It sure hasn't gone to where the US Congress
    earmarked it. Consider all the internet
    "background chatter" from neo-cons regarding
    Venezuela, the "oil worker revolt" there, and
    the recall election that Chavez won. The over-
    throw of a left-of-center regime that has had
    the temerity to support Castro's Cuba with
    cheap oil sounds like a bonafide Bush/Cheney
    operation.

    Between the veil of secrecy (post 9-11) and the
    USA Patriot Act (I), not much info slips into
    the press to cause public blowback. If you
    try to begome a "whistleblower" on some of these
    shennanigans, you are likely to disappear into
    Gitmo Bay (not unlike the "vanished" in
    Argentina).

  39. Re:Spider Sense (and roaches and flies, oh my) by G4from128k · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, as I understand it, spiders have fast nerve signaling - fast enough that their reactions are faster than your perception, so they look prescient.

    Very good point, many creatures do have "super-human" senses. The spider nerves are a great quantitative tweak on neuronal engineering - bigger diameter axons carry signals faster and the small size of spiders means the latencies are extremely low.

    Other creatures have abilities that seem near-psychic but are not when you study the creature further. Cockroaches have sensitive hairs on their tails that pick up the air pressure wave that precedes any subsonic moving object. Because the pressure wave travels at about 700 miles per hour (the speed of sound), the cockroach feels the swatter approaching long before it reaches the roach. As a double advantage the hairs are wired directly to the legs so the roach flees the instant something starts moving its way without "thinking."

    Flies have a 3-stage pipelined visual system that operates a 400 Hz (compared to human's 60 Hz system). They see the swatter and react more quickly than the human eye.

    Electric fish use an active electric field to map their surroundings in muddy water. Dolphins and bats use ultrasound. Mantis shrimp see 6 color bands and 4 polarizations. Pit vipers see far IR. Etc. All of these amazing examples rely on well know physics to let the animal sense what a human cannot.

    Geez, don't you ever get out to the movies?

    Unfortunately no! ;) I see most of my movies on the airplane. But I do find that reality is often much stranger than fiction, that scientists discover stuff that is more outrageous that anything Hollywood can dream up.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  40. First tests seem to work by nizo · · Score: 3, Funny

    It looks like Warp Drive Metrics has succeeded in teleporting $25,000 into their bank account from the taxpayers wallets; we shall see if future expirements are as successful.

  41. Remote Viewer on Art Bell Show says don't worry by dmh20002 · · Score: 2, Funny

    On the Art Bell Show, Major Ed Dames, a reknowed remote viewer, (you can spend a few $100 and take his class) used remote viewing to determine that the world will end in 2 years when a massive solar flare scorches everything. So don't worry about the wasted money. it doesn't matter anyway.

  42. What for? by Pentrite · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't get it, if they manage to discover how teleportation works, they will lose their jobs, as G. W. B. wont need airplanes anymore to bomb whoever he wants...

  43. Scientists have one major flaw by bigberk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    (And I say this as an Electrical Engineer). Established, respected experts in a field are among the most reluctant to consider radically new ideas. Major shifts in science have occurred when some young oddball found a new way to look at an old problem, or an outsider to the field found a new link that was never considered before. Consider the significant (albeit slow) revolution in medicine that is increasingly acknowledging the mind/body connection. Placebo treatments that actually have physiological healing effects; patients that exert conscious control over the failing processes in their bodies.

    Now I'm not saying that necessarily this teleportation stuff has any merit. I just want to point out that if you're quick to say "what crap" then you might have fallen into the trap that leads minds to stagnate; that is, to believe that existing human knowledge is complete.

    If there's one thing we can bet on, it's that human knowledge is far from complete and we are far from understanding the true nature of things. We are naive creatures with limited understandings of things. Perhaps the military is more willing to gamble funding in new directions, because unlike academics their main goal isn't to protect their researching asses for the rest of their lives. Their goal is to develop new tools that the enemy doesn't have.

  44. Constitutional amendment proposal by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    His proposal to amend the constitution to make sure no state allows gay people to marry is purely driven by his warped reading of the bible. Never mind that Jesus never mentions homosexuality one way or the other.
    If that's not theocratic I don't know what is.

  45. I already have this power by General+Alcazar · · Score: 2, Funny
    In the report, author Eric Davis says psychic teleportation, moving yourself from location to location through mind powers, is "quite real and can be controlled."

    I have tried to keep this a secret for as long as I have been able, but I guess the cat is out of the bag now. Just a few minutes ago, I was standing on the other side of the room from where I am now typing. With my mind, I told my body to move over to the other side of the room and immediately it happened! My body does whatever I tell it to! It is completely under my psychic control!

    For a while it was cool being the only one with this power, but now everyone is going to start doing it. Suxx azz.

    ga

  46. Why must you mock me? by TiggertheMad · · Score: 4, Funny

    Eighty-three percent of American adults believe in the Virgin birth of Jesus Christ

    I resent the fact that you imply my beliefs are backwards and illogical. I think it makes perfect sense to believe that Jesus Christ was a virgin when he was born.

    STOP MOCKING ME!

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  47. It's NOT a joke by khayman80 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I actually read the PDF and I have to say that I think they're dead serious.

    The first part of the article deals with all the legitimate ways to move particles from point A to point B without going through the intervening space. These methods (while very, VERY far off in the future) are scientifically plausible even if they sound like they were lifted from a bad Star Trek script. The second part, of course, is full of the worst kind of pseudo-science, like telekenisis and psychic abilities. But, really, the first half of the proposal is only a waste of money because the technology involved is too far off to be useful in any reasonably timeframe.

    For example, negative energy is a real phenomenon in quantum physics. It is most commonly discussed in the context of the Casimir effect. Here's an article that discusses the Casimir effect. Basically, the negative energy arises because empty space itself has a certain amount of vacuum energy, and the Casimir effect reduces these fluctuations inside two metal plates (which have to be spaced absurdly closely together and manufactured to extremely exact precision for the effect to be measureable). Because we generally say that empty space has zero energy and the space between the plates has less energy than that, the Casimir effect is regarded as a source of "negative energy". This could actually be useful (one day in the far FAR future) for opening up space-time wormholes. And, no, I'm not joking either.

    Also, while "warp drive" may be an overused Trek term, it's also a (semi) legitimate topic of discussion in physics. In 1994, Dr. Miguel Alcubierre found a solution to General Relativity that seemed to allow for faster than light travel while obeying special and general relativity. What followed was a lively debate on the plausibility of the "Alcubierre Warp Drive". One of the most recent objections argued that Alcubierre's warp drive would never be able to cross lightspeed but might allow for non-Newtonion sublight travel.

  48. Hardly surprising. by miguel · · Score: 2, Funny

    With a country that is going back to the middle
    ages, this seems only like the tip of the
    iceberg.

    With Bush in office, I expect the next couple of
    years to be packed with amusement from your witch
    hunts to your basic alchemy courses taught in
    schools and maybe some sacrifices made to the
    gods if the stock market goes up.

    miguel.

  49. Recommend: The Conscious Universe, Dean Radin by xtal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am an EE as well, and I don't consider any falsifiable hypothesis "quackery", just very improbable until tested by an experiment. I find it very amusing that more scientists have a very closed mind .. isn't the whole idea to question everything?

    Anyway, the above book covers a lot of studies headed up real scientists, and there is a lot of interesting data out there; the effects they find are not huge, but they are statistically signifigant and worthy of investigation.

    If someone has an odd idea, fine - ask them for a repeatable experiment anyone can do to replicate said hypothesis. That's what science is about, and that's why we don't automatically assume the world is flat and we are the center of the universe anymore.

    --
    ..don't panic
  50. No, no, no... rethink this. You need to be fair. by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Funny
    Those guys made an awful decision, and should be teleported out of their jobs.

    As a successful businessman who has handled many ticklish employee issues, let me explain how you should actually deal with this.

    First, you fire them using the normal politically correct "here are your final paychecks, and the Human Resources department's collective foot in your collective asses" procedure.

    But you inform them that if they can teleport back in, they can have their jobs back.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  51. Totally wrong by tehanu · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's totally wrong. For quantum teleportation to work you STILL need to be able to pass information from A to B say via a wire or other classical information route. What teleportation does that say a fax does not is it is supposed to make a *perfect* (well theoretically anyway) copy of the information. What is teleported is NOT the photon or the atom but information on the quantum state of the atom or photon which is reproduced in an atom or photon at the other end. I've heard quantum teleportation described as a "perfect fax machine". Regardless, the atom/photon does NOT suddenly disappear from A and appear at B.

  52. Re:Spider Sense (and roaches and flies, oh my) by sonicattack · · Score: 3, Funny


    Flies have a 3-stage pipelined visual system that operates a 400 Hz (compared to human's 60 Hz system). They see the swatter and react more quickly than the human eye.


    Why do Americans always assume the rest of the world goes by their standards?

    The human visual system, as we Europeans all know very well, runs on 50 Hz here. But this is more than well compensated for by our higher count of rods and staffs.

  53. The market isn't truly free, but is mostly free... by LinuxParanoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I totally agree with you that the market isn't truly free.

    A company or industry that's doing well can try to extract concessions from politicians (DMCA, antitrust wrist-slaps, telcom regulation, etc) and a company that's not doing well can generate political pressure to save jobs. And the former annoys me greatly, as I can tell it annoys you.

    But I find it hard to dismiss the sense that there is a "mostly free" market out there, having watched closely billion-dollar companies fall (SGI), and from a distance seen others just get lost (Kodak) or shift their core activity to avoid a lingering death (IBM). The market may not be truly free, but it is a harsh mistress.

    I can't find a full list of companies kicked off the Dow Jones (just 1999, 2004, 1895), but big companies even with their vast political influence cannot succeed when the market says "no thanks" to paying the hoped-for-nicely-profitable amount for their products.

    --LP