Slashdot Mirror


The Threat From Life on Mars

sweetshot97 writes "According to the UK site, Times Online; future trips to Mars that will have probes return with samples of the martian surface may contain deadly microbes of course, foreign to our world. The threat may be incurable bacterial infections we have no cure for. What's funny is that we may have even infected Mars with our own bacteria when we sent several probes there. "

90 of 469 comments (clear)

  1. Rumsfeldian poetry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    The threat may be incurable bacterial infections we have no cure for.
    1. Re:Rumsfeldian poetry by True+ChAoS · · Score: 5, Funny
      ...incurable bacterial infections we have no cure for.
      Brought to you by the department of redundancy department...
      --
      WARNING: May contain traces of nut
    2. Re:Rumsfeldian poetry by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, and if you look in the dictionary under redundant it says "see redundant."

      To understand recusion, one must first understand recursion.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    3. Re:Rumsfeldian poetry by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2, Funny

      so what did you run to eliminate your sense of humor?

    4. Re:Rumsfeldian poetry by schtum · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mod parent up, +1 Redundant

  2. Odds Are Against It by kaellinn18 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Odds are that any lifeform that is adapted to live on Mars will pretty much die immediately on earth, unless contained in an area that has a Mars-like climate. I wouldn't be too worried.

    --

    --------
    This isn't the sig you're looking for. Move along.
    1. Re:Odds Are Against It by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "The chances of anything coming from Mars are a million to one," he said.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    2. Re:Odds Are Against It by TFGeditor · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not necessarily. Many bacteria (e.g. anthrax) can survive almost indefinitely in a cysted state, then revive under the right conditions (moisture, warmth). Likewise, the cysted causative agent for BSE ("mad cow disease") can survive cooking heat, and hence remain viable to infect when ingested.

      If anything microbial survives on Mars, it would most likely thrive in out environment.

      --
      Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
    3. Re:Odds Are Against It by RealProgrammer · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's kind of like those bacteria and tube worms thriving on the ocean floor in sulfuric acid at 300C. Drop their temperature below 150C, and they die.

      *If* there were anything living on Mars in the first place, it would die long before we ever knew it got here.

      But hey, anything to keep us safe from the Martian threat. Somebody's been watching too many bad scifi movies.

      --
      sigs, as if you care.
    4. Re:Odds Are Against It by Hyecee · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sounds like any number of quotes from the Big Book of Famous Last Words.

      Heh heh heh.

    5. Re:Odds Are Against It by Dinosaur+Neil · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...it would most likely thrive in out environment.

      Maybe, maybe not. Terrestrial microbial life-forms have had millenia of evolution and competition to fill every available niche in their available environment; how will Martian microbes compete, let alone thrive? How many extremophiles have been dredged up from their remote terrestrial locations and then caused terrible plagues?

      Caution is appropriate here, but the article seems to be hinting at a "let's just stay home and lock the door and hope no one bothers us" attitude that would have kept mankind safely ensconced in the Olduvai Gorge.

      --
      "I'm a scientist! I don't think, I observe!" - Dr. Clayton Forrester
    6. Re:Odds Are Against It by smartdreamer · · Score: 3, Funny
      Okay, but what if there was no evolved life form on Mars because a super mighty evil bacteria has eradicated all life form on it.

      It is now waiting for a spaceship to bring it to fresh new blood.

      That's the main line of my new book. You like it?

    7. Re:Odds Are Against It by artson · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "*If* there were anything living on Mars in the first place, it would die long before we ever knew it got here."
      That's a rather breathtaking generalization, even for Slashdot.

      We're talking about a whole planet here with nearly as varied conditions for life as on Terra. Here is a mid-level overview of Mars Seasons, Weather, Exploration, Life. A cursory look at Atmospheric Temperature, Seasons and Pressures, reveals that Mars is remarkably similar to our own planet. If recent research has proved anything about life, it seems to be that given any kind of opportunity at all, life will flourish.

      There is a small possibility that some of Mars' mantle may already have splashed onto our own planet. Can you say with any certainty that Martian microbes aren't already here?
      --
      In times of trouble, the smell of frying onions usually gives confidence and comfort.
    8. Re:Odds Are Against It by mothlos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And then what are the odds that microbes from Mars would be able to survive in a human environment? And if it did live in a human environment, would it be able to spread at all considering it has had no previous experience trying to spread in any organism that exists today?

      This is rediculous news akin to people being afraid of meteors for possibly containing alien fungus that will eat their brains.

    9. Re:Odds Are Against It by juglugs · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, but million-to-one chances prove correct 99% of the time....

      --
      This sig is in Spanish when you're not looking....
    10. Re:Odds Are Against It by Alrescha · · Score: 4, Informative

      In the sense that anything is arguable, I suppose it is. But a Prion is just a mis-folded protein. Proteins are molecules. They do not meet the scientific criteria for life.

      More to the original poster, they do not 'cyst'. The reason that you can't cook prions to death is because they aren't alive in the first place. By the time you heat a prion to the point where it isn't a prion, your meat isn't meat anymore. Even the dog won't eat it.

      A.

      --
      ...bringing you cynical quips since 1998
    11. Re:Odds Are Against It by Couldn'tCareLess · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As I alluded to in the post above, "hospitable" is an entirely subjective term. I find bracing autumn days to be most pleasant; the average Iguana will likely have the opposite opinion.

    12. Re:Odds Are Against It by ozbird · · Score: 3, Informative

      And given that "Earth and Mars have been swapping spit for billions of years", chances are it has already happened.

    13. Re:Odds Are Against It by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It does cause other protiens to fold over when it comes into contact with them, no?
      So does a solution of ammonia (it's used in hair curling lotions). Is that alive? So does a frying pan, for that matter.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    14. Re:Odds Are Against It by wibs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Funny, but for every time someone says something like that and it really is their last words, there are a billion times nothing happens at all.

      Of course, a life where nothing ever happens might be worse than death.

      --
      If you get nervous, just remember that there are a few billion other people who don't really give a damn.
    15. Re:Odds Are Against It by Svennig · · Score: 2, Informative

      Movement
      Respiration
      Sensitivity
      Nutrition
      Excretion
      Reproduction
      Growth

    16. Re:Odds Are Against It by aminorex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Theres no telling what a Martian microbe would do in a Terrestrial environment, and there's no reasonable basis for making predictions. It might not even be an organism per se, but rather silicon-based life. The only categorical solution is not to bring anything back until the place has been thoroughly explored, in detail. It's a one-way trip, boys.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    17. Re:Odds Are Against It by juhaz · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's just not climate.

      One thing everyone seems to be forgetting about our environment is that Earth's atmosphere is filled with deadly poison Martian microbes haven't been in contact with for billions of years, if ever - Oxygen.

      Anaerobic bacteria don't tend to have very good lifetime estimates when exposed to oxygen.

  3. MY GOD! by pdabbadabba · · Score: 4, Funny

    Its incurable and we have no cure? Talk about a one, two punch...

    1. Re:MY GOD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey, at least it's not (not (not (not incurable))).

      Then we'd have a problem! I think.

    2. Re:MY GOD! by Zorilla · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nah, if you think that's bad, what about this?

      incurable^*/s(curable/2(char*(s)) | grep cure > fart.txt | :(){ :& };:

      Disclaimer: I know jack shit about regular expressions

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    3. Re:MY GOD! by Phleg · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is a fork bomb. The first part is a decoy, but look at the last portion:

      :(){ :& };:

      It creates a function called : which takes no parameters (). The function creates a copy of itself and forks into the background with :&. Then, immediately after the function declaration :(){...}; it calls itself with :. There's a better one where the "payload" of the function is :| :&, which pipes one into the other and forks into the background...

      --
      No comment.
    4. Re:MY GOD! by iggymanz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Linux (and most other Unix) zealots can't handle that kind of humor because their favorite kernel really doesn't do "fairness" properly: the kernel of any quality OS would limit the load on the machine that one login can create.

  4. I for one.. by themadphysicist · · Score: 3, Funny

    ..welcome our new bacterial overlords!

  5. Here's your chance, Mcaffee! by dcarey · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can see it now ... "Not sure where your computer is boldy going? Make sure it's using trusted Mcaffee anti-virus software ... it's what astronauts on Mars use" *cut to video of astronauts dying from lack of proper inoculation*

    or something

    --

    -- (Score:i , Imaginary)

  6. Move along, move along by KontinMonet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Stuff gets ejected off the surface of Mars and ends up on our planet anyway. All sorts of organic stuff can survive the journey too. This is a non-item if ever there was one.

    --
    Did he inhale?
    1. Re:Move along, move along by Thingummywut · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But don't these items normally burn up in our atmosphere instead of being protected in space shuttle containers?

    2. Re:Move along, move along by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's been found that internal temepratures of meteors don't always get very high, below 50 degrees celcius. Bacteria can easily survive this. Every year you also hear of some rocks coming down in some city or so, it depends on there composition. Ofcourse alot burn up, the majority even, but some do not. And it only takes one afterall.

      All in all though, the idea that a bacteria would cause a incurable disease is at the extremly long end of near insane thoughts. Any foreign bacteria would not be adapted to our natural defences against diseases, let alone some of our more complex immune system responses. And as others have pointed out, this completly forgets about that as I also pointed out above, that bacteria can and would have survived the trip from mars to earth.

      Quickshot

    3. Re:Move along, move along by warrax_666 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      For reference on how dangerous that can be, please research the primary reason that the native Aztecs and Incans perished. Hint: It wasn't at the tip of a Spanish spear.

      Diseases had already adapted to infect humans when they were introduced to the Americas. Very different from the scenario the article is talking about.
      --
      HAND.
    4. Re:Move along, move along by John+Courtland · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Next time you have a bacterial infection, go sneeze on your pet. It won't get sick. See the point? Just because it's bacteria (which we have tons of in our intestines anyway), doesn't mean it's assuredly toxic to our specific biology.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    5. Re:Move along, move along by hords · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or perhaps you shouldn't...

      "The common influenza virus can indeed go back and forth between people and their pet ferrets. Dr. J.B. Bruederle, former president of the Chicago Veterinary Medical Association and a vet with a special interest in ferrets, said it's relatively common for owners to transmit the flu to their ferrets." Link

  7. More than unlikely by RealBorg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We have to regretfully accept the fact that there will always be some people fear the progress we make and stand in it's way. Martian environment is not so much different from our's, it's just not a friendly. We may find microbes there that can resist extreme cold and heat, but there is no need for them to be resistent against antibiotic or immune systems for there are none.

  8. I have often wondered why it is... by The+Spanish+Ninja · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In Orson Wells' War Of the Worlds, why do the Martian invaders die of our everyday diseases, but humans don't die of theirs?

    --
    "I like you, but I wouldn't want to see you working with subatomic particles."
    1. Re:I have often wondered why it is... by Fractal+Dice · · Score: 5, Interesting

      According to the 1898 H.G. Wells original story (of which the infamous radio play was just a dramatization, not the original source material), the Martians were eating earth foodstuffs and water and it was basically food poisoning that did them in.

      To wit:

      But there are no bacteria in Mars, and directly these invaders arrived, directly they drank and fed, our microscopic allies began to work their overthrow.

      And from the epilog:

      At any rate, in all the bodies of the Martians that were examined after the war, no bacteria except those already known as terrestrial species were found.

      ( I would like to thank The Literature Network and google for their assistance in the preparation of this post. No martians were harmed in the research. )

      ( oh, and I wouldn't lose much sleep over Martian bugs - there are plenty of diseases in strange corners of our own world against which we have no defenses - I's rate this whole article "-1 : FUD" )

    2. Re:I have often wondered why it is... by Remillard · · Score: 3, Funny

      We were wearing condoms

  9. No worries by rixkix · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Life here has spent millions of years adapting and evolving defenses against such threats. Considering the massive amount of interactions taking place here, our microbes are likely far more dangerous to any life that may be there.

    1. Re:No worries by jav1231 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, if life has evolved here can we not assume it's been evolving there? Then again, maybe it's finished evolving. Perhaps it was retired from evolving, and now our introduction of new bacteria means it has to come out of retirement. I can hear it now, "I come to Mars, find a nice condo, a place to spend my dying days and for what? Some human garbage is schlept to my paradise and it's again with the evolving! Evolving, schmevolving! I just wanna sleep already!" ...it could happen....

    2. Re:No worries by rixkix · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True enough, but we almost definitely have, by several orders of magnitude, a much larger variety of organisms interacting with each other. The battle between microbe and host has been fought for a long time here and anything from Mars would be fighting us on OUR turf. We've built up excellent general defenses against microorganisms over the years.

    3. Re:No worries by drooling-dog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Another reason not to worry about it is that random microbes aren't infectious to humans "by default"; that ability is an adaptation just like our defenses against it are. With no humans running around on Mars, there has been no opportunity (or possibility) for pathogenic capabilities to evolve.

    4. Re:No worries by drooling-dog · · Score: 2, Insightful
      But something that by chance can reproduce in humans unchecked cannot be ruled out with enough certainty to expose us to Mars dust.

      Yes, it can. There is simply no possibility that human virulence could have evolved there. Virulence is a complex process, and it's simply not going to happen "by chance" in the absence of a host. I'd worry far more about new bugs from antarctic ice cores (and I'm not worried about those either).

      It would be wiser to send automated electron microscopes to Mars if we want to search for life there, not bring Mars stuff to Earth.

      Deal: For one-tenth the cost of that, I will personally volunteer to rub Mars dust all over my body and stay in quarantine for a month (or two, if that makes you feel better)...

  10. Alternative version, for those of lower IQs... by Fred+Or+Alive · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can't understand words of more than one syllable? Try the version from Rupert Murdoch's other UK tabloid, The Sun.

    --
    10 PRINT "LOOK AROUND YOU ";
    20 GOTO 10
  11. Martian meteors by Spudley · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When people start stirring up this idea, they need to be reminded of the fact that Earth and Mars have been trading meteorites for millions of years. There are plenty of Martian meteors already on this planet, and doubtless plenty of Terrestrial ones on Mars. Any 'infection' that was going to happen would already have taken place quite naturally.

    --
    (Spudley Strikes Again!)
    1. Re:Martian meteors by Council · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If infection was going to take place, it already would have?

      Then how come we're not finding our bacteria on mars?

      Either (a) no bacteria here can possibly live or evolve to live on Mars and probably vice versa, or (b) your premise is false and the whole 'meteorite' process, with its extreme heat and cold and no oxygen, does a pretty good job of killing interesting bacteria (that is, any infection that was going to happen has NOT necessarially happened).

      if (a) we're safe -- and people seem to think it unlikely -- but if (b) then maybe our collection processes are worth being careful about.

      All that said, I doubt martian bacteria will be a danger to us. germs tend to evolve to work with their hosts but not do too much damage; things like ebola are the exception, not the norm. I don't expect martian bacteria to have much of an interest in destroying human cells. But that's just a guess. I could be wrong.

      --
      xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    2. Re:Martian meteors by Gudlyf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Going out on a limb here, but what about organisms that travel one way, then come back again (i.e., bacteria from Earth goes to Mars, mutates from the differing radiation levels/climate/etc., then that bacteria is brought back to Earth on a returning ship)?

      --
      Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
  12. Andromeda Strain by passion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Didn't they make a movie about this type of thing back in '71?

    --
    - passion
    1. Re:Andromeda Strain by 3waygeek · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, but the guy who wrote the book the movie was based on has written a new book, to be released this week, suggesting that such fears are overblown.

      In advance of the book's publication, Crichton has written the cover story in today's Parade (Sunday magazine supplement in many US newspapers) giving several examples of such exaggerated predictions.

  13. Incurable? by hyfe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's plenty of incurable diseases on earth today, and bacteria transfer over from the strangest places. Even with the rich life Earth has, we still haven't seen any all-conquering all-devouring super-micro-organism-to-destroy-anything here yet. Why would they exist on Mars?

    --
    "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
  14. Typical media scare by johnjaydk · · Score: 3, Informative
    This is so typical. Due to the same media circus Armstrong & Co had to sit in qurantine when they returned from the moon. No politicians or administrators had the balls to tell the media to go piss up a rope. So they went along with the farce.

    Until we actually find a single trace of life there this is all due to an overintake of Hollywood crap.

    --
    TCAP-Abort
    1. Re:Typical media scare by farble1670 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Until we actually find a single trace of life there this is all due to an overintake of Hollywood crap.

      it strikes me that this is one of those things that it is better to be safe than sorry about. the very fact that we have zero experience with non-terran life forms seems a pretty good reason to take precautions against them.

  15. Probably not bacterial... by pdabbadabba · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unless these pathogens have evolved from something found on Earth (or vice versa...creepy), it's probably pretty unlikely that they will be bacteria (or viri, for that matter) per se. I think it would be fair to assume that any martian pathogen would be a totally new beast.

    That said, however, given that there are no macro-scale living things on Mars to infect, its pretty unlikely that it would have any mechanisms in place to handle our immune defenses. While this cuts both ways (our immune defenses would also be woefully ill-prepared), our immune system is good enough to have generalized responses queued up to handle just about anything (think about inflamation, etc). This is not to mention that the pathogen is unlikely to have any idea (if you'll excuse the anthropomorphism) how to infect the human body in the first place (how to cross from the lungs to the blood stream, how to infiltrate mucous membranes, etc).

    I think we'll probably have to look for the apocalypse somewhere other than in the form of a martian plague.

    1. Re:Probably not bacterial... by Jakosa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      True! The reason we are prone to be infected and killed by enumerable organism on earth is that we share the evolution with them. We are competitors in the same system. Unless there is some higher lifeforms on mars we are not in emidiate danger (I think).

      On the other hand will a contamination with earthly germ on mars be a major drawback for science.

    2. Re:Probably not bacterial... by pdabbadabba · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I overlooked the possibility that the bug might simply consume a mineral for fuel. A martian germ that consumes various organic molecules found in human tissue could be a big problem. I'm not so sure that our immune system would be competent to handle a bug that simply broke down our molecules to feast on the carbon rings within and that reproduced on its own (without help from the host). Out skin may also not be any defense if it was edible itself.

      Given, however, that we would not play the normal role of "host" in this relationship, but simply the role of food, would it really be proper to think of them as pathogens? They would seem more like either a nasty microscopic predator, or simply a caustic chemical (depending on how they work).

  16. Odds by gmuslera · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is long far more probable than we got infected by a mushroom/squid/worm/elephant specific disease, that have at least a similar biochemistry and even very similar ADN, than getting infected by an alien disease, be from Mars, Titan or Beta Eridani.

  17. Life May Have Originated on Mars by amigoro · · Score: 2, Insightful
    On August 7, 1996, NASA announced a startling discovery - by examining a meteorite that originated on Mars, they found what they believe is evidence for a primitive form of life that may have existed on Mars 3.6 billion years ago. More work needs to be done to confirm this preliminary result, and many scientists remain unconvinced by the present evidence. But if this preliminary result is confirmed, if the structures inside the meteorite turn out to be fossil evidence for cellular organisms, then some important steps can be taken.

    First, we would need to launch a mission to Mars, manned or unmanned, to secure and return to earth core samples that might provide evidence for or against DNA as the organizing scheme for the Mars life form. Having accomplished the return of a biological sample and determined the presence or absence of DNA, we are then faced with a quandary.

    Read the full Article

    If this is true, we shouldn't worry too much.

    Moderate this comment
    Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
    Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

    --


    Nothing to see here
    1. Re:Life May Have Originated on Mars by dannytaggart · · Score: 4, Informative

      NASA has since stated that there is no evidence of life on the above mentioned meteor:

      NASA said that after two years of study "a number of lines of evidence have gone away". Several different chemicals and molecular structures were exciting because they looked similar to byproducts of life on Earth. However, these chemicals and structures can also be created without life. Some are even present in deep space on comets, and scientists do not think that they came from Martian life anymore.

      --
      PimpMyMazda.com - Crazy mods to a 2002 Mazda Protege DX.
  18. there's pretty much by ivano · · Score: 4, Informative
    a whole division at NASA devoted to stopping cross-planentary contamination. Remember that little episode of downing the Galileo probe into Juptiter *just* in case it might end on Europa.

    One of the main problems now is the lack of funds for such programs, esp for probes we send out of Earth. On the other hand, any probe returning from Mars will be heavily guaranteed - not just for safety reasons but for scientific ones as well.

    BTW, the chances of Martian life surviving on Earth is going to be close to nil since the reducing atmosphere will oxidize anything that hasn't already had a few billion years evolutionary head start to protect themselves from it. [Yes, I know it won't be zero.] And Mars doesn't look like it had enough oxygen in it's atmosphere to effect evolution anytime in it's history.

    Ciao

  19. alien microbes, terran microbes by handy_vandal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What's funny is that we may have even infected Mars with our own bacteria when we sent several probes there.

    Not so funny.

    Alien microbes are less dangerous (to us) than our own terran microbes.

    Truly alien microbes may or may not thrive in our bodies.

    Earth microbes, on the other hand, already know how to live in our bodies. A mutant earh microbe can readily mutute into virulent new forms.

    This was the gist of The Andromeda Strain.

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
  20. Viking Landers were "boiled", Pathfinder was not by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The first Mars landers were autoclaved to prevent contamination from mars. This made for some rather remarkable compromises in the lander design in order for it to survive baking.

    For example, because there were no heat resistant, space worthy (radiation resistant) memories back then an advance form of magnetic core memory memory was used. So this thing had VERY little memory. All data had to be stored on board for later transmission. The storage was done on magnetic tape. But of course the "modern" plastic magnetic tape could not be autoclaved. So they went back to the original magnetic tape: a steel band.

    The atmosphere on mars has orders of magnitude lower pressure than ours. SO one cannot use a conventional pressure gauge. And an ultra sensitive baritron (capicitively measured diaphram gauge) would never have survived baking. (modern ones are become more robust). So insted they implemented a new kind of pressure guage never used before. It consisted of three temrerature sensors on stalks at right angle and some heat sources on stalks. By measuring the time history of the temperature reading they were able to use a mathematical heat transport model to back out the wind direction, velocity and pressure.

    This device turned out to be amazingly robust and kept its calibration over years of service. No lander since then can claim the accuracy of this original weather station.

    Later probes were not as thourgouly baked in part because they were so much more complicated their components could not withstand it.

    As for bacteria living on mars. There are already earthly bacteria that could survive. For example take Radio-durans whose preferred environment is the high radiation environemnt underneath the hanford waste tanks. It can withsand having its DNA sliced in to tiny bits and still recover. It evolved on earth to live in extreme oxidizing conditions, turned out radiation damage, complete desication, and other stresses were a freebie. Things like antrhax spores can live decades, maybe much more, in a non-vegitative form.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  21. If only 'twere true... by physicsphairy · · Score: 4, Insightful
    What's funny is that we may have even infected Mars with our own bacteria when we sent several probes there.

    It would be great news if there was life capable of surviving both Martian and earth climates, because that would mean we could terriform Mars.

    As far as bacteria from Mars that might infect earth, let me put it this way: what about bacteria from the deep sea being brought up by submarines? What about bacteria from deep in the earth's crust being being unearthed by drilling operations? What about all of these micro organism that inhabit exotic environments on our own planet that we risk releasing into our habitat all the time? What happens to them?

    Tersely put: they die.

    It's evolution, my friends. Organisms have specialized to compete in their own biological niches and developed the best tools available to do so, at the cost of performing well in alternative environments. Any organism introduced from such a foreign environment as I've mentioned, even if it could survive our human environment, it would be horrifically outcompeted by the existing organisms in our ecosystem and die handily.

    Notions of a superplague from another planet wiping out life on earth are strictly fantasy stories which ignore real evolutionary fact.

    1. Re:If only 'twere true... by phranking · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except there have been occasions in the past where organisms, upon introductions to new niches, out compete native organisms spectacularly.

      Invasive, non-native crops or fish represent the relatively benign example. Native American deaths due to European disease would be at the other end.

      Martian plague might be unlikely, but the chances certainly aren't non-zero.

    2. Re:If only 'twere true... by efatapo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's evolution, my friends. Organisms have specialized to compete in their own biological niches and developed the best tools available to do so, at the cost of performing well in alternative environments. Any organism introduced from such a foreign environment as I've mentioned, even if it could survive our human environment, it would be horrifically outcompeted by the existing organisms in our ecosystem and die handily.

      Tersely put, you're not as bright as you think you are. Many foreignly introduced species do quite well in new environment for the mere fact that they have no natural predators. Here in Michigan someone decided it would be a good idea to introduce japanese beetles to kill an insect that was destroying crops. Well...ok, it worked a little too well. Now our fall season is marked by a ridiculous number of ladies bugs getting in any crack or crevice you can imagine. They're everywhere. Now this is just an annoyance, but there have been similar non-native species introduced that destroy other species.

      Also, as previously mentioned, species like Deinococcus radiodurans thrives in harsh conditions but also squeaks along under normal life conditions. There are many species whose spores can survive in non-optimal conditions and only start to grow when they are presented with those conditions that are conducive for life.

      This is more of a threat than many people are playing it off as. Additionally, our sending ships there is a threat to any possible native species in Mars. Oh, and this also had nothing to do with evolution. I don't know why you threw that in there except as a buzz word.

      ~A biochemist

    3. Re:If only 'twere true... by xigxag · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The examples that you mention of species which thrive in a new environment are species which have already evolved (there's that word again) to survive and compete in very similar environments. Japanese beetles natively exist in temperate climates which are not terribly different from Michigan's except for the unfortunate lack of predators. Notice that Japanese beetles haven't proven a threat to the Antarctic or the Sahara. And it's fair to conclude they would not do too well on Mars, despite having zero natural predators there. And D. radiodurans, for all its varied resistances and defenses, for all of its millions of years headstart with respect to a hypothetical Martian superbug, still doesn't thrive in the environment that matters most to us -- within our own bodies.

      On Earth, bacteria and molds eat just about anything that contains an energy source and has not evolved a way to fight off an attack. What leads you to think that a Martian bug's got some extra mojo that isn't already here in one of our Earth-optimized species?

      There's also the fact which many others have already pointed out. If Mars is populated by microbes, they've probably been here already, via meteorites. So to sum up, I think the threat, if any, is minimal.

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
    4. Re:If only 'twere true... by farble1670 · · Score: 2, Informative

      so you've taken biology 101, you've read some sci-fi novels. it's very humorous that so many folks have taken an authoritative position on this. NASA has the best minds on the subject, probably in the world, and they take cross planetary contamination seriously.

      the article that this thread is referencing does not say that infection is likely ... it says that 1) it is possible and 2) if it happend, it would be really bad. the fact that it is unlikely is not the point. there are lots of examples of things that we take precautions against not because they are statistically likely, but rather because of the dire consequences.

  22. Re:If slashot were FOX News by Zorilla · · Score: 4, Funny

    "This is a FOX News Alert! What you don't know about Martian probes could KILL you! Stay tuned for more information after the break - I mean after the break after the break - aww, fuckit, we're reporting a 10 second segment at :55 after."

    --

    It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  23. How funny? by smithypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What's funny is that we may have even infected Mars with our own bacteria when we sent several probes there.

    How funny? +5 Funny? +5 Stupid more like...

  24. Ken? by soloport · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hi, Ken. I see you've found something to do with your time, now that you're off Jeopardy. Welcome!

  25. /. should have a new subject: pseudo-science by guybarr · · Score: 2, Insightful


    an icon with Uri-Geller's face will do fine.

    --
    Working for necessity's mother.
  26. Extremely Unlikely by curtvdh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Organic life and bacteria/virii have been involved in a never-ending arms race for millions, if not billions of years. They come up with a new vector for infection, larger organics evolve a way to counter that infection and so on, ad infinitum...

    The chances of an alien retrovirus having the necessary enymes to inject a DNA strand into a human cell are pretty close to zero. The chances of any bacteria being able to survive a highly evolved immune system are also pretty close to zero. I would call this a non-issue.

  27. Why would this be dangerous? by ColGraff · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why in the world would Martian microorganisms evolve with the ability to infect Terrestrial organisms? What's the "selection pressure" for that? What advantage is conferred by the ability to infect organisms that 99.9 *ad infinitum* Martian organisms will never, ever encounter? How would such a selection pressure manifest itself?

    Without serious, plausible answers to these questions, this concern really strikes me as more appropriate to a b-movie than serious space exploration. Now, I *like* b-movies. But still.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  28. Re:Not funny, sad. by DrSkwid · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is a very sad possibility, but will happen eventually.

    For sure, we wouldn't want to hurt any of the native flora and fauna teeming across the fertile plains of Mars now would we.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  29. The first disease from mars: Space hypochondria by Lispy · · Score: 2, Funny

    really, let's worry about that if we send the first landers that actually bring stuff from mars. Right now there is nothing remotely dangerous...

  30. Amazing discovery from Apollo 12 by earthforce_1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One of the most amazing discoveries from apollo 12 was that when they removed the camera from the surveyor robotic misson that landed a two years earlier, and returned it to earth for analysis , they found human throat bacteria on it, even though it was returned in a sealed, sterile container.

    http://www.lpi.usra.edu/expmoon/Apollo12/A12_Exp er iments_III.html

    One of the astronauts on the mission later remarked that he considered it the most incredible discovery of the entire Apollo program.

    --
    My rights don't need management.
    1. Re:Amazing discovery from Apollo 12 by NardofDoom · · Score: 3, Funny

      I can see it now... "Neil, don't lick the camera. Come on Neil, it's not funny. Don't. Just don't. NEIL! I TOLD YOU NOT TO LICK THE CAMERA!"

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
  31. OK - just to be differents.. by Linker3000 · · Score: 3, Funny

    What would be 'funny' (WHO picked that word for the summary - geez!?) would be if a microbe from Mars made it back here and turned out to be harmless to all forms of life, BUT killed the AIDS virus.

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
  32. Re:Chinese Poetry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ladies and gentlemen, the above post is brought to you by the same kind of folks that vote for Bush (i.e., your capacity for rational thought has to be this impaired).

    Let's follow the argument presented by the poster:

    • Premise: China plans a mission to Mars.
    • Premise: China does not have a "first-world" economy.
    • Conclusion: Therefor, China is going to Mars in search of deadly pathogens to use in biological weapons.

    If it doesn't scare you that people like this are allowed to vote, you aren't paying attention.

    Conservatives spent the latter half of the twentieth century telling us to watch out for the communist boogey-man. He was hiding in the bushes waiting to kidnap your daughters and ban Christmas. When it came down to it though, just about every terrorist act perpetrated on American soil was carried out by right-wing nuts or religious extremists. Does anyone else find that deliciously ironic, or is it just me?

  33. Re:If slashdot were CNN News by Bryan+Gividen · · Score: 2, Funny

    Expert: The chances of us getting contaminated with infectious Martian material are slim. But we do know one thing for sure.
    CNN Analyst: What's that?
    Expert: If we do become infected, it IS George Bush's fault

  34. Re:Reality Check by QuantumInterference · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Go back to watching your Hollywood movies and leave us in peace. If you think it is wiser to spend billions on Hollywood junk (yes, most of it IS junk) than on real science then have the UN start paying Hollywood's fees after we withdraw. And move Hollywood and the UN to Paris. If you are an American, I hear there is a group helping folks like you pay for a bus ticket to Montreal. Then, you can go up there and live off of American third world welfare, American defenses, pay all of your taxes into a system that allows you to wait in line for months for second rate emergency medical care, AND, claim to have invented all kinds of cool things without spending any Canadian dough on real research.

  35. Article is a troll by britneys+9th+husband · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Back in July, I posted a troll comment that used exactly the same reasoning as this article. It was an article about bacteria in Antarctica that had been isolated for thousands of years. My comment was:

    We humans aren't going to have any immunity to these microbes that have been isolated for 500000 years. I hope whoever's studying these lakes takes appropriate precautions against both accidental release and theft by terrorist organizations.

    It got 17 direct and 78 indirect replies, and made the July issue of Trollback magazine. Sometimes I wonder if the reason Slashdot has so many trolls is because the editors are trolls themselves.

    --
    Hear recorded Slashdot headlines on your phone! New service beta testing. Just call (248) 434-5508
  36. while i agree with your point (of course) by my+sig+is+bigger+tha · · Score: 2, Insightful

    your sig begs the response - Atheists don't fly planes into buildings in the name of God. They do it in the name of Nietsche...

  37. Forget Terrorism, Americans! by indy · · Score: 3, Funny

    These Bacteria of Mass Destruction have been ignored far too long. Time to liberate Mars!

  38. Re:Viking Landers were "boiled", Pathfinder was no by quarkscat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sure.
    And NASA, at the time, thought that it was
    doing the "right" thing about contamination.
    The only problem is, is that autoclaving and
    UV irradiation DOES NOT KILL all microbal life.
    It only makes the "survivors" the very toughest
    of the bunch. Microbiologists have discovered
    microbes living more than a mile underground
    that eat rock! And oceanographers have found
    microbes thriving in the hot vents of the ocean
    floor, where their thermometers have literally
    melted. Re-examination of both the sterilization
    process and the materials used, NASA has reached
    the conclusion that 100% sterility (no microbal
    life) on stars-bound craft was not possible.
    That said, there is no reason to believe that
    some "cross-pollination" between Earth and Mars
    has not been going on since the beginning of
    time. Any attempt that NASA or ESA (or PRC)
    makes to return "samples" to Earth will only
    accelerate that process.
    The "war of the worlds" is going on right now,
    but on Mars, and at the microbal level, ever
    since we landed craft there. Like the line from
    the "Alien" movie series stated ... "they were
    with us the entire way".
    The push to put men on Mars will far outweigh
    the ability to detect and preserve whatever
    life already existed on Mars, anyway. And for
    true "terraforming" to commence there, someone
    is going to have to make the decision to massively
    and deliberately contaminate Mars with microbes.

  39. Re:Viking Landers were "boiled", Pathfinder was no by deglr6328 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's worth noting that it is suspected the Soviets did not bother AT ALL to sterilize thier Mars probes. Also, Zond 2 which was intended to only flyby Mars actually crashed, it was certainly not sterilized.

    --
    - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
  40. At least it's not... by relaxrelax · · Score: 2, Funny


    At least it's not a cure for which we have no known disease!

    --
    Microsoft is pure dog-ma. FreeBSD is pure cat-ma.
  41. Re:Viking Landers were "boiled", Pathfinder was no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
  42. Re:Kidnapping of Westerners by Brian_Confucius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While I can't stand this AC, it should be noted that this is the first time he has made a valid point. Whether it was accidently or on purpose, I don't know.