Slashdot Mirror


Students Tracked By RFID

TheMeuge writes "The New York Times is reporting a new development in the unrelenting progress of the RFID juggernaut. The school district of Spring, Texas has adopted RFID as a way to track students' arrival and departure. Upon being scanned, the data are transmitted to both the school administrators, as well as city police. I guess cutting class is no longer an option."

122 of 866 comments (clear)

  1. barcode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you want to track people, why not just tattoo a bar code on the forehead.

    1. Re:barcode by DenDave · · Score: 2, Funny

      yeah beats having to say: Sorry teacher but the dog ate my RFID tag...

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    2. Re:barcode by SunPin · · Score: 4, Funny
      If you want to track people, why not just tattoo a bar code on the forehead.


      Because the barcode tattoo is _so_ 1984.

      --
      Laws are for people with no friends.
    3. Re:barcode by mwood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      [Paraphrase from the Revelation to John]

      Exactly the opposite of individual ID. The Mark of the Beast is the same for everyone, and doesn't identify anyone. Using that system, you could tell that somebody was in the school, but not who, because there no longer *is* any "who".

    4. Re:barcode by CaptainFrito · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Okay, I'm in. The Mark spoken of at Revelation ch 13 (aka Apocalypse) is a demonstrated allegiance to a way of life that is opposite to God's righteous way and blocks admittance into the promised new world (see Revelation ch7 and ch 20-22).

      For clarification of this position see the parallel prophecy given to the prophet Ezekiel at Ezek ch 9, where a 'secretary' from God is seen marking the foreheads of those that would be saved. It is clear that they get their mark because of their inner groaning over the detestible things being done in the Earth -- detestible according to God's standards, not their own. All others, starting from the sanctuary (those saying that they are Godly but are falsely so) are to be destoyed by the six other messengers.

      The physically tattooed marks and RFID tags are a means to control others, and of course things like these appeal to the masses because these measures seem benign, even helpful. After all, if you've done nothing wrong, what's to fear? But in the end they are a means of control. Today we have security cameras monitoring everything, even traffic flow, cross-referencing vehicle tags. People are being photographed hundreds of times a day in public places and their faces cross-referenced by high-speed computers, police now dress and train as military combatants. Core Internet routers are now archiving every single packet without prejudice. Voice recognition systems are scanning phone conversations in real-time. Fully automted packet-data-examining systems. And so on...it's all very sad, but it is also a warning.

      When Hitler began rouding people up, it all seemed benign and even helpful to the majority. Even those being rounded up believed that they had nothing wrong and thus had nothing to fear, according to their own testimony. But those that would not go along with the round-up got rounded up too. Compare that to the entire context of Rev ch 13. Hitler's actions were a dry run for the larger showdown that is to come, but it will be a world-wide affair according to Revelation. And God steps n to protect his own, and gives them the gift of the new paradise on Earth which he has promised.

      But now for the University science: According to Stanley Milgram's famous experiment, most people will go along with those perceived to be in authority, no matter how objectionable the request might seem upon first glance. And the Stanford Prison Experiment shows that most people in charge of others will without fail revel in sadism in very short order when given control over others. So, that people will attack those who desire to serve God en masse -- preventing them from even maintaining livlihoods and even from buying and selling to sustain life -- will be willing participants, even those of you who are convinced right now that you would never had help Hitler. Reliable scientific research consistently shows that most people would have, regardless of what they say when asked hypothetically.

      (Okay, mighty moderators, protectors of the /. common good, have your way with me. At least it wasn't posted anonymously. And, furthermore, I've actually read and sudied the Bible -- unlike most who are happy to comment as if they know what it says or mod down those that have the courage to repeat what it says -- hehehe.)

    5. Re:barcode by Mad_Rain · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just for the people who don't know: Here is a link to the Milgram experiment. In the experiemnt, it was found that around 60% of people would continue administering painful and life-threatening electric shocks to a stranger at the request of an authority figure.

      The Stanford Prison Experiment has recently gotten a little more press as a result of the problems at Abu Ghraib. Volunteer students at Stanford University were put into one of two roles: guards or prisoners. Despite being smart, "psychologically stable" people, the guards rapidly became abusive and the prisoners had varied reactions, from rebellion to one developing a psychosomatic rash within a day. (Philip Zimbardo ran the study).

      --
      "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
    6. Re:barcode by HiThere · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Being a dogmatic atheist is no better than being a dogmatic fundamentalist. The key is, they're both dogmatic.

      Someone who is thoughtful, and willing to explore the ways in which his beliefs mirror the world, and to consider as metaphysical those beliefs that DON'T mirror the world is much more congenial, and, to my mind, a much better kind of person.

      That many of which we hear are both biblical scholars and dogmatic fundamentalists should not blind us to the fact that many biblical scholars are intelligent people that would be nice to know. And AREN't dogmatic lunatics.

      I, personally, am not a Christian of any denomination, despite having been raised as one. I follow a much less common religion with a gnostic (but non-christian) basis. And I don't have any church. This causes me to be occasionally terrified about the fundamentalist Christians, most of whom don't even realize that they are followers of the cult of Osiris (historically speaking...not denying that there was a Jesus Christ just because I have no evidence indicating that such a person actually existed except in the sense that Nicolas Bourbaki did).

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    7. Re:barcode by CaptainFrito · · Score: 4, Interesting
      You probably think that Evolution is a hypothesis

      Yes I do, based on the Scientific Method. Most people that understand it recognize that it is still a theory. Proof? Simple: If you yourself contracted a cancer, is it good or is it bad? Cancer, according to evolution, is the engine of progress. Truth is, you'd leave everything just the way it is. Nobody wants their DNA fooled with because they know intuitively that it's a bad thing. Stanley Miller gave up trying to prove his organic soup theory because he could never make it work (one initial success followed by a career of failures) and that he could never eliminate himself from the experiments. Ironically, his experiments were to prove all this could have happened blindly, without intelligent intervention, but he realized after years and years of failures his experiments never worked without his thoughtful intelligence guiding it. So, in pure scientific terminology, evolution is still a theory, since no one has demonstrated exactly how it works and demonstrated it experimentally. And I might also point out that evolution relates to how organisms morph across specie boundaries, not how life appears in the first place. That is the providence of abiogenesis vs. panspermia.

      I arrived at creationism using the Sherlock Holmes method: Eliminate the impossible, and whatever's left, however improbable, is the truth. Since evolution is mathematically so remote so as to be impossible I gave up on it. After years of objective and deep academic research that had nothing to do with Bible research. I initially set out to disprove the Bible, but could not unless I abandoned objectivity.

      The book The Blind Watchmaker, often cited as having proved evolution, says in one chapter that to transform (evolve) an ordinary squirrel into a flyiong squirrel, one simply needs to find a clumsy squirrel with loose skin and have it fall from trees so often that it soon learns to glide to the ground. Okay, fine. Show me how it's done: get all the regular squirrels you want, and throw them from trees and produce a flying squirrel. If you can, you still haven't proven evolution, because I don't beleive that such an experiment would demonstrate a crossing of specie boundaries. When you've accomplished that feat, you woill have progressed from theory to fact. Otherwise, it's just a theory (hypothesis, actually, since it lacks the detail in the specific mechanisms involved).

      As far as the Earth being flat, the Bible pointed out it is a sphere some 3,000 years ago (Isiaih 40:22), some 250 years before Pythagoras. And it never said the Earth is the center of the universe. So, you're just making those things up. And the Bible clearly says that the subconscience is very treacherous and must be carefully monitored and curbed by the conscious mind (James 1:14,15).

      As for the final outcome, whether you are correct that the world will continue and man will evolve into some higher species through blind chance, or I am correct in believing the Bible's predictions, only time will tell.

  2. Cutting Class by aonnix · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It should be easier to cut class now. Just give your tag to your buddy, and the school's computers will think your there.

    1. Re:Cutting Class by Repugnant_Shit · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That won't be a problem once the subdermal tags arrive.

    2. Re:Cutting Class by hummassa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Simple, yet. You just put a tinfoil leave over the subdermal patch and leave the premises. The computer will still think you are inside.

      --
      It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    3. Re:Cutting Class by ultrasonik · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I really don't see any type of implant as being used in the future. Biometrics is comming along too well for that. The school could have just as easily used finger print scanners.

    4. Re:Cutting Class by themaidtricks · · Score: 2, Funny

      Right, and once kids figure out where the tags are, they'll start showing up to school with missing fingers, arms, and legs.

    5. Re:Cutting Class by double-oh+three · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, but I think the teachers will get suspiscious when there's only one kid in the class with buldging pockets.

      My real problem is what will happen when they get lost. My school instituted mandatory photo ID cards this year and pretty much everyday there's a crowd of 20-100+ teenagers outside the main office waiting for temporary IDs. Personally I havn't worn mine in two weeks and no one has noticed, so~

      I'm also wondering why it would be nessisary to CC the police on who didn't show up in the morning.

      Not to mention the fact that someone could track anyone in the school after they figure out which RFID is theirs. I think that's a much bigger invasion of privacy than having to wear photo IDs. I have no doubt that this will be spreading to other counties and states in the near future so I'm glad I'm graduating next year. Saves me the trouble of explaining why my RFID badge has become a finely ground white powder.

      --
      "For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
    6. Re:Cutting Class by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You just put a tinfoil leave over the subdermal patch and leave the premises.

      And still some people think that tinfoil hats are of no use.

      Tightens his tinfoil hat.

    7. Re:Cutting Class by Dwonis · · Score: 2, Interesting
      (+5, Insightful??)

      Anyway, subdermal tags are no match for an MRI... :-)

    8. Re:Cutting Class by Twanfox · · Score: 2, Informative
      Not to mention the fact that someone could track anyone in the school after they figure out which RFID is theirs.

      Not necessarily true, depending on the quality of the RFID badge and scanners. Have you ever seen those credit card like cards that companies use for secured access? Ever wondered "How they do that?" RFID. While I'm not a big fan of RFID on everything, carrying a badge with such a tag is commonplace for companies with secured areas. Oddly enough, dispite that, there still isn't a way to put a scanner in a room and actively scan who is where.

    9. Re:Cutting Class by mforbes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Where the issue is security, the RFID cards are used to keep doors unlocked unless a card is read to unlock them. This seems to be much more about tracking the comings & goings of students who already belong.

      Kind of interesting, since school security has two main concerns: keeping students where they belong (but with enough flexibility to allow them to leave for doctor's appointments, etc), and keeping out people who don't belong-- the divorced parent who lost custody but is determined to keep their child at any cost, for instance.

      Oh well, it's not like minors have rights in the US, so the schools are pretty much free to do what they want in this regard.

      --

      Allegedly real newspaper headline from 1998:
      Man Struck by Lightning Faces Battery Charge

    10. Re:Cutting Class by Politburo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I disagree. Laws can be misguided, and as such, breaking the law does not automatically mean you are doing a 'bad thing'.

    11. Re:Cutting Class by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This should help with the offtopic.

      Congratulations on making it out of that situation alive. There is no "right" way to grow up, and you did what you have to do. I admire you, if your story is true (I'm sure you understand why I'm adding that clause, this being the internet and all.)

      I've known many kids that were in your situation, but not necessarily about sports. They invariably turned to drugs and/or burnt out before they finished their freshman year of college.

      You're right about the shootings, too. School shootings happen because the kids are caged animals that have no other option in their mind than to lash out violently. School admin doesn't give a fuck, nor do their parents. Look at Columbine. Look at Jonesboro, AR. Look at Grayson, KY. That was the first in the big wave of shootings in the 90's and it happened at a high school near mine. The kid that was the shooter was one of these kids that I was talking about. I knew him and competed against him in our local academic competition league.

      Such a fucking waste, because adults can't stop using their children to cover up their insecurities and shortcomings.

    12. Re:Cutting Class by ikkonoishi · · Score: 4, Funny

      And "cutting" class takes on a whole new meaning.

    13. Re:Cutting Class by quarkscat · · Score: 4, Informative

      (Former?) Ed. Secretary Paige's "success" in
      the Houston, TX educational system was based
      upon faked data. Students that did poorly
      were moved to another school district, while
      the majority of dropouts were never designated
      as such. Lies, damn lies, and statistics.

      His "success" in Houston was the premise for
      Bush's "No Child Left Behind" program, which
      has brought little success but much turmoil
      to school districts across the nation. This
      is largely due to it being a Federal, albeit
      woefully underfunded, mandate.

      RFID tags, particularly implanted RFID tags,
      for students is the wave of the future. And
      when many of these students do drop out of
      school, they will feel equally at home with a
      minimum wage job at their local Wal-Mart, which
      eventually will require their employees to be
      RFID-tagged, along with their stock of WMD
      (Wal-Mart Merchandise Dumping).

      In reality, our calenders should be altered
      to reflect that "1984" was the start of a new
      epoch, rather than just a prescient sci-fi
      novel.

    14. Re:Cutting Class by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "My school instituted mandatory photo ID cards this year and pretty much everyday there's a crowd of 20-100+ teenagers outside the main office waiting for temporary IDs. Personally I havn't worn mine in two weeks and no one has noticed, so~"

      Wow....school has sure changed since I went (I'm assuming high school). We had a photo id card, but, didn't have to 'wear' it...and frankly, I don't remember ever having to use it for anything after we got it...maybe to check books out of the library or something.

      Do they not have 'open campus' out there anymore? We could drive in...and drive out at lunch to go get something. I think the rule for abscenses was like 15 days per class. You got 15 unexcused absenses from a class...you were dropped from that class, dropped from 3 classes...you were kicked out of school for that semester. Tardies counted for half an abscense. So, most everyone kept a good running record.

      But, sure, we'd cut class somedays...first sunny days of spring, we'd get beer, and hang out down by the river throwing frisbee, etc. Good clean fun, no one got hurt...and most everyone I know not only graduated HS...but, went on to college and are successful in life now.

      We came and went as we pleased back then... sure kids got stoned or drunk on occasion before/during school...but, no one got in serious trouble, and grew up to be just fine.

      Man...I'd hate to be a kid today with all the 'rules' , political correctness, tracking....seems they are taking all the fun out of the 'rights of passage' and being a teenager.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    15. Re:Cutting Class by wronskyMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Umm... students are required to attend public school unless their parents can pony up for private school/homeschooling, so there is no "well you chose to be here so you agreed to give up your privacy" argument.

      --
      --- You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you mad- Neal (not Cowboy) Boortz
    16. Re:Cutting Class by double-oh+three · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The counterargument is that we shouldn't be teaching teenagers and kids that they are A. always being monitored and have no privacy, B. that they are not trustworthy and C. acclimating them to both of those so they don't put up so much of a fight for them later. We would be better served by a population that got used to it's rights early and had some sense of what they were and more importantly what they should be.

      And I'm not arguing against keeping kids in class during class, I'm arguing against them tracking us via RFIDs and keeping a very tight leash on us. They treat people in High School like they're in Elementary School with the amount of things they entrust to us. A good number of us are able to make our own decisions at this age and we need more flexibility, not less.

      --
      "For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
    17. Re:Cutting Class by chainsaw1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, that excuse is fading fast. Many people are using thermally sensing contact pads, and there are a coupe vendors that actually analyize the sweat from the fingertip (that's what make the fingerprint) to make sure it's a real finger. Next stop will probably be IR scan of finger to make sure it contains protiens or something else attributable to a real finger.

      The other side is to make the reader part of the equasion too (such as those USB/fingerprint combo drives). This means you keep any latent prints on the reader with you--and you'd need a card just to try to fake out the system in the first place.
      Combine the fingerprint reader card with the rotating key sytem (like those on many dial-in access cards) and you shouldn't have to worry about all the fancy stuff I mentioned above anyway :-)

      --
      - Sig
    18. Re:Cutting Class by LilGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On the contrary...

      The wave of the future is simply to abandon the idea of school that was dreamed up during the Industrial Revolution. We now have technology that will allow students to excel way beyond anywhere today's schools can get them.

      The problem seems to be that people don't realize what the problem is. We just need to change how we view the education process and what exactly we are trying to accomplish with it, and then overhaul the system. We don't all need to BE somewhere to learn. Many will, many won't.

      Its almost laughable how badly the government and school districts struggle these days with the money issues, drop out rates, and whatnot.

      I like to compare it to this hypothetical (however unlikely) situation : all the major car companies in the world trying to come up with a hydrogen to diesel to unleaded gas engine, instead of just starting anew and creating a hydrogen gas engine.

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
  3. Insanity by david_594 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If I were still in High School I think i would be scared of this. RFID technology seems great for tracking shippments and such, but to track students like this seem pretty insane.

    1. Re:Insanity by jokumuu · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, the thing is, actually tracking anything is with this technology is the scary part. The actual use by a school is just the tip of the iceberg. I am sure that in future every person will be tracked "for their safety". I think that some small town will probably go for something like this at some point "to fight crime"

    2. Re:Insanity by lachlan76 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Being in high school now, I'd have to agree with you.

      You have no idea how fucked up your country looks from down under.

    3. Re:Insanity by tomstdenis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The bigger problem I see is you can't really force discipline and respect on children anyways. I mean you can show them how their actions have consequences and all but if the child doesn't take it upon themselves to straighten up there isn't much you can.

      For instance, a couple of years ago [ok so roughly 8 or so] the high school I went to started a "10 missed classes and you're suspended". Did that stop skipping? Did that make the students more respectful of the teachers and their peers [specially in grade 9, the first year of high school for us...]? Hell no.

      By contrast the "advanced stream" [basically get >60% in advanced courses] I was in was mostly populated with students who behaved themselves, got through the lectures and participated in class. We chose to act like adults we weren't forced to do so.

      So left to their own devices most children would come around on their own. The ones who don't want to can live exciting lives with a grade 10 education.

      So all this RFID thing is going todo is breed more contempt for "authority" on the part of the students who in my mind are already a bunch of punkagers anyways.

      As for "privacy" concerns... um there are none. You're in PUBLIC while at a PUBLIC SCHOOL. So long as the RFID tag is encrypted or something [e.g. not plaintext stored on it] and it's easy to stow when not on campus I don't see the huge security concern.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    4. Re:Insanity by Grym · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So left to their own devices most children would come around on their own. The ones who don't want to can live exciting lives with a grade 10 education.

      But you do realize that, in this wonderful democracy of ours, their vote will count just as much--maybe more if they're in Ohio--as yours, right? Will you be so flippant with regard to their education and "exciting lives" when you have to pay more in taxes to help pay for their welfare check and/or jail term?

      My point is, our children, including the "dumb" ones, matter. Our FUTURE matters. Children are affected by not only by what we say but also what we do. If we set forth an example that it's OKAY for the authorities to monitor your every movement for our children now, how much easier do you think it will be able to convince them unwarranted searches are similarly okay in the future?

      -Grym

    5. Re:Insanity by tomstdenis · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'll let you in on a little tip. Until your 18 in Canada [at least] you're not actually allowed [by law] to skip classes. The school is responsible for your well being during the day and if you go missing it's them who get looked at [at least initially].

      Ever hear the saying "you can show a horse the water but you can't make him drink?" that's not just clever it's also what the christian right would call "divine". While I'm not a religious type I do swing for "choice".

      It's upto the 14 year old kid to *choose* to act responsibly. It's one thing to show them what responsibility is but it's another for them to actually follow it.

      It's because of people like you that I sit in a college where "easy tests" is a good thing. The students don't actually think of learning as a good thing. It's just something they were told they have to do. So in the end even with college grads we end up with [on average from what I've seen] really stupid, unmotivated greedy induhviduals.

      I still routinely get the "why do you write free software when charging for it can make money" bit from people ranging from students to 52 year old retired HP engineers.

      Hardly anyone does anything [particularly in academia] for the simple pleasure of doing a good job, learning something new and giving back to the community.

      You say "we are doomed if we let the children fail" and I'm saying we're already doomed.

      As for the "unwarranted searches" um well again it's public property. "Your" locker is actually "their" locker. "Your" safety is everyones safety.

      Of course I speak as someone who finished high school without metal detectors on the doors...

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    6. Re:Insanity by Dashing+Leech · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Will you be so flippant with regard to their education and "exciting lives" when you have to pay more in taxes to help pay for their welfare check and/or jail term?

      That's not really a sound argument. The same could be said for anything we do that ends up costing tax payers money. People with bigger cars do more damage to the road. People who eat poorly require more medical attention (more hospitals, more medicare -- and in Canada health care is a direct drain on taxes). Are you saying we should regulate every individual's behaviour if it is going to affect the amount of taxes. Is that consistent with the concept of a free country?

    7. Re:Insanity by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, the thing is, actually tracking anything is with this technology is the scary part.

      It is insane to use RFIDs to track runners in a marathon? This has been done for over 10 years. It makes for a greatly reduced error rate for time reporting. It is cheaper than hiring people to sit at the finish line to record times. It allows immediate results tied to a person. If anything is insane, it is a person with an irrational fear of non-contact tags. They have been used for over 20 years in various implementations and have a near zero rate of illegal duplication, an absolute zero (from the information I have or even the worst posted about them here) rate of misuse of the types of misuses discussed here, and they are effective.

      You haven't expressed a problem with this or any other implementation, but any use of it whatsoever. So my question is, why do you fear a technology itself?

    8. Re:Insanity by DZign · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and have a near zero rate of illegal duplication, an absolute zero rate of misuse of the types of misuses discussed here, and they are effective.

      And why is there a near-zero rate up to now ?
      Because up they were used in such specific situations where usually nobody could have personal gain from misusing them.

      Once the technology gets more widespread, people may have valid reasons to crack or misuse the system and will find a way around it.

    9. Re:Insanity by Ba3r · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Its hard to seperate government regulation and a free country.

      With less regulation it is more difficult to maintain an orderly society , which consequently puts limits on how much an individual can do because of the massive effort that is needed just to deal with the entropy of daily life.

      A heavily regulated society will provide a baseline of order so that citizens can ignore the basics of day to day life, and concentrate on more complex things. But too much regulation makes a very rapid switch from freedom to oppression.

      An analogy: Given a roadway: without order it would be impossible to go fast, as you would not be able to interpret where people would go. Conversly, with a very orderly system you can make assumptions that people will stop at stop signs, stay in their lanes, and generally follow the traffic patterns. For concrete examples (from my own experience) look at the difference between the Autobahn in Germany, where going 145mph is a common occurence (albeit pushing the limit), as opposed to going 70mph on an Indian highway, which is tempting fate as you dodge ox-carts, absent minded cows (Holy Cow!), flipped-over trucks, and people driving on the wrong side of the road because their lane was blocked by one of the above.

    10. Re:Insanity by kabocox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If we set forth an example that it's OKAY for the authorities to monitor your every movement for our children now, how much easier do you think it will be able to convince them unwarranted searches are similarly okay in the future?

      School childern are already trained not to put up a fuss about school wide locker searches or searching of persons. Now they are being taught that have any concealing containers on you is wrong. How much longer until all school clothing is see through for a security measure?

    11. Re:Insanity by Rasvar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But using the technology also initiates children to the idea that its perfectly normal for an authority to monitor their every movement, so 10 years down the line, when tags like this are required for government business or even just your time tracking, there will be no questions asked

      Where is this different from taking attendence? This is just an electronic way of doing it. Doing it on the bus is just another cover for the schools in our lawyer/litigation happy society.

      As long as these are only on busses or at the entrances to schools, I have no problem with them. If they are used for internal tracking, that is going a bit overboard.

      This is a reasonable use of the technology.

      I am not trolling on this as some clodhoppers think by the moderation. The legal enviroment has created this morass. However, you know what? My office has the same system. I can not get into the building without my electronic pass key. My company does not go as far as to use it as a time clock. However, what is the difference between this and punching a card in a time clock? It is just a newer version of the technology.

      As far as the idea that this will lead to "embedded chips", that is something that will lead to a huge fight. There are fights worth fighting. This is not one of them.

    12. Re:Insanity by chialea · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >It's because of people like you that I sit in a college where "easy tests" is a good thing.

      *cough*

      I thought "easy tests" were a good thing. on the other hand, that was becasue I thought preparing for tests wa a waste of time. if I can't walk in an do very well, I don't know the material well enough, or the test is badly written.

      example: multivariate calculus. 6-problem exams, where each problem was quite trivial if you knew the material and pretty much impossible if you didn't. now that is a good test. it's also an easy test, assuming you're where you need to be on the material.

      > Hardly anyone does anything [particularly in academia] for the simple pleasure of doing a good job, learning something new and giving back to the community.

      well, I am in academia, but I'd have to say that pretty much anyone in academia does it because they're highly motivated, since grad school can be pretty miserable and demanding. (perhaps we have different definitions of academia. I'm thinking grad students and profs, basically) what you're citing as a rate event I'd have to say is the norm. sure, publishing a paper helps me out, since it makes getting a job easier, and I want to get people to pay me. however, the reason I want people to pay me is so I can do interesting things, learn interesting things, and teach interesting things. it's incredibly fun to go to someone with something new and interesting you did and say "look! cool!"

      Lea

    13. Re:Insanity by HeghmoH · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is a huge difference between a marathon and a school.

      The participants in a marathon are all consenting adults. They are able to refuse to participate. The students in a school are children who have no choice about attending.

      RFID is different from all previous forms of identification because it's the only one which can be reliably read from a distance without your consent. Remember that the short range of these devices is simply due to the power and sensitivity of the detector. Bluetooth isn't supposed to work from the next room down, but people have made it work over more than a kilometer away. Forcing people (not to mention children!) to carry identifying information that can be read involuntarily from a distance is evil. I'm not normally a tin-foil hatter, but I'm already thinking about countermeasures to use when my passport expires in seven years and I get a shiny new one with an RFID tag in it.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    14. Re:Insanity by Frobnicator · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I agree with your comments about kids NOT consenting. As their parent, I wouldn't consent to my kids being tracked, and having their info sent to the police.

      Just like I wouldn't consent to my boss installing a tracker for when I arrive at work. Although they already use electronic door keycards to unlock the outside door, usually enough people arrive at the same time that only one or two people get scanned for the large group. And there's always people who forgot their cards and nobody knows.

      I'm not normally a tin-foil hatter, but I'm already thinking about countermeasures to use when my passport expires in seven years and I get a shiny new one with an RFID tag in it.
      Put it in the microwave.
      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
  4. Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How prejudice and invasive technologies always attack those who cannot defend themselves first. I give it 5 years and you'll see rfid on vehicles or national id's. I mean you have a license plate now, whats the dif between that and rfid. right, right, nudge nudge.

    Thank you idiot america.

    1. Re:Funny by jokumuu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the difference: no rfid YET. Just wait for the new and improved "Crime fighting Lisence plate"

    2. Re:Funny by Lordrashmi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They already have that here in Texas. You get a 25% discount by using the radio tag and all major freeways have tag readers to monitor speed. That is how they come up with the nifty speed map.

      http://traffic.houstontranstar.org/layers/

  5. Tin foil hat by Xeo+024 · · Score: 4, Funny

    They won't be able to scan me as long as I hvae my tin foil hat on, right?

  6. Mark of the Beast by cuteseal · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Hm... I wonder if this is coming closer to the Mark of the Beast that the bible talks about?

    In Australia, they use now swipe cards to check attendance at schools. Swiping at a terminal brings up a mugshot of the student on the screen, so the staff member can perform a visual check to see why Abdul Habib has blue eyes and long blonde hair...

    1. Re:Mark of the Beast by Mant · · Score: 4, Informative

      I wonder if this is coming closer to the Mark of the Beast that the bible talks about?

      How can it be? Revaltions it was an apocalyptic writing (one of many) about the state of the Christian church at that time, under threat from both overt source (persecution) and more subtle ones (people lured to other faiths, such as worship of the Roman emporer).

      Whatever the Mark of the Beast was supposed to be, it was something that existed then, not now. So it can't be RFID tags. Revelations was never a prophecey or prediction.

      A quick Google turned up this which looks like a good starting point for finding out about apocalyptic writings.

  7. to the police?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    transmitted to both the school administrators, as well as city police

    Don't the police have better things to do instead of tracking students? Like maybe fighting crime?

  8. Re:Sorry, this is good.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    if you're not in the position to be affected by this, shut the hell up.....

    Yeah -- and do the same thing when they come for the Jews, right?

    Fuckwit.

  9. RFID circumvention by shadowmas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    soon we'll be learning tons of ways to circumvent RFIDs. kids are very good at finding out ways to circumvent stuff like this. nomatter how good a system might be when it goes against lots of kids with a lot of time on there hands and new ways of thinking i wonder how long it will take b4 kids find away around this.

    1. Re:RFID circumvention by lachlan76 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Disclaimer: I am 15

      • Aluminium foil
      • Coming to school and leaving it in my locker
      • Hack the computer system
      • Buying a similar model, reprogramming it, and getting someone to take it to your classes, if need be


      And finally, if they eventually decide to implant:
      • Knife...most people won't go this fat to get out of class, but I don't feel much pain anyway



      Thos are just the things I thought of in the last two minutes. I could probably think of more more.
    2. Re:RFID circumvention by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If it's anything like his bus pass it will be 15 mins before my 15 yr old son loses his - and they'll implant one over my dead body.

      --
      init 11 - for when you need that edge.
  10. Ah the prisoner by pklong · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where am I?
    In the School

    What do you want?
    Information

    Whose side are you on?
    That would be telling . . .

    We want Information
    You won't get it

    By hook or by crook . . .
    We will

    Who are you?
    The new Number Two

    Who is Number One?
    You are Number Six

    I am not a number . . .
    I'm a free man!
    (Mocking laughter)

    --

    Philip

    Signatures are broken

    1. Re:Ah the prisoner by AnswerIs42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      And if you cut class and try to get away... a giant bouncing ball comes and hunts you down...

  11. Freedom to monitor by Homology · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Upon being scanned, the data are transmitted to both the school administrators, as well as city police.

    The official USA propaganda is that the rest of the world envy USA because of it's freedom. Well, I don't envy the freedom US authorities has to continously monitoring anyone for no reason at all.

    1. Re:Freedom to monitor by rongten · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When Thomas Jefferson said The price of freedom is eternal vigilance some of you think he meant this?
      Why should we limit our civil liberties in trade of "security"?
      Why it is easy of letting something go, but hard and strenous to conquer it back?
      Some things we are hearing around start making 1984 sound like a bed time history.

      --
      Zed: Nothing is ever easy
    2. Re:Freedom to monitor by Kidbro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      1 school district in TX != everyone.

      The interesting thing is that you're so "free" that this gross invasion of privacy is allowed. While in a "less free" country this would be completely against all laws.

      I'm not really trying to judge, but it's not clear which of the systems that is best at protecting individual freedom.

    3. Re:Freedom to monitor by ifwm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ok, where? YOU give examples please, since they seem to be so abundant.

      As far as the PATRIOT act, it's getting dialed back bit by bit, which is how our system here works. Someone does something foolish in the heat of the moment, and cooler heads eventually prevail.

    4. Re:Freedom to monitor by enjo13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Freedom is sometimes about doing the wrong thing, just as much as doing the right. In this case the people of this town decided (of their own volition) that this was what they wanted to do. This wasn't imposed by the faceless government, but by the people themselves (through their elected school board I'm assuming). That's freedom and democracy in action...

      That said, this is a really sad indication of the neo-conservative movement sweeping through America (particularly in the southern states such as Texas). This is the next logical step from the same people that brought you teen curfews.. The same people up in arms over the intro. to Monday Night football. The same people who become outraged at this slightest hint of sexuality... in short, in their (well founded IMHO) desire to protect their children and themselves, they've lost all semblance of reason. On the surface making sure kids stay in school and learn gives them the best chance for success as adults.. that's a noble cause. However, they've taken a shotgun approach here. Now they're teaching kids that humiliation and bold invasions of privacy should be expected... This doesn't create a society of good adults, but wildly disenfranchised and angry ones.

      --
      Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!
  12. Beating up nerds? by exeme · · Score: 3, Funny

    Pretty freaky "Big Brother" stuff, but I guess its a good way to track students. But then I remember school being better when the trouble makers wern't there beating up us nerds..

  13. Re:Sorry, this is good.... by mumblestheclown · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I agree with your assessment that it's a good thing and I also share your dread at the predictable tin foil hat replies. However, "in you're not in a position to be affected by this.." is exactly the wrong attitude.

  14. Re:Sorry, this is good.... by eclectro · · Score: 5, Insightful

    if you're not in the position to be affected by this, shut the hell up.....

    Let me guess, if we don't that would make us unpatriotic as well???

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  15. Social engineering RFID into the children by WCMI92 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Something tells me the black market in RFID jammers and duplicators is going to be rampant...

    This is totally wrong. You are compelled by law to attend school. Most can't afford to NOT go to government school. Now the government is tagging people like animals.

    Be VERY afraid of the first RFID generation, ones who grow up with this commonplace, who never knew an age without it. Who will thing we are a bunch of kooks for opposing it.

    That is why those who want to social engineer people ALWAYS want to start with the schools...

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
    1. Re:Social engineering RFID into the children by sckeener · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Be VERY afraid of the first RFID generation, ones who grow up with this commonplace, who never knew an age without it. Who will think we are a bunch of kooks for opposing it.

      That is why those who want to social engineer people ALWAYS want to start with the schools...


      I've always wondered how we can expect our kids to fight for liberty later when we gave them none.

      How can you miss something you never had?

      --
      "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
    2. Re:Social engineering RFID into the children by ajs · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've always wondered how we can expect our kids to fight for liberty later when we gave them none.

      If you mean "fight" in the sense of soldiering, don't worry that's the easy part. The mental conditioning that is employed in the military (any military) is designed to enhance the bonds that men (mostly men, though women take to it, the bonds are different, as they provoke more of a defensive than offensive FoF reflex) form in small social groups. The end result is that to a soldier "freedom" is like a team name. You might as well say "Red Sox". If you think that can't be the case because soldiers are willing to die "for freedom", think about what would happen if you killed a member of a baseball team. The other players would be willing to kill and/or die to either prevent or avenge that killing, even though they probably never knew each other before joining the team. Such is the power of the team instinct in humans.

      So, you could call an opressive dictatorship "freedom", just as long as your soldiers are indoctrinated to defend it.

      The real question is a much more frightening one: how can we expect our kids to defend freedom as our future leaders when we didn't given them any as children? To what depths will our future judges, congresspersons and presidents sink when they have been treated like this growing up?

      That one keeps me up at night.

  16. Maybe this is a case by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    of law suits gone too far. It seems recently the trend has been to blame the school for whatever trouble a kid causes, and since the school may have difficulty tracking down individual students and whether or not they were on campus, the school may very well end up being responsible. At least this way the schools can say definitievely whether or not someone came(provided they actually still have their rfid, w hich may be a big assumption)

  17. Wonder why by chennes · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In an age when parents are suing schools for not keeping adequate track of their children (see http://www.overlawyered.com/archives/001699.html) is this any wonder?

    1. Re:Wonder why by npsimons · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In an age when parents are suing schools for not keeping adequate track of their children (see http://www.overlawyered.com/archives/001699.html) is this any wonder?

      Am I the only one who thinks that the solution to this is not more invasions of privacy (via tags), but less legal bullshit (via less lawyers, more personal responsibility, and less stupid laws)?
  18. This is the wrong approach. by RandoX · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If the student to teacher ratio is so large that the instructor can't even accurately take role, what is the level of education going to be like?

  19. Re:Sorry, this is good.... by Ralph+Yarro · · Score: 2

    but the majority of responses to this come from people who are long out of school, don't have kids in one, but still think they should be able to dictate how schools are run.

    Does the fact that despite all that I still have to PAY for them give me any voice at all in your world?

    --

    The real Ralph Yarro posts as Anonymous Coward. Anyone else is an impostor.
  20. Children of the free world by Zemran · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is the sort of thing we would have screamed about if China had done it a few years ago and now we just accept it. The East is moving West as quickly as the West is moving East. Soon they will occupy the moral high ground.

    --
    I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
  21. Re:Sorry, this is good.... by achilstone · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Unless the RFID tags are embedded in their skulls, then they can also be "lost, traded, broken, etc".
    The real convenience is that the student doesn't have to make any effort to register in or out but to just ensure that they remember to carry their tag.
    What happens with a faulty tag?
    Will a student suffer a poor attendance record without recourse?
    After all they might not find out until the end of year school report.
    "...it must be true because the computer says so."

  22. Anyone with kids in school should know... by HomerJayS · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... that the RFID plan is fatally flawed. On any given day, the RFID system will be reporting a 50% absentee rate. The typical high school student is lucky enough to remember to bring his/her bookbag to school every day, much less a small, easily misplaced RFID card.

  23. Re:Sorry, this is good.... by not_a_product_id · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "we are required by law to know where our pupils are at all times"

    probably another reason why this could be a good thing. The danger here comes when governments try to extend this and that's where this is the thin end of the wedge. It may be a good thing but we'd be stupid to ignore the dangers it also brings.

    --

    ---
    We spoke for about a half an hour. I don't recall a thing we said. - Colorblind James Experience

  24. Ferris Bueller by Jumbo+Jimbo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We can all watch Matthew Broderick skip class and reminisce about the days when this used to be possible - it'll become a period piece of a bygone age, along with Remains of the Day and Little Women.

  25. Students are *not* cattle by joelparker · · Score: 4, Insightful
    From the article:
    • a few schools have begun monitoring student arrivals and departures using technology similar to that used to track livestock and pallets of retail shipments.
    And adults wonder why our kids aren't learning important ideas like responsibility...
  26. Re:Sorry, this is good.... by erroneus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was going to mod this as interesting but I think I would rather reply to it.

    I think it's important to recognize that students (children, minors) are being entrusted to the public school system to make sure that while under their care, nothing bad happens to any student. They are, in essence, the largest daycare provider in any given area and they have a huge responsibility in keeping tracking and accounting of other people's children.

    Now I can't say that it's a good thing that the information is fed to the local law enforcement agency unless there is a particular student they wish to keep track of and in that event, there should be some sort of formality associated with "I need to know when 'Johnny' came and went for the past two weeks and for the next two weeks from now." But to have that information fed to them on a regular basis feels kinda wrong.

    But one thing to keep in mind -- while a person is a minor, there are no rights to privacy to speak of. The "rights" they might enjoy are whatever has been granted by their parents and/or the school system. I liken this to the same problem that students have with their "freedom of the press" rights in school newspapers -- while it's all well and good to want to exercise those rights, the fact remains that a school newspaper is a SCHOOL newspaper and as such is actually under the control and supervision of the school system, so guess who is in control of "freedom of the press" in that little world? Absolutely.

    It just might be a good thing... I'd be interested to see what pitfalls are to be revealed by any of this.

  27. The Slippery Slope.. by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are these guys trying to piss off the volcano!?

    Seriously, most proponents of RFID technology site its benefits in stock and supply line management only, and keep assurring us that RFID tags embedded in products will never be used to track people.
    And yet we're now seeing instances of the middleman, i.e the product tag, being bypassed altogether and people being tagged outright. Is this really what RFID was developed for in the first place? Tracking people?

    OK, these people are children. But that doesn't make this any less wrong. First criminals, then kids. They'll start on employees next, move it up to registered drivers, you'll see.

    Of course tagging children has nothing to do with their safety. Anyone who says so is a liar or an idiot. As has been mentioned numerous times, the legions of pedophiles that lurk outside scholl gates every day will simply take off the tag, as will the kids when they want to leave for that matter. Of course the response from RFIDphiles is "Let's implant the tag subdermally!!!! FOREVER!!!! What a great(completeely consistent with a free society) idea!!!". *Sigh*. Why can't so many people think past their next meal?

    The purpose of RFID tracking people is to cause a chilling effect. This is denied in the case of children and the public, but is the primary reason given for tagging criminals. Bit of a contridiction there. Effectively tagging children is a form of control, and an extreamly invasive one at that. I don't care what age I am, or who you are. No-one should know and have a documented record of my exact movements. Period. You want to protect your kids? Sit down and talk with them once in a while. Find out where they go rather than right clicking on a toolbar icon to see where they are. Don't squash their, or my, freedoms just because your too busy watching fear factor to look after your own kids.

    And of course when I start using by blocker tag, I'll be accused of aiding pedophiles and endangering the children. Won't someone please think of the children!!? I am!

    I'm ready for people to start with the tinfoil hat cracks, but to them I say, this is the exact kind of thing you said would never happen!! Well it's happening right now! What are you going to do about it.

    RFID tracking is data rape.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
    1. Re:The Slippery Slope.. by Tim+C · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Seriously, most proponents of RFID technology site its benefits in stock and supply line management only, and keep assurring us that RFID tags embedded in products will never be used to track people.
      And yet we're now seeing instances of the middleman, i.e the product tag, being bypassed altogether and people being tagged outright. Is this really what RFID was developed for in the first place? Tracking people?


      Hhhhmmmmmm, odd that - that there's a product that most people think would be really useful for this one particular (benign) use, but that a minority want to use for bad things. Can't see how that could ever happen with any other technology.

      You're right, this is wrong, and no I would not submit my daughter to this sort of treatment (and yes, I do actually have a daughter). But you seem to be implying that

      a) this was an inevitable (ab)use of RFID technology
      b) this one dubious use should see the tech banned/shunned despite all other legitimate uses

      As with all things, don't blame the technology itself for the use to which some people put it. Do that, and you'll end up banning all tech, including sharp sticks and fire.

      RFID tracking is data rape.

      That makes you sound like an extremist; I'd suggest that if you're serious about fighting things like this that you avoid such emotive language. You'll piss off more people than you sway with it.

    2. Re:The Slippery Slope.. by bucket74 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As a strong privacy advocate, regular supporter of the EFF and a tech in the RFID industry I would like to comment on some of the false assumptions that are being made (here and elsewhere) about RFID.

      People are assuming RFID technology has a whole lot more capability than it actually does. Let's look at the issue of sensing range/proximity. The most common (and least expensive) type of tags are passive RFID tags. Passive RFID tags have no battery or on-chip power source. They are powered via current induction by (typically) 13.56MHz RF. Because they have no internal power source their read/write range is very limited (read: 2-8 inches from an RFID antenna/reader combination). Greater read distances can be achieve by using an active (battery powered) tag but even then you're looking at a range of a few feet. It is not a very realistic speculation that active tags would be used on any scale for human implants because of cost *and* the need to replace the implant when the battery dies.

      I also think it's rather funny that a lot of people in this forum have "joked" about getting out aluminum foil or tinfoil hats to hide from the RFID gestapo. What many people don't realize is foil (or any metal) does a magnificent job of blocking RFID. There is no need for the mythical RFID blocker tag. Not that I encourage thisbut all anyone would have to do to circumvent RFID retail security for example would be to put all the items you'd like to shoplift in a foil lined bag. RFID's not that strong - no need for a Faraday cage here. You may joke, but this is a case where tinfoil hats would actually work (bring on more jokes).

      I will not argue over the benfits or detriments of using RFID. I work with the stuff every day, and I'm still not convinced. What I will argue over is unrealistic paranoia. If I have to hold an RFID antenna so close to you that I can physically touch you, just to read the tag - what is the real concern? I can track you more effectively using my eyes and you're license plate. There's sure to be plenty of bullshit RFID implementations from here on out but worry about how illogical the implementation is, not that the technology is inherently evil.

    3. Re:The Slippery Slope.. by Reziac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      See my post above about how if you SHOW that you don't trust your children, it works against you. Trustworthyness is itself largely generated by showing that you trust your child to do the right thing.

      I swear there's a Stupid Gene that gets turned on when people have kids, that makes them forget how much it sucked to be a kid -- to have NO privacy, to have NOTHING of your own, the sense of being OWNED by your parents, the sense that NO ONE TRUSTS YOU, and that YOU DON'T MATTER.

      The most important thing you can give your kids isn't love, or security, or a good life, or even an education. It's PRIVACY. The sense that they are a REAL PERSON, with their own inviolate "space", and with needs that matter -- everything else good in a kid's life follows from that, as it tells a kid they are a real person in their parents' eyes, not just property.

      And if a kid doesn't get that critical need from their home life, they'll go looking for it elsewhere, usually in all the wrong ways.

      Tracking your kid 24 hours a day tells the kid in no uncertain terms that he is both property and untrusted. And nothing you TELL your kid can counteract that. To a kid, actions speak louder than words.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  28. private schools by kardar · · Score: 2, Informative

    Again, if you send your kid to a private school of your liking you don't have to deal with this crap - and you'll get them a better education while you're at it. This will mean an easier time getting accepted at a better college, will lead to a more fulfilling career, a better quality of life, so on and so forth.

    The RFID is probably one of the more minor problems the students at many of our public schools face.

  29. Just Imagine by Hoplite3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What if they had spent that money on making kids want to go to school? I went to Texas public schools. No, I survived them. The one I attended was divided neatly into honors and regular classes. In the regulars classes, you learned how to take the TAAS (this test was required for graduation and pushed as a part of school accountability under the last federal administration). If you were in honors, you learned how to take the AP exam.

    Needless to say, not many people were really turned on to learn. Because nothing of substance was being taught.

    Personally, I think that large school reforms are in order. Let's divide students into classes with the type of instruction that suits them best. Let's not teach college prep to everyone, they'll resent it. Few people really connect with the idea of liberal arts anyway (even in college, I was a bit surprised) and it forms the basis for most highschool course requirements. Articles I've seen recently say that boys are doing poorly in American schools. It looks like all girls schools in England do significantly better than comparable coed schools, especially in math and science. Maybe gender segregation would help. Girls seem to be intimidated by boys in these subjects, and boys need more structure and encouragement. There's a lack of adolescent-to-adult ritual in our country. Maybe this could help provide what truant students are missing.

    It would be preferable to humiliation like this RFID crap.

    --
    Use the Firehose to mod down Second Life stories!
    1. Re:Just Imagine by Tryfen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A study was done at my old school (UK).

      Turns out the girls do far better in single-sex class rooms.

      But boys do better in mixed set class room!

      Quite how you solve that, I don't know.

      --
      If a square is really a rhombus, why aren't all triangles purple?
    2. Re:Just Imagine by ifwm · · Score: 4, Informative

      "What if they had spent that money on making kids want to go to school?"

      Ok, let's hear some ideas. I'm a teacher, so I'll be ecstatic to get some help in this area. Before you begin though, understand that we're state mandated to provide instruction on specific topics in a specific timeframe. We also have to make sure that no one is left out of activities, or if they are, develop an alernative activity. We also have to make sure that Susie who takes one day to learn plate tectonics doesn't get too far ahead of Johnny who takes 4 days. We also...

      I hope you see the point. School simply isn't fun most of the time. No matter how you slice it, some things are boring to teach and boring to learn. Couple this with restrictions on teaching techniques, budget problems, and over protective parents, and I'm amazed anything get's taught.

    3. Re:Just Imagine by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Before you begin though, understand that we're state mandated to provide instruction on specific topics in a specific timeframe.

      I know it's a lot of text and all, but read the comment.

      Personally, I got a lot out of our 'state-mandated' curriculum... but then, I had good teachers, which can make up for a lot.

      By the way, we had something similar to what you described in our school district. It worked very poorly, because most students aren't adequately self-motivated to learn. Except, as it turned out, about good places to get lunch in town, and which teachers would smoke pot with you.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    4. Re:Just Imagine by HeghmoH · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We also have to make sure that Susie who takes one day to learn plate tectonics doesn't get too far ahead of Johnny who takes 4 days.

      This bizarre belief that every student should advance in their knowledge at exactly the same rate is the primary reason I hated all of my schooling until I got to college. Why shouldn't Susie get too far ahead of Johnny? Why shouldn't she be able to spend those three extra days learning the subject in more depth, or painting, or playing in the sandbox?

      From the beginning of elementary school to the end of high school, I suffered from this. I pick things up quickly and don't need a lot of repetition. As a result, I was forced to do a great deal of homework that I didn't need, attend classes that weren't interesting, and I generally hated the experience. (Not everything was this way, but close.) Once I got to college, where homework is more of a check than a forced study aid, where classes are dense, and where people are expected to do more on their own if they need practice, things got a lot better.

      I realize the situation is different at the lower levels, and I don't have a proposed solution, but I still believe that this idea that all children must learn at approximately the same rate, and they must stay in a group of other children with exactly the same age, is one of the more poisonous ones in our educational system.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    5. Re:Just Imagine by Fallen_Knight · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe johnny doesn't want to learn plate techtonics? Why should he be forced to learn it?

      The only required subjects should be math and english. And even then not to the degree math is no and not english lit, grammer and spelling.

      The problem with the current school system is that it assumes everyon learns the same way and forces them to learn a large range of things that they will simpley forget once then ware out of highschool.

      And for a student who is not going to collage or university they should be learning a trade, or other skills that could help them. But they key thing is they should pick it. Not be forced to learn it. if you force somsone to learn somethging they won't learn it, they will remeber it for the test and then forget it.

      Just say you need X credits to pass highschool and let the students pick enough courses to get that number. Just doing that i think would allow for a much happier student body and allow for more educated students, true not all going to know the same things but overall they will kknow and keep more knowlage and give them a chance to sample many diffrent type sof clsses if they so want to.

      And i hate that if theres a fast student and a slow student the fast student is held back. Give the fast stuend all the amterial and let then go on ahead on their own if they want.

  30. Re:Sorry, this is good.... by REBloomfield · · Score: 2
    You send your child to school. Nay, you drop you child at the school gates. You see them walk through the doors.

    Four hours later, the police knock on your door, saying they were called to the mall where your child was caught shoplifting on CCTV.

    Are you going to blame the school for not ensuring that your child was under their supervision? I can probably guarentee that you'll say you won't, but the vast majority of parents will.

  31. Required implants by hrvatska · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Where this is leading is required RFID implants. The requirement will initially start out with groups that most of us don't care about, like convicted felons. Next, maybe immigrants. Then it'll start creeping into other sectors of society. Eventually you'll see a wide range of jobs where this is required. Perhaps nursing, police and emergency workers. Then it will start to be required for normal activities. Like you won't be able to board an airline without an RFID implant. The initial selling point will be that it speeds up boarding. And then it'll be required for driver licenses. Can't be too secure after all. I think it's inevitable.

  32. The Police? by 955301 · · Score: 5, Funny

    And I suppose the RFID's of the criminal element of the school will transmit data with the Evil Bit turned on? Shouldn't it be a word, or at least a few more bits?

    000 - Nothing to see here.
    001 - normal kid with mischevious mind. Watch for changes. May be intimidated back to 000 with minor police brutality.
    010 - Thief. Arrest if lingering in the parking lot or around school supply cabinets.
    011 - Fighter. Arrest if having an animated discussion with any 000's they don't normally congregate with or other 011's.
    100 - Stabby. Arrest when outer perimiter metal detectors are set off. Notify cafeteria to dispense plastic silverware to the 100 and immediately surrounding 000's. Exhibits 011 behavior, follow guidelines accordingly.
    101 - Brandisher. Arrest when outer perimiter detectors are set off and body mass = yesterday's + #g of any known gun + various # of bullets/magazines.Exhibits 011 behavior, follow guidelines accordingly.
    110 - Shooter. Arrest immediately. If no gun is found, plant one or make an announcement that arresting them was the right thing to do.
    111 - Dealer. "Accidently" shut fire doors on 111's crushing them to death. Accompany disposed of body with a 110, some stray bullets, and drug paraphenalia.

    Yeah, they definately need more Evil Bits...

    --
    You are checking your backups, aren't you?
  33. excelent alibi by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1- go to school
    2- leave the RFID tag there (or wrap tinfoil in your arm if is subdermal)
    3- leave the school
    4- comit a crime
    5- ???
    6- profit

    #5 could prety much be "don't worry with police. they think you were in school".

    thei're just giving students an excelent, state sanctioned alibi.

    i watched a movie once about a gang that used british prision system as alibi. they all comited light crimes (no more than 6 months jail time), then they broke of the jail, stole a roll of paper from the comapny that prints brit money, printed a batch of bills, hide the money, returned to jail.

    when the police found about the stolen paper, they dismissed the gang as suspects because they were all in jail, end were still there.

    do i see something like this happening in texas ?

    --
    What ? Me, worry ?
    1. Re:excelent alibi by Mojojojo+Monkey+Inc. · · Score: 2, Funny

      oh yeah dude? well i watched a movie once where a wacky gang of (mostly) american criminals used an EMP to knock out las vegas' power system for 30 seconds and used the ensuing chaos to break into a casino and steal a lot of money! but they hacked into the security system so it looked like they were somewhere else and fooled the evil casino owner, and george clooney stole his girlfriend!

      do i see george clooney coming to michgan to steal my girlfriend?! i think so! that is why i'm covering my apartment in tin-foil and using pin-hole cameras, to make it EMP- and clooney-proof.

  34. The Creationist State by gelfling · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So here's the stat that just required the schoolbook publisher to make changes in their books so that now marriage is strictly a lifelong relationship between a man and a woman (BTW Texas has one of the highest divorce rates in the country) and another change to call evolution an unproven theory.

    Now we have soccermoms micromanaging their own children's every movement with an eye in the sky.

    Welcome to George Bush's America.

    1. Re:The Creationist State by edwdig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and another change to call evolution an unproven theory.

      We can never prove that man evolved from apes. We can find evidence to suggest that it's highly likely that it happened, but that's as far as we can go.

      Well, if you invent time travel and set out to document you entirely ancestry all the way back to an ape, you could prove it, but I wouldn't bet on the odds of that happening.

      So yes, evolution is an unproven theory. It just happens to best one that we have at the moment.

  35. A Texas Highschool Student by marco0009 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I currently attend a Texas High School and I am quite glad that I will be graduating come spring of '05. I've seen my school dump the largest portion of its funds into the football team which then proceeded to loose every game, while our science wing must deal with outdated equipment, aging textbooks, and in many cases if the teacher is not an honors teacher, they have no idea what it is they are teaching. Our mathematics department is in the same condition.

    This is just a slight example of how ill-directed our administrator's are. They are easily blinded by people who have even the slightest ability to market a service or product, and I would not be in the least surprised to see that my class mates are all tagged with RFID in some form or fashion at the start of the next school year.

    --
    Physics makes the world go 'round.
  36. allergic reaction by PerpetualMotion · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why use a knife? Find a little poison ivy or something similar, get yourself a bad rash on and around the area implanted, and claim you are having an allergic reaction. They will take it out. Get everyone else in school to do the same.

    You have the poison ivy, you know what to do with the people who don't play along.

    1. Re:allergic reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      No Poison Ivy in Australia?!?
      Hold on, I'll FedEx you a bunch. Along with some toads, rabbits, and cats. If you cannot use the toads, rabbits, and cats...just let them loose in the countryside as I'm sure they'll just go away and die.

    2. Re:allergic reaction by Dwonis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your parents do, if you're underage.

    3. Re:allergic reaction by Reziac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True, but... too often, kids already suffer from the feeling that no one trusts them. Now they'll know FOR SURE that their parents don't trust them. And what happens then? The kid says "Fuck it, if they don't trust me anyway, I might as well do what I want and lie about it."

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  37. And horrified expressions by Omni-Cognate · · Score: 2, Funny

    As they realise that:

    • They're at a boring lecture
    • They've cut off their own body parts
    • And they're going to be in trouble because the authorities think they're still at home.

    Oops!

    --

    "The Milliard Gargantubrain? A mere abacus - mention it not."

    1. Re:And horrified expressions by themaidtricks · · Score: 2, Funny

      They're at a boring lecture They've cut off their own body parts And they're going to be in trouble because the authorities think they're still at home.

      That was the first day. They were too groggy from the anesthetic to realize they didn't have to go to school anymore. The next day they put all their fingers in the smart kid's backpack as he waited at the bus stop.

  38. homeschool by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And make sure your state doesn't mess with the homeschool law(s).

    It's not like there's really any educational excellence to be missed there (the fallacy of the false alternative). Public schools don't have the power to protect your kids, and as this story illustrates, you wouldn't want them to have the kind of power that they would need anyway.

  39. Priorities? by value_added · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When the district unanimously approved the $180,000 system, neither teachers nor parents objected ... Rather, parents appear to be applauding. "I'm sure we're being overprotective, but you hear about all this violence," said Elisa Temple-Harvey, 34, the parent of a fourth grader. "I'm not saying this will curtail it, or stop it, but at least I know she made it to campus."

    "We've been fortunate; we haven't had a kidnapping," Mr. Weisinger said. "But if it works one time finding a student who has been kidnapped, then the system has paid for itself."

    So, let me see if I get this right -- crime rates have been going down for years and are at historical lows, but people are worried more than ever about crimes they "hear about."

    Without investigating, I'd wager that the odds of being kidnapped are much lower than than those of being struck by lightning, lower still than being run over by a car at a crosswalk, and lower still that little Johnny or Susie will drop out of school altogether.

    Maybe the money would be better spent on textbooks? Or teachers? Nah ... let's spend money to fix a problem we don't really have so that we can satisfy the need to believe we're doing something. For the children's sake, of course.

  40. Zero sum situation by Not+Public · · Score: 5, Insightful

    we (parents, teachers, students, employers, etc.. are going to lose in this.

    I am a teacher, parent & employers of 16-23 year olds. We've set the education system up for failure, and it will continue to fail at amazing rate as desperate "solutions" such as this are thrown at the system until it kills a substantial percentage of the nation's youth.

    first and foremost- I'm going to say I blame the parents. (woohoo! watch that karma drop!) none of this would be necessary if the children were taught, or had it modeled for them, or had the values embedded in them that education was of value. That and the parents are going to have to suck it up and be the bad guy, be the hardass, be the one make certain the child is held accountable for their actions.

    A large part of the problem is that the system relieves parents of their duties of parenting. And then in turn holds schools responsible, and then in turn holds teachers responsible.

    But guess what, with all the responsibilities and duties and irrelevant tasks that have been placed on teachers- they have no time to teach. In fact, persons with any passion or desire to pass on knowledge and skills in a field are quickly driven out because they don't spend enough time doing attendance in the correct manner, because they don't spend enough time preparing children for a standardized test, because they don't document a complete and unique separate lesson plan/learning system FOR EACH CHILD.

    Which, if we allowed those children to who really wanted to learn, to be in the classes of those who really wanted to teach... (in my opinion) making individual plans wouldn't be so bad because you're not trying to force material down the throat of a child who simply doesn't care. As teachers we can't make them care, and yet parents and then administrators, and even future employers, are blaming us for students coming out without a work ethic, without a sense of responsibility, pride in their work, or the common sense to believe that they should show up on time, or do the task they were given through to completion.

    how's this relevant to the RFID tags? I used to live in Spring and taught in the district next to it. They're actually a pretty "calm" district comparatively. Not way out on the forefront of education, not in the ghettos. Just another suburban district on the outskirts of a large city. (I've heard rumor that even people in NY and LA recognize Houston as a "large city"). They have the luxury if you will, to try to throw new technology at old problems. they have some cash apparently, they're not having to spend it on metal detectors for every door, but tardiness and skipping? the tags them selves i would imagine are relatively cheap, and the scanners not too bad compared to some of the other ludicrous expenditures I've seen (and while teacher salaries fall in that category, its on the lower end of the spectrum).

    I can see how easily this could be sold to a school board, teachers and administrators. School board finally has some means of knowing where every child is. Administrators don't have to spend a fraction of their existing resources to implement or monitor this new system, and if done right, teachers are no longer responsible for the tedious tasks of attendance. (which in and of itself wouldn't be a problem if you didn't have 35 kids all coming in tardy-with various levels/legitimacies of excuses). Only the poor tech resource folks are contemplating suicide.

    But as another poster pointed out.. it does nothing for the kids except for give them something else to hate and manipulate. It doesn't hold them responsible for anything.

    It doesn't actually DO anything.

  41. Re:Your not as smart as you're brain thinks it is by plog · · Score: 2, Funny

    The AC, in its exuberant urge to aid the flailing grammarian, doesn't have a grasp on basic comma usage, forsooth, as the AC itself left out a necessary comma, and demands the removal of a comma that is nestled snugly into its proper syntax. Go read Faulkner, sheesh.

  42. Re:Sorry, this is good.... by Hatta · · Score: 2

    the majority of responses to this come from people who are long out of school, don't have kids in one, but still think they should be able to dictate how schools are run.

    These are the best people to run a school, next to the children themselves. They obviously remember what it felt like being a child with no rights and no power in an educational system that treats them like a cog in a giant conformity machine. When people have kids, they get a little irrational.Why do you think so many bad laws are passed because someone says "Won't somebody please think of the children!" They become overprotective, and send their kids off to what's essentially a day prison. What everyone forgets is that children are people too and have rights.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  43. Re:Teach by example by phuturephunk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem with it is, this is just another measure..under the guise of child safety..to take responsibility away from the parent of teaching the child that learning is valuable. We don't instill respect in our children for knowledge, then we use draconian measures to attempt to chain them to the learning process.

    You know what that gets you from the average teenager?

    The finger..

  44. Where will this lead? by Petaris · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I work for a School District so I not only understand the need for some type of survalance and security I also am an advocate for it. If we had the funds to do so I would have a camera at every entrance, in every hall, and in every out of the way nook and crany. However tracking them like you would track shipments of merchandise or live stock is going overboard. In theory it seems a good idea but where would it end? Surely once the children have been tagged, whether it is strapped on or implanted, do you think that other places won't just start putting in rfid recievers to track them elsewhere? And how long do you think it would just be the children being tracked?

    This seems to me like it could be a starting point for tracking other individules. At first maybe prisoners or employees, then maybe hospital patients and millitary personel. And who is to keep any one with a rfid reciever from tracking you. I am not trying to say this is a conspirisy I am warning that there is a very real possibility this will lead somewhere we do not wish to be. Would you really feel safer knowing that the government or other agencies could track criminals and ex-criminals so they would be less likely to commit a crime, if it meant that they were also tracking you? Even if a system like that wasn't abused, how willing would you be to have your whereabouts know 24 hours a day to someone.

    Like I said I'm not trying to scare anyone into thinking this is a conspirisy I just am giving my opinion. Many people I am sure would point out other good reasons for this, like finding lost missing persons or locateing someone in a medical emergency or hundreds of other good reasons. And ultimatly anything can be used both for good and for bad. I just want you to ask yourselves, would you want to be tracked? Even if it could save your life?

    I am not attempting to draw trolls and I did not mean this as flaimbait. This is just asking you to think if it was you in there position.

    Thanks for reading,

    --
    ~Petaris "The world is open. Are you?"
  45. Re:Sorry, this is good.... by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    erm, kids don't have rights. thats why we don't let them vote....

    Blacks don't have rights, that's why we don't let them vote

    Women don't have rights, that's why we don't let them vote.

    Of course children have rights. Rights are not granted by the state, but innate. Nothing really dramatic happens to a person on their 18th birthday suddenly endowing them with rights. They've had them all along, it's just the state finally recognizes them. It seriously troubles me that people like you, who apparently find children morally equivalent to livestock are responsible for their education.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  46. Re:Sorry, this is good.... by warkda+rrior · · Score: 2, Insightful
    First, in reply to
    if you're not in the position to be affected by this, shut the hell up
    with apologies to Rev. Martin Niemoeller:
    "First they tagged the highschool students, but I was not a highschool student so I did not speak out. Then they tagged the policemen and the firefighters, but I was neither, so I did not speak out. Then they tagged the immigrants, but I was not an immigrant so I did not speak out. And when they tagged me, there was no one left to speak out for me."
    Fear the trend.

    Second, in reply to
    for the pupils, this is actually a benefit
    I think this is a benefit to the people who want to track the students, not the students. These RFID badges can be lost just like any other swipe card, so they do not benefit students more than a swipe card.
    --
    You need to install an RTFM interface.
  47. It would be great fun to try a D-DOS attack. by ayjay29 · · Score: 3, Funny

    At lunch break, get 500 kids in a big group to run in and out through a few times. This is gonna create a LOT of traffic on the RFID system. Better still, get all the schools in the area to do the same thing at the same time.

    --
    Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
  48. Making it easier for child abductors by Girckin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So in the future, child abductors don't actually have to go out and look for children anymore. They just use their RFID scanner to find children of the age and gender they're looking for? How the hell is this a good idea?

  49. Someone should introduce... by man_ls · · Score: 2, Interesting

    an act in Congress making it a Felony to claim any measure, be it legal, technological, medical, etc. is to "protect the children" without statistically incontrovertible proof that children are being "harmed" in the first place.

    No more "Family Movies Act of 2004" banning skipping of commercials. No more COPPA Act, keeping kids off the Internet. etc.

  50. How many of you at work by chadseld · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At work, how many of you have a badge with one of those key cards that automagically opens doors when you wave it past the little black reader doohicky with the light on it? Do you realize you have been handed the same anti-libertarian treatment as these kids for years and never complained? I don't think it is right to track people this way. It is amaizing how these technologies have already become every day things for most of us.

  51. Students NEED to be able to skip class by GauteL · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While I do agree that on general kids should be in school, and certain measures should be put up to make them.

    However, nothing gets seriously broken by kids skipping classes very occasionally. How square are the kids supposed to be?

    Kids that are allowed a certain freedom and have some possibility of opposing authority grow up far more interesting.

    Just think how interesting you find a person who has never skipped class, never talked back at their parents etc.

    The truth is, the parental generation have always tried to impose severe restrictions on the younger generation, and the younger generation have always broken them. This is the way of life. The moment we make it impossible for kids to break their parents rules, we have changed the game in a way I don`t think we see the consequences of.

    It is ironic that we impose millions of laws and regulations, but the majority actually disrespects people that always live by them.

    There are certain things every (semi) interesting person have done. If you have never done any of the following you need to get out more:
    1. Skip class
    2. Go above the speed limit
    3. Take a u-turn where it wasn't allowed, but noone was around.
    4. Drink or smoke without being allowed to do so
    5. Sneak in somewhere you don't belong.

    I will put up rules for my children and I will be fairly strict about some of them. But if my children never breaks my rules I would be suspicious that they are hiding something major, or disappointed that my kids grew up to be that square.

    A well balanced human being bends or breaks rules now and then, but know which rules they really should abide by. The important lesson is to teach the children which rules are absolute, and which can be bent a little.

  52. I have no problem with this by ShadyG · · Score: 4, Funny

    My daughter is home-schooled. When the time comes, all of your children will be appropriately conditioned to submit to her every whim.

  53. Why ? by bmajik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm also wondering why it would be nessisary to CC the police on who didn't show up in the morning

    Because the public school system in the United States is a holding pen and work/release program for those not yet legally required to work and pay taxes.

    The police need to know when prisoners have escaped, don't they?

    --
    My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
  54. Don't tag everyone by Mordaximus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Keep track of the troublemakers. If a student gets suspended for skipping, violence or something similar, tag em. Make it clear that students who break the rules x number of times will be tagged. Give them room to make mistakes, but make it understood that if they make too many, part of the punishment is intrusive observation.

    Likewise, I'd love to see convicted criminals tagged in someway. Wouldn't it be nice if store owners could identify convicted shoplifters when they enter the store? Sell a consumer scanner that will tell you if a convicted murderer or rapist is nearby when you go for your jog. Or if they are on your property! If your car alarm could sound when a car thief tag is nearby for too long.

    I know, there is too much potential for abuse. A man can dream though. And it would sure beat "that guy looks shady" as a method of identifying potential criminals :)

  55. Re:"their" counting on it by Oligonicella · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, you'd rather there be no emergency plans?

  56. RFID Craze by kd5ftn · · Score: 2, Informative

    It was interesting for me to read this, I actually used to work for the MIS department of Spring Independent School District and my mom is working there now in an elementry school.

    The tracking system they're using only applies to students riding on the district buses (as they are the only ones the district is liable for) and I think it actually makes sense for use in elementry schools. You don't know how often a student accidently misses a bus, gets on the wrong bus, or even the unthinkable happening. However, this system really wouldn't be useful for middle/high school students as they can take care of themselfs.

    I don't see any real benefit to using RFID vs any other card technology to implement this system. It seems like it would be much more cost effective to have a barcode or magnetic card strip. Anyway, that district pushing the cutting edge of technology and we'll have to see the ultimate outcome of their actions.