Slashdot Mirror


Nvidia Partners with Sony on PS3 GPU

Anonymous Coward writes "Just a rumour last year, but it looks like Sony and Nvidia will be partnering for the PS3. Sony will be doing the manufacturing in one of their Nagasaki plants." From the article: "The move signals a shifting of allegiances for NVIDIA, who developed the graphics hardware at the heart of the original Microsoft Xbox, only for the Redmond-based platform holder to turn around and partner with fierce rivals ATI for 'future Xbox products' last August."

51 comments

  1. It's on now, baby! by GTRacer · · Score: 1
    Nothing like being spurned to stir the creative corporate juices! Go nVidia!

    Does this mean the PS3 is going to have supplier logos on it like the GameCube?

    GTRacer
    - Which will ship first? PS3 or GT4?

    --
    Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    1. Re:It's on now, baby! by oprahjesserafael · · Score: 1

      Am I missing something? Last time I checked the Gamecube chip was made by ArtX. ArtX consists of a bunch of ex SGI employees and is owned by ATi.. I don't get it.

    2. Re:It's on now, baby! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ArtX no longer exists. ATI bought them and their technology before the release of the GameCube. That's why ATI is happy to claim the GameCube's graphics processor as one of their own.

      IBM also touts the Gekko CPU on a system badge on the GameCube.

  2. go nVidia, go! by fireduck · · Score: 1

    in a nice coincidence, less than 2 minutes after seeing this headline, my stock broker called and told me that the nVidia stock I bought last year was finally out of it's $9 dollar hole and almost back to breaking even. all we need now is for Nintendo to announce they're going with nVidia for their next console and maybe I'll have made some money in this stock market thing.

    1. Re:go nVidia, go! by richarst1414 · · Score: 1

      hehe Im in the same boat except i sold half my stock at 70$ Im wishing I would have sold all of it.

    2. Re:go nVidia, go! by Doomstalk · · Score: 1

      Nintendo is rumored to have decided upon continuing their partnership with ATI. A partnership with nVidia is possible, but not likely.

  3. Nvidia's New Dance Partner by blueZhift · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, I'm actually glad that Nvidia has found a new dance partner after the falling out with Microsoft with respect to the next Xbox. With both Nvidia and ATI now firmly in the console wars as competitors, I think gamers are in for some serious treats. I just hope that gameplay won't be lost in all of that eye-candy!

  4. So... by buffer-overflowed · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's IBM all around, with Microsoft and Nintendo going with ATI. Sony's going with NVidia, and probably some hacked together backwards compat solution which will make developing for the thing a bitch.

    Interesting. Can't wait to see how this is gonna go...

    --
    The key to the enjoyment of pop music is to replace any instance of "love" with "C.H.U.D."
    1. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Can you explain why a "hacked together backwards compatibility thing" would affect developing for the thing?

      I'll tell you what effect the PS1 emulation had on PS2 development: none whatsoever. I don't see it being different here. Developing for PS2 is/was a bitch for many reasons, but backwards compatibility is not among them.

    2. Re:So... by Zangief · · Score: 1

      Do note that Microsoft and Nintendo are also going for the "hacked together backwards compat solution" for their consoles, with Microsoft facing the most tough scenario (going from a pentium/nvidia architecture to a powerPC/ati one), and Nintendo the easiest (keeping the same architecture, theorically, powerPC/ati).

      I also fail to see why this would make those consoles a bitch to program. Most probably, it will all be done via software, and not get in the way of developers.

      (IMHO, Nintendo should release an ultra-gameboy-player, with slots for the NES, SNES, N64, gameboy (advance), and, hopefully, DS, and also gamecube compatibility)

    3. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      (IMHO, Nintendo should release an ultra-gameboy-player, with slots for the NES, SNES, N64, gameboy (advance), and, hopefully, DS, and also gamecube compatibility)

      And I'm sure they'll win numerous design awards for their accomplishment. Seriously, that would turn out being one buttugly console, what with the variously sized slots all over the place. Imagine a 6-in-1 memory card reader, except at least 9 inches square. Not to say I wouldn't mind seeing it done...

    4. Re:So... by jkeyes · · Score: 1

      ith Microsoft facing the most tough scenario (going from a pentium/nvidia architecture to a powerPC/ati one)

      Why does everyone think this is going to be so hard? Why bother emulating it when you could simply license from Intel a mobileP3 that's the same speed as the xbox processor and then when you make the Xbox 2 OS/kernel a compatibility mode. Since ideally the GPU of the xbox was made to MS specs they can give the info to ATI and have them build in compatibility into the new Xbox 2 GPU. Tada Xbox 2 is backwards compatible with a few minor code tweaks and hardware adjustments. It won't make the system that much larger at all.

    5. Re:So... by lion2 · · Score: 1

      No one quote me on this but aren't all xbox games using Direct3D? I think I read some where a while back(Not sure if it was true or not) that Xbox games dont access the hardware directly and use Direct3D exclusively. So all you would need on the the new Xbox is Direct3D compatibility. Of course there will be some issues to iron out at first, but since the xbox is only using one gpu, it should not be to difficult to get it working. Microsoft can always use the current xbox cpu, or any other intel cpu(maybe even AMD chips) on the next xbox. All they need is a processor that would perform at least as good as the current Xbox cpu.

    6. Re:So... by dackroyd · · Score: 2, Informative

      no unfortunately. For speed reasons developers have bypassed the DirectX api to write native nvidia opcodes.

      D'oh!

      --
      "Free software as in beer, copy protection as in racket" - Telsa Gwynne
    7. Re:So... by dackroyd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why bother emulating it when you could simply license from Intel a mobileP3

      Because that would add cost to each Xbox2 sold.

      Since ideally the GPU of the xbox was made to MS specs they can give the info to ATI

      The graphics chip was designed by nvidia who licenses Microsoft to manufacture the chips, but not any derivatives. To make another chip that was backwars compatible Microsoft would need to pay nvdia more license fees to cover the patents which again would add to the cost of the xbox 2.

      Tada Xbox 2 is backwards compatible with a few minor code tweaks and hardware adjustments.
      Except that the Xbox2 probably won't have a hard drive.

      Why does everyone think this is going to be so hard?

      You are wrong because:

      Anything You Don't Understand is Easy to Do.
      Example: If you have the right tools, how hard could it be to generate nuclear fission at home?

      --
      "Free software as in beer, copy protection as in racket" - Telsa Gwynne
    8. Re:So... by Zangief · · Score: 1

      Well, for one it will increase the costs.

      Also, this doesn't solve the gpu problem, which may be not so large, but there are legal problems, and, now that Nvidia has partnered with Sony, they may not want to cooperate.

    9. Re:So... by Zangief · · Score: 1

      It won't be so easy. Yeah, a lot of games ported over from pc would play, but, those games made exclusively for the xbox, and the most popular (Halo and Halo 2, PGR, Ninja Gaiden), probably are programming right to the iron.

      Also, think of the problems that games have had on the pc on different configurations. Most games would need patches, which would be possible if the Xbox2 has a hard disk, but not easy.

    10. Re:So... by PerspexAvenger · · Score: 1

      No issues with anything previous to your final line, the answer to which is "It shouldn't be that hard to do. Doing it more than once, however, is somewhat more problematic." ;)

    11. Re:So... by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Anything You Don't Understand is Easy to Do.
      Example: If you have the right tools, how hard could it be to generate nuclear fission at home?


      Sure you could, all you need is a nuclear pile. Nuclear fission right there. How hard is it to find a few hundred pounds of high grade uranium/plutonium?

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  5. 2005 The Year Of NVIDIA by DeadBugs · · Score: 1

    Playstation 3, Nforce4, Nforce5, SLI, Geforce 6xxx I want stock.

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
  6. So which of the two is the fool? by LordZardoz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Microsoft turned their back on nVidia because nVidia would not deal on Microsofts terms.

    What makes nVidia so certain that Sony being easier to deal with then Microsoft?

    And what makes Sony feel good about keeping the PS3 manufacuring costs down when Microsoft could not get a deal with Nvidia which would let the X-Box be cheaper to manufacture?

    END COMMUNICATION

    1. Re:So which of the two is the fool? by Carlos+Rodriguez · · Score: 1

      INvidia and Sony are co-developing the chip, which means that Nvidia will be able to use it in future cards, while Microsoft used Nvidia's own chips. Sony is also manufacturing the chip at his own facilities instead of buying them from a supplier like Microsoft did.

      Unlike Microsoft, who bought different parts from different suppliers, Sony has always stressed that all the components for the PS and PS2 had to come out from Sony facilities to keep costs down during the lifetime of the console. I'm sure NVidia knew this when they signed the contract with Sony.

    2. Re:So which of the two is the fool? by dackroyd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What makes nVidia so certain that Sony being easier to deal with then Microsoft?

      Microsoft basically demanded that they be able to renegotiate the deal once they realised how much money they were losing per xbox and asked nvidia to just give up their money.

      They also demanded that Nvidia hand over all their patents so that Microsoft could give them away to whoevers going to make the Xbox2 chips, so that they could be backwardly compatible.

      However bad sony is they can't be as bad as microsoft to deal with.

      Oh and Nvidia will presumably benefit from Sonys chip making expertise and will be able to use their fabs to produce high end graphics chips for PCs at cheap prices - rather than having to pay TSMC through the nose...

      --
      "Free software as in beer, copy protection as in racket" - Telsa Gwynne
    3. Re:So which of the two is the fool? by abradsn · · Score: 1

      Could you point us to some documentation abou that? I would like to read about it some more.

    4. Re:So which of the two is the fool? by dackroyd · · Score: 1

      No unfortunately - most of it came from talking to people in the know and reading between the lines of the legal struggles between nvidia and microsoft. There's no document signed by Microsoft saying how they planned to shaft nvidia.

      The dispute over price was won by nvidia, presumably because it was very clear in the contract what the formula was for the profit per chip.

      --
      "Free software as in beer, copy protection as in racket" - Telsa Gwynne
  7. Microsoft and nVidia / ATi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ATi is really a much better fit for MS than nVidia. Working on the Xbox's graphics only set nVidia back, and from what I've heard, they had to fight with Microsoft nearly every step of the way. As nVidia favors OpenGL, it was quite a struggle for them to make the Xbox API more OpenGL-like, despite Microsoft's pressure. ATi, on the other hand, basically makes DirectX accelerators (witness their terrible OpenGL performance. Also, ATi and Microsoft's corporate cultures are much more similar. I doubt there will be nearly as much tension as nVidia had with MS.

  8. Awesome! by mindaktiviti · · Score: 1

    This is so awesome! If I had nVidia stock I'd be ric...wait a minute.

    1. Re:Awesome! by bhima · · Score: 2, Informative

      Rich? It's worth about 1/3 of what it was in the summer of 2001. I have it and I'm not rich!

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
  9. Summary for the uninformed by GarfBond · · Score: 1

    XBOX2 (or XBOX Next): IBM CPU, ATi GPU
    Future Nintendos: IBM CPU(?), ATi GPU
    PS3: IBM/Sony CPU, Sony/nvidia GPU

    Also keep in mind that this time, Microsoft is trying to get the first-mover advantage, something that the PS2 had and enjoyed quite a bit of success from.

    1. Re:Summary for the uninformed by oGMo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Also keep in mind that this time, Microsoft is trying to get the first-mover advantage, something that the PS2 had and enjoyed quite a bit of success from.

      Actually, that's not true at all. Remember the Dreamcast? Oh yeah, the Dreamcast. It was first to market by far... and lost.

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    2. Re:Summary for the uninformed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, if you cast your mind back, the Dreamcast was the first mover.

      Remember the Dreamcast?

    3. Re:Summary for the uninformed by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      And it's really too bad, because there still aren't many PS2 titles that look as good as Soul Calibur or Dead or Alive 2 did on the DC.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  10. Suprising, but true by Westacular · · Score: 1

    This seems a bit unlikely given the approach Sony took with the PS1 and PS2, but there's a press release to back this up on nVidia's site.

  11. Re:2005 The Year Of NVIDIA by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

    Fuck stock, I want a job there.

  12. Re:PS3 with NVidia? by SScorpio · · Score: 2, Informative
    *Tosses the Troll some rancid meat*

    It sounds like you have one of four issues.

    1. You have defective card. It happens, if it's under warrenty try returning it for one that works properly. I had this issue when I bought my current GeForce 4200TI and it wouldn't run in at 2x AGP correctly. RMA'd it with NewEgg and got a new one that works wonderfully, even at 8x which my new Athlon64 MB runs it at.

    2. Your Motherboard is crap and can't supply the card with the needed power. I had an old Gigabit Dual P3 board that caused with issue with an old SDR Geforce 1. That board finally died and I replaced it with a ABIT BX6R2 and everything ran great.

    3. Your powersupply isn't powerful enough to deliver the needed power to everything in your computer. Are you running a manufactored Gateway or Dell? Does it have a 180W powersupply, and you added an extra HD, DVD Burner, and more powerful video card? This can and will cause problems.

    4. You may have a corrupt driver or Windows installation. Try loading a new driver, and if that doesn't work see if reloading windows does.

    Still have problems? I guess your just screwed then, either give up on computer gaming and switch brain dead setup consoles. Or maybe get an ATI and spank yourself to sleep with the box.

  13. ps2 includes a ps1 == perfect compatibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    given the advaces in integration and the ownership of sony on their ps2 and ps1 design (no aditional cost), I suposse they will have backwards compatibility done in the same way.

    quite different from what happens in xbox...

  14. Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As much as I dislike Sony's hardware, its nice to see that they're finally going to utilize a proper GPU for once.

    Also interesting is that it sounds like sony will be manufacturing the chip provided by nVidia. This differs from the MS/nVidia deal in which nVidia was selling physical chips to MS. Looks like Sony will be liscensing IP, as Microsoft is doing with Xbox2. This gives them a better chance to help keep manufacturing costs down.

    The sour grapes between MS and nVidia actually stems from the fact that nVidia didn't want to give MS a price-break on their chips. Which, from what I heard, was because Xbox wasn't moving in the volumes the original deal was based on, and they eventually went to arbitration over the matter.

  15. No they don't... by NEOtaku17 · · Score: 1

    This completely debunks the myth that is this Slashdot article.

  16. NEOtaku17, look at the dates! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    [NEOtaku17] This completely debunks the myth that is this Slashdot article.


    Look at the date of the article in the link you provided, NEOtaku17. It was September 1, 2003.

    Now look at this press release from nvidia
    ( http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_17342.html):

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

    TOKYO and SANTA CLARA, CA--DECEMBER 7, 2004--Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. (SCEI) and NVIDIA Corporation (Nasdaq: NVDA) today announced that the companies have been collaborating on bringing advanced graphics technology and computer entertainment technology to SCEI's highly anticipated next-generation computer entertainment system. Both companies are jointly developing a custom graphics processing unit (GPU) incorporating NVIDIA's next-generation GeForce(TM) and SCEI's system solutions for next-generation computer entertainment systems featuring the Cell* processor.

    This collaboration is made under a broad, multi-year, royalty-bearing agreement. The powerful custom GPU will be the graphics and image processing foundation for a broad range of applications from computer entertainment to broadband applications. The agreement will encompass future Sony digital consumer electronics products.

    "In the future, the experience of computer entertainment systems and broadband-ready PCs will be fused together to generate and transfer multi-streams of rich content simultaneously. In this sense, we have found the best way to integrate the state-of-the-art technologies from NVIDIA and SCEI," said Ken Kutaragi, executive deputy president and COO, Sony Corporation, and president and Group CEO, Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. "Our collaboration includes not only the chip development but also a variety of graphics development tools and middleware, essential for efficient content creation."

    "We are thrilled to partner with Sony Computer Entertainment to build what will certainly be one of the most important computer entertainment and digital media platforms of the twenty-first century," added Jen-Hsun Huang, president and CEO, NVIDIA. "Over the past two years NVIDIA has worked closely with Sony Computer Entertainment on their next-generation computer entertainment system. In parallel, we have been designing our next-generation GeForce GPU. The combination of the revolutionary Cell processor and NVIDIA's graphics technologies will enable the creation of breathtaking imagery that will surprise and captivate consumers."

    The custom GPU will be manufactured at Sony Group's Nagasaki Fab2 as well as OTSS (joint fabrication facility of Toshiba and Sony).


  17. Re:PS3 with NVidia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No real point to this, but...

    1. You have defective card.

    I suppose that's technically possible. But it doesn't act obviously defective, in that it runs just fine for the first hour or so, before randomly causing a BSOD. On reboot I get another hour or so. Doesn't sound like a defective board, besides the obvious crashes.

    2. Your Motherboard is crap and can't supply the card with the needed power.

    No, the motherboard is fine. It's an ASUS board for an AMD Athlon XP with an NForce chipset. I would hope the NForce chipset would work with an NVidia card... (And before you ask, no, there is no onboard video to conflict with.)

    3. Your powersupply isn't powerful enough to deliver the needed power to everything in your computer.

    It's a 400 watt power supply, which is insane overkill for this computer. Unless those NVidia supplies take for more power than I thought.

    4. You may have a corrupt driver or Windows installation.

    Latest drivers. I've kept the drivers up to date hoping that eventually the problem would be solved. No luck yet.

  18. Re:PS3 with NVidia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you contacted Sony about this yet? I think we can all agree that you're morally obliged to tell Sony about these problems so that they can have a good chance of success with the PS3.

  19. THE MAGIC IS LOST. by astroblaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm has happy as any cross-platform gamer should be that nVidia has a new (and thriving), console bedfellow, but I have to be honest: knowing that the PS3 will have the same type of technology that's in the guts of my OEM high-end gaming rig seems to water down the mystical hype machine. In an age where it's common to hack apart consoles and use them as you see fit, I always feel that knowing what's within is, in a way, violating the experience between the controller and the screen. What keeps me interested in technology is not the fact that I know every detail (including the limits) of what's inside, that's for the office. In the living room I want to give my noodle a break and let the game development magicians take hold of my imagination without comparing it to what's back in the office. I had new confidence in the fact that Sony was developing this all-mystical device with an equally seductive custom innards (Cell), and that there would be a period of a good 5 months after its release where I could revel in the magic of the device before knowing that your common high school tinkerer could download the latest bios hack for it and use it as a pr0n server. I think I'll cover my ears about PS3 until its release. :)

  20. Re:PS3 with NVidia? by dackroyd · · Score: 2, Informative

    Your memory card is fuxored - corrupt blue screen - >the memory chips are failing. Been overclocking it have we or bought it second hand from Ebay?

    If it's working until it get to a certain temperature you could try slapping some memory heat sinks on the chips or increasing ventilation in your pc, but usually corrupt memory means it's time to get another card...

    --
    "Free software as in beer, copy protection as in racket" - Telsa Gwynne
  21. examine gamecube by koi88 · · Score: 1


    > examine gamecube

    On the side, you find a sticker that says: "Powered by ATi"

    --

    I don't need a signature.
  22. Re:PS3 with NVidia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This happens how often on the X-Box? About never, I would say. You've got a shitty PC. Stop blaming nVidia.

  23. Re:PS3 with NVidia? by j.bellone · · Score: 1

    BSOD is not the card's problem, it's your problem. You obviously have a hardware conflict somewhere. For it to be the card, you would probably get artifacts on the screen not a BSOD. I've never had a piece of hardware generate a BSOD, it's always something related to drivers or something set wrong in the BIOS.

    --
    I'm f#$king magic!
  24. Re:PS3 with NVidia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brand new from a brandname NVidia reseller. Can't remember the name. (PNY?)

    And I've run a memory check, let it go through several iterations. The memory is fine.

    It's also not a heating issue - according to the on-board temp sensors, it always operates within the acceptable thermal range.

    What I expect it is would be the drivers, because each new iteration makes it progressively worse. The 60.66 drivers (I think) actually caused massive graphical glitches that could only be solved by rolling back the drivers. As neat as the backwards Z-buffer was, it got annoying, fast.