Slashdot Mirror


High Speed Steam Powered Car

CodeWanker wrote in to tell us about a story about new steam powered vehicles that are aiming to set speed records. The car is kind of goofy looking, but more eco friendly (which works for the Prius ;) Don't expect to see anything like this at your local dealer any time soon tho.

24 of 286 comments (clear)

  1. It seems that... by slashdevslashtty · · Score: 5, Funny

    Valve has done something right.

    --


    M$ Lawyer: But `gcc /dev/random -o kernel.dll` is our trade secret!
  2. The Prius/hybrids actually isn't good at all by Enigma_Man · · Score: 4, Informative

    The gas mileage you can get with a hybrid is far less than what you can get with a good diesel engine. Hybrids are a bad idea, twice the weight (batteries, two motors), half the interior room. Diesel-engined cars have been getting 50+ MPG for years and years. Unfortunately the stigma in the US over "diesel" prevents them from being brought over here.

    -Jesse

    --
    Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    1. Re:The Prius/hybrids actually isn't good at all by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Diesel = Terrible for the environment"
      No not really if the US would adopt low sulfur diesel then it would not be much different than gas. Plus the one thing that people do not think about on electric and hybrids is the batteries. They are a nightmare to dispose or recycle.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:The Prius/hybrids actually isn't good at all by ArsonSmith · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Twice the weight? unless you have a 50lbs car then it is far less than twice the weight.
      Half the interior room? Unless you have 1.2 cubic foot of space in your car then it takes up far less than half the space.

      Why do hybrids get such criticism? The technology is sound, it is not married to petrol engines and could easily be used on Diesel. In fact it would be ideal for diesel engines to be hybrids. It does help improve mileage. What has a hybrid car done to you, and others who criticize this way?

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    3. Re:The Prius/hybrids actually isn't good at all by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 4, Informative

      " The gas mileage you can get with a hybrid is far less than what you can get with a good diesel engine."

      That's because we measure mileage using miles/gallon, and *diesel has more energy per gallon than gasoline*. About 30% more, in fact. That's like saying that a P-M is better than an Athlon 64 because it gets more work done "per clock". That's not the unit you need to be evaluating.

      "Unfortunately the stigma in the US over "diesel" prevents them from being brought over here."

      It's not the stigma, it's the envrionment. Even "clean" diesel engines rank horribly on particulate, NOx, and other nasty emissions.

      The Prius *wasn't* designed to get the best gas mileage period. It was designed to reduce emissions *and* get good fuel economy. The Prius actually burns gas when it doesn't have to so that the catalytic converter stays hot (it doesn't work otherwise).

      "Hybrids are a bad idea, twice the weight (batteries, two motors), half the interior room."

      That's bullshit. The entire THSD - including the batteries and motor - is around 800lbs. This is *easily* offset by the fact that the Prius doesn't need a wasteful transmission. You might be able to save 400lbs using a vehicle with a manual transmission, but that's not really comparable to the automatic Prius, is it?

      Oh, and your precious diesel cars? They weigh more than their gasoline counterparts because diesel engines need stronger components (much higher compression).

      And, half the interior room? What kind of crap is that? The batteries in the Prius don't take up much room at all - and the engine compartment isn't any bigger than the one on any other medium-small car.

      "Diesel-engined cars have been getting 50+ MPG for years and years."

      The Prius hits 50mpg in real-world testing, too, with fuel that has 30% less energy than diesel.

    4. Re:The Prius/hybrids actually isn't good at all by Eryq · · Score: 4, Funny
      Plus the one thing that people do not think about on electric and hybrids is the batteries. They are a nightmare to dispose or recycle.

      You're telling me! My car runs on 9,624 AA alkaline batteries. They only last about 30 miles, and when they conk out I have to use up the ones on my second car just to drive them to the dump...

      --
      I'm a bloodsucking fiend! Look at my outfit!
    5. Re:The Prius/hybrids actually isn't good at all by ngkdc · · Score: 4, Informative

      You'd better check the recycling rate for lead-acid batteries before you go on about how horrible it is to dispose or recycle them. With an approximate 94% recycling rate, the lead-acid battery industry is just about as good as it gets. Most of the batteries that don't get recycled are due to ignorance, not the lack of opportunity. ANY lead-acid battery reseller will accept old lead-acid batteries for recycling, since everything in the battery is fully recyclable, and has a strong market for the materials (plastic is reground and used to make new battery cases, the sulfuric acid electrolyte is neturalized and converted to food-grade sodium sulfate (a preservative), and the lead is smelted back into the appropriate alloy(s) for making new lead-acid batteries.
      Further, the cycle of lead from smelter -> battery manufacturer -> consumer -> old battery to smelter is as tight a closed loop as you'll find (short of a cow in a pasture).

      BUT, don't just take my word on it ... do some research!

    6. Re:The Prius/hybrids actually isn't good at all by PateraSilk · · Score: 3, Informative
      Grrr!!! Rowr!!!

      The "Bad Hybrid" trolls have been loud lately!

      As a present hybrid owner, I'm perfectly happy with my car, thank you very much. As a former Diesel owner, I was very happy with that car, too.

      --
      Danke tres mucho, tovarishch.
  3. The Air Car... by Kjuib · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://www.theaircar.com/

    does not run on steam. But runs on air... And you can expect to see these at a local dealer soon. (at least Europe)

    --
    - Your stupidity got you into this mess, why can't it get you out? -Will Rogers
    1. Re:The Air Car... by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can refill at a modified gas station in 3 or 4 minutes, for a couple of bucks, and the vehicle is equipped with a compressor that you plug in and can refill itself in 3 or 4 hours.

      It's also capable of running on gas, like a hybrid, so you can use it normally while you wait for the filling stations to propogate.

      The air compression uses electricity. Whether that electricity was generated *cleanly* or not is irrelevant to the car itself.

      The whole point is that 80% of vehicle emissions are released in densely populated city centers, and the quality of air in big cities is declining. When the local news is issuing "smog warnings" during the summer, somethings wrong.

      This is about fighting the pollution problems in cities, it doesnt pretend to be a magical source of free energy.

      This is an interesting idea, and I wish it success, but after reading that website (and the ridiculous amount of typos in their FAQ), it sounds like a lot of PR hype, they really seem to be running on hot air. Time will tell.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  4. Still using fossil fuels? by hexed_2050 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anything that can begin to cut down on the amount of pollution that is generated in our atmosphere is a step in the right direction.

    Sure, I'm not about to give up my VW GTI VR6 just yet, but sooner or later something's gotta give. Even Buzz Lightyear from Toy Story is mocking us:

    'Do you people still use fossil fuels, or have you discovered crystallic fusion?'

    --
    Valkyrie is about to die! Wizard needs food -- badly!
  5. Re:Regression by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    are we really going to start progressing towards an almost dark ages type society where we ressurect old tech and reuse it constantly?

    Is that such a bad thing assuming the old tech can be made to perform better than the new tech?

  6. So it's a steam turbine by Lisandro · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Turbines are interesting designs and have been tried in cars before IIRC (i remember seeing a documentary on History Channel about this), was it Ford? They had a car that basically ran on anything that burned; they even tried common isopropyl alcohol on it. Worked just fine.

    I wonder how efficient this engine is. Also, how quiet - that was one of the main issues with the car i mentioned before, it sounded like a small jet plane.

    1. Re:So it's a steam turbine by Alien+Being · · Score: 3, Informative

      "was it Ford?"

      It was Chrysler, but the car looked quite a bit like a Ford Thunderbird. IIRC, Chrysler builds the M1 Abrams tanks which are also turbine powered.

  7. Re:Regression by superstick58 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Old technology should not be completely ignored. Many times a new technology will come along that leads to the abandonment of current technology. However, over the years improvements in materials, design tools, etc. can lead to much more efficient designs of "old" tech.

    If it's not broke, don't fix it. I like to see new technology being developed as much as anyone else, but I believe we also need to keep enough of an open mind that we do not overlook great ideas that have already been made and improve on those ideas. Old tech can easily become new tech through basic improvements in efficiency, reliability, affordability, etc.

  8. Steam Powered? by freelance+cynic · · Score: 3, Funny

    Will the engine refuse to start if it can't connect to the internet?

  9. Operation by pete-classic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does the manual will indicate which lever is the velocitator and which the deceleratrix?

    -Peter

  10. Stanley Steamer by hey! · · Score: 4, Informative

    My father-in-law actually remembers some people who had Stanleys from back in the 30s. I imagine that they were the same kind of people I remember from my youth who kept their 2-stroke Saabs on the road: engineering afficiandos.

    According to pops, the Stanley was a terrific car in most respects, and fast as all get-out, but it had one fatal flaw. You had to heat the boiler up for a long time before you could get going. No running out the convenience store for a gallon of milk in that car.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  11. Re:Regression by CrankyFool · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In general, hand-made stuff was always highly prized when the hands involved were those of a master artisan -- the industrial revolution wasn't about producing something better than the best artisans could do, but something more _cheaply_ (and still pretty good -- the old 'bang for the buck' thing) than it would cost a master artisan to do.

    That this practice continues to today (A few years back I was looking into getting a sword commissioned as a wedding gift and only seriously looked at hand-made swords, because there are no good factory-made swords -- there's not enough of a volume for good swords to justify an entire factory) is not regression.

    Oh, and with regards to your sig, I think you want to say "woman-centric." The hyphen makes a difference.

  12. Re:Regression by saintp · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Did you ever consider that we're not regressing, but rather standing on the shoulders of giants? Admitting, as it were, that perhaps people who didn't live in the past twenty years had something valuable to contribute?

    The dark ages were characterized by a total lack of scholarship and invention. The Englightenment, you may recall, occurred not when people donned blinders to the past and started looking forward, but when they were willing to look further back than others had done. And, by building on Greek and Roman scholarship that was thousands of years old, they were able to usher in the environment of inventiveness that helped create the Industrial Revolution.

    Hell, we still learn things from Plato. Or would you consider that "regression" as well?

  13. Nothing new but.... by MajorDick · · Score: 5, Informative

    Steam and Electric are obviously nothing new, the first Car to break 100 mph was I belive electric.

    Steam , like electric has several DISADVANTAGES as well, The was a time, when steam engines didnt reclain their steam that steam polution caused great enviromental issues with their condensate.

    In addition high pressuer steam is DANGEROUS, and any vehicle designed would need to take that into account, think of the danger to the occupants of a vehicle whose boiler explodes.

    For a take on this take a Hot Water heater, it is actually (gas or electric) the MOST Dangerous item in you hous a blocked T&P (Temperature and Pressure relief valve) with a tank in ovverun condition can catapult a Hot water tank through a 3 story house to a height of 100 ft, yup thats right, just like those little red plastic water rockets you had as a kid.

    I was a union plumber and pipefitter, my specialty was in steam, I can tell you while the average goober might see great potential they seldom see the very real dangers of steam, steam to most seem innocent enough, just look at some of the deaths associate with steam engines recently, This even happened about 10 miles from my home an hourt after I left. Here and Here , and the fellow who owned and operated this was FAMILIAR with these risks, from burns to boiler failures, its not something to screw with unless you know what youre doing, and even then it will leave you suspicious

  14. Steam is not a source of energy by frovingslosh · · Score: 3, Informative

    OK, I've RTFA. Hype! The bottom line is that steam is not a source of energy. Something has got to make that steam. And that gets us right back to the problem of supplying the energy in a form that burns clean and is clean to produce in the first place (Hydrogen for hydrogen based cars, by the way, burns clean, but is made from natural gas in a very polluting and wasteful process; overall a "clean burning" hydrogen car is a much more wasteful car and a source of more total polution tyhan one that would just use natural gas directly. Of course, if we were to produce hydrogen cleanly that would change, but there seems to be no move to do so.)

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  15. Re:This car runs on gas by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny
    But the problem of turbines is that to be efficient, they have to run at a predetermined speed. The very nature of road cars is that their speed changes all the time, so this design would be no good for road vehicles.
    Some cars have a thingummyjig that allows you to change[1] the ratio between the engine speed and the roadwheel speed thus allowing the engine to be run at optimum revolutions. I forget the name of it.

    [1] One day some clever chap might invent one that does it by itself, automatically even, thus leaving one hand free for other tasks such as eating.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  16. External combustion engines by AtariAmarok · · Score: 3, Funny
    "Internal combustion engines are a century old too"

    We did experiment some with external combustion vehicles about 30 years ago.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.