Slashdot Mirror


High Speed Steam Powered Car

CodeWanker wrote in to tell us about a story about new steam powered vehicles that are aiming to set speed records. The car is kind of goofy looking, but more eco friendly (which works for the Prius ;) Don't expect to see anything like this at your local dealer any time soon tho.

55 of 286 comments (clear)

  1. It seems that... by slashdevslashtty · · Score: 5, Funny

    Valve has done something right.

    --


    M$ Lawyer: But `gcc /dev/random -o kernel.dll` is our trade secret!
  2. The Prius/hybrids actually isn't good at all by Enigma_Man · · Score: 4, Informative

    The gas mileage you can get with a hybrid is far less than what you can get with a good diesel engine. Hybrids are a bad idea, twice the weight (batteries, two motors), half the interior room. Diesel-engined cars have been getting 50+ MPG for years and years. Unfortunately the stigma in the US over "diesel" prevents them from being brought over here.

    -Jesse

    --
    Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    1. Re:The Prius/hybrids actually isn't good at all by Momoru · · Score: 2, Informative

      Diesel = Great for gas mileage

      Diesel = Terrible for the environment

    2. Re:The Prius/hybrids actually isn't good at all by lobsterGun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why not a diesel hybrid then?

    3. Re:The Prius/hybrids actually isn't good at all by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Diesel = Terrible for the environment"
      No not really if the US would adopt low sulfur diesel then it would not be much different than gas. Plus the one thing that people do not think about on electric and hybrids is the batteries. They are a nightmare to dispose or recycle.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:The Prius/hybrids actually isn't good at all by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 2
      BioDiesel == still bad for the environment because:
      • High compression/temperature == High NOx
      • High compression, short combustion == high soot production
      • High compression, high hp, low RPM == low efficiency during start/stop driving == high fuel consumption in city driving == more pollution/mile traveled.
      Yeah, biodiesel produces less marginal CO2 than dinodiesel, but the doesn't solve the problems implicit in a diesel engine.
    5. Re:The Prius/hybrids actually isn't good at all by ArsonSmith · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Twice the weight? unless you have a 50lbs car then it is far less than twice the weight.
      Half the interior room? Unless you have 1.2 cubic foot of space in your car then it takes up far less than half the space.

      Why do hybrids get such criticism? The technology is sound, it is not married to petrol engines and could easily be used on Diesel. In fact it would be ideal for diesel engines to be hybrids. It does help improve mileage. What has a hybrid car done to you, and others who criticize this way?

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    6. Re:The Prius/hybrids actually isn't good at all by jandrese · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You would probably get even better gas milage on the highways actually. The problem would be that your car would accelerate terribly and have trouble getting up to highway speeds. The advantage of the Hybrids isn't so much that it makes compact gas-sippers more efficent (it doesn't do a particularly good job of that), but rather it makes them perform like regular cars so regular people will be interested in them. People don't like taking a minute to get to highway speeds, which is one of the big reasons Diesals had such a bad rap early on (have you ever driven one of those Diesal Rabbits? It's no fun.).

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    7. Re:The Prius/hybrids actually isn't good at all by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 4, Informative

      " The gas mileage you can get with a hybrid is far less than what you can get with a good diesel engine."

      That's because we measure mileage using miles/gallon, and *diesel has more energy per gallon than gasoline*. About 30% more, in fact. That's like saying that a P-M is better than an Athlon 64 because it gets more work done "per clock". That's not the unit you need to be evaluating.

      "Unfortunately the stigma in the US over "diesel" prevents them from being brought over here."

      It's not the stigma, it's the envrionment. Even "clean" diesel engines rank horribly on particulate, NOx, and other nasty emissions.

      The Prius *wasn't* designed to get the best gas mileage period. It was designed to reduce emissions *and* get good fuel economy. The Prius actually burns gas when it doesn't have to so that the catalytic converter stays hot (it doesn't work otherwise).

      "Hybrids are a bad idea, twice the weight (batteries, two motors), half the interior room."

      That's bullshit. The entire THSD - including the batteries and motor - is around 800lbs. This is *easily* offset by the fact that the Prius doesn't need a wasteful transmission. You might be able to save 400lbs using a vehicle with a manual transmission, but that's not really comparable to the automatic Prius, is it?

      Oh, and your precious diesel cars? They weigh more than their gasoline counterparts because diesel engines need stronger components (much higher compression).

      And, half the interior room? What kind of crap is that? The batteries in the Prius don't take up much room at all - and the engine compartment isn't any bigger than the one on any other medium-small car.

      "Diesel-engined cars have been getting 50+ MPG for years and years."

      The Prius hits 50mpg in real-world testing, too, with fuel that has 30% less energy than diesel.

    8. Re:The Prius/hybrids actually isn't good at all by Eryq · · Score: 4, Funny
      Plus the one thing that people do not think about on electric and hybrids is the batteries. They are a nightmare to dispose or recycle.

      You're telling me! My car runs on 9,624 AA alkaline batteries. They only last about 30 miles, and when they conk out I have to use up the ones on my second car just to drive them to the dump...

      --
      I'm a bloodsucking fiend! Look at my outfit!
    9. Re:The Prius/hybrids actually isn't good at all by Enigma_Man · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not the stigma, it's the envrionment. Even "clean" diesel engines rank horribly on particulate, NOx, and other nasty emissions.

      I suggest you look into new diesel engines. They can be even cleaner than their non-diesel counterparts with recent innovations in diesel catalytic converters and filters.

      Oh, and your precious diesel cars? They weigh more than their gasoline counterparts because diesel engines need stronger components (much higher compression).

      A diesel engine may weigh slightly more than a regular gasoline engine (not if you use modern materials), but it certainly weighs less than a gasoline engine, an electric motor, and a pack of batteries. To get an engine to deal with much higher compression doesn't take that much strengthening; better rods, pistons, and crank.

      The Prius hits 50mpg in real-world testing, too, with fuel that has 30% less energy than diesel.

      Some recent numbers from Honda/Acura's new diesel engine in their... I think it's the new Accord, but they don't call it that: 76 MPG, 130 MPH stop speed, 8 second 0-60 acceleration. That's amazing numbers, and better than any hybrid system out there.

      I'm not a diesel fanatic, infact it hurts me to say that something involving electricity is worse (I'm an Electrical Engineer), but the fact remains that hybrids just aren't all the automakers crack them up to be.

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    10. Re:The Prius/hybrids actually isn't good at all by ngkdc · · Score: 4, Informative

      You'd better check the recycling rate for lead-acid batteries before you go on about how horrible it is to dispose or recycle them. With an approximate 94% recycling rate, the lead-acid battery industry is just about as good as it gets. Most of the batteries that don't get recycled are due to ignorance, not the lack of opportunity. ANY lead-acid battery reseller will accept old lead-acid batteries for recycling, since everything in the battery is fully recyclable, and has a strong market for the materials (plastic is reground and used to make new battery cases, the sulfuric acid electrolyte is neturalized and converted to food-grade sodium sulfate (a preservative), and the lead is smelted back into the appropriate alloy(s) for making new lead-acid batteries.
      Further, the cycle of lead from smelter -> battery manufacturer -> consumer -> old battery to smelter is as tight a closed loop as you'll find (short of a cow in a pasture).

      BUT, don't just take my word on it ... do some research!

    11. Re:The Prius/hybrids actually isn't good at all by PateraSilk · · Score: 3, Informative
      Grrr!!! Rowr!!!

      The "Bad Hybrid" trolls have been loud lately!

      As a present hybrid owner, I'm perfectly happy with my car, thank you very much. As a former Diesel owner, I was very happy with that car, too.

      --
      Danke tres mucho, tovarishch.
    12. Re:The Prius/hybrids actually isn't good at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was with you up until you mentioned needing a cat to clean the gasoline. Any particular breed?

    13. Re:The Prius/hybrids actually isn't good at all by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ok, sense you are pulling numbers out of thin air let me give it a try.

      400lbs engine + 200lbs transmission = 600

      Now lets take that 600 lbs and add in
      + 50lbs battery
      + 100lbs electric motor/generator

      we are up to 750lbs
      well, we don't need a 400lbs engine anymore
      -100lbs
      we don't need the standard battery (technically there is but it is similar to a motorcycle battery and much much smaller and lighter)
      -25lbs
      we don't need a regular alternator (taken care of by the motor/generator)
      -15lbs
      we don't need a regular starter (taken care of by the motor/generator)
      -15lbs
      We can use a CV transmission that is much simpler and lighter than a manual or automatic
      -50lbs

      realistically everything averages out to a hybrid weighing about 50-75lbs more than an equivalent straight petrol car.

      Plus you get the bonus of a brushless computer controlled electric motor that can run far longer than your starter and alternator in a standard car. Due to only one moving part and no dry rubbing brushes. My batteries have a 10 year warranty. I get an average of 42mpg when not trying by driving slower and accelerating slower. The worst I have ever got loaded with 5 people and luggage driving to Las Vegas (kinda kills your not enough interior room complaint) I still got 36mpg which is the best that a regular Civic will get.

      I got a hybrid because I think the technology is useful now and that will increase in usefulness. I will most likely be trading in my civic for an accord hybrid next year so I can have a fast sports car hybrid.

      Hybrid technology is not a flawed idea.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    14. Re:The Prius/hybrids actually isn't good at all by epall · · Score: 2, Informative

      You do realize that most hybrids (my Prius included) use NiMH batteries?

  3. The Air Car... by Kjuib · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://www.theaircar.com/

    does not run on steam. But runs on air... And you can expect to see these at a local dealer soon. (at least Europe)

    --
    - Your stupidity got you into this mess, why can't it get you out? -Will Rogers
    1. Re:The Air Car... by chill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Series 34 CATs engines can be equipped with and run on dual energies - fossil fuels and compressed air - and incorporate a reheating mechanism (a continuous combustion system, easily controlled to minimize pollution) between the storage tank and the engine.

      This mechanism allows the engine to run exclusively on fossil fuel which permits compatible autonomy on the road.

      While the car is running on fossil fuel, the compressor refills the compressed air tanks. The control system maintains a zero-pollution emission in the city at speeds up to 60 km/h.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    2. Re:The Air Car... by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can refill at a modified gas station in 3 or 4 minutes, for a couple of bucks, and the vehicle is equipped with a compressor that you plug in and can refill itself in 3 or 4 hours.

      It's also capable of running on gas, like a hybrid, so you can use it normally while you wait for the filling stations to propogate.

      The air compression uses electricity. Whether that electricity was generated *cleanly* or not is irrelevant to the car itself.

      The whole point is that 80% of vehicle emissions are released in densely populated city centers, and the quality of air in big cities is declining. When the local news is issuing "smog warnings" during the summer, somethings wrong.

      This is about fighting the pollution problems in cities, it doesnt pretend to be a magical source of free energy.

      This is an interesting idea, and I wish it success, but after reading that website (and the ridiculous amount of typos in their FAQ), it sounds like a lot of PR hype, they really seem to be running on hot air. Time will tell.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:The Air Car... by Cow+Jones · · Score: 2, Funny

      And you can expect to see these at a local dealer soon. (at least Europe)

      What, you mean it's not vaporware?

      --

      Ah, arrogance and stupidity, all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari
  4. Still using fossil fuels? by hexed_2050 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anything that can begin to cut down on the amount of pollution that is generated in our atmosphere is a step in the right direction.

    Sure, I'm not about to give up my VW GTI VR6 just yet, but sooner or later something's gotta give. Even Buzz Lightyear from Toy Story is mocking us:

    'Do you people still use fossil fuels, or have you discovered crystallic fusion?'

    --
    Valkyrie is about to die! Wizard needs food -- badly!
  5. Re:Regression by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    are we really going to start progressing towards an almost dark ages type society where we ressurect old tech and reuse it constantly?

    Is that such a bad thing assuming the old tech can be made to perform better than the new tech?

  6. So it's a steam turbine by Lisandro · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Turbines are interesting designs and have been tried in cars before IIRC (i remember seeing a documentary on History Channel about this), was it Ford? They had a car that basically ran on anything that burned; they even tried common isopropyl alcohol on it. Worked just fine.

    I wonder how efficient this engine is. Also, how quiet - that was one of the main issues with the car i mentioned before, it sounded like a small jet plane.

    1. Re:So it's a steam turbine by Alien+Being · · Score: 3, Informative

      "was it Ford?"

      It was Chrysler, but the car looked quite a bit like a Ford Thunderbird. IIRC, Chrysler builds the M1 Abrams tanks which are also turbine powered.

    2. Re:So it's a steam turbine by TheGavster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem that people keep running into with turbine powered cars is that they try to hook the turbine up the rest of the drivetrain from a gasoline powered car. If you hook the turbine instead to a generator, you can run at a constant RPM (making the turbine happy), and then power electric motors at the wheels (or a single motor driving a differential). With all the electronics on a modern car, you've got the alternator in there already, just need to go all the way.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
  7. Re: So hard to spell check? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Funny


    > WTF is tho?

    It's a quaint way of spelling "740", you 6006.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  8. Finally! by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Some place I can play my air guitar without feeling silly.

  9. Re:Regression by superstick58 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Old technology should not be completely ignored. Many times a new technology will come along that leads to the abandonment of current technology. However, over the years improvements in materials, design tools, etc. can lead to much more efficient designs of "old" tech.

    If it's not broke, don't fix it. I like to see new technology being developed as much as anyone else, but I believe we also need to keep enough of an open mind that we do not overlook great ideas that have already been made and improve on those ideas. Old tech can easily become new tech through basic improvements in efficiency, reliability, affordability, etc.

  10. Steam Powered? by freelance+cynic · · Score: 3, Funny

    Will the engine refuse to start if it can't connect to the internet?

  11. Re: So hard to spell check? by koreaman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Go here, please.

  12. Operation by pete-classic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does the manual will indicate which lever is the velocitator and which the deceleratrix?

    -Peter

  13. what is next? by whitelabrat · · Score: 2, Funny

    This would compliment my telegraph powered internet connection and my horse drawn dishwasher. Heh.

  14. Stanley Steamer by hey! · · Score: 4, Informative

    My father-in-law actually remembers some people who had Stanleys from back in the 30s. I imagine that they were the same kind of people I remember from my youth who kept their 2-stroke Saabs on the road: engineering afficiandos.

    According to pops, the Stanley was a terrific car in most respects, and fast as all get-out, but it had one fatal flaw. You had to heat the boiler up for a long time before you could get going. No running out the convenience store for a gallon of milk in that car.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:Stanley Steamer by gwn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I remember one late spring in the 70's, sitting in the back seat cruising down the highway and passing a convoy of steamers. Later they caught up with us at a fuel stop and we had a good look. The driver of one steamer replied to a speed question along these lines "she can go really fast, but we drive at a reasonable speed because of the bugs...". Several of the cars, all open, had dinky windshields and the black flies and mosquitoes must have hurt. They were certainly beautiful works of engineering and style, much nicer than the Ford we were in.

  15. Re:Regression by CrankyFool · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In general, hand-made stuff was always highly prized when the hands involved were those of a master artisan -- the industrial revolution wasn't about producing something better than the best artisans could do, but something more _cheaply_ (and still pretty good -- the old 'bang for the buck' thing) than it would cost a master artisan to do.

    That this practice continues to today (A few years back I was looking into getting a sword commissioned as a wedding gift and only seriously looked at hand-made swords, because there are no good factory-made swords -- there's not enough of a volume for good swords to justify an entire factory) is not regression.

    Oh, and with regards to your sig, I think you want to say "woman-centric." The hyphen makes a difference.

  16. Re:Regression by saintp · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Did you ever consider that we're not regressing, but rather standing on the shoulders of giants? Admitting, as it were, that perhaps people who didn't live in the past twenty years had something valuable to contribute?

    The dark ages were characterized by a total lack of scholarship and invention. The Englightenment, you may recall, occurred not when people donned blinders to the past and started looking forward, but when they were willing to look further back than others had done. And, by building on Greek and Roman scholarship that was thousands of years old, they were able to usher in the environment of inventiveness that helped create the Industrial Revolution.

    Hell, we still learn things from Plato. Or would you consider that "regression" as well?

  17. Goofy Looking? No way! by SpaFF · · Score: 2, Funny

    The car is kind of goofy looking...

    Whatever man, I think it looks awesome. Fark hit the nail right on the head when they described it as the batmobile in their headline.

    --
    -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GIT d? s: a-- C++++ UL++++ P++ L+++ E- W++ N o-- K- w--- O- M+ V PS+ P
  18. Alternative power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Also, check out this wood powered Yugo. It gets 145km per 35kg of wood.
    English text not available. :(

  19. Re:the downsides of Hydrogen fuel cells by neverutterwhen · · Score: 2, Informative

    Was that a joke? We don't have huge untapped reservoirs of hydrogen. the hydrogen will be created from water. Hydrogen fuel will hopefully be used to store all the energy we get from clean sources(wave, wind etc). The hydrogen itself is just a clean, non polluting battery. We don't create extra water.

    --
    My appreciation of Douglas Adams is far deeper than yours.
  20. Nothing new but.... by MajorDick · · Score: 5, Informative

    Steam and Electric are obviously nothing new, the first Car to break 100 mph was I belive electric.

    Steam , like electric has several DISADVANTAGES as well, The was a time, when steam engines didnt reclain their steam that steam polution caused great enviromental issues with their condensate.

    In addition high pressuer steam is DANGEROUS, and any vehicle designed would need to take that into account, think of the danger to the occupants of a vehicle whose boiler explodes.

    For a take on this take a Hot Water heater, it is actually (gas or electric) the MOST Dangerous item in you hous a blocked T&P (Temperature and Pressure relief valve) with a tank in ovverun condition can catapult a Hot water tank through a 3 story house to a height of 100 ft, yup thats right, just like those little red plastic water rockets you had as a kid.

    I was a union plumber and pipefitter, my specialty was in steam, I can tell you while the average goober might see great potential they seldom see the very real dangers of steam, steam to most seem innocent enough, just look at some of the deaths associate with steam engines recently, This even happened about 10 miles from my home an hourt after I left. Here and Here , and the fellow who owned and operated this was FAMILIAR with these risks, from burns to boiler failures, its not something to screw with unless you know what youre doing, and even then it will leave you suspicious

    1. Re:Nothing new but.... by calidoscope · · Score: 2, Informative
      Low water over the crown sheet will do it every time - epitaph for many locomotive firemen. IIRC, Strasbourg RR had an accident a few years ago just from that cause - contributing factor was problems with the sight gauge.

      It was common back in days of steam to see major parts of the locomotive a quarter-mile away from the site of the explosion.

      OTOH, most modern steam cars have been using flash boilers with a much smaller water inventory than the old style firetube boilers. Properly designed, a failure in a tube will result in venting of steam through the exhaust. As you mentioned, the plumbing outside the boiler has to be treated with care.

      As for high pressures in the hands of goobers - centerfire rifles typically generate 60,000 PSI peak pressure.

      --
      A Shadeless room is a brighter room.
  21. Steam is not a source of energy by frovingslosh · · Score: 3, Informative

    OK, I've RTFA. Hype! The bottom line is that steam is not a source of energy. Something has got to make that steam. And that gets us right back to the problem of supplying the energy in a form that burns clean and is clean to produce in the first place (Hydrogen for hydrogen based cars, by the way, burns clean, but is made from natural gas in a very polluting and wasteful process; overall a "clean burning" hydrogen car is a much more wasteful car and a source of more total polution tyhan one that would just use natural gas directly. Of course, if we were to produce hydrogen cleanly that would change, but there seems to be no move to do so.)

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  22. Re:Regression by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    It seems that lately a lot of stuff has started to regress to older tech. Steam power...

    So when we finally get portable fusion reactors, will it be "old tech" since it's been happening on the sun for billions of years?

    Yes, it's steam. It's superheated steam used to turn a turbine. Pretty much the same technology used in nuclear power plants. Of course power plant turbines turn at a constant speed to deliver constant power, which is why this is a new use for a steam turbine.

    ... hand labor being of higher value craftsmanship

    Hand craftsmanship has always been valued over mass produced items by those who see quality as more than the sum of the parts... and are willing to pay more for such quality. We've always been around and will always be. Perhaps the dominance of Walmart has made more people turn towards supporting local artists and craftsmen, but it's certainly not a new fad.

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
  23. Re:Regression by AviLazar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hand labor has always (at least in the past 50-60 years) been of more value then craftsmanship. Actually, hand craftsmanship never lost its value - because it takes so much manpower...these days because the whole "it was made by hand" commands a higher price, even though the hands might be of a 10 year old in Malaysia working for 10 cents a week.

    I hope you were not trying to be a troll, in all honesty, since you were around for a while. Through-out history there are records of us using older techniques (look at plastic surgery, how it uses techniques from India culture of over 4000 years ago).

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  24. Re:This car runs on gas by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny
    But the problem of turbines is that to be efficient, they have to run at a predetermined speed. The very nature of road cars is that their speed changes all the time, so this design would be no good for road vehicles.
    Some cars have a thingummyjig that allows you to change[1] the ratio between the engine speed and the roadwheel speed thus allowing the engine to be run at optimum revolutions. I forget the name of it.

    [1] One day some clever chap might invent one that does it by itself, automatically even, thus leaving one hand free for other tasks such as eating.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  25. Well by GasKewled · · Score: 2, Funny

    If we could make one run off flies, that would be something

  26. Re:the downsides of Hydrogen fuel cells by jandrese · · Score: 2, Informative

    One of the tricky things people don't always understand is that you can't create something from nothing. We can't flood the world by running fuel cells because we have to create the H2 before we can burn it in a fuel cell. One way to create H2 is to electrolize water! Other methods (usually using Hydrocarbons) may increase the amount of water not locked-up in the Earth's crust over the short run (much the same way we are currently releasing enormous amount of Carbon that was previously locked up in Old/Coal/Natural Gas/etc... deposits.

    That said the amount of water we are talking about is unlikely to have any significant impact on the environment, although the effects are hard to predict.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  27. External combustion engines by AtariAmarok · · Score: 3, Funny
    "Internal combustion engines are a century old too"

    We did experiment some with external combustion vehicles about 30 years ago.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  28. Re:the downsides of Hydrogen fuel cells by Vellmont · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ever heard of something called the Pacific Ocean? It's plum full of that substance we call water. I hear there's even more oceans than just the Pacific.

    I really do hope you're joking. Any amount of water we can "create" (that wasn't water to begin with) would be completely insignificant to the amount of water we already redistribute throughout the environment by just being alive.

    --
    AccountKiller
  29. It gives a new meaning... by mealtime_warrior · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...to vapor-ware!

  30. Re:This car runs on gas by wwest4 · · Score: 2, Informative

    > So you'd need one hell of a transmission with like 100 different gear
    > settings to get you a range of speeds from, say, 0 to 100. Transmissions
    > in ICE cars only have 5 or 6.

    Not all cars. CVT == continuously variable transmission... already in today's production cars... Honda's Civic HX, and their hybrid too.

  31. Can we make whiskey while we drive? by Blimey85 · · Score: 2, Funny
    What if instead of water we put in our ingredients for whiskey and use the car as a still? Maybe have a closed system that you get paid for that you can swap at gas stations... so you pull in to fuel up and you swap tanks... you give them your tank of whiskey and an empty ingredients tank. They give you an empty whiskey tank and a full ingredients tank.

    Then you run a hose from the whiskey tank to the drivers area... and you run a hose from you windshield wiper... hook both of those into a t connector... then fill the windshield wiper resevoir with oj... and you've got instant screwdrivers while you drive!

    --
    How is it that one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?
    1. Re:Can we make whiskey while we drive? by bje2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      i only see one problem with your plan...

      a screwdriver has vodka, not whiskey...everything else sounds great though...

      --

      "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
  32. Do the Math... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    30% less emissions, half the efficiency.

    Ever read about the good old days of good, clean, horse power? On big work projects, half of the horses were hauling water and food for the other half. Not to mention the tons of emissions - horse urine, road apples, and Al Gore's greenhouse gasses.

  33. Diesel is still better for the environment. by Shivetya · · Score: 2, Informative

    First it takes less energy and material to produce a gallon of diesel. I belive the cost to make gasoline is 55 gallons of diesel.

    Second the restrictions in the US are mostly because of California. The idea of what is pollution in California is nearly the opposite of what is considered in Europe. So Europe gets more diesels and there is much more money spent to make them efficient and clean.

    There is more real air pollution in the NorthEast during winter months than in California regardless of time of year there. Why? More engines are running enriched mixtures to get up to operating temperatures.

    Diesels do weigh more but only in the engine area. They make up for this "weight" issue by being more efficient in fuel usuage.

    So I have to ask, why not diesel? It really is a magnitude cheaper to produce, the cars perform better as for mileage, and the engines are built strong enough to survive many more miles than any gasoline engine.

    Also a nice side effect is that they DO NOT EXPLODE.

    The Prius will never return on its investment cost to regular drivers. The surcharge for the tricks needed to make a gasoline engine viable versus diesel are too high still. Better yet, a diesel electric combo would be more efficient.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.