Slashdot Mirror


Former Turkish DMOZ Editor Draws 10 Months In Jail

makne writes "H. Ertas, a Turkish editor of the Open Directory Project (www.dmoz.org) has been sentenced to 10 months in prison after being found guilty of editing a category about the Kurdish Workers Party (PKK). Ertas's lawyer, Suna Coskun, explained that his client had worked as a voluntary editor at the Open Directory Project during his studies at the Euphrat-University and had been responsible for the Kurdish category. At the same time he became interested in Kurds and undertook his own research into the subject. As a voluntary editor, he had sorted the directory submissions but could not be responsible for their content. Therefore there could be no penalty under international law, according to Coskun. His activities could in no way be understood as 'support for a terrorist organisation' and thus Ertas' release was appropriate. The court sentenced Ertas to 10 months in prison and a fine of 416 million Turkish lire ($293). The sentence is not eligible for probation." (Read on for more.) By email, makne writes "I don't know the editor personally, but the editor was first arrested two years ago, then released on parole until now. Members of the editor community have tried to help him in any way they can, with no apparent success. The editor resigned from the ODP in 2002."

Makne also provided this link to a summary (from the Kurdish point of view) of earlier attempts to stifle Kurdish sites, including a campaign to have DMOZ's then-parent company Netscape remove the Kurdish category from DMOZ.

105 of 666 comments (clear)

  1. Protest by dhart · · Score: 5, Insightful


    I believe that organizations like DMOZ should have the ability to quickly react, perhaps in protest, to situations like this one.

    For example, rigorous semantic information attached to every DMOZ record would allow the DMOZ community to suspend or flag all information related to the Turkish government, in protest of the current situation. Such a capability could easily be abused or taken too far, which is why it should be reserved only for situations which have direct effect on the organization (and/or its editors, in the case of DMOZ).

    With enough open (as in speech) organizations touching enough people in the world, both major and minor misbehavior by governments around the would could be brought to light in this way.

    1. Re:Protest by henleg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Is it the political information about the kurds that the turkish government wants to remove from DMOZ, or is it about kurds in general? When reading these things, I feel reluctant to have Turkey joining the European Union. They simply have to get better, and it will be very interesting to see if the turkish government can do this before the set deadline.

    2. Re:Protest by moonbender · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's what I thought, but keep in mind that in another EU country you can get arrested for publicly supporting certain political parties. Namely, in Germany it's against the law to be part of certain neo-nazi ideologies and holocaust denial.
      And in fact, I'm not sure I'm opposed to that eevn though it's certainly a limitation of my right of free speech. But then, what gives me the right to tell the Turkish government which ideologies are "dangerous". I guess that's why this kind of legislation is never a good idea in the first place.

      OTOH, of course the situation is not the same. It's not illegal to report about illegal ideologies in Germany, even if you did so in a rather positive way, I guess. There certainly are Wikipedia entries about them.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    3. Re:Protest by henleg · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I spent some time in Turkey not too long ago. I heard nothing from the people I met there about Turks' issues with Kurds. Rather they were all convinced the reason Turkey wasn't a shoe-in to the EU its its economic status. Just a bit of info.

      Where in Turkey did you go? (I'm only curious! :-))

      Living in a country in the EU, I can tell that both the economical AND the humanitarian issues are high on the list of issues taken in consideration. Another issue is border control.

    4. Re:Protest by G.+W.+Bush+Junior · · Score: 5, Insightful
      That's what I thought, but keep in mind that in another EU country you can get arrested for publicly supporting certain political parties. Namely, in Germany it's against the law to be part of certain neo-nazi ideologies and holocaust denial. And in fact, I'm not sure I'm opposed to that eevn though it's certainly a limitation of my right of free speech. But then, what gives me the right to tell the Turkish government which ideologies are "dangerous". I guess that's why this kind of legislation is never a good idea in the first place.

      Since you bring up up germany; do you sincerely beleive that a law designed to stop antisemitic propaganda is just as bad as a law that, say, limits the civil liberties of an ethnic minority like jews (or kurds for that matter).

      Kurds are an ethnic minority, like jews were in nazi germany - a Kurd cannot decide to stop being a kurd, no less than I can stop being a caucasean.

      On another note I fail to see how the german laws you cite are any more stifling to free speech than laws prohibiting libel. Neonazism is tightly coupled to malicious defamation of jews - according to the laws of most countries that constitutes libel. Mentioning neonazism explicitly in the law just serves to simplify libel lawsuits.

      Or do you beleive that libel laws in america are morally equivalent to limiting the civil liberties of an ethnic minority?

      --
      "I don't know that Atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots." -George H.W. Bush
    5. Re:Protest by jayminer · · Score: 4, Informative

      This story is bullshit. The story takes reference of the news article in: http://www.mhanews.com/modules.php?name=News&file= article&sid=9485

      BUT... Let's take a look at the real news article in NTV MSNBC, who takes the story from AA. Anadolu Ajansi (Anatolian Agency, the official (read STATE) news agency of Turkey. The STATE news agency of the Republic of Turkey publishes this kind of story. So the state kills Kurds? Yeah right..

      http://www.ntvmsnbc.com/news/297724.asp?cp1=1

      The first (Kurdish site which claims that it has published the information) has sentences removed from the original article! Take a look at those.

      1. The Kurdish site makes him to be seen as a Kurdish hero, but in the original article, H. Ertas claims that he does not have any kind of sympaty to the terrorist group. A hero that denies the link would of course won't be a good story.

      2. In his computer, e-mails of himself that contains propaganda of Kurdish terrorist and separatory acts has been found.

      3. His lawyer says that they'll go to appeal. Go on, it's open. The Kurdish site seems that he has been sentected without judgement.

      4. The Kurdish site is in Turkish, their TV is in Turkish, their newspaper published in several European Countries is in Turkish. Blah.

      Believe me, he wouldn't be sentenced for nothing. It's not illegal in Turkey to talk Kurdish, to be Kurdish (several ministers, even several of the most beloved prime ministers were Kurdish). It's just illegal to:

      1. Kill people in terrorist acts.
      2. Claim ownership in a territory of the country, which is known and acknowledged by the world.

      I'm sure that these are all illegal in other countries also.

      If you live in Europe, especially in northern Europe, you would not understand such dynamics and therefore you may see PKK/KADEK as a nice group claiming their rights. But maybe citizens of southern Europe countries, who know at least a little of terrorism, may see the acts of Turkey is to protect its people and its own land.

    6. Re:Protest by Gadzinka · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Now, that's exactly why I am opposed to any and all kinds of censorship. Whether it is about Nazi, KKK, or someone claiming that Robert R. Wal (that is me) is unwashing sodomite. In the last case I would go to court and he would have to prove his accusations, or pay me damages, but in my opinion people have every right to have their opinions and to publish them.

      Remember, that many despicable crimes of yesterday are normal things today. Like publishing research opposing church doctrine, advocating slavery abolition, homosexual relationships and extramarital sex. And remember, that many yesterday's terrorists are today's war heroes of new nations that fought for their freedom.

      Even when everybody agrees that child abuse, paedophilia is such despicable crime, and there are no chances of it changing in the future (apart from age of consent, legal tests for consent etc), I don't see how anyone would be hurt by someone advocating paedophilia, or disseminating synthetic paedophiliac images.

      Now, the cases like racism, terrorism or similar usually are (almost criminal) stupidity, but people have right to be stupid too. I mean, if stupidity was a crime, then most of the politicians and voting public would end up in jail in an instant ;)

      Robert

      PS Yes, I am libertarian too (among other things). Did libertarian advocacy become a crime in some jurisdiction I frequent?

      --
      Bastard Operator From 193.219.28.162
    7. Re:Protest by jayminer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, I also don't think that membership of Turkey to the EU is appropriate. I also have the same thought for other countries that are going to be a member.

      For Cyprus, please read my post at (and appropriate links there): http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=130990&cid=109 36357

      The Turkey's operation was legal (as a guarantor country), even though the current Turkish state on the north is not. The current state of the world-wide known Republic of Cyprus is also illegal, as it is not approved by all the three guarantor countries (which are Turkey, Greece and the UK).

      For the human rights ussue, yes we don't provide rights for people who like to divide our country (I don't know if any other country provides this or not), but there are no problems other than that.

      Talk to a friend of yours who has visited Turkey. Every single foreign person who has visited Turkey I have ever talked says that our country is not what it is know to be.

      I don't believe that we have any other issue than economy.

    8. Re:Protest by artson · · Score: 5, Informative
      "I believe that organizations like DMOZ should have the ability to quickly react, perhaps in protest, to situations like this one."

      They do have the ability and they did react quickly, however to no avail apparently. There was great discussion inside DMOZ about this situation and editors made many suggestions, but in the end it comes down to this: the Open Directory Project's aim is to disseminate information, not to use that information for specific purposes. Initially IIRC, the category was sequestered while possible options were examined, but in the end, to paraphrase some slash-dotter, information wants to be free.

      The Turkish government may be malign, but they aren't stupid and they understood that Ertas' collection of data did have an effect. In some ways, editors function like good journalists; they don't create news, but they find it and highlight it in categories which they create and place in the larger structure of the Directory. This makes the data accessible to more people who don't have to search the whole 'net for it. Creating a category makes a statement if you think about it. It says that the information in this category is worthy of consideration because somebody has organized the data in a way which emphasizes its significance in ways which the viewer may not have imagined were it not for the efforts of the editor.

      Editors are encouraged in their efforts to make novel and interesting collections of web sites and to lodge them within the greater structure of the Directory. It's one of the things that makes the Open Directory Project great and hugely useful.

      For more information on this subject, go to the Open Directory and type kurds into the search box. Failing that, here are some relevant DMOZ categories: Ethnicity Kurdish, History, Kurdistan or Kurdish Human Rights. See also this category Descriptiont

      --
      In times of trouble, the smell of frying onions usually gives confidence and comfort.
    9. Re:Protest by G.+W.+Bush+Junior · · Score: 3, Interesting
      So, why have them then? To make things easier is not a very good reason. After all, the USA Patriot Act merely makes certain police activities easier.... With regular libel laws you have to prove harm at some level-speech is a lot more protected. Even the speech that I think has no redeeming value...

      It simplifies the laws by clarifying them.
      Why are clear laws good? Well, they make it easier to determine when you've crossed them. If some deluded people choose to interpret a very general law in a way that justifies their actions, that could land them in jail. Having clear, specific laws makes it a lot easier to be a law abiding ciztizen. That is a good thing.

      Also, it is the job of the legislative branch to legislate and determine what should be punished and what should not. If you cut all clarifications in the law away, you end up with little less than "you must not be evil". While that contains the essence of all laws, you leave it to the judges to determine what is good and what is evil, and that is NOT their job. Their job is to uphold the law.

      You can't legislate morality/ethics.

      Hate to burst your bubble, but you can. It is in fact ALL law is; a clear specification of what is good and bad behaviour, ie. morality/ethics.

      --
      "I don't know that Atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots." -George H.W. Bush
    10. Re:Protest by G.+W.+Bush+Junior · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, the legislation regarding PKK is a part of the legislation that restricts the civil liberties of the kurdish minority.
      Bannning support of PKK could be compared to the german legislation.
      Passing legislation that makes it illegal to even gather information about a political party, as part of academic work, for example, is a restriction of civil liberties.

      --
      "I don't know that Atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots." -George H.W. Bush
    11. Re:Protest by G.+W.+Bush+Junior · · Score: 2, Insightful
      No, you can not legislate morality and ethics, only behaviour. Morality and ethics are expressions of a person's internal belief system. Society creates laws to govern the behaviour of those individuals whose sense of morality and ethics are deficient or unacceptable (this is important) as defined by that society.

      Of course that is correct; you can, and should, legislate acting upon ethics and morals that are different from the norms of the rest of society. That is why it's not illegal to agree with al-queda or the neonazis, only to actively support them.

      I interpreted grandparents post differently though.

      --
      "I don't know that Atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots." -George H.W. Bush
    12. Re:Protest by cherokee158 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, the German law DOES stifle free speech. I recently did some work for a game company that produces historical wargames. All of the cut scenes featuring archival war footage had to be edited to remove any sign of swastikas. (Keep in mind that the Nazis painted swastikas on EVERYTHING).

      I was forced to remove a promotional trailer for a cartoon about an inept Luftwaffe pilot (fritzthefox.com) from one of their kiosks at a convention because the aircraft in it had swastikas painted on their tails (which they did in real life).

      I found the whole thing ludicrous. I know these laws are meant to prevent the resurgence of one of the worst hate groups that ever existed, but the law is more about fear than it is prevention.

      The fact is, the Nazi party could never rise again. The next evil empire will not be led by a bunch of tatooed skinheads. The next time they start herding people into camps, if will be under a different flag, for different reasons, and everyone will fall in line in the name of patriotism and self-defense.

      Banning a symbol will accomplish nothing, except to wipe away any recorded memory of the last witch hunt.

    13. Re:Protest by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hate to burst your bubble, but you can. It is in fact ALL law is; a clear specification of what is good and bad behaviour, ie. morality/ethics.

      To quote a friend, 'morality is between you and God, ethics are between you and your fellow man'. Trespassing is not immoral, but it can be argued that it is unethical. Speeding, however is neither - it's just a regulation. Take another example: tax law - it isn't really a moral obligation or an ethical duty to pay uncle sam, especially if you believe you're being taken advantage of, but it is law.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    14. Re:Protest by adoarns · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I fail to see how the german laws you cite are any more stifling to free speech than laws prohibiting libel.

      Really? Like, honest-to-God you don't? Huh.

      Nazism = libel. Well, I suppose you could make the argument, analogizing from specifici individuals to an entire groupassuming everything national socialism says is anti-semitic propaganda, which like, I guess 0.6 is approx. equal to 1, in some places.

      But: nice machinations, though. Really. Original poster points out that suppression of politically-charged speech happens on a continuum and that some of those countries who would condemn Turkey are only a little bit further on the left of it. That somehow turns into a test of hatred for anti-semitism. And from all these threads you manage a nice, stout strawman, all prickly with delight.

      I call rhetorical shenanigans.
      --
      Tenemus pyrobolos atqui jacimus cognitiones.
    15. Re:Protest by gobbo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      For the human rights ussue, yes we don't provide rights for people who like to divide our country (I don't know if any other country provides this or not), but there are no problems other than that.

      Canada, that oh-so-boring nation of the north, has had a long internal struggle with separatism, which may be instructive.

      Quebec is francophone in a largely anglophone nation, with a distinct culture and long (for canadians) continuous history. Separatist sentiment runs high, including strong positions in various media, many organizations, and strong political institutions at both the provincial and federal level. The Bloc Quebecois, part of the official opposition in the federal government, is a powerful alliance of mostly separatist interests.

      Canadians don't shut down this discussion, on the whole. Oh, there is some rudeness (for canadians, who tend to be pretty courteous in public, except for Parliament), and some shouting, and some strong rhetoric in both directions. But, except for a brief period in 1970 (which was actually pretty mild by international standards), it hasn't erupted into violence and oppression.

      The key seems to be the right to dissent within reason. We don't disappear people for political opinion anymore in Canada (okay, well, not for long anyway), even though we have a genocidal history, like the Turks. While there has been federalist and separatist propaganda and some dirty tricks, there was also a referendum in the '90s in which Quebec voted 51-49% to stay in Canada, and surprisingly that has settled things for awhile.

      The nation-state is a malleable entity, and viciously protects that secret. Very few modern nation-states' borders are undisputed, and very few were formed without trampling on sovereign rights. How a nation deals with the fallout from that is an indication of its social maturity. Canada's major failure has not been Quebec separatism, but its dealings with the indigenous population (the continuing fallout from genocide).

    16. Re:Protest by fuck_this_shit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      amending != overthrowing

    17. Re:Protest by pbox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As a humanist, I take issue with your narrow minded definition of morality. It is certainly not between me and my God, as there is no God. Morality is a collection of common sense rules that make a society livable for all participants. If you look hard at the Ten commandments (or the Hindu or Buddhist, etc. analog) you will see that these rules are to ease building of a functioning society. The extra fluff of having it cast in stone and carried it by Moses dude is as real as Cinderella.

      --
      Code poet, espresso fiend, starter upper.
    18. Re:Protest by dunkelfalke · · Score: 2, Informative

      it is forbidden to use some symbols in a non-historical context.

      history books or films are perfectly ok

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    19. Re:Protest by Slur · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually that's not quite right. Nihilism is frankly a negative and annihilating attitude towards existence.

      Now, personally I consider it very unspiritual and damaging to sully one's mind with fanciful ideas about the personality and nature of a personified God. I just think it's an intellectually dishonest foundation on which to base your relationship with the world and other people. (And I'm sure you'll agree that the personified God idea is too nebulous to be the "rock" of which Jesus spoke to Simon Peter.)

      However this doesn't mean that I don't see an intrinsic goodness to the universe and to human nature, and it doesn't mean that I'm not trying to improve myself and become a more empathetic person and to transcend the veils of narrow self-identification.

      See what I'm saying? Nihilism is not the only alternative to personified God worship.

      --
      -- thinkyhead software and media
    20. Re:Protest by crazyeddie740 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are two reasons why censorship is a bad idea. The first is that democracy depends on there being a healthy debate of the issues. Using the law to silence your opponent in a debate is like winning a chess match by shooting your opponent.

      The second reason is that censorship is often counterproductive - instead of silencing the subject of the censoring, it brings the subject into sharp focus.

      While propaganda can influence opinion, it is not mind control. If we believe in democracy, we have to have faith on this, or we might as well just roll over and wait for our new alien overlords to take over.

      If someone says something you disagree with, the solution is not to silence them, but to state why you disagree with them. Or, perhaps better, ignore them. We should you give a little-heard idea notoriety by your opposition?

      If you want to fight against somebody using propaganda, which can't be fought be logical argument, then teach people the critical thinking skills they need to make their own decisions.

      If we don't want our children to grow up Nazis, then we shouldn't ban Triumph of the Will. Instead, we should show it in schools - and then take a week to discuss the propaganda techniques used in it. And refute what few logical arguments it uses.

      Speech, by itself, very rarely does harm. There are some exceptions, such as libel. Another exception is telling someone to cause a specific person harm. "Kill whitey!" is political speech. "Kill John Doe, who lives at..." isn't.

      If an individual causes another harm, then they should be punished. The author whose work they choose to (mis)interpret as urging them to do this act should not.

      Photographic pedophiliac images cause harm in the process of their creation. It could be argued that people who seek out pedophiliac pornography are a danger to themselves or others, and should be committed. But how about synthetic pedophiliac imagery whose primary purpose is not pornographic, such as the anime Domination Kite? I think we can agree that sex with children is wrong. But what about sex with minors who are past the age of puberty but are below the (local) age of consent? Note that I'm not advocating a position on these issues - but would it matter if I was?

      Yes, the welfare of children is very important to society. But so is the freedom of speech. Finding moral solutions means finding optimum, compromise positions between two or more opposing principles. The laying down of absolutes is not helpful.

    21. Re:Protest by spiritraveller · · Score: 2, Insightful
      On another note I fail to see how the german laws you cite are any more stifling to free speech than laws prohibiting libel. Neonazism is tightly coupled to malicious defamation of jews - according to the laws of most countries that constitutes libel. Mentioning neonazism explicitly in the law just serves to simplify libel lawsuits.

      Or do you beleive that libel laws in america are morally equivalent to limiting the civil liberties of an ethnic minority?

      American defamation law does not protect large groups of people. To succesfully sue someone for libel (or slander), you have to defame them personally. Members of very small groups of people can sometimes sue for defamation, but "Jews", "Blacks", and "Honkies" do not have a valid claim when someone says something bad about their respective group.

      This underlines an important distinction between American understandings of free speech and European understandings of it. The American understanding is that you can never limit political expression because of what is expressed. (Not meaning to imply that we have a perfect record or anything.)

      Expressions of racism or hatred are just that, expressions. If you let government decide what expressions are allowable and what are not, then you have something more than a government... you have a Thought Police.

  2. Who Did What When How? by fembots · · Score: 4, Informative

    Where's the news? I see four links in the summary and none of them points to the news about the sentence.

    1. Re:Who Did What When How? by jginspace · · Score: 2, Informative
      Article in Turkish is here:
      http://www.mhanews.com/modules.php?name=News&file= article&sid=9485

      Translation:

      DMOZ-Editor sentenced to imprisonment for KADEK propaganda

      Ankara - Construction engineer H. Ertas has been sentenced to 10 months in prison and fined after being found guilty of "Propaganda for KADEK".

      Ertas' lawyer, Suna Coskun, explained that his client had worked as a voluntary editor at the Open Directory Project (www.dmoz.org) during his studies at the Euphrat-University and had been responsible for the Kurdish category. At the same time he became interested in Kurds and undertook his own research into the subject.

      As a voluntary editor he had sorted the directory submissions but could not be responsible for their content. Therefore there could be no penalty under international law, according to Coskun. His activities could in no way be understood as "support for a terrorist organisation" and thus Ertas' release was appropriate.

      The court sentenced Ertas to 10 months in prison and a fine of 416 million Turkish lire ($293). The sentence is not eligible for probation.

      Mesopotamia News Agency

    2. Re:Who Did What When How? by killjoe · · Score: 4, Informative

      Apparently he was charged with publishing terrorist propaganda and found guilty. Similar things have happened in the US and elsewhere. People have been charged with supporting terrorists and inciting violence. For example right to life people have been charged with putting together web sites to incite people to kill doctors. In US controlled iraq sunni clerics have been arrested for publicly denoucing the occupation, urging resistance and recently for opposing the election process.

      The only thing that seems different is that the guy may not have actually posted the articles but instead compiled them in one place. I could certainly see how somebody could be charged with similar crimes in the US for the same act.

      We have had many people arrested, charged and found guilty of posting information on the internet both here and in the rest of the "first world". Here are some links

      http://www.raisethefist.com/news.cgi?artical=wir e/ -----74814smallsherm.gifIMG.article
      http://www.zo ne-h.org/en/news/read/id=785/
      http://www.nukefree zone.net/archives/000354.html
      http://cnnstudentne ws.cnn.com/2001/fyi/news/02/12/ chinese.webmaster/
      http://www.freemanz.com/politi cal/

      Arresting reporters, webmasters and other disseminators of information is very common in the US, europe, china and elsewhere. I guess I don't see why this is that special.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    3. Re:Who Did What When How? by Saeger · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Just for fun, I've compiled a list of misc "terrorist" links myself:

      If jackboot thug out there wants to arrest me for "implicitly supporting" the content of any of these links, feel free to abuse the PATRIOT ACT in order to force slashdot.org to reveal the IP address associated with this post, and in turn my ISP will reveal my name and home address associated with the DHCP lease (because I didn't bother to post through an anonymous proxy(s)). tinfoil_hat_mode off.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    4. Re:Who Did What When How? by Alan+Cox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is a big difference between sorting material *about* a group of people or historical events than supporting them. Is a historical compilation of facts about world war II an endorsement of war ? Of course not, but you can be sure such a history would include material from the point of view of the "bad guys" because it is neccesary context.

      Turkey does have some serious human rights problems, and terror problems, and many other problems. As it moves towards the EU we can only hope that it continues to improve on that (eg it abolished the death penalty)

      Not that EU countries all have a great record either. The UK has foreigners imprisoned indefinitely without trial for example.

  3. that stinks by polished+look+2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    but at least he'll be out (hopefully) in 10 months. Abuses of power are rampant throughout the globe.

  4. Guys please! by unixmaster · · Score: 2, Informative

    As a Turkish guy I can tell you PKK is a terrorist organisation now known as Kadek.
    Guilty of killing about ~30k people including children and women.
    Please see http://www.teror.gen.tr/english/organisations/pkk. html for more info.
    Also note that USA acknowledged recently PKK/Kadek being a terrorist organization.

    --
    Never learn by your mistakes, if you do you may never dare to try again
    1. Re:Guys please! by norkakn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Also note that USA acknowledged recently PKK/Kadek being a terrorist organization.

      No comment on whether they are or not (I haven't a clue), but that means jack. They said that the African National Congress was a terrorist organization.

    2. Re:Guys please! by flacco · · Score: 3, Insightful
      As a Turkish guy I can tell you PKK is a terrorist organisation now known as Kadek. Guilty of killing about ~30k people including children and women.

      what does that have to do with editing public information about PKK? do you really think that's going to do the slightest bit of good?

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    3. Re:Guys please! by ortcutt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's not the issue though. Nobody is defending the PKK. The question is whether organizing the categories of links on a web directory make someone a criminal. Putting H. Ertas in prison for 10 months for organizing categories of links on a website isn't right and it doesn't help fight terrorism.

    4. Re:Guys please! by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem is the guy was convicted of editing an article about them. Slashdot is a US website and most of us Americans hold free speech as the most important right in maintaining a democracy. For this case it doesn't matter what this group has done. Simply editing a public website with information about them shouldn't be a crime.

      As far as the US acknowleding the PKK as a terrorist organization, that doesn't always mean anything. Our outgoing secretary of education called the nations largest teachers group a "terrorist organization". So you'll understand if I'm a little skeptical of what the US government is saying these days.

      --
      AccountKiller
    5. Re:Guys please! by Karma+Sucks · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The same TV that's controlled and censored by your government?

      If this is what your government does to a web editor, what do you think they do to their journalists?

      --
      (Please browse at -1 to read this comment.)
    6. Re:Guys please! by unixmaster · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      Never learn by your mistakes, if you do you may never dare to try again
    7. Re:Guys please! by henleg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am no "America hater", but the actions in South America, for example Chile, makes the USA have blood on their hands. This is not something that the media speak loud about either. (All in the name of the cold war and the fight against communism.) It's quite ironic that the word "communism" is replaced by "terrorism" in our era, don't you think?!

    8. Re:Guys please! by gotih · · Score: 2, Interesting

      dude, did you even bother to check the links? i can't read turkish but even i can tell from the category he posted in (Top: World: Türkçe: Toplum: Sorunlar: Terörizm: Terör Örgütleri) that he is calling this group a terror organization and is therefore agreeing with you. he has provided an appropriate categorization of the information.

      it seems to me that if you are agreeing with the sentence then you agree with the Turkish government -- that information should be censored. he didn't post anything new or even a radical opinion of the group. he called them terrorists and provided information. in my American eyes (perhaps Civilized eyes would be more appropriate considering...), this is not a crime.

      --

      fear is the mind killer
    9. Re:Guys please! by unitron · · Score: 2, Funny
      "You have murdered quite a few curds yourselves."

      After which we slaughtered numerous whey.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    10. Re:Guys please! by krymsin01 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Should he recieve punishment for editing a collection of links to information that other people wrote? In my opinion, and most sane people's I would think, would be No. To say that he should recieve punishment for an action like that would be to say that the all librarians and bookstores should be shut down because they give people access to Mein Kampf or The Satanic Verses.

      --
      stuff
    11. Re:Guys please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While what much of the AC says is stupid and offensive, at least certain members/factions/wings of the ANC could accurately be described as terrorists.

      ""The ANC and its organs as well as the PAC and its armed formations...committed gross violations of human rights in the course of their political activities and armed struggles, for which they are morally and politically accountable," the report says.

      The commission noted it was ANC policy that the loss of civilian life should be avoided, but said operations by its armed wing uMkhonto weSizwe "ended up killing fewer security force members than civilians".

      In the case of the Pan-Africanist Congress (PAC) - a liberation movement which split from the ANC over ideological differences - the report focusses on the activities of its armed wing, Apla, which targeted white civilians and black leaders loyal to the government.
      "
      From BBC

    12. Re:Guys please! by kahei · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Well, _I'll_ defend the PKK (I'm neither a turk nor a kurd, though). The kurds in turkey are facing gradual annihilation -- some of them have attempted to fight back, without much success (they are heavily outnumbered and don't have much money). What on earth does the rest of the world expect them to do? Just die extra-quietly so that nobody is bothered?

      The issue of the war on the Kurds is the most important. Followed by the problem of Turks who don't join in the general hate being persecuted or imprisoned. The issue of holding an editor accountable for the links edited, while worrying, is absolutely insignificant by comparison.

      --
      Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    13. Re:Guys please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No comment on whether they are or not (I haven't a clue), but that means jack. They said that the African National Congress was a terrorist organization.

      Clueless, meet the KGB-funded ANC, their "necklace of death", bomber Nelson and Winnie's "football team". ANC, bomber Nelson, Winnie, meet Clueless.

      The ANC were terrorists, particularly nasty, ruthless and primitively murderous ones even, there's no question about it. Nowadays they're just incompetent and racist politicians, destroying a country.

    14. Re:Guys please! by andyfaeglasgow · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think the grand-parent was not explicitly linking the US with the notion of Civilised; rather pointing out that a pair of Civilised eyes would view the actions of the Turkish government in this case as wrong.

      I'm sure that even if the US Government is not Civilised, there are a great deal of Americans that are.

  5. This is where wikipedia may have problems too by Saven+Marek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is could be an example of the kind, of political pressure that will make things like say wikipedia less and less of a good thing.

    For example the slashdot article in the last months, where there were misinformous facts inserted. How many of these can pile up over time? If a country is suppressing all knowledge of what it really has done, and tying in information on what it wants to be seen as happening then the slow blend from one information into a misinformation can be complete.

    And these are self referencing things, too, so, you find wikipedia and dmoz links and maybe some other online encyclopedias all combined together with misinformation.

    How will one in the end sort it out?

    The nets biggest online nude anime gallery's

  6. We need a usable freenet! by scrod · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Turkish government could not have arrested Ertas if they weren't able to determine who had "inserted" the contraband information, nor would the equivalent of a freenet-based DMOZ be susceptible to coercion of any sort in pursuit of the removal any particular category.

    1. Re:We need a usable freenet! by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed. But Freenet hasn't been useable for what, over a year now? I'm amazed they continue to get any donations at all, and I think Ian Clarke (Sanity) has long since lost interest. Sadly, Freenet seems to have collapsed under its own weight of extreme complexity.

      Entropy was pretty good while it worked and still had a community, but I think concerns about the strength of its encryption kept it from being too popular (not to mention lack of advertising), and IIRC, ultimately the developer(s) lost interest.

      At this point, AFAIK there really is no good "anonymity layer" pseudo-protocol (conceptually, a distributed, encrypted datastore w/ routing on each node) like Freenet or Entropy that works at all. i2p is supposed to be Entropy's successor, but I haven't messed w/ it yet.

      If I were half as sharp as Clarke or developers of any other similar systems, I'd write my own, probably in C++ (for space and speed; Freenet runs in Java and last I checked chewed up tons of RAM and CPU time, whereas Entropy, written in C, didn't). I have some ideas for routing based on legal and geographic boundaries I'd like to implement...

      It's on my to-do list someday. But ultimately, I'm nowhere near bright enough to think I could pull it off. *shrug*

      Besides, the key legal argument Freenet and the like rest on is that of plausible deniability; that if you can't know for certain what is being trafficked, you can't be prosecuted for it. I think that's a weak argument though. I suspect a judge would take one look at Freenet or other such systems and say that finding "illegal stuff" (be it child porn in the U.S., anti-communist papers in China, photos of bare womens' faces in Iran, etc.) is easy enough to "reasonably" conclude there was knowledge of its traffic, and in fact, that was -- arguably -- the whole point of running Freenet in the first place. No judge is going to believe that such software is running so you can anonymously download photos of fluffy bunnies...

      So I'm not convinced that even if the technology were solid, that the legal basis for it is built on much more than quicksand... It's far-better than nothing in terms of initial detection is concerned, sure, but also, IMO, far from perfect once that detection has occurred. But I can't conceive of a better tech+legal defense system either.

      Ideally, I think we need a whole new *physical* layer Internet, separate from the existing Internet or Internet2 and devoid of participation by any and all governmental agents and anybody else who is significantly on the government payroll (defense contractors, etc.). Something like a wireless (or perhaps wired, where suitable), fully privately-owned mesh network on which only community-approved (based on the agreement of a certain number of surrounding and already-participating node-owners, much like with WASTE, except in meatspace) private nodes may communicate, over which all traffic is encrypted, possibly multiple times, possibly in hardware...

      Oh well, I can dream of a freer world, can't I? :-)

    2. Re:We need a usable freenet! by M1FCJ · · Score: 2, Insightful
      At least they tried this guy instead of putting him in a jail in a foreign country (like Cuba), denying him even rights to defend himself in a court (albeit, an unjust one).

      If Turkey followed America's example, this guy would have been rotting in a camp in a swamp, somewhere.
      The chances are he will be getting out of there in 3 months. It is still unjust but not the end of the world.

  7. Turkey in the EU by bhima · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And we're thinking of letting Turkey in the EU?

    --
    Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    1. Re:Turkey in the EU by Gadzinka · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly my thoughts...

      I mean, you can argue all you want about PKK being terrorist organisation or not, but this is just the issue of free speech! The guy wasn't sentenced for being a part of bombing or being a part of the plot to bomb anyone. He was sentenced for being editor of site that had public information about some organisation.

      If this isn't fucking censorship and criminal prosecution for exercising free speech, I don't know what is.

      Robert

      --
      Bastard Operator From 193.219.28.162
    2. Re:Turkey in the EU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      One of the conditions however is they clean up their disgusting human rights attitude.

    3. Re:Turkey in the EU by slavemowgli · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sadly, yes. Let's hope that the prospect of becoming a EU member will convince turkish politicians to stop things like this.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    4. Re:Turkey in the EU by LucidBeast · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think it is time for Turkey to join EU.

      My Kurdish friend, who actually fought Saddam back in the eighties, and now lives here in Finland, told me that the Turkish policy towards Kurds is that they don't really exist as a ethnic group. I think the Kurd situation is the most important reason not to let Turkey into EU. I think one reason Turkey wasn't delighted about the removal of Mr. Hussein was that they didn't want to have independent Kurdishtan in the north of Iraq. Kurds like Palestinians got the short end of the deal when British Empire divied up the remains of the Ottoman empire in the begining of last century and because of this both are people without their own nation.

      I hope, that if something good comes out of the War in Iraq it is that the Kurds get an independent state.

    5. Re:Turkey in the EU by dunkelfalke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      have you seen this site? this is the site where chechen terrorists brag about their "holy war" and where you can download videos on which the same chechen terrorists cut some russians their heads off. as far as i know snuffs are illegal.

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    6. Re:Turkey in the EU by RWerp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If it weren't for Turkish European ambitions, we would see much more of such sentences.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    7. Re:Turkey in the EU by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Unfortunately, Turkey is not the only one with such issues. Check this article from the Seattle Times about Sami, a Saudi Ph.D. student from Idaho that was stupid enough to help out with maintaining a web site. In post 911 America this can mean that you get locked up for two years and finally get kicked out of the country for minor visa application errors.

    8. Re:Turkey in the EU by Gadzinka · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, I never claimed, that US is peace-loving, human-rights-advocating heaven. In fact, I always claimed that US notoriously abuses human rights of its own and foreign citizens, on its teritory and abroad. And though human rights abuses aren't on the same level as in (e.g.) China or Indonesia, "less wrong" isn't "right".

      Robert

      PS Don't even get me started about abuses of human rights, due process and other issues in my country: Poland.

      --
      Bastard Operator From 193.219.28.162
  8. Happens all to frequently around the world by karlmiller · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The unfortunate thing is that this kind of action happens all to frequently everyday in countries around the world, where individuals say things that threaten people in power. What's worse is that similar activities are occuring in the United States, which is supposed to be the land that may not occur in.


    Remember, Freedom can't protect itself.

  9. Whew! by JoeShmoe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm glad I live in an open and free country like the USA where chilling tactics like this aren't used! Imagine if people were punished for merely providing a forum for other people to post information!

    Oh wait

    - JoeShmoe
    .

    --
    -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
    1. Re:Whew! by bnenning · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's not a very good example. The raid was conducted at the request of other countries, and AFAIK no Americans were actually arrested. Now we can debate to what extent the FBI should be an instrument of foreign law enforcement agencies (wasn't multilaterism was supposed to be good?), but it's not a case of Bush and Ashcroft just throwing their opponents in prison.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
  10. New plan. by dj245 · · Score: 3, Funny
    The court sentenced Ertas to 10 months in prison and a fine of 416 million Turkish lire ($293).

    To make the absurd amounts of money that the litigius lawyers demand in court these days even more absurd, I say we convert all monetary demands to Turkish Lire. For example:
    The RIAA today sued 793 more file-shares for between 2.83 and 5.67 Billion Turkish Lire each.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    1. Re:New plan. by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Okay, then. We hold the world ransom for.... two hundred... fifty-five... quadrillion lire!"

  11. Re:My goddamn point! by Krusty+Da+Klown · · Score: 2

    You've made your point time and time again, in several different postings. The point everyone else here is trying to make is that it doesn't matter who they are, *writing about them* shouldn't be a jailable offense. What's next, throw the Encylopedia Britannica people in jail for writing about al Qaeda?

  12. Turkey put its EC membership on the line... by ivi · · Score: 2, Informative


    The European Community could well put
    some pressure on the country or maybe
    bounce Yurkey out of the EC.

    How soon a wrongly sentenced person
    might be released from prison is,
    of course, another matter.

  13. Re:And this country... by johannesg · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Not even then. The "European Union" is a collection of nations that are all located IN EUROPE. Turkey is not in Europe, except for a very small part. Geographic issues aside, there is a major cultural and religious gap between Turkey and the EU. What's next? Should Iraq become part of the EU (next country after Turkey)? Hell, why not Saudi Arabia or Iran?

    Besides, Bush wants them in, so it cannot be right. He is probably hoping this to have a destabilizing and/or paralyzing influence on the entire EU...

  14. Get the EU Human Rights Court involved by LarsWestergren · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This sounds like a case for The European Cort of Human Rights. Turkey is very eager to join the EU and recently got promises that they could at least start talks with the EU about membership. This was after the EU recognized that Turkey had done progress with regards to human rights (they have had a very dark past with regards to womens' rights, minorities rights, police torture of dissidents, forbidding kurds to publish media in their own language etc). The EU have said that they have to do more though, there are still incidents of torture in Turkish prisons for instance, and opression of kurds.

    With the political preassure on the Turkish government, this guy might actually have a chance if enough people raise hell.

    I personally will write letter to the court about this case, and I will also contact Amnesty International in Sweden about this.

    I urge other Slashdot readers to take similar action.

    --

    Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    1. Re:Get the EU Human Rights Court involved by renoX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well except that Turkish is not currently a part of EU, so I'm not sure that the EU court of human rights will/can do anything..

    2. Re:Get the EU Human Rights Court involved by Looke · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not the "EU" court of human rights, it's "European". Big difference.

  15. My grandfather was an IRA terrorist by Magickcat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My grandfather was an I.R.A. terrorist who fought in the Irish War of Independence (1919-21). The Catholic Church excommunicated him for his allegianaces too. Oh and he certainly killed plenty of Black and Tans.

    Oh, but then the I.R.A. won the war, and he got a medal and a soldier's war pension, and the Catholic Church reinstated him. He never bothered with the Church again or with collecting his pension.

    Today's terrorist could be tommorow's war hero. The British government even today would have you think that my grandfather was a terrorist, but the Irish nation is living proof that it isn't always so clear cut. It's terribly important that people decide for themselves who are the terrorists and who are not. Governments that think that they can decide for their citizens are merely tyrants, and tyrants often fall when they become intolerable.

    --

    Si tacuisses philosophus mansisses. If you had kept quiet, you would have remained a philosopher.

    1. Re:My grandfather was an IRA terrorist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      the prima donna example is of the Allies during the war: fire-bombing German cities not to directly disrupt their war effort, but to terrorise the populous and kill factory workers. Not only did it not work, but few think of it as terrorism even today as the victims were so dehumanised.

    2. Re:My grandfather was an IRA terrorist by remi2402 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      During WWII, the militia men ("maquisards" for us frenchies) working/killing for the liberation of France were said to be terrorists by the Nazis and the collaborating government. Most of the French people considers them as war heroes.

      So, I agree. "Terrorist" is a very subjective term.

      (Don't get me wrong, I consider them as war heroes, but this was a point my history teacher in HS brought to us, to make us think beyond clear cut facts)

    3. Re:My grandfather was an IRA terrorist by burns210 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Good point.

      To go a step further back, the Revolutionary War was, to my knowledge, among the first instances of guerilla warfare and terrorism. The fouding fathers were leading the populous in a war against the occupying nation(then the world's most powerful nation) and used any means necesary, including the stories of farmers with rifles picking off british soldiers as they marched on the road.

      PS: Not to troll, but there could EASILY be made ties to presnet day conflicts in that sentence, and in the sense of the revolutionary war, be FULLY justified 50 years from now, depending on the timeline of events.

    4. Re:My grandfather was an IRA terrorist by entrigant · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is a distinction both you and the parent post failed to make. The key is in the fact that the farmers were picking off soldiers. Terrorists, imo, are the ones bombing civilian targets.

    5. Re:My grandfather was an IRA terrorist by Jodrell · · Score: 3, Informative

      Please remember that the IRA that fought in the War of Independence is not the same organisation as the Provisional IRA that has conducted a terrorist campaign in Northern Ireland in recent years. So it's unfair to say that "the British government would have us think that your grandfather was a terrorist". Most people in the UK are fully aware of the appalling acts committed in our name in Ireland, and few (apart from a few rabid Unionists) would say that the Republican movement of the time didn't have a legitimate cause. The provos are an entirely different matter, and one shouldn't be confused with the other.

      As for the "one man's terrorist is another's freedom fighter, others have done a better job than I could of that.

    6. Re:My grandfather was an IRA terrorist by StandardDeviant · · Score: 4, Interesting

      We made the war unwinnable by the occupying limey forces by making it expensive (both in real and political capital) to continue it. It's the classic guerilla war scenario, wherein the guerrilas don't have to *win*, they just have to *not lose*. The viet cong pulled the same shit on us in 'Nam, then the mujahedeen pulled the same shit on the Soviets in Afghanistan, and now a bunch of irritated nationalists, islamists, and wannabe mujahedeen are doing it to us again in Iraq. Google around sometime for "asymmetrical conflict". AC tends to work better if there is a foreign power bankrolling the guerillas (e.g. Russia and China in vietnam, the us in afghanistan, and probably one or more of {Iran,Syria, elements of Jordanian society, elements of Saudi Arabian society,etc.} in Iraq :P), but it's not absolutely required for success.

    7. Re:My grandfather was an IRA terrorist by jdcook · · Score: 3, Funny
      "the prima donna example is of the Allies during the war: fire-bombing German cities not to directly disrupt their war effort, but to terrorise the populous and kill factory workers. Not only did it not work, but few think of it as terrorism even today as the victims were so dehumanised."

      "prima donna"? They dropped ballet dancers on Dresden?

      --
      Q:How many libertarians does it take to stop a Panzer division? A:None. Obviously market forces will take care of it.
  16. And so? by TheLink · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, you better be careful then - maybe you should have posted anonymously and taken the necessary precautions (proxies etc).

    After all your country might decide to put you in jail since you are providing information about them just like your fellow countryman who's going to prison for 10 months.

    Unless there is PROOF he is supporting those terrorist organizations, I don't see how he deserves to be jailed for 10 months.

    If there isn't any evidence, then your government is fascist, and by defending their actions you are supporting them.

    --
  17. Re:Let me be the first by krymsin01 · · Score: 2, Funny

    It would get out that NORWEIGIAN RAPPERS were making threats about George W. Bush? I didn't even know there were Norweigian rappers until this thread!

    --
    stuff
  18. Re:Politics by RWerp · · Score: 2, Informative

    No, it didn't and reacts angrily when there is any commemorance of the fact. Some time ago in a beautiful Polish city of Kraków members of Armenian minority wanted to organize a 'remembrence day' for the massacre. The Turkish embassy protested strongly enough to make it troublesome for the Armenians to make a public ceremony.

    --
    "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
  19. Women and children by Animaether · · Score: 5, Insightful

    obligatory "I'll get flamed for this" statement aside...

    What's with the age-old "they killed women and children" stuff ?
    In war and terror, women and children *kill*.
    In war and terror, women and children get killed.

    If I were an Israeli borderguard and a woman strapped with explosives runs towards me, I would... kill them.

    If I were a Sudan military or somesuch and a rebel child points an AK47 at me ready to fire, I would... shoot them in the legs, hopefully, but good chance I'd aim for the chest due to the larger surface area and it'd probably... kill them.

    These particular 'women and children' statements are hollow when put into perspective this way, in my opinion.

    Now you may not share that point of view, or you may point out that these are "innocent women and children". Perhaps or, in the case of terrorist attacks, likely so. But does that mean the men were not innocent ? Does it mean that the loss of their life is somehow not as disturbing/devastating as that of the women and children ?

    Just my thoughts...

    1. Re:Women and children by Scudsucker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now you may scream at me for that last bit, but I'm affraid it is a simple fact which always sees men in the front line.

      That and the fact that society sees men as expendible.

  20. MOD PARENT UP!!! by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Those attacked call them terrorists, those attacking call themselves freedom fighters, I just call them guerillia warriors and leave the morality of their cause for the historians.

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  21. Re:And this country... by killjoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why don't you try and form a nazi web site in germany and tell me that you are democratic. Go ahead and make sure you deny the holocaust never happened too. Let's see how long that web site stays up and how long it takes to haul your ass to jail.

    europeans sure are sanctimonius bastards, I guess your shit don't stink huh?

    --
    evil is as evil does
  22. It happens in the US too :( by sg_oneill · · Score: 4, Interesting

    About a year and a bit ago, Sherman Austin was arrested and ended up doing about a year for providing a link on a website to another website with info on making molotov cocktails.

    When Ashcrofts boys leant on him and threatened him with charges of terrorism, he made a plea bargain that would get him a coupla months jail. The judge ignored the bargain and gave him a year.

    Groups like the EFF have basically said if he didnt do the plea bargain , he probably would of been released on grounds of first amendment, but he plead thinking he'd only be in a short stay. Effectively the judge denied him the chance for a real defence against a long sentence.

    In australia ,years ago, a guy did a long sentence for providing information on how to legally avoid voting (compulsary voting in australia).

    And in britain, the servers of journalist group indymedia where siezed without explaination or warning , and now it seems without legal grounds.

    Journalists are arrested *daily* around the world for writing articles that offend governments.

    Turkey aint the only ones up to this sort of crap.

    --
    Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
  23. The US government sends Turkey military aid by br00tus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Unfortunately as a US taxpayer, I have to finance US military aid to Turkey to the tune of billions of dollars. Locking up people who write about the Kurds in Turkey is small potatos, the Turks have been massacring Kurds for years. If anyone remembers, they even invaded Iraq (which the US administration didn't want) just to kill Kurds that were in Iraq. This is the thing that Saddam Hussein was lambasted for - gassing Kurds (although the US sent him helicopters after he did that of course too). Yet the Turks have been doing it, are doing it, and will be doing it. This never appears on the US corporate media of course, just the tragedy that a candidate not on the privatization fast track might win the Ukranian election.

  24. I am an American citizen living in Turkey... by Astart� · · Score: 3, Interesting


    ...and this is a beautiful country with a wonderfully rich culture. The Islamic Selçuk/Ottoman/Turkish culture was arguably the world's highest culture during times that Euope was wallowing in the filth of its own Dark and Middle Ages. Don't believe me? Pick up a history book. Remember: they were the ones that finally ended the Roman Empire (1453).

    An amazing thing about Turkey is its attitude to foreigners: it's warm, caring and hospitable. No where else in the world in my rather extensive travels have I met this level of friendliness and courtesy -- especially not in Europe. Foreigners are treated here with respect and with great interest.

    Turkey is also a country bordered by aggressor nations: Iran, Iraq, Syria. In addition, it has an internal population that is not just separatist, it's terrorist. Israel is in the same boat and is much harsher on its opposing poplulation -- and yet Israel has international support.

    I have watched the changes the Turkish government is making to enter the EU. You can't imagine how much pride they're swallowing to have their history and honor stepped on by Belgian chocolatiers, French pastry-chefs, German schnitzel-makers, English fish-and-chips vendors... There is NO WAY that any of you would tolerate such treatment in your own countries. Further -- the rank-and-file Turk doesn't want EU membership.

    Nobody seems to complain about the Turks when they're assisting US/NATO military operations, disallowing the transit through their waters of former Soviet aircraft carriers on their way to the Red Chinese military, managing the flow of Iraqi oil to the West...

    I am saddened by all your ignorance. Your education on Turkey has come from watching "Baron Munchausen" and "Midnight Express" too many times ("Midnight Express" is a hugely FALLACIOUS piece of shit, btw).

    1. Re:I am an American citizen living in Turkey... by tetromino · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sure, Turkey is a great country. However, this discussion is not about whether Turks are nice people or whether Turkey is a good place to live. The point of this discussion is that it is silly to arrest someone just for collecting (potentially) terrorist propaganda. If the guy was making bombs, or doing intelligence work for the PPK - sure, he deserves jail time. But arresting him just for managing a website?

      Turkey's criminal justice system is quite good by, say, the standards of North Africa (there, Coskun would just "disappear"). However, it's clearly not good enough by the standards of EU...

    2. Re:I am an American citizen living in Turkey... by foghorn19 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      what do you have to say about Turkey's oppression of Kurds, and the specific case of the dmoz editor being punished with 10 months prison?

  25. EUians, write your politicians! by infolib · · Score: 4, Informative

    Right now Turkey is extremely sensitive to criticism about human rights violations since they are applying for EU membership. This is quite controversial, so it's easy to find politicians who could have an interest in bringing this case to the forefront. Try to find the representatives involved in foreign affairs.

    Disclaimer: I'm a supporter of Turkey's EU membership, but I'm an even greater supporter of free speech.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
  26. EU by jrockway · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is why the EU won't let Turkey join. If you want to be taken seriously in the international community, you can't do things like this.

    We complain about our loss of freedom in the US, but I don't think something like this would happen here. We are slightly freer than Europe and Turkey.

    --
    My other car is first.
    1. Re:EU by RPoet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Slightly freer than Europe? At least in most European countries, your home cannot be searched or your phone tapped without a court order, and you cannot be imprisoned without a legal process.

      --
      "Oppression and harassment is a small price to pay to live in the land of the free." -- Montgomery Burns.
    2. Re:EU by praksys · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Depends very much on what you count as "most of Europe". From the WaPo...
      Not so in France, where four prisoners from the U.S. naval base were arrested as soon as they arrived home in July, and haven't been heard from since. Under French law, they could remain locked up for as long as three years while authorities decide whether to put them on trial -- a legal limbo that their attorneys charge is not much different than what they faced at Guantanamo.

      Armed with some of the strictest anti-terrorism laws and policies in Europe, the French government has aggressively targeted Islamic radicals and other people deemed a potential terrorist threat. While other Western countries debate the proper balance between security and individual rights, France has experienced scant public dissent over tactics that would be controversial, if not illegal, in the United States and some other countries.

      France is the worst, but you would be surprised how few limitations there are on what intelligence services in Europe can do when "national security" is involved.
  27. Re: We have that by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 4, Funny
    Ideally, I think we need a whole new *physical* layer Internet, separate from the existing Internet or Internet2 and devoid of participation by any and all governmental agents and (..) Oh well, I can dream of a freer world, can't I?

    Already in place. It's called "mouth-to-mouth", "face to face", "meeting in person". 6 billion users worldwide, very scalable, accessible to anyone who speaks the local lingo, free as in beer and free as in freedom, anonymous if desired (you don't know me, I don't know you, or secretly slip a note in someone's pocket), tamper-proof, available 24/7, works without electric power, earthquake and flood resistant, and can be secured very well against wiretapping.

    Drawbacks: moderate efficiency, high latency, low bandwidth, machine-readability stinks. Use when non-machine readable information exchange is desired, or when all else fails.

  28. Sorry guys by Ilgaz · · Score: 3, Informative

    As a turkish citizen, even posting with my real name for years..

    I'd love to participate in this discussion, ask about how come turkish media is cencored etc or replying to each clueless european which hates Turkey for some funny reason and jumping to this discussion about how disgusting thing Turkey did to poor(!) category editor etc.

    The problem is... I don't want to. I don't care. I stopped doing such stuff years ago.

    As an unimportmant note, can I BEG you people not to compare Mandela to PKK/KADEK? I don't remember Mandela ordered black people to burn schools, kill teachers, kill all village only because they participated in election...

    I mean, for my stomach's sake, don't make me disgusted.

  29. Thank you for spreading Nazi Propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    >>
    Kurds are an ethnic minority, like jews were in nazi germany - a Kurd cannot decide to stop being a kurd, no less than I can stop being a caucasean.
    >>

    That is exactly what the Nazis were saying: Jews are a ethnic group, a race. While the jewish religion has some disturbing conceptions of heritage and blood-lineage it is possible to become a member of a different religion and cease to be jewish. According to the local synode council it is much harder for a christian to become a jew than vice versa.

    Whatever, considering the jews an ethnic minority is making the Nazi point.

    And on a side note: explain "ethnic". Thank you.

  30. Informative? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Inflamatory perhaps.

    Branding not one but two whole ethnic groups as terrorists is a typical fascist tactic.

    Well done, we know how your boat rocks.

    To further add to your public humillation then you go on a cheap tirade against people form other European countries (did you notice I wrote "other", because I believe to deny Turkish European heritage is foolish), yet another fascist tactic.

    The part of Turkish history and "honour" that Turkey have to swallow is the worst part of it: torture, military dictatorships, ethnic discrimination against Kurds (they did not have schools where their language was spoken for example), lack of free speech.

    If Turkey expects to join an organization whith a certain outlook of the World then they should fit that outlook or stay away.

    It is not the EU who is eager to have Turkey, it is Turkey who has been pressing for EU membership.

    If what they have to give up was so precious then they could decide to stay out of the EU, the EU will not invade them to force to join....

    There may be people here that know not much about Turkey, but there is no worst ignorant than the one that has decided to be one, using whatever means are available to justify his own, not necessarily accurate, version of the world.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  31. Re:Politics by M1FCJ · · Score: 2, Informative
    First of all, USA and Turkey no longer have the good old relationship they used to have. That ended when Turkish parliament, much to everyone's suprise, refused to let American soldiers into Turkey to attack Iraq. America had to find other bases, much to their pain.
    Secondly, America doesn't army PKK, they arm two Kurdish factions which divvied the Northern Iraq between themselves (and to be fair, in civil var since 1960s. Reading the history of Barzani and Talibani families is much fun, how they betrayed Kurds to Iraqi and Turkish authorities, in turn is quite fascinating).

    PKK (also known as KADEK) is hated by both factions and is regarded as a terrorist organisation by all sides. Their bases in Iraq were shelled by American Army last year.

    PKK's former leader, Ocalan, was captured by Turks (or handed to them, depending on which conspiracy theory you subscribe to) also was quite a shame to Kurds, after grovelling to Turkish "Ideals" when he was on trial.

  32. Re:This is a symptom of bigger problems by dapyx · · Score: 2, Informative

    The average pay is probably around $2/hour, in Istanbul. Most likely, the rest of country, which is underdeveloped, has much lower wages.

    --
    I'm sorry, the number you have dialed is an imaginary number. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and dial again.
  33. Re:Politics by peter+hoffman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When I was programming at USC we had some Chinese grad students come to the U.S. right after Tianenmen square. After some months I asked them what they thought of the U.S. supporting the government of China with things like most favored nation trading status.

    They replied that it is absolutely a good thing. The corrupt leaders would otherwise continue to get whatever Western products they want while the average citizen would get no goods, no exposure to the West, and the Chinese economy would not do as well which would be a hardship on the working man.

    In the view of these students, the U.S. has to "hold its nose while dealing with these stinky situations" because that's the only way things will improve in the world.

  34. Sounds like simple enforced censorship by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Correct me if im wrong, ( not knowing the entire story here ) but that is how i take the summary.

    "you write/write/publish about subject xyz, we jail you'

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  35. Re:Er, dude, the US does this. by ldspartan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Dude, are you nuts? Hicks didn't just support the Taliban by editing articles about them on the internet, he fought with them against US forces. There's something of a difference there.

    Hicks' incarceration is not a free speech issue - at all - it's contentious because he's not an Afghani (sp?) citizen. Either way, he's an enemy combatant, not an editor.

    (N.B. All of what I've said is based off the Wikipedia article, if it is faulty than my analysis of the situation is likely to be as well.)

    --
    lds

  36. Anonimity (Not entirely OT) by ACNiel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "If you aren't doing anything wrong, you have no need for anonymity."

    Slashdot needs to start posting more of these articles from around the world. The less astute among us will still cling to their lack of sensibilities on this subject, but people must start to realize that people really are persecuted for unpopular opinions (Your terrorist is my freedom fighter).

    The more pervasive we make anonymity and cryptography everywhere, the easier it will be to protect people that need or deserve to be protected.

  37. I lived and worked in Turkey too... by theolein · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And even learned the language and can still speak it a bit now, ten years later. You obviously know very little about Turkey if you claim that Turkish prisons weren't that bad. I knew from quite a few turks who had landed up in them (and it isn't that hard to land up in a Turkish prison, just piss someone with money or influence off and bob's your uncle) that they were and are very harsh places.

    I also had some Kurdish friends who ran a restaurant, and they were regularly rounded up and stuffed into prison whenever the PKK had done something again. In fact the only local Kurd who wasn't regularly rounded up was the local mafia boss who had, wait for it, money and influence.

    There are very nice and friendly Turks, but there's one hell of a lot of fascist bigotted corrupt arseholes as well.

  38. His links were about culture, not politics!!! by Erdal+Ronahi · · Score: 2, Informative
    Hi. I am the guy who did the first translation and posted it to the DMOZ-Forum. There are lots of reports in the Turkish press about the case.

    The guy did NOT write about the PKK, not even give a link to PKK related issues. The sites he listed were entirely about Kurdish culture and language. The category he edited is the Turkish equvalent of Turkey/Ethnical Groups/Kurds

    There is an ongoing campaign to close down the whole World/Kurdish branch of the Open Directory Project. See details here: http://www.kurdmedia.com/news.asp?id=3341 (note: I personally don't agree with the term "fascist")

    The campaign itself is here: http://www.kampanyaturk.gen.tr/kampanya.php?id=25

    This is not about terrorism, it is entirely about free spreech.

    Erdal Ronahi

  39. Slashdot rectionaries by ajs · · Score: 2, Interesting
    We have so many misinformed or misleading replies here, that I had to simply post a bulk refutation rather than suffer Slashdot's filtering of multiple posts (their advertising loss, not mine):
    • This compares in no way to bringing charges against groups that post the addresses of doctors along with the suggestion that they should be punished. Even had the man directly posted a political rant about the plight of the Kurds, the difference between saying "abortion is wrong, and we should stand against people who do it" and "abortion, which John Smith of 1 Main St practices (bastard should pay for what he's done (wink, wink)) is wrong," is monumental under the laws of any civilized nation.
    • We're talking about editing links and summary descriptions, people, please try to keep that in mind when replying.
    • The Kurds are, according to Wikipedia, "an ethnic group of Iranian origin (itself a branch of the larger Indo-European family), comprised of (according to some sources) about 25 million people, primarily in Iraq, Iran, Turkey, and Syria [...] Kurdish guerillas launched attacks on Turkish targets in 1984, and since then they have fought against the Turkish government for independence and the right to be educated in Kurdish schools, with little success." You can see why the Turks are not particularly fond of the Kurds, but at the same time that in no way excuses this behavior.
    • Speaking of Wikipedia, no this doesn't bode ill for Wikipedia and other Wikis. Revision histories and revision editing are an increasingly sophisticated area of Wiki development and Wikipedia does a very good job of reverting changes that are motivated by non-factual concerns. In fact, it's generally easier for honest innacuracy (e.g. what the ex-Brittanica editor pointed out previously on Slashdot) to sneak in than deliberate mistruths in a controvercial subject (exactly because it IS controvercial).
    Thanks and carry on.
  40. Heh, its just us.... by Delifisek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So after using slashdot more then 6 years I got news about MY country...

    And I see lots of comments about Turkey and thoose PKK terrorists...

    Sorry guys your knowladge about Turkey and history just noting. Let me give some Turkish information to you.

    Remember this is Turkey, not USA not EU. Our first priorty is keep country together, one piece at whatever its cost.

    After World War I, Ottoman Empire was collapse, major European countries capture every location of Turkey. Our ancestors (including Kurds) fougth to get back our freedom. In our freedom war European nations ignite every minor culture in Turkey to weaken freedom fighters, there are lots of revolts against to new goverment founded by freedom fighters and all of them failed and their cost too high.

    After the won our freedom, new goverment create new vision to unification the country. Because Ottoman Empire was multi-culture nation (like today's USA) and when times become worst every part of the nation wants make their way and cannot became together to act against enemy. To avoid this Mustafa Kemal ATATURK creates new vision around Turk and Turkish language. The nation has upper ID around to be Turk also people has own minor culture ID but non of them above the country or country unification or coutry goals.

    So this nev vision works perhaps may not in best condition and its works. After 81 years, 3 military coups, lots of terror and anarchy we still one piece.

    When Ottoman Empire collapsed, European Nations and Russia take parts of Ottoman Empire other than current Turkey. So look most of them, pain, blood, war still continues. That chaos created by those MODERN WEST because of OIL.

    And we got tons of evidence USA, Grece and other European Nations support PKK/Kadek (AKA Baby Killers) in past to weaken Turkey.

    Our law system may not be perfect and that guy may goes prison because of the some stupid goverment officals (I thing you got same stories). And this isn't mean we are bad guys, we try to make them better we try to understand others.

    And I suggest you to do same, to understand us.

    We, The Turks owner of the best landscape of Old Eart. Our position is wery near of all major oil stocks in Asia and Middle East. Our lands is soil and fertile. We are middle of the WEST and EAST.

    We are willing to give all to keep this country to be unite and one piece.

    I'm writing this note as a Turkish guy who currently do his military service in these one of the hot areas.

    --
    [My english is better than most other people's Turkish, so please point out mistakes politely. Thank you.]