Slashdot Mirror


War of the Worlds, Chocolate Factory Trailers

rocketjam writes "The trailer for Tim Burton's version of 'Charlie and the Chocolate Factory' is online at Yahoo. The movie stars Johnny Depp and scheduled for release in July of '05. I think Tim Burton is the perfect director for a new Willie Wonka movie. The trailer looks very Burtonesque." And reader daquake writes "Our first peek at Steven Spielberg's contemporary version of War of the Worlds is available from Apple. Spielberg's installment is just one of many that have been developed throughout the years including a film produced last year n England."

70 of 637 comments (clear)

  1. Charlie and Chocolate Factory by superpulpsicle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That has to be the number 1 druggy movie ever.

    1. Re:Charlie and Chocolate Factory by maxbang · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but have you ever watched it...on weed?

      --
      I also reply below your current threshold.
    2. Re:Charlie and Chocolate Factory by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Interesting
      > > That has to be the number 1 druggy movie ever.
      >
      > You're forgetting the crazy psychedelic scenes toward the end of 2001: A Space Odyssey.

      So watch both sequels at the same time:

      Oompa Loompa, doopity doo,
      All these world are belong to you!
      Ooompa Loompa, doobie-doo-dopa,
      Keepa you space probe offa Europa!

    3. Re:Charlie and Chocolate Factory by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If only I had mod points, if only. That was really, really funny.

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    4. Re:Charlie and Chocolate Factory by sakasune · · Score: 2, Funny

      Grunka Lunka dunkity darmed-guards ...

      --
      "You're arguing for a universe with fewer waffles in it," I said. "I'm prepared to call that cowardice."
    5. Re:Charlie and Chocolate Factory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Confusing 2001 with 2010 is probably a sin on slashdot...

  2. Marylin Manson meets Willy Wonka... by neuro.slug · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow, that's one scary Willy Wonka. I can almost see him saying:

    "Hello, Charlie.."

    -- n

    1. Re:Marylin Manson meets Willy Wonka... by hey! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, Gene Wilder I think had an important insight into the character. Willy Wonka is supposed to be scary even a bit creepy. He is not like your parents, who will protect you from the consequences of your actions. He will let you be free, but you have to suffer the consequences.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:Marylin Manson meets Willy Wonka... by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He will let you be free, but you have to suffer the consequences.

      Just because his actions creep you out (that crooked smile and that detached wonder he seems to have) does not mean that he has to look like The Crow in a purple robe or a hollow eyed heroin addict.

    3. Re:Marylin Manson meets Willy Wonka... by DarkSarin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And you don't find Johnny Depp (ala pirates of the c.) to be just a shade creepy? Depp is a good choice, methinks, and I don't think that this is going to be a bad movie.

      Will it live up to the high bar set in the 70's? Perhaps, but I think you (and everyone else) should compare it to the book, not the Gene Wilder starring flick that we all know and most of us love (I have a friend that won't watch movies with midgets--eg, willow, willy wonka, ewoks, etc).

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    4. Re:Marylin Manson meets Willy Wonka... by the+gnat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, Depp looks a little blazed in that trailer. Does Wonka own a giant chocolate bong now?

    5. Re:Marylin Manson meets Willy Wonka... by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Funny

      Depp looks a little blazed in that trailer. Does Wonka own a giant chocolate bong now?

      He's a candy magnate, he knows that munchies account for a large part of his business ;-)

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    6. Re:Marylin Manson meets Willy Wonka... by Anonym1ty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I thought Depp looked almost as though they tried to add a little Michael Jackson to his appearance

      NOT the glove wearing hip look, but the freaky guy in his 40s Jackson

    7. Re:Marylin Manson meets Willy Wonka... by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, I can't view these trailers on my Linux box, so I can't comment directly on Mr. Depp's adequacy or inadequacy. However, commenting on your comment, I think that this character is very, very hard to get right. The trick is the character has to be tinged with menace without being overtly menacing. After all, the children are supposed to think Wonka's a patsy just like their unspeakable parents. On the other hand, you don't want to believe that Wonka would actually let the children be killed or really harmed. The fantasy for kids watching this movie is the that they can get a taste of freedom and its consequences, not the full adult load.

      Mr. Depp's screen personality does have me concerned. It's very very easy to fall into the trap of winking at the audience -- the way that actors in really bad Gilbert and Sullivan productions insist on being in on the joke. It'd be very easy to turn this story into a loud, archly self referential but ultimately neutered romp. The kind of movies idiot reviewers will find "magical", even though they would not know magic if it conjured a demon from hell to bite them on the ass.

      A fantasy movie has to be believable.

      Look at the scene in the original movie where Charlie and Granpa confront Wonka in his office. It was a sublime and courageous performance by Mr. Wilder.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    8. Re:Marylin Manson meets Willy Wonka... by Martin+Blank · · Score: 2, Informative

      The final scene is far and away my favorite. Gene Wilder has said that it was hard for him to do, screaming at young Peter Ostrum like that, but I think he managed to pull it off brilliantly. Credit also has to be given to Jack Albertson throughout the film, but also in that scene, where he showed Grandpa Joe's seething rage (watch his eyes during "You're an inhuman monster!") at Wonka's treatment of Charlie, and in so doing clearly delineated the difference between the world-view of an adult and the honest childhood innocence of Charlie, and also the delicate world between them where Willy Wonka exists.

      Incidentally, if you don't have the 30th Anniversary Edition, it's well worth picking up for the commentary by the now-grown actors who played the winners, as well as the separate interview with Gene Wilder.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  3. this movie is going to be awesome by hsmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The original was nothing like the book, it was dark and gloomy.

    i think burton w/ depp will combine to make an kick ass flick the way the book intended it to be. i hope burton redoes alice in wonderland, THAT would be a trippy movie

    1. Re:this movie is going to be awesome by mothlos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, the original film based on the musical was not too much like the book, but this movie doesn't look like it will shape up to capture the 'feel' of the book either. The book was always goofy but with an edge of sinister that you just couldn't grasp. This trailer with the music chosen and the silly slapstick Burton has Depp doing as well as the camera direction (the down shot on the group standing next to the chocolate river) makes it feel like Burton isn't catching the British part of all of this.

      Just like Planet of the Apes, he just doesn't 'get' the concept of the story and even if he is truer to hard action the original work, he just doesn't have it in him to be true to the idea of it.

    2. Re:this movie is going to be awesome by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 2, Funny
      Dodgson! Dodgson! We've got Dodgson here!

      See, nobody cares.

      --
      I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
  4. Panic by P-Nuts · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It would be amusing if the War of the Worlds TV trailer (which is refusing to play on my machine), was engineered to look like a news broadcast, and managed to cause panic like the radio series.

  5. Contemporary War of the Worlds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    *Yawn*

    Evil, vaguely Arabic aliens invade. Only the square jawed hero (played by the guy from that movie that was vaguely popular last year), the love interest (with that woman from the movie your girlfriend watched) and the wisecracking black sidekick (fuck knows, they all look the same to me) can defeat them. 2 hours of bland Hollywood shite. This is the sight of a culture so bereft of originality that plagiarism is hailed as a creative force.

  6. Nightmare inducing grin by Gudlyf · · Score: 3, Funny
    As if the first Woka movie's boat ride scene wasn't enough to give kids nightmares...dear lord that grin on Depp in the trailer...that grin...

    shiver

    --
    Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
  7. Why are we celebrating this? by nasalgoat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All they seem to do now is remake movies that don't need to be remade. The original Willy Wonka was a perfectly excellent film and I see no need to ruin it with a remake. Same with War of the Worlds.

    Whatever happened to original scripts?

    1. Re:Why are we celebrating this? by Monsieur+Canard · · Score: 2, Interesting
      IIRC correctly from watching this recently on AMC's "pop-up video" version of this, the reason that the title was changed in the original movie has something to do with Quaker Oats.

      Oh look. A link -> http://www.davidlwolper.com/shows/details.cfm?show ID=276

      "Willy Wonka" was 100% financed by the Quaker Oats Company, a television client of Wolper's who was buying a candy company and wanted to come out with a candy called the Wonka Bar when the picture was distributed so there would be cross-promotion. The name of the picture was changed from "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" to "Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory" so the name Wonka could become popular. When the picture was released, the candy was released at the same time. However, the candy had a problem and had to be withdrawn. The picture went on to be successful even though the candy didn't.


      The candy had a problem. That just can't be good.
      --
      He took a duck to the face at 250 knots.
    2. Re:Why are we celebrating this? by BTWR · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Given the original scripts coming out, mabye tons of remakes isn't so bad after all.

      ***YAWN***

      Yet another cliched "There's nothing good/original coming out anymore." Everyone like you seems to remember the "good ol' days" of 1972 or some shit like that. Well, let me tell you, aside from The Godfather, a LOT of crap came out that year, and every year after and before. This year (like most others) has had some AMAZINGLY wonderful AND ORIGINAL screenplays:

      Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (Oh yeah, Charlie Kaufman is "so unoriginal")

      The Incredibles (Yep, Pixar does the same film over and over - ALL ANIMATION! I mean, come on!)

      Kill Bill, Vol 2 (The best samauri movie made in 20 years. And wha!?!?!? It was American?)

      Spiderman 2 (MAYBE 1978's Superman was an equal. MAYBE. I personally thought Spiderman 2 was better. But this is without question at least ONE of the greatest super hero movies ever made. Took the genre to new levels that perhaps ALL future superhero movies will be judged against. And FYI, before you say so, a "sequel" does not connotate unoriginalness. Empire Stikes Back and Godfather 2 both took the same characters and presented them in a new light to be wonderfully entertaining).

      Shaun of the Dead (Um... a zombie romantic comedy, that works? Yeah, I'll call that original any day)

      Napoleon Dynamite (I didn't see it, but everyone I know says it was a different movie than had been made in a long time)

      Movies I personally loved (i.e. my opinion), but understand I may find no mass-critical acclaim for:

      Dodgeball: A True Underdog Story

      Mean Girls (seemed like yet another High School movie, but it surprisingly had a lot of heart, and great characters)

      Hero (It just worked for me)

      Team America: World Police (To me, it was the funniest film I had seen in years)

      Harry Potter & Prisoner of Azkaban (Alfonso Cuarón made the best film in the series, so far - I'm really looking forward to 4 and 5)

      Miracle (I never saw a movie before that I knew EVERYTHING that was going to happen, yet I was very excited and suspenceful in seeing it).

      And I can only speculate, based on the flawless (or nearly flawless) directoral efforts of these directors that we have at least a few more gems coming out:

      The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou (Wes Anderson is NOTHING if not original)

      The Aviator (Maybe he'll finally get his oscar?)

      Anyway, I didn't mean for this to sound mean-hearted. It's just that it's very common to hear this knee-jerk reaction to "today's (movies, television, culture, teenagers, music)" and forget that yes - a lot of trash comes out, but it does EVERY year. Be a half-full kinda person and treat yourselves to some of the wonderful new entertainment that came out this year.

  8. Hollywood made an updated war of the worlds once by Nine+Tenths+of+The+W · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And it was pure, unmitigated crap. What's wrong with steampunk Victorians fighting off a Martian invasion? It's not like Hollywood has any regard for science anyway.

    --
    Slashdot: News for Nerds, Stuff that matters only to them
  9. No creativity by rice0067 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Its nice to see that there is no creativity left in the movie industry. Why not come up with something new instead of redoing movies that there perfectly good to begin with.
    that means:
    Willy wonka....
    War of the worlds...
    Oceans 11..
    Manchurian candidate.
    Star Wars special editions.

    While we are at it might as well remake casablanca.
    And teen wolf.

    1. Re:No creativity by Mad_Rain · · Score: 3, Funny

      While we are at it might as well remake casablanca.
      And teen wolf.


      SSsssshhh! You're going to give them ideas!

      Movie Exec: I bet Keanu Reeves would be great for Rick's part!
      Keanu: You'll, like regret it - maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow, but you'll be all like 'Whoa!'

      noooooooooooooooo!

      --
      "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
    2. Re:No creativity by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      While we are at it might as well remake casablanca.

      How can you remake Casablanca? The one starring Myra Dinglebat and Peter Beardsley was definitive!

      "Of all the space bars on all the worlds you had to re-materialise in mine."

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  10. War of the Worlds has Tom Cruise by Nine+Tenths+of+The+W · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are the aliens going to be led by Xenu?

    --
    Slashdot: News for Nerds, Stuff that matters only to them
    1. Re:War of the Worlds has Tom Cruise by DaedalusLogic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Are the aliens going to be led by Xenu?

      oooohh snap! Take that dead L. Ron Hubbard!

  11. Great movie for Burton to do by vivin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    IMHO, this is a movie that will make full use of Burton's talents. Willy Wonka is a deeply eccentric character, and Burton is known for his well... "Burtonesque" way of doing things. Burton will really bring out the weirdness of Wonka. Although the book and even the previous movie (where Gene Wilder did a GREAT job) have alluded to it, I think Burton will really bring out how weird and eccentric and mysterious Wonka really is.

    --
    Vivin Suresh Paliath
    http://vivin.net

    I like
  12. I'm just not feelin' it... by phaln · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While I think Burton will do a decent job with Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, I really don't think it stands a chance of beating the 1971 version with Gene Wilder. There's a certain magic to it that I don't think can be replicated so easily into a polished Hollywood flick, no matter who's directing.

    War of the Worlds, so far, looks like one worth checking out.

    --
    SNACKS ARE AWESOME
    1. Re:I'm just not feelin' it... by gilesjuk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well the Wilder portrayal made Wonka come across as an eccentric loner type. He also didn't seem to care about the children who couldn't keep their hands to themselves.

      Dahl's novels are all quite gloomy and Burton would seem to be the ideal director for such books, but I'll reserve judgement until I see the whole film. Burton does have a reputation for creating visually impressive "gothic" films which lack in other areas. At least he's converting an existing story.

  13. Johnny Depp seems wrong for the part by psychotic_venom · · Score: 2, Informative

    The idea of having Tim Burton direct this remake seems like a masterstroke, but after seeing the preview, Depp seems so wrong for the part. I'm sure he'll bring his flare, and he's an amazing actor--but there's something about the way he was holding himself that seemed distinctly non-wonka. I for one *liked* the fact that the original movie was so much darker than the book, so I hope that this one stays dark in vibrant Burton-esque way.

  14. direct .mov url by TeknoHog · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  15. Re:The "In a world guy" by GuyZero · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Canadian comic Sean Cullen does a great bit on this guy. http://www.seancullen.com/

    The formula is:
    * "In a world..."
    * followed by some sort of contradiction
    * "one man..."
    * is doing some generic action

    They run the bit on those "Just for Laughs" shows on CBC every so often.

  16. Marilyn Manson by gamgee5273 · · Score: 4, Informative
    I remember a few years back, when Burton first started talking about doing the remake, that he wanted Marilyn Manson to be Willy Wonka.

    No matter how flipped-ouyt this version looks, can you imagine one with Manson in it? That would have rocked. :)

    1. Re:Marilyn Manson by EpsilonExordium · · Score: 2, Informative

      He wanted Marilyn Manson to do the score...not star in the movie... ...and he IS doing the score.

  17. Tim Burton has lost it by hcsteve · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does anyone remember Planet of the Apes? The original is a classic, and Burton's remake was one of the most memorable stinkers in recent movie history. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is a classic film, even if it doesn't hew very closely to the book, and I fear that a Burton remake will be Planet of the Apes all over again. Please, Tim Burton, leave my childhood alone.

    --
    If you were a hot dog, and you were starving, would you eat yourself?
    1. Re:Tim Burton has lost it by Dirtside · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The original "Planet of the Apes" was basically a philosophical movie with some action. It wasn't weird or creepy or macabre or especially fantastical, which are all the elements that Tim Burton is good at. He made the PotA remake into a standard action film, which is something he's not good at.

      But "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory," the book, has plenty of weird and creepy and macabre and fantastical stuff; it's exactly Burton's kind of movie. Just because it's a remake doesn't mean it'll suffer the same fate as PotA.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    2. Re:Tim Burton has lost it by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Does anyone remember Planet of the Apes? The original is a classic, and Burton's remake was one of the most memorable stinkers in recent movie history.

      The Planet of the Apes "reimagining" was craptacular indeed, but it wasn't a "Burton movie".
      It was a studio movie, with a big name director. There is a difference. I can't tell how much of the crap was inserted forcibly by the execs and how much was due to Burton being drunk off his ass, but it stank of marketing drone influence.

      If you haven't realised how badly the owners of the Apes franchise are willing to screw it up for marketing reasons, look at the DVD's cover art. The punch of the damn movie is ON THE FREAKING COVER! Yeah, everyone knows by now right? Pop culture has told everyone that "The maniacs! They blew it up!", but what about the kids? Why make it IMPOSSIBLE for the new, naive humans of the world to enjoy the movie and be surprised by that decrepit statue at the end?
      Don't blame Burton too much, he's only partially responsible. Blame the franchise holders, they aren't taking good care of it.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  18. With this remake... by gandell · · Score: 2

    I can't help but wonder if anyone will ever use the second book (Charlie and the Great Glass Elevator), and make a sequel. Yes, it wasn't as good as the first, but that's prose for you.

    --
    Mercy was given to me by Christ...I must give the same to others.
  19. Johnny Depp by the+Dragonweaver · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does anyone else look at Depp and think, "Oh God, that's Michael Jackson!"

    Brings an extra level of creepiness, donchathink?

    --
    Actually I am a lab rat in an elaborate plot to take over the world.
    1. Re:Johnny Depp by iiioxx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does anyone else look at Depp and think, "Oh God, that's Michael Jackson!"

      That was my first thought: "Holy fucking christ, it's Michael Jackson as Willy Wonka."

      That's scary: A guy who looks like that inviting five lucky children to tour his "chocolate factory."

      I read Charlie and the Chocolate Factory about 20 times as a kid. I don't remember picturing Willy Wonka as a Jackson-esque cross-dressing, psycho pedophile.

      Burton's gone over the edge. His Planet of the Apes sucked huge mutant donkey balls, and now this...

    2. Re:Johnny Depp by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Funny

      That was my first thought: "Holy fucking christ, it's Michael Jackson as Willy Wonka."
      That's scary: A guy who looks like that inviting five lucky children to tour his chocolate factory.


      That's not so bad.
      It's when he's "visiting" their "chocolate factory" that it gets scary ;-)

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  20. Re:Oompa Loompa Crime Wave by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd just like to know if Burton is going to use Pygmies like there were in the book?

  21. Chocolate Factory is Not a Remake by ytsejammer · · Score: 5, Insightful
    From what I understand, Burton's movie is not intended to be a remake, but rather a better interpretation of the book.

    So, I think it would be well advised for those of you looking to this movie in the hopes (or the fears) that it will be an updated Willy Wonka to attempt to forget about Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory and instead view this movie as the screen adaptation of the book 'Charlie and the Chocolate Factory'.

    In fact, if I remember correctly, Roald Dahl was not happy with 'Willy Wonka', which I can understand since the book is incredibly darker than the movie.

    Hopefully, with Burton directing, we can get a more faithful interpretation of the book that stays true to the dark material.

  22. Straight from the book... by Aash · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Did anyone notice that the narration in the War of the Worlds trailer is almost word-for-word from the beginning of the book?

    From the trailer:

    "No one would have believed in the early years of the twenty-first century that our world was being watched be intelligences greater than our own, that as men busied themselves about their various concerns, they observed and studied. With infinite complacency, men went to and fro about the globe, confident of their empire over this world. Yet, across the gulf of space, intellects vast and cool and unsympathetic regarded our planet with envious eyes, and slowly and surely drew their plans against us."

    And from the book:

    No one would have believed in the last years of the nineteenth century that this world was being watched keenly and closely by intelligences greater than man's and yet as mortal as his own; that as men busied themselves about their various concerns they were scrutinised and studied [...]. With infinite complacency men went to and fro over this globe about their little affairs, serene in their assurance of their empire over matter. [...] Yet across the gulf of space, minds that are to our minds as ours are to those of the beasts that perish, intellects vast and cool and unsympathetic, regarded this earth with envious eyes, and slowly and surely drew their plans against us.

    I think that's pretty cool.

    --

    --
    These aren't the droids you're looking for.
    1. Re:Straight from the book... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you look further, you'll find that the radio broadcast, the 1953 movie, and Jeff Wayne's Musical Version and PC game all adapted the opening from the book. Other versions likely did as well.

      The original book is available free on-line from The Gutenberg Project.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  23. Has anyone else noticed? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The alien hand on the War of the Worlds poster has its middle finger on top of Texas.

    Not that it necessarily means anything...

    1. Re:Has anyone else noticed? by zulux · · Score: 3, Funny

      The alien hand on the War of the Worlds poster has its middle finger on top of Texas.


      It's a good thing the globe is rotated to show America - otherwise most of us American wouldn't recognize the planet that the alien is grasping.

      Just kidding.... ....we American don't need geography, we just need missile coordinates.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

  24. Re:Hollywood made an updated war of the worlds onc by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What's wrong with steampunk Victorians fighting off a Martian invasion?

    You'll get them. There are two War of the Worlds movies coming out. The other one from Pendragon Pictures will be set in the original book's setting.

    I know what I'll be doing this weekend: retooling and reorganizing my War of the Worlds website. Interesting that this Spielburg version is depicting the alien hand holding the Earth in a manner very reminiscent of the 1988-1989 season of the TV series.

    I just wish I had a complete working copy of the old waroftheworlds.com Radio Classics website, especially their story, "The Last Chat Room". Lost my copy to hard drive corruption. Random two-byte errors in the image files. Anyone who can help, drop me a line at my site, either having an archived version or can repair damaged GIF and/or JPEG files. (The Way-Back Machine sadly doesn't have a copy.)

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  25. Direct download by Finuvir · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    Why is anything anything?
  26. What You Say? by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It would be amusing if the War of the Worlds TV trailer (which is refusing to play on my machine), was engineered to look like a news broadcast, and managed to cause panic like the radio series.

    Are you kidding? We're at freaking war in Iraq, soldiers are taking the SoD to task for the shit they have to ride into battle in, and most people are completely oblivious to the knucklehead who got us into this fine mess.

    Three years ago we witnessed something astounding, two jets colliding with the WTC towers and one with the Pentagon and, victims families aside, most americans are right back on track to worrying about which color iPod to get and whether they'll have enough beer in the cooler for the bowl games.

    I'm not saying we're stupid or anything, but we're remarkably resilient in bouncing back into our own little bubbles after a catastrophe, so long as it didn't directly touch us. Aliens could be all over the place and we'd just want to get through it so we can rebuild our civilisation and see how Survivor Vanuatu comes out.

    Meanwhile, in news that will ruin my life for the next 3 days or so:

    Pixar has pushed back their last feature, while paired with a certain evil empire, Cars until May 2006 (insert riot here) which had been due Nov 2005. This is so they can sell more DVDs for your holiday shopping pleasure later in 2006 (the fucked up logic escapes me, but Dreamworks is doing the same shit with Shrek 3, moving it back to May 2007)

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:What You Say? by operagost · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Are you kidding? We're at freaking war in Iraq, soldiers are taking the SoD to task for the shit they have to ride into battle in, and most people are completely oblivious to the knucklehead who got us into this fine mess.
      Muhammad?
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  27. Re:Compare to Original by RealProgrammer · · Score: 3, Informative
    • the point of the original was that honesty was something that is rewarded

    Yes, the book was about Virtue. Willie Wonka was looking for someone Good, displaying:

    • Honesty: conforming to what you know to be true and right (not lying or stealing)
    • Patience: the ability to delay gratification and avoid complaining about the trivial
    • Humility: thinking of oneself as no better than others.
    • Kindness: the habit of treating others well in all things
    • Charity: the practice of thinking the best of others, as opposed to assuming the worst
    • Generosity: looking for ways to give to others, rather than to acquire for yourself
    • Flexibility: the ability to accept new things, be spontaneously fun, and learn

    He found all of those things in Charlie. I always thought Wonka somehow knew Charlie would find the last ticket, and in fact the whole thing was a setup to test Charlie.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
  28. How about this idea? by Acy+James+Stapp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't go watch the fucking movie.

    --
    -- Too lazy to get a lower UID.
  29. Re:The "In a world guy" by fahrvergnugen · · Score: 4, Informative

    You need to watch the trailer for Jerry Seinfeld's comedian movie right now.

    --
    Even Jesus hates listening to Creed.
  30. WotW Fullscreen direct link by Chris+Carollo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Is here.

  31. War of the Worlds by blair1q · · Score: 2, Insightful

    War of the Worlds is an interesting example of the way derivative art works.

    It's not that much of a story: aliens attack, humans flee/fight/cower, aliens die of a cold.

    But it keeps getting remade. Why?

    I think it's mostly because of the way Orson Welles planted the meme in our consciousness. At the time, it was plausible to people that Mars was inhabited and even hostile, and of course the presentation believed the central conceit perfectly. Meanwhile the particular pitfalls of asynchronous simplex communication (people turning the radio on after the disclaimer; people appending their own interpretations and extrapolations when explaining what others entering the room are discovering) did nothing to reduce its credibility.

    So while the story isn't all that fascinating, the legend is, and derivative art capitalizes on the legend. Titanic is the single most expensive and profitable example, but I'd bet the budgets of the many remakes of War of the Worlds would be even more than what's been spent on the Titanic story.

  32. Re:Compare to Original by Bugmaster · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Note, however, that Willie Wonka himself possessed none of these qualities.
    • Honesty: he built what is essentially a giant mousetrap for children, and rigged his own lottery.
    • Patience: instead of actually doing something to pass on his empire (such as, I don't know, raising kids), he wants to pluck a ready-made perfect heir from the masses.
    • Humility: you're kidding, right ? He styles himself so far above humanity (literally, too), that he might as well be Apollo. Or Narcissus.
    • Kindness: here, have some blueberry candy, kids ! Mwa ha ha ha ! j00 d34d f00 !
    • Charity: see "Patience". He has studied humanity thoroughly; he knows to expect the worst.
    • Generosity: can we say, "financial empire", "media blitz", and "addiction-fostering ad campaign" ?
    • Flexibility: he is certainly whimsical, but Willie Wonka's methods are set in stone for all eternity. Feed chocolate to kids until they explode; if it was good enough 100 years ago, it's good enough now.
    And that's just what can be gleaned from his relations to other humans ! I am not even talking about his enslavement of an entire alien race.

    I hardly think that Wonka is looking for someone "Good". He is looking for someone Gullible enough to take the fall when the SEC probe arrives.

    --
    >|<*:=
  33. WotW: The Musical! by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny
    Evil, vaguely Arabic aliens invade. Only the square jawed hero (played by the guy from that movie that was vaguely popular last year), the love interest (with that woman from the movie your girlfriend watched) and the wisecracking black sidekick (fuck knows, they all look the same to me) can defeat them. 2 hours of bland Hollywood shite. This is the sight of a culture so bereft of originality that plagiarism is hailed as a creative force.

    Sounds like what we really need is a War of the Worlds Musical!

    Is this the real life
    Is this just fantasy
    A.D. 2101, War was beginning
    Open your eyes, look up to the skies and see
    Martians, yeilding no sympathy

    Because I'm easy come,easy go,
    Fly Zig high, fly Zig low,
    Anyway the Zig goes,doesn't really matter to me, to me

    Mama, just watched TV,
    Ignored what prophets said,
    Now martians coming and we're dead,
    Mama, life had just begun,
    But now we've gone and thrown it all away
    Mama ooo, didn't mean to make you cry
    If I'm not back again this time tomorrow
    Carry on,carry on,as if nothing really matters

    Too late, we're on our way,
    To destruction, Cats say,
    Told to make our time today,
    Goodbye everybody, I got to go
    Gotta leave you all behind and move a Zig
    Mama ooo- (any way the wind blow)
    I don't know how to fly,
    I sometimes wish I'd never been born at all

    I see a little silhouetto of a man
    Is the curate!, Is the curate, dragged by a tentacle
    Laserbolt and heatrays very very frightening me
    All your base, All your base
    All your base, All your base
    All your base are belong to us!

    But I just a poor boy and nobody loves me
    He just a poor boy from a poor planetoid
    Spare him his life from this monstrosity
    Easy come easy go, will you let me go
    Take off every Zig! For great justice!
    Take off every Zig! For great justice!
    Take off every Zig! For great justice!
    For great justice! For great justice!
    Move, move, move move, move, move Zig!

    Mama mia,mama mia,mama mia let me move
    Someone set up us the bomb!

    So you think you can stone me and spit in my eye
    So you think you can love me and leave me to die
    Oh baby, I know what I doing baby!
    Just gotta get out-just gotta move Zig right outta here

    Nothing really matters, anyone can see
    Nothing really matters ,nothing really matters to me

    Any way the Zig goes....

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  34. Grandpa Joe was a Welfare Queen? by cknight52 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok so I wonder if this will be the case in the new movie as well. I never did like Granpa Joe for the following reason... HE WAS A TOTAL LEECH! Don't believe me? Think about this:

    1) He's laid up in bed for 10 years, not able to work, living off of Charlie's Mom's generosity. She has to take in laundry and all sorts of odd jobs in order to support the hanger's on in the house.

    2) Charlie spends his newspaper money to buy Grandpa Joe tobacco. So not only is Grandpa Joe leeching off of Charlie's mom to buy his food and put a roof over his head, not to mention wash his ass, but he's got a 10 year old buying him pipe tobacco. Which is sure to throw him in the hospital at some point, and who will pay the hospital bills? Maybe Charlie can get a 4th paper route.

    3) So Charlie finds some money, and his mom, just trying to instill some values into her son asks him where he got it. What does G. Joe say??? "WHO CARES WHERE HE GOT IT, ITS HIS NOW!" (Yes I am paraphrasing.) Whats the lesson? It doesnt matter where you get something, if its in your greedy f'in palms, it's your's now.

    4) Then Charlie gets a golden ticket. Hooray. Grandpa Joe smells a free trip coming, and what do you know. Not ONLY can he walk, but he can dance like a madman! So much for 10 years in bed, not even collecting disability insurance.

    5) He breaks the rules, and drinks the gassy stuff. He and Charlie mess shtuff up, and don't feel badly in the least.

    6) When he gets called on it, he's all pissed that he got caught, and totally turns it around on Willie Wonka. He says "Screw this rule follower Charlie, lets go sell that gobstopper that you PROMISED to keep to yourself. Willie's only fault here is that he gives in. I think its out of desperation, since all the other kids are gone and apparently he has cancer of the spleen or something.

    So to sum up, Grandpa Joe Sucks. The movie is good though.

    1. Re:Grandpa Joe was a Welfare Queen? by CK2004PA · · Score: 2, Funny

      Also, doesn't Willy Wonka like "little people" a little too much ? I mean the little Oompa's everywhere, dressing up. Then he lures kids into his "big playground" , alla Michael Jackson, for some overnight "fun". "Want some candy little boy?" I mean c'mon, this guy is sick!

      --
      "I believe today that my conduct is in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator"-Adolf Hitler or George W Bush?
  35. you're gonna be [high voice]dis-a-point-ted by mcmonkey · · Score: 2
    Tim Burton is good; Depp is good; Wonka is good.

    But am I the only one who got a little Cat in the Hat vibe from the trailer?

    You know, they'll feel the need to pep it up for today's hip, wired youngsters. You know, "I feel we should rastafy him by ... ten percent or so." Then throw in a bunch of pop-cultural references and jokes for the 'grown-ups' and presto! sucky movie.

  36. Have you watched the original recently? by dmorin · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Ok, the Willy Wonka character was great. The concept of the kids getting to see what it's like inside the factory is great.

    But as a movie? Can adults really stomach all the moralizing? Wait, time for a song about watching too much television! And here's one about chewing bubble gum! If Depp's version is going to cut back on that, and get back into the darker sequences like the boat ride, then I'd be all for it.

    By the way, I think the poster looks too Clockwork Orange for me.

  37. Running out of movie acronyms by shmert · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ok, so now we add WOTW to the list:
    LOTR
    FOTR
    ROTK
    ROTJ
    WOTW

    The movie acronym namespace is getting overcrowded! I predict that soon movies will start being made with FIVE words in the title, maybe by throwing an adjective or expletive into the mix. War of the Doggone Worlds.

    --
    You drank my drink, you drunk!
  38. Re:What's the deal with Tim Burton?! by mikeg22 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What's the big f-ing deal about Tim Burton? The guy has NEVER directed a good movie.

    You're on crack...
    Batman
    Batman 2
    Sleepy Hollow
    Nightmare Before Christmas
    Ed Wood

    Tim Burton gives us something different with every new movie. You may not like his style, but at least the guy comes up with original ideas...a wonderful break from Spielburg, Michael Bay, etc. It should say something that Johnny Depp signs on so often.

  39. Re:MIDGETS!!! by Hitmouse · · Score: 2, Funny

    Tom Cruise isn't technically a midget.

  40. Depp as Wonka? Bad choice... by saccade.com · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just looking at the trailer, Depp is -way- to young to play Wonka. The whole point of the story is Wonka is getting on in years and is looking for an honest young person to help take over. Gene Wilder was the only redeeming feature of the first C&tCF...