Slashdot Mirror


Students Tracked By RFID

TheMeuge writes "The New York Times is reporting a new development in the unrelenting progress of the RFID juggernaut. The school district of Spring, Texas has adopted RFID as a way to track students' arrival and departure. Upon being scanned, the data are transmitted to both the school administrators, as well as city police. I guess cutting class is no longer an option."

62 of 866 comments (clear)

  1. barcode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you want to track people, why not just tattoo a bar code on the forehead.

    1. Re:barcode by SunPin · · Score: 4, Funny
      If you want to track people, why not just tattoo a bar code on the forehead.


      Because the barcode tattoo is _so_ 1984.

      --
      Laws are for people with no friends.
    2. Re:barcode by CaptainFrito · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Okay, I'm in. The Mark spoken of at Revelation ch 13 (aka Apocalypse) is a demonstrated allegiance to a way of life that is opposite to God's righteous way and blocks admittance into the promised new world (see Revelation ch7 and ch 20-22).

      For clarification of this position see the parallel prophecy given to the prophet Ezekiel at Ezek ch 9, where a 'secretary' from God is seen marking the foreheads of those that would be saved. It is clear that they get their mark because of their inner groaning over the detestible things being done in the Earth -- detestible according to God's standards, not their own. All others, starting from the sanctuary (those saying that they are Godly but are falsely so) are to be destoyed by the six other messengers.

      The physically tattooed marks and RFID tags are a means to control others, and of course things like these appeal to the masses because these measures seem benign, even helpful. After all, if you've done nothing wrong, what's to fear? But in the end they are a means of control. Today we have security cameras monitoring everything, even traffic flow, cross-referencing vehicle tags. People are being photographed hundreds of times a day in public places and their faces cross-referenced by high-speed computers, police now dress and train as military combatants. Core Internet routers are now archiving every single packet without prejudice. Voice recognition systems are scanning phone conversations in real-time. Fully automted packet-data-examining systems. And so on...it's all very sad, but it is also a warning.

      When Hitler began rouding people up, it all seemed benign and even helpful to the majority. Even those being rounded up believed that they had nothing wrong and thus had nothing to fear, according to their own testimony. But those that would not go along with the round-up got rounded up too. Compare that to the entire context of Rev ch 13. Hitler's actions were a dry run for the larger showdown that is to come, but it will be a world-wide affair according to Revelation. And God steps n to protect his own, and gives them the gift of the new paradise on Earth which he has promised.

      But now for the University science: According to Stanley Milgram's famous experiment, most people will go along with those perceived to be in authority, no matter how objectionable the request might seem upon first glance. And the Stanford Prison Experiment shows that most people in charge of others will without fail revel in sadism in very short order when given control over others. So, that people will attack those who desire to serve God en masse -- preventing them from even maintaining livlihoods and even from buying and selling to sustain life -- will be willing participants, even those of you who are convinced right now that you would never had help Hitler. Reliable scientific research consistently shows that most people would have, regardless of what they say when asked hypothetically.

      (Okay, mighty moderators, protectors of the /. common good, have your way with me. At least it wasn't posted anonymously. And, furthermore, I've actually read and sudied the Bible -- unlike most who are happy to comment as if they know what it says or mod down those that have the courage to repeat what it says -- hehehe.)

    3. Re:barcode by Mad_Rain · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just for the people who don't know: Here is a link to the Milgram experiment. In the experiemnt, it was found that around 60% of people would continue administering painful and life-threatening electric shocks to a stranger at the request of an authority figure.

      The Stanford Prison Experiment has recently gotten a little more press as a result of the problems at Abu Ghraib. Volunteer students at Stanford University were put into one of two roles: guards or prisoners. Despite being smart, "psychologically stable" people, the guards rapidly became abusive and the prisoners had varied reactions, from rebellion to one developing a psychosomatic rash within a day. (Philip Zimbardo ran the study).

      --
      "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
    4. Re:barcode by HiThere · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Being a dogmatic atheist is no better than being a dogmatic fundamentalist. The key is, they're both dogmatic.

      Someone who is thoughtful, and willing to explore the ways in which his beliefs mirror the world, and to consider as metaphysical those beliefs that DON'T mirror the world is much more congenial, and, to my mind, a much better kind of person.

      That many of which we hear are both biblical scholars and dogmatic fundamentalists should not blind us to the fact that many biblical scholars are intelligent people that would be nice to know. And AREN't dogmatic lunatics.

      I, personally, am not a Christian of any denomination, despite having been raised as one. I follow a much less common religion with a gnostic (but non-christian) basis. And I don't have any church. This causes me to be occasionally terrified about the fundamentalist Christians, most of whom don't even realize that they are followers of the cult of Osiris (historically speaking...not denying that there was a Jesus Christ just because I have no evidence indicating that such a person actually existed except in the sense that Nicolas Bourbaki did).

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    5. Re:barcode by CaptainFrito · · Score: 4, Interesting
      You probably think that Evolution is a hypothesis

      Yes I do, based on the Scientific Method. Most people that understand it recognize that it is still a theory. Proof? Simple: If you yourself contracted a cancer, is it good or is it bad? Cancer, according to evolution, is the engine of progress. Truth is, you'd leave everything just the way it is. Nobody wants their DNA fooled with because they know intuitively that it's a bad thing. Stanley Miller gave up trying to prove his organic soup theory because he could never make it work (one initial success followed by a career of failures) and that he could never eliminate himself from the experiments. Ironically, his experiments were to prove all this could have happened blindly, without intelligent intervention, but he realized after years and years of failures his experiments never worked without his thoughtful intelligence guiding it. So, in pure scientific terminology, evolution is still a theory, since no one has demonstrated exactly how it works and demonstrated it experimentally. And I might also point out that evolution relates to how organisms morph across specie boundaries, not how life appears in the first place. That is the providence of abiogenesis vs. panspermia.

      I arrived at creationism using the Sherlock Holmes method: Eliminate the impossible, and whatever's left, however improbable, is the truth. Since evolution is mathematically so remote so as to be impossible I gave up on it. After years of objective and deep academic research that had nothing to do with Bible research. I initially set out to disprove the Bible, but could not unless I abandoned objectivity.

      The book The Blind Watchmaker, often cited as having proved evolution, says in one chapter that to transform (evolve) an ordinary squirrel into a flyiong squirrel, one simply needs to find a clumsy squirrel with loose skin and have it fall from trees so often that it soon learns to glide to the ground. Okay, fine. Show me how it's done: get all the regular squirrels you want, and throw them from trees and produce a flying squirrel. If you can, you still haven't proven evolution, because I don't beleive that such an experiment would demonstrate a crossing of specie boundaries. When you've accomplished that feat, you woill have progressed from theory to fact. Otherwise, it's just a theory (hypothesis, actually, since it lacks the detail in the specific mechanisms involved).

      As far as the Earth being flat, the Bible pointed out it is a sphere some 3,000 years ago (Isiaih 40:22), some 250 years before Pythagoras. And it never said the Earth is the center of the universe. So, you're just making those things up. And the Bible clearly says that the subconscience is very treacherous and must be carefully monitored and curbed by the conscious mind (James 1:14,15).

      As for the final outcome, whether you are correct that the world will continue and man will evolve into some higher species through blind chance, or I am correct in believing the Bible's predictions, only time will tell.

  2. Cutting Class by aonnix · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It should be easier to cut class now. Just give your tag to your buddy, and the school's computers will think your there.

    1. Re:Cutting Class by Repugnant_Shit · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That won't be a problem once the subdermal tags arrive.

    2. Re:Cutting Class by hummassa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Simple, yet. You just put a tinfoil leave over the subdermal patch and leave the premises. The computer will still think you are inside.

      --
      It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    3. Re:Cutting Class by double-oh+three · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, but I think the teachers will get suspiscious when there's only one kid in the class with buldging pockets.

      My real problem is what will happen when they get lost. My school instituted mandatory photo ID cards this year and pretty much everyday there's a crowd of 20-100+ teenagers outside the main office waiting for temporary IDs. Personally I havn't worn mine in two weeks and no one has noticed, so~

      I'm also wondering why it would be nessisary to CC the police on who didn't show up in the morning.

      Not to mention the fact that someone could track anyone in the school after they figure out which RFID is theirs. I think that's a much bigger invasion of privacy than having to wear photo IDs. I have no doubt that this will be spreading to other counties and states in the near future so I'm glad I'm graduating next year. Saves me the trouble of explaining why my RFID badge has become a finely ground white powder.

      --
      "For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
    4. Re:Cutting Class by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You just put a tinfoil leave over the subdermal patch and leave the premises.

      And still some people think that tinfoil hats are of no use.

      Tightens his tinfoil hat.

    5. Re:Cutting Class by mforbes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Where the issue is security, the RFID cards are used to keep doors unlocked unless a card is read to unlock them. This seems to be much more about tracking the comings & goings of students who already belong.

      Kind of interesting, since school security has two main concerns: keeping students where they belong (but with enough flexibility to allow them to leave for doctor's appointments, etc), and keeping out people who don't belong-- the divorced parent who lost custody but is determined to keep their child at any cost, for instance.

      Oh well, it's not like minors have rights in the US, so the schools are pretty much free to do what they want in this regard.

      --

      Allegedly real newspaper headline from 1998:
      Man Struck by Lightning Faces Battery Charge

    6. Re:Cutting Class by Politburo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I disagree. Laws can be misguided, and as such, breaking the law does not automatically mean you are doing a 'bad thing'.

    7. Re:Cutting Class by ikkonoishi · · Score: 4, Funny

      And "cutting" class takes on a whole new meaning.

    8. Re:Cutting Class by quarkscat · · Score: 4, Informative

      (Former?) Ed. Secretary Paige's "success" in
      the Houston, TX educational system was based
      upon faked data. Students that did poorly
      were moved to another school district, while
      the majority of dropouts were never designated
      as such. Lies, damn lies, and statistics.

      His "success" in Houston was the premise for
      Bush's "No Child Left Behind" program, which
      has brought little success but much turmoil
      to school districts across the nation. This
      is largely due to it being a Federal, albeit
      woefully underfunded, mandate.

      RFID tags, particularly implanted RFID tags,
      for students is the wave of the future. And
      when many of these students do drop out of
      school, they will feel equally at home with a
      minimum wage job at their local Wal-Mart, which
      eventually will require their employees to be
      RFID-tagged, along with their stock of WMD
      (Wal-Mart Merchandise Dumping).

      In reality, our calenders should be altered
      to reflect that "1984" was the start of a new
      epoch, rather than just a prescient sci-fi
      novel.

    9. Re:Cutting Class by double-oh+three · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The counterargument is that we shouldn't be teaching teenagers and kids that they are A. always being monitored and have no privacy, B. that they are not trustworthy and C. acclimating them to both of those so they don't put up so much of a fight for them later. We would be better served by a population that got used to it's rights early and had some sense of what they were and more importantly what they should be.

      And I'm not arguing against keeping kids in class during class, I'm arguing against them tracking us via RFIDs and keeping a very tight leash on us. They treat people in High School like they're in Elementary School with the amount of things they entrust to us. A good number of us are able to make our own decisions at this age and we need more flexibility, not less.

      --
      "For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
  3. Insanity by david_594 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If I were still in High School I think i would be scared of this. RFID technology seems great for tracking shippments and such, but to track students like this seem pretty insane.

    1. Re:Insanity by jokumuu · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, the thing is, actually tracking anything is with this technology is the scary part. The actual use by a school is just the tip of the iceberg. I am sure that in future every person will be tracked "for their safety". I think that some small town will probably go for something like this at some point "to fight crime"

    2. Re:Insanity by tomstdenis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The bigger problem I see is you can't really force discipline and respect on children anyways. I mean you can show them how their actions have consequences and all but if the child doesn't take it upon themselves to straighten up there isn't much you can.

      For instance, a couple of years ago [ok so roughly 8 or so] the high school I went to started a "10 missed classes and you're suspended". Did that stop skipping? Did that make the students more respectful of the teachers and their peers [specially in grade 9, the first year of high school for us...]? Hell no.

      By contrast the "advanced stream" [basically get >60% in advanced courses] I was in was mostly populated with students who behaved themselves, got through the lectures and participated in class. We chose to act like adults we weren't forced to do so.

      So left to their own devices most children would come around on their own. The ones who don't want to can live exciting lives with a grade 10 education.

      So all this RFID thing is going todo is breed more contempt for "authority" on the part of the students who in my mind are already a bunch of punkagers anyways.

      As for "privacy" concerns... um there are none. You're in PUBLIC while at a PUBLIC SCHOOL. So long as the RFID tag is encrypted or something [e.g. not plaintext stored on it] and it's easy to stow when not on campus I don't see the huge security concern.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    3. Re:Insanity by Grym · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So left to their own devices most children would come around on their own. The ones who don't want to can live exciting lives with a grade 10 education.

      But you do realize that, in this wonderful democracy of ours, their vote will count just as much--maybe more if they're in Ohio--as yours, right? Will you be so flippant with regard to their education and "exciting lives" when you have to pay more in taxes to help pay for their welfare check and/or jail term?

      My point is, our children, including the "dumb" ones, matter. Our FUTURE matters. Children are affected by not only by what we say but also what we do. If we set forth an example that it's OKAY for the authorities to monitor your every movement for our children now, how much easier do you think it will be able to convince them unwarranted searches are similarly okay in the future?

      -Grym

    4. Re:Insanity by tomstdenis · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'll let you in on a little tip. Until your 18 in Canada [at least] you're not actually allowed [by law] to skip classes. The school is responsible for your well being during the day and if you go missing it's them who get looked at [at least initially].

      Ever hear the saying "you can show a horse the water but you can't make him drink?" that's not just clever it's also what the christian right would call "divine". While I'm not a religious type I do swing for "choice".

      It's upto the 14 year old kid to *choose* to act responsibly. It's one thing to show them what responsibility is but it's another for them to actually follow it.

      It's because of people like you that I sit in a college where "easy tests" is a good thing. The students don't actually think of learning as a good thing. It's just something they were told they have to do. So in the end even with college grads we end up with [on average from what I've seen] really stupid, unmotivated greedy induhviduals.

      I still routinely get the "why do you write free software when charging for it can make money" bit from people ranging from students to 52 year old retired HP engineers.

      Hardly anyone does anything [particularly in academia] for the simple pleasure of doing a good job, learning something new and giving back to the community.

      You say "we are doomed if we let the children fail" and I'm saying we're already doomed.

      As for the "unwarranted searches" um well again it's public property. "Your" locker is actually "their" locker. "Your" safety is everyones safety.

      Of course I speak as someone who finished high school without metal detectors on the doors...

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  4. Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How prejudice and invasive technologies always attack those who cannot defend themselves first. I give it 5 years and you'll see rfid on vehicles or national id's. I mean you have a license plate now, whats the dif between that and rfid. right, right, nudge nudge.

    Thank you idiot america.

  5. Tin foil hat by Xeo+024 · · Score: 4, Funny

    They won't be able to scan me as long as I hvae my tin foil hat on, right?

  6. Re:Sorry, this is good.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    if you're not in the position to be affected by this, shut the hell up.....

    Yeah -- and do the same thing when they come for the Jews, right?

    Fuckwit.

  7. RFID circumvention by shadowmas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    soon we'll be learning tons of ways to circumvent RFIDs. kids are very good at finding out ways to circumvent stuff like this. nomatter how good a system might be when it goes against lots of kids with a lot of time on there hands and new ways of thinking i wonder how long it will take b4 kids find away around this.

    1. Re:RFID circumvention by lachlan76 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Disclaimer: I am 15

      • Aluminium foil
      • Coming to school and leaving it in my locker
      • Hack the computer system
      • Buying a similar model, reprogramming it, and getting someone to take it to your classes, if need be


      And finally, if they eventually decide to implant:
      • Knife...most people won't go this fat to get out of class, but I don't feel much pain anyway



      Thos are just the things I thought of in the last two minutes. I could probably think of more more.
  8. Ah the prisoner by pklong · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where am I?
    In the School

    What do you want?
    Information

    Whose side are you on?
    That would be telling . . .

    We want Information
    You won't get it

    By hook or by crook . . .
    We will

    Who are you?
    The new Number Two

    Who is Number One?
    You are Number Six

    I am not a number . . .
    I'm a free man!
    (Mocking laughter)

    --

    Philip

    Signatures are broken

  9. Freedom to monitor by Homology · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Upon being scanned, the data are transmitted to both the school administrators, as well as city police.

    The official USA propaganda is that the rest of the world envy USA because of it's freedom. Well, I don't envy the freedom US authorities has to continously monitoring anyone for no reason at all.

    1. Re:Freedom to monitor by Kidbro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      1 school district in TX != everyone.

      The interesting thing is that you're so "free" that this gross invasion of privacy is allowed. While in a "less free" country this would be completely against all laws.

      I'm not really trying to judge, but it's not clear which of the systems that is best at protecting individual freedom.

    2. Re:Freedom to monitor by enjo13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Freedom is sometimes about doing the wrong thing, just as much as doing the right. In this case the people of this town decided (of their own volition) that this was what they wanted to do. This wasn't imposed by the faceless government, but by the people themselves (through their elected school board I'm assuming). That's freedom and democracy in action...

      That said, this is a really sad indication of the neo-conservative movement sweeping through America (particularly in the southern states such as Texas). This is the next logical step from the same people that brought you teen curfews.. The same people up in arms over the intro. to Monday Night football. The same people who become outraged at this slightest hint of sexuality... in short, in their (well founded IMHO) desire to protect their children and themselves, they've lost all semblance of reason. On the surface making sure kids stay in school and learn gives them the best chance for success as adults.. that's a noble cause. However, they've taken a shotgun approach here. Now they're teaching kids that humiliation and bold invasions of privacy should be expected... This doesn't create a society of good adults, but wildly disenfranchised and angry ones.

      --
      Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!
  10. Beating up nerds? by exeme · · Score: 3, Funny

    Pretty freaky "Big Brother" stuff, but I guess its a good way to track students. But then I remember school being better when the trouble makers wern't there beating up us nerds..

  11. Re:Sorry, this is good.... by eclectro · · Score: 5, Insightful

    if you're not in the position to be affected by this, shut the hell up.....

    Let me guess, if we don't that would make us unpatriotic as well???

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  12. Social engineering RFID into the children by WCMI92 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Something tells me the black market in RFID jammers and duplicators is going to be rampant...

    This is totally wrong. You are compelled by law to attend school. Most can't afford to NOT go to government school. Now the government is tagging people like animals.

    Be VERY afraid of the first RFID generation, ones who grow up with this commonplace, who never knew an age without it. Who will thing we are a bunch of kooks for opposing it.

    That is why those who want to social engineer people ALWAYS want to start with the schools...

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
    1. Re:Social engineering RFID into the children by sckeener · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Be VERY afraid of the first RFID generation, ones who grow up with this commonplace, who never knew an age without it. Who will think we are a bunch of kooks for opposing it.

      That is why those who want to social engineer people ALWAYS want to start with the schools...


      I've always wondered how we can expect our kids to fight for liberty later when we gave them none.

      How can you miss something you never had?

      --
      "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
    2. Re:Social engineering RFID into the children by ajs · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've always wondered how we can expect our kids to fight for liberty later when we gave them none.

      If you mean "fight" in the sense of soldiering, don't worry that's the easy part. The mental conditioning that is employed in the military (any military) is designed to enhance the bonds that men (mostly men, though women take to it, the bonds are different, as they provoke more of a defensive than offensive FoF reflex) form in small social groups. The end result is that to a soldier "freedom" is like a team name. You might as well say "Red Sox". If you think that can't be the case because soldiers are willing to die "for freedom", think about what would happen if you killed a member of a baseball team. The other players would be willing to kill and/or die to either prevent or avenge that killing, even though they probably never knew each other before joining the team. Such is the power of the team instinct in humans.

      So, you could call an opressive dictatorship "freedom", just as long as your soldiers are indoctrinated to defend it.

      The real question is a much more frightening one: how can we expect our kids to defend freedom as our future leaders when we didn't given them any as children? To what depths will our future judges, congresspersons and presidents sink when they have been treated like this growing up?

      That one keeps me up at night.

  13. Maybe this is a case by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    of law suits gone too far. It seems recently the trend has been to blame the school for whatever trouble a kid causes, and since the school may have difficulty tracking down individual students and whether or not they were on campus, the school may very well end up being responsible. At least this way the schools can say definitievely whether or not someone came(provided they actually still have their rfid, w hich may be a big assumption)

  14. Wonder why by chennes · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In an age when parents are suing schools for not keeping adequate track of their children (see http://www.overlawyered.com/archives/001699.html) is this any wonder?

  15. This is the wrong approach. by RandoX · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If the student to teacher ratio is so large that the instructor can't even accurately take role, what is the level of education going to be like?

  16. Ferris Bueller by Jumbo+Jimbo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We can all watch Matthew Broderick skip class and reminisce about the days when this used to be possible - it'll become a period piece of a bygone age, along with Remains of the Day and Little Women.

  17. Students are *not* cattle by joelparker · · Score: 4, Insightful
    From the article:
    • a few schools have begun monitoring student arrivals and departures using technology similar to that used to track livestock and pallets of retail shipments.
    And adults wonder why our kids aren't learning important ideas like responsibility...
  18. Re:Sorry, this is good.... by erroneus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was going to mod this as interesting but I think I would rather reply to it.

    I think it's important to recognize that students (children, minors) are being entrusted to the public school system to make sure that while under their care, nothing bad happens to any student. They are, in essence, the largest daycare provider in any given area and they have a huge responsibility in keeping tracking and accounting of other people's children.

    Now I can't say that it's a good thing that the information is fed to the local law enforcement agency unless there is a particular student they wish to keep track of and in that event, there should be some sort of formality associated with "I need to know when 'Johnny' came and went for the past two weeks and for the next two weeks from now." But to have that information fed to them on a regular basis feels kinda wrong.

    But one thing to keep in mind -- while a person is a minor, there are no rights to privacy to speak of. The "rights" they might enjoy are whatever has been granted by their parents and/or the school system. I liken this to the same problem that students have with their "freedom of the press" rights in school newspapers -- while it's all well and good to want to exercise those rights, the fact remains that a school newspaper is a SCHOOL newspaper and as such is actually under the control and supervision of the school system, so guess who is in control of "freedom of the press" in that little world? Absolutely.

    It just might be a good thing... I'd be interested to see what pitfalls are to be revealed by any of this.

  19. The Slippery Slope.. by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are these guys trying to piss off the volcano!?

    Seriously, most proponents of RFID technology site its benefits in stock and supply line management only, and keep assurring us that RFID tags embedded in products will never be used to track people.
    And yet we're now seeing instances of the middleman, i.e the product tag, being bypassed altogether and people being tagged outright. Is this really what RFID was developed for in the first place? Tracking people?

    OK, these people are children. But that doesn't make this any less wrong. First criminals, then kids. They'll start on employees next, move it up to registered drivers, you'll see.

    Of course tagging children has nothing to do with their safety. Anyone who says so is a liar or an idiot. As has been mentioned numerous times, the legions of pedophiles that lurk outside scholl gates every day will simply take off the tag, as will the kids when they want to leave for that matter. Of course the response from RFIDphiles is "Let's implant the tag subdermally!!!! FOREVER!!!! What a great(completeely consistent with a free society) idea!!!". *Sigh*. Why can't so many people think past their next meal?

    The purpose of RFID tracking people is to cause a chilling effect. This is denied in the case of children and the public, but is the primary reason given for tagging criminals. Bit of a contridiction there. Effectively tagging children is a form of control, and an extreamly invasive one at that. I don't care what age I am, or who you are. No-one should know and have a documented record of my exact movements. Period. You want to protect your kids? Sit down and talk with them once in a while. Find out where they go rather than right clicking on a toolbar icon to see where they are. Don't squash their, or my, freedoms just because your too busy watching fear factor to look after your own kids.

    And of course when I start using by blocker tag, I'll be accused of aiding pedophiles and endangering the children. Won't someone please think of the children!!? I am!

    I'm ready for people to start with the tinfoil hat cracks, but to them I say, this is the exact kind of thing you said would never happen!! Well it's happening right now! What are you going to do about it.

    RFID tracking is data rape.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
    1. Re:The Slippery Slope.. by Tim+C · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Seriously, most proponents of RFID technology site its benefits in stock and supply line management only, and keep assurring us that RFID tags embedded in products will never be used to track people.
      And yet we're now seeing instances of the middleman, i.e the product tag, being bypassed altogether and people being tagged outright. Is this really what RFID was developed for in the first place? Tracking people?


      Hhhhmmmmmm, odd that - that there's a product that most people think would be really useful for this one particular (benign) use, but that a minority want to use for bad things. Can't see how that could ever happen with any other technology.

      You're right, this is wrong, and no I would not submit my daughter to this sort of treatment (and yes, I do actually have a daughter). But you seem to be implying that

      a) this was an inevitable (ab)use of RFID technology
      b) this one dubious use should see the tech banned/shunned despite all other legitimate uses

      As with all things, don't blame the technology itself for the use to which some people put it. Do that, and you'll end up banning all tech, including sharp sticks and fire.

      RFID tracking is data rape.

      That makes you sound like an extremist; I'd suggest that if you're serious about fighting things like this that you avoid such emotive language. You'll piss off more people than you sway with it.

  20. Just Imagine by Hoplite3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What if they had spent that money on making kids want to go to school? I went to Texas public schools. No, I survived them. The one I attended was divided neatly into honors and regular classes. In the regulars classes, you learned how to take the TAAS (this test was required for graduation and pushed as a part of school accountability under the last federal administration). If you were in honors, you learned how to take the AP exam.

    Needless to say, not many people were really turned on to learn. Because nothing of substance was being taught.

    Personally, I think that large school reforms are in order. Let's divide students into classes with the type of instruction that suits them best. Let's not teach college prep to everyone, they'll resent it. Few people really connect with the idea of liberal arts anyway (even in college, I was a bit surprised) and it forms the basis for most highschool course requirements. Articles I've seen recently say that boys are doing poorly in American schools. It looks like all girls schools in England do significantly better than comparable coed schools, especially in math and science. Maybe gender segregation would help. Girls seem to be intimidated by boys in these subjects, and boys need more structure and encouragement. There's a lack of adolescent-to-adult ritual in our country. Maybe this could help provide what truant students are missing.

    It would be preferable to humiliation like this RFID crap.

    --
    Use the Firehose to mod down Second Life stories!
    1. Re:Just Imagine by Tryfen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A study was done at my old school (UK).

      Turns out the girls do far better in single-sex class rooms.

      But boys do better in mixed set class room!

      Quite how you solve that, I don't know.

      --
      If a square is really a rhombus, why aren't all triangles purple?
    2. Re:Just Imagine by ifwm · · Score: 4, Informative

      "What if they had spent that money on making kids want to go to school?"

      Ok, let's hear some ideas. I'm a teacher, so I'll be ecstatic to get some help in this area. Before you begin though, understand that we're state mandated to provide instruction on specific topics in a specific timeframe. We also have to make sure that no one is left out of activities, or if they are, develop an alernative activity. We also have to make sure that Susie who takes one day to learn plate tectonics doesn't get too far ahead of Johnny who takes 4 days. We also...

      I hope you see the point. School simply isn't fun most of the time. No matter how you slice it, some things are boring to teach and boring to learn. Couple this with restrictions on teaching techniques, budget problems, and over protective parents, and I'm amazed anything get's taught.

    3. Re:Just Imagine by HeghmoH · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We also have to make sure that Susie who takes one day to learn plate tectonics doesn't get too far ahead of Johnny who takes 4 days.

      This bizarre belief that every student should advance in their knowledge at exactly the same rate is the primary reason I hated all of my schooling until I got to college. Why shouldn't Susie get too far ahead of Johnny? Why shouldn't she be able to spend those three extra days learning the subject in more depth, or painting, or playing in the sandbox?

      From the beginning of elementary school to the end of high school, I suffered from this. I pick things up quickly and don't need a lot of repetition. As a result, I was forced to do a great deal of homework that I didn't need, attend classes that weren't interesting, and I generally hated the experience. (Not everything was this way, but close.) Once I got to college, where homework is more of a check than a forced study aid, where classes are dense, and where people are expected to do more on their own if they need practice, things got a lot better.

      I realize the situation is different at the lower levels, and I don't have a proposed solution, but I still believe that this idea that all children must learn at approximately the same rate, and they must stay in a group of other children with exactly the same age, is one of the more poisonous ones in our educational system.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  21. Required implants by hrvatska · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Where this is leading is required RFID implants. The requirement will initially start out with groups that most of us don't care about, like convicted felons. Next, maybe immigrants. Then it'll start creeping into other sectors of society. Eventually you'll see a wide range of jobs where this is required. Perhaps nursing, police and emergency workers. Then it will start to be required for normal activities. Like you won't be able to board an airline without an RFID implant. The initial selling point will be that it speeds up boarding. And then it'll be required for driver licenses. Can't be too secure after all. I think it's inevitable.

  22. The Police? by 955301 · · Score: 5, Funny

    And I suppose the RFID's of the criminal element of the school will transmit data with the Evil Bit turned on? Shouldn't it be a word, or at least a few more bits?

    000 - Nothing to see here.
    001 - normal kid with mischevious mind. Watch for changes. May be intimidated back to 000 with minor police brutality.
    010 - Thief. Arrest if lingering in the parking lot or around school supply cabinets.
    011 - Fighter. Arrest if having an animated discussion with any 000's they don't normally congregate with or other 011's.
    100 - Stabby. Arrest when outer perimiter metal detectors are set off. Notify cafeteria to dispense plastic silverware to the 100 and immediately surrounding 000's. Exhibits 011 behavior, follow guidelines accordingly.
    101 - Brandisher. Arrest when outer perimiter detectors are set off and body mass = yesterday's + #g of any known gun + various # of bullets/magazines.Exhibits 011 behavior, follow guidelines accordingly.
    110 - Shooter. Arrest immediately. If no gun is found, plant one or make an announcement that arresting them was the right thing to do.
    111 - Dealer. "Accidently" shut fire doors on 111's crushing them to death. Accompany disposed of body with a 110, some stray bullets, and drug paraphenalia.

    Yeah, they definately need more Evil Bits...

    --
    You are checking your backups, aren't you?
  23. excelent alibi by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1- go to school
    2- leave the RFID tag there (or wrap tinfoil in your arm if is subdermal)
    3- leave the school
    4- comit a crime
    5- ???
    6- profit

    #5 could prety much be "don't worry with police. they think you were in school".

    thei're just giving students an excelent, state sanctioned alibi.

    i watched a movie once about a gang that used british prision system as alibi. they all comited light crimes (no more than 6 months jail time), then they broke of the jail, stole a roll of paper from the comapny that prints brit money, printed a batch of bills, hide the money, returned to jail.

    when the police found about the stolen paper, they dismissed the gang as suspects because they were all in jail, end were still there.

    do i see something like this happening in texas ?

    --
    What ? Me, worry ?
  24. The Creationist State by gelfling · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So here's the stat that just required the schoolbook publisher to make changes in their books so that now marriage is strictly a lifelong relationship between a man and a woman (BTW Texas has one of the highest divorce rates in the country) and another change to call evolution an unproven theory.

    Now we have soccermoms micromanaging their own children's every movement with an eye in the sky.

    Welcome to George Bush's America.

  25. A Texas Highschool Student by marco0009 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I currently attend a Texas High School and I am quite glad that I will be graduating come spring of '05. I've seen my school dump the largest portion of its funds into the football team which then proceeded to loose every game, while our science wing must deal with outdated equipment, aging textbooks, and in many cases if the teacher is not an honors teacher, they have no idea what it is they are teaching. Our mathematics department is in the same condition.

    This is just a slight example of how ill-directed our administrator's are. They are easily blinded by people who have even the slightest ability to market a service or product, and I would not be in the least surprised to see that my class mates are all tagged with RFID in some form or fashion at the start of the next school year.

    --
    Physics makes the world go 'round.
  26. Re:Mark of the Beast by Mant · · Score: 4, Informative

    I wonder if this is coming closer to the Mark of the Beast that the bible talks about?

    How can it be? Revaltions it was an apocalyptic writing (one of many) about the state of the Christian church at that time, under threat from both overt source (persecution) and more subtle ones (people lured to other faiths, such as worship of the Roman emporer).

    Whatever the Mark of the Beast was supposed to be, it was something that existed then, not now. So it can't be RFID tags. Revelations was never a prophecey or prediction.

    A quick Google turned up this which looks like a good starting point for finding out about apocalyptic writings.

  27. allergic reaction by PerpetualMotion · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why use a knife? Find a little poison ivy or something similar, get yourself a bad rash on and around the area implanted, and claim you are having an allergic reaction. They will take it out. Get everyone else in school to do the same.

    You have the poison ivy, you know what to do with the people who don't play along.

    1. Re:allergic reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      No Poison Ivy in Australia?!?
      Hold on, I'll FedEx you a bunch. Along with some toads, rabbits, and cats. If you cannot use the toads, rabbits, and cats...just let them loose in the countryside as I'm sure they'll just go away and die.

  28. Priorities? by value_added · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When the district unanimously approved the $180,000 system, neither teachers nor parents objected ... Rather, parents appear to be applauding. "I'm sure we're being overprotective, but you hear about all this violence," said Elisa Temple-Harvey, 34, the parent of a fourth grader. "I'm not saying this will curtail it, or stop it, but at least I know she made it to campus."

    "We've been fortunate; we haven't had a kidnapping," Mr. Weisinger said. "But if it works one time finding a student who has been kidnapped, then the system has paid for itself."

    So, let me see if I get this right -- crime rates have been going down for years and are at historical lows, but people are worried more than ever about crimes they "hear about."

    Without investigating, I'd wager that the odds of being kidnapped are much lower than than those of being struck by lightning, lower still than being run over by a car at a crosswalk, and lower still that little Johnny or Susie will drop out of school altogether.

    Maybe the money would be better spent on textbooks? Or teachers? Nah ... let's spend money to fix a problem we don't really have so that we can satisfy the need to believe we're doing something. For the children's sake, of course.

  29. Zero sum situation by Not+Public · · Score: 5, Insightful

    we (parents, teachers, students, employers, etc.. are going to lose in this.

    I am a teacher, parent & employers of 16-23 year olds. We've set the education system up for failure, and it will continue to fail at amazing rate as desperate "solutions" such as this are thrown at the system until it kills a substantial percentage of the nation's youth.

    first and foremost- I'm going to say I blame the parents. (woohoo! watch that karma drop!) none of this would be necessary if the children were taught, or had it modeled for them, or had the values embedded in them that education was of value. That and the parents are going to have to suck it up and be the bad guy, be the hardass, be the one make certain the child is held accountable for their actions.

    A large part of the problem is that the system relieves parents of their duties of parenting. And then in turn holds schools responsible, and then in turn holds teachers responsible.

    But guess what, with all the responsibilities and duties and irrelevant tasks that have been placed on teachers- they have no time to teach. In fact, persons with any passion or desire to pass on knowledge and skills in a field are quickly driven out because they don't spend enough time doing attendance in the correct manner, because they don't spend enough time preparing children for a standardized test, because they don't document a complete and unique separate lesson plan/learning system FOR EACH CHILD.

    Which, if we allowed those children to who really wanted to learn, to be in the classes of those who really wanted to teach... (in my opinion) making individual plans wouldn't be so bad because you're not trying to force material down the throat of a child who simply doesn't care. As teachers we can't make them care, and yet parents and then administrators, and even future employers, are blaming us for students coming out without a work ethic, without a sense of responsibility, pride in their work, or the common sense to believe that they should show up on time, or do the task they were given through to completion.

    how's this relevant to the RFID tags? I used to live in Spring and taught in the district next to it. They're actually a pretty "calm" district comparatively. Not way out on the forefront of education, not in the ghettos. Just another suburban district on the outskirts of a large city. (I've heard rumor that even people in NY and LA recognize Houston as a "large city"). They have the luxury if you will, to try to throw new technology at old problems. they have some cash apparently, they're not having to spend it on metal detectors for every door, but tardiness and skipping? the tags them selves i would imagine are relatively cheap, and the scanners not too bad compared to some of the other ludicrous expenditures I've seen (and while teacher salaries fall in that category, its on the lower end of the spectrum).

    I can see how easily this could be sold to a school board, teachers and administrators. School board finally has some means of knowing where every child is. Administrators don't have to spend a fraction of their existing resources to implement or monitor this new system, and if done right, teachers are no longer responsible for the tedious tasks of attendance. (which in and of itself wouldn't be a problem if you didn't have 35 kids all coming in tardy-with various levels/legitimacies of excuses). Only the poor tech resource folks are contemplating suicide.

    But as another poster pointed out.. it does nothing for the kids except for give them something else to hate and manipulate. It doesn't hold them responsible for anything.

    It doesn't actually DO anything.

  30. Re:Sorry, this is good.... by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    erm, kids don't have rights. thats why we don't let them vote....

    Blacks don't have rights, that's why we don't let them vote

    Women don't have rights, that's why we don't let them vote.

    Of course children have rights. Rights are not granted by the state, but innate. Nothing really dramatic happens to a person on their 18th birthday suddenly endowing them with rights. They've had them all along, it's just the state finally recognizes them. It seriously troubles me that people like you, who apparently find children morally equivalent to livestock are responsible for their education.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  31. It would be great fun to try a D-DOS attack. by ayjay29 · · Score: 3, Funny

    At lunch break, get 500 kids in a big group to run in and out through a few times. This is gonna create a LOT of traffic on the RFID system. Better still, get all the schools in the area to do the same thing at the same time.

    --
    Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
  32. Students NEED to be able to skip class by GauteL · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While I do agree that on general kids should be in school, and certain measures should be put up to make them.

    However, nothing gets seriously broken by kids skipping classes very occasionally. How square are the kids supposed to be?

    Kids that are allowed a certain freedom and have some possibility of opposing authority grow up far more interesting.

    Just think how interesting you find a person who has never skipped class, never talked back at their parents etc.

    The truth is, the parental generation have always tried to impose severe restrictions on the younger generation, and the younger generation have always broken them. This is the way of life. The moment we make it impossible for kids to break their parents rules, we have changed the game in a way I don`t think we see the consequences of.

    It is ironic that we impose millions of laws and regulations, but the majority actually disrespects people that always live by them.

    There are certain things every (semi) interesting person have done. If you have never done any of the following you need to get out more:
    1. Skip class
    2. Go above the speed limit
    3. Take a u-turn where it wasn't allowed, but noone was around.
    4. Drink or smoke without being allowed to do so
    5. Sneak in somewhere you don't belong.

    I will put up rules for my children and I will be fairly strict about some of them. But if my children never breaks my rules I would be suspicious that they are hiding something major, or disappointed that my kids grew up to be that square.

    A well balanced human being bends or breaks rules now and then, but know which rules they really should abide by. The important lesson is to teach the children which rules are absolute, and which can be bent a little.

  33. I have no problem with this by ShadyG · · Score: 4, Funny

    My daughter is home-schooled. When the time comes, all of your children will be appropriately conditioned to submit to her every whim.

  34. Why ? by bmajik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm also wondering why it would be nessisary to CC the police on who didn't show up in the morning

    Because the public school system in the United States is a holding pen and work/release program for those not yet legally required to work and pay taxes.

    The police need to know when prisoners have escaped, don't they?

    --
    My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.