Slashdot Mirror


China Launches New Search Engine

stupidfoo writes "With all those nasty pro-democracy websites that Google keeps turning up, what's a communist country supposed to do? Well, create their own search engine of course! According to the AP, 'Bill Clinton on Monday helped launch a new Internet search company backed by the Chinese government which says its technology uses artificial intelligence to produce better results than Google Inc.' Accoona Corp. was one of the Chinese companies that donated an 'undisclosed amount' to the recently opened Clinton Library. Using the search engine from inside the US doesn't show any noticeable amount of censorship, but it also doesn't show how it's anywhere near the level of Google."

48 of 433 comments (clear)

  1. Latency by techsoldaten · · Score: 2, Informative

    Kathy Feaganes Allen is the lady from Florida who ran down a couple of teenagers for letting their golf ball hit her SUV. Compelling story, something that I really want to know about.

    No mention of it on Accoona at all, plenty on Google.

    'Nuff said.

    M

    1. Re:Latency by SIGALRM · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The deal gives Accoona data on some 5 million Chinese companies, which Accoona sees as a lucrative opportunity as U.S. businesses seek to do business in China
      Although I seriously doubt the folks at Google are shuddering over this new "rival", you can't overlook the potential benefit to American companies who are looking to do business in the world's largest consumer market.
      --
      Sigs cause cancer.
    2. Re:Latency by stupidfoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      American companies who are looking to do business in the world's largest consumer market.

      America is the world's largest consumer market. China merely has the most people.

    3. Re:Latency by techsoldaten · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No doubt.

      Then again, my company is not looking to do business with China. What real use does a tiny search engine have for me right now? (Not to mention the Chinese state probably censors the thing.)

      For the present, I will stick with the tried and least-untrustworthy solution.

      M

    4. Re:Latency by Steve+Embalmer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      America is the world's largest consumer market

      Only in terms of actual dollars spent per capita. China has *BY FAR* the fastest growing consumer growth in spending in the world. You can't ignore 1.3 billion people who have increased discretionary spending who wanna buy stuff.

    5. Re:Latency by Rei · · Score: 5, Informative

      Thanks for pointing out this basic fact: Accoona is developed by a *US COMPANY* that simply does a lot of business with China. The header remark:

      "Accoona Corp. was one of the Chinese companies that donated an 'undisclosed amount' to the recently opened Clinton Library." ... is completely wrong. Accoona was developed by China Communication Corp of Hoboken, New Jersey. Last I checked, New Jersey isn't in China. Do a whois on accoona.com, also - it's adminstrative contract, its technical contact, everything is in New Jersey.

      Blah. I'll bugger off now and let this thread turn to Clinton bashing, as the article submitter was undoubtedly intending.

      --
      The human body can be drained of blood in 8.6 seconds given adequate vacuuming systems.
    6. Re:Latency by nocomment · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's currently censored by not returning any results.

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    7. Re:Latency by MCraigW · · Score: 2, Funny
      But they also commit suicide at a rate of 4/minute.

      We could sell Dr. Kervorkian type services to them... what a money maker!

    8. Re:Latency by Rei · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Good point - the parent was comparing apples and oranges, since their search was about current news, which is an additional feature that accoona never claimed to support at the present time. Lets compare real searches on controversial topics.

      Search for: uranium enrichment

      Google top hits: A lay-person article from the US nuclear regulatory commission; A more detailed, although still not technical article from the australian Uranium Information Centre; 6 old news articles about controversy about Iran's nuclear intentions; a completely nondescriptive page of a company that deals in uranium enrichment equipment; and an article nearly identical to the second one, from the World Nuclear Association.

      Accoona top hits: A whole bunch of spammy sponsored links, right at the top of the page instead of on a side bar (booo!). The WISE project (World Information Service on Energy)'s links (some quite technical) about the entire uranium production and enrichment cycle, although from an environmentalist standpoint. The American Nuclear Society front page (useless, without further search on the site). 2 bloggers writing about Iran's nuclear program. A PDF (no convert to HTML option) of an investor factsheet about an enrichment company (no technical details at all). A blogger, whose site shows nothing relevant that I can see (and there is no cache option). Another front page to an inapplicable site (Riodejanero.com - apparently at some time in the past it had an article about getting approval for an enrichment plant). 2 old news articles about Iran's program controversy. The homepage of the Nuclear Information and Resource Service (no good information visible in apparent links; apparently the group is related to WISE).

      Summary:
      While google returned a lot of results tangential to actual uranium enrichment (for example, about the fact that one particular country, Iran, has been enriching uranium; if a person wanted those results, they realistically would have added Iran to their search), it performed far better than Accoona. Accoona returned a lot of "front pages" to websites instead of links to actual articles; many links to sources that no longer had the relevant article linked; and links to many poor quality sources (such as blogs). All in all, Google clearly wins top marks.

      --
      The human body can be drained of blood in 8.6 seconds given adequate vacuuming systems.
    9. Re:Latency by dalutong · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Chinese suicide rate is indeed high (note: i grew up in China), but the reasons aren't easily guessed.

      First, obviosly, China has 4-5 times the population. That makes China's about twice the percent.

      Second, China has a very high rural suicide rate. Many of the people who commit suicide are women. While men in America successfully kill themselves more than women do, women attempt it twice as frequently as men. Imagine if America had the same poor heathcare and readily available means of suicide (deadly pesticides are commonly used, as I understand it. those are available in rural China in a way that they are not available here in the U.S.)

      I don't know these numbers but I'd like to check out suicide attemp rates in the U.S. I can't really guess which would be higher. As much as I love both countries (and an American who was raised in China might), both have serious problems that could lead to high suicide rates.

      Having grown up in China finding such high levels of depression in America was a surprise. After all, we're supposedly leading the lives everyone wants to emulate...

      --

      What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
  2. Things the Clinton Search Engine finds fast: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Knee Pads
    Intern Job Listings
    Porn
    Cigars
    Directions to the Clinton Library and Massage Parlor in Little Rock
    Rose Law Firm Records
    Cattle Future Stock Quotes

    1. Re:Things the Clinton Search Engine finds fast: by Zorilla · · Score: 2, Funny

      Peter: I bet Hillary could straighten things out....even though she could never straighten out Bill!
      Lois: I love it when you use topical humor. It's just like watching Murphy Brown.

      ----

      "Hey, Murphy, blablablablablaaaablablabla, John Sununu!"
      "Bla bla bla blaa blabla, Tipper Gore."
      "Hey, Murph, you can bla bla bla the Ayatollah!"
      "Bla bla bla bla, Desmond Tutu, bla."

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  3. Cataloguing latency? by eln · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How much of the difference in quality results has to do with the fact that Google has a huge head start in indexing the web? Maybe Acoona's results will improve over time?

  4. Oh my god! by Spock+the+Vulcan · · Score: 4, Funny

    We slashdotted China!

    We bastards!

  5. doesn't seem so bad by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 4, Interesting

    free tibet still gets plenty of hits....

    even falun gong gets plenty of hits back.

    Once I get off work im gonna have to anonymous proxy inside china and try it.

    1. Re:doesn't seem so bad by darkani · · Score: 2, Interesting

      try "taiwan independence" or "taiwanese independence"

  6. Interesting that Bill Clinton helped by HadesX · · Score: 2, Funny

    Guess he is just thanking the Chinese for all of those funds he rec'd, democracy be damned.

    --
    Que Pasa?
  7. How Accoona is Better Than Google by bigtallmofo · · Score: 5, Funny

    According to a Chinese government spokesperson, "Accoona is a more efficient search engine because while Google uses automated system applications to crawl the Internet and add to their databse, we have assigned 481.2 million Chinese citizens the task of manually surfing the Internet and cataloging every site by hand. They work faster and far cheaper than Google's automated software."

    There you have it.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
  8. Re:Why Clinton? by Ironsides · · Score: 2, Funny

    So that we know which one NOT to use?

    --
    Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
  9. Sold China our Missile Technology why not Search ? by Art+Pollard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This isn't too surprising. Bill Clinton sold China our multi-stage missile technology for satellite launching. China is using this to build ICBMs to target the western United States. (And have since threatened to hit Los Angeles with a nuclear warhead if we ever interfere in regards to our ally Taiwan.) This was after he received numerous under the table donations for his campaign from the Chinese government and financiers. After he sold out our national security to the Chinese for some campaign donations, giving the Chinese a national search engine is no big deal.

  10. WTFometer pegged. by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny
    > Bill Clinton on Monday helped launch a new Internet search company backed by the Chinese government which says its technology uses artificial intelligence to produce better results than Google Inc.

    I'm sorry, I just wanted to re-read that sentence in all its glory. And to pound my head on the desk every fourth or fifth word. I've discovered that the mental imagery starts to look more coherent if you soak the brain in at least three beers' worth of alcohol before applying the blunt force trauma.

    On the bright side, if Fark ever holds a "Photoshop this Salvador Dali Masterpiece" contest, that sentence is gonna make me a surefire winner.

  11. Re:Can you hear the sound of "blue" states... by corbettw · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...claiming this is a dirty trick of Karl Rove?

    Well, that explains why Bill Clinton is behind it. Slick Willy will do anything to advance the Republican agenda.

    (Psst, that was me being sarcastic.)

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  12. Search for "tiananmen square" by closms · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe there is something to this.

    A search for tiananmen square on Accoona reveals mostly "Travel China" sites, although it does show the National Association for Democracy page as the 11th hit.

    A search for tiananmen square on Google finds sites like "student protests", "history declassified" and the wikipedia page.

    Hmmm, maybe there is something to this conspiracy theory.

  13. Communist search... by SkipRosebaugh · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just for fun, I decided to search on flaws of communism, just before Accoona got slashdotted. Very few, if any, of the search results mentioned "flaws" in the title or summary, and the third or fourth result was actually a communist party homepage. Google, on the other hand, produces relevant documents right off the bat, in America, at least. (Sorry for the imprecision, I closed the window before deciding to post this, and couldn't get in to research.)

    1. Re:Communist search... by mboos · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I got something similar for 'Flaws of communism,' with the following suggestion:

      Spelling suggestion: laws of communism

      --
      --Mike Boos
  14. Re:Fuck all Eastern shit... by geomon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Japan is west of Seattle.

    Perhaps you weren't aware of the fact that everywhere is west of somewhere.

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
  15. In Communist China by Anubis333 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You search for democracy,
    and engine finds you.

  16. Accoona Matata? by Overzeetop · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Chinese apparently want a site with "no worries"

    (Yes, I know, it's spelled wrong. I don't care)

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  17. Re:Oh my god! (slashdotted it) by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Chinese government which says its technology uses artificial intelligence to produce better results than Google

    Perhaps they focused so much on "better than Google" that they forget to load-test it? AI software is not known for speed. Right now it is probably thinking:

    "Hmmmm. 8000% more requests than I can handle? Should I lock up? Just process the first one? Let's check the rules database. Wup, that's flooded also. This flow-chart from Bob may offer a clue. It has heuristics prepared by somebody in a similar situation. Okay, it says, "call Mom". Okay.....what? I have no Mom? Hmmmm. Now why don't I have a Mom? Let's go research that....."

  18. You people need to get over yourselves by bogie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Chinese government was one of SEVERAL large investors. Not the only investor as the submittor tried to frame it. This search engine isn't some sort of special anti-democracy device whose sole purpose is to oppress the Chinese people. If you think Clinton was anti-democratic then you must be posting from Cananda right now considering the current administrations policies.

    If we are going to start bashing everyone who has anything to do with making or receiving money from the Chinese government then there are going to be a hell of a lot of Neocon's on the list as well.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  19. Do they know what they're missing? Show them. by ZackSchil · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This should signal google to immediately remove all of it censorship in China. They tried to do some minimal censorship but if that wasn't enough, why not just drop out entirely and put up a non-offensive message letting the chinese people know what they're missing. If that gets blocked too, so be it. I've talked to a few students from China in the US and they say that the public apathy over censorship is downright frightening. If your content is being censored, put up a message and withhold it all. Nothing they can do about that.

    1. Re:Do they know what they're missing? Show them. by burns210 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then China would just outright block Google. What would that accomplish?

      Losing a 1.3 billion person market on principle... Sounds nice, but unfortunately, this is the real world.

  20. A little biased? by CroyDax · · Score: 3, Interesting

    First search result for 'linux' is microsoft.com

    http://accoona.com/search?col=mc&qt=linux

    1. Re:A little biased? by dze · · Score: 2, Informative

      To be fair, that is a "sponsored result" (in admittedly tiny print). The actual results are lousy though. None of their top 10 are in google's top 10 (which seem quite fair to me -- sites like linux.com, linux.org, kernel.org, redhat.com, debian.org etc).

      --

      "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
  21. Re:Sold China our Missile Technology why not Searc by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 2, Informative
    And have since threatened to hit Los Angeles with a nuclear warhead if we ever interfere in regards to our ally Taiwan.

    This is not true.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  22. Another comparison: Tibet by zanderredux · · Score: 4, Informative
    It's funny to see that a generic query on "tibet" instead of the very specific "free tibet" yields differents results.

    Accoona shows a lot of tourist-related information on Tibet and pro-Chinese links on Tibet, that considers Tibet as any another region inside China.

    Google, in the other hand, shows a lot of pages related to the movement to free Tibet from Chinese domination. Note the link to the Tibetan Government in Exile's website, which ranked #3 in Google. Also, note that the #3 match in Accoona (under "sponsored links"), shows the Chinese government's page on Tibet.

    Isn't this undeniable proof that Accoona's filtering works?

  23. Re:Sold China our Missile Technology why not Searc by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This isn't too surprising. Bill Clinton sold China our multi-stage missile technology for satellite launching. China is using this to build ICBMs to target the western United States.

    The claim is perhaps debatable, but after all the accusations about it (I too remember all the hubbub about it years ago), Clinton would have been wise to stear clear of any business dealings related to the Chinese government. It does not "look good". It would be like doing business with Monica's family. Let it be, Bill.

  24. Riiiight. by gosand · · Score: 3, Informative
    I am sure others will point this out, but...
    Do a search for "linux" on google and on accoona.
    Other searches provided just as useless results.

    Linux on google:

    www.linux.org/
    www.linux.com/
    www.redhat.com/
    www.kernel.org/
    www.debian.org/
    www.linuxjourna l.com/
    www.linux-mandrake.com/
    www.linux-laptop. net/
    www.linuxtoday.com/
    www.gentoo.org/


    Linux on accoona:

    http://software-linux.jovencitas-cachondas.org/
    http://software-for-linux.jovencitas-cachondas.or g /
    http://programas-para-linux.jovencitas-cachonda s.o rg/
    http://linux-software.jovencitas-cachondas.or g/
    http://programas-en-linux.jovencitas-cachondas .org /
    http://linux.ittoolbox.com/
    http://ie.mojolin. com/
    http://zh.mojolin.com/
    http://uk.mojolin.co m/
    http://au.mojolin.com/

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  25. Uhh. by ad0gg · · Score: 3, Informative
    China has had multistage ICMBs since the 70's. Nice try troll.

    China's ICBMs

    --

    Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

  26. Re:I'm disappointed in Clinton. by lifeblender · · Score: 2, Informative

    We've got to be friends with them, or we'll be enemies. Clinton knows that the Right in the US would love to demonize China, especially once we run out of middle eastern countries again. So he pre-empts that by publicly cooperating with them. So what if they've violated international human rights agreements? If we hate them for that we'd better stop turning our eyes from our own self-abuse. All large organizations prey on the populace, governments included, the US government included. Clinton is as sharp as he always was. He knows, as you should, that the general policies of a large country are dictated not only by necessity but by ugly politics. If he goes over there and makes nice, just like Bush Sr. did, then we can talk with them about their politics. If it becomes a cold war, then each side will treat the other as faceless, and their political machinery will be out-of-bounds. So let him go over there and talk. Let him say we like China. We do like China; they'd be a good friend, and they treat their citizens about as well as we treat ours. The treatment is different, but the indifference and disrespect is the same.

    --
    Playing pornographics games during the day is evil! Play at night!
  27. sigh. communism != totalitarianism by maw · · Score: 4, Insightful
    With all those nasty pro-democracy websites that Google keeps turning up, what's a communist country supposed to do? Well, create their own search engine of course!

    I'm no communist, but I hate seeing the debate muddied like this. Just to be clear, communism shouldn't be conflated with totalitarianism, just as capitalism shouldn't be conflated with liberty. China demonstrates that well; for most of the past half-century it was basically communist and totalitarian; now it is rapidly moving towards capitalism, but the totalitarianism shows few signs of abating, unfortunately.

    --
    You're a suburbanite.
  28. Artificial Intelligence indeed by redNuht · · Score: 2, Funny

    Search for linux and get microsoft.com as the first result.

    Feeling Lucky?

  29. Can't resist by gmknobl · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, now China will have the Fox News of search engines.

    Both extremes meet in the middle and do the same..

  30. Better than Google? Not by a long shot. by Greenspan · · Score: 2, Informative
    Ever eager to hop on the next technological bandwagon, upon reading the article, I went to this Accoona.com and tried a few searches. The results shocked me. None of the four items I searched for were even on the first page! (except for AOL and Slate, which were found as a sponsored link). Most of the results were not even close to what I was looking for.

    Here are the first four Accoona searches I did:

    MSN

    SLATE

    AOL

    BAY AREA RIDERS FORUM (this is a very popular bay area-centric motorcycle forum that I regularly visit)

    Compare and contrast this with the results I received from Google:

    MSN

    SLATE

    AOL

    BAY AREA RIDERS FORUM


    Very, very different. After searching with these very common, popular queries, I've come to the conclusion that this new Accoona search engine isn't worth it's weight in salt. Really, it's a great testimony to how good Google really is.

    Of lesser importance, the time it takes to obtain said search results is significantly longer than for Google.

  31. Re:What about this one? by Cylix · · Score: 2, Funny

    I looked up destroy china....

    The first link was to a spyware cleaner.

    --
    "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
  32. Re:Fuck all Eastern shit... by thebobster · · Score: 3, Funny
    Perhaps you weren't aware of the fact that everywhere is west of somewhere.
    My home's not.

    --Santa Claus
  33. Re:As a conservative... by UserGoogol · · Score: 2, Funny

    In Korea, only old people use nuclear power.

    --
    "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
  34. Re:What about this one? by jwsmith00 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I typed in '"human rights" china'. The first result was "Human Rights on Ebay". Apparantly, Ebay sells everything including Human Rights. Perhaps China could get a good deal on it!